Trump/Bush Reboots COINTELPRO to Destroy Dissent: “When the government can label anyone or anything an enemy in order to wage war, we are all in danger”

From [HERE] When the government can label anyone or anything an enemy in order to wage war, we are all in danger.

That danger is no longer theoretical.

In the same breath that the administration touts lethal military strikes against Venezuelan boats in Caribbean waters, federal agents are conducting coordinated militarized raids on homes in Chicago, rappelling down on apartment buildings from Black Hawk helicopters, dragging families out of their homes, separating children from their parents, and using zip ties to immobilize them—even citizens.

The message—spoken and unspoken—is that the government is on a war footing everywhere: abroad, at sea, and now at our front doors.

This “everywhere war” depends on a simple redefinition: call it a war, and the target becomes a combatant. Call the city a battlespace, and its residents become suspects.

What the White House is doing overseas to vessels it deems part of a terrorist network (without any credible proof or due process), it is now mimicking at home with door-kicking raids, mass surveillance, and ideological watchlists.

With the stroke of a pen, President Trump continues to set aside the constitutional safeguards meant to restrain exactly this kind of mission creep, handing himself and his agencies sweeping authority to disregard the very principles on which this nation was founded—principles intended to serve as constitutional safeguards against tyranny, corruption, abuse and overreach put in place by America’s founding fathers.

Take National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), for example.

NSPM-7 directs a government-wide campaign to “investigate,” “disrupt,” and “dismantle” so-called domestic threats, ordering agencies to pool their data, resources, and operations in service of this agenda.

What makes NSPM-7 so dangerous is not only its declared purpose but its breadth and secrecy. There are no clearly defined standards, no meaningful transparency, and no external oversight. The public is told only that the government will protect them—by watching them.

Yet the danger is not only in what the government hides, but in what it chooses to see.

Even more troubling is the way “threats” are defined.

What is being sold as a campaign to disrupt left-wing conspiracies has expanded to include ideology, rhetoric, and belief.

Clearly, this is not just another surveillance program.

NSPM-7 is a framework for rebranding dissent as a danger to be quashed.

The government has a long history of using vague definitions of “extremism” to justify ever-expanding control. Once dissent is rebranded as danger, every act of resistance can be swept into the government’s dragnet.

NSPM-7 merely formalizes this cycle of suspicion.

It also resurrects an old playbook with new machinery—COINTELPRO, digitized and centralized. The tools may be different, but the logic—neutralize dissent—is the same, now scaled up with modern surveillance and stitched together under executive direction. From there, the apparatus needs only a pretext—a checklist of behaviors, viewpoints, associations and beliefs—to justify recasting citizens as suspects. [MORE]

A COVID Conspiracy Theory Isn't a Conspiracy If its True. But Coincidence Theorists Probably Disagree

Puff Daddy Sentenced to 4 years in prison, faced 20. Appeal will follow

Trump Honors His Klancestors by Restoring the Name of Military Base to "Fort Bragg," for Braxton Bragg, a Racist and Enslaver, Despite Bi-Partisan Law to Remove the Names of Confederate Traitors

Honoring a Champion of Slavery for Symbolic Value. From [HERE] Despite Bragg’s poor track record as a military leader and legacy as a notorious enslaver and defender of racial hierarchy, Camp Bragg was established in 1918 in Fayetteville, North Carolina, and became Fort Bragg in 1922.

Braxton Bragg was an unpopular military figure whose own soldiers tried to kill him before he was court-martialed for disrespecting Army leadership. He resumed military command for the Confederacy during the Civil War to preserve slavery and became “known for his pettiness and cruelty, along with the battlefield failures that eventually led to his being relieved of command.” Bragg was deeply committed to the institution of slavery and the exploitation of Black people. He contended that slavery was “just and necessary” and claimed it was “the best and most humane” labor system in the world. He told Irish journalist William H. Russell in 1861 that forced slave labor was the only way to farm in Louisiana:

“If a northern population…settled in Louisiana tomorrow, they would discover that they must till the land by the labour of the black race, and the only mode of making [them] work was to hold them in a condition of involuntary servitude.”1 

Bragg added that, to prevent the abolition of slavery, he would fight against the Union “as long as he had a drop of blood in his body.”2

For decades, the choice to name U.S. military bases after individuals who defended slavery and showed contempt for the lives and capabilities of Black soldiers has been criticized as divisive, dishonorable, and antithetical to democratic values.

In the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2021, a bipartisan majority of Congress voted overwhelmingly to end this painful legacy and established a Naming Commission to rename or remove all military assets that commemorate Confederate traitors.

In 2022, the commission recommended new names for nine Army bases, including Fort Bragg, which was officially redesignated as Fort Liberty in June 2023.

The renaming of Fort Bragg represented an acknowledgment of the name’s harm to decades of Black service members and community members.

“America should not have vestiges of slavery and secessionism and celebrate them,” Army veteran Isiah James, a senior policy officer at the Black Veterans Project, told PBS. “We should not laud them and hold them up and venerate them to where every time a Black soldier goes onto the base, they get the message that this base Bragg is named after someone who wanted to keep you as human property.”

Less than two years later, this progress was reversed.

In March 2025, at the urging of President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered that Bragg’s name be restored to the base. To get around federal law, which prohibits naming military installations for people who fought against the U.S., the Defense Department said it was naming the base after Pvt. Roland L. Bragg, an infantryman in World War II.

