Judge Napolitano: Trump-Bush Claims he can Declare War on Any Person or Group and Summarily Kill them. Wrong. Under the Constitution, only Congress can Declare War

From [HERE] The President of the United States did not take the Constitution seriously when he ordered the murders of 11 people who were riding in a speedboat in the Caribbean Sea on Sept. 1 around 1,300 miles from the U.S.

Afterward he said he did so because he believed that they were members of a “narco-terrorist gang” and were delivering illegal drugs to America. He also did so, he said, as a “message” to other drug dealers who should fear a similar fate.

The boat had no ability to reach the U.S. According to the former head of drug interdiction for the Department of Justice, this so-called boat gang is not known for trafficking in illegal drugs. The crimes that the president said these folks committed did not occur in the U.S., and if they had, do not permit the imposition of the death penalty.

He offered no evidence to support his claims and didn’t even suggest that the riders in the boat posed a threat to the American military personnel who killed them. He couldn’t say if anyone in the boat was an American.

When he was asked for the legal authority for these killings, President Donald Trump replied that these folks were waging war on the U.S., and, because he is the president of the United States, he can do as he wishes to them.

These are constitutionally ignorant, morally repugnant, profoundly erroneous responses from a person who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution.

Here is the backstory. [MORE]

UN experts say Murderous US strike on vessel violated Right to Life

United Nations human rights experts said Tuesday that a US strike on a vessel alleged to be operated by “narco-terrorists” violated the right to life. The statement follows the deadly incident in which two civilian boats were attacked on the high seas.

The experts said the vessel strikes were conducted without sufficient evidence that loss of life was necessary, or that less lethal means had been attempted. They warned that the action may constitute extrajudicial killing under international human rights law.

They said the attacks followed a classified order signed by the US President in August 2025 authorising military force in foreign territory or international waters against Latin American drug cartels designated by Washington as terrorist organisations.

The UN experts stressed that under international law, “the use of potentially lethal force is only permitted in personal self-defence or defence of others against an imminent threat to life.” They noted there was “no evidence” of an armed attack that would justify national self-defence and stressed that the law of the sea requires a law-enforcement rather than a military approach. The experts urged the US to conduct a full, independent investigation into the killings.

The US justified the strikes by referring to the vessels’ alleged role in narcotics trafficking. President Donald Trump said on social media that US forces conducted a “SECOND Kinetic Strike against positively identified, extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels and narcoterrorists” in international waters, killing three men he described as terrorists. He warned, “If you are transporting drugs that can kill Americans, we are hunting you.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X that the vessel was operated by a designated narco-terrorist organization and warned that similar actions could follow. [MORE]

Emails Show Fauci Told Colleagues to Delete COVID-Related Communications

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) called on Dr. Anthony Fauci to testify before the U.S. Congress after Paul released several emails from 2020 that show Fauci instructing colleagues to delete messages after reading them.

The email directives, which may violate federal law, contradict Fauci’s congressional testimony last year, when he repeatedly denied deleting official records or engaging in “attempts to obstruct the Freedom of Information Act and the release of public documents.”

Paul published the emails on Wednesday in a series of X posts.

He also posted a copy of a letter he sent to Fauci on Tuesday, asking Fauci to turn over documents and other records and to state his availability to testify before Congress this year.

The emails show that Fauci, who directed the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from 1984 to 2022, asked colleagues on at least two occasions to delete messages, a possible violation of federal records laws.

The emails also disclose Fauci’s discussions with key public health figures about how to “get ahead of the science and the narrative” during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. The emails exchanged ideas on how to promote the “zoonotic” — or natural origin — theory of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. [MORE]

Psyopsy: Like the Failed Re-Creation of Kamala Harris, Massa Media Attempts to Retroactively Impose Icon Status on Charlie Kirk, an Unfamous Person, Unknown Outside of MAGA w/Few Known Accomplishments

RIP: The Resume of Charles James Kirk (October 14, 1993 – September 10, 2025)

FUNKTIONARY explains:

public opinion – a contrived notion ostensibly of what “people” think other “people” are thinking without really thinking. 2) manufactured consent by the agents and dupes of Corporate State media. Public opinion is manufactured in this society to defend the spin—i.e. the political position of those in power. Are you contemptuous of the contrived, hyped, manipulated, orchestrated and outright fallacious centralized media memetics as portrayed to the credulous consumer through façade, illusion and collusion? Survey says: “You can live without public opinion.” (See: MEDIA, Psyopsy, Metaprogram, Propaganda, Public Relations, Culture, Primary Program, Reversibility Thinking, Paradigm, Brand, Reality-Boxes, FRAMES, Predictive Programming, Conditioning, Indoctrination, Beliefs & Semantic Reality)

psyopsy – performing an analysis of what caused one who is mentally dead and culturally comatose to reach such a state or fate. Psyopsies can be performed only on the living dead. Those who are living another’s script (“reality”) are candidates.

