[Elite Racists Continue to Trick Black People by Confusing Bigotry w/Racism] A Tenn Lawmaker Didn't Say Mean Words About Lynching (bigotry), He Proposed Lynching Mostly Blacks (racism) to Execute Them

WAKE UP. NAME CALLING IS NOT RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY. From [HERE] During a debate on Tuesday about a bill that would expand the State’s options for putting people to death, a Tennessee state representative expressed support for the bill and suggested adding hanging from a tree as an execution method.

Lawmakers were discussing HB1245, which would allow electrocution as an alternative to lethal injection, and an amendment that would add execution by firing squad, when Rep. Paul Sherrell (R-Sparta) said, “I was just wondering, could I put an amendment on that that would include hanging by a tree, also.”

Racial Terror Lynching in Tennessee

EJI has documented 236 racial terror lynchings of Black people in Tennessee between 1877 and 1950, including hangings of Black journalists, business leaders, and teachers.

EJI’s report on terror lynchings in the 12 most active lynching states in America found that Tennessee’s Lake and Moore counties had the sixth and seventh highest lynching rates, respectively, and Shelby County had the 18th highest number of lynching victims.

Black people were lynched in Tennessee for minor social transgressions or for demanding basic rights and fair treatment. Richard Wilkerson, for example, was lynched in Manchester, Tennessee, in 1934 for allegedly slapping a white man who had assaulted a Black woman at an African American dance.

Businessmen Thomas Moss, Calvin McDowell, and Henry Stewart were brutally lynched in Memphis in 1892 for defending their grocery business against white attackers. The men were friends of anti-lynching crusader Ida B. Wells, who wrote an editorial in response to their murders urging Black residents in Memphis to “leave a town which will neither protect our lives and property, nor give us a fair trial in the courts, but takes us out and murders us in cold blood when accused by white persons.” A white mob then attacked and destroyed her newspaper office and threatened her not to return to Memphis.

Tennessee lynch mobs regularly displayed complete disregard for the legal system. In 1906, Edward Johnson, a Black man, was convicted of raping a white woman and sentenced to death by an all-white jury in Chattanooga. His attorneys appealed the case and won a rare stay of execution from the U.S. Supreme Court.

In response, a white mob seized Mr. Johnson from the jail, dragged him through the streets, hanged him from the second span of the Walnut Street Bridge, and shot him hundreds of times. The mob left a note pinned on the corpse that read: “To Justice Harlan. Come get your n—r now.” Mr. Johnson, who used his last words to declare his innocence, was cleared of the rape nearly a century later.

The Legacy of Racial Terror

Communities across Tennessee have partnered with EJI to truthfully confront this history of racial terror lynching. Ed Johnson was among four lynching victims memorialized in Chattanooga, and community members have installed two historical markers in downtown Nashville to remember four men who were lynched there during the era of racial terror.

In 2020, a historical marker was installed in front of the Madison County courthouse to memorialize John Brown, who was lynched on the courthouse lawn by a mob of 500 men, and Eliza Woods, who was dragged to the courthouse by a mob after she was accused of poisoning her white employer. Ms. Woods declared her innocence, but the mob ripped off her clothes, hanged her from a tree, and shot at her body.

On Tuesday, however, other lawmakers failed to even respond to Mr. Sherrell’s comment. He apologized only after the remark drew widespread attention and criticism, and in doing so he restated his support for the death penalty bill.

“A bill calling to expand the death penalty by firing squad, and even lynching, is deplorable, immoral and takes us back to the dark days of Jim Crow,” the Rev. Kevin Riggs, pastor of Franklin Community Church, told The Tennessean. “I’m appalled by the words of Representative Sherrell. Suggesting firing squads and lynchings is unconscionable. Tennessee should be moving in the direction of outlawing state sanctioned killings, instead of toward more killings and in more inhumane ways than already exist. There is no moral way to murder another person.”

The decline of lynching in the early 20th century relied heavily on the increased use of the death penalty, and public hangings were often racialized displays intended to appease would-be lynch mobs.

Northern states had abolished public executions by 1850, but some Southern states authorized public hangings until 1938. And even after they were legally banned, mobs often succeeded in forcing public hangings in Southern states.

Lawmakers on Tuesday advanced HB1245 to the next committee.

'blows my mind that we're still hanging brothers by a tree:' Elite Racist Suspects @ Marriott/NFL/ESPN Gas Light Michael Irvin w/BS Claim He Touched a White Woman, Witnesses say Video Shows Otherwise

[MeToo movement Used as a Tool of Racism White Supremacy] From [HERE] and [HERE] Former Cowboys receiver Michael Irvin held a news conference on Wednesday to address an incident involving a female hotel staffer in Arizona, which led to Irvin being sent home from Super Bowl coverage.