But the Trump administration has been clear that its goal is to reimpose the names of insurrectionists who killed U.S. soldiers to defend slavery.

“This is about restoring all bases to their original names,” Hegseth told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee at a hearing earlier this year.

On the campaign trail, Trump promised, “We’re going to change the name back to Fort Bragg.” In June 2025, President Trump gave a speech at the base, where he told service members, “Fort Bragg is in. That’s the name. And Fort Bragg it shall always remain.”

Trump Continues to Deliver Symbolic Politics to the Neanderthal Community: Pete Hegseth says Soldiers who Participated in the 1890 Massacre of Native Americans will Keep Medals of Honor

From [HERE] Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced in a video post last week that soldiers who participated in the 1890 massacre of more than 250 women, men, and children at Wounded Knee will keep Medals of Honor that many have said should be rescinded.

The Massacre at Wounded Knee

On December 29, 1890, some 500 troops of the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment surrounded a group of Lakota people who were camped at Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota.

The Lakota had been forced to march to Pine Ridge from the Standing Rock Indian Reservation after U.S. Indian Agency Police killed Lakota Chief Sitting Bull, who led his people during years of resistance to U.S. government policies that forcibly relocated Indigenous people from their homes to reservations.

The troops entered the camp to disarm the Lakota. During a brief scuffle between a soldier and a Lakota man who refused to surrender his weapon, the rifle fired, alarming the rest of the troops. The soldiers began firing on the Lakota, many of whom tried to flee the assault. The attack left more than 250 Lakota dead; over half of those killed were women, children, and elderly tribal members, and most of the dead were unarmed.

Despite the extreme cruelty and the killing of so many innocent people, Medals of Honor were given to 19 soldiers for their actions and conduct.

“We Will Never Forget What They Did”

For generations, Native American groups, including the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the National Congress of American Indians, advocates, state lawmakers from South Dakota, and members of Congress have called forthe awards to be rescinded.

A century after the massacre, Congress apologized to the descendants of the people killed at Wounded Knee, but did not revoke the awards, AP reported.

In 2019, then-Rep. Deb Haaland (D-New Mexico) co-sponsored the Remove the Stain Act to rescind the awards. “This bill is particularly significant because it’s a marker that shows that our country is finally on its way to acknowledging and recognizing the atrocities committed against our Native communities,” Haaland said at a press conference, where South Dakota tribal members showed photos of their ancestors who survived Wounded Knee.

“While 1890 may seem like a long time ago, it’s actually only been a few generations since the bloodiest military attack on Indigenous people in the United States,” the Lakota People’s Law Project wrote.

Cheyenne River tribal member Manny Iron Hawk, whose grandmother survived Wounded Knee, said that rescinding the awards would help everyone to heal. “There was no honor in these murders and the Lakota, we live with these traumas to this day,” he told the Argus Leader.

“Picture in your mind, your grandma grabbing you by your hand when you were 12 and running away into a ravine trying to survive,” Iron Hawk said. “My mother usually tells about this story and she gets sad and she cries. All of us children, she transferred that sadness and story to us.”

Despite bipartisan support, the bill did not make it to a vote in the House.

But in the 2022 defense bill, Congress recommended that the medals be reviewed, and in 2024, then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered a special panel of experts to review the medals to “ensure no awardees were recognized for conduct inconsistent with the nation’s highest military honor.”

The panel was directed to review each individual award to assess whether the soldier’s conduct “demonstrated any disqualifying actions” under the standards at the time.

Austin ordered the panel to provide a written report of its findings. The report has not been released publicly.

But Hegseth said in his video post that the review panel concluded in October 2024 “that these brave soldiers should, in fact, rightfully keep their medals from actions in 1890.”

AP reports that the Defense Secretary’s office could not say if the report that Hegseth referred to in his video would be made public.

“We’re making it clear that (the soldiers) deserve those medals,” Hegseth said, before adding that “their place in our nation’s history is no longer up for debate.”

“We salute their memory,” he said in closing. “We honor their service, and we will never forget what they did.”

New South Korean Study Concludes All COVID Shots (both mRNA and non-mRNA) Increase Cancer Risk

From [HERE] COVID-19 vaccines and boosters — both mRNA and non-mRNA — pose an increased risk of six types of cancer and a 27% higher risk of cancer overall, according to a recent South Korean study of over 8 million people.

Four South Korean researchers published the report last week as a letter in Biomarker Research, a Springer Nature journal.

According to the study, COVID-19 vaccines and boosters are associated with a higher risk of breast, colorectal, gastric, lung, prostate and thyroid cancer, across all vaccine types and age groups.

Mainstream medical commentators were quick to dismiss the findings, with MedPageToday describing it as “flawed.” But other medical and scientific experts disagreed.

“In plain terms: both major COVID-19 vaccine platforms appear to be carcinogenic,” epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher wrote in a post on Substack.

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a medical oncologist, told The Defender the study builds on other recent findings but “is the first to show that cDNA [non-mRNA] and mRNA vaccines are associated with cancer risk, suggesting that the spike protein is directly carcinogenic.”

Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., said this week on his YouTube show that the research marks “the largest-scale study so far” examining the association between the COVID-19 shots and cancer.

