If You’re Black, Pro-FBI and Support Unrestrained Searches Then You Possess a ‘GOINTELBRO’ Mind and Accept White Liberals’ Agenda as Your Own. Blacks Parroting Trump Obsessed Dems Subvert Themselves

As Defined in FUNKTIONARY

GOINTELBRO – Government Operative Incognegro Notifying The Enforcers Liberating Blackamerica’s Racist Oppressors. A Gointel-bro is a sorry-ass sophisticated hanky-head, coin-operated, Sam-Bohican, Snigger on the payrolls of the F.B.I. (or any other alphabet threat agency) as an undercover informant to foment divisiveness in Blackamerica’s ongoing centuries-long struggle for socioeconomic advancement as a people. Sniggers are equal in intent, and bound by the same flaw—covertly soul-selling out the potential self-determination of his people for the sake of his Massa’s overtly racist, statist or fascist law. (See: Snigger, COINTELPRO, Sambo, Black Flask Brigade, BOHICAN & Coin-Operated)

According to FUNKTIONARY:

propaganda – a psychological technique and means by which the lawless confound the lawful (dwellers upon the land). 2) any message intended to influence whether true or false. 3) disinformation used as programming that in its absence wouldn’t stand up itself nor stand up for itself by itself. 4) the over-preponderance of a certain message that is designed to impose certain forms and frames of reference and patterns of thought the objective of which being to subjugate a people. . . Propaganda is to be used as subversion, which is the undermining or detachment of the loyalties of significant social groups and their transference to the symbols and institutions of the aggressor-oppressor. “It is a political necessity to destroy the African consciousness of colonialized Africans or African people.” ~Dr. Amos N. Wilson. [MORE]

By [MARGARET KIMBERLY] Why would Black people laud the FBI or criticize protection against self-incrimination? The unrestrained FBI search of Donald Trump's home has reawakened Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Progressives love the FBI? Leftists embrace the Espionage Act? Of course, one man is responsible for this madness, and he is none other than Donald J. Trump, 45th president of the United States. The fallout from the FBI search conducted at Trump’s home shows the rank confusion spread by people who call themselves liberal but who are as dangerous as anyone on the right. From the moment that Trump announced the raid they were in full fascist mode, even as they claimed to be fighting fascism.

Trump did what he usually does, play fast and loose with the truth. Of all former presidents only he would ignore subpoenas and claim to have declassified documents when he hadn’t done so. He can’t get out of his own way and thus makes himself a target. But Democrats should know that the search is seen as nothing more than a personal attack against him. Millions of people who love Trump will love him all the more and conclude that the raid was meant to keep him from running for president again. Liberal dead-enders will be happy, but everyone else will say that something rotten was conducted at Mar-a-Lago.

Attorney General Merrick Garland says that the documents were subpoenaed but the former president didn’t respond. The FBI search warrant states that the search encompassed three different issues: gathering, transmitting or losing defense information, which is part of the Espionage Act; concealment, removal, or mutilation concerning the handling of records and reports; and the destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy, which is part of a section dealing with obstruction of justice. The warrant also states a search for information on Roger Stone and on the President of France.

Aside from the item descriptions, no one knows what Trump had or what the FBI found. Leaks from the Justice Department indicate something about nuclear weapons, but no one knows what that means. The lack of information hasn’t stopped the speculation which Trump always causes. There is conjecture that he was selling information to Russia or to Saudi Arabia or was plotting some other treason. There are even claims that documents were buried with his recently deceased ex-wife. It is fascinating that there can be so much guesswork about issues no one can know.

The years long Russiagate investigation is responsible for ordinarily sensible people losing their minds. Hardly anyone recalls that the charge of collusion was actually disproven, that Robert Mueller only indicted for process crimes, such as those which occur when people let down their guard and talk to the FBI. Most Americans who know the name Paul Manafort think he was a Russian spy but don’t know that he went to jail for tax and bank fraud. Propaganda works very well when it is repeated over and over again.

Worse than the silly Trump inspired derangement is the way that those who call themselves left or progressive have chosen to defend federal law enforcement and bad legislation like the Espionage Act. The Espionage Act is a relic from the earliest days of the cold war, and Woodrow Wilson’s infamous Palmer Raids which targeted the left for persecution and prosecution. Barack Obama used it more than all previous presidents combined in order to prosecute journalists who published what the state didn’t want us to know. As for the FBI, its Counter Intelligence Program, COINTELPRO, created dissension in the liberation movement, targeted individuals for prosecution, spied on Martin Luther King and told him to commit suicide, and killed Fred Hampton and Mark Clark among others. The FBI continues to use informants to entrap Black people in phony terror cases.

It is truly shameful to see Black people exalt the FBI and act as if punishing Trump is the organizing principle of all political activity. The Trump organization is also under investigation by the New York Attorney General and the former president refused to answer questions put to him in a deposition. The right to remain silent is one of the most important in American law and should be used a lot more often. But copagandatelevision shows and Trump hatred have caused their own form of insanity, and his exercise of a fundamental right was widely lampooned. No one should ever be condemned for utilizing their fifth amendment right, not even Donald Trump.

Of course, this spectacle is also used to deflect from Biden administration failures. His approval rating is still low, for the simple reason that he didn’t do what he claimed he would for American voters. He continues to pour public money into the losing effort in Ukraine and needlessly provokes Russia and China. But who is paying attention if there is speculation that Trump put files in Ivana’s casket? [MORE]

Liberals Only Talk About Prison Reduction and Police Accountability to Trick the Gullible Black Votary: Efforts to Reduce the Mostly Black Jail Population End in LA, NYC, Chicago, Philly, etc.

ABOVE CORPSE JOE DURING THE CAMPAIGN USING GEORGE FLOYD’S FAMILY FOR A PHOTO OP.

NEUROPEON BIDEN BEGGED AND BEGGED BLACKS TO VOTE FOR HIM AND HE PROMISED “TO ROOT OUT SYSTEMIC RACISM IN OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND TO ENACT POLICE REFORM IN GEORGE FLOYD’S NAME.” HE ALSO pledgeD to “strengthen America’s commitment to justice and reform our criminal justice system.” THIS WAS ALL BULLSHIT THAT THE GULLIBLE BLACK VOTARY WANTED TO HEAR OR PROOF THAT HE WILL STAND FOR WHATEVER GULLIBLE BLACKS WILL FALL FOR. ACCORDING TO THE BRENANN CENTER BIDEN HAS MADE ‘LITTLE TO NO PROGRESS.’

Decarceration is Incompatible with White Supremacy’s Goal of PLACING LARGE NUMBERS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE INTO Greater Confinement.

From [HERE] More than two years after instituting policies to keep more nonviolent offenders out of jail to reduce populations during the pandemic, California’s biggest metropolitan areas are making a U-turn in the midst of rising crime.

Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Clara are among the counties that recently stopped setting zero bail for certain misdemeanors and nonviolent felony offenses.

Such pandemic-era policies were separate from broader criminal justice reform moves over the past few years that have included laws limiting the use of bail and new approaches by district attorneys who won office on platforms de-emphasizing incarceration.

Those were driven by advocates and lawmakers who said that harsh prison sentences did little to reduce crime and that bail was unfair for people too poor to pay it.

The policies instituted at the start of the pandemic, meanwhile, were public-health measures meant to quickly depopulate jails, which were home to numerous outbreaks of the then-new coronavirus. The U.S. jail population plunged 25% in 2020 from mid-2019, to about 550,000, its lowest level in nearly a decade, according to federal data. 

California made such policies optional in mid-2020, a few months after instituting them that spring. But counties that are home to some of the state’s biggest cities kept the policies in place until this summer, after increases in crime sparked public calls for a tougher approach. In San Jose, Mayor Sam Liccardo said the pandemic jail policies were among the reasons that 43 people were arrested and then released without bail on at least 10 separate occasions between January 2020 and April 2022. Officials of Santa Clara County, which includes San Jose, have disputed his claims.

“The zero-bail experiment largely failed,” said Mr. Liccardo, a Democrat. “There is a compelling reason to rethink cash bail to ensure it does not perpetuate the racial and economic inequities inherent in the criminal justice system, but we have seen too many violent and repeat offenders put out into our community without sufficient supervision, drug treatment or constraints.”

Nationwide, jail populations have risen but were 15% below their prepandemic levels as of the end of 2021, according to the Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit that advocates for reducing prison populations.

Homicide rates have increased nationwide over the past two years, but have edged down in the first half of 2022, according to the Major Cities Chiefs Association.

That has put district attorneys known as progressive prosecutors, in cities including Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia, on the defensive. Former San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin was recalled in June by voters angry over rising crime. 

New York City Mayor Eric Adams wants the state to do more and has been drawing attention to examples of suspects who were released and went on to commit other crimes. [MORE]

[A Major Goal of Racism White Supremacy is to Put Non-White People in Greater Confinement] The US Leads the World in Incarceration with 2.2 million people in prisons & jails; 67% are Non-White

Black Americans are incarcerated in state prisons at nearly 5 times the rate of white Americans.

