Unsealed Documents Reveal that Racist FBI Authorities Surveilled Aretha Franklin Throughout Her Career

From [HERE] The FBI surveilled Aretha Franklin several times throughout her career, primarily in the late ’60s and early ’70s, for her connection to the Black movement, newly unsealed documents reveal.

The FBI documents — which total 270 pages and also feature information regarding death threats to the singer and copyright infringement cases — highlight Franklin’s many performances at the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, of which Dr. Martin Luther King was president.

The shows for the SCLC took place in Atlanta and Memphis between 1967 and 1968 and were labeled as “communist infiltration” events and “a summary of the racial situation in Atlanta, GA” by the FBI. The bureau was concerned that Franklin’s performances at the events “would provide emotional spark which could ignite racial disturbance [in] this area,” due to members of the group that “have supported the militant black power concept.”

Other events Franklin was investigated for included a scheduled Black Panther Party performance, which the singer ultimately skipped due to timing issues but was nonetheless included in the documents. “Bobby Seale, Chairman of the Black Panther Party, has directed the Los Angeles Black Panther Party to initiate plans for a major rally culminating in free food distribution to the poor black people in Los Angeles,” it reads. “Source also advised that Gwen Goodloe wanted to contact Negro singing stars Aretha Franklin and Roberta Flack to possibly assist in the event.”

Elsewhere in the documents, the FBI saw a link between Franklin and the Black Liberation Army after reportedly finding her address in BLA’s organization documents. According to the bureau, the BLA was a “quasi-military group composed of small guerrilla units employing the tactics of urban guerrilla warfare against the established order with a view toward achieving revolutionary change in America.” Due to insufficient evidence, the FBI concluded that Franklin’s association with the BLA could not be determined.

See the court documents in full here.

Black South Carolina Trial Judge Strikes Down "WhichCraft" Law that Forced Death Row Inmates to Choose Between the "Cruel and Unusual Punishments" of Being Murdered by Firing Squad or Electrocution

From [DPIC] A South Carolina trial court has issued an injunction preventing the state from carrying out executions using a firing squad or the electric chair, ruling that those methods violate the state’s constitutional prohibition against “cruel, unusual, and corporal punishments.”

In a 38-page opinion issued September 6, 2022, Richland County Court of Common Pleas Judge Jocelyn Newman (pictured) opinion offered a sweeping condemnation of the state's 2021 method-of-execution statute, which made the electric chair the state’s default method of execution and added the firing squad as a second alternative to lethal injection. The decision came following a week-long trial in a case brought by death-row prisoners Freddie OwensBrad SigmonGary Terry, and Richard Moore that challenged the constitutionality of executions by firing squad or electrocution. Relying upon expert testimony presented in that trial, Newman found that the pain and bodily mutilation caused by electrocution and firing squad were intolerable under the state constitution.

In striking down the law, Judge Newman noted that only one state in the U.S. had carried out any executions by firing squad over the past fifty years and that South Carolina was the only state to have designated the electric chair as the default method of execution. South Carolina, she declared, had “turned back the clock” and “ignored advances in scientific research and evolving standards of humanity and decency.”

A spokesperson for Governor Henry McMaster said that governor disagreed with the court's ruling and would appeal.

Mississippi in Talks with Company to Run Jackson Water System, Mayor Says

From [HERE] The State of Mississippi is now in talks with a private company about managing its capital city’s struggling water system, Jackson Mayor Chokwe A. Lumumba said during a press conference Tuesday. The City of Jackson was also in discussions with the company before the State took over, he added.

“We had been in discussion with a corporation about taking over an operations and maintenance contract, but what I delayed telling you is that conversation stopped because they picked it up with the State,” the mayor told reporters. “So we’ve been unable to reach an agreement with them because we’re no longer at the table to talk about what that agreement would look like.”

Lumumba did not name the company. His remarks came a day after Gov. Tate Reeves, at a separate Labor Day press conference, said he was considering various long-term ideas for addressing Jackson’s water problems and that “privatization is on the table.” 

The Mississippi Free Press asked the mayor’s office for the name of the company with whom the City and State have had discussions, but Jackson Communications Director Melissa Faith Payne said the City was not releasing its name “due to ongoing negotiations.” The City provided no indication of a request-for-proposal process.

Video of Dark Brown Tap Water in Jackson, Mississippi on September 10, 2022

From [HERE] According to ABC News, Approximately 180,000 people in Jackson will go without clean or safe drinking water indefinitely after pumps at the main water treatment plant failed.

Here's the video of the water coming out of the faucet in Jackson, Mississippi.

Jackson has been run by Democrats since 1949. The water system had problems dating from the 1900s to 2005, with Mississippi controlled by Democrats for nearly all of those 105 years. [MORE]

Ad Says John Fetterman Heard a Gunshot and Assumed a Man Jogging by Committed a Crime b/c He Was Black, So He Chased Him 'Ahmad Arbery Style;’ Threatened His Life by Pointing a Gun @ Him/Detained Him

WHEN YOU HEAR THE SOUND OF HOOVES DO YOU THINK OF HORSES OR UNICORNS? RACISTS THINK OF THE LATTER. ? Get Out and Vote for a Stroked Out Racist Suspect Psychopath? Are you fucking crazy?What’s next, jump into the lion’s den at the zoo?

From [HERE] American Leadership Action, a super PAC aligned with Pennsylvania GOP Senate nominee Dr. Mehmet Oz, launched an ad campaign to target his Democrat rival, Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, for a 2013 incident in which he grabbed a shotgun and chased a Black jogger he had wrongly believed was involved in a shooting incident.

The $500,000 ad buy will appear only on stations in Philadelphia and will air on news channels such as MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News as well as other cable networks, the The Philadelphia Inquirer reported Thursday.

In the ad, which started running on Tuesday, the voice-over says Fetterman "chased down an innocent, unarmed Black man."

The incident occurred in 2013 when Fetterman was the mayor of Braddock, Pa., a city in the western part of the state.

Fetterman said at the time that he heard shots near his home and that after rushing his then-4-year-old son into the house and calling the police, he got in his truck and chased the man. He then held the man there, confronting him with a 20-gauge shotgun, until police arrived.

In the advertisement, footage of the jogger, Christopher Miyares, a black mand who had not committed any crime, says Fetterman pointed his gun at his chest, which Fetterman denies.

Fetterman has refused to apologize for the incident and said he was acting in his capacity as his city's chief law enforcement official while responding to a "chaotic" situation. [MORE]

Although elite white media probably wishes it were otherwise, private persons may only make citizens arrest when a crime occurs in their presence or when he/she has a reasonable articulable belief that the suspect committed a crime. It is no defense if a citizen was mistaken - citizens cannot interfere with the freedoms of others by touching, detaining or threatening them. Unlike police, Mayors and other elected puppetcians also have no authority to initiate unprovoked acts of violence on citizens. The media rarely bothers to explain even the most elementary legal concepts in order to promote confusion in furtherance of racism white supremacy and fascism disguised as democracy among other things.

Here, Mr. Fetterman did not see any crime - he merely heard gun shots. Without more information, he also had no idea of whether a crime had been committed because a gun shot could have been made for lawful reasons. Without having a description of the suspects involved, the mere fact that an individual is jogging or running down the street is not a reasonable basis to conclude that said individual probably committed a (unknown) crime.

Mr. Fetterman, who is an elite racist suspect from a very wealthy background, could have been charged with crimes like Ahmad Arbery’s racist killers but we know better. Said alleged conduct of pointing a shotgun at the Black man’s chest was a criminal assault and a felony threat. His unlawful detention of the Black man was a kidnapping or false imprisonment. If a Black man did Fetterman like that . . .

As such, evidence seems to indicate that Mr. Fetterman is a racist until proven otherwise. He assumed the Black man, whom he knew nothing about, was a criminal because of the virus in his mind. As explained by Dr. Amos Wilson, “In the context of White American domination there is no innocent Black male, just Black male criminals who have not yet been detected, apprehended or convicted.” [MORE] Mr. Fetterman’s conduct wasn’t reasonable, it was moronic, perhaps a sign of idiocy; because of a jogger’s skin color he assumed he committed an unknown crime that he believes he heard. At least Arbery’s killers had personal knowledge that a crime had been committed. As explained by Dr. Blind “racism is White Degeneracy wrongly cast as Supremacy.”

