‘Monkeypox’ Appears to be Only Circulating in Countries where the Pfizer Injection has been distributed & is being used to advance a Technocratic Great Reset

/

From [DAVIDICKE] Since around the middle of May 2022, you will have most likely heard or seen the word Monkeypox mentioned numerous times in the mainstream media. 

If you haven’t then you’re about to. 

This is because on Saturday 23rd July 2022, the Director General of the World Health Organization, Dr Tedros, overruled the World Health Organization to single-handedly declare the alleged monkeypox outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. (Source)

Allegedly, for the first time since its discovery among humans in Africa over 50 years ago, the monkeypox virus is circulating throughout several countries including the USA, UK, Canada, Brazil, Australia and most of Europe all at the same time.

But it just so happens that every single country where monkeypox is allegedly circulating is also a country that has distributed the Pfizer Covid-19 injection to its population; excluding some countries in Africa where the disease has been endemic for the past 50 or so years.

The World Health Organization has not received a single report of monkeypox from any country in the world where the Pfizer vaccine was not administered.

Why is this?

Well, it’s most definitely not because we’re witnessing what we will soon be told is a second pandemic to hit the world within the past two years.

It’s because we’re seeing the consequences of injecting millions of people with an experimental mRNA injection that causes untold damage to the immune system, and public health authorities are now scrambling to cover up Covid-19 vaccine-induced shingles and using it as an opportunity to advance their technocratic agenda of implementing ‘The Great Reset’.

Click on the below image and take a good long look to compare which countries have reported cases of monkeypox to the W.H.O. since May 2022, and which countries have distributed the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.

Video Shows Watsonville Police Punching a Latino Man on the Ground While Making an Arrest

/

From [INDY BAY] A video posted to social media (see below) shows police in Watsonville suddenly pushing 39 year-old Antonio Zepeda to the ground and then punching him in the area of his head and neck while arresting him on July 19. Community members are calling for transparency and for police to release their bodycam footage of the incident.

On July 20, Watsonville Police issued the following statement on social media:

We are aware of a video circulating on social media depicting three Watsonville Police Officers using force on an individual during an arrest Tuesday night.

All cases involving any of our officers using force are thoroughly reviewed. This video has caused some concerns within our community and we would like to take a moment to provide additional context surrounding this case.

Here is what we are able to provide at this time:

▪️At about 6:28 p.m., officers were dispatched to a residence on the 400 block of Chappell Rd. for reports of a man who caused a disturbance, punched his brother in the head, and pushed his mother. The suspect left the scene before officers arrived.
▪️Less than an hour later, the suspect’s family once again called 9-1-1 to report the suspect was armed with a knife and attempting to get inside their home.
▪️Officers located the suspect and eventually arrested him.

Please note that the video circulating on social media gives a small glimpse of the officers’ interaction with the suspect. Any time there are serious concerns over our officers’ actions, we investigate and share as much information with you as possible.

Merriam-Webster Changes Dictionary Definition of ‘female’ to include ‘gender identity’

/

From [HERE] The Merriam-Webster Dictionary now includes “gender identity” in the definition of female. The change, which apparently took place in 2020, became more widely known after conservative commentator Matt Walsh brought attention to it with a tweet he published on Tuesday.  

“It was bound to happen. Merriam-Webster has changed its dictionary definition of ‘female’ to appease the trans activists,” Walsh wrote. 

The venerable American dictionary, first published by Noah Webster in 1828 and purchased by Merriam Co. in 1843, now lists among the definitions of female “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male.” A similar change took place within the dictionary’s definition of “male,” with the entry now including “having a gender identity that is the opposite of female.” 

Merriam-Webster has a history of modifying definitions to fit leftist narratives. In October 2020, the dictionary changed the definition of “sexual preference,” to please homosexuals, stating that the term was “outdated” and “offensive.” The change followed a rant by Hawaii Democrat U.S. Senator Maisie Hirono against pro-lifers during Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearings. The Supreme Court Justice had used the expression.  

Merriam-Webster also changed the definition of a “trans” woman that year, stating that a “trans” woman, or a gender confused man, is “an adult who was born male but whose gender identity is female.” The alteration came shortly after the dictionary changed the definition of racism; a young black woman had asked the company to make the dictionary definition reflect “a systematic oppression upon a group of people.” 

According to FUNKTIONARY:

gender – anatomical and chromosomic differentiation. Gender is a set of learned sexual behaviors or orientations that do not necessarily have to comport to one’s anatomical sex. Gender transcends or extends past sexuality when there are hormonal deficiencies or genetic crossfires. There is nothing immoral about sexual disorientation. The masculine\feminine relationship is of great import so that the individual can see in the complement sex what they have denied in themselves. Women are dressed but very few are clothed; with men it’s just the opposite: men are clothed but very rarely dressed. Our true Essence is pure Consciousness, which has no age or genital differences—and at the pinnacle of consciousness all duality disappears. However, be that at is may—or dismay others—we are living within the relative manifestation of 3-D matter reality, therefore we must play out our part (with our parts) in the “real” world of flesh, feelings, emotions and fluids. Now, it has been said that sex is universal and that gender is just spare parts, but I’ve never seen or heard of a vagina producing stinky farts. Until a rectum secretes juices like a vagina—I’ll stay steady and stick with (and to) factory-ready.

Though Blacks are Only 6% of San Francisco, the McNegro Mayor and Probot DA Seek to Place Them in Greater Confinement. Rehab/Housing/Policing/Black Lives Not Priorities to Their White Liberal Masters

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

McNegro – over one million sold-out. How can any neo-Negro sell out of anything that he does not own—other than merchandise? You have to own something to sell-out. (See: Negropolitan, BOHICAN, Eyeservant, $nigger & Sambo)

Negro – a nonexistent person. The word “Negro” is an adjective—and has only within the last century become used as a Noun. Since becoming used as a noun, it is a word to describe a man or woman of Afrikan descent living in pathological mental state of cultural abstinence and historical amnesia—one who wants to impress his or her oppressor while ignoring the effects and plight that his or her accommodationist posture inures. 2) a Hanky-head. 3) an indigenous-to-the-land (American) Afrikan who does everything in his or her power to suppress or pretend that he or she is other than someone of recent Afrikan descent. 4) ethnicitydenying, assimilated and confused formerly enslaved natives (largely indigenous to America) as well as the smaller percentage Afrikan captives kidnapped and brought to America in ships and chains. 5) one who truly believes he or she is white American— masquerading in black face. In the preface to “The Nigger Bible,” written by Robert H. decoy, the late social activist Dick Gregory, defines Negro as, “A state of a Nigger’s mind which describes how Caucasian and Christian he hopes to be.” ~The Nigger Bible. Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s a Negro after all? (See: Nigger, Rentellectual, McNegro, $nigger, Coin-Operated, Double Consciousness, Sambo & Negropolitan)

From [HERE] Just two weeks after replacing San Francisco’s progressive district attorney Chesa Boudin, DA Brooke Jenkins is taking heat for a mass firing which many attorneys say is throwing the office into chaos. 

