Public transit problems disproportionately impact Black, vulnerable communities

From [HERE] From Chicago to Los Angeles, Houston to New York City, some of the country’s largest and most populous cities are facing financial stress. 

According to analysis by The Pew Charitable Trusts, published earlier this year, at least 20 of the country’s 25 largest cities must close budget gaps, as cities experience budget challenges related to rising costs, revenue sources that are struggling, reduced federal support and increased fiscal and economic uncertainty.

When cities are plagued by financial stress, essential services such as transit and infrastructure can be affected, further marginalizing already marginalized communities. Transit systems in various cities are experiencing funding gaps, with cities adding bus and rail systems to their budget cuts.

… Non-White communities made up 60% of riders, and 24% of riders were Black, according to the report. While 13% of U.S. households had incomes below $15,000, 21% of transit-using households had incomes below $15,000. Most riders used transit to get to and from work or to shop. “The overall majority of people who ride public transit are non-White, with Black people comprising the largest single group. So, when you cut funding for public transportation, when you refuse to invest in public transportation infrastructure, particularly as it relates to the inner cities, then what you have is a situation whereby these persons find it difficult to get back and forth to work,” Student Min. Haleem Muhammad said. “Public transportation is a necessity because most of the poor don’t have vehicles or have cars.”[MORE]

Human feces dripping from ceilings due to bad plumbing? Report Reveals Inhumane Conditions at Baltimore Jail, Mostly Black Inmates Lacked Basic Necessities in Facility Controlled by Elite Liberals

From [HERE] Maryland’s Department of Corrections released a report Wednesday revealing extensive structural and safety issues at the Maryland Reception, Diagnostic, and Classification Center (MRDCC) in Baltimore, problems that led to the jail’s shutdown in December.

The report, prepared by Chicago-based Walker Consultants, exposed crumbling infrastructure that deprived inmates of basic necessities such as communal spaces for recreation, meals, and personal or medical visits. The facility, built in 1981 as a short-term intake center, was housing individuals for over a year, far exceeding its original design.

These issues were first raised by planning firm CGL, after the firm had previously conducted a more general assessment of regional correctional facilities.

As a result of their study, CGL wrote in a memo to the Maryland Departments of General Services and Public Safety and Correctional Services that it was the company’s “professional opinion that the existing building does not meet the minimum requirements for the purposes intended for incarceration.”

The Walker report was shared Wednesday with The Baltimore Sun in response to a public information act request lodged after the facility’s closure.

Safety and building issues

The Walker report delved into a litany of safety and building issues faced by inmates and staff on a regular basis, including the facility’s failing heating and cooling systems, as well as its malfunctioning plumbing and fire alarm systems.

Investigators mentioned human feces dripping from ceilings in the facility due to its faulty plumbing infrastructure, and a 2022 mattress fire that its malfunctioning fire alarm system failed to activate its sprinkler system to abate.

DCPSCS officials were not able to share whether any inmates were injured in the fire, though they did say that agency and management were aware of many of MRDCC’s issues for years and routinely opted to implement temporary fixes to the facility instead of substantial improvements.

“While many of these prior repairs addressed symptoms, they did not resolve the root causes,” said a spokesperson for DPSCS. “As a result, deferred maintenance compounded over the decades.”

Aside from the general safety issues posed by the facility’s neglect, MRDCC also faced serious security concerns as a result of the building continuing to fall further into disrepair.

For one, investigators wrote that incarcerated individuals had breached the facility’s walls, digging through its structure to the exterior and between cells, enabling them to bring in contraband from the street below.

Agency officials said facility management was aware of this issue and maintained an increased presence of guards and CCTV surveillance of the impacted areas, as well as in areas in which the doors and windows of cells were broken.

Investigators also found that incarcerated individuals were spending more and more time in their cells, without other places to go for recreation, visitation and meals. [MORE]

New Report Examines the Unprecedented Execution Pace in Florida- which accounted for 40% of All Executions in the US in 2025 (35% of those Murdered by FLA Authorities were Black)

From [HERE] and [HERE] The United States car­ried out 47 exe­cu­tions in 2025, and Florida car­ried out 19 — the high­est num­ber in state his­to­ry and more than dou­ble its pre­vi­ous mod­ern record, accord­ing to a year-end report from Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (FADP). Executions in Florida — which aver­aged one exe­cu­tion every 16 days from February 2025 through December 2025 — account­ed for 40% of the 47 exe­cu­tions nation­wide, mak­ing Florida a clear out­lier in the use of the death penal­ty in the United States. Setting Florida’s record-break­ing num­bers aside, 28 peo­ple were exe­cut­ed in 10 states in 2025, sim­i­lar to 2024’s total of 25 exe­cu­tions in nine states.

