[In Clown World We are the Joke] Plandemic II Launched to Keep Plandemic Funds Flowing to Big Pharma: "MonkeyPox" ('Monkey See Monkey Do') after "Omicron" (For Monkey Minded Morons to Believe)

/

From [HERE] After weeks of indicating that perhaps the Bird Flu hoax was going to be recycled again as a new “pandemic” to instill fear and continue the state of “emergency” the entire country has been under since 2020 that has resulted in $trillions given over to Big Pharma for their products, mainly the COVID-19 “vaccines,” it appears now that plans are in place to actually use the “monkeypox” as the new “pandemic” to further the goals of the Globalists to create new vaccines and control the population.

The World Health Organization just announced that they are “convening an emergency meeting on the alarming spread of monkeypox around the world.” (Source.)

Just how bad is this new “outbreak” which now threatens the world in a similar way to how COVID threatened to wipe out humanity?

Cases of monkeypox in the UK doubled this week – to an “alarming” 20 cases. And it is now spreading to the U.S. at an alarming rate, as one person has reportedly now tested positive for it (determined by the PCR test apparently) in New York City. (Source.)

It appears that worldwide this “alarming spread” of monkeypox is well below 100 cases at this point, which means it would probably not even break into the top 1000 list of current infectious diseases spreading around the globe.

So why the media hype and sudden attention by government health organizations like the WHO and the CDC?

The first clue that this is a new “plandemic” is to see how Big Pharma is setup to profit from it, because disease management is first and foremost a marketing opportunity, and to create to the proper fear factor, one has to advertise a “new” and “deadly” disease to start the funds flowing through emergency use authorizations.

And sure enough, that first criterion for identifying a “plandemic” has been met this week, as Whitney Webb reported:

Two corrupt companies were in rocky financial territory just a few weeks ago. Now, with concerns over a global monkeypox outbreak being hyped by media and global health organizations alike, the worries – and sins – of these two firms are quickly being forgotten.

In recent days, concern over a global outbreak of monkeypox, a mild disease related to smallpox and chickenpox, has been hyped in the media and health ministries around the world, even prompting an emergency meeting at the World Health Organization (WHO). For some, fears have centered around monkeypox being the potential “next pandemic” after Covid-19. For others, the fear is that monkeypox will be used as the latest excuse to further advance draconian biosecurity policies and global power grabs.

Regardless of how the monkeypox situation plays out, two companies are already cashing in. As concern over monkeypox has risen, so too have the shares of Emergent Biosolutions and SIGA Technologies. Both companies essentially have monopolies in the US market, and other markets as well, on smallpox vaccines and treatments. Their main smallpox-focused products are, conveniently, also used to protect against or treat monkeypox as well. As a result, the shares of Emergent Biosolutions climbed 12% on Thursday, while those of SIGA soared 17.1%.

For these companies, the monkeypox fears are a godsend, specifically for SIGA, which produces a smallpox treatment, known by its brand name TPOXX. It is SIGA’s only product. While some outlets have noted that the rise in the valuation of SIGA Technologies has coincided with recent concerns about monkeypox, essentially no attention has been given to the fact that the company is apparently the only piece of a powerful billionaire’s empire that isn’t currently crumbling.

That billionaire, “corporate raider” Ron Perelman, has deep and controversial ties to the Clinton family and the Democratic party as well as troubling ties to Jeffery Epstein. Aside from his controlling stake in SIGA, Perelman has recently made headlines for rapidly liquidating many of his assets in a desperate bid for cash. (Full article.)

The second sign to look for, is if this “new outbreak” has already been predicted beforehand, and even simulated in an effort to predict how to “contain the outbreak,” much as COVID-19 was weeks before the first alleged cases even showed up, with the pandemic simulation called Event 201.

Data Analyst says at least 10,000 Reports of Death or Serious Injury Following COVID Injections were Inexplicably Removed by CDC since the Rollout of the shots, and they were not duplicate reports

/

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was created as an early warning system to identify vaccines that may be triggering a higher than expected number of adverse events

  • Publicly available VAERS data clearly reveal that the COVID shots are the most dangerous “vaccine” ever created, accounting for more injuries and deaths than all previous conventional vaccines combined over the last three decades

  • Data analyst Albert Benavides has been analyzing VAERS data since the release of these novel shots. According to Benavides, at least 10,000 reports of death or serious injury following COVID “vaccination” have vanished since the rollout of the shots — and they were not duplicate reports, which is a common “explanation” for their removal

  • About 2% of all COVID jab-related reports are deaths, and about 5% of death-related reports are being deleted

  • Only the initial VAERS reports are available to the public. Updated reports are only viewable internally. That means we have no way of knowing how many of those who were injured have since died from those injuries. This is a loophole that can make a vaccine appear less deadly than it actually is

From [MERCOLA] The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was created as an early warning system to identify vaccines that may be triggering a higher than expected number of adverse events. One of its primary objectives is to:1

“Provide a national safety monitoring system that extends to the entire general population for response to public health emergencies, such as a large-scale pandemic influenza vaccination program.”

It’s far from perfect, but it’s still incredibly useful and does serve its purpose. Publicly available VAERS data clearly reveal that the COVID shots are the most dangerous “vaccine” ever created, accounting for more injuries and deaths than all previous conventional vaccines combined over the last three decades.

But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which jointly run VAERS, continue to insist the shots are “safe and effective,” and that not a single death has been directly attributed to the shot.

Such claims are outlandish in light of the available data, and perhaps they’re starting to realize the pickle they’re in as well, because in recent months, investigators have discovered that VAERS reports are being deleted in ever growing numbers. As noted by Stew Peters of the Stew Peters Show (above):

“VAERS is supposed to simply collect reports filled out by doctors and other medical professionals from around the country — reports of people suffering injuries and illnesses and even death after taking vaccines.

Nobody is supposed to be editing or curating or fact-checking it. It’s supposed just be the reports of doctors for the entire world to see. But now we have evidence that that’s, in fact, not what’s happening at all.”

Who’s Deleting VAERS Reports?

Peters interviews Albert Benavides, an RCM expert, data analyst and auditor, who’s been analyzing VAERS data since the release of these novel shots.2 3 According to Benavides, at least 10,000 reports of death or serious injury following COVID “vaccination” have vanished since the rollout of the shots — and they were not duplicate reports, which is a common “explanation” for their removal.

Benavides cites the case of a young child in Alaska who reportedly died after the jab. That death report is now gone, and there’s no other remaining report that matches it.

