What to Know as Police Release Remixed BodyCam of Patrick Lyoya Shooting: White Cops who are Too Weak to Subdue Black Men After Traffic Stops Can Execute Them. Cell Phone Video Appears to Show Murder

FULL (remixed) bodycam and cell phone video released by Grands Rapids Authorities

On April 4, 2022. Patrick Lyoya, a 26-year-old Black man, was shot by a white police officer after an attempted arrest led to a scuffle for the officer’s Taser. There were no warrants for his arrest.

After community protests led by Atty Ben Crump took place, on Wednesday, the Grand Rapids Police Department in Michigan hosted a press conference where they released a redacted, remixed video of the officer’s body-cam, which cuts out right before the shooting of Mr. Lyoya. The police claim the bodycam malfunctioned at the moments prior to the shooting.

"Lawless Society - a socio-juristic human relation confliguration where law is upheld, codified, and deified over humanity. If you fear or worry about its advent, you'll certainly never recognize its presence. 2) a Police State of the Overruling Class" - from FUNKTIONARY. Dr. Blynd states, "the difference between an outlaw and a lawman is mainly on paper - not on principle."

Mr. Lyoya was fatally shot by a police officer following a traffic stop on the southeast side of Grand Rapids, Mich. Grand Rapids police said Mr. Lyoya fought with the officer after his vehicle was pulled over. Initially, the circumstances that led to the traffic stop weren’t clear, but police said after further inspection the vehicle had a license plate not registered to the vehicle. However, police stops cannot be justified after the fact. In order for the police to stop you the Supreme Court has ruled that police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and that you are involved in the activity. Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate or unclear and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. Here, the stop would be lawful only if police puled him over because of the discovery of the unregistered vehicle (or some other traffic infraction) before the stop. To discover that the vehicle was unregistered after the stop would be an unconstitutional violation of so called 4th Amendment rights - in so far as laws are usually applied to white citizens.

Mr. Lyloa had not committed any felony (unregistered vehicle is a minor traffic misdemeanor) and the white cop was not authorized to use deadly force to apprehend him as a fleeing felon. Nevertheless, in the system of Authority all “laws” are threats backed by the use of deadly force against those who disobey. As Dr. Blynd explains, obedience to authority or jail is the actual reality; an individual may willingly comply with authorities but they really have no choice in the matter. To comply or not comply is a false choice because all laws and commands from authorities are threats backed by the use of physical violence. Additionally, in most states it is unlawful for citizens to resist an unlawful arrest. The legal system is anchored in violence, nothing more. “Authority” is the right to rule over people, the right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence on others. The idea that some people have the moral right to forcibly control others, and that, consequently, those others have the moral obligation to obey is what killed Mr. Lyoya. Authority caused his murder, which is the ultimate slavery.

As undeceiver Michael Huemer explains,

Government is a coercive institution. Generally speaking, when the state makes a law, the law carries with it a punishment to be imposed upon violators. It is possible to have a law with no specified punishment for violation, but all actual governments attach punishments to nearly all laws.  Not everyone who breaks the law will in fact be punished, but the state will generally make a reasonable effort at punishing violators and will generally punish a fair number of them, typically with fines or imprisonment. These punishments are intended to harm lawbreakers, and they generally succeed in doing so.

Direct physical violence is rarely used as a punishment. Nevertheless, violence plays a crucial role in the system, because without the threat of violence, lawbreakers could simply choose not to suffer punishment. For example, the government commands that drivers stop before all red lights. If you violate this rule, you might be punished with a $200 fine. But this is simply another command. If you didn’t obey the command to stop before all red lights, why would you obey the command to pay $200 to the government? Perhaps the second command will be enforced by a third command: the government may threaten to revoke your driver’s license if you do not pay the fine. In other words, they may command you to stop driving. But if you violated the first two commands, why would you follow the third? Well, the command to stop driving may be enforced by a threat of imprisonment if you continue to drive without a license. As these examples illustrate, commands are often enforced with threats to issue further commands, yet that cannot be all there is to it. At the end of the chain must come a threat that the violator literally cannot defy. The system as a whole must be anchored by a non-voluntary intervention, a harm that the state can impose regardless of the individual’s choices.

That anchor is provided by physical force. Even the threat of imprisonment requires enforcement: how can the state ensure that the criminal goes to the prison? The answer lies in coercion, involving actual or threatened bodily injury, or at a minimum, physical pushing or pulling of the individual’s body to the location of imprisonment. This is the final intervention that the individual cannot choose to defy. One can choose not to pay a fine, one can choose to drive without a license, and one can even choose not to walk to a police car to be taken away. But one cannot choose not to be subjected to physical force if the agents of the state decide to impose it.

Thus, the legal system is founded on intentional, harmful coercion. To justify a law, one must justify imposition of that law on the population through a threat of harm, including the coercive imposition of actual harm on those who are caught violating the law. In common sense morality, the threat or actual coercive imposition of harm is normally wrong. This is not to say that it cannot be justified; it is only to say that coercion requires a justification. This may be because of the way in which coercion disrespects persons, seeking to bypass their reason and manipulate them through fear, or the way in which it seems to deny the autonomy and equality of other persons. [MORE]

Grand Rapids police said Mr. Lyoya’s vehicle was also occupied by another person, who witnessed and filmed some of the incident on their cellphone. [MORE] The police and their dependent media obviously have disregarded his/her account of what took place - the official government version is always the defacto truthful version when cops harm people.

Body Cam Shows White KY Cops Murder Black Man. In Racist System Homicide by Cops is Always Justified if Blacks Possess a Gun, Regardless of Any Threat or Circumstance

THE LOGIC OF JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE. The system of white supremacy/racism is predicated upon black people's belief in many, many lies. The 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures is one of those lies. Dr. Blynd explains,  “Rights are myths—obedience to servitude or jail is the reality.”

Below is white propaganda from the Supreme Court about the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing felon. Clearly such rules are not intended to be applied to non-whites:

The use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable. It is not better that all felony suspects die than that they escape. Where the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting from failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly force to do so. It is no doubt unfortunate when a suspect who is in sight escapes, but the fact that the police arrive a little late or are a little slower afoot does not always justify killing the suspect. 