Prior to 2025, the only state that had ever exceed­ed 18 exe­cu­tions in a sin­gle year was Texas, which last did so in 2009. States exe­cut­ed pris­on­ers at high­er rates in the late 1990s and ear­ly 2000s, when pub­lic sup­port for the prac­tice was much high­er than it is today. Unlike most states, where courts and pros­e­cu­tors set exe­cu­tion dates, Florida’s gov­er­nor holds sole author­i­ty to sign death warrants.

“Despite [the governor’s] pre­vi­ous mid­dling inter­est in cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, Gov. [Ron] DeSantis elect­ed to use his pow­er exten­sive­ly in 2025.”

WE, THE PEOPLE: A RECORD OF FLORIDA’S DEATH PENALTY IN 2025, FLORIDIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO THE DEATH PENALTY.

The Florida leg­is­la­ture enact­ed sev­er­al bills relat­ed to death penal­ty expan­sion in 2025, includ­ing a manda­to­ry death penal­ty pro­vi­sion for unau­tho­rized immi­grants con­vict­ed of cer­tain cap­i­tal crimes; addi­tion­al aggra­vat­ing fac­tors for crimes at schools, gov­ern­ment, or reli­gious gath­er­ings, and for the delib­er­ate tar­get­ing of politi­cians includ­ing gov­er­nors and oth­er high-rank­ing offi­cials; and expan­sion of pos­si­ble exe­cu­tion meth­ods to include any method ​“not deemed uncon­sti­tu­tion­al.” FADP’s report notes the U.S. Supreme Court has nev­er found a method of exe­cu­tion uncon­sti­tu­tion­al and ​“that Florida’s pris­on­ers could pre­sum­ably be exe­cut­ed by fir­ing squad, nitro­gen suf­fo­ca­tion, hang­ing, behead­ing, or any oth­er method imag­in­able.” The state also des­ig­nat­ed sex­u­al traf­fick­ing of a vul­ner­a­ble per­son as a cap­i­tal felony, despite Supreme Court prece­dent estab­lished in Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008) pro­hibit­ing death sen­tences for non-homicide crimes.

The state’s cur­rent exe­cu­tion method also received scruti­ny in FADP’s report. Florida remains the only state using a three-drug pro­to­col con­sist­ing of eto­mi­date, rocuro­ni­um bro­mide, and potas­si­um acetate. Court fil­ings from December 2025 pre­sent­ed evi­dence of sig­nif­i­cant pro­ce­dur­al fail­ures, includ­ing four exe­cu­tions using expired eto­mi­date, under­dos­ing of required drugs in two exe­cu­tions, unlogged eto­mi­date appear­ing in autop­sy results, and using lido­caine, which is not list­ed in the state’s exe­cu­tion pro­to­col. In response to these fail­ures, for­mer Florida State Prison Warden Ron McAndrew, who over­saw three exe­cu­tions, warned in the Tampa Bay Times that the cur­rent pace of exe­cu­tions is ​“test­ing the lim­its of the law.” FADP’s report notes the lack of trans­paren­cy sur­round­ing Florida’s exe­cu­tion pro­to­col makes it ​“increas­ing­ly like­ly that addi­tion­al details about the pro­ce­dur­al fail­ures and moral injuries inflict­ed upon state employ­ees dur­ing this exe­cu­tion spree will reveal themselves.”

The report also doc­u­ments sev­er­al trou­bling pat­terns among those exe­cut­ed in Florida in 2025. Four indi­vid­u­als—James Ford, David Pittman, Victor Jones, and Frank Walls—had thor­ough­ly doc­u­ment­ed intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties, though the report states all four indi­vid­u­als’ claims were dis­missed ​“not due to a lack of mer­it, but because they were deemed raised too late or incor­rect­ly.” Florida exe­cut­ed these four men despite cat­e­gor­i­cal legal pro­tec­tions for indi­vid­u­als with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty under both Florida and fed­er­al law. Eight peo­ple exe­cut­ed were sen­tenced to death under schemes allow­ing non-unan­i­mous jury rec­om­men­da­tions, and Florida’s cur­rent statute per­mits death sen­tences with just 8 of 12 jurors in agree­ment, the low­est thresh­old in the coun­try. FADP high­lights that almost all, 97%, of Florida’s 30 death row exonerees were sen­tenced to death by non-unan­i­mous juries. Seven1 of the 19 exe­cut­ed indi­vid­u­als had served in the U.S. mil­i­tary, con­sti­tut­ing 70% of vet­er­ans exe­cut­ed nation­wide in 2025. Four indi­vid­u­als faced exe­cu­tion with­out ade­quate legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion, with Bryan Jennings and Norman Grim hav­ing death war­rants signed while they did not have state-appoint­ed coun­sel, and Anthony Wainwright​’s attor­ney had not vis­it­ed him in more than a decade. Two exe­cut­ed indi­vid­u­als — Victor Jones and Michael Bell—were sur­vivors of abuse at state-run reform schools that the Florida Legislature offi­cial­ly acknowl­edged the trau­ma endured at these state facil­i­ties and compensated victims. [MORE]

The Imprisonment Rate for Black Women is 1.7 times the rate of imprisonment for white women - but has Declined as the Overall Rate for Women has Substantially Increased

From [HERE] Research on female incarceration is critical to understanding the full consequences of mass incarceration and to unraveling the policies and practices that lead to their criminalization. The female incarcerated population stands over seven times as high than in 1980.

