Dumbocrats Martyrize and Niggerize Donald Trump w/Guilty Verdict in Obviously Politicized Prosecution that Causes His Donation Page to Go Viral. Felony Conviction Won't Disqualify Him from Presidency

From [HERE] WinRed, the Republican donation platform, crashed due to overwhelming traffic moments after Former President Donald Trump was found guilty on all charges in his New York ‘hush money’ trial:

Users were flocking to Trump’s donation page only to be greeted with an error message telling them “Engineers have been notified.”

Nothing in the U.S. Constitution bars a felon from running or becoming president. The conviction isn’t disqualifying. [MORE]

Tucker Carlson railed against a New York jury’s decision finding former President Donald Trump guilty on 34 counts of fraud, saying it ensures his victory in November, but signals the death of the American justice system.

“Import the Third World, become the Third World. That’s what we just saw,” Tucker wrote on X.

Similarly, Infowars’ Alex Jones declared the verdict signals the Biden admin and the corrupt Deep State have decided to go all-in on their police state lawfare tactics, arguing this is actually a win for the people, as it has forced the authoritarians to expose themselves. [MORE]

James Freeman observed, “The obscene spectacle in a Manhattan courtroom seemed to be an almost daily reminder that the protections for the accused that we all learned about in school do not exist for Donald Trump in the chambers of Juan Merchan, who allowed falsehoods to be repeated to a jury, allowed prejudicial irrelevant testimony to paint the defendant in the worst possible light, and allowed a prosecutor with an obvious bias against the defendant to bring the case in the first place. To top it off, as the defendant prepared for trial he was not even told precisely how he was supposed to have committed felonies.”

The so-called Constitutional protections that we were indoctrinated to believe also don’t exist in reality for most Black people charged with crimes; as racism is the dominant feature of the criminal justice system and “race” is a political category. In other words, overzealous liberal dumbocrats have now niggerized Trump. Their obvious political prosecution of Trump was the exact opposite of Robert Mueller’s painstaking efforts to present an unbiased, non-political prosecution of an elected puppetician. Without the appearance of justice, the outcome is often rendered meaningless; once it looks political, it’s over - the verdict in this matter can’t be taken any more serious that one rendered from a Taliban court in Afghanistan or from children playing ‘court on the playground’

THE DISTRACTED ATTORNEY ALVIN BRAGG IS More Busy Defending a Porno Ho for his White Liberal Masters than He is Protecting Blacks from NYPD who Surveil/Stop Them w/Impunity? So Far, He Hasn't Prosecuted Any Cops: MR. BRAGG CAME INTO OFFICE VOWING NOT TO CHARGE NUMEROUS NON-VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER. BUT HE MUST’VE MEANT TO PROMISE ‘NOT TO CHARGE WHITE FOLKS’ BECAUSE SOMEBODY IN HIS OFFICE IS FILLING UP MANHATTAN COURTROOMS AND RIKERS ISLAND JAIL WITH BLACK PEOPLE. BOB GANGI, DIRECTOR OF THE POLICE REFORM ORGANIZING PROJECT AND LONGTIME COURT WATCHER, SAYS HE’S SEEN LITTLE CHANGE FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE IN THE BACK ROW OF MANHATTAN ARRAIGNMENTS.

“THEY WERE STILL PROSECUTING LOW-LEVEL BROKEN-WINDOWS TYPE CASES, IT SEEMED TO US, AS OFTEN AS VANCE’S OFFICE WOULD DO,” GANGI SAID, REFERRING TO BRAGG’S IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR AS MANHATTAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, CY VANCE JR. [MORE].

DATA FROM THE COURT MONITORING PROJECT DEMONSTRATE THAT THE NYPD TARGETS BLACKS AND LATINOS: AS BLACKS/LATINOS MAKE UP 90% OF ALL NYPD ARRESTS, MOSTLY FOR VICTIMLESS CRIMES. WORKING HAND IN HAND WITH THE NYPD, MR. BRAGG’S DA OFFICE IN MANHATTAN — ONE OF THE WEALTHIEST AND LEAST EQUAL PLACES IN THE COUNTRY — HAS CONVICTED BLACK PEOPLE OF FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS AT A RATE 21 TIMES GREATER THAN THAT OF WHITE PEOPLE OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES. THIS DISPARITY IS THE LARGEST OF ANY COUNTY IN THE STATE. [MORE] and [MORE]

A White Man Sentenced to Death by an All White Jury after a White DA Removed All the Black Jurors Can’t Appeal Decision b/c Attorney Didn’t Object, Says ALA Criminal Ct of Appeals [also a white jury]

From [HERE] On May 3, 2024, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals announced its decision in the case of Christopher Henderson, a death-sentenced man who had been tried by an all-white jury in Madison County, Alabama, where the population is 24.6% Black.  Prosecutors in his capital trial used peremptory strikes to remove six of the 10 qualified Black potential jurors and all remaining jurors of color. Mr. Henderson’s appellant counsel from the Equal Justice Initiative identified evidence that the prosecutor’s strikes were racially discriminatory in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, which held that excluding a potential juror based on race is unconstitutional.

But in its decision in Henderson v. State, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals refused to even consider the evidence of illegal racial bias in jury selection, declaring instead that this claim was distinct from all other legal claims and would no longer be considered if presented as plain error. 

Alabama’s “plain error” rule has long provided that, because death penalty cases require the highest possible level of reliability and scrutiny, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals must address errors or issues raised for the first time on appeal. It applied a higher standard to claims that were not preserved at trial, but it could not refuse to consider those claims.

The Henderson court departed from decades of precedent when it declared that claims involving racial discrimination in jury selection would no longer be reviewed under plain error. The court will still review other claims for plain error if they were not raised at trial—but an unpreserved claim of racial bias in the selection of the jury in a death penalty case is now the only claim asserting a constitutional violation that is barred from review on appeal.

The ruling is believed to be the first time a state court has proclaimed a bar on review on a single issue while permitting review for all other issues.

Plain error review emerged in Alabama in response to serious problems in the state’s indigent defense system, especially in capital cases. There is no statewide public defender in Alabama and no capital defender office to represent indigent defendants at trial or on direct appeal.

Instead, lawyers from the private bar are appointed to represent poor people facing the death penalty. Until 1999, attorneys were paid only $40 per hour for in-court work and $20 for out-of-court work, and compensation for out-of-court work was capped at $1,000. Nearly half of the people currently on Alabama’s death row were convicted under this compensation cap, and indigent people facing the death penalty in Alabama continue to struggle to find adequate legal assistance.

In contrast with limits on defense counsel, Alabama’s system puts no limits on the number of capital murder indictments a prosecutor can seek, resulting in rampant over-charging. At any given time, more than 300 people are awaiting trial for capital murder in the state, which is more pending capital cases than in most other Southern states combined.

Under Alabama Rule of Appellate Procedure 45A, known as the “plain error” rule, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals is required to review claims on appeal, even if there were no objections at trial. Rule 45A allowed appellate attorneys to identify and correct unconstitutional conduct in capital trials throughout the state. As a result, many wrongful convictions and illegal sentences have been brought to light. Mandatory plain error review has been responsible for nearly 40% of all reversals in Alabama death penalty cases. 

Plain error has been especially important for addressing illegal racial discrimination in jury selection. Alabama has a long history of racial bias in its criminal legal system. The earliest Supreme Court decisions calling out the illegal exclusion of Black people from juries because of their race came in appeals from the wrongful convictions and death sentences of nine Black teenagers wrongly charged with raping two white women and convicted by an all-white jury in Scottsboro, Alabama. The “Scottsboro Boys” were innocent but falsely convicted because—as the Supreme Court found in Norris v. Alabama—Alabama courts would not evaluate evidence of racial bias.

Racial bias continued to plague jury selection in Alabama, prompting the Supreme Court to address racially discriminatory peremptory strikes in Swain v. Alabama in 1965. That decision created a legal standard that made it impossible to prove intentional discrimination even when prosecutors excluded every single African American from the jury, and growing criticism forced the Court to overrule it two decades later in Batson, which made racial bias in jury selection reversible error because of the fundamental way it undermines the integrity of the legal system.