Civil rights attorney Arcelia Hurtado, among about 15 people fired from the interim DA’s office this past Friday, called Jenkins’ management a “disaster.” She said in a phone interview she was abruptly removed from managing the post-conviction unit — in the middle of the Napoleon Brown murder caseinvolving Mayor London Breed’s brother — without explanation or transition plans. 

She called this “the biggest red flag” because Jenkins was appointed by the mayor and seems to be following instructions. 

“I’ve been locked out of my computer, locked out of everything,” Hurtado said. “This is clearly a political move and she clearly lined up all of the senior management people Boudin hired and fired us all without cause.”

This week, Jenkins asked the state Attorney General’s office to take over Hurtado’s case to avoid any conflict of interest with the mayor. It’s just one piece of what city attorneys and the Public Defender’s Office say is the fallout of returning to failed war-on-drugs policies after a heavily funded recall — which blamed homelessness and the opioid crisis on the DA — that could harm many people. It is also being called a political backslide for San Francisco, recently poised as a progressive city for criminal justice reform while Breed positions herself as a centrist ally of frustrated voters.

Jenkins’ team fired critical Boudin staffers like data research director Mikaela Rabinowitz; the Independent Investigations Bureau attorney prosecuting cops, Lateef Gray; and assistant district attorney Dana Drusinsky, who helped resentence rehabilitated people. The DA installed new transition managers, including people Boudin fired like former assistant DA Ana Gonzalez, according to San Francisco Chronicle. 

Breed appears to have considerable influence over Jenkins’ office. Documents obtained by Mission Local show that the mayor’s office is intercepting press inquiries for Jenkins and providing media announcements for the DA to release, based on communications between DA spokesperson Robyn Burke and Breed’s deputy chief of staff Andrea Bruss. 

When contacted for comment, Breed’s office said the mayor has only been involved in the public events she attended with the DA, including the announcement of her appointment and her swearing in. The office said staff did not field press requests or send out announcements for Jenkins, and that they forwarded requests to members of the DA’s team.

“There has been no involvement on policy-making or decisions around cases,” Breed’s office said in an emailed statement.

Jenkins’ office did not respond to multiple requests for an interview to discuss changes in policy.

San Francisco Police Officers Association president Tracy McCray supports Jenkins’ actions. “After more than two years of having a criminal defense attorney occupy the district attorney’s office, we are hopeful that having an actual prosecutor in charge will result in criminals being held accountable and crime victims once again having a voice in our criminal justice system,” McCray said in a statement.

Tal Klement, who oversaw the felony and misdemeanor units, said by phone he was surprised to be fired after Jenkins promised there would not be mass firings of Boudin hires. He said he is concerned about Jenkins’ replacements, including law enforcement officials and traditional prosecutors who may prefer stricter penalties for people accused of crimes.

“I worry about a return to the policies of mass incarceration and tough on crime type approaches to addressing social problems,” he said. “I’m particularly concerned about the reinstituion of gang enhancements that have historically targeted young Black and brown people and led to racial profiling and lack of trust between the police and those communities.” [MORE]

Police Unions in "Very Liberal" Boston File Suit to Roll Back Limits on the Use Tear Gas, Pepper Spray and Crowd Control Methods and Seek to Invalidate an Independent Board Created to Probe Misconduct

/

According to Best Places, “The Political Climate in Boston, MA is Very liberal.

Suffolk County, MA is Very liberal. In Suffolk County, MA 80.6% of the people voted Democrat in the last presidential election, 17.5% voted for the Republican Party, and the remaining 1.9% voted Independent.

In the last Presidential election, Suffolk county remained overwhelmingly Democratic, 80.6% to 17.5%. 
Suffolk county voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 2000.”

From [HERE] Two police unions in Boston want to roll back limits on when they can use tear gas, pepper spray and other less-than-lethal crowd control methods, which the City Council implemented last year.

The two unions are asking a judge to rule on whether the City Council ordinance is valid and enforceable, and also on the validity of an independent board to probe allegations of police misconduct created in January. The Boston Police Superior Officers Federation and the Boston Police Detectives Benevolent Society filed the suit Monday in Suffolk County Superior Court.

The ordinance came about after Boston police were criticized for some of their crowd control measures during a June 2020 protest, amid nationwide demonstrations sparked by the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.

The unions say the use-of-force rules are based on politics and put public safety at risk.

“By eliminating our officers’ ability to use less than lethal force, City Council themselves are forcing escalation of incidents with their irresponsible and poorly researched policies,” the unions said in a statement.

The ordinance puts limits on — but does not eliminate — the use of tear gas, pepper spray, rubber bullets and beanbag rounds by law enforcement agents operating in Boston.

Instead, under the ordinance, an on-scene police supervisor of the rank of deputy superintendent or higher must personally witness ongoing violence or property destruction and determine there are no reasonable methods of de-escalation that could succeed. The same supervisor must give two separate warnings at least two minutes apart announcing the group must disperse, saying which weapon will be used and ensuring the group has a way to exit.

Mayor Michelle Wu, City Council President Ed Flynn and Boston Police Department Superintendent-in-Chief Gregory Long are named as defendants. A spokesperson for the mayor said the city had no comment.

Wu last week named a new police commissioner, but he’s not taking over until next month.

The police unions’ suit also asks the court to rule on the validity of the city’s Office of Police Accountability and Transparency, which was created in December 2020 and allows citizens with complaints against police officers to appeal to an oversight panel, even if the police department’s own internal affairs unit determines the complaint is unfounded.

The lawsuit contends that under state law, city law enforcement policy decisions rest with the commissioner, and there are legal precedents for courts declaring city council-imposed rules to be invalid.

