Court Allows Mumia Abu-Jamal to Reargue His Appeal b/c White Appellate Judge Should Have Recused Himself Due to His Bias Against Black People Accused of Killing White Cops

https://democracynow.org - Former Black Panther and award-winning journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal was convicted of the 1981 murder of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner but has always maintained his innocence. On Thursday, a Philadelphia judge ruled Abu-Jamal can reargue his appeal in the case before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

From [HERE] A Philadelphia Common Pleas Court judge ruled Thursday that Black Panther Mumia Abu-Jamal can reargue an appeal before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court because then-Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille [in photo] did not recuse himself from the case despite his prior role as the Philadelphia district attorney. Philadelphia Judge Leon Tucker ruled Thursday that Castille should have recused himself because of statements he made as a prosecutor about police killers that suggest a potential bias. They include campaign speeches and letters advocating the issuance of death warrants in such cases. The ruling gives Abu-Jamal the chance to reargue his appeal. However, Judge Tucker denied Abu-Jamal’s claim that Castille had “personal significant involvement” in his case due to lack of evidence.

“Judge Tucker recognized the unconstitutional bias,” said Judith L. Ritter, an attorney for Abu-Jamal, in a statement. “This was a straightforward application of federal and Pennsylvania law requiring cases to be decided by judges whose impartiality cannot reasonably be questioned.”Abu-Jamal, a former Black Panther, is currently serving a life sentence for the 1981 death of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner. [MORE]

Racist Suspect Liberals at the Washington Post Provide Dis-Info in Accord w/the Appetite of the Racist Reader, Not Reality: Contrary to Propaganda, the Murder Rate in Baltimore Declined in 2018

Black-on-Black Crime - a psycho-political euphemism, unwittingly used and abused by African-Americans and deliberately by Caucasians, describing demographic criminal activity in general, as people commit violent crimes on people who live in closest proximity to them, and the violence mostly occurs by those and to those who are held hostage under chronic and cyclical economically disadvantaged circumstances and environments. Do you ever hear of the slogan "White-on-White" crime? Most violent crimes (by number and by percentage of population) take place by Caucasians against Caucasians. Where's the associated terminology? (See Gangbanking & Racism." [FUNKTIONARY]

In Thursday’s Washington Post a headline suggests an escalating war is going on in Baltimore, “As police struggle to solve homicides, Baltimore residents see an ‘open season for killing.” Underneath the headline is a picture of a sad Black woman sitting on her knees in a church [see below].

The article’s writers believe that Baltimore cops are struggling to solve murder cases because the mostly Black population in Baltimore does not work with police to solve them. To exaggerate the importance of this premise the racist suspect writers claim murders are increasing. No data is provided. It states,

“As Baltimore has seen a stunning surge of violence, with nearly a killing each day for the past three years in a city of 600,000, homicide arrests have plummeted. City police made an arrest in 41 percent of homicides in 2014; last year, the rate was just 27 percent, a 14 percentage point drop.”

The racist suspects then state,

Baltimore is also one of 30 cities that have seen an increase in homicides in recent years, with the greatest raw number increase in killings of any city other than Chicago, which has four times the population. While homicide rates remain near historical lows in most American cities, Baltimore and Chicago are now both seeing murder tallies that rival the early 2000s.”

As stated no data is presented to support their belief in ”a raw number increase,” or “stunning surge in violence” or the “open season for killing going on.”

Mixing actual facts with nonsense the racist suspect writers also claimed:

“While homicide rates remain near historical lows in most American cities, Baltimore and Chicago are now both seeing murder tallies that rival the early 2000s.”

Contrary to the above, according to a report “Crime in 2018: Updated Analysis” released last week by the non-partisan, Brennan Center at NYU School of Law, Baltimore’s 2018 murder rate is projected to decline by 7.4 percent. In fact, last week, Interim Commissioner Gary Tuggle and Mayor Catherine Pugh acknowledged homicides are trending down in 2018. [MORE] 

According to the Brennan Center report “the 2018 murder rate in the 30 largest cities is estimated to decline by nearly 6 percent.” Additionally, in contrast to the Post’s assertions, “The murder rate in Chicago — which increased significantly in 2015 and 2016 — is projected to decline by 18.1 percent in 2018.“

The report also states “the overall crime rate in the 30 largest cities in 2018 is estimated to decline slightly from the previous year, falling by 1.8 percent. While this conclusion is based on preliminary data, if the trend holds, the crime rate will fall to its lowest since at least 1990.” Moreover, “violent crime rates are projected to decline in the majority of the 30 largest cities through the end of 2018. Overall, the violent crime rate is estimated to decrease by 2.7 percent, continuing a downward trend from 2017.” [MORE]

The war going on is the relentless propaganda against Black people. Also propagandized is the jesusized need to promote fear and dependence on Government; what would we do without it? Factually supported or not, elite racists continue to propagandize Chicago and Baltimore violence for their political purposes. It is usually done under the pretense of concern about Black people and their communities.  The newsworthiness of stories about the crime rate in places where Black people live are “scripted using stereotypes grounded in White racism and White fear of Black crime.” [MORE] A recent study by the Sentencing Project found that White Americans overestimate the proportion of crime committed by people of color, and associate people of color with criminality. Many media outlets reinforce the public’s racial misconceptions about crime by presenting African Americans and Latinos differently than whites – both quantitatively and qualitatively. As explained by Dr. Amos Wilson, "in the context of White American domination there is no innocent Black male, just Black male criminals who have not yet been detected, apprehended or convicted. Their mere presence inspires in White Americans, fears of being assaulted, raped, robbed, or some other indefinable dread of being criminally victimized." [MORE] Toward this end, the media, which is a white owned enterprise with billions of dollars at their disposal, present information in accord with the appetite of the racist reader/viewer and not in accord with the realities of life.

Dr. Amos Wilson explains, 

"Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their self-congratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control.

White America's self-appreciation is enhanced as it insatiably feeds on overblown reports about Black criminality while denying its own incomparable criminal record, and its own racist-imperialist incubation and giving birth to the very same criminal forces which now threaten to destroy it.

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image.”  [MORE]

Exaggerated crime rates are part of “white propaganda” which Dr. Blynd explains as “a game two can play—which consists simply in repeating '"I am better than you" and "you are utterly unlike (opposite to) me" over and over again; despite the historical record to the contrary.”

Gullible unsuspecting Black readers usually associate the kind of “data” presented as fact in the Washington Post with racist Republicans and their media outlets. However, often overlooked is how racist suspect liberals use so-called Black on black violence in Chicago and Baltimore and elsewhere to propagandize racism white supremacy and ad-hoc liberal ideologies such as gun control, the disarmament of law abiding Black folks, the moral suasion of racists and reforming police departments.

Here, pursuant to liberal ideology we are to believe that police are here to serve and protect us and are primarily engaged in “police work” in the “community.” According to this logic, Baltimore cops have broken trust with the Black community because of its unaccountability resulting from the actions of a few bad apples in an imperfect system trying to get it right. As a result, they are unable to solve murders.

However, in reality, cops exist primarily to consensually manage the behavior of Blacks & Latinos within a free-range prison controlled by Government. Their goal is to place you in greater confinement. Anything else cops do, good or bad,  is random or incidental to said goals.

As Dr. Blynd observes, "people who are awake see cops as mercenary guards that remind us daily through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate State - colonized, surveilled and patrolled by the desensitized and lobotomized drones of the colonizers." [MORE] 

As with disjointed racist republican drivel, liberalism in general cannot explain or address the phenomenon of this racist system of control [everywhere Blacks and whites live in proximity the whites are in control]. It has no explanation for the system of racism white supremacy and avoids addressing it entirely by discussing bigotry and other distracting subjects. Ad hoc liberal positions are a patchwork of disjointed stances intended to increase the numbers of the Democratic party - not empower Black people or provide any meaningful explanation of the clearly visible phenomenon of racism going in right in front of our eyes.  

Dr. Blynd explains, 

Black-on-Black Crime - a psycho-political euphemism, unwittingly used and abused by African-Americans and deliberately by Caucasians, describing demographic criminal activity in general, as people commit violent crimes on people who live in closest proximity to them, and the violence mostly occurs by those and to those who are held hostage under chronic and cyclical economically disadvantaged circumstances and environments. Do you ever hear of the slogan "White-on-White" crime? Most violent crimes (by number and by percentage of population) take place by Caucasians against Caucasians. Where's the associated terminology? (See Gangbanking & Racism." [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY says "Entertainment is mental masturbation bringing you to indoctrination—coming into your (five) senses."

According to FUNKTIONARY:

entertainment - visual information passively experienced (mediated). 2) a medium where one's actions are dissociated from one's beliefs. 3) the process whereby art-forms and creative impulses are turned into commodities to be bought and sold. 4) a type of voyeurism that separates one's work from one's play thereby engendering consumerism instead of co-creation. 5) the re-erection of barriers between audience and artist, spectator and performer, where interaction is rendered impossible. 6) passive mediated and half-duplex form of performance attempting to create a pleasurable atmosphere from the performer to trie audience. 7) performance that fosters watching instead of acting; buying instead of creating. Entertainment is mental masturbation bringing you to indoctrination—coming into your (five) senses. The goal of entertainment is entrainment—to rot the minds of the populace—that is, what's left of them. (See: Irinertairtment. Federal Hollyork Complex, MEDIA, Predictive Programming, Quantum Partners, Programming, Matrix, Discernment, Sacred Psychology, Spectacle Soceity & Conditioning)

Entertainment Criminals - the Media Mafia. If you give them your attention, you give them your power, unless you can observe the Spectacle without involvement, consumeristic demand or mindless attachment to a virtual world.

enterstainment - dubious, dreadful, inappropriate or grossly offensive entertainment which leaves one feeling stained.

