McNegro Mayor Increases LAPD's Budget Under a Pretense of Fighting Crime and Real Purpose of Surveilling/Killing Black Citizens to Please Her White Liberal Masters who Control All Major City Resources

In the aftermath of multiple episodes in which LAPD have killed at least 2 Black men and one Latino man since January, McNegro Mayor Bass is proposing to do what so many of her predecessors have done and hire more cops.

Her budget calls for additional funds for recruitment, including signing bonuses; for additional civilian employees, including 911 operators; and for more rank-and-file officers, in part by coaxing some recent retirees back into uniform. All told, she is hoping to expand the department by some 400 officers. [MORE] But what else can a McNegro puppetican like Bass do when her white masters pull the strings? According to FUNKTIONARY:

 McNegro – over one million sold-out. How can any neo-Negro sell out of anything that he does not own—other than merchandise? You have to own something to sell-out. (See: Negropolitan, BOHICAN, Eyeservant, $nigger & Sambo)

Los Angeles is a city run by white liberals - they own and control all major real estate, businesses, banks, industry, utilities, resources and media and control government and its puppeticians and authorities. They all also function as the major decision makers in regards to what happens or does not happen to non-white people. Non-whites, particularly Blacks and Latinos, function in some capacity as their workers, helpers, servants, tenants and customers (but go on enjoying your delusions).

IT IS A WHITE SUPREMACY MYTH THAT POLICE BUDGETS EFFECT THE CRIME RATE. For decades in America we’ve been told by liberal and conservative politicians and other leaders that we have to keep spending money on the police if we want to keep our communities safe. It’s been repeated so many times over so many years that many of us probably don’t give it a second thought. But we started wondering… is it actually true? The answer surprised us, and it might surprise you too. A recent study(Opens in new window) took a look at police spending and crime rates and found that there’s no correlation at all between the two. 

Seeing that made us dig a little deeper into the numbers. According to data collected over the past 60 years, from 1960 to 2018, spending more on policing doesn’t lower the crime rate and spending less on policing doesn’t increase it. Despite that total lack of correlation, politicians always seem to call for more police spending when the crime rate goes up. But what about when crime goes down—what do they do then? You guessed it! They keep calling for increased police spending. No matter what happens, the response is always the same: Put more money in police budgets.

In fact, there’s six decades’ worth of data showing no correlation (Opens in new window) between police spending and the overall crime rate—so we wanted to know if more police spending is the most effective way to address a rise in the violent crime rate. [MORE]

LAPD INCIDENTALLY PROTECTS NON-WHITE PEOPLE AND MURDERS AND SURVEILS (stalking, watching, stopping, searching and detaining) THEM ON A DAILY BASIS IN WHITE, LIBERAL LA.

Media and LAPD Pretend Knife Justifies Murder. Takar Smith was Holding a Childs Bike when Provocative Cops Repeatedly Tased Him, Then Shot Black Man to Death While He Was on His Knees, Posed No Threat

On January 2, 2023. The LAPD fatally shot 45-year-old Takar Smith. Provacative cops shot said Black man while he was on his knees holding a child’s bike in his own kitchen and not posing a threat to police. [MORE]

On Jan. 3. 2023 the LAPD fatally shot 35-year-old Oscar Sanchez because he was holding a metal pipe in his own house. [MORE]

Cops Only Need “Possible Cause” to Use Force on Blacks in Racist System: LAPD Smother and Tase Black Teacher to Death as He Begged for Life. Stopped for “Possible DUI Driver” While Walking in Street

Also on Jan. 3, 2023 the LAPD murdered 31-year-old school teacher Keenan Anderson by smothering and tasing him to death the street. Cops initiated violence against him because they believed he was DUI as he walked in the street (?). On video he begged cops not to kill him. [MORE]

Mayor Karen Bass was sworn in on December 10, 2022. She is the first woman and the second Black person, after Tom Bradley, to serve as mayor of Los Angeles. As explained by Mapping Police Violence, Black people are 3X more likely than whites to be killed by police and Los Angeles is among other major cities where said racial disparity occurs. A large number of police murders of Black people occur in white, liberal cities. [MORE]

Without Probable Cause LA Cops Detain Latino Family in Their Own Home - Police Snatched Phones and Handcuffed Teens During Niggerization Lesson

From [HERE] A mom says her teenagers were wrongfully detained by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department inside their own home after deputies entered following reports of fighting inside the house. 

The family spoke with KTLA and said the teens, 19 and 14, are still traumatized by the incident in which they believed their civil rights were violated. 

'It was terrifying,' said homeowner Ceidy Cordova. 'My kids should have never gone through this. Never. They shouldn't ever put hands on them at all.' 

Security camera footage of the October 2022 incident shows deputies enter the home and detain the children, including one clip where 19-year-old Aliza is held against a wall. 

Another clip shows 14-year-old Isaac have his phone snatched from his hand and pushed up against the wall outside the family's apartment. 

In a statement, LASD officials said they did not make a mistake, writing: 'In fact, they were directed to the location by concerned citizens and based on the information, deputies had a lawful duty to ensure there were no injured victims and/or suspects inside the location.' 

According to Ceidy, the 'wrongful arrests' occurred inside their home in the 5100 block of Rosemead Boulevard on October 22, 2022. 

The mother said she and her husband were not at home when their son and daughter alerted them to what was happening at home. 

'When she said that they were already in there and they were being aggressive and trying to grab her, that's when I turned on the cameras,' said Ceidy. 

'Then I saw what happened,' the mother told KTLA of what the footage showed. 

Security video shows Ceidy attempting to speak through the home camera to ask what was going on but being ignored as her daughter spoke with deputies. 

Aliza is seen passionately talking with the deputies for several seconds as the mother yells out 'hello' to the group.   

According to investigators, deputies had received a call reporting screaming person and another person who may have been hit.

The children, however, told deputies they had no idea why they were there. 

Despite their confusion, the pair of teenagers were then roughed up for asking questions and were seen handcuffed by authorities.

After the deputies take the pair outside, several agents are seen holding Aliza against the wall as she yells at them through tears. 

'You're holding me so tight,' the teen is heard saying. 

In another clip, Isaac is seen holding his phone in an attempt to record the encounter. 

One deputy grabs the teen's phone and three others then force him up against the wall and place him in handcuffs. 

'You see in the video they are grabbing her so tight, they left bruises on them and took my son and husband to jail for no reason,' said Ceidy.

When the woman and her husband returned home, another video shows deputies ask Ceidy's husband to exit the vehicle before he is also taken into custody.

The family has since hired a lawyer who says the deputies violated their rights.

'You can see in the video, they are pushing him towards the wall, brutally,' said Narine Mkrtchyan, the family's attorney, told KTLA. 

'That's unlawful detention in retaliation, a violation of the first amendment, fourth amendment and excessive force,' Mkrthyan said. 

The family says they have been traumatized and are looking to now relocate. 

'I want justice,' said Ceidy. 'They should never do this to any family, any children or my kids. I want justice for what they did.' 

White Liberal Authorities in Minneapolis Investigate Hiring White Cop Charged, then Cleared, in Assault on Unarmed Black Man in VA- Tased Him in the Back as He Sought Help

From [HERE] The Minneapolis Police Department is investigating its own hiring of an officer charged, but later cleared, of assaulting an unarmed Black man.

The Minnesota Reformer first uncovered the story. Just days after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis, Fairfax County police officer Tyler Timberlake was one of the first on scene when La Monta Gladney was walking in the street, rambling incoherently in June of 2020.

Gladney was not under arrest. Police arrived to assist paramedics put him in an ambulance. His family apparently dialed 911 for mental health help.

The Fairfax County police officer is seen on body-camera footage firing a Taser at the disoriented Black man without apparent provocation, before pinning him to the ground with a knee to his neck, as a Minneapolis officer did in the encounter with Floyd. [MORE]

"Mr. Gladney was not violating any laws, he was not a risk to anyone, he was not a safety risk to himself," said Tom Hennessey, Gladney's attorney.

Hennessey says the video shows the other officer on the scene almost had Gladney in the ambulance when Timberlake arrived.

