No Cops Charged for Murdering Ryan LeRoux After Oscar Worthy BodyCam Performance by MD Police: Cop-Artists Acted Terror Struck by a Gun They Saw in Black Man's Car, Thus His Execution Was Lawful

From [HERE] Four Maryland police officers won’t be charged in the fatal shooting of a 21-year-old Black man in a McDonald’s drive-thru last summer, officials said.

The Montgomery County’s State’s Attorney’s Office announced Monday that an investigation by prosecutors in neighboring Howard County into Ryan LeRoux’s July 2021 death was complete and a grand jury found the shooting was legally justified under the circumstances, news outlets reported.

Officers were called to the McDonald’s in Gaithersburg on July 16 for a report of a person refusing to leave the drive-thru line. An officer found LeRoux reclined in the driver’s seat with headphones on and both hands on his cellphone. The officer said over the radio that he saw a gun on the front passenger seat and asked LeRoux several times to open the passenger-side door, but he did not, officials said.

Officers negotiated with LeRoux for half an hour. Then, when several officers said LeRoux pointed that gun at police, officers fired. Based on the body camera footage, prosecutors said it was not clear if LeRoux was holding a gun or a cellphone.

VIEWING RESTRICTED BY YOUTUBE TO PROTECT THE SYSTEMS OF RACISM/WHITE SUPREMACY AND AUTHORITY.

“He sat up, and he extended his arm in a straight, locked way towards the police, his right arm,” Howard County state’s Attorney Rich Gibson said. “We know that to be the case. The question is, what was in his hand?”

A gun and a cellphone were found in LeRoux’s lap after the shooting, prosecutors said. A crisis negotiator was on the way, but did not arrive before the shooting, prosecutors said.

LeRoux’s father, Paul LeRoux, and activists have protested, saying the situation should have been resolved without deadly force.

“Rhonda and I are deeply saddened that four Montgomery County Police Department officers met our African-American son’s cry for help with 23 shots fired. Ryan LeRoux was in the midst of a mental health crisis — not a crime. The MCPD knew that Ryan needed help — not bullets,” LeRoux said in a statement Monday.

County police said all four officers have been returned to full-time, active duty status and there will be an internal investigation.

Murder of Black Couple Lawful: LA County DA says White Cops Saw a Gun in a Car Occupied by Blacks and Cops Claimed to Be In Danger. Thus, the Blacks Were Executed Under the Law of the Jungle Standard

From [HERE] No charges will be filed against five former police officers involved in the 2016 shooting deaths of a man and a woman who were found unconscious in their car, Los Angeles County prosecutors confirmed this week. 

Marquintan Sandlin and Kisha Michael, who were Black, were killed Feb. 21, 2016, by Inglewood police officers who were responding to a call about a vehicle that was stopped in traffic lanes. 

Sandlin, who was in the driver's seat, was shot five times after police were able to wake the couple up. He died at the hospital. Michael was shot 13 times and was pronounced dead at the scene. 

Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón said in a 36-page report that an investigation found "that there is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the officers’ use of deadly force was unlawful." 

The shootings happened around 4 a.m. A man called 911 to report that two people were either asleep or unconscious in the front seats of their car. The caller also reported that the woman, later identified as Michael, had a gun on her lap, the March 31 report states. 

Responding officers placed cars in front of and behind the couple's vehicle to prevent them from leaving. A Los Angeles police helicopter assisted. 

Gascón said officers tried for over 40 minutes to wake up Sandlin and Michael. They used spotlights, light bars, sirens and an air horn and nudged the car’s back bumper with a police vehicle, but the couple did not awaken, he said. 

A sergeant then made an announcement over a speaker while instructing Michael and Sandlin not to move and to roll the windows down. After a few minutes, Sandlin began to stir. 

The report says Sandlin rolled the window down and then drove the car forward, hitting one of the patrol vehicles. He then reversed, striking another police vehicle. Sandlin is alleged to have driven the car forward again and stopped. 

Multiple officers said they saw Sandlin lean toward his right and reach toward Michael's lap, where there was a handgun, according to the report. 

An officer fired two shotgun rounds, hitting Sandlin. Michael then woke up and opened the passenger's door, the report says. Officers said they fired after they saw her reach toward her lap.

Trial Stopped for Saudi Officials Accused of Murdering Jamal Khashoggi. Case Removed to Saudia Arabia So Authorities Can Remain Immune from Accountability Under the Law of the Jungle Standard

From [HERE] An Istanbul court on Thursday halted the Turkish murder trial of Saudi security officials charged with killing journalist Jamal Khashoggi, amid efforts by Ankara to improve relations with the kingdom.

The court granted a request from prosecutors to refer the case to authorities in Saudi Arabia, where a separate trial sentenced eight lower-level officials to prison over the killing, but spared senior leaders from accountability.

The ruling closes off an important avenue for justice in the killing of Mr. Khashoggi, a Washington Post columnist and prominent critic of the Saudi government, rights advocates said. Human-rights groups had urged Turkey not to transfer the case back to Saudi Arabia, arguing that doing so would end hopes of accountability in the case and stop key evidence of the murder from becoming public.

“In the same way Saudi Arabia covered up the killing of Jamal Khashoggi, Turkey is now covering up its own investigation and its findings,” said Agnes Callamard, a former United Nations special rapporteur who investigated the killing and is now secretary-general of Amnesty International. “Let’s not forget how Jamal was killed. Let’s not forget that the Saudi authorities never revealed what they did with his body after their officials dismembered him on the floor of the Saudi consulate. Now, they will also have to deal with Turkey’s cowardice and denial of justice.”

A team of Saudi operatives killed and dismembered Mr. Khashoggi inside Saudi Arabia’s consulate in 2018 after he entered to secure documents for his coming wedding. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said Saudi officials carried out the murder but denied personal responsibility.

U.A.E. Prime Minister Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, right, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met in Dubai in February.PHOTO: TURKISH PRESIDENT PRESS OFFICE H/SHUTTERSTOCK

Mr. Khashoggi’s fiancee, Turkish academic Hatice Cengiz, said after Thursday’s decision that she wasn’t done fighting for justice. “The courts might have decided that they can ignore the truth about his case, but I will not stop and I will not be quiet about it,” she tweeted. “We all know who is guilty of Jamal’s murder and it is now more important than ever that I keep going.”

Ms. Cengiz filed a civil action in Washington in 2020 against Prince Mohammed and other Saudis accusing him of ordering the killing. The case was brought jointly with Democracy for the Arab World Now, a U.S.-based nonprofit set up to promote human rights and the rule of law that Mr. Khashoggi founded while living in self-exile in Washington.