Auto-Coon Entertainer Travis Scott Chosen for the Job of SNiggering at the Super Bowl Halftime Show b/c He said Mike Brown ‘Deserved’ to be Executed by White Cop in Ferguson

BOHICAN - Bend Over Here It Comes Again Negro. "The value of a dollar, will never, ever drop as low as the standards of some miseducated self-hating Negroes to obtain it." [FUNKTIONARY]

Rolling Out explains, “People were surprised when Houston-based [alleged] rapper Travis Scott bucked popular sentiment and accepted the NFL’s offer to perform during their halftime show when other Black artists turned them down.

But if you listen to Travis Scott’s interview from 2014 and his stance on Mike Brown, who was gunned down by police in Ferguson, Missouri, sparking nationwide protests, you can probably” understand why elite racist NFL owners chose this coin-operated SNigger.

Twitter users uncovered Scott’s 2014 Hot97 interview in which he discussed his views on the Mike Brown situation and Black people in general.

Scott, 26, the boyfriend of racist suspect Kylie Jenner, 21, and the father of her child, told radio host Ebro how he felt about how Ferguson jumped off and how hip-hop affects youth culture.

“I’m kind of angry; so many Black people are acting like fake activists … I’m not saying [Mike Brown] deserved to get killed. But I’m not saying that he didn’t deserve to pay for consequences he probably inflicted,” Scott said.

Scott added that “the problem with Black people” is there always has to be a “disruption” when something like the Ferguson situation happens.

“And I know we’re like ‘fed up’ quote/un-quote, with whatever is going on in culture…but at the same time, you gotta just stop putting yourself in positions where you’re continuously having this situation go down,” said Scott. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

“Auto-coon - (noun) a cookie-cutter rapper/entertainer that shells out his/her community out and personal dignity to profit from ignorance. Auto-coons are typically produced in great numbers by major recording labels and corporate media. (Verb) to fall back on the gimmicks, buffonery, and swagger-jacking to sell records due to lack of intelligence, real talent and creativity.”

sniggering - 1) the modus vivendi of opportunist (sell-out) compromises. 2) the actions of SNiggers. (See Coin-Operated). 

Sambo - a self-loathing Negro lacking self-knowledge. "A willing slave gets upset if you refuse to acknowledge his or her master. 

Vaginal ”RAPPER” ROLEBOT PLAYING LIKE HE’S A HARD. NEELY FULLER EXPLAINS ELITE RACISTS INTEND TO KEEP BLACK PEOPLE IN A CHILDISH CONDITION IN ORDER TO DOMINATE THEM.

Part of white supremacy is the annihilation of Black self respect. As explained by Amos Wilson, "the most powerful obstacle against the liberation of Afrikan peoples from White domination and exploitation is not the ability of Whites to use superior military or police firepower or their threat to use it against Afrikan insurgency, but is their ability to engage in unrelenting psychopolitical violence against the collective Afrikan psyche." [MORE] 'Their devastatingly ingenious use of it against the minds of Afrikan peoples which represent the greatest threat to Afrikan survival.' [MORE] 

Elite racists/white supremacists have created an army of showcase Blacks, like coin-operated SNigger, Travis Scott. Although elite racists do all the showcasing - sambo celebrities would not exist without Black people’s support! 

The Blight House is Detaining a Record Number of Non-White Migrant Youth in HHS Family Destruction Facilities

From [WashPost] With a record number of migrant children and teens in U.S. government custody, the Trump administration is easing screening of potential sponsors, a change officials say will speed the release of minors from shelters that are nearly full.

By dropping a six-month-old requirement that all people living in the home of a would-be sponsor submit fingerprints to the FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services says it may be able to send thousands of migrant youths to relatives or other temporary guardians by Christmas.

The amount of time children are spending in HHS facilities has grown dramatically in recent months — averaging 90 days as of November — mostly because it is taking the government longer to find and vet sponsors. HHS says the fingerprinting of all members of a household, ordered in June, had “generally not yielded additional information that has enabled [officials] to identify new child welfare risks.”

But the government is keeping a second, equally controversial policy that advocates say also has slowed the release process: allowing HHS to share information about those they are screening with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Between July and late November, ICE arrested 170 individuals suspected of being in the country illegally as a result of information that came from sponsor-related background checks. The majority did not have criminal records, ICE said (being in the country illegally is a civil violation).

Immigration lawyers and advocates say the information-sharing arrangement — and the arrests — have had a chilling effect on sponsors, leaving children in federal custody longer, and in some cases indefinitely, if no one comes forward to claim them.

The number of children in federally funded shelters and facilities has climbed to 14,600, up from approximately 9,200 when President Trump took office two years ago, HHS officials said. The system’s current capacity is 16,000 beds.

Most of the children crossed the U.S.-Mexico border alone, or with adults who were not relatives, often fleeing poverty, corruption and violence and in many cases planning to seek asylum here.

“Anyone who has interacted with a child in detention knows there is no way to overstate the ongoing suffering they experience and how profoundly damaging it is for them,” said Neha Desai, an attorney at the National Center for Youth Law. She said she has interviewed children who were so traumatized by being held that ultimately they chose to return to dangerous situations in their home countries rather than pursue immigration claims.

A total of 50,036 unaccompanied minors were taken into custody after crossing the border in fiscal 2018, the third-highest total ever, but significantly fewer than during the mass surges of 2014 and 2016. The average time in Office of Refugee Resettlement custody rose to 60 days in fiscal 2018, compared to 48 days in 2017.

The youths are processed and sent to shelters that are scattered across the country. Some facilities also housed the 2,500 children separated from their parents at the border last spring as part of Trump’s “zero-tolerance” policy. The chaos involved in reuniting those families preoccupied HHS officials throughout the summer, and at times took priority over processing minors who had crossed the border on their own.

An overflow facility that opened this summer in Tornillo, Tex., now houses 2,800 teenagers, up from 1,500 in October, and there is room for 1,000 more. On average, minors spend 33 days there, living and attending classes in heated tents.

The contract with the nonprofit that runs the facility — yards from the Mexican border — expires Dec. 31. HHS spokeswoman Evelyn Stauffer declined to say whether it would be extended or renegotiated. [MORE]

Racist Cincinnati Cop Investigated for Calling Black Woman NGHR [“bigotry"] & Using His Vast Unequal Power to Treat Her Like a NGHR [“racism"] During Violent Arrest to Enforce Parking Law

Nigger - "A non-white person who is subject to the system of White Supremacy." -Neely Fuller Jr.

“The Way Not to Be a Nigger is to Not be Subject to White Supremacy.” From [HERE] A white Cincinnati police officer was suspended Wednesday after he used a racial slur while he attempted to arrest a black woman during an incident at Brownstone Nightclub in Roselawn on Saturday.

Officer Dennis Barnette's use of the slur can be heard on the body camera of a fellow officer, Police Chief Eliot Isaac wrote in an email to his boss, City Manager Patrick Duhaney.

"This type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated inside the department," Isaac wrote.

Isaac shared details of the incident via email Wednesday night with Duhaney, who in turn notified other city officials. The emails were obtained by The Enquirer.

According to Isaac's email, Barnette responded to the Reading Road nightclub to assist with parking complaints and traffic control. During the course of his response, Barnette tried to arrest the woman, and she pushed him.

Due to the lack of details provided by the white owned media it is not clear whether her arrest was lawful or supported by reasonable articulable suspicion or probable cause. According to a witness, the white cop grabbed her from behind and slammed her into a police car. [MORE] Thus, we can surmise that he called her a nigger and used his superior power to treat her as a nigger.

"Subsequent to the incident, Officer Barnette is clearly heard on a nearby Officer’s Body Worn Camera using a racial slur ... ( the “N” word)," Isaac wrote.

Barnette's police powers have been suspended, and he's restricted to desk duty. An internal investigation has also begun.

"I share Chief Isaac’s concerns regarding this matter," Duhaney told city officials in his email. "It is unacceptable and not in line with the standard of conduct we expect from city employees."

A February 2014 police memo shows Barnette was given the department's Award for Exemplary Conduct. The award is given to members of the department who consistently conduct themselves in a highly professional manner, leading by example for co-workers to follow. [MORE] And in 2017, Barnette was commended for “professionalism” as part of the CPD “Civil Disturbance Response Team” in 2016. That team of officers worked during the trial of former University of Cincinnati police officer Ray Tensing who shot and killed an unarmed black man during a 2015 traffic stop. [MORE]

The Question is Not Why Did You Call Me Nigger but What Do You Plan to Do with a Nigger? Among other things FUNKTIONARY defines nigger as a species of caterpillar—known also as a 'black-jack.' It has no meaning. But as Anon explains, "in the absence of white supremacy, niggers would not exist." "Once we understand what a "nigger" is, we will understand that a made-up word does not define who we are; it defines what is being done to us." [MORE]

Racism is not primarily about bigotry - minor inconveniences such as trouble catching a cab, standing in a long line to vote, or name calling, disrespect, stereotypes or mean words by white people. Rather racism/white supremacy is about the superior, dominate position of whites and vast unequal power and opportunities and maintaining that imbalance of power through your cooperative control and oppression. 