Officer Timberlake was arrested and charged with three counts of misdemeanor assault and battery and relieved of duty. At the time of the arrest, it's been reported that Timberlake was already in the process of moving to Minneapolis. 

"One of my principal goals...in taking this case, besides getting financial relief for Mr. Gladney to compensate for his injuries, was to make sure that this officer did not work in law enforcement either in Fairfax County, Virginia, or anywhere else," Hennessey said.

Two years after the incident, TImberlake was acquitted of the assault charges. He is now in training to be a Minneapolis police officer.

"One would think that of all the jurisdictions in the country, Minneapolis would be especially vigilant about the officers that they hire and checking their backgrounds," Hennessey said.

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara released a statement Wednesday, saying in part, "I am extremely concerned about what I have just learned pertaining to the hiring of this individual who is currently in agency training and yet to be deployed into service," O'Hara said. "Effective immediately, I am directing that a thorough investigation be conducted into this matter."

Timberlake is still in training, and Chief O'Hara says he will not hit the streets of Minneapolis until an investigation into his hiring is complete. 

"We will get to the bottom of this and take whatever measures are necessary to ensure we are always hiring officers who meet our standards, and that we are ultimately placing only the most qualified and competent police into the service and protection in the City of Minneapolis," O'Hara said.

New Jersey Police Officer Took Photos Up a Child’s Shorts, “Intimate Parts,” Prosecutor says. Arrest made

From [HERE] A police officer was caught with photographs taken up a child’s shorts and was arrested in New Jersey, a prosecutor announced.

Patrick Kelly, 37, of Winslow Township, took the photos himself with an iPhone, according to a complaint provided to McClatchy News by the Camden County Prosecutor’s Office.

Kelly is a state park police officer, according to an April 18 news release from the office. An attorney for Kelly was not provided in court documents.

He was arrested on child sexual abuse material charges on April 17 at the New Jersey State Park Police Headquarters in Egg Harbor City, about 20 miles northwest of Atlantic City, officials said.

When taking the photos, Kelly tried photographing “the victim’s intimate parts,” the complaint says.

He was suspended without pay on April 18 due to the pending criminal charges against him, Larry Hajna, a press officer for the New Jersey Department on Environmental Protection, told McClatchy News in a statement on April 19.

Kelly has worked as a state park police officer since 2012, Hajna said. His most recent salary was $76,491 ahead of his suspension, according to Hajna.

He’s facing two charges, including a second-degree manufacturing child sexual abuse materials and third-degree possession of child sexual abuse materials, the prosecutor’s office said.

The charges came following an investigation involving the prosecutor’s office, Homeland Security Investigations office in Cherry Hill and the West Deptford Township Police Department, according to the release. The Camden County Sheriff’s Office, state park police and the Winslow Township Police Department also helped investigate Kelly. The investigation began after an online tip was received, according to the criminal complaint.

Winslow Township, where Kelly is from, is about 35 miles northwest of Atlantic City.

(gasp! Racist Cops in Liberal Antioch?) CA Police Dept Faces Suit and Audit After Text Messages Show Cops Bragged about Making Up Evidence and Beating Black/Latino Residents. Half the Force Involved

From [HERE] Amid outrage over text messages showing police officers in northern California using racist slurs and bragging about making up evidence and beating suspects, city officials voted to audit the troubled department.

Also the city of Antioch, California and members of its scandalized police force have been hit with a federal lawsuit for civil rights violations stemming from a barrage of racist text messages that have shocked the community. 

John Burris, an Oakland-based civil rights attorney known for his work exposing police brutality, filed the complaint in federal court Wednesday on behalf of four individuals who say they were targeted by police officers who sent text messages using slurs to describe Black people and boasting about fabricating evidence and beating on suspects. A fifth plaintiff is suing on behalf of his father, who was shot and killed by two of the officers involved in the text scandal.

The FBI and the Contra Costa district attorney’s office discovered the shocking messages while investigating officers within the Antioch police department suspected of crimes. Officials have named 17 officers who sent texts, including the president of the Antioch police union, but nearly half the department was included in the messages

The texts include frequent use of the terms “monkey” and “gorilla,” and boast about beating up suspects and targeting Black people for traffic stops. In April 2020, one Antioch officer texted an officer at another police department: “Since we don’t have video I sometimes just say people gave me a full confession when they didn’t, get filed easier.” 

At a crowded Tuesday meeting at the city hall, where local media reports almost 70 people spoke, the Antioch city council voted unanimously to conduct audits of the department’s internal affairs unit as well as its hiring and promotional practices and department culture.

The text scandal has rocked the city of 115,000 residents about 45 miles (72km) east of San Francisco, which the mayor, Lamar Thorpe, said was once predominantly white but has diversified in the last 30 years. The city has seen multiple protests since the news broke, including from families of victims of police violence who were mentioned in the texts.

“The officers’ texts about my baby made me feel like he died all over again,” Kathryn Wade told the East Bay Times, which first reported on the texts. “The boasting and bragging about what you did to people is so heartbreaking. The threats you make on this community, Black and brown [residents], something needs to be done.”

The police chief, Steve Ford, issued a statement last week apologizing and condemning “in the strongest possible terms – the racially abhorrent content and incomprehensible behavior being attributed to members of the Antioch police department in media reports.

“I promise to hold accountable the officers expressing racist or bigoted beliefs, biased insensitivity, and those boasting about harming members of the community.”

Ellen McDonnell, a defense attorney, has asked the district attorney, Diana Becton, to dismiss all cases involving the public defender’s office and Antioch police. Becton said she was reviewing cases for potential dismissal or resentencing. It is unclear how many cases are at stake.

“The public simply cannot have trust or confidence in any criminal prosecution involving the Antioch police department,” McDonnell said in an email on Wednesday. “No one should be charged with a crime based on the report of a police department so thoroughly riddled with corruption.”

In the text messages, which are heavily redacted, officers use derogatory, racist, homophobic and sexually explicit language and brag about making up evidence and beating up suspects. They refer to women as water buffalo, use sexist and racist language to describe an activist, share photos of gorillas in reference to black people, freely use racial slurs and make light of the police killing of George Floyd.

One officer offered a steak dinner to anyone who could “40” the city’s now mayor, Lamar Thorpe, at a June 2020 protest, referring to a “.40mm less lethal launcher”, a senior inspector for the district attorney’s office explained in a report, which shoots rubber bullets or bean bag rounds.

In September 2020, two officers agreed by text to write a large number of traffic citations by targeting a specific group in a specific area. A male officer referred to Black people by a racist slur and said authorities should make them “eat shit”. A female officer responded, “Yes that will be easy. And it will be a good time lol start off quick with the numbers.”

Tensions were high in a council meeting last week – Thorpe and a man defending the department had a heated exchange as the man argued the mayor should be investigated and Thorpe accused him of dog whistle racism.

Thorpe is among three Black, progressive members of the five-person council who have said they are committed to holding police accountable and protecting tenants’ rights. In 2021, the city issued an apology for its past treatment of Chinese immigrants.

“What you’re seeing is a maturation process, it’s like watching a teenage kid develop pimples,” he said. “The institutions have taken a long time to catch up with where the voters and public have been.”

The text messages came out as part of an investigation launched in March 2022 by the FBI and the Contra Costa district attorney’s office into a broad range of offenses, including what prosecutors called crimes of “moral turpitude”, by officers with the Antioch and nearby Pittsburg police departments.

The district attorney’s office released two batches of text messages to reporters after a judge on 7 April ordered the messages shared with defense attorneys in a pending felony case involving some of the officers. The reports did not identify the races of the officers who sent the text messages, and none have yet been charged with a crime.

The messages were sent largely in 2020 and 2021. The president of the Antioch Police Officers Association, Sgt Rick Hoffman, is named as sending communications. The association did not respond to requests for comment from the Associated Press.

The East County NAACP has requested federal oversight of the department and said the organization has reported numerous complaints about the Antioch police.

“No apologies from the police department, city manager, chief of police or the city council of Antioch will ever return the lives of a child or loved one to their families or return the life loss of an innocently incarcerated resident,” the organization’s president, Odessa Lefrancois, said in a statement.

