Operation "Shrivelization" is Going On Right in Your Face: 'Global Overt Depopulation strategies, programs and efforts designed and implemented by the pathological elite' - FUNKTIONARY

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Shrivelization – world-wide covert and overt depopulation strategies, programs and efforts designed and implemented by the pathological elite—specifically the deliberate and diabolical shrinking (reduction) of non-white populations globally through, genthanasia, genocide, eugenics, internecine scarce-resource-based ethnic conflicts, plandemics, richcraft (billionaires Soros, Gates, Rockefeller types) funding and rolling out voodoo vaccinations, Neo-Crony colonialism, government social credit systems, surveillance capitalism, free-range slavery, Geo-fencing, socialist distancing, and food desert starvation, etc. (See: Genthanasia)

Joel Smalley: ‘It is Indisputable that Deaths Across All Ages are Substantially Higher Since the "Vaccine" Rollout.’ Social Security Administration Data Shows that COVID Injections are Causing Death

JOEL SMALLEY reports “The mRNA experiment will go down as the most heinous crime against humanity ever witnessed. Those that persist in its support or even its promotion would do well to look at the data that unequivocally demonstrates that the novel gene therapy is not Safe or Effective™.”

Over 55s

In the over 55s, even the most basic summary statistics clearly show that deaths in the COVID era (Feb ‘20 to present), are higher than expected according to historical trend:

Comparing periods running from August to July each year (since this is the observed seasonal mortality pattern), 2019-20, the year of the COVID epidemic, results in 6% more deaths than expected.

In 2020-21 and 2021-22, the post-mRNA experiment years, deaths are respectively 15% and 12% higher than expected. The unusual spikes in deaths occur coincidentally with the start of the mass mRNA injection campaign1:

18 to 55s

In the 18 to 55s, the basic summary statistics again clearly show that deaths in the COVID era, are higher than expected according to historical trend:

2019-20 results in 9% more deaths than expected. In 2020-21 and 2021-22, deaths are an unprecedented 26% and 34% higher than expected. 

Once again, the unusual spikes in deaths occur coincidentally with the start of the mass mRNA injection campaign:

The recent trend of declining mortality is reversed ever so slightly in 2019-20, with deaths 5% higher than expected. However, deaths are respectively 11% and 21% higher than expected in the subsequent two-year periods.

The correlation between deaths and mRNA adverse event reports are strongest in this age group:

Conclusion

Whilst correlation does not equal causation, it is an indisputable fact that deaths across all ages are substantially higher (in absolute terms and relative to expectation) in the post-mRNA experiment era than they were during the COVID era prior to the start of the experiment.

In terms of overall public health, in the absence of any other plausible explanation (which is not apparent), it is safe to conclude that the mRNA experiment is not associated with lower mortality overall. 

In fact, it is quite the contrary, with the severity of the increase in mortality in the post-mRNA experiment era being more heavily felt in the age groups under 55, who were less affected by the natural virus when it first emerged. [MORE]

Report from a Group of Independent German Scientists says ‘COVID Injections Must Be Stopped 'to Avert a Direct and Imminent Danger to Human Life.' Claims Toxic Substances were Found in COVID Shots

From [HERE] A group of independent German scientists found toxic components—mostly metallic—in all the COVID vaccine samples they analyzed, “without exception” using modern medical and physical measuring techniques.

The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis says that some of the toxic elements found inside the AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna vaccine vials were not listed in the ingredient lists from the manufacturers.

The following metallic elements were found in the vaccines:

• Alkali metals: caesium (Cs), potassium (K)
• Alkaline earth metals: calcium (Ca), barium (Ba)
• transition metals: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti)
• Rare earth metals: cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd)
• Mining group/metal: aluminum (Al)
• Carbon group: silicon (Si) (partly support material/slide)
• Oxygen group: sulphur (S)

These substances, furthermore, “are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, can only partially be explained as a result of crystallization or decomposition processes, [and] cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process,” the researchers found.

They declared the findings as preliminary.

The report states,

The German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. The group consists of independent scientists, including physicians, physicists, chemists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and alternative health practitioners, supported by lawyers, psychologists, analysts and journalists. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis uses modern medical and physical measuring techniques, the results of which have confirmed and complemented each other: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), Mass Spectroscopy (MS), Inductively Coupled Plasma Analysis (ICP), Bright Field Microscopy (BFM), Dark Field Microscopy (DFM) and Live Blood Image Diagnostics, as well as analysis of images using Artificial Intelligence. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis continues to work in close cooperation with several international groups that are carrying out similar investigations and who have obtained results consistent with our own. The results from our analysis of the vaccines can, consequently, be regarded as cross-validated. There are questions that need to be satisfactorily answered by the vaccine manufacturers and, in Germany, by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (the agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health responsible for the regulation of vaccines in that country). Possible causal links between the vaccines and fatalities need to be investigated.

In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the COVID-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately. [MORE]

Liberal NYC Chills the "Free Speech" of Black Protest by Failing to Prosecute Any Cops who Violently Silenced Protestors in 2020. DA Dismisses its Only Case Against a Cop Who Pushed Woman to Concrete

From [HERE] The lone NYPD officer criminally charged in connection with use of force during the 2020 George Floyd protests will have the charges dismissed after he completes conflict-resolution training and other measures, according to a disposition reached Thursday.

The dependent media explained “the outcome in Brooklyn Criminal Court means the case against officer Vincent D’Andraia will be dismissed and sealed in six months if he stays out of trouble.” On video the large white authoritarian shoved Dounya Zayer, a small woman, like an offensive lineman pulling on a running play and caused her to hit her head against the street. He yelled out loud, “fucking bitch” while he did so. Said massa’ media pretends that Dounya Zayer is the only victim in this matter. The dependent media also falsely pretends that persons harmed by crimes like Zayer make prosecutorial decisions about what crimes to charge, what sentence to request or what pea deals to offer. The liberal media explains

“prosecutors with the office of Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez said Zayer “had chosen the restorative justice approach, focusing more on repairing harm than on doling out discipline.”  “Based on her beliefs, [she] went through the restorative justice process, which allowed the defendant to take the classes and to do what was necessary to make amends for what happened there,” Assistant District Attorney Daphney Gachette said in Brooklyn Supreme Court on Thursday.”

Said statements are inaccurate and mischaracterizations. Sometimes “victims” are given input in the prosecutorial decision making process but only when authorities request it. The restorative justice was a choice presented to her by authorities among other specific options they believed to be acceptable. Such prosecutorial decisions are made in accordance with the priorities and goals they set for themselves and upon their value choices. As explained by Professor Angela Davis, “Like the charging decision, the plea bargaining process is controlled entirely by the prosecutor and decisions are entirely within her discretion. A criminal defendant cannot plead guilty to a less serious offense unless the prosecutor decides to make a plea offer. While the defense attorney may attempt to negotiate the best possible offer, the decision is ultimately left to the prosecutor's discretion.” [MORE] There is also little a judge can do where a prosecutor decides to withdraw its own prosecution.

Importantly, the white liberal media and its prosecutors have decontextualized this matter by pretending that the harm done here was done primarily to Ms. Zayer. A mainstream media outlet called “The City” stated, “A Brooklyn law enforcement source said the resolution and penalty in the case were not unusual for third degree assault by a person with no prior criminal history.”

Dr. Amos Wilson and Neely Fuller explain that decontextualization is a most effective deception in the system of racism white supremacy. Dr. Wilson states,

The bane of the African community is the exploitative White American community which projects a so-called civilized, fraternal, egalitarian, liberal face while concurrently seeking to maintain White supremacy. This means that the White American community must maintain African subordination while not appearing to do so. It must cannibalistically sacrifice the vitality, autonomy, and if need be, the life of the African American community while posing as its benefactor and savior. It pleads innocence while washing its hands of the blood of African people.