VAERS ID 18150964 is another example. This is the case of a 13-year-old girl in Maryland, who died 16 days after her first jab. This report was entered October 25, 2021, and deleted April 15, 2022. VAERS claims it was deleted because it was a duplicate, but there are no 13-year-old girls in Maryland who died, anywhere else in VAERS.

According to Benavides, over the past 30 years, some 4,000 non-COVID reports have been deleted, and of those only a couple of hundred were deaths. For the COVID jab, VAERS is deleting a far higher proportion of severe injuries and deaths. About 2% of all COVID jab-related reports are deaths, and about 5% of death-related reports are being deleted.

The result of this is that the ratio of deaths to other injuries appears lower than it probably is. Overwhelmingly, it’s reports of severe injuries and death that are being deleted, which gives the distinct appearance that they’re trying to hide the true extent of the harm of these shots. Who could possibly be doing this? Benavides insists the direction to delete valid reports must be coming from the very top of the FDA and/or CDC.

If you want to dive deeper into Benavides’ data, you can find his VAERS Analysis Dashboard here. Another resource you’ll want to bookmark is the VAERS Wayback Machine on MedAlerts — a search system specifically for deleted VAERS reports.

Other Factors That Downplay COVID Jab Risks

Benavides also points out that only the initial VAERS reports are available to the public. Updated reports are only viewable internally. What that means is, we have no way of knowing how many of those who were injured have since died from those injuries. This is a loophole that can make a vaccine appear less risky than it actually is.

“65% of all COVID related reports have the lowest severity classification, meaning they’re not serious. However, when you actually read the reports, you find heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolisms and other clearly serious injuries. So, many are clearly misclassified.”

What’s more, Benavides is finding that they’re routinely misclassifying the event level of severity; 65% of all COVID-related reports have the lowest severity classification, meaning they’re not serious and didn’t require medical intervention or hospitalization.

However, when you actually read the reports, you find heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolisms and other clearly serious injuries. So, many are clearly misclassified, or mis-coded. Benavides has also found 65 reports where the patient died after the COVID shot, but because the box for death is not checked, they are not included in the total death tally.

We also have evidence that VAERS is throttling the release of reports. It can take months before a filed report is actually published, as COVID jab victim Brittany Galvin has discovered.

In January 2022, she was eight months into the reporting process to VAERS and was advised by VAERS staff that it would likely be another six to 12 months before her case would be posted.5 In early June 2021, Peters interviewed her about her injuries and experience with the VAERS process (video below).6

VAERS Analysis Reveals Hundreds of Serious Side Effects

An earlier VAERS data analysis by Benavides, reported by Steve Kirsch in November 2021,7 revealed there were by then already hundreds of serious adverse events associated with the COVID shot that were far more elevated than the admitted risk of myocarditis, identified by the Department of Defense (although that fact was for a time dismissed as “conspiracy theory”).

“The evidence in plain sight shows that they are either lying or incompetent. Or both,”Kirsch wrote.8 “In a ... VAERS data analysis performed by our friend Albert Benavides (aka WelcomeTheEagle88), we found hundreds of serious adverse events that were completely missed by the CDC that should have been mentioned in the informed consent document that are given to patients.

And we found over 200 symptoms that occur at a higher relative rate than myocarditis (relative to all previous vaccines over the last 5 years). All together, there were over 4,000 VAERS adverse event codes that were elevated by these vaccines by a factor of 10 or more over baseline that the CDC should have warned people about ...

The FDA and CDC have basically been batting .000 in terms of spotting safety signals that have been sitting in plain sight the entire time ... The CDC has repeatedly said you can’t ascribe causality to data in VAERS. Not true.

The VAERS data analysis (temporal data, the dose dependency, and the elevated reporting rates compared to baseline) provide ample signal to enable us to show causality on all of these events using the five Bradford-Hill criteria applicable to vaccines.”

Of the hundreds of side effects Benavides identified, neurological, cardiovascular and female reproductive problems topped the list. (You can view and download the data from Kirsch’s article.9) Here are some selected highlights from Kirsch’s comprehensive review of Benavides’ findings:10

  • Pulmonary embolism, listed at No. 24, is 954 times higher than normal

  • Increased fibrin D-dimer, No. 53 on the list, is elevated by a factor of over 400 times above baseline. Charles Hoffe has reported that D-dimer was elevated in over 60% of patients measured.11 As noted by Kirsch, “This is very serious as D-dimer is a lagging indicator of blood clots”

  • Increased troponin, listed at No. 130, is 205 times higher than normal. Elevated troponin is a biomarker for heart damage, and in COVID jab victims, they are often elevated to extreme levels, up to 10 times higher than that indicating heart attack, and can remain elevated for months

  • Brain herniation is elevated by a factor of 100 times above baseline

  • Death is 96 times higher than normal

  • Cardiac arrest is 93 times higher than normal

  • Intracranial hemorrhage is 79 times higher than normal

High Rates of Post-Jab Myocarditis Confirmed

Getting back to myocarditis (heart inflammation), which is the only side effect the FDA and CDC have really admitted, a recent JAMA study found that:12

“Both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. For individuals receiving 2 doses of the same vaccine, risk of myocarditis was highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose.”

Among double-jabbed men (age 16-24), there were four to seven excess myopericarditis events per 100,000 vaccinees in the first 28 days after the second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA shot, and anywhere from nine to 28 excess myopericarditis events per 100,000 after the second dose of Moderna.

According to the authors, “The risk of myocarditis in this large cohort study was highest in young men after the second SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose” and “this risk should be balanced against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19 disease.”

While fact checkers are hard at work trying to debunk VAERS data as too unreliable to pay any attention to, doctors and specialists around the world — those brave enough to speak — are reporting absurdly high rates of side effects among their COVID jabbed patients.

One of the latest ones is Dr. Robert Jackson, an award-winning rheumatologist in Missouri. Kirsch recently interviewed Jackson (video above),13 who reports that 40% of his COVID jabbed patients have been injured by the shots; 5% remain unresolved, 5% have developed a new clotting disorder and 12 have died. For comparison, he normally sees only one or two deaths a year.

Of his 5,000 patients, about 3,000 got the shot. That means just over 1 in 300 were killed by the shot. Jackson’s clinical experience matches nicely with data from other rheumatologists, published in the BMJ.14 They report a 37% adverse event rate among jabbed patients; 4.4% of patients also had a flare up of their disease after the jab.