 ‘No vaccine technology was free from cancer risk’

According to the study, while the carcinogenic potential of the SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for COVID-19 “has been hypothetically proposed,” there has been little research on the potential cancer risk from COVID-19 vaccines.

The researchers said the “shared structures” contained within the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 vaccines, including the spike protein, might mean that the COVID-19 shots are associated with cancer risks.

The study used data from 2021-2023 for over 8.4 million people in South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service database. The sample was split into two groups based on vaccination status. The vaccinated sample was further split into booster and non-booster groups.

Researchers tracked the patients for one year. The vaccinated group was tracked following vaccination. The results showed a statistically significant higher risk of cancer in the vaccinated group, including:

• Overall cancer: 27% higher risk

• Breast cancer: 20% higher risk

• Colorectal cancer: 28% higher risk

• Gastric cancer: 34% higher risk

• Lung cancer: 53% higher risk

• Prostate cancer: 69% higher risk

• Thyroid cancer: 35% higher risk

The statistical analysis of the results showed that there is a “1 in 1,000 chance that this result arose by chance,” Campbell said.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna showed a 20% higher overall risk of cancer and were most closely linked to a higher risk of breast, colorectal, lung and thyroid cancers.

Non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, known as cDNA vaccines and which include the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) shots, were associated with a 47% higher overall risk of cancer. They were specifically linked to an increased risk of colorectal, gastric, lung, prostate and thyroid cancers.

Patients who received a mixture of mRNA and cDNA doses also faced an increased risk, with a 34% higher incidence of cancer overall and a close association with a higher risk of breast and thyroid cancers.

“The elevated cancer risks were not confined to one vaccine platform,” Hulscher wrote. “Each vaccine type was associated with a measurable increase in overall cancer — and each had specific cancer sites driving the signal. In other words, no vaccine technology was free of cancer risk in this dataset.”

Internal medicine physician Dr. Clayton J. Baker said the data show that among vaccinated people, the cancer risk increases with time.

“The increased risk of cancer for vaccinated subjects rises in a linear fashion over the entire period of the study, at a steeper angle than the unvaccinated curve, and it does not flatten out. The increased incidence just keeps getting bigger. It could go on for decades. It’s truly alarming,” Baker said.

‘Every demographic group experienced elevated cancer risks’

The results also showed vaccinated people under 65 years of age were at particular risk of some types of cancer.

“The relatively younger population (individuals under 65 years) was more vulnerable to thyroid and breast cancers; by comparison, the older population (75 years and older) was more susceptible to prostate cancer,” the researchers wrote.

Overall, vaccinated people under age 65 showed an overall increased risk of cancer, while elderly adults — particularly those over 75 — had the highest overall risk.

Vaccinated women also had a relatively higher risk of cancer than vaccinated men, with vaccinated women showing a particularly increased risk of colorectal and thyroid cancers, and vaccinated men showing a higher risk of gastric and lung cancers.

Hulscher wrote:

“Both the overall and site-specific results show a consistent pattern — every demographic group experienced elevated cancer risks, though the type and absolute burden varied. Women and the elderly were hit hardest, but no population segment was spared.”

The study’s results also showed that COVID-19 boosters resulted in a substantially higher risk of certain types of cancer. This included a 125% higher risk of pancreatic cancer and a 23% higher risk of gastric cancer.

Dalgleish called the numbers “striking,” saying the jump in risk after booster shots “is an unexpected increase that we are also seeing in the United Kingdom.”

Critics call one-year follow-up period ‘bonkers’

According to MedPageToday, the one-year follow-up period the researchers used in the study was “bonkers,” and the study didn’t take into account the patients’ family histories of cancer and their screening history.

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense, said “the criticism levied against the study is of healthy user bias.” He explained:

“The idea that people more likely to engage in one medical intervention (vaccination) are also more likely to engage in another (cancer screening) … is a valid concern for a vaxed-unvaxed study such as this one, as those seeking a vaccine will have drastically different healthcare-seeking behavior than those not seeking a vaccine.

 “[However,] this is not just a vaxed-unvaxed study — it also differentiates the vaccines. Healthy user bias is not a point of argument for why one vaccine (cDNA) shows a strong cancer risk above another (mRNA). Further, the study doesn’t say vaccines cause cancer, but are associated with them.

“We are complex multicellular organisms. Cancerous cells are created within us with great frequency, and are usually subdued by our anti-cancer mechanisms. … If a vaccine can disrupt that anti-cancer mechanism, then cancers can manifest in a short time window.”

Even if cDNA vaccines were shown to pose a higher cancer risk, Baker said the study also highlights the risk of mRNA technology.

“This study absolutely implicates the mRNA platform,” he said. “Remember, COVID-19 was the first widespread use of that technology platform in humans … In its first application, it increases cancers.”

Campbell said official South Korean data is typically reliable, and the study was well structured.

“South Korea was a very heavily vaccinated country,” he said. “There was … just a few hundred thousand in the unvaccinated group, but that’s good enough to get some pretty good data from.”

The study’s authors did not elaborate on possible mechanisms contained within the COVID-19 vaccinesthat might result in a higher cancer risk.

Baker said the “significantly increased hazard ratios for six different cancer types suggests to me a possible immune system impairment contributing to the increased risk. It’s frightening, because the risk is not limited to any one type of cancer that might be screened against.”

According to Campbell, the spike protein and DNA contaminants found in the mRNA vaccines may be among the factors contributing to this risk.