A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead… Where the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. Thus, if the suspect threatens the officer with a weapon or there is probable cause to believe that he has committed a crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical harm, deadly force may be used if necessary to prevent escape, and if, where feasible, some warning has been given. 

Tennessee v. Garner - 471 U.S. 1 at page 11 (1985).

Like Other False Flags, Insta-Terror Case is Open/Closed by NY Authorities with Weird Admissions, Omissions, Bad Effects and a Ready Made Tale Told in Accord with the Appetite of the Racist Believer

AUTHORITIES ARE FUCKING WITH OUR SENSES AND PROGRAMMED BELIEFS. If his YouTube/blog “evidence” wasn’t enough, this just in; the attacker, whom the Dependent media has characterized as “a black nationalist,” confessed to the crimes by calling the police tip line on himself! Yes, he snitched on himself (similar to “manifestos,” diaries, rap books, tweets or ISIS press releases containing confessions to the entire crime immediately found in other false flag episodes). What an unbelievably stupid fairy tale told by elite whites in accordance with the appetite of the believer. In this episode, at issue is the appetite of the Neuropeon and Neuropean believer and a story told according to racist ideas, prejudices, fears and myths. What does “a black nationalist” even mean to elite whites? Apparently deluded racist suspects actually believe there is a competing system of Black supremacy somewhere on the planet where Black individuals use their collective power to control or dominate the lives of white people in all areas of people activity.

Don’t be surprised if a manifesto or diary or unnamed neighbor/friend pops up with confessions, unauthenticated social media posts, messages or detained plans of the incident. If there is a “trial” it will be solid gold bullshit, like Dyann Roofs’ fabricated “trial.”

Due to the contrived nature of the evidence this insta-terror case feels synthetic and should be suspected as a false flag operation conducted by the government until proven otherwise. If Crimethinc would create fake vaccines for the purpose of genthanasia and biocide then surely It would have no problem fake shooting at people in the subway.

Why would the government do such a thing? As undeceiver Larken Rose explains, authorities terrorize or create great fear in the citizenry in order convince them to voluntarily give authorities more control, more power over them and their lives. Authorities and their Dependent Media must constantly misrepresent reality so citizens always have a bogey-man or a perceived unsolvable problem to fear. Rose states, elites “must pound into [citizens] heads, day in and day out, that the world is full of horrors and injustices , and that only the government authorities can make their lives bearable and that is necessary for them to have enormous power in order to do so.”

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Belief- the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. 2) a construction of approximate truths, absolute truths, mass truths and primary myths, based on genetic predisposition, and environmental and socio-psychological conditioning. 3) the institutionalization of the unknowable, i.e., a conviction that is not necessarily based upon any empirical, direct-mind or experiential knowledge. 4) a non-physical surviving thought-form. 5) any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought. [MORE]

Believer - one who accepts that which has no basis in reality. 2) a person who enjoys being deceived. A believer does not seek—just accepts theologies and/or ideologies. 3) one who is addicted to vanity and/or chained to convention with conviction. 4) one who lives in a cloud of illusions, confounded by language and its deceptions. Believers are people who make their lives subjective slaves to a mere belief—engineered my limited and fragmented understanding and fostered by erroneous conclusions based solely on effects and appearances. A true believer would rather believe in something and be wrong than not believe in it and be right.

cover-stories – headlines that provide cover (hiding and distraction) for the real untold and undiscussed stories behind the one’s they are really (deliberately) not covering, undressing or addressing at all. 2) planted actors and/or provocateurs providing misinformation immediately after a false flag operation—like 9-11, Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon bombing. The methodology: Sell the lie with authority, then change the subject to something emotional. For example, the cover stories about whether or not “well-intentioned” public officials (on oxymoronic characterization itself) made “mistakes” in not paying attention to obvious warnings of so-called Al-Qaida operations inside the territorial United States posed by the mock 9-11 Commission mockery. The whole thrust behind the cover-story was to specifically avoid treating the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon, and the fields in Pennsylvania as actual crime scenes—to avoid the contradictions in the official stories with physical evidence to the contrary, to totally ignore the blatant anomalies regarding the well-planned, orchestrated, and executed sophisticated operations (hoax) that happened and didn’t happen on that fateful day. (See: Underlying, MEDIA, Tyrant-Paradigm, Pixelated People, West-Wingers, Oklahoma City Bombing, Nine- Eleven, MEDIA NSA Position, Bush Family Crime Syndicate, Pentagon Murders, Killer-Jet, CIA, Israelians, NSA, King TUT, RUN—GMC & The OCTOCON)

false flag – staged psychological operations by government operatives and shadow elite orchestrated and perpetrated against the civilian population. False flag operations does not necessarily mean that oftentimes real people don’t die.

WOW. ALL 600 Cameras around the brooklyn subway station at issue all broke down, at the same time and on the same day the black nationalist decided to shoot at people’s legs in the subway. THE VICTIMS MAY BE REAL BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE BULLSHIT.

citizens – those who instinctively seek permission or ask themselves whether or not they are allowed to do anything before they act. Citizens (serfs, subjects or slaves), possess a “ruled” mind-virus mentality. 2) the hapless residents of the great democracy whose Constitution deliberately throttled democratic rule. (See: Citizenship, Plutocracy & Slavery)