In the interview, Jackson also discusses some of the treatments he’s using on these vaccine injured patients. Interestingly, he’s seen significant improvement using a 30-minute infusion of mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes.

Non-COVID Excess Deaths Are Exploding

Across the world, and in most U.S. states, we are now seeing excess deaths rates skyrocketing, and it’s not due to COVID. For U.S. data, check out USmortality.com,15where the excess mortality for each state is listed.

In California, the excess death rate rose from 13.5% in 2020 (38,799 excess deaths) to 18.7% in 2021 (52,278 excess deaths). And, less than five months into 2022, California’s excess mortality has already breached the 20% mark.

For the U.S. as a whole, there were 3,440,546 deaths of all ages for the year 2020. The expected numbers were 3,028,959, so that was an excess of 13.6% (411,587 above expected). In 2021, there were 3,459,496 deaths of all ages, which was 16.4% above expectations. As of mid-April 2022, the excess death rate was already at 14.1%, with 1,041,538 reported deaths of all ages. Among working age Americans, deaths are up 40%, compared to prepandemic levels.16

If the COVID jabs worked, you’d expect excess mortality to drop, yet that’s not what we’re seeing. We’re also not seeing mass death from COVID. The only clear factor that might account for these discrepancies is mass injection with an experimental gene transfer technology.

Cyprus is also reporting elevated all-cause mortality for 2021 (16.5%, perfectly matching that of the U.S.).17 Third and fourth quarter rates are particularly elevated, which corresponds with the rollout of booster shots. Canada, meanwhile, is seeing a shocking 70% excess death rate for ages 0 to 44, compared to 2014 through 2019,18 and U.K. data show COVID-jabbed children, aged 10 to 14, are dying at 28 times the rate of their unvaccinated peers.19 20

I’ve provided other data examples in other articles, and they’re all showing the same trend. The most tragic part of this is that it’s intentional. None of the agencies charged with protecting public health have lived up to their mandate. Instead, they’ve been serving the Great Reset agenda.

Eventually, though, I believe the truth will simply be too overwhelming and obvious to be ignored by the masses. FDA and CDC can’t delete enough reports to make the jabs look safe. People’s personal experiences also trump that of any data set, and now, vaccine injuries are so commonplace, most people know of someone who had a bad reaction, got COVID anyway or died from it. And they can’t scrub that.

[Police Can Wrap Up a Mass Shooting in a Matter of Hours but When White Cops Murder Blacks it Takes Years] No Time to Comply. Video Shows TX Cop Shoot Jalen Randle in Back and Then Ask If he Had Gun?

/

Isn’t ironic that Texas cops are “in the early stages of its investigation” in this 2020 case which involves the camera recorded murder of a Black man by a cop. Yet, in an alleged mass shooting involving 20 or so victims in San Antonio cops wrapped things up all in the same day! Only the mindfucked would believe any of this bullshit.

From [HERE] and [HERE] A lawyer for the family of a 29-year-old Black man who was fatally shot last month by a Houston police officer said body camera video shows he was given only seconds to raise his hands before he was shot.

Jalen Randle was shot April 27 as he exited a vehicle, police said. Police said he was being pursued because he was wanted on three felony warrants.

Police released video of the shooting Tuesday after Randle's family demanded it, but Assistant Chief Thomas Hardin said in the introduction to the footage that the department is still in the early stages of its investigation. A spokesman for the Houston police department declined to comment further because of the ongoing investigation.

The video shows the officer firing once almost immediately after yelling “Hey, let me see your hands!” as he got out of a police car. After Randle fell to the ground, the officer asked, did he have a gun.

Attorney Ben Crump said in a statement that the video shows clearly that Randle had no time to comply with the officer's orders before he was shot. Crump said Randle was handcuffed and drug across the ground before officers rendered aid.

"The brutality displayed in this video is extremely disturbing — from the officer firing a deadly shot seemingly as he ordered Jalen to put his hands up to the way they handcuffed and dragged his lifeless body across the ground,” said Crump, who is one of the nation's top civil rights attorneys and also represented the family of George Floyd after he was killed by Minneapolis police officers, has won financial settlements in about 200 police brutality cases.

Police have said officers tried to pull over a vehicle after seeing Randle get into its passenger seat, but the driver didn’t stop till officers eventually blocked its path.

Police say Randle then exited and an officer shot him. Police say Randle was in possession of a bag with a gun in it. [k. and such alleged information was not known to police until after he was dead. The relevant time when evaluating deprivation of life or rights, is what the cops knew at the time of the incident. Thanks to the video we don’t have to rely on racist media for details parroted from cops. After the murder, the white cop asked “Did he have a gun?” - obviously he didn’t know. Most importantly, the black man posed no threat to the cops as he fled away from them.]

Crump said previously that an independent autopsy showed that Randle was shot in the back of his neck and witnesses said he was running away.

Police haven’t identified the officer who shot Randle, but the body camera footage released Tuesday is labeled “Officer Privette BWC.” Houston Officer Shane Privette was indicted for using excessive force in a 2017 incident but that charge was dismissed in 2019.

Black, Democrat DA says Atlanta Cops Won't Face Charges from 2020 Arrest of 2 Black College Students Out Past Master's Curfew in the Free Range Prison

/

Black, Democrats at All Levels of Govt in Atlanta Yet Blacks are Still Subjected to Routine Interference w/Their Freedom of Movement. Cops abuse their power So Much that no Black Person could make a compelling Argument that so-called constitutional rights Provide any protection from Cops. “RIGHTS” ARE MYTHS, MASTER’S FAVORS.

From [HERE] An Atlanta district attorney has dropped the charges for six police officers accused of battery and aggravated assault against two college students, after they were out past curfew following a George Floyd protest in 2020, the DA announced Monday. 

Video footage shows officers on foot confronting two Black young adults, Taniyah Pilgrim and Messiah Young, who, at the time, were students of Spelman College and Morehouse College, respectively. The pair had been passing officers in a car 45 minutes after the city's 9 p.m. curfew.

After they appear to drive away briefly from the officers, Pilgrim and Young stop — at which point the officers swarm the vehicle. Stun guns are used on both occupants, who are ripped from the car as Pilgrim screams for them to stop.

"I agree with Mayor [Keisha Lance] Bottoms and I agree with our police chief, Erika Shields, when they both have conveyed in so many separate ways that the conduct in this incident — it is not indicative of the way that we treat people in the city of Atlanta," Fulton County, Ga., District Attorney Paul Howard told reporters at the time. 