The authors suggested that more research is necessary “to elucidate potential causal relationships, including the underlying molecular mechanisms related to COVID-19 vaccine-induced hyperinflammation.”

Growing number of studies link COVID shots to severe adverse events

Other recent large-scale studies and analyses suggest a link between the COVID-19 vaccines and serious adverse events such as cancer.

Earlier this year, an analysis of a Japanese database of 18 million people showed that people who received COVID-19 vaccines had a significantly higher risk of death in the first year after vaccination compared to the unvaccinated. The risk increased with each additional dose.

A study of 1.3 million women in the Czech Republic published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine in June showed that the rate of successful conception — a pregnancy leading to live birth nine months later — for vaccinated women was “substantially lower” than for those who were unvaccinated.

A 30-month study of nearly 300,000 people in Italy, published in the journal EXCLI in July, found a 23% increased risk of cancer following one or two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, and an additional 9% increased risk among those who received three or more doses.

The Italian study’s results also showed statistically significant increases in breast, bladder and colorectal cancers.

Jablonowski said the Italian study’s findings largely mirror those of the South Korean study, as there is “a corroboration of evidence that cannot be ignored.”

“The comparison of the results … is awfully interesting,” Jablonowski said. “The two studies generally agree on many cancer types. One form of cancer that they do not agree on is prostate cancer. It is not remotely noteworthy in the Italian study, and the strongest signal in the Korean study.”[MORE]

Hiding the Alcoholocaust: Big Alcohol Uses Tobacco Playbook to Rewrite Science, Block Reforms and Conceal the Reality that Alcohol is 1 of the World’s Leading Drivers of Preventable Disease and Death

Urgent action is needed to protect public health from alcohol industry influence and to curb alcohol-related disease and death, according to international researchers.

“The alcohol industry has a serious, and dangerous, conflict of interest between its health-related education and policy-influencing activities, and its commercial priorities,” they say.

That warning comes in one of a series of reports published this year in Future Healthcare, The Lancet Public Health, Addiction and other journals, all pointing to the same conclusion: Alcohol is one of the world’s leading drivers of preventable disease, yet industry tactics routinely delay or weaken health protections to maximize sales and profits.

The numbers are stark. Alcohol consumption accounted for 2.6 million deaths worldwide in 2019. It was recently shown to increase the risk of developing at least seven types of cancer: mouth, throat, larynx, esophagus, liver, colorectal and female breast.

The toll also extends far beyond individual drinkers. Like tobacco, the alcohol industry also fuels broad population-level secondhand harms, including injuries and deaths.

Those impacts have been substantially underestimated until now due to a lack of data and modern analysis techniques, researchers say this month in The Lancet Public Health. [MORE]

US and Israel Mark 2 Years of Their Gaza Genocide: At Least 76,000 Murdered, 200,000 Tons of Bombs, Thousands of Families Destroyed

THE US HAS BEEN SO-CALLED “MAKING PEACE” IN PALESTINE FOR DECADES. From [HERE] The Government Media Office in Gaza has released a harrowing two-year report detailing the scale of Israel’s ongoing genocide in the Strip. The document marks 730 consecutive days of mass killing, starvation, and forced displacement that have left almost all of Gaza in ruins.

According to the report, more than 76,600 Palestinians are dead or missing since the start of Israel’s genocide on October 7, 2023. Over 20,000 of them are children. At least 12,500 women have been killed, alongside 1,670 medical workers and 254 journalists. The report says 2,700 families were completely annihilated, while another 6,000 lost nearly every member.

Israeli forces have dropped more than 200,000 tons of explosives on Gaza, flattening homes, hospitals, and schools. About 90% of the Strip lies in ruins, and two million people are now displaced.

Hospitals have been bombed repeatedly. Thirty-eight hospitals and 96 clinics no longer function. 197 ambulances and 61 rescue vehicles were directly targeted. The health system, once strained, has completely collapsed. Thousands of patients with cancer, kidney failure, and chronic diseases have died after Israel blocked medical evacuations and destroyed infrastructure.

Hunger has become a weapon as Israel has closed all Gaza crossings for 220 days, blocking over 120,000 aid trucks. At least 460 people have died of starvation, including 154 children. The report warns that 650,000 children face death from hunger and malnutrition and more than 22,000 patients need treatment abroad but are denied travel.

The education sector is in ruins with ninety-five percent of schools damaged, and 165 universities and schools completely destroyed. More than 13,500 students and 830 teachers have been killed, according to the report.

Religious sites have also been wiped out. Israel has destroyed 835 mosques, three churches, and 40 cemeteries. The report says Israeli forces desecrated graves, stealing 2,450 bodies and digging seven mass graves inside hospitals.

Infrastructure across Gaza has collapsed. 725 water wells and over 5,000 kilometers of power lines were destroyed. Israel’s bombing of freshwater projects caused 9,400 deaths, mostly children. The Strip has been left without safe water, electricity, or sewage systems.

The report lists total direct losses of $70 billion across 15 key sectors, with $28 billion in housing destruction alone. Nearly 268,000 housing units were completely leveled, leaving over 288,000 families homeless.

Gaza’s agriculture and fishing sectors no longer exist as over 94% of farmland and all fishing facilities have been destroyed, plunging the population into deeper starvation.