Here, by focusing on Ms. Zayer we are led to believe that the only real harm done was to one white lady and dismissal of the charges is the remedy she wanted, so case closed. (Let’s be clear here; when we say liberal NYC we mean that NYC is a mecca for democrats, liberals, gays and Blacks. In fact, there are more Blacks and gays in NYC than in any other US city. Democrat authorities control all levels and branches of NYC government.)

Although liberal authorities and their media treat the incident with Ms. Zayer like a common assault that occurred between two citizens in front of a 7-11, in real life it involved a police officer and a citizen during a nationwide wave of ongoing political protest and riots over the police murders of George Floyd and others. Said protest occurred in front of a captive tv audience during bogus COVID shelter in place lockdowns. In most places authoritarians treated protesters like criminals. According to the CCRB, at least 318 complaints were made against NYPD officers for misconduct during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Of those, the CCRB has recommended the highest level of discipline, which includes suspension or termination, against 47 officers and less severe discipline for 33 others. Only 3 were disciplined and as stated, none were prosecuted. [MORE] In the context of reality the individual remedy for Ms. Zayer was provided to her in tort law. Accordingly, she filed a lawsuit against the NYPD which was settled for $387,000 earlier this year under an agreement that compelled Officer D’Andraia to pay $3,000 out of his own pocket as well.

The crime is against the public, particularly Black people and those who protest against authority and racism. The harm done to Black protesters and individuals who consider engaging in protest against police brutality in the future is real; where authorities choose not to hold police accountable after they violently silence the speech of protesters, they officially encourage the cops’ right to remain violent and chill so-called “1st Amendment rights.” The message from authorities to Blacks and Latinos is, ‘if you protest against police brutality we can degrade and harm you and nothing will be done about it.’ The message from massa’ media is ‘when authority brutalizes you during protest we will make sure said white lawlessness is understood as nothing other than public order.’

In the context of reality, last week liberals in NY made it unlawful to carry or bear arms during any kind of political protest no matter the location. As such, citizens wishing to protest against police brutality also have no meaningful right to defend themselves against the unlawful conduct of cops like Officer Vincent D’Andraia. The undeceiver Jeremy Locke states,

“The objective of the control of speech is making sure that those who were compelled to bend to the will of authority never gain the courage to look back.”

FUNKTIONARY describes the situation where you only have adherent rights which can be turned on and off like a light switch by authorities and where you are prohibited by authorities from defending yourself is totalitarianism, a form of reverse terrorism in a fascist society disguised as a democracy. FUNKTIONARY further states,  “totalitarian Patriotism – terrified silence created through the suppression of principled cognitive dissent under the First Amendment and the Declaration of Independence. 2) allowing the officers of so-called “government” to become free from the limits of law.”

It is a shame that Black psheep go on enthusiastically supporting white liberals as they go about destroying various freedoms and devaluing black life right in their faces. The right to protest and to carry and bear arms in case of public confrontation and to prevent tyranny are unalienable rights that have even less meaning in NYC and many other liberal places where Blacks live.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” The Declaration of Independence quoted in FUNKTIONARY

The message to liberals and their government should be FUCK WHITE SUPREMACY and FUCK AUTHORITY.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Psheep – the silence of the lames. 2) people as the mass herd-sheep (the “P” is as silent as the sleepwalking psheople are). 3) the assembled masses. 4) the couch-bound talk-show vortexed voyeurz. The Psheep Song: Sing along—Some contemplate their navel, others contemplate their gold—some stray to other pastures, while most stay within the fold. (See: Mass, Sheople, Groupentity, WASSUP, Sheep, Thoughtforms, Religion, Absolute Truth, Finitude & Reification)

lawless society – a socio-juristic human-relation configuration where law is upheld, codified, and deified over humanity. If you fear or worry about its advent, you’ll certainly never recognize its presence. 2) a Police State of the Overruling Class.

Larken Rose: The Belief in Authority, that Certain People Have the Right to rule over others who are legally obligated to obey is Irrational and Insane

According to FUNKTIONARY:

authority - (from the root word author)—which means to originate. Only you have authority over your Self...anything else. i.e.. to accept any authority external to one's Self once of discriminating age, is the very definition of irresponsibility. There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority, i.e. outside of one's Self and Self-Nature.) 2) the handmaiden of autonomy. 3) internal power. 4) Nommo. All authority, like the kingdom of heaven, is within. Be an authority unto yourself as all authority should come from your own authentic experience—that is the only source or wellspring of authority. Authority is the means by which society uses to control its population. Ignoring or belittling authority does not mean people are either good or bad, whether or not they are punished for their insubordination. Healthy people do not need authority figures to tell them what to do, but only the knowledge of themselves. You can teach a parrot to quote from either scripture or statute, but a parrot is not an authority. Only by you becoming truth do you have authority to speak—and then only on your behalf (i.e., your inner truth), your innerstanding. An authority is an eyewitness or an I-witness. and to picture the dynamic truth no proofs or negatives are needed nor possible—as reality isn't certain or static. When you are dead to sin and Alive to the God-Self-Divine, you become the Buddha, the Christ, the true authority within. (See: Obedience, Predictive Programming. Autonomy, Anarchy, Nommo, Sin, Alive. Authentic, Responsitivity, Dharma, Follower, Spontaneity, Conditioning, Conditions, Freedom & Responsibility) [MORE]

In a Credibility Contest btw an Accused White Cop and 5 Black Witnesses who Will a Jury of White Sheeple Believe? Wichita Cop Not Liable After Shooting Black Marine to Death in Front of His Family

An experienced trial attorney will tell you that it is very difficult to get a white juror to believe a white cop is lying, especially if the client is Black.  Reality or anything too real (such as racism) in court is simply unbelievable to judges and jurors in the fake world created in court. Many cops are sophisticated, masterful liars who are taught how to testify and create persuasive, detailed police reports. Mixing actual facts with nonsense sounds & looks real in court. White DA's, judges, jurors and the white media are also eager and programmed to believe anything foul cops say about Blacks. A testilying racist suspect cop only needs to presents facts in accord with the appetite of the racist suspect listener, not in accord with actual reality. 

In a case that concerns whether use of force was reasonable, like this one, the evidence simply consisted of a credibility contest between a sworn white police officer and several Black adult witnesses. According to news reports from the white media the accused cop never explained how exactly he faced imminent danger from the Black man who had a pocket knife down at his side. All he had to say was ‘a shirtless, muscular, Black marine with an aggressive look in his eye was coming toward me.’ Why would a cop make it up? Because white sheeple will believe it and use their imaginations to fill in the details. As explained by Osho Rajineesh, 'A mind that is filled with belief is a mind which can project anything according to that belief.' And most whites believe Black men are inherently criminal or a threat to their existence.

WHITE COPS’ PHOTO HIDDEN BY WHITE MEDIA TO PROTECT THE SYSTEM OF AUTHORITY AND RACISM/WHITE SUPREMACY. From [HERE] A white Wichita police officer was acting in self defense when he shot and killed a 26-year-old Marine veteran in front of the man’s family eight years ago, a jury decided Wednesday.

The family of Icarus Randolph had sued the officer, Ryan Snyder, and the city of Wichita seeking $5 million for wrongful death and other allegations in the July 4, 2014 shooting.

But an eight-day trial ended Wednesday afternoon when a jury took less than an hour to find in favor of the officer.

“I wish I could say I was amazed or shocked,” said William Skepnik, lead attorney for the family. “It’s hard for me to not see a racial component in this. I do not believe that a white man or a white family would have been treated this way. These people were treated as people that don’t matter.”

