Study says Police Killed 1,066 People in 2020 and Blacks are 3X More Likely than Whites to be Slain [as Long as Cops Wield Absolute, Uncontrollable Power Over Us said Numbers should Remain Static]

From [HERE] and [MORE] American law enforcement officers have killed well over 1,000 people in 2020. Between January 1 and December 15 of this year, the Mapping Police Violence project has recorded 1,066 people nationwide killed at the hands of the police, an average of around three killings per day. Despite the fact that 2020 has brought with it a pandemic forcing Americans to stay off the streets (and, presumably, out of trouble) as much as possible, there have only been 17 days recorded this year where the police did not kill someone.

The project also compiled statistics on the racial backgrounds of the victims. Black people are three times more likely than white people to be slain by police, and more likely to be unarmed when it does happen. Eight of the 100 largest city police departments kill black men at a higher clip than the U.S. murder rate. Those eight are Reno, NV, Oklahoma City, Santa Ana, CA, Anaheim, CA, St Louis, MO, Scottsdale, AZ, Hialeah (Miami), FL, and Madison, WI. “Death by cop” is a leading cause of death for black males in the U.S., killing around one in 1,000.

U.S. police violence is off the charts in comparison to other developed countries, with homicides occurring at a per capita rate almost 70 times that of the United Kingdom, or nearly 170 times more than Japan. This puts it closer to many Latin American nations, notorious for their corrupt and militarized police departments’ heavy-handed response to drug smuggling and organized crime. [MORE]

In Court Filings the DOJ Argued the US Government Has the Authority to Kill its Own Citizens Without Judicial Review if Litigation Would Reveal State Secrets

From [HERE] A U.S. Department of Justice lawyer argued last month that the United States can kill its own citizens without judicial review when litigation would reveal state secrets.

The argument drew alarm among judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Courthouse News Servicereports.

Judge Patricia Millett characterized the DOJ’s argument as giving the government the ability to “unilaterally decide to kill U.S. citizens,” according to coverage of the argument by Courthouse News Service. “Do you appreciate how extraordinary that proposition is?”

The government’s brief in the case supplies details of the lawsuit. The plaintiff, Bilal Abdul Kareem, is a U.S. citizen who works as a journalist in Syria for the “On the Ground Network” news channel, which provides access to the views of rebel fighters. The militants are linked to al-Qaida, according to Courthouse Service.

Kareem alleges that he was narrowly missed by five military strikes that he thinks were carried out by the U.S. military as a result of his inclusion on a kill list. He suggests that he was put on the list because of metadata from electronic devices, and he doesn’t meet the guidelines for inclusion.

The government sought to dismiss the case, invoking the state secrets privilege because Kareem sought discovery on whether he had been targeted, the process the government used to target him, and whether the United States had attempted to kill him. A federal judge agreed with the government.

In its appellate brief, the government argued that Kareem lacked standing because he makes an unsupported assertion about being targeted in a war zone. Even if he had standing, the government argued, the state secrets privilege forecloses litigation of his claim.

DOJ lawyer Bradley Hinshelwood acknowledged during the hearing that a strike against U.S. citizen is a serious undertaking. He said the courts have a role in deciding whether the state secrets privilege is appropriately applied, according to Courthouse News Service.

But Kareem’s lawyer, Tara Jordan Plochocki, argued that the federal government was seeking to expand sovereignty allowed under the state secrets privilege.

“Whether that’s in a parking lot in the United States or abroad in Syria, the government has claimed—for the first time ever in this case—that it has unfettered and unreviewable discretion to kill US citizens at will,” Plochocki said.

Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Right to Resist Unlawful Arrest and Rules that the Right Includes the Use of Proportionate Force Against Government Property

From [HERE] The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed that the common-law right to resist an unlawful arrest continues to be the law in Georgia and announced that the right includes the right to use proportionate force against government property to escape from an unlawful detention following the arrest.

Christopher Glenn was walking near a tree line when he was confronted by police officers who were investigating a report of a suspicious person. Glenn immediately identified himself to the officers and informed them he was walking home. The officers handcuffed Glenn and placed him in a patrol car. Several minutes later, Glenn complained of being dehydrated and an ambulance was summoned. While he was being examined in the back of the ambulance, the supervising officer ordered him out, saying that Glenn would be examined by jail personnel. Glenn refused to exit the ambulance, and officers forcibly dragged him out. Glenn continued to resist the officers, and he damaged one of the doors to a patrol car when the officers forced him inside.

Glenn was charged with loitering and prowling, obstruction of a law enforcement officer, and interference with government property. Glenn was on probation, and the State filed a petition to revoke it based on the new charges.

At a hearing on the petition, the trial court ruled that the evidence did not support a finding that Glenn committed the offense of loitering and prowling. The judge also determined that the evidence did not support a finding that Glenn committed the offense of obstruction because there was no basis for arresting Glenn on the charge of loitering and prowling. But the trial court did find by a preponderance of the evidence that Glenn committed the offense of interference with government property when he damaged the patrol car door. The judge reasoned that even though the arrest was unlawful, the time for forcibly resisting the arrest had passed, and Glenn should’ve acquiesced to the arrest to later attack the charges in court. The judge revoked Glenn’s probation for 90 days, and Glenn appealed. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals (“COA”) affirmed, reasoning that “Glenn’s damage to the vehicle was not in response to an immediate need to resist an unlawful arrest, but rather was an intentional act occurring some time after he was arrested.” The Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The Court observed “[t]he Georgia General Assembly adopted the common law of England as of May 14, 1776, as Georgia’s own law, except to the extent that Georgia’s statutory or constitutional law displaced the common law, and that adoption remains in force today.” OCGA § 1-1-10(c)(1). Personal liberty and corresponding limitations on the power to arrest were fundamental to the Magna Carta: “No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.” Magna Carta § 39 (1215). Under the common law, arrests were accomplished with and without warrants. An arrest warrant was issued only when a person made a formal accusation, under oath, and in the presence of a magistrate. 4 William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1769) (“4 Blackstone”). If the magistrate determined there was probable cause to believe a crime had been committed and that the accused was responsible, a warrant was issued commanding that the accused be brought in to answer for the charge. 1 William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England(1765).

But for purposes of public safety, warrantless arrests were permitted for felonies. 4 Blackstone. Warrantless arrests were also permitted for a misdemeanor if the officer personally witnessed the offense being committed. Id. The arrestee was then taken before a magistrate to answer for the charge. Id. The common-law right to forcibly resist an unlawful arrest arose in the context of a warrantless arrest. Paul G. Chevigny, “The Right to Resist an Unlawful Arrest,” 78 Yale L.J. 1128 (1969).

In The Queen v. Tooley, 92 Eng. Rep. 349 (K.B. 1709), a constable arrested a woman without a warrant on the charge of being a disorderly person and put her in jail. Three men armed with swords intervened to free the woman. One of the armed men was charged with homicide after he fatally struck a man who was assisting the constable. Id. A jury later found that the woman was not behaving disorderly. Id. Based on the jury’s findings, the court determined that the constable had no legal authority to arrest the woman. Therefore, he was not executing the duties of his office but was instead acting as a common oppressor. The court reasoned an invasion of the liberty of any person was an offense against the Magna Carta, i.e., the imprisonment of a person without lawful authority, especially under “a colour of justice … is sufficient provocation to all people out of compassion” to use force to rescue a person who is “unlawfully restrained of her liberty.” Id. The fact that the arrest had already been accomplished and she was held in jail did not lessen the provocation. In fact, the Tooley Court reasoned jailing her only “aggravated” the provocation. The court held that the provocation of the woman’s unlawful arrest and unlawful detention reduced the offense from murder to manslaughter. Id.

When this rule was applied in later cases where the defendant was charged with crimes other than homicide while resisting arrest, a finding that a person committed an otherwise criminal act in the course of resisting an unlawful arrest served as a complete defense to the criminal charges. The King v. Curvan, 168 Eng. Rep. 1213 (K.B. 1826).

However, if the officer had an arrest warrant, there was no common-law right to resist. When an officer received a warrant, he was bound to execute it, and he was always exercising his lawful authority when he made an arrest based on a warrant. 4 Blackstone. An arrest effectuated via a warrant is presumed lawful because a neutral magistrate has determined there is probable cause. Mullis v. State, 27 S.E.2d 91 (Ga. 1943). It is one’s duty to submit to a lawful arrest. Id. [MORE]

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Says the Use of Pole Cameras by Police for Extended Surveillance of a Citizen's Residence is an Unlawful Search Under State Law

From [HERE] The Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) of Massachusetts announced that continuous, long-term pole camera surveillance targeting a residence is a search under article 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.

Shortly after an undercover officer made a controlled drug purchase from Nelson Mora, investigators installed pole cameras (a video camera attached to a utility pole) in front of the houses of Mora and Randy Suarez. The cameras captured a portion of the front of each house and doorway, the sidewalk next to it, and the adjacent street.

The cameras recorded uninterruptedly, 24 hours per day, seven days per week. The cameras made video recordings but not audio. None had “night vision” capabilities nor could they view inside the residences. Investigators could remotely zoom in and angle the cameras in real time, permitting the officers to read the license plates on vehicles. The cameras recorded the comings and goings of all persons at the targeted residences. While the cameras were in operation, investigators could view the live footage with a web-based browser. The footage also was saved in a searchable format, permitting investigators to review particular previously-recorded events. The camera near Mora’s home captured 169 days of footage, and ...[MORE]

Another Black Man Arrested Due to a Bad Facial Recognition Match - Locked Up 10 Days, case dismissed for lack of evidence

From {HERE] In February 2019, Nijeer Parks was accused of shoplifting candy and trying to hit a police officer with a car at a Hampton Inn in Woodbridge, N.J. The police had identified him using facial recognition software, even though he was 30 miles away at the time of the incident.

Mr. Parks spent 10 days in jail and paid around $5,000 to defend himself. In November 2019, the case was dismissed for lack of evidence.

Mr. Parks, 33, is now suing the police, the prosecutor and the City of Woodbridge for false arrest, false imprisonment and violation of his civil rights.