Coin-Operated Corpse Bernie Sanders Takes a Break from Pretending that Deadly COVID Shots are "Vaccines" to Acknowledge the IsrAlien Genocide, 1 Year After the Fact

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) said Wednesday that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza — becoming one of the highest-profile elected U.S. officials to do so and marking the first time he has used the term to describe Israel’s nearly two-year military campaign in the enclave, which has come under growing international criticism.

In an op-ed published on his website, Sanders wrote: “The intent is clear. The conclusion is inescapable: Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.”

While acknowledging Israel’s right to defend itself following Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attack, Sanders said that “over the last two years, Israel has not simply defended itself against Hamas” but has “waged an all-out war against the entire Palestinian people.”

His statement comes a day after a United Nations commission said Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Sanders wrote that he agreed with the finding, in a change of course after he had refrained from labeling Israel’s conduct “genocide,” including during a July interview with CNN when he called it a “legal term” and said it was more important to end the “horror” in Gaza than to define it. [MORE]

Political Silence: Trump and Media QUIET after a Heterosexual, White Man Murdered 3 White Cops in an All White PA Town [NonWhites Function as a Negative Reference Group Vital to the Racist Self-Image]

Racists are obsessed with crime statistics in Black communities. According to the Sentencing Project, “Researchers have shown that crime reporting exaggerates crime rates and exhibits both quantitative and qualitative racial biases. This includes a tendency to exaggerate rates of black offending and white victimization and to depict black suspects in a less favorable light than whites.“Under the pretense of being concerned about the well-being of Black people, MASSA media in urban areas in particular, sensationalize crime with overblown coverage and hyper alertness. To be explicitly clear, it is a guise because we live in a system of racism/white supremacy in which most white people (or the most powerful white people) seek to dominate or control non-white people with master-servant relations in all areas of people activity and who project and maintain unequal power and conditions in a white over Black system. Racists, either self-described as liberal or conservative, have no intention of changing this arrangement because they are the permanent enemy of non-white people. RACIST liberals and conservatives spare no cost when it comes to placing Black people in greater confinement.

NOT A FALSE FLAG. From [HERE] Detectives arrived at the home of Matthew Ruth Wednesday afternoon, searching for him in connection to a stalking case — a visit authorities say took place only a couple of hours before he ambushed and killed three police officers.

Ruth, who was killed in return fire by police, lived at a home on Hall Drive in Penn Township, York County, according to court documents. Neighbors say he lived there with his parents.

After communicating with Ruth's family and learning that Ruth wasn't at the home, police said the detectives then went to the residence of his ex-girlfriend, who had identified Ruth as the man spotted the evening prior on a trail camera peering into her mother's home in North Codorus Township with an AR-15 slung across his body.

That residence is where the ambush occurred on Wednesday, shortly after 2 p.m.

"The door was open and upon immediately opening the door, the actor repeatedly fired at the officers with multiple rounds from an AR-15 style rifle with the suppressor," said York County District Attorney Tim Barker during a Thursday news conference.

Three Northern York County Regional Police Department detectives, identified as Det. Sgt. Cody Becker, Det. Mark Baker and Det. Isaiah Emenheiser, were fatally shot. Another detective with the same department was seriously injured, as was a sheriff's deputy assisting with the arrest.

In the hours following the shooting, police swarmed the neighborhood where Ruth lived, startling neighbors as investigators collected evidence at the home.

One neighbor said he was surprised to see Ruth as the suspected gunman in the police killings, but not that he'd been involved in a crime.

IF THESE MURDERS OF POLICE OFFICERS INVOLVED ANYONE BLACK OR A NON-WHITE MIGRANT OR TRANS,‘ MEDIA COVERAGE AND NEUROPEON COMMENTARY WOULD BE OMNIPRESENT & NON-STOP

Dr. Amos Wilson asks and then answers, ‘ What does White America have to gain from choosing to perceive Black males as stereotypically criminal? By socio-psychologically inducing Black males into criminality. . . .?

Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their selfcongratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control. White America's self-appreciation is enhanced as it insatiably feeds on overblown reports about Black criminality while denying its own incomparable criminal record, and its own racist-imperialist incubation and giving birth to the very same criminal forces which now threaten to destroy it.

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image. The Black criminal is used to support the White American community's self-serving, self-justifying judgments of itself. White America's preoccupation with Black criminality betrays its own need for reassurance; betrays its own basic insecurity regarding its projected moral purity. Consequently, the higher the incidence of reported Black criminality, the more exceptionally righteous White America feels itself to be. The more righteous it feels itself to be the more intensely and guiltlessly it promulgates and justifies its domination and exploitation of African peoples at home and abroad. The alleged innate criminality of Black America, particularly of Black males, and their actual high level of self-destructive criminality remain incontrovertible psycho-political necessities if the White American-Eurocentric culture of inequality is to be self-justifiably continued without end. In the context of this collective necessity, more Blacks are arrested, charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced to longer prison terms for allegedly committing the same type of crimes as Whites. Many are arrested, charged, tried, convicted and sentenced to long prison terms merely for committing the crime of being Black in America.

The White American community's need to stereotypically perceive Blacks as innately criminal, coupled with its socioeco­nomic power to control the availability of resources and their renumerative allocation, confers on it the power of creating or controlling circumstances conducive to the satisfaction of its hegemonic requirements. Under these circumstances, the need of the collective White ego to project an image of endemic Black criminality in order to maintain its power status quo, is tanta­mount to the creation of Black criminality, particularly of the self-destructive kind. [MORE]

Despite the Supreme Court’s Prohibition on Executing Intellectually Disabled People, Florida Authorities are Scheduled to Murder Victor Jones in 12 Days (a Black Man who Killed a White Couple)

From [HERE] Gov. Ron DeSantis, the Republican governor of Florida has signed more death warrants this year than any of his predecessors.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2002 deci­sion in Atkins v. Virginia estab­lished that the Eighth Amendment pro­hibits exe­cut­ing peo­ple with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. The Court lat­er clar­i­fied that rigid IQ cut­offs were not per­mis­si­ble and also required states to con­sid­er mean­ing­ful evi­dence of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty, includ­ing sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly valid expert tes­ti­mo­ny and adap­tive func­tion­ing deficits. Despite this unequiv­o­cal con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­tec­tion, two death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers — David Pittman and Victor Jones—face exe­cu­tion this month in Florida. Attorneys for both men argue they are peo­ple with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties that should be exempt from exe­cu­tion and pro­tect­ed under Atkins

Pittman was murdered last night by government authorities.

Much like Mr. Pittman, Victor Jones, who was sen­tenced to death in 1993 for the 1990 mur­ders of his two employ­ers, has been denied relief in low­er courts regard­ing his intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty claim and is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed on September 30, 2025. At tri­al, the court found three aggra­vat­ing fac­tors and reject­ed every mit­i­gat­ing fac­tor pre­sent­ed by defense coun­sel. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s rul­ing in Atkins, Mr. Jones was able to secure an evi­den­tiary hear­ing to demon­strate he met the stan­dards out­lined in that case. The State argued that because Mr. Jones’ IQ was test­ed and found to score above the hard­line thresh­old of 70, he did not qual­i­fy for relief, and the cir­cuit court agreed. After the state’s rul­ing in Hall, Mr. Jones again peti­tioned the courts for relief, but they sum­mar­i­ly denied his claims based on pri­or tes­ti­mo­ny from the Atkins hear­ing, despite its reliance on out­dat­ed medical science. 

During post-con­vic­tion pro­ceed­ings, Mr. Jones’ sis­ter and cousin described in detail the pain and abuse they all suf­fered at the hands of Laura Long, an aunt who raised them.” Both Mr. Jones’ sis­ter and cousin described beat­ings in which Mr. Jones was made to first undress, not­ing that Ms. Long would call him ​“slow” and ​“stu­pid,” and beat him for get­ting bad grades. They also tes­ti­fied that Ms. Long’s son, who was ten years old­er than Mr. Jones, would beat them as well. This infor­ma­tion was nev­er pre­sent­ed to a jury. 