Over the past quarter century, there has been a profound change in the involvement of women within the criminal legal system. This is the result of more expansive law enforcement efforts, stiffer drug sentencing laws, and post-conviction barriers to reentry that uniquely affect women. The female incarcerated population is over seven times as high than in 1980. Over sixty percent (62%) of imprisoned women in state prisons have a child under the age of 18.1

Between 1980 and 2023, the number of incarcerated women increased by over 600%, rising from a total of 26,326 in 1980 to 186,244 in 2023. While 2020 saw a substantial downsizing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this trend reversed with a 22% increase in 2023.

Though many more men are in prison than women, the rate of growth for female imprisonment has been twice as high as that of men since 1980. As of 2023, over 1 million women are under the supervision of the criminal legal system.

Race and Ethnicity in State and Federal Prisons

  • In 2023, the imprisonment rate for Black women (68 per 100,000) was 1.7 times the rate of imprisonment for white women (41 per 100,000).

  • Latina women were imprisoned at 1.2 times the rate of white women (51 vs. 41 per 100,000).

  • Between 2000 and 2023, the rate of imprisonment declined by 69% for Black women, while the rate of imprisonment for white women rose by 18%. For Latina women, the rate of imprisonment has declined 15% between 2000 and 2023. [MORE]

Contrary to Propaganda, in 2025 Police Officer Deaths Hit An 80-Year Low, Declined by 25%; More Cops Committed Suicide (184) Last Year than Were Killed On Duty (111); new law enforcement fund report

From [HERE] Deaths of on-duty law enforcement officers in the U.S. decreased by nearly 25% in 2025, according to an annual report. Said report says that “law enforcement deaths have hit an 80 year low.” [MORE]

The report from the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund shows a drop in all categories of fatalities, from 148 total deaths in 2024 to 111 last year.

Officer firearm fatalities dropped to 44, a 15% decrease from 52 in 2024 and the lowest number in at least a decade, according to the Fund's previous annual officer fatality reports.

The National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund's fatality report also showed no on-duty officer fatalities in 17 states and Washington, D.C., and none at the nation's federal and tribal law enforcement agencies last year.

It also showed a 37% drop in the “other” fatalities category that includes physical or medical issues from on-duty incidents and most other fatalities like stabbings, drownings or plane crashes. The number dropped from 52 in 2024 to 33 in 2025, and includes 14 officers who died last year from illnesses related to responding to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. [MORE] In contrast to the number of police killed (111) while on duty, police killed at least 1284 people in 2025 or more than 10 times the amount of cops who were killed.

More cops died off duty. Police officers are at a significantly higher risk of dying by suicide than in the line of duty, with an average rate of approximately 21.4 per 100,000 officers between 2016 and 2022. About 184 law enforcement officers die by suicide each year. In fact police work is not in OSHA’s Top 10 Most Dangerous Jobs. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

propaganda – a psychological technique and means by which the lawless confound the lawful (dwellers upon the land). 2) any message intended to influence whether true or false. 3) disinformation used as programming that in its absence wouldn’t stand up itself nor stand up for itself by itself. 4) the over-preponderance of a certain message that is designed to impose certain forms and frames of reference and patterns of thought the objective of which being to subjugate a people. The Jesuits were the ones who invented the word and the first to systematize its practice. Propaganda is memes distributed with an external anchor and an embedded carrier; it is linguistic obfuscation, misdirection, and purposeful deception in public rhetoric to accomplish plutocratic ends of wealth centralization and power through mind-control of the masses. Propaganda is to be used as subversion, which is the undermining or detachment of the loyalties of significant social groups and their transference to the symbols and institutions of the aggressor-oppressor. “It is a political necessity to destroy the African consciousness of colonialized Africans or African people.” Dr. Amos N. Wilson. As for the minds of the general public, the most sinister part of The Matrix in which we now live is that you have been cajoled and convinced to suppress your own free will and surrender to the manipulators who control not just your mind, but your entire reality. Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda, explained: “If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of... In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.” “Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government (all forms are) entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.” ~Michael Rivero.