He is the third person known to be falsely arrested based on a bad facial recognition match. In all three cases, the people mistakenly identified by the technology have been Black men.

Facial recognition technology is known to have flaws. In 2019, a national study of over 100 facial recognition algorithms found that they did not work as well on Black and Asian faces. Two other Black men — Robert Williams and Michael Oliver, who both live in the Detroit area — were also arrested for crimes they did not commit based on bad facial recognition matches. Like Mr. Parks, Mr. Oliver sued over the wrongful arrest.

Nathan Freed Wessler, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union who believes that the police should stop using face recognition technology, said the three cases demonstrated “how this technology disproportionately harms the Black community.”

“Multiple people have now come forward about being wrongfully arrested because of this flawed and privacy-invading surveillance technology,” Mr. Wessler said. He worries that there have been other arrests and even mistaken convictions that have not been uncovered.

Law enforcement often defends the use of facial recognition, despite its flaws, by saying it is used only as a clue in a case and will not lead directly to an arrest. But Mr. Parks’s experience is another example of an arrest based almost solely on a suggested match by the technology.

The Crime

On a Saturday in January 2019, two police officers showed up at the Hampton Inn in Woodbridge after receiving a report about a man stealing snacks from the gift shop. [MORE]

Black Man Released After 44 Years in Prison. Judge said White Cops Withheld Semen Samples and Fingerprints and Lied in Court to Convince All White Jury that Ronnie Long Raped a White Woman

From [HERE] In 1976, an all-White jury from Concord, North Carolina, convicted Ronnie Long, a Black man, of raping a White woman and sentenced him to 80 years in prison. He was convicted despite a lack of physical evidence tying him to the rape. In 2005, his attorneys discovered evidence that was withheld during the trial and could have proved his innocence, according to a website dedicated to freeing Long.

Forty-four years later, in August 2020, he walked out of the Albemarle Correctional Institution a free man and hugged what remained of his family after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled his rights were violated at his trial.

Long was 21 years old when the jury convicted him and sentenced him to life in prison. He continually insisted he was innocent. In 2005, attorneys discovered the evidence that was withheld. Apparently his postconviction motions were denied in the state courts, forcing him to seek relief in the federal courts.

Judge Stephanie Thacker wrote that “post-trial disclosures ha[ve] unearthed a troubling and striking pattern of deliberate police suppression of material evidence.” That evidence included semen samples and fingerprints from the crime scene that did not [MORE]

When an Innocent Person is Punished in these Revenge Courts who is the Real Criminal? Philly to Pay $9.8M to Black Man Exonerated After Being in Prison for 30 Yrs, White DA Used Coerced Statements

From [HERE] In one of the largest wrongful-conviction settlements in Philadelphia history, the city said Wednesday it will pay $9.8 million to a man exonerated after spending nearly three decades in prison for a murder he did not commit.

Chester Hollman III was 21, with no criminal record and a job as an armored-car driver, when he was pulled over in Center City one night in 1991 and charged with the fatal shooting of a University of Pennsylvania student in a botched street robbery. A judge ordered him released last year at age 49, citing evidence that police and prosecutors built their case on fabricated statements from people they coerced as witnesses and later withheld evidence pointing to the likely true perpetrators of the crime.

The agreement announced Wednesday is the latest in a string of seven-figure settlements stemming from claims of misconduct by city police in the late 1980s and ’90s. Those cases have led to more than a dozen exonerations in recent years and have cost the city more than $35 million since 2018.

“There are no words to express what was taken from me,” Hollman said in a statement. “But this settlement closes out a difficult chapter in my life as my family and I now embark on a new one.” [MORE]

From [HERE] The Crime 

On August 20, 1991, 24-year-old Tae Jung Ho was robbed and shot to death as he walked with his friend, Junko Nihei, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Nihei told police that two black men approached and pushed Ho to the pavement. One man, wearing red shorts, held his legs and searched his pockets. The other man, wearing a blue hooded sweatshirt, fatally shot Ho. Nihei said neither man wore glasses or a hat.

Investigation and Trial

John Henderson, a taxi driver, told police he saw a man wearing a blue hooded sweatshirt get into a white vehicle that had four other people in it. He followed it for seven blocks, but eventually lost sight of it. He noted that the vehicle’s license plate contained the letters YZA, but he didn’t record the numbers. 

Four minutes later and six blocks from the crime scene, police pulled over a white Chevrolet Blazer which had a license plate with the letters YZA. The driver, 21-year-old Chester Hollman III, and his passenger, Deirdre Jones, were the only occupants. Police searched the vehicle, but didn’t find a weapon or anything related to the crime.

Hollman, who was wearing green pants, glasses and a hat, said the car was a rental he’d borrowed from his roommate. Hollman said that only he and Jones had been in the vehicle that night, and he knew nothing about the crime.

Police then brought Hollman to the scene of the crime, where Andre Dawkins, a homeless drug addict with a history of mental illness, identified Hollman as the man who’d held Ho’s legs and searched his pockets. Of the eight eyewitnesses, Dawkins was the only one to ever identify Hollman. 

Hollman and Jones were taken to the police station and interrogated separately. Although Hollman denied involvement in the crime, detectives told Jones that Hollman had already confessed to being involved in the crime and promised Jones that she would not be charged if she implicated him. Jones ultimately told police that she was waiting in the getaway car with another woman while Hollman and another man committed the crime. 

Hollman was tried in April 1993. Jones and Dawkins both continued to testify against him. On May 4, 1993, Hollman was convicted of second-degree murder and robbery.

Before the sentencing, Hollman learned that the prosecution had withheld Dawkins’ full criminal history from the defense, which included convictions for robbery, conspiracy and filing a false report of incriminating evidence with the police. Hollman then filed a motion for a new trial, arguing that the prosecution hadn’t disclosed exculpatory evidence; the prosecution, however, maintained that they weren’t aware of Dawkins’ full criminal history prior to trial. Hollman’s motion was denied, and he was sentenced to life without parole.

Post-Conviction Investigation

The Pennsylvania Innocence Project accepted Hollman’s case in 2013. By this point, Dawkins had recanted his trial testimony in 2001, stating that he hadn’t seen Hollman at the scene and only identified him due to police pressure and bribery. Jones had also recanted in 2005, saying she gave false testimony because police had refused her requests for a lawyer and threatened to charge her with a crime. 

In February 2018, the PA Innocence Project, along with co-counsel Alan Tauber of the Law Office of Alan J. Tauber, P.C., asked the Philadelphia County District Attorney’s Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU) to review Hollman’s conviction. The CIU agreed and delivered the police and prosecution files for the case. 

These files revealed that substantial evidence had been withheld from the defense, including proof that the prosecution had been aware of Dawkins’ full criminal record before he testified at trial and knew that Dawkins lied about his record, which would’ve impeached him as a witness. 

The files also showed that police had investigated Denise Combs and her return of the white Blazer to Alamo Rental Car about four hours after the shooting. The files contained Alamo records showing that Jeffrey Green – who had a prior record of violent crimes including arrests for robbery in the months before Ho was killed – was listed as an additional driver. Combs also had a brother, Jack, who was convicted of two separate third-degree murders, one of which was a roadside murder committed in a vehicle rented from Hertz Rental Car by Combs and returned it the day after the murder.

Further, the files showed that within 24 hours of Ho’s murder, an anonymous caller told police that a woman and a man who lived at 2114 Natrona Street were involved in the crime. Combs lived there at that time, and police had gone to that address and interviewed her. The police investigation, however, apparently ended there.

In July 2018, the PA Innocence Project and Tauber filed a Post-Conviction Relief Act petition seeking a new trial for Hollman in light of this newly discovered evidence. After the CIU’s re-investigation of the case, they joined the petition to vacate Hollman’s convictions. The court granted the petition, and Hollman was released after spending 28 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. On July 30, 2019, the charges against Hollman were completely dismissed.

At the hearing, Patricia Cummings, the head of the CIU, said, “I apologize to Chester Hollman. I apologize because he was failed, and in failing him, we failed the victim, and we failed the community of the city of Philadelphia.” [MORE]

To Create the Appearance of Fairness Cities may Join Baltimore in Appointing Attys [mannequin advocates] to Renters in Conveyer Belt Eviction Courts [still No Viable Defense to 'Failure to Pay Rent']

‘MAY IT PLEASE THOSE WHO RUN THE COURT & EVERYTHING ELSE.’ FUNKTIONARY explains: lex-icon - “law as image - the appearance of justice (the form) over the substance of justice via truth and law over humanity.”

MAKE IT LOOK RIGHT. From [HERE] As the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic stretch into 2021, millions of renters in Baltimore and nationwide are bracing for the possibility of having to show up in housing court to avoid getting evicted. But unlike their landlords, only a small fraction of them will do so flanked by an attorney. Fewer than [blah blah]

In reality there are few legal defenses to a failure to pay rent in MD and in many other landlord friendly states. Here, instead of providing meaningful, tangible substantive help where it is needed, the government merely pretends to help in order to maintain the appearance of justice. Such appearances are necessary to maintain control over our perceptions and our belief in the system. Destroy the illusion yourself. Go to landlord and tenant court and watch the proceedings. ‘COVID Housing court’ is a conveyer belt where mostly smug, white, loud talking judges move through the docket at a quick pace (each “trial” for failure to pay rent is about 5-7 minutes) to get home early or rush back to chambers to sit around. Occasionally mannequin like attorneys appear and go through the motions to defend the tenant (checking for errors on the complaint). Thereafter, obedient citizen-renters are re-assured that they are indeed losers but they had there fair chance in court to be heard by their masters. Then they say “thank you” to his/her Highness and shuffle out the court to the curb. On behalf of the landlord the government officially says ‘Get the fuck out.’ Providing an eviction attorney in COVID court will make the tenant citizen feel more better about getting evicted and provide the illusion that the process was voluntary.

Evictions Are Violence Committed by Mostly White Landlords Against Mostly Non-White Renters Because All Laws Are Violence.

