A Misstatement or Another "Great Lie?" Biden’s Latino Probot Xavier Becerra Said, 'Vaccines Kill Non-Whites at 2X the Rate of Whites.' ["Beware of a half-truth. It may be the wrong half"]

According to FUNKTIONARY,

shenanigger - a Negro (neo-lawn-jockey) who carries out Step-n-Fetchit type activites/actions (shenanigans) for the dominant immoral majority (the psychopathic white power semi-organism), i.e., the Rhodes, Rothschild, Anglo Saxon Zionist power clique, unknowlingly at the expense of him/herself and knowlingly at the expense (sell-out/buy-out) of his people and culture. (See: McNegro, Coin-Operated, The Moteasuh Tribe, Sambo & SNigger).  

Probot – a propagandizing programmed robot. A representative from an organization, agency or institution, especially the Internal Revenue Service, Pentagon, State Department, or Blight House, whose assignment is to make prepared statements and answer “cooked” (prepared) questions at news conferences, briefings and the like. A probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite. (See: Proxymoron)

Great Lies – half-truths, absolute truth, complete falsities and distortions uttered by the agents of the Corporate State, its mass media, and the Oligarchy; strategically deployed to keep its citizen-victims apathetic and docile. (See: The Truth)

Half-Truth – a come-on to either swindle you out of money or out of mind. Beware of a half-truth. It may be the wrong half. Half truth can always appear to be consistent, but a total truth is always inconsistent because in total or absolute truth the opposite or complement polarity is not included and therefore a duality is forged instead. A half-truth plus a half-truth equals absolute truth—a whole lie or a holy lie. You will know a half-truth when you hear it because its delivery (utterance) is always the by-product of a mid-lie crisis. (See: Absolute Truth, Subjective Truth, Devil, Sin, Mass Truth & Lie)

A Blight House Email Obtained by FOIA Request Shows Facebook, Merck and the CDC Foundation (includes Pfizer) Formed an Alliance “to build confidence in vaccines" [to destroy informed consent]

From [HERE] A White House email, obtained on behalf of ICAN, shows Facebook, Merck, and the CDC Foundation, whose corporate partners includes Pfizer, have formed an alliance “to use social media and digital platforms to build confidence in and drive uptake of vaccines.” No conflict there.

On August 12, 2021, ICAN, through its attorneys, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for communications between White House staff and Facebook, Google, and YouTube.  In response to this request, ICAN received a June 15, 2021 email sent by Facebook’s then-Public Policy Manager, Nkechi “Payton” Iheme, to several White House employees.

In it, Iheme announces a new initiative, the “Alliance for Advancing Health Care,” between Facebook and several major companies and organizations, including Merck, the Vaccine Confidence Project, the Sabin Vaccine Institute, and the CDC Foundation.  Significantly, one of the CDC Foundation’s corporate partners is Pfizer.  In the email, Iheme explains that the Alliance is “focused on advancing public understanding of how social media and behavioral sciences can be leveraged to improve the health of communities around the world” and states that its first project is to “provide grants to researchers and organizations for projects that explore how to use social media and digital platforms to build confidence in and drive uptake of vaccines.”  Facebook announced this new initiative on June 9, 2021 here.

The conflict of interest is astonishing.  This email shows without a doubt that, through the CDC Foundation created “to support the [CDC’s] work,” the federal government, which is in charge of ensuring the safety of vaccines, has teamed up with Big Pharma and Big Tech to push a liability-free product on the world, while attempting to stomp out anyone who questions this arrangement.

Just as the pharmaceutical companies will never rest when it comes to promoting and selling their vaccine products, and the federal government will not rest in its efforts to assist them, we will never rest in exposing the truth regarding these products or in demanding full transparency and full informed consent for any and all vaccines.

6 Companies Control 90% of What Americans Read, Watch and Hear (Talk and Think About). Many Black Sheeple Believe "The Dependent Media" is disinterested, unbiased and independent from Vested Interests

DR. AMOS WILSON EXPLAINED, “The most effective means of disseminating and reproducing ideas in society, and in the Afrikan American community in particular, is to have that community perceive their dissemination and reproduc­tion as the work of disinterested, unbiased, non-manipulative, liberal yet authoritative, White American individuals, groups, or institutions, or as flowing from sources independent of the marked influence of the powerful. Thus, White America strongly pushes and projects the powerful mythology of independent, liberal American media, universi­ties, and other information processing establishments. That is, America loudly congratulates itself for what it calls its "free press" and mass media which permit the free exchange of ideas. Most Black Americans utilize White media and these factors as their primary, if not sole, source of information. Most are not mindful of the fact that the American press and mass media are privately owned, profit-making, White elite-controlled corporations. The press is one among other institutions, "and one of the most important in maintaining the hegemony of the corporate class and the capitalist system itself," advances Parenti.

If the press cannot mold our every opinion, it can frame the perpetual reality around which our opinions take shape. Here may lie the most important effect of the news media: they set the issue agenda for the rest of us, choosing what to emphasize and what to ignore or suppress, in effect, organizing our political world for us. The media may not always be able to tell us what to think, but they are strikingly success­ful in telling us what to think about ...”.

From [CHD] Today, just six conglomerates — Comcast, Disney, AT&T, Sony, Fox and Paramount Global (formerly known as ViacomCBS) — control 90% of what you watch, read, or listen to. To put this into perspective: that means about 232 media executives have the power to decide what information 277 million Americans are able to access. In 2021, the “big six” banked a total of more than $478 billion in revenue. That’s more than both Finland’s and Ukraine’s GDP combined.

