Mathematician says Government Authorities Manipulated COVID Data to Exaggerate Crisis, Sell Fear [Vaccines] to the Public

/

From [Video HERE] the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Norman Fenton, Ph.D., could see health officials were misusing data and misleading the public.

A professor of risk information management at Queen Mary University of London, Fenton is a mathematician who focuses on critical decision-making and quantifying uncertainty.

Throughout the pandemic, he closely examined and criticized how officials used data to make decisions about lockdowns, testing and vaccines.

Fenton spoke last week with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast.”

“When the COVID pandemic emerged, what kind of challenges did you specifically see?” Kennedy asked Fenton.

Fenton replied:

“It was clear I think from the start that most of the data that governments put out — not just the UK government, but most governments around the world … were kind of misleading because it was based on very easily manipulated statistics.”

This was true of both the nature of COVID itself and the vaccines, Fenton said.

“There was an immediate rush to draw conclusions, which were sort of based on over-simplistic data on case numbers and deaths,” he said.  “… the problem was that that data was very easily used by influencers and decision-makers to fit particular narratives that exaggerated the scale of the crisis.”

Fenton’s team published some of the first research providing more accurate estimates about the infection rate versus the fatality rate compared with official estimates he said were based on faulty data.

The research showed the virus was more widespread than people assumed, but nowhere near as dangerous as was being claimed.

Fenton also addressed issues with PCR tests.

Although it was clear early on that a proper understanding of the virus depended on accurate diagnostic tests, he said, “we were initially led to believe that the PCR test was an accurate diagnostic test.”

“But later, of course, we discovered that wasn’t true. And the impact of that has been catastrophic,” he said.

Kennedy agreed. “The magnitude of [the epidemic] was enormously and deceptively amplified by the misuse of the PCR test,” he said.

Fenton first came under attack in the summer and early fall of 2020, when he challenged how COVID deaths were classified, he said, and questioned the widespread testing of asymptomatic people.

“That was when we were finding the real problems about the false positives and the scale of the false positives,” Fenton said.

Excessive testing led to “absolutely ridiculous decisions,” he said, including new lockdowns.

Information concerning deaths following COVID vaccination also was manipulated, Fenton said, as part of the official claim that the vaccine was the only way to keep people from becoming seriously ill and dying.

Data adjusted to take into account misclassification show a peak in mortality shortly after vaccination, he said, cautioning:

“Now, of course, it could well be that these are people who are indeed immunosuppressed seriously. Also … the vaccination might just be bringing forward the death, which would’ve occurred shortly afterward anyway.

“But nevertheless, that’s what we believe is there in the data, but is of course being hidden.”

Although Only 6% of Africa is Fully Vaccinated, It is “One of the Least-Affected Regions in the World," according to WHO. So-called “COVID Deaths" in Africa Have Now Dropped to Lowest Levels Yet

/

 The number of Covid-19 cases and deaths in Africa have dropped to their lowest levels since the pandemic began, marking the longest decline yet seen in the disease, according to the World Health Organization.

In a statement on Thursday, the U.N. health agency said Covid-19 infections due to the omicron surge had “tanked” from a peak of more than 308,000 weekly cases to fewer than 20,000 last week. Cases and deaths fell by 29% and 37% respectively in the last week; deaths decreased to 239 from the previous week.

“This low level of infection has not been seen since April 2020 in the early stages of the pandemic in Africa,” WHO said, noting that no country in the region is currently seeing an increase of Covid-19 cases. [MORE]

While it’s true the continent has some of the lowest vaccination rates in the world, with only 6% fully vaccinated, the World Health Organization has consistently described Africa as “one of the least-affected regions in the world” in its weekly pandemic reports. [MORE]

A Misstatement or Another "Great Lie?" Biden’s Latino Probot Xavier Becerra Said, 'Vaccines Kill Non-Whites at 2X the Rate of Whites.' ["Beware of a half-truth. It may be the wrong half"]

/

According to FUNKTIONARY,

shenanigger - a Negro (neo-lawn-jockey) who carries out Step-n-Fetchit type activites/actions (shenanigans) for the dominant immoral majority (the psychopathic white power semi-organism), i.e., the Rhodes, Rothschild, Anglo Saxon Zionist power clique, unknowlingly at the expense of him/herself and knowlingly at the expense (sell-out/buy-out) of his people and culture. (See: McNegro, Coin-Operated, The Moteasuh Tribe, Sambo & SNigger).  