"He Appeared to Turn Toward Me" is Cop Mantra (pretense for murder of Blacks/Latinos): No Accountability from Liberal Authorities After a White Chicago Cop Fatally Shot Anthony Alvarez in the Back

/

From [HERE] The white Chicago cop who shot and killed Anthony Alvarez during a foot chase last year was suspended Thursday for 20 days after Supt. David Brown successfully beat back a recommendation from the city’s police oversight agency that sought his dismissal. Brown is a Black Strawboss.

Officer Evan Solano fired five shots as he pursued Alvarez through the Portage Park neighborhood early on March 31, 2021, striking the 22-year-old in the back and thigh after he ignored orders to drop a handgun. The cop claimed that he appeared to turn his body. Alvarez’s death came just two days after 13-year-old Adam Toledo was fatally shot by Officer Eric Stillman during another foot chase in Little Village.

The shootings prompted outrage and pushed department leaders to urgently develop its first foot-pursuit policy. Despite the scrutiny, Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx announced in March that her office found no evidence to support criminal charges against the officers involved in either shooting. Foxx is also a Black Strawboss working on behalf of the system of racism white supremacy.

Solano’s case is the first to be heard by the Chicago Police Board, which decides serious disciplinary matters. 

Board member Steven Block wrote in a 31-page ruling that Solano’s use of force was “objectively reasonable, necessary, and proportional in order to ensure his own safety and the safety of his partner.” He announced his findings during Thursday’s board meeting.

Block was tapped to decide whether to uphold Brown’s recommendation to suspend Solano for 20 days or to set in motion disciplinary proceedings that could lead to his dismissal, as was recommended by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability. COPA held that Solano broke six departmental rules, including for disregarding his training for starting and continuing foot pursuits and violating a general order dealing with officers’ use of force.

But Block said the evidence supporting those allegations was “legally insufficient” and noted that Solano’s actions were “objectively reasonable based on the totality of the circumstances.” The only allegations against Solano that were sustained stemmed from his failure to activate his body-worn camera in a timely manner, properly load his gun and notify dispatchers of the pursuit.

Solano’s partner, Sammy Encarnacion, was also handed down a 20-day suspension for violating those same rules. His other charges, for improperly starting and continuing the chase, weren’t sustained.

Alvarez’s family said they were “appalled” by Block’s ruling, which they claimed “marks a continuation of the City of Chicago’s complicity in a loss of human life due to CPD’s decadeslong failure to enact a meaningful foot-pursuit policy.”

“Today’s decision is not only a gut-punch to the Alvarez family, but it perpetuates the message that encounters with the Chicago Police Department remain potentially lethal,” the family said. “As is too often the case, it is our Communities of Color that are most vulnerable to victimization during these encounters.”

During Thursday’s meeting, Andrea Kersten, COPA’s chief administrator, said her agency stands by its “thorough investigation, its analysis and findings.” She called for a full evidentiary hearing for every incident that “results in the death of someone at the hands of law enforcement.”

“This is not about winning or losing, but facts, evidence and testimony being presented to the full police board before a final decision is determined,” she said. “We respect the process but strongly disagree with the final decision put forth by the one-member review.”

During the pursuit, Solano claimed he saw Alvarez holding a gun in the 5200 block of West Eddy Street and ordered him to drop it. Then Solano opened fire.

Solano told COPA investigators he opened fire after Alvarez looked over his shoulder, fearing Alvarez was turning around to shoot him and his partner. Video surveillance footage showed Alvarez was holding a gun in front of him when the shots rang out, Block said. [whether he posed a threat is not even part of the analysis here by these white “journalists” drunk off racism white supremacy (mind blocked by a mind-virus). They simply seek to justify murder and uphold authority regardless of the circumstances - observe whenever they write and talk about incidents involving non-white people harmed by cops. White prosecutors and the white media (and their Black servant rolebots) are especially ager and programmed to believe anything foul cops say about Latinos and Blacks.  Why would a cop make anything up? Because they will believe it. They want to be deceived and will rationalize away to justify their projections]

“The Alvarez family will continue to seek justice for Anthony and other young Black and Brown men who have been killed by police officers due to CPD’s failure to implement a meaningful foot-pursuit policy,” the family said, “and to allow undisciplined and unqualified police officers to remain on the force.”

They said Block’s decision is “particularly galling” given that Solano was later caught on video brandishing a gun during a road rage incident in Logan Square in May 2021, as Block Club Chicago first reported. [MORE]

White Cop Went Too Far with Imposing Rulership During Arrest, So a Disobedient Black Man Beat the 18-Wheeler Brakes Off Him, Terrance Crawford Style

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

disobedience – thinking for oneself—deciding for oneself what to do and not to do. 2) the refusal of services of those in power—to deny their alleged authority over you. The Beast allows you to be disobedient or ignorant but not both. Disobedience is the only crime—all others are offshoots. (See: Prometheus, Rights, Thinking, Thought & Rebel)

disobedient – master over one’s thoughts and acting on same relative to the dominating recidivism of authoritarian culture.

Force – the source or sources of all possible actions of the particles or materials of the universe(s). 2) the manipulation of a man or woman in disregard of its own volition or nature. 3) the use of an outside physical coercion of any kind by one or more humanoids against another or others in order to make him/her or them obedient and compliant to his/her or their will. 4) the basis of all social evils and can only be used in the sense of attack not defense. 5) You must! In the way I say! 6) the social disease. “Force (coercion) and fraud are the foundation of all social systems and the source of the aroma which they exhale.” ~Max Nomad. “Force” operates to remove personal volition from opportunity to act or not act. Someone “makes” you behave in a certain way by threatening to injure or enslave you, someone you love, or something you prize, if you do not behave in that way. Force operates to obtain an intended behavior when the forced party would otherwise have exhibited a different behavior. Punishment, pain, suffering, and discomfort characterize force. Unfortunately, governments only function by misuse of force—mistreatment, duress and coercion. Once established, they put laws into effect by threatening persecution, imprisonment, fine, or death against all who don’t comply with those laws—including the use of the force continuum. “That which is imposed by force is sooner or later deposed by force.” ~ Mikhail Naimy. In reality, force is neutral, it is how it is applied that colors its action. The greatest and highest force in the universe is love unfolding in each moment. (See: Government, Autonomy, Justice, Fiction, Fraud, Corporate State, Freedom, Forgery, Racism White Supremacy, Religion, Authority, Violence, Coercion, Deception, Language, Force Continuum, Capital Punishment & Gerp)

Can You Accidentally Lift and Slam a Person Head First Into the Concrete? Despite Finding a White PG County Cop Not Credible, a Black Judge Gave Him Only 1 Yr for Paralyzing a Black Man During Arrest

/

From [HERE] and [MORE] Prince George’s County police officer Bryant Strong was sentenced Thursday to one year in jail followed by three years of probation for his actions during a traffic stop in 2019 that left Demonte Ward-Blake paralyzed from the neck down. He faced up to 10 years in prison.