“Government” – Latinized Greek (“Gubernatio” = control; and from the Latin “mente” = mind; “The control of the mind.” 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one’s comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of “protecting” their victims. Government is lawlessness (monopolized violence) mindlessly respected and accepted as law (open threats); politics is the way to enable and circumvent the law. The outworking of history consistently demonstrates that government will, in spite of the Bill of Rights, arrogate all power to itself eventually, if the people don’t act to prevent it. You have rights alright, just don’t get caught exercising them, O.K.? “Government” is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else. Official “government” is disorganized, politicized; centralized; canonized and revered initiation of force, but it is no less initiation of force and coercion than any unofficial singular action of the same offensive or violent content. “Government” is an abstract infinite entity acting as a possessive noun. There is not a single line in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any governmental document that states that a natural person will be left alone as long as she or he does not impose upon another or others. By commission and omission, all official decrees make clear that a human is regarded as owned property or resource of the god called “Corporate State.” It is controlling the lives, energy and property of others that requires coercive force and this is its sole function. Endorsing the lie of an imagined abstract collective interest supports the very concept that gives rise to all covert and overt oppression. “The government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of the way. It does not keep the country free. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its way.” ~Kirkpatrick Sale. The wayward notion that government redistributes wealth is widely held as sacrosanct as it is patently false. There are redistributes aspects, sure, but that’s as close as it gets. “As long as government is allowed to exist, it will everywhere keep growing and getting worse. Nearly everything that “governments” do (i.e., those with wholly symbolic roles “running” it, and who perform acts in its name) is grounded in fear. Government will cease to exist when people cease to grant it legitimacy—in other words stop believing in it, stop looking to it for solutions to problems in their lives, and stop supporting it.” ~Fred Woolworth. Government has failed at every attempt in 6,000 years of recorded history. Government atrocities—carried out by irrational functionaries, economic hit men, soldiers, diplomats, emissaries, etc., under every possible flavor or form of government—have littered the bloody pages of recorded history. Government is indisputably the greatest purveyor of murder, mayhem, genocide, exploitation, rape, forced starvation, pillage and chaos in the annals of humanity. Government does not need to be abolished; merely rendered obsolete through seeing it for what it truly is—a prime manufacturer of poverty, brutal oppression, violence, coercion, conformity and fear. [MORE]

25-Year-Old Black Woman Gone - Dead After COVID Injection. Was a Pre-School Teacher. Governments, Dependent Media and Big Pharma Keep Lying and Murdering

In a Facebook post, preschool teacher Desiree Penrod said the vaccine is “killing” her, as she suffered from fatigue, headaches, stomach cramps and earaches after getting the J&J jab. Days later, she passed away. [MORE]

“I Wasn’t Sick Before I Took that Fucking Vaccine, Now I’m a Little Skeptical.” Video Compilation of Various People who Had Adverse Neurological and Pulmonary Side Effects from COVID Injections

UK Authorities Quietly Published Data Confirming the Fully Vaccinated Accounted for 92% of all COVID Deaths in March [read that again]

From [HERE] Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population. 

But something even stranger than this is also occurring. Covid-19 is currently on the rise again across the UK, but the data confirms cases, hospitalisations and deaths are only rising among the triple vaccinated population, whereas they are declining significantly among the unvaccinated population.

You have been lied to on a monumental scale over the past two years by your Government, its Scientific Advisers, and the mainstream media. But the biggest lie of all is perhaps that the Covid-19 injections are both safe and effective. Neither of these statements are true. If you want recent evidence of them not being safe then look no further than the recent announcement from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). 

On the 6th April 2022, the UKHSA released a statement confirming they were launching an urgent investigation due to the detection of higher than usual rate of liver inflammation (hepatitis) among children, and that similar cases were also being assessed in Scotland. 

They have already ruled out the common viruses that cause hepatitis, so now they need look no further than the Covid-19 injection that has been unnecessarily offered to children, because Pfizer’s own study confirms the Covid-19 mRNA jab accumulates in the liver following vaccination and causes hepatitis. [MORE]

New Study: One-Fifth of Fully Vaxxed (3X) Swedes became Infected with Omicron Within 2 Months

From [HERE] As concluded by researchers at Danderyd Hospital in Sweden, the Omicron strain effectively gets past antibodies. While most of the patients surveyed only had mild symptoms, they remained infectious for up to nine days.

More than one in five people tested positive for the Omicron strain of the COVID-19 virus within two months of receiving their third dose or booster shot, a fresh Swedish study shows.

The study is part of the large COMMUNITY project at Danderyd Hospital aimed at examining and comparing immunity after COVID-19 infection and after vaccination. During this stage of the study, 375 hospital staff were PCR-tested regularly, regardless of symptoms.

“Omicron gets past the antibodies. We see that those who become infected had as high levels of antibodies as those who didn’t become infected”, Charlotte Thålin, assistant chief physician and the study’s research leader, told national broadcaster SVT.Many of those who ultimately tested positive had symptoms ranging from mild to none whatsoever, yet still had high virus levels. Over half of the participants tested positive for 11 days and remained infectious for up to nine days.

“This is the first time that it has been possible to follow the virus levels in the airways during an ongoing Omicron infection, and it was surprising that so many remained positive for so long and had such high virus levels even though they had just received their third dose”, Charlotte Thålin mused.

When asked whether it is still worth vaccinating when the protection levels promised by vaccine producers initially are obviously failing, Thålin remained adamant that the jab still protects against serious illness, whereas Omicron can be dangerous for the unvaccinated as well as for the elderly and risk groups.

“And in the grand scheme of things, we want to reduce the spread of infection because the higher the spread of infection in a well-vaccinated population, the greater the risk that we get new mutations and new virus strains”, Thålin concluded.

Sweden has an overall vaccination rate of over 73 percent, far above the worldwide rate of under 59 percent. 

Fed Apls Court Holds that Government Lock Down Orders During COVID are a Valid Contractual Defense. Business Defendant Excused from Performance Under a Contract (If There is a Force Majeure Clause)

• Is Your Landlord Trying to Get Paid Off the Virus? If Your Lease Has a "Force Majeure" or Emergency Clause then Payment May Be Excused Due to an ‘Unforeseeable Event’ Making It Impracticable to Pay

From [HERE] Over the past two years, there has been a fair amount of litigation surrounding the enforceability of force majeure provisions in response to the pandemic. A force majeure clause is a contractual provision that excuses one or both parties’ performance obligations when circumstances beyond the parties’ control arise and make performance impracticable or impossible. Such provisions ordinarily cover natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods. Other circumstances that may trigger force majeure provisions and relieve parties of liability include war, acts of terrorism, labor strikes and epidemics. With respect to COVID-19, courts around the country have generally construed force majeure provisions narrowly to find that, absent specific pandemic-related language, the pandemic does not trigger force majeure provisions. Other courts have decided that the COVID-19 pandemic falls within the more general definitions of “natural disaster.” Last week, a Federal Court of Appeals weighed in for the first time on the issue.