Israel Authorities Murder Doctors Without Borders Staffer in Gaza - Part of a Pattern by Barbaric IsrAliens to Murder Doctors and Healthcare Providers

From [HERE] Doctors Without Borders condemned Israel for killing an occupational therapist in Gaza. Israel has killed over 1,500 medical professionals in Gaza, including 14 Doctors Without Borders staffers. 

“An attack carried out by Israeli forces in Gaza killed Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) occupational therapist Omar Hayek and seriously injured four other people,” the statement from MSF explained. “The attack took place on a street where our teams were waiting to take a bus to the MSF field hospital in Deir Al-Balah. All staff were wearing MSF vests, clearly identifying themselves as medical humanitarian workers.”

“Multiple health care workers, MSF family members, and MSF staff were also seriously injured in the attack this morning, including a physiotherapist, orthopedic surgeon, supply officer, and a finance assistant.” MSF adds, “One of our staff members is in critical condition with shrapnel wounds.”

Israel has frequently attacked hospitals and medical facilities across Gaza, leaving the millions of Palestinians in the Strip with only one fully functioning hospital. UN experts have deemed Israel’s onslaught in Gaza a “medicide” or the intentional destruction of the health care system. 

The World Health Organization found Israel has conducted over 700 attacks on health care facilities. The WHO reports that 1,580 doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals have been killed over the past two years. 

MSF said the attack that killed Hayek is “part of a years-long pattern of targeting health care.” The organization went on to say Israel is conducting a genocide in Gaza and called for a ceasefire. 

Despite Dummy Trump's ‘Piece Deal’ the IsrAlien and US Holocaust Continues; Israeli Forces have Murdered More than 100 Palestinians in Gaza Over the Past 2 Days

THE US HAS BEEN SO-CALLED “MAKING PEACE” IN PALESTINE FOR DECADES. From [HERE] The Israeli government said on Sunday that there is no ceasefire in place in Gaza despite President Trump’s calls for Israel to “immediately stop the bombing of Gaza” as the IDF continues to slaughter Palestinians across the Strip.

“While certain bombings have actually stopped inside of the Gaza Strip, there’s no ceasefire in place at this point in time,” said Israeli government spokeswoman Shosh Badrosian, according to The Associated Press.

Badrosian added that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in “regular contact” with Trump and that the upcoming negotiations in Egypt aimed at securing the release of Israelis held by Hamas and implementing a ceasefire will “be confined to a few days maximum, with no tolerance for maneuvers that will delay talks by Hamas.”

Trump first made the call for Israel to stop bombing Gaza on Friday after Hamas issued its response to the US-Israeli ceasefire proposal. On Saturday, Trump said that he appreciated that “Israel has temporarily stopped the bombing,’ but on the same day, the IDF killed at least 70 Palestinians in Gaza, according to medical sources speaking to Al Jazeera. [MORE]

US President Donald Trump issued a dramatic ultimatum on Truth Social, demanding Hamas agree to what he described as a “peace deal” by Sunday evening. His post, however, is filled with falsehoods, inflated numbers, and misleading historical claims.

Trump claimed more than 25,000 Hamas fighters have already been killed. He suggested that the rest are “militarily trapped” and waiting for his order to be wiped out.

This figure does not match US intelligence. Washington estimates Hamas had 25,000 to 30,000 fighters before the genocide. US assessments suggest 20–35% of those resistance fighters have been killed since October 7, 2023. That translates to about 4,000 to 8,750 deaths; far fewer than the number Trump presented.

Misleading Historical Narrative

Trump also wrote that the war in Palestine has lasted 3,000 years. Historians and political analysts reject this claim as baseless. No evidence supports the idea of an unbroken conflict lasting millennia.

The post further accuses Hamas resistance movement of killing Israeli women and children during the October 7 military operation. However, Israeli reports and survivor testimonies complicate this narrative. Evidence shows that an Israeli infant died that day due to the army’s own Hannibal Directive. Testimonies from Israeli survivors also indicate that Hamas fighters, in some cases, tried to protect Israeli settlers from Israeli fire.

Several investigations confirm that Hamas primarily targeted Israeli military bases, many of which were built inside settlements where ‘civilians’ lived. This overlap fueled civilian casualties but undermines Trump’s claim that Hamas deliberately killed women and children.

Dangerous Rhetoric

Trump’s post went beyond statistics. He told “innocent Palestinians” to leave Gaza for safer areas. He threatened that Hamas fighters would be “hunted down and killed.” Such language blurs the line between military targets and civilian populations, echoing Israeli narratives that justify large-scale civilian harm.

Trump has been known for parroting Israeli claims. He has repeatedly claimed that Hamas killed and burned babies and raped women, claims that were debunked by several Israeli and international investigations. [MORE]

Trump's Paper Boat 'Gaza Plan' Is Mere "Repackaging of Genocide" for Israel's Benefit: Diana Buttu

Investigation Reveals More Lies by Barbaric Israeli’s: ‘Hamas Cameras’ were Actually Reuters' Cameras Monitored by Authorities before and during Attack on a Hospital Murdering 22 People

A Reuters investigation has revealed that what Israel called “Hamas camera” at Gaza’s Nasser Hospital was actually a Reuters camera. Israeli drones monitored the hospital before and during the deadly attack that killed journalists.