Steven Pigg, lead attorney for the officer and city, said: “The jury system works. ... This is justice.”

Over the course of the past week, the jury heard accounts from family members who witnessed the fatal shooting and from Snyder, the crisis intervention-trained officer who shot Randolph four times in the chest after he used a Taser on him.

Randolph’s mother, Beverly Allen, called 911 in the afternoon to request mental health treatment for her son, who suffered from PTSD after serving as an infantry rifleman in Iraq for three years. Randolph had been hospitalized two months earlier for a similar episode. The family believed loud fireworks on the night of July 3 triggered his PTSD.

Snyder and fellow Wichita officer Danny Brown were talking with family members in front of the house when they heard a loud bang from inside. Randolph then kicked through a sliding screen in the den doorway and emerged into the front yard.

Exactly how events unfolded in the next five to seven seconds varies based on who’s giving the account.

Everyone agreed Randolph was shirtless and wearing camouflage Marine capris. They agreed he was holding a pocket knife with an almost 4-inch blade by his side — the same knife he had been holding in his hand since he woke up that morning.

The white cops told the white jury that a shirtless, muscular Black man had an “aggressive” look in his eyes and “zeroed in” on Snyder, power-walking directly toward him with tensed muscles and clenched fists.

In direct contrast Randolph’s family members said he was staring off into the distance with an unfocused gaze and walking slowly toward a neighbor’s house with the knife at his side when Snyder moved into his path and initiated contact, first deploying his Taser and then switching to his handgun when Randolph continued to advance.

Randolph’s face was blank, sister Elisa Allen testified. “Like he was looking at something that wasn’t even there.”

Neither Snyder nor Brown issued verbal commands to Randolph before Snyder shot him. He was not suspected of any crimes. While it is clear that the white officer wanted him stop walking in his front yard, It’s not clear how exactly the officer was facing an imminent threat of death when he shot him to death. Clearly, he was not under arrest.

“It wasn’t just a head in the clouds situation. It was a determined assault situation,” Snyder testified.

Snyder said he remembers pointing his Glock 17 only at Randolph that day and that Randolph’s mother, sisters, nieces and nephews were comfortably outside of the line of fire when he shot. [he only remembers that he didn’t do anything unlawful. lol]

The family says Elisa Allen was standing directly behind her brother when Snyder fired his weapon and that he then pointed it at Randolph’s mother when she tried to approach her son after the shooting.

Snyder told the jury he was 5 to 7 feet from Randolph and backpedaling when he shot him with both the Taser and the handgun. Brown told police investigators the day of the incident that Snyder and Randolph were 10 to 15 feet apart.

Sedgwick County District Attorney Marc Bennett, a racist suspect (pictured above) decided in 2014 not to pursue criminal charges against Snyder, a 17-year veteran of the Wichita Police Department who is now a community police officer in northeast Wichita.

In what has been a seven-year court battle, the civil lawsuit was reopened in 2020 after the Kansas Court of Appeals reversed a Sedgwick County District Court’s dismissal of it.

The trial, in 18th Judicial District Court Judge Deborah Hernandez Mitchell’s courtroom, was delayed more than three months after lawyers representing the city claimed news coverage of the Wichita Police Department’s racist text messaging scandal, first reported by The Eagle, would “inject race” into the killing of Randolph, a Black man.

THANKS FOR SERVICE NGHR. “He wanted to serve his country. He felt it was the right thing to do,” Elisa Allen said.

He didn’t like to talk much about his three years in Iraq, even to his closest family members.

“He felt uneasy about the things he participated in (in Iraq) that didn’t sit right with his soul,” Ida said.

When he was experiencing an acute PTSD episode, he would sometimes go “catatonic,” family testified, saying July 4, 2014 was one such day when he remained in an unresponsive stupor as they tried to assess his wellbeing.

July 4

In a 911 call seeking an ambulance to take her son to Ascension Via Christi St. Joseph for mental health treatment, Beverly Allen told dispatch Randolph had something in his hand but that he didn’t have a weapon. Pigg argued that officers may have handled the entire call differently if they had been aware Randolph had a knife before he emerged from the house.

“I certainly didn’t want a confrontation with police with my son in that state,” said Beverly Allen, who watched a Wichita police officer fatally shoot her father in front of the family home when she was 7 years old.

“I seen my brother fall and I seen him die with his face in the dirt,” Alford said.

“We have to live with, we made the call that killed him,” sister Ida Allen said.

No Right to Be Left the Fuck Alone in Free Range Prison: LAPD Shot a Black Man in the Back as He Walked Down the Street Holding a Car Part, Threatening Nobody. White Liberal Media Analyze the Car Part

From [HERE] and [HERE] When two Los Angeles police officers confronted Jermaine Petit on an evening in July, one of them quickly realized that reports Petit was carrying a gun were inaccurate.

“It’s not a gun, bro,” the officer told his partner about the metallic object in Petit’s hand, according to video of the incident from officers’ body-worn cameras that the Los Angeles Police Department made public Thursday.

But that realization wouldn’t matter. Less than half a minute later, Petit would be shot multiple times by an LAPD sergeant firing from inside his vehicle and the officer’s partner, who failed to hear the warning that Petit was unarmed, according to the videos and information released by the department.

Petit was taken to a hospital with serious injuries but has since been released, according to this family. No officers were injured.

On July 18, a man called 911 to report he had confronted a man who appeared homeless and was behind his house in the city’s Leimert Park neighborhood, according to the recordings released by the LAPD. The man refused to leave and had pulled a “pistol” on him, the homeowner said.

Officers were dispatched and, as they were looking for the man, another 911 caller said an armed man was walking up Degnan Boulevard, just north of Obama Boulevard. A short time later, two officers pulled up alongside Petit, who matched the description the callers had given, as he walked on Obama Boulevard. The LA Times misleads here to rationalize or normalize cop conduct- cops don’t answer 911 calls. They receive info from dispatch. At any rate, all law enforcement must seek to corroborate details in order to establish probable cause or reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion otherwise they cannot stop, search or arrest- if cops get a call for a fat, old white man wearing a tuxedo with white a beard stealing a car when they come upon a suspect they must corroborate said details and determine whether a crime is occurring right now in this moment and whether he is involved in it, that is, if you believe in such things. Actually, lets go over their statist truths here just for kicks:

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, although only one sentence long, protects people against unjustified detentions by the government. It reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In order for the police to stop you the Supreme Court has ruled that police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and the person detained is involved in the activity

In order to frisk you the Supreme Court has ruled that the police must have independent reasonable articulable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous before they may touch you (a cursory patdown for weapons). Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. [MORE]

Clearly these rules are only intended for white people. Non-whites are stopped, shot and then frisked because they are Non-white. This does not happen to white folks. It happens to Black and Latino people regardless of income, education, political affiliation or skin color.

Of course police cannot stop people because they have unknown black objects in their hand. There is no black object exception to so-called 4th Amendment - but racists might disagree with regard to stopping Blacks.]

The officer riding in the passenger seat quickly got out of the vehicle and ordered Petit to “come here.”

Petit continued walking away on the sidewalk, nervously turning back every few steps while repeating something unintelligible without stopping, the video shows. Again, the LA Times reporter misleads - if there is no reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion to stop the Black man then police cannot lawfully stop him. Question here is, when they ordered him to stop, did the cops have articulable reasons to believe he had committed a crime? If so, what crime?

The officer walked after him with his gun drawn, telling him repeatedly to “take your hands out of your pockets, bro,” while his partner, who was identified by the LAPD as Officer Daryl Glover, drove ahead and stopped beside Petit, according to the video.

Glover exited the vehicle and, as he was pointing his weapon at Petit from a few feet away, the first officer told him that the object in Petit’s hand was not a gun.

