Campaign in the Ass: Black Senate Hopeful Kathy Barnette Calls Out Dr. Oz and Dave McCormick for Being World Economic Forum Members [Elite Eugenicists, Racists] at PA Republican Senate Debate

According to FUNKTIONARY:

politician – a campaign in the ass; a pocket-prowler. 2) one who suffers from liplash. 3) one who will run for office and then mostly likely run for cover. 4) one who can win more votes through dishonesty or self-aggrandizement than through keeping promises. A politician will stand for anything that will leave him or her sitting pretty. Remember, there is reason for the word ‘politician’ to have the letters ‘CIA’ towards the end—because it stands for “Cash In Advance” right now. Only a Self-Realized man or woman with clarity of vision, who is not dependent on votes of the people, can master and see pass (and through) truth as easy as they can lies—politicians can only say beautiful lies, consoling lies, just to get your support in the form of a vote—because the self-realized wants nothing from you and has nothing “on you” to get from you. In fact, speaking reality-based truth can be dangerous to his life and his career—vermiculating politicians want power, not funerals or meaningful jobs. For the politician, the satisfaction of the power of office takes priority over his or her integrity. They covet making a living or a killing—not making a difference. A politician’s pedigree is his/her filigree or vice versa—strictly adjunct. (See: Bribery, Political Power, Statutes, Police, FLEAS, LAWS, Greater System & Tyrannolaw)

eugenics – the science of African extermination and of the gene that produces a people (ethnicity) with the object being African and melanated peoples of the world. 2) the science of Racism White Supremacy. Eugenics is a bogus pseudoscience founded by English psycho-ologist Francis Galton, used for purposes of white supremacy tactics made popular by Hitler in Nazi Germany but practiced earlier in the U.S.S.A. 3) the maniacal (Yurugu-istic) philosophy of using genetic manipulation to create a better organism, better race or even a so-called master race by a lone totalitarian Dictator or a group of evil men under the veil of a Corporate State, i.e., Social Eugenics. 4) the racist belief held by many Caucasians that Africans and descendants of Africans are biologically moribund—and consequently were deficient in native or inborn intelligence and that the lack of intelligence would likely lead to a decline in the nation’s collective intelligence. 5) the antidote of the Caucasian’s unconscious fear of a Black Planet. 6) the artifice of attempting to make people appear to be other than they are. 7) the propaganda that African people should be done away with—exterminated. The name ‘eugenics” was coined by the white psychologist Francis Galton. The triune objectives of Eugenics is selective ethnic genetic annihilation, population control (or depopulation), and selective breeding by a pathological strain of DNA. Eugenics essentially means, good white genetic stock; the selective breeding of white people and the mass extermination of African people. Mass incarceration, the homosexuality agenda (depopulation) grew out of the Eugenics movment. Read “War of the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race” by Edwin Black. (See: Genocide, Yurugu,  Recombinant DNA, U.S. Sterilization Laws, Freemasony, Theosophy, Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments, Planned Parenthood, Neuropean, Weiteko Disease, Racism White Supremacy, Similac, P.I.C., Caucasian & Inferiority Complex)

"Massa’s media plus Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses:" How Advertisers’ ‘Invisible Strings’ Control What You Read and Watch

Amos Wilson explained that 'a Goal of the Media is to Make White Dominance and Control Over Everything Seem Natural' According to FUNKTIONARY:

mass media – “Massa’ Media. Massa’s media plus (+) Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The “Mess” Media. 3) wholesale retale— retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you’re told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let’s be perfectly clear on this. There’s no counteroption or outlet to vent when you’re under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.” ~A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

From [CHD] In 2020, while writing for a popular online news platform geared toward millennials, I proposed what I thought was a timely and non-controversial story.

As marijuana legalization was spreading to more and more states, lots of my peers were looking to cut back on their drinking — which had gotten out of control during the pandemic — and turning to cannabis as an anxiety-reducing replacement.

So, I pitched my editor on an experiential piece: For a few weeks, I’d swap my nightly glass of wine with a popular new celeb-backed cannabis beverage and share the effects. She didn’t go for it, but not because she didn’t find the idea interesting or relevant to our audience.

“Unfortunately, our advertisers won’t like it,” she said. “We just can’t do any cannabis stories, period.” Her feedback left me wondering which of our sponsors wouldn’t approve the topic due to conflicting interests.

Was it oh-so-wholesome Disney? An alcohol brand that saw cannabis as a threat to business?

I’ll never know. But regardless of the specifics, the experience left a sour taste in my mouth.

I hadn’t realized until that moment that the advertisers had so much control over what we did and didn’t cover.

As it turns out, research has repeatedly shown this to be a common problem:

  • In response to a survey I conducted back in April, 50% of journalists said they’d been told to avoid certain topics that might conflict with advertisers’ interests.

  • In a 1992 survey of editors at daily newspapers, a staggering 90% reported that advertisers tried to influence stories and applied economic pressure in response to reporting — and 37% of editors had given in to that advertiser pressure.

  • A 2000 Pew Research and Columbia Journalism Review survey found that 30% of journalists admit to purposely avoiding newsworthy stories or “softening the tone” of stories that could adversely affect advertisers.

  • A 2013 study of U.S. daily newspapers showed that conflicts between the business and journalism sides of these operations are rampant. Advertising directors at chain-owned newspapers and small newspapers were more likely to support compromising editorial integrity in order to please or avoid riling advertisers.

  • A 2009 study revealed that whether due to overt pressures or a subconscious desire to please advertisers, publishers tend to give their sponsors special treatment.

  • In a 2021 Mass Communication & Society study, most editors admitted that they feel advertisers pose a significant source of pressure on the newsroom.

  • A 1992 study examined this potential influence and found dozens of examples where news organizations buried stories out of fear of offending advertisers. Some of them didn’t even attempt to deny or hide it. The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette had outright told a columnist not to criticize advertisers, and at the time, the managing editor said: “We do not hire opinion writers to trash advertisers … No newspaper would do that.”

2 Months Before "the Uvalde Massacre" an Active Shooter Drill was Conducted by Police at the Killer’s High School. Cops Taught Participants How to Act. Coincidence Theorists call it "Prophetic"

According to The NYT Post, Haunting images show students pretending to be dead during a recent active-shooter drill at the Texas mass murderer’s high school — conducted by the cop husband of one of the slain teachers.

Ruben Ruiz, a Uvalde school district cop and husband of slain Robb Elementary School fourth-grade teacher Eva Mireles, held the chillingly prophetic drill on March 22 at Uvalde High School, where gunman Salvador Ramos, 18, was a student. 

“Our overall goal is to train every Uvalde area law enforcement officer so that we can prepare as best as possible for any situation that may arise,” the police agency said on its Facebook page.

The 16-year veteran posted photos on Facebook showing him and fellow officers posing as active shooters. He also is seen addressing students about how to react to such emergencies.

One photo also shows a fake attacker confronting one of the officers, who points an orange handgun at him.

Ruiz’s wife, Mireles, 44, taught fourth-graders at Robb Elementary School, her cousin Cristina Arizmendi Mireles said on Facebook.

“My beautiful cousin! Such a devastating day for us all! My heart is shattered into a million pieces,” she wrote.

A neighbor of Mireles told The Post the teacher “was just a sweetheart.”

“It’s a tragedy that this happened to a person like this,” said the neighbor, who did not want to be identified.

“She was the sweetest person, and she would take her cute dogs out on walks and she would say, ‘Hi.’

“Her husband is a police officer, and they are just very nice people. We are in shock something like this would happen. This is a quiet community.”

According to FUNKTIONARY:

coincidence theories – the naïve belief that problems (and solutions to them) happen spontaneously that nothing is ever foreseen plotted planned or conspired through collusion by the wealthy and powerful. (See: Pathocracy, Fronts, Predictive Programming, Conspiracy Theories, Laws, Technetronic Age, WARS & Council on Foreign Relations)

Conspiracy Theories – the notion that one particular group or combination of a group of going concerns plot and execute control over the various dwellers upon the land—when in reality no one controls Control, however there are a conglomerate of individuals, Secret Orders and owners of inter-generational dynastic families who administer the greed that control breeds by “The Greater System” via intrigue primarily within the veil of granfalloons (so-called “governments”) for their collective nefarious vested interests at the expense, detriment, and or demise of the life-force of the real wealth producers in the lands. Conspiracy theories, however well they accurately explain historical events, tempt citizens and orglings to the “sins” of irresponsible apathy and willfully ambiguous incomprehension or misinterpretation. (See: The Greater System, Leviathan, Gangbanking, Freemasonry, C.I.A, Corporations, Yurugu, Psychological Reversal & White Supremacy)

Are These Folks Real or Coin-Operated? 2 Men Claim to be the Only Father of a Child Killed in Uvalde as Facts Beyond Change and Time Lines Get Changed in Microwave Terror Episode, like other ffs

DIFFERENT STORY BUT SAME CHILD, SAME CHILD PHOTO, SAME DADDY, SAME COMPLICIT MEDIA. THE ONLY QUESTION IS WHETHER THAT IS THE SAME HAT?