A grand jury indicted Strong in the fall of 2020, nearly a year after his encounter with Ward-Blake on Oct. 17, 2019, in Oxon Hill, Md., on the three misdemeanor charges.

Strong, 29, was found guilty in May of second-degree assault, misconduct in office and reckless endangerment during a bench trial before Circuit Court Judge DaNeeka V. Cotton, a “black” judge.

At Strong’s sentencing hearing Thursday, the courtroom was packed with about 50 people, many of them police employees there to support him and his right to harm and kill citizens at will. Three Prince George’s officers who had worked alongside Strong and developed friendships with him over the years spoke on his behalf, saying he is collegial, has a strong work ethic and is dedicated to his family and young son when he is not committing crimes against citizens.

Thursday, Judge Circuit Court Judge DaNeeka V. Cotton sentenced Strong to a total of 20 years, with all but one of them suspended, as long as he doesn’t violate his probation.  His attorney’s request to delay the start of incarceration pending appeal was denied, as was the request for home detention.

Ward-Blake had been pulled over for expired tags; that he became verbally outraged when a different officer pulled a gun because his girlfriend’s 6-year-old daughter was in the back seat; and that throughout parts of the encounter captured on film he had been compliant with all officer commands, including when he was detained, placed in handcuffs and sat on the curb.

Strong then decided to arrest Ward-Blake for disorderly conduct and walk him to the side of his cruiser, where he conducted a body search.

The judge found that Strong had become fed up with Ward-Blake’s cursing and yelling and snapped, lifting the man’s feet from the ground and slamming him headfirst into the concrete in a maneuver called a “takedown.”

A witness officer who had also responded to the traffic stop testified that soon after her arrival on the scene, she heard a “commotion” near Strong’s police cruiser and turned her head to see Ward-Blake’s feet in the air at a diagonal and Strong’s feet on the ground.

Prosecutors said her testimony, coupled with similar testimony from Ward-Blake’s girlfriend, Chinayne Pollard, and medical records showing the severity of the man’s injuries, proved Strong had used excessive force to slam the 24-year-old into the ground.

That use of force was reckless, they said, because Ward-Blake was compliant, handcuffed and had no way of breaking his own fall.

Strong’s attorneys, however, unsuccessfully argued that Ward-Blake’s paralysis was not the result of a criminal act but an “accident.”

Strong testified that once he took Ward-Blake to the side of his police cruiser, he started searching the man’s upper body and had crouched down by his ankles. At that point, Strong said, Ward-Blake elbowed him in the head — knocking him off balance. The officer testified that, at the same time, Ward-Blake had turned away in an alleged attempt to flee. Strong said he reached for the man’s arm to catch his balance, and the two fell together to the ground.

The judge did not find the officer to be credible. When she delivered her verdict, though, Cotton discounted that theory. The use of force was intentional and not accidental, she said, adding that she was “unpersuaded” that Strong’s testimony was “credible.” The judge called his actions “excessive” and “unjustified.”

Strong, she said, “did not act as a reasonable officer would.”

Civil rights attorney Malcolm Ruff spoke on behalf of Ward-Blake’s family, whom he is representing in a federal civil lawsuit against the county and Strong. Ruff told the judge that Ward-Blake was a loved and gregarious 24-year-old before the traffic stop, but his paralysis forced him into a wheelchair and caused agonizing pain. Ward-Blake died in a 2020 District Heights shooting. But, his family alleges his prior injuries contributed to his death. 

The Ward-Blake family is still pursuing a $75 million civil suit against Bryant Strong and Prince George’s county. The suit addresses a systemic pattern of police brutality in Prince George’s County.

Ward-Blake’s mother, Rena Ward, bowed her head as she listened in the courtroom beside community organizers and other women impacted by police violence. Ward said she was disappointed Strong hadn’t been given more jail time but that she had to “give it up to God.”

Judge Cotton did not, however, take into account Strong’s history of using force with others. Prosecutors presented evidence during the hearing about a previously undisclosed incident from November 2018 — one year before Ward-Blake was paralyzed — when Strong wrongfully detained someone who matched a robbery suspect description. The man, prosecutors said, protested the arrest. Strong took him to the ground, cuffed him and hit him several times, an action the police department’s internal investigation later found excessive.

Prosecutors argued this showed a pattern of behavior that the judge should consider before sentencing Strong. But Cotton disagreed, saying the matter was administrative, not criminal, and therefore irrelevant. [sounds incompetent. MLK warned: an effective way racists practice racism is by handling matters of great importance to Black people with frivolity; this can be carried out through the placement of unskilled, mediocre Black people in positions of great responsibility such as judges and officials in other areas of people activity.]

Strong’s police powers remain suspended until the police department’s internal affairs office completes its own investigation into the traffic stop.

Mother Accuses Argentinian Government of Murdering Her 3-Year-Old Girl: 'Son of a Bitches Forced Us To Get Vaccinated.' Healthy Child Died 1 Day After Injection

/

From [HERE] A three-year-old healthy little girl, Ambar Maite Catán, died after being forced by the Argentinian government to be “vaccinated.” Ambar’s distraught mother, Miryam, recounted the heartbreaking story of her daughter’s senseless death in a television interview. The mother not only holds the government responsible for “killing” her child but vowed to fight the government to protect other children from receiving the dangerous and deadly experimental Covid injections. 

The little girl passed away on Thursday, December 16, 2021, but her story, like many who died following the covid injections, went unreported by the U.S. left-wing news. The day after Ambar passed away, the mother told reporters that her 3-year-old girl died from the Chinese Sinopharm vaccine required for her to enter kindergarten. Argentina approved the vaccine for children between three and eleven in October 2021. 

On Wednesday, the perfectly healthy child received her first controversial Covid vaccine injection at the Hippodrome [Covid vaccination hub], and then the next day, she dropped dead. 