The issue extends to print media and radio giants, too: iHeartMedia owns 863 radio stationsnationwide, while Gannett owns more than 100 daily U.S. newspapers and nearly 1,000 weeklies.

As the pool controlling the media keeps shrinking, so does the breadth of the information reported. Hence why today’s thousands of news outlets often churn out embarrassingly duplicative content. [MORE]

J&J Pays $99M to Settle Suit for Causing West Virginia's Opioid Crisis. J&J Concealed, Mischaracterized and Failed to Disclose Risks of Addiction and Serious Health Risks, just Like COVID Vax

From [HERE] Johnson & Johnson will pay $99 million to settle a lawsuit in West Virginia that alleges the company helped fuel the state’s opioid crisis, removing the company from a trial that began this month.

West Virginia was one of several states that didn’t join a nationwide $5 billion opioid settlement that J&J  completed in February to resolve state and local government lawsuits against the company. 

J&J said Monday that its settlement with the West Virginia attorney general isn’t an admission of wrongdoing and that its marketing and promotion of prescription opioids were appropriate and responsible. The company no longer sells prescription opioids in the U.S.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said the settlement allowed the state to recover more than double the $48 million that the company had offered it in the national settlement.

“It was absolutely the correct decision to proceed to trial,” Mr. Morrisey said. “This settlement will provide significant help to those affected the most by the opioid crisis in West Virginia.”

The trial in Kanawha County is continuing against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and AbbVie Inc.’s Allergan and affiliated companies.

In that case, Mr. Morrisey alleges that the companies concealed, mischaracterized and failed to disclose the serious risk of addiction and promoted higher dosage amounts without disclosing inherently greater risks, among other things.

Teva declined to comment. Allergan didn’t respond to a request for comment. 

A separate bench trial was held last summer in federal court in Charleston, W.Va., in which Cabell County and the city of Huntington, W. Va., accused drug wholesalers McKessonCorp., AmerisourceBergen Corp. and Cardinal Health Inc. of creating a public nuisance when they shipped 81 million pills to the city and county between 2006 and 2014.

Defense attorneys argued that physicians prescribed opioids using their medical judgment and pharmacies dispensed medications to patients. They said they followed the law and had systems in place to identify suspicious orders.

The judge has yet to rule on that case.

After Begging Blacks for Their Vote, White Liberals Sit On Their Ass While Evictions of Mostly Black Tenants by Mostly White Landlords for Non-Payment of Rent (Due to COVID Lockdowns) Are On the Rise

From [HERE] Evictions on the rise but lawsuits, nonpaying tenants still vex the rental housing market

Landlords nationwide are booting out more tenants who haven’t paid their monthly rent since the COVID-19 pandemic started, but legal challenges are slowing them down in some places.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s moratorium on evictions ended July 31. But lawsuits continue to flood state and local courts as property managers seek to pay their bills and lodgers complain of price-gouging in rent increases.

The past two years of the pandemic saw the largest drop in eviction filings on record when the federal government intervened to prevent landlords from dislodging tenants, according to the Princeton University’s Eviction Lab, which tracked 31 cities in six states.

While those areas typically see 865,000 evictions a year, the lab said only 434,304 cases were filed last year.

The number of evictions is ticking up again as landlords push renters to pay back what they owe on monthly payments stretching back up to two years.

In those 31 cities representing a fraction of all U.S. renters, the lab reports that 7,973 people have been evicted in the past week alone.

“Trends on evictions vary city to city and state to state, but they are trending upwards in general and in many places are overpassing pre-pandemic averages,” said Juan Pablo Garnham, a member of the Eviction Lab’s media team.

New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against real estate law firm Balsamo on Wednesday, accusing the Brooklyn-based attorneys of suing to evict nonpaying renters without any “meaningful reviews” of their cases.

“This lawsuit is the first step in righting the wrongs done by unscrupulous landlords and their lawyers and reversing the negative impacts of their negligence on our communities,” Ms. James, a Democrat, said in a statement.

St. Louis media outlet KMOV reported that tenant Anthony Glasby has sued the Lewis and Clark apartments for allegedly forcing him out illegally over unpaid back rent — payments he said he was starting to make after catching COVID-19 in December.

“You cannot be evicted in Missouri without judicial process,” Rob Swearingen, an attorney at Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, told the news station.

But John J. Vecchione, a lawyer with the nonpartisan New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), said some states made it harder for landlords by imposing longer moratoriums than the CDC required.

That has put added pressure on property owners to choose between evictions and raising their rents to cope with the lost revenues.

“The longer a moratorium goes on, the more economic disruption happens until it’s lifted,” Mr. Vecchione said. “I think that’s just logic.”

The attorney said his legal advocacy group filed three lawsuits representing more than 20 landlords to overturn the CDC moratorium before the Supreme Court struck it down on Aug. 26.

“The federal eviction moratorium was illegal and had the bad consequences of not allowing the housing market to function,” Mr. Vecchione said.

But while U.S. eviction moratoriums have ended, many landlords are still struggling to compensate for the billions of dollars in unpaid rent.

Iowa landlord Asa Mossman, the lead plaintiff in NCLA’s lawsuit Mossman vs. CDC, said it would cost his small business more in legal fees to collect the unpaid rent than he would get for his trouble.

“I haven’t received any compensation, but I got a symbolic court judgment against one tenant for a small amount of money that I have no hope of collecting,” Mr. Mossman said.

And the Cedar Rapids-based owner of 11 affordable-rent properties said he worries government officials may change the law again if the pandemic flares back up.

That would make things even harder on the low-income market, he said.