Racist Oklahoma Authorities Caught on Tape Talking About Practicing Racism (not just saying mean words): Lynching Black People, Murdering Journalists who Report Misconduct Against Blacks

From [HERE] In Oklahoma, a county commissioner in McCurtain County resigned Wednesday, days after a local newspaper published secretly recorded audio revealing he spoke with local law enforcement officials about lynching Black people and assassinating reporters. Mark Jennings’s resignation came after Oklahoma’s Republican Governor Kevin Stitt called on him and three other officials to resign. They are county jail administrator Larry Hendrix, sheriff’s investigator Alicia Manning and McCurtain County Sheriff Kevin Clardy. In this clip, secretly recorded last month after a McCurtain County Board of Commissioners meeting and published by the McCurtain Gazette-News, Jennings discusses the county’s history of racist beatings and hangings with Sheriff Clardy.

Mark Jennings: “I’m gonna tell you something. If this was back in the day, would that — would Alan Marston take a damn Black guy, whoop their [bleep] and throw them in the cell, I’d run for [bleep] sheriff.”

Sheriff Kevin Clardy: “Well, it’s not like that no more.”

Mark Jennings: “I know. Take them down to Mud Creek and hang them up with a damn rope.”

Sheriff Kevin Clardy: “Yeah.”

Mark Jennings: “But you can’t do that anymore.”

Sheriff Kevin Clardy: “And the thing about it is” —

Mark Jennings: “They got more rights than we got.”

In another clip, Sheriff Clardy and Jennings are heard discussing hiring hit men to kill two journalists who’d reported on misconduct by county officials.

Sheriff Kevin Clardy: “The old saying is: What comes around goes around.”

Mark Jennings: “It will. I told you it will.”

Sheriff Kevin Clardy: “Yeah.”

Mark Jennings: “I know where two big deep holes are here, if you ever need them.”

Sheriff Kevin Clardy: “I’ve got an excavator.”

Mark Jennings: “Well, these are already pre-dug.”

Since the McCurtain Gazette-News published those and other hateful comments, Sheriff Clardy has so far refused calls to step down. The sheriff instead accused the publisher of the McCurtain Gazette-News, Bruce Willingham, of making the recording illegally, and predicted he would face felony charges. Willingham and his son, whose potential murders were discussed in the tape, have turned the recordings over to the FBI and the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office.

Toforest Johnson Appeals Death Row Sentence w/Support from DA. Conviction Rests on Testimony of 1 witness who claimed to hear him Confess on the Phone. Gov Failed to Disclose Payment of $5k to Witness

From [HERE] On April 17, 2023, lawyers for Toforest Johnson (pictured, center), who has spent 25 years on Alabama’s death row, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court requesting a new trial. The petition was buttressed by support from the present District Attorney and from the original trial prosecutor in Johnson’s case. 

Johnson’s conviction rested on the testimony of a single witness who claimed to hear him confess over the phone and who was secretly paid a $5,000 reward. For two decades, local officials repeatedly denied the existence of a reward. Only after defense counsel received information from a retired state employee did the state disclose it. Nevertheless, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals denied Johnson a new trial on May 6, 2022.

Johnson has also received support from judges, other prosecutors, and three former jurors from his original trial. In a March 2021 Washington Post op-ed, former Alabama Attorney General Bill Baxley wrote, “[a]s a lifelong defender of the death penalty, I do not lightly say what follows: An innocent man is trapped on Alabama’s death row. … Johnson’s murder trial was so deeply flawed, the evidence presented against him so thin, that no Alabamian should tolerate his incarceration, let alone his execution.” Former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Drayton Nabers, Jr. voiced his concern in a 2022 Alabama Daily News op-ed titled “Why Is Toforest Johnson Still on Alabama’s Death Row?”

Johnson’s lawyers assert that the state was required to turn over information about the reward prior to his trial and that such evidence probably would have resulted in a different outcome.

Supreme Court Allows Texas Death Row Inmate Rodney Reed to Pursue DNA Testing in Bid to Prove Innocence

From [HERE] The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way Wednesday for Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed to pursue DNA testing on evidence that his attorneys say may help exonerate him.

Reed, a Black man, was convicted in 1998 of killing Stacey Stites, a white 19-year-old, in Bastrop. Reed has maintained his innocence and has been engaged in a yearslong battle to get crime scene evidence, including the murder weapon, tested for traces of DNA.

“The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling today is a critical step toward the ultimate goal of getting DNA testing in Rodney Reed’s case,” said Parker Rider-Longmaid, one of Reed’s attorneys. “We are grateful that the Court has kept the courthouse doors open to Mr. Reed, a Black man who has spent 24 years on death row for the murder of a white woman with whom he was having an affair, a crime he has steadfastly maintained he did not commit.”

Reed was set to be executed in November 2019, but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals stayed the execution and sent his case back to a lower court to review new claims, including that Reed was innocent. But after a 2021 evidentiary hearing, the district judge ruled against granting Reed a new trial. [MORE]

Ohio Attorney General Calls Death Penalty System Broken and “Enormously Expensive”

From [HERE] In a report released late last month, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost characterized his state’s capital punishment system as “broken” and “enormously expensive.” Mr. Yost called on Ohio’s elected officials to either overhaul the capital punishment system or end it, arguing that the current system “produces churn, waste, and endless lawsuits and nothing else.”

Over 120 people are currently on death row in Ohio, where executions have been paused since 2018 due to the state’s inability to procure lethal injection drugs.

According to a study from the Ohio Legislative Service Commission, capital punishment cases can cost $1 million to $3 million more than cases resulting in life sentences. The cost of imposing the death penalty on all of the people currently on Ohio’s death row, Mr. Yost extrapolated, would likely cost the state between $128 million to $384 million.

“That’s a stunning amount of money to spend on a program that doesn’t achieve its purpose,” Mr. Yost wrote. “This system satisfies nobody,” he added.

In March 2023, a group of Ohio lawmakers reintroduced legislation to abolish capital punishment in the state. Ohio is one of 27 death-penalty states in the country. Since 2004, eleven states including New Hampshire, Colorado, and Virginia have abolished the death penalty.

The decline in the use of the death penalty over the last two decades reflects a growing body of evidence that capital punishment does not deter crime or increase public safety and is extremely costly, unreliable, geographically arbitrary, and racially biased.

Are Inhumane Authorities at Sussex Prison Denying Black Panther Kevin ”Rashid” Johnson Cancer Treatment?

From [HERE] It’s been exactly a year and a half since Virginia prison officials had clinical evidence from PSA blood tests that I have prostate cancer and ten months since my cancer was definitively diagnosed by biopsy at the Medical College of Virginia (MCV). The biopsy found that the cancer was then spread throughout my entire prostate. To present date my treatment has still not begun. Not only that, but the option for receiving the course of treatment that doctors advised me is the least dangerous and most effective has been now scrapped for the MOST DANGEROUS and likely LEAST EFFECTIVE plan of treatment.

When I elected radiation treatment over surgery during early January 2023 it was a desperate move to finally get some regiment of treatment underway, in the face of hospital and prison medical staff repeatedly denying and delaying my access to care. I didn’t want to give them any more pretexts to falsely justify refusing to set me on a course of care as they had already done for over a year.

At that time the radiologist, Dr Alfredo Urdaneta, explained to me the course of treatment that he recommended as most likely to eliminate my cancer and cause me the least physical harm. This four-stage plan of care consisted he said of my first receiving a month’s prescription of an oral medication that would suppress my body’s testosterone levels and thereby shrink my prostate, to make the gland a more effective target for radiation treatment. This would also stop the cancer’s growth he said. During the time that I’d take the meds I would also, second, receive two injections of a testosterone suppressant. Third they would inject tiny radiation pellets into my prostate gland. Then fourth I would undergo about twenty sessions of external radiation.

Dr. Urdaneta explained that this plan of care offered the most effective option for targeting the cancer with radiation while minimizing the amount of radiation beamed into my body and in such a sensitive region where damage to other organs and vital functions might occur.

But it was a case of bait and switch.

On Feb 14, 2023 I was ordered the oral meds by Dr. Urdaneta, but the prison never administered them despite my repeated written complaints at the prison.

