The Moron Variant Requires Morons to Inject Themselves w/Bioweapons to "Feel Safer" [OMICRON is a virus of the mind. In Reality, the COVID Vax Weakens the Immune System, may Cause Illness and Death]

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

consensus REALITY~ - a movie comprising belief, expectation and the magic of agreeing. 2) an aggrieved upon hallucination. Consensus Reality is the most malefic trickster of all. Whether you think you can or you can't, or whether you think it is or it ISN’T, you're right! (See: Maya, GranfaUoons, OWLs & Dreamland)

From [HERE] The dreadful-sounding “Omicron” variant is the latest chapter in the globalist psycho-bio-warfare attack on humanity. The “psycho” part refers to the psychological terrorism inflicted by the complicit media and its attempts to drive everyone into widespread fear. The “bio” weapon is the vaccine itself, which was engineered from the start as a depopulation bioweapon designed to cause mass fatalities over the next decade (from cancer, autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular disorders, etc.).

Notably, this new form of warfare requires no actual kinetic, real world weapons. The entire psychological terrorism campaign takes place purely in the minds of the targeted victims. They imagine the omicron variant stalking them and threatening them. They imagine pain and suffering if they don’t do what they’re told (take the vax shot).

But if they open their eyes and look at the real world right around them, there is no war. There is no omicron. There is no covid pandemic. Only those who tie their consciousness to the dishonest fake news media are even aware of the existence of a “pandemic.” Without the media fear campaign, the pandemic doesn’t exist at all. It’s just another seasonal flu.

That’s why NY Gov. Hochul declared a State of Emergency out of thin air, with not even a single “case” of omicron detected in the entire state of New York. No physical infections are needed to spread fear since this is psycho-bio-warfare, meaning it requires nothing rooted in reality.

The goal of the globalists is to dissociate you from reality, then control all your perceptions and beliefs

In order to achieve this war against your psyche, globalists have been slowly prying your consciousness away from reality, introducing layer upon layer of abstract fictions into your mental landscape. Transgenderism is one such fiction. No biological man can get pregnant and have a baby, but the globalist-run media complex has convinced at least half the population that biology isn’t real. They have dissociated the psyche from physical reality.

Importantly, they have also convinced people to disbelieve their own senses. That’s why I posted this important podcast over the weekend that urges you to trust your senses and stop believing in the spell weaving liars:

The only real virus in this pandemic is the virus of the mind

Dr. Thomas Cowan is actually correct when he says there’s no such thing as a covid-19 virus that has been isolated, purified and shown to cause disease. The covid-19 “virus” as a standalone pathogen is a work of fiction. But the virus of the mind — i.e. the pandemic of fear — is producing very real effects in the real world, such as people lining up to be injected with deadly spike protein bioweapons in the form of a so-called “vaccine.”

Yes, the deaths from the vaccine are real. The blood clots, the stillbirths (up 2900% in Canada so far), the cancer deaths, the vaccidents… it’s all real. Yet this real tragedy is born out of a fictional construct… the “pandemic of fear” that has been installed into your consciousness by the propagandists, liars, and genocidal global killers.

According to the UK Health Agency (UKHSA) The Vaccinated Accounted for 61% of all New COVID cases, 66% of all hospitalizations and 81% of all deaths in the UK

From [HERE] With the emergence of an alleged new variant that the UK Health Secretary Sajid Javid said “may evade the current vaccines”, despite also saying “that is why you should get your boosters” in the same sentence, we felt it was best to take you on a journey through three months worth of UKHSA Covid-19 data to show you why the unvaccinated population have absolutely nothing to worry about, but the vaccinated population have everything to fear. 

You’ve most likely been seeing headlines like ‘Worst Ever Covid Variant’ in the mainstream media, such as this one from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funded newspaper ‘The Guardian’. 

The mainstream media, trying to once again frighten the nation into compliance with inevitable Draconian restrictions, has failed to informed you that this alleged new variant was first discovered among four individuals, each of them fully vaccinated. 

Current trends suggest that the unvaccinated will no doubt be blamed for the emergence of this new variant, and the onslaught of propaganda designed to sway the nation into supporting a lockdown of the unvaccinated will probably now pick up pace. 

But is this justified?

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publish a weekly ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ report containing statistics on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status across England over the past four weeks. 

Their latest report, published Thursday November 25th covers data on infections, hospitalisations and deaths from Week 43 to Week 46 of 2021 (October 25th – November 21st).

The report reveals that there were 833,332 recorded Covid-19 cases, 9,094 Covid-19 hospitalisations and 3,700 Covid-19 deaths from October 25th to November 21st. Of these the unvaccinated accounted for 39% of all cases, 34% of all hospitalisations, and 19% of all deaths. Whilst the vaccinated accounted for 61% of all cases, 66% of all hospitalisations, and 81% of all deaths.

Source Data

But a more detailed look at three months worth of Covid-19 data published by the agency reveals that projections show the fully vaccinated were already in for a very rough winter prior to the alleged emergence of the “worst ever” Covid-19 variant. Infections rates are already much higher among the fully vaccinated, and the case-fatality rate is frighteningly worse than what is being seen among the unvaccinated population. 

We used the following reports for our analysis –

• COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 39 (Covers Week 35-38)

• COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 43 (Covers Week 39-42)

• COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – Week 47 (Covers Week 43-46)

Covid-19 Cases

The following chart shows the total number of cases over four week periods from August 30th to November 21st 2021 as per table 8 of the Vaccine Surveillance reports. [MORE]

"If vaccines reduced infections, how come the steepest rise in infections in Malta happened after 70% were vaccinated?" [regardless, Coincidence Theorists Continue to Follow the Science Free Medicine]

From [HERE]

According to "FUNKTIONARY:

coincidence theories - the naive belief that problems (and solutions to them) happen spontaneously, that nothing is ever foreseen, plotted, planned or conspired through collusion by the wealthy and powerful. (See: Pathocracy, Fronts, Predictive ~ng, Conspiracy Theories, Laws, Lawyers, Technetronic Age, WARS & Council on Foreign Relations)

Black Texas Democrat Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson announces retirement at end of term

From [HERE] Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (Texas) announced on Saturday that she will be retiring once she finishes her current term, becoming the latest Democrat to announce she is forgoing reelection, according to The Dallas Morning News.