“It’s become extremely difficult for people to find housing in lower price ranges because rents have gone up, there’s more scrutiny of tenants and supplies have gone down,” Mr. Mossman said.

Tracy Mills, a landlord in Charleston, South Carolina, said he will never recover $50,000 in unpaid rent from the tenant he evicted from a single-family home in July after 18 months of missed payments.

“The tenant had plenty of money, but chose to ride the moratorium and not pay up,” Mr. Mills said. “We tried everything we could to work something out without an eviction, but they wouldn’t apply for any rental assistance to stay.”

Mr. Mills, who manages six affordable housing properties in South Carolina, said it’s the only eviction he’s had in the past 20 years.

“We’re still trying to recover from it, putting the house on Airbnb as a short-term rental, but they start you off at low rates. Eventually, I think we’ll crawl out, but it’s frustrating,” he said.

Some financial experts said that the affordable housing market will suffer more in states and cities that hinder evictions.

“If landlords are not allowed to enforce contracts and evict those who shirk their obligations, they will have no choice but to pass on the costs to paying tenants or to sell off their properties, possibly reducing the availability of rental housing overall,” said John Berlau, director of finance policy at the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Economist Victor Claar, who teaches at Florida Gulf Coast University, said the ongoing rise in U.S. home prices means most landlords are not price-gouging by raising their rents.

And since soaring home prices have driven more Americans into the affordable rental market, the pressure on landlords to evict nonpaying tenants is growing.

“Landlords have bills to pay and sometimes those bills are mortgage bills on their rental properties,” Mr. Claar said. “There’s no moratorium on those.”

Bryan Cannon, a North Carolina-based financial planner at Cannon Advisors, said it could help if more tenants apply for local, state and national rental assistance funds.

“It should not necessarily fall on the backs of landlords to subsidize rents to renters who do not pay,” Mr. Cannon said. “However, there should be some safeguards established to help egregious landlords who gouge their renters by dramatically escalating their rents to essentially force their tenants out.”

Bacteria that Causes Legionnaires’ Disease Found in Illinois Prison Water

From [HERE] Legionella, the bacteria that causes Legionnaires’ disease, has been detected in the water at five correctional facilities in the past 12 months, the Illinois Department of Corrections confirmed to The Appeal.

The contaminated water was found during routine quarterly testing at Stateville Correctional Center, Joliet Treatment Center, Graham, Kewanee, and Stateville Northern Reception and Classification Center.

State officials told The Appeal that as of March 15, no one was exhibiting symptoms of the disease—a potentially fataltype of pneumonia.

When asked if all prison water supplies were tested for legionella on a quarterly basis, Illinois DOC Chief of Staff Camile Lindsay told The Appeal in an email that the department tests only “a sample size of water sources” at each facility.

At Stateville, after one positive sample was gathered from a cell, a second sample from a separate cell in the same unit was tested and was negative for legionella. The department did not test any other cells in the unit, Ms. Lindsay wrote, and the only other sources tested were sinks in the “healthcare” and “dietary” units, which came back negative.

The Appeal reported yesterday that, in a second round of testing on the contaminated water sources conducted in late March, officials again found legionella in Kewanee and Stateville.

Outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease have been reported at prisons in California, Indiana, New Jersey, and Connecticut, according to The Appeal.

In Illinois, two people incarcerated at the Pontiac Correctional Center were diagnosed with Legionnaires’ disease in 2020, and a person incarcerated at Stateville was also diagnosed with the disease in 2015. All three were hospitalized.

Complaints about contaminated water in Illinois prisons are longstanding and go beyond legionella, The Appeal reports. In the 1990s, Stateville’s water was found to contain almost twice the level of radium permitted by federal guidelines.

People incarcerated at Stateville have been reporting that the water is discolored and has a strange taste since at least 2013. Extremely elevated levels of copper and lead were found in seven locations tested at the prison in October 2021.

In December 2021, protesters gathered outside Stateville to demand clean water. Injustice Watch reported that the water problems had reached crisis levels as supply chain issues and contract disputes created a shortage of bottled water in the prison commissary, where people who can afford it purchase drinking water. Advocates delivered more than 62,000 bottles of water to the prison during the protest.

The following month, a report from the Chicago Reader said that the company responsible for testing Stateville’s water for lead did not follow federal protocols and failed to test kitchen or cell faucets.

And in February, The Appeal reports, a lawsuit was filed alleging that the sink water in cells at the Northern Reception and Classification Center smells “like sewage and has a faint, brown color.”

Alan Mills, executive director of the Uptown People’s Law Center, which filed the Northern Reception suit, told The Appeal that corroding pipes can contribute to the growth of legionella bacteria.

As the state’s prisons age, the corrections department should be doing regular, system-wide testing of water sources, Mr. Mills said.

Federal Prosecutors Decline to File Murder Charges Against White Cop who Murdered Laquan McDonald and then Lied About It

Neuropeon Biden begged Blacks to vote for him and he promised “to root out systemic racism in our criminal justice system and to enact police reform in George Floyd’s name.” Proof that he will stand for whatever gullible Blacks will fall for. He is a liar doing nothing for Black people. Above Corpse Biden during the campaign using George Floyd’s family for a photo op.

From [HERE] Federal prosecutors said on Monday that they would not bring criminal charges against a former Chicago police officer who served about three years in state prison after being convicted of second-degree murder in the 2014 shooting of Laquan McDonald, a Black teenager.

In a statement on Monday, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois said that, after consulting with Mr. McDonald’s family, it decided not to charge the former officer, Jason Van Dyke, in the killing of the 17-year-old boy, whose murder put a spotlight on police brutality, prompted changes in police procedure and had political ramifications.