In June 2020, JN Contemporary Art LLC (JN) sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC (Phillips) in the Southern District of New York for breach of a contract which obligated Phillips to sell a painting on behalf of JN at a live auction. Phillips moved to dismiss the complaint, invoking the force majeure clause to terminate its agreement to sell the painting on behalf of JN, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and state government orders requiring nonessential businesses to cease in-person operations. The terms of the force majeure clause contained in the agreement provided: “In the event that the auction is postponed for circumstances beyond our or your reasonable control, including, without limitation, as a result of natural disaster, fire, flood, general strike, war, armed conflict, terrorist attack or nuclear or chemical contamination, we may terminate this Agreement with immediate effect. In such event, our obligation to make payment of the Guaranteed Minimum shall be null and void and we shall have no other liability to you.” Judge Denise Cote of Southern District of New York granted the motion to dismiss filed by Phillips, finding that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” and that the pandemic constituted “a circumstance beyond the parties’ reasonable control” as contemplated by their agreement. JN appealed and just last week the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal. See JN Contemporary Art LLC sued Phillips Auctioneers LLC, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 7652, 2022 WL 852293 (2d Cir. March 23, 2022).

JN first argued on appeal that the district court erred in finding as a matter of law, without the benefit of any discovery, that the COVID-19 pandemic is a natural disaster, as it is debatable whether COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus or one created by man. JN next argued that Phillips did not have to sell the painting at a live auction, but could have sold it online or delayed a live auction sale to some point in the future. The Second Circuit disagreed. The Second Circuit stated that it did not need to rule on the finding by the district court that the COVID-19 pandemic is a “natural disaster” as it could decide the case on other grounds. The Second Circuit stated that the primary purpose of a force majeure clause is to “relieve a party from its contractual duties when its performance has been prevented by a force beyond its control or when the purpose of the contract has been frustrated.” The Second Circuit held that the COVID-19 pandemic and the orders issued by the government restricting nonessential businesses constituted circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the parties. In addition, the Second Circuit held that the agreement only required sale at a live auction and that when a defendant is excused from performance by force majeure, a defendant is not required to provide substitute performance.

Much has been written over the last year or two about courts interpreting force majeure clauses narrowly and strictly and not excusing performance due to COVID-19, and many parties are now excluding COVID-19 from their force majeure clauses altogether. The decision last week by Second Circuit in JN Contemporary Art LLC vs. Phillips Auctioneers LLC stands in contrast to many prior court decisions for two reasons. First, the Second Circuit interpreted the force majeure clause at issue more broadly and excused performance due to COVID-19. Second, it appears to be the first decision by a Federal Court of Appeals on this issue.

The Italian National Institute of Health Reveals the Fully "Vaccinated" now account for 7 in every 10 COVID Deaths

From [HERE] Covid-19 Deaths are beginning to rise again across Italy despite millions now being triple vaccinated, and the latest official Italian Government data shows that the vaccinated population account for 7 in every 10 of those deaths, as well as 8 in every 10 cases and hospitalisations, and 7 in every 10 ICU admissions. 

Italy’s National Institute of Health publishes a periodic Covid-19 Surveillance report, the latest of which can be accessed here, or the full list of which can be accessed here. 

In the latest report, data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths can be found in tables 4a, 4b and 4c on pages 26, 27 and 28. 

The following table has been collated from the data found in Table 4A in the ‘Diagnosi tra 25/02/2022 – 27/03/2022’ section and shows the total number of cases across Italy by vaccination status –

In all, between 25th Feb and 27th March 22, Italy recorded 1,594,849 Covid-19 infections, and an astounding 1,284,615 of these were among the vaccinated population, meaning the vaccinated accounted for 81% of all Covid-19 cases within one month. 

The unvaccinated accounted for just 310,234 cases, the one-dose vaccinated accounted for 36,199 cases, the two dose vaccinated accounted for 329,016 cases, and the triple vaccinated accounted for a shocking 919,400 cases. This means the triple vaccinated alone accounted for 58% of all Covid-19 cases across Italy between 25th Feb and 27th March 22. [MORE]

A Great Hoax: Multiple Studies Show COVID Injections Don't Stop Infections, Transmissions, Hospitalizations or Deaths. More than 3 Dozen Studies Contradict the Effectiveness of Forced Injections

From [HERE] Studies on the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines found that they do not effectively stop the transmission of the disease, bringing into question the necessity of mandating them.

Epidemiologist Paul Alexander recently published a round-up of some of the newest evidence that calls into question the safety and efficacy of COVID shots.

Among the studies that he summarized was one from Israel that showed vaccinated individuals who have never been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 had a 13-fold increased risk of getting infected with the delta variant compared to those who have been unvaccinated but have been previously infected, showing that natural immunity is more effective.

Another study from the European Journal of Epidemiology found that there is no significant relationship between COVID-19 cases and the number of people getting vaccinated on a countrywide level. In other words, getting more people injected does not necessarily lower the spread of the virus.

Official data from the United Kingdom also showed that fully vaccinated adults now have a higher risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death compared to the unvaccinated.

Based on the studies, Alexander concluded that COVID vaccines are not to be expected to contribute to eliminating the communal spread of the virus or reaching herd immunity. He also said the studies “unravel the rationale for vaccine mandates and passports.” (Related: Over 400 studies show COVID-19 measures are failures… lockdowns don’t work, masks don’t work and school closures help no one.)

Alexander also noted that taking the vaccine escalates the person’s risk of getting infected. This is called negative efficacy, which is jargon for disease-promoting effects in drugs. In the case of a vaccine, this means that the vaccinated person is more likely to get infected compared to the unvaccinated.

This is bad, in particular, because evidence shows that the vaccines are non-sterilizing and that they do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization or death. They never worked.

For Alexander, what is happening with the COVID vaccines is reminiscent of the negative vaccine efficacy of the dengue vaccines that killed children in the Philippines in 2017, where the shots should not have been used.

Today, the repercussions of COVID vaccines show a massive increase in all-cause mortality numbers reported by insurance companies. Excess deaths are also showing up in almost all age cohorts and cannot be explained away by other causes, and the COVID-19 vaccine is now being referred to as the “greatest fraud” in modern history.

While business continues for Big Pharma companies like Pfizer and Moderna, as word gets out past censors and silencers, it is only a matter of time until the truth about the ineffective vaccines becomes evident to everyone.