Many prosecutors found ways to avoid the new standard in Batson and have continued to routinely exclude Black prospective jurors from serving on capital trial juries in Alabama. In 2010, the Equal Justice Initiative conducted a comprehensive study of racial bias in jury selection and found that Alabama appellate courts had identified illegal, intentional racially discriminatory jury selection in 25 death penalty cases, with compelling evidence of racially biased jury selection in dozens of other death penalty cases where no relief was granted.  

In 2022, the Alabama Supreme Court, over the objections of several justices, changed the rules of court to make plain error review in death penalty cases discretionary rather than mandatory. Since then, the Court of Criminal Appeals continued to engage in discretionary plain error review until it ruled in Henderson that claims involving racial bias in jury selection—and only those claims—are now barred from review. This ruling is troubling, given the long history of racial bias in the administration of the death penalty and in Alabama in particular.  This action also sets Alabama apart in its approach to racial bias even as other states are advancing innovative approaches to identify and eliminate bias in jury selection.

On the Anniversary of George Floyd’s Murder by Police “Journalists” are Asking 'Has Anything Changed?' Of Course Not. Police Still Have the Uncontrollable Power to Use Force Offensively Against People

FREEDOM CANNOT EXIST IN THE PRESENCE OF SO-CALLED AUTHORITY. On the Anniversary of George Floyd’s Murder by police officers in Minneapolis mostly neuropean “journalists” are provocatively asking, ‘what has changed since his death?’ Can you make a mirror out of a brick?

First of all the operating system of racism white supremacy is thriving - as it goes on continually updating and refining itself while most Black sheople are oblivious to its existence, continue to live in a reactionary state and have become politically powerless, “complicit in their own political emasculation,” and kept in a continuous state of checkmate. The quality of Black citizenship is so low that; no matter what the law says Blacks are prohibited from possessing guns and Blacks are subject to omnipresent interference by cops with their freedom of movement and their right to be left the fuck alone. Police exist primarily to manage the behavior of Blacks & Latinos and any protection from them is incidental and random. [MORE] Their goal is to place Blacks & Latinos in greater confinement.  Said factors exist in a legal context in which law enforcement is uncontrollable by citizens, generally unaccountable to them, can’t be hired or fired by citizens and it has irresponsible, limitless power to take life on the street as they see fit while providing a compulsory “service” that citizens have no “right” to decline. Dr. Blynd observes, "people who are awake see cops as mercenary guards that remind us daily through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate State - colonized, surveilled and patrolled by the desensitized and lobotomized drones of the colonizers."

Most importantly however, nothing can ever change with regard to police brutality so long as police have the power to use force offensively on “citizens.” In fact, despite the falling violent crime rates since 1993, police killings have increased. According to Mapping Police Violence, “Police killed more people in 2023 than any year in more than a decade. Police have continued to kill at a similar rate in 2024.“ Police killed at least 1,247 people in 2023. Black people were 27% of those killed by police in 2023 despite being only 13% of the population. Thus far, there have been only 9 days in 2024 where police did not kill someone. Black people are most likely to be killed by police and are three times more likely than whites to be killed by police. 33% of Black people killed by police were running away, driving away or otherwise trying to flee. Regardless of race, there is no accountability: 98.1% of killings by police from 2013-2023 did not result with officers even being charged with a crime. [MORE]

Petitioning puppeticians for reforms, or begging them to enforce the status quo by punishing police for conduct that is already illegal or begging them to defund or lower police department budgets can have no effect on the extraordinary police power to use force offensively on citizens. Said non-reformable and uncontrollable power to initiate the use of unprovoked violence on people is called “authority.”

As you will see, if you indulge BW here, due to the fact that "authority" is immoral and unjust and there is no legitimate or rational way to account for belief in its existence, the legal system is entirely based on physical coercion or violence. In other words, we are not free.

Political “authority” can be summed up as the implied right to rule over people. It is the idea that some people have the moral right to forcibly control others, and that, consequently, those others have the moral and legal obligation to obey.’ [MORE] Authority is the basis and operating system for all governments throughout the world, regardless of type, function or characterization. As so-called representatives of authority, police officers (among other authorities) are empowered to use force offensively against citizens who are legally and morally obliged to obey authority.

However, all use of force offensively is immoral and evil. Acts that would be considered unjust or morally unacceptable when performed by “citizens” are just as unjust or morally unacceptable when performed by government agents. Putting your hands on another human being, not in self-defense but offensively, without their consent and ‘manipulating their body in disregard of their volition is evil’, whether its done by citizens or representatives of “authority” wearing blue costumes. Larken Rose explains, “authority is permission to commit evil – to do things that would be recognized as immoral and unjustified if anyone else did them.”

To be clear, all persons have the natural, inalienable right to defend themselves and come to the defense of others if they believe another person is in imminent danger from an aggressor. Private security workers and guards work under said natural law. In contrast, police officers and other representatives of authority have the extra or added “power” to act offensively as aggressors; higher authorities have granted police the power to use force offensively on people or initiate unprovoked acts of violence against people whenever they deem it necessary. As such, police are permitted to do things “citizens” cannot do, such as, stop individuals, touch them against their will, attack (make arrests) people, kill people, interfere with their freedoms in many ways, kidnap people (that is, ‘detain and transport’) or imprison them because higher authorities have empowered them to do so. In turn, “citizens” are said to have a moral and legal obligation to obey all government orders, laws and have no right to resist an unlawful arrest in most states. Authority must be obeyed on a content-neutral basis (regardless of whether citizens agree or not.) [MORE] This hypothesized moral property (authority) believed to be possessed by all governments is said to make government the supreme authority over human affairs. Subconsciously we know and understand that ruling over other people through violence is irrational and barbaric. [MORE]

There is also no legitimate or rational way to account for our belief in the existence of authority.

“Authority” does not come from people nor is it derived from any rational or natural source. All governmental power allegedly is said to come exclusively from the people. It is believed that citizens delegate their individual power to the government and it’s representatives for government to represent citizens and act on their behalf. Such political representation works much in the same way agents represent principals in all kinds of business or other contractual relationships. For instance, a manager at McDonalds represents the franchise owner when she carries out his everyday business requests, like ordering inventory and hiring workers, etc. She is the agent and the owner is the principal who empowers and directs her work. Naturally, an agent only can possess whatever powers the principal gave to her. For instance, the McDonalds manager does not have the authority to sell the store unless the owner granted her such power. Similarly, the McDonalds manager could not have the power to do things that the franchise owner has no power to do - such as change the McDonalds logo to a black panther or use another business’ parking lot for its storage. Additionally, numbers don’t change anything – a group of McDonald’s owners still wouldn’t have the power to grant an agent the power to use another business’ parking lot either. An agent cannot have more power than the principal because all his/her power necessarily originated exclusively from the principal.

In the case of government however, the government has somehow granted itself the power to do things that no individual citizen could ever do. While citizens have the inalienable right to act in self-defense or come to the defense of others, citizens have no right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence (use force offensively) on other people and no right to forcibly control other people. When citizens commit such acts it is considered unlawful and/or criminal. Citizens cannot possibly delegate rights they don’t have - so it is logically impossible for citizens to delegate the power to forcibly control others to the government and its agents. Larken Rose explains simply, “you can’t give someone something you don’t have.” [MORE] and [MORE] He states;

“Despite all of the complex rituals and convoluted rationalizations, all modern belief in “government” rests on the notion that mere mortals can, through certain political procedures, bestow upon some people various rights which none of the people possessed to begin with. The inherent lunacy of such a notion should be obvious. There is no ritual or document through which any group of people can delegate to someone else a right which no one in the group possesses. And that self-evident truth, all by itself, demolishes any possibility of legitimate “government.”