The prosecutors said that the bar to convict Mr. Van Dyke on federal charges would have been much higher than the one for state charges. They would have to prove that he knew deadly force was excessive and that his actions “were not the result of mistake, fear, negligence, or bad judgment,” the statement said.

They added that a second round of charges against Mr. Van Dyke “would diminish the important results already achieved.” They noted that a federal judge would have to consider Mr. Van Dyke’s previous sentence and his good conduct in prison.

Daniel Herbert, Mr. Van Dyke’s lawyer and a former police officer, did not immediately respond to emails or phone calls on Monday.

In October 2014, Mr. Van Dyke, who is white and was then on the Chicago police force, responded to a report that a person was breaking into vehicles and found Mr. McDonald holding a knife but veering away from the police. Mr. Van Dyke shot the boy 16 times, firing even after Mr. McDonald had collapsed onto the street.

The shooting was caught on a dashboard-camera video, but the city released it only 13 months later after a judge’s order. The footage prompted protests across the city that denounced both the cover-up and Mr. McDonald’s brutal death.

Mr. Van Dyke was convicted in state court in 2018 of one count of second-degree murder and 16 counts of aggravated battery with a firearm. He was the first Chicago police officer to be convicted of murder in an on-duty shooting in nearly 50 years.

He was released in February, with credit for good behavior, after having served less than half of an 81-month prison sentence. While it is fairly routine for prisoners to be released early if they demonstrate good conduct, some Chicago activists were outraged. They called on the federal authorities to file civil rights charges against Mr. Van Dyke to make up for what they believed to be a lenient sentence.

Ja’Mal Green, 26, a former Chicago mayoral candidate who has spoken out about Mr. McDonald’s killing for several years, said that he had wanted the federal authorities to press charges against the former officer. 

“The fact that a white man was able to pump 16 bullets into a young Black boy and only do three years in jail? That’s not justice,” Mr. Green said on Monday night.

As a result of Mr. McDonald’s killing, the federal authorities investigated the Chicago Police Department and issued a consent decree ordering hundreds of police reforms. Chicago police officers now wear body cameras while on duty - so they can record and better spy on Blacks in their communities and use the recordings to secure prosecutions.

The police superintendent and several police officers were firedover the cover-up, which also may have been one of the reasons Rahm Emanuel, the former mayor, did not seek a third term.

MI Police Refuse to Release the Name of the White Cop who Murdered Patrick Lyoya. Are Cops Really "Public Servants" if They are Uncontrollable by the Public and Have Unaccountable Power to Take Life?

From [HERE] Patrick Lyoya’s father says he and his family have a right to know the name of the White officer who fatally shot the 26-year-old Black man.

But the police chief in Grand Rapids says he will only do so if the officer is charged in the April 4 shooting that followed a brief foot chase and a struggle over the officer’s Taser.

Eric Winstrom’s department is among those across the U.S. that have faced scrutiny for withholding identities of officers in cases where Black people were wounded or killed during interactions with police. Some have said it’s to protect the officers from retribution. Others, like Grand Rapids, point to policies that prohibit the release of an officer’s name before charges are filed.

“I’m asking for the law to release his face, his image and his identification because I would love to know the person who has killed my son. I have the right,” Peter Lyoya said through a translator during an emotional news conference after video of the shooting of his son was released last week.

Andrew Shannon, president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference Peninsula Chapter and vice president for the SCLC Virginia State Unit, said police departments should treat officers who are under investigation like they would anyone else.

“They always report who the suspect is and they report who the victim is, except in cases of rape,” Shannon told The Associated Press. “There should be no special treatment when law enforcement are involved in these types of matters. They should want to demonstrate transparency and openness so everyone can be fully apprised of the process.”

Lyoya was facedown on the ground when an officer shot him in the back of the head while straddling Lyoya. The officer had stopped Lyoya for driving with a license plate that didn’t belong to the vehicle.

While Winstrom said he could not release the officer’s name, he did release videos of the shooting, citing a need for transparency. The officer could be heard repeatedly ordering Lyoya to “let go” of his Taser, at one point demanding: “Drop the Taser!”

Ben Crump, an attorney for Lyoya’s family, planned to release results of an independent autopsy on Tuesday.

Michigan State Police are investigating. The prosecutor who will determine whether the officer will face any charges has said not to expect a quick decision.

A Grand Rapids police spokeswoman said Monday in an email that a person’s name, age, other basic information and the charges against him can be released following an arrest or issuance of an arrest warrant.

“Not releasing the officer’s name is consistent with” the procedure, Jennifer Kalczuk wrote.

Ephraim Eaddy, spokesman for the agency, said it has concluded that officers’ names cannot be held back because they are public servants.

Crump, the Lyoyas’ attorney, said having the officer’s name would allow the family to find out more about him.

“We want to know his history,” Crump said last week. “I can guarantee you, they’re going to do everything in their power to try to learn the history of Patrick to assassinate his character.”

Dr. Ardis Says "COVID Deaths" are Due to Federal Protocols Requiring Hospitals to Treat Patients with Remdesivir, an Experimental Drug that Causes Liver, Heart and Kidney Failure and Kills People

Dr. Bryan Ardis’ testimony from Day 3 of the Model Grand Jury to Investigate COVID Eugenocide and Crimes Against Humanity

What to Know as Police Release Remixed BodyCam of Patrick Lyoya Shooting: White Cops who are Too Weak to Subdue Black Men After Traffic Stops Can Execute Them. Cell Phone Video Appears to Show Murder

FULL (remixed) bodycam and cell phone video released by Grands Rapids Authorities

On April 4, 2022. Patrick Lyoya, a 26-year-old Black man, was shot by a white police officer after an attempted arrest led to a scuffle for the officer’s Taser. There were no warrants for his arrest.