[making whites feel safer] Liberal Authorities Surveil Black Residents in DC and Baltimore. Study Finds Over 2.5 Times More "Public Cameras" in Black/Brown Neighborhoods Than in White Neighborhoods

From [HERE] In parks, near grocery stores and schools, lining streets and at intersections, police-owned surveillance cameras in the District of Columbia and Baltimore disproportionately monitor majority nonwhite areas, most of which are predominantly Black, a Capital News Service analysis has found.

There are over two-and-a-half times more cameras in majority nonwhite areas, on average, than in majority white neighborhoods of the nation’s capital and Maryland’s largest city, according to a CNS examination of camera locations plotted over demographic information.

In both cities, around half of majority white areas had no cameras, compared to around one-fifth of majority nonwhite neighborhoods.

The racial differences in police camera surveillance illustrated by this data analysis “is sadly not surprising,” said Nassim Moshiree, policy director at the American Civil Liberties Union’s Washington office.

“Most alarmingly, (the camera deployment) is contributing to the over-policing of Black and Brown communities,” Moshiree said. She added that concerns about such technology “should be viewed through the greater context of privacy risks that are inherent in the government’s use and expansion of mass surveillance.”

The Metropolitan Police Department maintained 264 closed-circuit television cameras throughout Washington’s neighborhoods as of Oct. 6.

Using demographic information from “clusters” of neighborhoods developed by the District’s Office of Planning, CNS found that the average majority white area had fewer than three cameras, while the average majority nonwhite area had more than seven.

Each camera can pan 360 degrees and tilt 180 degrees, but cannot zoom, according to the Metropolitan Police’s website. Footage generally is kept for 90 days per legislation passed last year, but can be kept longer if it contains evidence of criminal activity, will be used for training or captures footage that could subject police to civil liability, according to a department memo.

Whether the cameras are consistently monitored and whether they can be accessed or controlled outside of a centralized watch center remains unclear. Police officials did not answer questions from CNS about that issue. Likewise, the police did not respond to questions about image resolution of the cameras.

The area with the most cameras – 31 – includes Washington’s Congress Heights, Bellevue and Washington Highland. These neighborhoods are 95% Black and are among DC’s most impoverished regions, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

The Baltimore Police Department maintains nearly 780 closed-circuit cameras throughout the city. CNS used areas designated by the City’s Department of Planning to find that, on average, there were over 16 cameras per majority nonwhite area, and around six per majority white area.

These cameras are monitored 24 hours a day every day and can pan, zoom and rotate and follow moving objects.

Baltimore Police did not answer CNS questions about the cameras’ image resolution, whether cameras can be controlled or accessed outside of a centralized watch center, and what guidelines govern keeping footage longer than the department’s standard of 28 days.

Research suggests that surveillance cameras may increase detection of previously underreported crimes. But research is conflicting and inconclusive regarding whether these cameras deter crime, especially violent crime.

In the District, “cameras alone did not appear to have an impact on crime,” and in Baltimore crime decreased in some areas but not in others following camera deployments, according to a 2011 Urban Institute study. In Baltimore’s Cherry Hill, crime slightly increased following camera installations, according to a 2018 study from the University of Central Arkansas.

Cherry Hill has 61 cameras, more than any region in Baltimore after the downtown area. It is nearly 90% Black and is among Baltimore’s poorest neighborhoods, according to census data.

Along with disproportionately surveilling people of color, the ACLU says there are additional ways in which cameras could be abused: for voyeuristic purposes, which has especially targeted women; for spying on or harassing political activists; and for criminal purposes (in 1997 a Washington police officer used surveillance databases in attempted blackmail of gay club patrons).

“What there is a significant body of evidence for is that the proliferation of surveillance like CCTV can infringe on fundamental rights,” Moshiree said.

Both the District and Baltimore have spent millions of dollars on acquiring and maintaining the surveillance technology, according to media reports. Neither agency answered questions regarding the costs.

The cameras are part of over-policing that targets minority communities, according to the ACLU.

And over-policing actually leads to more crime by destabilizing communities, according to Lawrence Grandpre, director of research for Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle, a Baltimore-based think tank that advocates for improved living conditions for the city’s Black residents.

Last year, an analysis of District arrest records from 2013-2017 “revealed a pattern of disproportionate arrests of Black people that persists across geographic areas and offense types,” the ACLU said in a report.

A 2016 Department of Justice investigation of the Baltimore police found that its practices violated rights guaranteeing free expression and prohibiting unreasonable searches, along with federal anti-discrimination laws, and especially harmed Black communities. The police department later entered into a consent decree to address these issues.

“Our Black communities have been over-policed or under-policed, never the right amount of community-based, community-driven, public safety approach policing,” Baltimore City Council President Brandon M. Scott said in an interview with CNS.

Scott said that he has heard some concerns about police cameras, but more often his constituents, particularly Black women, have asked for more cameras in their neighborhoods.

“It’s more complicated than people think,” he said. “We’re talking about Black communities that have been stricken by gun violence for longer than I’ve been breathing… We have to be very careful that people don’t just paint the Black community in one way or another, and that we’re not this monolithic community.”

Grandpre said many underserved communities, including Black communities, will choose more policing “because they have been conditioned through 50 years of austerity and racism that there is nothing, nothing that the people in power will invest in their communities except policing.”

“So the important thing to do is… expose the insanity of that choice,” Grandpre said. “There’s an entire ecosystem of Indigenous and Black people… addressing the very issues that police are meant to solve, that inherently denaturalizes the assumption that the choice is more police or nothing.”

Investment in social programs consistently reduces crime, according to researchers from Harvard and Yale Universities. 

Grandpre said communities should also have control over their policing agencies to “establish legitimacy to police authority,” which he said currently works for a larger system of oppression rather than for the public, by prioritizing the protection of property for those in power at the expense of communities experiencing racism and poverty.

“Crime is socially constructed in a way that it has now criminalized our lives,” said Tiffany Reid-Collazo, an attorney and member of the Total Liberation Collective, a group advocating for racial equality and freedom through community-building.

Criminalizing certain experiences more likely to be had by impoverished people, like failure to pay fines, panhandling and certain drug use, often also targets people for race, according to an Institute for Policy Studies report.

“To consistently look outside your window and to understand that you’re always being surveilled… there is not a safe space that lacks this access to Black bodies from policing,” Reid-Collazo said, adding that this has broad, harmful psychological impacts, as it can internalize feelings of oppression.

Laura Moy, the director of Georgetown Law’s Communications and Technology Law Clinic, said: “The very presence of cameras in neighborhoods is going to change how people live their daily lives. It’s going to change who they meet with, what kind of activities they do… maybe even how long they spend outside.”

Baltimore and Washington police also have used various other surveillance tools, sometimes coordinated with federal agencies. Neither department answered questions regarding their possession or use of any surveillance technology.

“They don’t tell us half of what they do,” David Grosso, at-large D.C. Council member, said of the Metropolitan Police, before adding that it offers less information than that. “It’s like pulling teeth.”

Grosso said among surveillance technologies, “the thing that bothers me the most is these cell site simulators.”

Cell site simulators collect cell phone serial number and location information by acting as cell phone towers that many devices can connect to at once.

Both Washington and Baltimore police departments signed nondisclosure agreements with the FBI nearly 10 years ago to purchase and coordinate use of cell site simulators.

Police deploy cell site simulators in nonwhite areas more often than in white areas of Baltimore, according to a 2016 analysis by Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit digital rights group.

Facial recognition technology, which has also been used by both agencies, disproportionately falsely identifies people of color, women, children and the elderly, according to findings last year by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

In July, amidst massive protests against police violence and other racial injustices, Grosso introduced amendments to limit the Metropolitan Police Department’s use of facial recognition technology and temporarily ban its use of cell site simulators. The amendments did not pass, but Grosso said he plans to reintroduce them before his January 2021 departure from Council.

Georgetown’s Moy said when surveillance tools are used against activists “exercising their First Amendment rights to protest,” concerns regarding civil rights are exacerbated.

In 2015, Baltimore police used facial recognition and social media analytics to identify the locations of protesters demonstrating in response to Freddie Gray’s killing. That same year, the department requested the FBI’s help in monitoring protests via aerial surveillance.

In June, both the FBI, according to Buzzfeed, and the National Guard, according to the Pentagon, conducted aerial surveillance over demonstrations in the District, although the Metropolitan Police told Buzzfeed that it did not request the FBI’s help. FBI aircraft may be equipped with cell site simulators, according to the outlet.

Neither Baltimore nor Washington police answered questions regarding surveillance of recent protests.

“There’s no way that they’re not keeping tabs on all of us in some way, form or fashion,” said Arianna Evans, who was active in organizing protests against policing abuses this summer. “It just goes to show that we are getting under their skin.”

Moshiree said she doesn’t know specifically how surveillance technologies “are likely being used” during protests, “but I think that’s exactly the problem.”

“The public should have access to that,” Moshiree said. “If the government has access to a surveillance technology… that has the ability to infringe on your rights, then we should know the contexts in which they’re being used, how they’re being used, how the information is being kept secure.”

A Black Doctor Died of Covid After Accusing the White Doctors and Staff at Indiana University Health North Hospital of Racist Treatment (ignoring symptoms, requests for pain meds, disbelieving her)

NGHR TREATMENT FROM RACISTS. From [HERE] and [HERE] A Black physician died of Covid-19 weeks after she described a White doctor dismissing her pain and concerns about her treatment as she lay in an Indiana hospital. 

Dr. Susan Moore passed away on Sunday due to complications from Covid-19, her son told the New York Times. The internist died about two weeks after she shared a video in which she accused a doctor at Indiana University Health North Hospital (IU North) of ignoring her complaints of pain and requests for medication because she was Black, even though she was both a patient and a doctor herself.

In a video that was posted earlier this month, she filmed herself from a hospital bed and recounted her experience at IU North. Moore said her doctor brushed off her symptoms, telling her, "You're not even short of breath."

"Yes, I am," Moore said in the video, which she shared on Facebook December 4.

She had to beg to receive remdesivir, she recalled in the video, the antiviral drug used to treat patients who are hospitalized for Covid-19 and are not in need of mechanical ventilation.

And despite her pain, the doctor told Moore he might send her home, she said, and he didn't feel comfortable giving her more narcotics.

"He made me feel like I was a drug addict," she said in the video. "And he knew I was a physician."