A Central Intelligence Agency assessment found that Prince Mohammed likely ordered the murder himself, but Saudi Arabia’s de facto leader has largely escaped punishment. Still, he has been regarded as a pariah by much of the world since the killing.

Ben Crump Doesn't Get It: the Purpose of Bodycam is to Convict Black People, Not to Prosecute Cops. MI Police Want to Keep Video of Patrick Lyoya's Deadly Arrest a Public Secret As Long They Can

Imagine if police departments across the nation sought funding for a new program described as follows: "We propose a video surveillance program targeted toward heavily patrolled low-income neighborhoods of color in ordeR to gather evidence of crimes such as drug possession, vandalism, and resisting arrest. We will primarily use this evidence to prosecute criminal cases against civilians - not police officers - withholding it from defendants to encourage pleas, and allowing access only to those who take the risk of going to trial. The public and the media wilL rarely, if ever, gain access to these videos, and we will release them at our unilateral discretion; we will, of course, own and control all the footage." If this were the avowed purpose and description of a program, few would support it. Yet this is precisely how most police body camera programs are currently run.

From [HERE ]NAACP Greater Grand Rapids Branch officials are demanding Grand Rapids police immediately release all footage surrounding the fatal shooting Monday of a 26-year-old man by a city police officer.

“The public deserves to have the footage released immediately,” Cle Jackson, president of NAACP Grand Rapids, said Wednesday, April 6.

Grand Rapids city officials previously told reporters that video of the fatal encounter between a GRPD officer and the man killed, Patrick Lyoya, was expected to be released early next week – much later than community leaders like NAACP and others want.

An immediate release of any video, city officials previously said, would go against protocols giving the officer 72 hours to give a statement.

Grand Rapids Police Chief Eric Winstrom previously said he wants to give state police, which are investigating the shooting, enough time to collect and review all video of the incident before making anything public.

The chief said he is “committed to providing information as transparently and quickly as the investigation allows.”

Jackson said Winstrom is not obligated nor required to wait for Michigan State Police to finish their investigation into the shooting before releasing any footage of the incident.

He said his organization is demanding “full transparency and cooperation” from the GRPD and other law enforcement agencies involved in the investigation into the deadly shooting.

The deadly police shooting happened around 8:10 a.m. Monday, April 4, when an officer conducted a traffic stop on a vehicle near Griggs Street SE and Nelson Avenue.

GRPD officials said Monday that what circumstances led to the traffic stop aren’t clear at this time but that the vehicle had a license plate that wasn’t registered to it.

Lyoya, who was the driver, exited the vehicle and interacted with the officer but began to flee when he learned he was about to be arrested, police said.

A fight ensued between the officer and Lyoya, and the officer fired his weapon, killing Lyoya. The chief previously said the fight is believed to have lasted around 90 seconds to two minutes.

Police identified Lyoya, who is Black, Tuesday evening. The officer who killed Lyoya has not been named, but officials said he is white and has been with the department since 2015.

The officer was placed on administrative leave pending an internal investigation. The practice is standard protocol.

It wasn’t immediately clear how much of the incident was caught on video. The officer’s body camera became dislodged and fell onto the ground during the fight. It was still operating while on the ground.

Officials have not said the extent of video captured by the dash camera on the officer’s vehicle.

“Again, we are demanding the immediate release of any body camera footage or other video surveillance tools used in this incident,” Jackson said.

Circuit Ct Split Over Who the Real Victim is in ATM Stickup Robberies: You or the Bank? [Since Banks Create Money Out of Thin-Air when Loans are Made, What Does It Actually Lose During a Stickup?]

From [HERE] If someone is held at gunpoint and forced to withdraw money from an ATM, is the bank being robbed (a federal crime) or just the person (not a federal crime)? Seventh Circuit(link is external) (2005): The bank - because the money belongs to the bank. Fifth Circuit(link is external) (2005): The person - because the money belongs to the account holder. Tenth Circuit(link is external) (last week): Bank - because the money belongs to the bank.

How do banks create money, and why can other firms not do the same? An explanation for the coexistence of lending and deposit-taking

According to FUNKTIONARY:

“money” – the imaginary “monetized” debt as an asset without parity, being accepted as a medium of exchange by the public— (inflation per se). 2) whatever is accepted in lieu of a perceived full parity product or service during an exchange. 3) the difference between full parity and actual parity received during an exchange. 4) psychologically created entity credit — imaginary — demand — inflation — seignorage. 5) the unspoken token of submission. 6) pulses recalled, transmitted and stored in electronic ledgers. 7) a concept which only exists as a reference to the mathematical relativity of value in the mind, left over or reminiscent from a time when the word “money” referred to wealth (a commodity) used as a means of exchange. As a value reference, only exists as an acknowledged negotiated abstract accounting unit (figure) in hue-man minds, it is created there, and it is destroyed or redeemed there. 8) the abstract promise of a non-producer to perpetrate a fraud by “creating” and representing a claim on resources that do not exist and/or claims on resources that they have no lawful claim to, on, or against. 9) illusive conjecture—illegitimate and fraudulent numeric claim-tickets to wealth that are neither earned nor borrowed. 10) an ego-supplement—trickery and selfdeception made transferable (spendable). “Money bemuses. Recurrently over the centuries, men, mostly men, have supposed that they have mastered the secret of its infinite amplification. Invariably, this involves the rediscovery, perhaps in slightly novel form, of some infinitely ancient fraud.” ~G.K. Galbraith, “Money.” Money is an elastic accounting media and system by and through which free men translate their needs into the production and exchange of the goods and services they require and wishes they desire. In a BM (Bad Money) debt-based system of exchange, millions have to be left out of work and wages while in need of the very goods and services they could otherwise buy, make and freely exchange. A “BM” (debt-based) system creates an otherwise avoidable arithmetically and economically insoluble problem—usury, i.e., creating imaginary demand and ascribing it with a tangibility, measurability and false existing value conjured and sanctioned solely through the fictitious corporate twin-impostors, “government” and private central banks. Any debt-based “monetary” system will ultimately collapse. It is as mathematically irreconcilable as a “chain-letter.” Apart from its communal context solely among traders, money becomes meaningless; it sustains the illusion of portable symbolic value only as long as the social or communal bond holds. Although both “money” and “time” are conceptual abstractions (non-existents), we think more about the use of “money,” (its function, not its anatomy) which is replenishable, than we do about the use of time, which is irreplaceable. When money is literally no object to someone, it blinds him or her from seeing everyone as nothing more than mere objects. Most economists and all official monetary policies follow discredited Flat-Earth theories about money. Academic scholars, financiers and official monetary authorities are monetary Flat- Heads screwing everyone with a Phillips while using a Laffer Curve for fun and kicks. Just because it’s all in your mind doesn’t mean it’s not real. “Money” is as real as any other abstraction. Jump in, the water is fine, we’re not only losing money, but we’re also losing our minds. Let me put it to you straight—Money and State must separate! (See: Gangbanking, IN HOC SINK, Usury, Political Money, Interest, Maya Banking, Phillips Curve, Laffer Curve, Quantity Theory of Money, Public Debt, Cainsian Economics, Economies, Assumptions, S&M Banking, Gangbanking, Hidden Tax, Real Federal Taxes, Second Tax, Property, Wealth, Reverse Loan, The CODE, Meta-Money, Currency Switch, Cultural Induction, Beggar-Rich & Hegelian Banking