Yesterday between 10 and 11 am, I took my daughter to the Hipodromo [vaccination hub] to get her vaccinated. Because, well, they were vaccinating children aged three and up. 

I had pre-enrolled her in the school. So she would start kindergarten this coming year, where you need to be vaccinated. She was healthy; she was fine. She was not ill at all; she had no Covid, she had nothing. 

She had Covid last year, and she was hospitalized. She was hospitalized at the San Lucas Hospital for five days. She had already had Covid; I am not getting why 

Today my daughter got up, and she was really fine. She hung out with her friends. And in the afternoon, she collapsed and she fainted. I can’t believe it. 

Miryam blames the government for requiring Covid vaccines: 

They tell us to get vaccinated repeatedly. They tell us to get our children vaccinated repeatedly. I know it is the vaccine that made my 3-year-old daughter die. It did because my daughter was a healthy child. 

That son of a bitch government forces us to get vaccinated. They made my 3-year-old baby die. She was really healthy. She had no pathology; she was not a sick child. She was a healthy child.

In addition, Miryam explained how the events happened the morning her child died: 

This morning she got up as usual, like every day. She had breakfast and played with me. She told me: “Mom, I am going to play with my friends.” I told her: “Play right here in the garden, in front of the door.”She was playing with the other girls. 

Then I went out for a moment, 10 or 15 minutes. I found my daughter dead. I can’t believe it.

The mother repeatedly emphasized that Ámbar was healthy:

She did not have a fever. I asked her whether she did, because yesterday I got him [Ambar’s brother] vaccinated too, he is 14 years old. 

I asked her: “Ambar, does your arm hurt?” “No, mom!” 

Whereas his arm did hurt, and mine did too because I got vaccinated too. I got the second jab. 

She said: “No, mom, I am fine.”It was her first jab. 

Although, according to an autopsy carried out by the government, the girl had “heart disease and a long-standing lung infection.” However, the mom said her daughter was healthy and not sick. 

Ambar’s mom does not want another family to suffer the tremendous pain and loss she is experiencing. She vows to fight not to allow the government to ‘kill” another child: 

I will fight to the end. I don’t want other Ambars to die. But, because I don’t want this to happen to other children, as it happened to my daughter, the government here in Tucuman demands that everyone be vaccinated to be allowed to do anything. So they kill our children.

Argentina Wants All Children ‘Vaccinated’

Argentina moved aggressively last year to vaccinate every child over three by the end of 2021. “Argentina will finish 2021 with the full coverage and protection of people over three years,” vowed health minister Carla Vizzotti last October.

According to Life Site News, Children and teenagers face virtually no risk of death or serious illness from COVID-19. According to the American Pediatric Association, 0-0.03 percent of COVID cases in the United States under age 18 have resulted in death. In addition, the survival rate for coronavirus has been estimated at no lower than 99.7 percent for all age groups under 60 years old.

"We are Being Lied to." A Group of New Zealand Doctors Calls for Criminal Investigations into COVID Injection Deaths. 'The Shots are Not Vaccines because They Don't Prevent Disease or Spread'

/

From [HERE] The group New Zealand Doctors Speaking out With Science (NZDSOS) has published an open letter calling for a comprehensive investigation into the wave of deaths occurring in New Zealand among the “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).

A redacted version is available for the public to read, while an unredacted version is still being carefully prepared for law enforcement to ensure it contains all of the necessary information for a proper investigation to be conducted.

According to the group, there is a “shockingly large burden of deaths and injuries following the Covid-19 vaccine, of itself and compared to any other treatment or vaccine in modern times.”

“We report many cases that DEMAND proper investigation, as befits any medication lacking safety studies,” the letter’s executive summary further states.

NZDSOS says the country’s surveillance systems, which would otherwise catch these injuries and deaths, have been disabled “in order to hide the extent of harm.”

“Adverse event reporting is NOT COMPULSORY, and this alone undermines any attempt to portray the injections as safe,” the group further explains.

“CARM (New Zealand’s version of the U.S.-based Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) was never designed to early warn about experimental drugs rolled out to massive numbers.”

Post-covid injection deaths are the elephant in the room that nobody wants to address

Perhaps most concerning are the large numbers of young children who after getting shot are suffering cardiac injuries that used to only occur among the elderly – though many elderly people have mysteriously died post-jab as well.

Seeing as how children have a zero percent risk of dying from covid, let alone getting sick from it in the first place, jabbing them is arguably the worst crime against humanity that has occurred in modern times.

“We believe we are being lied to,” says NZDSOS. “We appeal AGAIN to the Police, headed by Andrew Coster, and our MPs (members of parliament), to intervene to protect the People.

Halfway through the letter, a long list of cases is presented showing that post-injection injuries and deaths are anything but “rare.” They are disturbingly and obviously common when looking at the data, though few are brave enough to actually look.

A summary of some 500 post-injection deaths is included in the letter, as recorded in the Citizen’s Database. A community group of volunteers with backgrounds in healthcare, information technology and science help to maintain it with the support of epidemiology and database professionals.

“It has been built mainly from notifications by relatives, friends and health workers of people who have died following the covid-19 shots,” the letter explains.

“Scientific accuracy forbids the use of the word ‘vaccine,’ since it does not prevent the disease nor its transmission. Some information has been gleaned from social media posts, newspaper reports and obituaries. Has anyone noticed how many there are? ‘Taken too soon,’ ‘sudden and unexpected’ adorn the pages.”

Because the so-called “authorities” refuse to even look into the situation at all is a huge red flag all on its own. If the jabs really are “safe and effective” as claimed, then there should be no problem looking through each case in order to debunk it as unrelated to the injections, right?

This is the elephant in the room that almost nobody in any position of power is willing to address, and NZDSOS is demanding once again that someone step up to the plate and take the matter seriously on behalf of public health.

“Whatever the actual truth, NZDSOS and many others are certain that the true number of dead and injured people is very elevated, and not made clear to the public, who thus continue to sleepwalk into a treatment that is much more dangerous than the disease it purports to prevent, especially for the young,” the group says.

UK Gov. Data Shows COVID Injections are Killing Children. Report Demonstrates that "Vaccinated" Kids are Substantially More Likely to Die than Unvaccinated Kids

/

From [HERE] and [EXPOSE] On June 17th 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criminally extended the emergency use authorisation of the mRNA Covid-19 injections for use in children as young as 6 months. 