Moore had also posted updates on her Facebook page along with the video.

Moore, who was an internist, said her pain was "adequately treated" only after she raised concerns about her treatment. She was later discharged from IU North, but returned to a different hospital less than 12 hours later, she wrote on her Facebook page.

"I put forth and I maintain if I was White, I wouldn't have to go through that," Moore said.

A spokesman for IU North confirmed to CNN that Moore was a patient at the hospital and that she was eventually discharged, but declined to say more about her, citing patient privacy.

"As an organization committed to equity an reducing racial disparities in healthcare, we take accusations of discrimination very seriously and investigate every allegation," the spokesman said.

Moore's story speaks to a broader issue of what experts call implicit racial bias in health care toward Black patients. Studies have shown that Black patients are in some situations prescribed less pain medication than their White counterparts. And a recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine attributed unequal treatment in part to "enduring racist cultural beliefs and practices."

The article cited a 2016 study that found half of White medical students and residents "held unfounded beliefs about intrinsic biologic differences between Black people and White people," falsely believing the pain of Black patients was less severe than White patients.

"Acceptance of this inequitable treatment as 'normal' is historically rooted in and supported by the belief that Black people are intrinsically disease-prone and, implicitly or explicitly, not deserving of high-quality care," the authors of the New England Journal of Medicine article wrote, comparing the issue of racism in medicine to racism in policing.

Racial disparities in medical treatment have been further underscored by Covid-19, which disproportionately impacts communities of color.

To a "majority of physicians, predominantly who are White in the United States, the perception is that African Americans do not need as much for pain," said Dr. Ala Stanford, a pediatric surgeon and the founder of the Black Doctors Covid-19 Consortium. [MORE]

After Intentionally Poisoning the Water in Flint Should its Mostly Black Residents Trust the Government to Deliver a Safe COVID Vaccine? No. Governments are Trying to Kill Us. Fuck the Government.

FUCK THE GOVERNMENT. “Government atrocities—carried out by irrational functionaries, economic hit men, soldiers, diplomats, emissaries, etc., under every possible flavor or form of government—have littered the bloody pages of recorded history. Government is the indisputable greatest purveyor of murder, mayhem, genocide, exploitation, rape, forced starvation, pillage and chaos in the annals of humanity.” [MORE]

From [HERE] In a city synonymous for half a decade with disaster, something remarkable happened in February 2019. A team of researchers reported that Flint’s homes—even the ones at the highest risk for undrinkable, lead-poisoned tap water—finally had clean water running through their pipes.

After years of painstaking cleanup and rebuilding, the study’s results were a sparkling capstone. Earlier tests already hinted at good news, and this one confirmed it: In the vast majority of such homes, lead levels were 5 parts per billion or better—far below even the strictest regulations in the country. Local news outlet MLive trumpeted the news, and Michigan’s Department of Environmental Quality tacked it to their ongoing list of promising signs that indicated the city’s potable present and future.

But a few weeks later, another, equally remarkable thing happened. As part of a United Nations-sponsored “World Water Day” celebration, the City of Flint parked 12 semitrailers stacked with pallets of bottled water on the city’s street corners, offering them to any city resident who could show an ID. People flocked to the pickup locations. They lined up their cars and popped their trunks to collect cases of water to use in their homes—water in bottles, from somewhere else, that they actually trusted.

The wariness wasn’t out of ignorance. Equally wary was Jim Ananich, a lifelong Flint resident and outgoing leader of the Democratic minority in the Michigan State Senate. Ananich wasn’t in line that day, but he understands why people were.

“I can’t tell somebody they should trust [claims that the water is safe], becauseI don’t trust them—and I have more information than most people,” said Ananich. “Science and logic would tell me that it should be OK, but people have lied to me.” [MORE]

"The Destruction of Reason:" Trump's Cult of 73 Million FAGA Totalitarian Patriots [white trash converted into Obedient Human Resources] Guarantee Turmoil Over the Coming Years

According to FUNKTIONARY obedience is “the highest form of the power-fear systemic” and is “slavery sold to both children and adults alike deceptively packaged in a respectfully sounding label.” [MORE] It further defines:

totalitarianism - a neologism coined by Mussolini--best understood by the phrase "The Nightmare State," whose agents (neocrats) seek totality of control over its subject-victims ("citizens"), including their erotic emotions and minds. 2) Big Brother's Fantasy State. 3) total impersonalized terror. 4) fascism disguised as democracy. (See: Fascism & Demockcracy) [MORE]

Human Resources - answer questions when asked; sign their names when told; open doors when knocked upon; entrust themselves to the protection of others as a ward; trust in anything other than their inner authority; believe what they are told; know the definitions of words and meaning of terms without bothering to reference the source of the definitions; evade instead of confront apparent external authority or putative jurisdiction, alleged liability or presentment; covet the property of merchants; volunteer to servitude; desire a kinder MASTER instead of liberty; and, yearn for the illusion of security at the expense of inalienable fights and freedom. Are you a human resource of the Corporate U.S. "government"? [MORE]

From [HERE] It is happening here.

The soul of America is like the character Two Face in the Batman movie series.

One defeat of the Party of Trump and its 73 million apparatchiks is not enough. In Trump, the United States has bred its own dictator in waiting and he’s got an army of servile apostles willing to fight and die for him. Vigilance by his opponents has never been more important.

“This Fuhrer dictatorship could produce only lackeys and profiteers of the most reactionary and aggressive part of German imperialist reaction. Its Germanic democracy reared the repulsive type of a human breed that was boundlessly servile to men of higher rank and just as boundlessly cruelly tyrannical towards men below it.” The Destruction of Reason, Georg Lukacs

Incumbent President Donald Trump now owns the Republican Party, lock, stock and barrel. With 73 million restless apparatchiks clearly beholden to the cult of Trump, will it be long before the Republican Party gets rebranded as the Trump National Party; or, perhaps, the MAGA Party (Make America Great Again)? Maybe Trump sells-off his faltering real estate empire and creates a media conglomerate—consisting of television, radio,and the Internet/WWW—that spews out divisive, fascist, ultraconservative fare 24 hours a day, 7 days week. Trump Media would absorb the National Review, New York Post and similar conservative publications/websites.

Sky’s the limit for Trump: His 73 million followers include an increasing number of Blacks and Latinos who appear to revere him for his apparent strength, tough talk and sense of honor.

According to Fortune Magazine, “As Trump once put it: ‘Real power is fear. It’s all about strength. Never show weakness. You’ve always got to be strong. Don’t be bullied. There is no choice.’”

Adolf Hitler Said That Too

“Brutality is respected. The ordinary man in the street only respects brute force and ruthlessness. The people need to be kept in a salutary state of fear. They want to fear something. Why make a fuss over brutality and wax indignant over tortures? The masses want ti. They want something that will give them shudders of terror. Moralistic platitudes are essential for the masses. There could be no greater mistake for a politician than to be seen posing as the immoral superman. Of course I shall not make it a matter of principle whether or not to act immorally in the conventional sense. I do not abide, you see, by any principles whatever.” (Adolf Hitler quoted in The Destruction of Reason by Georg Lukacs)

We are all familiar with these wicked sentiments expressed by Trump and Hitler and assorted cult leaders, or should be. The history books are replete with tales of dastardly kings, princes and dictators who said nearly the same things and lived and ruled by such dictates. Democracy has been the aberration in politics, not dictatorship or kingship.

The Path to an American Hitler

The Destruction of Reason by Lukacs traces the development of irrationalism and fascism in Germany; specifically, the intellectual fertilizer that led to Hitler’s rise to power and National Socialism. His analysis reaches back to 1789 and includes commentary on Hegel, Kant, Nietzsche, Marx, Engels, and scores of other philosophical heavyweights.

In an epilogue to the book titled Post World War II Irrationalism, Lukacs argues that the USA achieved all that Hitler sought without all the baggage of National Socialism, psychopathic leaders and the industrialized murder of the Jewish people. He kicks off the epilogue by quoting from Norman Mailer’s novel the Naked and the Dead, specifically the character of General Cummings:

“As kinetic energy, a country is organization, coordinated effort, your epithet, fascism. Historically the purpose of this war is to translate America’s potential into kinetic energy. The concept of fascism, far sounder that communism, if you consider it, for it is grounded firmly in men’s actual natures, merely started in the wrong country, in a country that did not have enough intrinsic potential power to develop completely. In Germany with that basic frustration of limited physical means there were bound to be excesses. But the dreams, the concept was sound enough. For the past century the entire historical process has been working toward greater and greater consolidation of power.”

Lukacs puts a fine point on the United States succeeding where Hitler could not:

“In contrast to [Nazi] Germany, the USA had a constitution which was democratic from the start. The ruling class managed, particularly during the imperialist era, to have the democratic forms so effectively preserved that by democratically legal means, it achieved a dictatorship of monopoly capitalism at lest as firm as that which Hitler set up with tyrannical procedures. This smoothly functioning democracy, so called, was created by the Presidential prerogative, the Supreme Court’s authority in constitutional questions (and the monopoly capitalists always decided which were the constitutional questions), the finance monopoly over the press, radio, etc., electioneering costs, which successfully prevented really democratic parties from springing up besides the two parties of monopoly capitalism, and lastly the use of terrorist devices (the lynching system—targeting Blacks). And this democracy could in substance realize everything sought by Hitler without needing to break with democracy formally.”

Lukacs also notes in passing that Hitler was a fan of American advertising and used what he learned from that field to ply his destructive trade in Germany and across Europe.

Lost Souls

Now we turn to Trita Parsi the Executive Vice President of the Quincy Institute discussing the

tortured soul of America. The insight could not have been penned any better than this:

“If Joe Biden was right and the 2020 presidential elections were a contest over the soul of America, then his victory is bittersweet. With almost half of the votes cast for Donald Trump, he is undeniably very much a part of the American soul...Trump is not an aberration, but a reflection of the ugliness that very much is, and always has been, a part of us. While the US may not yet be ready to grapple with this reality, the rest of the world can no longer afford to live

in denial. Around the world, many hoped that the lies we have told ourselves of our American innocence – the lies that form the bedrock of American Exceptionalism and neatly separate us from the desperate impulses that brought forward Trump – would prove true. They didn’t.

