Khashoggi Murder Reveals Unaccountable Partnerships between Elites at Colleges, Government, Corporations & Saudis. Forensic Doctor who Allegedly Dismembered Him had Ties with Univ of New Haven

https://democracynow.org - In Connecticut, activists are calling on the University of New Haven to cut ties to King Fahd Security College in Saudi Arabia. According to news reports, the Saudi forensic doctor who allegedly dismembered Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi's body served on the editorial board of a publication tied to King Fahd Security College.

To Get a Few More Votes Dictator Trump Deploys Troops to the Border & Makes Implied Felony Threat to Use Force Against Non-White People in "Migrant Caravan"

From [HERE] President Donald Trump’s administration announced on Monday it is sending 5,000 active-duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border in the latest stunt designed to raise fears about a migrant caravan traveling north from Central America.

The Pentagon, under Defense Secretary James Mattis, reportedly approved operation Faithful Patriot last week. Despite initial estimates that 800 troops would be sent to the border, Fox News reported that 1,700 members of the U.S. military are expected to be at the southern border by Saturday.

Politico noted some troops already at the border “are actually feeding and shoveling out manure from the stalls of the Border Patrol’s horses.”

Gil Kerlikowske, former Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) commissioner, told the Washington Post that Trump’s action is “a misuse of active duty military,” adding, “To say this isn’t a political stunt is misleading the public.”

The caravan is several weeks from reaching the U.S. border. It is legal to claim asylum at a port of entry.

The Washington Post’s Christopher Ingraham noted the number of U.S. troops at the border will exceed the number of members of the caravan, which continues to shrink as migrants claim asylum in Mexico during the dangerous journey.

Earlier on Monday, Trump resumed tweeting conspiracy theories about the migrant caravan. The anti-Semite who has been charged with murdering 11 people at a Pittsburgh synagogue on Saturday also ranted about right-wing caravan conspiracy theories on social media.

The smears of migrants fleeing violence, natural disasters, and brutal authoritarian crackdowns have been amplified by conservative media and elected Republicans alike, as the manufactured migrant caravan controversy has become the GOP’s closing argument in advance of next week’s midterm elections.

Numerous prominent Republicans, including House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-TX), Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), and Trump, have amplified the baseless conspiracy theory that the migrant caravan is being funded or directed by George Soros, who was targeted in last week’s spate of attempted bombings of Democrats who have been frequent focuses of Trump’s incendiary rhetoric.

Last week, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said there are no plans for the U.S. government to shoot at the asylum-seekers “right now.”

Shepard Smith, Fox News’ unofficial on-air ombudsman, reacted to the Pentagon’s announcement by telling viewers, “There is no invasion. No one is coming to get you. There is nothing at all to worry about.”

Dummy Trump's Unemployment Statistics are Opinions Dressed as Facts, Abstracted & Disembodied from Reality: Wage Growth is Weak, Average Real Wage is $10.76 an hour

From [HERE] Despite a strong economy, booming stock market and plentiful job openings, wage growth is weak. In July, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell testified before the Senate Banking Committee that “In the last five years or so, labor share of profits has been sideways. This is very much akin to the flattening of the median income over the last few decades.” He noted that the share of national income going to workers had fallen “precipitously” for more than a decade.

Trump administration officials tout a rise in the average earnings of all employees - not the average workers, whose earnings have declined under the Trump administration, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics data for “median workers” (mid-wage workers). These officials also tend to gloss over inflation. Recently the inflation rate has outstripped small wage growth, driving up the cost of food, energy, housing and health care. The average real wage in July was $10.76 an hour. According to statistics developed by the Brookings Institution, earnings for workers have dropped to 62 percent of the overall economy, down from 66 percent in 2000.

The Trump administration’s actions have been hostile to the welfare of workers. Its tax cut legislation bestowed large benefits on corporations and the wealthiest segments of society. The tax cut is projected to cost $1.2 trillion over the next 10 years. Most benefits from it and from the strong economy have been realized by high-paid workers, large corporations and stock market investors.

America now faces a federal deficit of $779 billion for the year that ended Sept. 30. With such a strong economy and record low unemployment, the fiscal deficit could be reduced by reasonable and frugal tax and spending policies. Yet, congressional Republicans propose offsetting the budget deficit with cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid - an additional burden to the average worker.

Other factors contribute to low wages for the typical worker. Upward mobility is a myth. Many young Americans are moving downward - not able to achieve what their parents achieved. A major academic study found that of children born in 1970, only 61 percent achieved more than their parents, of those born in 1980, only 50 percent did.

Dwindling union membership means diminished bargaining power for workers and fewer regular pay increases. Wages even remain stagnant for those low-wage workers who stay in their jobs long-term and for mid-level workers. Another important contributor to low pay is the rising costs of employer-provided health care. These costs fall most heavily on low-paid workers.

The typical Walmart worker - of its 2.3 million workers - made less than $19,200 last year. That amounts to less than $11 an hour for a full-time worker. Some small progress has been made recently by large retailers such as CVS, Cosco, Target and Amazon. Amazon, for example, recently raised its hourly rate to $15.

Walmart’s Chief Executive, Douglas McMillon, received $22.8 million in a pay raise last year. In 2017, in America’s top 350 publicly held corporations, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was 312 to 1. Top executives in these companies saw their pay surge to an average $18.9 million in that same year, and the average Wall Street salary rose 13 percent, with average annual compensation in the finance industry rising to $422,506.

Other more fundamental economic forces contribute to stagnant wage growth. Changes in real wages depend on how much workers produce. In the last 10 years, productivity growth has been extremely low - in the 1 to 2 percent range. Some of that is attributed to low investment by business and government. Most is caused by worker productivity levels. And most of America’s rapid job growth has been in low-productivity jobs in industries such as leisure and hospitality.

