Provoking Others to be Violent Against you is Called Sado-Masochism Not Protest: Suit to Stop Nazis Return Filed in Charlottesville

html5 video converter by v3.9.1

Whitenology Lesson 23. White scholars "warn that suppressing racist speech leads us down a slippery slope towards totalitarianism, vesting in the government a censorship power over unpopular ideas which is inconsistent with the First Amendment and the most basic precepts of a democratic society." White judges have almost unanimously accepted this nonsense in the system of racism//white supremacy. Such courts ignore the right of non-whites to equal protection of the law-a right which is sacrificed by oppressive hate speech. Racist speech, more than any other extremist speech, subjects its already-weakened victim to humiliation, isolation, and self-hate. [MORE]

Going to Where You Are Unwanted to Provoke Violence is Not "Non-Violent" Activity. From [HERE] Georgetown Law School's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection [advocacy site] on Thursday filed a lawsuit [complaint, pdf] in the Circuit Court for the City of Charlottesville [official site] seeking to prevent armed organizations from returning to Charlottesville. 

The lawsuit was filed in response to the organizations' leadership calling on their members to keep returning to the city. The suit claims groups associated with the August 12 Unite the Right [JURIST report] rally are a threat to public safety and create a public nuisance

Several white-nationalist organizations came to Charlottesville to fight. Applying techniques developed well in advance, affiliated bands of alt-right warriors used clubs, flagpoles, and shields to batter their ideological opponents. Sporting matching uniforms and weaponry—and with command structures to coordinate their actions—they functioned as paramilitary units. These paramilitary organizations and their leaders (the Alt-Right Defendants) wielded their weapons on August 12 not “as individuals” exercising their Second Amendment rights to self-defense, but “as members of a fighting force.”

The suit further alleges that the violent rhetoric and action present an immediate threat for the local citizens, noting that "key organizers and leaders of the Unite the Right rally" visited Charlottesville five days ago "reappearing at Emancipation Park in a torchlit procession designed to intimidate local residents." 

Additionally, the suit accused the groups of violating established law by using paramilitary techniques and identification tactics, arguing that court intervention is necessary because, "as through centuries of American tradition, the government alone retains a monopoly on the organized use of force."

The lawsuit is seeking injunctive and declaratory relief "to prevent Defendants from returning to Virginia organized as military units and engaging in paramilitary activity. Without such relief, Charlottesville will be forced to relive the frightful spectacle of August 12: an invasion of roving paramilitary bands and unaccountable vigilante peacekeepers." [MORE]

White Victimhood. For insight into the dysfunctional racist mind Dr. Frances Cress Welsing stated; "An additional psychological defense maneuver utilized by whites has been that of projection. Feeling extreme hostility and hate towards non-whites, whites began the pattern of stating that non-whites hated them. In many instances, this mechanism has served to mitigate the guilt whites occasionally experience for their impulse to aggress against Blacks and other people of color." [MORE]

Tyranny of Racist Majority. For more legal insight professor Derrick Bell explained;

"While the First Amendment may be "the Constitution's most majestic guarantee," it is nonetheless a limited guarantee. Defamation, obscenity, and speech which threaten the social order, bomb threats, incitements to riot, and "fighting words" - are all limited by law. In the world of business, false advertisements, insider information, and suggestions that prices be fixed, are also off-limits. Yet hate speech-expressions which abuse, insult, or belittle a person because of his or her race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or physical abilities-is still tolerated and even protected" in the system of racism/white supremacy. [MORE

Turn His Other Cheek & Hit Him Harder. At any rate, provoking and encouraging others to be violent against you is called sado-masochism. It is not non-violence. 

For more insight into reality Osho Rajineesh offers the following: 

Non-violence just for the sake of it, is just stupid ideology taken out of its proper historical context. Osho Rajineesh explained that non-violence should simply be a consequence of having a reverence for life. "Non-violence simply says don't kill others. Do you think that is enough? It is only a negative statement: don't kill others, don't harm others. Is that enough?" He said, 

"I will say respect life, yours included.

In fact, you are first to be respectful towards yourself, then only can you be respectful towards anybody else.

Be loving towards yourself, then you will be able to love others too.

Reverence for life will not allow any provocation to violence. It will not start violence, but if anybody starts it, it will stop it immediately.

Jesus says, "If somebody hits you on one of your cheeks, turn the other cheek." I say, "Okay, turn his other cheek - and hit him harder. Give him a lesson! Make it clear to him that it is not so easy to hit somebody on the cheek- that it comes back, and comes back harder.

And if you are capable, hit both his cheeks at the same time. Why give him the chance to turn the other cheek and become a saint? Hit him and tell him simultaneously,'! do not believe in violence, hence I have to stop it at the first chance. And remember that you cannot just be violent without being prevented.'" [MORE]