Belief that racism is only bigotry is a vital part of false programming sold to you by the vested interests for your cooperation and submission to your own oppression. It is whitenology sold by elite whites - publishers, scholars, professionals and government representatives and also promoted by showcase Blacks who parrot such programming in various styles. Amos Wilson explained that defining racism in terms of attitude or bigotry leads to solving the wrong problems. [MORE]

In reality, to be a racist is to be an "upholder, supporter and perpetrator of the institution of the White Supremacy Dynamic in a system of oppression (structured and perpetuated injustice—racism.)" Dr. Blynd explains, "Racism is not individualistic, but institutional, cultural, economic, political, linguistic, self-perpetuating and systematic." White Supremacy is a power group dynamic involving the relationship between whites and Blacks in a vast system of unequal power. It is economic discrimination by one group over and against another for the purposes of subjugation and/or maintaining the imbalance of power through cooperative control, misinformation, indoctrination, genocide and oppression.

There is no system of Black supremacy. Nelly Fuller has observed that there is only one functioning form of racism in the known world- White supremacy. He challen­ges his readers to identify and then to demonstrate the superiority or functional supremacy of any of the world's "non-white" peoples over anyone. Concluding that since there is no operational supremacy of any "colored" people, Fuller reveals that the only valid operational definition of racism is white supremacy. He observes that in spite of any and all statements the world's "non-white" peoples may make about themselves having economic and/or political independence and the like, in the final analysis, they are all victims of the white supremacy process. He places major emphasis on the present realities of the world that can be verified and tested, rather than on what one could imagine to be the case (such as a black or yellow supremacy). He further emphasizes that, instead of focusing on individual cases or on specific locations, a perspective that examines the patterns of relationships between whites and "non-whites" worldwide must be developed. [MORE]

Racism is white supremacy and white supremacy is racism. 

Anon explains: 

Q: Why is it called “Racism/White Supremacy?”

A: Because this describes exactly WHO is practicing racism. For one group to practice racism that group must have MORE POWER than another group. Since whites control ALL the major areas of human activity in America — housing, education, health, entertainment, economics, politics, law, and religion — it is accurate to define all “racism” as “white supremacy.” We must be accurate so the victims of racism do not become confused. 

Q: Isn’t all racism the same, regardless of who is practicing it?

A: There is only ONE kind of racism: white supremacy. White people are the only group in America with the POWER to discriminate (deprive or punish other ethnic groups), and the systems and institutions to maintain the imbalance of power.

For example, rich people are more powerful than poor people. Rich people have the POWER to discriminate against poor people by depriving them of income, promotions, jobs, housing, land, justice, and any other rights – if they choose to do so.

In America, whites have the POWER to discriminate against blacks (and other non-whites) by depriving them of income, promotions, jobs, housing, land, justice, and any other rights – if they choose to do so. It doesn’t matter that some whites are poorer than some blacks.

In all things and in all places in America, whites are collectively more powerful than blacks are collectively. This imbalance of (white) power creates the opportunity and the ability to practice racism against non-whites. Racism is not empty rhetoric (words) or mindless emotion. Racism is economic, political, institutional, and systematic POWER. Since whites control all the institutions and systems of power in America, only whites have the power to practice racism. [MORE]

---

As explained by Dr. Varius Blynd in FUNKTIONARY;

bigot - one who manifests and expresses self hatred and self inferiority. Not to be confused with racism. 

Bigotry - manfestation of the self-alien(h)ated and self hatred projected towards others, especially those of a different so-called race. Bigotry is personal, whereas white supremacy racism is an institutionalized group power dynamic and impersonal. 

Racism White Supremacy - 1) psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." -Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, MD. 

---

In a system of white supremacy/racism non-whites cannot be racist to whites b/c they have no power to do so. It is a white over Black system of vast unequal power by design.   

Anon further states, 

"Q: Are you saying blacks cannot be racist toward whites?

A: That’s correct. Of course, all people can be hateful or prejudiced. Those terms describe individual behaviors, not systematic power. Racism is the COLLECTIVE behaviors of a group. A white individual within a system of racism/white supremacy has the implicit or explicit support of that system IF they choose to practice racism.

If a poor man robs a rich man at gunpoint that doesn’t mean the poor man is more powerful (economically and politically) than the rich man. The poor man is an individual who committed a crime of opportunity. There are no powerful institutions or systems that support his right to rob the rich man, but there are institutions and systems that allow the rich man to rob the poor man - which is why he doesn’t need a gun to do it.

A black person who mistreats a white person doesn’t mean black people are more powerful (economically and politically) than white people. Never confuse the actions of a black individual (or a group of black individuals) that mistreats someone white as proof that black racism exists. Their “power” is limited ONLY to what they can do as individuals. There are NO black institutions or systems that support, defend, or finance the right of blacks to mistreat whites.

There are NO black individuals or black organizations that have the power to strip whites of their collective right to live where they want, work where they want, get an education wherever they want, or control what white people do collectively in ANY area of human activity. There are NO black institutions that are more powerful than white institutions. Therefore, blacks do not have the COLLECTIVE POWER to diminish the quality of life for the white collective.

Q: What is collective power?

A: Collective power is the institutions and systems that benefit one group at the expense of another group, and allow one group to dominate another group in all areas of human activity.

For example, when a white policeman shoots an unarmed black man (50 times), his fellow officers, the police chief, internal affairs, the union, the media, the prosecutor, the judge, and the jury will support, defend, and finance that white police officer’s “right” to shoot (murder) an unarmed black person. That is white collective power. [MORE]

Two More Racist Suspect Michigan Authorities Take Misdemeanor Plea Deals in the Flint Water Case

RACISM IN THE WATER: On January 28, 2016, Porshe Loyd uses bottled water to wash her three-week-old son, LeAndrew, in a baby bather in the kitchen sink at their home in Flint, Michigan.

From [HERE] Two white Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) officials pleaded no contest to misdemeanors Wednesday and agreed to testify against other defendants in the criminal cases arising from the Flint drinking water crisis.

Michael Prysby, 55, of Bath and Stephen Busch, 42, of DeWitt are the fifth and sixth defendants — out of 15 charged through the state Attorney General's Office — to enter pleas to criminal charges with connection to Flint.

All the pleas to date have been no contest pleas to misdemeanors with agreements to cooperate. No contest pleas are treated similarly to guilty pleas for sentencing purposes.

Todd Flood, the Flint prosecutor hired by the Attorney General's Office, said he was accepting the pleas because of "substantial assistance being given to move the ball down the field in the Flint water investigation."

Sentencing dates for Prysby and Busch are Jan. 23.

Prysby, a state drinking water official, pleaded no contest to one count under the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, related to the issuance of permits for the Flint Water Treatment Plant and the start-up of the plant in April 2014, before it was ready to properly treat water from the Flint River and distribute it for human consumption.

Busch, the Lansing district coordinator for the DEQ’s Office of Drinking Water and Municipal Assistance, pleaded to a misdemeanor charge of causing a disturbance in a public building.

Mark Kriger, Busch's attorney, told the court that the charge relates to a January 2015 public meeting in Flint, attended by Busch and Prysby, at which Flint residents expressed concerns about their smelly and discolored drinking water.

"Because of Mr. Busch's failure to address those concerns adequately, the meeting became extremely boisterous, and in fact it had to be ended prematurely," Kriger told the judge.

As long as Prysby cooperates and follows the term of his probation, that charge and other, more serious charges against him are expected to be dismissed, Genesee District Judge David Goggins was told.

Charges initially brought against Prysby included several felonies -- two counts of misconduct in office and one count each of conspiracy to tamper with evidence and tampering with evidence.

Flint Prosecutor Todd Flood told the court that Prysby is prepared to testify that the Flint Water Treatment Plant was never tested in connection with the Flint drinking water system before the plant was activated. Prysby agreed.

Prysby is also prepared to testify that there was something bogus about an administrative consent order that was tied to the water treatment plant and used to allow the heavily indebted City of Flint to issue bonds for the new Karegnondi Water Authority pipeline to Lake Huron, Flood told the judge. The administrative consent order, signed by DEQ officials, related to an emergency repair of a sludge lagoon that wasn't even being used by the Flint Water Treatment Plant, Flood told Goggins and Prysby agreed.

Flood said Prysby would also testify that the decision to operate the Flint Water Treatment Plant before it was ready to safely treat Flint River water for human consumption was ultimately made by state-appointed emergency managers. Prysby also agreed with that statement in court.

Two former Flint emergency managers — Gerald Ambrose and Darnell Earley — are among the 15 people charged in the case.

Busch, who faced charges similar to those Prysby faced, will also be placed on probation for one year and have his charges dismissed, based on cooperation, court was told. Goggins took Busch's plea under advisement, meaning no conviction has been registered against him.

Busch told the court he is prepared to testify he had a discussion with Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Director Nick Lyon — who is facing involuntary manslaughter and other charges — about legionella bacteria, prior to March 2015.

Flint's drinking water became contaminated with lead in April 2014 after the city switched from treated Lake Huron water supplied from Detroit to raw water from the Flint River, which was treated at the Flint Water Treatment Plant.