Pilgrim was never charged; Young was charged with attempting to elude officers before the charge was dismissed at the request of Bottoms, who apologized. 

The officers charged following the incident were Lonnie Hood, Willie Sauls, Ivory Streeter, Mark Gardner, Armond Jones and Roland Claud. Streeter and Gardner were fired from the force, while the three others were placed on desk duty. 

But Samir Patel, the temporary district attorney for the Atlanta Judicial Circuit, dropped the charges against the officers, arguing that the officers' use of force was "the direct result of Mr. Young and Ms. Pilgrim's resistance to and noncompliance with the officers' instructions." 

Patel said the officers were acting within the Atlanta Police Department's use of force policy, and that the force stopped after Pilgrim and Young were subdued by stun guns.

"The video that was widely distributed through media in the days following May 30, 2020, was not an accurate portrayal of the entire encounter between Mr. Young, Ms. Pilgrim, and law enforcement," he said. 

He continued, "I wholeheartedly believe that Georgia has made significant progress in improving how our communities and police work together and we must continue that positive path, always guided by the rule of law." 

After Down Playing Rampant Police Brutality Against Blacks and Latinos in LA, the White Liberal Media Fakes Confusion Over Why Latino Sheeple Support Sheriff's Alex Villanueva Re-election

/

REALITY CONCEALMENT [MORE] and [MORE] and [MORE] and [MORE] According to FUNKTIONARY:

Dependent Media - Establishment (dependent) media is both unwilling and incapable of reporting events truthfully, accurately or without extreme bias. News coverage is just that - covering up (masking) and distorting the events and those wielding power behind the events (those reported and deliberately unreported). News coverage has simply become “disinfotaiment” with the sole purpose of perception and knowledge containment as well as reality concealment. You report in the interests of those who are paying you to do so. (see MEDIA, NBC & NEWS).

mass media - "Massa' Media. Massa's media plus + Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The "Mess" Media. 3) wholesale re-tale--retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you're told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let's be perfectly cleat on this. There's no counter-option or outlet to vent when you're under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. "Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one." -A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

From [HERE] Los Angeles Sheriff Alex Villanueva rode a wave of progressive energy to become the first Democrat and Spanish speaker to win the seat in more than a century. Now his party is having buyer’s remorse.

A campaign promise to reform a troubled department has given way to four years of scandals, attacks on journalists and conservative rhetoric around crime that has shocked Democrats and endeared him to far-right media figures like Tucker Carlson.

It may just propel him to reelection.

Villanueva could cruise to an easy victory next month in the nation’s most populous county. He is banking on the Latino vote and angst about public safety to carry him to reelection on June 7 in the reliably left-leaning area — and he could avoid a general election if he wins more than 50 percent of the primary votes.

The race will be a test of how far Democratic voters are willing to go to support a candidate who promises to clean up the streets as the party nationwide battles to hold seats in competitive districts where crime is among residents’ top concerns.

There’s a feeling of deep regret among some Democrats who propelled Villanueva, a former department watch commander who ran for sheriff in 2018, to power and celebrated his victory as a win for criminal justice reform, said Mark Gonzalez, chair of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party.

Those who backed Villanueva based on promises that he would cut ties with federal immigration enforcement, crack down on department corruption and reduce the prison population are now flabbergasted at his pivot toward Republican talking points — like blaming “wokeism” for declining living standards in the county — and his vitriolic reactions to those who question his policies.

“The same people that helped fund and put you forward in 2018 are the same people that you’re criticizing,” Gonzalez said of Villanueva. “My mama taught me ‘don’t bite the hand that feeds you,’ and that’s the first thing you’re doing.”

Villanueva’s campaign did not respond to multiple emails and calls requesting comment on this story. The sheriff has at many points defended his record as a reformer, pointing out that he banned the transfer of county inmates to federal immigration custody without a criminal warrant. He also touts his ban of deputy gangs in the department, though a civilian oversight commission says it’s still a problem.

But Villanueva may not need the support of his party to win reelection, especially in a year where Californians are on high alert about crime, public safety and homelessness. As a well-funded, Spanish-speaking incumbent who enjoys broad support from law enforcement, Villanueva may be able to rise above the cacophony of controversy that has surrounded his tenure.

A survey of registered voters in the city of Los Angeles conducted this week by BSP Research, a Los Angeles-based polling firm, found that 55 percent of Latino voters had a favorable perception of Villanueva, compared to 24 percent who viewed him unfavorably. BSP Research estimates 1.2 million Latinos will cast votes in Los Angeles County during the general election, equal to a record turnout for the 2018 presidential election.

Roughly 40 percent of Los Angeles County residents of voting age are Latino, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Like other groups, Latino voters have consistently ranked public safety as a major concern in local polling.

Andrew Acosta, a Democratic political consultant who has worked on law enforcement campaigns in California, said Villanueva’s tough-on-crime platform and calls to remove homeless encampments could be attractive to voters. He also questioned how closely residents are following media coverage of the department’s scandals — most recently, an attempt to investigate a local journalist for reporting on a coverup in the department.

“Just because he says outlandish things and columnists in the LA Times write about him, I don’t know if that makes him a dead man walking,” he said.

Police in Liberal San Francisco are Using Driverless Cars as Mobile Surveillance Cameras to Surveil Law Abiding Citizens

/

From [HERE] For the last five years, driverless car companies have been testing their vehicles on public roads. These vehicles constantly roam neighborhoods while laden with a variety of sensors including video cameras capturing everything going on around them to operate safely and analyze instances where they don't (article available here(link is external)).

While the companies themselves tout the potential transportation benefits their services may one day offer, they don’t publicize another use case, one that is far less hypothetical: Mobile surveillance cameras for police departments.

“Autonomous vehicles are recording their surroundings continuously and have the potential to help with investigative leads,” says a San Francisco Police department training document (link is external) obtained via a public records request. “Investigations has already done this several times.”  

The document(link is external) is a three-page guide for how officers should interact with autonomous vehicles (AVs), especially ones that have no human driver inside. It outlines basic procedures such as how to interact with the vehicles (”Do not open the vehicle for non-emergency issues” and ”Do not pull vehicles over unless a legitimate law enforcement action exists”) as well as whether to issue a citation for a moving violation for a car with no human driver (”No citation can be issued at this time if the vehicle has no one in the driver’s seat” but an incident report should be written instead). And the section titled “Investigations” has two bullet points advising officers of their usefulness in collecting footage. 