White liberals in particular have done quite a mind job on the Black votary and its so-called Black “leadership.” These racist folks pose as our allies but are our permanent enemies. Surely, soon enough this racist suspect and his Black campaign ‘jungle guides’ will be in a Black neighborhood in Philadelphia begging Black people to vote for him. But he has already shown Black people who he really his with this story - his goal, not dissimilar from racist republicans, is to put as many Black people in greater confinement as possible. However, unlike the other ‘white party, Fetterman will pose as our ally and trusted “brother” while doing so. Such a position is the true nature of racism white supremacy - its not weirdos wearing Nazi costumes or Aryan nation drone folks holding torches and chanting slogans or Honkey Kong Trump lovers saying “nigger” over and over. Rather, It’s normal, regular looking white folks like Fetterman, soccer moms, businessman, real estate agents, school teachers etc. who primarily use deception to maintain and refine RWS. Fetterman and many, many other urban white liberals clothe their conduct in political rhetoric about safety and crime. In reality, they only intend to surveil, control and subordinate Black people with their prosecutors, police and jails. If this were not the case then white liberals would be just as willing to heavily tax themselves to provide appropriate funding for education of Black children, adequate housing, medical care, food, job training, economic empowerment etc. as no expense is spared when it comes to police budgets, criminal justice system expenditures and the incarcera­tion of Blacks. [MORE]. Chuck D explained, “It’s high time to cut the leash.” Dr. Wilson, further explains;

“The bane of the African community is the exploitative White American community which projects a so-called civilized, fraternal, egalitarian, liberal face while concurrently seeking to maintain White supremacy. This means that the White American community must maintain African subordination while not appearing to do so. It must cannibalistically sacrifice the vitality, autonomy, and if need be, the life of the African American community while posing as its benefactor and savior. It pleads innocence while washing its hands of the blood of African people. This duplicitous task can only be accomplished by making it appear that the African community is dying of natural causes, not of an ingenious attempt on the part of the White American community to strangle it to death.” [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY

The Electorant – the willfully ignorant electorate—the suckers (voters and “taxpayers”) who delegate and abdicate their power to elected and appointed officials (employees) and the system through which voters’ will is subverted through statutes, laws and policies not approved or even known in the election process. The ‘electorant’ are always ranting and raving about their sordid and assorted conditions when they are responsible for them by being ignorant of the nature of delegated power and its effect, i.e., arbitrary power wielded with impunity and State-sanctioned immunity. The electorant have no recourse but to fuss and talk about change—utterly clueless. All power of the State resides in those who hold the purse strings. Control of the “money” is in the hands of those who further use it to corrupt others in order for one to retain power (dynastic banking cartel families) and the other to remain in power (politician). It is a symbiotic racket and one that continues unabated. (See: Voters, GEO-Dollars, “Monetized Debt,” Federal Reserve System, Willful Ignorance, Political Money, Gangbanking, Elections, MONEY, S&M Banking, Taxpayers, Second Tax, Dumbing-Down, Colonized Mind & Citizens of the United States)

Kevin “Rashid” Johnson - "First Do No Good:" the Hypocritical Oath of Prison Medical Care. It's Not Medical Care but Medical ‘professionals’ who Don’t Care

By [Kevin Rashid Johnson] who is Black prisoner currently being denied cancer treatment at Nottoway, a Virginia state prison. Rashid is a Black Panther, realitarian and writer and artist.

THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH VERSUS THE HYPOCRITICAL OATH

The Hippocratic Oath, often reduced to the four words “First do no harm,” is one of the oldest professional pledges in Western society. Still preserved and taken by medical professionals in various forms today, it is a commitment to provide patients with healing care, to protect their privacy, and so on.

In the profit-driven medical industries of capitalist society the pledge amounts to little more than rhetoric, but even worse is the context of U.S. prisons (the world’s largest prison system) where its purpose is turned in its head to one of “First do no good.”

The grossness of medical neglect and abuse in Amerikan prisons would likely shock many in society, and is such a common condition that almost any case of prisoners’ medical treatment can be given as proof of this inhumane reality. In fact I need look no further for a random example than the prisoner housed in the cell right next to me here at Virginia’s Nottoway Correctional (sic!) Center.

UNTREATED BROKEN BONES AND LOST VISION—THE PRODUCT OF PRISON MEDICAL CARE

My neighbor is Jaxon Chavez Reyes, #1527438. Jaxon has had not one but two recent serious injuries needing medical care, which was essentially not given. As a result he has suffered a now permanently broken jaw and partial blindness in his left eye.

His first injury, a broken jaw, happened on June 27, 2022 while he was playing soccer. Jaxon immediately submitted emergency complaints of needing medical care, and was seen by the prison dentist who examined him and declared she could not treat him. He was sent to an outside hospital for x-rays that confirmed his jaw was broken, but he was returned to the prison without treatment.

It took him and other prisoners complaining that he needed care for his jaw for him to be sent out and admitted to another hospital on July 12, 2022, where he was belatedly scheduled to receive surgery to repair his jaw on July 15, 2022. However, on July 14th, the day before his scheduled surgery, prison officials removed him from the hospital and returned him to prison without treatment.

When he and other prisoners continued protesting his denial and need of care, he was taken back to the hospital two weeks later on August 1, 2022; where doctors told him it was by then too late to treat his broken jaw, since the delays and interruptions in care by the prison and it’s medical staff caused his jaw to progress too far in healing in its broken state, so that now he has been left with an untreated, permanently deformed, and painful jaw.

Jaxon’s second untreated injury is even more egregious, and stems from the disregard and inhumane treatments prisoners suffer as slave laborers. Jaxon works in the prison’s kitchen for only a nominal payment of a few cents per hour. Although he is forced to work with hazardous chemicals and under other dangerous conditions, he and the other prisoner workers receive no protective equipment or gear, and receive no safety or health instructions or precautions, as is given workers in society.

On July 5, 2022, a concentrated chemical degreaser called Native Green was sprayed into his left eye, causing severe irritation, burning, and redness. The warning label on this chemical warns that skin and eye protection should be worn by anyone working with the agent, and a poison control center and emergency care should be immediately consulted should skin or eye contact occur. Also immediate flushing of the affected areas.

When the chemical got into his eye Jaxon immediately sought emergency medical help, but was told by the prison medical staff it was not an emergency, and he was left to merely rinse his own eye with water. Nothing was done to treat his eye or even determine what the chemical was that got in it.

It wasn’t until his eye became blood red, he lost vision in it, and several other prisoners went with him to the medical department to demand care for him that he was sent out to a hospital several days later; where doctors immediately questioned why the prison’s medical staff waited so long to get him to a hospital.

At the hospital he had to wait several hours for the prison to find out and inform the doctors what the chemical was that contaminated his eye. Then came efforts to treat his eye, which yet again was by then too little too late. As a result Jaxon is now partially blind in his left eye.

THIS IS NOT MEDICAL CARE IT’S MEDICAL ‘PROFESSIONALS’ THAT DON’T CARE

Jaxon’s experiences came at the hands of the same prison medical department and staff that has left me with untreated cancer for nearly a year, and untested for over six months after they knew that cancer specific blood tests showed that I likely had cancer. They have been deliberately allowing needless delays in testing and care that will assure the spread and growth of my cancer so that it will almost certainly prove fatal.

We are subjected to extreme suffering and permanent injury, and even murder by medical neglect, at the hands of an indifferent and negligent medical bureaucracy that simply doesn’t care. Many of these prison medical officials are people who cannot find work in society because of lack of professional ethics or concern for patients. In prison jobs they are free to commit the grossest malpractice because the people of color and poor people who are the disproportionate targets of U.S. mass imprisonment are demonized in the public eye, as we have been throughout Amerikan history, so that the public remains indifferent and blinded to our exploitation and brutality at the hands of this profit-driven system. This is the basis of the hypocritical standard of harm we suffer at the hands of the prison medical industry. An industry that, like the public medical industry, must be dismantled and replaced with one that is people-and not profit-centered.