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality officials have acknowledged a mistake in failing to require corrosion-control chemicals be added to the more corrosive water. As a result, lead leached from pipes, joints and fixtures into Flint households.

In addition to lead contamination concerns, there were 12 deaths linked to Legionnaires' disease during a 17-month period in 2014 and 2015 in the Flint area. Dozens more were sickened by the disease, a severe type of pneumonia.

In previous years, six to 13 cases were typically confirmed annually in the county.

Looks Like Lebron Had to Work for White Folks on Christmas - But He's Correct, NBA Plantations Offer Better Conditions than Those Owned by Mean Cracker Masters in the NFL

OWNER OF THE LA LAKERS JEANNIE BUSS.

Last week Showcase Black Lebron James offered what the white owned media has described as “a scathing assessment of NFL team owners” on the latest episode of "The Shop," on HBO (a white owned network) saying the league is run by "old white men" with a "slave mentality" towards players. [of course, here Bron-Bron meant a “slave master’s” mentality].

In the new episode that aired last Friday night on HBO, James spoke with business partner Maverick Carter, Los Angeles Rams star Todd Gurley and actor/rapper Ice Cube about NFL player protests over social injustice.

After Gurley called it "a touchy subject," James criticized NFL owners for wanting to exert "control." James went on to praise NBA Commissioner Adam Silver for his support of players speaking out in favor of social causes.

"In the NFL, they got a bunch of old white men owning teams and they got that slave mentality," James said. "And it's like, 'This is my team. You do what the (expletive) I tell y'all to do. Or we get rid of y'all.' "

"I'm so appreciative in our league of our commissioner" James added. "He doesn't mind us having .. a real feeling and be able to express that. It doesn't even matter if Adam agrees with what we are saying, he at least wants to hear us out. And as long as we are doing it in a very educational, non-violent way, then he's absolutely OK with it." [MORE]

RACIST SUSPECT owner OF THE WASHINGTON NFL TEAM Daniel Snyder linked arms with HIS NIGGER cornerbacks Josh Norman (24) and Bashaud Breeland (26) during the national anthe before Snyder’s team played the Oakland Raiders at FedEx Field on Sept 24, 2017.

Lebron was just stating the obvious - all NFL teams are owned by racist suspects. It probably never dawned on Bron-Bron that said NFL ownership is simply a consequence of the system of racism white supremacy. A global system in which everything of material value and all material resources, are owned and controlled by racists suspects. Dr. Bobby Wright observed, ‘Although the entire world is 90% Non-white, "everywhere one finds Whites and Blacks in close proximity to each other, whether it is Chicago or Zimbabwe, the Whites are in control. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every known statistical law of probability." [MORE] and [MORE]. With the exception of Michael Jordan’s ownership of the Hornets, all the NBA teams are also owned by white people.

Remarkably mediocre, untalented racist suspects like Jeannie Buss (the owner of the Lakers) or the white folks running EPSN make a fortune off Lebron’s incredible talents. Dr. Amos Wilson stated, ‘Blacks must question how is it that a minority people [white people], a very small percentage of mankind, a people who are essentially resourceless in terms of their natural resources, maintain the power they have. Why is it that the peoples whose lands contain the wealth of the earth are the poorest people? Why is it that Afrika with some twenty (20) or thirty (30) strategic metals that make the space age possible — why is it that the image of Afrika is projected at us time and time again as that of starving children, as societies in disorder, as societies on the verge of disaster?

This implies that there must exist a political, social situation wherein the mental orientation of our people must be so structured that the power and the ability of the Europeans to rule this earth are continually maintained.' [MORE]

Both leagues are plantations and the Black players on them, no matter the salary, function similarly to slaves. Lebron misses the point that he is also a slave in a sophisticated form of slavery and subjected to the system of racism white supremacy. Neely Fuller states ‘under White Supremacy, Black people, regardless of age, function as "children." They are the servants to, the victims of, and the "children" under the power and direction of the White Supremacists. The White Supremacists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers.’ Clearly, the NBA plantation treats it slaves better than the slaves on the NFL plantation with its mean cracker masters who for instance demand compelled symbolic obedience to authority and have larger rosters on their plantations. They perform for different audiences as well. The NFL’s demographic is is 83 percent white and 64 percent male and its corporate client base of advertisers are elite whites. The NFL makes more money than the NBA and NHL combined. [MORE]

Lebron also misidentifies his comforts as justice and his money as some sort of power in this system. Neely Fuller states, many Black people like to pretend that they are unaffected by racism white supremacy and that they have power they don’t really have. He explains, "in a socio-material system dominated by White Supremacists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by White Supremacists. "Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by White Supremacists. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many people — particularly non-white people — prefer not to acknowledge." [MORE] Fuller observes that in spite of any and all statements the world's "non-white" peoples may make about themselves having economic and/or political independence and the like, in the final analysis, they are all victims of the white supremacy process. Nevertheless, it is true that Lebron’s money enables him greater freedom of movement to roam about within the free range slavery system.

Lebron is a high paid servant. Elite racist suspects showcase him and his basketball talents for profit. Said elites reward and punish him for his conduct and statements. Can he reverse the relationship he has with his masters?

FUNKTIONARY defines as follows:

Professional Sports - a socially insignificant form of amusement (synthesized and packaged reality) designed/used primarily to pacify the masculine population by absorbing their aggression and (secondly) to keep them distracted from liberation technology (by maintaining mental impoverishment), and lastly to peddle beer and unass them, i.e. take their “chicken” from them and leave them scratch. (See: Consumerism, Testosterone and Tumescence).

enslaved - living under unchallenged assumptions, authority, rules, etc. Enslaved people must free themselves or they remain enslaved. Harriett Tubman decided she was free before the wording of the statutes of the U.S. Government consented, and the defeat in the uncivilized war between that states (of mind) forced enslavers to agree. (See: Traps)

Slavery - psychologically or physically subjugated to another where one"s thoughts or one's labor is not his or her own. 2) mental and/or physical captivity—living someone else's reality consciously or unconsciously, willingly or unwillingly. 3) a system wherein someone is forced to work without pay, being economically exploited, and unable to walk away. 4) that which separates thought from action. Slavery is an economic system, not a social system. Slavery  wasn't ended—-but extended, i.e., slavery is not dead—but in the head—of all men it lingers. Forced labor, also known as involuntary servitude, may result when unscrupulous employers exploit workers made more vulnerable by high rates of unemployment, poverty, racism, crime. discrimination, corruption, political conflict, or cultural acceptance of the practice. Immigrants are particularly vulnerable, but individuals also may be forced into labor in their own countries. Female victims of forced or bonded labor, especially women and girls in domestic servitude, are often sexually exploited as well. Slavery is never dropped gradually, either you have overstood and you are free, or you have not overstood and are just pretending to overstand.

For instance, taxation is a form of slavery when your labor is taxed. We're living an Agenda not our own—merely an obfuscated and sophisticated form or" slavery. Slavery is a segmented labor market—it is cut off from the other types of labor that exist within a nation or region.

Nowhere in the Bible (the Godspell) is slavery condemned by God. Instead, the mythic Sky God of the Bible accepts slavery as moral and normal. Slavery is not despised but legitimized in the Old and New Testaments. Exodus 21:20 and 21:7-10; Proverbs 20:19: Deuteronomy 20:13-14. I Peter 2:18: and Ephesians 6:5 ("Slaves, obey your human masters with fear and trembling.") Christianity included the exhortation of slaves to remain enslaved, such as reflected in the gospel fable at 1 Timothy 6:1, where "freedom-loving" Paul states. "Let all who are under the yoke of slavery regard their masters as worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and the teaching may not be defamed." See also Colossians 3:22 and Titus 2:9 in the New Testament. The goal of chattel slavery was to psychologically make the enslaved a willing accomplice in his own extermination. (See: "The Laws." Sky God. Servitude. Income Taxes. Palhocracy. Direct Taxes. Patriarchy. Gangbanking. Slave Lifestyle, Bureaucratic Structures, Holy Bible. Corporate Religion. Old Testament. Doggy. Willie Lynch Letter, Infallibility, Phfreedom & "The Greater System,"' Human Resources, "Monetized Debt" GEO-Dollars. Law of Moses & Power)

To Justify Its Police Budget in the Face of Declining Crime Rates, St. Louis Authorities Trot Out Strawboss to Make the Claim that Crime is Down Due to Over-Policing & Surveilling Black People

CHIEF JOHN HAYDEN IS WHAT FUNKTIONARY DEFNES AS A STRAW-BOSS - A SAMBO WHO IS APPOINTED A CERTAIN OVERSIGHT ROLE FOR THE WHITE POWER OVERSEER. IT IS THE JOB OF THE STRAW BOSS TO ESTABLISH A FORMAL ORGANIZATION TO EFFECTIVELY AND SYSTEMATICALLY CARRY OUT THE WISHES OF THE WHITE SUPREMACIST POWER MATRIX WHILE SERVING HIS OWN PERSONAL NEEDS AND ENDS THROUGH PATRONAGE POWER. 2) A RANKING SNIGGER. 3) TOBY. 4) "SAFE NEGRO." 5) RESPONSIBLE (TO THE WHITE SUPREMACIST IDEOLOGY) NEGRO. 6) THE GATEKEEPER FOR BLACK PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS GAINED THROUGH (ACQUIESCED) TO VARIOUS SEXUAL POSITIONS. 7) PORK CHOP BOY. (SEE SNIGGER & MCNEGRO)

ABOVE St. Louis police commanders listen as Chief John Hayden presents the 2018 crime statistics at a town hall on Wednesday. Hayden says CRIME IS DOWN DUE TO MASTER’S EFFECTIVE PLAN TO TREAT BLACKS AS ENEMIES OF THE STATE & SLAVES.