Probot – a propagandizing programmed robot. A representative from an organization, agency or institution, especially the Internal Revenue Service, Pentagon, State Department, or Blight House, whose assignment is to make prepared statements and answer “cooked” (prepared) questions at news conferences, briefings and the like. A probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite. (See: Proxymoron)

Great Lies – half-truths, absolute truth, complete falsities and distortions uttered by the agents of the Corporate State, its mass media, and the Oligarchy; strategically deployed to keep its citizen-victims apathetic and docile. (See: The Truth)

Half-Truth – a come-on to either swindle you out of money or out of mind. Beware of a half-truth. It may be the wrong half. Half truth can always appear to be consistent, but a total truth is always inconsistent because in total or absolute truth the opposite or complement polarity is not included and therefore a duality is forged instead. A half-truth plus a half-truth equals absolute truth—a whole lie or a holy lie. You will know a half-truth when you hear it because its delivery (utterance) is always the by-product of a mid-lie crisis. (See: Absolute Truth, Subjective Truth, Devil, Sin, Mass Truth & Lie)

A Blight House Email Obtained by FOIA Request Shows Facebook, Merck and the CDC Foundation (includes Pfizer) Formed an Alliance “to build confidence in vaccines" [to destroy informed consent]

/

From [HERE] A White House email, obtained on behalf of ICAN, shows Facebook, Merck, and the CDC Foundation, whose corporate partners includes Pfizer, have formed an alliance “to use social media and digital platforms to build confidence in and drive uptake of vaccines.” No conflict there.

On August 12, 2021, ICAN, through its attorneys, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for communications between White House staff and Facebook, Google, and YouTube.  In response to this request, ICAN received a June 15, 2021 email sent by Facebook’s then-Public Policy Manager, Nkechi “Payton” Iheme, to several White House employees.

In it, Iheme announces a new initiative, the “Alliance for Advancing Health Care,” between Facebook and several major companies and organizations, including Merck, the Vaccine Confidence Project, the Sabin Vaccine Institute, and the CDC Foundation.  Significantly, one of the CDC Foundation’s corporate partners is Pfizer.  In the email, Iheme explains that the Alliance is “focused on advancing public understanding of how social media and behavioral sciences can be leveraged to improve the health of communities around the world” and states that its first project is to “provide grants to researchers and organizations for projects that explore how to use social media and digital platforms to build confidence in and drive uptake of vaccines.”  Facebook announced this new initiative on June 9, 2021 here.

The conflict of interest is astonishing.  This email shows without a doubt that, through the CDC Foundation created “to support the [CDC’s] work,” the federal government, which is in charge of ensuring the safety of vaccines, has teamed up with Big Pharma and Big Tech to push a liability-free product on the world, while attempting to stomp out anyone who questions this arrangement.

Just as the pharmaceutical companies will never rest when it comes to promoting and selling their vaccine products, and the federal government will not rest in its efforts to assist them, we will never rest in exposing the truth regarding these products or in demanding full transparency and full informed consent for any and all vaccines.

