Pfizer and BioNTech Raise Price on COVID Vaccines Sold to US Government from $19 to $24 a Shot on Latest Purchase of 200 Million Vaccines. So Far US has Bought 1 Billion Doses

From [HERE] The U.S. has purchased 200 million additional Covid-19 vaccine doses from Pfizer Inc.PFE 0.51% and partner BioNTech SE, BNTX 0.35% at a higher price than previous deals.

The U.S. is paying about $24 a dose, according to Pfizer, up from the $19.50 that the government paid in its earlier deals to supply the country. The deal brings the total purchased from the U.S. to 1 billion doses.

The companies said they expect to deliver 110 million of the additional doses by the end of the year, with the rest by the end of next April. Pfizer said the U.S. has the option to acquire an updated version of the vaccine targeting variants, should they be available and authorized by regulators. Pfizer is testing one targeting the Beta variant, which was first identified in South Africa. 

“The price for this order accounts for the additional investment necessary to produce, package and deliver new formulations of the vaccine, as well as the increased cost associated with delivering the vaccine in smaller pack sizes to facilitate delivery at individual provider offices, including pediatricians,” a Pfizer spokesman said in a statement.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki confirmed that the Biden administration’s purchase could be used to inoculate children or serve as booster shots should health regulators deem them necessary.

“We’ve always prepared for every scenario,” Ms. Psaki said, noting that the additional shots will be delivered between the upcoming fall and the spring of 2022.

Officials from the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have yet to say that booster shots are necessary. Pfizer said earlier this month it would seek clearance from U.S. regulators to distribute a booster shot of its Covid-19 vaccine. 

More than 86 million people in the U.S. ages 12 and up have received the two-dose shot, the most among the three shots cleared by regulators for use, according to federal figures.

Johnson and Johnson Hits the Jackpot w/COVID: Vaccine Should Notch $2.5 Billion in Revenue for the Year, according to Chief Financial Officer

From [HERE] Greater demand for medical devices, drugs and consumer-health products helped boost sales and profit for Johnson & Johnson JNJ 1.06% in the latest quarter, a sign people are returning for healthcare services they deferred earlier in the pandemic.

Sales of J&J’s medical devices climbed 63% year over year, the company said Wednesday. Higher sales of the company’s skin-care and beauty products helped lift J&J’s consumer-health revenue by 13% compared with a year earlier.

The New Brunswick, N.J.-based company, a bellwether for the healthcare industry because its products span several categories, logged sales of $23.31 billion—a 27% increase year over year—and adjusted earnings of $2.48 a share.

Wall Street analysts had forecast adjusted earnings of $2.29 a share and revenue of $22.49 billion, according to FactSet.

Shares of Johnson & Johnson were largely flat Wednesday.

J&J executives expressed confidence the return to healthcare use would continue, saying they didn’t expect the spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus would have an impact.

“Our outlook for the rest of the year really remains strong for our sector regardless of what happens with emerging variants and any continued blips as it relates to Covid,” said Jennifer Taubert, who runs J&J’s pharmaceuticals business.

Ashley McEvoy, J&J’s medical devices chief, said hospitals appear better than earlier in the pandemic at handling any surges in Covid-19 cases while keeping elective surgeries going. Yet she said some hospitals in the U.S. are beginning to delay elective procedures as Covid-19 cases mount.

The company raised its guidance for full-year performance. J&J forecast sales of $93.8 billion to $94.6 billion and adjusted earnings of $9.60 to $9.70 a share, up from the maximums from its previous forecast of $91.6 billion and $9.57 a share.

J&J said sales of its Covid-19 vaccine, which generated $164 million in revenue in the second quarter, would pick up during the latter parts of the year. The shot should notch $2.5 billion in revenue for the year, most of it in the fourth quarter, Chief Financial Officer Joseph Wolk said.

CBPP Study Says COVID has Exacerbated “Socialist Distancing" btw Whites and Non-Whites as Black/Latino Households Still Disproportionately Lack Sufficient Food and are Unable to Pay Rent/Daily Needs

From [HERE] While employment is rising and strains on household budgets have eased in recent months, the employment rate remains low and millions still report that their households did not get enough to eat or are not caught up on rent payments. We are able to track the extent of the nation’s progress against hardship thanks to nearly real-time data from several sources on the ongoing economic crisis.

Key hardship indicators show strong improvement since December, Census Bureau data show, aided by job growth and government benefits. Hardship rates fell especially fast after the enactment of the American Rescue Plan on March 11, which included $1,400 payments for most Americans as well as other assistance to struggling households. (See Figure 1.) Nonetheless, 20 million adults live in households that did not get enough to eat, 11.5 million adult renters are behind on rent, and some of the progress from late March appears to be waning.

The impacts of the pandemic and the economic fallout have been widespread, but remain particularly prevalent among Black adults, Latino adults,[1] and other people of color. These disproportionate impacts reflect harsh, long-standing inequities — often stemming from structural racism — in education, employment, housing, and health care that the current crisis has exacerbated. Households with children also continue to face especially high hardship rates. Considerable evidence suggests that reducing childhood hardship and poverty would yield improvements in education and health, higher productivity and earnings, less incarceration, and other lasting benefits to children and society.[2]

Report is [HERE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Socialist distancing – the ever-expanding and increasing disparity between the haves and the have-nots until the Socialist (i.e., monopoly capitalist) Welfare State becomes the Farewell State—farewell to your rights, your family, friends and even your life through Plandemics (Coronavirus), $camdemics (Corporate State turned Surveillance and Nanny State), 5G bio-weaponized eugenics, starvation, vaccinations, civil unrest, genocide and other nefarious LWO (Last World Order) activities that will greatly reduce the world’s population by 2030. Before Social Distancing, we were experiencing the effects of “Socialist Distancing”...the ever-widening separation between the “haves” (holders) and the “have-nots” (held-back) due to “monopoly capitalism” (centralization of credit in the hands of the State) which by wide academic recognition is the core attribute of communism / socialism, in fact, it is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The litmus test to any political system is what is used as “money” and who controls (monopolizes) its “issuance.” Labels just don’t cut it. Think deeper...learn to access the underlying reality behind the truth veneer you’ve been conditioned to hold or have been told. (See: Plandemic, $camdemics, Vaccines, Coronavirus, “Monopoly Capitalism,” Exchange, Economics, Matrix Capitalism, Political Money, GEO-Dollars, The Farewell State, Trapitalism, Cultural Induction & COVERT-19)

'Because We Said So' Not Good Enough for Everybody: Surgeon General Mad About Covid Misinformation but Fails to Dispel Claim that Vaccines Carry Substantially Serious Side Effects and May Cause Death

From [HERE] Joe Biden’s administration renewed its assault on social media companies allegedly spreading Covid-19 misinformation on Sunday, as new infections continued to surge across the entire US.

Vivek Murthy, the US surgeon general who has accused companies including Facebook of “poisoning information” about coronavirus vaccines, said they were not doing enough to check the online proliferation of false claims.