(See: Public Relations, Memes, Mind Viruses, Dance of Truth, Absolute Truth, Human Language, Memetics, Good & Evil, Confusion, False Flag Operation, Nine-Eleven, MEDIA, Propagenda, The Truth, Subvertilizers, Evolution, Religion, State, ESP, Predictive Programming, Symbolaeography, Voting, Elections, Orderlies, Critical Thinking, Colonized Mind, Corporate State, “Government,” “Rolebot” & Reification)

While Wearing a Cowboy Hat Neuropeon Kristi Noem Claimed a Woman “Rammed” an ICE Cop w/Her Car. In Reality the Cop Protected Himself from Danger that He Created; Moving into the Path of a Fleeing Car

According to FUNKTIONARY

Cop Mantra – “Stop resisting arrest, stop resisting arrest, stop resisting arrest.” A pretense and precursor to murder. Everything cops say or do (including life-ending, life-wrecking abuses and/or rage-inducing bullying they routinely inflict on innocent people with impunity) needs to be looked at with extreme suspicion. Cops (patrolling predators) not only need to wear body-cameras, but they also need to be under surveillance 24/7. “If one million cobras were set loose on our city streets, wouldn’t you think it proper to know where each one was and what it was doing all the time?” ~Fred Woodworth

According to legal scholar Cynthia Lee

Officer-Created Jeopardy. Situations in which the unwise decisions or actions of the police create or increase the risk of a deadly confrontation have been called “officer-created jeopardy.” As described by one legal scholar, “[o]fficer-created jeopardy is, in essence, a manner of describing unjustified risk-taking that can result in an officer using force to protect themselves from a threat that they were, in part, responsible for creating.”

A critically important but understudied question that arises in cases involving officer-created jeopardy is whether the jury should fo- cus only on the facts and circumstances known to the officer at the moment when the officer used deadly force or whether it should be allowed to consider any facts or circumstances relevant to the reason- ableness of the officer’s use of force, including conduct of the officer that may have created or increased the risk of a deadly confrontation. In other words, is a narrow time framing approach appropriate in cases where an officer’s pre-shooting conduct may have created or in- creased the risk that the officer would need to use deadly force, or is a broad timing approach more appropriate?

Several scholars have addressed this question, primarily in the context of § 1983 litigation and how the federal courts have under- stood the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on “excessive force” under the Fourth Amendment.76 This Article builds upon the existing schol- arship and adds an examination of this question in the context of state criminal prosecutions of law enforcement officers whose use of force has killed or seriously injured a civilian. This Article challenges the conventional wisdom that the states must follow the Supreme Court and lower federal courts when deciding what constitutes excessive police force. Contrary to popular belief, states enjoy broad authority in rafting their use of force statutes and need not follow federal civil rights jurisprudence.

Seth Stoughton, a former police officer and now a law professor at the University of South Carolina, is one of the leading voices criti- quing the narrow time framing approach embraced by a number of federal courts in the § 1983 context. In his recently published book with Jeffrey Noble and Geoffrey Alpert, Evaluating Police Uses of Force, Stoughton and his coauthors note that “[a]n officer’s use-of- force decision . . . will almost always be affected by events that occur prior to use of force itself, and often prior to the subject’s noncompli- ance, resistance, or other physical actions upon which the use of force is immediately predicated.” They also assert that the argument that an officer’s conduct prior to the use of force—what [has been] referred to as “pre-seizure conduct”—is not properly part of the analysis . . . is not only self-defeating, it also runs counter to the Supreme Court’s acknowledgment that meaningful review “requires careful attention to the facts and circumstances of each particular case.”

In A Tactical Fourth Amendment, Brandon Garrett, another leading expert on police use of force, and Seth Stoughton observe that a narrow time framing approach, under which the possibility that the officer may have contributed to the creation of the dangerous situa- tion is not part of the Fourth Amendment analysis,82 unwisely ignores the fact that sound tactical police training focuses on giving the officer time to make decisions from a position of safety.83 Garrett and Stoughton point out that a decision made early in an encounter, when there is less time pressure, can avoid putting officers into a position in which they have to make a time-pressured decision.84 Sound police tactics, such as increasing the distance between the officers and a suspect or taking cover behind a physical object that protects an officer from a particular threat, can give officers more time to analyze the situation and thus reduce the risk to officers and the subject.85 In con- trast, “[a] poor tactical decision, such as stepping in front of a moving vehicle, can deprive the officer of time in which to safely make a deci- sion about how to act, forcing the officer to make a seat-of-the-pants decision about how to respond.”86 Garrett and Stoughton argue that the training that an officer has had and the training that a reasonable officer would have received should be considered relevant circum- stances in the Fourth Amendment totality of the circumstances analysis and that constitutional reasonableness should be grounded in sound police tactics. [MORE]

Make Iran Great Again: Drunk with Authority Trump Takes Off MAGA Costume to Showcase his New Neo-Con Hat with Freedumb and Piece Lover Lindsay Graham

[MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Neo-con – shortened for neo-Confederate not neo-conservative. Neo-cons often finagle into political office with sonorous realityconcealing rhetoric and take to the streets without their sheets and dunce hoodie-hats. 2) a cone-cloned racist-fascist political drone. (See: KKK, Popular Sovereignty & Racism White Supremacy)

Congressional Black Caucus Condemns "the Deadly Insurrection of January 6th" but Remains Silent about Israel's Ongoing Extermination of All Humans in Gaza [CBC= Coin-Operated Black Puppetican Cowards]