According to FUNKTIONARY:

belief-based truth - a description or perception of reality, (the content of which comprises what we call "truth"), that one desires or hopes to be true, despite external scientific, natural, or reproducible proof-based truth to the contrary. People all-too-often compromise their integrity and/or intelligence by devising truth which disallows any proof by design, as part and parcel of its ruse to allure its believers)—and even the truth that carries proof cannot be proven against the undeniable uncertainty of Reality. You fall prey to (or fall for) the illusions of proof if you ignore the pure subjectivity of reality. Illusions of scientific proof follow illusions of limits, and illusions of religious proof follow illusions of truth. Science makes truth out of proof, while belief-based religions make proof out of truth. (See: Infinity, Proof, Revelatory Truth, Absolute Truth & Belief System)

government & crime – two sides of the same (counterfeit) coin. (See: Violence, Power, Force, Statism & Religion)

Government – (as commonly misunderstood)—a communal exchange of autonomy for appearance of order (peace via coercion), expanded over time, with the option of exercising violence being reserved to those who define and provide an illusion of order through force and fear. 2) a coercive institution—dysfunctional force and veiled violence. 3) the compelled enforcement of involuntary society. The Corporate State)—a fictitious entity (mental aberration or abstraction) and thus a non-producer of wealth, but masquerading as the prime merchant. 4) human failure programs that stay (hold off) maximumissness and depend on the support (stealing then redistributing wealth) of its subject-victims. 5) ‘organized’ coerced support of selected monopolized services. 6) licensed, sanctioned and legalized criminal activity. 7) a sticky residue on your shoe. The whole idea of government is this: If enough people get together and act in concert, they can take some and not pay for it. Any government represents a crucial compromise with freedom and distortion of reality, and no reified abstraction (however crafted by crafty corporate cartoonists) can protect anyone from any and all danger. The feudal subject-King relationship is exactly the same as the federal citizen-Government relationship. [MORE]

"Mo Tea Suh?" Corpse Joe Sees a Mass Exodus of Black Staff in Blight House Blaxit. Gullible Step-and-Fetchit Coordinators Mistakenly Beleived They Would Have Their Fingers on the Nuclear Button

[Racists Appear Superior by Surrounding Themselves w/Mediocre Blacks] Neutral OpporTomist Ketanji Believes She Vicariously Empowers Blacks. To Dems “Blackness" Means 'Not Republican' but What Else? According to FUNKTIONARY:

shenanigger – a Negro (neo-lawn-jockey) who carries out Step-n-Fetchit type activities/actions (shenanigans) for the dominant immoral minority (the psychopathic white power semi-organism), i.e., the Rhodes, Rothschild Anglo-Saxon Zionist power clique, unknowingly at the expense of him/herself and knowingly at the expense (sell-out/buy-out) of his/her people and culture. (See: McNegro, Coin-Operated, The Moteasuh Tribe, Sambo & $nigger)

More Tea Sir? From [HERE] At least 21 Black staffers have left the White House since late last year or are planning to leave soon. Some of those who remain say it’s no wonder why: They describe a work environment with little support from their superiors and fewer chances for promotion.

The departures have been so pronounced that, according to one current and one former White House official, some Black aides have adopted a term for them: “Blaxit.”

The first big exit came in December, when Kamala Harris’ senior adviser and chief spokesperson Symone Sanders announced she was leaving, ultimately for a gig at MSNBC. Since then, Harris senior aides Tina Flournoy, Ashley Etienne and Vincent Evans, and public engagement head Cedric Richmond have left.

Public engagement aide Carissa Smith, gender policy aide Kalisha Dessources Figures, National Security Council senior director Linda Etim, digital engagement director Cameron Trimble, associate counsel Funmi Olorunnipa Badejo, chief of staff Ron Klain advisers Elizabeth Wilkins and Niyat Mulugheta, press assistant Natalie Austin, National Economic Council aides Joelle Gamble and Connor Maxwell, and presidential personnel aides Danielle Okai, Reggie Greer and Rayshawn Dyson have all departed too. Deputy White House counsel Danielle Conley and Council of Economic Advisers aide Saharra Griffin are among others planning to leave in the coming weeks, according to White House officials.

The exodus has raised concerns among outside observers who push for the diversification of government ranks.

“I have heard about an exodus of Black staffers from the White House — ‘Blaxit’ — and I am concerned,” said Spencer Overton, president of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, which tracks government staff diversity numbers. “Black voters accounted for 22 percent of President Biden’s voters in November 2020. It is essential that Black staffers are not only recruited to serve in senior, mid-level and junior White House positions, but are also included in major policy and personnel decisions and have opportunities for advancement.”

A White House official pushed back on those concerns, saying that around 14 percent of current White House staffers identify as Black — in line with national proportions. The official added that the number is expected to increase as more Black staffers are brought on board and that 15 percent of Black staffers have been promoted in the last year. [MORE]

The CDC Knew that a Young Boy Died from Myocarditis [heart inflammation] After Getting a COVID Injection When it Signed Off on the 3rd Shot for Kids 5-11

DETAILS ARE FURTHER DOWN THE PAGE.

From [CHD] and [HERE] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,277,980 reports of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and May 20, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). That’s an increase of 9,972 adverse events over the previous week.

VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 28,312 reports of deaths — an increase of 171 over the previous week — and 232,694 serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 2,330 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 820,788 adverse events, including 13,045 deaths and 82,974 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and May 20, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 13,045 U.S. deaths reported as of May 20, 16% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 20% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 59% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 583 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been administered as of May 20, including344 million doses of Pfizer, 220 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to May 20, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to May 20, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to May 20, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

[MORE] and [MORE]

CDC acknowledges boy died of myocarditis, signs off on COVID for kids 5 to 11 

A young boy between the age of 5 and 11 died after receiving his first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, according to the CDC.

Yet, the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel and its director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, signed off on a third dose for the young age group despite their knowledge of the boy’s death.

Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a member of the agency’s vaccine safety team, said during a virtual meeting held by the Advisory Committee on Immunization and Practices (ACIP) a young male died 13 days after receiving his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

The boy experienced a fever 12 days after his first dose. A day later, he experienced abdominal pain and vomiting. He passed away the same day. Evidence showed the boy suffered from heart inflammation known as myocarditis.

“This patient had a rapid clinical course. From the time they started experiencing their abdominal pain day 13 after dose one until the time they were brought into the [emergency department] and subsequently died was on the order of a couple of hours,” Shimabukuro said.

“Histopathological evidence of myocarditis was present on autopsy, and that was resolved to be the cause of death,” he added.

The death was reported to VAERS and verified by the CDC through an interview with the healthcare provider.

Tests conducted on the boy by the CDC’s infectious disease pathology branch “did not find evidence of viral infection at the time of death,” Shimabukuro said.

The ACIP did not ask questions or discuss the death, but instead, determined the benefits of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine outweigh the risks. [MORE]

Complicit in Genocide: In Case You Missed It NY Gov Kathy Hochul Told a Black Church, 'God made the Vaccine and Wants Us Vaccinated.' The Unelected Ruler Ruled that No Religious Objection is Valid

From [CHD] New York City paused its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for New York Police Department (NYPD) employees so the department can retain roughly 5,000 police and other employees who have not received the vaccine.

The May 19 announcement came one day after Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon issued an orderallowing depositions to be taken in a class-action lawsuit on behalf of NYPD and municipal employees alleging the city violated their religious and constitutional rights through widespread discrimination.

According to city officials, 91% of the NYPD uniformed cops and other employees are vaccinated, leaving approximately 4,659 NYPD unvaccinated employees despite a deadline to get the jabs by Oct. 29, 2021.