Almost eight million more Americans voted for Trump this past Tuesday than they did in 2016. They saw the divisions he fueled, the xenophobia he embraced, the children he caged, the white supremacists he refused to condemn, and the pandemic he bungled; and they weighed that against the tax cuts they won, the conservative Supreme Court judges he appointed, the climate chaos they can ignore, and the punishments he inflicted on the “liberal elites”. They decided they wanted four more years of Trump.”

As the legendary American actress Betty Davis once said in character, “Fasten your seat belts, it’s going to be a bumpy night.” [MORE]

KRS-One. "America Needs to Heal? America ain’t really Sick, this is what It really is. Gunshots and Cages for Black Brown little Kids"

https://krsone.bandcamp.com/album/between-da-protests-extended-edition

"Realitrix" as defined by Dr. Blynd in FUNKTIONARY

According to FUNKTIONARY, THE KEY HOLDERS ENPSYCHLOPEDIA:

Realitrix - the psychologically constructed dreamworld where the distinction between reality and entertainment become blurred. For example, the US Presidential elections are a prime case of Realitrix. Couched in what seems to be reality, we are entrained and entertained with memes, images, symbols, generalizations and rhetoric that provide the impression in our minds that what we hear and see in the dominant print and visual media reflects the reality of what is actually happening behind the scenes when the opposite is in fact taking place, i.e., the deflection of our attention away from the shadow government and the intergenerational dominant minority families of power and psychopathology who set the Agenda and pull the strings remotely and invisibly to the conditioned and infected minds of the masses in their dreamlike state of engaged obliviousness. Aloneness in the price you pay for knowledge and overstanding the nature, structure, existence and content of the Realitrix. (See: No- Mind, Aloneness, Split-Mind, Predictive Programming, MEDIA, Conditioning, Imprinting, Economatrix & Matrix)

Granfalloon - an empty representation, of which one cannot even positively aver that it is even a concept All Corporate State fictions (stationary bandits) are "created" by its creators as a psychological retro-virus in people's minds as if it were a real (existential and volitional) entity, the sole purpose of which is to command, mediate, control and subdue the natural inclinations of a sleeping people who do not understand (know) themselves in order that they may silently rob them of their property and mind—under the Great Brain Robbery. The Constitution is a putative agreement or covenant to which you were neither a signatory nor interested party. The Constitution made provisions for the establishment of a Congress. Congress never formally created the so-called Internal Revenue Service as a duly formed agency of the United States of America. The Secretary of the Treasury never created revenue districts in the States of the Union. Internal Revenue Service was never granted authority to tax income of American citizens (or citizens of the United States of America, not U.S. citizens or subjects of Congress) earning money within the 50 States of the Union. The word "income" is not explicitly defined in the Internal Revenue Code (although it is implicitly defined by the most basic of accounting principles, i.e., cost. The income ("money") that you earn is simply hypothecated "credit" created as iconic numbers within yet another fictitious corporate entity known as a bank. When every foundation is imaginary, alienation becomes desirable but impossible. You can elude the "authorities" but you cannot escape that which simply isn't real or has no reality to begin with—so just what are any so-called "authorities" agents of anyway? Where are the office and the oath of office? Never fight (oppose) things that are not or 'what is not'—as you will stratify your energy and dissipate your life-force while paradoxically strengthening what-is-not. Determine whether something has a real existence or whether it is just an absence. If it is an absence—a granfalloon - then don't fight with "it," seek the thing of which it is the absence (for), find it and handle your business accordingly. (See: Reification, Stationary Bandits, Territorial Gangsters Voting, Doggy, Somnamnesiac, Sleepwalking, Corporate State, Income, "Government," President, SimCult. Authority Grand Junes, Tax Invasion, "Credit," Hegelian Banking, Holodeck Court, Judicial Victimization, Statutory Oppression & The Flag)

[The Centuries Long Losing Streak Must End. Moral Suasion as a Tool of Liberation RIP. Racists Can't be Transformed] Doc Rivers: 'It's amazing, we keep loving this country but It doesn't love us back'

Along with John Lewis Black people need to bury moral suasion as a tool of liberation from racism white supremacy (RWS). Here now, at this point in history attempting to transform or reform racists – white individuals who either function as psychopaths in their interactions with Black people or believe they must dominate them to in order to survive and seek to have master-servant relations with them - is entirely pathological. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained in this white over Black system of domination Black people “are in a continuous state of checkmate” and are currently in a “losing streak that is centuries long.” [MORE] Thus far, all persons such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, the BPP, Marcus Garvey, Elijah Mohammed, Nelson Mandela and many courageous others who have attempted to establish justice and/or to eliminate racism white supremacy have failed.’ [MORE] Essentially all strategies including moral suasion and all statist politics have failed to decode the white supremacist/racist playbook and have been met with crushing defeat. Museums and cemeteries are filled with our dead and gone and fucked up memories and Blacks should leave them there and learn from it. Dead ass concepts and old heroes died so we don’t have to keep re-trying failed experiments. 

FUNKTIONARY states “a slave is one who waits for someone else to free him”

Recent episodes are also learning opportunities for Black people to witness and overstand that their relationship with the government [whether they perceive it as happy or consensual] is non-voluntary, non-contractual and not reciprocal. Complete obedience to government authority in exchange for what again? The “social contract” is illogical bullshit, unsupported by reality. Authorities are not solving Black people’s problems they are causing them. Look out your window, cops aren’t looking for criminals they are looking for us. But that is not what Doc Rivers was talking about above and that is not what this article is about. 

Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Andrew Young along with symbolic rolebot Rev. Bernice King at the 2019 superbowl, an extra whitewashed spectacle that year.

John Lewis’ politics always involved an appeal to the moral suasion of racists. Like many confused victims of racism/white supremacy Lewis did not view racism white supremacy as a system of white over Black domination and vast unequal power. In a quest for [artificial] “equality” and equal protection from the government he viewed racism as a battle for civil rights against bigots and bigotry. Hence his goals were a moral quest for respect from racists as he and many other black advocates hoped to secure legal freedoms and reform the bad attitudes, behavior and hurtful speech and conduct of racists. Through articulate and moving speeches and non-violence he attempted to transform racists- as they appear to be the indirect target of his messaging and activities. Reformers continue to follow this model – and after every unsuccessful speech they cue up another thinking it will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. 

Belief in somehow changing racists has led to suffering, it is a prison. Begging racists to change is flattering to them.  Civil rights reformers fail to understand that there is no way to integrate racism white supremacy. Neely Fuller explains, Racism can either be practiced or not practiced." [MORE] It either exists or it doesn’t. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing further explained that ‘because Blacks and other non-white people have failed to understand the true meaning of racism white supremacy they have erroneously believed they could be integrated into the white supremacy system and depend upon racists to maximally develop Black children, communities, organizations and institutions and so forth in the same manner that white people promote their own maximal development and solve their own problems.’ [MORE] She explained that Black people must understand what the operating system of racism white supremacy is and how it functions in order to disempower it and unplug themselves from it.

Racism white supremacy is not a system of bigotry, discrimination, mean acts and minor inconveniences run by bigots. FUNKTIONARY defines:

Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." [MORE] and [MORE]

Welsing described Racism as a behavioral system of survival whereby racists believe they must dominate Blacks and other non-whites to survive through genocidal and genthanasiastic conduct in all areas of people activity. Welsing explained that most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

• White plus Black equals Colored.

• White plus Brown equals Colored.

• White plus Yellow equals Colored. [MORE]

Although rarely discussed, white people are genetic recessive. It is scientific fact that Black is a genetically dominant trait. Whenever Black mixes with White, which is a recessive genetic trait, Black will dominate. In general, this means "whites" cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. The so-called white "race" can and eventually will be replaced or "genetically annihilated" through such assimilation or social intermixing with non-whites. As white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. According to Welsing, ‘genetic annihilation is the fundamental motivation of racists, whether it is conscious and/or subconsciously determined. [MORE] Said "fear of replacement" and/or the fear of losing control over non-whites fuels the system of white supremacy/racism and motivates racists to act genocidally towards non-whites in their perceived "survival game" with non-whites. Welsing’s color confrontation theory explained that the more the white population shrinks the worse its conduct toward non-whites will get. [MORE] A recent Reuters poll reflects white people fear of replacement as 31% of participants agreed "America must protect and preserve its White European heritage” and 39 percent agreed with the statement that “White people are currently under attack in this country.” [MORE] Welsing states:

“Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (the civilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation), all white peoples have the spoken or unspoken mandate to participate actively in their collective struggle for global white genetic survival. This specifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black and other non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to be necessary and, therefore, justified.” [MORE]

Considering racism through such a lens, Black people should easily understand that for racists to integrate with them or to work alongside Blacks to maximally develop Black individuals, communities and economies, “would mean active white participation in white genocide.” [MORE] Welsing explained that white supremacy is really “only a compensatory psychological adjustment for a genetic, numerical deficiency state.” When non-whites have such an understanding, ‘the white supremacy message can be evaluated and negated more readily. This helps non-whites to drop unrealistic expectations and disappointment and gain psychological liberation from the white ideological domination that negatively affects the total functioning of non-whites.’ Racists see themselves as the permanent enemy of Blacks and Black people must wake up to that reality. 

At a press conference on Wednesday Doc Rivers said “It’s amazing to me why we keep loving this country and this country does not love us back.” It’s not clear whether Doc had just come to this realization or whether he was simply baffled by the conduct of racists. 

To help undeceive overwhelmed victims of racism white supremacy Neely Fuller offered a basic theory to measure against reality,

"most white people hate Black people. The reason that most white people hate Black people is because whites are not Black people. If you know this about white people, you need know little else. If you do not know this about white people, virtually all else that you know about them will only confuse you." [MORE] 

He further explained that ‘the quality of the relationship between white people and black people is, and has been, a total disaster.’ He stated a racist cannot be humane in their relations with non-white people... Racists (white supremacists) are masters of deceit and violence. It is correct to expect them to be deceitful, and/or violent - either directly or indirectly. It is correct to expect them to be this way all the time.’ [MORE]

Dr. Bobby Wright characterized the historical and ongoing treatment of Blacks by whites in all areas of people activity as psychopathic. That is, in their relationships with Blacks, racists function as psychopaths. He states “One of the best methods that can be used to measure the psychopathic traits of the White race is observing and analyzing their universal overt behaviors and attitudes toward Blacks.”