The two officers broke into a jog to follow Petit and Glover asked, “What is — bro, you said it’s not a gun?”

The officer’s response was muffled and Glover didn’t hear it. “Huh?” he asked. So the cop was informed it was not a gun - that’s what he actually heard.

Immediately after the exchange, Glover shouts at Petit, “Hey, drop it!.” About three seconds later, the first of three shots were fired.

The videos released by the LAPD do not make clear who fired the first shot. In the days following the shooting, the LAPD said that two officers had fired their weapons, and identified them as Glover and Sgt. Brett Hayhoe, a supervisor who had arrived at the scene as Glover and his partner were chasing after Petit.

With regard to the possession of guns by Black people the bottom line here is that blacks are prohibited from possessing guns in the system of racism white supremacy. Whether the black individual posed a threat or possessed it unlawfully or lawfully is beside the point; no guns allowed for blacks. Any black person in possession of a gun or a black object in their hand or physically near a gun or black object or any black person says they ‘have a gun,’ can be executed anytime by cops. Particularly white liberal citizens, media and professionals in white liberal cities like LA, DC, Chicago, NYC, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Seattle and many more go on enforcing their hypocrisy of white lawlessness as law and order. Apparently, they just hope sleeping Blacks never notice.

In response to questions from The Times, Capt. Kelly Muniz, a department spokeswoman, clarified that Hayhoe fired first, shooting Petit while he was still inside his vehicle. Glover then fired. It is not clear from the videos if Hayhoe or Glover shot twice. The fact that Hayhoe fired from his vehicle was first reported by Sahra Sulaiman, a writer for StreetsBlog L.A.

As Petit writhed on the ground and moved his arm, Glover and his partner yelled at him to “Stop moving!” and “Stop reaching for it!” in reference to the magical black object he had been carrying. Hayhoe exited his vehicle and ordered the officers to back up and take cover behind a car.

The object was a black metal “latch actuator,” a part of a car door’s locking mechanism, which is shaped somewhat like a small handgun.

The case garnered attention after a police spokesman at a news conference the night of the shooting lied and said Petit had been carrying a “weapon” and then Police Chief Michel Moore corrected the obviously false claim the following day, saying Petit was holding the car part.

Anger flared again at a virtual community meeting several weeks later, which was cut short after a police captain lied again and said Petit was carrying as a “nonfunctioning firearm.”

Before the release of the video, relatives and friends of Petit had spent weeks pressing the Police Department for more information about the case, which has received attention on social media and among elected officials. Congresswoman and mayoral candidate Karen Bass said in a post on her Facebook page that the reports surrounding the shooting were “increasingly alarming,” while calling for a “full and transparent” investigation.

Police are seeking a misdemeanor charge of possession of an imitation weapon to be filed against Petit. A spokesman for the city attorney’s office said Thursday that a decision had not been made on whether to prosecute Petit.

The LAPD’s decision to pursue a criminal case has drawn strong condemnations from neighbors, activists and academics, who see the department’s response as an attempt to deflect scrutiny from its officers’ actions.

Nichole Jones, the mother of Petit’s daughter, said Petit is an Air Force veteran.

Civil rights groups/Sharpton Meet w/Feds to Discuss Dietary Racism and Milk Consumption. The Collapse of Public Education or the Servant Training Provided to Black Kids in Liberal Cities Not Addressed

From [HERE] and [MORE] Twenty-eight civil rights and health care groups announced Tuesday they have requested that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) address “dietary racism” in national school lunch programs, raising concerns to the federal agency about forcing millions of minority children to drink cow’s milk without allowing them a healthier alternative.

In a letter to the USDA’s Equity Commission, the groups said the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) only incentivizes dairy milk, a policy they called “inherently inequitable and socially unjust” because children of color are more likely to be lactose intolerant — meaning they cannot fully digest sugars in dairy and can suffer from adverse effects after consumption.

The NSLP covers 30 million children in 100,000 schools across the U.S., a program the civil rights groups said children of color are historically overrepresented in.

“If Black lives matter, so does our health and nutrition, but the National School Lunch Program has consistently failed children of color,” said Milton Mills, a Washington, D.C., urgent care physician who has researched the topic, in a statement. “Either schoolchildren drink the milk they’re given and suffer in class while they’re trying to learn, or they go without a nutritionally significant portion of their meal.”

The letter was signed by leading national groups such as Progressive Democrats of America, the Maryland chapter of the NAACP, Switch4Good, the Center for a Humane Economy and the National Action Network Washington Bureau, which was founded by civil rights leader the Rev. Al Sharpton.

The USDA reimburses schools covered under the 76-year-old NSLP if they provide fluid milk during meals, which does not cover soy milk or other types of organic milk. Dairy milk must be served with every meal. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

"education" - word-generated opinions combined with force for control over competent hue-mans. 2) coercive persuasion. 3) indoctrination and regimentation. 4) braindraining. 5) developing the powers and faculties of a person. "Developing the powers" means de-veloping, or dis-veloping the powers, which means to negate, or have a privative, or reversing force on the powers. •"The invisible capital which enables its possessors to remain, or to climb on, the backs of the uneducated and to fill their heads with prejudices useful for the maintenance of either the old or the new status quo. It's Squid Pro Row, baby. -Austin Powers. The whole machinery of "education" is to make you mechanical—devoid of intelligence—reduced to an academented drone or a conforming clone for the marketplace of "society." "True education is that which is experienced, tested and digested. What can be counted and recorded is not education." -Vinoba Bhave. What passes for "an" education is second-hand experiences, misconceptions filtered through memories and lies sold in units. True education is transformative, fluid and lifelong. (See: De-education, Experience, Academented, Knowledge Scrolling, Pedagogy, Democracy, Dead Knowledge, Transformative Education, Efficiency, Language, Develop, Envelope, School, Devotion & Learning)

Public Fool System - a place where children are having unprotected education. 2) a syndromatic exercise in conformity and blind obedience to so-called "authority" (disguised repression). 3) systematic planned violence meted out on children and young adults—held hostage and hostile—daily, hourly, quarantined from the natural rhythm of things in life through Pavlovian bells and shrink-wrapped prefabricated and curriculum and distorted history. 4) a training boot camp for life-long slavery and indentured servitude to gangbankers and the Corporate State in a society created and based in violence, governed by fear, propaganda, psychogenic money and power.

Another Video Catches White and Black High School Students Mocking the Police Murder of George Floyd. Blindly Obedient Drone Kids Act Out Master-Servant Roles as Conditioned in MI Public Fool System

From [HERE] “I can’t believe kids are doing this,” parent Jaimie Nasceif told local outlet Fox 2 Detroit. “I think it’s ridiculous and something completely unacceptable.”

According to Fox 2, the video was recorded during an off-campus breakfast in August for players from Stevenson High School’s football team.

In the video, reposted to Instagram earlier this week by @metrodetroitnarc, white ninth-grade students in football jerseys stand in a circle on an outdoor patio. They surround a Black student, who kneels on the ground. The Black student wears all black clothing, except for a cloth that acts as a blindfold, and he places his hands behind his back as if he’s been arrested. The white students point water guns at him.

“I dare you to shoot him,” one of the white students says.

The white students shout a noise resembling a gunshot and tell the Black student to fall to the ground. One of the students even pushes him as a signal to fall.

“Shoot him in the head,” a student says after the Black child hits the ground.

Then, the circle of boys pretend to stomp and kick him while laughing. One of the white teammates tells the Black student to “go back to Africa.”

In a separate clip, white football players with water guns approach a Black teammate outside. (It is unclear if he is the same football player from the previous scenario.) They holler at him to “stop resisting” while pointing their guns. Then, one of the white students ends the fake arrest by tackling the Black kid.