“In a nutshell, no decisions will be made, no further members will be forced to leave until further notice,” an NYPD sergeant told the New York Post. “There hasn’t been any memo, just basically keep everything status quo and if issues arise we will revisit it down the road.”

Last month, an unknown number of officers received final notices rejecting their requests for religious or medical exemptions to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for municipal employees.

As of November 2021, NYPD employees had filed 6,170 requests for religious or medical exemptions.

“The city’s legal argument for upholding religious discrimination is falling apart in real time as the litigation progresses,” lead attorney Sujata Gibson told The Defender. [MORE]

According to the class action suit,

"Both mandates were to take effect on September 27, 2021. The day before the state mandate was supposed to take effect, Governor Hochul gave a sermon at a Brooklyn church [a black church], during which she said that God made the vaccine and that she was recruiting apostles to coerce those who did not understand God’s will and what God wants (that we be vaccinated). Governor Hochul then told the press that the Pope supports vaccination and that no religious objections to vaccination are valid, and this is why she removed the religious exemption from the state healthcare mandate. [MORE] and [MORE]

Hochul stated, "All of you, yes, I know you're vaccinated, you're the smart ones. But you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God. ... I need you to be my apostles. I need you to go out and talk about it and say, we owe this to each other. We love each other."

Clearly, the governor said, getting vaccinated was the best way to obey God in this crisis.

NY Governor Does a Niggarmarole as New Token McNegro Rep. Antonio Delgado Replaces Broken Token Rolebot as Lt Governor. How It Tangibly Helps Black People is Another White Supremacy Mystery

From [HERE] Rep. Antonio Delgado has been sworn in as New York's next Lieutenant Governor. This move will trigger a special election for his congressional seat in an already politically chaotic election year.

Delgado, 45, grew up in the Electric City. He attended Notre-Dame Bishop Gibbons High School where he was dubbed a basketball star. He went on to earn degrees from Colgate, Oxford, and Harvard law schools.

The Democrat was tapped by Gov. Kath Hochul in May following the abrupt resignation of her former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin. Benjamin was arrested in April on bribery charges related to a past campaign.

How his selection will tangibly help Black people is a mighty mystery. But dems love it, get out the vote!

According to FUNKTIONARY:

 The Niggarmarole – bullshit laced with hype sprinkled with jive-ass incompetence resulting in a tragicomedy of errors—self-repeating and never receding—played out and played over and over until you’ve realized that it’s over—but something you’ll never truly get over. The Niggamarole is an experience that you allow others to put you through when you think you’ve been left with nothing else to do. The only performance happening in a niggamarole is purely theatrical—all for show—none for closing deals and making dough. (See: Bullshit, Piece-Activist, Reaves Technique & Soonshine)

 mandroid – a programmed, indoctrinated, academented, miseducated, trained, stupefied and stymied conformist.

SNAGs – $nitch-ass Negroes Aiding Governments. 2) COINTEL-BROs. 3) Smile Negro And Grin—while I put it in. SNAGs are coin-operated piece-activist sniggering infiltraitors from the native Black American community. SNAGs are on the stroll, exacting Black life as the toll, while klandestinely on the rogue “government” payroll. Dumb-ditty dumb where the hell do these sorry-ass sellout Negroes come from? When you see them, go and give them some—or at least a piece of your mind. It’s easy to heckle and hyde, but why do we seem to always let self-hating sucker-perpetrating Negroes electric slide? SNAGs are Negroes who run from the fabric, the very essence of their Afrikan heritage struggle, culture and consciousness, and run to support the psychopathological dominant minority elite European global racist-supremacist mindset and Agenda along with its narcissistic projections and population control objectives (genocide and eugenics). The more you pull at a snag, the more problems it causes—hence, you have to cut it off from the garment so it will cease causing constraint and strain on the integrity of the fabric of Afrikan consciousness and liberation. Don’t just run them off, cut them off. SNAGs get dealt with! SNAG’s are responsible for facilitating agents of various “government intelligence” operations in successfully accomplishing the “wet jobs” (assassinations) and downfall of some of our most cherished leaders, luminary thinkers, uncompromising revolutionaries and lovers of justice for all humanity. SNAGs come in all shapes, colors, sizes and forms within the Black American community but they all share one common thread—self-hatred. Some of the less known but high-exposure SNAGs were Alex Haley (who covertly worked his roots on Malcolm X), Enest Withers (civil rights photographer and FBI informant), and Justice Thurgood Marshall (also snitching and informing on the Right-Reverend Martin L. King, Jr.), not to mention another “Reverend” from Memphis, TN who was heavily involved (along with Jesse Jackson) in the orchestration of King’s assassination. SNAGs have also been known to be complicit in both successful and botched assassination schemes plotted and executed by the shadowy characters within and behind the veil of the Corporate State and its wet-works black operations spy agencies. Where is the Black Flask Brigade when you need them? (See: COINTELPRO, FBI, CIA, Manhood, $nigger, Sigma Pi Phi, Coin-Operated, Racism White Supremacy, HO-Method, Infiltraitors, Wet Jobs & Piece-Activist)

Nancy Pelosi’s Husband Faces Drunken Driving Charge in California [Puppeticians Can't Run Their Own Lives. Why Trust Them to Run Ours? Fuck the Government]

From [HERE] Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol in Napa County, Calif., on Saturday night, according to the county’s website.

Bail for Mr. Pelosi, 82, was set at $5,000. County records show he was released from custody on Sunday morning. The charge he faces is a misdemeanor.

Mr. Pelosi was driving a 2021 Porsche and attempted to cross State Route 29 when his car was struck by another vehicle, a Jeep, at 10:26 p.m., according to a California Highway Patrol report. No one was injured, according to the report. 

Ms. Pelosi, a Democrat, has not addressed the arrest publicly. On Sunday, she delivered a commencement address at Brown University. News of her husband’s arrest was reported by TMZ.

From [FUNKTIONARY]

"Government" - Latinized Greek ("Gubematlo" = control; and from the Latin "menre" = mind; "The control of the mind." 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one's comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of "protecting" their victims.

The outworking of history consistently demonstrates that government will, in spite of the Bill of Rights, arrogate all power to itself eventually, if the people don't act to prevent it. You have rights alright, just don't get caught exercising them, O.K.? "Government" is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else.

Official "government" is disorganized, politicized; centralized; canonized and revered initiation of force, but it is no less initiation of force and coercion than any unofficial singular action of the same offensive or violent content. "Government" is an abstract infinite entity acting as a possessive noun. There is not a single line in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any governmental document that states that a natural person will be left alone as long as she or he does not impose upon another or others.

By commission and omission, all official decrees make clear that a human is regarded as owned property or resource of the god called "Corporate State." It is controlling the lives, energy and property of others that requires coercive force and this is its sole function. Endorsing the lie of an imagined abstract collective interest supports the very concept that gives rise to all covert and overt oppression.

"The government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of the way. It does not keep the country free.

The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way." -Kirkpatrick Sale. The wayward notion that government redistributes wealth is widely held as sacrosanct as it is patently false. There are redistributes aspects, sure, but that's as close as it gets. "As long as government is allowed to exist, it will everywhere keep growing and getting worse.

Nearly everything that "governments" do (i.e., those with wholly symbolic roles "running" it, and who perform acts in its name) is grounded in fear. Government will cease to exist when people cease to grant it legitimacy—in other words stop believing in it, stop looking to it for solutions to problems in their lives, and stop supporting it." -Fred Woolworth.

Government has failed at every attempt in 6,000 years of recorded history.

Government atrocities—carried out by irrational functionaries, economic hit men, soldiers, diplomats, emissaries, etc., under every possible flavor or form of government—have littered the bloody pages of recorded history. Government is the indisputable greatest purveyor of murder, mayhem, genocide, exploitation, rape, forced starvation, pillage and chaos in the annals of humanity.

Government does not need to be abolished; merely rendered obsolete through seeing it for what it truly is—a prime manufacturer of poverty, brutal oppression, violence, coercion, conformity and fear.

The monetary genius E.C. Riegel once wrote that petitioning to government is like writing to Santa Claus.