Dare to Struggle Dare to Win!
All Power to the People! [MORE]

Affirmative Auction: CoinOperated BlackStabber Stephen A Smith Puts-Down Tiger Woods to Big-Up Serena Williams and Define "Blackness" for His Masters During a MasaBaiting' Session In the Spectacle

Above SNigger Stephon A. Smith always whoring well for racism white supremacy.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

blackstabbers – flunkey buck-dancing and sniggering Negroes who multiply their trinkets by carrying out division amongst their own people. Blackstabbers typically come in the form of “trusted” friends who work as spies and agent provocateurs for the FBI. Blackstabbers were bountiful during the FBI’s COINTELPROgram. FBI’s domestic spying budget has increased and so have the bucket-mouth Negro flunkeys and Snigger operatives. The names and dirty deeds of Blackstabbers and their families will be enshrined, dishonored and disgraced (posthumously and currently) in the soon-to-be erected African-American Hall of Shame. The website will have pictures, linking evidence and biographies. Sing!! “They smile in your face—plotting to turn on their race—the blackstabbers.” With credits and apologies to the good O’Jays. (See: Sniggers, Coin-Operated, Sambo, Black Flask Brigade, UNCLE TOM & Piece-Activist)

Affirmative auction – $N1gg3rs on the block doing the moneywalk—Negroes up for sale—totally Souled-Out of their minds. Your brain must be clean because it has been truly whitewashed. “Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.” ~Martin L. King, Jr. (See: Black Conservative, Coin-Operated & Sambo)

analogy – comparisons via abstractions. Analogies are best served to convey an experience, not to make a comparison.

comparison – a disease of the mind due to the ignorance of uniqueness. 2) the endless swing of the clash of opposites fueled by the perpetual motion of the mind-pendulum within the mind governed by the separate sense of self. Each individual is unique and beyond the scope of comparison. Those who fall victim to comparison will either become egoistic or bitter. You don’t belong to any hierarchy—nobody is lower or higher than what “you” imagine yourself and “others” to be. Comparison creates differences or distinctions only when there is not uniformity. Comparison limits the possibility of living in the moment. Academic studies of reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum depicts the greatest activation of the brain’s rewards centers depends crucially on a comparison which the rewards received by others, further demonstrating that the pain of having less is greater than the pleasure of having more. In life’s division of spoils, if you have less comparatively, no matter how much you do have, you still recoil. (See: Judgment, Discernment, Joo-Joo, Problems, Moment, Running Man, Surrender, Subcess, Value, Success, Contentment, Exchange Value, Choice, Decision- Making, Ego-Self, Intellect, Yoodoo, Pain, Suffering, Envy, Jealousy, Ego, Uniqueness, Awareness & Compassion)

The Spectacle – a constructed reality; the concrete inversion of life; via the autonomous movement of the apparently non-living. 2) the mirrorization of the noumenon into the phenomenal universe without understanding or overstanding it as such an objectivization in duality. The Spectacle is not a collection of images but a social relation among people mediated by images. The Spectacle is a theoretical construct—a tool for explaining many things about society; how people live vicariously through the dominant images of production, consumption and power relations. It is the thoughtforms in which people create, contemplate and consume mediated by images of what-life-is, so that they will forget how to live radically for themselves. It is the totality of images and illusions that alienate people from living, its the primary production of modern societies. It is ideology materialized. It is the social relations that are mediated by the mass media; it is what makes people apathetic and reduces them to inactivity. It is what prevents people from realizing what their collective problems are and dissolving them. It is what perpetually absorbs people into activities that prolong their misery. It is the mediated stream of unreality that channels desire-energy against itself, producing a separate world, a pseudo-world apart form one’s self-history—from all those powerful institutions of Self-actualization. It is what motivates people to live a pseudo-life in submission to products and machines, basking passively in the acceptance of oppression, to blindly do what is manifestly against their own self-interest, to pollute the land they love and the air they breathe—it is a fundamental sickness of modern societies superimposed over and aided by the “Rolebots” (clones and drones) of Corporate State. It is the mass media and the propaganda from the pure war machine and the military prison industrial police state complex. It is Doggy, the double-bind of not knowing real from unreal, (hypereal) or what you say from what you want. It is the mass objectivization and unholy marriage (union) of the Beasthood with the Syndrome, leaving people fragmented, separated, isolated, alienated, fascinated, pixelated, dilated, intimidated, exasperated, mediated, concatenated, weak, docile, dependent, submissive and uncritical. “The Spectacle is the ultimate commodity in that it makes all others possible.” ~Scott Bukatman. “Without the slightest hint of suppression or intolerance, the spectacle ensures that the appearance of real dissent precludes its real appearance.” ~Sadie Plant. (See: PIC, Commodity, Screen, Maya, Pseudolife, The Passing Show, Rolling Mirror, MEDIA, Materialism, Funktionalize, F-Prime, Meta-Frame, Naïve Realism, “Dream,” Trance, Emergency, Consumers & Doggy)

If a “Public Servant” Has Uncontrollable Authority Over His Master is He Still a Servant? Cops Brutalize and Mock Latino Man for Failure to Comply During a Beer Can Stop in Liberal, White San Rafael

FUNKTIONARY explains ‘Authority and freedom cannot co-exist. If a “public servant," such as a police officer, is uncontrollable, unaccountable, can’t be hired or fired by you, has irresponsible power over you and provides a compulsory “service” then he is actually your Master. Lysander Spooner, stated “It is of no importance that I appointed him, and put all power in his hands. If I made him uncontrollable by me, and irresponsible to me, he is no longer my servant, agent, attorney, or representative. If I gave him absolute, irresponsible power over my property, I gave him the property. If I gave him absolute, irresponsible power over myself, I made him my master, and gave myself to him as a slave. And it is of no importance whether I called him master or servant, agent or owner.

The rebel Larken Rose explains,

“Contrary to what nearly everyone has been taught to believe, “government” is not necessary for civilization. It is not conducive to civilization. It is, in fact, the antithesis of civilization. It is not cooperation, or working together, or voluntary interaction. It is not peaceful coexistence. It is coercion; it is force; it is violence. It is animalistic aggression, cloaked by pseudo-religious, cult-like rituals which are designed P make it appear legitimate and righteous. It is brute thuggery, disguised as consent and organization. It is the enslavement of mankind, the subjugation of free will, and the destruction of morality, masquerading as “civilization” and “society.” The problem is not just that “authority” can be used for evil; the problem is that, at its most basic essence, it is evil. In everything it does, it defeats the free will of human being controlling them through coercion and fear. It supersedes and destroys moral consciences, replacing them with unthinking blind obedience. It cannot be used for good, any more than a bomb can be used to heal a body. It is always aggression, always the enemy of peace, always the enemy of justice. The moment it ceases to be an attacker, it ceases to fit the definition of “government.” It is, by its very nature, a murderer and a thief, the enemy of mankind, a poison to humanity. As dominator and controller, ruler and oppressor, it can be nothing else.

The alleged right to rule, in any degree and in any form, is the opposite of humanity. The initiation of violence is the opposite of harmonious coexistence. The desire for dominion is the opposite of love for mankind. Hiding the violence under layers of complex rituals and self-contradictory rationalizations, and labeling brute thuggery as virtue and compassion, does not change that fact. Claiming noble goals, saying that the violence is “the will of the people,” or that it is being committed “for the common good” or “for the children,” cannot change evil into good. “Legalizing” wrong does not make it right. One man forcibly subjugating another, no matter how it is described or how it is carried out, is uncivilized and immoral. The destruction it causes, the injustice it creates, the damage it

does to every soul that it touches – perpetrators, victims, and spectators alike-cannot be undone by calling it “law,” or by claiming that it was necessary. Evil, by any name, is still evil.

The ultimate message here is very simple. All of recorded history screams it, yet few have, until now, allowed themselves to hear it. That message is this:

If you love death and destruction, oppression and suffering, injustice and violence, repression and torture, helplessness and despair, perpetual conflict and bloodshed, then teach your children to respect “authority:’ and teach them that obedience is a virtue.