A fundamental restructuring of the world economy is occurring. Productivity is largely realized in big money-makers such as Apple, Google and Facebook. These companies employ only about 230,000 people worldwide. Ten percent of firms account for 80 percent of corporate profits. It is technologies and intellectual property, not people, that are now driving productivity.

Ultimately, persistent, stagnant wage growth spawns a lowering standard of living for most Americans. It shrinks the middle class and deprives our children of the promise of the good life that earlier generations realized.

Brazilians Choose a Tyrant to be Their Master. Like Trump, Psychopath Bolsonaro Incited fear, anger and hatred to Motivate the Electorate

[MORE]

FUNKTIONARY defines:

tyrants - there are none; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind-control and word-conditioning control? "Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive." -Freddy D. "The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." -John Jay, Castilian Days II, 1872. (See: Tyranny, Terms, "The Law," Dictatorship, Corporate State & Fascism)

Latino Woman Wins Settlement Against Feds & San Bernardino: ICE Cops “Intercepted" & Detained US Citizen Based on Error Filled Records, Skin Color, Accent and Common Name

From [HERE] A California woman who was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) despite having been a U.S. citizen for two decades, has won a settlement against the government, according to the Associated Press.

Guadalupe Plascencia, a 60-year-old from San Bernadino, California, will receive a $55,000 cash settlement from “the federal government and San Bernardino County.”

The settlement, obtained through the assistance of the American Civil Liberties Union, stemmed from a March 2017 incident in which the career hairstylist, was detained overnight by county authorities over a decades-old bench warrant issued for her alleged failure to appear as a witness in a court case.

The next day, after being released from the West Valley Detention Center, she was intercepted by ICE agents and taken into custody anew. As the Los Angeles Times reported at the time, “Plascencia would spend the rest of the day in ICE custody, fearful that she would be deported despite having become an American citizen some 20 years ago, following an amnesty program initiated by President Reagan.” Plascencia was mocked by officers when she told them she was a citizen.

ACLU states

“Plascencia's nightmarish ordeal began on March 29, 2017 when she went to the Ontario Police Department to collect property recovered from her car after an accident. She was detained overnight for her alleged failure to show up as witness in a decade-old case. During her detention, sheriff's deputies notified ICE that she was in custody and about the details of her release — even though they had her California driver license and other documentation confirming her legal immigration status. Just when she was walking out of San Bernardino's custody, ICE agents took her into custody. Plascencia could not convince sheriff's deputies or ICE agents to give her the chance to prove she was a citizen. "I felt helpless, like I was no one," she later said in a Los Angeles Times interview. "Here, they talk about rights … in that moment, I realized, we don't have rights."

Her wrongful arrest and detention likely stemmed from the agents' reliance on ICE's electronic records, which are widely known to be incomplete and full of errors. Still, ICE and collaborating local law enforcement agencies have used them to target people for arrest — relying even on the absence of records or on records pertaining to completely different individuals with similar but common Latino names, as they did in this case."

Plascencia was accused by agents of being an unlawful resident and threatened with deportation. An agent finally called her daughter to say her mother was being held, and the agent let Plascencia speak to her, leading to her release.

"Ms. Plascencia, a mother of five and grandmother of 16, has a constitutional right to live in her own country without being unlawfully detained by her government," said Alexandria Ruiz, an attorney with Sidley Austin LLP. "This settlement sends a strong message that her entire ordeal could have been prevented had law enforcement taken a moment to properly investigate Ms. Plascencia's citizenship before arresting her. The Constitution requires no less."

The American Civil Liberties Union filed notices of a claim that week, citing the fact that Plascencia had a California drivers license as well as other paperwork proving her status as a legal citizen of the United States on her person at the time she was remanded into custody by county officials. Plascencia’s protestations were met with mockery by ICE agents, who held her in custody for an hour and a half.

The settlement agreements require San Bernardino County to pay Plascencia $35,000; the federal government will be required to make restitution to the tune of $20,000.

Feds Take Years to File Charges Against Cops when They Commit Crimes Against Non-White People - Holding Sovereign Cops to Different Legal & Moral Standards

From [HERE] It was July 2014 when Eric Garner died after a violent struggle with New York City police on a Staten Island street, an encounter captured on video and replayed worldwide. When a local grand jury declined to indict any police officers, federal authorities announced in December 2014 that they would launch their own civil rights investigation.

Nearly four years later, no decision has been made on whether to file charges. “It’s a horror show,” said Jonathan C. Moore, the Garner family’s lawyer. “The family’s very frustrated.”

In November 2017, Bijan Ghaisar died after being shot by two U.S. Park Police officers in Fairfax County, Va., an episode also captured on video. The FBI and the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department took over the case within three days. As the first anniversary of that killing approaches, the names of the officers and an explanation of their actions have been withheld by federal authorities. The Ghaisar family has not been told where the investigation stands.

“To wait like this is like being underwater and not being able to breathe,” said Kelly Ghaisar, Bijan Ghaisar’s mother. The family has pleaded with the Park Police and the Justice Department, held public demonstrations, and finally filed a lawsuit in search of answers to why Ghaisar, 25, was shot repeatedly in the head as he slowly steered his Jeep Grand Cherokee away from two officers. His family said he was not armed, and Fairfax County Police Chief Edwin C. Roessler Jr. confirmed this at a recent police chiefs' conference in Orlando.

The anguish of the Garner and Ghaisar families over what they see as needlessly drawn-out investigations is common for those who think they or their families have been the victim of police brutality or other misconduct.