There has never been an emergency in regard to Covid-19 infection among children. Two years of evidence show the alleged disease has only adversely affected the elderly and vulnerable. Children have been unlucky to suffer symptoms more severe than those associated with the common cold. 

But despite this fact, the FDA has decided it is perfectly safe to administer an experimental injection to babies and toddlers, with FDA Commissioner Robert Califf saying – 

“Many parents, caregivers and clinicians have been waiting for a vaccine for younger children and this action will help protect those down to 6 months of age.  As we have seen with older age groups, we expect that the vaccines for younger children will provide protection from the most severe outcomes of COVID-19, such as hospitalization and death. 

Those trusted with the care of children can have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of these COVID-19 vaccines and can be assured that the agency was thorough in its evaluation of the data.”

The FDA Commissioner will live to regret that last sentence. As will any parent who takes the Commissioners words at face value. Because official data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics show that Covid-19 vaccinated children are between 8,100% and 30,200% more likely to die than unvaccinated children.

On 16th May 2022, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on ‘deaths by vaccination status in England’ between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st March 2022.

The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, double vaccinated children aged 10-14 were statistically up to 39 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, and double vaccinated teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically up to 4 times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers.

For every 100,000 kids aged 10 to 14 who were FULLY VACCINATED in England, over 40 died from Covid-19. That’s a negative effectiveness rate against death of minus 13,633 percent among the triple-vaxxed kids and early teens, but that’s not all. The ONS failed to publish the death rate for children under 10 years young, obviously because that was most likely even MORE shocking. [MORE]

…The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, triple jabbed children aged 10-14 were statistically 303 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children of Covid-19, 69x more likely to die of any cause other than Covid-19 than unvaccinated children, and 82x more likely to die of all-causes than unvaccinated children.

This suggests that three doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for children by an average of 8,100%, and the risk of dying of Covid-19 by an average of 30,200%. Whilst two doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 3,600%.

But as things currently stand it’s the other way round for teenagers. Two doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for teens aged 15 to 19 by an average of 300%. Whilst three doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 100%. [MORE]

Letter from 76 Doctors Urgently Tells the UK Government: ‘mRNA Vaccines Are Inappropriate for Small Children’

/

From [CHD] The letter below was signed by 76 doctors in the U.K. and sent to the Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and other U.K. Government officials.

This letter lays out comprehensive reasons why the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) decision authorizing COVID vaccinations in infants and young children must not happen in the U.K.

June 30, 2022

Dear Dr. Raine,

We are writing to you urgently concerning the announcement that the FDA has granted an Emergency Use Authorization for both Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in preschool children.

We would urge you to consider very carefully the move to vaccinate ever younger children against SARS-CoV-2, despite the gradual but significant reducing virulence of successive variants, the increasing evidence of rapidly waning vaccine efficacy, the increasing concerns over long-term vaccine harms, and the knowledge that the vast majority of this young age group have already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 repeatedly and have demonstrably effective immunity.

Thus, the balance of benefit and risk which supported the rollout of mRNA vaccines to the elderly and vulnerable in 2021 is totally inappropriate for small children in 2022.

We also strongly challenge the addition of COVID-19 vaccination into the routine child immunization program despite no demonstrated clinical need, known and unknown risks (see below) and the fact that these vaccines still have only conditional marketing authorization.

It is noteworthy that the Pfizer documentation presented to the FDA has huge gaps in the evidence provided:

  • The protocol was changed mid-trial. The original two-dose schedule exhibited poor immunogenicity with efficacy far below the required standard. A third dose was added by which time many of the original placebo recipients had been vaccinated.

  • There was no statistically significant difference between the placebo and vaccinated groups in either the 6-23-month age group or the 2-4-year-olds, even after the third dose. Astonishingly, the results were based on just three participants in the younger age group (one vaccinated and two placebo) and just seven participants in the older 2-4-year-olds (two vaccinated and five placebo). Indeed, for the younger age group the confidence intervals ranged from minus-367% to plus-99%. The manufacturer stated that the numbers were too low to draw any confident conclusions. Moreover, these limited numbers come only from children infected more than seven days after the third dose.

  • Over the whole time period from the first dose onwards (see page 39 Tables 19 and 20), there were a total of 225 infected children in the vaccinated arm and 150 in the placebo arm, giving a calculated vaccine efficacy of only 25% (14% for the 6-23 months, and 33% for 2-4s).

  • The additional immunogenicity studies against Omicron, requested by the FDA, only involved a total of 66 children tested one month after the third dose (see page 35).

It is incomprehensible that the FDA considered that this represents sufficient evidence on which to base a decision to vaccinate healthy children. When it comes to safety, the data are even thinner: only 1,057 children, some already unblinded, were followed for just two months.

It is noteworthy that Sweden and Norway are not recommending the vaccine for 5-11s and Holland is not recommending it for children who have already had COVID-19.

The director of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority stated recently that with what is now known, the decision to vaccinate children was a mistake.

We summarize below the overwhelming arguments against this vaccination.

A. Extremely low risk from COVID-19 to young children

  • In the whole of 2020 and 2021, not a single child aged 1-9 died where COVID-19 was the sole diagnosis on the death certificate, according to ONS data.

  • A detailed study in England from March 1, 2020, to March 1, 2021, found only six children under 18 years died with no co-morbidities. There were no deaths aged 1-4 years.

  • Children clear the virus more easily than adults.

  • Children mount effective, robust, and sustained immune responses.

  • Since the arrival of the Omicron variant, infections have been generally much milder. That is also true for unvaccinated under-5s.

  • By June 2022 it is now estimated that 89% of 1-4-year-olds had already had SARS-CoV-2 infection.

  • Recent data from Israel show excellent long-lasting immunity following infection in children, especially in 5-11s.

B. Poor vaccine efficacy

  • In adults, it has become apparent that vaccine efficacy wanes steadily over time, necessitating boosters at regular intervals. Specifically, vaccine efficacy has waned more rapidly against the latest Omicron variants.

  • In children, vaccine efficacy has waned more rapidly in 5-11s than in 12-17s, possibly related to the lower dose used in the pediatric formulation. One study from New York showed efficacy against Omicron falling to only 12% by 4-5 weeks and to negative values by 5-6 weeks post second dose.