If, on the other hand, you value peaceful coexistence, compassion and cooperation, freedom and justice, then teach your children the principles of self-ownership, teach them to respect the rights of every human being, and teach them to recognize and reject the belief in “authority” for what it is: the most irrational, self-contradictory, anti-human, evil, destructive and dangerous superstition the world has ever known. “ [MORE]

Liberal NYC Chills the "Free Speech" of Black Protest by Failing to Prosecute Any Cops who Violently Silenced Protestors in 2020. DA Dismisses its Only Case Against a Cop Who Pushed Woman to Concrete

From [HERE] The lone NYPD officer criminally charged in connection with use of force during the 2020 George Floyd protests will have the charges dismissed after he completes conflict-resolution training and other measures, according to a disposition reached Thursday.

The dependent media explained “the outcome in Brooklyn Criminal Court means the case against officer Vincent D’Andraia will be dismissed and sealed in six months if he stays out of trouble.” On video the large white authoritarian shoved Dounya Zayer, a small woman, like an offensive lineman pulling on a running play and caused her to hit her head against the street. He yelled out loud, “fucking bitch” while he did so. Said massa’ media pretends that Dounya Zayer is the only victim in this matter. The dependent media also falsely pretends that persons harmed by crimes like Zayer make prosecutorial decisions about what crimes to charge, what sentence to request or what pea deals to offer. The liberal media explains

“prosecutors with the office of Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez said Zayer “had chosen the restorative justice approach, focusing more on repairing harm than on doling out discipline.”  “Based on her beliefs, [she] went through the restorative justice process, which allowed the defendant to take the classes and to do what was necessary to make amends for what happened there,” Assistant District Attorney Daphney Gachette said in Brooklyn Supreme Court on Thursday.”

Said statements are inaccurate and mischaracterizations. Sometimes “victims” are given input in the prosecutorial decision making process but only when authorities request it. The restorative justice was a choice presented to her by authorities among other specific options they believed to be acceptable. Such prosecutorial decisions are made in accordance with the priorities and goals they set for themselves and upon their value choices. As explained by Professor Angela Davis, “Like the charging decision, the plea bargaining process is controlled entirely by the prosecutor and decisions are entirely within her discretion. A criminal defendant cannot plead guilty to a less serious offense unless the prosecutor decides to make a plea offer. While the defense attorney may attempt to negotiate the best possible offer, the decision is ultimately left to the prosecutor's discretion.” [MORE] There is also little a judge can do where a prosecutor decides to withdraw its own prosecution.

Importantly, the white liberal media and its prosecutors have decontextualized this matter by pretending that the harm done here was done primarily to Ms. Zayer. A mainstream media outlet called “The City” stated, “A Brooklyn law enforcement source said the resolution and penalty in the case were not unusual for third degree assault by a person with no prior criminal history.”

Dr. Amos Wilson and Neely Fuller explain that decontextualization is a most effective deception in the system of racism white supremacy. Dr. Wilson states,

The bane of the African community is the exploitative White American community which projects a so-called civilized, fraternal, egalitarian, liberal face while concurrently seeking to maintain White supremacy. This means that the White American community must maintain African subordination while not appearing to do so. It must cannibalistically sacrifice the vitality, autonomy, and if need be, the life of the African American community while posing as its benefactor and savior. It pleads innocence while washing its hands of the blood of African people.

Here, by focusing on Ms. Zayer we are led to believe that the only real harm done was to one white lady and dismissal of the charges is the remedy she wanted, so case closed. (Let’s be clear here; when we say liberal NYC we mean that NYC is a mecca for democrats, liberals, gays and Blacks. In fact, there are more Blacks and gays in NYC than in any other US city. Democrat authorities control all levels and branches of NYC government.)

Although liberal authorities and their media treat the incident with Ms. Zayer like a common assault that occurred between two citizens in front of a 7-11, in real life it involved a police officer and a citizen during a nationwide wave of ongoing political protest and riots over the police murders of George Floyd and others. Said protest occurred in front of a captive tv audience during bogus COVID shelter in place lockdowns. In most places authoritarians treated protesters like criminals. According to the CCRB, at least 318 complaints were made against NYPD officers for misconduct during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Of those, the CCRB has recommended the highest level of discipline, which includes suspension or termination, against 47 officers and less severe discipline for 33 others. Only 3 were disciplined and as stated, none were prosecuted. [MORE] In the context of reality the individual remedy for Ms. Zayer was provided to her in tort law. Accordingly, she filed a lawsuit against the NYPD which was settled for $387,000 earlier this year under an agreement that compelled Officer D’Andraia to pay $3,000 out of his own pocket as well.

The crime is against the public, particularly Black people and those who protest against authority and racism. The harm done to Black protesters and individuals who consider engaging in protest against police brutality in the future is real; where authorities choose not to hold police accountable after they violently silence the speech of protesters, they officially encourage the cops’ right to remain violent and chill so-called “1st Amendment rights.” The message from authorities to Blacks and Latinos is, ‘if you protest against police brutality we can degrade and harm you and nothing will be done about it.’ The message from massa’ media is ‘when authority brutalizes you during protest we will make sure said white lawlessness is understood as nothing other than public order.’

In the context of reality, last week liberals in NY made it unlawful to carry or bear arms during any kind of political protest no matter the location. As such, citizens wishing to protest against police brutality also have no meaningful right to defend themselves against the unlawful conduct of cops like Officer Vincent D’Andraia. The undeceiver Jeremy Locke states,

“The objective of the control of speech is making sure that those who were compelled to bend to the will of authority never gain the courage to look back.”

FUNKTIONARY describes the situation where you only have adherent rights which can be turned on and off like a light switch by authorities and where you are prohibited by authorities from defending yourself is totalitarianism, a form of reverse terrorism in a fascist society disguised as a democracy. FUNKTIONARY further states,  “totalitarian Patriotism – terrified silence created through the suppression of principled cognitive dissent under the First Amendment and the Declaration of Independence. 2) allowing the officers of so-called “government” to become free from the limits of law.”

It is a shame that Black psheep go on enthusiastically supporting white liberals as they go about destroying various freedoms and devaluing black life right in their faces. The right to protest and to carry and bear arms in case of public confrontation and to prevent tyranny are unalienable rights that have even less meaning in NYC and many other liberal places where Blacks live.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” The Declaration of Independence quoted in FUNKTIONARY

The message to liberals and their government should be FUCK WHITE SUPREMACY and FUCK AUTHORITY.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Psheep – the silence of the lames. 2) people as the mass herd-sheep (the “P” is as silent as the sleepwalking psheople are). 3) the assembled masses. 4) the couch-bound talk-show vortexed voyeurz. The Psheep Song: Sing along—Some contemplate their navel, others contemplate their gold—some stray to other pastures, while most stay within the fold. (See: Mass, Sheople, Groupentity, WASSUP, Sheep, Thoughtforms, Religion, Absolute Truth, Finitude & Reification)

lawless society – a socio-juristic human-relation configuration where law is upheld, codified, and deified over humanity. If you fear or worry about its advent, you’ll certainly never recognize its presence. 2) a Police State of the Overruling Class.

In a Credibility Contest btw an Accused White Cop and 5 Black Witnesses who Will a Jury of White Sheeple Believe? Wichita Cop Not Liable After Shooting Black Marine to Death in Front of His Family

An experienced trial attorney will tell you that it is very difficult to get a white juror to believe a white cop is lying, especially if the client is Black.  Reality or anything too real (such as racism) in court is simply unbelievable to judges and jurors in the fake world created in court. Many cops are sophisticated, masterful liars who are taught how to testify and create persuasive, detailed police reports. Mixing actual facts with nonsense sounds & looks real in court. White DA's, judges, jurors and the white media are also eager and programmed to believe anything foul cops say about Blacks. A testilying racist suspect cop only needs to presents facts in accord with the appetite of the racist suspect listener, not in accord with actual reality. 