Rotten to the Core in Liberal NYC; The NYPD are Clearing Homeless Encampments that are Filled with Mostly Black People. Strawboss Mayor Bends Over Backwards to Serve Racist, Hobophobic Dems

PHOTO IS COURTESY OF UNDECEIVER VINCENT BROWN

From [HERE] A small encampment of homeless people defiantly stood its ground against New York City police and sanitation workers before authorities moved in Wednesday afternoon to clear tents, blankets and other belongings as part of a crackdown launched by Mayor Eric Adams to rid his city of people living in the streets.

Police arrested two homeless people and several of their advocates who for hours had shielded a handful of homeless people from being removed from a street in the Lower East Side, amid the cold and rain.

As of last week, police have visited more than 250 such encampments and cleared most of them, more than half in Manhattan. The mayor’s office said it didn’t have updated statistics readily available.

“I don’t need a safe haven or a shelter. I need a home,” said a homeless woman who identified her “professional name” as Synthia Vee, hours before she was taken into custody with another homeless person. For much of the day, she and a handful of other homeless people resisted leaving their patch of Ninth Street, where they have been squatting for days.

“I have something to say to Mayor Adams. Shelters – no. Safe havens – not quite. Apartments – that’s the one,” she said. “He’s the new guy. We’ll see. He’s a Democrat, but he’s also a cop.”

A spokesperson for Adams said the mayor has sought to provide dignity to every New Yorker.

“There is no dignity in living on the street. We have been engaged at this site for weeks, and our teams then and today were respectful and made repeated offers of shelter and wraparound services to provide these individuals with clean, safe places to sleep tonight,” said the spokesman, Charles Lutvak.

FUCK NYC

Two More Black Coaches Join Brian Flores’s Racial Discrimination Suit Against the NFL. The Filing also Includes New Evidence the Miami Dolphins’ Owner Asked Him to Lose Games on Purpose

From [HERE] Two additional coaches joined Brian Flores’s racial discrimination lawsuit against the National Football League, expanding a case involving two sensitive issues—race and tanking—roiling the sport. 

Steve Wilks and Ray Horton are now part of Flores’s proposed class action lawsuit, which alleges that the league and teams discriminate against Black coaches in their pursuit of head coaching opportunities. Wilks, currently an assistant with the Carolina Panthers, was the head coach of the Arizona Cardinals for one season in 2018. Horton, a longtime defensive assistant, has never been a head coach. 

The amended suit also includes new evidence related to one of Flores’s related claims. As part of his original suit, Flores accused Miami Dolphins owner Stephen Ross of offering to pay him in order to lose games when Flores was the team’s coach. 

An addition to the suit now says that Flores wrote a memo in 2019 to Dolphins executives that documented Ross’s desire to lose games. The Dolphins gave that letter to the NFL weeks ago amid the NFL’s probe of the situation, a person familiar with the investigation said. 

Ross has previously said Flores’s allegations are “false, malicious and defamatory.” The NFL has said his lawsuit is meritless, although commissioner Roger Goodell has acknowledged that the league has room to improve its diversity in top posts. The league is running an investigation into Flores’s tanking allegations. 

An NFL spokesman declined further comment. 

Flores’s lawsuit, originally filed in February in the U.S. Southern District Court of New York, shined a newfound spotlight on what has long been one of the NFL’s thorniest issues. For years, the league has been criticized for its dearth of minority coaches and executives and it has made numerous attempts to spur change by changing and rewriting rules surrounding the interview and hiring process. 

Following the recent retirement of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ Bruce Arians, the ascension of Todd Bowles into the top post, there are six Black head coaches in the NFL. More than half of the league’s players are Black. 

The allegations from Flores, who was Miami’s coach from 2019 through 2021, expand beyond the Dolphins. He accused two other clubs, the New York Giants and Denver Broncos, of giving him sham interviews in order to satisfy the NFL’s Rooney Rule, which requires teams to interview minority candidates for roles such as head coach or general manager. Both teams denied the allegations and said the interviews were legitimate. 

His accusation that Ross, the Dolphins owner, offered to pay him in order to lose games in 2019—thereby tanking in order to secure a better draft pick—has drawn equal if not more attention. His lawsuit says Ross offered to pay him $100,000 per loss and that Ross was upset after Flores declined and the team won a handful of games. If the accusation proves true, it could land Ross in severe trouble with the NFL for violating the game’s competitive integrity and perhaps even legal authorities under anti-sports-bribery laws. 

Wilks was the Cardinals coach for just one season in 2018 before he was fired. He alleges that he wasn’t given a fair opportunity to coach a team that drafted a rookie quarterback, Josh Rosen, who struggled and was ultimately just used as a “bridge” coach who was meant to keep the seat warm until the team was ready to succeed. The suit contrasts Wilks’s firing with the retention of general manager Steve Keim, who is white, and was arrested for driving under the influence that year. The team suspended Keim for five games and fined him at the time. 

“The decisions we made after the 2018 season were very difficult ones,” the Cardinals said in a statement. “But as we said at the time, they were entirely driven by what was in the best interests of our organization and necessary for team improvement. We are confident that the facts reflect that and demonstrate that these allegations are untrue.”

Horton, who has been the defensive coordinator for numerous teams including the Pittsburgh Steelers and Detroit Lions, accuses the Titans of giving him an illegitimate interview, in order to satisfy the Rooney Rule or make the process appear nondiscriminatory, when the team had already settled on another candidate. A spokesman for the Titans did not immediately respond to a request for comment

Judge Tosses California Law Mandating Diversity on Boards of Public Companies. Law Required 1 board director from "minority" groups. Suit was Filed by Judicial Watch [elite white Republicans]

From [HERE] A judge struck down a California law that requires public companies based in the state to have at least one board director from underrepresented groups, a setback to efforts to mandate board diversity.