New DOJ Policy Requires Federal Cops to Stop Other Cops from Committing the Crime of Using Excessive Force

/

From [HERE] The Justice Department is updating its use of force policy for the first time in 18 years, saying explicitly that federal officers and agents must step in if they see other officers using excessive force. The policy takes effect on July 19.

The new policy is outlined in a memo Attorney General Merrick Garland sent to senior Justice leaders on Friday. The rules apply to all agencies under the Justice Department, including the FBI, DEA, ATF and U.S. Marshals Service.

The rules emphasize de-escalation, and a duty to intervene

"It is the policy of the Department of Justice to value and preserve human life," the policy begins. It later adds, "Officers may use force only when no reasonably effective, safe, and feasible alternative appears to exist and may use only the level of force that a reasonable officer on the scene would use under the same or similar circumstances."

The policy's first portion deals with deadly force, barring tactics such as firing guns to disable cars. But the next section calls for de-escalation training, and the next two spell out situations in which officers have an "affirmative duty" — to prevent or stop other officers from using excessive force, and to render or call for medical aid when it's needed.

Law enforcement officers should be able to recognize and act on "the affirmative duty to intervene to prevent or stop, as appropriate, any officer from engaging in excessive force or any other use of force that violates the Constitution, other federal laws, or Department policies on the reasonable use of force," the policy states.

Scrutiny of police use of force has grown due to high-profile killings

The DOJ policy was announced days before the two-year anniversary of George Floyd's death — a police killing that set off a racial reckoning and calls for change in Minneapolis and across the nation. But it's worth noting that federal officers have not been involved in the vast majority of recent high-profile cases in which people of color died at the hands of local or state police.

Last month, for example, a Connecticut state trooper was charged with manslaughter over his killing of a Black man in 2020.

Garland said that the new rules draw on the 2020 National Consensus Policy on Use of Force — a document that was created in response to the public debate over police use of deadly force, after a spate of controversial incidents in which officers killed civilians. It reflects the views of 11 law enforcement leadership and labor groups, led by the International Association of Chiefs of Police and the Fraternal Order of Police.

The attorney general said the new policy also stems from changes in how federal law enforcement agencies have approached their work since 2004, when it was last updated. It sets out to standardize an agreed-upon set of best practices, as over time, individual agencies have been updating their own training programs on the use of force.

Along the way, the Justice Department has also issued incremental updates to its guidelines. Last fall, for instance, it banned the use of chokeholds and carotid restraint maneuvers "unless deadly force is authorized." It also limited the use of "no knock" warrants — a tactic that came under renewed scrutiny in the police killing of Breonna Taylor in Louisville, Ky.

Florida Joins the Growing Number of States to End the Uncivilized Practice of Automatically and Permanently Putting Death Row Inmates in Solitary Confinement

/

From [DPIC] Florida has joined the growing number of states that have ended automatic permanent solitary confinement for prisoners sentenced to death.

The Florida Department of Corrections agreed to the action as part of a settlement of a federal civil rights lawsuit brought by eight prisoners who alleged that the state’s death-row conditions were “extreme, debilitating, and inhumane, violate[d] contemporary standards of decency, and pose[d] an unreasonable risk of serious harm to the health and safety.” U.S. District Court Judge Marcia Morales Howard approved the settlement in late April 2022, to eliminate permanent solitary confinement for death-row prisoners and to improve death-row conditions in the state.

Florida death-row prisoners had for more than forty years spent almost every day in 24-hour-a-day solitary confinement in concrete rooms the size of a parking space with no windows. They had severely limited access to exercise, phone calls, and other human interaction, including with other prisoners and staff. 

The settlement allows the prisoners to spend up to 20 hours a week in a day room, where they can meet with others, watch television, and have access to Department of Corrections multimedia kiosks. They will also have more access to phones to call loved ones, increased shower access, and will be granted six hours a week of outside activity — up from three hours — with a new sunshade. Prisoners who meet eligibility requirements determined by the Department of Corrections will also have access to institutional jobs.

Evan Shea, whose law firm helped coordinate the lawsuit, praised the settlement. “This is going to lead to a smoother operation of the prison,” he said. “It’s not a good way to run a prison to have inmates that are subject to severe psychological strain. That leads to unhappy prisoners, inmates that are not stable and react in ways that place burdens on correctional officers and on the prison administration.”

9th Circuit Vacates Conviction Based On Courtroom Closure Due to COVID: A Public Trial Must be In Person or by Video. An Audio Only Trial Violates the 6th Amendment

/

From [HERE] California man charged in gun case was facing trial in September 2020. The trial court adopted COVID restrictions and precluded the public from entering the courtroom and giving access to the proceedings only by streaming audio. Man: objection! This violates my Sixth Amendment right to a public trial because ‘the ability to have the courtroom open is not simply to hear the witnesses but to see the witnesses, to see the jury, to see the defendant, to see the attorneys, see the court,’ but I'll settle for video as an adequate substitute for in-person. Trial court: no, audio only. Man convicted and sentenced to six years in prison. Ninth Circuit(link is external): The Constitution required the district court to pivot to video, not just audio, streaming. Conviction vacated and case remanded for a new trial and suppression hearing, either in public or on video.

Supreme Court makes it harder for state prisoners to pursue ineffective assistance of counsel claims in federal court

/

From [HERE] The US Supreme Court Monday ruled 6-3 in Shinn v. Ramirez that “a federal habeas court may not conduct an evidentiary hearing or otherwise consider evidence beyond the state-court record based on the ineffective assistance of state postconviction counsel.”

In Shinn, two prisoners filed for federal habeas relief under 28 USC §2254. The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counsel at trial. However, no constitutional right to counsel exists regarding state post-conviction proceedings. The prisoners argued trial counsel was ineffective due to failure to conduct adequate investigations. The federal district court held in each prisoner’s case that their ineffective-assistance claim was presented improperly in state court and thus was procedurally defaulted.

In an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, the court found that in order to overcome procedural default in cases such as the prisoners’, “a prisoner must demonstrate ’cause’ to excuse the procedural defect and ‘actual prejudice.'” Additionally, Thomas wrote “[p]ermitting federal fact-finding would encourage yet more federal litigation of defaulted claims.”

In Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent, she wrote that the court’s ruling “hamstrings the federal courts’ authority to safeguard that [effective assistance of counsel] right.” Further, she stated that the court’s holding is compelled by statute. However, [m]ake no mistake. Neither [Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act] nor this Court’s precedents require this result.”