On August 25, Israeli forces struck Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, killing 22 people, including Reuters journalist Hussam al-Masri, AP journalist Mariam Dagga, and freelance journalist Moaz Abu Taha. Israel initially claimed the strike targeted a “Hamas camera” filming troops from the hospital. The investigation found this was false. Masri had positioned his camera on a stairwell for live coverage of Gaza. He routinely covered it with his green-and-white prayer rug to protect it from heat and dust.

Reuters reviewed over 100 videos and photos from the scene and interviewed more than two dozen sources, including Israeli military officials. The investigation confirmed that the camera was visible in drone footage for several days before the attack.

Witnesses said Israeli drones hovered near the hospital entrance for more than ten minutes before the attack. The drones recorded doctors, nurses, journalists, and emergency responders moving on the ground. “They saw us and decided to hit us,” said Dr. Ahmed Abu Ubeid, who was injured in the strike. [MORE]

Trump Murders 4 More Non-White People in a Strike on a Boat He Claims “Entered US Territory” and was “Loaded w/Drugs.” In Reality, It was Off the Venezuela Coast, Far from US Waters, No Proof of Drugs

From [HERE] A day after President Trump informed Congress that the US is in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug cartels, the US carried out yet another strike on a Venezuelan boat in the Caribbean Sea, alleging it was loaded with drugs.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced the attack on social media, claiming the attack on the small boat killed four “narco-terrorists.” President Trump went on to claim, without evidence, that the boat was loaded with enough drugs to kill 25,000 to 50,000 people and was “entering American territory.”

In reality, the boat attacked was off the coast of Venezuela, far from US territorial waters. Secretary Hegseth further claimed that the US had intelligence the four were affiliated with a “designated terrorist organization” but did not specify which nor show the evidence.

The US has attacked multiple Venezuelan boats in recent weeks, with US officials saying the goal of the strikes is regime change in Venezuela as opposed to the war on drugs. Along with the airstrikes of boats, a US destroyer boarded and seized a Venezuelan boat in mid-September, which the Venezuelan government insists was a tuna fishing vessel.

The administration’s strikes are fueling growing opposition within Congress, with ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee Sen. Jack Reed (D – RI) saying the strikes were unconstitutional, and Sen. Rand Paul (R – KY) saying that “blowing them up without knowing who’s on the boat is a terrible policy, and it should end.”

Sen. Jim Risch (R – ID), the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said that he believes Trump is allowed to attack the boats by virtue of “his general powers under the Constitution.” Many in the Senate, however, argue there is a legal process to be followed, and the unilateral attacking of boats isn’t it.

Sen. Mark Kelly (D – AZ) was concerned in particular about the legality of the strikes under international law, wondering of the officers involved in the strikes “What situation did we, did the White House, just put them in?”

Though President Trump informed Congress after the fact of the strikes by way of claiming a general armed conflict, there is as yet no indication Congressional leadership intends to bring the question of the ongoing US strikes to a vote.

Family of Black Man Murdered by a GA Trooper Settles Suit for $6M. Cop Said Andrew Smyrna Drove Towards Him but Video Shows Cop on the Passenger Side. Caucasional "Black" DA Failed to File Charges

ALL TO RECOVER A RECOVER A HERTZ RENTAL CAR THAT WAS NOT STOLEN. The family of a Black man shot and killed by a Georgia State Patrol trooper nearly six years ago has settled an excessive force lawsuit for $6.6 million. The agreement includes a $5.5 million payment by the state of Georgia, the largest settlement reached with the state government in at least 15 years, records show.

Andrew “A.J.” Smyrna, a 32-year-old father of two, was killed Jan. 23, 2020, when a trooper opened fire on the convertible he was driving in Atlanta’s Edgewood neighborhood.

After waiting an entire year for justice, in February 2021 Smyrna's parents found out that the officer, Georgia State Trooper Brandon Byrd would not be charged with any crime.

“After reviewing all of the evidence and also engaging some use-of-force experts, I made the decision there would be no criminal charges brought against Trooper Byrd in the shooting death of Andrew Smyrna,” DeKalb County DA Shirley Boston said (SEE VIDEO). Boston is Black. [MORE] The SNAG’s bio states, she is “among the elite in the world of prosecution as one of the rare 1% of African American females currently serving as district attorney nationwide.” Perhaps by “black” she is only referring to her chromosomes.

Attorneys for the Ellenwood man’s family said former state trooper Brandon Byrd (below) fired nine times, striking Smyrna and another man who were seated inside the rented Chevrolet Camaro.

The incident unfolded on January 23, 2020 when police were in pursuit of Smyrna after believing the vehicle he was driving was stolen. However, it was a properly rented car from Hertz Rental. Smyrna attempted to flee officers when they tried to pull him over before Byrd blocked him in. While Smyrna attempted to flee, Byrd opened fire, dumping at least 9 rounds into the unarmed father, killing him on the spot.

Investigators said Smyrna drove toward Byrd, prompting the trooper to open fire.

However, Byrd was not in his way, and when you watch the video below, it is entirely clear that Byrd was in no danger of being run over at all. He was on the passenger's side of the vehicle, his patrol car was protecting him, and Smyrna was driving away.

Smyrna’s family accurately said the patrolman was never in danger of being struck by the car.

According to the complaint,

‘Defendants Burrell, Rivera, Horton, and Byrd had no information to indicate that the driver or anyone else inside the Camaro had committed or was involved in the commission of any crime.