LESS CRIME, MORE COPS, MORE SURVEILLANCE, MORE GOVERNMENT POWER TO CONTROL BLACK PEOPLE. From [KBLA] St. Louis’ police chief says his strategy of focusing more resources on violent areas of the city has led to a nearly six-percent drop in crime compared to this time last year.

Chief John Hayden presented the 2018 crime statistics Wednesday night at a town hall at Forest Park Community College. Every category except rape and vehicle thefts has dropped compared to November of 2017.

Citywide, homicides have dropped 13 percent, from 191 to 166. But rape increased seven percent, from 260 to 279, and vehicles thefts were up slightly. Vehicle thefts do not include carjackings, which are being counted as a separate category for the first time in 2018. So far, there have been more than 300 carjackings in the city this year.

[According to the index crime rate, since 1990 there has been a gradual decline in St. Louis’ crime rates. However, its murder rate (while decreasing) remained higher than the national metropolitan area average. [MORE] The Brennan Center’s new report, Crime and Murder in 2018: A Preliminary Analysis, has concluded that crime and murder in 2018 are again declining nationwide, continuing the historic downward trend. [MORE]]

When he became chief at the beginning of 2018, Hayden announced a plan to send more police and social services to an area bounded by Goodfellow, West Florissant, Martin Luther King and Vandeventer. The rectangle contains some of the highest-crime neighborhoods, including Wells-Goodfellow, Walnut Park East and West, and Penrose.

The increased police attention included everything from extra traffic patrols to agents from several federal law-enforcement agencies. Better Family Life opened centers where teenagers in the neighborhoods who were feuding could come and work out their disputes without guns. The Urban League invested in job training.

Hayden said the statistics show the strategy worked. Violent crime in the zone dropped 20 percent.

“There’s 23 less homicides that didn’t happen this year,” he said. “There’s 70 less robberies that didn’t happen. And then there are 128 less assaults with guns.”

Crime statistics show the Walnut Park neighborhoods had seen 10 fewer homicides at the end of this November compared to last year. Kingsway West, which borders St. Louis County, had five fewer killings.

Hayden said adding license-plate readers and high-quality cameras inside the rectangle played a role in getting the numbers down, as well. The cameras meant officers had better information available to them.

“When we talk about how many arrests were able to be affected due to the fact that we were able to see the car that had just been carjacked, we were able to see the car that had just been stolen, we were able to see the people that had just committed the shooting, those resulted in 228 arrests, 128 stolen vehicles recovered and 38 firearms recovered,” he said.

Hayden says he plans to add two more rectangles next year – one covering a large portion of the Downtown and Downtown West neighborhoods, and another in south St. Louis. He said the specialized units like SWAT and traffic enforcement will rotate through the different rectangles as crime spikes, but there are enough officers in those units to handle multiple increases at a time.

YOU CAN’T FIRE THEM & THEY ARE NOT HERE TO PROTECT AND SERVE YOU. A necessary & comforting illusion in a police state is that police are here to protect us and are primarily engaged in “police work.” As Dr. Blynd observes, "people who are awake see cops as mercenary guards that remind us daily through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate State - colonized, surveilled and patrolled by the desensitized and lobotomized drones of the colonizers."

Would an armed, private security force be more accountable to Blacks & Latinos?

CHART FROM THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE’S Crime and Murder in 2018: A Preliminary Analysis

Research and data continues to debunk false narratives about crime in the United States. Contrary to racist propaganda, the Brennan Center at the NYU School of Law 2018 analyses have consistently shown that overall crime rates in America’s 30 largest cities remain at or near historic lows. [MORE]

Alleged Black criminality plays a very important role in defining the collective White American ego and personality. [MORE] Racists project criminality upon Blacks in order to treat Blacks criminally and to simultaneously empower themselves. Dr. Amos Wilson states, such maneuvers are necessary in order to justify racist White American community's repression of African Americans and psychodynamically defend the collective White American ego complex. [MORE]

Wilson explains, "Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their self-congratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control.

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image. The Black criminal is used to support the White American community's self-serving, self-justifying judgments of itself. White America's preoccupation with Black criminality betrays its own need for reassurance; betrays its own basic insecurity regarding its projected moral purity. Consequently, the higher the incidence of reported Black criminality, the more exceptionally righteous White America feels itself to be. The more righteous it feels itself to be the more intensely and guiltlessly it promulgates and justifies its domination and exploitation of African peoples at home and abroad. [MORE]

The [Mostly White] Prosecutors in St Louis Voted to Join the [Mostly White] Police Union. Will They Have a Conflict of Interest "Doing Justice" for Black Residents in a System of White Supremacy?

Under the pretense of working to obtain justice for Black people, Government Orderlies purposefully create injustice, the ultimate hypocrisy. From [ABA Journal] Assistant prosecutors and investigators in St. Louis County have voted to join the police union in advance of a reform-minded leader taking the helm.

The Monday vote is raising questions about possible conflicts of interest, report the Associated Press and the St. Louis American. Columnists for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and the Washington Post also raised concerns in columns written before the vote.

The new St. Louis County prosecutor, Wesley Bell, is the first African-American to be in the position. He replaces Robert McCulloch, a racist suspect who could have directly filed charges against Darren Wilson, the white cop who shot Michael Brown to death, but instead chose to take the case to a grand jury. He then purposefully undermined his own grand jury , selecting a mostly white (9 out of 12) grand jury. McCulloch’s prosecutors handling the case took the highly unusual course of dumping all evidence on the jurors and leaving them to make sense of it. McCulloch’s office claimed that this is a way to give more authority to the grand jurors, but it was more like a way to avoid charging Wilson at all — and to use the grand jury as cover for the outrage that ensued. McCulloch's father was a police officer killed in a shootout with a black suspect, and several of his family members are, or were, police officers. He did not prosecute a single police shooting in 23 years. [MORE] and [MORE]. Even Nancy Grace thought the Ferguson Grand Jury McCulloch created was bullshit. 

Bell has opposed the death penalty, backed treatment instead of jail for people accused of minor drug crimes, pledged to reform the cash bail system, and promised to set up a unit to review wrongful convictions. He also has pledged to hold police officers accountable for wrongful acts.

The union—the St. Louis Police Officers Association—had donated to McCulloch’s campaigns during his 28 years in office. Washington Post columnist Radley Balko described the union as “one of the most aggressive police unions in the country.”

The union’s controversial business manager, Jeff Roorda, was criticized when he wrote a Facebook post linking the murder of five Dallas police officers to President Barack Obama. He also wrote a book entitled Ferghanistan: The War on Police and told the Daily Beast that the Ferguson protests were “an all-out war on police officers.”

The Washington Post gave an example of potential conflicts that could happen as a result of the union representation. “What happens if a prosecutor charges a police officer for a shooting, and the officer then files a complaint against that prosecutor?” the column asks. “Which party does the union defend?”

The Post also predicts that the union vote “will only further poison the relationship between law enforcement and the city’s communities of color. … Having the same union represent both cops and prosecutors certainly won’t help with the public perception—particularly in the black community—that St. Louis prosecutors will always back the cops.”

Bell issued this statement: “As a union member, I support and welcome the assistant prosecutors’ right to organize. The choice of the police union raises some questions, though we will work in good faith to minimize any cost to taxpayers or conflicts with the police union that this could represent.”

U.S. judge says law enforcement officers had no legal duty to protect Parkland students during mass shooting

From [HERE] A federal judge in South Florida tossed out a lawsuit filed by more than a dozen students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., who said they were traumatized by a mass shooting there in February and that county officials should have protected them.

U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom said neither the school nor sheriff’s deputies had a legal obligation to protect students from the alleged shooter, Nikolas Cruz, who is accused of killing 17 people at the school Feb. 14. Her reasoning? The students were not in state custody, the Sun Sentinel reported.

Bloom, who was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama in 2014, wrote in her opinion:

“The claim arises from the actions of Cruz, a third party, and not a state actor. Thus, the critical question the Court analyzes is whether defendants had a constitutional duty to protect plaintiffs from the actions of Cruz.

“As previously stated, for such a duty to exist on the part of defendants, plaintiffs would have to be considered to be in custody.”

It’s not the first time such reasoning has been used. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm. That ruling overturned a federal appeals court in Colorado that allowed a lawsuit to stand against a town when its police refused to protect a woman from her husband. He had violated a restraining order and kidnapped their children, whom he killed, the New York Times reported.

But even as Bloom issued her decision, another Florida judge ruled differently in a related case.

Patti Englander Henning, a county judge, ruled that Scot Peterson, the only armed resource officer working at Stoneman Douglas High the day of the shooting, had a responsibility to take on Cruz. Instead, Peterson remained outside. The judge was ruling on a legal bid by Peterson to dismiss a lawsuit by the family of one of the students killed that day. The Sun Sentinel quoted his attorney, Michael Piper, as saying:

“We want to say he had an obligation, but the law isn’t that. From a legal standpoint, there was no duty.”