His tri­al jury also nev­er learned that as a young teenag­er, Mr. Jones was con­fined to Okeechobee School for Boys on four sep­a­rate occa­sions between 1975 and 1978. While at Okeechobee, Mr. Jones suf­fered neglect, phys­i­cal and sex­u­al abuse by state employ­ees, and wit­nessed bru­tal­i­ty against his peers. Mr. Jones was beat­en sev­er­al times with thick leather straps, wit­nessed the gang-rape of his peers, and to avoid sex­u­al vio­lence, he had to fight off oth­er boys, which land­ed him in soli­tary con­fine­ment. As a result of the abuse he wit­nessed and expe­ri­enced, Mr. Jones devel­oped Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), sui­ci­dal ideations, and a drug depen­den­cy. Though Mr. Jones told oth­ers, includ­ing author­i­ty fig­ures and adults about Okeechobee, no one believed him — includ­ing his pros­e­cut­ing attor­ney. Throughout his tri­al and appel­late pro­ceed­ings, the state of Florida has con­sis­tent­ly argued that evi­dence of Mr. Jones’ abuse and the men­tal health effects of that abuse was not cred­i­ble or believ­able. Without hear­ing the evi­dence of Okeechobee and his child­hood abuse, his jury returned two ver­dicts for death. Mr. Jones’ cur­rent coun­sel con­tends that had the tri­al jury heard this evi­dence it would not have sen­tenced him to death. 

Gov. DeSantis signed Mr. Jones’ exe­cu­tion war­rant less than eight months after sign­ing a bill that sets aside $20mil­lion to com­pen­sate indi­vid­u­als who were sent to Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys and Okeechobee between 1940 and 1975 who suf­fered from men­tal, phys­i­cal, or sex­u­al abuse at the hands of state-employed offi­cials. By sign­ing this leg­is­la­tion, Gov. DeSantis acknowl­edged the wrong­do­ing of the state and trau­mat­ic effects of both Dozier and Okeechobee. An inves­ti­ga­tion by The Marshall Project found that at least 34 for­mer res­i­dents of Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys were even­tu­al­ly sen­tenced to death in Florida. One of these indi­vid­u­als, Michael Bell, was exe­cut­ed in May 2025, despite fed­er­al courts nev­er hear­ing his claims. 

In January 2025, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody’s office for­mal­ly rec­og­nized in a let­ter to Mr. Jones that he is a mem­ber of the class of boys who were abused at Okeechobee. The let­ter states in part, ​“Please know that we are sor­ry to hear about the cir­cum­stances that prompt­ed you to apply for com­pen­sa­tion,” which was even­tu­al­ly sent to his account in prison. Mr. Jones’ coun­sel argues that the let­ter from AG Moody’s office should pre­clude the state from con­tin­u­ing to pro­mote the the­o­ry that his claims of abuse are not cred­i­ble. Noting the lim­it­ed nature of the aggra­vat­ing fac­tors found at tri­al, attor­neys for Mr. Jones argue his case requires relief because a rea­son­able prob­a­bil­i­ty exists that in con­junc­tion with new evi­dence of his men­tal health issues and low IQ, the let­ter from January 2025, would lead a jury to sen­tence him to life impris­on­ment. Mr. Jones’ final war­rant-relat­ed appeals remain pend­ing in the Florida Supreme Court. 

Autopsy Shows that the Lethal Injection Given to Byron Black by Tennessee Authorities Causes Pul­monary Ede­ma While Awake, Leading to Great Pain and a Feeling of Suf­fo­ca­tion like Water Boarding

From [HERE] Byron Black was exe­cut­ed in Tennessee by lethal injec­tion on August 5, 2025. During his exe­cu­tion, Mr. Black unex­pect­ed­ly and repeat­ed­ly groaned over the course of sev­er­al min­utes and audi­bly told his spir­i­tu­al advi­sor that he was in pain. An autop­sy released September 10, 2025, pro­vides some expla­na­tion. It found evi­dence of ​“pul­monary con­ges­tion and ede­ma”– defined as an abnor­mal buildup of flu­id in the lungs which can pro­duce sen­sa­tions of ​“doom, pan­ic, drown­ing, and asphyx­i­a­tion” accord­ing to Dr. Mark Edgar, a pathol­o­gist and autop­sy direc­tor at the Mayo Clinic in Florida until his death ear­li­er this year. 

“It’s hurt­ing so bad.” 