Rose correctly explains, ‘the people whom the politicians claim to represent have no right to do anything that politicians do: impose “taxes,” enact “laws,” etc. Average citizens have no right to forcibly control the choices of their neighbors, tell them how to live their lives, and punish them if they disobey, So when a “government” does such things, it is not representing anyone or anything but itself.’ He further explains

“if those in “government” have only those rights possessed by those who elected them, then “government” loses the one ingredient that makes it “government”: the right to rule over others (”authority”). If it has the same rights and powers as everyone else, there is no reason to call it “government.” If the politicians have no more rights than you have, all of their demands and commands, all of their political rituals, “law” books, courts, and so on, amount to nothing more than the symptoms of a profound delusional psychosis. Nothing they do can have any legitimacy, any more than if you did the same thing on your own, unless they somehow acquired rights that you do not have. And that is impossible, since no one on earth, and no group of people on earth, could possibly have given them such superhuman rights.”[MORE]

Thus, there is no rational basis for the belief in authority or rational way to account for its existence as a legitimate basis for government. Other explanations for authority have been thoroughly debunked, here is a summary:

SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY. How about the social contract theory - the idea that there is a contract between people and the government in which the government protects the people and enforces the laws, in exchange for citizens obedience and taxes? That is, individuals have contractually agreed to obey the government and must do so and the government is obliged to provide services and protection. However, if such an agreement exists, WHEN DID YOU SIGN IT? We were born into this arrangement, no one signed anything. Yet we are bound to obey authority. Therefore, there is no contract and no social contract exists.

At any rate, the so called “public duty” doctrine renders the “social contract theory” meaningless. Decades ago the Supreme Court ruled that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen. It means for instance that police have no legal duty to protect any victim from violence by other private parties unless the victim was in police custody. [MORE] and [MORE] This means that police cannot be sued for any federal constitutional claim for a failure to protect citizens. Unless a state negligence law exists allowing such a lawsuit, victims cannot hold police liable for a failure to protect from harm from private parties. [MORE] and [MORE].

Pursuant to the social contract, citizens are contractually obliged to obey all laws and commands and when they fail to do so the government punishes the citizen, usually with fines or imprisonment. However, authorities are bound to do whatever they want to do, whenever they want to do it and to whom they choose, but no one in particular. Dr. Blynd asks “Makes you feel like a fool, doesn’t it?” There is no contract between the individual and the state. It is device or trick to control the populace.

IMPLICIT AGREEMENT. What about an implicit agreement to obey authority - where we are deemed from birth to have agreed to obey authority until we decline, opt out or reject it? This proposition is also an illusion because whether you reject or object to authority you must obey authority regardless. You have no real choice in the matter. Like a plantation system, there is no way to opt out and avoid being a slave subject to another (authority) plantation owner.

AGREEMENT BY ACCEPTING BENEFITS. Perhaps authority is made legitimate when citizens agree to accept the benefits provided by government, such as public schools or police “service?” For the same reasons no one has an implicit contract with the government. Government authority is not made legitimate through acceptance of benefits. Whether a person accepts the benefits of government or not, all persons are still subject to the laws and required to obey authority.

CONSENT BY PRESENCE. How about consent to authority by simply remaining in a particular location - consent by presence on the land? In other words, in order to remain on your own land then you must pay a government and obey laws to do so. Said theory means governments own all land and property everywhere government exists. According to such clogic as stated by Huemer, “Those seeking to avoid all governmental jurisdiction have three options: they may live in the ocean, move to Antarctica, or commit suicide.” [MORE]

Larken Rose explains, “To tell someone that his only valid choices are either to leave the “country” or to abide by whatever commands the politicians issue logically implies that everything in the “country” is the property of the politicians. If a person can spend year after year paying for his home, or even building it himself, and his choices are still to either obey the politicians or get out, that means that his house and the time and effort he invested in the house are the property of the politicians. And for one person’s time and effort to rightfully belong to another is the definition of slavery. That is exactly what the “implied consent” theory means: that every “country” is a huge slave plantation, and that everything and everyone there is the property of the politicians. And, of course, the master does not need the consent of his slave.”

It is also obviously circular thinking to say ‘the government has authority over everything and everybody because it has authority over everything and everybody’ - such statement may indeed be the case but it cannot be a justification for the legitimacy of authority in the first place.

CONSENT THRU PARTICIPATION. Finally, does consent through participation make government authority legitimate or valid? Not at all. “If you didn’t vote in the election, would you then not have to obey the laws made by whoever wins? Of course not. You will be subject to the same laws whether you vote or not.” [MORE]

MAGIC WORDS, CAPES & CEREMONIES. It should also go without saying but there is no magic ceremony, special costumes to put on, voting process or magic statements (oaths) which can grant certain people extra-human powers to rule over other people, exempt them from morality, accountability and do things which no individual or group of individuals can do.

All pretenses of civilization and “human progress” aside, the legal system is primarily based on physical coercion (violence): comply with authority or go to jail or die. There is no “free government” anywhere. Government does not rest on our voluntary consent, it is a system anchored in violence. As explained by FUNKTIONARY, “Government” is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else. Citizens can either obey authority or go to jail. ‘The lie of tyranny is that you will maintain your freedom by obeying authority. The choices it offers you are a lifetime of obedience or death.’ [MORE] Government and it’s “services” are not voluntary but mandatory and individuals cannot opt out or reject government services or choose to live without government – rather, we are born into this involuntary arrangement.

All “Laws” in actuality are threats backed by the ability and willingness to use violence/force against those who disobey. An individual can choose not to comply with a law or an order, which will subsequently lead to another order/command or threat of a worse sanction, but in all governmental systems, at the end of the chain of orders or worsening sanctions comes a threat that the violator cannot defy. Michael Huemer states, “The system as a whole must be anchored by a nonvoluntary intervention, a harm that the state can impose regardless of the individual’s choices. That anchor is provided by physical force.” Huemer explains, “One can choose not to pay a fine, one can choose to drive without a license, and one can even choose not to walk to a police car to be taken away. But one cannot choose not to be subjected to physical force if the agents of the state decide to impose it. Thus, the legal system is founded on intentional, harmful coercion.’

The point here is not a theoretical discussion about the purpose of government or how it should run. Rather, it is the fact that there is no valid justification for one man (or government) to have supreme authority over another. Although we all assume that there is some valid explanation for why the government should be entitled to engage in behavior that would be deemed to violate individual rights if performed by anyone other than the government, there is none.

Due to fact that there is no legitimate basis for belief in authority or legitimate basis for government, then citizens are in actuality slaves or prisoners of authorities within a free range system of slavery or within a free range prison. FUNKTIONARY states, “citizens can come and go when they want and therefore have the illusion of true freedom—called “free-range slavery.”

SYSTEM OF POWER SUPREMACY. In reality, persons do not actually live under “democracies” or “republics” or monarchies or dictatorships. Said descriptions or characterizations are designed to conceal the reality of an elite ruling class and the master/servant relations it has with its citizens. In the United States and everywhere else government exists, Rose states

“there is a ruling class and a subject class, and the differences between them are many and obvious. One group commands, the other obeys. One group demands huge sums of money, the other group pays. One group tells the other group where they can live, where they can work, what they can eat, what they can drink, what they can drive, who they can work for, what work they can do, and so on. One group takes and spends trillions of dollars of what the other group earns. One group consists entirely of economic parasites, while the efforts of the other group produce all the wealth. It is patently obvious who commands and who obeys. The people are not the “government,” by any stretch of the imagination, and it requires profound denial to believe otherwise. For example, it is also claimed that “the government works for us; it is our servant.” Again, such statements does not even remotely match the obvious reality of the situation; it is little more than a cult mantra, a delusion intentionally programmed into the populace in order to twist their view of reality.”

Within said “consensus reality” created by elites, various other fictions and devices are used to disguise the reality of the master-servant relationship. These devices include concepts such as “consent of the governed,” “we are the government,” “democracy,” “representative government,” “majority rule,” and “constitutional rights” given to you by a magical government, which functions as your public master that gives and takes rights, etc. According to FUNKTIONARY these ‘fictions lead only to a progressive social, personal, racial and jurisprudential separation from reality.’ Dr. Blynd states, “discussion and debates about fictions such as “rights” merely evades the frequently avoided question of who is to enforce any “right” and who will benefit from the pretense? . . Government” is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else. . . and “While there are varying degrees, “government” very simply is “one man violently controlling the life and property of another man.”