Judge Terry Green of the Superior Court of California in Los Angeles County granted on Friday a summary judgment in favor of a lawsuit challenging the law as unconstitutional. Judge Green said the law improperly mandated heterogeneous boards and must protect the right of individuals to equal treatment.

The law, enacted in 2020, required the boards of publicly traded companies based in the state to have at least one racially, ethnically or otherwise diverse director by 2021.

A lawsuit backed by Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation, said the law, known as Assembly Bill 979, violated the equal protection clause of the state’s constitution.

The board-diversity quota was the first of its kind in the U.S. and followed a similar California measure enacted in 2018 that mandated female directors on all boards of the state’s public companies. That measure is also facing legal challenges in state and federal courts.

A personal, guided tour to the best scoops and stories every day in The Wall Street Journal.

PREVIEWSUBSCRIBE

Under the board-diversity law, individuals who identify as Black, African-American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian or Alaska Native, or who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, would be considered eligible for meeting the requirement.

In a statement following the judge’s decision, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton applauded the court for upholding “the core American value of equal protection under the law.”

It wasn’t clear if the defendant in the case, the California Secretary of State’s office, would appeal the decision. The agency didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

The requirements are now on hold pending any potential appeals.

Esther Aguilera, president and chief executive of the Latino Corporate Directors Association, said the ruling wasn’t unexpected. “Even when the law was passed, there was always discussion that this might be the outcome. Are we surprised? No.” 

She added that her organization would continue its work on advancing Latino board membership, including reaching out directly to CEOs, board chairs and corporate secretaries. 

The killing of George Floyd in police custody in 2020 and subsequent protests prompted pledges from U.S. business leaders to fight racism and increase diversity. Since then, some states, regulators and investors have pushed for greater diversity on corporate boards. Most of these efforts have called for more disclosure and stopped short of mandates or quotas. Many of the measures have faced legal challenges.

In August 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved a Nasdaq Inc. proposal to include gender and race in its listing rules. Under the Nasdaq proposal, listed companies would need to meet certain minimum targets for the gender and ethnic diversity of their boards or explain in writing why they aren’t doing so. For most U.S. Nasdaq companies, the target would be to have at least one woman director, as well as a director who self-identifies as a racial minority or as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer. Companies would also be required to disclose diversity statistics about their boards.

A Texas-based nonprofit has filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, arguing that the SEC’s approval of Nasdaq’s rule violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and federal antidiscrimination laws.

Advocates of greater board diversity say that mandates or quotas are sometimes the only way to achieve meaningful progress in improving representation among key decision makers on corporate policy. [MORE]

Senate Prepares Confirmation Vote for Lisa Cook, who would be the First Black Woman to Serve as a Federal Reserve Governor

From [HERE] The Senate voted Tuesday to advance the nomination of economist Lisa Cook for a seat on the Federal Reserve’s board, a procedural step required before the full chamber can vote on whether to confirm her for the post.

Ms. Cook, professor of international relations and economics at Michigan State University, received a tie vote in the Senate Banking Committee earlier this month, with all 12 Democrats on the panel backing her nomination and all 12 Republicans opposed.

Under Senate rules, a nominee who receives a tied vote in committee can advance to a vote in the full chamber through a motion by the majority leader. Democrats have 50-50 control of the Senate, with Vice President Kamala Harris able to break a tie.

Tuesday’s 50-49 procedural vote to advance Ms. Cook’s nomination could set up a full Senate vote later this week for her and three of President Biden’s other Fed nominees, including Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, who advanced through the banking committee earlier this month with a 23-1 vote.

The latest economic news, analysis and data curated weekdays by WSJ's Jeffrey Sparshott. 

Mr. Biden has also nominated Fed governor Lael Brainard to serve as the board’s vice chairwoman and Philip Jefferson, an economist and administrator at Davidson College in North Carolina, to serve as a Fed governor.

The confirmation process for the nominations had stalled until earlier this month, when Mr. Biden’s pick for vice chairwoman of bank supervision, Sarah Bloom Raskin, withdrew from consideration. Her nomination drew opposition from nearly all Senate Republicans and from Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

Ms. Cook, who would be the first Black woman to serve on the Fed’s board, has focused her research on policies that promote broad economic opportunity, particularly for racial minorities and women.

Some Republicans suggested at her Feb. 3 hearing that she lacked sufficient experience in macroeconomics in monetary policy, a claim she countered by highlighting her research experience and work at the Treasury Department and on the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

Sen. Pat Toomey (R., Pa.), in remarks on the Senate floor on Tuesday opposing the vote to advance Ms. Cook’s nomination, said her confirmation hearing last month led him to believe she would be inclined to resist tighter monetary policy to bring down inflation. “Professor Cook’s answers to basic questions about what the Fed should do to tame inflation amount to nothing more than word salad,” said Mr. Toomey.

Democrats rallied behind Ms. Cook’s candidacy on Tuesday. “I’m thrilled by this nomination,” said Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown (D., Ohio). “She’s seen how the economy works—and sometimes doesn’t work so well—for all kinds of different people in different parts of the country…That’s an unusual thing for a Fed governor.”

[Racists Appear Superior by Surrounding Themselves w/Mediocre Blacks] Neutral OpporTomist Ketanji Believes She Vicariously Empowers Blacks. To Dems “Blackness" Means 'Not Republican' but What Else?

The myth of white superiority is exploded in the presence of equitable social and economic opportunity. The white personality, in the presence of color, can be stabilized only by keeping Blacks and other non-whites in obviously inferior positions. Which is why racists ALSO often lower the bar to include unqualified or mediocre Blacks like Ketanji. Judge Brown has only worked as an appellate judge SINCE June 2021. She was not the most qualified Black woman, or most qualified Black person TO BE A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, WHICH THE HIGHEST APPELLATE COURT. At any rate, to racists, all of the above are not the same person as the person who is the most qualified person. [white propaganda]. Biden never said he wanted TO SELECT the most qualified person to serve on the Supreme Court and he certainly never said the most qualified person is a Black woman, AS he and his followers (white and black) don’t believe that, SUCH IS THE NATURE OF MASTER-SERVANT RELATIONS IN A WHITE OVER BLACK SYSTEM (IT TAKES TWO FOR SAID RELATIONSHIP TO VOLUNTARILY EXIST).

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Opportomist – a straight-up opportunist who revels in his tokenhood. 2) a token hood handpicked and taken out of the ‘hood. 3) a lawn jockey. 4) a “Yes-man” for the “Other Man” in derogation of the “Brotherman.” An opportomist is an African-American nameslug who has been acculturated and culturally conditioned into self-hatred and seeks personal gain through obsequious behavior to Caucasian overlings. (See: Sambo, Criss-Crossover, DAMS & Mainstream)

From [HERE] Dabbing tears from her face on the South Lawn of the White House, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson spoke of her personal journey to the steps of the Supreme Court, and how it dovetailed with the hopes and history of people she had come to symbolize.