Justice Department investigations into sworn law enforcement officers — police, jail guards and sheriff’s deputies — often take years. An examination by The Washington Post of more than 50 recent civil rights cases filed by federal prosecutors against such officers found an average of slightly more than three years elapsed from the day of the event to the day that charges were filed. The cases were all the subject of Justice Department news releases in the past year announcing either charges or a conviction in a federal prosecution of civil rights violations “under color of law.”

Those are only the cases with charges filed. A study of more than 13,000 misconduct cases submitted to the Justice Department over 20 years, conducted by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review in 2016, found that no charges were filed in 96 percent of them.

A cumbersome process within the Justice Department for seeking charges and the high legal standard for prosecuting law enforcement officers contribute to the slow pace. In addition, law enforcement officers are sometimes reluctant to testify against colleagues, and jurors can be reluctant to convict them.

But many experts said another key factor is that no one is demanding the Justice Department move more quickly in civil rights cases to resolve the tensions of a community and the miseries of a family.

“The bottom line is there’s no pressure,” said Roy L. Austin Jr., an attorney for the Ghaisar family who was formerly a top official in the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department. “They don’t care how long it takes because there is no one telling them they need to get it done sooner. So they aren’t concerned about the impact it may have on the community or the impact it may have on the family. That’s just their way, because they are answerable to no one except their immediate bosses.”

A number of police chiefs at the Orlando conference made a similar point, noting that leaders of federal agencies don’t have constituents who confront them at community meetings or barrage them with angry emails. Local political leaders can hold police chiefs accountable, but federal investigators do not face that pressure. [MORE]

New Study Examines How Black DC Residents were Discouraged and Barred from Renting or Purchasing Homes by the Federal Government, Banks, Realtors and Citizens Associations

From [HERE] In an essay on tax practices that amplify racial inequities, D.C. Policy Center Executive Director Yesim Sayin Taylor examines how property tax treatment of owner-occupied housing amplifies existing inequalities in wealth, both today and in generations to come. However, the landscape for today’s racial disparities in income, wealth, and home ownership, as well as the patterns of segregation and underinvestment, follow from a long history of public and private practices that have discriminated against Black communities and other communities of color.

Many experts have explored how racial disparities in the present day have stemmed from policies and practices in the District’s history. The Color of Wealth in the Nation’s Capital—a joint publication of the Urban Institute, Duke University, The New School, and the Insight Center for Community Economic Development—is one such vital resource, tracing the barriers that prevented D.C.’s Black residents from building wealth and assets from the Black Codes of the 1840s through the destruction of the Barry Farms community in the 1940s, as well as white flight, urban renewal, and the effects of the Greatc Recession. Along with books like Richard Rothstein’s The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America, Howard Gillette, Jr.’s Between Justice & Beauty: Race, Planning, and the Failure of Urban Policy in Washington, D.C., and Chris Myers Asch and George Derek Musgrove’s Chocolate City: A History of Race and Democracy in the Nation’s Capital, The Color of Wealth shows that D.C.’s Black residents were not passively priced out of housing in high-opportunity areas due to the legacy effects of slavery; they were explicitly discouraged and barred from renting or purchasing homes by the federal government, banks, realtors, and citizens associations.[1]

This supplementary publication gives a brief summary of this history in the 20th century through today in order to provide context for discussions of present-day practices, drawing on these and other resources. It is part of a broader series of essays about racial equity in D.C., including a written symposium on achieving racial equity in housing outcomes, available at dcpolicycenter.org/racialequity. [MORE]

D.C.’s Aggressive Confiscation of Illegal Guns Leaves Black Residents Feeling Targeted & Its Deluded Gentrifier White Liberal Residents Feeling Safer

From [HERE] and [MORE] Few police departments are better at confiscating illegal guns than Washington, D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department. Every day, teams of officers, often driving unmarked cars, scour the streets looking for people who might be carrying a firearm.

These tactics have helped D.C. police seize thousands of illegal weapons. The aggressive search for guns has come with a cost, however — residents in heavily patrolled neighborhoods say they feel targeted.

Additionally, many suspects charged with gun possession ultimately walk free, according to an analysis of court documents by WAMU and the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University, leading to more questions about the usefulness of the tactic.

In D.C.'s most violent neighborhoods, officers frequently stop pedestrians and pull cars over, searching for illegal guns.

For many longtime residents, these officers have an unofficial name: the "jump-outs."

"It's normal in my neighborhood for the police to stop-and-frisk," M.B. Cottingham says. "On this particular day, it was my turn."

Cottingham, 39, was hanging out outside his aunt's house in Southwest D.C. last September when several police officers showed up.

"'Do we have any guns?' That's the first thing they said," Cottingham says.

One of the officers asked Cottingham if he'd consent to a pat-down. Cottingham agreed. What happened next was captured on a cellphone video. It shows an officer repeatedly patting down Cottingham's crotch area. Police didn't find a gun.

"It's not easy to just hand over your manhood like that. It's not easy at all," Cottingham says. "But what can I do?" Cottingham and the ACLU of D.C. are now suing the officer who searched him.

Although D.C. police didn't find a gun on Cottingham, they do take a lot of guns off the streets.

In 2016, D.C. police confiscated more than five times as many illegal guns per capita as did the New York City Police Department, and nearly twice that of the Los Angeles Police, according to police data.

But those gun seizures and arrests are just part of the story, says Jim Trainum, a former homicide detective with the D.C. police. He now works at a Washington think tank that promotes constitutional policing, which puts an emphasis on protecting citizens' civil liberties in order to promote trust and cooperation with law enforcement.