Nationally, one in 81 Black adults per 100,000 in the U.S. is serving time in state prison. Wisconsin leads the nation in Black imprisonment rates; one of every 36 Black Wisconsinites is in prison.

In 12 states, more than half the prison population is Black: Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia.

Seven states maintain a Black/white disparity larger than 9 to 1: California, Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Wisconsin.

Latinx individuals are incarcerated in state prisons at a rate that is 1.3 times the incarceration rate of whites. Ethnic disparities are highest in Massachusetts, which reports an ethnic differential of 4.1:1. [MORE]

Private Autopsy of Black Death-Row Prisoner Joe Nathan James Shows Uncivilized Authorities Subjected Him to a Torturous, Hours-long Murder Process. Experts say the Longest Execution in US History

From [DPIC] A private autopsy of Alabama death-row prisoner Joe Nathan James, Jr. suggests that unqualified corrections personnel subjected him to a torturous, hours-long execution process in a botched execution that experts say was the longest since the advent of lethal injection forty years ago.

The autopsy findings, described by reporter Elizabeth Bruenig in an August 15, 2022 exposé in The Atlantic, document multiple failed attempts to set an intravenous execution line, puncture wounds in Mr. James arm muscles that appear to be unrelated to efforts to insert the IV, multiple unexplained incisions, and bleeding and bruising around Mr. James’ wrists where he was strapped to the gurney. Bruenig called the execution “lengthy and painful," and a doctor who attended the autopsy said the execution team that carried it out “was unqualified for the task in a most dramatic way.”

The report belies the representation by ADOC Commissioner John Hamm that “nothing out of the ordinary” occurred during the three-hour period between the scheduled start of James’ execution at 6:00 p.m. on July 28, 2022 and the time the curtain to the execution chamber was opened at 9:02 p.m. to reveal a motionless and nonresponsive James on the execution gurney.

The autopsy, which was conducted August 2, 2022, several days after the official post mortem examination, was funded by the human rights organization Reprieve US on behalf of James’ family. Bruenig, who witnessed the private autopsy, along with noted Emory University anesthesiologist Joel Zivot, wrote that James’ “hands and wrists had been burst by needles, in every place one can bend or flex” during a “lengthy and painful death.“ The “carnage” on his body, she said, indicated that “[s]omething terrible had been done to James while he was strapped to a gurney behind closed doors without so much as a lawyer present to protest his treatment or an advocate to observe it.”

Reprieve executive director Maya Foa estimated that the execution took between three and three and a half hours to carry out from the time the execution team first attempted to insert the intravenous execution line. Reprieve’s review of 275 botched U.S. executions since 1890 found that it was the longest botched execution on record. 

Death Penalty Information Center executive director Robert Dunham said in a statement that “There is no question that this is another botched execution, and it is among the worst botches in the modern history of the U.S. death penalty.” It is the longest botched lethal-injection execution in the 40-year history of that execution method, followed by Alabama’s 2½-hour failure to establish an execution line in the aborted February 2018 execution of Doyle Ray Hamm.

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules that Arkansas’ 3 Drug Protocol Used to Murder the People on It's Mostly Black Death Row Is not Cruel and Unusual Punishment Under the Imaginary 8th Amendment

Although Arkansas is Only 16% Black, It's Death Row is 50% Black

From [HERE] The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Tuesday held that Arkansas’ three-drug execution protocol does not violate the Eighth Amendment’s protection against cruel and unusual punishment. The case, Stacey Johnson v. Asa Hutchinson, was initially brought by death-row prisoners seeking to avoid the execution protocol in Arkansas. Though Arkansas’ supply of the three drugs has expired, the ruling means that the death-row prisoners still could face execution.

Arkansas death row is 50% Black despite the state being overwhelmingly white, 68%.

The court affirmed an earlier district court ruling which also found the death-row prisoners failed to establish that the three-drug execution protocol violated the Eighth Amendment. Death-row prisoners first brought the case in 2017 when Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson scheduled their execution ahead of when the state’s supply of one of the drugs was set to expire. Four of the scheduled executions occurred, but courts halted the other four. At the time, the prisoners asked the court to find the three-drug execution protocol in violation of the Eighth Amendment and to stay their executions.

Following trial, the district judge ruled that the death-row prisoners failed to prove that the three-drug execution protocol created a substantial risk of severe pain. The judge also noted that the death-row prisoners failed to present a feasible alternative to reduce the risk of severe pain they alleged was presented by the three-drug execution protocol.

The three-drug execution protocol used by Arkansas relies on midazolam, vecuronium bromide and potassium chloride. Midazolam is meant to sedate the death-row prisoner. Vecuronium bromide then stops the lungs. That is then followed by potassium chloride, which stops the heart.

At issue before the appeals court was whether the district court erred in finding that the three-drug execution protocol presents an unsubstantial risk of severe pain. At the heart of the death-row prisoners’ argument was the so-called “ceiling effect” presented by midazolam. The prisoners argued that while the drug effectively sedates the death-row prisoner, they are still aware of the pain that comes with the issuance of the second and third lethal drugs. Both the state and the prisoners presented competing scientific evidence.

Ultimately the court found “With no scientific consensus and a paucity of reliable scientific evidence concerning the effect of large doses of midazolam on humans, the district court did not clearly err in finding that the prisoners failed to demonstrate that the Arkansas execution protocol is sure or very likely to cause severe pain.”

Arkansas has not executed any death-row prisoners since the start of the case in 2017. Arkansas’ supply of the three drugs used in the execution protocol has since expired and has not been replaced.

Catholic Order of Jesuit Priests, who Unjustly Enriched Themselves Off Slave Labor and Sales for Over a Century, Claim its Struggling to Raise Money after Promising to Atone for African Genocide

From [HERE] A prominent order of Catholic priests vowed last year to raise $100 million to atone for its participation in the American slave trade. At the time, church leaders and historians said it would be the largest effort by the Roman Catholic Church to make amends for the buying, selling and enslavement of Black people in the United States.

But 16 months later, cash is only trickling in.

The Jesuit priest leading the fund-raising efforts said he had hoped that his order would have secured several multimillion-dollar donations by now, in addition to an initial $15 million investment made by the order. Instead, only about $180,000 in small donations has flowed into the trust the Jesuits created in partnership with a group of descendants whose ancestors were enslaved by the Catholic priests.

Alarmed by the slow pace of fund-raising, the leader of the group of descendants that has partnered with the Jesuits wrote to Rome earlier this month, urging the order’s worldwide leader to ensure that the American priests make good on their promise.

The American Jesuits, who relied on slave labor and slave sales for more than a century, had discussed plans last year to sell all of their remaining former plantation lands in Maryland, the priests said. They discussed transferring the proceeds, along with a portion of the proceeds of an earlier $57 million plantation sale, to the trust. Money from the trust will flow into a foundation that will finance programs that benefit descendants, including scholarships and money for emergency needs, and promote racial reconciliation projects.

But the remaining land has yet to be sold and the proceeds from prior land sales have yet to be transferred to the trust, Jesuit officials and descendants say.

“It is becoming obvious to all who look beyond words that Jesuits are not delivering in deed,” Joseph M. Stewart, president and chair of the Descendants Truth and Reconciliation Foundation, wrote in his letter to the Rev. Arturo Sosa, the Jesuit superior general. “The bottom line is that without your engagement, this partnership seems destined to fail.”

In his letter, Mr. Stewart warned that “hard-liners” within the order maintained the position that they “never enslaved anyone and thus do not ‘owe’ anyone anything.”

In an interview, Mr. Stewart said he believed that the Jesuit leadership remained committed to the partnership, describing ongoing meetings and conversations. The point, he said, was that the descendant community needed the priests to do more than talk. [MORE]

Cops Want to Kill Blacks and Any Excuse Will Do: Video Shows White Denver Cop Shoot Black Man After He Put Gun Down, Put Hands Up. In Disregard of Life Cops Shot in Front of a Crowd, Hit 6 Bystanders

From [HERE] and [HERE] The Denver Police Department has released the bodycam video of the police shooting that left six bystanders injured in Lower Downtown on July 17.

Police say they shot Jordan Waddy after he pointed a gun at them. But the newly released video tells a different story, as it shows Waddy tossing his gun and putting his hands up just as officers began firing.

Bodycam video shows Waddy pulling the handgun from the lefthand side of his hoodie and throwing it onto the ground as he raises both hands into the air before police began firing at him from the front and the side.

Yamilette Bravo said “He did put the gun down, he threw it down and he backed away. He was in a surrendering position and yet they still shot,” Bravo said.

“There are so many civilians in that area, you basically shot innocent people. Why couldn’t you think of different ways?” Murillo inquired after watching the video.

Both students say the trust is trying, especially after seeing this video, which has now led to many people wondering what to do in this situation.

Guadalupe Murillo observed: “He did surrender, he did what almost everyone should do and officers still shot him, which is very disturbing for me.”