Today, Congressional Black Caucus Chair Yvette D. Clarke (NY-09) and members of the Congressional Black Caucus issued the following statement:

“The deadly insurrection of January 6, 2021 was not merely an attack on a building, but a direct assault on members of Congress, law enforcement, staff, and the foundations of democracy itself. Today, we honor the extraordinary bravery of the U.S. Capitol Police and other law enforcement officers who protected our democracy and saw to it that the attempt to overturn the 2020 election results failed. We also remember those officers who tragically lost their lives and the more than 140 others who were seriously injured in the line of duty—many of whom continue to bear lasting physical and psychological wounds from that day. [MORE]

According to The Funktionary

coin-operated – the apt name for ravenous, puerile and greedy (“mine-controlled”) folk who only act if there is money, power or fame in the game (endeavor)—typically and consciously undertaken underhandedly at another’s expense. 2) anyone with a sell-out-slot that doubles as a mouth or who easily bends south—a south-bender repeat offender. 3) the subsumable drive for money, prestige, influence and power. 4) those that calculate and manipulate to get what they want— usually at the expense of others whom they claim to represent. 5) the description of (and name for) someone whose sole motivation is ‘paper-chasing.’ The living-larger supercilious sell-outs have to use the cracks of their arse as a discredit card swiper—since the stakes are higher and call for more drastic measures and high-volume transfers (the booty of sell-out treasures) can only be accessed in the form of plastic pleasures. They call them token Negroes because they are coinoperated. If you put money in them they will dispense (‘espew’—espouse and spew) the view, vision, wishes, ideas, thoughtforms, ideology, hopes and dreams of the customer. “The price of a dollar is a lot cheaper than the price we pay for violating our own inner integrity.” ~Rafael Catalá. You can easily spot coin-operated people because they always have one dry itchy hand out (waiting to be greased or bribed), the other groping for a handout, and their mouth-slots are always open. Some coin-operatives are equal orifice deployers, i.e., they will use both ends to satisfy others’ desires as a means to achieve or finance their own desired ends—these are better known as CO-HO’s. (See: Piece-Activists, Sniggers, Massa’bators, BOHICANs, Purcheat, Greedy, Ho-Reps, Selfishness, NSA Position, Politicians & Racism White Supremacy)

cowards – word-manipulated creatures who knowingly accept the parameters imposed on them by their enemies. 2) those who sleep soundly and live silently in the face of injustice, abuse, tyranny, racism and oppression. (See: Slave Revolts, Meritorious Manumission, Contract On America, Statists, Authority, Conservatives, Racists, KKK & Dummies)

“pork chops” – illicit “payoffs,” economic advantages and/or sexual favors someone receives, usually in the field of polytricks by puppeticians, typically in the field of “law and order” by pigs (“cops,”) and sometimes in the landmindfield of religion by pulpiteers. (See: Puppeticians, Pulpiteers, Politician & Altar Egos)

puppetician – a politician (Ho-Rep) with all strings (and G-strings) attached. We’re all puppets. I’m just one who can see the strings and play music with them while making others dance to it. (See: Politicians, VOTER & Ho-Reps)

Watchdog Demands to Know If Trump Admin Colluded with Big Oil in Lead-Up to Venezuela Attack

From [HERE] A legal watchdog group is demanding information about the extent to which the Trump administration planned its attack on Venezuela last weekend with American oil companies, which are expected to profit royally from the takeover of the South American nation’s oil reserves.

The group Democracy Forward filed a series of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests on Monday seeking records and information about the role of US oil companies in the planning of the attack, which killed an estimated 75 people and led to the US military’s abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

President Donald Trump did not inform Congress of the operation, which is required under the War Powers Act of 1973, but he told reporters on Sunday that he’d tipped off oil company executives both “before and after” the strike.

According to reporting by the Wall Street Journal, he informed executives roughly a month before the strike to “get ready” because big changes were coming to the country, which had long held state control over the largest oil reserves in the world.

Democracy Forward has requested information about communications between senior officials at the US departments of Energy and the Interior and executives at top oil companies, including Chevron, ExxonMobil, and ConocoPhillips, prior to the attack. This includes emails, attachments, and calendar invitations exchanged since December 2025.

The group has said it will seek to determine whether these companies were given “privileged access or influence” over the administration’s policy toward Venezuela. [MORE]

Maduro says he’s a ‘prisoner of war’: Why that matters

From [HERE] Two days after Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, 63, was abducted by special forces of the United States during an operation in the Latin American country, he appeared in a court in New York.

On Monday, Maduro pleaded not guilty to federal charges, including narcoterrorism and conspiring to import cocaine. In a blue and orange prison uniform, he listened to the indictment filed by prosecutors against him and his codefendants, including his wife and son.

The Trump administration has framed Maduro’s abduction as a law enforcement operation, arguing that congressional approval was not needed.