On Feb 23 I called the hospital for confirmation that I was supposed to be receiving the meds, but was told by MCV staff that they could not give me any information about my own care. I then calling back with a journalist Carole Seligman then a lawyer Noelle Hanrahan on the line to witness this claim, but they then sent us to voicemail.

When I went to the hospital two weeks after the meds were ordered, on March 3, for the first shot, the shot could not be given because the meds were never administered. The meds were then reordered and the entire plan of treatment was rescheduled.

 TO THE WORSE CARE…

I began receiving the meds on March 5, and returned to the hospital on March 20 for the first shot. After that the plan of treatment suddenly changed. The second shot was never given and the oral meds ended. I was seen again on March 27 by Dr Urdaneta, at that time he informed me that my plan of treatment would now be nothing but some 40 sessions of external radiation. FORTY SESSIONS! That’s forty times of having organ-frying radiation beamed into my body without any precautions or protections. He would not give any explanation for this sudden change or the choice of this admittedly more dangerous course of treatment.

He did rush to have me sign a consent form acknowledging that I recognized the treatment I was going to receive might not cure my cancer and there may be serious side effects and injury. I had to sign the form as a condition to receiving any treatment at all.

Throughout the year and a half that I have been known to have cancer the hospital visits and acts of initiating treatment that did happen were solely the result of persistent outside protests against my denied treatment that occurred throughout this time. Yet even now when a course of treatment has been planned, it has been scrapped for the worst and most dangerous choice. A choice that will likely not cure my very curable form of cancer and will likely cause severe internal injury to my body. This is the state of prison medical ‘care’ in Amerika and especially that given even by force of public pressure to the politically imprisoned.

Dare to Struggle Dare to Win!
All Power to the People! [MORE]

Study Finds African Americans Live Longer in Counties with More Black Doctors

The Journal of the American Medical Association finds that Black people living in U.S. counties with more Black primary care physicians live longer, whether or not they are treated by those doctors. Research has shown that when Black doctors treat Black patients, health outcomes are more positive, including in preventive care. Less than 6% of U.S. doctors are Black, around half the proportion of Black people in the U.S. population. [MORE]

Fucking With Our Food: Attorney Thomas Renz Claims mRNA Gene Therapy Is Coming to the Food Supply this Month

Vaccines in the Food Supply: Attorney Thomas Renz says Big Agriculture Intends to Put mRNA COVID Shots in Pork, Meat, Chicken and Vegetables Without Any Warning Label Disclosing Harms Caused by Gene Therapy

Are You Eating Pork Injected With Merck’s mRNA Livestock Vaccine?

mRNA Shots are Being Used in Pork. Soon, Cattle may Get mRNA Shots as well, which could Affect Beef and Dairy Products: Beef Producers Panic Over mRNA Vaccine News

Are You Eating Pork Injected With Merck’s mRNA Livestock Vaccine?

Meat Unsafe? Dr Michalcea Finds Meats from Major Grocery Stores Full of Structures Similar to What's Seen In Covid Injection Vials and the Blood of the Injected, Now Also Being Found in the Uninjected

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds since 2018, without telling the public

• All customized mRNA “vaccines” are untested. Only the mRNA platform itself has been approved

• According to the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, “there are no current mRNA vaccines licensed for use in beef cattle in the United States.” However, a lobbyist for the association claims to have “double-vaccinated” his own herd with an mRNA “vaccine” against bovine respiratory disease

• Iowa State University began trialing an mRNA “vaccine” against bovine respiratory syncytial virus October 1, 2021

• Missouri House Bill 1169 would require labeling of products that can alter your genes. Big Ag lobbyists strongly oppose it

From [MERCOLA] Last week, I reported that pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based "vaccines" on their herds since 20181 — without telling the public. This issue really only rose to the surface after attorney Tom Renz started promoting new legislation in Missouri (House Bill 1169, 2 which he helped write) that would require labeling of mRNA products. 3 In an April 1, 2023, tweet (and no, this was not an April Fool's joke), Renz stated:4

"BREAKING NEWS: the lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH. WE MUST SUPPORT MISSOURI HB1169. It is LITERALLY the ONLY chance we have to prevent this … NO ONE knows the impacts of doing this but we are all potentially facing the risk of being a #DiedSuddenly if we don't stop this."

The Transhumanist Agenda and Its Focus on Food

Within days, alternative media was abuzz with this story and Renz started making the rounds sharing evidence that shows the U.S. government has been working on the integration of vaccines into foods for at least two decades. In an April 2, 2023, interview with Naomi Wolf, Ph.D., Renz said: 5

"[Bill] Gates, the WHO [World Health Organization], a ton of these universities: they're all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They're going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines."

Industry Doesn't Want You to Know What They're Doing

The pushback by Big Ag lobbyists against this bill to require industry transparency on this important issue has been enormous, and one potential reason for that is because they'd have to admit that all sorts of foods may have been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, have genetic modifications, or be modified to serve as vaccinations for humans.

Not only might this destroy Big Ag, but it would also seriously impact any surreptitious attempts by Big Pharma to use the food supply as a tool to distribute vaccines unbeknownst to consumers. 6

 In short, Renz suspects the globalists' transhumanist agenda is being secretly pushed forward using gene therapy in food production.

I can't help but wonder whether the industry simply doesn't understand how mRNA gene therapy in livestock might affect consumers, or whether they want to conceal the fact that they're using gene therapy because they DO know it can also affect humans.

Globalists like World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab have openly admitted that they intend to alter humanity — both on the genetic level and through the incorporation of artificial intelligence and nanotechnology into the human body.

And, using COVID-19 as the cover, they managed to turn the entire world population into test subjects for this dangerous experimentation. As noted by Renz in the Real America's Voice interview above, we know for a fact that the mRNA COVID shots have no beneficial impact in terms of preventing COVID infection.

mRNA 'Vaccines' in Livestock Are Untested

If the mRNA COVID shots don't prevent infection, why would we assume mRNA shots for viral and bacterial infections in swine work any better?

One of the most disturbing aspects of using mRNA "vaccines" in swine is the fact that all of them are by definition untested. As explained by Merck on its website, its "custom swine vaccine," Sequivity, is not a vaccine but, rather, a platform that allows for the endless customization of "mRNA vaccines."

The customized mRNA shots that are created using it are completely untested. Here's how it works: 7

1. A pathogen is collected and sent to a diagnostic lab.

2. The gene of interest is sequenced and sent electronically to Sequivity analysts.

3. A synthetic version of the gene of interest is synthesized and inserted into the RNA production platform.

4. The RNA particles released from incubated production cells are harvested and formulated into a customized "vaccine."

As noted by Zoetis, the largest producer of veterinary drugs and vaccines: 8

"Sequivity has safety and efficacy studies based on the platform with a historical initial isolate, not likely the isolate that customers would be requesting in their product."

What was that initial isolate? Will mRNA against a bacterial disease affect the animals in the same way that mRNA against a viral infection does? What "genes of interest" are being chosen? If spike proteins are selected, might they be as pathogenic as the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein?

In CAFO environments with high populations of animals, won't mutations become rampant as the bacteria and viruses are subjected to constant "customized" vaccination pressure to adapt and become more dangerous? These are just some of the questions that need answers.

At the end of the day, the fact that mRNA shots can be endlessly customized without safety testing shows just how broken the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration are.

There's simply no way they can guarantee that customized mRNA shots are safe. The fact that the platform itself works and allows for this customization does NOT prove the safety and effectiveness of the shots being cooked up. Approval of the platform also does not prove the food is safe for consumption after it's been treated with mRNA.

Cows Milk Used to Immunize Mice

As reported by Dr. Peter McCullough, 9 Chinese researchers have demonstrated that food can indeed be turned into a vaccine. 10

"The nation's food supply can be manipulated by public health agencies to influence population outcomes … Now an oral route of administration is being considered specifically for COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA in cow's milk.

Zhang and colleagues have demonstrated that a shortened mRNA code of 675 base pairs could be loaded into phospholipid packets called exosomes derived from milk and then using that same milk, be fed to mice.