“The reality is that misinformation is still spreading like wildfire in our country aided and abetted by technology platforms,” he said on Fox News Sunday.

“I’m worried about what is to come because we are seeing increasing cases among the unvaccinated in particular. It’s so important people have the information they need about the vaccine … it is our fastest, most effective way out of this pandemic.” [MORE]

Last month a medical study that appeared on the National Library of Medicine website called "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations — We Should Rethink the Policy" explained that the COVID vaccines are effective but carry significant risk of death and serious side effects. The doctors who authored the study, Harald Walach Rainer (Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital in Poland ) J. Klement (Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Germany) and Wouter Aukem (Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg, The Netherlands), explain that ‘governments should rethink their vaccination policies in light of the deadly risks involved.’

The study was removed from the internet last week and replaced with a version that has “retracted” stamped across it. The original is posted here. The abstract states:

COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

Covid Deaths in Africa Jumped 40% Last Week

From [HERE] Africa is now in the deadliest stage of its pandemic, and there is little prospect of relief in sight.

The Delta variant is sweeping across the continent. Namibia and Tunisia are reporting more deaths per capita than any other country. Hospitals across the continent are filling up, oxygen supplies and medical workers are stretched thin and recorded deaths jumped 40 percent last week alone.

But only about 1 percent of Africans have been fully vaccinated. And even the African Union’s modest goal of getting 20 percent of the population vaccinated by the end of 2021 seems out of reach.

Rich nations have bought up most doses long into the future, often far more than they could conceivably need. Hundreds of millions of shots from a global vaccine-sharing effort have failed to materialize.

Supplies to African countries are unlikely to increase much in the next few months, rendering the most effective tool against Covid, vaccines, of little use in the current wave. Instead, many countries are resorting to lockdowns and curfews.

Even a year from now, supplies may not be enough to meet demand from Africa’s 1.3 billion people unless richer countries share their stockpiles and rethink how the distribution system should work.

“The blame squarely lies with the rich countries,” said Dr. Githinji Gitahi, a commissioner with Africa Covid-19 Response, a continental task force. “A vaccine delayed is a vaccine denied.”

Unable to strike early deals for vaccines, African nations relied on Covax, a global partnership, to deliver free doses to countries that needed them.

But Covax deliveries ground to a halt after India imposed export restrictions on the AstraZeneca vaccine as it dealt with its own resurgence this year.

U.S. Sending Senior FBI, DHS Officers “to Assist" Haiti in Aftermath of Moïse Assassination

From [HERE] Senior officials with the FBI and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will go to the nation as soon as possible after receiving a request from Haitian authorities for security and investigative assistance.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the objective of the delegation is to support law enforcement efforts on the ground and provide resources in terms of womanpower and manpower, in addition to financial assistance.

Moïse was shot dead in his private residence in the hills above Port-au-Prince around 1 a.m. Wednesday. The attack also wounded his wife, Martine Moïse, who was transported to a hospital in Florida for treatment.

Four people suspected of being involved in Moïse's assassination were killed by police in a shootout. Haitian authorities have arrested 17 suspects and are searching for eight more believed to be involved in the slaying.

"We are going to bring them to justice," National Police Chief Léon Charles said at a news conference Thursday. During the briefing, the 17 suspects sat handcuffed on the floor.

Two U.S. citizens of Haitian descent were among those arrested, investigative Judge Clément Noël told French newspaper Le Nouvelliste. Noël said the two Haitian Americans were acting as translators for a group of attackers that originally planned to arrest, not kill, Moïse.

The American suspects have been identified as James Solages, 35, and Joseph Vincent, 55.

Psaki said Friday that the ongoing investigation into the assassination, including the arrest of two U.S. citizens, is "not going to impact the assistance we are providing to the people of Haiti."

"Our assistance is to help the people of Haiti and to help them get through what is a very challenging time and has long been, even before the assassination of the president," Psaki told reporters.

Newsweek reached out to the FBI and DHS for comment on the law enforcement delegation but didn't receive a response before publication.

The White House also announced Friday that Haiti is one of the countries that will receive COVID-19 vaccines from the United States. Psaki didn't provide the number of vaccines that will be shipped but said the administration is preparing to deliver them as early as next week. [MORE]

[if the vaccines were unsafe would the privately owned, profit-making, White elite-controlled Dependent Media let us know?] FDA Gives Warning of Rare Nerve Syndrome to J&J Vaccine

From [HERE] The Food and Drug Administration warned Monday that Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine can lead to an increased risk of a rare neurological condition known as Guillain–Barré syndrome, another setback for a vaccine that has largely been sidelined in the United States.

Although regulators have found that the chances of developing the condition are low, they appear to be three to five times higher among recipients of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine than among the general population in the United States, according to people familiar with the decision. The warning was attached to fact sheetsabout the vaccine for providers and patients.

Federal officials have identified 100 suspected cases of Guillain-Barré disease among recipients of the one-dose shot through a federal monitoring system that relies on patients and health care providers to report adverse effects of vaccines. Ninety five percent of those cases were considered serious and required hospitalization, the F.D.A. said. The reports are preliminary.

In a statement, the agency said that while “the available evidence suggests an association” between the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and increased risk of Guillain–Barré syndrome, “it is insufficient to establish a causal relationship.” [MORE]

Peer Reviewed Study in Medical Journal Removed from the Internet says COVID Vaccines are More Risky than Advertised and Should Be Used Sparingly b/c They Cause Death and Serious Side Effects

From [HERE] A medical study that appeared on the National Library of Medicine website called "The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations — We Should Rethink the Policy" explained that the COVID vaccines are effective but carry significant risk of death and serious side effects. The doctors who authored the study, Harald Walach Rainer (Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital in Poland ) J. Klement (Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Germany) and Wouter Aukem (Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg, The Netherlands), explain that ‘governments should rethink their vaccination policies in light of the deadly risks involved.’

The study was removed from the internet last week and replaced with a version that has “retracted” stamped across it. The original is posted here. The abstract states:

COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

The conclusion states:

Conclusions.

The present assessment raises the question whether it would be necessary to rethink policies and use COVID-19 vaccines more sparingly and with some discretion only in those that are willing to accept the risk because they feel more at risk from the true infection than the mock infection. Perhaps it might be necessary to dampen the enthusiasm by sober facts? In our view, the EMA and national authorities should instigate a safety review into the safety database of COVID-19 vaccines and governments should carefully consider their policies in light of these data. Ideally, independent scientists should carry out thorough case reviews of the very severe cases, so that there can be evidence-based recommendations on who is likely to benefit from a SARS-CoV2 vaccination and who is in danger of suffering from side effects. Currently, our estimates show that we have to accept four fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2–11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations, placing risks and benefits on the same order of magnitude.

COVID "Socialist Distancing" Has Lowered the Life Expectancy of Black People to 71.5 Yrs, Increasing the Gap w/Whites [77.6 yrs]. Still, the "White Race," Unable to Produce Color, Continues to Decline

As stated by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, white people are vulnerable to their sense of numerical inadequacy. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

White plus Black equals Colored.

White plus Brown equals Colored.