As stated by Wright, ‘the psychopath is an individual who is constantly in conflict with other persons or groups. He is unable to experience guilt, is completely selfish and callous, and has a total disregard for the rights of others.’ 

Wright explains,

‘Unlike other extreme pathological syndromes, only a very small percentage of psychopaths are committed to mental hospitals with another small percentage ending up in penal institutions. The majority of psychopaths function very well in society. They are generally average or above average in intelligence and have engaging personalities. In addition, they are usually very impressive and competent with no feelings of insecurities, anxieties, or any other manifestations or psychoneurosis. They appear to be very honest and humane, but really have no concern or commitment except to their own selfish interests. Psychopaths will consistently make commitments that they have no intentions of keeping and show great indignation and anger when their integrity is questioned. 

Behavioral scientists generally agree that the outstanding characteristics of the psychopathic personality are the almost complete absence of ethical or moral development and an almost total disregard for appropriate patterns of behavior. Psychopaths know the difference between right and wrong but simply ignore the concept of right and wrong."‘ [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY further defines the psychopathic racial personality as “yurugu” and explains that racists suffer from Weitko disease or a “patapathetic fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man.” Wright stated,

‘By ignoring these traits in racists (the lack of ethical and moral development) Blacks have made and are still making a tragic mistake in basing the worldwide Black liberation movement or black politics on moral suasion. It is pathological for Blacks to keep attempting to use moral suasion on a people who have no morality where race is the variable.' [MORE] 

Episode after episode racist individuals and cops are murdering or inflicting harm on non-white people. In contrast, it is rare for a black police officer to murder or use excessive force against a white person. Over the past 60 years the number of violent incidents between Black cops and white citizens can be counted on your hands. Anon explains, “A black person whose power comes from a white institution will not be allowed to mistreat whites - unless he or she is following orders from more powerful whites. In a system of white supremacy, all whites are more powerful than blacks. A white supremacy system by its very NATURE forbids ALL non-white people - regardless of wealth, status, or position - from victimizing white people.” [MORE]

Whether they are motivated by extinction, fear, jealously, hatred or something else, Racists practice racism because they have the power to do so. Racism involves the power of one race to impose its will upon another. 

Wright observed, “although the world is 90% non-white, everywhere one finds whites and blacks in close proximity to each other, whether it is Chicago or Zimbabwe, the whites are in control. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every know statistical law of probability.” [MORE]

Dr. Amos Wilson, a true rebel to lionize, similarly stated, "[Blacks] must question how is it that a minority people [whites], a very small percentage of mankind, a people who are essentially resourceless in terms of their natural resources, maintain the power they have. Why is it that the peoples [Afrikans] whose lands contain the wealth of the earth are the poorest people? This implies that there must exist a political, social situation wherein the mental orientation of our people must be so structured that the power and the ability of the Europeans to rule this earth are continually maintained.' [MORE] 

Dr. Blynd explains, "Racism is not individualistic, but institutional, cultural, economic, political, linguistic, self-perpetuating and systematic." White Supremacy is a “power group dynamic” involving the relationship between whites and Blacks in a vast system of unequal power. It is economic discrimination by one group over and against another for the purposes of subjugation and/or maintaining the imbalance of power through cooperative control, misinformation, indoctrination, genocide and oppression. [MORE] 

Fuller states, "in a socio-material system dominated by White Supremacists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by White Supremacists. The White Supremacists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers. Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by White Supremacists. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many people — particularly non-white people — prefer not to acknowledge. 

Wilson asks Black people, 

‘Who has control of your food? Who has control of your electricity? Who has control of your water? Of your jobs? Who tells you what to wear when you go to work? Who tells you when to come to work...when to leave...when to go to lunch...how to speak...how to write...how to do this...how to do that...and how are these things taught, and how they are conditioned?"-- It is by reward and punishment. " You do this you get paid; you don't do this you don't get paid; you get a raise, you get docked. What do we have here?’

To live under the power of another people is to be created by that people. To be rewarded or punished by that people is to be created by that people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of another people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation (i.e., the conditions under which we live), then we must change the power relationships. If we are to prevent ourselves from being created by another people and are to engage in the act of self creation, then we must change the power relations.’ [MORE]

No one is chained up in the free range prison. The “group dynamic” is based on consensual master/servant relations between white and black people. Whether racists are rich, poor, Democrat or Republican and whether they are violent psychopaths or persons engaging in gethanasiatic or genocidal conduct - - they all seek master-servant relations with non-white people. Such relations are the gravamen of the current operating system of racism white supremacy. Non-whites, regardless of education or status who indulge racists in such relations and cooperate with their own oppression may be described as “niggers” within the meaning of FUNKTIONARY. Racists seek relations with niggers and such relations help to cooperatively maintain this system. Wilson explains, “the oppressive configuration the White man has assumed in relationship to the Black man is in good part the result of the fact that we have permitted ourselves to remain in a complementary subordinate configuration conducive to his oppressive designs.” 

He states,

'white people’s so-called power, is to a great extent based upon the nature of the relationship they have with Black people. We empower them by the nature of our own behavior and attitudes as a people. They cannot be what they are, unless we are, what we are. To a good extent, the European is our creation … yes. If we look at our behavior, we will see that to a good extent, it is our behavior, our values, our consciousness, the kind of personalities we’ve established in ourselves, our taste, our desires and needs; that maintains the European in their dominant position’.  

This master servant relationship is something Black people can control and it must be destroyed - but not through Moral suasion. Similarly, when non-whites attempt to convince racists of the value of “black life” they engage in activity compatible and complementary to their own oppression and self-deception. The only purpose of race is to practice racism. Having little biological validity, the term "race" is better translated to mean organization. The sole purpose of which is to maintain white domination and control of non-whites. As such race is a granfalloon. [MORE] Getting caught up in such unreality of proving your humanity or that ‘you are not other’ is a trick bag, a form of mental bondage. If you believe Black lives matter is a proposal and not something to assert as fact then you are a slave. "Dr. Blynd states, "never fight (oppose) things that are not or 'what is not' - as you will stratify your energy and disparate your life force while paradoxically strengthening what is not. If it is an absence - a granfalloon - then don't fight with it, seek the thing of which it is the absence (for), find it and handle your business accordingly.[MORE]. Osho Rajineesh explained, "fighting with anything non-existent is the most dangerous thing in the world. It is like fighting with darkness; if you start fighting with darkness, wrestling, even if you are a Mohammed Ali you are not going to win. Soon you will be tired, exhausted, and you will fall flat on the ground, thinking that darkness seems to be very powerful. Darkness is not powerful, darkness is not weak, because darkness does not exist at all. All that you need is just a small candle and the darkness will be gone.’

Black people have wasted a lot of time and energy appealing to racists, and analyzing them in order to somehow transform them. Such efforts appear to be John Lewis’ and many others life work. If Lewis died for something let it be that he died so we don’t have to continue to engage in a pathological struggle against darkness.’ 

There is no need to try to transform racists - people can only change themselves - work on yourself and then help other non-white people. The destruction of the master/servant relationship does not mean destroying white folks or not having relations with them. It means no longer engaging in master/servant relations with them. Your relations with white people should be either at arms-length or non-existent. When a critical mass of individual, endependent, self-respecting Black people do so, the voluntary nature of RSW will cease to exist, forcing change. 

Wilson explains, We talk about the Civil Rights Movement, and the Apartheid system of the South, when Blacks decided to just get out of the buses and just walk, the system changed. Yes, when they stopped sitting behind the white driver, just changing that relationship, changed the nature of power, in that system. When they decided then to walk side by side, when they decided to walk abreast and line themselves up, because they had not walked that way before … for the ends to be fought, the relationship changed. When they kept their monies in their pockets, when they sat on the stools and blocked the other people from them, and change the nature of the interactions between themselves and Europeans, the nature of the system changed.  

So therefore we have tremendous Power. It depends upon how we align ourselves as a people, and how we decide to relate to other people in the world, because they cannot have what they have, unless we are who we are. And that is why we don’t have to waste a great deal of time always appealing to them, and analyzing them, because we can better appeal to our own sense of self, and our own consciousness, and we waste a lot of time trying to transform them, when through transforming ourselves, they will be transformed automatically.’

To end racism/white supremacy we must end or neutralize white power.' [MORE] ‘Black people's uncritical acceptance of the rules, moral beliefs, perspectives, and their customary traditional participation in the American (White) political-economic process and system is tantamount to the legitimization of their own oppression and to the consensual ensurance of their own powerlessness.’ [MORE]  

Old frameworks must be re-invented or dropped altogether. Many Blacks 'continue to live in a dream world where they believe that emotional singing, marching, dancing, chanting, praying, barbecuing, releasing balloons into the air and hoping will solve their problems.' [MORE] Neely Fuller calls such activity “the Teddy Bear Code” or "protest" actually in cooperation with and submission to white supremacy/racism and government authority. Anon asks, 'If marching, picketing, and protesting was an effective strategy to achieve justice — why are we still marching, picketing, and protesting FOUR DECADES later? Why is there MORE police brutality, MORE black men and women in prison, MORE black children at risk, MORE family instability, MORE single mothers, and MORE black children dropping out of high school now than before the civil rights era?' [MORE] The operating system of White supremacy is refining itself while Blacks remain in a reactionary state. For the most part, ad-hoc liberal progressive theory and politics have failed. Black and other friendly white elected officials at the highest levels and appointments to various government positions along with individual accomplishments in corporations have not translated into power for Black people. Reformers should witness that Minnesota, Atlanta, St. Louis, Cleveland, Baltimore or NYC or many other places where white cops murder Blacks in broad daylight were all already dominated by liberal Democrats duly elected by the black votary. Said “black voting power” did not produce justice and does not prevent injustice from occurring to Black people. Additionally, laws enacted and funded by white legislators, administered by white Government workers, enforced by white prosecutors or cops and remedied by white jurors and judges [& their Black & Brown rolebots]- the same racist suspects who participate, perpetuate and/or benefit from this system of white domination and control – has not produced justice. 