The mice gastrointestinal tract absorbed the exosomes and the mRNA must have made it into the blood stream and lymphatic tissue because antibodies were produced in fed mice against SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (receptor binding domain) …

[G]iven the damage mRNA vaccines have generated in terms of injuries, disabilities, and deaths, these data raise considerable ethical issues. The COVID States project has shown that 25% of Americans were successful in remaining unvaccinated.

This group would have strong objections to mRNA in the food supply, particularly if it was done surreptitiously or with minimal labelling/warnings …

For those who have taken one of the COVID-19 vaccines, having milk vaccines as an EUA offering would allow even more loading of the body with synthetic mRNA which has been proven resistant to ribonucleases and may reside permanently in the human body.

These observations lead me to conclude that mRNA technology has just entered a whole new, much darker phase of development. Expect more research on and resistance to mRNA in our food supply. The Chinese have just taken the first of what will probably be many more dangerous steps for the world."

Will Beef Be Treated With mRNA Too?

At present, there's no evidence to suggest beef cattle are being treated with customizable mRNA "vaccines," either in Europe 11 or the U.S. The National Cattlemen's Beef Association has also denied it, saying "there are no current mRNA vaccines licensed for use in beef cattle in the United States." 12 13

That said, the Cattlemen's Association previously confirmed they do, eventually, intend to use mRNA shots in cattle, 14 15 which might affect both dairy and beef. Time will tell whether public outrage will halt such plans. Clearly, the Cattlemen's Association is concerned about internet rumors that it's already in use.

April 3, 2023, Texas Department of Agriculture commissioner Sid Miller issued a statement promising to conduct a risk assessment of the technology before its adoption: 16

"Since news of the development of mRNA vaccines and mRNA-related treatments for livestock came to the attention of the Texas Department of Agriculture, we have been working towards developing a fact and science-based assessment of the risks associated with this technology.

Our analysis will include the clinical research, the structure of existing Texas law, and the public policy, economic, and production impact of the different policy prescriptions we may adopt. I aim to ensure that Texas agriculture remains safe, trusted, healthy, and wholly uninfected by dangerous or unproven technology.

I personally take this issue very seriously. No political hot takes. Just a well-reasoned and well-researched proposal based on a wide range of input from stakeholders, scientists, agriculturalists, and other experts. We are looking at this issue at TDA and will share your concerns. Please stay tuned …"

Confusion Caused by Cattlemen's Association Lobbyist

What's causing significant confusion on this issue is a statement made by National Cattlemen's Beef Association lobbyist Shannon Cooper 17 before the Missouri House. 18

Cooper told the House members he had recently "double-vaccinated" his herd with "vaccinations that have this mRNA." According to Cooper, the mRNA "vaccine" given was for bovine respiratory disease.

Is he confused? Did he mistakenly believe the vaccine he gave had mRNA in it? Or is the National Cattlemen's Beef Association incorrect in stating there are no approved mRNA vaccines for cattle in the U.S.? Or, are experimental mRNA shots being used without approval? Who knows at this point?

What we do know is that mRNA "vaccines" against bovine respiratory disease are being developed. Iowa State University began trialing an mRNA "vaccine" against bovine respiratory syncytial virus October 1, 2021.19

 The project end date is listed as September 30, 2026.

According to the trial submission, mice would be used to establish proof of concept. Cows would be used in year two of the trial. Assuming they're on schedule, that means cows will be experimented on somewhere in late 2023 and/or 2024.

Is mRNA Jabbed Livestock Safe to Eat?

Considering health authorities insist the COVID shots are safe, it's no wonder they also insist there are no problems associated with eating mRNA-treated meat. But can we trust them? What about the cells now highjacked by the foreign mRNA instruction to create novel proteins? Are these proteins safe to consume? How long are the nano-lipid particles preserved in the tissue?

Livestock such as swine are routinely vaccinated against several diseases, 20 and many of these vaccines must be administered at specific times to ensure there's no residue left in the meat. So, just when are swine receiving these customized mRNA shots? And could there be mRNA vaccine remnants in the pork you buy?

Vaccines are nearly always given in the hindquarter of the animal, and according to mRNA jab developers, the mRNA remains at the injection site. This theory has long since been proven false, as the mRNA in the COVID jab gets has been shown to be distributed throughout the human body.

But it makes sense that the mRNA might be more concentrated at the injection site. In livestock, this could be bad news, seeing how the hindquarters are usually where the prime cuts of meat come from.

So, knowing whether there's any mRNA left in the animal at the time of slaughter is important. At present, we have no way of knowing this. We don't even know exactly how long the synthetic lipid-enveloped mRNA stays in the body.

We also don't know how long the antigen produced by the animal's cells in response to a customized mRNA shot sticks around, and whether ingesting that antigen might have repercussions for human health.

Stanford researchers found the spike protein produced in response to the COVID shot remains in the human body for at least 60 days, 21 22 and the spike protein is what's causing most of the health problems associated with the jab. Could the same be true for mRNA jabs used in animals? Hogs can be killed anywhere from the age of 6 weeks to 10 months, which doesn't allow a whole lot of time for the mRNA and/or antigen to get flushed out. 23

Notorious Industry Mouthpiece Defends Livestock mRNA Jabs

Aside from the many open questions, the fact that notorious Big Pharma mouthpieces are the ones cited by media, ensuring us that mRNA jabbed animals are safe to eat is yet another red flag. In this case, we have Dr. Kevin Folta insisting the mRNA is harmless.

Folta, a University of Florida horticulture professor, is a longtime advocate for genetically modified organisms (GMOs). He has also advocated for the safety of glyphosate, and in 2015, he was caught lying about his financial ties to Monsanto. Now, he's taken up the advocacy for mRNA shots in livestock. As reported by Cowboy State Daily: 24

"Lawmakers in Arizona, Idaho, and Missouri have introduced legislation related to the use of mRNA vaccines in food. The Arizona bill only restricts labeling such food as organic. The Idaho bill amends state law to prohibit the sale of such foods unless conspicuously labeled that the presence of the vaccine is in the food.

The Missouri bill requires a conspicuous 'Gene Therapy Product' label. Dr. Kevin Folta told Cowboy State Daily the proposed 'gene therapy' label is inaccurate.

It 'means they have no idea what they are trying to regulate,' Folta said, because 'there is no integration into the DNA. It's a transient set of instructions, like a USB drive. Not a hard drive' … Messenger RNA occurs naturally as part of the function of cells in the body. 'mRNA is everywhere, and you cant live without mRNA,' Folta said …

Folta said that the vaccines can't get into the food people eat. 'mRNA is an extremely unstable molecule. That's why it works. It's very temporary. So when an animal is slaughtered or when a plant dies, mRNA is the first thing to go,' Folta said."

Many of you will know exactly what's wrong with Folta's arguments that mRNA is "everywhere" and therefore harmless, and that its activity is temporary because it's so unstable. The mRNA in the shots is synthetic and does NOT break down the way normal mRNA does.

He is clearly misleading people, and it's hard to believe it's not intentional, considering the fact that everyone who knows even the slightest bit about mRNA jab technology knows the synthetic mRNA has been designed to prevent rapid breakdown and is further stabilized by the nanolipid. So, Folta's arguments are null and void from the get-go.

Final Thoughts

Moving forward, it's going to be extremely important to stay on top of what's happening to our food supply. Many of us were surprised to realize mRNA shots have been used in swine for several years already. Soon, cattle may get these customizable mRNA shots as well, which could affect both beef and dairy products.

For now, I strongly recommend avoiding pork products. In addition to the uncertainty surrounding these untested mRNA "vaccines," pork is also very high in linoleic acid, a harmful omega-6 fat that drives chronic disease. Hopefully, cattle ranchers will realize the danger this mRNA platform poses to their bottom-line and reject it. If they don't finding beef and dairy that has not been "gene therapied" could become quite the challenge.

Will Harris, from White Oak Pasture in Bluffton Georgia, is a rancher who has already come out against mRNA "vaccines" in cattle. An April 10, 2023, White Oak Pastures tweet stated: 25

"There is talk about domesticated food animals soon being vaccinated with mRNA. We want our customers to know that we will not vaccinate our animals with mRNA vaccines. We believe there is a time and place for vaccinations, but they must be used sparingly.