Englander Henning disagreed and said Peterson had an obligation to “act reasonably.” She allowed the lawsuit against Peterson, who has resigned from the Broward County Sheriff’s Office, to stand.

The Parkland students sued Broward County as well Peterson, Broward County Public Schools Superintendent Robert Runcie and Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel.

The lawsuit said in part:

Defendant Israel and Defendant Broward County either have a policy that allows killers to walk through a school killing people without being stopped. Or they have such inadequate training that the individuals tasked with carrying out the polices . . . lack the basic fundamental understandings of what those policies are such that they are incapable of carrying them out.

Here’s the lawsuit that was thrown out by U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom:

New Study: Black People are 50% More Likely than Whites to have a Family Member who is Formerly or Currently Incarcerated & 3X More Likely to Have a Relative who Spent at least 10 Yrs in Prison

A MAJOR GOAL OF THE SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY IS TO PLACE BLACK PEOPLE IN GREATER CONFINEMENT. From [EJI] A first-of-its-kind study released on Thursday shows that about 113 million American adults have an immediate family member who is formerly or currently incarcerated.

FWD.us, a criminal justice and immigration reform advocacy group, and Cornell University surveyed a representative sample of more than 4000 people. The resulting report shows that one in seven adults has had an immediate family member incarcerated for more than one year, and one in 34 has had a loved one incarcerated for 10 years or more.

One in four American adults has had a sibling incarcerated. One in five has had a parent sent to jail or prison. One in eight has had a child incarcerated.

Today, 6.5 million adults have an immediate family member currently in jail or prison.

Researchers found that rates of family incarceration were disproportionately higher for communities of color and low-income families.

Black people are 50 percent more likely than white people to have a family member who is formerly or currently incarcerated, and three times more likely to have a family member who has spent at least 10 years in prison. The survey found that six of 10 African Americans and Native Americans have an immediate family member who has been in jail or prison. 

FWD.us also reports that family incarceration is more concentrated in poor communities; the proportion of people who have had an immediate family member incarcerated increases as income declines. 

Adults with household incomes of less than $25,000 per year are 61 percent more likely than adults with household incomes of more than $100,000 to have had a family member incarcerated, and three times more likely to have had a family member incarcerated for one year or longer.

The seven states with the highest incarceration rates are all in the South. Forty-nine percent of adults living in the South and West have had an immediate family member incarcerated for at least one night in jail or prison, compared to the national average of 45 percent. The report says people living in the South or West are almost 60 percent more likely to experience family incarceration than those living in the Northeast.

"These new findings bring to light the staggering scale of the United States’ incarceration crisis, as nearly 1 in 2 American adults has an immediate family member who is currently or has previously spent time behind bars," said Todd Schulte, President of FWD.us. "This research corroborates what too many families have known for too long: our current criminal justice system is harming our economy, communities, and families and undermining the promise of what America can and should be." 

Incarceration not only costs families precious time together, but also imposes direct and indirect financial costs on families, including bail, court fees, and fines. Families are often charged excessive fees to speak to their incarcerated loved ones by phone, and visiting people incarcerated far from home can be prohibitively expensive. Fewer than one out of four people with an incarcerated family member was ever able to visit their loved one, FWD.us reports.

Families of incarcerated people must also replace lost income, child support, and other financial contributions. Nearly two in three families (65 percent) were found in a separate study cited by FWD.us to be unable to meet basic needs such as food, housing, and medical care while their family member was incarcerated. Indeed, 54 percent of the parents who are incarcerated were the primary breadwinners in their families, and three-quarters were employed in the month prior to their arrest.

Losing their primary source of income can push families into financial disaster, and the destabilizing and traumatic effects of incarceration on family members is magnified the longer their loved one is incarcerated. Having an incarcerated family member has been shown to increase the risk of depression, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes.

Further, these costs continue to mount after incarceration. It can be difficult to find employment after incarceration, and many formerly incarcerated people must pay restitution, supervision fees, and other costs to comply with parole conditions. As of 2011, FWD.us reports, the total amount of criminal justice debt owed by Americans amounted to around $50 billion.

Families often forgo basic necessities to pay fees because the failure to pay can lead to their loved one being returned to jail or prison. FWD.us cites a study finding that 63 percent of respondents said family members were primarily responsible for covering conviction-related costs; almost half of those family members were mothers, and one in 10 were grandmothers.

Despite recent limited declines in incarceration, FWD.us reports that jail and prison populations in the United States are four times larger today than in 1980, with more than 1.5 million people in state or federal prisons on any given day. Admissions to local jails have exceeded 10 million annually for the past two decades.

The United States continues to incarcerate more people than any other country in the world, spending $273 billion each year on police, courts, and corrections, FWD.us says. Researchers estimate the economy loses $87 billion annually in GDP due to mass incarceration.

Felicity Rose, a criminal justice researcher at FWD.us whose father was incarcerated, said the report is intended to demonstrate the broad impact of incarceration and make it easier for people to talk about. "This isn't just a few people, this is millions of people, but yet there's so much shame and stigma attached to this issue, so much so that people just don't talk about it," she said. "There is a silent suffering around the country, but people need to know they're not alone."

Black “Subject" is Forced to Realize "Public Servants" are Actually his Costumed Rulers: Garfield Settles Case for 80K after White Cops Falsely Arrested & Assaulted Black Man who Laughed at Them

COMMUNITY OVERSEER PUBLIC RELATIONS. ‘BOO-HOO. HE MENACED US’ - costumed criminal assault, kidnapping, wrongful incarceration & MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

From [HERE] and [HERE] Garfield Heights authorities agreed Wednesday to pay $80,000 to settle Robert Spencer’s federal civil rights lawsuit, which alleged First and Fourth Amendment police brutality violations and said police fabricated a story that he threatened officers, when he actually just laughed and insulted them.

According to Spencer’s attorneys, he was beaten and arrested in July 2017 after he laughed while Garfield Heights officers drove down his street.

The lawsuit claimed Spencer was arrested for “laughing while black.”

The settlement also requires the city to train its officers on the First Amendment and how it applies to their job, as well as on limitations on forced labor by inmates, according to a news release from Spencer’s lawyers at The Chandra Law Firm in Cleveland.

According to his attorneys, the officers confirmed their motivation on videotape at the police station. “All you had to do was shut the f*** up,” one officer reportedly said. “We weren’t even going to arrest you.”

They told Mr. Spencer that “saying stuff to us when we drive by” justified investigation, arrest, detention, beatings and prosecution, Spencer’s attorneys argued.

Robert Spencer, a resident of the inner-ring suburb, says officers Kenneth Falzini and David Simia approached him outside his home on Christine Avenue while he was around some neighborhood children, according to lawsuit filed Monday by attorneys Subodh Chandra and Patrick Kabat.

The officers told Spencer they heard someone threaten them. Spencer said he and the children were joking around, or "ranking," the lawsuit says. He told the officers he would rank them as well, according to the suit.

When Falzini asked for Spencer's identification, he told the officers to leave his property and insulted them. While Spencer never threatened the officers, he did call Falzini "Beavis & Butthead" and Simia "Elvis," according to the suit.

Those insults and others set off a series of events that led to Spencer's arrest, according to the suit. A Cuyahoga County jury in November acquitted Spencer of felony and misdemeanor charges.

The white officers claimed he threatened and shoved one of them and resisted arrest. However a jury did not find those allegations to be credible and acquitted him of the charges, including assault and aggravated menacing.

His lawsuit filed in July that he was never aggressive with the officers. A video shot by his girlfriend [see it below] contradicts statements officers made about Spencer’s arrest in their sworn police reports.

According to the lawsuit, Falzini asked for Spencer's ID and told Spencer he would go to jail if he didn't comply. Spencer replied: "Motherf----r, for what? I'm on private-ass property and you ain't got no reason to sit here and talk that bulls--t to me," according to the lawsuit.

Spencer did not threaten them, though, the lawsuit says.

"No reasonable officer would believe that 'ranking' police officers constitutes a true threat," according to the suit.

Once handcuffed and in the patrol car, Simia told Spencer "All you had to do was shut the f--k up. We weren't even going to arrest you," the suit states.

Spencer was in jail for three days before he posted bond. While in there, an unnamed female corrections officer forced him to clean his and other cells, according to the suit. He objected but says he relented after the officer threatened to use pepper spray on him. [MORE]

REALITY UNDERMINES BELIEF. In general, in the fake world created in courts judges have held higher expectations for police officers because they are trained to be more patient than the average person in the face of hostile words and to deal with unruly and uncooperative members of the public. The DC Court of Appeals stated, ‘A police officer is expected to have a greater tolerance for verbal assaults, . . . and because the police are especially trained to resist provocation, we expect them to remain peaceful in the face of verbal abuse that might provoke or offend the ordinary citizen.’ In re W.H.L., 743 A.2d 1226, 1228 (D.C. 2000). Such dicta is part of the vested interest’s Spectacle in the lex-icon for its believers and rule worshippers to indulge in. But reality, alarming as it is to our programmed minds - is much better.