“I think also punishment. They did shoot innocent people. What’s going to be their punishment? If I were to go out on the street and I had a gun and I shot someone, I know I would have to serve time, I know I would have a punishment,” Bravo explained.

In a news conference, Matt Clark the commander of the Denver Police Department’s Major Crimes Division said the officers attested they had feared for their lives or the lives of their fellow officers, so they fired their weapons.

The officer on the sidewalk, who was several feet away to the right of Waddy, said he was aware of the crowd outside the Beer Hall and “explained he worked to obtain a clear sight picture of Mr. Waddy before firing one round. The officer stopped firing their weapons when they believe Mr. Waddy was no longer a threat,” Clark said in a critical incident briefing. 

The video show the cops statements are lies.

Investigators have not found any evidence that Waddy ever fired the weapon they say he pulled and the officers who fired their guns did not alert the crowd they were going to shoot, nor did they tell them to clear the area beforehand as they did not have time to do so, the commander said. [MORE]

Sacramento to Pay Only $1.7M to Stephon Clark’s Parents. White Cops Murdered Black Man, Shot at Him 20X Without Warning as he Held a Phone in Backyard and After he Fell to His Hands and Knees

From [HERE] The city of Sacramento on Friday said it had agreed to pay $1.7 million to the parents of Stephon Clark, an unarmed Black man who was shot seven times by city police officers in March 2018.

The payment settled the final portion of a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by his parents and ends the family’s legal action against the city, the city attorney, Susana Alcala Wood, said in a statement.

Mr. Clark was 22 years old when two officers in the Sacramento Police Department chased him into his grandmother’s backyard and shot at him 20 times, killing him. His death ignited widespread protests in the capital city and prompted the city and the state to change their policies around the use of deadly force by police officers.

In October 2019, the city agreed to pay $2.4 million to Mr. Clark’s two sons, then ages 2 and 5, after his family filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against the city and the two officers involved in the shooting. A later court ruling left his parents as the sole remaining plaintiffs, the statement said.

The two white officers who shot Mr. Clark, Terrence Mercadal and Jared Robinet, did not face criminal prosecution because Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert, a racist suspect liberal democrat declined to file charges. In fact she has Not Charged Any Cop in Over 30 Separate Shooting Investigations

Both white officers are still employed by the police department, a police spokesman said.

"The involved officers . . . fired 20 shots striking (Clark) approximately eight times," including shots as he was going to the ground and shots after he had already went down to the ground. At the time of the shooting, DECEDENT was unarmed, with nothing but a cell phone in his hand.”

"The conduct of officers Terrence Mercadal and Jared Robinet was willful, wanton, malicious, and done with reckless disregard for the rights and safety" of Clark, the lawsuit alleges. It says the officers violated Clark's basic civil rights.

At the time of the shooting Clark posed no immediate threat of death or serious physical injury to either Officers TERRENCE MERCADAL or JARED ROBINET, or any other person, especially since he was unarmed and since he was going to the ground or already on the ground when he was shot, including multiple shots to his back.

Officers did not give Clark a verbal warning that deadly force would be used prior to shooting him multiple times, despite it being feasible to do so and they did not issue appropriate commands to Clark. Further, the involved officers did not announce themselves as police prior to the shooting.

Further, Clark was not suspected of committing any serious crime, the involved officers did not observe him commit any crime, the involved officers had no information that he was armed with a weapon, and there was no information that he had physically injured anyone.

The involved officers shot Clark even though he was not an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury to the officers or anyone else and there were other less than lethal options available. Officers TERRENCE MERCADAL and JARED ROBINET did not show a reverence for human life.

The involved officers are responsible for every single shot they fired and this was not an immediate defense of life situation.

After striking Clark approximately eight (8) times, TERRENCE MERCADAL and JARED ROBINET did not provide or summons timely medical attention for Clark, who was bleeding profusely and had obvious serious injuries, and TERRENCE MERCADAL and JARED ROBINET also did not allow and prevented responding medical personnel on-scene to timely render medical aid/assistance to him. [MORE]

An analysis of police video footage by The New York Times found that the police officers continued to shoot Mr. Clark after he had fallen to his hands and knees.

The killing ignited protests to demand accountability, with demonstrators stopping traffic in downtown Sacramento and on a major interstate that runs through the city.

Mr. Clark’s brother, Stevante Clark, said at a news conference on Friday that he would continue to call for the officers involved to be fired, charged and prosecuted, the local NBC affiliate KCRA reported.

“There’s no reason I should be out here talking about my brother’s legacy, defending my brother’s legacy, when the officers who murdered him should be proving their innocence in court,” Mr. Clark said. “We always have to relive the death of Stephon.”

Stevante Clark said that he had organized a protest for Saturday afternoon and that events would be held throughout the weekend in honor of what would have been Stephon Clark’s 27th birthday on Aug. 10.

“Stephon Clark’s death was a tragedy that brought pain and sorrow to his family and to our entire city,” the mayor of Sacramento, Darrell Steinberg, said in the city’s statement about the settlement. “Everyone wishes this heartbreaking event had not occurred.”

Investigations by the city, county and state and federal agencies found that the officers acted within the rules of the police department and the laws of the state.

“The fact that the officers acted within the law does not diminish the tragedy of what occurred,” Ms. Alcala Wood said in the statement. “This case has led our city to implement meaningful improvements to policy, and it will continue to do so.”

Mr. Clark’s death prompted California to raise the legal standardfor when police can use deadly force to “only when necessary in defense of human life.” Previously, the law allowed for the use of deadly force when “reasonable.”

The Sacramento Police Department also updated its body camera, foot pursuit and use-of-force policies.

Although Lexington, Mississippi is 85% Black, Elite Whites are in Control of Everything of Value. Said Phenomenon which Defies Statistical Laws of Probability is Finally Questioned in Police Lawsuit

THE WORLD IS 90% NON-WHITE BUT EVERYWHERE WHITES AND BLACKS LIVE TOGETHER THE WHITES ARE IN CONTROL. THERE IS NO SYSTEM OF BLACK SUPREMACY IN EXISTENCE

Truthout reports that “A flagrantly racist and violent ex-cop is bringing national attention to a small town in Mississippi where Black residents say they were systematically “terrorized” by police and the court system. Civil rights advocates condemn the officer’s actions and say they are a symptom of a larger problem that extends far beyond one rural community and a “bad apple” among the local police.

A lawsuit filed in federal court this week claims white police in the rural, majority-Black town of Lexington, Mississippi, targeted Black residents and subjected them to false arrests, brutality, excessive fines and unreasonable searches. The department’s discriminatory intent was made clear by a leaked recording of Sam Dobbins, the former police chief, hurling racist and homophobic slurs and bragging about killing 13 people as an officer, the lawsuit argues. In the recording, Dobbins relishes the idea that residents “fear” him.

Dobbins made national headlines after a Black officer secretly recorded 17 minutes of audio capturing his former boss repeatedly using words such as “faggot” and “N—–” while boasting about police brutality. Dobbins patrolled the streets of Lexington “with impunity” despite a well-known history of harassment, racist remarks and allegations that he jailed a man on bunk charges while working for a different Mississippi county in 2013 and nearly beat the man to death, according to the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting, which first revealed the audio recording. The officer who secretly recorded Dobbins reportedly resigned on July 19.’

Local aldermen voted 3-2 to fire Dobbins on July 20 to applause from Black residents. However, those residents and activists say the problem of racist policing in Lexington and across the South is much bigger than Dobbins. Jill Collen Jefferson, founder and director of JULIAN, the Mississippi-based civil rights group that filed the lawsuit, said it’s time to shine a light on the ongoing racist abuses in Lexington. Representing several local Black plaintiffs, the group is asking a federal judge for a temporary restraining order on Lexington police to protect Black residents.

Civil rights groups and local plaintiffs are also calling on the Justice Department to investigate, as federal officials have done in larger cities with patterns of racist police abuse, a practice that was temporary halted under former President Donald Trump before resuming under President Joe Biden. Allegations included in the lawsuit also come from witnesses working for the Lexington police, who reported that Dobbins and other officers brutally beat residents after handcuffing them or dragging them out of the back of patrol cars. 

“There needs to be a formal, federal investigation, and not just of the one office or two offices or the police department, but of this entire town,” Jefferson said in an interview. “It’s really hard to explain [to outsiders], but every branch of government in Lexington is corrupt, every branch of government is controlled by white supremacy.”

Of Lexington’s roughly 1,800 residents, about 85 percent are Black, but former Police Chief Dobbins, the local prosecutor, the judge, the mayor, and other top officials are all white and politically intertwined with one wealthy white family, according to Jefferson. Katherine Barrett Riley, the city’s attorney and a member of the family Jefferson described, did not respond to a request for comment. 

Despite his checkered past, Dobbins was hired by city officials to “control” the local Black population and boost revenue with fines and legal fees, Jefferson said. Residents reported hundreds of roadblocks set up in the tiny town to target and stop Black drivers. Two plaintiffs, both Black men, say they were targeted and arrested on bogus charges — including for possessing marijuana that was allegedly planted by police — after speaking out about police harassment at a community “know your rights” meeting earlier this year.