If livestock are raised in an environment where they can express their natural instincts, they probably wont need many (if any) vaccines. We hope to one day move away from all vaccines on our farm — we are close, but not there yet.

Everyone should know that over 80% of the antibiotics produced today are consumed by domesticated food animals … It would only make sense that in order for vaccine companies to move from 'very profitable' to 'obscenely profitable' would be to capture the animal agriculture market.

I'm not sure that this would ever pass legislation, but law or not, Big Ag is highly influenced by Big Pharma. The multinational meat companies would certainly choose to mandate this if there was an opportunity for a shared profit.

In closing, please know: We don't believe in a blanket, one-size-fits-all approach to our health or our livestock. We will not add vaccinations for our livestock — we are moving in the other direction hoping to give fewer. (And, we already give very few).

If this is adopted and there is a 'panic' for food from livestock that hasn't had the MRNA vaccine, we will choose to honor the demand from our loyalty members and employees first. If you are not a part of that group, we cannot guarantee we will have any product for you.

We are certainly not trying to promote panic — but, we do intend to notify our customers of how we will operate in times of growing demand. We screwed up during the pandemic — we won't do that again."

Dr McCullough says Chinese Researchers have Demonstrated that Food can be Turned into a “Vaccine.” Authorities May Allow Big Agriculture to Put COVID mRNA “Vaccines” in the Food Supply

From Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH The nation’s food supply can be manipulated by public health agencies to influence population outcomes. A great is example is fortification of cereal grains with folic acid — the synthetic form of folate — which successfully reduced the incidence of neural tube defects (e.g. spina bifida). Now an oral route of administration is being considered specifically for COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA in cow’s milk.

Zhang and colleagues have demonstrated that a shortened mRNA code of 675 base pairs could be loaded into phospholipid packets called exosomes derived from milk and then using that same milk, be fed to mice. The mice gastrointestinal tract absorbed the exosomes and the mRNA must have made it into the blood stream and lymphatic tissue because antibodies were produced in fed mice against SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (receptor binding domain).

An oral vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 RBD mRNA-bovine milk-derived exosomes induces a neutralizing antibody response in vivo. Quan Zhang, Miao Wang, Chunle Han, Zhijun Wen, Xiaozhu Meng, Dongli Qi, Na Wang, Huanqing Du, Jianhong Wang, Lu Lu, Xiaohu Ge bioRxiv 2022.12.19.517879; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.19.517879

From a scientific perspective, these experimental steps taken by the Chinese were a stunning success. However, given the damage mRNA vaccines have generated in terms of injuries, disabilities, and deaths, these data raise considerable ethical issues. The COVID States project has shown that 25% of Americans were successful in remaining unvaccinated. This group would have strong objections to mRNA in the food supply, particularly if it was done surreptitiously or with minimal labelling/warnings. Children could be targeted with easily administered oral vaccine dosing or potentially get mRNA through milk at school lunches and other unsupervised meals.

For those who have taken one of the COVID-19 vaccines, having milk vaccines as an EUA offering would allow even more loading of the body with synthetic mRNA which has been proven resistant to ribonucleases and may reside permanently in the human body.

These observations lead me to conclude that mRNA technology has just entered a whole new, much darker phase of development. Expect more research on and resistance to mRNA in our food supply. The Chinese have just taken the first of what will probably be many more dangerous steps for the world.

If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.

Former Director of National Intelligence Admits Fauci Lied about Gain of Function Research

From [HERE] While testifying before Congress this week, former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) John Ratcliffe told legislators that former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Tony Fauci lied under oath about the gain of function research that was taking place on the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) prior to its release.

Appearing before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Ratcliffe was questioned by Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) about Fauci’s infamous sworn testimony before the Senate back in November of 2021. Fauci told Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) at the time that the NIH, which oversees the NIAID, did not fund any gain of function research.

(Related: Former National Institutes of Health [NIH] director Francis Collins also lied about gain of function research and other elements of the covid scamdemic.)

Rep. Malliotakis revealed that Fauci knew, as he was told in an email dated from January of 2021, that the NIH had, in fact, formed a monetary relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the EcoHealth Alliance, which was, in fact, conducting gain of function research in communist China using American taxpayer dollars.

“Some of Dr. Fauci’s testimony is inconsistent with some of the intelligence that we have that remains classified as well as inconsistent with some information that is publicly available,” Ratcliffe responded carefully to Rep. Malliotakis’ questioning – watch below:

Fauci Caught Going to Door to Door Lying to Black People About COVID Shots: Consent to Medical Experiments Obtained by Inducement, Coercion, HalfTruths, Nondisclosures, etc is Fraud, Battery or Murder

Fauci lied; many people died

Gain of function research, just to get you back up to speed, involves modifying pathogens like coronaviruses with the intent of making them deadlier or more transmissible. The claim is that such research needs to be done in order to ascertain future pandemic threats, or so we are told.

In truth, it appears that a few mad scientist psychopaths embedded within the highest agencies of government commissioned such research overseas, since it is illegal stateside, for the purpose of creating a deadly bioweapon that they could then unleash upon the world.

Domestic funding for gain of function research dried up in 2014 when Barack Hussein Obama was president due to the risks involved. It was at that time that gain of function research appears to have been outsourced to overseas locations in order to sidestep that ban.

Around 2017, the NIH lifted Obama’s funding “pause” following the creation of a special oversight framework. American taxpayer dollars were then sent overseas for the purpose of manipulating bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, which is where the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is believed to have originated.

In his earlier defenses, Fauci tried to claim that the work being done at the Wuhan lab did not constitute gain of function research. This was denied by Dr. Richard Ebright, who clarified that the experiments taking place in Wuhan did, in fact, constitute gain of function research.

To this very day, the Biden regime still openly supports gain of function research, despite widespread concerns about the risks involved. Back in February, National Security Council communications coordinator John Kirby stated that Biden “believes that [the research is] important to help prevent future pandemics.”

Congress, meanwhile, continues to probe gain of function research to try to figure out whether or not the “lab leak” hypothesis is the most likely explanation for covid’s release.

Undetected Heart Damage May Be Present in up to One in 30 "Vaccinated" Individuals

COVID Injections and the Virus Itself Cause Neurological Disorders — But There’s a Difference, Study Says

From [HERE] I stumbled upon this article in mainstream media, which linked to the Medpage Today review of an important study detailing functional neurologic disorders (FND) after COVID-19 infection or vaccination.

I don’t usually bother to re-publish items from Medpage Today because of their extreme bias against physicians and scientists who have spoken out about the pseudo-mRNA vaccine. I am making an exception because they actually published this review without bias.

I am posting sections of the article here for educational purposes only.

Please note the subtitle from Medpage article below, “Long COVID functional manifestations differ from post-vaccine effects.”

Within the body of the text, Medpage admits adverse events from the vaccine are more common than previously thought! Is this evidence that the tide of misinformation from medical journals geared toward physician education may be decreasing? One can only hope …

In my experience, post-vaccination twitching is almost as common as tinnitus (ringing in the ears). Based on this casual observation, I suspect that post-vaccination FND is quite common, which (if true) is likely to predict long-term neurologic consequences for a large fraction of the population.

According to “Functional Neurological Disorder Emerges After COVID Infection, Vaccines — Long COVID functional manifestations differ from post-vaccine effects,” Medpage Today, March 24, 2023:

“Patients with functional neurologic disorder (FND) after SARS-CoV-2 infection had different symptoms than people with FND after COVID vaccines, retrospective data showed.

“Patients with post-COVID FND tended to be older, had more insidious onset, and had higher disability, according to Araceli Alonso-Canovas, MD, PhD, of Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal in Madrid, and co-authors.

“Those with FND after COVID vaccination more closely resembled classic FND: they were younger, had an acute onset, and tremor was the most common phenotype, the researchers reported in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

“‘We show for the first time evidence from a multicenter national study that FNDs after COVID-19 infections and vaccines are more common than previously reported and have distinct clinical profiles,’ Alonso-Canovas told MedPage Today.