Johnson, who has served in Congress for close to three decades and has broken barriers in both Texas politics and the House, said she decided against running again despite receiving support for a reelection bid. 

Johnson has marked many firsts over the course of her political career. She was the first Black woman elected to public office in Dallas, the first Black person to represent the city in the Texas state Senate since Reconstruction, the first registered nurse voted into Congress, and the first Black woman to chair the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, per the Morning News.

According to the Morning News, Johnson is one of 16 Democratic lawmakers to say so far that they will not be seeking reelection for the upcoming midterm season in 2022. 

Other Democrats who will not run again include Reps. Jackie Speier(Calif.), Mike Doyle (Pa.), David Price (N.C.) and John Yarmuth (Ky.) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).

A handful of Republicans have also announced they won't seek reelection in 2022, including Rep. Adam Kinzinger (Ill.) and Rep. Anthony Gonzalez(Ohio), who both voted to impeach former President Trump following the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

DeSantis Proposed to Make Businesses Liable for Any Harm or Death to a Worker that Results from a Mandatory Vax but Corporate Elites and Dependent Media Shut that Down, Not Part of New Florida Law

From [HERE] and [HERE] Although Florida’s governor Ron DeSantis declared war on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination he has apparently been reigned in by puppeticians indentured to elite corporations and their Dependent Media. Two weeks ago he sought a proposal making businesses liable for any medical harm that results from a mandatory vaccination, An addendum to the 2021 law protecting businesses from coronavirus-related liability undoing those protections if businesses mandate vaccination for their employees and A measure allowing parents to collect attorney’s fees if they win a lawsuit against a school district for enacting illegal coronavirus restrictions. [MORE]

However, the new Florida law has none of the above protections for people potentially harmed or killed after being forced to take a mandatory vaccine. [MORE]

Florida Statute § 381.00317 prohibits private employers from imposing a COVID-19 vaccination mandate for employees unless the private employers also permit five different individual exemptions for employees. The exemption forms created by the State of Florida are posted here.

The Florida law’s prohibition extends to “any full-time, part-time, or contract employee.” The Florida statute fails to define “employee” or “contract employee” in its text. It is presumed that a “contract employee” means an independent contractor, but the law is unclear. The Florida law also does not reference employee applicants, so at present it appears that mandating COVID-19 vaccines for applicants remains permissible.

The five individual exemptions set forth in the new Florida law are as follows:

• Medical reasons.

• Religious reasons.

• “Immunity” based on prior COVID-19 infection.

• Agreeing to be tested regularly.

• Agreeing to use personal protective equipment (PPE).

To qualify for an individual exemption, Florida employees must submit an exemption statement, which varies depending on the category of exemption sought.

• A medical exemption statement must be completed by a health care professional as defined in the law. While the Florida law does not provide detailed explanations, the form provided by the State of Florida is very bare bones and simply requires the health care professional to check a box and execute the form. The Florida law also provides that pregnancy or “anticipated pregnancy” (which, at present, does not appear to have any restriction on timing) qualifies as a medical exemption.

• A religious exemption statement must mention the employee’s sincerely held religious belief. Again, the Florida law lacks details regarding this exemption, but the form provided by the State of Florida again just requires the employee to execute a statement that mentions the employee’s sincerely held religious belief (including moral or ethical belief). The form specifically prohibits the employer from challenging the veracity of the employee’s belief.

• An immunity exemption statement must contain “medical evidence” such as laboratory test results (no time limit on the prior infection is included at present in the Florida law). The form provided by the State of Florida requests the test date, but does not put any time limitation on how old the test can be.

• A testing exemption statement must include a commitment to comply with “regular testing” (the form provided by the State of Florida indicates that testing cannot be more frequent than weekly). The required testing must be at no cost to the employee. There is no reference in the Florida law to whether the employee’s time incurred in getting tested must be compensated.

• A personal protective equipment exemption statement must include the employee’s agreement to comply with the employer’s PPE requirements when around others. Again, the Florida law does not define PPE.

The Florida law provides that existing “employer COVID-19 vaccination mandates” are “invalid until the Department of Health files its emergency rules or 15 days after the effective date of this law, whichever occurs first.” [MORE]

Immunity from COVID Vaccines? Only for its Makers: Most Sheeple are Unaware that the Federal Government has Given Immunity to Pfizer, Moderna and J&J for Any Injury or Death Caused by Vaccines

From [Injecting Freedom] Imagine that in order to keep your job, the government requires you to take a pill that only protects you, and not others, and if you are harmed by that pill, you can’t sue the company that makes and sells the pill.  Seems dystopian?  Well, it is.  But it is exactly what is occurring with Covid-19 vaccines.

The federal government has given complete immunity to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J for any injury caused by their Covid-19 vaccines.  That’s right: you cannot sue them if you are injured by their Covid-19 vaccine.  (See Note 1 to read the law yourself.)  So, while their product may not give you immunity, they are guaranteed immunity.   

And it gets even worse.  These companies are even immune for – hold your breath – willful misconduct.  That may sound crazy, but it is shockingly true.  You can only sue them for willful misconduct if the federal government first sues them for such conduct.  (See Note 2 to read the law yourself.)  And what are the odds the federal government will do so after wildly promoting the vaccine?  About as likely as the FDA ever admitting they promoted a vaccine that caused widespread harm. 