White plus Yellow equals Colored.

The declining white population is not a new or reversible trend - the decline has only quickened. Although rarely discussed, white people are genetic recessive. It is scientific fact that Black is a genetically dominant trait. Whenever Black mixes with White, which is a recessive genetic trait, Black will dominate. In general, this means "whites" cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. The so-called white "race" can and eventually will be replaced or "genetically annihilated" through such assimilation or social intermixing with non-whites. As white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. And this scares some racists to death, CAUSING THEM TO ACT OUT GENOCIDALLY AND genthanasiastically [MORE]

The LA Times states Americans were in trouble, with an average life expectancy that had sunk below that of any other affluent country.

Now, new research finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has delivered another crushing blow to longevity in the United States. In just two years, the pandemic that has killed more than 600,000 Americans has slashed close to two years off the average life expectancy.

An American born in 2018 could expect to live 78.7 years, on average. At the end of 2020, that number had fallen to 76.9 years, according to research published this week in the medical journal BMJ.

That precipitous drop — more than eight times steeper than in any other country in the U.S.’ economic league — now puts American life spans on par with those seen in Peru, Colombia, Chile and Thailand. Not since World War II have Americans experienced such a steep dive in longevity.

But those averages hide an even more shocking reality in communities of color. The pandemic’s power to shorten the lives of Black and brown people in the U.S. has been even more striking.

In fact, in just one year, the pandemic has wiped out two decades of progress made by Black Americans in narrowing a longevity gap with white Americans. 

In 2018, a Black American had an average life span of 74.7 years. But by the end of 2020, the life expectancy of a Black American had dropped by more than three years, to 71.5 years. Meanwhile, the average life span for white Americans dropped from 78.6 years to 77.3 years.

In other words, the gap between Black and white Americans grew from 3.9 years to 5.8 years.

For Latino Americans, the pandemic’s damage has cut even more deeply. Despite their higher rates of poverty and hardship, U.S. residents who identify as Latino have historically lived close to three years longer, on average, than non-Hispanic whites.

But the pandemic’s outsized toll in Latino communities, especially among working-age adults, has all but wiped out that advantage.

In 2018, a Latino resident of the United States could expect to live 81.8 years. By 2020, that had sunk to 78 years.

“Look at the massive disproportionality and the profundity of the insult shown here,” said Dr. Clyde Yancy, a Northwestern University cardiologist who has called on colleagues to address racial and ethnic inequities in medicine. “We have to reengineer our societies and healthcare for better opportunity, and for greater health equity. If we had to roll up our sleeves before, now we have to fundamentally start over.”

In an editorial published alongside the new research, UC Berkeley demographer Magali Barbieri wrote that the pandemic has “operated as a magnifier of already existing vulnerabilities within the U.S. population.”

The United States spends by far the most on healthcare of any high-income country — a whopping 17% of its gross domestic product, Barbieri wrote. But even that won’t fix the inequities made plain by the new life expectancy numbers if leaders fail to acknowledge and address the needs of vulnerable Americans, she wrote.

Computing figures for average life expectancy at birth may seem like a sterile statistical exercise. But they are an important measure of a nation’s health. In addition to revealing health inequities within a given country, they offer a standard yardstick by which to compare the health of people in different countries.

Childhood vaccination, better pregnancy care and wider use of disease-preventing treatments will nudge a country’s life expectancies upward. War, famine, disease and inefficient use of medical resources will drive them downward. Life span inequities within a country will drag down a country’s average and expose systemic discrimination and societal fissures.

The paper’s senior author, Dr. Steven Woolf, said he is often challenged to understand why the world’s wealthiest country — a country that quickly produced a trio of COVID-19 vaccines that are among the world’s most powerful — has fared so poorly in limiting the pandemic’s toll.

“It’s a vivid paradox,” Woolf said. “We really do a fantastic job in developing cutting-edge medications and technologies in healthcare, but a pretty lousy job of distributing them fairly. The same thing happens with diabetes, hypertension, and even maternal and child health. ... We have a fundamental problem with providing healthcare and getting it out to the people who need it most.”

UNDECEIVER DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINED, “THE BANE OF THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS THE EXPLOITATIVE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHICH PROJECTS A SO-CALLED CIVILIZED, FRATERNAL, EGALITARIAN, LIBERAL FACE WHILE CONCURRENTLY SEEKING TO MAINTAIN WHITE SUPREMACY. THIS MEANS THAT THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY MUST MAINTAIN AFRICAN SUBORDINATION WHILE NOT APPEARING TO DO SO. IT MUST CANNIBALISTICALLY SACRIFICE THE VITALITY, AUTONOMY, AND IF NEED BE, THE LIFE OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHILE POSING AS ITS BENEFACTOR AND SAVIOR. IT PLEADS INNOCENCE WHILE WASHING ITS HANDS OF THE BLOOD OF AFRICAN PEOPLE. THIS DUPLICITOUS TASK CAN ONLY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING IT APPEAR THAT THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS DYING OF NATURAL CAUSES, NOT OF AN INGENIOUS ATTEMPT ON THE PART OF THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY TO STRANGLE IT TO DEATH.” [MORE]

PHFREEDOM FIGHTER DR. BLYND DEFINES: SOCIALIST DISTANCING – THE EVER-EXPANDING AND INCREASING DISPARITY BETWEEN THE HAVES AND THE HAVE-NOTS UNTIL THE SOCIALIST (I.E., MONOPOLY CAPITALIST) WELFARE STATE BECOMES THE FAREWELL STATE—FAREWELL TO YOUR RIGHTS, YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND EVEN YOUR LIFE THROUGH PLANDEMICS (CORONAVIRUS), $CAMDEMICS (CORPORATE STATE TURNED SURVEILLANCE AND NANNY STATE), 5G BIO-WEAPONIZED EUGENICS, STARVATION, VACCINATIONS, CIVIL UNREST, GENOCIDE AND OTHER NEFARIOUS LWO (LAST WORLD ORDER) ACTIVITIES THAT WILL GREATLY REDUCE THE WORLD’S POPULATION BY 2030. (SEE: PLANDEMIC, $CAMDEMIC, VACCINES, CORONAVIRUS, THE FAREWELL STATE & COVERT-19) [MORE]

ACCORDING TO UNDECEIVER ISHMAEL REED: GENTHANASIA - THE NON-VIOLENT WEEDING OUT OF UNDESIRABLES OR THE SLOW MOTION EXTERMINATION OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE.[MORE]

COVID "Socialist Distancing" Has Lowered the Life Expectancy of Black People to 71.5 Yrs, Increasing the Gap w/Whites [77.6 yrs]. Still, the "White Race," Unable to Produce Color, Continues to Decline

As stated by Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, white people are vulnerable to their sense of numerical inadequacy. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

White plus Black equals Colored.

White plus Brown equals Colored.

White plus Yellow equals Colored.

