Peer Reviewed Study Says COVID is a Bio-Weapon Created by Fauci/US Gov and COVID Shots are Bio-Weapons Causing "Profound Harm," "Contributing to Unprecedented Levels of Morbidity and Mortality”

/

From [HERE] A new peer-reviewed study suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for COVID-19 shows signs of “deliberate engineering” and that these features, including the spike protein also found in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, are responsible for widespread health harms globally.

The study, authored by 11 scientific and legal experts, was published in the fall edition of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

The authors argue that the man-made features of SARS-CoV-2 and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are likely the outcome of controversial gain-of-function research, in violation of the United Nations’ Biological Weapons Convention.

Gain-of-function research, which increases the transmissibility or virulence of viruses, is frequently used in vaccine development.

According to the paper, the spread of COVID-19 — followed by the rollout of mRNA vaccines — resulted in unprecedented health harms, ranging from “autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular catastrophes to pregnancy complications and aggressive cancers.”

“Far from benign, these vaccines have unleashed profound harm, disrupting nearly every system of the human body and contributing to unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality,” the paper states.

Dr. Andrew Zywiec, principal physician at Zywiec & Porter, is the paper’s lead author. He said the paper reveals a “pattern of harm too consistent, too pervasive to be dismissed as chance.” He added:

“The systemic toxicity unleashed by these interventions, manifesting as autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular devastation, aggressive cancers, and catastrophic reproductive harms, represents not merely a public health failure but a profound betrayal of trust.”

Joseph Sansone, Ph.D., a psychotherapist who filed a lawsuit to prohibit mRNA vaccines in Florida, said the paper is “extremely significant” as it is “the first peer-reviewed journal article stating that both COVID and the COVID injections violate the Biological Weapons Convention and that both COVID-19 and the COVID injections are biological weapons.”

SARS-CoV-2 virus ‘indicative of laboratory manipulation’

According to the paper, the SARS-CoV-2 virus “displays multiple genomic features indicative of laboratory manipulation,” including its furin cleavage site, which “enhances infectivity” and which is “absent in SARS-like viruses found in nature.”

Several other features of the SARS-CoV-2 virus “enhance immunological evasion and aerosol transmissibility,” making the virus “unusually durable … and five times more stable in air” than other respiratory viruses.

“These combined traits, along with the virus’s mutation patterns, are strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 could not have evolved naturally,” the paper states.

The paper cites two peer-reviewed journal articles by military scientists stating that SARS-CoV-2 contained “evidence of manipulation” that makes the virus an “attractive pathogen” due to its features, which resemble those of a biological weapon.

These manipulations “represent a violation of the Biological Weapons Convention,” the paper argues.

Enacted in 1975, the convention “effectively prohibits the development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use of biological and toxin weapons.” Nearly 200 countries have signed it.

Paper accuses Fauci of deliberately concealing SARS-CoV-2 origins

According to the paper, gain-of-function research involves “viral manipulation techniques” that can lead to the development of pathogens that are banned under the convention.

Yet, the U.S. government — particularly the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, led by Dr. Anthony Fauci until 2022 — has long been involved in gain-of-function research, “including a long-standing collaboration between U.S.-funded institutions and the Wuhan Institute of Virology” in China.

Proponents of the “lab-leak theory” of the origins of SARS-CoV-2 argue that gain-of-function research at the Wuhan laboratory and a subsequent leak led to the global outbreak of COVID-19, which was covered up.

In April, the Trump administration launched a new version of the government’s official COVID-19 website, presenting evidence that COVID-19 emerged due to a leak at the Wuhan lab. The CIA, FBI, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Congress and several foreign intelligence agencies have endorsed this theory.

The paper refers to Project DEFUSE, a proposal the EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan scientists submitted to the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in 2018. Although the proposal was rejected, it described the creation of coronaviruses with features that enhanced their infectivity, including the furin cleavage site.

EcoHealth Alliance and its former president, Peter Daszak, Ph.D., collaborated with Wuhan researchers. Last year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) suspended all funding for EcoHealth Alliance after finding the organization had failed to properly monitor risky coronavirus experiments.

The paper states that Fauci and the U.S. Intelligence Community never disclosed the existence of the research. Instead, “they obfuscated what is, in fact, proof of intent to produce a virus much like the one that caused the COVID-19 pandemic.”