6 Companies Control 90% of What Americans Read, Watch and Hear (Talk and Think About). Many Black Sheeple Believe "The Dependent Media" is disinterested, unbiased and independent from Vested Interests

/

DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINED, “The most effective means of disseminating and reproducing ideas in society, and in the Afrikan American community in particular, is to have that community perceive their dissemination and reproduc­tion as the work of disinterested, unbiased, non-manipulative, liberal yet authoritative, White American individuals, groups, or institutions, or as flowing from sources independent of the marked influence of the powerful. Thus, White America strongly pushes and projects the powerful mythology of independent, liberal American media, universi­ties, and other information processing establishments. That is, America loudly congratulates itself for what it calls its "free press" and mass media which permit the free exchange of ideas. Most Black Americans utilize White media and these factors as their primary, if not sole, source of information. Most are not mindful of the fact that the American press and mass media are privately owned, profit-making, White elite-controlled corporations. The press is one among other institutions, "and one of the most important in maintaining the hegemony of the corporate class and the capitalist system itself," advances Parenti.

If the press cannot mold our every opinion, it can frame the perpetual reality around which our opinions take shape. Here may lie the most important effect of the news media: they set the issue agenda for the rest of us, choosing what to emphasize and what to ignore or suppress, in effect, organizing our political world for us. The media may not always be able to tell us what to think, but they are strikingly success­ful in telling us what to think about ...”.

From [CHD] Today, just six conglomerates — Comcast, Disney, AT&T, Sony, Fox and Paramount Global (formerly known as ViacomCBS) — control 90% of what you watch, read, or listen to. To put this into perspective: that means about 232 media executives have the power to decide what information 277 million Americans are able to access. In 2021, the “big six” banked a total of more than $478 billion in revenue. That’s more than both Finland’s and Ukraine’s GDP combined.

The issue extends to print media and radio giants, too: iHeartMedia owns 863 radio stationsnationwide, while Gannett owns more than 100 daily U.S. newspapers and nearly 1,000 weeklies.

As the pool controlling the media keeps shrinking, so does the breadth of the information reported. Hence why today’s thousands of news outlets often churn out embarrassingly duplicative content. [MORE]

J&J Pays $99M to Settle Suit for Causing West Virginia's Opioid Crisis. J&J Concealed, Mischaracterized and Failed to Disclose Risks of Addiction and Serious Health Risks, just Like COVID Vax

/

From [HERE] Johnson & Johnson will pay $99 million to settle a lawsuit in West Virginia that alleges the company helped fuel the state’s opioid crisis, removing the company from a trial that began this month.

West Virginia was one of several states that didn’t join a nationwide $5 billion opioid settlement that J&J  completed in February to resolve state and local government lawsuits against the company. 

J&J said Monday that its settlement with the West Virginia attorney general isn’t an admission of wrongdoing and that its marketing and promotion of prescription opioids were appropriate and responsible. The company no longer sells prescription opioids in the U.S.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said the settlement allowed the state to recover more than double the $48 million that the company had offered it in the national settlement.

“It was absolutely the correct decision to proceed to trial,” Mr. Morrisey said. “This settlement will provide significant help to those affected the most by the opioid crisis in West Virginia.”

The trial in Kanawha County is continuing against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and AbbVie Inc.’s Allergan and affiliated companies.

In that case, Mr. Morrisey alleges that the companies concealed, mischaracterized and failed to disclose the serious risk of addiction and promoted higher dosage amounts without disclosing inherently greater risks, among other things.

Teva declined to comment. Allergan didn’t respond to a request for comment. 

A separate bench trial was held last summer in federal court in Charleston, W.Va., in which Cabell County and the city of Huntington, W. Va., accused drug wholesalers McKessonCorp., AmerisourceBergen Corp. and Cardinal Health Inc. of creating a public nuisance when they shipped 81 million pills to the city and county between 2006 and 2014.

Defense attorneys argued that physicians prescribed opioids using their medical judgment and pharmacies dispensed medications to patients. They said they followed the law and had systems in place to identify suspicious orders.

The judge has yet to rule on that case.

UK Authorities Quietly Published Data Confirming the Fully Vaccinated Accounted for 92% of all COVID Deaths in March [read that again]

/

From [HERE] Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population. 