The declining white population is not a new or reversible trend - the decline has only quickened. Although rarely discussed, white people are genetic recessive. It is scientific fact that Black is a genetically dominant trait. Whenever Black mixes with White, which is a recessive genetic trait, Black will dominate. In general, this means "whites" cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. The so-called white "race" can and eventually will be replaced or "genetically annihilated" through such assimilation or social intermixing with non-whites. As white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. And this scares some racists to death, CAUSING THEM TO ACT OUT GENOCIDALLY AND genthanasiastically [MORE]

The LA Times states Americans were in trouble, with an average life expectancy that had sunk below that of any other affluent country.

Now, new research finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has delivered another crushing blow to longevity in the United States. In just two years, the pandemic that has killed more than 600,000 Americans has slashed close to two years off the average life expectancy.

An American born in 2018 could expect to live 78.7 years, on average. At the end of 2020, that number had fallen to 76.9 years, according to research published this week in the medical journal BMJ.

That precipitous drop — more than eight times steeper than in any other country in the U.S.’ economic league — now puts American life spans on par with those seen in Peru, Colombia, Chile and Thailand. Not since World War II have Americans experienced such a steep dive in longevity.

But those averages hide an even more shocking reality in communities of color. The pandemic’s power to shorten the lives of Black and brown people in the U.S. has been even more striking.

In fact, in just one year, the pandemic has wiped out two decades of progress made by Black Americans in narrowing a longevity gap with white Americans. 

In 2018, a Black American had an average life span of 74.7 years. But by the end of 2020, the life expectancy of a Black American had dropped by more than three years, to 71.5 years. Meanwhile, the average life span for white Americans dropped from 78.6 years to 77.3 years.

In other words, the gap between Black and white Americans grew from 3.9 years to 5.8 years.

For Latino Americans, the pandemic’s damage has cut even more deeply. Despite their higher rates of poverty and hardship, U.S. residents who identify as Latino have historically lived close to three years longer, on average, than non-Hispanic whites.

But the pandemic’s outsized toll in Latino communities, especially among working-age adults, has all but wiped out that advantage.

In 2018, a Latino resident of the United States could expect to live 81.8 years. By 2020, that had sunk to 78 years.

“Look at the massive disproportionality and the profundity of the insult shown here,” said Dr. Clyde Yancy, a Northwestern University cardiologist who has called on colleagues to address racial and ethnic inequities in medicine. “We have to reengineer our societies and healthcare for better opportunity, and for greater health equity. If we had to roll up our sleeves before, now we have to fundamentally start over.”

In an editorial published alongside the new research, UC Berkeley demographer Magali Barbieri wrote that the pandemic has “operated as a magnifier of already existing vulnerabilities within the U.S. population.”

The United States spends by far the most on healthcare of any high-income country — a whopping 17% of its gross domestic product, Barbieri wrote. But even that won’t fix the inequities made plain by the new life expectancy numbers if leaders fail to acknowledge and address the needs of vulnerable Americans, she wrote.

Computing figures for average life expectancy at birth may seem like a sterile statistical exercise. But they are an important measure of a nation’s health. In addition to revealing health inequities within a given country, they offer a standard yardstick by which to compare the health of people in different countries.

Childhood vaccination, better pregnancy care and wider use of disease-preventing treatments will nudge a country’s life expectancies upward. War, famine, disease and inefficient use of medical resources will drive them downward. Life span inequities within a country will drag down a country’s average and expose systemic discrimination and societal fissures.

The paper’s senior author, Dr. Steven Woolf, said he is often challenged to understand why the world’s wealthiest country — a country that quickly produced a trio of COVID-19 vaccines that are among the world’s most powerful — has fared so poorly in limiting the pandemic’s toll.

“It’s a vivid paradox,” Woolf said. “We really do a fantastic job in developing cutting-edge medications and technologies in healthcare, but a pretty lousy job of distributing them fairly. The same thing happens with diabetes, hypertension, and even maternal and child health. ... We have a fundamental problem with providing healthcare and getting it out to the people who need it most.”

UNDECEIVER DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINED, “THE BANE OF THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS THE EXPLOITATIVE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHICH PROJECTS A SO-CALLED CIVILIZED, FRATERNAL, EGALITARIAN, LIBERAL FACE WHILE CONCURRENTLY SEEKING TO MAINTAIN WHITE SUPREMACY. THIS MEANS THAT THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY MUST MAINTAIN AFRICAN SUBORDINATION WHILE NOT APPEARING TO DO SO. IT MUST CANNIBALISTICALLY SACRIFICE THE VITALITY, AUTONOMY, AND IF NEED BE, THE LIFE OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY WHILE POSING AS ITS BENEFACTOR AND SAVIOR. IT PLEADS INNOCENCE WHILE WASHING ITS HANDS OF THE BLOOD OF AFRICAN PEOPLE. THIS DUPLICITOUS TASK CAN ONLY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING IT APPEAR THAT THE AFRICAN COMMUNITY IS DYING OF NATURAL CAUSES, NOT OF AN INGENIOUS ATTEMPT ON THE PART OF THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY TO STRANGLE IT TO DEATH.” [MORE]

PHFREEDOM FIGHTER DR. BLYND DEFINES: SOCIALIST DISTANCING – THE EVER-EXPANDING AND INCREASING DISPARITY BETWEEN THE HAVES AND THE HAVE-NOTS UNTIL THE SOCIALIST (I.E., MONOPOLY CAPITALIST) WELFARE STATE BECOMES THE FAREWELL STATE—FAREWELL TO YOUR RIGHTS, YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND EVEN YOUR LIFE THROUGH PLANDEMICS (CORONAVIRUS), $CAMDEMICS (CORPORATE STATE TURNED SURVEILLANCE AND NANNY STATE), 5G BIO-WEAPONIZED EUGENICS, STARVATION, VACCINATIONS, CIVIL UNREST, GENOCIDE AND OTHER NEFARIOUS LWO (LAST WORLD ORDER) ACTIVITIES THAT WILL GREATLY REDUCE THE WORLD’S POPULATION BY 2030. (SEE: PLANDEMIC, $CAMDEMIC, VACCINES, CORONAVIRUS, THE FAREWELL STATE & COVERT-19) [MORE]

ACCORDING TO UNDECEIVER ISHMAEL REED: GENTHANASIA - THE NON-VIOLENT WEEDING OUT OF UNDESIRABLES OR THE SLOW MOTION EXTERMINATION OF NON-WHITE PEOPLE.[MORE]

So Called "Delta Variant" of Covid-19 Surges Across Africa

From [HERE] The more-transmissible Delta variant of the coronavirus is surging across Africa, the continent with the least vaccines and weakest healthcare systems, feeding fears among epidemiologists and political leaders of a public-health disaster that could echo the tragedy that unfolded in India in the spring.

The speed of the takeover of the variant, which was first identified in India and is forcing governments around the globe to tighten restrictions on social and economic activities, has shocked health experts in Africa, a continent that—in part thanks to its younger population—has recorded fewer Covid-19 deaths than other regions. Some are warning that previous infection from another strain of the virus may not protect against Delta, leaving swaths of the population that were believed to be immune once again vulnerable.