Former resident Tasha Walden said she fled Lexington and moved to Memphis, Tennessee, to protect her family from Dobbins, who repeatedly wrote baseless tickets and made “repeated excuses” to arrest her son without a warrant. Walden’s son, who followed her and now lives in Memphis, is one of several plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which lays out a disturbing pattern of racial profiling, excessive force and sexual harassment by Lexington police.

“It’s a nightmare, it’s terrible, people are afraid to even walk down the street to go to the store to pay bills, because every time Black people come out, it’s always a problem,” Walden said over the phone on Thursday. “No matter if you ride or if you’re walking, it’s still a problem, especially the young Blacks, the younger generations, it’s a problem for them.” [MORE]

Anon states:

Q: Are you saying blacks cannot be racist toward whites?

A: That’s correct. Of course, all people can be hateful or prejudiced. Those terms describe individual behaviors, not systematic power. Racism is the COLLECTIVE behaviors of a group. A white individual within a system of racism/white supremacy has the implicit or explicit support of that system IF they choose to practice racism.

If a poor man robs a rich man at gunpoint that doesn’t mean the poor man is more powerful (economically and politically) than the rich man. The poor man is an individual who committed a crime of opportunity. There are no powerful institutions or systems that support his right to rob the rich man, but there are institutions and systems that allow the rich man to rob the poor man - which is why he doesn’t need a gun to do it.

A black person who mistreats a white person doesn’t mean black people are more powerful (economically and politically) than white people. Never confuse the actions of a black individual (or a group of black individuals) that mistreats someone white as proof that black racism exists. Their “power” is limited ONLY to what they can do as individuals. There are NO black institutions or systems that support, defend, or finance the right of blacks to mistreat whites.

There are NO black individuals or black organizations that have the power to strip whites of their collective right to live where they want, work where they want, get an education wherever they want, or control what white people do collectively in ANY area of human activity. There are NO black institutions that are more powerful than white institutions. Therefore, blacks do not have the COLLECTIVE POWER to diminish the quality of life for the white collective. [MORE]

SYSTEM OF RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY IS A BEHAVIORAL SYSTEM OF SURVIVAL. In reality, persons who classify themselves as Whites make up less than 10% of the world's population. That is, 90% of the world's population of 7 billion people are non-white. [MORE]

Dr. Bobby Wright observed, “although the world is 90% non-white, everywhere one finds whites and blacks in close proximity to each other, whether it is Chicago or Zimbabwe, the whites are in control. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every know statistical law of probability.” [MORE]

Dr. Amos Wilson, a true rebel to lionize, similarly stated, "[Blacks] must question how is it that a minority people [whites], a very small percentage of mankind, a people who are essentially resourceless in terms of their natural resources, maintain the power they have. Why is it that the peoples [Afrikans] whose lands contain the wealth of the earth are the poorest people? This implies that there must exist a political, social situation wherein the mental orientation of our people must be so structured that the power and the ability of the Europeans to rule this earth are continually maintained.' [MORE] 

Dr. Blynd explains, "Racism is not individualistic, but institutional, cultural, economic, political, linguistic, self-perpetuating and systematic." White Supremacy is a “power group dynamic” involving the relationship between whites and Blacks in a vast system of unequal power. It is economic discrimination by one group over and against another for the purposes of subjugation and/or maintaining the imbalance of power through cooperative control, misinformation, indoctrination, genocide and oppression. [MORE] 

Fuller states, "in a socio-material system dominated by White Supremacists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by White Supremacists. The White Supremacists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers. Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by White Supremacists. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many people — particularly non-white people — prefer not to acknowledge. 

Wilson asks Black people, 

‘Who has control of your food? Who has control of your electricity? Who has control of your water? Of your jobs? Who tells you what to wear when you go to work? Who tells you when to come to work...when to leave...when to go to lunch...how to speak...how to write...how to do this...how to do that...and how are these things taught, and how they are conditioned?"-- It is by reward and punishment. " You do this you get paid; you don't do this you don't get paid; you get a raise, you get docked. What do we have here?’

To live under the power of another people is to be created by that people. To be rewarded or punished by that people is to be created by that people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of another people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation (i.e., the conditions under which we live), then we must change the power relationships. If we are to prevent ourselves from being created by another people and are to engage in the act of self creation, then we must change the power relations.’ [MORE]

NAACP Confuse 'Demands' with Begging and 'Public Servant' with Master. Authorities Keep Policies, Reports Secret in Fanta Bility Case. 8 Yr Old Girl Murdered by Cops who Fired Recklessly Into a Crowd

Larken Rose explains, “In the United States there is a ruling class and a subject class, and the differences between them are many and obvious. One group commands, the other obeys. One group demands huge sums of money, the other group pays. One group tells the other group where they can live, where they can work, what they can eat, what they can drink, what they can drive, who they can work for, what work they can do, and so on. One group takes and spends trillions of dollars of what the other group earns. One group consists entirely of economic parasites, while the efforts of the other group produce all the wealth. In this system, it is patently obvious who commands and who obeys. The people are not the “government,” by any stretch of the imagination, and it requires profound denial to believe otherwise.” [MORE]

Among other things FUNKTIONARY describes the NAACP as the Negro-Anglo-American Corporate Preserve or National Association for the Advancement of Confused People. [MORE]

From [HERE] The NAACP Darby branch and several community groups on Thursday called on the Sharon Hill mayor, police chief and borough council to release current police policy and procedures on deadly force.

Sheila Carter, president of the NAACP Darby branch, said she filed a freedom of information request on Aug. 2, seeking the deadly force policies and the contents of a heavily redacted report on the nine-month investigation by Kelley Hodge, a lawyer at Fox-Rothschild LLP, into the shooting death of Fanta Bility last August.

“If I am not going to get the recommendations from Ms. Hodge, then give me and the residents of Sharon Hill and as president of the NAACP, a copy of the policies and procedures that are in place for your officers,” said Carter, who is a Sharon Hill resident and a former county police officer.

Carter made her comments at a news conference outside of the Sharon Hill Borough Council Hall. She was joined by Cathy Hicks, president of the NAACP Philadelphia Chapter; Malcolm Yates, convener of the Delaware County Black Caucus; Alascal Wisner, executive director of the Minority Center for Participation and a representative of the United Coalition for Fanta Bility.

Bility was shot in August 2021 as she walked with her mother following a football game at Academy Park High School.

Three officers, identified as Brian Devaney, Sean Dolan, and Devon Smith, fired their weapons as the game was letting out in response to gunfire they heard in the vicinity that was unrelated to the football game.

They fired 25 shots at a black Chevy Impala, which they believed was where the shots were coming from.

That vehicle was passing the exiting crowd, which included Bility. Each officer was charged with 10 counts of reckless endangerment and one count of manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter, according the to the charging documents.

After a grand jury investigation, three Sharon Hill police officers were arrested in January and charged by Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer with manslaughter and reckless endangerment.

The police officers have been released in lieu of $500,000 unsecured bail and are awaiting trial.

In a letter to the Sharon Hill mayor, Borough Council and police chief, Carter wrote:

“As a community leader and resident of Sharon Hill, I have a right to know what rules and regulations, policies and procedures you have in place to ensure all residents, including myself and my family feel safe. I have a right to know that all officers are properly trained to be able to respond to active shooter incidents without doing harm to innocent bystanders. As a mother, my heart aches for Fanta’s family. The tragedy that took place on August 27, 2021 should have never happened. We all know and can agree to that fact. The Bility family is still in mourning and, they, along with the residents and leaders of Sharon Hill and vicinity are left one year later with more questions than answers. Therefore, we are asking for you, the Mayor and Police Chief, to provide the public with some answers. Having this information won’t bring Fanta back, but it will allow us to feel safer and know that the Sharon Hill Police Department has policies, procedures and proper training for officers in place to ensure what took place last year never, ever happens again. In order to make things right, you have to acknowledge what went wrong and tell us how you are correcting the problems that exist within the department. Full access to the independent report that was commissioned by Borough Council would do that, but in the interim, we hope you will do the right thing. Transparency is key and the residents of Sharon Hill and our community deserve answers and information.”

Carter and the group planned a protest at the Sharon Hill Borough Council meeting Thursday evening (after Tribune presstime) to address the Council and “ensure what took place last year in the case of Fanta Bility never happens again.”

On Aug. 2, the borough released its heavily redacted version of a police report about procedures. At the time, the Sharon Hill Borough Council solicitor, Courtney Richardson, said the goal of the report was to “provide measurable information that can guide future planning, training and resources allocation.”

But releasing the redacted report was a public relations disaster and was blasted by Bruce L. Castor Jr., the attorney representing the family of Fanta Bility, who said the report was “completely unacceptable.”