At the video’s conclusion, someone within the group mentions George Floyd.

After the video circulated on social media, Stevenson High School Principal Kenneth L. Cucchi III told parents that it was inspired by a TikTok trend “based on the tragic death of George Floyd,” Detroit Metro Times reported. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY

Public schools - the instrument of Hidalgo (the "Greater System") and the "State" whereby readers, writers and counters are produced who are certified as qualified to understand orders and obediently carry them out... the tenth gang-plank of the Communist Manifesto. (See: Compulsory Schooling, Indoctrination & Formal Education)

Public Fool System - a place where children are having unprotected education. 2) a syndromatic exercise in conformity and blind obedience to so-called "authority" (disguised repression). 3) systematic planned violence meted out on children and young adults—held hostage and hostile—daily, hourly, quarantined from the natural rhythm of things in life through Pavlovian bells and shrink-wrapped prefabricated and curriculum and distorted history. 4) a training boot camp for life-long slavery and indentured servitude to gangbankers and the Corporate State in a society created and based in violence, governed by fear, propaganda, psychogenic money and power. [MORE]

New UK Report Finds that More than 120,000 Non-White Workers Quit Jobs b/c of Racist Degradation

From [HERE] and [HERE] More than 120,000 workers from minority ethnic backgrounds have quit their jobs because of racism, suggests a landmark study that has found workplace discrimination is sapping the confidence of a large part of the UK workforce.

More than one in four workers from black and other minority ethnic backgrounds have faced racist jokes at work in the last five years and 35% said it left them feeling less confident at work, according to what is believed to be the largest representative survey conducted of the UK’s 3.9 million minority ethnic workers. Eight per cent of victims left their job as a result of the racism they experienced, according to the study by the Trades Union Congress.

“Many told us they experienced racist bullying, harassment – and worse,” said the TUC general secretary, Frances O’Grady. “And alarmingly, the vast majority did not report this to their employer … Ministers need to change the law so that employers are responsible for protecting their workers and preventing racism at work.”

One black Caribbean lecturer in the south-west of England told researchers: “I drive a nice car and one member of staff asked me if I was a drug dealer, because how else could I afford [it]?” When she reported the incident she was told ​​“it’s because of the area of the country we live in, which is predominantly white”.

A British Indian woman from London, who was told she was overlooked for a job because the company didn’t want front-facing staff wearing “funny clothes”, said she had never reported a racist incident because she was afraid she would lose her job. The survey found only 19% of those who had experienced harassment reported the most recent incident to their employer. Almost half feared it would not be taken seriously.

Dr Halima Begum, the chief executive of the Runnymede Trust, a race equality thinktank, said the findings showed many employers lacked “accountable structures supporting employees to report racist incidents”.

“Without adequate action from employers the pervasiveness of racism mounts, and it’s this lack of accountability which tips any single accusation within a workplace from an individual ‘bad apple’ to an institutional problem.”

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, which represents human resources professionals, said the 1,750-person survey was a “stark reminder that far too many black and minority ethnic workers still face discrimination in the workplace on a regular basis”. It said the findings should provide fresh impetus for the government to introduce mandatory ethnicity pay reporting.

Examples of racism given in focus groups ranged from children asking a teacher with a non-British accent where she is from, to people being told to “go back to your country”. Workers aged 18 to 24 were significantly more likely to say they had experienced racism than older workers. [MORE]

How Racists Use Race to Affect Your Credit Score

From [HERE] When looking at the numbers, you can't ignore the racial disparity in credit scores.

Rates of subprime credit scores in majority-Black, Hispanic and Native American communities are at least 1.5 times higher than in majority-white communities, according to a 2022 report from the Urban Institute, a nonprofit think tank. FICO defines subprime as poor or fair credit scores that fall below 670.

A low credit score or no credit history can make borrowing difficult and expensive. If you can't access good credit products, you may struggle to build wealth. Here's how discrimination can affect credit scores and what you can do to build and protect your credit.

How Credit Scores Are Developed

Your credit scores are derived from data in your credit reports compiled by the three major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion.

Scoring systems are based exclusively on the information in those reports, says credit expert John Ulzheimer, formerly of FICO and Equifax. "Race is never on the report and is not considered in a score," he says. "Neither is your address or a ZIP code where racial diversity is different."

Lenders supply the credit bureaus a steady stream of consumer credit information, such as the date you opened an account, the balance and whether the account is paid on time.

For revolving credit products, such as credit cards, the amount of the credit line will show up on your credit report. Collection agencies and courts also provide data to the credit bureaus, which means collection accounts and bankruptcies appear.

Credit scoring companies, such as FICO and VantageScore, use proprietary algorithms that emphasize different factors to create scores of between 300 and 850. Higher numbers predict lower credit risk, and scores can change as credit reports are updated.

To have a credit score, you first need to use credit products that are reported to the credit bureaus. But to develop a good credit score, you must use those products responsibly for a long time.

So, in theory, credit scores should not be affected by race. But an individual's credit is built on his or her history, and for Black Americans, that history may well include a lack of generational wealth partly because of past discriminatory practices like redlining, which denied mortgages in minority neighborhoods. Though redlining was outlawed in the 1960s, Black homeownership still lags; the National Association of Realtors reported that, as of 2020, homeownership rates were about 72% for white households, 62% for Asian, 51% for Hispanic and 43% for Black.

Average Credit Score by Race

Credit scores differ vastly when broken down by race. The credit card processing company Shift found these average FICO scores in 2021:

  • Asian, 745.

  • White, 734.

  • Hispanic, 701.

  • Black, 677.

Then there's the issue of credit invisibles, or people with no credit history or report at any of the three bureaus. If you don't do business with companies that report to the credit bureaus, you will be penalized when applying for credit. A thin credit file appears riskier to lenders, resulting in credit denials or higher interest rates for the borrower.

Roughly 15% of Black and Hispanic consumers are considered credit invisible, compared with 9% among white and Asian consumers, according to the most recent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau data. An additional 13% of Black and 12% of Hispanic consumers have unscored records, compared with 7% of white.

How Lending Discrimination Affects Borrowing Opportunities

Lending discrimination prevents qualified borrowers from seeking homes in certain neighborhoods and building wealth through homeownership.

Ulzheimer points to a recent case of lending discrimination affecting borrowing opportunities. The CFPB and the Department of Justice found that Trident Mortgage Co. intentionally discriminated against families living in majority-minority neighborhoods in the Philadelphia area and ordered the company to pay more than $22 million in damages.

Tiffaney Williams, an Atlanta credit educator with a doctorate in business from Trinity International University, has seen lending discrimination firsthand.

"I've had clients with the exact same scores and financial situations almost mirrored," Williams says. "The minority was rejected. My white client's credit request was accepted on the same exact day."

She adds: "It also weighs heavy on the client's confidence to build credit and wealth, making them back away from their goals."

Other Race-Related Factors That Hurt Credit Scores

Disparities in wealth, student loan debt and financial literacy are factors that can hurt credit scores for different racial groups. Much of the problem with credit scores stems from the income gap, says Ramona Ortega, founder of My Money My Future, a financial services firm helping millennials of color build wealth.

The difference between "the average wealth of a white family and that of a family of color is huge," Ortega says. "That alone impacts credit scores. If you have a higher income, you are more likely to pay your bills on time and are offered higher credit limits."

The median income in 2020 for Black households was $45,870, compared with $55,321 for Hispanic, $74,912 for white and $94,903 for Asian households, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Regardless of income after graduation, Black households carry more student debt, which can hurt their creditworthiness, reports the Brookings Institution. Student loans can be problematic for credit scores, Ortega says.