Government, Big Pharma gaslighting people

There has also been an interesting change in narrative from medical influencers, public health officials and other mainstream advocates regarding the COVID vaccines. Now, people are supposed to believe that the vaccines were never meant to stop transmission, nor are they supposed to prevent others from getting infected with the disease. (Related: Even the NYT admits covid infections in children are merely like a “mild flu” – so why the vaccines, then?)

Today, vaccines are said to only prevent severe illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky brazenly admitting the injections can no longer prevent transmission.

This move by the government, Big Pharma and other medical “professionals” is called manipulative gaslighting. People were told from the beginning that the rapidly developed vaccines will “end the pandemic” and those who are fully vaccinated are the only ones allowed to have access to their jobs and going to public spaces.

People are also expected to accept the unethical decisions from policymakers regarding their decisions to lift vaccine mandates for professional athletes and performers, but not for police officers or healthcare workers, many of whom already lost their careers because of the mandates that local governments have previously implemented on the guise of public safety.

There’s no other way to describe it: COVID-19 vaccine is the greatest fraud in modern history.

Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts Says the Nanotech found in COVID Shots "Suggests Genocide"

Short Black Man Wearing Sweatshirt Shoots Up Brooklyn Subway, No One Dies, 599 Cameras Broken @ the Same Time? Victims Might Real but It Sounds Like Bullshit. NY Authorities Urge Fear as They Fix Hoax

WHATS NEXT? Will Authorities Find Admissions in the killer’s “Manifesto,” “Rap Book” or a “Social Media Posts?” According to liars at the NYT, Five miles away from where a man opened fire in a subway train in Brooklyn and shot 10 people during the morning rush, the police recovered a rented U-Haul van late Tuesday afternoon that they believed had been driven by the gunman, a senior law enforcement official said.

But the van was empty, the official said, and the shooter remained at large, as agents from dozens of local, state and federal law enforcement agencies searched for him, more than eight hours after he donned a gas mask on a crowded N train, released a canister of smoke and began shooting.

At least 23 people were injured, 10 of them by gunfire, on the train and on the platform at the busy 36th Street station in the Sunset Park neighborhood, where three subway lines meet. The Fire Department said that five victims were in critical condition, but none were believed to have suffered life-threatening injuries.

The shooting, shortly before 8:30 a.m., set off panic and chaos aboard the train, in the station and the surrounding streets and sent schools in the vicinity into lockdowns that lasted much of the day. It came as the city was already struggling to cope with both a rise in shootings citywide and an increase in crime and disorder in the subway that has scared commuters from returning to a transit system that saw ridership plummet during the pandemic.

Mayor Eric Adams said that the search for the gunman was hampered by the fact that at least one security camera at the 36th Street subway station that might have captured the scene was not operating. There was a “malfunction with the camera system at that particular station,” Mr. Adams told WCBS 880 radio.

Witnesses to the shooting described the gunman as a short, dark-skinned man with a heavy build wearing a green construction vest and gray sweatshirt.

The van was spotted in front of an apartment building on West 3rd Street just off the Kings Highway shopping strip in the Gravesend neighborhood, the senior law enforcement official said.

The U-Haul was found after a man who lives in the Highlawn, an apartment building on the street, called the police to report it. In an interview, the man said his superintendent had complained to him that morning about a van with Arizona plates blocking the driveway, preventing him from moving his car. The tenant said he later heard about the hunt for the van on Rudy Giuliani’s radio show.

The senior law enforcement official also said that a gun had been found inside the subway station. The authorities have not released a suspect’s name, nor a motive for the attack. But another high-ranking police official said that the attack appeared to have been planned and showed no signs of having stemmed from something spontaneous like a dispute on the train.

As the shooting unfolded and the doors of the N train opened, sending smoke billowing through the station, fearful riders fled, many of them hurrying onto an R train sitting across the platform. Subway seats and cars were streaked with blood as people called for help.

Fifteen people were treated at hospitals for injuries including gunshot wounds and smoke inhalation: eight at NYU Langone Hospital-Brooklyn, five at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn, and three at NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, the hospitals said.

As officers scoured a Brooklyn neighborhood for a man who opened fire in a subway car, at least one security camera at a nearby station recorded nothing, thanks to “a malfunction,” Mayor Eric Adams said.

The issue was under investigation, Mr. Adams said, and officials were working to determine whether a single camera — or all of them — failed. One senior law enforcement official briefed on the investigation said on Tuesday afternoon that it appeared none were in full operation at the time of the shooting that morning.

The malfunction appeared to be a significant obstacle in the investigation, which by late Tuesday afternoon involved an expansive search for information throughout streets in Sunset Park and other parts of the city.

The description of the suspect was vague — heavy build, green construction vest and gray sweatshirt — and bystander videos of the smoke-filled scene underground revealed no obvious assailant. Police said he is a roughly 5-foot-5 black man with a heavy build at around 170 pounds. A second senior law enforcement official said the police believed the gunman was driving a U-Haul with Arizona license plates. A vehicle matching the description was found late Tuesday afternoon near Kings Highway in the borough, police said. Investigators also found a gun at the shooting scene. [MORE]

Mr. Adams, who was overseeing the response from Gracie Mansion after testing positive for the coronavirus this week, said in a television interview around 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday that officials had not determined the gunman’s motive or whether he was from New York. He said earlier in the afternoon that the number of transit officers who regularly patrol the system would double and that officers who work day shifts would continue onto the evening.

Janno Lieber, the chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said in separate interview that he was not aware of any specific problems with the security cameras at the Sunset Park station. But he added that a broader review would be completed.

“We have almost 10,000 cameras in our system, including almost 600 just on the Brooklyn section of this one line where the attack took place,” Mr. Lieber said. “So we’re going to work with the NYPD to capture all that video to find out where this criminal may have come in or out of the system.”

Another BlackStabbing Slap Fest Among Black Rolebots as Puppetician NY Lt Gov is Forced to Resign After RecoNegro NY Prosecutor Filed Corruption Charges and Sought Arrest

From [HERE] New York Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin resigned Tuesday after being arrested in connection with an alleged bribery scheme and coverup while he was being vetted to join the administration of Gov. Kathy Hochul. 