But in court, Maduro insisted he was a “prisoner of war” (POW).

What did Maduro say?

“I am innocent. I am not guilty. I am a decent man. I am still president of my country,” he said through an interpreter, before he was cut off by US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in a Manhattan federal court.

Maduro called himself a POW, a person captured and held by an enemy during an armed conflict.

Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores, who appeared in court on Monday as a codefendant, also pleaded not guilty.

Other Venezuelan leaders have echoed Maduro’s position. On Saturday, his then-deputy, Delcy Rodriguez, appeared on state television alongside her brother, National Assembly chief Jorge Rodriguez, Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello and Defence Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez, declaring that Maduro was still Venezuela’s sole legitimate president.

However, on Monday, the day when Rodriguez took over as Venezuela’s interim president, she posted a statement on social media offering to cooperate with Trump. In the statement, she invited Trump to “collaborate” and sought “respectful relations”.

“President Donald Trump, our peoples and our region deserve peace and dialogue, not war,” she wrote.

The Venezuelan ambassador to the United Nations, Samuel Moncada, said, “We cannot ignore a central element of this US aggression.

“Venezuela is the victim of these attacks because of its natural resources,” Moncada said, according to the UN website.

“Maduro is a prisoner of war as he said,” Vijay Prashad, the director of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research based in Argentina, Brazil, India, and South Africa, told Al Jazeera.

“The US declared war on Venezuela when Barack Obama signed his Executive Order 13692 in 2015 to say that the country was a threat to US national security.”

In March 2015, former US president, Democrat Barack Obama, signed an executive order declaring a national emergency over the “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US national security posed by the situation in Venezuela.

“Since then, the US has committed itself to a hybrid war against Venezuela. The kidnapping of its president in this state of war, during an illegal bombardment of the country by 150 military aircraft, is certainly, therefore, an act that can make Maduro a prisoner of war,” Prashad said. [MORE]

At 7AM Knox County Cops Broke Into a Black Family’s Home Unannounced, Threw a Flash Bang Grenade and Then Fatally Shot Teen 9 Times; Ben Crump Files Suit for Daevon Saint-Germain

From [HERE] The parents of an 18-year-old shot and killed during a SWAT raid in Knox County have filed a wrongful death lawsuit.

Daevon Montez Saint-Germain was shot on the morning of January 3, 2025, at a Sevierville Pike house, according to the Knox County Sheriff’s Office. This lawsuit argues his death was caused by the unconstitutional actions of the officers involved in the raid, the Knox County government, Sheriff Tom Spangler and the Knox County Sheriff’s Office.

The lawsuit claims the defendants violated Saint-Germain’s Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unlawful seizure and excessive force, stating that the SWAT Team officers used excessive force by shooting him nine times when he did not pose a threat. KCSO has said that Saint-Germain pointed a weapon at officers, which has been repeatedly denied by his family and their attorneys. The suit also claims Saint-Germain was denied critical medical care, and none of the officers were wearing body cameras.

The lawsuit also claims the search warrant was based on a cursory review of Saint-Germain’s social media, adding that it was “void of probable cause” and obtained “through reckless and/or intentional misrepresentations.” The suit added that officers “did not identify themselves or provide a copy of the search warrant before wrongfully seizing and detaining the 18-year-old.” However, the office of the Sixth Judicial District Attorney General previously said officers repeatedly announced, “sheriff’s office search warrant” during the raid.

The lawsuit also claims that the defendants “fabricated post-incident reports to justify deadly force” as part of a conspiracy to deprive Saint-Germain and his family of their constitutional rights. It alleged Knox County and Spangler maintained a culture that encouraged excessive force, failed to train officers properly, and ratified unconstitutional conduct.

Racist Who Shot 5 Black People Protesting the Police Murder of Jamal Clark in Minneapolis Released from Prison after Serving Light Sentence Due to Charges Filed by White Liberal Prosecutor

From [HERE] A white man who was convicted of shooting five Black Lives Matter protesters in November 2015 has been released from prison.

Allen Scarsella of Bloomington, 33, was found guilty of a dozen felony counts of assault and riot. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison, and after his release, will remain under court supervision until 2031. Records from the state's Department of Corrections show that he is not in Minnesota.

Scarsella shot the five Black men at a protest after Minneapolis police shot and killed Jamar Clark. Scarsella and three other men, all wearing face masks, went into an encampment outside a north Minneapolis police station to livestream the Black Lives Matter protests. Scarsella, who is White, brought a .45-caliber handgun and fired at demonstrators.

During the trial, jurors saw numerous text messages Scarsella sent friends, including one saying "Cool — the gun I'm getting is proven to kill black guys in a single shot." He was identified in a video taken the night of the shootings waving a handgun and making racially-charged statements about the Black Lives Matter protesters.

One of the five victims was Jamar Clark's cousin, Cameron Clark. Injuries to the victims ranged from leg, arm and foot to stomach and back wounds. 