But something even stranger than this is also occurring. Covid-19 is currently on the rise again across the UK, but the data confirms cases, hospitalisations and deaths are only rising among the triple vaccinated population, whereas they are declining significantly among the unvaccinated population.

You have been lied to on a monumental scale over the past two years by your Government, its Scientific Advisers, and the mainstream media. But the biggest lie of all is perhaps that the Covid-19 injections are both safe and effective. Neither of these statements are true. If you want recent evidence of them not being safe then look no further than the recent announcement from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). 

On the 6th April 2022, the UKHSA released a statement confirming they were launching an urgent investigation due to the detection of higher than usual rate of liver inflammation (hepatitis) among children, and that similar cases were also being assessed in Scotland. 

They have already ruled out the common viruses that cause hepatitis, so now they need look no further than the Covid-19 injection that has been unnecessarily offered to children, because Pfizer’s own study confirms the Covid-19 mRNA jab accumulates in the liver following vaccination and causes hepatitis. [MORE]

New Study: One-Fifth of Fully Vaxxed (3X) Swedes became Infected with Omicron Within 2 Months

/

From [HERE] As concluded by researchers at Danderyd Hospital in Sweden, the Omicron strain effectively gets past antibodies. While most of the patients surveyed only had mild symptoms, they remained infectious for up to nine days.

More than one in five people tested positive for the Omicron strain of the COVID-19 virus within two months of receiving their third dose or booster shot, a fresh Swedish study shows.

The study is part of the large COMMUNITY project at Danderyd Hospital aimed at examining and comparing immunity after COVID-19 infection and after vaccination. During this stage of the study, 375 hospital staff were PCR-tested regularly, regardless of symptoms.

“Omicron gets past the antibodies. We see that those who become infected had as high levels of antibodies as those who didn’t become infected”, Charlotte Thålin, assistant chief physician and the study’s research leader, told national broadcaster SVT.Many of those who ultimately tested positive had symptoms ranging from mild to none whatsoever, yet still had high virus levels. Over half of the participants tested positive for 11 days and remained infectious for up to nine days.

“This is the first time that it has been possible to follow the virus levels in the airways during an ongoing Omicron infection, and it was surprising that so many remained positive for so long and had such high virus levels even though they had just received their third dose”, Charlotte Thålin mused.

When asked whether it is still worth vaccinating when the protection levels promised by vaccine producers initially are obviously failing, Thålin remained adamant that the jab still protects against serious illness, whereas Omicron can be dangerous for the unvaccinated as well as for the elderly and risk groups.

“And in the grand scheme of things, we want to reduce the spread of infection because the higher the spread of infection in a well-vaccinated population, the greater the risk that we get new mutations and new virus strains”, Thålin concluded.

Sweden has an overall vaccination rate of over 73 percent, far above the worldwide rate of under 59 percent. 

Fed Apls Court Holds that Government Lock Down Orders During COVID are a Valid Contractual Defense. Business Defendant Excused from Performance Under a Contract (If There is a Force Majeure Clause)

/

From [HERE] Over the past two years, there has been a fair amount of litigation surrounding the enforceability of force majeure provisions in response to the pandemic. A force majeure clause is a contractual provision that excuses one or both parties’ performance obligations when circumstances beyond the parties’ control arise and make performance impracticable or impossible. Such provisions ordinarily cover natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods. Other circumstances that may trigger force majeure provisions and relieve parties of liability include war, acts of terrorism, labor strikes and epidemics. With respect to COVID-19, courts around the country have generally construed force majeure provisions narrowly to find that, absent specific pandemic-related language, the pandemic does not trigger force majeure provisions. Other courts have decided that the COVID-19 pandemic falls within the more general definitions of “natural disaster.” Last week, a Federal Court of Appeals weighed in for the first time on the issue.