In South Africa, families have been driving ailing relatives across state lines to try to secure one of the country’s few remaining intensive-care beds. On a recent June night, every one of the 30 Covid-19 patients in the intensive-care unit of Uganda’s largest hospital died as the oxygen supplies ran out. In Zambia’s capital, Lusaka, doctors say the mortuaries have run out of space.

“We are in the grip of a devastating wave that by all indications seems like it will be worse than those that preceded it,” South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said Sunday in a televised address in which he imposed new lockdown measures. “The rapid spread is extremely serious,” he said.

Africa’s third wave of infection comes at a perilous moment for the continent: Just 1.1% of its 1.3 billion people are fully vaccinated, medical supplies have been depleted, doctors are physically and mentally exhausted and, in some cases, unpaid and hospitals are turning patients away for lack of beds and oxygen.

Governments, struggling to rebound from the region’s worst recession on record, had been reluctant to impose new lockdowns until they saw the speed of the Delta’s expansion.

The reason—and the cause of rising panic—is the spread of the Delta variant that ripped through India in April and May, killing nearly 400,000 people according to the government and more than 1 million according to some epidemiologists. The Delta strain, also known as B.1.617.2, will probably make up 50% of Covid-19 infections in the U.S. by early to mid-July, according to researchers. It has been cited by Anthony Fauci, President Biden’s chief medical adviser, as the greatest threat to U.S. efforts to defeat the virus.

Across Africa, at least 20 countries are experiencing sharp increases in infections that have already surpassed or are projected to top earlier peaks, according to the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Over the past week, Covid-19 infections on the continent jumped by 31%, while the number of deaths rose by 19%, the agency said.

The NOI says COVID-19 Vaccines are the Drug Pushers’ Dream of Profit and Depopulation

From [HERE] Why are Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates pushing vaccines so hard and completely dismissing known therapies or treatments for COVID-19? Minister Farrakhan directly addressed them both in “The Criterion”:

“They’re making money now plotting to give seven billion five hundred million people a vaccination. Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and Melinda, you want to depopulate the earth? What the hell gives you that right? Who are you to sit down with your billions and talk about who can live and who should die?”

Let’s go back a bit to understand the background leading up to the “Warp Speed” production of “vaccines”, when there are dietary regimens, therapies and treatments to prevent and/or dramatically reduce the impact of COVID-19 and viruses like it.

In December of 2017 America dropped the ban on genetic modifications of viruses, which allowed non-military labs to genetically modify viruses, like in China’s Wuhan province laboratory.

• On January 11, 2017, at a Georgetown University forum on pandemic preparedness, Dr. Anthony Fauci predicted the Trump Administration would face a surprise disease outbreak, noting that “risks have never been higher.”

• Also, in January 2017 the Pentagon (US Dept. of Defense) predicted a coronavirus epidemic while America would be unprepared.

• On August 12, 2019, the world was warned to be ready for ethnic specific bioweapons.

• In October of 2019, China surpassed America and became the greatest economy in the world.

• On October 18, 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum (an international think tank of bankers) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201 which “modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic…”

They said that this strangely prophetic event was “not a prediction,” but a lot of people dropped their stock portfolios, including the head of the Senate intelligence committee, Richard Burr. The “scenario” predicted that the pandemic would produce a worldwide recession. And though it was claimed to be a fantasy, CEOs of major corporations started quitting their jobs like never before; they appeared to be anticipating the stock market crash in February of 2020.

Among the seven major recommendations coming out of Event 201 was that governments would take control of social media to “combat mis- and disinformation,” and to “flood media with fast, accurate, and consistent information.” And that is exactly what happened. There has been a TOTAL CENSORING from broadcast, print and social media of anyone speaking or writing against the reckless and unlawful imposition of the experimental vaccines. 

The people are constantly bombarded about the “severity” of the “pandemic”, new variants of the virus and “the need” to take the so-called vaccines. They advised health authorities to employ “trusted community leaders such as faith leaders” to herd the masses to the vaccines.

As far back as 2015 Bill Gates suggested that in an epidemic governments should indemnify drug companies against lawsuits, if officials expect them to test new treatments very quickly.

(https://www.gatesnotes.com/Health/The-Next-Epidemic-Berlin-and-DC-Trip)

He got his wish in February of 2020. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked a 2005 law that empowers him to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines. That protection lasts until 2024. For the next four years, these vaccine manufacturers have no liability for injuries stemming from their product.

In January 2016, Moderna “…entered a global health project framework agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases. 

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has committed up to $20.0 million in grant funding to support our initial project related to the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting as well as the conduct of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine to help prevent … HIV infections. 

Follow-on projects which could bring total potential funding under the framework agreement up to $100 million (including the HIV antibody project) to support the development of additional mRNA-based projects for various infectious diseases.”

(https://www.modernatx.com/ecosystem/strategic-collaborators/foundations-advancing-mrna-science-and-research)

Moderna’s company shares began trading on Nasdaq in December of 2018, though it never produced an HIV vaccine or any other product that had been approved by the FDA or offered on the open market. 

The value of Moderna’s stock was stagnant throughout 2019. After the government provided protection against lawsuits, their stock value skyrocketed by 400% by the end of 2020.

• Moderna Historical Annual Stock Price Data

• Year Year Close Annual % Change

• 2020 104.47 434.10%

• 2019 19.56 28.09%

• 2018 15.27 0.00%

Another company that produced an early “vaccine”, Pfizer, also took advantage of indemnity. They needed it because they had been sued a number of times for faulty drugs. Pfizer, the largest pharmaceutical company in the world, recently reported revenue of $52 billion. operates in over 180 countries with over one-hundred thousand employees. [MORE]

153 Houston Hospital Workers Fired or Quit over COVID Vaccine Requirement

From [HERE] More than 150 workers at a Houston hospital quit or were fired on Tuesday after being suspended for refusing to get vaccinated against the coronavirus.

The Houston Methodist Hospital system suspended 178 unvaccinated employees without pay two weeks ago for missing a June 7 deadline to get jabbed.

Whoever didn’t comply or resign during the suspension period was let go on Tuesday, system spokeswoman Gale Smith told The Post.

“The employees who became compliant during the suspension period returned to work the day after they became compliant,” Smith said.

A group of 117 staff members had sued the hospital in May, claiming the COVID-19 vaccines were “experimental” and required inoculations made workers “guinea pigs.” The lawsuit compared the vaccine requirement to medical experiments inside Nazi Germany concentration camps.

But US District Judge Lynn Hughes tossed out the suit on June 12, condemning the Nazi comparison and saying it was false to label the vaccines as experimental.

The judge made a distinction in her ruling between an employment requirement and a forced inoculation.

“If a worker refuses an assignment, changed office, earlier start time, or other directive, he may be properly fired,” the judge wrote in her ruling.

“Every employment includes limits on the worker’s behavior in exchange for remuneration. That is all part of the bargain.”

The case has been appealed.