In a case that concerns whether use of force was reasonable, like this one, the evidence simply consisted of a credibility contest between a sworn white police officer and several Black adult witnesses. According to news reports from the white media the accused cop never explained how exactly he faced imminent danger from the Black man who had a pocket knife down at his side. All he had to say was ‘a shirtless, muscular, Black marine with an aggressive look in his eye was coming toward me.’ Why would a cop make it up? Because white sheeple will believe it and use their imaginations to fill in the details. As explained by Osho Rajineesh, 'A mind that is filled with belief is a mind which can project anything according to that belief.' And most whites believe Black men are inherently criminal or a threat to their existence.

WHITE COPS’ PHOTO HIDDEN BY WHITE MEDIA TO PROTECT THE SYSTEM OF AUTHORITY AND RACISM/WHITE SUPREMACY. From [HERE] A white Wichita police officer was acting in self defense when he shot and killed a 26-year-old Marine veteran in front of the man’s family eight years ago, a jury decided Wednesday.

The family of Icarus Randolph had sued the officer, Ryan Snyder, and the city of Wichita seeking $5 million for wrongful death and other allegations in the July 4, 2014 shooting.

But an eight-day trial ended Wednesday afternoon when a jury took less than an hour to find in favor of the officer.

“I wish I could say I was amazed or shocked,” said William Skepnik, lead attorney for the family. “It’s hard for me to not see a racial component in this. I do not believe that a white man or a white family would have been treated this way. These people were treated as people that don’t matter.”

Steven Pigg, lead attorney for the officer and city, said: “The jury system works. ... This is justice.”

Over the course of the past week, the jury heard accounts from family members who witnessed the fatal shooting and from Snyder, the crisis intervention-trained officer who shot Randolph four times in the chest after he used a Taser on him.

Randolph’s mother, Beverly Allen, called 911 in the afternoon to request mental health treatment for her son, who suffered from PTSD after serving as an infantry rifleman in Iraq for three years. Randolph had been hospitalized two months earlier for a similar episode. The family believed loud fireworks on the night of July 3 triggered his PTSD.

Snyder and fellow Wichita officer Danny Brown were talking with family members in front of the house when they heard a loud bang from inside. Randolph then kicked through a sliding screen in the den doorway and emerged into the front yard.

Exactly how events unfolded in the next five to seven seconds varies based on who’s giving the account.

Everyone agreed Randolph was shirtless and wearing camouflage Marine capris. They agreed he was holding a pocket knife with an almost 4-inch blade by his side — the same knife he had been holding in his hand since he woke up that morning.

The white cops told the white jury that a shirtless, muscular Black man had an “aggressive” look in his eyes and “zeroed in” on Snyder, power-walking directly toward him with tensed muscles and clenched fists.

In direct contrast Randolph’s family members said he was staring off into the distance with an unfocused gaze and walking slowly toward a neighbor’s house with the knife at his side when Snyder moved into his path and initiated contact, first deploying his Taser and then switching to his handgun when Randolph continued to advance.

Randolph’s face was blank, sister Elisa Allen testified. “Like he was looking at something that wasn’t even there.”

Neither Snyder nor Brown issued verbal commands to Randolph before Snyder shot him. He was not suspected of any crimes. While it is clear that the white officer wanted him stop walking in his front yard, It’s not clear how exactly the officer was facing an imminent threat of death when he shot him to death. Clearly, he was not under arrest.

“It wasn’t just a head in the clouds situation. It was a determined assault situation,” Snyder testified.

Snyder said he remembers pointing his Glock 17 only at Randolph that day and that Randolph’s mother, sisters, nieces and nephews were comfortably outside of the line of fire when he shot. [he only remembers that he didn’t do anything unlawful. lol]

The family says Elisa Allen was standing directly behind her brother when Snyder fired his weapon and that he then pointed it at Randolph’s mother when she tried to approach her son after the shooting.

Snyder told the jury he was 5 to 7 feet from Randolph and backpedaling when he shot him with both the Taser and the handgun. Brown told police investigators the day of the incident that Snyder and Randolph were 10 to 15 feet apart.

Sedgwick County District Attorney Marc Bennett, a racist suspect (pictured above) decided in 2014 not to pursue criminal charges against Snyder, a 17-year veteran of the Wichita Police Department who is now a community police officer in northeast Wichita.

In what has been a seven-year court battle, the civil lawsuit was reopened in 2020 after the Kansas Court of Appeals reversed a Sedgwick County District Court’s dismissal of it.

The trial, in 18th Judicial District Court Judge Deborah Hernandez Mitchell’s courtroom, was delayed more than three months after lawyers representing the city claimed news coverage of the Wichita Police Department’s racist text messaging scandal, first reported by The Eagle, would “inject race” into the killing of Randolph, a Black man.

THANKS FOR SERVICE NGHR. “He wanted to serve his country. He felt it was the right thing to do,” Elisa Allen said.

He didn’t like to talk much about his three years in Iraq, even to his closest family members.

“He felt uneasy about the things he participated in (in Iraq) that didn’t sit right with his soul,” Ida said.

When he was experiencing an acute PTSD episode, he would sometimes go “catatonic,” family testified, saying July 4, 2014 was one such day when he remained in an unresponsive stupor as they tried to assess his wellbeing.

July 4

In a 911 call seeking an ambulance to take her son to Ascension Via Christi St. Joseph for mental health treatment, Beverly Allen told dispatch Randolph had something in his hand but that he didn’t have a weapon. Pigg argued that officers may have handled the entire call differently if they had been aware Randolph had a knife before he emerged from the house.

“I certainly didn’t want a confrontation with police with my son in that state,” said Beverly Allen, who watched a Wichita police officer fatally shoot her father in front of the family home when she was 7 years old.

“I seen my brother fall and I seen him die with his face in the dirt,” Alford said.

“We have to live with, we made the call that killed him,” sister Ida Allen said.

No Right to Be Left the Fuck Alone in Free Range Prison: LAPD Shot a Black Man in the Back as He Walked Down the Street Holding a Car Part, Threatening Nobody. White Liberal Media Analyze the Car Part

From [HERE] and [HERE] When two Los Angeles police officers confronted Jermaine Petit on an evening in July, one of them quickly realized that reports Petit was carrying a gun were inaccurate.

“It’s not a gun, bro,” the officer told his partner about the metallic object in Petit’s hand, according to video of the incident from officers’ body-worn cameras that the Los Angeles Police Department made public Thursday.

But that realization wouldn’t matter. Less than half a minute later, Petit would be shot multiple times by an LAPD sergeant firing from inside his vehicle and the officer’s partner, who failed to hear the warning that Petit was unarmed, according to the videos and information released by the department.

Petit was taken to a hospital with serious injuries but has since been released, according to this family. No officers were injured.

On July 18, a man called 911 to report he had confronted a man who appeared homeless and was behind his house in the city’s Leimert Park neighborhood, according to the recordings released by the LAPD. The man refused to leave and had pulled a “pistol” on him, the homeowner said.

Officers were dispatched and, as they were looking for the man, another 911 caller said an armed man was walking up Degnan Boulevard, just north of Obama Boulevard. A short time later, two officers pulled up alongside Petit, who matched the description the callers had given, as he walked on Obama Boulevard. The LA Times misleads here to rationalize or normalize cop conduct- cops don’t answer 911 calls. They receive info from dispatch. At any rate, all law enforcement must seek to corroborate details in order to establish probable cause or reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion otherwise they cannot stop, search or arrest- if cops get a call for a fat, old white man wearing a tuxedo with white a beard stealing a car when they come upon a suspect they must corroborate said details and determine whether a crime is occurring right now in this moment and whether he is involved in it, that is, if you believe in such things. Actually, lets go over their statist truths here just for kicks:

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, although only one sentence long, protects people against unjustified detentions by the government. It reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In order for the police to stop you the Supreme Court has ruled that police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and the person detained is involved in the activity

In order to frisk you the Supreme Court has ruled that the police must have independent reasonable articulable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous before they may touch you (a cursory patdown for weapons). Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. [MORE]

Clearly these rules are only intended for white people. Non-whites are stopped, shot and then frisked because they are Non-white. This does not happen to white folks. It happens to Black and Latino people regardless of income, education, political affiliation or skin color.