So, despite Pfizer’s history of willful misconduct, and that this is Moderna’s first product, and that they going to rake in over $100 billion selling a product millions of Americans are mandated to take, you cannot sue them for injuries.  That seems fair.  After all, we should take pity on these companies since this revenue may not be sufficient to pay for the injuries. 

What is most incredible is that we are talking about a product that does not prevent infection and transmission.  It, at best, provides personal protection.  So, you cannot say “no” to the product without losing your job, cannot sue if you are injured, cannot see the data underlying its licensure, all while it can only potentially protect … you!  What?!  

It is indeed dystopian to fire someone from their job for refusing to receive an injection that is only for that person’s “benefit.”  Let me repeat.  The government cares about you so much that in order to get you to take your medicine that will only help you, it is going to make sure you cannot earn a living until you roll up your sleeve like an obedient child and take the jab.  But don’t worry, it is so safe that the government did you the favor of making sure you cannot sue the companies that sell this medicine, even for willful misconduct.

If this form of authoritarianism is permitted to stand, there is no limit to what the government can mandate you to do in the name of public health.  If a Covid-19 vaccine can be mandated, then there is no reason the government cannot mandate every drug a doctor believes you should receive for your own good.  Why not? 

The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure.  Never.  It is the last and final backstop to the dangerous authoritarianism that results when we permit the government to decide what must be injected or placed into or onto our bodies.   Whatever your views are on the Covid-19 vaccine itself, every American should reject letting the government decide what medical procedures they must engage in to have a job. 

Note 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d the federal government “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19” provides that “manufacturers” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].”

Note 2.  Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(c)(5) “If an act or omission by a manufacturer or distributor with respect to a covered countermeasure, which act or omission is alleged under subsection (e)(3)(A) to constitute willful misconduct, … such act or omission shall not constitute ‘willful misconduct’ … if—(i)neither the Secretary nor the Attorney General has initiated an enforcement action with respect to such act or omission; or (ii)such an enforcement action has been initiated and the action has been terminated or finally resolved without a covered remedy.”

In a Suit Seeking Info Relied Upon by the FDA to License the Pfizer Vax, Released Docs Reveal 42,086 Injury Reports Containing 158,893 Adverse Events, disproportionately Affecting Women

From [HERE] Two months and one day after it was sued, and close to 3 months since it licensed Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, the FDA released the first round of documents it reviewed before licensing this product.  The production consisted of 91 pdf pages, one xpt file, and one txt file. You can download them here.

While it is for the scientists to properly analyze, let me share one observation.  One of the documents produced is a Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of [the Vaccine] Received Through 28-Feb-2021, which is a mere 2 ½ months after the vaccine received emergency use authorization (EUA).  This document reflects adverse events following vaccination that have completed Pfizer’s “workflow cycle,” both in and outside the U.S., up to February 28, 2021.

Pfizer explains, on page 6, that “Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, [Pfizer] has prioritised the processing of serious cases…” and that Pfizer “has also taken a [sic] multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports” including “increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues” and “has onboarded approximately [REDACTED] additional fulltime employees (FTEs).”  Query why it is proprietary to share how many people Pfizer had to hire to track all of the adverse events being reported shortly after launching its product. 

As for the volume of reports, in the 2 ½ months following EUA, Pfizer received a total of 42,086 reports containing 158,893 “events.”  Most of these reports were from the U.S. and disproportionately involved women (29,914 vs. 9,182 provided by men) and those between 31 and 50 years old (13,886 vs 21,325 for all other age groups combined, with another 6,876 whose ages were unknown).  Also, 25,957 of the events were classified as “Nervous system disorders”

Females between the ages of 30 and 51. Nervous system disorders. That sounds familiar.  As a matter of fact, that sounds similar to the concerns raised by some of the women testifying or described in the videos below.

But no cause for alarm since Pfizer explains to the FDA: “The findings of these signal detection analyses are consistent with the known safety profile of the vaccine.”  So if they knew these issues were going to arise, then why didn’t they appear to have enough staff to process this expected volume of reports?  The grand conclusion by Pfizer to the FDA: “The data do not reveal any novel safety concerns or risks requiring label changes and support a favorable benefit risk profile of to the BNT162b2 vaccine.” 

Nothing to see here.  Just ask all those women.

Kellai Rodriguez, mother, reliant on walker following vaccination. [MORE]

Renowned Cardiologist Dr. Steven Gundry Warns that Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines ‘Dramatically Increase’ Heart Attack Risk

From [CHD] The COVID-19 Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines “dramatically increase” a common measure of heart risk in people.

That’s according to a recently published “warning” in the journal Circulation by cardiologist Dr. Steven Gundry, who is called a pioneer in infant heart transplant surgery.

The analysis was presented at the recent meeting of the American Heart Association.

The “dramatic changes in most patients” mean they are at higher risk of a new acute coronary syndrome, such as a heart attack, according to Gundry.

In part, the analysis states:

“We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

Gundry explained:

“Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.”

Thousands of heart-related injuries have been reported following COVID mRNA vaccines. These injuries lead to the formation and progression of cardiac lesions which may become unstable and rupture, leading to cardiac events.

The PULS (Protein Unstable Lesion Signature) test measures the most clinically significant protein biomarkers that leak from cardiac lesions in the blood vessel walls, providing a measure of the body’s immune system response to arterial injury.

Scientists have already established a myriad of heart- and blood-related effects of COVID-19 vaccines in some patients, including young people. Among the adverse events linked to the vaccines are thrombosis blood clots and heart inflammation known as myocarditis and pericarditis.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration say the vaccines are safe and effective for everyone they are recommended for, and that the benefits outweigh the known risks, which will be emerging for some years as more people get vaccinated.

Supreme Court to consider whether North Carolina Republicans may intervene in NAACP's Voter ID case

From [HERE] The US Supreme Court granted certiorari Wednesday to consider whether North Carolina Republican legislators can intervene in a case to defend the state’s voter ID law.