Larken Rose states, “It is very telling that many modern “law enforcers” quickly become angry, even violent, when an average citizen simply speaks to the “officer” as an equal, instead of assuming the tone and demeanor of a subjugated underling. Again, this reaction is precisely the same – and has the same cause – as the reaction a slave master would have to an “uppity” slave speaking to him as an equal. There are plenty of examples. depicted in numerous police abuse videos on the internet, of supposed representatives of “authority” going into a rage and resorting to open violence, simply because someone they approached spoke to them as one adult would speak to another instead of speaking as a subject would speak to a master. The state mercenaries refer to this lack of groveling as someone having an “attitude.” In their eyes, someone treating them as mere mortals, as if they are on the same level as everyone else, amounts to showing disrespect for their alleged “authority.”

Similarly, anyone who does not consent to be detained, questioned, or searched by “officers of the law” is automatically perceived, by the mercenaries of the state, as some sort of troublemaker who has something to hide. Again, the real reason such lack of “cooperation” annoys authoritarian enforcers is because it amounts to people treating them as mere humans instead of treating them as superior beings, which is what they imagine themselves to be." [MORE]

Here, Black man, Robert Spencer, believed he was having an arms-length conversation and interaction with public servants - a talk with his equals who also work on his behalf. He also felt & believed he could clown around with them because his “rights” protected him from harm. He should now know that he is merely a subject who disturbed the peace of his masters and understand that authoritarians or public rulers, costumed or not, do not serve subjects unless they so desire. Rose states, ‘to expect the master to serve the slave - to expect power to be used solely for the benefit of the one being controlled, not the one in control - is ridiculous.’ Here, the white cops were offended that Spencer did not recognize their “authority” and extra-human status so they corrected him, teaching him and the amused audience of Black children watching, an obedience lesson. Maybe this woke him up. Dr. Blynd states, "people who are awake see cops as mercenary guards that remind us daily through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate State - colonized, surveilled and patrolled by the desensitized and lobotomized drones of the colonizers." He further explains, “anyone who thinks that he or she is immune to the baseless destruction of his or her life by a "government" or corporation does live in a happy menagerie—enjoy your illusions." [MORE]. Beaten, falsely arrested, locked up for 3 days and maliciously prosecuted, Mr. Spencer should also overstand what Doc Blynd is talking about.

As far as Mr. Spencer’s 1st and 4th Amendment rights are concerned, where were “his rights” on the street? Perhaps your rights exist if the cops also share in your illusion that they do, but brazen cops so frequently abuse their power that no one—no Black motorist, no juvenile, no adult, no professional of any kind—could make a compelling argument that constitutional rights afford Black people any real protection from the state, - not on the street. Dr. Blynd states, "The child who is taught to believe the law will be his protection is the child who will become the victim of its own beliefs."  "Unquestioned beliefs own you."

According to Dr. Blynd:

rights - fantasmatic or fictitious objects having no reality in actuality by those imagining as an identity being in possession of them. Rights are cultural gratuities perceived through various fantasy frames, recognized, and sometimes even created, by man's system of law to provide a modicum or pretense of civility under a system whereby their very undermining and violation is vouchsafed. Rights are merely rites unless you know how to assert and defend them in order to enjoy them. 2) things people are free to do whether they are able to or not. 3) conditions of existence required by hue-man's nature for their potential survival (primarily against the cartoon that kills, i.e., the wholly unconscionable entity called the "State"). It is a mistaken notion that rights are enjoyed by one at the expense of the many—that is the realm of privilege. Enjoyment of rights in a neo-imperialistic world controlled by Yurugu through the Greater System (Symbolic Order), paradoxically, entails not only a recognition of their inevitability but, equally, their impossibility. How can we be endowed with rights, or even know what rights are when they are based on binary considerations? Rights, as ontological ephemera, cannot be universally observed, recognized, realized or, enforced—and paradoxically, act also as its own eternal source for its assertion and vessel for its fulfillment in our imaginary enjoyment of them. While the law reads rights referentially, what is universally needed in the praxis of rights discourse today is a particular re-inscription, demystification or reontologising of rights (revivified and convivial) by the pan-gendered subject-citizen-decoder—taken symptomatically rather than seriously. Most people rarely experience the cognizance of being property of corporate fictions because as long as you don't violate the rules of society your real status as feudal-property-slave is no: involved or revealed. If there is no 'I,' to what and to whom do rights as objects accrue? Those who are confused by suffering (and the subject of same) require a re-onotoligisation of rights through the trajectory of meaning independent of their existence. Rights and even 'lefts' (i.e., what remains after all of our imaginary rights are traced to their inception as figment) for that matter, like good and evil, are human inventions which humans treat as non-human realities. While fantasy frames invent rights, romanticism reinvents them. Enjoy your symptoms and play with your syndrome—the symptom is the solution. Read carefulh the holding in the supreme Court case of U.S. v. Babcock. Rights are myths—obedience to servitude or jail is the reality. (See: Abilities, Bill of Rights, Monoright, Servitude, Fantasy, Jurisdiction, Human Resources, Citizenship, Frankenstein, Autonomy. Rule of Law, Surrogate Power, Indigenous Power, Yurugu, Jouissance, Privilege, Disobedience, Duty & Willpower)

At Least 200 Police Departments are Using "Suspect Technologies" Facial Recognition Software to Create Secret Public Safety Watchlists

MassPrivatel writes, “To everyone that thinks secret watchlists are nothing more than a conspiracy theory I give you, law enforcement's secret public safety watchlists.

The name of the company responsible for creating public safety watchlists should say it all but I digress.

A recent article in Xconomy reveals that law enforcement is using Suspect Technologies facial recognition software to create secret public safety watchlists.

"Suspect Technologies is also working to pilot a real-time service next year by monitoring public surveillance video feeds with its facial recognition software and cross-referencing it all against a public safety watchlist, CEO Jacob Sniff says. He explained the plans but declined to identify the law enforcement client."

“We have an agency early adopter, his conception is he’s going to have 10 facial recognition cameras in town: one in the police station lobby, some at the Greyhound bus locations, city hall, even the public pool area,” Sniff says. “He’s going to be scanning people’s faces against a small public watchlist.”

Sniff claims that at least 200 hundred police departments are secretly using his software. Sniff said, "Suspect’s software is being used by a couple hundred law enforcement agencies" but declined to identify them.

A look at Suspect Technologies "solutions" section reveals that they have partnered with NVIDIA.

NVIDIA is no stranger to helping law enforcement spy on the public. Last year, I revealed that NVIDIA and COBAN Technologies (CT) have been trying to create 360 degree facial recognition police cars.

"CT's technology is designed to work with up to six cameras, so police departments could choose to turn their vehicles into 360-degree cameras, making it easier to identify faces."

How will these companies convince the public to accept public safety watchlists?

Suspect Technologies CEO Sniff hinted that corporations will use loyalty rewards to help convince the public to accept them.

According to Xconomy, Sniff said, "that eventually the public will get used to having their faces scanned by law enforcement, advertisers, and technology companies; he cites Apple, Delta, and Hertz as already commercializing the technology."

What he is really saying is Hertz, Delta and every facial recognition company plan to use loyalty rewards and quicker check-in/checkout lines to convince the public to accept being watchlisted. (Click here to see how Delta Air Lines owns 5% of CLEAR.)

As I mentioned earlier, real-time public safety watchlists are not the only thing Americans should be worried about.

According to an article in PRWeb, a company called Biometrica Systems announced that they have created a facial recognition software program called eMotive that will conduct real-time 24x7 background checks on everyone.

Biometrica’s Director of Product Architecture, Kevin King, said "eMotive was a unique platform because it continuously provided background information on individuals."

Biometrica claims that their software will only be used to notify employers when their employees have been arrested. But is that really what eMotive will be used for?

Clicking on Biometrica's "Fusion Center" link reveals that their software will almost certainly be used by law enforcement to conduct secret criminal background checks.

"Biometrica’s Fusion Center is the hub from where our global security and surveillance operations are managed. It is also the connection point for the data aggregated through our multi-layered private sector networks and multi-jurisdictional law enforcement watchlists, and is therefore uniquely poised to do as the President asked."

The fact that Biometrica even has a "Fusion Center" should send shock waves across the country.

According to Biometrica, their (Fusion Center) software secretly assigns people "threat vectors" which is just a fancy way of saying "risk assessments."

"The BFC also has an internal risk metric assigned to a particular ID, providing a client with a “threat vector” of the person or persons concerned."

Biometrica's "law enforcement" link reveals their plan to become "the world’s largest private, encrypted, and law enforcement-verified facial recognition database."

What is truly terrifying is that law enforcement is using Biometrica's multi-million person database to identify alleged terrorists, gang members and criminals. Biometrica even boasts about providing access to DARPA's facial recognition software.

If you want more proof that private corporations will use Biometrica to conduct secret 24x7 background checks on everyone. I invite you to check out their "Casinos" link which boasts that their software allows "customers to run operational real-time facial recognition scans of any individual on their property."

Biometrica also claims that their software gives "customers (Casinos) access to the software and systems that will help them create their own encrypted, private platform-agnostic whitelists and blacklists."

According to Statista.com there are more than 500 Casinos in the U.S. which means that there are at least 500 secret private watchlist and blacklists that Americans have no knowledge of.

There is no denying it, police and corporations are creating secret public safety watchlists and blacklists of everyone.”