In June 2020, JN Contemporary Art LLC (JN) sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC (Phillips) in the Southern District of New York for breach of a contract which obligated Phillips to sell a painting on behalf of JN at a live auction. Phillips moved to dismiss the complaint, invoking the force majeure clause to terminate its agreement to sell the painting on behalf of JN, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and state government orders requiring nonessential businesses to cease in-person operations. The terms of the force majeure clause contained in the agreement provided: “In the event that the auction is postponed for circumstances beyond our or your reasonable control, including, without limitation, as a result of natural disaster, fire, flood, general strike, war, armed conflict, terrorist attack or nuclear or chemical contamination, we may terminate this Agreement with immediate effect. In such event, our obligation to make payment of the Guaranteed Minimum shall be null and void and we shall have no other liability to you.” Judge Denise Cote of Southern District of New York granted the motion to dismiss filed by Phillips, finding that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” and that the pandemic constituted “a circumstance beyond the parties’ reasonable control” as contemplated by their agreement. JN appealed and just last week the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal. See JN Contemporary Art LLC sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 7652, 2022 WL 852293 (2d Cir. March 23, 2022).

JN first argued on appeal that the district court erred in finding as a matter of law, without the benefit of any discovery, that the COVID-19 pandemic is a natural disaster, as it is debatable whether COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus or one created by man. JN next argued that Phillips did not have to sell the painting at a live auction, but could have sold it online or delayed a live auction sale to some point in the future. The Second Circuit disagreed. The Second Circuit stated that it did not need to rule on the finding by the district court that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” as it could decide the case on other grounds. The Second Circuit stated that the primary purpose of a force majeure clause is to “relieve a party from its contractual duties when its performance has been prevented by a force beyond its control or when the purpose of the contract has been frustrated.” The Second Circuit held that the COVID-19 pandemic and the orders issued by the government restricting nonessential businesses constituted circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the parties. In addition, the Second Circuit held that the agreement only required sale at a live auction and that when a defendant is excused from performance by force majeure, a defendant is not required to provide substitute performance.

Much has been written over the last year or two about courts interpreting force majeure clauses narrowly and strictly and not excusing performance due to COVID-19, and many parties are now excluding COVID-19 from their force majeure clauses altogether. The decision last week by Second Circuit in JN Contemporary Art LLC vs. Phillips Auctioneers LLC stands in contrast to many prior court decisions for two reasons. First, the Second Circuit interpreted the force majeure clause at issue more broadly and excused performance due to COVID-19. Second, it appears to be the first decision by a Federal Court of Appeals on this issue.

The Italian National Institute of Health Reveals the Fully "Vaccinated" now account for 7 in every 10 COVID Deaths

/

From [HERE] Covid-19 Deaths are beginning to rise again across Italy despite millions now being triple vaccinated, and the latest official Italian Government data shows that the vaccinated population account for 7 in every 10 of those deaths, as well as 8 in every 10 cases and hospitalisations, and 7 in every 10 ICU admissions. 

Italy’s National Institute of Health publishes a periodic Covid-19 Surveillance report, the latest of which can be accessed here, or the full list of which can be accessed here. 

In the latest report, data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths can be found in tables 4a, 4b and 4c on pages 26, 27 and 28. 

The following table has been collated from the data found in Table 4A in the ‘Diagnosi tra 25/02/2022 – 27/03/2022’ section and shows the total number of cases across Italy by vaccination status –

In all, between 25th Feb and 27th March 22, Italy recorded 1,594,849 Covid-19 infections, and an astounding 1,284,615 of these were among the vaccinated population, meaning the vaccinated accounted for 81% of all Covid-19 cases within one month. 

The unvaccinated accounted for just 310,234 cases, the one-dose vaccinated accounted for 36,199 cases, the two dose vaccinated accounted for 329,016 cases, and the triple vaccinated accounted for a shocking 919,400 cases. This means the triple vaccinated alone accounted for 58% of all Covid-19 cases across Italy between 25th Feb and 27th March 22. [MORE]

A Great Hoax: Multiple Studies Show COVID Injections Don't Stop Infections, Transmissions, Hospitalizations or Deaths. More than 3 Dozen Studies Contradict the Effectiveness of Forced Injections

/

From [HERE] Studies on the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines found that they do not effectively stop the transmission of the disease, bringing into question the necessity of mandating them.