Philip Berger, a state senator from North Carolina, along with a group of fellow Republican state legislators, petitioned the Supreme Court to consider whether they may intervene in, or join as a party, a case where the North Carolina State Conference for the NAACP (NC NAACP) sued the state over a controversial voter ID law. The law, Senate Bill 827, requires all North Carolina voters to provide identification before voting.

In its original suit, the NC NAACP argued that the new voter ID requirement discriminated against Black and Latinx voters. According to the NC NAACP, after it filed suit, North Carolina President Pro Tempore Philip Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore moved to intervene in the case. After a US District Judge in the Middle District of North Carolina denied the Republicans’ motion, they once again moved to intervene. Their motion for intervention was denied a second time.

The legislators then appealed their issue to the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. At first, a divided panel reversed the district court’s decision to prevent the Republican lawmakers from joining in the case. However, following a rehearing, the full court affirmed the district court’s decision by a 9-6 vote. The court there concluded that the North Carolina Attorney General was “already representing the state’s interest,” and there was no need for the lawmakers to “also [] speak for the State.”

In the lawmakers’ brief to the Supreme Court, they argue that the circuit courts are split over “whether a state-designated agent must overcome a presumption of adequate representation when seeking to intervene alongside another state official.” They suggest that requiring state officials who want to intervene in cases like this one need not overcome a presumption of adequate representation by other state officials because to say so would be inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supreme Court precedent and “proper respect for State’s sovereign authority.”

The Supreme Court is set to hear the case during its 2021-2022 term.

The Victims in Waukesha Might be Real but “Darrell Brooks" Looks Like Police or AFRO-INTELPRO: Studio Photo, Lack of Incident Video and a Story Told in Accord w/the Appetite of the Neuropeon Believer

DIVIDE & CONQUER [What is Belief and Do You Suffer From it?] Due to the contrived nature of the evidence and weird timing of the incident, Waukesha feels synthetic and should be suspected as a false flag operation conducted by the government until proven otherwise. If Crimethinc would create fake vaccines for the purpose of genthanasia and biocide then surely It would have no problem executing 6 white people at a X-Mas parade.

During the week of Thanksgiving and after the conclusion of multiple race related criminal trials involving white male defendants, we are now presented with Mr. “Darrel Brooks” and his conduct in a 90% white city of Waukesha. Observe the common name and generic look in which he can be easily confused with many other middle-aged light skinned Black males with long dreadlocks covering much of his head and a beard concealing much of his face. Dood looks like police, a snitch [SNAG], a ho or an actor. According to FUNKTIONARY:

AFRO-INTELPRO - an FBI created, CIA and NSA backed, black-on-black infiltration and snitch network. AFRO is the acronym for Africans For Revolution Only. The intelligence operatives infiltrate revolutionary organizations to disrupt and foment confusion, terror and distrust within the ranks of those organizations not unlike COINTELPRO. (See: SNigger)

SNAG - $nitch-ass Negroes Aiding Governments. 2) COINTEL-BROs. 3) Smile Negro And Grin—while I put it in. SNAGs are coin-operated piece-activist sniggering infiltraitors from the native Black American community. . .SNAG's are responsible for facilitating agents of various "government intelligence" operations in successfully accomplishing the "wet jobs" (assassinations) and downfall of some of our most cherished leaders, luminary thinkers, uncompromising revolutionaries and lovers of justice for all humanity. SNAGs come in all shapes, colors, sizes and forms within the Black American community but they all share one common thread—self-hatred. Some of the less known but high-exposure SNAGs were Alex Haley (who covertly worked his roots on Malcolm X), Ernest Withers (civil rights photographer and FBI informant), and Justice Thurgood Marshall (also snitching and informing on the Right-Reverend Martin L. King, Jr.), not to mention another "Reverend" from Memphis, TN who was involved (along with Jesse Jackson) in the orchestration of King's assassination. SNAGs have also been known to be complicit in both successful and botched assassination schemes plotted and executed by the shadowy characters within and behind the veil of the Corporate State and its wet-works black operations spy agencies. [MORE]

Although the incident happened less than a week ago the dependent media has already supplied us a ready made bio containing info (faster than court pre-trial services and PO’s) about his childhood upbringing (not dissimilar to the readily found unauthenticated manifestos or diaries found in other false flag episodes), how his ex-girlfriend feels and a slick headshot photo (like ISIS press releases). The media has stated he is a rapist, depicted him as a serial criminal who is unreformable (because Blacks are inherently criminal) [MORE] and said he is a welfare recipient. We are told he is an auto-coon rapper (an unsigned artist of course and “promoted” on a YouTube channel formed over the past few days by another cop, SNAG or actress. Waukesha is 3% Black by the way) who raps about committing his crimes (snitching on yourself is not gangster) and he showcased the same Ford Escape he used as a weapon as a prop in a music video (an auto-coon rapper with a Ford Escape? Police issued. Reminds BW a little of the “Black rapper” from SD found on the battlefield in Syria who was fighting for ISIS, confirmed of course by tweets). The media explained he hates Trump and based on the generic profile he probably loves fried chicken, watermelon, collards, white woman, rims, cereal etc. Also, only after days the incident, the government concluded he intentionally ran people over – probably based on an upcoming custodial confession video or a rap diary perhaps. Like other false flags, less than 7 days after the incident we have an open and shut case - no need for a trial. All this leads the believer to believe that he ran people over because they were white. Like other false flags, Brooks’ alleged “intentional murder planning” is undermined by having no getaway plan, which we deduce due to the existence of a silly pre-arrest video from “a neighbor” – apparently “Darrel Brooks” planned to run people over during a holiday parade, crash the car, flee on foot and then catch an Uber to escape.