Government has created its own necessity by making people (its fictitious subject-citizens) fearful of the violence it creates by the effects of its very existence— in the form of violent criminals and external aggressors. "Government is men and women providing services on a compulsory basis; pay or get shot. To be legitimate they would have to drop their guns and provide their services on a voluntary basis. However, the moment they do so, they cease to be a government. That's quite the conundrum." -Marc Stevens.

Government is at the root of the cycle of violence—you run to it for protection and run from it out of fear for your life. The Slaughterhouse is to cattle as "government" is to people.

"Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem." -U.S. "President" Ronald 'McDonald' Reagan.

"The only idea they have ever manifested as to what is a government of consent, is this—that it is one to which everybody must consent, or be shot." - No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, Lysander Spooner.

Men and women calling themselves "government" violently impose themselves on victims labeled "citizens," and "ordain" scriptures called "laws" that define the way "government" sanctions business as a crime by providing services over the barrel of a gun.

What exactly is "government?" Have you ever seen a "government?" While there are varying degrees, "government" very simply is "one man violently controlling the life and property of another man." In some places this violent control is "decreed" to be for the latter's "own good" and "protection" and hailed as the "best system in the world." Because it's based on violence, there are no "states" or "nations," "states" being "voluntary associations."

You may recognize that violent control over a man's life and property is what we like to call—slavery. Slavery is a form of "government," and in most cases, if not all, synonymous with "government." [MORE]

Suit Says 13 Yr Old Black Boy Stopped Running and Put His Hands Up. "But the [Chicago] Officer Still Shot Him –Recklessly, Callously, and Wantonly – Right Through his Back." He is Permanently Disabled

From [HERE] The family of a 13-year-old Black boy filed a federal lawsuit Thursday accusing an officer of needlessly shooting the unarmed youth in the back during a foot chase. The incident occurred on May 18, 2022, in the 800 block of North Cicero Avenue in Chicago. The shooting occurred in the community area of Austin on the City’s West Side. More than 75% of the community residents of Austin are African American.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court on behalf of the teen’s mother, Cierra Corbitt, lists the city and the unidentified officer who fired the shot as defendants and alleged the shooting was a direct result of the city’s failed implementation of a new policy governing “inherently dangerous” foot pursuits.

The teen, who is Black and in seventh grade, is identified only by his initials, A.G. The lawsuit stated that A.G. is currently lying in Stroger Cook County Hospital “with a bullet still lodged in his body after being shot in the back” by the officer on May 18.

To justify the shooting the dependent media has parroted the police claim that the 13-year-old possibly was linked to a carjacking. It should go without saying that said allegation has no relevance as to whether the police conduct was lawful or moral.

The officer involved has been relieved of his police powers pending an investigation (paid vacation), the Chicago Police Department has said. The officer has not been charged.

The complaint states:

This is A.G. He is a young Black seventh grader. He is 13 years old, 5 feet 8 inches tall, and weighs 122 pounds. A.G. is currently lying in a hospital bed with a bullet still lodged in his body after being shot in the back by an officer with the Chicago Police Department (“CPD”). A.G. and his family are waiting to learn whether he will ever be able to walk again. The bullet in A.G.’s body was fired from the gun of a CPD officer. The officer was chasing A.G. and, according to witness statements, was screaming for him to stop running and put his hands up. A.G. was unarmed and did as he was instructed. But the officer still shot him – recklessly, callously, and wantonly – right through his back.

CPD’s shooting was wholly unjustified as A.G. was running away from the shooter, he was unarmed, and he posed no threat of harm to the officer who shot him or anyone in the vicinity. Multiple witnesses at the scene reported that A.G. was complying with the officers’ directive for him to put his hands up – and indeed his hands were up – when John Doe Officer shot him.

While A.G. survived the shooting, he has been permanently and catastrophically injured and remains hospitalized.

While the City of Chicago is currently subject to a Consent Decree to address CPD’s long sordid history of using excessive force, leadership within the City and CPD have not taken those efforts seriously. As a result, there remains a widespread pattern and practice of using excessive force, including deadly force, against African Americans.

According to the complaint: the facts are as follows:

On the evening of May 18, 2022, A.G. was riding as a passenger in a Honda Accord. CPD was in pursuit of the car. As the car was driving west on Rice Street towards Cicero Avenue, A.G. got out of the car and ran. As A.G. was running south on Cicero Avenue through the lot of a Marathon gas station, there were several CPD officers on foot chasing him from behind. There were also several police vehicles nearby, in addition to a CPD helicopter overhead.

According to witness accounts, while A.G. was running he was told by one or more of the pursuing CPD officers to put his hands up. A.G. did as he was directed; he put his hands up with the intent of surrendering to the police.

At or about the same time, John Doe Officer, who was running behind A.G. with his gun unholstered, shot A.G. without cause or justification, causing A.G. to sustain catastrophic and permanent injuries.

A.G. immediately collapsed in the lot of the Marathon gas station. CPD officers did not render immediate aide to A.G., but instead callously dragged him across the pavement and then turned their attention to an uninjured officer who crashed into a sign at the gas station while arriving on scene.

A.G. did not have a weapon or do anything to make John Doe Officer believe that he was armed or dangerous. A.G. did not pose an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to John Doe Officer (who was running behind him) or to anyone.

As a result of the unjustified shooting by John Doe Officer, A.G. has (so far) been diagnosed with the following injuries:

  1. gunshot wound;

  2. complete lesion at T7-T10 level of thoracic spinal cord;

  3. T10 spinal cord injury;

  4. fracture of lamina of thoracic vertebrae;

  5. fracture of transverse process of thoracic vertebrae;

  6. fracture of spinous process of thoracic vertebrae;

  7. retained magnetic metal foreign body;

  8. multiplefracturesofribs;

  9. hemothorax (collection of blood between the chest and lungs);

  10. acute blood loss anemia;

  11. bilateral pulmonary contusion;

  12. esophageal injury; and

  13. impaired mobility and ADLs.

White Klansas City Cop Shot an Unarmed, Pregnant Black Woman 5 Times. Claimed 'He Faced Imminent Threat' as She Fled. Not Charged or Arrested. [Authority Can't be Reformed, it's Uncontrollable]

From [HERE] and [HERE] An unarmed Black woman told officers she was pregnant just before she was shot multiple times in Kansas City, Missouri, according to a witness.

Leonna Hale, 26, had her hands up in the moments before officers shot her in the parking lot of a Family Dollar store on Friday night, a woman identified only as Shédanja told The Kansas City Star. 

Shédanja said Hale was attempting to run away from officers when they shot her five times.

he Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) said the shooting occurred as officers with the Kansas City Police Department (KCPD) attempted to arrest the occupants of a car in connection with a reported armed carjacking.

The officers had spotted a vehicle matching the description of a stolen vehicle at the Family Dollar at Prospect and East 6th Avenues shortly before 8 p.m. on Friday, MSHP said on Twitter.

As officers attempted to make contact with the vehicle's occupants, a man exited the vehicle, fled on foot and was apprehended, the MSHP said. He was not identified.

The highway patrol said Hale exited the vehicle and fled into the store's parking lot. "Two officers fired shots," MSHP added. "A suspect handgun was recovered from the scene. Hale was seriously injured & her condition is stable. No other injuries."

Shédanja, who had gone to the store with her three children, described a scene where officers opened fire on a woman who allegedly posed no threat.

She told The Star that when she arrived at the store she heard officers yelling "get out [of] the car" to two people in a vehicle next to hers.

A man got out, jumped a fence and fled, she said, and three officers ran after him. Hale got out of the vehicle with her hands up, Shédanja said.

When officers told her to get on the ground, she told them she was pregnant and couldn't, Shédanja said.

Officers repeatedly asked Hale to get down, she said, and at one point, Hale told officers there was a gun in the vehicle.

Hale then started backing towards a fence and several officers approached her with their guns drawn, Shédanja said. "She did not pull out a weapon on them," she said. "She did not even have a stick in her hand."

According to Shédanja, Hale had taken just three steps to run away from the officers when they fired five times. "I remember it because it didn't stop. They shot five times," Shédanja said. Newsweek has reached out to her for further comment.

In a video she captured following the shooting, Hale is seen lying on the ground with blood on her shirt as other officers arrive on the scene and one appears to handcuff her.

The witness account of the shooting has prompted outrage on social media

"She had her hands up and told police she could not follow their directions to get on her stomach b/c she was pregnant. There is no reforming this," tweeted activist Leslie Mac.