Alabama Prison Cops Charged with Negligent Homicide of Incarcerated Man

/

From [EJI] On May 10, two Alabama correctional officers were arrested on charges connected to the death of Jason Kirkland in a segregation unit at Donaldson Correctional Facility near Birmingham, Alabama. Mr. Kirkland was 27 years old. He was serving a 15-year sentence for nonviolent offenses.

Donaldson correctional officers John Rodgers and Latasha Terrell were charged with criminally negligent homicide for failing to render aid to a mentally ill man who unnecessarily suffocated and died while they were on duty.

In the past 18 months, at least three people have died in segregated housing at Donaldson after officer neglect.

On December 7, 2020, Tommy Rutledge died in a solitary confinement cell where the temperature exceeded 100 degrees. His core body temperature was recorded at 109 degrees prior to his death.

On February 23, 2022, Victor Russo was found unresponsive in a segregation unit cell with blunt force trauma injuries. One day before collapsing, Mr. Russo had written a letter to the warden saying that a lieutenant at Donaldson had struck him repeatedly in the head and sprayed chemical agents in his mouth before placing him in segregation without medical attention. The officer, Lt. Mohammad Jenkins, was subsequently charged with assault.

Other prisoners have died after officers at Donaldson have used excessive force in responding to incidents.

In October 2019, Steven Davis, 35, died after he was struck repeatedly in the head by correctional staff. According to the Justice Department, “Numerous prisoner witnesses reported that correctional officers continued to strike the prisoner after he dropped any weapons and posed no threat.”

In June 2020, Darnell McMillian, 38, died in a suicide watch cell after a lieutenant sprayed a large volume of irritating chemical agents into the cell. Alabama Department of Corrections records confirm that after the use of force, Mr. McMillian was “non-verbal and unresponsive” and he was pronounced dead an hour later.

Although Jason Kirkland died in July 2021, the charges against Mr. Rodgers and Ms. Terrell were filed only two weeks ago. The officers continued to be employed by the Department of Corrections until they were arrested.

A lawsuit filed in December 2020 by the Department of Justice against Alabama and the state’s Department of Corrections alleges that the state “is deliberately indifferent to the serious and systemic constitutional problems present in Alabama’s Prisons.”

Despite the continuing crisis in Alabama’s prisons, no significant changes have been implemented to improve conditions or safety.

19 yr Old Black Man Held Pre-Trial Got Locked into Cell, Beat and Cut Over 100 Times at Rikers Island, a Reprehensible Jail Run by Liberals. Rate of Violence 8X Greater than Other Municipal Jails

/

From [HERE] A 19-year-old Rikers Island Black teen pre-trial detainee was beaten and slashed after correction staff moved him to a chaotic unit where other detainees somehow got into his locked cell and left him unconscious and bleeding on the floor, his mother tells the Daily News.

The Rikers Island complex, which consists of ten jails, holds local offenders who are awaiting trial.

Marquise Thomas of Far Rockaway, Queens, suffered numerous slash wounds on his legs, back, thighs and neck in the Feb. 20 assault at the Robert N. Davoren Center on Rikers Island, according to his mother Trina Thomas, who says for weeks after the attack the Correction Department rebuffed her attempts to visit him.

“I want to know why would they move him, and then how they got in his cell at 1:30 in the morning. They could have murdered him in his sleep,” said Trina Thomas, 43. “He said he was cut over 100 times. The doctors said he was lucky to be alive.”

She said her son’s account of the ordeal began with officers pulling him out of his relatively peaceful unit at the Davoren Center about 10 p.m. on Feb. 19, telling him, “You’re going to have a fight, and if anyone gets stabbed or hurt bad, it won’t matter because the cameras are out.”

He tried to refuse, but was taken anyway with four other detainees to another unit where roughly eight inmates were causing a disturbance.

In the midst of the chaos, he was put in a locked cell — but at about 1:30 a.m. the raucous detainees somehow got through the locked door and attacked him, his mom said.

“He heard some loud noise and his [cell door] was being opened,” she said. “He tried to pull it shut, but they come in. The COs [correction officers] weren’t stopping it.

“Then, they were stabbing him in the hands. They beat him, stabbing him in his legs, thighs, and cut up his legs and thigh area. He’s laying in the fetal position.”

Thomas told his mother he passed out from blood loss as Emergency Services officers with pepper spray arrived to quell the disturbance. Those officers found him unconscious in the cell. He was then taken to Bellevue Hospital for two days.

In a statement, the Correction Department did not answer specific questions about Thomas’ slashing, but confirmed he was hospitalized and said the agency is pursuing charges against the detainees involved. A spokeswoman said staff could be disciplined once an investigation is concluded.

“We take assaults on people in our custody very seriously and we will not tolerate any form of violence in our facilities,” correction spokeswoman Danielle DeSouza said.

Assemblyman Khaleel Anderson, a Democrat who represents Thomas’ district, called for an independent investigation.

“The job description for correction officers is very clear: There’s a duty to ensure inmate safety, and we did not see that happen here,” he said. “It’s a tragedy, but it speaks to the culture of violence there. We have a jail system that’s not working.”

The incident comes as violence in New York City’s jails continues to be a significant problem, with the rate of violence “seven to eight times” greater than in other municipal jail agencies, according a March 16 report by the federal monitor overseeing the jails.

The monitor said there were more inmate fights in 2021 than in 2016, when the jail population was 40% higher. And there were 48 slashings in January, the second highest in any month since the monitor was installed in 2016.

Staff use of force also has increased in each year since 2016, the monitor said.

“An unfortunate and dangerous side effect of these high rates of use of force and violence is that they have become normalized,” the monitor wrote. “These high rates are not typical, they are not expected, they are not normal.”

Thomas was arrested Sept. 9 for four armed robberies of livery cab drivers in Queens and Manhattan last August and September and ordered held without bail.

He claimed to cops that the alleged “gun” used in the robberies was actually a cell phone case made to look like a gun and blamed a female accomplice, court records show. He’s pleaded not guilty.

Marquise’s defense lawyer, Risa Beth Procton, of Legal Aid declined to comment on the criminal case.

Thomas’ mother was on vacation in Hawaii and didn’t find out about the attack until three days later on Feb. 24, when her oldest son Michael Smith called to tell her.

Smith, 26, said he was devastated when he learned about it from a friend. “His legs were cut open. He got 30 stitches in his legs, 20 in his back,” he said. “He was having trouble walking and stuff like that.”

Trina Thomas then repeatedly called the Correction Department, but couldn’t get much information. Over the next month, she tried to visit her son, only to be rebuffed without explanation. Calls to the mayor’s office and 311 also went nowhere.

