The False Conviction of Reiner Fuëllmich - Authoritites Kidnapped and Locked Up Attorney After He Investigated COVID Shots as Genocide and Attempted to Convene 2nd Nuremberg Trial

/

[MORE] The Corona Committee was established in July 2020 by Attorneys at Law Dr Reiner Fuellmich (agEt) Viviane Fischer, Dr Justus P. Hoffmann (agEt), and Antonia Fischer (agEt). Initially in English as the German Corona Investigative Committee, its present-day internet presence is in German: Corona Ausschuss (Corona Committee (agEt)). The Corona Committee seeks answers to the legal questions of whether the anti-Corona measures taken by the German federal and state governments against a possible overloading of the healthcare system (“flattening the curve”) and to prevent SARS-CoV2 deaths were suitable, necessary and proportionate – in accordance with the constitutional standard of review – or whether the collateral damage that occurred was culpably caused.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has been admitted to the bar in Germany and California for more than 25 years. Born and raised in Bremen, he attended school in Bremen and Farmington Hills, Michigan and studied law at Georg-August University in Göttingen and Los Angeles. Along the way he was a research assistant at the law faculty of Georg-August-U and received his doctorate there. Prior to founding his law firm in 1993, he worked in corporate banking for Deutsche Bank in Germany and Japan. Dr. Fuellmich has published various articles and books in the fields of banking law, medical law and private international law, has taught as a professor and lecturer at universities in Germany and Estonia, and is a member of the German American Lawyers Association, German Japanese Lawyers Association, German Lawyers Association, and Bürgerbewegung Finanzwende (Citizens’ movement financial turnaround e.V.). Additionally, Dr. Fuellmich is the founding chairman of the Corona Committee Foundation, and founding member of the interest group A-DuR (Aktion Demokratie und Recht/Action Democracy and Law) for the introduction of, among other things, genuine class actions in the sense of class action and a sanction-protected right of proof in the sense of discovery into civil procedural law for the purpose of creating equality of arms in legal disputes with structural imbalance due to the involvement of state bodies or corporations.

HHS Secretary Kennedy: Fauci Pardoned by Biden To Protect From Creation of COVID

/

From [HERE] Trump administration Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. joined journalist Tucker Carlson this week and made a series of stunning remarks, including suggesting the Sleepy Joe Biden autopen was used to pardon Dr. Anthony Fauci due to his involvement in creating and unleashing COVID-19.

“Why did he [Fauci] need immunity?” Kennedy asked Carlson. “Why did he need a pardon in advance?”

When Tucker asked for his opinion on why Dr. Fauci was pardoned, RFK Jr. answered, “I would be speculating, but I think he was vulnerable, I think he had a lot of liability on creating coronavirus. You know, he was funding precisely that research at the Wuhan lab and he was giving them the technology.

“He gave them, not only the precise technology for developing that parthenogen, and published about it by the way,” the HHS head continued. “The publications credit NIH for financing the studies. He [Fauci] also gave them one of his fundies Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina, [who] developed a technique called the seamless ligation technique, which is a technique for hiding the laboratory origins of a manipulated virus.”

Kennedy explained Baric’s technique is capable of making a manmade virus appear to be of a natural origin, sarcastically asking, “What is the public health rationale?”

“If you were interested in public health, you would do the inverse,” he noted.

During another portion of the bombshell interview, RFK said the CDC was involved in the cover-up of the hepatitis B vaccine’s connection to an 1135% increase in autism risks. [MORE]

Non-Profit Organization Gets Kenya Court to Temporarily Suspend Diplomatic Immunity for Bill Gates

/

From [HERE] The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation no longer has diplomatic immunity and privileges in Kenya, at least for now. Kenya’s High Court suspended the immunity after the Law Society of Kenya filed a legal challenge against the government.

The Kenyan government in October recognized the Gates Foundation and its employees as a charitable trust with special rights in Kenya, under the Privileges and Immunities Act. The new status exempted the foundation and its employees in Kenya from legal action for acts performed in Kenya as part of official duties.

However, the Nov. 25 ruling by Justice Bahati Mwamuye suspends the immunity until at least Feb. 5, 2025, when a court will “review progress and set a hearing date for oral submissions on the petition.”

The ruling also requires all defendants, including Kenya’s minister of foreign affairs and the State Law Office, “to collect, preserve, and compile all documentation regarding the privileges granted to the Gates Foundation, including details of the cooperation agreement,” under threat of legal consequences for non-compliance.

The Gates Foundation and the Kenyan government have until Dec. 10 to respond, Eastleigh Voice reported.

The diplomatic privileges allowed the Gates Foundation “to engage in contracts, legal actions, and property transactions within the country” and granted the foundation “tax exemptions and immunityfrom legal actions related to their official duties,” leaving many Kenyans “with raised eyebrows,” Kenyans.co.ke reported.

In its legal challenge, the Law Society of Kenya said the immunity “undermines public interest and constitutional principles” and argued that the government’s decision should be declared null and void.

Gates ‘holds governments ransom’

Dr. David Bell, a public health physician and senior scholar at the Brownstone Institute, said the High Court’s suspension “shows the Kenyan system is functioning as it should.”