"Everybody looks at the arrests; everybody you know focuses on all of that," Trainum says. "Look at the numbers behind it: How many cases get dismissed? How many cases end up in a conviction?"

Police don't track that for illegal gun cases. And neither do prosecutors.

An investigation by WAMU and the Investigative Reporting Workshop analyzed nearly 500 affidavits from 2010-2015 in cases where MPD officers had arrested suspects for illegal gun possession. Nearly 4 in 10 of these cases ended up getting dismissed in court.

Jim Trainum wasn't surprised by this statistic. "Stop and frisk is a good tool, but we've taken it and abused it over the years," Trainum says. "So that is just another tool that we manipulate in order to get the stats, to get the guns off the street."

Trainum says that too often, police stop and frisk residents without legal justification. In order to legally stop and temporarily detain someone, police must have "reasonable suspicion" the person has engaged in criminal activity or is about to.

If they don't — or can't prove it in court — the case can get dismissed in court.

Jessie Liu, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, says defense attorneys frequently argue that these gun arrests violate the Constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure, but she doesn't see a "systematic problem" with how D.C. police are making stops.

"I think that both the police department and our office are doing a great deal to train on what the legal requirements are," Liu says.

Assistant D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee says court cases can get derailed for all kinds of reasons, and that prosecutors are the ones who decide what cases to pursue.

"We are out here to get illegal guns. It's not to violate anyone's rights or have a community uproar. That's not our intent," Contee says.

Contee is concerned about the high number of gun possession cases that are dismissed, but says there are bigger issues at play. "What I know is that that firearm that's been recovered off that street, it won't take the life of somebody out here," Contee says.

Contee wasn't the only official to argue that, even if the charges don't stick, taking guns off the streets makes the community safer.

But there are other consequences. Young black men say they feel targeted and harassed by these stops. To avoid being frisked, they say they lift up their shirts when police drive by to show they don't have a gun in their waistband.

This summer, angry and exasperated residents testified at a D.C. Council hearing about police tactics in the city's predominantly African-American neighborhoods. Many shared stories of getting stopped on the street or pulled over in their car by police who were looking for guns.

One man who spoke out identified himself by only his initials because of concerns about police retaliation. D.R. summed it up this way: "They look at everyone in the community like villains."

To understand why police were searching certain residents, the WAMU investigation analyzed the police affidavits from a sample of nearly 500 gun possession cases. These affidavits explain why police stopped or searched someone in the first place.

The most common justification: The suspect acted or looked suspicious.

In some cases, police wrote the suspect appeared "nervous" when they saw the cops; or they crossed the street; or they ran; or they wore a heavy jacket in warm weather; or they held their pants a certain way while walking.

Assistant Police Chief Contee said police know what they're doing. As proof, he points to the fact that the incidents end with police confiscating illegal guns.

"There's certain things that as a law enforcement officer that my eyes are trained to see," Contee says. "And if that behavior that I see is consistent with the person who's carrying a gun, I'm going to stop that individual."

Trainum, the former D.C. detective, says this aggressive search for guns may work in the short term, but over time, it builds resentment.

"Once we start cutting corners, to make that stat, get that arrest, that's when you lose the trust of the community," Trainum says.

And, he adds, if that happens, the job of the police gets even harder. When that trust is lost, witnesses go silent, murders go unsolved, and the criminal with a gun is often back out on the street.

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS

Black-on-Black Crime - a psycho-political euphemism, unwittingly used and abused by African-Americans and deliberately by Caucasians, describing demographic criminal activity in general, as people commit violent crimes on people who live in closest proximity to them, and the violence mostly occurs by those and to those who are held hostage under chronic and cyclical economically disadvantaged circumstances and environments. Do you ever hear of the slogan "White-on-White" crime? Most violent crimes (by number and by percentage of population) take place by Caucasians against Caucasians. Where's the associated terminology? (See Gangbanking & Racism." [MORE]

People’s perception of the crime rate is always at odds with reality because propaganda serves a greater in purpose in the system of racism/white supremacy. Alleged Black criminality plays a very important role in defining the collective White American ego and personality. It also falsely programs the Black consciousness with self-hate and mentacide - as Black people think of themselves as criminals who are surrounded by crime - in spite of evidence to the contrary. [MORE] 

For instance, although Washington D.C.’s murder rate has risen in 2018, the DC murder rate hit historic lows in 2017 with only 116 homicides. Right now the District has surpassed that number  with 119 homicides. Yet this is nothing compared to what it was; in 1991 there were 482 murders and 443 and 454 murders respectively in 1992 and 1993. These numbers are on a substantial downward decline in general. See Chart below. [MORE]

But you wouldn’t know that by listening to the local media in DC, including the Washington Post and its straw-boss Black mayor and racist suspect police chief [in photo]. They have sounded the fear panic button to the white liberal gentrifier population. A recent Post headline alarmed the public, “There’s nothing but trouble out here.’ D.C. shootings claim four lives as homicide count surpasses 2017 total.”

Looking at the numbers outside of their historical context is part of racist propaganda programming for the racist mind and manufactured mentacidal Black mind.

Dr. Amos Wilson explains, "Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their self-congratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control.

White America's self-appreciation is enhanced as it insatiably feeds on overblown reports about Black criminality while denying its own incomparable criminal record, and its own racist-imperialist incubation and giving birth to the very same criminal forces which now threaten to destroy it.