The paper cites a Feb. 1, 2020, teleconference with Fauci and key virologists, including several of the co-authors of the now-infamous “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” paper. The paper, which promoted the natural origin of COVID-19, was published in Nature Medicine in March 2020.

Although several of the co-authors of “Proximal Origin” expressed doubts that SARS-CoV-2 developed naturally, Fauci “aimed to suppress” such concerns during the Feb. 1, 2020, call.

“Proximal Origin” became one of the most-cited papers of 2020 and has been accessed over 6 million times. In 2023, The Nation reported that over 2,000 media outlets cited the paper.

The U.S. government, the scientific community and the media subsequently used “Proximal Origin” to promote the “zoonotic” — or natural origin — theory of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and to discredit proponents of the “lab-leak theory.”

“The deliberate concealment of critical genomic features delayed public awareness and pandemic mitigation efforts, potentially allowing wider spread and more deaths,” the paper states.

In May, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that paused gain-of-function research in the U.S. for 120 days while a new regulatory framework is developed. It also ended U.S. funding for such research in some countries.

Spike protein poses ‘potential for irreversible harm’

According to the paper’s authors, the development of SARS-CoV-2 — and the COVID-19 features that contain similar gain-of-function properties — resulted in significant harm to global public health.

The paper references statistics from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database which show a significantly increased incidence of myocarditis (151.4%), pulmonary embolism (43.6%), ovarian dysfunction (34.9%), hypertensive disease (22.9%), Guillain-Barré syndrome (14.9%), esophageal cancer (12.5%) and breast cancer (7%) in 2021, the year the COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out globally.

Additional U.S. military data cited in the paper show “persistent elevations” in myocarditis, digestive organ cancer, brain cancer and other injuries between 2022 and 2025.

Reproductive harms also significantly increased following the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, the paper argues. It cites data from sources including the U.S. government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Pfizer’s 2021 post-marketing surveillance report and its Phase 2/3 clinical trial data for its COVID-19 shot, showing increased miscarriages, stillbirths and neonatal deaths.

The paper cites the spike protein in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines as one of the likely factors for the increased incidence of cancers and other health conditions in recent years.

“Prolonged protein expression, exemplified by S1 spike protein detection more than 700 days post-COVID vaccination, underscores the potential for irreversible harm,” the paper states.

The paper argues that suppression of “proven or promising treatments” such as hydroxychloroquine in favor of universal COVID-19 vaccine mandates — and the policy decision to implement mass vaccination during the pandemic — further exacerbated global public health and had “damaging effects on public trust.” [MORE]

The American Academy of Pediatrics Received Tens of Millions in Federal Funding to Push Dangerous COVID Shots and Censor ‘Misinformation’ that Warned of its Dangerous

/

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which is suing U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and has called for the end to religious exemptions, received tens of millions of dollars in federal funding in a single year, according to public records.

AAP, which represents 67,000 pediatricians in the U.S., received $34,974,759 in government grants during the 2023 fiscal year, according to the organization’s most recent tax disclosure. The grants are itemized in the AAP’s single audit report for 2023-2024.

Documents show some of the money was used to advance childhood vaccination in the U.S. and abroad, target medical “misinformation” and “disinformation” online, develop a Regional Pediatric Pandemic Network, and highlight telehealth for children.

However, not all of the money could be tracked through public records.

The federal grants are in addition to financial contributions the AAP receives from several major pharmaceutical companies, including Eli Lilly, GSK, Merck, Moderna and Sanofi.

Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo and co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom, said the joint funding that the AAP receives from taxpayers and Big Pharma “reflects a troubling alignment between its policy positions and the interests of its largest funders — both federal agencies and pharmaceutical corporations.”

He added:

“Federal grants tied to vaccination programs, pandemic preparedness and public health messaging create an inherent conflict of interest when the same organization actively lobbies against religious and personal exemptions, promotes universal uptake of COVID-19 shots in children and pregnant women, and funds or publishes research that omits clear stratification of outcomes by vaccination status.”

The AAP is also a lobbying organization. It spent between $748,000 and $1.18 million annually over the previous six years to advocate for its members, according to Open Secrets. [MORE]

Over 1.5 Million People Who Reported COVID Shot Injuries Can't Get Compensation: Gov Requires Injury to be “life-threatening” or result in 'permanent loss of body function' or permanent body damage

/

Over 1.5 million people who reported a COVID-19 vaccine injury to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) cannot even apply for compensation from the government program that covers COVID-19 vaccine injuries — that’s because the program covers only death or “serious physical injury.”