“From the point of view of the average Kenyan citizen, granting immunity to a large collection of foreigners working for a private foundation … with financial interests in the drugs they are being told to take should be really alarming,” Bell said.

Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, executive director of Children’s Health Defense Africa and founder of the health advocacy organization Transformative Health Justice, said Gates “operates from a position of immense financial wealth and thus political clout. Through using mechanisms of the carrot (funding) and the stick (withdrawal of funding), he holds governments ransom.”

Mohamed called the Kenyan government’s decision to offer the Gates Foundation immunity “horrifying” and said it shows “our governments are captured.”

She added:

“The negative consequences of this shocking decision are far-reaching. They include the erosion of accountability, unequal treatment in the law, damage to national sovereignty, the mockery of public transparency and participation.”

HONORED & REMEMBERED

10 a.m. ET 
Monday, Dec. 2
to noon ET
Wednesday, Dec. 4

DONATE NOW

Tim Hinchliffe, editor of The Sociable, said he believes Gates’ efforts to attain diplomatic immunity in countries like Kenya are connected to a profit motive.

“Wherever Gates goes, he stuffs his pockets under the guise of philanthropy while he sits back and collects his returns on investment, no matter the outcome,” Hinchliffe said.

“When you have that much wealth and power — when you have an organization that contributes more to the annual WHO [World Health Organization] budget than most nation-states — then you can buy your way into anything you want, including diplomatic immunity,” Hinchliffe said. “But, that immunity can only last so long.”

For other experts, Gates’ drive to attain diplomatic immunity is an effort to shield himself from legal consequences for his actions and those of the Gates Foundation.

Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, told The Defender, “It should be assumed that no one entity would seek such immunity unless they thought they might be at risk of legal penalties.”

Nass added:

“Gates has been charged with many crimes, including for monopolistic business practices, for conducting a clinical trial involving girls in India that was associated with child deaths and lack of informed consent. He has certainly been accused of false advertising of agricultural products in India and Africa.”

Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., professor of international law at the University of Illinois, said, “It is pretty bizarre that they gave Gates privileges and immunities under their domestic legislation in the first place. Obviously, this was an attempt by Gates to shield himself and his accomplices from criminal prosecution and civil liability in Kenya.”

Gates is currently facing a lawsuit in The Netherlands filed by seven COVID-19 vaccine injury victims, and faces legal challenges in at least one other country, India, for damages connected to the vaccines.

During the Year of “Safe and Effective,” US Authorities Knew COVID Shots Were Deadly: Mounting Evidence Suggests CDC Hid Data on COVID Injections and Myocarditis

/

From [HERE] Documents shared last week with Children’s Health Defense include emails between top officials at U.S. public health agencies showing that Israel’s Ministry of Health contacted U.S. public health officials as early as Feb. 28, 2021, about data showing a strong link between COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis.

Israel’s Ministry of Health by March 2021 identified a nearly 1,000% increase in the risk of myocarditis associated with the second dose of the COVID-19 mRNA shot, according to documents obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

The documents, which were shared with Children’s Health Defense (CHD) last week, also include emails between top officials at U.S. public health agencies showing that Israel’s Ministry of Health contacted them about myocarditis related to the shots as early as Feb. 28, 2021.

Ministry of Health Deputy Director Roee Singer informed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that the health ministry had concerns about “a large number of myocarditis and pericarditis cases in young individuals” following the Pfizer shot and sought to discuss those concerns with the CDC.

A source who obtained documents from the U.S. Department of State shared Israel’s data on myocarditis rates and U.S. public health agencies’ correspondence with CHD. The documents include a slide presentation by Israel’s Ministry of Health Division of Epidemiology dated March 31, 2021.

The slides showed that by the end of March 2021, 5.2 million Israelis received the first dose of the vaccine and 4.8 million received the second dose. The incidence of myocarditis following dose 1 was 1.1 per million, and 11.7 per million following dose 2 — a 964% increase in incidence between the two.

The CDC didn’t publicly admit the link between the COVID-19 shots and myocarditis until May 27, 2021, even though Israel’s Ministry of Health had reached out in February 2021, and the agency had the slide presentation soon after that.

The slide presentation was included in an April 5, 2021, email that Dr. Lauri Markowitz, co-lead of the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Technical Work Group, sent to her staff.

CHD Senior Scientist Karl Jablonowski, who along with CHD Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker was among the first to detail the deception around myocarditis, told The Defender that the Israeli document amounts to a safety surveillance study of 5 million people — and it flags myocarditis as an “undeniably strong signal.”

Jablonowski added:

“It is unconscionable that the CDC, NIH [National Institutes of Health], and FDA-CBER [U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research] had possession of this study at a time when over a million U.S. citizens were being vaccinated every day, and yet those agencies took no observable action.

“The year 2021 was the year of ‘safe and effective,’ yet the safety studies were left undone. Had the gene therapy products repurposed as vaccines actually been safe, it would have been serendipitous.

“The U.S. citizens were among the last to know of vaccine-induced myocarditis, while the U.S. government was among the first to know.”