At Scarsella's sentencing, Cameron Clark said he believed the initial charges brought forth against Scarsella should have been more severe. But Mike Freeman, who was the Hennepin County attorney at the time, said that first-degree assault was the highest charge his office could bring, given the evidence they had.

Jamar Clark was killed in November 2015 during a confrontation with two White Minneapolis officers on the city's north side. The 24-year-old's death set off weeks of protests, including an 18-day tent encampment around the area's police precinct. 

Freeman's office chose not to charge the officers. In 2019, the Minneapolis City Council approved a $200,000 settlement with Jamar Clark's family.

ICE Race Soldier Violates White Code by Murdering White Woman. DHS Probot Justifies w/Cop Mantra; ‘He Feared for His Safety,’ but Video Shows Cop Move Into the Path of Fleeing Car Before Firing Shots

From [HERE] Videos circulating on social media and verified by The New York Times show the shooting of a woman by a federal agent in Minneapolis on Wednesday, as well as the moments immediately before and after.

A maroon Honda Pilot is stopped on Portland Avenue, apparently blocking one lane of the snowy residential street. The driver rolls forward slightly, then stops and waves at approaching vehicles, signaling that they should drive past.

The videos show the driver wave one vehicle by. When a truck with flashing lights approaches, she waves again, but the truck stops and federal agents emerge.

Two step out and move toward the driver’s side. The agents tell the driver to get out.

One of the agents tries to open the driver’s side door and reaches through the window. A third agent crosses in front of the Honda, as the driver begins to flee by putting the car in reverse, turning to drive away from the agents.

Immediately after the Honda shifts from reverse into drive and begins to move ahead turning to the right, that agent moves into the pathway of the vehicle, pulls out a gun and aims at the driver.

The Honda moves forward, turning to the right. The agent aiming the gun fires, and continues to shoot as the vehicle moves past him.

The Honda accelerates, colliding with two parked vehicles and a light post. The agent who fired approaches the vehicle, then walks away and tells other agents to call 911. [MORE]

Massa Media [also] had Prior Knowledge of Trump’s Venezuela Assault but Withheld Coverage [The Dependent Media and Trump Serve the Same Masters. Who Benefits from 2 Party Politics Theater?]

From [HERE] The two largest US newspapers learned in advance of the secret US raid to abduct Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, but chose not to publish what they knew to avoid endangering US troops, Semafor reported on 4 January, citing two people familiar with the matter.

Despite so-called hostility toward US President Donald Trump regarding domestic issues, the New York Times (NYT) and Washington Post cooperated with his administration ahead of the operation to attack Venezuela.

US forces deployed more than 150 aircraft to eliminate air defenses, clearing the way for helicopters to insert troops who then moved on to President Maduro’s location.

After Maduro and his wife were abducted, President Trump and top administration officials praised the operation, citing both the lack of US casualties and the total secrecy surrounding it, including from the media.

“The coordination, the stealth, the precision, the very long arm of American justice - all on display in the middle of the night,” Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said.

Trump approved the assault at 10:46 pm Friday. Though aware of the decision, the NYT and Washington Post waited several hours before reporting it because the White House had warned that doing so would expose US troops performing the operation to danger.

However, the decision showed disregard for the lives of Venezuelans.

US airstrikes accompanying the commando operation killed 40 people, including civilians and military personnel, a senior Venezuelan official told the NYT on Saturday.

One strike targeted a three-story civilian apartment complex in Catia La Mar, a poor coastal area just west of the Caracas airport, killing an 80-year-old woman, Rosa González, and seriously wounding a second person. [MORE]

The Wealth of Billionaires Surges to $8.1 Trillion as Affordability Crisis Hammers Working Class

The collective wealth of US billionaires surged to $8.1 trillion in 2025 as working-class Americans faced a cost-of-living crisis made worse by President Donald Trump’s tariff regime and unprecedented assault on the social safety net.

An analysis released Friday by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) found that the top 15 US billionaires saw the largest wealth gains last year, with their collective fortune growing from $2.4 trillion to $3.2 trillion. That 33% gain was more than double the S&P 500’s 16% increase in 2025.

What IPS describes as the “elite group” of US billionaires includes Tesla CEO Elon Musk, the richest man in the world; Google co-founder Larry Page; Amazon founder Jeff Bezos; and Oracle executive chairman Larry Ellison.

IPS emphasized that “these staggering combined billionaire wealth totals come as the Trump-GOP budget bill passed in 2025 defunded health insurance, food stamps, and other vital anti-poverty safety net programs, in order to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy and budget increases for militarism and mass deportations.” [MORE]

A Commission Acknowledged that Maryland Authorities and Agencies were Complicit in at Least 38 Lynchings and Promoted Racial Terror. How Many Billions Does the Gov Owe for its Official Oppression?

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Lynching – the juxtaposition of insensate self-hatred (inferiority complex) and sudden death within the horror-dome of Racism White Supremacy (the expression of the fear of genetic annihilation). For pictorial proof of the Caucasian’s inhumanity to Afrikans (the civilizers of hue-manity), see: “Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America.”