According to the government’s definition of “serious physical injury,” the injury must either be “life-threatening,” result in “permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure,” or require “medical or surgical intervention to preclude permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure.”

According to OpenVAERS, there are over 1.5 million people who suffered injuries that weren’t life-threatening and were not life-ending. These individuals are shut out of the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

Injuries such as chronic headache, chest pain, digestive issues, dizziness, fatigue, nausea and rapid heartbeat are not serious enough to qualify for compensation since CICP only provides “compensationto an eligible individual for a covered injury — as in, serious injury or death.”

COVID-19 shots were classified as “countermeasures” during the COVID-19 pandemic, which means they are governed under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.

The PREP Act grants blanket liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers for nearly every type of injury caused by the vaccines.

Instead, the injured must submit a claim to the little-known CICP within one year of injury. CICP is the federal program that “provides compensation for covered serious injuries or deaths that occur as the result of the administration or use of certain countermeasures,” including COVID-19 vaccines.

‘I will be dead by the time they compensate people’

Even for those whose injuries meet the criteria for submitting a claim to CICP, the odds are slim that they will be compensated quickly, sufficiently, or at all.

As of June 1, CICP had received 13,836 COVID-19 vaccine injury claims and had compensated only 39 — less than 0.3%.

CICP isn’t keeping up with the number of claims, according to its website. As of June 1, the program had yet to review or was still reviewing 9,423 of the nearly 14,000 claims submitted since the start of the pandemic.

Among those is Doug Cameron, an Idaho man who received a COVID-19 vaccine when his employer “strongly implied” he should get the shot. Ten days later, he was permanently paralyzed from a blood clot. He filed a CICP claim in 2022.

In a November 2024 interview with The Defender, Cameron’s wife said that every time she calls to check on their claim, she is told, “Yeah, it’s still sitting on somebody’s desk for medical review.”

That is still the case today, Cameron told The Defender. “No word. I will be dead by the time they compensate people,” he said.

Cameron’s injury resulted in about $2 million in medical expenses.

For those few compensated by CICP, the payouts likely didn’t cover their medical expenses. The median payout was $4,182. Due to two anomalous payments, the average payout was just over $80,000.

In 2022, React19, whose mission is to support the COVID-19 vaccine-injured, launched React19 Care Fund to provide financial help for medical treatments and therapies for people injured by the shots.

Cameron hasn’t applied for a grant. “Other people need the money more than I do,” he said.

In January, the nonprofit surpassed $1 million in its latest round of grants. “To date, we have given out $1,292,169.79 to 175 recipients,” React19 Co-Chairman Joel Wallskog told The Defender in an email.

Wallskog, an orthopedic surgeon who was injured by Moderna’s shot, said he applied to CICP in early to mid-2021. “It took me 18 months to receive my denial,” he said.

Wallskog immediately appealed. “It took about 14 months after submitting the appeal to get denied again,” he said.

How can the government fix this? [MORE]

Anti-Human: Vaccines, Depopulation, and Nanotechnology Sponsored by Bill Gates Part 1

/

On May 8, 2025, Bill Gates announced that he will donate most of his fortune to his foundation over the next 20 years, and then it will terminate on December 31, 2045.

In an article posted on gatesnotes.com he stated, “This is a change from our original plans. When Melinda and I started the Gates Foundation in 2000, we included a clause in the foundation’s very first charter: The organization would sunset several decades after our deaths. A few years ago, I began to rethink that approach. More recently, with the input from our board, I now believe we can achieve the foundation’s goals on a shorter timeline, especially if we double down on key investments and provide more certainty to our partners.”

He went on to say that he expects the foundation to spend more than $200 billion between now and 2045. He then goes on to state, “We were central to the creation of Gavi and the Global Fund, both of which transformed the way the world procures and delivers lifesaving tools like vaccines and anti-retrovirals… we’ll continue supporting new uses of artificial intelligence, which can accelerate the quality and reach of services from health to education to agriculture.”

The Gates Foundation along with the Clinton Global Initiative and George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, are strategic partners with the United Nations Population Fund, which stated, “In a major step toward expanding access to voluntary family planning for millions who need it, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, in September 2023, has made a long-term commitment of up to $100 million to the UNFPA Supplies Partnership to support commodity procurement directly.”

As stated on their website, “UNFPA is the United Nations sexual and reproductive health agency. Our mission is to deliver a world where every pregnancy is wanted, every childbirth is safe and every young person’s potential is fulfilled.”