After community protests led by Atty Ben Crump took place, on Wednesday, the Grand Rapids Police Department in Michigan hosted a press conference where they released a redacted, remixed video of the officer’s body-cam, which cuts out right before the shooting of Mr. Lyoya. The police claim the bodycam malfunctioned at the moments prior to the shooting.

"Lawless Society - a socio-juristic human relation confliguration where law is upheld, codified, and deified over humanity. If you fear or worry about its advent, you'll certainly never recognize its presence. 2) a Police State of the Overruling Class" - from FUNKTIONARY. Dr. Blynd states, "the difference between an outlaw and a lawman is mainly on paper - not on principle."

Mr. Lyoya was fatally shot by a police officer following a traffic stop on the southeast side of Grand Rapids, Mich. Grand Rapids police said Mr. Lyoya fought with the officer after his vehicle was pulled over. Initially, the circumstances that led to the traffic stop weren’t clear, but police said after further inspection the vehicle had a license plate not registered to the vehicle. However, police stops cannot be justified after the fact. In order for the police to stop you the Supreme Court has ruled that police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and that you are involved in the activity. Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate or unclear and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. Here, the stop would be lawful only if police puled him over because of the discovery of the unregistered vehicle (or some other traffic infraction) before the stop. To discover that the vehicle was unregistered after the stop would be an unconstitutional violation of so called 4th Amendment rights - in so far as laws are usually applied to white citizens.

Mr. Lyloa had not committed any felony (unregistered vehicle is a minor traffic misdemeanor) and the white cop was not authorized to use deadly force to apprehend him as a fleeing felon. Nevertheless, in the system of Authority all “laws” are threats backed by the use of deadly force against those who disobey. As Dr. Blynd explains, obedience to authority or jail is the actual reality; an individual may willingly comply with authorities but they really have no choice in the matter. To comply or not comply is a false choice because all laws and commands from authorities are threats backed by the use of physical violence. Additionally, in most states it is unlawful for citizens to resist an unlawful arrest. The legal system is anchored in violence, nothing more. “Authority” is the right to rule over people, the right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence on others. The idea that some people have the moral right to forcibly control others, and that, consequently, those others have the moral obligation to obey is what killed Mr. Lyoya. Authority caused his murder, which is the ultimate slavery.

As undeceiver Michael Huemer explains,

Government is a coercive institution. Generally speaking, when the state makes a law, the law carries with it a punishment to be imposed upon violators. It is possible to have a law with no specified punishment for violation, but all actual governments attach punishments to nearly all laws.  Not everyone who breaks the law will in fact be punished, but the state will generally make a reasonable effort at punishing violators and will generally punish a fair number of them, typically with fines or imprisonment. These punishments are intended to harm lawbreakers, and they generally succeed in doing so.

Direct physical violence is rarely used as a punishment. Nevertheless, violence plays a crucial role in the system, because without the threat of violence, lawbreakers could simply choose not to suffer punishment. For example, the government commands that drivers stop before all red lights. If you violate this rule, you might be punished with a $200 fine. But this is simply another command. If you didn’t obey the command to stop before all red lights, why would you obey the command to pay $200 to the government? Perhaps the second command will be enforced by a third command: the government may threaten to revoke your driver’s license if you do not pay the fine. In other words, they may command you to stop driving. But if you violated the first two commands, why would you follow the third? Well, the command to stop driving may be enforced by a threat of imprisonment if you continue to drive without a license. As these examples illustrate, commands are often enforced with threats to issue further commands, yet that cannot be all there is to it. At the end of the chain must come a threat that the violator literally cannot defy. The system as a whole must be anchored by a non-voluntary intervention, a harm that the state can impose regardless of the individual’s choices.

That anchor is provided by physical force. Even the threat of imprisonment requires enforcement: how can the state ensure that the criminal goes to the prison? The answer lies in coercion, involving actual or threatened bodily injury, or at a minimum, physical pushing or pulling of the individual’s body to the location of imprisonment. This is the final intervention that the individual cannot choose to defy. One can choose not to pay a fine, one can choose to drive without a license, and one can even choose not to walk to a police car to be taken away. But one cannot choose not to be subjected to physical force if the agents of the state decide to impose it.

Thus, the legal system is founded on intentional, harmful coercion. To justify a law, one must justify imposition of that law on the population through a threat of harm, including the coercive imposition of actual harm on those who are caught violating the law. In common sense morality, the threat or actual coercive imposition of harm is normally wrong. This is not to say that it cannot be justified; it is only to say that coercion requires a justification. This may be because of the way in which coercion disrespects persons, seeking to bypass their reason and manipulate them through fear, or the way in which it seems to deny the autonomy and equality of other persons. [MORE]

Grand Rapids police said Mr. Lyoya’s vehicle was also occupied by another person, who witnessed and filmed some of the incident on their cellphone. [MORE] The police and their dependent media obviously have disregarded his/her account of what took place - the official government version is always the defacto truthful version when cops harm people.

Body Cam Shows White KY Cops Murder Black Man. In Racist System Homicide by Cops is Always Justified if Blacks Possess a Gun, Regardless of Any Threat or Circumstance

THE LOGIC OF JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE. The system of white supremacy/racism is predicated upon black people's belief in many, many lies. The 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures is one of those lies. Dr. Blynd explains,  “Rights are myths—obedience to servitude or jail is the reality.”