CHD received the documents just days after Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) demanded public health agencies provide complete and unredacted documents about the development and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, after learning of extensive redactions in documents released in response to multiple FOIA requests.

In a letter sent Nov. 19 to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the FDA and the CDC, Johnson said the redactions make the documents nearly impossible to comprehend. He also said they obscure the public’s understanding of issues like myocarditis and pericarditis linked to vaccines.

CDC’s ’embarrassing’ response [MORE]

NIH Chief Confesses COVID Health Initiatives Were Completely Made Up and Vax Didn't Stop COVID. Raja Cholan: 'We’re all going to learn about the dangers of COVID Injections When It’s Too Late'

/

From [HERE] O’Keefe Media Group on Monday released its first undercover video in its NIH Tapes series.

In OMG’s first video release, Raja Cholan, Chief of Health Data Standards Branch US National Library of Medicine, said the Covid health initiatives were completely made up.

“I probably shouldn’t be saying this out loud. They might have funded a lab in Wuhan, China and Pfizer and Moderna are getting a bunch of money from all of these vaccine mandates,” Raja Cholan said to the OMG undercover journalist.

“I don’t even know if these vaccines stop you from getting COVID. They don’t,” Raja Cholan said, adding, “We’re all going to learn [about the dangers of the Covid vaccine] when it’s too late.”

Raja Cholan said the ‘six feet of social distancing’ rule “wasn’t based on any real evidence that it did anything – it was completely made up.”

The NIH Chief told OMG that Trump’s victory is “worse for the NIH.”

“It would be better for a Democrat to be in office,” he said.

“We fly under the radar of really being scrutinized…I don’t think I have too much to worry about. That’s not recording, right?” he said to the undercover journalist.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) earlier this year finally admitted to funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the ground zero for the COVID-19 pandemic.

This admission directly contradicts previous statements made under oath by Dr. Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). [MORE]

Biden, Fed Authorities Hired PR Firm to Aggressively Push Useless and Dangerous COVID Injections for Kids

/

From [HERE] A U.S. House of Representatives committee report revealed the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ $900 million “We Can Do This” COVID-19 campaign was flawed and claimed COVID-19 shots prevented transmission despite the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stating there was no such evidence.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) shifting mask guidelines and reversals on recommendations damaged public trust, with changes appearing politically motivated rather than based on scientific evidence.

  • The government aggressively promoted COVID-19 shots for children despite low-risk levels, using emotional manipulation and fear-based messaging through the Fors Marsh Group PR firm.

  • Clinical trial studies showed significant bias in measuring COVID-19 shot effectiveness, with case-counting window bias making ineffective shots appear 50% to 70% effective.

  • Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials revealed higher risks of serious adverse events than initially reported, with Pfizer showing 36% higher risk compared to placebo groups.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee released an assessment of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) COVID-19 public health campaign, revealing it was fraught with miscalculations that set the stage for widespread public distrust.

In December 2020, the FDA granted emergency use authorization (EUA) to the first COVID-19 shots, yet these authorizations clearly stated there was no evidence the shots prevented viral transmission.

Despite this, the administration launched the “We Can Do This” campaign, spending over $900 million to promote vaccine uptake and public health measures.

However, foundational issues plagued the campaign from the beginning. Past contracts and fiscal mismanagement within HHS raised red flags about the effectiveness and integrity of their public relations, or PR, efforts.

As the campaign aimed to shape public behavior around masking, social distancing and vaccination, the reliance on flawed CDC guidance undermined its credibility.

By allowing CDC recommendations to drive public messaging, the administration sowed confusion and mistrust.

These early failures were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of inconsistent and politically influenced public health strategies that ultimately eroded the very trust needed to effectively manage a public health crisis. [MORE]

COVID Shot Antidote: Due to Shedding and Food Contamination, Dangerous Self-Assembling Nanotechnology is Also In the Blood of the Unvaxxed. Dr Mihalcea Provides Simple Way To Remove It From Your Body

/

Peer Reviewed Study Finds that COVID Injections Pose 112,000% Greater Risk of Brain Clots, Strokes Than Flu Shots

/

From [HERE] COVID-19 vaccines pose a 112,000% greater risk of brain clots and strokes than flu vaccines and a 20,700% greater risk of those symptoms than all other vaccines combined, according to a peer-reviewed study that calls for a global moratorium on the vaccines.

The study, published last week in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, found reports of 5,137 cases of cerebral thromboembolism after COVID-19 shots over 36 months. This compares to 52 reported cases following flu vaccination and 282 cases for all vaccines over the past 34 years.

According to the study, this represents an “alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis adverse events” following COVID-19 vaccination.

The study’s authors — independent researcher Claire Rogers, obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. James A. Thorp, independent researcher Kirstin Cosgrove and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough — used data from the U.S. government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), for their analysis.

The data also indicated 9,821 reports of atrial fibrillation — an irregular heart rhythm that is “the most common identifiable cause of cerebral arterial thromboembolism” — following COVID-19 vaccination in 41 months, compared to 797 cases reported in 34 years for all other vaccines combined.

Rogers told The Defender the findings confirm anecdotal evidence of an increased incidence of stroke seen during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. [MORE]