Epidemiologist Paul Alexander recently published a round-up of some of the newest evidence that calls into question the safety and efficacy of COVID shots.

Among the studies that he summarized was one from Israel that showed vaccinated individuals who have never been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 had a 13-fold increased risk of getting infected with the delta variant compared to those who have been unvaccinated but have been previously infected, showing that natural immunity is more effective.

Another study from the European Journal of Epidemiology found that there is no significant relationship between COVID-19 cases and the number of people getting vaccinated on a countrywide level. In other words, getting more people injected does not necessarily lower the spread of the virus.

Official data from the United Kingdom also showed that fully vaccinated adults now have a higher risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death compared to the unvaccinated.

Based on the studies, Alexander concluded that COVID vaccines are not to be expected to contribute to eliminating the communal spread of the virus or reaching herd immunity. He also said the studies “unravel the rationale for vaccine mandates and passports.” (Related: Over 400 studies show COVID-19 measures are failures… lockdowns don’t work, masks don’t work and school closures help no one.)

Alexander also noted that taking the vaccine escalates the person’s risk of getting infected. This is called negative efficacy, which is jargon for disease-promoting effects in drugs. In the case of a vaccine, this means that the vaccinated person is more likely to get infected compared to the unvaccinated.

This is bad, in particular, because evidence shows that the vaccines are non-sterilizing and that they do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization or death. They never worked.

For Alexander, what is happening with the COVID vaccines is reminiscent of the negative vaccine efficacy of the dengue vaccines that killed children in the Philippines in 2017, where the shots should not have been used.

Today, the repercussions of COVID vaccines show a massive increase in all-cause mortality numbers reported by insurance companies. Excess deaths are also showing up in almost all age cohorts and cannot be explained away by other causes, and the COVID-19 vaccine is now being referred to as the “greatest fraud” in modern history.

While business continues for Big Pharma companies like Pfizer and Moderna, as word gets out past censors and silencers, it is only a matter of time until the truth about the ineffective vaccines becomes evident to everyone.

Government, Big Pharma gaslighting people

There has also been an interesting change in narrative from medical influencers, public health officials and other mainstream advocates regarding the COVID vaccines. Now, people are supposed to believe that the vaccines were never meant to stop transmission, nor are they supposed to prevent others from getting infected with the disease. (Related: Even the NYT admits covid infections in children are merely like a “mild flu” – so why the vaccines, then?)

Today, vaccines are said to only prevent severe illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky brazenly admitting the injections can no longer prevent transmission.

This move by the government, Big Pharma and other medical “professionals” is called manipulative gaslighting. People were told from the beginning that the rapidly developed vaccines will “end the pandemic” and those who are fully vaccinated are the only ones allowed to have access to their jobs and going to public spaces.

People are also expected to accept the unethical decisions from policymakers regarding their decisions to lift vaccine mandates for professional athletes and performers, but not for police officers or healthcare workers, many of whom already lost their careers because of the mandates that local governments have previously implemented on the guise of public safety.

There’s no other way to describe it: COVID-19 vaccine is the greatest fraud in modern history.

Doctor’s Analysis of Data Obtained on 78 Million People in the US and England Demonstrate that COVID Injections Don't Prevent COVID or its Transmission and Don't Prevent Severe Illness or Death

/

From [CHD] “Our vaccines are working exceptionally well,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death — they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”

Thus spoke Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Walensky, in an Aug. 5, 2021 interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

Walensky may have believed the vaccines prevented severe illness and death then — but she cannot possibly believe that now.

That was eight months ago. The vaccines had barely been rolled out eight months earlier.

Now we have nearly 16 months of observation and what have we found? What has Walensky’s CDC revealed that contradicts her glib patter?