“It has taken 232 years and 115 prior appointments for a Black woman to be selected to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States,” she told the crowd. “But we’ve made it. We’ve made it. All of us.”

A day after the Senate confirmed Jackson 53 to 47, the White House hosted a presidential-level victory lap, featuring tear-filled speeches from President Biden and two of the women he has held up as proof that his presidency is making America more equitable: Jackson and Vice President Harris.

“This is going to let so much sun shine on so many young women, so many young Black women, so many minorities,” said Biden, who told the crowd that nominating a Black woman to the Supreme Court was one of the first decisions he made when he decided to seek the presidency a third time. “Today is a good day, a day that history is going to remember. And in the years to come, they’re going to be proud of what we did.”

Harris, who spoke just before Biden and presided over Jackson’s Senate confirmation vote a day earlier, said she “will inspire generations of leaders. They will watch your confirmation hearings and read your decisions in the years to come.” [MORE]

NOT BLACK POWER. What did they do? This is maya, this is “black leadership” compatible with racism white supremacy. Surely there will be more confirmations of Black tokens who in no way threaten to neutralize or destroy the system of racism white supremacy.

Has Ketanji demonstrated any commitment to empowering Black people or neutralizing white supremacy? The ABA [elite whites in an overwhelming white profession] endorsed her essentially because of her neutrality to Black criminal defendants. The ABA standing committee explained that Jackson “showed no signs of bias toward criminal defendants” (who are disproportionately Black) and she definitely was not “soft on crime” (means soft on Blacks) as racist Republicans contended without any factual basis. Is it pro-Black to be neutral to Blacks in a system of injustice that has as its main goal to put more Blacks into greater confinement? Prosecutors (who are overwhelmingly white) reaped praise onto Ketanji:

 Among the prosecutors in the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, D.C., who spoke with the committee, all rejected any claim that Jackson is “soft on crime.”

“I vehemently disagree” with the allegation, said one high-ranking prosecutor.

Another federal prosecutor who appeared before Jackson at least 10 times said there is no bias toward defendants. Such an allegation was “absolutely not borne out based on my experience with her,” the prosecutor said. Another prosecutor from the office said Jackson was regarded as “a good draw” because “she is a smart judge without any biases, which is all we’re asking for.” [MORE]

Has Ketanji articulated any constitutional or political theory concerning Black people, their so-called “rights” or Black politics in general? Does she even recognize the existence of the system of racism white supremacy? Of course not, which is why racist dems and republicans are comfortable her rolebotic neutrality. Never mind a Black philosophy, Jackson has "not yet written a body of appeals court opinions expressing a legal philosophy." [MORE]. This is a result of her judicial inexperience. Contrary to the puffery surrounding her nomination, Ketanji just started working as an appellate judge in June of 2021. [MORE] Work in trial courts has little to do with appellate issues and the work of appellate courts. Thus, her judicial views on constitutional issues or other legal issues affecting Black people are unknown, unformulated and probably unthought of. [MORE] Much was made of the fact that she worked as public defender attorney for a short while - she did her job defending people charged with crimes; but that’s not Black power - everyone is entitled to a rigorous criminal defense, ask Kyle Rittenhouse. Nevertheless, to racist Dems and their gullible Black followers “Black power” simply means “not Republican,” and/or an allegiance to an ad-hoc slate of views concerning environmentalism, gun rights, gay rights, abortion, immigration and whatever else elite white dems think of. Dems have no explanation for racism white supremacy, no nuts and bolts plan for dealing with it and the real circumstances most Black people find themselves facing on a daily basis. Dems fail to recognize that a system of racism white supremacy exists. As explained by her co-token Kamala Harris, “America is not a racist country.” Like Republicans, Dems prefer the fantasy of white supremacy and maintaining master-servant relations.

Gullible Black Dems are for too tolerant of irresponsible and unrepresentative political leaders. Would gay folks be so supportive of gay public officials neutral to gay issues? As explained by Norman Kelley, ‘the concentration of power in the hands of a few token Blacks perhaps creates charisma around them that gives some Blacks a vicarious sense of empowerment. But, characteristic and token leadership is inherently anti-democratic and incapable of creating authentic mass empowerment.’ In reality, having Black elected/selected Dems at all levels of government has had no effect on racism white supremacy. Despite all evidence to the contrary if you believe otherwise then you’ve probably lost your mind. The great rebel Dr. Amos Wilson explained,

Left leaning dependent media and racist Dems and and their gullible Black followers provide an almost uncritical and very adulatory support for Black Dem politi­cians. Dependent media lionizes Black incumbents without critical examinations of their records and supports Black candidates for political office essentially on the basis of their Blackness (generally as long as they are not Republicans). Dependent left leaning media make little or no demands on Black politicians while it constantly parades them before the Black community as role models, regardless of their success or lack of it in advancing the interests of the community. The achieve­ments of Black politicians, no matter how dubious, are often pre­sented as vicarious achievements of the Black community as a whole. Black incumbents are given ready access to left leaning dependent media outlets to massage the Black community, to maintain their public persona, and to rationalize their very frequent failures to provide the Black community with responsive and effective political leadership. Hiding the reality that their accomplishments are meager when not plainly regressive.

Doctor’s Analysis of Data Obtained on 78 Million People in the US and England Demonstrate that COVID Injections Don't Prevent COVID or its Transmission and Don't Prevent Severe Illness or Death

From [CHD] “Our vaccines are working exceptionally well,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death — they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.”

Thus spoke Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Walensky, in an Aug. 5, 2021 interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

Walensky may have believed the vaccines prevented severe illness and death then — but she cannot possibly believe that now.

That was eight months ago. The vaccines had barely been rolled out eight months earlier.

Now we have nearly 16 months of observation and what have we found? What has Walensky’s CDC revealed that contradicts her glib patter?

While there are thousands of articles discussing COVID-19 vaccines, I have come to agree with professor Tom Jefferson that in order to arrive at the truth, all we need to look at are epidemiological data of very high quality.

In other words:

• We want raw, official data, before it has been subjected to adjustments or algorithms that “smooth” the data.

• We want large populations.

• We want the most solid endpoints, such as hospitalizations or deaths.

Over the past few days I have identified and analyzed such studies on my blog (here and here) and on Substack. The data are from official sources, published by the U.S. CDC and the UK’s Office of National Statistics.

Information on 30 million adults in California and New York, three-fourths of whom were vaccinated, were used to compare COVID hospitalization and case rates in those who were vaccinated and had no prior COVID illness, with adults who were never vaccinated but had recovered from COVID, and presumably had natural immunity.