With a real understanding of the system of racism white supremacy, the actual context that we live in, non-white people must critically re-examine concepts and assumptions about democracy, government, authority, rights, majority rule, duty, dogma, monetary systems and the purpose of education to determine whether they are complementary to our liberation or our enslavement.  

At the White Party’s [GOP] Party Neuropeans and Neuropeons Obsessed w/Skin Color and Their Numerical Inadequacy Insist They're Not Racist and Offer Sambo BOHICANS as Proof to Undecided [Racist] Voters

BLACK CONSERVATIVES CONSERVE THE SYSTEM OF RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY. GOP NEGRO OUTREACH INVOLVES servant SNAG’s Telling Black Democrats they should join them on the mean cracker master’s plantation, which features more restrictions and cruelty. [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY explains as follows:

BOHICANS - Bend Over Here It Comes Again Negro. SNiggers are the last of the buck dancing Bohicans. “I am the last of the Bohicans” he said “. . .and I will never be broken. I am the last and worst of my breed - and the final token.” (See: SNigger, Coin-Operated, Samboism, Uncle Tome, Possumist, Turdistan, Piece-Activist, Niggeroe and GOP).

SNAG = $nitch-ass Negroes Aiding Governments. 2) COINTEL-BROs. 3) Smile Negro And Grin—while I put it in. SNAGs are coin-operated piece-activist sniggering infiltraitors from the native Black American community. SNAGs are on the stroll, exacting Black life as the toll, while klandestinely on the rogue "government" payroll. Dumb-ditty dumb where the hell do these sorry-ass sellout Negroes come from? When you see them, go and give them some—or at least a piece of your mind. It's easy to heckle and hyde, but why do we seem to always let self-hating sucker-perpetrating Negroes electric slide? SNAGs are Negroes who run from the fabric, the very essence of their Afrikan heritage struggle, culture and consciousness, and run to support the psychopathological dominant minority elite European global racist-supremacist mindset and Agenda along with its narcissistic projections and population control objectives (genocide and eugenics). [MORE]

Neuropeans - (Neurotic Europeans) - neurotic, ignorant, narcissistic and self-deluded white supremacist Caucasians operating at the mythic and rational levels of consciousness only. 2) Fascists. (See Weitko Disease, White Supremacy and Yurungu.)

Neuropeons - neurotic, stupid and self deluded poor white trash. 2) skin heads 3) Nazis, neo-Nazis and Theo-nazis (See KKK, WOTAN, Weitko Disease, Fasxism, Racism White Supremacy, Stupidity, Ku Klux Klan & Yurungu).  

Black Conservative - a lost sheep in master's clothing. A black conservative typically has nothing of his own to conserve with the exception of his or her own double-consciousness. So-called "Black Conservatives" dodge the reality of their folly and posit is that what they truly are conserving is traditional "values" as if values ever had anything whatsoever to do with morality or ethics. A black conservative unknowingly preserves the differential power-relations and dynamics between those of African descent he and their bosses, the overruling overclass elite. [MORE]

Sleeping Tom - a person of Afrikan descent who has not consciously awakened to fully embrace his or her own asili (cultural heritage and imperative). 2) a socially unconscious person of Afrikan descent who participates in secret balloting (voting). A sleepin' Tom lives and reacts out of another culture's asili or out of the mind of another; not their own. 3) a Negro who is unaware that he is all souled-out. 4) a Negro who isn't aware that he is in fact and in deed a certified Sambo. 5) a broken, token Negro; a coin-operative. (See: Straw Boss, Doublemindedness, Sambo, Uncle Tom-Tom, Coin-Operated & Secret Ballots) 

Sambo - a self-loathing Negro lacking self-knowledge. "A willing slave gets upset if you refuse to acknowledge his or her master. [MORE]

ABOVE BLACK CONSERVATIVE amateur PROBOT KENTUCKY AG DANIEL CAMERON ON DISPLAY LIKE A POTTED PLANT AT THE GOP CONVENTION. THIS CHILDISH-LIKE UNQUALIFIED SIMPLETON WAS APPOINTED TO OVERSEE THE PROSECUTION OF BREONNA TAYLOR ON MAY 13TH. THUS FAR HE HAS DONE NOTHING BUT STALL THE PROSECUTION OF WHITE COPS FOR HIS MASTERS. MLK WARNED THAT RACISTS OFTEN SUPPORT, APPOINT OR PROMOTE UNQUALIFIED NEGROS INTO HIGH POSITIONS SO THAT IMPORTANT MATTERS TO BLACK LIFE WILL BE HANDLED FRIVOLOUSLY. [MORE] PRIOR TO CAMERON’S ELECTION AS AG IN 2019 HE NEVER TRIED A CASE OF ANY KIND, NEVER REPRESENTED AN ACTUAL CLIENT IN A COURT CASE AND HAD NO COURTROOM EXPERIENCE. HE ALSO NEVER ARGUED A LEGAL BRIEF BEFORE EITHER THE APPELLATE COURT OR THE SUPREME COURT — AT THE STATE LEVEL OR FEDERAL LEVEL. CAMERON’S ONLY EXPERIENCE WAS WORKING AS GENERAL COUNSEL FOR MITCH MCCONNELL FOR 2 YEARS, WORKING AS A LAW CLERK AND WORKING FOR A LAW FIRM THAT FOCUSED ON LOBBYING - POSITIONS THAT HAVE NO MEANINGFUL RELEVANCE TO PROSECUTORIAL TRIAL AND APPELLATE WORK. [MORE]

In Dr. Frances Cress Welsing’s color confrontation theory she defines racism white supremacy and explains that racists suffer from numerical inadequacy and color deficiency. She explains that both conditions are the primary motivational operating forces behind the system of racism white supremacy. Welsing observed that [numerical inadequacy] whites are vastly outnumbered, 90% of the world is non-white and the white population is rapidly declining. She states, ‘Indeed, if racists had not created such a global system in which they established power over the world's non-white majority, the white collective would have been genetically extinct a long time ago.’ Welsing further explains [color deficiency] ‘people of color always will have something highly visible that whites never can have or produce — the genetic factor of color. Always, in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior. Whites are genetic recessive (white genes or the "white race" cannot be reproduced when mixed with non-white persons. “White can be genetically annihilated. White plus Black equals Colored. White plus Brown equals Colored. White plus Yellow equals Colored.”

Welsing stated that non-white people must understand that the racist collective is playing a survival game with non-white people - engaging in behaviors in economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and more—in order for them to survive on the planet, by any means necessary. [MORE] 

Welsing states:

“Neely Fuller, in his 1969 copyrighted The United Independent Com­pensatory Code System Concept: a textbook/workbook for thought, speech and/or action for victims of racism (white supremacy), recognized the need for a functional statement on racism, one that could be utilized daily by those earnestly seeking to bring about social change. Fuller observed that, contrary to most present thinking, there is only one functioning racism in the known world — white supremacy. He challen­ges his readers to identify and then to demonstrate the superiority or functional supremacy of any of the world's "non-white" peoples over anyone. Concluding that since there is no operational supremacy of any "colored" people, Fuller reveals that the only valid operational definition of racism is white supremacy. He observes that in spite of any and all statements the world's "non-white" peoples may make about themselves having economic and/or political independence and the like, in the final analysis, they are all victims of the white supremacy process. He places major emphasis on the present realities of the world that can be verified and tested, rather than on what one could imagine to be the case (such as a black or yellow supremacy). He further emphasizes that, instead of focusing on individual cases or on specific locations, a perspective that examines the patterns of relationships between whites and "non-whites" worldwide must be developed.

Fuller explains that racism is not merely a pattern of individual and/or institutional practice; it is a universally operating "system" of white supremacy and domination in which the majority of the world's white people participate. He discounts the validity of theories that recognize the evolution of economic systems as the origin of this state of affairs. Instead, he reveals the inadequate analysis of such theories by suggesting that various economic systems - such as capitalism, communism and socialism - have been devised, used and refined in the effort to achieve the primary goal of white domination.  In other words, the goal of the white supremacy system is none other than the establishment, main­tenance, expansion and refinement of world domination by members of a group that classifies itself as the white "race." Fuller then suggests that the word "race," in this sense, has little biological validity but is translated more correctly as "organization," the sole purpose of which is to maintain white domination and world control. Fuller's emphasis on the concept of color amplifies the assertion made in 1903 by W.E.B. Du Bois (perhaps the greatest American social scientist) in The Souls ofBldckFolk, that the great problem facing the 20th century is that of the color-line.

Whether or not one is emotionally comfortable with Fuller's thesis and assessment is not germane. The question of such comfort never has been the important concern of scientific investigation. Of great significance in Fuller's work is the description of relationships between "non-white" and white peoples. Fuller defines and elucidates these relationships as a means of accounting for and illuminating many past and present observ­able social practices. Also, this examination reveals that, despite all kinds of programs and pronouncements to the contrary, for the past several hundred years, white supremacist social conditions have remained intact as the dominant social reality.

Impressed that the concept of a "system" of white domination over the world's "non-white" peoples could explain the seeming predicament and dilemma of "non-white" social reality, I tended to focus, as a psychiatrist, on what possible motivational force, operative at both the individual and group levels, could account for the evolution of these patterns of social behavioral practice that apparently function in all areas of human activity (economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war). While Fuller clearly suggests that this "system" consists of patterns of thought, speech and action, practiced to various degrees by the majority of the world's white people, the only comment on etiology he makes is that:

"Most white people hate Black people. The reason that most white people hate Black people is because whites are not Black people. If you know this about white people, you need know little else. If you do not know this about white people, virtually all else that you know about them will only confuse you."