Mr. Benjamin, a Democrat, surrendered to federal authorities Tuesday morning, and Ms. Hochul announced shortly after 5 p.m. that she had accepted his resignation. Mr. Benjamin pleaded not guilty to five criminal counts including bribery, honest-services wire fraud and falsification of records.

In a statement, Ms. Hochul said it wouldn’t be possible for Mr. Benjamin to remain in office while the legal process played out. 

“New Yorkers deserve absolute confidence in their government, and I will continue working every day to deliver for them,” the Democratic governor said in a statement.

The events are a blow to her bid to win a full term in office this year, political observers said. Candidates for governor and lieutenant governor run separately in the June 28 party primary, which means Ms. Hochul could be placed on a ticket with a running mate who doesn’t share her political philosophy.

U.S. Rep. Lee Zeldin, a Republican candidate, said the indictment of Mr. Benjamin showed what Mr. Zeldin described as Ms. Hochul’s terrible judgment.

As recently as last week, Ms. Hochul said Mr. Benjamin had what she said was her utmost confidence and was cooperating fully with the investigation.

Prosecutors said the alleged scheme stretched from 2019 to 2021, when Mr. Benjamin represented Harlem in the New York state Senate and made an unsuccessful bid for New York City comptroller.

At a news conference Tuesday, Manhattan U.S. Attorney Damian Williams called the indictment a simple story of corruption in which Mr. Benjamin used his position as a state senator to procure a $50,000 state grant in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from a real-estate developer. 

Mr. Benjamin then attempted to cover up the alleged scheme by repeatedly lying on vetting forms he filled out before he became lieutenant governor. 

“Taxpayer money for campaign contributions,” Mr. Williams said. “Quid pro quo. This for that. That’s bribery, plain and simple.”

Michael Driscoll, the special agent in charge of the New York branch of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said the probe was a continuing investigation.

Mr. Benjamin said during a press conference last week that he received a subpoena last summer, before his appointment as lieutenant governor, but didn’t inform Ms. Hochul. Mr. Benjamin said the New York State Police did a thorough investigation into his background before his appointment.

The Harlem real-estate developer identified in the indictment as co-conspirator 1 is Gerald Migdol, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Migdol was indicted in connection to the alleged scheme last November and is cooperating with the investigation, the people said. A lawyer for Mr. Migdol didn’t respond to a request for comment. 

Messrs. Migdol and Benjamin met in 2017, according to the indictment. Mr. Migdol supported community events promoted by Mr. Benjamin, and Mr. Benjamin attended events connected to Mr. Migdol and his nonprofit, the indictment said.

In March 2019, during a meeting at Mr. Migdol’s residence, Mr. Benjamin said he intended to run for comptroller and wanted the developer to obtain donations, prosecutors said. When Mr. Migdol balked at the idea, Mr. Benjamin said, according to prosecutors, “Let me see what I can do.”

3 Years Later, East Point Cops are Indicted for Shooting a Black Man in the Back as He Fled Into the Woods, Causing Permanent Paralysis

From [HERE] Three years after East Point Police officers opened fire on an allegedly stolen black Nissan and left a man paralyzed -- two of them have been indicted.

The shooting happened in Dec. 2018. Police and the victim's attorneys have given different stories about what happened that day. In the end, Devin Nolley was paralyzed from the neck down. 

The now-former officers, Rodney Etienne and Shiron Nicole Varner, were indicted by a Fulton County grand jury on Monday on charges that include aggravated assault, the Grand Jury concluding that they used excessive force when trying to arrest Nolley.

According to authorities, that day in December 2018, an officer in an unmarked East Point police car identified a stolen black Nissan in a gas station parking lot on Camp Creek Parkway. Several marked police cars joined the unmarked vehicle and followed the Nissan to a Publix parking lot on Carmia Drive.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation said uniformed officers walked up to the Nissan. The driver, later identified as Nolley, reversed and rammed the unmarked police car. Officers fired upon the Nissan. Nolley then drove toward I-285. Officers from the City of South Fulton then joined the pursuit, records show.

Once Nolley reached the interstate, he collided into the median wall, got out of the car and ran toward the woods. As he was running away, the officers shot him in the back. 

But according to one of Nolley's attorneys, Jackie Patterson, his client never rammed a police car.

“My client simply backed up and drove around them, and that’s when they started shooting at him at the Camp Creek Marketplace," Patterson said in 2019.

Patterson also said that officers rammed Nolley's vehicle on I-285, causing him to lose control.

“He jumped out of the vehicle, jumped over the rail to head towards the woods and that’s when they shot him in the back and he was completely unarmed," Patterson said in 2019. "He was shot twice in the back and twice in the legs."

Nolley's attorneys have since filed a lawsuit for $30 million against the cities of East Point and South Fulton.

"It was excessive force to shoot a man in the back who was unarmed, who was running away from the officers," Patterson said Thursday. "The D.A.'s office has determined that, no matter what my client did."

He added, "the officers used excessive force And that's the real issue in this case. No lives were in danger at the time that they fired and struck him in the back."

Patterson added that Nolley now lives in a west Georgia facility receiving 24 hour care. 

Jury (indoctrinated Sheeple drafted to prevent law from degenerating into justice) Finds White VA Cop Not Guilty of Assault Despite Video of Cop Tasing Black Man in the Back as He Sought Medic Help

From [HERE] and [HERE] A white Fairfax County Police officer was charged after a body camera video released showed him tasing an unarmed Black man and has been found not guilty on all counts Friday.

Officer Tyler Timberlake was charged with three counts of misdemeanor assault and battery for tasing LaMonta Gladney, smacking him in the face and tasing him a second time on June 5, 2020, at the height of the social justice protests.

The police officer is seen on body-camera footage June 5 firing a Taser at a disoriented man without apparent provocation, before pinning him to the ground with a knee to his neck, as a Minneapolis officer did in the encounter with Floyd.

La Monta Gladney, 36, survived and officer Tyler Timberlake was charged with three counts of misdemeanor assault and battery less than 36 hours after the incident on a Mount Vernon street. The bogus assault charges against the Black man were dropped.