  • In the Pfizer 0-4s trial, the efficacy after two doses fell to negative values, necessitating a change to the trial protocol. After a third dose, there was a suggestion of efficacy from 7-30 days but there is no data beyond 30 days to see how quickly this will wane.

C. Potential harms of COVID-19 vaccines for children

  • There has been great concern about myocarditis in adolescents and young adults, especially in males after the second dose, estimated at one per 2,600 in active post-marketing surveillance in Hong Kong. The emerging evidence of persistent cardiac abnormalities in adolescents with post-mRNA vaccine myopericarditis, as demonstrated by cardiac MRI at 3-8 months follow-up, suggests this is far from ‘mild and short-lived’. The potential for longer-term effects requires further study and calls for the strictest application of the precautionary principle in respect of the youngest and most vulnerable children.

  • Although post-vaccination myocarditis appears to be less common in 5-11-year-olds than older children, it is, nonetheless, increased over baseline.

  • In the Pfizer study, 50% of vaccinated children had systemic adverse events, including irritability and fever. Diagnosis of myocarditis is much more difficult in younger children. No troponin levels or ECG studies were documented. Even a vaccinated child in the trial, hospitalized with fever, calf pain and a raised CPK, had no report of D-dimers, anti-platelet antibodies, or troponin levels.

  • In Pfizer’s 5-11s post-authorization conditions, it is required to conduct studies looking for myocarditis and is not due to report results until 2027.

  • Of equal concern are, as yet unknown, negative effects on the immune system. In the 0-4s trial, only seven children were described as having “severe” COVID-19 – six vaccinated and one given placebo. Similarly, for the 12 children with recurrent episodes of infection, 10 were vaccinated against only two who received placebo. These are all tiny figures and much too small to rule out any adverse impacts such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and other impacts on the immune system.

  • Also unanswered is the question of Original Antigenic Sin. It is of note that in a large Israeli study, those infected after vaccination had poorer cover than those vaccinated after infection. In the Moderna trial, N-antibodies were seen in only 40% of those infected after vaccination, compared with 93% of those infected after placebo.

  • There is evidence of vaccine-induced disruption of both innate and adaptive immune responses. The possibility of developing an impaired immune function would be disastrous for children, who have the most competent innate immunity, which by now has been effectively trained by the circulating virus.

  • Totally unknown is whether there will be any adverse effect on T-cell function leading to an increase in cancers.

  • Also, in terms of reproductive function, limited animal bio-distribution studies showed lipid nanoparticles concentrate in ovaries and testes. Adult sperm donors have showed a reduction in sperm counts particularly of motile sperm, falling by three months post-vaccination and remaining depressed at four to five months.

  • Even for adults, concerns are rising that serious adverse events are in excess of hospitalizations from COVID-19.

D. Informed consent

  • For 5-11s, the JCVI, in recommending a “non-urgent offer” of vaccination, specifically noted the importance of fully informed consent with no coercion.

  • With the low uptake in this age group, the presence of ‘therapy dogs’, advertisements including superhero images and information about child vaccination protecting friends and family all clearly run contrary to the concept of consent, fully informed and freely given.

  • The complete omission of information explaining to the public the different and novel technology used in COVID-19 vaccines compared to standard vaccines, and the failure to inform of the lack of any long-term safety data, borders on misinformation.

E. Effect on public confidence

  • Vaccines against much more serious diseases, such as polio and measles, need to be prioritized. Pushing an unnecessary and novel, gene-based vaccine onto young children risks seriously undermining parental confidence in the whole immunization program.

  • The poor quality of the data presented by Pfizer risks bringing the pharmaceutical industry into disrepute and the regulators if this product is authorized.

In summary, young healthy children are at minimal risk from COVID-19, especially since the arrival of the Omicron variant. Most have been repeatedly exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, yet have remained well, or have had short, mild illness.

As detailed above, the vaccines are of brief efficacy and have known short- to medium-term risks and unknown long-term safety. Data for clinically useful efficacy in small children are scant or absent.

In older children, for whom the vaccines are already licensed, they have been promoted via ethically dubious schemes to the potential detriment of other, and vital, parts of the childhood vaccination program.

For a tiny minority of children for whom the potential for benefit clearly and unequivocally outweighed the potential for harm, vaccination could have been facilitated by restrictive licenses.

Whether following the precautionary principle or the instruction to First Do No Harm, such vaccines have no place in a routine childhood immunization program.

Signed by:

Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Principal, Institute for Cancer Vaccines & Immunotherapy (ICVI)

Professor Anthony Fryer, Ph.D., FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Keele University

Professor David Livermore, BSc, Ph.D., Retired Professor of Medical Microbiology, UEA

Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon

Lord Moonie,  MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine

Dr. Abby Astle, MA(Cantab), MBBChir, GP Principal, GP Trainer, GP Examiner

Dr. Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

Dr. Alan Black, MBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, Retired Pharmaceutical Physician

Dr. David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist

Dr. Emma Brierly, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr. David Cartland, MBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner

Dr. Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine practitioner

Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

Julie Coffey, MBChB, General Practitioner

John Collis, RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner, retired

Mr. Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant Ophthalmologist

James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health

Dr. Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Pathologist

Dr. David Critchley, BSc, Ph.D. in Pharmacology, 32 years of experience in Pharmaceutical R&D

Dr. Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (hons), DipPharmMedDr Elizabeth Evans, MA (Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, Retired Doctor

Dr. John Flack, BPharm, Ph.D., retired Director of Safety Evaluation at Beecham Pharmaceuticals and retired Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery SmithKline Beecham

Dr. Simon Fox, BSc, BMBCh, FRCP, Consultant in Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine

Dr. Ali Haggett, Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of medicine

David Halpin, MB BS FRCS, Orthopaedic and trauma surgeon (retired)

Dr Renée Hoenderkampf, General Practitioner

Dr. Andrew Isaac, MB BCh, Physician, retired

Dr. Steve James, Consultant Intensive Care

Dr. Keith Johnson, BA, DPhil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing

Dr. Rosamond Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant pediatrician

Dr. Tanya Klymenko, Ph.D., FHEA, FIBMS, Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Sciences

Dr. Charles Lane, MA, DPhil, Molecular Biologist

Dr. Branko Latinkic, BSc, Ph.D., Molecular Biologist

Dr. Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS Ph.D. ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow

Dr. Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, Ph.D., Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath

Katherine MacGilchrist, BSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd.