Irvin sued the Arizona Marriott hotel for $100 million in damages over the allegations. He has denied the allegations that he had any inappropriate physical conduct between him and the woman.

Irvin said in the press conference that this situation "sickens" him. He said it takes him "back to a time where a white woman would accuse a Black man of something and they would take a bunch of guys who were above the law, run in the ban and put a rope around his foot and drag him through the mud and hang him by the tree."

Irvin said he's been asked if he remembers the woman from the lobby, to which he replied that he meets so many people year-long staying in hotels. 

"I couldn't even tell you what she looks like," Irvin said. "I don't even know who I'm talking about it. This just blows my mind that, in 2023, we're still dragging and hanging brothers by a tree."

Irvin said he still has not seen the tape of the alleged incident and does not know what he is being accused of. He said if he did something wrong, he'll suffer the consequences. 

"But if you did something wrong, you meaning them, then they should suffer the consequences," Irvin said.

Two witnesses of the incident also spoke with reporters. 

One was an Australian man who said he did not know who Irvin was because he's not an NFL fan and the Super Bowl was his first introduction to the sport. He said he met Irvin while doing business with his colleagues in the hotel lobby. 

The other man said he did know who Irvin was, as an Eagles fan, but offered to buy Irvin a drink, which he refused.

Both men said they did not see any behavior from Irvin that was a cause for concern.

Irvin got emotional after listening to the two men give their accounts of the incident because he was thankful they were there and weren’t alone with his word versus his accuser.

ESPN said it had no comment on the legal developments in the case and the NFL Network did not respond to a request for comment.

In his lawsuit, which is filed in Collin County where he lives, Irvin's attorneys accused Marriott's employees and management of "inaccurately and inflammatorily" accusing Irvin of misconduct.

The lawsuit said Irvin had a "brief, friendly interaction with a Marriott employee lasting no longer than one minute" as he arrived back at the hotel Sunday night.

"Witnesses have verified that Mr. Irvin, casually exchanged pleasantries with one of the hotel employees, Mr. Irvin shook her hand, and went to his room alone," the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit said Irving "appreciates spending time with his fans," including taking pictures and talking with them, and that his interaction with the Marriott employee "was no different and witness testimony will prove this to be the case."

"Nonetheless, Marriott recklessly reported to the NFL that Mr. Irvin had somehow acted inappropriately even though in this brief interaction with multiple witnesses, nothing took place other than a friendly interaction that ended with a polite handshake," the lawsuit said.

In a legal response filed Wednesday, Marriott said it didn’t provide the video due to concerns it would reveal the identity of the woman and other guests if Irvin’s attorneys released it publicly.

The company’s attorneys said the order they were given didn’t require the video to be copied, but if the judge now orders a copy, they would ask that it not be shared publicly. They say they offered to allow Irvin to watch the video, but he declined.

The lawsuit also said Irvin then went upstairs to his room. After he fell asleep, he was "shockingly woken up" by security and removed from the hotel. WFAA reached out to Marriott for a comment on the lawsuit when it was filed and they did not respond.

Irvin's lawyer, Levi G. McCathern, previously told WFAA that his office had reached out to the hotel to talk about the situation but "they refused to speak to us." In the press conference, McCathern said Irvin's agent was eventually able to get a meeting with Marriott's GM and head of marketing. The head of security was not included in that meeting, McCathern said.

"They absolutely refused to give [Irvin's agent] any information about what the allegations were against Mr. Irvin," McCathern said.

Irvin and two other men, who were witnesses to the incident and part of Wednesday's press conference, were made available to Marriott for interviews and the hotel declined to speak with any of them, according to McCathern.

The press conference came one day after a judge ordered Marriott to provide Irvin “any and all video recordings, written reports, and/or witness statements gathered” that pertain to Irvin’s February visit at the Arizona hotel by March 7 at 5 p.m.

McCathern said he has seen the surveillance video, but was not allowed to have a copy of it. In a new court filing, Irvin's team filed for an emergency court order to obtain a copy of the video with a proposed deadline of the end of the day – 5 p.m. on March 8.

Since there was no copy of the video to show, McCathern gave his personal description of what the video entailed.

McCathern said the video shows Irvin being approached by the woman after taking pictures outside with some fans – the witnesses in the press conference – and the interaction between Irvin and the woman happens behind a pole in the center of the room. According to McCathern and the two witnesses, Irvin touches the woman four times: the introductory handshake, the handshake at the end of the interaction, once on the elbow and "brushes" her once on the other elbow after bowing over laughing.

McCathern said the woman is never seen in the video acting upset and doesn't back away from Irvin. The conversation between Irvin and the woman lasted about a minute and a half, McCathern said.

"This is what I'm struggling with," Irvin said. "You try to be an ambassador of the league and also understand that God has blessed me and given me a platform to try to touch people, try to raise people, try to lift people up. I've met a lot of fans. I've always tried to be good with people."