Although there are different brands and flavors of “government” across the ideological spectrum, it is more accurate to describe such systems as “free range plantations” or “free range prisons.” The inhabitants of such “jurisdictions” are “free range slaves” or “free range prisoners.” Some prisons or plantations are more restrictive than others but all “citizens” within them are subject to an implied authority. Slaves or prisoners in the Free Range Prison may face greater or lesser restrictions depending upon their income, status or race but none are free. Whether individuals choose to be willing slaves (citizens) or unwilling slaves (denizens) depends upon how aware they are of their true reality and their response to it.

Nevertheless, there is no need to revolt against authority. Authority is only a belief that must be dropped. FUNKTIONARY states, ‘there are no tyrants only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind-control and word-conditioning control?’

Government means “control of the mind” and “authority is the means by which society uses to control its population.” Trent Goodbaudy describes this is as a “statist delusion.” Statist, within the meaning of FUNKTIONARY means “the belief “citizens” and “states” exist and the memetic thought patterns supporting such beliefs.” Goodbaudy states, “We are stuck in an illusory construct that only exists in a diseased psyche. There really are no rulers and no masters anyway; just claims of authority, and acceptance of these claims by the brainwashed. There really is no government other than what you choose to be governed by: they only have the authority that you grant them.”

Dr. Blynd states, ‘The real threat to "authority" is the masses overcoming info-gaps and verigaps through self-knowledge and the proliferation of symbols of opposition, not crime or destruction of property.’ FUNKTIONARY explains, “We don’t violently overthrow government, rather we silently and organically outgrow it in its current form as we know it. Where there is no energy for conflict upon which to feed, it starves itself into oblivion or becomes malnourished to the point of ineffectual irrelevance.”

Where a critical mass of individuals see authority for what it is – an irrational, self-contradictory, evil, granfalloon, contrary to civilization and morality that “constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed”- they will drop it like a wooden coin.

ACLU: D.C. Has a Police Abuse Problem

From [HERE] M.B. Cottingham has lived in Southeast D.C. his entire life. For the last decade, he has worked as an ice-cream vendor, selling frozen treats out of a truck. He has three children.

Late on a September afternoon in 2017, Mr. Cottingham gave Officer Sean Lojacono permission to frisk him. Instead of a limited pat-down for weapons, Officer Lojacono aggressively probed Mr. Cottingham’s sensitive body parts. Mr. Cottingham physically flinched and verbally protested, making clear that this highly intrusive search was not the frisk to which he had consented. Officer Lojacono responded by handcuffing Mr. Cottingham and violating his body two more times.

Mr. Cottingham partnered with the ACLU-D.C. to sue over this abuse. The police department eventually paid Mr. Cottingham a substantial sum to settle his case. They also fired Lojacono, but he recently got his job back with back pay because of a system that values the interests of officers over the safety and well-being of those they harm. Mr. Cottingham should never have experienced this abuse. It should not have taken a lawsuit to get some semblance of accountability. And Mr. Cottingham is not alone.

Police abuse in the District causes significant harm, costs millions of dollars, and undermines the whole justice system. It’s clearly time for District leaders to invest in police accountability solutions.

D.C. has spent $91 million over the last decade to settle cases involving police misconduct, including ones by repeat-offending officers. A recent D.C. Auditor report revealed that D.C. taxpayers footed a $14.3 million bill to re-hire police officers who have been found guilty of serious offenses, including drunk driving and sexual abuse. The Auditor classified three of these rehired officers as a “Threat to Safety.” Six of the officers who are back on the force have had misconduct reports filed against them since being rehired.

In addition to putting people at risk of serious harm and costing the District tens of millions of dollars, police misconduct erodes community trust in law enforcement and damages public safety efforts. When police officers are allowed to abuse their power without facing consequences, the public can understandably grow reluctant to interact with the criminal justice system at all. Last year, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson emphasized that one of the biggest issues with fighting crime in D.C. is the police department’s low closure rates. The Chairman also noted that one of the barriers to closing cases has been community members not coming forward to speak with the police.

A lack of accountability has also contributed to a hostile work environment for officers who are trying to follow laws and policies. Since 2020, more than 20 former police officers have filed lawsuits that allege a toxic work culture at the Metropolitan Police Department. In 2020, a sergeant sued over retaliation for reporting improper arrest tactics. One year later, 10 Black women officers sued over racial discrimination, sexual harassment, bullying, and retaliation for expressing concerns. Without accountability, it’s no wonder that the department has struggled to hire and retain officers.

Because the police department has shown time and again that they are unable or unwilling to hold themselves accountable, the D.C. Council and the mayor have to act. Strict limitations and real accountability can start to fix the police abuse problem, but our leaders need to find the will to invest in these solutions.

The D.C. Council recently passed a comprehensive police accountability bill that takes popular and effective steps to address abuse. For example, the law established a public police misconduct database, a solution that an overwhelming 90% of Americans polled in 2020 by the Pew Research Center support. But the D.C. Council and the mayor have yet to fully fund this database and to make sure it includes the total number of allegations against officers. This database is just one example of a great solution that is sitting on the shelf instead of being implemented right away.

Each one of us has a role to play in fixing the police abuse problem in D.C. — from contacting legislators, to asserting our rights, keeping each other safe, and supporting ongoing work. Together, we can move the District closer to ensuring public safety for all.

In Order to Lock Up More Blacks, Corpse Biden says he would Sign a GOP Bill Overturning DC Crime Laws. White Liberals Have Already Overcrowded Their Inhumane DC Jail by Filling It w/Blacks- 91% Black

From [HERE] President Joe Biden said on Thursday he would sign a Republican-led bill that would overturn recent changes to Washington, D.C.'s laws which lowered penalties for some crimes, should it pass in the U.S. Senate.

"I support D.C. statehood and home rule, but I don't support some of the changes D.C. Council put forward over the Mayor's objections, such as lowering penalties for carjackings," Biden said on Twitter after a meeting with Senate Democrats. "If the Senate votes to overturn what D.C. Council did, I'll sign it."

A veto would run counter to Biden's longtime view that Washington should be a state that sets its own laws, free from interference from Congress. But it might help counter accusations that his Democratic Party is soft on crime.

Congressional oversight of Washington, D.C. is written into the U.S. Constitution, and the city's 700,000 residents do not have voting representation in Congress.

Washington's city council has been facing criticism from elite racists after lowering penalties for burglary, carjacking and other criminal activity. Police statistics show that crime in the city has broadly dropped since 2018, but a spike in carjacking and a recent assault on a member of Congress have heightened concerns about safety.

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives rejected Washington's changes to the criminal code in a bipartisan vote in February. The Senate could vote on the measure next week.

ABOVE YURUGU BIDEN WITH GEORGE FLOYD’S FAMILY- TELLING THEM LIES. The Brennan Center says Biden Has Made “Little or No Progress" after Promising “to root out systemic racism in our criminal justice system and to enact police reform in George Floyd’s name" LIBERALS EmbracE the Same Police who Surveil and Murder Law Abiding Black People On a Daily Basis – b/c They Know There Will Be No Sanctions from the Emasculated, Powerless Black Votary [MORE]

LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA BOTH FEED THIER AUDIENCES WITH CRIME DATA TO HELP OTHERIZE BLACKS AND SUPPORT A POSTURE ALREADY TAKEN AND PROJECTED; SAID NEUROPEANS BELIEVE CRIME STATS ARE PROOF THAT BLACKS ARE INHERENTLY CRIMINAL. BASED ON THIS UNSTATED FANTASTIC BELIEF, WHITE LIBERALS IN LOCAL MAINSTREAM MEDIA FOR INSTANCE, GO ON USING CRIME TO JUSTIFY TREATING BLACK PEOPLE CRIMINALLY IN LIBERAL CITIES, FREELY IMPOSING PUNITIVE POLICIES AND SOCIALLY DISTANCING THEMSELVES FROM BLACKS. IT SHOULD GO WITHOUT SAYING BUT WHITE REPUBLICAN PROSECUTORS AND JUDGES AREN’T THE ONES FILLING THE JAILS WITH BLACK PEOPLE IN DIVERSE, LIBERAL CITIES LIKE WASHINGTON D.C., NYC OR CHICAGO.

DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINS, "ALLEGED BLACK CRIMINALITY, WHILE EVOKING WHITE AMERICAN FEAR AND LOATHING, REASSURES THEM OF THEIR VAUNTED SELF-WORTH, THEIR ASSUMED INNATELY SUPERIOR MORAL STANDING, OF THEIR SELF-CONGRATULATORY SELF-CONSTRAINT IN CONTRAST WITH PRESUMED BLACK AMERICAN UNWORTHINESS, INNATE INFERIOR MORAL STANDING, INHERENT CRIMINALITY, LACK OF SELF-CONSTRAINT AND SELF-CONTROL.” “BLACK CRIMINALS FUNCTION AS A NEGATIVE REFERENCE GROUP VITAL TO MAINTAINING THE WHITE AMERICAN SELF-IMAGE. [MORE]

LIBERALS CRAM BLACKS (91%) INTO INHUMANE DC JAIL: LACK DRINKING WATER, SHOWERS, FIRST AID, BROKEN TOILETS, FOOD W/WORMS, TRIALS POSTPONED UNTIL '24. JAN 6TH DEFENDANTS BRING ATTENTION TO CONDITIONS

DC Jail is 91% Black. Although the percentage of the overall Black population in DC has decreased, the percentage of incarcerated Blacks, particularly Black men, has remained relatively high and stable since 1990. [MORE] The vast majority of inmates are held pre-trial. All trials have been subject to postponements because of COVID. Felony trials in some cases are being set far into the future due to the busy calendars of prosecutors, courts and defense attorneys. [MORE] and [MORE] This means persons held pre-trial and presumed innocent must wait for trial in this reprehensible jail run by liberals. [who do you think has jammed the jail with Blacks? Do republican judges and prosecutors run the courts or police force in DC?? DC is 95% liberal and white liberal prosecutors/judges and their rolebotic servant Blacks are responsible, - just as they are in many places where Blacks attempt to live] [MORE] and [MORE]

The intersection between health care and prison reform has arguably never been more publicly visible than through the inhumane living conditions endured by the detainees at the D.C. county jail. This jail has consistently come under scrutiny regarding its conditions including, but not limited to, extreme confinement lasting more than 400 days and a class action lawsuit pertaining to proper COVID protocols. Unfortunately, this is just one example of the many jails, prisons, and detention centers in America that force detainees to suffer through uninhabitable conditions.

An impromptu inspection in October of 2021 revealed that the D.C. jail’s roughly 1,500 detainees are forced to live in systemic, inhumane and unsanitary living conditions. Notedly, many of these detainees have yet to be found guilty and are currently awaiting trial. These egregious conditions range from denial of food, water, and showers for punitive reasons, cells filled with sewage and blood, water leaks, mold, roaches, and lack of access to necessary medical care. There is no question that long term exposure to these conditions leads to physical and psychological trauma, which increases the likelihood that they will require future medical care. [MORE]

Reward and Punishment in The System of White Supremacy: Elites Drop Poop Daddy After Years of Promoting Him on Various Platforms They Own and Control b/c All Showcase Blacks are Disposable/Replaceable

From [HERE] With so many sexual assault, abuse, and sex trafficking lawsuits and accusations against Diddy, people are thinking a lot about his reputation. More specifically, they are considering his massive influence, financial stake, and ubiquity in the entertainment sphere, a presence that these allegations are shifting quite dramatically. Moreover, folks are reacting to Sean Combs' legacy change in real time, although some initiatives to de-platform him in the wake of these alleged crimes seem more futile than others. For example, an alleged representative for the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce reportedly spoke to TMZ about one particularly visible and popular accolade of his: his Walk of Fame star. [MORE]

NEVER PARTICIPATE IN OR COOPERATE WITH THE SYSTEM OF RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY. ON A DALY BASIS CNN PROBOT ABBY PHILLIP HELPS RACISTS PRACTICE RACISM. HERE, CAMRON WANTS NO PART OF IT.

ELITES RETIRE THEIR SHOWCASE OF DIDDY. CAN HE MAKE IT W/O THEM? Neely Fuller correctly states that in the system of racism white supremacy Black people are subject to the direct and indirect power of elite racists in all areas of activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, religion, Sex and War.

In the area of “entertainment” the dependent media, “a segregated white-owned enterprise with billions of dollars at their disposal,” makes great use out of Showcase Blacks to control the behavior and thinking of Black and other non-white people. Said auto-coons have priceless value to racists in the system of racism white Supremacy.

Showcase Blacks are “coin-operated,” high-profile blacks that are constantly paraded before the public. They may be political dignitaries, pro athletes, entertainers, educators, business people, judges or elected officials. In general, their real purpose is to mask the REALITY of being black in America. [MORE]

Showcase Blacks are literally the creation of elite racists who launch and promote their careers on various platforms they own and control. Elite racists (liberal or republican) are the deciders, choosers and creators for the success or failure of showcase Blacks; they select and groom the potential celebrity as they see fit. Most have no independent power or ability to have the same success without the backing of elite racists. As such, said coin-operated Blacks are compromised sambos and SNiggers paid to do as their white masters direct them. Showcase Blacks are rewarded handsomely for their activities and their created personas are a career investment. But they are also disposable and easily replaceable.

Bear in mind that elite white supremacists/racists control the show. Showcase Blacks are not showcasing themselves, they are being showcased by white supremacists to promote some aspect of RSW. [MORE]

Showcase Blacks are tools for mind control and a necessary illusion of the racism/white supremacy system. Elite racists have created an army of these rolebotic, celebrity Blacks. FUNKTIONARY explains, “A role-bot merely plays the role of the mask - the personae - society issued and approved.” A main function of showcase blacks is to control the spectrum of ideas discussed by Blacks, control the parameters of dissent, parameters of political discussion and define what kinds of ideas or activities are "proper" and "reasonable" for Blacks to discuss or engage in. Through showcase blacks, elite whites present a numerous array of “black” personalities and characters in movies, tv, social media programming whom are obedient citizen-subjects to authority, pliable and in general compatible with the white supremacy dynamic and the servant role in a white over Black system.

Showcase Blacks thus function as rolebots to Black viewers who mimic and integrate said characters into their own personality and falsified Afrikan consciousness. “People see, people do.” Such “black” characters generally are SNiggering, dancing, singing, begging, emotional, joking, always non-serious, thug, nigger/ho/bitch, ongoing smiling face, sambo characters and reactionary personas who would never be fit to neutralize the system of racism white supremacy or destroy the master/servant relationship. [MORE]

Documentary on Predictive Programming and Thought Control: ‘The Occupation of the American Mind - Israel's Public Relations War in the US’

From [HERE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

SARC – Self-Appointed Ruling Class—the noblesse oblige. 2) the overruling class elite. SARC controls the Corporate federal and state levels of stationary bandits and territorial gangsters better known as or doing business as “government,” university systems, political machines (as evidenced by Presidential [s]elections), mainline dependent media, the gangbanking system and most major multi-national corporations. Through its political and financial prowess, it is able to create (and impose) a collective virtual bozone layer reality conjured up and sustained by ritual white magic. (See: Statutory Oppression, Stationary Bandits, Corporate State, Involuntary Servitude, Bozone Layer & Territorial Gangsters)

mind control – a misnomer for thought control, e.g., a dollar is a dollar is a dollar. 2) corporate religion and T.V. 3) Media. 4) belief in granfalloons. Mind control comprises three sequential steps—Unfreezing, Changing and Refreezing. The essence of mind control is that it encourages dependence and conformity, and discourages autonomy and individuality. (See: MEDIA, Indoctrination, Pixilated People, Thought, Brainwashing, Unfreezing, Refreezing, Unsucking, Hypnotism, Isolation, Data Smog, Predictive Programming, Cultural Conditioning, Indoctrination, Programming & Granfalloons)