Britni Danielle wrote: "How many people have to die before y'all realize police can't be reformed? Leonna Hale deserved better. We all do."

"She'd have been safer if, instead of being unarmed and pregnant, she were armed in a school shooting children," added Steve Cox, referring to the delayed police response to the shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, last week.

Media Parrots Whatever Cops Say About Uvalde and Sheople Believe It. No Photo Journalists Allowed on Crime Scene, No Images Released by Cops, No Cell Video/Objective Evidence, No Trial, like Most FF

TELL ME, THINK FOR ME MASTER.’ Yesterday the NYT stated,

“We’re always trying to balance the news value of an image and its service to our readers against whether or not the image is dignified for the victims or considerate toward the families or loved ones of those pictured,” said Meaghan Looram, the director of photography at The New York Times. “We don’t want to withhold images that would help people to understand what has happened in scenarios like these, but we also don’t publish images sheerly as provocation.”

In the case of the Uvalde shooting, photojournalists were not allowed on the grounds of the school, and law enforcement did not release any images from the crime scene. Press photographers were only able to capture what was visible outside the school, including the images made by Pete Luna from the Uvalde Leader News, who witnessed children fleeing a classroom after climbing through a window. Media outlets had no access to images of the shooting’s aftermath, so decisions about whether to publish graphic images from this situation are moot.”

No Right to Shoot Back? Cops Did Nothing While Kids Were Massacred. Although We Must Obey, the Supreme Ct Has Ruled COPS Have NO LEGAL DUTY to PROTECT. Who are the Mind and Gun Controlled Fools Here?

NO RIGHT TO SHOOT BACK? FUCK THAT. According to the Wall Street Journal, police who responded to the mass shooting at an elementary school here waited around an hour to enter the classroom where the gunman had locked himself. After the fact, the police claim that a commander on scene incorrectly thought no lives were at risk despite multiple 911 calls from children inside, the director of the Texas Department of Public Safety said Friday. The cops probably also heard the gun shots while they stood outside.

The decision was a mistake and it is unclear how many lives it may have cost, said the director, Steven McCraw, at a news conference. Ultimately 19 children and two teachers were found dead (if this event really took place).

Despite sheople’s outrage about cops standing down, the Supreme Court has ruled that police departments and their officers have no legal duty to protect any particular person. Courts throughout the nation have upheld and expanded on what is known as the “public duty doctrine.” This little known legal realism is concealed in The Spectacle by the Dependent Media and puppeticians in their emotional rants about gun control. Understanding “gun control issues” in their actual context undercuts propaghandi stances as loud and ignorant. The public duty doctrine is well known by cops as they go around surveilling and controlling us like rats.

According to the Supreme Court police have no legal duty to protected any victim from violence by other private parties unless the victim was in police custody. [MORE] and [MORE] This means that police cannot be sued for any federal constitutional claim for a failure to protect citizens. Unless a state negligence law exists allowing such a lawsuit, victims cannot hold police liable for a failure to protect from harm from private parties.

The only legal question for victims such as the ones in Ulvalde is whether the students were in the “custody” of the government during the “massacre.” In other mass shootings such as Parkland where a failure to protect children was claimed, the court ruled that students were not in “custody” and dismissed all claims against the police for a failure to protect students. Other victims such as the alleged victims in the Buffalo Supermarket were not in custody and therefore they would have no claims for a failure to protect. Said legal precedent applies regardless of circumstances such as whether police were present or aware of dangers - the Supreme Court has held that police have no legal duty to protect.

The case of Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (1981), in which police were present and should have been aware of danger to the victims, clearly articulates the public duty doctrine. The facts were as follows:

In the early morning hours of March 16, 1975, appellants Carolyn Warren, Joan Taliaferro, and Miriam Douglas were asleep in their rooming house at 1112 Lamont Street, N.W. Warren and Taliaferro shared a room on the third floor of the house; Douglas shared a room on the second floor with her four-year-old daughter. The women were awakened by the sound of the back door being broken down by two men later identified as Marvin Kent and James Morse. The men entered Douglas' second floor room, where Kent forced Douglas to sodomize him and Morse raped her. Warren and Taliaferro heard Douglas' screams from the floor below. Warren telephoned the police, told the officer on duty that the house was being burglarized, and requested immediate assistance. The department employee told her to remain quiet and assured her that police assistance would be dispatched promptly. Warren's call was received at Metropolitan Police Department Headquarters at 6:23 a. m., and was recorded as a burglary in progress. At 6:26 a. m., a call was dispatched to officers on the street as a "Code 2" assignment, although calls of a crime in progress should be given priority and designated as "Code 1." Four police cruisers responded to the broadcast; three to the Lamont Street address and one to another address to investigate a possible suspect.

Meanwhile, Warren and Taliaferro crawled from their window onto an adjoining roof and waited for the police to arrive. While there, they saw one policeman drive through the alley behind their house and proceed to the front of the residence without stopping, leaning out the window, or getting out of the car to check the back entrance of the house. A second officer apparently knocked on the door in front of the residence, but left when he received no answer. The three officers departed the scene at 6:33 a. m., five minutes after they arrived.

Warren and Taliaferro crawled back inside their room. They again heard Douglas' continuing screams; again called the police; told the officer that the intruders had entered the home, and requested immediate assistance. Once again, a police officer assured them that help was on the way. This second call was received at 6:42 a. m. and recorded merely as "investigate the trouble" — it was never dispatched to any police officers.

Believing the police might be in the house, Warren and Taliaferro called down to Douglas, thereby alerting Kent to their presence. Kent and Morse then forced all three women, at knifepoint, to accompany them to Kent's apartment. For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of Kent and Morse.

Denying all claims of liability against the government and the police for a failure to protect the victims the court explained,

the District of Columbia appears to follow the well established rule that official police personnel and the government employing them are not generally liable to victims of criminal acts for failure to provide adequate police protection.

This uniformly accepted rule rests upon the fundamental principle that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen.

A publicly maintained police force constitutes a basic governmental service provided to benefit the community at large by promoting public peace, safety and good order. The extent and quality of police protection afforded to the community necessarily depends upon the availability of public resources and upon legislative or administrative determinations concerning allocation of those resources. Riss v. City of New York, supra. The public, through its representative officials, recruits, trains, maintains and disciplines its police force and determines the manner in which personnel are deployed. At any given time, publicly furnished police protection may accrue to the personal benefit of individual citizens, but at all times the needs and interests of the community at large predominate. Private resources and needs have little direct effect upon the nature of police services provided to the public. Accordingly, courts have without exception concluded that when a municipality or other governmental entity undertakes to furnish police services, it assumes a duty only to the public at large and not to individual members of the community.”

The Supreme Court has also ruled that police are not liable under the Due Process clause for a failure to protect even where the police are have adopted a department policy of non-action. In Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005), the Court explained that police have broad discretion to arrest people whenever they want to; even when a court’s restraining order has explicitly ordered the arrest of a violator (as it did in that case) the police have discretion as to whether they will or not arrest.

Despite reality concealment by puppeticians and their Dependent Media the public duty doctrine is a legal reality that, as explained by the DC Court of Appeals, is “well established” throughout the nation. A responsible, capable and intelligent citizen should be ready and able to defend himself and come to the defense of others when necessary because the police have no legal obligation to do so. Who would think that under the most violent terroristic circumstances such as an alleged “madman” murdering children, the police would choose not to offer protection? Lax gun policies? How about an unaccountable government that can’t protect even the most vulnerable citizens unable to defend themselves? Rather than take guns away from people, it is rational for more people to arm themselves; you should have the right to shoot back especially since vaginal cops have no legal obligation to protect you.

The public duty doctrine is yet another reason the social contract between government and citizens is myth. The theory is that there is a “social contract” between people and the government in which the government protects the people and enforces the laws, in exchange for citizens’ obedience and taxes. That is, people have agreed to obey the government and do so voluntarily in exchange for government services. Mutual obligations, a promise for a promise, are a necessary element of every contract. Where persons mistakenly believe they have a contract and one party fails to fulfill an obligation, the other is necessarily excused from performing her obligation. A contract places both parties under an obligation to each other, and one party’s rejection of his contractual obligation releases the other party from her obligation.