What’s missing is video evidence of the actual incident – although there were hundreds of people present with their cell phones recording the parade, there appear to be only a few videos [HERE] and [HERE] of the incident online – that is not normal.

Uncle Brother’s purpose here would be primarily to distract us and secondarily to make white people hate and fear Black people more than they already do. And so far its working - deluded white folks on Infowars, for instance, actually believe there is a competing system of Black supremacy somewhere on the planet. That is, there are powerful Black institutions or Black systems that might support or defend “Darrel Brooks” right to kill white people in accord with millions of Black individuals using their collective Black power (in banks, corporations, governments, media, hospitals, universities, think tanks, courts, police stations, juries etc) to control the lives of white people in all areas of people activity. This is maya and really stupid (meaning unaware). [MORE]

Waukesha appears to be another story told by the dependent media in accordance with the appetite of the believer. Specifically, the appetite of the Neuropeon and Neuropean believer. As explained by Dr. Amos Wilson, “In the context of White American domination there is no innocent Black male, just Black male criminals who have not yet been detected, apprehended or convicted. Their mere presence inspires in White Americans, fears of being assaulted, raped, robbed, or some other indefinable dread of being criminally victimized. Fantasies of the sexual molestation of White females by rapacious Black males are common to the White American male and female consciousness, and are frequent themes of their literary, cinematic, and pornographic productions.”

Despite the facts that 1) nearly 99% of crimes committed against whites are committed by whites and 2) white people are totally unaffected by most street crime involving Black people, the dependent media nevertheless projects white people as the most frequent victims of street crime. As explained by Wilson, the myth of black violence serves important roles in justifying and rationalizing white supremacy and in supporting the white american ego and personality (fabrications). Thus, if Waukesha is a false flag, it is another easily believable delusion in conformance with Neuropeon and Neuropean beliefs and ego.

So far, this episode reminds BW most of the Charleston Hoax with Dylann Roof - a tale of a young racist filled with hatred for Blacks who spent months planning to murder black people in a church in South Carolina. The Dylann Roof incident presented Black people with a fear based narrative that was easy to perceive; racist-klan-nazi whites are around every corner, getting ready to murder Blacks at anytime. Said narrative concealed the reality that being a racist/white supremacist has little to do with membership in KKK, nazis or another clownish organization. There are different ways in which racists practice racism and while some racists may hate Black people, other racists may not have any hate towards Blacks but nevertheless seek to dominate them because the gravamen of racism white supremacy is master-servant relations not hate. Like the Roof case, perhaps we will also get a fake “trial” in which not a single objection is raised to statements and unautheticated evidence.

Red Silver J, an undeceiver apparently skilled in the area of reality discernment, posted some excellent material on the Charleston Hoax - naturally elites at YouTube censored all of it. BW has posed one of the videos below.

The great rebel, Buddha said: "All beliefs are dangerous. You should not believe, you should see.”

Osho Rajineesh stated, "a mind filled with belief always goes on projecting things in the world, it sees things which are not there. This is the problem. The mind which believes is always vulnerable and always provides an opportunity to be exploited by the cheaters - and the cheaters are all around." According to FUNKTIONARY:

Hoax - a mirage that appears as believable, popular (and marketable) as Jesus, as tempting as sin, and as captivating as a sweet taboo---without its consequences and side-effects too. The illusion of truth seems real--the "reality" of the reel (the Passing Show)--the surreal. The two most pervasive hoaxes we put over on ourselves is ego and money--neither have any existence. (See: Passing Show, Mirage, Rolling Mirror, Objectivity, Ego, Money, Utopia, Kansas & Alice in Wonderland)

belief-based truth - a description or perception of reality, (the content of which comprises what we call "truth"), that one desires or hopes to be true, despite external scientific, natural, or reproducible proof-based truth to the contrary. People all-too-often compromise their integrity and/or intelligence by devising truth which disallows any proof by design, as part and parcel of its ruse to allure its believers)—and even the truth that carries proof cannot be proven against the undeniable uncertainty of Reality. You fall prey to (or fall for) the illusions of proof if you ignore the pure subjectivity of reality. Illusions of scientific proof follow illusions of limits, and illusions of religious proof follow illusions of truth. Science makes truth out of proof, while belief-based religions make proof out of truth. (See: Infinity, Proof, Revelatory Truth, Absolute Truth & Belief System)

belief exams - self-administered tests of one's assumptions (cherished beliefs); testing one's beliefs. The only way to recognize the limits under which you have been living is to test them. If you do not test your beliefs they will become your warden an; you their hostage.   Unquestioned beliefs own you. If you don't confront your beliefs they will only comfort you in you: imprisonment to them. (See: O.D., Belief Systems, Belief Pushers, Guilt, ludgment, Fear, Sin, Fate & Convictions) [MORE]

Belief- the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. 2) a construction of approximate truths, absolute truths, mass truths and primary myths, based on genetic predisposition, and environmental and socio-psychological conditioning. 3) the institutionalization of the unknowable, i.e., a conviction that is not necessarily based upon any empirical, direct-mind or experiential knowledge. 4) a non-physical surviving thought-form. 5) any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought. 6) an intellectual
rationalization surrounded by (based on) "'proofs," reasons and arguments. 7) that which springs out of cultural ideology. 8) the greatest fiction. 9) a trick of the mind to repress doubt. 10) a mental doubt-suppression tactic. A suppressed doubt is neither faith nor even trust. 11) repressed doubt. 12) an explicit or implicit assent to dogmatic propositions (with or without overgrown religious foliage) on someone else's authority. 13) reverential blindness that thwarts fresh perception and intuitive apperception. 14) a prejudice without any experience to support it. 15) a peculiar blend of fatiloquent assertion on one hand and adamant
denial on the other. 16) a manic flirtation with the terminally unprovable. 17) certainty based in the unknown. 18) having another "see" it for you while seeing him see it (for you)—in effect being for another. 19) a conclusion without the verification of direct experience—make-believe made real. 20) the inability or unwillingness to master the requisite logic or reason to counterbalance (or overcome) the willingness to be misled. [MORE]

Black Prosecutor Drops Charges Against White Cop who Shot a Black Woman in the Back After a Successful Mediation Session [White Supremacy is Maintained thru Cooperative Master-Servant Relations]

FUCK RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY AND FUCK THE POLICE.