From [HERE] A Maryland commission recently concluded that state leaders and institutions were complicit in 38 lynchings and the widespread racial terror that followed the Civil War – and said current leaders should atone with cash payments to descendants of the victims.

The commission spent six years and 630 pages documenting how law enforcement, politicians, judges and media contributed to either the deaths, the lack of justice for victims or the systemic racism that empowered White mobs to act with impunity.

Victim by victim, the Maryland Lynching Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s sprawling final report details that complicity. It recommends $100,000 for every surviving descendant of lynching victims and $10,000 for descendants of people who lived in communities terrorized by lynchings, among 84 suggestions for how Maryland could atone for the extrajudicial killings and the racial terror created in Black communities.

“The trauma inflicted by these crimes, often carried out as public spectacles, reverberated through generations. Communities were left to live in the shadow of violence without recourse, justice or recognition,” the report said.

No perpetrators were ever held accountable in any of the deaths, which occurred between 1854 and 1933. Some included mutilations or burnings. Photos of some lynchings were made into postcards as souvenirs. All killed were Black men or boys; one was 14 years old.

Nicholas Creary, a Bowie State University professor and commissioner who helped build the historical record for the report.

“Lynching was not just the murder of an individual,” he said. “It was a communal act, and it was a message crime, intended to silence African American communities and to ensure that they – to use the old colloquial phrase – that Black folks stayed in their place.”

Maryland’s newly elected House speaker, Joseline A. Peña-Melnyk (D-Prince George’s), sponsored the law to create the lynching commission in 2019, when she was a delegate, and has championed its mission.

“This is just the beginning, and there’s a lot of work to be done,” Peña-Melnyk said in an interview.

The law granted the commission subpoena power and resources to collect oral histories, documents, testimony and existing local research, as well as hold public hearings and hire genealogists to track down the full truth about the state’s brutal history.

Maryland is among eight states outside the Deep South where lynching was common albeit less frequent, according to a report by the Equal Justice Initiative.

More than 4,000 lynchings happened in 12 Southern states between the Civil War and World War II, the EJI report found, with the most – 654 – documented in Mississippi. Another 361 were in Alabama, 549 in Louisiana and 84 in Virginia. Historians have struggled for years to pinpoint how many Black people died in lynchings. As recently as 2020, researchers documented an additional 2,000 lynchings that had not be included in their previous tallies. The current estimate stands at 6,500.

Gov. Wes Moore (D), a potential 2028 presidential contender and the only Black governor of a U.S. state, ran on a “Leave No One Behind” platform in 2022 that included closing the racial wealth gap and dismantling systems of racial oppression.

This year, he vetoed a bill to study reparations for the legacy of slavery, saying that the enduring racial disparity in Maryland had been sufficiently studied and that he wanted to enact policies, not study them.

The General Assembly overrode his veto last month, on the same day the House of Delegates elected Peña-Melnyk as its new leader. The commission details 84 specific policies, divided into nine categories, to remedy the injustice. It’s now working on turning those into legislation for Peña-Melnyk to consider championing in the upcoming General Assembly session.

“Every Black person who modified their behavior out of fear, who lost property to White mobs, who was denied economic opportunity, who fled their community to protect their family, was a victim of this system,” the report said.

The proposals range from the cash compensation to strengthening current due-process protections, law school scholarships, integrating the history of racial terror into school classrooms, and an array of “symbolic reparations” that include apologies and memorials.

The governor’s office has so far been noncommittal about all of them.

“Given the scope of the report, it would be premature to commit to specific proposals before completing a full review,” spokesman Ammar Moussa said in a statement.

But, Moussa said, “Gov. Moore believes the work of repair demands urgent, measurable action – and his administration will keep delivering results that expand opportunity and close gaps that have held Black Marylanders back for generations.”

Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) said through a spokesman he looks forward to reviewing the recommendations, and “recognizes the painful and necessary work” the commission undertook.

The $100,000 and $10,000 amounts of the proposed reparations are drawn from history: They represent the present-day value of compensation proposed in anti-lynching bills Maryland state lawmakers drafted but did not approve in the 1930s.

David O. Fakunle, commission chair and an assistant professor at Morgan State University, said that while the cash reparations constitute the most eye-catching recommendation, it’s not the most important.

“The number-one recommendation is to tell the truth,” Fakunle said.

“It’s the story that nobody wants to talk about. We’ll talk about slavery, Jim Crow, all that stuff before we want to talk about lynching. There’s a reason: because it’s heinous. It’s the worst of humanity.”

Fakunle said that over the course of six years, the commission notified some people of the fact that their ancestors had been lynched, and heard from descendants of people who had been perpetrators and wanted to make amends. Institutions, such as the Baltimore Sun, acknowledged the role they played in creating a culture that allowed lynching to fester, he said.