“The findings point to a need to consider FND when diagnosing patients with post-COVID neurologic symptoms, she added.

“’Long COVID is an umbrella term and many different circumstances have to be considered,’ Alonso-Canovas said. ‘If there are neurological symptoms, a careful history and examination is mandatory to rule out FND, as it is a well-defined clinical condition that is potentially treatable.’

“FND refers to disorders caused by an abnormality in brain signaling with no significant structural brain damage. It occurs in an estimated four to 12 people per 100,000 per year and accounts for about 6% of outpatient neurology visits.

“Vaccinations can trigger FND, as can other stressors including infections. While experts maintain some people with FND might be long COVID patients, little research has been conducted to evaluate this.

“’If the neurological examination is not searching for these features, the diagnosis will be missed,’ Espay told MedPage Today. ‘Given the therapeutic implications, ascertaining the functional subtype of long COVID is imperative.’

“Phenotype was purely motor in 65% of FND patients and mixed sensorimotor in 32%. One patient had isolated sensory syndrome. Fatigue (72%), pain (57%), and cognitive difficulties (30%) were common.

“People in the post-COVID group were older (46 vs 35 years in the post-vaccine group) and had higher disability (76% vs 31%, respectively). The post-COVID group also trended toward having more men (24% vs 15%), more people with previous psychological difficulties (50% vs 23%), and less frequent abrupt FND onset (38% vs 62%).

“In the post-COVID group, 58% had previously received a long COVID diagnosis, and FND symptoms started within the convalescence period in 87% of patients. In the post-vaccine group, FND symptoms started within 1 week after vaccination in most cases.

“Overall, 22 FND patients (48%) required treatment with psychiatry or psychology specialists, 15 (33%) needed physical therapy, and one needed speech therapy. After a mean follow-up of 14 months from onset, 46% had improved, 39% remained stable, and 9% had worsened. Three patients were unavailable for follow-up after diagnosis.”

The actual scientific article may also interest readers, therefore highlights from that are posted below. Again, the main article is behind a paywall.

“Functional neurological disorders after COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a national multicentre observational study,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, a BMJ Journal. [MORE]

Pfizer, CDC Withheld Evidence of Myocarditis After COVID Shots, New Documents Reveal. Dependent Media Conceals Story on Behalf of Their Masters

From [HERE] Pfizer and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) withheld evidence that COVID-19 vaccinations led to an increased risk of myocarditis, especially in young males, according to two sets of documents made public this week.

Confidential Pfizer documents leaked Thursday by Project Veritas show the company had “evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”

And heavily redacted CDC documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request indicate the agency provided an undercounted figure of post-COVID-19-vaccination myocarditis cases to Israel’s Ministry of Health in early 2021.

The latest revelations come as Germany, Japan and other governments are raising questions about the significant numbers of severe adverse events recorded in individuals following administration of the COVID-19 vaccines.

According to researchers at the National Organization for Rare Disorders, myocarditis can result from infections, or it may result directly from a toxic effect such as a toxin or a virus.

“More commonly the myocarditis is a result of the body’s immune reaction to the initial heart damage,” researchers said.

Severe myocarditis can permanently damage the heart muscle, possibly causing heart failure.

Internal documents contradict Pfizer claim of ‘low incidence of myocarditis’ 

An internal Pfizer document leaked to Project Veritas on Thursday, updated Feb. 11, 2022, and authored by eight scientists in Pfizer’s Drug Safety Research & Development division, indicates that the drugmaker was aware of a connection between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and higher incidence rates of myocarditis within two weeks of vaccination — particularly following the second dose of the primary series.

“There is evidence that suggests patients who receive a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis,” the document read.

“Onset was typically within several days after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (from Pfizer or Moderna), and cases have occurred more often after the second dose than the first dose.”

Pfizer cited CDC data to make this determination:

“Since April 2021, increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), particularly in adolescents and young adults (CDC 2021).”

“The pattern of cases conform, as per the label, to a pattern of myocarditis cases occurring in majority of young males below 29 years of age within the first two weeks post-vaccination.”

“The reasons for male predominance in myocarditis and pericarditis incidence post COVID-19 vaccination remain unknown.”

Although Pfizer couldn’t identify a “clear mechanism” behind the increased risk in males, it did identify several possibilities.

These included direct cardiotoxicity, acute/active viral infection, genetic predisposition and pre-existing conditions, a prior history of myocarditis, immune-mediated mechanisms and vaccine-associated autoimmunity, molecular mimicry to the spike protein and sex-related effects.

These cases occurred, according to the document, despite a claimed low incidence of myocarditis during the clinical trials for the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

“Within the participants 16 years of age and older from the Pfizer clinical trial dataset, two cases of pericarditis were reported through the data cut-off date of 18 June 2021,” the document read. “These cases originated from the Phase 3 clinical study C4591001 and both were deemed not related to study treatment by the Investigator.”

“There were no cases of myocarditis reported as serious adverse events through the data cut-off date of 18 June 2021,” the document added.

Based on these incidences of myocarditis, the document states the product labels for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine were updated to state:

“Post marketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose of the 2-dose primary series.

“The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age.”

This change had already been made as of August 2021, according to a document released as part of the so-called “Pfizer documents” — documents pertaining to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) issuance of Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

The “Pfizer documents” were released last year by court order following a FOIA request filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.

Another internal Pfizer document from these same “Pfizer documents” states that on July 13, 2021, it was suggested that myocarditis and pericarditis be added “to the PVP” (pharmacovigilance plan).

This addition appears to have taken place.

The Pfizer pharmacovigilance plan of July 28, 2021 — also contained within the “Pfizer documents” release — lists myocarditis and pericarditis as “important identified risk[s]” identified in Pfizer’s safety database on June 18, 2021.

A pharmacovigilance plan “proposes activities to better characterize and assess the risks during the lifecycle of a medicine. (e.g., to investigate frequency, severity, seriousness and outcome of a risk under normal conditions of use, and/or which populations are particularly at risk).”

Pfizer’s July 28, 2021 pharmacovigilance plan stated that two serious adverse events of pericarditis were reported during the C4591001 clinical trial, although “both [were] deemed not related to study treatment by the Investigator.”

The document also refers to data from Pfizer’s safety database, stating that among people 16 and older, “490 cases reported events related to myocarditis and 371 cases reported events related to pericarditis (in 38 of these 823 cases, the subjects developed both myocarditis and pericarditis related events).”

Of these 490 cases, 26 were later definitively rejected as not being myocarditis, leaving 464 cases ranging from “definitive case” to “reported event.” From there, 459 were listed as “serious,” 337 required hospitalization, and 14 resulted in death.

Nearly 71% of these cases were recorded in males.

Of 371 reported pericarditis cases in individuals 16 and over, all but one was listed as “serious,” 206 required hospitalization, and 3 resulted in death.

Pfizer, in the same pharmacovigilance plan, claimed that no myocarditis or pericarditis cases were recorded in C4591001 trial participants ages 12 to 15.

However, its safety database recorded 11 possible cases of myocarditis — all but one among males, 10 of which were “serious” and nine of which required hospitalization.

Four cases of pericarditis among males between the ages of 12 and 15 also were recorded in the safety database, three of which were considered serious and one of which required hospitalization.

However, in the July 28, 2021 pharmacovigilance plan, Pfizer told the FDA:

“Considering the low rates of myocarditis and pericarditis reported following vaccination, balanced with the risk of death and illness (including myocarditis) caused by SARS-CoV-2, the public health impact of post-vaccination myocarditis and pericarditis is minimal.”

Nevertheless, in another leaked document publicized by Project Veritas, dated May 2022, further confirms Pfizer was aware of the increased incidence of myocarditis.

According to the leaked document:

“Adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination are of high clinical importance: even adverse events with small incidence may be seen in appreciable numbers given the massive scope of the vaccination effort.

“There is evidence that suggests patients who received a COVID-19 vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”

CDC undercounted myocarditis cases in 2021

Documents provided by the CDC in response to an Oct. 12, 2022 FOIA request submitted by CHDreveal the agency provided an undercounted number of recorded myocarditis cases following COVID-19 vaccination to the Israeli Ministry of Health.