MR. BYRON BLACK, FIVE MIN­UTES INTO HIS EXE­CU­TION WITH PEN­TO­BAR­BI­TAL ON AUGUST 5, 2025

Mr. Black’s suf­fer­ing was not unprece­dent­ed. In 2016, Dr. Edgar and Dr. Joel Zivot, then both at the Mayo Clinic, began exam­in­ing autop­sy reports of exe­cut­ed pris­on­ers and noticed that many of the pris­on­ers’ lungs were twice as heavy as they should have been. After gath­er­ing more records, they found pul­monary ede­ma in approx­i­mate­ly three-quar­ters of the peo­ple who had been exe­cut­ed. Their work led to a 2020 National Public Radio analy­sis of more than 200 autop­sies of death-row pris­on­ers exe­cut­ed using lethal injec­tion. That study found that 84% showed evi­dence of pul­monary ede­ma, a con­di­tion in which a person’s lungs fill with flu­id, cre­at­ing the feel­ing of suf­fo­ca­tion or drown­ing that some experts have likened to water­board­ing. Their find­ings were con­sis­tent irre­spec­tive of the state that car­ried out the exe­cu­tion or the drug pro­to­col employed. Autopsy results showed the pres­ence of pul­monary ede­ma in lethal injec­tions involv­ing sodi­um thiopen­tal, pen­to­bar­bi­tal, mida­zo­lam, and etomidate. 

Prior to Mr. Black’s exe­cu­tion, his attor­neys flagged that a sin­gle-drug pen­to­bar­bi­tal exe­cu­tion raised the risk that he would suf­fer from pul­monary ede­ma in vio­la­tion of the Eighth Amendment pro­hi­bi­tion on cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment. But the state’s expert tes­ti­fied in hear­ings pri­or to his exe­cu­tion that Mr. Black would lose con­scious­ness under the pen­to­bar­bi­tal quick­ly — with­in 20 sec­onds. Witnesses to Mr. Black’s exe­cu­tion not­ed that he was still awake and a groan­ing in appar­ent pain five min­utes after the start of the exe­cu­tion, say­ing ​“It’s hurt­ing so bad.” 

Even with the release of Mr. Black’s autop­sy, his attor­neys are still seek­ing addi­tion­al infor­ma­tion. Speaking to the Nashville Banner about ques­tions still unan­swered by the autop­sy, attor­neys for Mr. Black not­ed that the report ​“fails to doc­u­ment the con­di­tion of the veins … [and] to doc­u­ment the EKG results.” His attor­neys are also con­cerned about the admin­is­tra­tion of the pen­to­bar­bi­tal, includ­ing whether prison staff were able to locate a vein, or if they inject­ed the drug into his mus­cle, some­thing that would have cre­at­ed a wound at the injec­tion site. Mr. Black’s team has filed free­dom of infor­ma­tion act requests of the Tennessee Department of Corrections which they expect to be answered by December. 

Crump Demands Authorities to Release the Public's Surveillance Video of the Delta State Hanging Incident to Trey Reed's Family

From [HERE] Attorney Ben Crump is demanding that all video footage pertaining to the Delta State incident be shown to family.

On Monday, the body of Demartravion “Trey” Reed, 21, a Black student at Delta State, was found hanging from a tree on the university’s campus.

At a Wednesday press conference, authorities said there is footage of the incident.

“There are videos,” said Pike Peeler, Delta State’s Director of Public Safety, at a press conference on Wednesday. “They are in the hands of the investigative team.”

In a press release, Ben Crump, who has been retained by Reed’s family, said that all video footage in the investigation of Reed’s death should be shown to his family.

In an official statement from the Bolivar County Coroner’s Office, which was released late Monday evening, Coroner Randolph Seals said that based on their preliminary examination, Reed was not suffering from any lacerations, contusions, compound fractures, broken bones, or injuries consistent with assault.

Seals also stated that, at this time, there is no evidence to suggest Reed had been physically attacked before his death.

However, Crump says that Reed’s family has raised concerns after receiving what he says are conflicting accounts and incomplete information about the circumstances of his death.

Crump says he, the family, and their civil rights partners will also commission a separate, independent autopsy. This, he says, “to verify the findings of the state medical examiner and ensure no question goes unanswered.”

Preliminary results of Reed’s autopsy should be available within the next 24 hours, Director Peeler said during the Wednesday press conference at Delta State.

NAACP alleges state withheld millions that could have helped Jackson’s water system

The NAACP sued Mississippi last week, alleging that state officials withheld millions of federal dollars while knowing the City of Jackson’s water system was on the edge of failure.  