Defendants Burrell, Rivera, Horton, and Byrd formulated a plan to unlawfully apprehend and arrest the driver and take possession of the Camaro.

Defendants Burrell, Rivera, Horton, and Byrd each understood and agreed that Defendant Byrd and Officer Horton would unlawfully apprehend and arrest Mr. Smyrna once he stopped in DeKalb County.

Defendants Burrell, Rivera, Horton, and/or Byrd followed Mr. Smyrna as he drove the Camaro into DeKalb County and communicated Mr. Smyrna’s movements to the others.

Mr. Smyrna lawfully stopped and parallel parked the Camaro on the side of Leslie Street facing East and exited the vehicle, which Defendants Burrell, Rivera, Horton, and/or Byrd observed and communicated to the others.

Mr. Smyrna re-entered the Camaro and began to leave by making a lawful three-point turn to travel West on Leslie Street, which Defendants Burrell, Rivera, Horton, and/or Byrd observed and communicated to the others.

As Mr. Smyrna was turning to leave, Officer Horton stood on the sidewalk and pointed Trooper Byrd to Mr. Smyrna’s exact location, at which point the Camaro was cross-wise in the middle of Leslie Street facing North as Mr. Smyrna was completing a three-point turn to travel West on Leslie Street.

Trooper Byrd drove his patrol vehicle down the middle of Leslie Street traveling West, accelerated directly toward the Camaro while it was turning to enter Leslie Street and cross-wise in the middle of the street facing North, and then suddenly stopped his patrol vehicle in front of the Camaro and partially blocked its immediate path of travel, thereby causing the front right bumper of the Camaro to strike the front left panel of Trooper Byrd’s patrol vehicle as Mr. Smyrna entered Leslie Street (the “initial seizure”).

Immediately upon impact, Trooper Byrd jumped out of his patrol vehicle which still did not have any emergency equipment activated, and aimed his weapon at Mr. Smyrna; Officer Horton likewise raised his weapon and began running toward the Camaro on foot with his gun trained on Mr. Smyrna which Mr. Smyrna observed.

All windows to the Camaro were up.

Mr. Smyrna backed the Camaro up and carefully turned the vehicle away from Trooper Byrd’s patrol vehicle as he successfully entered Leslie Street and proceeded West.

Within seconds after the initial seizure, Trooper Byrd began shooting and fired a total of nine (9) shots in rapid succession to stop Mr. Smyrna as the Camaro was entering Leslie Street and driving away.

Because Trooper Byrd had not put his patrol vehicle in park, it began rolling away from him when he exited and ultimately struck a parked vehicle on the right side of the road.

At no point was Trooper Byrd or any other person standing in front of the Camaro or otherwise at risk of receiving serious injury as Mr. Smyrna was turning and driving away.

Trooper Byrd fired the first two (2) shots while standing on the front right passenger’s side of the Camaro, seconds after exiting his patrol vehicle which entered the front right passenger’s side windshield; Trooper Byrd fired an additional seven (7) shots into the Camaro from the back passenger’s side and from behind the vehicle, which shots entered the Camaro through the right passenger’s side window, the right side of the canvas convertible top, and the back windshield.

Defendant Rivera began chasing Mr. Smyrna in his unmarked black sedan westbound on Leslie Street.

Defendants Byrd and Horton re-entered their respective patrol vehicles and joined Defendant Rivera’s pursuit of the Camaro down Leslie Street, a curvy and narrow residential street.

Defendants Byrd, Horton, and Rivera violated applicable traffic laws and ordinances and pursued Mr. Smyrna at dangerously high speeds down Leslie Street which well-exceeded the applicable speed limit and which placed him in reasonable apprehension of receiving a violent injury and caused him to crash into trash cans, a parked vehicle, and a brick mailbox before ultimately coming to a stop, at which point Defendants Byrd and/or Horton successfully carried out their plan and physically apprehended and arrested Mr. Smyrna.

Trooper Byrd and Officer Horton allowed Defendant Rivera to freely enter and remain on the scene of an officer-involved shooting entirely unsupervised.

At all times material herein, Defendant Rivera was wearing a vest displaying the word “POLICE” printed in bold yellow letters to misrepresent that he was a law enforcement officer when he was not:

ACCOMPLICE TO MURDER. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINT, Defendant Rivera WORE A VEST STATING THAT HE WAS POLICE, BUT HE IS NOT POLICE.

Mr. Smyrna bled out and died from his fatal gunshot injury.

At the time of Mr. Smyrna’s arrest and shooting death, there existed no actual or arguable probable cause to arrest Mr. Smyrna for any crime.

At the time of Mr. Smyrna’s arrest and shooting death, no Defendant had immediate knowledge of or had observed Mr. Smyrna committing a crime.

At the time of Mr. Smyrna’s arrest and shooting death, no Defendant had sought or obtained an arrest warrant authorizing Mr. Smyrna’s arrest.

At the time of Mr. Smyrna’s arrest and shooting death, the Camaro was not reported stolen in any official law enforcement database, and Defendants Burrell, Rivera, Horton, and Byrd each had knowledge of said fact.’