One of goals of the UNFPA is to end unmet need for family planning, as they go on to say, “We are the world’s single-largest provider of donated contraceptives to developing countries, and our programs increase the availability of contraceptives and dismantle barriers to services.” The UNFPA views access to contraception as a human right. In the “Human Rights” section, they say, “Population dynamics can be affected by policies. But these policies must strengthen, rather than weaken, fundamental human rights and freedoms. Population dynamics are and must remain the cumulative result of individual choices and opportunities, and they are best addressed by expanding these choices and opportunities – especially those related to sexual and reproductive health and rights. When couples can freely decide the number, timing and spacing of their children, evidence shows more children survive and thrive, and overall fertility levels trend downward.” [MORE]

Mississippi Declares Public Health Emergency Over Infant Death Rates – Black Infants are More than Twice as Likely as White infants to Die before their 1st birthday. Are Vaccines the Cause?

/

From [HERE] The State of Mississippi has declared a "public health emergency" after recent data show that the infant mortality rate in the State is now the highest it has been in 10 years. As the CBS article notes, this rise in infant deaths is not limited to the State of Mississippi, but is happening all over the country, and it is primarily happening with Black infants.

In Mississippi, there were 9.7 infant deaths for every 1,000 live births in 2024, which is almost double the most recent national average of 5.5 deaths per 1,000, according to the state Department of Health. The state has long struggled with high infant mortality rates. Since 2014, there have been 3,527 babies who have died before their first birthday in the state, public health officials said. [MORE]

Cindy Rahman, CEO and president of March of Dimes, described Mississippi’s declaration of a public health emergency as a "painful reminder" of a U.S. crisis in maternal and infant health.

“Although Mississippi accounts for less than 1% of U.S. births, the state accounts for more than 1.6% of all infant deaths. These losses should be a wake-up call to the nation," Rahman said, adding that March of Dimes supports officials’ efforts to improve birth outcomes in the state.  

Black infants in Mississippi face the nation's highest death rates. In 2024, more than 15 deaths per 1,000 live births were recorded among Black babies — up 24% in one year over already higher-than-average rates, CNN said. [MORE]

What do public health "authorities" believe is the cause of this increase in infant deaths among Black children? "The leading causes of infant death in Mississippi include congenital malformations, premature birth, low birthweight, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. (SIDS) Disparities remain stark — Black infants in Mississippi are more than twice as likely as White infants to die before their first birthday, and recent state data show those racial gaps have widened."

"Sudden Infant Death Syndrome" or "SIDS" is just the code name the medical system uses for mostly infant vaccine deaths, since they obviously will never blame infant mortality on vaccines. It has been known for over 2 decades now, including with top scientists at the CDC, that vaccines, and in particular infant vaccines, cause far more damage to Black people than they do to the rest of the population in the United States.

What Are The Real Causes of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)? Why Are Vaccines Excluded?

Here is another report published in 2014 by Neil Z. Miller explaining that the CDC does not even have a classification of death due to vaccines:

CDC Lists 131 Causes of Death For A Child but Omits Vaccines

While it is good that the infant mortality rate in the U.S. is finally getting some coverage in the Corporate News media, their “solutions” are obviously funded by their advertisers in Big Pharma, as they recommend the very things that have caused the problem of SIDS in the U.S.: more medical services to supply more vaccines and drugs.

To support their claims, they point out that medical care in the rural south is not as prevalent as in more affluent areas of the U.S.

But when it comes to sticking needles into the tiny bodies of infants, there are no shortages anywhere in the U.S., as it can be done in any local drug store on the corner of every town and city in the U.S., as well as in clinics right in the public schools.

Even churches now can function as vaccine clinics, as we saw during COVID.

In 2014, Dr. William Thompson of the CDC, who was one of three top researchers at the CDC who published a study in 2004 that was supposed to “prove” that vaccines do not cause autism, admitted to Dr. Brian Hooker that they committed fraud and withheld some data from that study that showed black boys were more susceptible to autism after receiving the MMR vaccines, than non-Black children.

The US Government has a "compelling interest" to shorten your life expectancy. COVID Shots are "the least restrictive" way to further that interest.