The data were collected from June to November 2021, before the Omicron wave appeared.

The Defender reported on this data two months ago:

• Vaccinated Californians and New Yorkers were three times more likely to develop COVID than those who had prior immunity and were unvaccinated.

• Vaccinated Californians had a higher rate of hospitalizations (severe illness) than those who were unvaccinated but had prior immunity. (New York did not provide hospitalization data.)

• The vaccine failures in this huge study cannot be blamed on Omicron, because the data were collected during Delta.

The UK data from its Office of National Statistics, published March 16, extend from Jan. 1, 2021, through Jan. 31, and include both the Delta and Omicron waves.

The data have been age-standardized. The database includes 86% of all deaths in England (which has a population of 56 million) during the 13 months described.

The graphs reveal that being doubly vaccinated protected the English against death for most of 2021.

However, over last December and January (corresponding to the Omicron wave), COVID death rates in the doubly vaccinated but unboosted were higher than in those who had never been vaccinated. This was true for the population as a whole.

If you break down the deaths by age group, the vast majority of COVID deaths occurred in the over-70 population.

While deaths from COVID in younger people were trending up as the time since vaccination increased, by Jan. 31, 2022, they had not exceeded COVID deaths in the unvaccinated.

Boosters did appear to “top up” COVID immunity for a time in all age groups, reducing death rates. But one wonders how long it will take before this effect wears off?

What is the bottom line?

High-quality, official data obtained on more than 30 million American adults and 48 million residents of England incontrovertibly reveal that:

• Natural immunity was three times better at preventing cases than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

• Natural immunity was somewhat better at preventing serious illness, measured as hospitalizations, than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

• Boosters (a third shot) reduced the death rate in England of those vaccinated against Omicron, but the benefit was starting to drop off by January 2022.

• Overall, England’s unvaccinated population had a lower COVID death rate during the Omicron wave than the COVID death rate in its doubly vaccinated population.

• Walensky and the other so-called experts are wrong. Natural immunity provided three times more protection against infection (and therefore against transmission) than did double vaccination, even before Omicron. After Omicron, vaccine efficacy was even worse.

• While vaccination provided some protection against severe illness (measured as hospitalizations) during the Delta wave, it provided less protection than natural immunity.

• The vast majority of COVID deaths occur in those over 70. In this age group, the doubly vaccinated died from COVID at higher rates during Omicron than the unvaccinated.

Corpse-like President Can Barely Talk. On Video Brandon Praises "Vice President Jill Biden" [incompetency is Not a Defense to Crimes Against Humanity]

[MORE]

UnMasked Mayor Promotes an Ongoing Grimace and More Science-Free COVID Rules: The Proxymoronic StrawBoss says NYC Won’t Rehire Unvaxxed Workers. Video Shows Him Grin and Wave as a Crowd Shouts Insults

From [HERE] New York City Mayor Eric Adams said Thursday that his administration would not rehire unvaccinated city workers.

Around 1,400 city employees were fired earlier this year for failing to comply with the city’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Adams said, during a news conference at Citi Field, he did not plan to rehire them.  “Not at this time,” he said, according to The Wall Street Journal, “We are not reviewing if we are going to bring [them] back.”

He also thanked the more than 340,000 city employees who have been vaccinated, recognizing them for “[standing] up and [doing] the right thing.” [MORE VIDEO]

Adams is a Proxymoron (one moron who speaks or acts on behalf of another pluperfect moron or a whole gang of morons) and a democrat BOHICAN (Bend Over Here It Comes Again Negro). He is also the physical representation of the opposite of Black power in a city with the largest number of Black people in the country.

Official data obtained on more than 30 million American adults and 48 million residents of England incontrovertibly reveals that COVID-19 vaccines aren’t preventing COVID or its transmission, and they aren’t preventing severe illness or death. Also,

• Natural immunity was three times better at preventing cases than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

• Natural immunity was somewhat better at preventing serious illness, measured as hospitalizations, than vaccination alone, even before Omicron.

• Boosters (a third shot) reduced the death rate in England of those vaccinated against Omicron, but the benefit was starting to drop off by January 2022.

• Overall, England’s unvaccinated population had a lower COVID death rate during the Omicron wave than the COVID death rate in its doubly vaccinated population.

• Walensky and the other so-called experts are wrong. Natural immunity provided three times more protection against infection (and therefore against transmission) than did double vaccination, even before Omicron. After Omicron, vaccine efficacy was even worse.

• While vaccination provided some protection against severe illness (measured as hospitalizations) during the Delta wave, it provided less protection than natural immunity.

• The vast majority of COVID deaths occur in those over 70. In this age group, the doubly vaccinated died from COVID at higher rates during Omicron than the unvaccinated.

German Data Confirms that COVID Deaths are Exaggerated in Most Countries and Much of the World is Unvaccinated [meaning not injected with poisons]

From [HERE] Mass formation collapse!

In a previous post, we referred to Worldometer to show not many died of Covid in most countries, even according to the official data.

Corona in Zahlen is a German site that also records Covid cases, and deaths, as well as official vaccination and Covid test numbers.

Corona in Zahlen is run by Dr. M. Siekmann and uses statistics from Johns Hopkins University to report corona infections in over 200 countries worldwide.

Worldwide corona statistics “are accessed via the freely accessible Our World in Data data set,” explains Corona in Zahlen.

Our World in Data is a non-profit organisation made up of researchers from the University of Oxford and the Global Change Data Lab.

Corona in Zahlen also uses data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for European countries and Robert Koch Instituts, R-Welt and DIVI for Germany.

Data Comparison

Of the 227 countries Worldometer have been tracking since the beginning of the pandemic, 9 have recorded zero deaths, 38 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 62 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 80 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 100 have recorded less than 1000 deaths each.

In fact, 206 countries from the 227 reported less than 50,000 deaths.

Of the 222 countries Corona in Zahlen have been tracking, 8 have recorded zero deaths, 33 have recorded less than 100 deaths, 56 have recorded less than 200 deaths, 78 have recorded less than 500 deaths, and 93 less than 1000 deaths.

Covid in Zahlen reports less than 50,000 deaths for 200 of the 222 countries tracked.

Influenza Comparison

Now consider that during the 2018 flu season, the Office for National Statistics reported just over 50,000 deaths in England and Wales.

This was considered high, yet during the outbreak, Public Health England (PHE) declared that “while flu was rendering the largest number of people seriously unwell since the winter of 2010/11, it was still not an epidemic.”

Although we need to take the total size and population of each country into account, we can at least acknowledge that the population of England and Wales – even combined – is pretty small compared to most countries, say in Africa, for example.