With regard to the social contract undeceiver Michael Huemer states,

‘individuals are supposed to be obligated to obey the laws promulgated by the state. Sometimes citizens violate those laws, in which case the state’s agents will punish the citizen, usually with fines or imprisonment. Given the wide and indefinite range of laws that might be created by the state and the range of punishments to which one might be subjected for violating them, an individual’s concessions to the state under the social contract are quite large. The state, in turn, is supposed to assume an obligation to the citizen, to enforce the citizen’s rights, including protecting the citizen from criminals and hostile foreign governments.’

Citizens are contractually obliged to obey all laws and commands and when they fail to do so the government punishes the citizen, usually with fines or imprisonment. However, authorities are bound to do whatever they want to do, whenever they want to do it and to whom they choose, but no one in particular. Dr. Blynd asks “Makes you feel like a fool, doesn’t it? ”

There is no contract between the individual and the state.” The social contract is a device or trick that is parcel to a paradigm in the citizen’s mind that enables the coercive system (government). Huemer goes on,

What of the suggestion that the state’s obligation is owed to the public at large rather than to any individual? One problem with this suggestion is that it is purely arbitrary. There is no actual evidence for the suggestion, and one might be forgiven for suspecting that the state simply declares that the social contract requires only whatever the state itself wants to do. The other problem is that the social contract theory is meant to explain why individuals are obligated to obey the state. If an individual is not a party to the social contract, then the individual has no duty to the state under that contract. If the contract somehow holds only between the state and the public at large, then perhaps ‘the public at large’ owes something to the state, but no individual does. If, on the other hand, the social contract holds between the individual and the state, then the state must have an obligation to the individual. One cannot have it both ways: one cannot maintain that the individual owes duties to the state but that the state owes nothing to the individual.

It should also go without saying but there is no magic ceremony, voting process or magic statements (oaths) which can grant certain people extra-human powers to rule over people, exempt them from morality, accountability and do things which no individual or group of individuals can do.

Why does any of this matter? If there is no social contract then there is no rational basis for the belief in political authority.

Here, we are not talking about the purpose of government or how government can be improved. Rather, authority is the belief in the government’s implied right to rule over people in the first place. Authority is the belief that some people have the legal and moral right to forcibly control others, and that, consequently, those others have a legal and moral obligation to obey.’ Huemer defines political authority as “the hypothesized moral property in virtue of which governments may coerce people in certain ways not permitted to anyone else and in virtue of which citizens must obey governments in situations in which they would not be obligated to obey anyone else.” The reason the government is said to have a special entitlement to make and enforce laws for the rest of society and citizens have a special obligation to obey is because of the social contract. However, as stated, the social contract is an illusion. In addition to the above reasons about the public duty doctrine, there is no social contract because no one has ever agreed to it. If such a social contract agreement exists, WHEN DID YOU SIGN IT? We were born into this arrangement, no one signed anything. Yet citizens are obligated to obey all laws and governmental orders regardless of whether they agree or disagree with it. Also, there is no implicit social contract agreement; the government imposes its law on everyone whether you object or not, the law will be imposed on you regardless of whether you use government services or participate in elections and there is no way to decline government service or ‘opt out’ of legal obligations owed to the government or cancel the requirement of obedience to all laws. Therefore, there are no rational explanations for the fantastic belief in authority. [MORE]

No person(s) or entity has the right to rule over other human beings. Authority is a granfalloon, an unreality. FUNKTIONARY explains Authority “has no meaning in reality,” it “is the means by which society uses to control its population.” Authority is a “cartoon” or an “image of law” because among other things the social contract is a lie told to you by your masters. Consequently, there is no rational justification for anyone to rule over others.

In real life “Authority is rule through coercion.” Coercion here means physical force. “Laws” are threats backed by the ability and willingness to use violence/force against those who disobey. Huemer explains ‘the legal system is anchored by a non-voluntary intervention, a harm that the state can impose regardless of the individual’s choices.’ The only actual choice authority presents to citizens is to obey commands and laws or go to jail. Locke states, “The lie of tyranny is that you will maintain the freedom of life by obeying authority. The choices it offers you are a lifetime of obedience or death.” FUNKTIONARY explains, “Once a man has said “yes” under “coercion,”once a man has yielded because he was forced to yield, you have destroyed his capacity to say “yes” spontaneously forever. He will say yes only when he is coerced.”As a placebo, citizens might rationalize that they voluntarily comply with authority but there really is no other choice. The only reality is to comply with the law or eventually authoritarians will place you in greater confinement. Huemer spells out the mechanics of it,

“One can choose not to pay a fine, one can choose to drive without a license, and one can even choose not to walk to a police car to be taken away. But one cannot choose not to be subjected to physical force if the agents of the state decide to impose it.” The legal system is not voluntary or consensual and there is no way to opt out or decline participation in it; we are born into an involuntary system of physical coercion where you either obey authority or go to jail.

Although all governments work this way regardless of how they are described, they are not all the same- some allow more freedoms or grant more “rights” in “their territory” than others. FUNKTIONARY defines this circumstance as “Free Range Prison” or “Free Range Slavery.” A goal of authority is to place you in greater confinement. It states, “demockery” is “a spectacle of the true nature of democracy. . . next to "monetized debt," and direct taxation (on labor) it is the biggest con-game perpetrated on a population. Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain and sustain power over people is to assure the people that they are ruling themselves. Once they believe that lie, they make wonderfully submissive and self-maintained slaves.’

Authority doesn’t need to be destroyed just like a cartoon doesn’t need to be destroyed; authority only exists in people’s minds. Rather, it is the belief in authority which is evil, a curse upon mankind. The great rebel, Larken Rose explains, “The belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.” FUNKTIONARY explains, belief in authority is no different than “Most beliefs [which] are merely the result of indoctrination, acculturation, programming and conditioning.” “Belief” itself is a cultural conditioning imposed on you by others; it is also a slavery. [MORE] Like other granfalloons, authority must be relentlessly propagandized to maintain its existence in The Spectacle. One minor example is the thousands of tv shows and movies about police, fire departments, schools, courts, politicians etc.; regardless of the content, this programming elevates obedience to authority and government into people’s minds as a real entity that solves people’s problems, like a god. Trent Goodbaudy states: “We are stuck in an illusory construct that only exists in a diseased psyche. There really are no rulers and no masters anyway; just claims of authority, and acceptance of these claims by the brainwashed. There really is no government other than what you choose to be governed by: they only have the authority that you grant them.” In other words, as Larken Rose explains, ‘millions of people have hallucinated that puppeticians have authority and then do their bidding, paying for their empires and carrying out their orders.’ [MORE]

The belief in authority must be dropped to usher in human civilization and allow humanity to mature and develop. FUNKTIONARY states, “Only you have authority over your Self...anything else. i.e.. to accept any authority external to one's Self once of discriminating age, is the very definition of irresponsibility.” Authority doesn’t have to be fought and destroyed - just dropped by people. FUNKTIONARY defines, “injustice” as the by-product of authority and its enforcement through legal fictions: the Corporate Police State and their tribunals. 2) forced obligations. Where a critical mass of individuals see authority for what it is, a farce, they will drop it the same way they would discard a wooden coin or expired coupon. As explained by FUNKTIONARY:

The real threat to "authority" is the masses overcoming info-gaps and verigaps through self-knowledge and the proliferation of symbols of opposition, not crime or destruction of property.”