Of course police cannot stop people because they have unknown black objects in their hand. There is no black object exception to so-called 4th Amendment - but racists might disagree with regard to stopping Blacks.]

The officer riding in the passenger seat quickly got out of the vehicle and ordered Petit to “come here.”

Petit continued walking away on the sidewalk, nervously turning back every few steps while repeating something unintelligible without stopping, the video shows. Again, the LA Times reporter misleads - if there is no reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion to stop the Black man then police cannot lawfully stop him. Question here is, when they ordered him to stop, did the cops have articulable reasons to believe he had committed a crime? If so, what crime?

The officer walked after him with his gun drawn, telling him repeatedly to “take your hands out of your pockets, bro,” while his partner, who was identified by the LAPD as Officer Daryl Glover, drove ahead and stopped beside Petit, according to the video.

Glover exited the vehicle and, as he was pointing his weapon at Petit from a few feet away, the first officer told him that the object in Petit’s hand was not a gun.

The two officers broke into a jog to follow Petit and Glover asked, “What is — bro, you said it’s not a gun?”

The officer’s response was muffled and Glover didn’t hear it. “Huh?” he asked. So the cop was informed it was not a gun - that’s what he actually heard.

Immediately after the exchange, Glover shouts at Petit, “Hey, drop it!.” About three seconds later, the first of three shots were fired.

The videos released by the LAPD do not make clear who fired the first shot. In the days following the shooting, the LAPD said that two officers had fired their weapons, and identified them as Glover and Sgt. Brett Hayhoe, a supervisor who had arrived at the scene as Glover and his partner were chasing after Petit.

With regard to the possession of guns by Black people the bottom line here is that blacks are prohibited from possessing guns in the system of racism white supremacy. Whether the black individual posed a threat or possessed it unlawfully or lawfully is beside the point; no guns allowed for blacks. Any black person in possession of a gun or a black object in their hand or physically near a gun or black object or any black person says they ‘have a gun,’ can be executed anytime by cops. Particularly white liberal citizens, media and professionals in white liberal cities like LA, DC, Chicago, NYC, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Seattle and many more go on enforcing their hypocrisy of white lawlessness as law and order. Apparently, they just hope sleeping Blacks never notice.

In response to questions from The Times, Capt. Kelly Muniz, a department spokeswoman, clarified that Hayhoe fired first, shooting Petit while he was still inside his vehicle. Glover then fired. It is not clear from the videos if Hayhoe or Glover shot twice. The fact that Hayhoe fired from his vehicle was first reported by Sahra Sulaiman, a writer for StreetsBlog L.A.

As Petit writhed on the ground and moved his arm, Glover and his partner yelled at him to “Stop moving!” and “Stop reaching for it!” in reference to the magical black object he had been carrying. Hayhoe exited his vehicle and ordered the officers to back up and take cover behind a car.

The object was a black metal “latch actuator,” a part of a car door’s locking mechanism, which is shaped somewhat like a small handgun.

The case garnered attention after a police spokesman at a news conference the night of the shooting lied and said Petit had been carrying a “weapon” and then Police Chief Michel Moore corrected the obviously false claim the following day, saying Petit was holding the car part.

Anger flared again at a virtual community meeting several weeks later, which was cut short after a police captain lied again and said Petit was carrying as a “nonfunctioning firearm.”

Before the release of the video, relatives and friends of Petit had spent weeks pressing the Police Department for more information about the case, which has received attention on social media and among elected officials. Congresswoman and mayoral candidate Karen Bass said in a post on her Facebook page that the reports surrounding the shooting were “increasingly alarming,” while calling for a “full and transparent” investigation.

Police are seeking a misdemeanor charge of possession of an imitation weapon to be filed against Petit. A spokesman for the city attorney’s office said Thursday that a decision had not been made on whether to prosecute Petit.

The LAPD’s decision to pursue a criminal case has drawn strong condemnations from neighbors, activists and academics, who see the department’s response as an attempt to deflect scrutiny from its officers’ actions.

Nichole Jones, the mother of Petit’s daughter, said Petit is an Air Force veteran.

Another Video Catches White and Black High School Students Mocking the Police Murder of George Floyd. Blindly Obedient Drone Kids Act Out Master-Servant Roles as Conditioned in MI Public Fool System

From [HERE] “I can’t believe kids are doing this,” parent Jaimie Nasceif told local outlet Fox 2 Detroit. “I think it’s ridiculous and something completely unacceptable.”

According to Fox 2, the video was recorded during an off-campus breakfast in August for players from Stevenson High School’s football team.

In the video, reposted to Instagram earlier this week by @metrodetroitnarc, white ninth-grade students in football jerseys stand in a circle on an outdoor patio. They surround a Black student, who kneels on the ground. The Black student wears all black clothing, except for a cloth that acts as a blindfold, and he places his hands behind his back as if he’s been arrested. The white students point water guns at him.

“I dare you to shoot him,” one of the white students says.

The white students shout a noise resembling a gunshot and tell the Black student to fall to the ground. One of the students even pushes him as a signal to fall.

“Shoot him in the head,” a student says after the Black child hits the ground.

Then, the circle of boys pretend to stomp and kick him while laughing. One of the white teammates tells the Black student to “go back to Africa.”

In a separate clip, white football players with water guns approach a Black teammate outside. (It is unclear if he is the same football player from the previous scenario.) They holler at him to “stop resisting” while pointing their guns. Then, one of the white students ends the fake arrest by tackling the Black kid.

At the video’s conclusion, someone within the group mentions George Floyd.

After the video circulated on social media, Stevenson High School Principal Kenneth L. Cucchi III told parents that it was inspired by a TikTok trend “based on the tragic death of George Floyd,” Detroit Metro Times reported. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY

Public schools - the instrument of Hidalgo (the "Greater System") and the "State" whereby readers, writers and counters are produced who are certified as qualified to understand orders and obediently carry them out... the tenth gang-plank of the Communist Manifesto. (See: Compulsory Schooling, Indoctrination & Formal Education)

Public Fool System - a place where children are having unprotected education. 2) a syndromatic exercise in conformity and blind obedience to so-called "authority" (disguised repression). 3) systematic planned violence meted out on children and young adults—held hostage and hostile—daily, hourly, quarantined from the natural rhythm of things in life through Pavlovian bells and shrink-wrapped prefabricated and curriculum and distorted history. 4) a training boot camp for life-long slavery and indentured servitude to gangbankers and the Corporate State in a society created and based in violence, governed by fear, propaganda, psychogenic money and power. [MORE]

NY AG Fines Keller Williams Reality for Steering White Property Buyers Away from Black/Latino Areas and Directed Non-Whites into Areas with Fewer White Residents

From [HERE] After being accused of racial discrimination, three Long Island brokerages are to pay $115,000 in a settlement with New York State.

According to an announcement from the New York State Attorney General’s office released on Tuesday, Keller Williams Greater Nassau, Keller Williams Realty Elite, and Laffey Real Estate will pay the penalty as part of a settlement. The three brokerages were implicated for racial discrimination in a Newsday investigation in 2019. The New York Office of the Attorney General opened an investigation into these brokerages and several others after the Newsday exposé.

“Efforts to discriminate against any New Yorker’s fair access to housing cannot, and will not, be tolerated,” Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “These investigations have uncovered a pervasive culture of allowing unlawful discrimination and violations of every New Yorker’s right to fair housing. These settlements should send a clear message: if you discriminate and deny New Yorkers their basic right to housing, we will take action.”

According to the release, the penalties will fund fair housing training for agents and the enforcement of fair housing laws in Suffolk and Nassau Counties on Long Island. Laffey will pay $30,000 to the state and $35,000 to Suffolk County to conduct unannounced fair housing training of any Laffey agent at any Laffey Branch. Both Keller Williams franchises are required to pay $25,000 to Suffolk County and spend $25,000 on fair housing training for its agents, according to the attorney general’s office.