The NOI says the US Govt is Suppressing Safe COVID Treatments to Push Deadly "Vaccine." Claims Americans are 22x more likely to die than Cubans and Chinese people are 517x better off than Americans

From [HERE] The U.S. government and mass media are keeping the public blind to possible inexpensive treatments for COVID-19, while pushing vaccines like a drug-pusher promotes cocaine. The vaccine producers are distributing their so-called vaccines under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), based upon their being no other treatments or therapies that can fight COVID-19. 

To keep their authorization and monopoly, the drug companies have gotten the government and mass media to hide known and proven therapies for COVID-19. We will first introduce you to proven treatments, then later go into the hidden agenda behind these so-called vaccines.

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan in his monumental July 4, 2020 presentation called “The Criterion” warned the people not to take these experimental vaccines for COVID-19, especially while there are potential therapies available. He said:

“I asked God to bring down the virus heavily on Florida because 90 miles from Florida our Cuban family, when the plague broke out in Wuhan, they went to Hubei province in Wuhan and with the Chinese they corrected it and drove it out of Wuhan. Don’t we need something that Cuba has? But you have an embargo on Cuba. …”

In a May 13, 2020 Reuters articled entitled “With Castro-era biotech, Cuba seeks to compete in coronavirus treatment race,” it was reported that:

“None of the nearly 3,000 healthcare workers who used interferon nose drops became infected with the novel coronavirus. …. They included more than 500 with high exposure to infected patients, the Chinese researchers said. … The island nation says it has been successful in treating the novel coronavirus at home and in China, and that 80 countries have already expressed an interest in buying its interferon alpha 2b.”

“None of the nearly 3,000 healthcare workers who used interferon nose drops became infected with the novel coronavirus. …. They included more than 500 with high exposure to infected patients, the Chinese researchers said. … The island nation says it has been successful in treating the novel coronavirus at home and in China, and that 80 countries have already expressed an interest in buying its interferon alpha 2b.”

In the meantime, America continues to blockade Cuba, thereby depriving American citizens of proven therapies for COVID-19. So how has America, Cuba, China and other countries fared over the last year fighting this coronavirus, even before there were any so-called vaccines?

Below we have compared the deaths per 100,000 population between the U.S. and eight other so-call Third World countries. When you crunch the numbers, you find that the United States has registered 181 deaths per 100,000. And yet Cuba deaths per 100,000 are only eight. So, people in the U.S. are 22 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than are the Cubans. By this same measurement Chinese people are 517 times better off than Americans. 

This should be eye opening! How is it that COVID-19 broke out in China first, and way before there were any so-called vaccines China had broken the grip of this virus by asking Cuba for help with her interferon alpha 2b. Today China only has 4,636 COVID deaths for its entire population of 1.4 billion, and the U.S. now counts 601,000 deaths for its much smaller population of 330 million. Not only does America have the most racist historical medical malpractice, but it has—by far–THE WORST RECORD OF COVID DEATHS ON PLANET EARTH.

Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad asked readers:

What happened in the six African countries? Johns Hopkins University keeps a running count of mortality rates for 180 countries since the beginning of the COVID-19 “outbreak.” The data below was taken from their May 27, 2021 update.

And here is something else that Dr. Fauci and mainstream media do not want their terrified public to know. There is another cheap, widely used drug that has now been shown to be most effective against COVID-19—Ivermectin. On December 8, 2020 Dr. Pierre Kory testified to the Senate Homeland Security committee on “Focus on Early Treatment of COVID-19” that “Ivermectin is highly safe, widely available, and low cost. Its discovery was awarded the Nobel Prize in medicine, and is already included on the WHO’s ‘World’s List of Essential Medicines.’”

“Nearly all studies are demonstrating the therapeutic potency and safety of ivermectin in preventing transmission and progression of illness in nearly all who take the drug. We now have data from over 20 well-designed clinical studies, ten of them randomized, controlled trials, with every study consistently reporting large magnitude and statistically significant benefits in decreasing transmission rates, shortening recovery times, decreasing hospitalizations, or large reductions in deaths.”

He went on to describe the benefits that were achieved in Peru and Mexico after deploying mass ivermectin treatments between August and October of 2020. These benefits were so compelling that recently Mexico City implemented a similar program, that resulted in an incredible 52–76 percent reduction in hospitalizations.

Judge Says TX Hospital's Requirement Making Employees Take COVID Shot or Get Fired is ‘Not Coercion but a Choice.’ Despite the Lack of FDA Approval Judge says the "Vaccine" is "Not Experimental"

ROBERT HIGGS EXPLAINS, “DIRECTING FEAR IN A SOCIETY IS TANTAMOUNT TO CONTROLLING THAT SOCIETY.” LARKEN ROSE STATES, “ALMOST ALL OPPRESSION VIA PROPAGANDA IS BASED UPON SCARING PEOPLE, AND THEN PRESENTING A FALSE CHOICE WHERE THE PEOPLE CAN CHOOSE EITHER TO DO WHAT YOU WANT THEM TO DO, OR FACE SOME UNKNOWN (OFTEN PURELY FICTIONAL) HORROR.” LYSANDER SPOONER EXPLAINS THAT ALL GOVERNMENTS RULE THROUGH AND CREATE LAWS THROUGH SOME FORM OF “EMERGENCY” OR CONSPIRACY.

From [HERE] and [HERE] A Texas hospital system’s mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy for employees can stand after a federal judge on Saturday dismissed a closely watched lawsuit from workers refusing to get the shot.

Southern District of Texas Judge Lynn Hughes made his decision days after Houston Methodist Hospital suspended 178 workers for not getting vaccinated by a June 7 deadline.

The court’s pre-trial ruling was made without the benefit of receiving testimony or other actual evidence.

The hospital system’s policies were not coercion against staff, Hughes said. They were a choice the hospital system made “to keep staff, patients, and their families safer.”

The 117 suing workers, including plaintiff Jennifer Bridges, a nurse for almost seven years at the hospital system, had their own choices to make, the judge said. Bridges and other plaintiffs had every right to accept or refuse the vaccine. “If she refuses, she will simply need to work somewhere else,” the decision said.

Hughes wrote that employers could impose consequences for noncompliance on all sorts of rules, far beyond vaccination.

“If a worker refuses an assignment, changed office, earlier start time, or other directive, he may be properly fired. Every employment includes limits on the worker’s behavior in exchange for his remuneration. That is all part of the bargain.”

But Jared Woodfill, the lawyer for the suing workers, vowed to appeal the case all the way up to the Supreme Court. “This is just one battle in a larger war to protect the rights of employees … All of my clients continue to be committed to fighting this unjust policy.” [MORE]

The complaint states “None of the currently available experimental vaccines for COVID-19 has received final approval from the FDA. Rather, each one of the COVID-19 experimental vaccines is an unapproved product that has been granted EAU. The FDA refers to the COVID-19 experimental vaccine as “investigational products”, meaning they remain classified as experimental.“ It further explains:

It is undisputed that the vaccine being forced upon Plaintiffs is “unapproved”. Even though the FDA granted emergency use authorization for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines in December 2020, the clinical trials the FDA will rely upon to ultimately decide whether to license these and other COVID-19 experimental vaccines are still underway and are designed to last for approximately two (2) years to collect adequate data to establish if these vaccines are safe and effective enough for the FDA to approve. The abbreviated timelines for the emergency use applications and authorizations means there is much the FDA does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that is allegedly the cause of the COVID disease. Given the uncertainty about the COVID-19 experimental vaccines, the FDA requires that each dose of the experimental vaccine shall have a label that states that the product is an emergency use authorization, that the EAU is explicit that each is “an investigational vaccine not licensed for any indication” and that all “promotional material relating to the Covid-19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously…state that this product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA”.