The FOIA request asked the CDC to “provide all emails sent by any of the relevant individuals or received by any of the relevant individuals (whether directly or via cc or bcc) containing the search word ‘myocarditis’” between Oct. 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021.

“There has been considerable public discussion of and controversy about how to weigh

the risk of myocarditis that is associated with COVID-19 vaccines,” the request stated. “The public has a significant interest in having a full understanding of how U.S. public health agencies have addressed this issue.”

Following a response by the CDC, CHD on Nov. 17, 2022, narrowed down its request to include only documentation containing the term “myocarditis” within 25 words of “(covid or report* or child* or adolescent* or young*or teen* or male or fatal* or death* or die* or serious or severe or hospital*).”

The heavily redacted 985-page tranche of documents provided to CHD included a Feb. 28, 2021 request, on page 692, from Israel’s Ministry of Health. The request, logged on that date by CDC’s internal task tracking system, stated:

“We are seeing a large number of myocarditis and pericarditis cases in young individuals soon after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. We would like to discuss the issue with a relevant expert at CDC.”

A CDC email, dated March 10, 2021, and found on pages 710-714 of the document, read:

“They are investigating a safety signal of myocarditis/myopericarditis in a younger population (16-30 years old) following administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

“The Ministry of Health stated they received reports of around 40 cases of this adverse event.”

In the March 10, 2021 response, page 861, sent by the CDC to the Israeli Ministry of Health stated:

“A search of the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) conducted on February 23, 2021 revealed 27 cases (6 cases of myocarditis, 7 cases of myopericarditis, 14 cases pericarditis).

“Twelve cases occurred after dose 1, 7 cases after dose 2, and the dose was not reported for 8 cases. Four patients had comorbid conditions that could suggest alternate etiologies for the adverse event.

“During this analysis period the reporting rate of myopericarditis following administration of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was low and estimated to be 0.7 per million doses of vaccine administered.

“However, the limitations of passive surveillance such as under-reporting, lack of a control group, missing and incomplete data make it challenging to assess causation.

“Thus, FDA has not made a final determination regarding the causality between myopericarditis and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.”

However, up to Feb. 23, 2021, VAERS had actually received 36 reports of myocarditis — although at that time, the database was significantly backlogged.

It is unclear why data from a Feb. 23, 2021 search was provided by the CDC, when the request from Israel’s Ministry of Health was submitted on Feb. 28, 2021. There is no indication that there was contact from the Israeli health ministry with the CDC regarding this issue prior to Feb. 28, 2021.

While reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed, the system has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

Studies have found further deficiencies in the VAERS system, including deleted or missing reports, the delayed entry of reports and the “recoding of Medical

Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms from severe to mild.”

Out of the deleted or missing reports, 13% pertained to deaths and 63% represented severe adverse events.

VAERS data is publicly accessible on the internet and presumably would already have been available to the Israeli Health Ministry as a result, therefore it is unclear why the CDC appears to have relied on this data in its response to Israel.

Moreover, by March 10, 2021, the presumed date of the CDC response to the Israeli Health Ministry, 14 more cases of myocarditis were reported to VAERS, for a total of 49 such cases identified in the database.

Of the 36 myocarditis cases reported to VAERS by Feb. 23, 2021, 25 were in males, 21 involved the Moderna vaccine (15 males), and 15 involved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (10 males).

And of the 49 cases recorded by March 10, 2021, 35 were in males, 26 involved the Moderna vaccine (20 males) and 23 involved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (15 males).

The average age of the patients was 33.6 and median age was 31.5 — with the average age of male cases being 31.1 (median 28) and the average age of females 40.8 (median 36.5), indicating a higher incidence in younger males.

The average number of days before onset and diagnosis following vaccination was 5.4, with a median of 3 days.

With hundreds of pages’ worth of redactions, it is unclear if there are more documents or data that would provide further insights into the response provided by the agency to Israel’s Ministry of Health.

In its Feb. 24 response, the CDC claims the redacted documents are protected by statute, confidentiality laws or privacy laws.

Notably, on the same day as the Israel Ministry of Health’s request to the CDC, Pfizer published a document — released as part of last year’s “Pfizer Documents” release from the FDA — titled “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) received through 28-Feb-2021.”

BNT162B2 refers to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that received Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA.

This document indicated that 25 cases of myocarditis were reported by Feb. 28, 2021 as part of a list of “adverse events of special interest” (AESI).

This figure drew from several databases, including the Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), the EU’s ACCESS protocol, U.S. CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance) and the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.

Studies show COVID shots lead to increased risks of myocarditis

Several recent studies have shown an increased prevalence of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination.

“Delayed Vigilance: A Comment on Myocarditis in Association with the COVID-19 Injections,” by Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D. and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., published Oct. 17, 2022 in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, found that two months after COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out to the public, a statistically significant safety signal for myocarditis in males ages 8 to 21 appeared in VAERS.

However, as previously reported by The Defender, even though this safety signal was visible as early as Feb. 19, 2021, CDC officials waited until May 27, 2021 before alerting the public.

By then, over 50% of the eligible U.S. population had received at least one mRNA COVID-19 vaccine — and the FDA expanded the EUA of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine to include adolescents 12 and older.

Another study, released April 15, 2022 by seven Israeli researchers, examined the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis in adults previously were infected with COVID-19, between March 2020 and January 2021.

Despite arguments that an increase in myocarditis diagnoses may be attributed to COVID-19 infections instead of the vaccines, the study “did not observe an increased incidence of either pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.”

As of March 3, 16,641 cases of myocarditis were recorded in VAERS following the receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine or booster — with the number growing to 16,660 when including diagnoses of bacterial myocarditis, infectious myocarditis, mycotic myocarditis, post-infection myocarditis and septic myocarditis.

Of the latter number, 10,701 cases (64.2%) were recorded in males.

While the age of over half of the patients in these recorded cases was listed as “unknown,” in cases where an age was recorded, myocarditis diagnoses peaked in the 18-29 year age group, with high prevalence also found in the 6-17 and 30-39 age groups.

Of 2,778 cases in the 18-29 age group, 2,211 were recorded in males — further indicating the particularly high risk of myocarditis young males face following COVID-19 vaccination.

More governments raising concerns about myocarditis

As early as October 2021, Sweden’s Public Health Agency paused Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for people born 1991 and later, “as data pointed to an increase of myocarditis and pericarditis among youths and young adults that had been vaccinated,” according to Reuters.

At around the same time, Finland’s public health authorities also paused the vaccine in young people.

And in November 2022, Sweden paused the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine for those under 30, due to an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis.

As reported by The Defender in June 2022, Novavax received EUA from the FDA despite “Multiple events of myocarditis/pericarditis” recorded during clinical trials.

Earlier this week, Yanagase Hirofumi, a member of Japan’s House of Councillors, accused the Japanese government of covering up injuries and deaths stemming from the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Hirofumi told the House of Councillors that in Japan’s vaccine-related adverse events tracking system, at least 2,001 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination have been recorded.

 BREAKING 
The excess mortality caused by vaccination is making waves in the Japanese Diet.

In Japan, the number of deaths after vaccination has increased by 210,000 since 2020, the highest number since the World War II.
People are dying immediately after vaccination, and… https://t.co/0dDnDtJndfpic.twitter.com/03vB4BYaDR

— You (@You3_JP) March 13, 2023

However, despite “approximately 260 cases in which the doctor in charge reported that there was probably a link between the vaccine and the death” and, citing Japan’s health minister, “52 cases where a pathologist has performed an autopsy, and reported that there is a link between the vaccine and the death,” the database indicates that “only one case has been found to have a causal relationship between the vaccine and death.”

Hirofumi cited the example of “a man in his 30s” who “died three days after receiving the second dose of the vaccine. The cause of death was myocarditis,” adding that “ as a result of the autopsy, doctors concluded that there was a link between the vaccine and the death.”

In an interview on Sunday, Germany’s federal minister of health Karl Lauterbach — previously a proponent of a national vaccine mandate who had stated the COVID-19 vaccines had “no side effects” —admitted that serious adverse events were prevalent and that the vaccine injured are being ignored by the authorities.