/

In every crime investigation, it is important to identify the Motive, the Means and the Opportunity. I have covered the means and opportunity of the covid democide (and broader CDC vaccine schedule democide) very extensively - covid is an ongoing global military mass killing/injuring campaign. This post discusses the motives and additional “means” built into the “illegal” (unconstitutional) US communicable disease related law, starting over a century ago. While many things have been said about the “global elites, etc” and their desire to control the population, this post is a bit more down to earth look at the immediate “compelling interest” that motivates the US Government to shorten the lifespan of the US population, despite economic growth theories to the contrary.

This post is based on my analysis (with help from Katherine Watt) of the recently circulated letter sent by the HHS’s Office of Civil Rights to West Virginia Health Department. The beginning of the letter sounds like HHS is warning WVHD that if they keep violating religious freedom of West Virginians in regard to vaccinations, the federal funding the WV receives (in part to enforce the violation of the religious freedom and enforce the full CDC vax schedule) is somehow jeopardized. That’s a head scratcher, I know. When you get to p. 2 it becomes less confusing: [MORE]

Helena Glass Claims RFK is on Video Telling Congress that DOD Created COVID Shots, and Gave Them to Big Pharma, which is why Govt Granted Big Pharma Immunity

/

From [HERE] Scrolling thru Twitter I came across a video of RFK, Jr. telling Congress that the Covid vaccines were actually developed by the DoD and given to Pfizer and Moderna so they would appear to be from Big Pharma which is why Big Pharma was given the ‘no liability’ clause. The video disappeared, was purged from my repost, and has since been deleted.

Trump takes a bow for making Operation Warp Speed one of his most definitive moments in history. He continues to completely ignore the fact that these vaccines have caused not just adverse events and death but the recurrence of CoVid in individuals. Sometimes lasting for weeks.

An NIH study of Soldiers early in the vax administration (December 2020 thru August 2021 – although published in June 2021) determined that Myocarditis had developed among 24 recipients within 4 days. The study’s authors questioned whether myocarditis should be considered an ‘adverse event’ and reportable. The conclusion was to Not Include the findings. The authors came from the Navy, Army, Marines, and Mayo Clinic. [MORE]

New Study Says Sugar Substitute in Zero Sugar Sodas, Diet Sodas, Gum and Other Foods May Raise Risk of Stroke

/

Aspartame — the artificial sweetener found in everything from Diet Coke and sugar-free chewing gum to children’s medications — may raise the risk of the most common type of stroke by causing inflammation and disrupting blood vessel health and blood flow, according to new research.

Published last month (July 2025) in Scientific Reports, the study is the first to combine advanced computer modelling techniques to examine how aspartame interacts with processes in the body that can lead to a stroke or affect its severity, its authors said.

The findings add to longstanding concerns about the sugar substitute’s impacts on the brain and heart.

“Given that aspartame is one of the most pervasive artificial sweeteners used in the global food industry, its cumulative effects from long-term, low-dose exposure may indirectly affect cerebrovascular [brain blood vessel] health through metabolic interference,” the researchers said.

Ischemic stroke, which accounts for about 87% of all strokes in the U.S. and is a leading cause of death globally, occurs when a blood clot blocks a brain blood vessel, cutting off oxygen and causing brain cells to die. Common risk factors include high blood pressure, smoking and Type 2 diabetes.

Aspartame — also marketed as NutraSweet, Equal, Sugar Twin and AminoSweet — is up to 200 times sweeter than sugar and promoted as a way to cut calories and sugar intake, especially for people with diabetes.

Its safety has been debated for decades, with studies linking aspartame consumption to chronic diseases, weight gain and even aggressive brain cancer.

This study provides preliminary systematic insights into the potential neurotoxicity mechanisms of aspartame, its authors said. They found that aspartame strongly binds to and influences five key genes that code for proteins linked to ischemic stroke.

These proteins help regulate inflammation (the body’s response to injury or infection), blood pressure, and the strength and function of blood vessels. Disruptions may:

  • Raise blood pressure.

  • Trigger inflammation in the brain and blood vessels.

  • Weaken blood vessel walls and the brain’s protective barrier (blood-brain barrier), allowing harmful substances to enter the brain and worsen a stroke. [MORE]

U.S. Birth Rate Hits All-Time Low, CDC Data Show

/

The fertility rate in the U.S. dropped to an all-time low in 2024 with fewer than 1.6 children being born per woman, federal data released Thursday shows. The U.S. was once among only a few developed countries with a rate that ensured each generation had enough children to replace itself — about 2.1 kids per woman. But it has been sliding in America for close to two decades as more women are waiting longer to have children or never taking that step at all.