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image. The Black criminal is used to support the White American community's self-serving, self-justifying judgments of itself. White America's preoccupation with Black criminality betrays its own need for reassurance; betrays its own basic insecurity regarding its projected moral purity. Consequently, the higher the incidence of reported Black criminality, the more exceptionally righteous White America feels itself to be. The more righteous it feels itself to be the more intensely and guiltlessly it promulgates and justifies its domination and exploitation of African peoples at home and abroad. [MORE]

Racists & Cops are Losing It. Get Yourself a Firearm While You Still Can [Anti-Terror & Niggerization Defense/color confrontation theory]

Niggerized - "unsafe, unprotected, subjected and subjugated to random violence, hated for who you are to the point you become so scared that you defer to the powers that be while willing to consent to your own domination." Dr. Cornel West quoted in FUNKTIONARY.

Used Guns and Ammunition Sold [HERE]

White Woman With A ‘Concealed Weapon’ Caught On Video Threatening Black Women Waiting For AAA

Facebook CHARLOTTE, N.C. - A video showing a woman harassing two women standing outside their apartment has gone viral over the weekend. The initial incident happened happened Friday, Oct. 19, according to Charlotte-Mecklenburg police. The two sisters, Leisa and Mary Garris, were waiting outside of their apartment for AAA to jump their car when the woman approached them.

Always, in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing’s Color Confrontation Theory explains as follows:

“Racism (white supremacy), having begun as a form of self-alienation, has evolved into the most highly refined form of alienation from others as well. The Color-Confrontation theory views all of the present battlegrounds in the world as vivid reflections of this reality; the destructive and aggressive behavioral patterns being displayed by white peoples towards all non-white peoples is evidence of the inner hate, hostility and rejection they feel towards themselves and of the depth of self-alienation that has evolved from the genetic and psychological kernel of color inadequacy.

The mass inability of whites to live and attend school in the presence of non-whites is expressed in the patterns of Black and white housing and education throughout this country and the world. In terms of the Color-Confrontation thesis, this inability is seen as the apparent psychological discomfort experienced by whites in situations where, in confronting their neighbors of color, they must face their color inadequacy daily . Also, the myth of white superiority is exploded in the presence of equitable social and economic opportunity. The white personality, in the presence of color, can be stabilized only by keeping Blacks and other non-whites in obviously inferior positions. The situation of mass proximity to Blacks is intolerable to whites because Blacks are inherently more than equal. People of color always will have something highly visible that whites never can have or produce- the genetic factor of color. Always, in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior.

The difficulty whites have in according non-whites socio-political and economic equality within the white supremacy structure stems neither from a moral issue nor from political or economic need, but from the fundamental sense of their own unequal condition - in regards to their numerical inadequacy and color deficiency. They can compensate for color inadequacy only by placing themselves in socially superior positions. The color inadequacy of whiteness necessitates a social struc­ture based on white superiority. Only tokenism can be tolerated by such a motivational psychological state, wherein the evolution of the myth of the exceptional non-white is used, again, as a defense mechanism. [MORE]

On Video Neuropean Lady, who also 'Likes Beers,' Harasses Black Women in Parking Lot of their Apt Complex ["Always in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior." dilly dilly]

Neuropeans - (Neurotic Europeans) - neurotic, ignorant, narcissistic and self-deluded white supremacist Caucasians operating at the mythic and rational levels of consciousness only. 2) Fascists. (See Weitko Disease, White Supremacy and Yurungu.) - FUNKTIONARY

White Woman With A ‘Concealed Weapon’ Caught On Video Threatening Black Women Waiting For AAA in parking lot of their apartment complex.

Always, in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior. Racism is a virus in the mind. Suffering from the disease of constant comparison racists “believe” they are another “race” or species and believe they belong to an imaginary hierarchy wherein they imagine themselves to be higher than what they imagine “others” to be based on their lack of skin color, melanin and the ability to produce color. This whole make believe game and genocidal thoughting is unconsciously and consciously going on in their minds and is just below the surface whenever they are in the presence of color. Anything done in this sleeping state will be stupid. How could it not be? Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explains,

“the white personality, in the presence of color, can be stabilized only by keeping Blacks and other non-whites in obviously inferior positions. The situation of mass proximity to Blacks is intolerable to whites because Blacks are inherently more than equal. People of color always will have something highly visible that whites never can have or produce- the genetic factor of color. Always, in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior.” [MORE and see story above]

In their relations with non-whites racists function as psychopaths. Racists are obsessed with skin color and their inability to produce color. They created the concept of “race” out of thin air sometime in the late 1600’s. The only purpose of race is to practice racism. Having little biological validity, the term "race" is better translated to mean organization. The sole purpose of such organization is to maintain white domination and world control of non-whites, who have been frictionalized into made up various classifications of non-white people by racists. [MORE]

Mexican Government Sprays Insecticide on People in "Migrant Caravan" Sleeping on the Street

10 Characteristics of False Flag Operations

"The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own government." —Dr. Martin L. King. Jr. quoted in FUNKTIONARY [MORE]

Connecticut Supreme Court Orders Sandy Hook Documents Released

From [HERE] The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Hartford Courant Tuesday in a lawsuit seeking the release of documents related to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

The Hartford Courant requested documents created by the perpetrator, Adam Lanza, through Connecticut’s Freedom of Information Act (FOI). When the state denied the request, the Hartford Courant brought this suit.

The Connecticut Attorney General argued that the records fell outside the scope of the FOI. The Attorney General claimed statutes (§§ 54-33a through 54-36p) governing the nondisclosure of evidence gathered during police searches and seizures should bar disclosures under the FOI.

The Connecticut Supreme Court disagreed.