WTOP Radio reports that both a prosecutor and a defense lawyer for Officer Tyler Timberlake agreed at a preliminary hearing that Timberlake thought he shot a person named Anthony, who had an extensive criminal record. But the victim was somebody else entirely.

The video shows the white cop walking at a brisk pace straight toward the black man and without any hesitation or communication with him he shoots him the back upper shoulder. Clearly the cop took no time to corroborate any description, details or identity to support his lies.

In 2018, African Americans made up roughly 10 percent of Fairfax’s population but constituted 44 percent of the cases in which officers deployed force, according to department statistics. In contrast, whites made up 61 percent of the county’s population but were involved in only 33 percent of such cases. [MORE]

The number of use-of-force cases against African Americans has jumped 25 percent since 2016, according to the figures. 

Dozens of Fairfax County police officers crowded into the courtroom throughout the trial to support Timberlake. When he stepped out in the hallway after the not guilty verdicts, the officers applauded and cheered.

"Thanks you all for your support," Timberlake told them. "It means the world to my family. Stay safe out there."

Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Steve Descano released a statement after the verdict calling it a "disappointment," adding he was not surprised.

"It is notoriously hard to prosecute a case like this, but my standard of prosecuting a case isn’t whether it’s easy or hard. My standard is doing what I think is right to hold people, including law enforcement, accountable for their actions," the statement says.

Descano said more work needs to be done. 

"True justice will be achieved when my Black and brown neighbors don’t have to fear for their well-being when they leave their homes."

Fairfax County Fraternal Order of Police President Brad Carruthers released a statement saying, "We vociferously defended Timberlake from the beginning, and this case highlights the importance to conduct a thorough and balanced investigation before levying charges..... Partisan politics has no place in the prosecutor's office."

Timberlake still faces potential police department discipline. But his lawyer thinks that that is unlikely now. He’s been on restricted duty since the incident on June 5, 2020. Soon he’ll be back out the streets trying to kill other NGHRS!

Liberal LA Cty DA Won't Charge White Cop Who Murdered Anthony McLain. Cops Had No Legal Basis to Detain Black Passenger Shot in the Back as He Fled. Fearful Cop Reasonably Believed a Belt was a Gun

From [HERE] In a separate report also made public late Wednesday, prosecutors said they would not charge the Pasadena police officer who shot and killed Anthony McClain as he fled from a traffic stop two years ago. The Aug. 15, 2020, shooting spurred protests by Black Lives Matter in the streets of Old Pasadena and gained the attention of nationally renowned civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump.

The city of Pasadena has already paid out $7.5 million to McLain’s family.

The decision not to prosecute could engender political backlash against George Gascón, the embattled white Los Angeles County district attorney, who is facing the threat of a recall and who was elected on a promise of holding police accountable in cases where they used deadly force in unnecessary situations.

Activists in San Francisco had long warned that Gascón, who did not charge a single officer in a shooting case in eight years as a top prosecutor in the Bay Area, would fail to do so in Los Angeles as well. Gascón also promised to reopen a number of cases in which police used fatal force that his predecessor, Jackie Lacey, declined to prosecute. But that plan has also hit a number of roadblocks.

“We know this is excruciating and that the families are understandably devastated. We also understand that the public has questions, but out of respect for the families, we wanted to meet with them first and give them time to process this difficult information,” Gascón said in a statement. “We do want to be clear: the burden of proof for prosecution is high. Our decision does not mean that what happened is right.”

Attorneys for the family of a Black man who was fatally shot by a Pasadena police officer last year said Monday that video of the incident is evidence that the shooting was unjustified.

Around 7:52 p.m., officers stopped a four-door, dark-colored Infiniti without a front license plate. McClain was the passenger. 

When police asked the driver for his license, the driver said his license was suspended. The driver cooperated with police after being asked to get out of the car, the department said.

McClain, who was also asked to get out of the car, is seen on video getting out, then running away from the officers. There appears to be no lawful basis for the cops to detain or seize the Black man because he was the passenger in the vehicle. While a passenger may be ordered out of a vehicle for officer safety the Supreme Court has explained that unless the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion, he may not further detain a passenger. Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997). Cops apparently did no articulate any reason they wanted to detain McLain. The driver may have been under arrest for something but that did not provide the police any justification for detaining or arresting McClain. Flight alone is not a basis for an arrest.

Police say he reached for an item in his waistband, which they believed to be a firearm. That is bullshit unsupported by the video - watch for yourself.

“The natural swinging movement of the individual’s arms while running revealed what both officers immediately recognized as a firearm in his left hand,” according to the department.

With two officers chasing him, McClain can be seen turning [more bullshit from white journalists- watch the video yourself] and looking at the officers over his right shoulder. Police say they feared he was turning back to shoot at them, so the officer closest to McClain shot at him twice.

It wasn’t immediately clear that he had been shot, as he continued to run “for a considerable distance,” police said. He eventually fell.

Caree Harper, the McClain family’s attorney, said what police saw in the video was a large metal belt buckle, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Neither McClain nor the second officer fired a weapon. No weapon was found on McClain, but a gun was recovered across the street. Apparently no prints or DNA connect the gun to McClain’s possession. At any rate, no officer’s saw him throw a gun up in the air and across a street as he fled.

Attorneys Benjamin Crump and Caree Harper presented a video during a news conference that they say shows that as Anthony McClain lay bleeding on the sidewalk after being shot in the back by police while trying to flee, he told approaching officers “I can’t breathe.” Yet, one of them knelt on McClain’s back as he handcuffed him, Crump and Harper said.

One of the two gunshots that hit McClain traveled through his right lung before coming out of his chest, leading to fatal blood loss. McClain died a few hours later at Pasadena Huntington Memorial Hospital on Aug. 15, 2020.

Crump, a nationally renowned civil rights attorney representing some of the McClain’s family, said McClain’s shooting combines the elements of two high-profile police shootings. One was that of Jacob Blake Jr., who was shot while running from police in Wisconsin and left paralyzed; and the other was the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police as an officer knelt on his neck.

“Not only was Anthony McClain shot in the back like Jacob Blake Jr.,” Crump said. But in the aftermath, as officers handcuff him with his hands behind his back, they worsen his blood loss by kneeling on his back.