According to the DA’s office, the tragic incident started with gunshots on the 900 block of Coates Street in Sharon Hill after a verbal altercation between a 16-year-old Sharon Hill teenager and Hasein Strand, 18, of Collingdale.

The DA’s office said the gunfire included two shots in the direction of the police officers, who were monitoring the crowd leaving the stadium after that night’s football game.

The police officers discharged their service weapons in the direction of the Academy Park football field. The investigation by Stollsteimer’s office concluded that the shots from one of the officers killed Fanta and wounded three others who were passengers in a car traveling nearby.

Fear of a Black Quarterback: ScAry-ans Try to Run Another Black QB (Deshaun Watson) Out the NFL to Make Room for More Caucasian Mediocrity, Maintain Double Standards and Uneven Playing Fields

Cleveland Browns QB Deshaun Watson suspended 11 games, fined $5 million after settlement between NFL, NFLPA. [MORE] Sambo massa’baitor says Stephen A Smith he should be happy with master’s suspension. [MORE]

No matter what racists and fascists say, "allegations are not evidence of the truth of what is alleged."

According to FUNKTIONARY:

ScAry-ans – Caucasians who fear genetic annihilation and assimilation within the ever-impending and ever-increasing “Black Planet.” (See: Ku Klux Klan, Eugenics, Klanarchy, Bell Curve, DNA & Melanin)

white propaganda – a game two can play—which consists simply in repeating “I am better than you” and “you are utterly unlike (opposite to) me” over and over again; despite the historical record to the contrary. (See: Black Propaganda, Intoxification, Oppositional Imaging, Oppositionalism, Neuropeans, Superiority Complex, Caucasian & Disinformation)

NFL – Not For Long. In a society based on the creation and satiation of desire, and an economy wherein its sustainability and viability rests on the perpetuation of desire, how long can desire remain satiated? 2) Now-married Former Lover—the one that got away. Preoccupied with the vexed truth of an NFL, she cannot have who she truly wants, so she has someone who cannot have her truly. Are you still into the NFL? (See: Secret, PM Dawn, BASIC, Fleshback, SOB, Desire & DOPE)

Child Abuse, Best Interest of the Child or Shenanigans by a Shenanigger for the Dominant Immoral Minority? Elites Showcase D-Wade to Propagandize Genderplex Confusion as He Changes His Son's Gender

NICE FUCKING JACKET DWAYNE. PLEASE GO AWAY.

Coin-operated shenanigger Dwayne Wade is asking a court to officially change the name and gender of his 15 year old son, Zaya, whom he has apparently groomed as a transgender and “sexualized” since he was a child.

According to legal documents, obtained by The Blast, Wade is asking a Los Angeles County Court judge to make the transition official, and change his child’s name from Zion Malachi Airamis Wade to Zaya Malachi Airamis Wade. [MORE]

What is an inversion of life?

FUNKTIONARY defines as follows:

Genderplex – sexual disorientation. 2) uncertain sexual proclivities. 3) certain sexual conclivities. 4) sexual misfit. 5) sexual identity confusion. (See: Heisenberg’s Syndrome, Heterophobia, Genderflex, Homo Tiempos, Oyster & CUSP)

shenanigger – a Negro (neo-lawn-jockey) who carries out Step-n-Fetchit type activities/actions (shenanigans) for the dominant immoral minority (the psychopathic white power semi-organism), i.e., the Rhodes, Rothschild Anglo-Saxon Zionist power clique, unknowingly at the expense of him/herself and knowingly at the expense (sell-out/buy-out) of his/her people and culture. (See: McNegro, Coin-Operated, The Moteasuh Tribe, Sambo & $nigger)

Weiteko Disease – the Caucasian’s patapathetic and pathological fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man . 2) Death-force. (See: Caucasian, Western Civilization & Yurugu)

Propagenda – propaganda developed and directed to a particular audience as a means of predictive programming for accepting someone’s agenda as their very own. (See: $pinfidels, Predictive Programming & Coin-Operated)

'Thanks for the Vote But Keep the Change NGHR.” Despite Begging for Reform and Electing Liberal Puppeticians in the St Louis Area, Cops Keep on Killing Black People: 132 Dead Since 2009, 72% Black

From [HERE] On the night of April 24, 2013, six residents living in a neighborhood just north of downtown St. Louis say they saw the same thing.

A young Black man — 25-year-old Cary Ball Jr. — crashed his car, got out, stumbled onto another car and limped away. And then each said they saw Ball drop a gun from his hand and raise his arms to surrender.

That’s when they saw two police officers stand over Ball and shoot him repeatedly. Analysis of the evidence three years later by a Washington University professor concluded Ball was shot 25 times from within five feet range.

The police stated in their report that they feared for their lives because Ball pointed the gun at them. A police and F.B.I. investigation of the incident cleared the officers, and charges were never filed.

A year later, Michael Brown’s shooting death in Ferguson started a national movement calling for police accountability. Ball’s shooting barely registered with local or national media.

There was no blueprint for what Ball’s mother, Toni Taylor, or his younger brother, Carlos Ball, should do or who they could turn to.

“When my brother was killed, I wish it could have been an impacted family that reached back and grabbed us,” said Carlos Ball, who was 24 at the time. “But there wasn’t.”

Carlos Ball and his mother are now leaders in a group of largely grieving families who respond to officer-involved shooting scenes, called the Fatal State Violence Response Team, which was organized by the ArchCity Defenders nonprofit law firm.

At crime scenes, volunteer “crisis responders” ask the questions of witnesses and law enforcement that Ball’s family wish someone would have asked for them — including the names and badge numbers of the officers involved.

And they also try to support the families in every way they can.

“There’s no book that comes along with this fight,” Taylor said. “So what [Fatal State Violence] has done is basically provided a little structure of pamphlets and brochures to at least get the families in the right direction and be of assistance.”

The team also writes up reports and inputs information into databases that they can use for future analysis for the ArchCity’s overall Fatal State Violence project. The project’s January 2021 report found that from 2009 to 2019, at least 132 people have been killed by police in the St. Louis region.

Of those deaths, 72% of the people were Black.

The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department was responsible for more killings per capita than any other of the 100 largest police departments in the nation. The report, citing data from mappingpoliceviolence.org, indicates St. Louis city police killed about 18 people per 1 million residents, exceeding cities like Chicago (4), Los Angeles (4.7) and Denver (7.4). [MORE]

The group uses the analysis to support their calls to action. And those calls have resulted in action by local government — including a June executive order from the mayor to end no-knock raids and legislation the mayor signed last week to create a civilian-led agency to investigate police misconduct.

No more no-knock raids . . so now cops will knock and then murder or just claim they did like with Breonna. A civilian-led agency to investigate police misconduct? Nevertheless, citizens; have no power to hire or fire officers, are legally and morally obligated to obey all police commands, cannot decline their public service or resist even an unlawful arrest and have no power to control police authority, which is absolute on the street.

The statist, liberal who wrote this article for NPR goes on about reforms, missing the point, talking about “change is coming.” [MORE] Naturally, the answer from white liberals to all this “black lives” trouble is to vote for Democrats. It’s like a psy-op. The Democratic Party has dominated St. Louis city politics for decades. The city has not had a Republican mayor since 1949 and the last time a Republican was elected to another citywide office was in the 1970s. As of 2022, all 28 of the city's Aldermen are Democrats. With 2 exceptions it has been this way since 1981. [MORE]

At the federal level, in Missouri's 1st congressional district, a Republican has not represented a significant portion of St. Louis in the U.S. House since 1953. [MORE] Blacks make up 43% of St. Louis and 70% of Ferguson and the Black votary has undoubtedly helped Dems dominate St. Louis. Obviously, this has not translated into Black power or much of anything but continued powerlessness in a system of racism white supremacy and authority.