Monkey-Vision – imitation station—we begin to imitate what we see on network, Internet videos and cable TV—monkey see, monkey do. Monkey-minded people will watch any program on television rather than to watch no television at all. Before you get used to it, you will get used by it. While we’re monkeying around, we’re being monkeyed-down to the point where most people will stare at the screen rather than be alone with their thoughts causing them to scream. With Monkey-Vision, we never have to be told to do anything, just simply shown, repeatedly, with calculated precision. (See: Schooling, Conditioning, The Federal Hollyork Complex, Predictive Programming, Recall Button, Indoctrination & MEDIA)

predictive programming – an ancient technique of downloading (marketing) an idea into the subconscious of the conditioned mass-mind (step-by-step) guiding (bringing) the duped victims into a desired or predetermined conclusion that they actually believe was consciously derived on their own. Predictive programming works down through the centuries like a charm. Everyone is standardized with the same indoctrination—conditioned under the same mis-education and disinformation. Since we all watch the same TV and download the same standardized education, it never occurs that we are getting conned, uploaded, downgraded, brainchipped and ultimately faded from any memory of being an individual self. “Most folk’s beliefs and what they think is induced beliefs, is propagated into them through repetition as Bertrand Russell said. Just repetitive advertising and people start parroting it in their daily lives and it’s actually changing the structure of their mind into acceptance of something they don’t even perceive yet.” ~Alan Watt. With predictive programming you are entrained to accept something that has not yet happened (but will) and respond to it just like the characters in the movie—performing and dream-weaving what you’ve subliminally consumed. (See: THC, Borg, Pathocracy, MEDIA, T.V., Money, Deaf-Effect, Schooling, Education, Indoctrination, Cultural Conditioning, Dollar, “Government,” Authority, DOOR, Zombie, Android, Belief, Cognitive Dissonance, Clocksuckers, Chemtrails & Democracy)

[The Occupation of the “African American” Mind] Dr Umar: 'There Can Be No Liberation from the Master Servant Relationship Until We Change the Way We Think About Ourselves, Our People and Our Future'

According to FUNKTIONARY:

African-American – a non-immigrant Afrikan (mentally captured and economically indentured) in America. 2) the hyphenated-hybrid—implicated, marginalized, demonized, profiled, targeted, Xeroxed, incarcerated Afrikan misplaced in America. “African-American” is a dash surrounded by a paradox masked as contradiction; an existential aposiopetic pause—a stutter step for the proverbial cause—a tenuous graft that left us faded, jaded, degraded, and unwhole, and in fact, according to his-story, less than a half—one third human to be exact. It is the fool who says “I have lost nothing in Africa or I have not gained anything in America.” (See: Doctrine of Exclusion, Racism White Supremacy, Melanin & Genius)

Pan-Afrikan Nationalist – one forever down with the cultural and mental liberation and economic self-determination of Mother Afrika and her tricked-out daughter-in-love—Blackamerica—come hell or high water—both of which have come to past.

Pan-Africanism – a phrase invented by Africans, manipulated by British Intelligence operative cells, and financed by bankers in order that it may include oppressors of Afrikan people, namely, colonial interlopers (the slave-running subjugationist Pan-Arabcentrist Arabs across northern Afrika) and European White Supremacists (from the country called “South Afrika”), via well intentioned Afrikan created political bodies such as the Organization of Afrikan Unity (OAU), i.e., giving non-Afrikans a means by which to covertly sabotage and derail the development, direction and actual survival of the Afrikan liberation struggle. The phrase, terminology or ideology of Pan-Africanism is a eulogy fabricated for something that is very much still alive. It lives in the sense that we have reclaimed the power to define, or redefine if necessary, the structure, context, content and portent of our words and phrases that assist us in our efforts for Afrikan liberation around the globe. Pan-Afrikanism was initially promulgated by Diasporan Afrikans and only later by continental Afrikans. Pan-Afrikanism, in the spirit of Garvey-Nkrumah-Malcolm-Lumumba, precludes those not culturally, genetically, geographically, philosophically, chronologically and politically connected and committed through word, aspiration, asili, necessity and deed to the notion of and struggle for “Afrika for Afrikans.” Pan-Africanism is encompassed within and informed by the broader umbrella of Afrikan-Centrism. The next phase in the political movement called Pan-Afrikanism is to redefine it as an Afrikan-centered Pan-Afrikanism, encompassing the aforementioned attributes as the litmus test for those ascribing (or aspiring) to the noble mission of Pan-Afrikanism. (See: Afrikan-Centrism, Liberation, Phfreedom, LAND & Self-Determination)

Dolly Want a Cracker? Are Your Thoughts Your Own? - Behavioral Manipulation Expert David Charalambous Discusses False Reality Programming

Prosecution is about Locking Up Blacks Not Prosecuting Cops Who Murder Black People: Gullible Black DA who Tried to Get Justice for Freddy Gray is Now Jobless and On House Arrest for Victimless Crime

Contrary to the illusion presented in The Spectacle The Legal Profession is Lilly White: ACCORDING TO THE ABA, only 3% of All elected prosecutors are Black, only 5% of All attorneys are Black and 85% of All attorneys are White

In general, the small number of Black attorneys that are actually filtered into the legal system are merely tolerated and remain in active, semi-successful practice only so long as they indirectly or directly work in service of RWS or complement governmental authority in some manner AND/OR NEVER CHALLENGE IT. Gullible civil rights advocates and do-gooders such as Ms. Mosby fail to understand what they are dealing with.

Racism is the dominant feature of the criminal justice in the United States and a major goal of the white supremacy system is the greater confinement of substantial numbers of non-white people, particularly Blacks. As explained by Kenneth Montgomery, a former Black prosecutor for the Brooklyn, New York district attorney’s office, “prosecution is about locking black people up.” “I thought that because of who I was, because of the street and academic smarts I had, I was able to do some things that were more in line with justice. But, it was like putting a Band-Aid on a gunshot wound. In the long run, I didn’t think it was worth it, so that’s why I left.” [MORE]. The black prosecutor will be rewarded so long as he/she continues to lock up Black people. REFORMERS GET REFORMED INTO THE SYSTEM. To the extent that a prosecutor decides to spend his/her time prosecuting other persons such as police officers or ELITE white folks he or she will be soon be disappeared, Kaepernick style. [MORE]

From [HERE] The former top prosecutor in Baltimore, convicted of fraud for lying about financial hardship during the pandemic in order to buy a beach house with money from the federal government, will serve no prison time.

Marilyn Mosby, 44, was sentenced to 12 months of house arrest, 100 hours of community service and three years of supervised release Thursday, Erek Barron, United States Attorney for the District of Maryland announced.

The ex-prosecutor was found guilty of multiple felony charges in two separate trials, one that took place this year and one last fall.

During the sentencing hearing in Prince County, U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby sentenced Mosby to home confinement with electric monitoring and also ordered forfeiture of 90% of the property Mosby bought with the fraudulently obtained mortgage.

Mosby garnered national attention in 2015 when she charged six Baltimore police officers in connection to the death of Freddie Gray. A Black man, Gray, 25, died in police custody  a week after he was brutalized on the street and then suffered a severe spinal injury while traveling without a seatbelt in the back of a police van on the way to the police station.

Prosecutors had asked for a 20-month sentence

Under the law, Mosby had faced up to 35 years in prison for her fraud and perjury convictions.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sean R. Delaney and Aaron S.J. Zelinsky prosecuted the federal cases. Federal court records show they had argued for a 20-month prison sentence.

The court agrees these are very serious offenses and that this conduct displays a pattern of dishonesty,” The Baltimore Sun reported Griggsby told Mosby in court. “This dishonesty also occurred when you held the highest office for a prosecutor in the City of Baltimore.”

While Mosby’s crimes didn’t have “victims in a traditional sense,” the outlet reported, Griggsby said Mosby "betrayed people who looked up to her in the community."