This question of statutory interpretation also must be resolved in light of certain general principles governing the act. First, we have often recognized the longstanding legislative policy of the [act] favoring the open conduct of government and free public access to government records. … We consistently have held that this policy requires us to construe the provisions of the [act] to favor disclosure and to read narrowly that act’s exceptions to disclosure.

In their coverage of the lawsuit, the Hartford Courant released the following statement from Andrew Julien, publisher and editor-in-chief.

Since the day of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, the Courant has worked to advance the understanding of how so heinous a tragedy could happen and we applaud today’s decision as we feel these documents are necessary for us to tell a complete story in our reporting.

On December 14, 2012, Adam Lanza shot and killed 20 children and six teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

Billionaires Made More Money in 2017 than Any Other Year in History

From [HERE] During a year in which so much of the world faced deep poverty, the corrosive effects of austerity, and extreme weather caused by the worsening human-caused climate crisis — from devastating hurricanes to deadly wildfires and floods — one class of individuals raked in more money in 2017 than any other year in recorded history: the world’s billionaires.

According to the Swiss bank UBS’s fifth annual billionaires report published on Friday, billionaires across the globe increased their wealth by $1.4 trillion last year — an astonishing 20 percent — bringing their combined wealth to $8.9 trillion.

“The past 30 years have seen far greater wealth creation than the Gilded Age,” the UBS report notes. “That period bred generations of families in the U.S. and Europe who went on to influence business, banking, politics, philanthropy, and the arts for more than 100 years.”

UBS estimates that the world now has a total of 2,158 billionaires, with 179 billionaires created last year. The United States alone is home to 585 billionaires — the most in the world — up from 563 in 2017.

Meanwhile, according to a June report by U.N. Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights Philip Alston, 18.5 million Americans live in extreme poverty and “5.3 million live in Third World conditions of absolute poverty.”

A significant percentage of the “newly created” billionaires are hardly the self-made men — and they are overwhelmingly men — of popular lore. According to UBS, 40 of the 179 new billionaires created last year inherited their wealth—a trend that has driven an explosion of wealth inequality over the past several decades.

According to UBS, this trend will continue to accelerate over the next 20 years, given that there are currently 701 billionaires over the age of 70.

“A major wealth transition has begun. Over the past five years (2012–2017), the sum passed by deceased billionaires to beneficiaries has grown by an average of 17 percent each year,” the UBS report concludes. “Over the next two decades we expect a wealth transition of $3.4 trillion worldwide—almost 40 percent of current total billionaire wealth.”

Manhattan DA's Office Tracks Cops With ‘Credibility’ Problems, But Refuses to Release Its List of Liars to the Victimized Public

From [HERE] In July, the Manhattan district attorney’s office blasted the New York City Police Department over its refusal to share information on officers’ misconduct records with prosecutors pretrial. The office argued such information—which speaks to the credibility of police officers—is critical for prosecutors seeking to vet their witnesses and decide whether and how to charge a case.

But a new court petition, filed Monday, presents evidence that the Manhattan DA’s office keeps its own internal records on police officers with questionable credibility, and is refusing to disclose this information to defense attorneys and the public at large.

Access to such information could prevent wrongful incarceration, defense attorneys argue, because plea deals—how 97 percent of felony cases that result in convictions are settled in New York City—often turn on police officer testimony. Although prosecutors are technically required to disclose exculpatory material about officers that could help the defense under the Supreme Court decision Brady v. Maryland, defense attorneys argue these disclosures are seldom exhaustive and can be legally submitted weeks before trial starts, long after plea negotiations may have ended.

“The release of these names would impact the plea bargaining process in significant ways,” said Bennett Gershman, a Pace University law professor and former Manhattan prosecutor.

“Right now it’s a crapshoot for defense attorneys. They don’t know what a prosecutor has.”

The petition, filed by Andrew Stengel, a defense attorney and former Manhattan prosecutor, requests the DA’s office turn over a list he asserts it has of police officers with any indication of “adverse credibility findings” since Jan. 1, 2017. As evidence of the list’s existence, he points to a February 2018 trial for one of his clients during which the Manhattan DA’s deputy bureau chief, Jeffrey Levinson, publicly stated, “We have a list of officers where we—that have adverse credibility findings, that have been found to have testified falsely.”

According to the suit, Levinson’s statement didn’t surprise Stengel, who since 2014 had been aware of such a list, known colloquially to his then-colleagues within the Manhattan DA’s office as the “naughty list.”  

Judges issue adverse credibility findings when they have found officers’ testimony to be untruthful. In a 2011 speech, District Attorney Cy Vance said the agency routinely reviewed “all circumstances in which the credibility of a police officer is called into question.” According to Vance, “Every judicial adverse credibility finding is investigated to determine whether disclosure is warranted when the officer testifies in the future.” How the office chooses which officers warrant future disclosures and how this information is consolidated internally remains unclear.

In March, Stengel filed a Freedom of Information Law request asking for the list, but the DA’s office denied his request, saying that it does not have a “list” as defined by his request. “While this office does maintain information regarding a court’s ‘adverse credibility finding,’” the denial states, “these records are prepared in anticipation of litigation and are thus exempt from disclosure.”

Stengel appealed the ruling, to no avail, so he decided to file his suit. “The very purpose of the list is for the adverse credibility findings of police officers to be disclosed by the DA’s Office to defendants,” the petition argues, noting that the office’s claim to have information but not a “list” is a “semantic decision without a meaningful difference.”

The DA’s office declined to comment on the petition by publication time.