Below is white propaganda from the Supreme Court about the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing felon. Clearly such rules are not intended to be applied to non-whites:

The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. It is not better that all felony suspects die than that they escape. Where the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting from failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly force to do so. It is no doubt unfortunate when a suspect who is in sight escapes, but the fact that the police arrive a little late or are a little slower afoot does not always justify killing the suspect. 

A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead… Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. Thus, if the suspect threatens the officer with a weapon or there is probable cause to believe that he has committed a crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical harm, deadly force may be used if necessary to prevent escape, and if, where feasible, some warning has been given. 

Tennessee v. Garner - 471 U.S. 1 at page 11 (1985).

Like Other False Flags, Insta-Terror Case is Open/Closed by NY Authorities with Weird Admissions, Omissions, Bad Effects and a Ready Made Tale Told in Accord with the Appetite of the Racist Believer

AUTHORITIES ARE FUCKING WITH OUR SENSES AND PROGRAMMED BELIEFS. If his YouTube/blog “evidence” wasn’t enough, this just in; the attacker, whom the Dependent media has characterized as “a black nationalist,” confessed to the crimes by calling the police tip line on himself! Yes, he snitched on himself (similar to “manifestos,” diaries, rap books, tweets or ISIS press releases containing confessions to the entire crime immediately found in other false flag episodes). What an unbelievably stupid fairy tale told by elite whites in accordance with the appetite of the believer. In this episode, at issue is the appetite of the Neuropeon and Neuropean believer and a story told according to racist ideas, prejudices, fears and myths. What does “a black nationalist” even mean to elite whites? Apparently deluded racist suspects actually believe there is a competing system of Black supremacy somewhere on the planet where Black individuals use their collective power to control or dominate the lives of white people in all areas of people activity.

Don’t be surprised if a manifesto or diary or unnamed neighbor/friend pops up with confessions, unauthenticated social media posts, messages or detained plans of the incident. If there is a “trial” it will be solid gold bullshit, like Dyann Roofs’ fabricated “trial.”

Due to the contrived nature of the evidence this insta-terror case feels synthetic and should be suspected as a false flag operation conducted by the government until proven otherwise. If Crimethinc would create fake vaccines for the purpose of genthanasia and biocide then surely It would have no problem fake shooting at people in the subway.

Why would the government do such a thing? As undeceiver Larken Rose explains, authorities terrorize or create great fear in the citizenry in order convince them to voluntarily give authorities more control, more power over them and their lives. Authorities and their Dependent Media must constantly misrepresent reality so citizens always have a bogey-man or a perceived unsolvable problem to fear. Rose states, elites “must pound into [citizens] heads, day in and day out, that the world is full of horrors and injustices , and that only the government authorities can make their lives bearable and that is necessary for them to have enormous power in order to do so.”

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Belief- the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. 2) a construction of approximate truths, absolute truths, mass truths and primary myths, based on genetic predisposition, and environmental and socio-psychological conditioning. 3) the institutionalization of the unknowable, i.e., a conviction that is not necessarily based upon any empirical, direct-mind or experiential knowledge. 4) a non-physical surviving thought-form. 5) any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought. [MORE]

Believer - one who accepts that which has no basis in reality. 2) a person who enjoys being deceived. A believer does not seek—just accepts theologies and/or ideologies. 3) one who is addicted to vanity and/or chained to convention with conviction. 4) one who lives in a cloud of illusions, confounded by language and its deceptions. Believers are people who make their lives subjective slaves to a mere belief—engineered my limited and fragmented understanding and fostered by erroneous conclusions based solely on effects and appearances. A true believer would rather believe in something and be wrong than not believe in it and be right.

cover-stories – headlines that provide cover (hiding and distraction) for the real untold and undiscussed stories behind the one’s they are really (deliberately) not covering, undressing or addressing at all. 2) planted actors and/or provocateurs providing misinformation immediately after a false flag operation—like 9-11, Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon bombing. The methodology: Sell the lie with authority, then change the subject to something emotional. For example, the cover stories about whether or not “well-intentioned” public officials (on oxymoronic characterization itself) made “mistakes” in not paying attention to obvious warnings of so-called Al-Qaida operations inside the territorial United States posed by the mock 9-11 Commission mockery. The whole thrust behind the cover-story was to specifically avoid treating the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon, and the fields in Pennsylvania as actual crime scenes—to avoid the contradictions in the official stories with physical evidence to the contrary, to totally ignore the blatant anomalies regarding the well-planned, orchestrated, and executed sophisticated operations (hoax) that happened and didn’t happen on that fateful day. (See: Underlying, MEDIA, Tyrant-Paradigm, Pixelated People, West-Wingers, Oklahoma City Bombing, Nine- Eleven, MEDIA NSA Position, Bush Family Crime Syndicate, Pentagon Murders, Killer-Jet, CIA, Israelians, NSA, King TUT, RUN—GMC & The OCTOCON)

false flag – staged psychological operations by government operatives and shadow elite orchestrated and perpetrated against the civilian population. False flag operations does not necessarily mean that oftentimes real people don’t die.