From [HERE] A white suburban St. Louis police officer who shot a Black woman suspected of shoplifting will have assault charges against her dropped, a decision reached Monday after the victim and the ex-officer participated in a mediation session together, the Associated Press reported.

Julia Crews, 39, shot Ashley Fountain Hall on April 23, 2019, after Hall was accused of stealing from a local grocery store in Ladue, Missouri. Hall and another woman were accused of taking a grocery cart full of steaks and seafood without paying and assaulting a grocery worker. The store workers followed the women outside and kept them in the parking lot until police arrived.

Crews arrived at the scene and said she intended to deploy her taser to restrain Hall but mistakenly pulled out her service firearm instead, and shot Hall in the back. Crews resigned after the shooting incident.

Hall asked for the dismissal of charges against Crews after the process known as restorative justice mediation that took place on November 5.

"This was a unique opportunity where the defendant immediately realized she had made a terrible mistake in shooting the victim, and both the defendant and victim reached places where they could see a resolution for this incident outside of the criminal justice process," Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell said in a news release.

Bell's office said Crews and Hall agreed to participate in restorative justice mediation conducted through a videoconference. In the restorative justice process, the victim and the offender work together toward a resolution, typically with the help of a facilitator.

In this case, the volunteer facilitator was Seema Gajwani, chief of the Restorative Justice Program for District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine. Bell and Lisa Jones, his office's manager of victim services, also participated.

Last year, the city of Ladue agreed to pay $2 million to settle Hall's lawsuit. The suit said Hall tried to break away from police in fear prompted by the history of Black people who aren't armed "being shot by white officers." The city admitted no wrongdoing in the confidential settlement.

Latino Newark Cop Hit a White Man w/His Car, Then Took the Body Home, Prosecutors Say

From [HERE] A Newark police officer was charged with reckless vehicular homicide, prosecutors said on Wednesday, accusing the man of hitting a pedestrian with his personal car and briefly taking the body home, where he discussed with his mother what to do with it.

The officer, Louis Santiago of the Newark Police Department, was off duty when his Honda Accord drifted into the northbound shoulder of the Garden State Parkway around 3 a.m. on Nov. 1, the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office said in a news release issued on Wednesday. His car struck Damian Z. Dymka, 29, a nurse from Bergen County.

Neither Mr. Santiago nor the passenger in his car, Albert Guzman, both 25, called 911 or rendered aid to Mr. Dymka, the prosecutor’s office said. Instead, Mr. Santiago drove away and returned to the scene multiple times before loading the victim into the Honda and driving to the home he shared with his parents in Bloomfield, N.J. The two men then discussed what to do with the body with Mr. Santiago’s mother, Annette Santiago, 53, according to prosecutors.

“There is an allegation that he went to his house and talked to his mother, but we cannot comment on that because we have seen no evidence of that to date,” a lawyer for Mr. Santiago, Patrick P. Toscano Jr., said in an interview on Thursday.

The prosecutor’s office said Mr. Santiago eventually returned to the scene. Mr. Santiago’s father, Lt. Luis Santiago of the Newark Police Department, called 911 at some point to report that his son had been in an accident.

When the state police arrived, they found Mr. Dymka’s body in the Honda’s back seat. He was pronounced dead at the scene around 4 a.m., said Katherine Carter, a spokeswoman for the prosecutor’s office, adding that he had died of blunt force trauma.

Mr. Santiago was charged on Nov. 18, surrendered to the State Police on Tuesday and was arraigned the next day, according to Mr. Toscano. He said that Mr. Santiago had cooperated with the State Police.

In addition to vehicular homicide, Mr. Santiago faces charges including leaving the scene of a deadly accident, endangering an injured victim and two counts of official misconduct.

“We believe he has been tremendously overcharged here,” Mr. Toscano said. “There is maybe probable cause for two or three charges, certainly not 12 or 13.”

The Newark Police Department suspended Mr. Santiago, his lawyer said.

Mr. Toscano said that, in the early hours of Nov. 1, Mr. Santiago had recently finished a shift and was driving to a friend’s home. Mr. Toscano said Mr. Dymka had been walking against traffic in a werewolf costume, adding that it was not clear why he was walking along the highway.

That day, the State Police took a blood sample from Mr. Santiago and released him, Mr. Toscano said, adding that he had not seen any evidence that his client had been drinking before the crash.

The Newark Police Department on Thursday referred questions to the prosecutor’s office, which directed further questions to the State Police. A spokesman for the State Police did not immediately respond to questions about what took place in the weeks after Mr. Dymka died and before charges were filed.

Mr. Guzman and Ms. Santiago were also arrested, charged and released on conditions, the prosecutor’s office said.

They each face charges including hindering apprehension and conspiracy to desecrate human remains and tamper with physical evidence.

Mr. Guzman’s lawyer, Dennis Carletta, did not respond to emails or phone calls on Thursday. Mr. Santiago’s mother does not yet have a lawyer, Mr. Toscano said.

Henry Montgomery, a 75 Year old Black Man, Released After 57 Years in Prison for Crime Committed when he was 17

From [EJI] Last Wednesday, Henry Montgomery, now 75, was released after nearly six decades in a Louisiana prison for a crime that happened when he was a 17-year-old child.

In 1963, when Mr. Montgomery was a child, he was accused of shooting a white East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s deputy just two weeks after his 17th birthday. More than 60 Black men were arrested in the wake of the shooting, and cross burnings were reported in the days leading up to trial. Henry was tried and convicted for the murder. He automatically received the death penalty.