The new statistic is on par with fertility rates in western European countries, according to World Bank data. Alarmed by recent drops, the Trump administration has taken steps to increase falling birth rates, like issuing an executive order in February meant to expand access to and reduce costs of in vitro fertilization and backing the idea of “baby bonuses” that might encourage more couples to have kids. White House staff secretary Will Scharf remarked to reporters at the time that in vitro treatments “have become unaffordable for many Americans or been unaffordable for many Americans.”

Health insurance companies aren’t required to cover IVF treatments, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars. But there’s no reason to be alarmed, according to Leslie Root, a University of Colorado Boulder researcher focused on fertility and population policy. “We’re seeing this as part of an ongoing process of fertility delay. We know that the U.S. population is still growing, and we still have a natural increase — more births than deaths,” she said. [MORE]

Another Black Person's Lawsuit Dismissed w/o a Trial: NY Judge Rules Against Black Firefighter Injured by COVID Shot w/Permanent Heart Damage. Forced to Get Injected or Be Fired by NYC Government

/

mRNA COVID injections are not “vaccines” within the meaning of Supreme Court case precedent because they don’t prevent transmission or provide immunity from COVID. As such, COVID shots are simply medical treatments and do not the pass strict scrutiny under the Constitution because individuals have the fundamental right to refuse medical treatment. [MORE]

From [HERE] Black New York City firefighter O’Brian Pastrana, who was forced to retire after he was diagnosed with permanent heart damage following the mandated COVID-19 shot, is not entitled to financial compensation for his losses, a federal judge ruled last week.

U.S. District Judge Brian M. Cogan ruled that none of Pastrana’s fundamental rights were violated when he was denied a medical exemption — even though he experienced a severe reaction to the first shot — and compelled to either get fully vaccinated or be fired by the New York City Fire Department (FDNY) (city run by elite liberals).

Cogan said the vaccine mandate wasn’t to blame for Pastrana’s injury, as he claimed. “In this case, Pastrana always had a choice between receiving the vaccine and keeping his job.”

Pastrana also “was free to decide between taking the vaccine or seeking different employment” in another department or a neighboring state, Cogan ruled. And he was “free not to receive the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, potentially sacrificing his career.” As a result, the city can’t be held accountable for his injuries, Cogan ruled.

Based on the facts presented, Cogan granted the city’s motion for summary judgment, ruling in the city’s favor without a trial.

Christina Martinez, one of Pastrana’s attorneys, said the court sidestepped the unconstitutional conditions doctrine, which prohibits the government from conditioning a public benefit, like employment, on the waiver of a constitutional right.

Video Shows a Realitarian Speaking Reality to Fauci’s Truths During His Trip to a Hood in DC, Ruining His Door to Door, Genocidal Sales Pitch for Experimental COVID Shots Based on “The Science”

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Realitarian – one who acknowledges reality over truth, substance over form, subjective truth over objective truth, natural over artificial, clarity over fuzziness and see abidance of presence in expanded awareness. 2) one who subscribes to the applied radical transformative Realigion of Reality-Cracking. 3) one who rigorously hacks his or her own brain (wetware) for bugs and viruses in the indoctrination program codes (memons) acquired and running throughout one’s mortal consciousness in this earthuman life. (See: Suddenlightenment, Psylence, Poetic Vision, Slavespeak & Realigion)

California Hospital Concealed Evidence Linking ‘Catastrophic Surge’ in Stillbirths to COVID Injections, Lawsuit Alleges

/

A California hospital concealed data linking a “catastrophic surge” in stillbirths among women who received COVID-19 vaccines, according to a lawsuit filed last week in the Superior Court of California, Fresno County.

Michelle Spencer, a nurse at Community Medical Centers’ (CMC) Community Regional Medical Center, said the hospital “deliberately and selectively” concealed from staff, patients and regulators a spike in unborn baby deaths that began in spring 2021, and retaliated against her when she publicized the information.

The lawsuit also says the hospital concealed medical data related to the fetal deaths that showed a link to COVID-19 vaccination of pregnant mothers.

The data include hospital-wide medical records documenting the number of stillbirths and the vaccination histories of those babies’ mothers. One managing nurse at the hospital told a staff member that nearly all of the stillbirths occurred among vaccinated mothers.