WOW. ALL 600 Cameras around the brooklyn subway station at issue all broke down, at the same time and on the same day the black nationalist decided to shoot at people’s legs in the subway. THE VICTIMS MAY BE REAL BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE BULLSHIT.

citizens – those who instinctively seek permission or ask themselves whether or not they are allowed to do anything before they act. Citizens (serfs, subjects or slaves), possess a “ruled” mind-virus mentality. 2) the hapless residents of the great democracy whose Constitution deliberately throttled democratic rule. (See: Citizenship, Plutocracy & Slavery)

“Government” – Latinized Greek (“Gubernatio” = control; and from the Latin “mente” = mind; “The control of the mind.” 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one’s comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of “protecting” their victims. Government is lawlessness (monopolized violence) mindlessly respected and accepted as law (open threats); politics is the way to enable and circumvent the law. The outworking of history consistently demonstrates that government will, in spite of the Bill of Rights, arrogate all power to itself eventually, if the people don’t act to prevent it. You have rights alright, just don’t get caught exercising them, O.K.? “Government” is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else. Official “government” is disorganized, politicized; centralized; canonized and revered initiation of force, but it is no less initiation of force and coercion than any unofficial singular action of the same offensive or violent content. “Government” is an abstract infinite entity acting as a possessive noun. There is not a single line in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any governmental document that states that a natural person will be left alone as long as she or he does not impose upon another or others. By commission and omission, all official decrees make clear that a human is regarded as owned property or resource of the god called “Corporate State.” It is controlling the lives, energy and property of others that requires coercive force and this is its sole function. Endorsing the lie of an imagined abstract collective interest supports the very concept that gives rise to all covert and overt oppression. “The government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of the way. It does not keep the country free. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way.” ~Kirkpatrick Sale. The wayward notion that government redistributes wealth is widely held as sacrosanct as it is patently false. There are redistributes aspects, sure, but that’s as close as it gets. “As long as government is allowed to exist, it will everywhere keep growing and getting worse. Nearly everything that “governments” do (i.e., those with wholly symbolic roles “running” it, and who perform acts in its name) is grounded in fear. Government will cease to exist when people cease to grant it legitimacy—in other words stop believing in it, stop looking to it for solutions to problems in their lives, and stop supporting it.” ~Fred Woolworth. Government has failed at every attempt in 6,000 years of recorded history. Government atrocities—carried out by irrational functionaries, economic hit men, soldiers, diplomats, emissaries, etc., under every possible flavor or form of government—have littered the bloody pages of recorded history. Government is indisputably the greatest purveyor of murder, mayhem, genocide, exploitation, rape, forced starvation, pillage and chaos in the annals of humanity. Government does not need to be abolished; merely rendered obsolete through seeing it for what it truly is—a prime manufacturer of poverty, brutal oppression, violence, coercion, conformity and fear. [MORE]

25-Year-Old Black Woman Gone - Dead After COVID Injection. Was a Pre-School Teacher. Governments, Dependent Media and Big Pharma Keep Lying and Murdering

In a Facebook post, preschool teacher Desiree Penrod said the vaccine is “killing” her, as she suffered from fatigue, headaches, stomach cramps and earaches after getting the J&J jab. Days later, she passed away. [MORE]

“I Wasn’t Sick Before I Took that Fucking Vaccine, Now I’m a Little Skeptical.” Video Compilation of Various People who Had Adverse Neurological and Pulmonary Side Effects from COVID Injections

UK Authorities Quietly Published Data Confirming the Fully Vaccinated Accounted for 92% of all COVID Deaths in March [read that again]

From [HERE] Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population. 

But something even stranger than this is also occurring. Covid-19 is currently on the rise again across the UK, but the data confirms cases, hospitalisations and deaths are only rising among the triple vaccinated population, whereas they are declining significantly among the unvaccinated population.

You have been lied to on a monumental scale over the past two years by your Government, its Scientific Advisers, and the mainstream media. But the biggest lie of all is perhaps that the Covid-19 injections are both safe and effective. Neither of these statements are true. If you want recent evidence of them not being safe then look no further than the recent announcement from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). 

On the 6th April 2022, the UKHSA released a statement confirming they were launching an urgent investigation due to the detection of higher than usual rate of liver inflammation (hepatitis) among children, and that similar cases were also being assessed in Scotland. 

They have already ruled out the common viruses that cause hepatitis, so now they need look no further than the Covid-19 injection that has been unnecessarily offered to children, because Pfizer’s own study confirms the Covid-19 mRNA jab accumulates in the liver following vaccination and causes hepatitis. [MORE]

New Study: One-Fifth of Fully Vaxxed (3X) Swedes became Infected with Omicron Within 2 Months

From [HERE] As concluded by researchers at Danderyd Hospital in Sweden, the Omicron strain effectively gets past antibodies. While most of the patients surveyed only had mild symptoms, they remained infectious for up to nine days.

More than one in five people tested positive for the Omicron strain of the COVID-19 virus within two months of receiving their third dose or booster shot, a fresh Swedish study shows.

The study is part of the large COMMUNITY project at Danderyd Hospital aimed at examining and comparing immunity after COVID-19 infection and after vaccination. During this stage of the study, 375 hospital staff were PCR-tested regularly, regardless of symptoms.

“Omicron gets past the antibodies. We see that those who become infected had as high levels of antibodies as those who didn’t become infected”, Charlotte Thålin, assistant chief physician and the study’s research leader, told national broadcaster SVT.Many of those who ultimately tested positive had symptoms ranging from mild to none whatsoever, yet still had high virus levels. Over half of the participants tested positive for 11 days and remained infectious for up to nine days.

“This is the first time that it has been possible to follow the virus levels in the airways during an ongoing Omicron infection, and it was surprising that so many remained positive for so long and had such high virus levels even though they had just received their third dose”, Charlotte Thålin mused.

When asked whether it is still worth vaccinating when the protection levels promised by vaccine producers initially are obviously failing, Thålin remained adamant that the jab still protects against serious illness, whereas Omicron can be dangerous for the unvaccinated as well as for the elderly and risk groups.