Imagine how relieved and relaxed the global population would be feeling now, instead of stressed and fearful, if mainstream media had reported on the vast number of countries hardly hit with Covid-19 deaths over the last two years instead of reporting recorded Covid cases.

Also note that Covid only deaths are proving to be much smaller than official numbers as data in countries like Australia , New Zealand, the UK and USA now goes public, and the mainstream media like The New York Times, and Spectator are beginning to ask questions.

Vaccination Noncompliance

It is also reassuring to see Covid in Zahlen report official data showing less than 20% of the population went for the Covid vaccine in 30 countries, and less than 50% of the people had the vaccine in 78 countries. Less than 50% have fully vaccinated status in 96 countries (did not go back for more shots), and less than 25% have had a booster in 138 countries.

Big Pharma Accounts for 75% of the Total Ad Spend on TV. Which is Why The Dependent Media is Unwilling and Incapable of Reporting the Truth About Deadly COVID Injections

From [HERE] and [HERE] Pharmaceutical industry TV ad spend in the U.S 2016-2020. In 2020, the pharmaceutical industry spent 4.58 billion U.S. dollars on advertising on national TV in the United States, unsurprisingly representing a big shift in spending compared to the 2019 pre-covid market. In 2020 TV ad spending of the pharma industry accounted for 75 percent of the total ad spend.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Dependent Media – Establishment (dependent) media is both unwilling and incapable of reporting events truthfully, accurately, or without extreme bias. News coverage is just that—covering-up-(masking) and distorting the events and those wielding the power behind the events (those reported and deliberately unreported). News coverage has simply become “disinfotainment” with the sole purpose of perception and knowledge containment as well as reality concealment. You report in the interests of those who paying you to do so. (See: MEDIA, NBC & NEWS)

Today in History the Great Non-Violent Rebel, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was Assassinated. In 1967 He Explained, "The Greatest Purveyor of Violence in the World Today [is] My Own Government"

From [EJI] On April 4, 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was shot and killed while standing on a hotel balcony in Memphis, Tennessee. Dr. King was in the city to speak on his growing Poor People's Campaign, and to support an economic protest by Black sanitation workers.

About two months earlier, 1,300 African American Memphis sanitation workers began a strike to protest low pay and poor treatment. When city leaders largely ignored the strike and refused to negotiate, the workers sought assistance from civil rights leaders, including Dr. King. He enthusiastically agreed to help and, on March 18, visited the city to speak to a crowd of more than 15,000 people.

Dr. King also planned a march of support. When the first attempt was violently suppressed by police, leaving one protestor dead, Dr. King resolved to stage another peaceful march on April 8. He returned to Memphis by plane on April 3, braving a bomb threat on his scheduled flight. Once in Memphis, he stayed at the Lorraine Motel and gave a short speech reflecting on his own mortality.

The next evening, April 4, Dr. King was shot as he stepped out onto the motel balcony. He was rushed to nearby St. Joseph's Hospital and pronounced dead at 7:05 pm, leaving a nation in shock and sparking mournful uprisings in more than 100 cities across the country. Just 39 years old, Dr. King left behind a wife, Coretta Scott King, and four young children. James Earl Ray, a white man, was later convicted of his assassination.

The above art-tillery is from undeceiver, Kevin Rashid Johnson

According to FUNKTIONARY:

rebel – one who lives authentically in the present, spontaneously responding to life according to the dictates of his/her inner voice and undivided intent and unrelenting will. Rebellion is unorganized, autonomous and individualistic. Wherever there is organized rebellion, it is no longer rebellion but rather revolution planned by revolutionaries—for in the very organization, the rebellion and the rebel both die. Revolution is a social phenomenon; rebellion is meditative. Lao Tzu was a rebel; Confucius and Karl Marx were not rebels. Martin Luther was purely a cunning politician fronting as a rebel, joining vested interests after creating a rift in Christianity. He was protesting the power of the Pope, not so that power should be distributed, but that he should be given the power. The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on the other hand, was a non-violent rebel. The philosophy of a rebel is always that of decentralization of power, and is the acid test of the true nature of a rebellion. A rebel is one who would rather live in hell along with those who are Alive authentically living their own reality than to be in heaven with those thinking they hold and know the truth—vicariously living. If your mama or daddy taught you well, you wouldn’t conform, assimilate, or shirk, you’d raise your frequency, change the channel and rebel. For a rebel, its space is always here, and its time is always now. To a rebel, the past is an unnecessary burden—one need not carry it. (See: Authenticity, Presence, Selt-Realization, Protestant, Pope, The Reformation, Revolution, Religion, Ideology, Ego, Mass, Class, Collective, Assimilation, Conformity & Rebellion)

"Authority-" is not a force but a farce! "Every great advancement in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority." —Aldous Huxley. Government is the hefty price we pay for our lack of being further evolved as humans. "The disappearance of a sense of responsibility is the most far-reaching consequence of submission to authority." —Stanley Milgram Regarding obedience to authority and carrying out "orders" Milgram states, "Thus there is a fragmentation of the totai human act; no one man decides to carry out the evil act and is confronted with consequences. The person who assumes full responsibility for the act has evaporated. Perhaps this is the most common characteristic of socially organized evil in modern society." At its root, government is based on violence and coercion. Without violent authority, studies show that violent behavior will all but disappear in its wake. Authority breeds the violence that it combats and perpetuates. Violence perpetrated by individuals is learned through noxious social experiences typically suffered under some assumed "authority." "The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own government." —Dr. Martin L. King. Jr.. 1967. Read "Obedience to Authority" by Stanley Milgram, and "Constitution of No Authority" by Lysander Spooner. (See: Violence, Government. Yurugu, BOG. "The Law," Hierarchy. Obedience, Duty, Defiance, Disobedience, Compliance Priests, Preachers, Citizens, States, Involuntary Taxation, Tax Invasion, Behavior, Orders, Allegiance. Internal Revenue Service, Corporate State, Anarchy. Taxtortion, Power, Experts, Doggy & Neuropeans) [MORE]

Mega-Rich Got So Much Richer During Manufactured Pandemic the English Language Didn’t Have a Word to Describe it. FUNKTIONARY Calls it "Richcraft" Thru a "Plandemic" and "Socialist Distancing"

According to FUNKTIONARY

Richcraft – the sorcery of greed—the use of violence, laws, deception, theft, secret oaths, and oppression to snatch and hoard resources from and gain power over the vast majority of people’s lives through the widespread use of this vicious concoction of nefarious, lethal, legal, and demonstrably devious power. (See: COP, Gangbanking, Privilege, Aristocracy, Corporations, Usury, Power, Oppression, Violence, Greed, Deception, GIMME!, Political Money, Cultural Induction, GEO-Dollars, Control, The Pathocracy & Poor)