The complaint also explains that the COVID “vaccine” has caused an extraordinarily high number of reports of illness to be reported in the VAERS system which under normal circumstances would cause it from being pulled off the market. It states;

In 1990, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems (“VAERS”) was established as a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S. licensed vaccines. VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to voluntarily send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is useful in detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine. This way, VAERS can provide CDC and FDA with valuable information that additional work and evaluation is necessary to further assess a possible safety concern.

There were 4,434 death reports and over 12,619 serious injuries reported to the CDC's VAERS database from COVID-19 vaccines through May 10, 2021. By comparison, from July 1, 1997, until December 31, 2013, VAERS received 666 adult death reports.3 The flu vaccines are linked to 20–30 death reports a year, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, and those 20–30 death reports come with considerably more vaccines administered. Arguably, if the experimental vaccine was any other vaccine or drug, it would already have been removed from the market. Usually, a new drug is withdrawn after 50 deaths, which is not typical because the FDA has a strict approval process. The COVID-19 vaccines have been exempted from the approval process, instead being temporarily "authorized" for emergency use.

Thirty-five hundred plus (3,500 +) reports is 70 times the normal threshold for pulling a drug from the market. Although this is raw data, previous VAERS studies have shown that only 1-10% of vaccine-related deaths are reported to VAERS —or less. The COVID vaccines are adding a year's worth of VAERS reports every week. In just four months, more adverse reports were added to the VAERS database than any single vaccine has had cumulatively over the past 31 years. This is clearly a safety signal, further studies need to be done and Plaintiffs should not be forced to participate in these dangerous trials as a condition for employment. [MORE]

[Mostly White] Landlords in NYC Lose Suit: Covid Eviction Ban Remains in Effect for Mostly Non-White Tenants

From [HERE] Citing a 1905 Supreme Court decision regarding smallpox vaccination, a federal judge held that public health eclipses individuals’ challenges to legislative acts, and denied an attempt from New York landlords to block the state’s eviction ban during the Covid-19 pandemic. 

U.S. District Judge Gary Brown consolidated the landlords’ motion for preliminary injunction with the merits of the case, ruling in favor of defendant Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks and dismissing all other defendants — which included county sheriffs and other court officials — from the case. 

At the top of his ruling, Brown pulled an excerpt from Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a Supreme Court ruling from 1905 that held that requiring smallpox vaccination does not violate the due process rights of an individual.

“Whatever may be thought of the expediency of this statute, it cannot be affirmed to be, beyond question, in palpable conflict with the Constitution. Nor, in view of the methods employed to stamp out the disease of smallpox, can anyone confidently assert that the means prescribed by the state to that end has no real or substantial relation to the protection of the public health and the public safety,” reads the ruling, as quoted by Brown. 

In his 29-page order, Brown tossed out the plaintiffs’ allegations that the eviction moratorium is too vague, and that its requirement of landlords to provide tenants with a financial hardship declaration form constituted compelled speech. 

Doesn't the Takings Clause Require Gov to Compensate People for COVID Business Closures and Work Stoppage? [Yes but "Your Rights" Must Yield to Authority in the Cult of Statism] NM Court to Decide

FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS:

Statism - the belief "citizens"' and "states" exist and the memetic thought patterns supporting such beliefs. 2) the religion of oppression and domination coupled with the science of exploitation and sociopathic control. 3) the opiate of the so-called Elites. 4) a philosophy that idealizes majority rule gang force (authority) over individual authenticity (autonomy). 5) servitude over liberty and statutes over humanity. So long as "states"' are viewed and accepted as natural, normal, reality-based and inevitable, they will continue to violently abstract humans into extinction. Statism is mind control; people both unwillingly and willingly surrender their property (labor being one's most inviolable property) to men and women pretending to be "governors,"" "commissioners," and "presidents" etc. because they believe they are "citizens" of a so-called "state" and must pay their proverbial "fair share" to support such abstractions or fictions of law. [MORE]

Tyrannolaw - a peremptory (beyond debate or recall) system of law held to be superior to humanity, such that whenever the two are in conflict, humanity must yield. Typified by too many self-propagating laws, contrived complexity, debatable interpretations, encroachment, abuse, corruption, symbolaeography, and overdeveloped unrelenting and violent enforcement. Tyrannolaw subjugates humanity to unyielding, despotic, blind and arbitrary authority—resulting in constraint, conformity and fear. Tyrannolaw is the by-product from the myth that truth and law came from God. Reflect for a minute and realize that if people can't manage themselves, how can they possibly manage law. Law cannot prevent its abuse.

From [HERE] and [MORE] The New Mexico Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on whether businesses which lost income due to Covid-19 shutdowns can seek compensation from the state under rules governing regulatory takings.

The high court took up a petition for writ of superintending control and emergency request for stay brought by the state involving plaintiffs in 20 lawsuits brought across the state. The plaintiffs claim business closures and restrictions brought under public health emergency orders constituted regulatory takings and thus the businesses are entitled to compensation under New Mexico’s Public Health Emergency Response Act.

At the heart of the dispute is the concept of a legal “taking.” Under the U.S. Constitution, a regulatory taking occurs when a government regulation limits the uses of private property to such a degree that the owners are deprived of the use or value of their property.

Although shelter in place orders may be necessary they are nevertheless Government seizures of people’s livelihoods and businesses that have forced indefinite closures and widespread layoffs. The government’s actions may be described as “uncompensated takings” that violate the Takings Clause of the 5th Amendment. That is, the government is legally obligated to properly compensate citizens for their tangible losses.

Because the orders would be characterized to effect an alleged regulatory (rather than physical) taking, a fact-intensive, multi-factor analysis applies. The Orders constitute a regulatory taking implemented for a recognized public purpose, and therefore the failure to pay just compensation contravenes the Takings Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978); Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992); Horne v. Dep't of Agric., 576 U.S. 350, 135 S. Ct. 2419, 2426 (2015) (“Nothing in the text or history of the Takings Clause, or our precedents, suggests that the rule is any different when it comes to appropriation of personal property. The Government has a categorical duty to pay just compensation when it takes your car, just as when it takes your home.”). [MORE]

Chief Justice Michael Vigil Sr., Justices Barbara Vigil, Shannon Bacon, David Thomson, and retired Court of Appeals Judge Michael Bustamante heard initial statements by attorney Nicholas Sydow, representing the state, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham and state Secretary of Health Kathyleen Kunkel.