“And in the grand scheme of things, we want to reduce the spread of infection because the higher the spread of infection in a well-vaccinated population, the greater the risk that we get new mutations and new virus strains”, Thålin concluded.

Sweden has an overall vaccination rate of over 73 percent, far above the worldwide rate of under 59 percent. 

Fed Apls Court Holds that Government Lock Down Orders During COVID are a Valid Contractual Defense. Business Defendant Excused from Performance Under a Contract (If There is a Force Majeure Clause)

• Is Your Landlord Trying to Get Paid Off the Virus? If Your Lease Has a "Force Majeure" or Emergency Clause then Payment May Be Excused Due to an ‘Unforeseeable Event’ Making It Impracticable to Pay

From [HERE] Over the past two years, there has been a fair amount of litigation surrounding the enforceability of force majeure provisions in response to the pandemic. A force majeure clause is a contractual provision that excuses one or both parties’ performance obligations when circumstances beyond the parties’ control arise and make performance impracticable or impossible. Such provisions ordinarily cover natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods. Other circumstances that may trigger force majeure provisions and relieve parties of liability include war, acts of terrorism, labor strikes and epidemics. With respect to COVID-19, courts around the country have generally construed force majeure provisions narrowly to find that, absent specific pandemic-related language, the pandemic does not trigger force majeure provisions. Other courts have decided that the COVID-19 pandemic falls within the more general definitions of “natural disaster.” Last week, a Federal Court of Appeals weighed in for the first time on the issue.

In June 2020, JN Contemporary Art LLC (JN) sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC (Phillips) in the Southern District of New York for breach of a contract which obligated Phillips to sell a painting on behalf of JN at a live auction. Phillips moved to dismiss the complaint, invoking the force majeure clause to terminate its agreement to sell the painting on behalf of JN, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and state government orders requiring nonessential businesses to cease in-person operations. The terms of the force majeure clause contained in the agreement provided: “In the event that the auction is postponed for circumstances beyond our or your reasonable control, including, without limitation, as a result of natural disaster, fire, flood, general strike, war, armed conflict, terrorist attack or nuclear or chemical contamination, we may terminate this Agreement with immediate effect. In such event, our obligation to make payment of the Guaranteed Minimum shall be null and void and we shall have no other liability to you.” Judge Denise Cote of Southern District of New York granted the motion to dismiss filed by Phillips, finding that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” and that the pandemic constituted “a circumstance beyond the parties’ reasonable control” as contemplated by their agreement. JN appealed and just last week the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal. See JN Contemporary Art LLC sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 7652, 2022 WL 852293 (2d Cir. March 23, 2022).

JN first argued on appeal that the district court erred in finding as a matter of law, without the benefit of any discovery, that the COVID-19 pandemic is a natural disaster, as it is debatable whether COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus or one created by man. JN next argued that Phillips did not have to sell the painting at a live auction, but could have sold it online or delayed a live auction sale to some point in the future. The Second Circuit disagreed. The Second Circuit stated that it did not need to rule on the finding by the district court that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” as it could decide the case on other grounds. The Second Circuit stated that the primary purpose of a force majeure clause is to “relieve a party from its contractual duties when its performance has been prevented by a force beyond its control or when the purpose of the contract has been frustrated.” The Second Circuit held that the COVID-19 pandemic and the orders issued by the government restricting nonessential businesses constituted circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the parties. In addition, the Second Circuit held that the agreement only required sale at a live auction and that when a defendant is excused from performance by force majeure, a defendant is not required to provide substitute performance.

Much has been written over the last year or two about courts interpreting force majeure clauses narrowly and strictly and not excusing performance due to COVID-19, and many parties are now excluding COVID-19 from their force majeure clauses altogether. The decision last week by Second Circuit in JN Contemporary Art LLC vs. Phillips Auctioneers LLC stands in contrast to many prior court decisions for two reasons. First, the Second Circuit interpreted the force majeure clause at issue more broadly and excused performance due to COVID-19. Second, it appears to be the first decision by a Federal Court of Appeals on this issue.

The Italian National Institute of Health Reveals the Fully "Vaccinated" now account for 7 in every 10 COVID Deaths

From [HERE] Covid-19 Deaths are beginning to rise again across Italy despite millions now being triple vaccinated, and the latest official Italian Government data shows that the vaccinated population account for 7 in every 10 of those deaths, as well as 8 in every 10 cases and hospitalisations, and 7 in every 10 ICU admissions. 

Italy’s National Institute of Health publishes a periodic Covid-19 Surveillance report, the latest of which can be accessed here, or the full list of which can be accessed here. 

In the latest report, data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths can be found in tables 4a, 4b and 4c on pages 26, 27 and 28. 

The following table has been collated from the data found in Table 4A in the ‘Diagnosi tra 25/02/2022 – 27/03/2022’ section and shows the total number of cases across Italy by vaccination status –

In all, between 25th Feb and 27th March 22, Italy recorded 1,594,849 Covid-19 infections, and an astounding 1,284,615 of these were among the vaccinated population, meaning the vaccinated accounted for 81% of all Covid-19 cases within one month. 

The unvaccinated accounted for just 310,234 cases, the one-dose vaccinated accounted for 36,199 cases, the two dose vaccinated accounted for 329,016 cases, and the triple vaccinated accounted for a shocking 919,400 cases. This means the triple vaccinated alone accounted for 58% of all Covid-19 cases across Italy between 25th Feb and 27th March 22. [MORE]