“Real estate professionals in New York state have an obligation to provide fair and equitable services to all,” Robert J. Rodriguez, New York’s Secretary of State, said in a statement. “Housing discrimination is illegal, and the Department will not tolerate New Yorker’s rights being violated. This comprehensive fair housing settlement demonstrates that New York’s leadership is making sure every New Yorker has equal access to housing. The penalties and agreements with these real estate companies educate their agents about housing laws to ensure New Yorkers are protected.” 

Discrimination uncovered by Newsday

The discriminatory practices were discovered in a 2019 Newsday investigation. The publication found that “numerous” Long Island real estate agents tried to steer white property buyers away from minority neighborhoods, and directed minorities into areas with fewer white residents.

As part of the investigation, actors went into real estate offices posing as prospective homebuyers. Diane Leyden, a manager at Laffey Real Estate in Great Neck, was captured on a hidden camera steering a actor posing as a Hispanic homebuyer away from whiter areas, and lecturing him on viewing properties outside of his budget, without any insight into his finances. On the other hand, in Leyden’s interactions with a white actor, she was seen not offering any of the same warnings on budgeting, and guiding the buyer towards whiter neighborhoods.

“Do you want your kids to be in school with kids that they relate to?” she asked the white actor, according to the attorney general’s investigation.

Another Laffey broker, Nancy Anderson, asked a Black actor for proof that he had been pre-approved for a mortgage before agreeing to show him any properties, a step she did not make any white actors take.

Over at the Keller William franchises, the investigation stated that agent Le-Ann Vicquery of steering a Black homebuyer into the minority neighborhood of Brentwood, while warning a white tester to research gang violence in the neighborhood.

As a result of the Newsday investigation, Vicquery and 22 other agents were sued by the New York Department of State. After initially winning her case, Vicquery ended up having her real estate license suspended for 30 days after the state won an appeal.

The majority of the brokers named in the investigation have not admitted to any wrongdoing. When asked to appear at a New York State Senate hearing in December 2019, only one of the 68 agents asked agreed to appear. In addition, the Keller Williams branches have strongly denied that they ever steered anyone away from certain neighborhoods based on their race.

Keller Williams Greater Nassau, Keller Williams Realty Elite, and Laffey Real Estate had not returned requests for comment by the time of publication.

Court Overturns Ohio Death Sentence After a Racist Defense Expert Testified that 'One Quarter of Black Men were sociopaths who Should be Locked Up or Thrown Away'

From [DPIC] A federal appeals court in Ohio has overturned the death sentence imposed on an African American defendant whose defense lawyer presented testimony from a clinical psychologist that one quarter of urban Black men were sociopaths who should be locked up or thrown away. 

In a unanimous ruling on August 22, 2022, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the “racialized testimony” offered by a defense expert at the trial of Malik Allah-U-Akbar (pictured) “offends the Constitution on its face” and that Akbar’s defense counsel was ineffective in presenting it to the jury. The court, which referred to Akbar by his prior name, Odraye Jones, ordered that Akbar be granted a new sentencing trial. (Akbar legally changed his name while his federal habeas corpus proceedings were pending.)

Akbar was convicted and sentenced to death for the November 1997 murder of an Ashtabula police officer who was attempting to serve an arrest warrant. He was represented by a court-appointed lawyer, David Doughten, whom Akbar unsuccessfully tried to replace just before the start of trial with another lawyer retained by his family. Doughten hired clinical psychologist Dr. James Eisenberg as a defense mental health expert, who, while the trial was already underway, submitted an expert report to the defense in which he diagnosed Akbar with Antisocial Personality Disorder.

Doughten nevertheless presented Eisenberg as an expert witness when Akbar’s trial advanced to the penalty phase. Eisenberg then offered the jury what the court described as a “racialized” description of ADP, falsely stating that while the disorder afflicted “one to three percent of the general population,” it was present in “15 to 25 percent, maybe even 30 percent” of “urban African American males.” 

“[T]he best treatment for the antisocial, if the violations are severe, is to throw them away, lock them up,” Eisenberg said. He then credited the high incarceration rates for Black men with reducing the number of homicides, saying it “would eliminate those individuals from engaging in this conduct. So part of it is incarceration itself that precludes homicide.”

The appeals court reversed Akbar’s death sentence, citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Buck v. Davis, which vacated Texas death-row prisoner Duane Buck’s death sentence after his own lawyer presented mental health testimony that Buck would be more likely to present a future danger because he was Black. Writing for the unanimous panel, Judge Richard Allen Griffin said, “Much like the expert in Buck, Eisenberg’s ‘opinion coincided precisely with a particularly noxious strain of racial prejudice’ — that of Black men as ‘violence prone’ — which offends the Constitution on its face and cannot be considered strategic.”

Will Missouri Authorities Murder an Innocent Black Man? Racist Suspect Governor Silent on Marcellus Williams’ Case 5 Years After His Execution was Stopped by Board of Inquiry Innocence Review

From [HERE] Five years after former Gov. Eric Greitens issued an execution-day reprieve for a Board of Inquiry to address questions of innocence, Marcellus Williams remains on Missouri’s death row. Though the board presented its recommendations more than a year ago, current Gov. Mike Parson has taken no action on the case. 

Williams was set to be executed on August 22, 2017. Mounting evidence of his innocence produced a groundswell in opposition to his execution and calls for an independent investigation into the case. Hours before the execution, Greitens granted Williams a stay and convened a board of inquiry to review new DNA evidence and “any other relevant evidence not available to the jury.” At the time, Greitens explained that “To carry out the death penalty, the people of Missouri must have confidence in the judgment of guilt.” Greitens later resigned from office after a scandal, and Lieutenant Governor Mike Parson replaced him and was later elected to the office.

Board of Inquiry members said that they had met quarterly until July 2021 when they made oral recommendations to the governor. The governor’s office has refused to comment on the case, citing state statutes that classify the information reviewed by the board confidential. 

Advocates have called the governor’s silence “a political stand.” Parson “want[s] to come off as someone who is tough on crime, and who is going to make sure that people convicted get their punishment,” Michelle Smith, director of community outreach and advocacy for Missourians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, told St. Louis Public Radio. But “when an error or a mistake comes to light,” she said, “it is also part of [elected officials’] job within justice to make sure that there aren’t innocent people sitting in prison.”

Parson’s failure to act has renewed criticisms that he and other statewide officials have repeatedly obstructed the release of innocent African Americans who have been wrongfully convicted of murder. In June 2021, Parson took no action on the pardon application of Kevin Strickland, who spent 42 years in prison wrongfully convicted of capital murder, saying his application was not “a priority.” Two months later, he pardoned Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who had pled guilty to misdemeanor harassment and assault charges after pointing an automatic rifle and a handgun at peaceful Black Lives Matter demonstrators in June 2020. 

In 2001, the Missouri Attorney General’s office told the Missouri Supreme Court that Joseph Amrineshould be executed, even if the court found him to be actually innocent. Both Strickland and Amrine were later exonerated. 

Lamar Johnson remains imprisoned 26 years after he was wrongfully convicted of murder in St. Louis, despite agreement by city prosecutors that he is innocent.

Williams was sentenced to death for the 1998 murder of a former St. Louis Dispatch reporter. No physical evidence links Williams to the murder, and neither footprints from the murder scene nor DNA from the victim’s clothing and under her fingernails match Williams. In the lead up to his 2017 execution date, his lawyers presented Missouri’s state and federal courts with the results of new DNA testing of the knife used in the killing, which a defense expert said excluded Williams and implicated an unknown man as the killer. The courts denied Williams an evidentiary hearing on the new evidence and declined to stay his execution. His lawyers’ motions to stay his execution were pending before the U.S. Supreme Court when Greitens issued the stay.

SNiggering Strawboss NYC Mayor Defends a Large NYPD Cop who Punched a Black Woman in the Face and Knocked Her Down b/c She Slapped the Officer's Hand [never touch Cops b/c They're Not Your Equal]

THIS IS BLACK POWER?? GET OUT THE VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS AND ELECT SNIGGERS LIKE THIS WHO ADVOCATE FOR LESS FREEDOMS AND ENCOURAGE THE USE OF FORCE? HAVE YOU LOST YOUR FUCKING MIND?