According to the complaint, Spencer “witnessed firsthand the exponential increase in unborn baby deaths directly correlating with pregnant women who received a Covid vaccine and then would deliver a dead baby a close number of days or weeks following their injection.” [MORE]

Rep. Gosar Reintroduces Bill to Strip the Liability Protection for Unsafe, Experimental COVID Shots Granted to Big Pharma by Corpse Biden

/

From [HERE] Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) on Tuesday reintroduced legislation to end the liability shield for vaccine manufacturers and allow people injured by a vaccine to sue the drug’s manufacturer.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is one of the bill’s supporters.

The End the Vaccine Carveout Act targets two federal laws that give legal immunity to vaccine makers — the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005 (PREP Act).

The NCVIA’s liability shield covers vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for routine use in children or pregnant women.

The PREP Act protects manufacturers from liability for injuries or death caused by vaccines or other countermeasures implemented during a public health emergency.

“Current immunity provisions unfairly shielding Big Pharma from the harms caused by their products prevent those injured by vaccines to pursue a civil lawsuit in state or federal court,” Gosar said in the press release.

Gosar’s bill removes language in the NCVIA that requires people injured by vaccines to first seek compensation through the government-run National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).

Under the new legislation, the vaccine-injured could file lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers while also submitting a VICP claim. [MORE]

Attorney Suing Bill Gates, Bourla, Schwab Over Covid Shot Injuries Arrested by Military Police and Imprisoned in Netherlands

/

A Dutch lawyer leading a lawsuit against billionaire Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and World Economic Forum chair Klaus Schwab over Coronavirus policies and Covid-19 vaccine injuries was arrested last month and thrown in prison as the trial was set to get underway.

Reports state attorney Arno van Kessel, who was representing the case alongside attorney Peter Stassen, was brutally arrested during a late-night raid at his home in Leeuwarden on June 11, with police accusing him and others of terrorism.

Van Kessel was “blindfolded, taken by military police, and is now being held in a maximum-security facility — without charges, and without access to his legal team or family,” according to The People’s Voice TV.

Dutch newspaper De Andere Krant described the nature of the lawsuit, writing, “These cases revolve around the central questions of whether the coronavirus policy is part of the globalist reform agenda ‘the Great Reset’ and whether the COVID-19 vaccine is a bioweapon.” 

“Skeptics suspect that linking Van Kessel to a criminal organization is intended to damage his reputation, which is intended to ensure that the substance of these cases is glossed over,” continued De Andere Krant. [MORE]

The False Conviction of Reiner Fuëllmich - Authoritites Kidnapped and Locked Up Attorney After He Investigated COVID Shots as Genocide and Attempted to Convene 2nd Nuremberg Trial

/

[MORE] The Corona Committee was established in July 2020 by Attorneys at Law Dr Reiner Fuellmich (agEt) Viviane Fischer, Dr Justus P. Hoffmann (agEt), and Antonia Fischer (agEt). Initially in English as the German Corona Investigative Committee, its present-day internet presence is in German: Corona Ausschuss (Corona Committee (agEt)). The Corona Committee seeks answers to the legal questions of whether the anti-Corona measures taken by the German federal and state governments against a possible overloading of the healthcare system (“flattening the curve”) and to prevent SARS-CoV2 deaths were suitable, necessary and proportionate – in accordance with the constitutional standard of review – or whether the collateral damage that occurred was culpably caused.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has been admitted to the bar in Germany and California for more than 25 years. Born and raised in Bremen, he attended school in Bremen and Farmington Hills, Michigan and studied law at Georg-August University in Göttingen and Los Angeles. Along the way he was a research assistant at the law faculty of Georg-August-U and received his doctorate there. Prior to founding his law firm in 1993, he worked in corporate banking for Deutsche Bank in Germany and Japan. Dr. Fuellmich has published various articles and books in the fields of banking law, medical law and private international law, has taught as a professor and lecturer at universities in Germany and Estonia, and is a member of the German American Lawyers Association, German Japanese Lawyers Association, German Lawyers Association, and Bürgerbewegung Finanzwende (Citizens’ movement financial turnaround e.V.). Additionally, Dr. Fuellmich is the founding chairman of the Corona Committee Foundation, and founding member of the interest group A-DuR (Aktion Demokratie und Recht/Action Democracy and Law) for the introduction of, among other things, genuine class actions in the sense of class action and a sanction-protected right of proof in the sense of discovery into civil procedural law for the purpose of creating equality of arms in legal disputes with structural imbalance due to the involvement of state bodies or corporations.