Climate Change in Gaza: Pale Interloper Alien European Hebrews Reclaim Their Land and Ancestral/Genetic Connection to Afrikan Hebrews from Ancient Times: Video Shows Annihilation of Life, Destruction

IsrAliens [Pale Interloper Alien European Hebrews Faking Like they have an Ancestral Connection to Afrikan Hebrews from ancient times] are Holocausting the Rightful Dwellers of Palestine in Fake "War"

Video from Pelham Shows Total Destruction, Annihilation of Life. Photos are from [HERE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Israeliens – impostor (pale interloper alien) Hebrews—Eastern European stock Caucasians who adopted the philosophy, myths, fables, and traditions of the so-called “Jews” while living in Russia—masquerading as if they had any genetic or historical ancestry and cultural heritage to the Afrikan Hebrews, the Afrim people, who occupied Canaan (Palestine) from ancient times. 2) those who currently are occupying Palestine (the land of Canaan), colonizing and killing its rightful descendants, historic owners and dwellers), and are undeniably alien (foreign—not aboriginal) to that land. 3) impostor Hebrews originating from the Pale of Settlement in Kazzarian Russia currently an occupying force (militarily holed-up and propped-up by US financial support and British skullduggery) in occupied Palestine. 4) alien Jews—Pinchbeck Hebrews. Israeliens are East Europeans with no genetic or actual historic ties whatsoever to the land now called Palestine. Israeliens have brainwashed (and fooled) themselves and many others into believing this historical lie and propaganda that they are the descendents of “Jews” (a misnomer for African Hebrews, itself a misnomer for the Afrim people). Anyone with a modicum of research skills, knowledge of basic geography, philology, and an unbiased-by-religious-myth mind can easily confirm or validate this fact for his or herself. Both so-called Sephardim and Ashkenazim “Jews” are not historically tied to the Afrim. It’s not that Caucasians who have adopted the “Jewish” religion shouldn’t have a place to live—but how about suggesting relocating where they came from—the hills of Russia, and not on another peoples’ land. You don’t invade (break into) someone’s house (property) and expect them to just go away and not fight to get it back (despite how much force, murdering, deception, and propaganda that is brought to bear to justify such wrongful invasion and genocide). Psychological repression is both invisible and reflexive. (See: Zionism, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, Genocide, Immigrant Human, Jew, Twelve Tribes of Israel, Evolution, Caucasian, Pilgarlick, El & Judaism)

Farrakhan: ‘We Charge Genocide. Netanyahu Sanctioned the October 7th Attacks to Initiate Holocaust. Our Extermination is Planned as Well. The Government is Trying to Kill Us Slowly w/COVID Vaccines’

From [HERE] and [HERE]

The UN is Manipulating the Gaza Death Toll to Support Israeli Terrorcrats and Conceal Ongoing Holocaust

From [HERE] Controlling narratives is critical in the context of international war and the media. The UN’s reported death toll from Gaza has recently come under fire; allegations suggest that the UN dramatically reduced its numbers downward. The UN has denied this accusation, but it seems to be a part of a larger disinformation operation meant to support Israeli state propaganda and hide the truth about Palestinian suffering.

The UN promptly refuted the initial accusation that it had significantly altered the death toll from Gaza. In spite of this, the idea was not written off as a straightforward error in the media but rather as a conscious attempt at misinformation. The number of civilian deaths recorded by the Gaza Health Ministry—figures that are also cited by significant NGOs and the UN—has long been contested by pro-Israeli pundits and government representatives. These officials, frequently without supporting documentation, have written off these figures as Hamas propaganda for years.

Unwanted Cop Acquitted in Manny Ellis Case Sues Tacoma and DA for “False Allegations.” Was 1 of 6 White Cops who Held Black Man Down in a Hobble Restraint and Smothered Him to Death w/Spit Mask

From [HERE] Swift reaction to a $47 million claim filed by one of the three Tacoma police officers acquitted in the beating death of an unarmed black man.

Former Tacoma Police officer Timothy Rankine filed the claim, four months after a jury found him and two other officers not guilty in the death of Manuel Ellis.

Now Rankine and his wife are suing the state and city of Tacoma.

All three officers settled with the city for half a million dollars earlier this year and then resigned.

Now Timothy Rankine and his wife say the damage to their lives was so great they want more.

This, after a jury determined he and his fellow officers were not guilty of murder in the death of Manny Ellis.

“You think you got away with something but everybody’s going to be judged in the end,” said Brad Williams, a barber.

Emotions still run high inside the Goodfellas Barbershop when the subject of Manny Ellis comes up. The 33-year-old black man was repeatedly punched, tased, a spit hood placed over his head, in a deadly encounter with three Tacoma police officers four years ago.

“And I know of that man,” Williams said. “He used to go to this church over here.”

So, news that one of the acquitted officers, Timothy Rankine, and his wife, are now seeking $47 million in damages from the city and the state, well, it rankles.

“I don’t think anyone should be compensated for doing wrong,” Williams said.

A jury deliberated for three days before finding Rankine, Christopher Burbank and Matthew Collins not guilty in Ellis’s death last December.

In January, the three officers each agreed to a half-million-dollar settlement with the city of Tacoma in exchange for turning in their badges.

Now, in the $47-million claim filing, Rankine is accusing the city and the state attorney general of “politically motivated, false allegations of biased policing and criminal misconduct, creating a hostile work environment, inciting hatred, threats, and violence toward me and my family.”

That does not sit well here.

“Because he already had his $500,000 depart,” said Leonard Olsen, barber. “And that’s it. Enough is enough. That’s just putting salt on the wound of disrespect.”

KIRO 7 spoke to Timothy Rankine’s attorney by telephone. She said she was too busy today to have a statement.

But she says she wants his voice heard. So, stay tuned.

A White Woman is the Latest Derek Chauvin Accuser Claiming the Killer Cop Performed the Same 'Signature Pose' on her that he Used to Murder George Floyd in Liberal, Minneapolis

GEORGE FLOYD’S Murder Wasn't Caused by 'Funding/Defunding polICE DEPARTMENTS' but by "Authority," the UNCONTROLLABLE POWER to Forcibly Control/Rule Over Citizens

From [HERE] Disgraced policeman Derek Chauvin is accused of using the same deadly restraint against a woman just a few months before he murdered George Floyd.

Patty Day is suing him and the City of Minneapolis for $9 million in damages for injuries and psychological trauma she suffered during a January 2020 arrest.

The lawsuit filed by Robins Kaplan LLP in federal Minnesota court alleged that five months before George Floyd's death Day was 'violently jerked from her car' and thrown to the ground by Chauvin and his partner Ellen Jensen.

Chauvin then allegedly applied his knee to Day's back while she lay handcuffed - the same stance he would fatally take for nine minutes during his arrest of Floyd.

Day claimed that due to the excessive force, she suffered 'significant' arm and shoulder injuries, as well as a fractured tooth.

All the while, Jensen did nothing to intervene, according to the suit.

She argued the City of Minneapolis was aware officers within its police department had a history of 'gratuitous use of excessive force'.

'Sadly, my experience with Derek Chauvin is not unique,' Day said.

'George Floyd died at the hands of this individual, and had the City intervened on his behavior after my interaction, he could still be alive today... It was a traumatic part of my life that I hope no one else will have to endure.'

Day, who was at the time communications director for the Minneapolis Department of Public Works, got behind the wheel after drinking on January 17, 2020.

Chauvin and Jensen showed up after someone called 911 to report a driver who appeared to be intoxicated stuck in a snowbank.

Judge Denies San Francisco Government’s Claim that 2 White Cops are Immune from Suit after They Fabricated Evidence to Falsely Convict a Latino Man who Spent Most of His Life in Prison

From [HERE] San Francisco police inspectors will face a trial following a judge’s finding Tuesday that they can’t use qualified immunity to avoid claims that their investigation led to the wrongful imprisonment of a man for 32 years. 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore deemed Joaquin Ciria’s case against two San Francisco police inspectors ripe for a trial, denying most of their requests for summary judgment. 

However, two conspiracy claims, a claim for nondisclosure of evidence, and all claims against one officer who filed a report based on the inspectors’ case against Ciria, will not proceed to trial. 

Attorneys for Ciria did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Jen Kwart with San Francisco's city attorney's office said in an emailed statement, “We are pleased the court granted portions of our motion for summary judgment, and we are evaluating all options moving forward.”

The trial of Inspectors James Crowley and Arthur Gerrans is set for July 1.

Joaquin Ciria challenged the city for charging him with a 1990 killing he didn’t commit, leading to a conviction of first-degree murder at the age of 29. After spending most of his life behind bars, he was officially exonerated in the shooting death of his friend Felix Bastarrica in 2022 at age 61. 

He accused the city in the same year of conspiracy and false imprisonment, among other claims, saying that officials deprived him of his civil rights by fabricating evidence "despite obvious evidence of his innocence."

Westmore said in a 24-page order Tuesday that Ciria made a sufficient case for “a triable issue as to the state of mind of Inspectors James Crowley and Arthur Gerrans.” She added that qualified immunity "cannot act as a shield to judicial deception." 