Change is always coming and will always be in the future for slaves or Black voters waiting for their masters to free them! FUNKTIONARY explains,

reform – superficial change in form and formalities (fictitious change) which only further lubricates the status quo by renovating and painting old society in new colors. 2) appearance of change sans the change. Reform is always in the service of the status quo and the politician: it serves the privilege of the past not the promise of the future. Reform creates hypocrisy as a matter of course. Reform is the first stage in the three “R’s” in hue-man evolution; the other two being revolution and rebellion. There are two basic types of reformists: those who are preparing the ground for Third Eye revolution and those who are trying to prevent the conscious revolution. (See: Revolution, Status Quo, Meme & Change)

reformers – naïve politicians. They came to do good and stayed to do well. Reformers themselves get reformed into the structure, consciousness and content of the dominant exploitative system—and thus become the system. (See: Revolution)

Statism – the belief “citizens” and “states” exist and the memetic thought patterns supporting such beliefs. 2) the religion of oppression and domination coupled with the science of exploitation and sociopathic control. 3) the opiate of the so-called Elites. 4) a philosophy that idealizes majority rule gang force (authority) over individual authenticity (autonomy). 5) servitude over liberty and statutes over humanity. So long as “states” are viewed and accepted as natural, normal, reality-based and inevitable, they will continue to violently abstract humans into extinction. Statism is mind control; people both unwillingly and willingly surrender their property (labor being one’s most inviolable property) to men and women pretending to be “governors,” “commissioners,” and “presidents” etc. because they believe they are “citizens” of a so-called “state” and must pay their proverbial “fair share” to support such abstractions or fictions of law.

voting booth – the PIT—a place where one takes a Political Ineptitude Test. Haven’t you heard or come to realize that secret ballots beget secret “government.” Until they pay you for your vote, you will pay for (casting) your vote. “I shall not go the polls. I have not registered. I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no ‘two evils’ exist. There is but one evil party with two names, and it will be elected despite all I can say or do.” ~W.E.B. DuBois, 1956.

voting hoax – “Help Slave America.” “We would do well to remember that voting is often a way not of consenting to something, but only of expressing a preference. If the state gives a group of condemned prisoners the choice of being executed by firing squad or by lethal injection, and all of them vote for firing squad, we cannot conclude from this that the prisoners thereby consent to being executed by firing squad. They do, of course, choose this option; they approve of it, but only in the sense that they prefer it to the other option. They consent to neither option, despising both. Voting for a candidate in a democratic election sometimes has a depressingly similar structure. The state offers you a choice among candidates (or perhaps it is “the people” who make the offer), and you choose one, hoping to make the best of a bad situation. You thereby express a preference, approve of that candidate (over the others), but consent to the authority of no one.” ~A. John Simmons. “It’s not who vote that counts—it’s who counts the votes!” ~J. Stalin. (See: Taxtortion, Freedom Iron Rule, Political Power, Technology, Ph.F. Degree, NOW, Golden Rule, Property, The Matrix, MEDIA & Elections)

voting power – an oxymoron. 2) a transitory form of illusory power. 3) the appearance of power without the juice.

As Crime Rates Drop Nationwide (Shootings and Murders are Down According to NYT/FBI) Racists Scramble to Find Another Way to Propagandize and Justify Treating Law Abiding Black People Like Criminals

According to the NYT, Nationwide, shootings are down 4 percent this year compared to the same time last year. In big cities, murders are down 3 percent. If the decrease in murders continues for the rest of 2022, it will be the first year since 2018 in which they fell in the U.S.

The declines are small. But they are welcome news after two years of large increases left the murder rate nearly 40 percent higher than it had been.

When the media reports on crime, it almost always focuses on grim stories. A recent analysis by Bloomberg found that headlines about shootings in New York City recently increased while the actual number of shootings remained relatively flat.

Americans consistently say crime is getting worse when it is not. Between the 1990s and 2014, crime — including violent crime and murders — fell more than 50 percent across the U.S. Yet for most of that time, a majority of Americans told Gallup that crime was up compared to the year before.

The bad news bias potentially leaves Americans more scared for their safety than they should be. It also may drive more people to believe that punitive criminal justice policies are needed, or that reforms are increasing crime when they are not. In a speech last month, for example, Donald Trump recounted several recent murders in grisly detail and called for “tough,” “nasty” and “mean” anti-crime policies. [MORE]

The racist suspects at NYT report that “Crime, murder and mass shootings have dominated headlines this year.” They do every year regardless of the crime rate and the NYT is very much a part of it. The Sentencing Project found that ‘Dependent media outlets reinforce the public’s racial misconceptions about crime by presenting African Americans and Latinos differently than whites – both quantitatively and qualitatively. Television news programs and newspapers over-represent racial minorities as crime suspects and whites as crime victims. Black and Latino suspects are also more likely than whites to be presented in a non-individualized and threatening way – unnamed and in police custody.’ FUNKTIONARY states:

Black-on-Black Crime – a psycho-political euphemism, unwittingly used and abused by African-Americans and deliberately by Caucasians, describing demographic criminal activity in general, as people overwhelmingly commit violent crimes on people who live in closest proximity to them, and the violence mostly occurs by those and on those who are held hostage under chronic and cyclical economically disadvantaged circumstances and environments. Do you ever hear of the slogan “White-on-White” crime? Most violent crimes (at least by number, if not also by percentage of population) take place by Caucasians against Caucasians. Where’s the associated terminology? The pathological criminality within Black neighborhoods is maintained by the ones “keepin’ it real”—that is, real quick to murder people who look like themselves. (See: Gangbanking, Pan-Africanism & Racism)

crime – as we are programmed to perceive it involves drugs, theft, murder, etc., most of which is an outward expression or release of energy by the victims from the circumstances conjured up by Doggy and the criminals which make up the majority of what passes as criminality, but in reality, the victimization of the masses by the means in which they are left to live by. Crime is so-called “government’s” biggest industry, followed closely by propaganda. Corporate State derives revenue on both sides of the law (licenses and fees) so you can avoid having to pay (penalties, violations, fees, citations, peonage, and jail time) for “breaking” the law (i.e., Roman civil law). (See: Corporate State, “Government” & Servitude)

Racists are obsessed with crime statistics in Black communities. According to the Sentencing Project, “Researchers have shown that crime reporting exaggerates crime rates and exhibits both quantitative and qualitative racial biases. This includes a tendency . . to exaggerate rates of black offending and white victimization and to depict black suspects in a less favorable light than whites.“Under the pretense of being concerned about the well-being of Black people, the liberal white media in urban areas in particular, sensationalize crime with overblown coverage and hyper alertness. To be explicitly clear, it is a guise because we live in a system of racism/white supremacy in which most white people (or the most powerful white people) seek to dominate or control non-white people with master-servant relations in all areas of people activity and who project and maintain unequal power and conditions in a white over Black system. Racists, either self-described as liberal or conservative, have no intention of changing this arrangement because they are the permanent enemy of non-white people. White liberals and conservatives spare no cost when it comes to placing Black people in greater confinement. Dr. Amos Wilson states,

"Given the historical and contemporary virulence of White racism in America and the injustice toward Blacks that such racism engenders, the number of arrests, incarcerations, and in many instances, convictions of Black males should be viewed with a jaundiced eye. The willingness of White Americans to heavily tax themselves in order to finance accelerated and increased prison construction, rapidly expanding police forces and so-called criminal justice system personnel, burgeoning private police and security establishments; their willingness to finance the incarcera­tion of a Black male prisoner upwards of $30,000 to $40,000 per year, in sharp contrast to their unwillingness to tax themselves to provide for the appropriate funding of the education of Black children and to commit themselves to the ending of racist employment practices; to provide adequate housing medical care, food and clothing; clearly implies that alleged Black male criminality plays a very important role in defining the collective White American ego and personality.”

Liberal white media (also) engage in daily “white propganda,” which FUNKTIONARY explains “is a game two can play—which consists simply in repeating “I am better than you” and “you are utterly unlike (opposite to) me” over and over again; despite the historical record to the contrary,” is aimed at satisfying the imaginative appetite of the neuropean viewing audience. It feeds them with crime data to help otherize Blacks and support a posture already taken and projected; as these white simpletons believe crime stats are proof of the fantastic myth that Blacks are inherently criminal. Based on this unstated belief, white liberals go on using crime to justify treating Black people criminally in liberal cities, freely imposing punitive policies and socially distancing themselves from Blacks.

It should go without saying but White republican prosecutors and judges aren’t filling the jails with Black people in diverse, liberal cities like Washington D.C., NYC or Chicago. If you don’t believe it put down your phone and go watch the arraignments in your local criminal court run by white liberals. While you’re there please count the number of white defendants you see. Elite white liberals control the material resources, media, government, utilities, property, commerce etc. in liberal cities. White liberal puppeticians, prosecutors, administrators and judges (along with their Black servant rolebots) use their authority to place Black and Latino people into greater confinement in places like Chicago. The real life arrangement in which nearly all arrests and criminal defendants are of Black people and all the persons doing the prosecuting and adjudicating are nearly all white, (perhaps considered disproportionate and protested to an extent by conscious liberals, always looking to reform) is tolerated in white liberal cities and considered a natural arrangement or outcome that occurs spontaneously, every day, decade after decade. Here, it also should go without saying that race is not real (racism is). [MORE]

But as demonstrated by white liberals during the COVID episode, who needs “science” and reality when you have dogma, fear, superstition, belief, stupidity and emotion, all of which are the substance of the granfalloon of racism/white supremacy? Neuropeans who imagine Black people to be inherently criminal can rationalize that it makes sense to stalk, stop, search, seize and fill the jails with them. Upon such human hierarchy clogic; Blacks naturally fall into inferior or servant positions and conversely whites necessarily maintain their master roles. As such, along with their conservative counterparts, white liberals use “black criminality” to simultaneously empower themselves.