Out of frustration, she turned to Assemblyman Anderson, a former community activist who grew up in the same neighborhood. But even Anderson had trouble getting information from the Correction Department.

“By pushing and prodding, we were able to at least get him a few minutes on the phone, which is totally unacceptable. But it speaks to that culture that is festering on Rikers Island,” Anderson said.

Since the assault, the worried mom has only been able to see Marquise once — at a March 9 court date for less than 15 minutes.

“He could barely walk, and they wouldn’t give him a cane,” Trina Thomas said. “They had two officers helping him in and out of the room.”

She last spoke to him for just three minutes Thursday. Finally, after The News contacted the Correction Department, the agency called her to schedule an in-person visit.

Marquise Thomas is now in 23-hour a day lockdown in the West Facility, a jail sometimes used for inmates with communicable diseases.

'Tyranny Depends on the Ignorance of the Public.' A Documentary Called "The Plan" Shows the Agenda of the World Health Organization is to have 10 Years of Ongoing Plandemics, from 2020 to 2030

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyrants – there are none; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mindcontrol and word-conditioning control? “Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive.” ~Freddy D. “The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it.” ~John Jay, Castilian Days II, 1872. (See: Terms, “The Law,” Dictatorship, Corporate State & Fascism)

From [HERE] “The Tyranny is 100% dependent on the ignorance of the public. The solution is therefore to inform the people around you. Once people know what is really happening, they will stop complying and start resisting.”

“The experts [witnesses] identify the powerful entities that are able to install this world dictatorship. They explain how they orchestrate and implement it and what their ultimate agenda is for humanity.”

Find this and more on the Stop World Control website.

FDA is “Rotten to the Core,” says Dr Robert Malone – Agency Knew COVID Injections Cause Viral Replication

/

From [NN] World-renowned vaccinologist and physician Dr. Robert Malone is speaking out about how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) knew all along that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” spur viral reactivation of diseases like the varicella-zoster virus (shingles), but chose to withhold this information from the public.

Speaking at a panel discussion hosted by Del Bigtree along with fellow Global COVID Summit physicians Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Richard Urso, Malone, the original inventor of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination technology, exposed the FDA as a corrupt federal agency that continues to lie about Fauci Flu shots.

“They knew about the viral reactivation,” Malone stated, adding that he was “very actively engaged” with senior personnel at the FDA’s Office of the Commissioner when the jabs were first being rolled out under Donald Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” program.

“We were talking by Zoom on a weekly or twice a week basis,” Malone further explained about his involvement in assessing the jabs right before they were publicly released. (Related: Malone has also previously called out the CDC for engaging in “scientific fraud and criminal activity”.)

“This is the group that first discovered the signal of the cardiotoxicity,” Malone said. “They also knew at that time – one of them actually had the adverse event early on of shingles. They knew that the viral reactivation signal – which the CDC has never acknowledged – was one of the major known adverse events.”

Malone says the FDA used to be more honest, but was it really?

Both the FDA and the CDC knew full well that the shots were dangerous but did not acknowledge it. This is “another one of those things that is inexplicable,” Malone maintains, adding that there used to be strict rules in place that governed “these types of products.”

“You have to characterize where it goes, how long it sticks around, and how much protein it makes, or what the active drug product is,” he added. “None of that stuff was done very well. It wasn’t done rigorously, and there was a series of misrepresentations about what the data were.”

“And the thing is, the FDA let them get away with it. They did not perform their function. They’re supposed to be independent gatekeepers.”

Malone was previously under the impression that the FDA paid very close attention to these types of processes. If any red flags emerged, he suggested, then the FDA would immediately halt the research in the interest of public health – but no longer.

“What happened here is the regulatory bodies gave the pharmaceutical industry a pass,” Malone stated, adding that the drug industry also “misrepresented key facts about their product.”

“On the basis of that, average docs just assumed that this was something that it wasn’t. They assumed that this was a relatively benign product that didn’t stick around in the body. All of that is false.”

Malone says that he and others in the field have been wracking their brains trying to understand how any of this could possibly happen. How and why is America’s regulatory apparatus so broken that deadly products such as these so easily made it onto the market – and at warp speed, no less.

“We as physicians had all come to assume the FDA had a function that actually did the job that we could believe in and trust, and what we find out now is the whole house of cards is rotten to the core,” Malone further explained.

At the May 11 event, which was attended by 17,000 physicians and medical scientists from around the world, a four declaration was presented demanding that the current state of medical emergency be lifted immediately.

Statistical Analysis of Over 1,500 Death Reports Shows that NOBODY under 60 Should Take the COVID vaccine

/

From [KIRSCH] Figure 1 below is an analysis of survey data I collected. The analysis shows that the vaccines are harmful to those under 60. The red dots higher than the error bar means more vaccinated people observed dead than expected based on the population of vaccinated to all people. In other words, if we vaccinated 60% of people (middle of the grey bar) and 70% (red dot) of the deaths are vaccinated, we have a serious problem.

The precautionary principle of medicine suggests if you are under 60 and thinking of taking a vaccine, you shouldn’t. These preliminary results are both statistically significant. 

However, there could be errors in the analysis and/or survey bias errors that will change the result, so this is preliminary. I hope to make these not preliminary in a few days.

I created a mortality survey which asked people to report the date, age, and vaccine status of the people who died who they had the tightest relationship with. You could report as many deaths as you wanted for people you PERSONALLY knew, but if you didn’t report them all, start with the person closest to you. All deaths should be reported no matter what the cause of the death. If they died after December 1, 2020, report it.

The first 1,700+ results are in and Joel Smalley had time to do the analysis. It is stunning. The conclusion is very clear: nobody under 60 years old should get the vaccine because there is no evidence of a benefit. In fact, if you are between 40-60, it’s clear that vaccination makes it more likely you’ll die, not less likely. It’s statistically significant. The result that the younger you are, the less sense it makes, is consistent with what pretty much everyone has been saying.

The only thing that surprised me in the analysis is that data showed that if you are 60 and older, getting vaccinated reduces your chance of dying. 

I’m astonished by the data showing a benefit for >60 because it is inconsistent with the VAERS data (which is off the charts showing nearly 500,000 deaths), embalmer data, and this article about 6 elderly deaths in Palo Alto out of 9 people vaccinated, and medicare data, and UK ONS data. I’m confident of the embalmer data and Palo Alto deaths: there is absolutely no way if the vaccine was protective that those events could occur. This means there must be an error in the analysis or confounding of the data. There cannot be two truths.