Dr. Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, Consultant Physician, retired

Ahmad K Malik FRCS (Tr & Orth) Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr. Kulvinder Singh Manik, MBBS, General Practitioner

Dr. Fiona Martindale, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr. S McBride, BSc (Hons) Medical Microbiology & Immunobiology, MBBCh BAO, MSc in Clinical Gerontology, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, FRCP (Edinburgh). NHS Emergency Medicine & Geriatrics

Mr. Ian McDermott, MBBS, MS, FRCS(Tr&Orth), FFSEM(UK), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr. Franziska Meuschel, MD, ND, Ph.D., LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine

Dr. Scott Mitchell, MBChB, MRCS, Emergency Medicine Physician

Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology

Dr. David Morris, MBChB, MRCP(UK), General Practitioner

Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire

Dr. Alice Murkies, MD FRACGP MBBS, General Practitioner

Dr. Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

Dr. Sarah Myhill, MBBS, retired GP and Naturopathic Physician

Dr. Rachel Nicholl, Ph.D., Medical researcher

Dr. Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause specialist

Rev Dr. William J U Philip MB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow, formerly physician specializing in cardiology

Dr. Angharad Powell, MBChB, BSc (hons), DFRSH, DCP (Ireland), DRCOG, DipOccMed, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr. Gerry Quinn, Ph.D. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology

Dr. Johanna Reilly, MBBS, General Practitioner

Jessica Righart, MSc, MIBMS, Senior Critical Care Scientist

Mr. Angus Robertson, BSc, MB ChB, FRCSEd (Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr. Jessica Robinson, BSc(Hons), MBBS, MRCPsych, MFHom, Psychiatrist and Integrative Medicine Doctor

Dr. Jon Rogers, MB ChB (Bristol), Retired General Practitioner

Mr. James Royle, MBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon

Dr. Roland Salmon, MB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre Wales

Sorrel Scott, Grad Dip Phys, Specialist Physiotherapist in Neurology, 30 years in NHS

Dr. Rohaan Seth, BSc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner

Dr. Gary Sidley, retired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist

Dr. Annabel Smart, MBBS, retired General Practitioner

Natalie Stephenson, BSc (Hons) Paediatric Audiologist

Dr. Zenobia Storah, MA (Oxon), Dip Psych, DClinPsy, Senior Clinical Psychologist (Child and Adolescent)

Dr. Julian Tompkinson, MBChB MRCGP, General Practitioner GP trainer PCME

Dr. Noel Thomas, MA, MBChB, DCH, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, retired doctor

Dr. Stephen Ting, MB CHB, MRCP, Ph.D., Consultant Physician

Dr. Livia Tossici-Bolt, Ph.D., Clinical Scientist

Dr. Carmen Wheatley, DPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology

Dr. Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Mr. Lasantha Wijesinghe, FRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon

Dr. Damian Wilde, Ph.D., (Chartered) Specialist Clinical Psychologist

Dr. Ruth Wilde, MB BCh, MRCEM, AFMCP, Integrative & Functional Medicine Doctor

[Genthanasia = A Slow Motion Extermination of Undesirable People by Elites] According to UK Data Thousands of People are Dying “Unexpectedly” Every Week in the Post-Covid Era

/

From [Natural News] For the week ending July 8, 2022, 10,232 deaths were recorded by the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), 432 of which were recorded as being related to the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). This is nearly 1,000 more deaths than normal compared to pre-covid levels, a trend that has been going on for at least the past 11 weeks.

“Excess deaths,” as they call them, have been noteworthy ever since Chinese Virus injections were first introduced. Many now believe that the cause is the shot, which is why there have been calls to end the jabbing and boosting agenda.

“This is not just a U.K. phenomenon,” said Dr. John Campbell, PhD, in a July 6, 2022, video. “This is an international phenomenon.”

Dr. Campbell earned his doctorate from the University of Bolton in 2013, with an emphasis on teaching biosciences in the context of national and international nurse education. His YouTube channel, which boasts some 2.39 million subscribers, contains many videos about the Fauci Flu and the lies that are being told about it.

“Way more people are dying than we would expect based on the previous five years,” he says. “What is going on here? This is too many to be a statistical artifact. This is a genuine effect.”

Covid “vaccines” are a form of mass genocide

Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president at Pfizer, has also come forward with claims that Chinese Virus injections are, in fact, responsible for the excess deaths phenomenon now being seen all around the world.

Prior to Operation Warp Speed, death rates were mostly stable and generally predictable. Now, more people are dying than usual, and there is only one obvious culprit: the jabs.

Even if you exclude the deaths that are being blamed on covid and not the jabs, there is still an excess of them that cannot be explained by anything other than the jabs, Campbell says.

“Excluding that data, the excess death rate in 2022 for England and Wales is 16.6 percent combined, and 18.2 percent just in Wales alone,” write Jennifer Margulis and Joe Wang for The Epoch Times.

One young boy, 14-year-old Ted Sanderson, died suddenly at his school, Woodham Academy, on June 21. Sanderson received his covid injections as recommended by the government, and now his life is over.

That same day, another person named Chris Houghton-Rai collapsed while working his job at a Toyota dealership. For 90 minutes, paramedics tried to revive him but were unable to stop his sudden death.

About a week later, a retired professional soccer player named Gary Pearson, who had just taken on a new job as a soccer team manager, collapsed at his home. Two weeks prior, Pearson had received heart surgery and was “expected to make a complete recovery.”

That did not happen, though, as Pearson, who was described by his friends as being “fit and healthy,” died for no apparent reason. Like Houghton-Rai, paramedics tried to revive Pearson but to no avail.

While plandemic-induced stress and isolation may have also played a role in some of the excess deaths, leading to fatal conditions like cancer that were left either undiagnosed or untreated, the biggest elephant in the room is the injections.

Some post-injection deaths are immediate, but others take weeks or even months to develop. It all depends on a person’s immune capacity as well as any pre-existing conditions that may exist.

Neurologist Dr. Tom Lowry, MD, a concussion and musculoskeletal expert based out of San Antonio, says he and his colleagues are likewise seeing an uptick in neurological damage ever since the jabs were introduced – and young people are especially prone to these conditions, he says.

“We should be doing autopsies on every one of these young people,” Lowry is quoted as saying. “If we did, we would know for sure within six months what is actually going on.”