Dr. Amos Wilson explains that “Black-on-Black criminality and violence play a crucial role in maintaining White American power in all of its manifestations.” Unlike many republicans who are overtly racist, “The bane of the African community is the exploitative White American community which projects a so-called civilized, fraternal, egalitarian, liberal face while concurrently seeking to maintain White supremacy.” White liberal crime coverage functions as propagenda in support this hypocrisy. Wilson further explains, "Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their self-congratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control.” “Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image. The Black criminal is used to support the White American community's self-serving, self-justifying judgments of itself. White America's preoccupation with Black criminality betrays its own need for reassurance; betrays its own basic insecurity regarding its projected moral purity. Consequently, the higher the incidence of reported Black criminality, the more exceptionally righteous White America feels itself to be. The more righteous it feels itself to be the more intensely and guiltlessly it promulgates and justifies its domination and exploitation of African peoples at home and abroad.” [MORE]

Do Racists Want Peace btw Gangs? Lil Doc of East Coast Crips Gets 35 Yrs for Role in 2014 Murder. Indicted After Brokering Truce w/Bloods and Florencia 13. Prosecutors Call Peace Efforts "Lip Service"

DID U KNOW THE WORLD IS OVER 90% NON-WHITE?? THE COLOR CONFRONTATION THEORY EXPLAINS THAT RACISTS GO THROUGH GREAT EFFORT “TO DIVIDE THE VAST MAJORITY OF NON-WHITES INTO FRACTIONAL, AS WELL AS FRICTIONAL, MINORITIES. THIS IS VIEWED AS A FUNDA­MENTAL BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE OF WHITES TO THEIR OWN MINORITY STATUS. THE WHITE "RACE" HAS STRUCTURED AND MANIPULATED THEIR OWN THOUGHT PROCESSES AND CONCEPTUAL PATTERNS, AS WELL AS THOSE OF THE ENTIRE NON-WHITE WORLD MAJORITY, SO THAT THE REAL NUMERICAL MINORITY (WHITES) ILLUSIONALLY FEELS AND REPRESENTS ITSELF AS THE WORLD'S MAJORITY, WHILE THE TRUE NUMERICAL MAJORITY (NON-WHITES) ILLUSIONALLY FEELS AND VIEWS ITSELF AS THE MINORITY. INTEREST­INGLY, THE WHITE COLLECTIVE, WHENEVER DISCUSSING THE QUESTION OF COLOR, NEVER DISCUSSES ANY OF ITS OWN PARTICULAR ETHNIC GROUPS AS MINORITIES, BUT CONSTANTLY FOCUSES ON THE VARIOUS ETHNIC, LANGUAGE AND RELIGIOUS GROUPS OF NON-WHITE PEOPLES AS MINORITIES. THEN GREAT EFFORTS ARE MADE TO INITIATE CONFLICT BETWEEN THESE ARBITRARY GROUPS. THIS IS ONE OF THE KEY METHODS BY WHICH A MINORITY CAN REMAIN IN POWER. THE "DIVIDE, FRICTIONALIZE AND CONQUER" PATTERN, OBSERVABLE THROUGHOUT HISTORY WHEREVER NON-WHITES ARE CONFRONTED BY WHITES, RESULTS PRIMARILY FROM WHITES' SENSE OF COLOR DEFICIENCY AND SECONDARILY FROM THEIR SENSE OF NUMERICAL INADEQUACY. THIS PATTERN, THEN, IS A COMPENSATORY ADJUSTMENT TO PERMIT PSYCHOLOGICAL COMFORT THROUGH DOMINANCE AND CONTROL.”

From [HERE] A judge sentenced South Los Angeles gang leader-turned-peacemaker Paul "Lil Doc" Wallace to 35 years in federal prison for his role in a 2014 murder.

The government has called Wallace the "boss of bosses," a senior leader for roughly 30 years of the East Coast Crips, a "violent street gang that claimed a large portion of South Los Angeles." In April, a federal jury in Downtown LA found Wallace guilty of murder and racketeering, while clearing him of a different murder in 2003. 

Wallace was known in the community for playing a key role in brokering a truce between the East Coast Crips and Florencia 13, a neighboring Latino street gang, after a 20-year war. His defense team cited "his important gang peacekeeping efforts," as well as the fact that Wallace has been shot three different times (with a total of nine bullets), in asking for a mitigated sentence. 

"I'm not here to talk about who Paul was before," Skipp Townsend, a well-known gang expert and gang interventionist, told the court on Friday. "I saw him do God's work."

But prosecutors who asked that Wallace be given a life sentence, pointed out that Wallace had made the same argument in 2018 before being sentenced for a gun charge. Then, he claimed he was " trying to lead the youth down a right path and teaching the youngsters to take care of their kids, mothers turn from drugs, you know, just leave the gang life alone.”

In their sentencing memo, prosecutors called these earlier claims of reformation "lip-service," and wrote that Wallace had "spent a great deal of his time in custody before sentencing in 2018 managing the affairs of the East Coast Crips, orchestrating extortion, and facilitating witness intimidation against perceived cooperating witnesses."

"Are you saying the efforts to make peace didn't exist?" Judge Andre Birotte (who also sentenced Wallace in 2018) asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeff Chemerinsky.

Chemerinsky said they did exist, but believed that Wallace was still capable of "horrible acts in the future." He said that Wallace had been implicated — although not charged — in a jailhouse stabbing in May 2021. 

"Arguments that he's been reformed are negated by the stabbing," said Chemerinsky. 

Wallace was convicted of murder for his role in the killing of Reginald Brown, a member of the the Hoovers, a rival gang. Wallace was said to have driven the shooter to Brown's home in his White Escalade; the AK-47 used in the killing was later found in a minivan being rented by Wallace. The government's case rested on the testimony of three cooperating witnesses, all East Coast Crips members who said that Wallace had bragged about the murder while in custody with them.

Brown's surviving wife, daughter and brother all spoke in support of giving Wallace a life sentence. 

Judge Birotte appeared torn on how severe a sentence to hand down.

"These kinds of cases are challenging," he said. "It seems as if Mr. Wallace was trying to do something different." But, the judge added, "the "long trail of destruction" left behind by Wallace "caught up to him in the end." 

"I'm not of the view that a life sentence is appropriate, but a significant sentence is," Birotte said. He sentenced Wallace to 25 years in federal prison for the murder, in addition to the mandatory minimum 10 years for the racketeering charge. Upon his release, he will have to serve 5 years probation.

About two dozen people showed up in court to support Wallace, including his wife, two daughters and various community members. After the sentencing, one of them said, "Anything is better than life."

Janine Webster, who was married to Reginald Brown, had a different reaction. 

"It wasn't what I wanted," she said. 

Before the sentencing, Wallace's lawyers asked the judge for a new trial. 

"This is a case based on circumstantial evidence," said his attorney Amy Jacks. That evidence, she said, was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. 

The judge denied the motion, saying, "I'm not inclined to take away the jury's verdict. It will be left up to the Ninth Circuit to decide," referring to the court of appeals. Later in the hearing, Jacks said that Wallace would be appealing the verdict.

Although Blacks Make Up Only a Fraction of White Liberal Seattle, They Are Far Likelier to Be Held at Gunpoint by Cops than Whites. Suit says Cops Stalked, Threatened to Kill Black Man Leaving 7-11

From [HERE] Anthony Sims was making an early morning delivery to a downtown Seattle 7-Eleven on May 17, 2020, when he noticed a Seattle police cruiser following him. As he parked and stepped out of his car, the cruiser's emergency lights activated and an officer, weapon drawn, ordered him back into his car.

Within minutes, seven additional officers, guns out, surrounded Sims, who is Black. He was ordered to walk backward toward the officer who stopped him and told to lift his coat and spin around to show he wasn't armed.

"It may be a misunderstanding," said the officer who conducted the stop.

It was. Sims had done nothing wrong and was released within minutes of the encounter.

The incident exemplifies findings by the Seattle Police Department's federal monitor earlier this year, and an independent study in 2021, showing Black people — and other people of color — are far likelier to find themselves at police gunpoint in Seattle than white people, even though Black people make up a fraction of the city's population.

That discrepancy holds for the use of force by officers on the city's residents, even though the data shows white people are more likely to be armed when confronted by officers. Sims had no weapon when he was stopped.

Sims has sued the Police Department over the stop, alleging the officer followed him for several blocks and detained him on a pretext because he's Black.

"The only apparent reason [the officer] would have stopped Mr. Sims was his race," the lawsuit alleges.

The federal monitor, appointed after the Department of Justice sued Seattle police in 2012 and the city entered into a consent decree, noted in a May assessment of the department's progress on court-mandated reforms that officers' use of force had "decreased significantly" over the past decade, including incidents where officers pointed their guns at people — considered a "Type I" use of force, the lowest category.

The Justice Department lawsuit alleged Seattle officers routinely used excessive force when making arrests and found evidence of biased policing.

Despite the overall improvements, the court-appointed monitor said Seattle police's data — which was unnecessarily incomplete — continues to show Black and Native American people "are disproportionately stopped, detained, and/or subjected to force by Seattle police," including the use of deadly force.

While instances of pointing guns at Black people were down 66% between 2015 and 2021, the data showed they were still "most likely to be the subject of a firearm pointing despite being the subject of force less frequently than White subjects or subjects of unknown race."