Socialist distancing – the ever-expanding and increasing disparity between the haves and the have-nots until the Socialist (i.e., monopoly capitalist) Welfare State becomes the Farewell State—farewell to your rights, your family, friends and even your life through Plandemics (Coronavirus), $camdemics (Corporate State turned Surveillance and Nanny State), 5G bio-weaponized eugenics, starvation, vaccinations, civil unrest, genocide and other nefarious LWO (Last World Order) activities that will greatly reduce the world’s population by 2030. Before Social Distancing, we were experiencing the effects of “Socialist Distancing”...the ever-widening separation between the “haves” (holders) and the “have-nots” (held-back) due to “monopoly capitalism” (centralization of credit in the hands of the State) which by wide academic recognition is the core attribute of communism / socialism, in fact, it is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The litmus test to any political system is what is used as “money” and who controls (monopolizes) its “issuance.” Labels just don’t cut it. Think deeper...learn to access the underlying reality behind the truth veneer you’ve been conditioned to hold or have been told. (See: Plandemic, $camdemics, Vaccines, Coronavirus, “Monopoly Capitalism,” Exchange, Economics, Matrix Capitalism, Political Money, GEO-Dollars, The Farewell State, Trapitalism, Cultural Induction & COVERT-19)

From [CHD] The word “billionaire” didn’t even exist until 1844. Fifty years later, we got “multibillionaire.” And for the next 127 years, that was enough.

But in 2020, while the working class faced near-record unemployment during the COVIDpandemic, the wealthiest Americans faced a different problem. Some of them had gotten so rich, there was no longer a word to describe just how rich they were.

That’s why I want to bring you one of the newest additions to the English language: “centibillionaires,” people with $100 billion or more.

What’s it like being one of history’s first centibillionaires? It’s hard to even imagine, but let’s try it by comparing them to the less fortunate. By which I mean just … regular … billionaires.

If you’re a regular billionaire, you can afford a private jet. If you’re a centibillionaire, you can afford a brand-new Gulfstream jet every single day for more than 10 years. (Not sure what you’d do with a new Gulfstream every day — maybe give one to each of your closest 4,000 friends?)

A regular billionaire would struggle to buy their own professional baseball team. Sad, I know. But a centibillionaire could easily buy every team in the entire major league.

If you’re a regular billionaire, you can donate to your alma mater and get your name on a building. If you’re a centibillionaire, you could single-handedly give every teacher in America an $8,000 raise for five straight years.

Of course, that’s not all you could do. $100 billion is enough to wipe out all the medical debt in the United States. Or provide permanent shelter for every homeless person in America. Or buy COVID vaccines for the entire world.

Basically what I’m saying is, $100 billion is a lot of money.

More than two and a half million times what the average American worker makes in a year.

1 Million Copies Sold — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ — The book that launched a movement. BUY TODAY!

So here’s the big question. Are these centibillionaires so rich because they work two and a half million times harder than the average American? Are they really 100 times smarter than the typical billionaire?

I don’t think so. The reason for the rise of centibillionaires is that for decades, wealth hasn’t trickled down, it’s gushed up, all the way to the very top.

That’s not an accident. As it turns out, the system that the super-rich themselves carefully crafted and lobbied for, benefits… the rich!

And while you may not own more private jets than your average centibillionaire, you probably do pay a higher tax rate.

And thanks to legal loopholes and the Trump tax cuts, when the wealthiest Americans die, they get to pass on most of their centibillions to their kids tax-free.

We’ve got two choices as a country. We can tax the richest Americans fairly, and invest that money in ways that benefit all of us.

Or we can keep doing what we’re doing, and watch as centibillionaires get even richer while the rest of us get left behind.

If you think wealth and power are too concentrated in the hands of a privileged few now, just imagine what a few more years of trickle-down nonsense will bring.

Of course, it won’t be all bad. At least “trillionaire” is easy to say.

Pfizer Seeks Approval to Inject Infants with its Deadly COVID Gene Therapy Shots

From [HERE] Because some human beings care about their children, VAERS was established in 1990 as an early-warning system to identify negative reactions and side effects of vaccination – which makes sense.

But there a major problems. It is managed by the FDA and the CDC, which explains why the VAERS database requires a class to learn how to find anything.

Taking the time to actually file a report is voluntary and out of fear of losing their jobs or being considered an “anti-vaxxer”, nobody wants to speak ill of the all-holy vaxxine, let alone make an official report.

It is estimated that only 1% of vaccine injuries ever get reported to VAERS. So that means when VAERS reports over 44,000 adverse reactions and 90 deaths, one can expect it to be as much as 4.4 million adverse reactions and 9,000 deaths. And these numbers are only from the age 5-17 group.

Conservative numbers put it at 10%, which is half a million children that have been wounded and killed from an unneeded, unwanted experimental gene therapy shot that we were lied to about, every step of the way.

Thanks to the OpenVAERS project, which is built upon the VAERS data, the public can easily search these reports and see for themselves: people are reporting adverse reactions such as chronic pain, loss of hearing and taste, talking gibberish and acting-out aggressively. And these are the mild cases.

There is a tsunami of major brain damage, major heart disease and fatalities. Edward Dowd has analyzed the data and has reported an 84% increase in deaths among ages 25-44, which is the same amount of lives lost to the Vietnam war.

Toby Rogers estimates that Big Pharma kills twice as many people that died in World War II – every single year.

The press ignores this because it’s not enough. They want your newborn babies, as well. Pfizer is pushing to get children as young as six months old given a shot that we know is potentially fatal, even though children were never at risk and are still not at risk.

The United States has been force-injecting infants and children with experimental vaccines for years and now, they want to this infamous clotshot.

Thanks to virtue-signalling mothers, some children have already been getting it in the womb, which is resulting in miscarriages, stillbirths and deaths from breastfeeding on toxic, genetically-modified mother’s milk.

Pfizer is planning on submitting another application for Emergency Use Authorization in early April. That’s about 18 million children under 5 who could be sacrificed to the altar of Big Pharma and political correctness.

If Pfizer can achieve permanent liability protection from the FDA, who they control, then they can add the mRNA gene therapy shot to the childhood vaccine schedule, where it will enjoy permanent liability protection, under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

These same crooks are putting a judge on the Supreme Court who openly defends leniency towards crimes that involve child rape.

They’re coming for your children and they will not stop.

If you still care about the human race and are looking for something you can do right now, you can go to TobyRogers.substack.com and read his “Urgent Call to Action” for more info.