Immigration Arrests & Deportations Increased by 11% Under Trump. ICE Data Shows It Arrested 159,000 Foreigners in 2018, Were They All Non-White People?

From [HERE] The Trump administration significantly stepped up its arrests and deportations of undocumented immigrants last year, according to government data released last Friday, even as other parts of the president’s hard-line immigration agenda have been blocked by Congress and courts.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement said it arrested about 159,000 foreigners during the 2018 fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, an increase of 11 percent from the previous year.

About 90 percent of the people arrested had criminal convictions, were facing pending criminal charges or had been previously issued a final deportation order by an immigration judge.

Officials said they also deported 256,085 people last year, a 13 percent increase from fiscal year 2017.

That included 5,914 undocumented immigrants, 5,872 known or suspected gang members and 42 suspected terrorists, the agency’s data show.

On Friday, agency officials called the increases a result of an executive order by President Trump to rescind an earlier policy that prioritized the arrests and deportations of foreigners who had criminal records, or those who posed a threat to public safety.

The new policy, which Mr. Trump signed in early 2017, is not selective about which illegal immigrants should be arrested or deported first.

Critics said the stepped up enforcement has led to the arrest of undocumented immigrants for minor violations, or who pose no security threat.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has been widely criticized for arresting parents as they dropped off children at school and for raiding businesses, including a nationwide sweep of 7-Eleven stores that resulted in charges against fewer than two dozen. Some Democrats have called for the agency to be abolished.

Blight House’s Newest Racial Exclusion Policy Forced Onto the Public Will Send Non-White Migrants to Mexico to "Wait" on Asylum Claims to Prevent Them from ‘Gaming Yurugu’s System’

From [NY TIMES] The Trump administration announced a new migration policy Thursday that will require asylum seekers who cross the Mexican border illegally to return to Mexico while their cases are decided.

The United States has been trying for months to get Mexico’s leaders to agree to house those migrants, and on Thursday Mexico’s new government reluctantly agreed.

The American secretary of homeland security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, said the move would prevent people from using the asylum process as a way of slipping into the United States and remaining in the country illegally.

“Today we are announcing historic measures to bring the illegal immigration crisis under control,” she said. “Aliens trying to game the system to get into our country illegally will no longer be able to disappear into the United States, where many skip their court dates.”

In a statement, she said, “‘Catch and release’ will be replaced with ‘catch and return.’”

The new policy, announced as the president and Congress were at odds over funding for a border wall, amounts to the boldest effort yet by the Trump administration to discourage [non-white] people from seeking refuge in the United States. It follows a series of other curbs that had been introduced, including the separation of migrant families, which was later reversed in an executive order after a public outcry.

The migrant issue has put considerable pressure on the United States’ relationship with Mexico as Trump administration restrictions have left thousands of asylum seekers stranded in Mexican border towns, overwhelming local shelters and resources.

The new policy would also alleviate pressure on American border agents, who for months have argued that they are overwhelmed by the record-breaking number of migrant families seeking asylum.

Mexican officials say they were told of the latest American decision on Thursday morning in letters from the Department of Homeland Security and the United States chargé d’affaires in Mexico, John S. Creamer. The letters stated that the returns would begin immediately under a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The Mexican Foreign Ministry has essentially agreed to accept the decision by the United States, and will be forced to house thousands of people from other countries, particularly from Central America, as they await their asylum decisions.

A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry, Roberto Velasco, said the move did not represent an agreement between the two countries, but rather “a unilateral move by the United States that we have to respond to.”

Mr. Velasco said the rules would apply only to new asylum applicants, not to individuals who have already entered the United States with processes underway. The United States did not initially make clear if the policy applied only to new applicants.

The administration’s move is a sharp departure from decades of American asylum practice, according to legal experts and advocates. The United States has long accepted individuals from across the world fleeing harm or persecution in their home countries.

The program is almost certain to be challenged in the United States courts by human rights groups and advocates. Many have already claimed that sending persecuted individuals to Mexico, one of the most violent countries in the world, places them in harm’s way.

“This deal is a stark violation of international law, flies in the face of U.S. laws passed by Congress, and is a callous response to the families and individuals running for their lives,” said Margaret Huang, the executive director of Amnesty International.

While the individuals would be allowed to return to the United States for court hearings, they would remain in Mexico under a humanitarian visa until their process is completed.

Mexico’s decision to accept the asylum seekers is likely to be seen as a capitulation by the new government to President Trump, who proclaimed over Twitter two weeks ago that Mexico would house asylum applicants to the United States on its soil.

18 Years After Enacting DNA Law, Racist Suspect Florida Judges Continue to Deny Death-Row Prisoners [38% Black] Access to DNA Testing

From [DPIC] Florida courts have refused death-row prisoners access to DNA testing seventy times, denying 19 men – eight of whom have been executed – any testing at all and preventing nine others from obtaining testing of additional evidence or more advanced DNA testing after initial tests were inconclusive. For a six-part investigative series, Blood and truth: The lingering case of Tommy Zeigler and how Florida fights DNA testing, Tampa Bay Times Pulitzer-prize winning investigative journalist Leonora LaPeter Anton reviewed more than 500 cases in which Florida’s defendants were sentenced to death. Her investigation disclosed that even after Florida adopted a DNA testing law in 2001, court rulings have continued to create barriers to obtaining testing that could potentially prevent wrongful executions. “Almost 20 years later,” she wrote, “some prosecutors routinely fight DNA requests, especially in high-profile death row cases, and the courts often fail to intervene.“ According to Innocence Project of Florida executive director Seth Miller, “[i]n 2018, it is just as hard to get post-conviction DNA testing as it was before we had a post-conviction DNA testing law, and that’s completely upside down.” 

The investigative series focuses on the case of Tommy Zeigler who has maintained his innocence throughout the 42 years in which he has been on Florida’s death row. On Christmas Eve in 1975, Ziegler was shot and his wife, her parents, and a man who served as Ziegler’s handyman were murdered in Ziegler’s furniture store in Winter Garden, Florida. Ziegler was charged with the murders. The Times series describes the controversial trial and questionable evidence in his case in detail. Ultimately, the jury convicted Zeigler but took less than half an hour to recommend that he be sentenced to life. The trial judge overrode their decision and sentenced Zeigler to death. 

Zeigler has sought DNA testing six times. In 2001, he was granted limited testing, which, Anton reports, “appeared to support his story that he was a victim of a robbery at his furniture store.” However, even though Ziegler’s lawyers have offered to defray the entire cost of DNA analysis, Florida’s courts have refused to grant him a more advanced type of DNA testing that is now routinely available in murder cases. Ziegler’s lawyers have already presented evidence discrediting some of the key prosecution witnesses and demonstrating the implausibility that Ziegler could have shot himself through the stomach to fake his own victimization. They argue that the DNA evidence would prove his innocence and, at a minimum, transform the rest of the prosecution’s case by proving that the testimony the prosecution presented was false. 

Twenty-eight Florida death-row prisoners have been exonerated, more than in any other state. In 90% of the more than twenty exonerations for which the jury vote is known, jurors had not unanimously recommended death and had in some cases – like Ziegler’s – recommended life. Former Republican state senator J. Alex Villalobos, who helped write Florida’s DNA statute, told Anton that the law was designed to remove doubts as to guilt and that the prisoners should be given access to DNA testing. Death Penalty Information Center executive director Robert Dunham agreed, telling the Times, “If we’re interested in the truth and interested in avoiding executing the innocent, we need to be allowing this kind of testing.”

Why are Puppeticians Trying To Pass An Obviously Unconstitutional Bill to Criminalize Boycotts Of Israel? [b/c ‘eventually government will arrogate all power to itself if people don’t stop it’]

{TechDirt] asks a question on many people’s minds, Why Is Congress Trying To Pass An Obviously Unconstitutional Bill That Would Criminalize Boycotts Of Israel? [MORE] The answer is why would it not? In the context of a gun control, Dr. Blynd says the operative question is, “how much do you dislike your slavery?” Authority is a farce. Once you have conceded a limited amount of freedom to a higher authority you have conceded all. It is just a matter of time. Everyday “the government” attains more power. What is the “government hoax?’

Doc Blynd explains: “Throughout history many intelligent thinkers all around the world have tried to contemplate or design some way to have "government" and freedom too. Failing miserably and repeatedly to find one either in practice or in theory, it is time for intelligent human beings to give way to beings of higher consciousness using sagacity and sapience to finally realize that:.

1) "government" itself is a deadly mental contrivance and immanent threat to their freedom;

2) there is no way to prevent "government" from constantly increasing its power and eroding freedom;

3) "government" itself being a reification (deadly cartoon) will vanish when the illusion on which it rests dissipates.

This goes for all brands and flavors of "government" across the ideological spectrum. Violence (against statists) makes government appear government legitimate. Non-violence and non-cooperation exposes government for what it is: a gang of killers, thieves and liars. Governments do not protect the people they subjugate and control; on the contrary, they control, kill, maim spray from the skies, lie, steal, harass, wrongfully imprison, torture and spy on them. It is high time for the nature of "government" itself (not any particular brand on the violence spectrum) to be fully and plainly overstood and be regarded as an enemy—for it is truly our enemy. Freedom is the enemy of the State and our enemy is the State. Government is deadly force deified and reified then superimposed (falsified) on non-consenting, clueless and passively willing duped-victims alike. [MORE]