Black college graduates owe an average of $25,000 more in student loan debt than their white counterparts, according to a 2022 report by the Education Data Initiative.

Misinformation about credit also can work against communities of color, Ortega says. The sense is that "all credit is bad," she says, which leads to avoidance of traditional credit products.

Some types of credit favored by Black borrowers, such as payday loans, aren't factored into credit scores. Black and Latino consumers are more likely than white consumers to depend on high-interest financial services such as payday lenders and check-cashing counters because their neighborhoods have fewer banks, according to a Brookings Institution analysis. [MORE]

San Jose Removes “Bascom” from Buildings and Streets as Records Reveal the Bascom Family Bought Slaves, Unjustly Enriched Themselves

From [HERE] For decades, the Bascom family name has adorned one of San Jose’s busiest thoroughfares, a bustling light rail station and prominent buildings around the city.

But now the California pioneers whose lineage in the area dates back to the Gold Rush era are the latest historical figures to come under scrutiny over their ties to the slave trade.

Spurred by county health workers who questioned the family’s past, Santa Clara County has decided to remove the name from Valley Health Center Bascom — an outpatient clinic established in 1985 — replacing it with “San Jose.”

“I think it’s about time,” said Herbert G. Ruffin, a historian who has investigated the Bascoms’ history, about the county building name change. “This is just the beginning.”

According to records, Dr. Louis Hazelton Bascom, who came to the city with his wife and seven children in 1849 from Kentucky, bought an unidentified Black man upon his arrival to be his cook for four years — a troubling account that prompted the health workers to seek to have the name removed.

The move places the Bascoms on a long list of historical figures around the Bay Area and beyond whose names have stirred debate amid a reckoning of the country’s racist past.

It also may put a wide variety of sites around San Jose that bear the Bascom name on the chopping block, most significantly a 158-year-old, 5-mile-long avenue that runs through both San Jose and a small chunk of Campbell. The Bascom name also appears on a San Jose community center, light rail station and public library, which came under fire a year ago when a petition was created to change the name for the same reasons, though the effort has so far gone nowhere.

Santa Clara Valley Medical Center CEO Paul Lorenz said county health workers approached him in April about removing the family’s name.

“When the history of the Bascom family, including slave ownership, became known, we listened to the thoughtful and constructive opinions of our physicians and staff,” said Lorenz in a statement. “By doing so, and by changing the clinic’s name, we uphold our beliefs and commitment to our community, employees, and patients.”

On Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to rename the hospital. The vote was part of a wider rebranding effort that included a handful of other health centers at a cost of around $250,000.

At the center of the Bascom controversy is a May 1887 article penned by historian M.H. Field in The Overland Monthly, a now-defunct national magazine once based in California.

“It was not till spring that Doctor (Bascom) found a black man who could cook,” wrote Field in a larger story about the family’s arrival in San Jose. “He paid $800 for him.”

Still a mystery are the exact circumstances surrounding the cook’s arrangement, as well as what eventually happened to the man after a four-year period with the Bascoms, as additional documentation hasn’t come to light.

Ruffin, whose 2014 book “Uninvited Neighbors: African Americans in Silicon Valley” mentions the Bascoms, said that the history of slavery in California around the time of the Gold Rush was complicated and murky. Though California was established in 1850 with statewide legislation banning the practice, localities such as the then-capital San Jose did not enforce the law for roughly five years. This meant that a free person could be sitting in the same room as someone who was enslaved.

Field makes mention of this in the 1887 article. “Folks said (the cook) wouldn’t stay — for, of course, he was free in California — but he did,” he wrote.

Ruffin says that the evidence that the Bascoms purchased the man — combined with similar stories he’s investigated around that time in California — indicates the cook was a slave.

“A free person does not get purchased for $800,” said Ruffin, an associate professor of African American studies at Syracuse University.

Louis Bascom and his wife, Anne Marie, are both buried at the Oak Hill Funeral Home in south San Jose. Described as “early California pioneers” on their gravestone, their home was known as a “center of activity” within the community. Louis practiced medicine but liked to farm, the gravestone states, and he and his wife eventually moved to Santa Clara near where Bascom Avenue is located.

Local historian Frank Maggi said that a number of early Californians also were slaveowners, including the state’s first governor Peter Burnett, whose name was taken off of a San Jose middle school in 2019 and replaced with the title of a local Native American tribe because of the politician’s racist past. James Reed, who has a street named after him in San Jose and was one of the organizers of the ill-fated Donner Party, also was a slave owner.

NY AG Fines Keller Williams Reality for Steering White Property Buyers Away from Black/Latino Areas and Directed Non-Whites into Areas with Fewer White Residents

From [HERE] After being accused of racial discrimination, three Long Island brokerages are to pay $115,000 in a settlement with New York State.

According to an announcement from the New York State Attorney General’s office released on Tuesday, Keller Williams Greater Nassau, Keller Williams Realty Elite, and Laffey Real Estate will pay the penalty as part of a settlement. The three brokerages were implicated for racial discrimination in a Newsday investigation in 2019. The New York Office of the Attorney General opened an investigation into these brokerages and several others after the Newsday exposé.

“Efforts to discriminate against any New Yorker’s fair access to housing cannot, and will not, be tolerated,” Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “These investigations have uncovered a pervasive culture of allowing unlawful discrimination and violations of every New Yorker’s right to fair housing. These settlements should send a clear message: if you discriminate and deny New Yorkers their basic right to housing, we will take action.”

According to the release, the penalties will fund fair housing training for agents and the enforcement of fair housing laws in Suffolk and Nassau Counties on Long Island. Laffey will pay $30,000 to the state and $35,000 to Suffolk County to conduct unannounced fair housing training of any Laffey agent at any Laffey Branch. Both Keller Williams franchises are required to pay $25,000 to Suffolk County and spend $25,000 on fair housing training for its agents, according to the attorney general’s office.

“Real estate professionals in New York state have an obligation to provide fair and equitable services to all,” Robert J. Rodriguez, New York’s Secretary of State, said in a statement. “Housing discrimination is illegal, and the Department will not tolerate New Yorker’s rights being violated. This comprehensive fair housing settlement demonstrates that New York’s leadership is making sure every New Yorker has equal access to housing. The penalties and agreements with these real estate companies educate their agents about housing laws to ensure New Yorkers are protected.” 

Discrimination uncovered by Newsday

The discriminatory practices were discovered in a 2019 Newsday investigation. The publication found that “numerous” Long Island real estate agents tried to steer white property buyers away from minority neighborhoods, and directed minorities into areas with fewer white residents.

As part of the investigation, actors went into real estate offices posing as prospective homebuyers. Diane Leyden, a manager at Laffey Real Estate in Great Neck, was captured on a hidden camera steering a actor posing as a Hispanic homebuyer away from whiter areas, and lecturing him on viewing properties outside of his budget, without any insight into his finances. On the other hand, in Leyden’s interactions with a white actor, she was seen not offering any of the same warnings on budgeting, and guiding the buyer towards whiter neighborhoods.

“Do you want your kids to be in school with kids that they relate to?” she asked the white actor, according to the attorney general’s investigation.

Another Laffey broker, Nancy Anderson, asked a Black actor for proof that he had been pre-approved for a mortgage before agreeing to show him any properties, a step she did not make any white actors take.

Over at the Keller William franchises, the investigation stated that agent Le-Ann Vicquery of steering a Black homebuyer into the minority neighborhood of Brentwood, while warning a white tester to research gang violence in the neighborhood.

As a result of the Newsday investigation, Vicquery and 22 other agents were sued by the New York Department of State. After initially winning her case, Vicquery ended up having her real estate license suspended for 30 days after the state won an appeal.