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Endependence - the open declaration of the beginning of self determination, self-reliance and Self-realization that spells the end to dependence on objective truth-based truth, abstractions, reifications, granfalloons, father figures and organized religion.

government paradox - Government is men and women providing services on a compulsory basis—pay and obey or get shot. "To be legitimate they would have to drop their guns and provide their services on a voluntary basis. However, the moment they do so, they cease to be a government. That's quite the conundrum." —Marc Stevens. (See: Statism, Nations, Slavery, Standing, Jurisdiction, State, Unalienable Rights, Freedom, Predictive Programming, Education & Citizens)

"Authority-" is not a force but a farce! "Every great advancement in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority." —Aldous Huxley. Government is the hefty price we pay for our lack of being further evolved as humans. "The disappearance of a sense of responsibility is the most far-reaching consequence of submission to authority." —Stanley Milgram Regarding obedience to authority and carrying out "orders" Milgram states, "Thus there is a fragmentation of the totai human act; no one man decides to carry out the evil act and is confronted with consequences. The person who assumes full responsibility for the act has evaporated. Perhaps this is the most common characteristic of socially organized evil in modern society." At its root, government is based on violence and coercion. Without violent authority, studies show that violent behavior will all but disappear in its wake. Authority breeds the violence that it combats and perpetuates. Violence perpetrated by individuals is learned through noxious social experiences typically suffered under some assumed "authority." "The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own government." —Dr. Martin L. King. Jr.. 1967. Read "Obedience to Authority" by Stanley Milgram, and "Constitution of No Authority" by Lysander Spooner. (See: Violence, Government. Yurugu, BOG. "The Law," Hierarchy. Obedience, Duty, Defiance, Disobedience, Compliance Priests, Preachers, Citizens, States, Involuntary Taxation, Tax Invasion, Behavior, Orders, Allegiance. Internal Revenue Service, Corporate State, Anarchy. Taxtortion, Power, Experts, Doggy & Neuropeans) [MORE]

Militia – a lawful organization outside the control of organized (and unorganized) crime under the direct control of non-merchants formed for the purpose of hands-on remedies for the prevention of violence where there is no “money” to be made (advantage). 2) the last remedy for the non-merchant denied remedy by the merchant courts and police. 3) combat shooting clubs that keep the fetid and flagituous elements (rogue agents and bad actors) in and behind “government” a tad bit nervous. Militias protect the unalienable rights of free men and women. You are more likely to be visited-upon by the “authorities” of whatever stripe more than a would-be robber. Both have the same intention—to take you and/or your property by force. While violence is never the answer, protecting yourself and defending your rights, family, dignity, property and honor is the solution for lawless encroachment by those sworn to uphold the law and those who could care less about you, the authorities, or the law to begin with. “Stop right there! Drop your weapons and let me see your hands in the air—and wave them like you’re in despair.” ~Arnecca DeWoods. Never forget Ruby Ridge. (See: Force Continuum, Gun Control, Startle, Fascism, Rights, Justice System, Unalienable Rights, Police, Law Enforcement, Authorities, Orderlies, Game Warden, Jehovah Witness Protection Program, Surveillance State, Nation- States, Political Boundaries, Free-Range Slavery, Territorial Boundaries, Waco “No-Knock,” The Greater System, WACO, Longevity, Faction, Authority, Government, Granfalloon, Legislation & Second Amendment)

Killers Hell Bent on Committing Mass Murder Probably Wouldn’t Do So if All Law Abiding Citizens Were Background Checked. Or So Goes the Hebrew Slave Logic Parroted by Propaghandi After "Terror Event"

A Latino teen shot up an elementary school filled with Latino children and adults for no reason after he shot his grandmother. Oh, he crashed his grandmother’s car on his way to the school, thereby losing his means of getaway, but he was crazy so he probably wanted to get caught because that’s what crazy killers in mass shootings do in episodes in The Spectacle. Sounds like a story made up by government orderlies based on their low opinion of people. There is no surveillance video, cell phone video or other independently objective evidence, the scene is closed to dependent media and the alleged killer logged onto Facebook after shooting his Grandmother to confess to the crime and announce his crime plan to conduct a mass shooting at a school; another microwave instant terror episode open/closed in a matter of hours, just like other false flags (and TV shows in The Spectacle). There won’t be an adversarial trial where the government will have to prove any of these allegations, establish hearsay and authenticate conveniently discovered social media confessions because the killer was killed by cops prior to his quick capture. As with other microwaved terror episodes we are left with unsubstantiated statements and unverifiable stories told by the police that are parroted by the Dependent Media. Such facts are sprinkled in among hours of emotional begging about disarming citizens. Listen closely, authorities and their media whores tell us that all law abiding people should be background checked before purchasing a gun. And doing so is relevant to this episode because…. . . it probably would have stopped an allegedly deranged Latino Teen hell bent on committing multiple murders from doing so but for a background check law? It should go without saying but criminals break laws to get guns and commit crimes b/c they are criminals. Laws only prohibit law abiding citizens from doing things. Government is rule through coercion [authority] using one conspiracy/emergency after another to control humanity.

Corpse Biden said he was “sick and tired of what’s going on and continues to go on.” He said he has long worked for “common sense gun reforms,” adding that certain moves would have a significant impact without affecting Second Amendment rights. “The idea that an 18-year-old can walk into a store and buy weapons of war designed and marketed to kill is, I think, just wrong,” he said.

Old dumb motherfucker, of course guns are designed to kill. Specifically, the 2nd Amendment is for when all other rights have failed. More than an insurance policy, it also serves as a deterrent. For when would-be tyrants know that the citizenry is well-armed, they think twice about imposing tyranny. [MORE].

Due to the unverifiable nature of the evidence and omission of evidence this insta-terror case feels synthetic and should be suspected as a false flag operation conducted by the government until proven otherwise. If Crimethinc would create fake COVID injections for the purpose of genthanasia and biocide then surely It would have no problem fake shooting at children in a school.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Hebrew slavery – abdicating one’s mind to another thereby allowing the full manipulation of it. “Don’t’ let anyone or any cult-body violate your innocence exploit your ignorance or usher you into cognitive dissonance.

Human Resources – answer questions when asked; sign their names when told; open doors when knocked upon; entrust themselves to the protection of others as a ward; trust in anything other than their inner authority; believe what they are told; know the definitions of words and meaning of terms without bothering to reference the source of the definitions; evade instead of confront apparent external authority or putative jurisdiction, alleged liability or presentment; covet the property of merchants; volunteer to servitude; desire a kinder master instead of liberty; and, yearn for the illusion of security at the expense of inalienable rights and freedom. Are you a human resource of the Corporate U.S. “government”? Are you a fictional citizen of the United States—as granted by Congress? Do you have a Birth Certificate with a date of birth? Have you registered to vote? Have you applied for the “benefits” of Social Security? (See: Statutory Oppression, Involuntary Servitude, Citizen of the United States, Legislation, Date of Birth, Statutes, Freedom, Liberty, Inalienable Rights, Empty Words, Blanks, Employee, Tin Woodsman, Scarecrow, OWLs, Hireling, Voting, SSN, Socialism & IRS)

gun control – using both hands. 2) actually hitting your target. 3) holding an instrument of persuasion with a good grip. You don’t shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive. Those who use guns to “break” (violate) the law will have no problem breaking the law to get guns (to commit violent crimes against you). The issue is not the laws, it’s the lawlessness. The drop in the overt crime rate in any geographic area or so-called “jurisdiction” is proportional to the number of permits of concealed handgun licensing issued in any particular “jurisdiction” across the country. This fact is reported in a study within the book More Guns, Less Crime by Dr. John R. Lott. Those who bend their guns into plowshares will plow for those who don’t. I don’t mean to alarm you, but the statists and fascists are trying to unarm you while the less respectable criminals are waiting to harm you. While going to shop at Target unarmed at the strip mall you become an even easier target to get stripped of your property, if not your life, by the armed criminals. Don’t let a walk back to the parking lot be your final lot in life. In a 1989 Supreme Court decision, the court held: “…the Constitution does not impose a duty on the state state and local governments to protect the citizens from criminal harm.” ~DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 1989. Look, I’m here for moral support—ignore the gun. “There are approximately two million defensive gun uses per year by law abilding citizens.” ~National Institute of Justice, 1997. According to a National Crime Victimization Survey reported in 2000 conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics: “550 rapes, 1,100 murders are prevented everyday just by the wouldbe victim flashing / brandishing their firearm on the perpetrator. Check the statistics, not the background. Register fascists, not guns! Hey, “Keep the piece…(or someone else might).” We live in a quiet neighborhood; we use silencers. People are much better off protected by an empty gun that the feds think is loaded than they are by a loaded gun that the “government” doesn’t know you have. All the arms laws in America began in the South, called Black Codes. In US v. Dewitt (1869) 9 Sup Ct. 41, it was determined that US jurisdiction was non-existent intra-state. To be on the safe side, it is highly suggested to purchase guns that have not crossed state lines. The only reason why there is such a thing called a “drive-by” is that there is no return fire. Gun control creates victims and advertises where other “will-be” victims (marks) can be found. Keeping the peace requires keeping the piece handy and loaded. Trade fire? A good trade may be constituted of any trade that your opponent, assailant or enemy, given his druthers, would not have made. Let us pray: “Avoid those that do not read; and never ever let them lead. Avoid hateful hearts because they won’t be there when the shooting starts. If freedom gets us shot to hell, I pray that we may do it well. Do it well, make them pay, so Americans won’t live slave this way.” The operative question is, how much do you dislike your slavery? Change the lifestyle or accept the taxation, legislation and regulation that you dislike. State-terrorist sponsored false flag operations of mass-killings, especially of children will escalate (as planned) until like fish we are totally hooked in an ocean of gun-grabbing legislation while they wash the sand out of hair with lather-like lies and mind-control techniques. Where are the Black Deacons for Justice in these times? I’d rather claim the Second now than to plead the Fifth later—be judged by 12 instead of carried by six. Remember, you are your first responder! The police and ambulance show up after the crime is over. I’ll just hold my piece and let it speak for me at the same time. Gun control: When you come for mine, better bring yours! (See: Freedom, False Flag, Racism White Supremacy, Slavery, Fascism, MK-Ultra, Tavistock Institute, Black Flask Brigade, Statist, Eugenics, Firearms, Second Amendment, Waco No-Knock, Violence, Militia, BOP, Crime Rate, Gun Ban, Police, Duty, Allegiance, Citizens, States, Jurisdiction, Fishbowl, Narco-Economy, Shower Gun, Black Codes, Probable Cause & Gun Safety)