My advice is to avoid the COVID vaccines for ALL ages. If you get sick, get early treatment. This is because we have strong DIRECT evidence (embalmer, nursing home data is clearly strongly negative) that the vaccines are deadly to the elderly and until someone explains how the direct evidence is wrong, the precautionary rule of medicine says we should respect that possibility and thus early treatment is the preferred alternative. 

In other words, if you have conflicting evidence, better to avoid that option until the conflict is resolved especially when the more direct evidence suggests that the intervention is deadly.

I’m not trying to cherry pick here. I’m saying that quality direct evidence rules over calculated numbers. If the best evidence I have is calculated numbers, I go with that. 

For example, if the calculations show that the vaccine is safe for those over 60 and I find that 9 out of 10 people over 60 who get the shot die within 24 hours from blood clots, which evidence do you believe?

I cannot reconcile the discrepancy at this time. 

Joel may have made a mistake. So take all these results (including under 60) with a grain of salt for now. We are getting close to finding the truth. There could be a bias that shifts everything in one direction. We’ll see.

We want to have many eyes on this data before we will announce a definitive result. 

I’m making all the data to date available for people to validate or invalidate the result. I’ll periodically update the spreadsheet as we collect more data.

We’ll be collecting a lot more data to refine the result and employ 3 different third party survey firms as well. This eliminates the risk of people trying to game the survey (not that anyone would do that). So if the independent polling firm results don’t match our results, we’ll look for what happened. Using five or more sources of independent data (mine, Joe’s, 3 polling firms, etc.) will give everyone more confidence that the results are valid.

Note that the definition of vaccinated here is “got the vaccine” not “two weeks after they got the vaccine.” We are NOT using public data that is encumbered this way. Such definitions are misleading since if the vaccine kills everyone within two weeks of the shot, the vaccines look amazingly safe and not being vaccinated looks risky. [MORE]

Major Study Finds that mRNA COVID Injections are Significantly Associated with Deadly Blood Clots

/

From [HERE] Blood-clotting condition cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), which can cause serious neurological damage, is significantly associated with mRNA Covid vaccination, a major study in leading medical journal Vaccines has found.

The research team analysed 1,154,023 adverse event reports from more than 130 countries logged with VigiBase, the World Health Organisation’s global deduplicated database, and found a “potential safety signal for CVT occurrence after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination”.

The authors note many reports were in younger people and the conditions were serious: “CVTs were commonly reported in patients aged 18-44 and 45-64 years, more frequently in women, and mainly in Europe and America… More than 90% of the patients were in serious condition, and 33% did not recover or died.”

The researchers take into account under-reporting to produce estimates of increased risk above a baseline: around 3.5 times greater risk for mRNA vaccines and seven times greater risk for AstraZeneca. This means the CVT risk from mRNA vaccines, while high, is around half that of AstraZeneca.

They also found that CVT following mRNA vaccination is only around a third as deadly as that following AstraZeneca vaccination. This means mRNA vaccines lead to deadly CVT around a sixth as often as AstraZeneca, which may explain why the condition is particularly associated with the AstraZeneca jab.

The researchers cite earlier studies to suggest the mechanism relates to the spike protein binding to the wall of blood vessels, particularly in the brain, and activating clotting mechanisms.

There are few reports on CVT after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. These studies suggested that CVT occurrences related to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines may be due to endothelial dysfunction caused by spike glycoprotein interactions with endothelial cells resulting in immunothrombosis. If the spike glycoprotein of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, several inflammatory and thrombogenic molecules, such as leukocyte chemotactic factors, cell adhesion molecules (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1), and procoagulant cytokines, can be activated. This mechanism may cause endothelial dysfunction, particularly in brain endothelial cells, which could contribute to a significant disruption of brain endothelial barrier integrity, ultimately promoting thrombus formation. Moreover, a previous study suggested that the spike glycoprotein may induce platelet aggregation and activation and eventually result in thrombus formation. Although the period of time in which the spike glycoprotein persists has not been clearly established, several studies have suggested that it may last for weeks. Thus, spike glycoprotein-related platelet activation triggered by mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines could explain the trend of CVT occurrences after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccinations. Furthermore, in line with these previous case reports, our results showed that CVT occurred mainly within a few weeks of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccinations.

Here is the study abstract, summarising the findings.

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), a rare thrombotic event that can cause serious neurologic deficits, has been reported after some ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] nCoV-19 vaccinations against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there are few reports of associations between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and CVT. We retrospectively analysed CVT occurrence, time of onset after vaccination, outcomes (recovered/not recovered), and death after COVID-19 vaccination from adverse drug reactions (ADR) reports in VigiBase. A disproportionality analysis was performed regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 [Pfizer] and mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. We identified 756 (0.07%) CVT cases (620 (0.05%) after BNT162b2 and 136 (0.01%) after mRNA-1273) of 1,154,023 mRNA vaccine-related ADRs. Significant positive safety signals were noted for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (95% lower end of information component = 1.56; reporting odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.27). The median days to CVT onset differed significantly between the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines (12 (interquartile range, 3-22) and 11 (interquartile range, 7-16), respectively; p = 0.02). Fewer CVT patients died after receiving mRNA vaccines than after receiving the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22–0.45; p < 0.001). We noted a potential safety signal for CVT occurrence after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Therefore, awareness about the risk of CVT, even after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, is necessary.

The association of blood-clotting adverse reactions with adenovirus vector vaccines like AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson have led to them being restricted or withdrawn in many countries, most recently by the U.S. FDA. The fact that this adverse reaction is also associated with mRNA vaccines, albeit in a somewhat less deadly form, suggests that the differential treatment of the two vaccine types on this basis is unlikely to be tenable.

CDC Says There are No Documents to Back Its Claim that COVID Injections Don't Cause Variants of the Virus that Causes COVID-19

/

The Epoch Times reported: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says it does not have documents backing its claim that COVID-19 vaccines do not cause variants of the virus that causes COVID-19.

The CDC’s website calls it a myth that the vaccines cause variants. “FACT: COVID-19 vaccinesdo not create or cause variants of the virus that causes COVID-19. Instead, COVID-19 vaccines can help prevent new variants from emerging,” the website states.

The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), a nonprofit, asked the CDC in Freedom of Information Act requests for documentation supporting the claim.

The CDC has now responded to both requests, saying a search “found no records responsive” to them.