A similar battle is playing out in Los Angeles over a sheriff’s list of tainted cops, where the police officer’s union is working to prevent the release of the list to prosecutors. Earlier this year, Philadelphia prosecutors released such a list under court order, after the Philadelphia Inquirer reported on its existence. The public defender’s office reportedly filed more than 6,000 petitions for new trials as a result. Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner is also reportedly in the process of developing a more comprehensive list than his predecessor’s, as well as a new protocol for sharing information with defense attorneys. [MORE]

Dangerous White Millville Cop Indicted on 24 Counts of Using Excessive Force, Felony Assaults & 10 Counts of Falsifying Evidence, Reports

Jeffrey E. Proffit (center) is a suspended Millville police officer facing trial for allegedly abusing as many as 13 people. Proffit and attorney Michael L. Testa Sr. (left) were in Cumberland County Superior Court LAST YEAR.

From [HERE] and [HERE] A white Millville police officer accused of slamming a suspect face-first onto a concrete floor and trying to jam a gun into another man's mouth before pistol-whipping him has been indicted on 24 counts of using excessive force, tampering with evidence and lying to his superiors.

Jeffrey E. Profitt, 39, is accused of using excessive force in five violent arrests and is charged with 10 counts of filing false and incomplete reports about arrests he made between 2013 and 2016. At least one of those arrests resulted in a lawsuit.

Profitt was originally indicted last year on charges related to a 2016 arrest in which he allegedly threw a 62-year-old man, Alphonzo Williams, to a concrete floor in the police station's sally port, causing serious facial injuries after a disorderly conduct arrest. At that time, the eight charges were: Aggravated assault/second degree; aggravated assault/third degree; two charges of tampering with public records or information/ third degree; tampering with physical evidence/fourth degree; obstructing administration of the law/fourth degree; official misconduct/second degree;  and pattern of official misconduct/second degree.

Profitt sought to have the count of pattern of official misconduct/second degree separated from the other seven, which dealt specifically with the incident involving Alphonzo Williams Sr. [MORE]

A judge granted that move, but prosecutors appealed the decision. In June, appellate court judges sent the matter back to the lower court to reconsider severing the counts into two separate cases.

Prosecutors expanded on the pattern of misconduct allegations contained in that eighth count and took their case back to a Cumberland County grand jury, which handed up this week's superseding indictment.

The charges include multiple counts of official misconduct, aggravated assault, endangering another person, terroristic threats, tampering with physical evidence, tampering with records and obstructing the administration of law.

The allegations involving Alphonzo Williams’ injuries  stem from an April 11, 2016 arrest at a liquor store where he was allegedly "causing public alarm," according to Profitts police report. EMTs arriving at the police station because of the man's apparent intoxication testified that they saw Profitt pick up A.W. and throw him to the floor.

"A.W.'s face, according to one of the EMT witnesses, hit the concrete floor like 'a pumpkin smashing,'" according to details described in the appellate court ruling.

The state claims Profitt misled superior officers about the extent of Alphonzo Williams injuries, describing it as a mere nosebleed. As a result, a lieutenant called for maintenance staff to clean up the area, rather than ordering an investigation. Hours later, after a pool of blood had been cleaned up, the lieutenant learned how seriously A.W. had been injured.

The man required three hours of surgery to repair facial fractures.

In the meantime, Profitt laundered his uniform to get rid of blood evidence, prosecutors allege.

The indictment goes on to accuse Profitt of using excessive force in four other cases.

In an incident from Oct. 8, 2014, Profitt arrested a man identified as W.H., and while the officer's report made no mention of injuries, the man's arrest photo showed facial swelling, bruising and "copious blood around his nose and forehead," according to appellate documents related to the first indictment. The new indictment states that Profitt grabbed W.H. and threw him, causing the man to hit the ground face-first.

On May 3, 2015, he allegedly grabbed O.P. from behind and threw him to the ground, smashing his face onto a stone driveway.

On Dec. 12, 2015, Profitt allegedly forced H.G. against the exterior of a restaurant, then threw him face-first onto large landscaping rocks.

On July 16, 2015 Kenneth Harden [Black man in photo] was driving home from Atlantic City with a person identified as Desiree Best when Proffit stopped his vehicle. According to a lawsuit fled by Harden,

“After Plaintiff’s vehicle was stopped, Defendant Proffit forced Plaintiff out of his vehicle and without provocation punched Plaintiff numerous times in the face and about his body,” the suit states. “Fearing for his safety, Plaintiff began to flee from Officer Proffit who began to give chase to Plaintiff.”

The suit states that Proffit pulled his pistol during the foot chase and Harden, seeing it, stopped running. Harden claims he was forced to the ground, where Proffit tried to shove the pistol in his mouth.

“Officer Proffit subsequently pistol-whipped Plaintiff on the back-right side of his head causing Plaintiff’s head to split open and begin bleeding,” the suit adds. Harden then was processed on a resisting arrest charge and taken to a hospital.

The suit alleges “deliberate indifference” on the part of the city and Police Chief Jody Farabella as a factor in Proffit’s behavior.

Prosecutors charge that Profitt failed to file "truthful, accurate and complete" Attorney General use of force reports about those arrests and five others that occurred between 2013 and 2015. He also didn't report the severity of the injuries suffered by the people he arrested.

He was also the focal point of another lawsuit. The estate of Joey Myers is suing Proffit and Millville police for allegedly unleashing a police K-9 on Myers after he was apprehended as a burglary suspect.  Among the injuries alleged in that lawsuit, the dog tore off a piece of Myers' ear. [MORE] The facts from said suit apparently are not apart of his current criminal case.

"We can only assume that the conduct of Officer Proffit is an example of a police officer gone wild without proper supervision or discipline," Attorney Conrad J. Benedetto said in a statement.