To take Fuller's account a step further, it should be noted that, in the majority of instances, any neurotic drive for superiority usually is founded upon a deep and pervading sense of inadequacy and inferiority. Is it not true that white people represent in numerical terms a very small minority of the world's people? And more profoundly, is not "white" itself the very absence of any ability to produce color? I reason, then, that the quality of whiteness is indeed a genetic inadequacy or a relative genetic deficiency state, based upon the genetic inability to produce the skin pigments of melanin (which is responsible for all skin color). The vast majority of the world's people are not so afflicted, which suggests that color is normal for human beings and color absence is abnormal. Additionally, this state of color absence acts always as a genetic recessive to the dominant genetic factor of color-production. Color always "annihilates" (phenotypically-and genetically speaking) the non-color, white. Black people possess the greatest color potential, with brown, red and yellow peoples possessing lesser quantities, respectively. This is the genetic and psychological basis for The Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and Racism (White Supremacy).

The Color-Confrontation theory states that the white or color-deficient Europeans responded psychologically, with a profound sense of numerical inadequacy and color inferiority, in their confrontations with the majority of the world's people - all of whom possessed varying degrees of color-producing capacity. This psychological response, whether con­scious or unconscious, revealed an inadequacy based on the most obvious and fundamental part of their being, their external appearance. As might be anticipated in terms of modern psychological theories, whites defen­sively developed an uncontrollable sense of hostility and aggression. This attitude has continued to manifest itself throughout the history of mass confrontations between whites and people of color. That the initial hostility and aggression came only from whites is recorded in innumerable diaries, journals and books written by whites. Also, records indicate that only after long periods of great abuse have non-whites responded defen­sively with any form of counterattack. This perplexing psychological reaction of whites has been directed towards all peoples with the capacity to produce melanin. However, the most profound aggressions have been directed towards Black people, who have the greatest color potential and, therefore, are the most envied and feared in genetic color competition.

The experience of numerical inadequacy and genetic color inferiority led whites to implement a number of interesting, although devastating (to non-white peoples), psychological defense mechanisms. The initial psychological defense maneuver was the repression of the initial painful awareness of inadequacy. This primary ego defense was reinforced by a host of other defense mechanisms.

One of the most important of these defense mechanisms was reaction formation, a response that converts (at the psychological level) something desired and envied but wholly unattainable, into something discredited and despised. The whites, desiring to have skin color but unable to attain it, claimed (consciously or unconsciously) that skin color was disgusting to them, and began attributing negative qualities to color - especially to blackness. Interestingly, the term "non-white" is a double negative result­ing in a positive statement. This is perhaps a Freudian slip, wherein the use of language ultimately reveals the primary psychological dynamic. Whites' desire to have colored skin can be observed at the very first signs of spring or summer when they begin to strip off their clothes (as many pieces as the law will allow), often permitting their skins to be burned severely in an attempt to add some color to their pale bodies and rendering themselves vulnerable to skin cancer in the process. Most cosmetics are also an attempt to add color to white skin. Such coloring makeup is provided for the white male as well as female. And finally, untold millions are spent annually on chemicals that are advertised as being able to increase the tanning potential of whites.

The fact that some Blacks have attempted to change the color of their skin to white does not mitigate the force of this argument, as it can be demonstrated readily that these non-whites are responding to the already established social conditions of white supremacy. Such a process, as seen in Blacks and other non-whites, may be described as identification with the oppressor.

Another example of the reaction formation defense is the elaboration of the myth of white genetic superiority, which continues to be reinforced assiduously (note Jensen's latest elaborations and their acceptance at all levels of the white social structure). Acutely aware of their inferior genetic ability to produce skin color, whites built the elaborate myth of white genetic superiority. Furthermore, whites set about the huge task of evolving a social, political and economic structure that would support the myth of the inferiority of Blacks and other non-whites.

An additional psychological defense maneuver utilized by whites has been that of projection. Feeling extreme hostility and hate towards non-whites, whites began the pattern of stating that non-whites hated them. In many instances, this mechanism has served to mitigate the guilt whites occasionally experience for their impulse to aggress against Blacks and other people of color.” [MORE]

"Plandemic 2: Indoctornation" (Movie)

According to FUNKTIONARY

Richcraft – the sorcery of greed—the use of violence, laws, deception, theft, secret oaths, and oppression to snatch and hoard resources from and gain power over the vast majority of people’s lives through the widespread use of this vicious concoction of nefarious, lethal, legal, and demonstrably devious power. (See: COP, Gangbanking, Privilege, Aristocracy, Corporations, Usury, Power, Oppression, Violence, Greed, Deception, GIMME!, Political Money, Cultural Induction, GEO-Dollars, Control, The Pathocracy & Poor)

Socialist distancing – the ever-expanding and increasing disparity between the haves and the have-nots until the Socialist (i.e., monopoly capitalist) Welfare State becomes the Farewell State—farewell to your rights, your family, friends and even your life through Plandemics (Coronavirus), $camdemics (Corporate State turned Surveillance and Nanny State), 5G bio-weaponized eugenics, starvation, vaccinations, civil unrest, genocide and other nefarious LWO (Last World Order) activities that will greatly reduce the world’s population by 2030. Before Social Distancing, we were experiencing the effects of “Socialist Distancing”...the ever-widening separation between the “haves” (holders) and the “have-nots” (held-back) due to “monopoly capitalism” (centralization of credit in the hands of the State) which by wide academic recognition is the core attribute of communism / socialism, in fact, it is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The litmus test to any political system is what is used as “money” and who controls (monopolizes) its “issuance.” Labels just don’t cut it. Think deeper...learn to access the underlying reality behind the truth veneer you’ve been conditioned to hold or have been told. (See: Plandemic, $camdemics, Vaccines, Coronavirus, “Monopoly Capitalism,” Exchange, Economics, Matrix Capitalism, Political Money, GEO-Dollars, The Farewell State, Trapitalism, Cultural Induction & COVERT-19)

predictive programming – an ancient technique of downloading (marketing) an idea into the subconscious of the conditioned mass-mind (step-by-step) guiding (bringing) the duped victims into a desired or predetermined conclusion that they actually believe was consciously derived on their own. Predictive programming works down through the centuries like a charm. Everyone is standardized with the same indoctrination—conditioned under the same mis-education and disinformation. Since we all watch the same TV and download the same standardized education, it never occurs that we are getting conned, uploaded, downgraded, brain-chipped and ultimately faded from any memory of being an individual self. “Most folk’s beliefs and what they think is induced beliefs, it’s propagated into them through repetition as Bertrand Russell said. Just repetitive advertising and people start parroting it in their daily lives and it’s actually changing the structure of their mind into acceptance of something they don’t even perceive yet.” ~ Alan Watt. (See: Borg, Pathocracy, MEDIA, T.V., Money, Schooling, Education, Indoctrination, Cultural Conditioning, Dollar, “Government,” Zombie, Android, Belief, Inoculation, Chemtrails & Democracy)

Along w/Stupid, Obedient, Mannequin "Human Resources" On Display at the Whitest Party's Convention, a Provocative White Couple was On Stage Solely because They Waived Guns at Black People

According to FUNKTIONARY

Human Resources - answer questions when asked; sign their names when told; open doors when knocked upon; entrust themselves to the protection of others as a ward; trust in anything other than their inner authority; believe what they are told; know the definitions of words and meaning of terms without bothering to reference the source of the definitions; evade instead of confront apparent external authority or putative jurisdiction, alleged liability or presentment; covet the property of merchants; volunteer to servitude; desire a kinder froster instead of liberty; and, yearn for the illusion of security at the expense of inalienable fights and freedom. Are you a human resource of the Corporate U.S. "government"? Are you a fictional citizen of the United States--as granted by Congress? Do you have a Birth Certificate with a date of birth? Have you registered to vote? Have you applied for the "benefits" of Social Security? (See: Statutory Oppression, Involuntary Servitude, Citizen of the United States, Legislation, Date of Biah, Statutes, Freedom, Liberty, Inalienable Rights, Empty Words, Blanks, Employee, Tin Woodsman, Scarecrow, OWLs, Hireling, Voting, SSN, Socialism, IRS & Birth Certificate)

citizens - those who instinctively seek permission or ask themselves whether or not they are allowed to do anything before they act. Citizens (serfs, subjects or slaves), possess a "ruled" mind-virus mentality (See: Citizenship & Slavery). 

“Today, law makes people equal—that is, equal wards of the state (the plantation called Congress); the Corporate Police State. A citizen is one who lives a life of involuntary servitude under the command of another. A citizen is one whose second nature is to do whatever might please his or her master without question in order to avoid disapproval and/or punishment. Citizens show-up, shut-up, and pay-up—extorted tribute and fines.” [MORE]

obedience - a Self-Other irreversible relationship in which there is only communication (mind-to-mind), i.e. no contact, and an imbalance of power. 2) the highest form of the power-fear systemic. 3) slavery sold to both children and adults alike deceptively packaged in a respectfully sounding label. 4) reverse terrorism. You can compel obedience but you cannot compel responsibility or respect. Everyone should have a say in waking-up to (or waking up from) whatever they have been programmed to obey. It is difficult to reduce to obedience anyone who has no wish to command. If you can't read very well and follow it up with the absence of critical thinking skills, then obey your masters and oppressors until you can—for your own survival. Life is more trouble-free when you obey. If you speak TV-English, by all means obey the beast, if you like freedom of movement with your slavery. TV's ought to have warning labels: "Use of this device can be hazardous to your freedom.'" How can you take a man seriously who watches T.V. obediently, drinks habitually and desires freedom too? The historian Howard Zinn is clear on the role obedience has played on our conditions throughout the centuries. "[Civil disobedience] is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions of people have been killed because of this obedience. ...Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is people are obedient while the jails are full with petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." More atrocities are committed in the name of economics than in the name of hate, ideological or religious intolerance. (See: Authority, God, Atrocities, Conditioning. TV, War, The COMB, Control, Power, Violence. Religion, Should. Duty, Hatred, Other, Inhumanity, Communication, Programming, Indoctrination, Poverty, Gangbanking, Education, Unlearning. Force. Orderlies, Police, Force Continuum. Judicial Tyranny, Residency, Labor, Property, Servitude, Critical Thinking, Holodeck Court, Questioning, Pulpit. TUFF. Authenticity. Fear & Authoritarians).