The judge detailed the shaky case built by the city to charge Ciria for the shooting and prosecute him, from misidentifying him to using witness interviews with very little basis in fact, which led to his exoneration several decades later. 

At least one interview was coerced, as when the inspectors threatened to charge witness George Varela with murder if he did not identify Ciria as the shooter they were looking for.

"Much of the other cited evidence and witness interviews were not based on personal knowledge, and, instead, are more akin to gossip or rumor, which may not be relied upon for a finding of probable cause," the judge wrote.

The case built in total “falls far short of what is required for a finding of probable cause to arrest,” Westmore said, adding that it creates a triable case to explore “whether there was probable cause to prosecute.”

“If the jury believes plaintiff’s version of events, it could find that Crowley and Gerrans’ conduct, at the very least, involved reckless or callous indifference,” Westmore said. 

However, the judge granted most claims for summary judgment against Nicholas Rubino, another officer involved in filing the case against Ciria.

Westmore also granted summary judgment on the claims of intraconspiracy and state law conspiracy, and of nondisclosure of evidence, for the inspectors. She said the plaintiff failed to build a plausible case that any San Francisco department policy, custom or training was in place that would have allowed the inspectors to carry out the actions which Ciria accuses them of.

The city argued in a hearing before Westmore earlier this month that inspectors proved their investigation met the legal standard for probable cause, and that only the facts they had at the time they got the warrant matters. Attorneys cited a Ninth Circuit ruling that probable cause to arrest a person can come from an identification, a physical description and a connection to a vehicle used in a murder. 

Ciria’s family also separately filed claims in June 2023, saying they want the city to pay for his wrongful detention. His son Pedro and former partner Yojana Paiz say his conviction resulted from the city and police department’s “unconstitutional investigative policies” and a failure to train or intervene or to implement remedial measures to address “tainted, reckless and unconstitutional investigation and interrogation techniques.” 

Ciria says it was a pattern of tactics the city used to craft unreliable suspect identifications — including by suggesting that witnesses make less-than-certain identifications, selectively recording portions of interviews, falsely documenting witness identifications and priming witnesses to identify specific suspects.

The Northern California Innocence Project and The Innocence Commission successfully cleared Ciria’s name in 2020, saying police relied on rumors and coerced another man who drove the actual shooter to falsely name Ciria. 

At least five Black men were falsely convicted of murders that occurred between 1990 and 1991 in San Francisco based on fabricated evidence, unconstitutionally influenced witness identification or improperly incentivized evidence from San Francisco Police Department officers and inspectors. 

Fed Judge Denies Immunity to a White Cop who Framed Desmond Green for Murder based on a “lying, drug-impaired jailhouse informant” whom she Steered to Select Black Man from a Photo lineup

From [HERE] The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi issued a compelling decision Monday denying qualified immunity to a detective who falsely accused Desmond Green of capital murder based on a “lying, drug-impaired jailhouse informant” whom she steered to select Mr. Green’s face from a photo lineup. 

The “horrifying wrong” of being wrongly accused and arrested was compounded by Mr. Green’s imprisonment for nearly two years in the Hinds County Detention Center, which was full of violence, rodents and snakes, and moldy food, where he endured “constant yelling, fighting, and threats,” often had to sleep on the bare floor, and “constantly feared for his life.”

After the informant recanted and prosecutors dropped the charges, Mr. Green filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the Jackson police detective (as well as the city itself and Hinds County, which runs the jail) seeking justice for his wrongful prosecution and conditions of confinement. 

The detective responded that Mr. Green’s suit should be dismissed under the doctrine of qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that, according to the court, “means people wronged by government agents cannot sue those agents unless the Supreme Court previously found substantially the same acts to be unconstitutional.”

In his 62-page order, District Judge Carlton W. Reeves concludes after a detailed legal analysis that the detective is not entitled to qualified immunity because her actions violated clearly-established law.

The court goes on, however, to address Mr. Green’s argument that qualified immunity is itself unlawful, setting out the historical context for the doctrine’s invention and tracing its evolution into what Justice Sonia Sotomayor has called “an absolute shield” against accountability for police officers accused of using excessive force. 

Qualified immunity “has no basis in law,” the court concludes. “It is an extra-constitutional affront to other cherished values of our democracy.”

“Waves of Terrorism”

The federal statute under which Mr. Green sued the police detective is usually called “section 1983,” but the court insists on using the law’s formal name—the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871—to underscore why Congress passed it in the first place. The decision sets the historical stage this way (citations omitted):

After the Civil War, white supremacists unleashed waves of terrorism across the South. Lawlessness was the order of the day. Groups like the Ku Klux Klan carried out “thousands of beatings, lynchings, and incidents of torture and mutilation.” “These atrocities were inflicted with impunity because judges, politicians, and law enforcement officers were fellow Klansmen and loyal sympathizers.” White supremacy empowered them to kill Black men, women, and children without fear of consequences.

EJI has documented nearly 2,000 confirmed racial terror lynchings of Black people by white mobs during Reconstruction, the 12-year period following the Civil War. Thousands more were attacked, sexually assaulted, and terrorized by white mobs and individuals who were shielded from arrest and prosecution. [MORE]

Alabama DA Seeks New Trial for Toforest Johnson, Black Man on Death Row. No Physical Evidence Connected Him to the Crime, 10 witnesses placed him at a nightclub and Liar Witness Paid by Government

From [HERE] On May 20, 2024, Jefferson County, Alabama District Attorney Danny Carr asked a circuit judge to grant a new trial to Toforest Johnson (center), an Alabama death row prisoner whose conviction DA Carr believes is “fundamentally unreliable.” This extraordinary request is the latest in a series of appeals for Mr. Johnson, who was sentenced to death in 1998 for the 1995 murder of Jefferson County Deputy Sheriff William Hardy but has always maintained his innocence. “A thorough review and investigation of the entire case leaves no confidence in the integrity of [Mr.] Johnson’s conviction,” DA Carr wrote. “The interest of justice demands that [Mr.] Johnson be granted a new trial.” DA Carr initially filed a motion requesting a new trial for Mr. Johnson in 2020, voicing similar concerns over the validity of his conviction. The United States Supreme Court declined to hear Mr. Johnson’s case in October 2023.

Mr. Johnson was convicted in the murder of Deputy Sheriff Hardy, who was killed in a hotel parking lot, despite his maintenance that he was at a nightclub across town. His conviction relied largely on testimony from Violet Ellison, who claimed to have listened to phone calls between her daughter and heard someone at Jefferson County Jail who identified himself as “Toforest” confess to the shooting. DA Carr wrote that Mr. Johnson’s original prosecutor has acknowledged that the case hinged on Ms. Ellison’s testimony and that “nobody contests that [Ms.] Ellison is the key to [Mr.] Johnson’s conviction and the reason he is on death row today.” In 2008, several individuals submitted affidavits in support of Mr. Johnson, claiming they had seen him across town on the night of the murder and in 2022, information was revealed indicating Ms. Ellison was a key witness in several other criminal cases for the State. “We also know the [Ms.] Ellison was not believed by law enforcement initially and that a different theory of the case that contradicted her account was pursued after [Mr.] Johnson’s trial and that the lead prosecutor now has such grave concerns about [Ms.] Ellison that he supports a new trial for [Mr.] Johnson,” DA Carr wrote.

Lawyers for Mr. Johnson have long argued that the prosecution suppressed evidence that Ms. Ellison had knowledge of the $5,000 reward being offered in the case and testified in hopes of receiving that money. In a 2018 hearing in Jefferson County, a copy of the check that was paid to Ms. Ellison surfaced after the US Supreme Court sent Mr. Johnson’s case back to state court. The Circuit court ruled that Mr. Johnson’s legal team could not establish that Ms. Ellison knew there was a reward when she talked with the police.

Former Alabama Attorney General Bill Baxley, former Chief Justice Drayton Nabers, and several former judges and prosecutors have also voiced support for a new trial for Mr. Johnson, as well as three former jurors on the case. Shanaye Pool, Mr. Johnson’s daughter, was grateful for DA Carr’s support of her father. “Our hope is that the courts will agree with him. Our hope is for our family to finally be reunited,” said Ms. Poole.