The Louisiana Supreme Court overturned his conviction and sentence in 1966, finding that the atmosphere around the trial had prejudiced him and prevented a fair trial. Henry was retried in 1969 and received a mandatory life-without-parole sentence.

As a teenager entering Louisiana’s notoriously violent and abusive Angola prison, Henry originally struggled to adjust, but even with no hope of release, he became a coach and trainer for a boxing team he helped establish, worked in the prison’s silkscreen department, and matured into a positive role model and counselor for other incarcerated men.

In 2012, the Supreme Court held in Miller v. Alabama that mandatory life-without-parole sentences imposed on children are unconstitutional. Mr. Montgomery filed a motion to challenge his sentence under Miller, but unlike most states, the Louisiana courts refused to apply the decision to cases that had completed the direct appeal process.

Mr. Montgomery appealed, and in 2016, the Supreme Court decided in his case that all states were required to retroactively apply the ban on mandatory death-in-prison sentences for children that the Court announced in Miller.

The Court in Montgomery v. Louisiana underscored that life-without-parole is unconstitutional for all “juvenile offenders whose crimes reflect the transient immaturity of youth” and, as a result, “it will be the rare juvenile offender who can receive [that] sentence.”

The decision required states to provide people who were children at the time of the offense a meaningful opportunity for release based on demonstrated rehabilitation and maturity.

Regardless of when their sentences were issued, the Court held that a chance for release must be given “to those who demonstrate the truth of Miller‘s central intuition—that children who commit even heinous crimes are capable of change.”

Henry Montgomery was resentenced to life with the opportunity for parole after the Court’s decision, but the parole board denied him release in 2018 and 2019.

Last week, though, the Board of Pardons and Committee on Parole voted unanimously for his release.

Today, 31 states and the District of Columbia either ban life-without-parole sentences for children or have no one serving the sentence.

Kevin Strickland Exonerated after 43 years in Prison. White Prosecutors Used All White Jury to Wrongly Convict Black Man. Racist Authorities in Missouri Deny Any Compensation

From [HERE] For the first time in more than four decades in prison, Kevin Strickland allowed himself to make a wish list of all the things he would do if he were to be exonerated for a triple murder he has long said he did not commit.

A judge on Tuesday exonerated him after more than 43 years in prison, making his case the longest confirmed wrongful-conviction case in Missouri’s history — and one of the longest-standing such convictions in the nation’s history. He was released shortly after the judge issued his decision.

Strickland was convicted of the 1978 murders of Sherrie Black, 22, Larry Ingram, 21, and John Walker, 20, even though no physical evidence linked him to the crime scene, family members provided alibis and the admitted killers said he was not there. The case was built on the testimony of Cynthia Douglas, the sole survivor and eyewitness, who later attempted multiple times to recant her testimony because she said she was pressured by police.

“Under these unique circumstances, the Court’s confidence in Strickland’s conviction is so undermined that it cannot stand, and the judgment of conviction must be set aside,” Judge James Welsh wrote Tuesday. “The State of Missouri shall immediately discharge Kevin Bernard Strickland from its custody.”

Tricia Rojo Bushnell, his attorney and executive director of the Midwest Innocence Project, said Strickland’s case was “a great example of how much a system cares about finality over fairness.”

He is not eligible for any compensation from the state for the 43 years he spent behind bars — one of the longest-standing wrongful convictions in the nation’s history.

That hasn’t stopped his supporters from stepping in instead, raising more than $1 million through a GoFundMe campaign to help him start a new life. [MORE]

While legal experts and elected officials in both parties supported Strickland’s case for exoneration, top Republicans in Missouri pushed back. Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt (R), who is running for the U.S. Senate in 2022, said he believed Strickland committed the murders. Andrew Clarke, an assistant attorney general, argued that Strickland not only received a fair trial in 1979 but has “worked to evade responsibility” for decades.

Gov. Mike Parson (R) agreed with them, saying before Strickland was exonerated that pardoning him would not be a “priority.” Not long afterward, he pardoned Mark and Patricia McCloskey — a White couple who gained national notoriety for brandishing guns at peaceful social-justice protesters in St. Louis last year and pleaded guilty to firearms charges.

Spokesmen for Parson and Schmitt did not make them available for interviews.

Four Black men were accused of rape in Jim Crow Florida. 72 years later, they’ve been exonerated.

Days before finding out he would be exonerated, Strickland spoke to The Post about his life and his chance at exoneration. Even with the groundswell of support, he said, decades of imprisonment left Strickland “pessimistic” about whether he would be released.

“I mean, I’m hoping for the best,” he said, “but I’m anticipating the worst.” [MORE]

Walgreens, Walmart and CVS Pharmacies Contributed to Opioid Epidemic, Ohio Jury Finds

A federal jury in Cleveland on Tuesday found that the companies owning CVS, Walgreens and Walmart pharmacies were liable for contributing to the opioid epidemic in two Ohio counties—the first, potentially influential verdict among many lawsuits targeting pharmacy chains.

In the suit, attorneys for Lake and Trumbull counties in northeastern Ohio had argued that the chains failed to stop pain pills from flooding the counties and false prescriptions from being filled. The counties argued that by enabling the opioid crisis the pharmacy companies had created a public nuisance costing them each about $1 billion in law-enforcement, social-services and court expenses.

The companies argued that they had tried to stop pills from being illegally diverted and followed procedures required by federal and state regulators. They said that others were to blame in the crisis and that the counties had failed to show that the pharmacies played a major role in the epidemic.

The verdict, delivered after a six-week trial, came in a so-called bellwether case that attorneys elsewhere have watched closely. Similar cases across the country continue to play out against pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors, but Tuesday’s verdict was the first against deep-pocketed pharmacy chains.