Willie D: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX All Silent on DIRTY COP Framing Kyren Lacey, PROOF Why Massa' Media Can't Be TRUSTED

Jack-Officer who Shot a Latino Man 13X said ‘He Pointed a Black Gun at My Face and I heard it Go Off,’ but there was No Such Gun and Only Heard Another Cop Firing. Suit Filed Against Tolleson Police

NO REASON TO SHOOT. From [HERE] A West Valley man says he’s lucky to be alive after being shot more than a dozen times by Tolleson police officers, and now he’s planning to sue the city.

Ricky Barron’s attorney, Robert Pastor, said his client is a single father to twin 14-year-old girls and spent two months in the hospital, undergoing multiple surgeries, including amputations.

He’s now in a wheelchair and unable to take care of himself or his daughters on his own.

“He is struggling just to get back up on his own feet, literally,” said Pastor.

On March 28, 32 shots rang out in a matter of seconds, and all of the gunfire came from two Tolleson police officers.

Nearly one minute after the first shot was fired, police body camera video shows an officer pull the trigger again. Barron was unarmed.

“They shot first and asked questions later,” said Pastor, who added that Barron was hit 13 times.

“Where’s the gun at?” asked an officer on body camera footage after the gunfire. “I don’t have one,” replied Barron.

Body camera footage shows paramedics treating Barron on the scene while police search for his weapon.

“I know for a fact he said ‘I have a gun’ and pointed what I thought was a black pistol at me and I heard a pow and a flash,” said an officer on body camera footage.

They never find a firearm.

“Did you hear the gunshot?,” asked one officer on body camera footage. “Yeah,“ replied another officer. ”I heard a gunshot in my face," the first officer said. “Yeah. I heard a pop. A loud pop,” said the other.

Investigators later determined that the loud pop was from an officer’s pistol and that the flash was likely the flashlight on Barron’s cellphone.

It has now been six months since it began, starting the day before, as a shoplifting and stolen license plate investigation.

According to a police report, Tolleson police received a call about a woman stealing two beers from a gas station before getting into a silver Nissan pickup truck.

Officers believe they saw that same truck a few hours later with a stolen license plate, and then early the next morning, Barron borrowed the truck from a friend.

“There’s no evidence that he was involved in that at all,” said Pastor.

Barron is known to law enforcement and has a violent criminal history, but Pastor said his client’s past does not justify excessive force in this case.

“There was no gun. There was no risk of harm and they had no reason to shoot this man at all,” said Pastor. “These two officers acted like judge and jury, and they had no business doing so.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office confirms both officers were cleared of any criminal wrongdoing. They are still employed by the Tolleson Police Department and remain on active-duty status.

Barron is planning to sue the city of Tolleson and the officers involved. He is asking for $135 million to settle, according to the notice of claim obtained by Arizona’s Family.

Pastor said they also plan to file a federal civil rights lawsuit.

Lawsuit Filed Against the Mississippi Capitol Police On Behalf of Jaylen Lewis: 2 Cops Indicted for Manslaughter Shot the 25 Yr Old Black Man to Death after a Traffic Stop

The mother of a 25-year-old Black man who was fatally shot by police is suing the officers involved, the Mississippi Capitol Police and the Mississippi Department of Public Safety, among others.

Arkela Lewis’ son, Jaylen Lewis, was shot by Capitol Police during a traffic stop on Sept. 25, 2022. Two officers involved, Stephen Frederick and Michael Rhinewalt, were indicted for manslaughter in March. Both have entered not guilty pleas and are no longer employed with DPS.

According to the lawsuit, Frederick, Rhinewalt and other Capitol Police officers were conducting a drug operation when they pulled Lewis over. He reversed his car into a police vehicle, and officers opened fire.

“Jaylen (did not) brandish a weapon, reach for a weapon, make any violent gestures, threaten anyone or otherwise take any actions that could reasonably be perceived as endangering officers,” the lawsuit says.

Arkela Lewis, who has spoken out against Capitol Police, is asking the court to force DPS and Capitol Police to adopt a policy that would “prevent future instances of the type of misconduct” that led to her son’s death.

She is also seeking compensation for emotional damages.

Rhinewalt and another Capitol Police officer are also being sued by another woman, Sherita Harris, who says she was shot in the head by Rhinewalt during a pursuit after a traffic stop, also in 2022.

The officers have said the car Harris was in fled after they exited their patrol vehicle, and they heard gunshots from the car as they gave chase, according to court records.

Two officers involved in that shooting, including Rhinewalt, have been indicted on aggravated assault charges. [MORE]

Globocop Trump Unlawfully Deploys Unwanted National Guard to Chicago as a Trump Appointed Federal Judge Declares His Portland Deployment Unconstitutional

President Donald Trump on Saturday authorized the activation of 300 National Guard troops in this city against the Illinois governor’s wishes. The orders came after heavily armed federal agents shot a woman, sparking further clashes between immigration authorities and angry residents.

A federal judge separately barred Trump from sending National Guard troops to Portland, where protesters and federal law enforcement were facing off outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility. The rapidly unfolding events in both cities represented an escalation of weeks of tension between local residents and officials and the Trump administration.

Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said federal agents shot the woman in Chicago during immigration enforcement operations in the city’s Brighton Park neighborhood. [MORE]

Meanwhile a federal judge on Saturday blocked the Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, at least temporarily thwarting President Donald Trump’s push to send the military into Oregon’s biggest city.

Oregon demonstrated that such an action would violate the state’s 10th Amendment right to control its National Guard, U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut, a Trump appointee, wrote in her decision granting a temporary restraining order. [MORE]