A 38-page lawsuit contends that Mississippi “knowingly and intentionally” created policies that stopped Jackson from receiving millions of dollars from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds in May 2021.

The lawsuit, which names the State Treasurer, the head of the Department of Environmental Quality, and the Executive Director of the Department of Finance and Administration, claims state leaders denied the citizens of Jackson equal protection under the law in violation of the 14th Amendment.

With 122,000 black residents, the lawsuit claims the unequal access to funding amounted to race-based discrimination.

“With discriminatory purpose, the state of Mississippi enacted facially discriminated against the City of Jackson by requiring that funds awarded to Jackson and only Jackson were to be held by the Mississippi Treasury in a Capital City Water/ Sewer Projects Fund. S.B. 2822 provided no clear guidance as to what Jackson would have to do to receive those monies. No other municipality was singled out in this way or had its ARPA award withheld,” the lawsuit reads. [MORE]

Mississippi police await autopsy results for Black student found hanged at Delta State University

Mississippi police on Wednesday awaited autopsy results for a Black student found hanging from a tree at Delta State University, in a case that has ignited strong emotions in a state with a history of racist violence.

The 21-year-old student was found near the campus pickleball courts early Monday. While police have said they saw no evidence of foul play, his family is demanding answers and has hired prominent civil rights attorney Ben Crump.

Campus police Chief Michael Peeler released little new information about the investigation at a news conference, calling the death an "isolated incident" and insisting there were no active threats to students and faculty.

The chief state medical examiner was conducting an autopsy Wednesday, and Peeler said preliminary findings should be released in a day or two.

Peeler said the evidence includes video footage, but he would not say what it shows and where it came from, citing the ongoing investigation. [MORE]

Attorney Aaron Siri Told Senate Puppeticians that a Large Study Found Vaccinated Kids were Far More Likely to Develop Chronic Disease than Unvaccinated Kids, But Researchers Fear Releasing It

In a U.S. Senate hearing today, attorney Aaron Siri revealed the results of a large study that found vaccinated children were far more likely to develop chronic disease than unvaccinated kids.

The study never underwent peer review and was never published, because the authors — staunch vaccine supporters — told Siri they were concerned about losing their jobs or reputations because their findings contradicted the official public health narrative and vaccine policy.

Siri’s testimony, delivered during Tuesday’s Senate hearing, “How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines,” addressed the study’s origins, findings and suppression.

The study involved over 18,000 children enrolled in Henry Ford Health system’s insurance plan in Michigan.

“The results are astonishing,” Siri told The Defender. “For example, vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease (a group of allergic conditions), 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorder.”

These findings were statistically significant — even when accounting for gender, race, birthweight, premature birth, and respiratory distress or trauma at birth.

But rather than publishing the results, the study authors and their bosses at Henry Ford Health refused to make them public — even though the lead author previously assured Siri and Del Bigtree he would publish the results, whatever the findings. [MORE]

Trump-Bush Stopped Celebrating the Life of Charlie Kirk Long Enough to Murder 3 More People in Venezuela; Claimed w/o Proof They Were Running Drugs Out of Boat Drifting at Sea, Posed No Threat to US

From [HERE] The US military on Monday bombed a boat near Venezuela and killed three people, according to a statement released by President Trump on Truth Social.

President Trump claimed without providing evidence that the boat was carrying drugs and that the three people who were killed were “narcoterrorists.” He made similar claims about the first US military strike on a boat near Venezuela that occurred on September 2, which he said killed 11 “narcoterrorists.”

The president also posted a video that purported to show the Monday strike. It showed what appeared to be a boat that was drifting at sea, followed by an explosion.

“This morning, on my Orders, US Military Forces conducted a SECOND Kinetic Strike against positively identified, extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels and narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility,” Trump said. “The Strike occurred while these confirmed narcoterrorists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics (A DEADLY WEAPON POISONING AMERICANS!) headed to the US.”

The president also signaled that more US strikes on boats in the region were coming. “BE WARNED — IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!” he wrote.

The second US bombing in the region came after the Venezuelan government said that personnel from a US warship boarded a Venezuelan tuna boat that was in Venezuelan waters. Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil said 18 armed US troops were on the vessel for 18 hours, a claim that hasn’t been confirmed by the US military.

“Those who give the order to carry out such provocations are seeking an incident that would justify a military escalation in the Caribbean,” Gil said.