From [HERE] A New York City police officer is under investigation after social-media video surfaced showing him knocking a woman to the ground during a scuffle as her boyfriend was arrested, prompting accusations of brutality and a vociferous defense on Thursday from the mayor.

The Police Department, the Manhattan district attorney’s office and the Civilian Complaint Review Board all said they were reviewing the conduct of the officer, Detective Kendo Kinsey, 46, after the recording of the Tuesday incident on West 136th Street in Harlem began circulating online. Facing growing outrage on Thursday, the police released video pulled from officers’ body-worn cameras.

The videos show the woman, identified as Tamani Crum, 19, approaching her boyfriend, Elvin James, 22, as he stands handcuffed and surrounded by officers, who had arrested him on an attempted murder charge.

In the video, an officer grabs Ms. Crum and orders her to back away before he pushes her. When she slaps his hand away, he strikes her with enough force to knock her to the ground. She lies with her hands at her head with a stunned expression for several seconds before the officer picks her up and places her in handcuffs. No officers in the video appear to give medical aid to Ms. Crum.

“He decked her,” Mr. James says in the video. “Why would you do that?”

The confrontation between the stocky officer and the slim young woman drew accusations of excessive force from residents and elected officials. But Mayor Eric Adams, who was questioned over the incident Thursday, put the blame on Ms. Crum.

‘Never Put Your Hands On Cops b/c They Are Not Your Equal in a “Copitalist" System. With regard to mere mortals self defense is measured against necessity and civilians don’t have the right to initiate unprovoked violence against others. But cops are not mere mortals in a legal system of coercion or physical force. According to statist belief “the people” have delegated or transferred to police the moral right to commit acts of unprovoked violence on people. [MORE] Question here: can you delegate a right to someone that you don’t have? where does their “authority,” the right to rule others, come from? Asked differently, if you don’t have the right to initiate unprovoked acts of force against other people then how can you delegate or authorize another person to do such things? How did police acquire such super-human powers? The answer is logically unsupportable as “the belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory. Yet all modern statism is based entirely on the assumption that people can delegate rights they don’t have.” [MORE]

“The young lady came, smacked a police officer. The police officer responded,” the mayor said. “They did what the system called for. They didn’t turn off their body cameras. That’s why we have footage of what happened.”

The comments were at least the second time that Mr. Adams has defended a police officer whose conduct was under official scrutiny.

Kristin Richardson Jordan, who represents the neighborhood on the City Council, said this week’s violence reflected longstanding problems with how the police engage with the historically Black community, which has long had a tense relationship with the department.

“There is no reason for a resident that hasn’t committed a crime to be treated like a criminal,” Ms. Jordan wrote on Twitter.

Mr. Adams said he refused to second-guess the actions of the officers at the scene. He focused instead on Mr. James.

“He was armed with a ghost gun in his belt,” the mayor said. “Those officers showed great restraint. They didn’t discharge their weapons.”

Ms. Crum was arrested along with two other people who police and prosecutors say attacked officers as they were arresting Mr. James. But prosecutors dropped all but a charge of obstructing governmental administration against Ms. Crum before her arraignment late Wednesday in Criminal Court in Manhattan, where she was released without bail on the misdemeanor offense.

Her lawyer, Jaime Santana Jr., said the incident had “taken a toll” on his client, who has no criminal record. “We also fully intend on making sure this officer is held accountable for his actions,” he said after the hearing. “He absolutely used excessive force.”

Paul DiGiacomo, the president of the Detectives’ Endowment Association, said in a statement posted on Twitter that the union was considering a lawsuit against Ms. Crum. “When you assault a New York City detective in order to interfere with the arrest of a man armed with a gun, there are repercussions,” he wrote.

Mr. James, who the police say was carrying a semiautomatic pistol and 20 oxycodone pills, was arraigned on drug and weapons charges. The judge, Melissa Lewis, ordered him to be held on $300,000 bail.

Albuquerque Pays $42K Settlement After Cops Tried to Kill a Small, Restrained Latino Man During Arrest and then Lied About It. Suit Says the liberal City Failed to Discipline its Uncontrollable Cops

From [HERE] The city of Albuquerque has settled a lawsuit with a man who claimed officers used excessive force that could have killed him. In 2015, Albuquerque Police Department officers were chasing Majestic Howard after catching him in a bait car.

The lawsuit states, that right before his arrest, Howard stopped running and sat with his hands up. He claims Officers Jonathan Franco kneed him in the head and didn’t mention it in his police report. “In the reports, they omitted the fact that they administered blows to Mr. Howard’s head, knowing that he had a head injury and that they could in fact kill him,” said Louren Oliveros, attorney. That head injury came from an incident a month earlier. A man suspected Howard of stealing his so he shot him in the head.

The city disclosed it paid Howard $42,500 in a settlement. After Howard’s arrest, the city did give Officer Franco a seven-day suspension. That happened a year later after the case made headlines. Right now, Howard is behind bars after being accused of driving into a house on Bridge Blvd. in a stolen car back in 2020 while out on probation in another case. Since he is behind bars, the settlements will be paid to a relative on his behalf.

Federal Indictment Says a MD Cop Unlawfully Pulled Over and Falsely Arrested a Black Man. The Cop then Peppered sprayed him while he was handcuffed and waited several hours to transport him to jail

From [HERE] A federal grand jury indicted a former Maryland police officer on charges that he violated a man's civil rights during a 2019 traffic stop — and lied about it.

Officer Phillip Dupree, 38, is accused of deploying pepper spray, in an unreasonable use of force, on a man he pulled over in Washington, DC, outside his jurisdiction, on the early morning hours of August 4, 2019, the Justice Department wrote in a news release Wednesday.

The officer then wrote up a probable cause statement fabricating a justification for why he used force, according to the Justice Department. He was employed at the time by the Fairmount Heights Police Department in a small Maryland town with a population of less than 2,000.

Dupree was indicted on charges of kidnapping, perjury, and misconduct in office by a Maryland grand jury in November 2021 for the same case.

The state indictment alleged that Dupree arrested Torrence Sinclair, peppered sprayed him while he was handcuffed, and waited several hours to transport him from the police department to the county jail. This violates the department's general orders, which state "prisoners will be transported without unnecessary delay to the nearest processing facility," according to the indictment.

Sinclair also filed a civil suit in October 2020 against Dupree and the town of Fairmount Heights. The case is ongoing.

The suit alleged that Dupree submitted charges against Sinclair "based on a fabricated rendition of facts" with "one count of resisting arrest, two counts of disorderly conduct, one count of attempted assault second degree on a law enforcement officer, one count of malicious destruction of property and one count of attempted escape second degree."

The Prince George's County State Attorney's Office dropped all charges in November 2019.

Dupree is no longer with the department, Doris Sarumi, Fairmount Heights' town manager, told Insider. Sarumi could not comment on whether Dupree was fired and for what cause because it's a pending legal matter. 

An attorney for Dupree did not respond to a request for comment.

"This officer should have never been hired by the city of Fairmount Heights," Jonathan Y. Newton, Sinclair's attorney, told Insider. "He is the quintessential example of a bad cop, and everybody at that department and a lot of people in the area knew he was a bad cop. He gambled on the fact that nobody would challenge him on it."

Dupree also was fired by three other Maryland police departments, including for issues involving excessive force, before he was hired by Fairmount Heights in 2019, records showed.

He was first fired from the Capitol Heights Maryland Police Department in 2013, according to The Washington Post.

The officer was then hired by the District Heights Police Department on June 5, 2014. But in less than a year, Dupree racked up "more citizen complaints than that of any other officer" within the department and was fired in October 2015, according to a court opinion denying Dupree's appeal to consider his termination improper.

In 2018, he was fired from Prince George's Community College campus police force after eight months on the job, a spokesperson for the college wrote in an email to Insider. He was terminated for "performance" reasons.

While Dupree was with the Fairmount Heights Police Department, the officer was indicted on one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud by the US District Court.

He and two other police officers were accused of working together in 2019 to report false thefts of their own debit cards to law enforcement in order to claim insurance money and reimbursement from several banks.

A trial for the officers was tentatively set for January 23, 2023.