While there are thousands of articles discussing COVID-19 vaccines, I have come to agree with professor Tom Jefferson that in order to arrive at the truth, all we need to look at are epidemiological data of very high quality.

In other words:

  • We want raw, official data, before it has been subjected to adjustments or algorithms that “smooth” the data.

  • We want large populations.

  • We want the most solid endpoints, such as hospitalizations or deaths.

Over the past few days I have identified and analyzed such studies on my blog (here and here) and on Substack. The data are from official sources, published by the U.S. CDC and the UK’s Office of National Statistics.

Information on 30 million adults in California and New York, three-fourths of whom were vaccinated, were used to compare COVID hospitalization and case rates in those who were vaccinated and had no prior COVID illness, with adults who were never vaccinated but had recovered from COVID, and presumably had natural immunity.

The data were collected from June to November 2021, before the Omicron wave appeared.

The Defender reported on this data two months ago:

  • Vaccinated Californians and New Yorkers were three times more likely to develop COVID than those who had prior immunity and were unvaccinated.

  • Vaccinated Californians had a higher rate of hospitalizations (severe illness) than those who were unvaccinated but had prior immunity. (New York did not provide hospitalization data.)

  • The vaccine failures in this huge study cannot be blamed on Omicron, because the data were collected during Delta.

The UK data from its Office of National Statistics, published March 16, extend from Jan. 1, 2021, through Jan. 31, and include both the Delta and Omicron waves.

The data have been age-standardized. The database includes 86% of all deaths in England (which has a population of 56 million) during the 13 months described.

The graphs reveal that being doubly vaccinated protected the English against death for most of 2021.

However, over last December and January (corresponding to the Omicron wave), COVID death rates in the doubly vaccinated but unboosted were higher than in those who had never been vaccinated. This was true for the population as a whole.

If you break down the deaths by age group, the vast majority of COVID deaths occurred in the over-70 population.

While deaths from COVID in younger people were trending up as the time since vaccination increased, by Jan. 31, 2022, they had not exceeded COVID deaths in the unvaccinated.

Boosters did appear to “top up” COVID immunity for a time in all age groups, reducing death rates. But one wonders how long it will take before this effect wears off?

What is the bottom line?

High-quality, official data obtained on more than 30 million American adults and 48 million residents of England incontrovertibly reveal that:

  • Natural immunity was three times better at preventing cases than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Natural immunity was somewhat better at preventing serious illness, measured as hospitalizations, than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Boosters (a third shot) reduced the death rate in England of those vaccinated against Omicron, but the benefit was starting to drop off by January 2022.

  • Overall, England’s unvaccinated population had a lower COVID death rate during the Omicron wave than the COVID death rate in its doubly vaccinated population.

  • Walensky and the other so-called experts are wrong. Natural immunity provided three times more protection against infection (and therefore against transmission) than did double vaccination, even before Omicron. After Omicron, vaccine efficacy was even worse.

  • While vaccination provided some protection against severe illness (measured as hospitalizations) during the Delta wave, it provided less protection than natural immunity.

  • The vast majority of COVID deaths occur in those over 70. In this age group, the doubly vaccinated died from COVID at higher rates during Omicron than the unvaccinated.

UnMasked Mayor Promotes an Ongoing Grimace and More Science-Free COVID Rules: The Proxymoronic StrawBoss says NYC Won’t Rehire Unvaxxed Workers. Video Shows Him Grin and Wave as a Crowd Shouts Insults

/

From [HERE] New York City Mayor Eric Adams said Thursday that his administration would not rehire unvaccinated city workers.

Around 1,400 city employees were fired earlier this year for failing to comply with the city’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Adams said, during a news conference at Citi Field, he did not plan to rehire them.  “Not at this time,” he said, according to The Wall Street Journal, “We are not reviewing if we are going to bring [them] back.”