While Trump and other US officials claim the military action and pressure on Venezuela’s government is about drug trafficking and a response to overdose deaths in the US, fentanyl doesn’t come from or through Venezuela, and the majority of the cocaine that is transported to the US comes through the Pacific, not the Caribbean. Gil said that the real purpose of the US operations was for the US to “persist in their failed policy” of regime change in Venezuela.

The Venezuela policy is being largely driven by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has long pushed for regime change in Venezuela. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Monday called out Rubio in response to the US boarding the tuna boat, calling him a “lord of death and war.”

Florida Court Strikes Down Law that Prohibited Law Abiding People from Carrying Guns in Public for Self-Defense, "the right to bear arms in public necessarily includes the right to do so openly"

Florida is one of just four states that generally prohibit people from openly carrying firearms in public. That law, a Florida appeals court ruled on Wednesday, is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.

"The Constitution protects the right to carry arms openly for self-defense," Judge Stephanie Ray writes in a unanimous opinion from the First District Court of Appeal. "Florida's Open Carry Ban cannot be reconciled with that guarantee."

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier welcomed the decision. "Florida's 1st District Court of Appeals just ruled that Florida's open carry ban is no longer constitutionally enforceable statewide," he wrote on X. "Our office fully supports the Court's decision. This is a big win for the Second Amendment rights of Floridians."

The case, McDaniels v. Florida, involves an activist who sought to test Florida's ban by inviting his own arrest. In July 2022, Ray notes, Stanley Victor McDaniels "stood at a major intersection in downtown Pensacola," holding a copy of the U.S. Constitution and waving at passing cars. He "had a loaded handgun tucked inside his pants using an inside-the-waistband holster. The holstered firearm was visible to anyone who passed by, but McDaniels was not threatening anyone. He had also set up a camera on a tripod to record his activity."

When police questioned him, McDaniels explained that he planned a constitutional challenge to Section 790.053 of the Florida Statutes. That provision, enacted in 1987, says "it is unlawful for any person to openly carry on or about his or her person any firearm." Violating the prohibition is a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine.

Trump Claims to Support Gun Rights but Most of the Arrests in DC by His Fed Cops Were of Black Men for Mere Gun Possession [not gun violence]; No Different than the White Liberals He Whines About

On President Donald Trump’s orders, thousands of local police, federal agents and camouflage-clad troops have fanned out across the nation’s capital every night for the past month. The surge sprawled across D.C., from its poorest pockets to its busiest commercial corridors and marbled monuments.

The White House has touted the success of the operation, saying it drove down crime and took illegal guns off the streets. But they’ve offered little insight into who was being arrested, how, where and for what.

To answer those questions, The Washington Post gathered more than a thousand charging documents from local and federal courts, mapped the incidents and examined how they played out. The documents portray an expanded law enforcement presence that considered no crime too small while hunting for guns and employing tactics that have sparked community opposition in the past.

More than a third of the 1,273 arrests examined by The Post from the first four weeks of Trump’s crackdown in D.C. involved federal law enforcement, a figure that doesn’t include arrests made by immigration officers.

Those arrests occurred in all eight city wards, but were concentrated in the city’s poorest, least White and most crime-ridden neighborhoods.

Additionally, many occurred in low-crime areas highly visible to the president and tourists: the National Mall, outside the White House and around Union Station.

Of the 470 arrests where federal officers were present:

  • Weapons charges were the most common, primarily illegal gun possession. One in 4 cases involved gun charges. Officers found firearms in cars, waistbands and a child’s backpack.

  • About 1 in 7 cases involved people accused of having open containers of alcohol, in cars or parks or curbside. Almost two dozen cases involved public consumption of marijuana — possession of which, in small quantities, is legal in D.C.

  • One in 8 cases involved people accused of assaulting a police officer or resisting arrest. Most of those also involved other charges, but on 20 occasions, assaulting or resisting was the sole charge — including people who have screamed at, spat on and, in one viral case, hurled a sandwich at a federal officer.

  • One in 12 arrests included solely minor charges, such as using marijuana in public, fare evasion and traffic offenses like driving without a valid license.

  • Those arrested were overwhelmingly young, Black men. Black men have made up the majority of D.C. police arrests for years.

  • The quarter of the D.C. census tracts with the highest violent crime rates were the site of nearly half of arrests, while the quarter with the lowest rates had 11 percent. [MORE]