“You can hear him say hurry up, I cannot breathe,” Crump said of McClain. “And so you have elements of Jacob Blake Jr. and George Floyd both here in Anthony McClain’s death.”

“Go look at the video; it tells you about the mentality” of the police officers, Crump said.

Floyd was captured on video saying “I can’t breathe” in the minutes before his death, and the phrase has become synonymous with alleged police misconduct during the last year. Crump represents Blake’s family and secured a $27-million settlement for Floyd’s family.

“I am passing out,” McClain said in the video footage. “Hurry up I cannot breathe.”

The officer asks McClain how many times he was shot and he says twice.

“I don’t have a gun,” McClain tells the officers in the video.

As the officer and another officer begin to handcuff McClain, a bystander video shows an officer’s left knee or thigh over McClain’s back but does not clearly show the exact position. The officer with the body camera tells onlookers, “I have got pressure, okay,” seeking to assure those watching he is trying to stem the bleeding. The officer can be heard repeatedly assuring McClain he is trying to help him.

But Harper said the officer’s body pressure on McClain quickened his blood loss. The department, in court papers responding to the lawsuit, recently identified that officer as Officer Sereno, according to Harper.

Pasadena Police Lt. Bill Grisafe said department policy allows the use of knees to restrain a detainee.

Black Chicago Cop-Artist Acted Like He was Being Burglarized to Justify Shooting a Drunk Latino Man in the Face. Claimed a 'Burglar Pushed Door, Forced his way in.’ But Video Appears to Show Otherwise

From [HERE] After a night of heavy drinking, Jose Mendoza wandered into the common area of an apartment building to wait for a friend who had invited him to spend the night at his place.

But he ended up walking into the wrong building and was shot in the face by a nervous cop who claimed Mendoza was trying to break into his apartment.

Mendoza survived the shooting but is now partially blind. And he remains incarcerated on felony home invasion charges with no bond since the shooting last year – despite existing video evidence that supports his story over the cop’s story.

Last month, his attorney filed a lawsuit against the city of Chicago and the cop, Iwan Smith, who was “relieved of police powers” in June 2021 for unspecified reasons, according to NBC Chicago.

His attorney, Thomas Glasgow, told NBC Chicago that the Cook County District Attorney’s Office is blaming a prior DUI arrest for keeping him incarcerated with no bond or trial for his false arrest.

The incident took place on March 31, 2021 after Mendoza made earlier arrangements to spend the night at a friend’s apartment. He had worked all day, then got drunk and was still wearing his work clothes from XFiniti Digital Cable TV when he staggered into Smith’s building, thinking it was his friend’s building.

Surveillance video shows him milling around the common area for about ten minutes, including sitting on a short set of stairs. He then climbs those stairs and tries a doorknob of an apartment to the right just out of view from the camera believing it to be his friend’s.

After finding the door locked, he leans against a wall outside the apartment and squats down to continue waiting for his friend.

However, Smith was inside watching television with his girlfriend and heard somebody trying to open the door so he retrieved his service pistol from a safe in the closet and opened the front door to his apartment.

Mendoza stood up from his squatting position as soon as the door opened, expecting to see his friend, but was quickly shot in the face. He then collapsed in the doorway but Smith kicked him and he fell a few feet away.

Smith closed his apartment door and told his girlfriend to call 911 as Mendoza bled out while trying to stand but failing, slipping and falling into a growing pool of blood. At no point did Smith try to determine if Mendoza was armed nor did he ever attempt to render him aid.

Jose Mendoza is blind in one eye and remains incarcerated after mistaking a cop’s apartment for his friend’s apartment.

The cops arrive six minutes after the call and Smith greets them at the door to the building with his badge and gun but places the gun down on the floor to allow them to pick it up.

“Did he have a weapon on him,” a cop asks him.

“No, he didn’t have no weapon,” Smith responds.

Smith then proceeds to tell them a story about Mendoza trying to force his way inside his apartment.

“He knocked on my door and when I approached to open it, he pushed it in and I tried to hold it and he forced his way in.”

But the video evidence contradicting his story has been publicly available on the website of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability since November and nobody at the Cook County District Attorney’s Office seems to care.

Liberal Prosecutors Decline to Hold White Cops Accountable for Murdering Amir Locke Pursuant to the Law of the Jungle Standard. Shot to Death During a 6AM Burglary [A "Raid" when cops do it]

IS WHETHER COPS KNOCK AND ANNOUNCE THEMSELVES PRIOR TO BREAKING IN AND MURDERING FOLKS THE PROBLEM OR IS AUTHORITY, THE RIGHT TO RULE OVER PEOPLE THE PROBLEM?

Unprovoked violence against others or the use of “force” is the basis of all social evils and can only be used in the sense of attack not defense. As explained in FUNKTIONARY, “Unfortunately, governments only function by force. Once established, they put laws into effect by threatening persecution, imprisonment, fine, or death against all who don't comply with those laws--including the use of the force continuum.” [MORE]

If a “public servant," such as a police officer, is uncontrollable, unaccountable, can’t be hired or fired by you, has irresponsible power over you and provides a compulsory “service” then he is actually your Master. Lysander Spooner, stated “It is of no importance that I appointed him, and put all power in his hands. If I made him uncontrollable by me, and irresponsible to me, he is no longer my servant, agent, attorney, or representative. If I gave him absolute, irresponsible power over my property, I gave him the property. If I gave him absolute, irresponsible power over myself, I made him my master, and gave myself to him as a slave. And it is of no importance whether I called him master or servant, agent or owner. The only question is, what power did I put into his hands? Was it an absolute and irresponsible one? or a limited and responsible one?”

How did politicians and public servants acquire such powers?

Allegedly governmental power comes from the people. That is, we delegate our individual power to the government for it to act on our behalf. However, it goes without saying that people cannot delegate powers or rights that they do not possess. So if people have delegated their powers to lawmakers and lawmakers have empowered police officers to act on our behalf, how did police acquire the moral right to commit acts of unprovoked violence on people? Asked differently, if you don’t have the right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence against other people then how can you delegate or authorize police officers or anyone else acting on your behalf to do so? How did government representatives and police acquire such super-human powers? [MORE]