He also thanked the more than 340,000 city employees who have been vaccinated, recognizing them for “[standing] up and [doing] the right thing.” [MORE VIDEO]

Adams is a Proxymoron (one moron who speaks or acts on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons) and a democrat BOHICAN (Bend Over Here It Comes Again Negro). He is also the physical representation of the opposite of Black power in a city with the largest number of Black people in the country.

Official data obtained on more than 30 million American adults and 48 million residents of England incontrovertibly reveals that COVID-19 vaccines aren’t preventing COVID or its transmission, and they aren’t preventing severe illness or death. Also,

  • Natural immunity was three times better at preventing cases than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Natural immunity was somewhat better at preventing serious illness, measured as hospitalizations, than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

  • Boosters (a third shot) reduced the death rate in England of those vaccinated against Omicron, but the benefit was starting to drop off by January 2022.

  • Overall, England’s unvaccinated population had a lower COVID death rate during the Omicron wave than the COVID death rate in its doubly vaccinated population.

  • Walensky and the other so-called experts are wrong. Natural immunity provided three times more protection against infection (and therefore against transmission) than did double vaccination, even before Omicron. After Omicron, vaccine efficacy was even worse.

  • While vaccination provided some protection against severe illness (measured as hospitalizations) during the Delta wave, it provided less protection than natural immunity.

  • The vast majority of COVID deaths occur in those over 70. In this age group, the doubly vaccinated died from COVID at higher rates during Omicron than the unvaccinated.

German Data Confirms that COVID Deaths are Exaggerated in Most Countries and Much of the World is Unvaccinated [meaning not injected with poisons]

/

From [HERE] Mass formation collapse!

In a previous post, we referred to Worldometer to show not many died of Covid in most countries, even according to the official data.

Corona in Zahlen is a German site that also records Covid cases, and deaths, as well as official vaccination and Covid test numbers.

Corona in Zahlen is run by Dr. M. Siekmann and uses statistics from Johns Hopkins University to report corona infections in over 200 countries worldwide.

Worldwide corona statistics “are accessed via the freely accessible Our World in Data data set,” explains Corona in Zahlen.

Our World in Data is a non-profit organisation made up of researchers from the University of Oxford and the Global Change Data Lab.

Corona in Zahlen also uses data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for European countries and Robert Koch Instituts, R-Welt and DIVI for Germany.

Data Comparison

Of the 227 countries Worldometer have been tracking since the beginning of the pandemic, 9 have recorded zero deaths, 38 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 62 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 80 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 100 have recorded less than 1000 deaths each.

In fact, 206 countries from the 227 reported less than 50,000 deaths.

Of the 222 countries Corona in Zahlen have been tracking, 8 have recorded zero deaths, 33 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 56 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 78 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 93 less than 1000 deaths.

Covid in Zahlen reports less than 50,000 deaths for 200 of the 222 countries tracked.

Influenza Comparison

Now consider that during the 2018 flu season, the Office for National Statistics reported just over 50,000 deaths in England and Wales.

This was considered high, yet during the outbreak, Public Health England (PHE) declared that “while flu was rendering the largest number of people seriously unwell since the winter of 2010/11, it was still not an epidemic.”

Although we need to take the total size and population of each country into account, we can at least acknowledge that the population of England and Wales – even combined – is pretty small compared to most countries, say in Africa, for example.

Imagine how relieved and relaxed the global population would be feeling now, instead of stressed and fearful, if mainstream media had reported on the vast number of countries hardly hit with Covid-19 deaths over the last two years instead of reporting recorded Covid cases.

Also note that Covid only deaths are proving to be much smaller than official numbers as data in countries like Australia , New Zealand, the UK and USA now goes public, and the mainstream media like The New York Times, and Spectator are beginning to ask questions.

Vaccination Noncompliance

It is also reassuring to see Covid in Zahlen report official data showing less than 20% of the population went for the Covid vaccine in 30 countries, and less than 50% of the people had the vaccine in 78 countries. Less than 50% have fully vaccinated status in 96 countries (did not go back for more shots), and less than 25% have had a booster in 138 countries.