The majority of the brokers named in the investigation have not admitted to any wrongdoing. When asked to appear at a New York State Senate hearing in December 2019, only one of the 68 agents asked agreed to appear. In addition, the Keller Williams branches have strongly denied that they ever steered anyone away from certain neighborhoods based on their race.

Keller Williams Greater Nassau, Keller Williams Realty Elite, and Laffey Real Estate had not returned requests for comment by the time of publication.

Google Unveils New Rules to Ban Smartphone Apps that Provide Info Contrary to Big Pharma in Uncle Brother's Latest Attempt at "Single Source Propaganda" for its Deadly Vaccines and Harmful Drugs

From [HERE] Google Play, the Android smartphone-based app store, has unveiled sweeping new rules that ban apps deemed to contain or promote “misleading health claims that contradict existing medical consensus, or (that) can cause harm to users.”

Issued on August 31, Google Play’s new “health misinformation” policy is an in-app censorship sweep that targets any and all apps that even so much as question official health policy about vaccines, including the idea that “vaccines can alter one’s DNA.”

Google is also going after apps that advocate for “harmful, unapproved treatments” such as vitamin C, vitamin D, ivermectin, or any number of other remedies that the government has deemed to be “misinformation.” (Related: Google no longer allows any mention of covid vaccines in Google Surveys.)

According to Google, “conversion therapy” is another “harmful health practice” that cannot be advocated for in any apps available on Google Play. One wonders if this means that Bible apps are now forbidden since the Holy Word addresses unnatural homosexual behavior.

Big Tech is the government’s Ministry of Truth

The timing of this new policy change coincides with a major shift in the government position on things like masking and even vaccinating. Suddenly, the government is no longer pushing these things like it once was, which begs the question: Will Google be able to keep up with accurate censorship?

In 2020, Tony Fauci was insistent that Pfizer’s mRNA (messenger RNA) injection was 90 percent effective against the Fauci Flu, which he called extraordinary. Fast-forward to 2022 and now Deborah Birx is basically admitting that she, Fauci, and others lied about the shots.

The newest claim is that everyone “knew” that Chinese Virus injections were not effective at preventing infection. They all just lied about it to pad the pockets of Big Pharma and complete Operation Warp Speed.

Big Tech, meanwhile, has struggled to get the narrative right at any given time. On one day, social media and tech platforms are having to silence people for saying that the shots are ineffective, while the next the government itself is saying they are ineffective.

Still to this day, Facebook is banning users of notoriety who claims that covid injections might not keep a person safe from infection. YouTube is doing the same thing, even going against World Health Organization (WHO) directives about the shots.

“Even after the consensus changed and some of the censorship rules were quietly dropped, most of the censored posts and channels weren’t reinstated,” reports Reclaim the Net.

“The new health misinformation rules add to Google Play’s extensive set of existing misinformation rules which prohibit apps containing ‘election misinformation’ and ‘misleading’ content. Google Play has already removed thousands of apps under these existing rules.”

Rockefeller Foundation Funds Behavioral Scientists to Push Genocidal COVID Injections in Africa and the Americas

From [HERE] An initiative funded in part by the Rockefeller Foundation is investing an initial $7.2 million in behavioural research focused on convincing more people to get the Covid-19 injections, the foundation announced last week.

The initiative is called The Mercury Project, run by the Social Science Research Council (“SSRC”). In September 2021, the SSRC received a three-year $7.5 million grant from the Rockefeller Foundation toward the costs of launching a research consortium to drive acceptance and uptake of Covid-19 vaccination efforts and provide insights to counter health misinformation and disinformation. The grant will fund research through 31 August 2024.

The Rockefeller Foundation is a globalist organisation founded by oil magnate and robber baron John D. Rockefeller in 1913. Since then, the Foundation has influenced many of the world’s largest and most powerful institutions, including the World Health Organisation and the National Institutes of Health.

An initiative funded in part by the Rockefeller Foundation is investing an initial $7.2 million in behavioural research focused on convincing more people to get the Covid-19 injections, the Foundation announced last week. 

The initiative is called ‘The Mercury Project’, run by the Social Science Research Council (“SSRC”). In September 2021, the SSRC received a three-year $7.5 million grant from the Rockefeller Foundation “toward the costs of launching a research consortium to drive acceptance and uptake of Covid-19 vaccination efforts and provide insights to counter health mis- and dis- information.” The grant will fund research through 31 August 2024. 

The Rockefeller Foundation is a globalist organisation founded by oil magnate and robber baron John D. Rockefeller in 1913. Since then, the Foundation has influenced many of the world’s largest and most powerful institutions, including the World Health Organisation and the National Institutes of Health.  

The Foundation’s $7.5 million grant to SSRC for The Mercury Project remains the lion’s share of a total $10.25 million also granted by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. 

“The Social Science Research Council (SSRC) announced it will provide an initial USD 7.2 million in direct research funds to 12 teams working in 17 countries in order to better understand how health mis- and disinformation spreads, how to combat it, and how to build stronger information systems, while increasing Covid-19 vaccination rates,” said the Rockefeller Foundation in a statement. 

The SSRC last week announced its first cohort of “social and behavioural scientists from around the world to generate much-needed new research on locally tailored solutions in Bolivia, Brazil, Côte D’Ivoire, Ghana, Haiti, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, United States, and Zimbabwe.” 

Each team on The Mercury Project will receive over $600,000 to research such topics as “Combatting health misinformation with community-crafted messaging: Developing a scalable community-driven approach in Latin America and the United States.” Teams will also study how to “harness influencers to counter misinformation” and censor dissenting viewpoints on social media through “network-transforming interventions for reducing the spread of health misinformation online.” 

In addition to research, the Rockefeller Foundation joins George Soros’ Open Society Institute (“OSI”) in funding local community efforts to inject residents with Covid-19 injections. 

Earlier this month, Frontline News revealed earlier this month that the Orthodox Jewish community in Baltimore has unknowingly been the target of an injection campaign funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Open Society Institute. The campaign is run by fellow resident Laura Kurcfeld and her team of five vaccine evangelists, who are funded by VALUE Baltimore’s BMoreVaxxed initiative. VALUE Baltimore, in turn, is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and OSI. 

US Pumped $20M into a New Behavioral “Science” Propaganda Program that Seeks to Trick More Sheeple Into Taking COVID Shots by Failing to Disclose that they Cause Death, Cancer, Clots, Miscarriages etc

From [HERE] In June of 2022, the United States government pumped $20 million into a new behavioral science program that seeks to brainwash more Americans to take covid vaccines. The National Science Foundation, an entity of the federal government, transferred the taxpayer funds to the Social Science Research Council (SSRC), to advance a worldwide vaccine uptake program called the Mercury Project.

The SSRC in a non-profit group that takes in money from governments and globalist organizations to study behavioral psychology and influence people’s behavior en masse. Their Mercury Project is targeted toward vaccine resistance and seeks to implement new interventions that can effectively manipulate people to take more covid vaccines.

Mass propaganda effort currently underway to increase vaccine uptake

The Mercury Project will deploy groups of behavioral scientists to multiple regions throughout the world. They will study the reasons why people refuse the covid vaccines, and they will target the information and messages that lead people to make that decision. Their goal is to create new vaccine narratives that can be tailored to specific audiences around the globe. The behavioral research is designed to exploit the psychology of people from different ethnic and political backgrounds to increase vaccine compliance. The Rockefeller Foundation is also investing millions of dollars into this effort.

The Rockefeller Foundation and the SSRC wrote: “Following the characterization of inaccurate health information by the U.S. Surgeon General as an ‘urgent threat,’ and by the World Health Organization as an ‘infodemic,’ the SSRC issued a call for proposals to counter the growing global threats posed by public health mis- and disinformation and low Covid-19 vaccination rates.” The SSRC has already received two hundred submissions from organizations around the world. All these organizations hope to exploit the population and change human behavior through propaganda and coercion.