Bellwether cases typically don’t carry precedential weight, but lawyers on similar cases across the country often use them as guideposts for settlement talks.

Although judges in opioid cases in Oklahoma and California recently issued judgments against plaintiffs’ public-nuisance claims in cases involving drugmakers, some legal experts said it was difficult to say whether the Ohio case could meet a similar fate on appeal. Public-nuisance laws vary by state, adding to the possibility of different results in different jurisdictions.

“The public-nuisance theory in general is pretty novel and untested as it applies to the sale of controlled substances,” said Elizabeth Burch, a University of Georgia law professor. “We’re so early in the overall distribution that we don’t know whether these are outliers or trendsetters.”

Lawyers for the plaintiffs hailed Tuesday’s verdict.

“For decades, pharmacy chains have watched as the pills flowing out of their doors cause harm and failed to take action as required by law,” they said in a joint statement. “Instead, these companies responded by opening up more locations, flooding communities with pills, and facilitating the flow of opioids into an illegal, secondary market.”

All three companies said they planned to appeal the verdict, arguing that Ohio’s public-nuisance law had been applied incorrectly in the case. [MORE]

University System of Georgia to keep names on buildings with ties to slavery and white supremacy

The University System of Georgia’s governing board on Monday rejected the recommendation of an advisory group to rename 75 buildings and colleges on campuses across the state that honor individuals who supported slavery, racial segregation and other forms of oppression.

Among the buildings at issue are more than two dozen at the flagship University of Georgia. Aderhold Hall, according to the advisory group’s report, is named for a 20th-century president of the university, Omer Clyde “O.C.” Aderhold, who was a “committed segregationist.”

Also on the Athens campus, according to the report, are Lipscomb Hall, named for Andrew Adgate Lipscomb, a university chancellor in the 19th century who was an enslaver and author of an anti-immigrant tract, and Candler Hall, named for Allen Daniel Candler, a Confederate Army veteran who later became governor of Georgia and advocated for segregation and disenfranchisement of African Americans. [MORE]

Suits Filed by NAACP say Alabama's new Congressional Redistricting plan will dilute the voting power of Black citizens by packing many of them into 1 district and breaking up other Black communities

The Alabama branch of the NAACP filed a pair of lawsuits challenging the state’s new congressional redistricting plan, arguing it will dilute the voting power of Black citizens by packing many of them into one district and breaking up other Black communities.

Click here and here to read the two complaints.

Jury Convicts Three Racists for Ahmaud Arbery’s Murder

From [EJI] Today, a jury convicted three white men of murder and other related charges for killing Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man. Mr. Arbery, a former high school football star, had been out jogging when three white men in two vehicles chased him down, stopped and confronted him, and, after a struggle, shot Mr. Arbery three times.

The case attracted international attention because of the legal system’s longstanding failure to hold accountable those who perpetrate racially motivated violence against Black victims. In this case, local prosecutors and police initially refused to even arrest, let alone prosecute, the three men responsible for Mr. Arbery’s murder. Local activism and video of the tragedy prompted the appointment of a special prosecutor and the ensuing trial and conviction.

Across the country, there is extreme underrepresentation of Black and brown people on juries and in the role of judges and prosecutors. The lack of diversity is compounded by an illegal but pervasive presumption of dangerousness and guilt which gets assigned to Black people. A long history of racial injustice, racial hierarchy and white supremacy has fostered conditions that make accountability much more difficult than it should be.

During slavery, violence against Black people to ensure subjugation and reinforce the myth of racial hierarchy was endemic. Enslavement could not be sustained without a false narrative that Black people were less human and less deserving of freedom to justify this violence. This narrative incorporated the belief that Black people were inherently dangerous and criminal.

After the Civil War, this belief spurred the lynching of thousands of Black women, men, and children, which often followed spurious accusations of criminal wrongdoing. A Black named Ben Daniels and his two sons, for example, were murdered in 1879 by a white mob after attempting to pay for goods with a fifty dollar bill, which they were accused of stealing simply because of its large denomination. Often, authorities, including law enforcement officers and elected officials, were directly involved or complicit in such racial terror lynchings, and there was no accountability for the perpetrators.

Even when perpetrators of racial violence were prosecuted, which was incredibly rare, the prosecutions were pro forma and particularly Southern juries, composed by law entirely of white men until civil rights reforms of the 1960s and 1970s, refused to convict. The two men who killed Emmett Till in 1955 were prosecuted, though the prosecutor agreed Mr. Till deserved punishment for acting “familiar” with a white woman, but acquitted by the all white male jury despite testimony from several Black witnesses establishing their guilt. The jury deliberated for 67 minutes, but as one juror later said: “We wouldn’t have taken so long if we hadn’t stopped to drink pop.” In the modern era, perpetrators of racial violence have found a similar lack of accountability, as seen in the acquittals of those who killed Trayvon Martin, Tarika Wilson, Amadou Diallo, and Eleanor Bumpurs.

The presumption of guilt and dangerousness used to justify violence against Black people and the lack of accountability for those who perpetrate such violence has lead to and long supported the sense of entitlement on display in the killing of Mr. Arbery. Three white men, seeing a Black man jogging down the road, assume without evidence that he is the perpetrator of nearby thefts days earlier, chase him, stop and confront him, and kill him. Indeed, their sense of entitlement was for a time perfectly vindicated as the local prosecutor declined to prosecute. It was only after video of the killing emerged causing a national outcry and a new prosecutor took over that the three white men were arrested and charged.

The trial judge in the Arbery case allowed the trial to move forward even as he found, “There appears to be potential discrimination in the panel.” The guilty verdict in this case is rare and atypical which says a lot about the work that remains to address racial injustice in America even as many express relief and gratitude that this is not another instance of no accountability for unjustified, lethal violence directed at a Black person because of their race.