The state argued closures mandated by public health orders do not constitute takings because they are by nature temporary and because property cannot be used in a manner that endangers public health and safety. “It’s not taking away property rights,” Sydow argued, “it’s ensuring that the property will not be used in a way that endangers the public health and safety.”

Further, Sydow said the very nature of the adaptive health orders, which expire in a matter of weeks and which in New Mexico have changed to reflect the best information about the spread and treatment of Covid-19, mean they are not arbitrary or capricious. He said the rules governing the operation of restaurants, close-contact businesses such as salons and others have altered as scientific understanding of how and when people are likely to spread Covid-19 has evolved.

When questioned by the justices, Sydow asserted if there is compensation to be offered to business owners, it should be determined by the Legislature, not by the courts, and offered to all businesses affected by the pandemic.

The plaintiffs’ attorney A. Blair Dunn of Western Agriculture, Resource and Business Advocates argued the closures did constitute a taking because the right to have property — and not have it taken by the government — is a fundamental liberty under the Bill of Rights. To interfere in the operation of private businesses without offering compensation, he argued, violates that liberty.

Asked by Senior Justice Barbara Vigil whether the closures might be covered under the police powers exception to regulatory takings — which says takings prompted by a danger to public health or safety aren’t entitled to compensation — Dunn argued that should be decided on a case-by-case basis in state courts rather than decided broadly in a single hearing. Different business models, he argued, might or might not offer different risks to the public.

“There isn’t some blanket, blank-check limitless exception to the use of police powers,” Dunn argued, “that removes this action by the government from any sort of analysis at the district court level.”

On rebuttal, Sydow brought the focus back to the matter of state law. “This court isn’t being asked to entertain a collective motion for summary judgment [against the individual lawsuits], but to determine as a matter of law that the public health orders cannot support takings claims.”

The justices will issue a ruling soon.

Was Being Infected w/Poisons an "[Un]natural Cause" of Hank Aaron's Death? Legend Gone After Getting COVID Vaccination @ Event to Propagandize the Safety of the Toxin w/COINTELBRO Andrew Young

ABOUT THE TUSKEGEE EXPERIMENT SNAG [SNITCH ASS NEGRO AIDING GOVERNMENTS] ANDREW YOUNG STATED “WE HAVE TO GET OVER THAT.” ABOUT FELLOW SNAG ERNEST WITHERS, A BLACK PHOTOGRAPHER WHO WAS AN UNDERCOVER FBI snitch who gave extensive information on MLK and other BLACK activists, their movements, their conversations, endangering their lives, HE SAID “I don’t think Dr. King would have minded him making a little money on the side” [MORE] and "We have no problem with Ernest acting as an agent of the Government because it was OUR Government and we were acting within the law" [MORE] THIS COIN-OPERATED CORPSE ALSO APPEARED IN AND ENDORSED THE NEW DOCUMENTARY MLK/FBI WHICH PARROTS J EDGAR HOOVER’S DEROGATORY IMAGE OF Martin Luther King TO DEMEAN HIM AND DEGRADE BLACK SELF-RESPECT.

From [HERE] and [HERE] Baseball Hall of Famer Hank Aaron, former U.N. Ambassador and civil rights leader Andrew Young and former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Louis Sullivan got vaccinated against COVID-19 in Georgia on January 4, 2021.

Within about two weeks Aaron was dead. Hank Aaron died of natural causes, according to the Fulton County Medical Examiner’s office today. No other details were provided.

Morehouse School of Medicine issued a statement, saying his death was not related to the vaccine.

“Baseball legend, businessman and philanthropist Henry “Hank” Aaron was a strong supporter of Morehouse School of Medicine. Our clinical team was honored to administer the Moderna Covid19 vaccine to Mr. Aaron and wife Billye Suber Aaron — along with more than 20 civil and human rights leaders — on Jan. 5, 2021. Each recipient was over the age of 75 and therefore part of Class 1A.”

“Mr. Aaron was a public health advocate and worked with us to help bridge the health equity gap in Atlanta and around the world. His passing was not related to the vaccine, nor did he experience any side effects from the immunization. He passed away peacefully in his sleep.” [MORE]

According to the Braves, he died peacefully in his sleep. [MORE] and [MORE]

Getting vaccinated "makes me feel wonderful," Aaron told The Associated Press. "I don't have any qualms about it at all, you know. I feel quite proud of myself for doing something like this. ... It's just a small thing that can help zillions of people in this country.''

Rolling up their sleeves to take the first of two doses, these octogenarians, their spouses and several other civil rights leaders who received the shots in a brand-new health clinic at the Morehouse School of Medicine acknowledged the legacy of mistrust that many African Americans have toward medical research, stemming from the infamous Tuskegee experiment in which U.S. health workers left syphilis untreated in Black men without their consent, making them suffer needlessly.

"I've been taking vaccines now for 88 years and I haven't been sick,'' Young said. "The truth of it is, Black folk have been living by shots, and just because they did something crazy and murderous and evil back in 1931, we're still thinking about that. We've got to get over that.''

Young told KSDK in Atlanta that Aaron "never had any reaction" to the shot before his death. "I talked to the fella who was his driver," Young told KSDK ... "And I said, 'Was Hank feeling any discomfort or any problem over the last few days?' And he said, 'No.'" [MORE] [Young is a broken down token, watch your front - BW]

It’s only right that if authorities use Hank Aaron to “propagendize” the safety of the COVID vaccine then authorities should be completely transparent about the precise, detailed cause of his death. Unverifiable, conclusive statements that Aaron’s vaccination and death are coincidence are insufficient. In fact, it is suspicious that authorities are so dogmatically dismissive and uncurious of whether there was any actual connection.

THEY ARE NOT THE SAME PEOPLE. (NOTE ALSO THAT TUSKEEGEE IS MISSPELLED). IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER THE BROTHER ABOVE SURVIVED HIS COVID INJECTION. NEVERTHELESS, BOTH EVENTS APPARENTLY PROPAGANDIZED “GETTING OVER TUSKEGEE.” AS EXPLAINED, SLEEPING TOM ANDREW YOUNG SAID IT IS TIME FOR BLACK PEOPLE TO PUT THE TUSKEGEE EXPERIMENT BEHIND US and get on THE COVID EXPERIMENT. more photos HERE.

According to FUNKTIONARY :

vaccine - toxin. Vaccines are pus -- decaying animal tissue and other foreign/toxic matter (allergens/antigens). Most vaccine, contain the mercury-based preservative and known neurotoxin thimerosal. Thimerosal (mercury acetate) in vaccines serve two purposes. First, it's a preservative, and second, it's an adjuvant, i.e., it irritates the immune system to catalyze it into creating 'search-and-destroy' antibodies to attack the injected dead or inactive viruses or bacteria in the vaccine. The body cannot excrete mercury, it accumulates and impairs brain development, sometimes even resulting in autism. (See: Squalene & Gull War Syndrome)

vaccinated - infected with poisons. (See: Antibiotics)

vaccination - mandatory infection--typically administered by agents of Corporate State in their public schools of indoctrination camps. How can unvaccinated children endanger other children who are immunized?