Apparently Profitt joined the department in 2012 and is currently suspended without pay, according to a department spokesman. Police Chief Jody Farabella could not be reached for comment.

Profitt is free pending future court appearances. He's due back before a judge on Nov. 9 for a post-indictment arraignment.

Woman 'brutally punched' for speaking Spanish on London Train by Caucasian Man Unable to Abate his Unacknowledged Destructive Capabilities & Fear of Impending Non-White Planet

Global System of Racism White Supremacy. Dr. Blynd explains that a racist’s worst and most basic fear still remains genetic annihilation in the form of the fear of the impending "Black Planet." Whither goest thou white man? (See: Weiteko Disease, Yurungu, Western Civilization, Recessive Genes, Colored People, Melanin & Mutant). [MORE]

From [HERE] A woman was “brutally” punched on a London Overground train after her attacker heard her speaking Spanish – the second time this year someone has been assaulted on the city’s transport system for using the European language.

Commuters in east London were shocked when a man violently confronted a woman talking on her mobile phone between Dalston Kingsland and Canonbury earlier this week. 

“He was shouting at her, ‘You need to speak in English, you’re in f***ing England. You shouldn’t speak other languages’,” Enrik Del Sol, 35, told the Evening Standard. “The lady was in so much shock she couldn’t seem to reply to him in English so she was just replying in Spanish. Then he came up and punched her in the face.”

He added: “Someone pressed the emergency stop. But the attacker just walked off, nobody tried to stop him.”

A 56-year-old man was later arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated actual bodily harm (ABH), according to the British Transport Police.

“The woman was bleeding and I gave her some tissues,” he said.

In April, a 24-year-old woman was attacked on the London Underground for speaking Spanish.

Einstein said: "The separation of the races is not a disease of colored people. It is a disease of white people. I do not intend to be quiet about it." Most white people hate non-white people.  The reason that most white people hate non-white people is because whites are not non-white people. If you know this about white people, you need know little else. If you do not know this about white people, virtually all else that you know about them will only confuse you" - Neely Fuller [MORE] and [MORE].

Video of Brookings Institute Event on 10/26/18 - “Deadly Force: The legal basis of Police Shootings of Unarmed Black Males"

On Friday, Oct. 26, the Race, Prosperity & Inclusion Initiative at the Brookings Institution hosted a moderated discussion with legal, academic, and advocacy experts to examine these pressing issues and challenges and explore policy options to address the cycle of police brutality against black males. Join the conversation on Twitter using #PoliceReform Subscribe!

Justifiable Homicide in a Racist System. This video should be considered in the context of the racism/white supremacy dynamic. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained, 'Whenever there is a sense of increased vulnerability within the local and/or global white collective - as, for example, caused by the rapidly declining white population and demographic transformation in the US or the election of a Black president- there will be an increase of the ever-present "normal" daily slaughter and murder of Black and other non-white males by those both legally and illegally authorized to do so. This murder and slaughter will be logically viewed as justified within the specific logic framework of the fear of white genetic annihilation. [MORE]

The video should also be considered within the context of this corporate police state of Government. Contrary to Brookings, police forces cannot be reformed. Larken Rose explains, “the belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.”

Allegedly governmental power comes from the people. But people cannot delegate rights they do not have to other people. You don’t have the right to arrest someone or initiate unprovoked acts of force against other people - so how can you delegate or authorize anyone else to do such things? This makes it impossible for anyone to acquire the right to rule (”authority”). If everybody on your block voted to make you responsible for picking up their trash would it be binding? When you don’t do it could they fine you and use force to compel you to do so? What makes it right when politicians require you to do things through “laws?” When did you explicitly consent to this “voluntary” governmental arrangement?

Dr. Blynd explains that there is no freedom in the presence of authority. Authority is not a force but a farce! FUNKTIONARY states: 

"authority" - (so-called)—a cartoon, an alleged image of the Law. 2) a cartoon clothed in flesh and blood. 3) the notion of an implied right and application of that "right" of individuals or groups of same to control or exercise external power over others, which has no meaning in reality. 4) power over...which is thoroughly institutionalized. 5) ruling through coercion. So-called "authority" is the justification for remaining impotent. The real threat to "authority" is the masses overcoming info-gaps and verigaps through self-knowledge and the proliferation of symbols of opposition, not crime or destruction of property.

authority - (from the root word author)—which means to originate. Only you have authority over your Self...anything else. i.e.. to accept any authority external to one's Self once of discriminating age, is the very definition of irresponsibility. There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority, i.e. outside of one's Self and Self-Nature.) 2) the handmaiden of autonomy. 3) internal power. 4) Nommo. All authority, like the kingdom of heaven, is within. Be an authority unto yourself as all authority should come from your own authentic experience—that is the only source or wellspring of authority. Authority is the means by which society uses to control its population. Ignoring or belittling authority does not mean people are either good or bad, whether or not they are punished for their insubordination. Healthy people do not need authority figures to tell them what to do, but only the knowledge of themselves. You can teach a parrot to quote from either scripture or statute, but a parrot is not an authority. Only by you becoming truth do you have authority to speak—and then only on your behalf (i.e., your inner truth), your innerstanding. An authority is an eyewitness or an I-witness. and to picture the dynamic truth no proofs or negatives are needed nor possible—as reality isn't certain or static. When you are dead to sin and Alive to the God-Self-Divine, you become the Buddha, the Christ, the true authority within. (See: Obedience, Predictive Programming. Autonomy, Anarchy, Nommo, Sin, Alive. Authentic, Responsitivity, Dharma, Follower, Spontaneity, Conditioning, Conditions, Freedom & Responsibility). [MORE]