gun ban – the precursor to servitude. Enslavement is like old age; it creeps up on you. Banning guns to reduce crime is like banning sex to reduce rape. If guns supposedly cause (or encourage) crime, why are we arming police officers? The same people who fear firearms in the hands of the people also fear information in the minds of people. Information bans (censorship) only affect people who desire to think for themselves.

“Government” – Latinized Greek (“Gubernatio” = control; and from the Latin “mente” = mind; “The control of the mind.” 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one’s comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of “protecting” their victims. Government is lawlessness (monopolized violence) mindlessly respected and accepted as law (open threats); politics is the way to enable and circumvent the law. The outworking of history consistently demonstrates that government will, in spite of the Bill of Rights, arrogate all power to itself eventually, if the people don’t act to prevent it. You have rights alright, just don’t get caught exercising them, O.K.? “Government” is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else. Official “government” is disorganized, politicized; centralized; canonized and revered initiation of force, but it is no less initiation of force and coercion than any unofficial singular action of the same offensive or violent content. “Government” is an abstract infinite entity acting as a possessive noun. There is not a single line in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any governmental document that states that a natural person will be left alone as long as she or he does not impose upon another or others. By commission and omission, all official decrees make clear that a human is regarded as owned property or resource of the god called “Corporate State.” It is controlling the lives, energy and property of others that requires coercive force and this is its sole function. Endorsing the lie of an imagined abstract collective interest supports the very concept that gives rise to all covert and overt oppression. “The government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of the way. It does not keep the country free. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way.” ~Kirkpatrick Sale. The wayward notion that government redistributes wealth is widely held as sacrosanct as it is patently false. There are redistributes aspects, sure, but that’s as close as it gets. “As long as government is allowed to exist, it will everywhere keep growing and getting worse. Nearly everything that “governments” do (i.e., those with wholly symbolic roles “running” it, and who perform acts in its name) is grounded in fear. Government will cease to exist when people cease to grant it legitimacy—in other words stop believing in it, stop looking to it for solutions to problems in their lives, and stop supporting it.” ~Fred Woolworth. Government has failed at every attempt in 6,000 years of recorded history. Government atrocities—carried out by irrational functionaries, economic hit men, soldiers, diplomats, emissaries, etc., under every possible flavor or form of government—have littered the bloody pages of recorded history. Government is indisputably the greatest purveyor of murder, mayhem, genocide, exploitation, rape, forced starvation, pillage and chaos in the annals of humanity. Government does not need to be abolished; merely rendered obsolete through seeing it for what it truly is—a prime manufacturer of poverty, brutal oppression, violence, coercion, conformity and fear. The monetary genius E.C. Riegel once wrote that petitioning to government is like writing to Santa Claus. Government has created its own necessity by making people (its fictitious subject-citizens) fearful of the violence it creates by the effects of its very existence—in the form of violent criminals and external aggressors. “Government is men and women providing services on a compulsory basis; pay or get shot. To be legitimate they would have to drop their guns and provide their services on a voluntary basis. However, the moment they do so, they cease to be a government. That’s quite the conundrum.” ~Marc Stevens. Government is at the root of the cycle of violence—you run to it for protection and run from it out of fear for your life. The Slaughterhouse is to cattle as “government” is to people. “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.” –U.S. “President” Ronald ‘McDonald’ Reagan. “The only idea they have ever manifested as to what is a government of consent, is this—that it is one to which everybody must consent, or be shot.” ~ No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, Lysander Spooner. Men and women calling themselves “government” violently impose themselves on victims labeled “citizens,” and “ordain” scriptures called “laws” that define the way “government” sanctions business as a crime by providing services over the barrel of a gun. What exactly is “government?” Have you ever seen a “government?” While there are varying degrees, “government” very simply is “one man violently controlling the life and property of another man.” In some places this violent control is “decreed” to be for the latter’s “own good” and “protection” and hailed as the “best system in the world.” Because it’s based on violence, there are no “states” or “nations,” “states” being “voluntary associations.” You may recognize that violent control over a man’s life and property is what we like to call—slavery. Slavery is a form of “government,” and in most cases, if not all, synonymous with “government.” Govern means control, not protect. Have you ever noticed the word “protect” is mysteriously not included in any definitions of govern? “govern.” To direct and control; to regulate; to influence; to restrain; to manage. State v. Ream, 16 Neb 681, 683.” ~Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, page 530. [MORE]

Guard-Dogma Prevents Unsight-Seeing Sheople from Watching the Buffalo FF Video. ‘As if existence depends on their seeing; and if They don’t see then the thing disappears.’ No Bullets/Blood are Visible

According to FUNKTIONARY

ostrichism – a belief that knowledge ignored does not exist and cannot affect anyone. (See: Bra, Ignorance & Stupidity)

Unsight – psychological blindness. People only see what they want to see, and when they see more than they want to see, they don’t see anything at all. Anything we take to be unsightly arises from our collective unsight—you being the collective anger and blind ignorance of the unsight-seeing. Just because you cannot see something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, likewise, just because you cannot find it or perceive it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t persist. I see you almost daily, disguised in different dress, conveying what you’ve learned (so small) as though chosen and somehow seemingly blessed. The illusions of truth should raise if not highlight the issue of what we understand about reality’s nature and as equally important, how we arrive at that understanding. (See: Identification, BLYND, Unseen, Core Beliefs, OZ & Unseeing, Tradition, First Eye, Single Eye, Pineal Gland & Dogma)

guard-dogma – calcified thought with a leash and collar used to scare away frightening or heretical contrary thoughts. A guard-dogma is a well-trained and loyal companion who will quickly fetch you a pre-canned explanation in the face of intruding thoughts of cognitive dissonance. A properly trained guard-dogma never chases karmas. If your concept of God or of what many consider or call God is tied (chained) to a religious post (stake)—then you’re being protected by guarddogma. Before long you won’t realize that a guard-dogma can be vicious and a risk to any dogma-owner.

Analysis of US Counties Demonstrates that COVID Injections Absolutely Do Not Reduce Hospitalizations

From [JOEL SMALLEY] Do the COVID-19 injectables (aka "vaccines") reduce COVID-19 hospitalisations?

Analysis of US counties 24-Feb to 19-May 2022 shows a statistically significant POSITIVE correlation between vaccination and hospitalisation.

Method

Regression of COVID-19 hospitalisation rates between 24-Feb and 19-May 2022 and rates of full and booster vaccination rates on 19-May-22 for the 3,095 US counties that reported the data.

Results

There is a positive relationship between hospitalisation rates and the rate of full vaccination. In other words, the higher the rate of full vaccination, the higher the rate of COVID hospitalisations, assuming ceteris paribus.

There is a positive relationship between hospitalisation rates and the rate of booster vaccination. In other words, the higher the rate of booster vaccination, the higher the rate of COVID hospitalisations, assuming ceteris paribus.

Both variables are statistically significant but the model has very low explanatory power. In other words, there are lots more factors in play but the small impact of COVID vaccination is statistically significant, i.e. not random or due to chance.

Interestingly, the South (Bible Belt) had the least fully vaccinated counties. They are also Republican.

[MORE]