"Having a gun pointed at you is traumatic," said Antonio Oftelie, the monitor. "Over time, these practices erode the trust of the community."

Oftelie's findings bolstered a July 2021 report from the Center for Policing Equity, which found that among subjects of police use of force, Black people "were overrepresented at a rate several times their 7% share of the city population."

When it came to being held at gunpoint, 45% of the total instances involved Black people, the report found.

Sims, who delivers for an app-based service, said the incident that May morning two years ago left him deeply shaken.

"When Seattle police ordered me out of my car at gunpoint, I was terrified of being shot. I felt violated," he said. "The police targeted me because I had the audacity to drive while Black in Seattle. I do not feel safe driving in the city knowing that this is how SPD operates."

Sims' attorney, Nathaniel Flack, said officers endangered his client's life "without justification ... as part of a well-documented pattern of unlawful stops and excessive force against people of color."

According to Seattle police documents and an internal investigation by the Office of Police Accountability, the incident began when acting Lt. Robert Brown spotted Sims traveling east on Marion Street at 5:08 a.m. Brown noted in his report that Sims' headlights were off, "despite it being dark."

Brown ran the plate on his in-car computer and received a hit on a possible stolen vehicle out of Snohomish County. Brown radioed that he had a "possible rolling stolen" vehicle. While he was waiting for confirmation, according to the OPA report, the car pulled over outside the convenience story on First Avenue and Cherry Street, and Sims got out of the vehicle.

That's when Brown turned on his overhead lights, drew his weapon, got on the car's public-address system and ordered Sims back into the vehicle, according to the reports. At the same time, several nearby officers responded and prepared to conduct what Seattle police refers to as a "high-risk vehicle stop." Seven additional officers were on the scene within minutes, surrounding Sims' vehicle. The officers all exited their cruisers with weapons drawn, some pointing their guns at Sims, while others displayed theirs in the less-threatening "Sul" position — held close to the chest but pointed downward.

In his OPA interview, Brown said he could not tell the race of the driver when he first spotted the vehicle. The lawsuit notes Brown didn't activate his emergency lights and initiate the high-risk stop until after Sims stepped out of the car.

With the other officers watching, Brown ordered Sims out of the car and told him to show his hands. Brown then ordered Sims to spin around with his coat raised to show he did not have a weapon and walk backward toward his voice.

According to the report and a review of dash- and body-worn camera video, a baffled Sims complied with the officer's orders.

Even as he ordered Sims at gunpoint, Brown can be heard telling him, "I have no doubt that's your vehicle," and "sometimes there's a misunderstanding."

According to the lawsuit, by that point Brown and the other officers had been told by dispatch that the plate was legal and the car registered to Sims. The OPA investigation determined Brown transposed the last two digits of the plate when he input the number into his cruiser's computer.

Even so, according to the lawsuit, three of the officers approached Sims' car with guns up and searched its interior and trunk "without any probable cause or justification."

The officers, the lawsuit alleges, "could see that Mr. Sims was African-American and were motivated to use unnecessary force by conscious or unconscious bias."

The lawsuit alleges Brown's initial decision to run the plate was motivated by bias and used as a pretext to stop Sims. According to the OPA investigation, sunrise that day was expected at 5:27 a.m., and the Seattle Municipal Code states headlights should be turned on a half-hour before sunset and can be turned off a half-hour before sunrise.

Brown began following Sims at 5:08 a.m.

And while the OPA investigator and Brown's report state it was "dark" when Brown spotted the car, the dash-camera video clearly shows the sky lightening with the impending sunrise.

None of the officers were disciplined. But OPA's director at the time, Andrew Myerberg, wrote a "Management Action Recommendation" suggesting the department provide training and "guidance on the requirements and limitations of [high-risk vehicle stops], including when it is appropriate for officers to conduct felony-level stops" with firearms drawn.

Sgt. Patrick Michaud, a Seattle police spokesperson, said he could locate "no formal policy for a high-risk vehicle stop."

Cincinnati Cop Blows Her Cover: Says She "Fucking Hates Niggers.” [Why Do Racists (the Permanent Enemies of Black People) Join Police Forces in Cities w/Large Black Populations? To practice racism]

A Nigger is a Non-White Person who is Subject to White Supremacy According to FUNKTIONARY:

Neuropeans - (Neurotic Europeans) - neurotic, ignorant, narcissistic and self-deluded white supremacist Caucasians operating at the mythic and rational levels of consciousness only. 2) Fascists. (See Weitko Disease, White Supremacy and Yurungu.)

Neuropeons - neurotic, stupid and self deluded poor white trash. 2) skin heads 3) Nazis, neo-Nazis and Theo-nazis (See KKK, WOTAN, Weitko Disease, Fasxism, Racism White Supremacy, Stupidity, Ku Klux Klan & Yurungu).  

From [HERE] The Dependent Media reports that A racist Cincinnati police officer caught on tape saying “F---ing N-----s, I f---ing hate them,” now claims that she overstated her case.

Officer Rose Valentino made those remarks while stuck in traffic outside Western Hills University High School, Cininnati.com reports. She claims that she said she hated all niggers because she was provoked by a Black male high school student who stuck up his middle finger while walking past her car. The officer’s remarks were picked up on her body camera.

Valentino has been suspended pending an investigation, City Manager John Curp said.

Local outlet News 12 reports that the officer told police investigators her use of the N-word “was not intended to refer to all African-Americans,” but only to the teen who flashed her an obscene gesture.

Valentino herself has reportedly been at odds with the law, including a 2020 arrest for allegedly punching her sister and brother-in-law and vandalizing her sister’s car. There were also three occasions where failed to activate her bodycam, including two chases.

Investigators said Valentino insists she does not harbor prejudices that effect her work and, according on one officer, she claimed she’d been “desensitized to racially offensive language” by hearing music and conversation on the street where such talk is used. [MORE]

And Only a NGHR or a racist would believe or attempt to rationalize that.

It is constructive when white people reveal to us who is white supremacist - as it can be difficult for non-white people to determine who is a racist, and who is not- as it is impossible to monitor (or judge) all the individual actions and words of any white person at all times. According to Neely Fuller, identifying racists is an important step, toward counter-acting and eliminating or neutralizing Racism. He explains that Racism is primarily carried out by deception and/or violence. All white people are not racist. So it is great deception for racists to conceal themselves amongst non-racist whites. Logically however, we know that most white people are racist. Otherwise there would be no global system of racism white supremacy. Contrary to liberal disinformation, being white supremacist really has nothing to do with membership in some clownish organization like the KKK, the Nazi Party, White nationalists, Aryan Nation and racists are not necessarily white countrified hillbilly’s covered with tattoos. Anon explains, it has nothing to do with income, title, or status. A white supremacist is a white person who practices racism against non-whites. A white supremacist can be a soccer mom, a businessman, or a US Senator if they are practicing racism against non-whites. Another term for a white supremacist is “racist white man” and “racist white woman.” [MORE] Also, there are differing ways of practice white supremacy. FUNKTIONARY explains,

 “A racist regulates the withholding, distribution and redistribution of resources between two or more groups through the actual or threatening use of force, deceit and/or power.”  “Racists” are “upholders, supporters and perpetrators of the institution of the White Supremacy Dynamic.”

Most importantly, racism is not primarily about bigotry - mean words or name calling by white people, minor inconveniences such as trouble catching a cab, standing in a long line to vote or stereotypes or bad conduct . Rather racism/white supremacy is about the superior, dominate position of whites and vast unequal power, conditions and opportunities and maintaining that imbalance of power through your cooperative control and oppression.  Belief that racism is only bigotry is a vital part of false programming sold to you by the vested interests for your cooperation and submission to your own oppression. Such belief is whitenology sold by elite whites - publishers, scholars, professionals and government representatives and also promoted by showcase Blacks who parrot such false consciousness programs in various styles. FUNKTIONARY states,  “Caucasians can be racists, but racism is systematic (collective institutional) oppression.”

According to the American Psychiatric Association Only 2% of All Psychiatrists are Black in the US

ABOVE IS THE GREAT REBEL AND BLACK PSYCHIATRIST DR. FRANCES CRESS WELSING. SHE IS THE AUTHOR OF THE COLOR CONFRONTATION THEORY AND THE DEFINITION OF RACISM/WHITE SUPREMACY, must reading for any guerilla seeking to destroy the system of racism white supremacy and master-servant relations. With respect to black people’s mental health she stated,

“It is imperative that all Blackp eople understand they are not in a benign environment of benevolence and support, and that the surrounding highly structured environment is deadly; a very specific warfare is being waged against Blacks and other people classified as non-white in this social system. Further, all must understand that the specific war is racism for the purpose of white genetic survival -by any and all necessary means, inclusive of chemical and biological warfare.” [MORE]

From [HERE] There is a lack of Black mental health professionals, according to data shown by the American Psychiatric Association. 

As of 2021, only two percent of the estimated 41,000 psychiatrists in the US are black. According to the US Census, black people make up 14 percent of the USA population. [MORE]