“With Covid-19 prevalent and rapidly evolving everywhere, there is a pressing need to identify interventions with the potential to increase vaccination take-up,” the SSRC wrote.

Over the past two years, interventions such as workplace vaccine mandates had a strong effect on human psychology, making people line up for experimental vaccines under duress because their careers and their ability to provide for their family was on the line. The vaccine passports also had a strong effect on human behavior, converting more people into guinea pigs because their livelihood and civil liberties were threatened. What other unlawful decrees will this manipulative and abusive program conjure up?

In many cases, the rule of law has been restored. Civil disobedience and court rulings have shut down vaccine passports and vaccine mandates in many places, but the threat of segregation, discrimination and lost income still looms for many people around the world – across the dilapidated healthcare field and even in the United States military! (Related: Government conducting clinical trials to learn how best to manipulate Americans to take covid-19 shots.)

World manipulators seek new interventions to coerce people to submit to upcoming covid vaccines

Some of the newly proposed interventions include: partnering with secondary school students to identify so-called covid-19 vaccine misinformation. These vaccine uptake programs are looking for ways to infiltrate curriculum and public educations systems to brainwash children into being vaccine-obedient parrots. The intervention also includes partnerships with local authorities to target covid-19 vaccine misinformation. Local authorities who enter into these partnerships will be able to target people in the community as “public health threats” if they talk about vax freedom, hold rallies on medical freedom, or educate and write books about health freedom.

The interventions will also include partnerships with trusted, influential community members who will be enlisted to amplify covid-19 vaccine propaganda to increase demand for vaccines in the local community. Additionally, the evidence against the covid-19 vaccine will be increasingly targeted for removal across the internet. Even though most of this information is already blacklisted across social media, this project will seek to reinforce previous bans and target individuals are are spreading “false or misleading” messages.

This is multi-million-dollar operation designed to infiltrate communities and push more propaganda on weary populations that have had to make decisions under duress, censorship and coercion. Even though the scientific literature overwhelmingly supports non-paranoid, natural exposure to one’s environment, a healthy lifestyle, nutrition, natural immunity and treatments if need be, the globalists still demand 100 percent obedience to deadly vaccines and will go to great lengths to manipulate the population to comply. As their efforts to control, coerce, manipulate and abuse people continue to fall short, their crimes against humanity become more obvious by the day.

A Stanford Report claims the US Government Used Sock Puppet Accounts to Spread Disinformation to Social Media Users in Russia, China and Iran to Manufacture Support for Ukraine Intervention

From [HERE] The moral high ground is almost impossible to hold. The United States has portrayed itself as the world ideal for personal freedom and government accountability, despite those holding power working tirelessly to undermine both of those ideals.

It’s not that other world governments aren’t as bad or worse. It’s that “whataboutism” isn’t an excuse for navigating the same proverbial gutters in pursuit of end goals or preferred narratives. The ends don’t justify the means. The fact that other countries violate rights more often (or more extremely) doesn’t excuse our own.

Hypocrisy and government entities are never separated by much distance. Our government has fought a War on Drugs for years, publicly proclaiming the menace created by the voluntary exchange of money for goods while privately leveraging drug sales to supply weapons to the US’s preferred revolutionaries or simply to ensure local law enforcement agencies have access to funding options that operate outside of oversight restraints.

The same government that has frequently called out other countries for disinformation campaigns and election disruption has engaged in coups and deployed its own media (social and otherwise) weaponry to push an American narrative on foreigners. 

Under President Biden, the administration (briefly) formed a “Disinformation Governance Board” under the oversight of the DHS. The intent was to prevent foreign disruption of elections and other issues of public concern. The intent may have been pure, but the reality was Orwellian. Fortunately, it was quickly abandoned.

But while the federal government sought ways to respond to the disinformation spread by foreign, often state-sponsored, entities, it was apparently doing the same thing itself, as Lucas Ropek reports for Gizmodo.

In July and August, Twitter and Meta announced that they had uncovered two overlapping sets of fraudulent accounts that were spreading inauthentic content on their platforms. The companies took the networks down but later shared portions of the data with academic researchers. On Wednesday, the Stanford Internet Observatory and social media analytics firm Graphika published a joint study on the data, revealing that the campaigns had all the markings of a U.S. influence network.

According to the report [PDF], the US was engaged in a “pro-US influence operation” targeting platform users in Russia, China, and Iran. Specific attribution is apparently impossible at this point, but evidence points to the use of US government-created sock puppet accounts (with possible assistance of the UK government) to win hearts and minds (however illegitimately) in countries very much opposed to direct US intervention.

It was not a small operation. Although likely dwarfed by operations originating in China and Russia, the US government leveraged dozens of accounts to produce hundreds of thousands of posts reflecting the preferred narrative of the United States.

Twitter says that some 299,566 tweets were sent by 146 fake accounts between March 2012 and February 2022. Meanwhile, the Meta dataset shared with researchers included “39 Facebook profiles, 16 pages, two groups, and 26 Instagram accounts active from 2017 to July 2022,” the report says.

Being American doesn’t mean being better. As the authors of the report note, most of the effort was low effort: AI-generated profile photos, memes, and political cartoons were all in play. But, more notably, the accounts spread content from distinctly American government-related services like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe.

This is not to say the United States government is wrong to combat disinformation being spread by countries often considered to be enemies. But it should do so through official outlets, not faux accounts represented by AI-generated photos and unquestioning regurgitation of US government-generated content. Splashing around in the disinformation sewer doesn’t make any participant any better. It just ensures every entity that does so will get dirty.

Corpse Biden’s Liarability Ratings Remain High though: He Vowed to Isolate and “cripple” the Russian economy but the US has Imported Over $6 Billion in Goods from Russia Since Ukraine Invasion

From [HERE]  In response to Russia’s attack on Ukraine, US President Joe Biden vowed to isolate and “cripple” the Russian economy. However, Moscow has been able to maintain its economic strength, in part by exporting over $1 billion per month in wood, metals, food and other goods to the US. 

More than 3,600 ships from Russia have arrived at US ports since February 24, according to statistics cited by the Associated Press. While that is nearly half of the shipments over the same period compared to last year, it still amounts to over $6 billion in imports. 

The number of Russian products entering US ports suggests Biden is falling short of his pledge to isolate Moscow’s economy. Due to so-called “wind down” periods that allow companies to complete previous deals, some of the goods continue to enter the country long after the White House announced sanctions on those products, including oil and gas. Paradoxically, other Russian imports, such as fertilizer, came at the request of the Biden administration, which has urged American companies to make up for shortages.

And while the White House has seized several luxury yachts owned by rich Russians with loose ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, the AP found that American and European firms are importing millions of dollars in metal from a Russian company that makes parts for Moscow’s fighter jets, highlighting another odd discrepancy in Biden’s sanctions campaign. 

Despite diplomatic pressure from Washington, other American allies are increasing their economic ties with Russia. Turkey – a NATO member – has doubled its imports of Russian oil this year. 

During Biden’s presidency, he has taken several steps to strengthen ties with New Delhi, with American troops currently engaged in war games with India on the Chinese border. But like Ankara, the country has similarly significantly increased energy imports from Moscow. The Indian rupee has also become a major currency for the diamond trade, allowing buyers to bypass US sanctions. 

Though the Western economic war was meant to negate Moscow’s military might and bring it to the negotiation table, it has so far seen little success. With Russian energy exports topping pre-war levels in recent months and the ruble rallying against the dollar, Russia’s economy appears to have fared far better than much of Europe since fighting erupted last winter.