Political Silence: Trump and Media QUIET after a Heterosexual, White Man Murdered 3 White Cops in an All White PA Town [NonWhites Function as a Negative Reference Group Vital to the Racist Self-Image]

Racists are obsessed with crime statistics in Black communities. According to the Sentencing Project, “Researchers have shown that crime reporting exaggerates crime rates and exhibits both quantitative and qualitative racial biases. This includes a tendency to exaggerate rates of black offending and white victimization and to depict black suspects in a less favorable light than whites.“Under the pretense of being concerned about the well-being of Black people, MASSA media in urban areas in particular, sensationalize crime with overblown coverage and hyper alertness. To be explicitly clear, it is a guise because we live in a system of racism/white supremacy in which most white people (or the most powerful white people) seek to dominate or control non-white people with master-servant relations in all areas of people activity and who project and maintain unequal power and conditions in a white over Black system. Racists, either self-described as liberal or conservative, have no intention of changing this arrangement because they are the permanent enemy of non-white people. RACIST liberals and conservatives spare no cost when it comes to placing Black people in greater confinement.

NOT A FALSE FLAG. From [HERE] Detectives arrived at the home of Matthew Ruth Wednesday afternoon, searching for him in connection to a stalking case — a visit authorities say took place only a couple of hours before he ambushed and killed three police officers.

Ruth, who was killed in return fire by police, lived at a home on Hall Drive in Penn Township, York County, according to court documents. Neighbors say he lived there with his parents.

After communicating with Ruth's family and learning that Ruth wasn't at the home, police said the detectives then went to the residence of his ex-girlfriend, who had identified Ruth as the man spotted the evening prior on a trail camera peering into her mother's home in North Codorus Township with an AR-15 slung across his body.

That residence is where the ambush occurred on Wednesday, shortly after 2 p.m.

"The door was open and upon immediately opening the door, the actor repeatedly fired at the officers with multiple rounds from an AR-15 style rifle with the suppressor," said York County District Attorney Tim Barker during a Thursday news conference.

Three Northern York County Regional Police Department detectives, identified as Det. Sgt. Cody Becker, Det. Mark Baker and Det. Isaiah Emenheiser, were fatally shot. Another detective with the same department was seriously injured, as was a sheriff's deputy assisting with the arrest.

In the hours following the shooting, police swarmed the neighborhood where Ruth lived, startling neighbors as investigators collected evidence at the home.

One neighbor said he was surprised to see Ruth as the suspected gunman in the police killings, but not that he'd been involved in a crime.

IF THESE MURDERS OF POLICE OFFICERS INVOLVED ANYONE BLACK OR A NON-WHITE MIGRANT OR TRANS,‘ MEDIA COVERAGE AND NEUROPEON COMMENTARY WOULD BE OMNIPRESENT & NON-STOP

Dr. Amos Wilson asks and then answers, ‘ What does White America have to gain from choosing to perceive Black males as stereotypically criminal? By socio-psychologically inducing Black males into criminality. . . .?

Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their selfcongratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control. White America's self-appreciation is enhanced as it insatiably feeds on overblown reports about Black criminality while denying its own incomparable criminal record, and its own racist-imperialist incubation and giving birth to the very same criminal forces which now threaten to destroy it.

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image. The Black criminal is used to support the White American community's self-serving, self-justifying judgments of itself. White America's preoccupation with Black criminality betrays its own need for reassurance; betrays its own basic insecurity regarding its projected moral purity. Consequently, the higher the incidence of reported Black criminality, the more exceptionally righteous White America feels itself to be. The more righteous it feels itself to be the more intensely and guiltlessly it promulgates and justifies its domination and exploitation of African peoples at home and abroad. The alleged innate criminality of Black America, particularly of Black males, and their actual high level of self-destructive criminality remain incontrovertible psycho-political necessities if the White American-Eurocentric culture of inequality is to be self-justifiably continued without end. In the context of this collective necessity, more Blacks are arrested, charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced to longer prison terms for allegedly committing the same type of crimes as Whites. Many are arrested, charged, tried, convicted and sentenced to long prison terms merely for committing the crime of being Black in America.

The White American community's need to stereotypically perceive Blacks as innately criminal, coupled with its socioeco­nomic power to control the availability of resources and their renumerative allocation, confers on it the power of creating or controlling circumstances conducive to the satisfaction of its hegemonic requirements. Under these circumstances, the need of the collective White ego to project an image of endemic Black criminality in order to maintain its power status quo, is tanta­mount to the creation of Black criminality, particularly of the self-destructive kind. [MORE]

Despite the Supreme Court’s Prohibition on Executing Intellectually Disabled People, Florida Authorities are Scheduled to Murder Victor Jones in 12 Days (a Black Man who Killed a White Couple)

From [HERE] Gov. Ron DeSantis, the Republican governor of Florida has signed more death warrants this year than any of his predecessors.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2002 deci­sion in Atkins v. Virginia estab­lished that the Eighth Amendment pro­hibits exe­cut­ing peo­ple with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. The Court lat­er clar­i­fied that rigid IQ cut­offs were not per­mis­si­ble and also required states to con­sid­er mean­ing­ful evi­dence of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty, includ­ing sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly valid expert tes­ti­mo­ny and adap­tive func­tion­ing deficits. Despite this unequiv­o­cal con­sti­tu­tion­al pro­tec­tion, two death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers — David Pittman and Victor Jones—face exe­cu­tion this month in Florida. Attorneys for both men argue they are peo­ple with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties that should be exempt from exe­cu­tion and pro­tect­ed under Atkins. 

Pittman was murdered last night by government authorities.

Much like Mr. Pittman, Victor Jones, who was sen­tenced to death in 1993 for the 1990 mur­ders of his two employ­ers, has been denied relief in low­er courts regard­ing his intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty claim and is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed on September 30, 2025. At tri­al, the court found three aggra­vat­ing fac­tors and reject­ed every mit­i­gat­ing fac­tor pre­sent­ed by defense coun­sel. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s rul­ing in Atkins, Mr. Jones was able to secure an evi­den­tiary hear­ing to demon­strate he met the stan­dards out­lined in that case. The State argued that because Mr. Jones’ IQ was test­ed and found to score above the hard­line thresh­old of 70, he did not qual­i­fy for relief, and the cir­cuit court agreed. After the state’s rul­ing in Hall, Mr. Jones again peti­tioned the courts for relief, but they sum­mar­i­ly denied his claims based on pri­or tes­ti­mo­ny from the Atkins hear­ing, despite its reliance on out­dat­ed medical science. 

During post-con­vic­tion pro­ceed­ings, Mr. Jones’ sis­ter and cousin described in detail the pain and abuse they all suf­fered at the hands of Laura Long, an aunt who raised them.” Both Mr. Jones’ sis­ter and cousin described beat­ings in which Mr. Jones was made to first undress, not­ing that Ms. Long would call him ​“slow” and ​“stu­pid,” and beat him for get­ting bad grades. They also tes­ti­fied that Ms. Long’s son, who was ten years old­er than Mr. Jones, would beat them as well. This infor­ma­tion was nev­er pre­sent­ed to a jury. 

His tri­al jury also nev­er learned that as a young teenag­er, Mr. Jones was con­fined to Okeechobee School for Boys on four sep­a­rate occa­sions between 1975 and 1978. While at Okeechobee, Mr. Jones suf­fered neglect, phys­i­cal and sex­u­al abuse by state employ­ees, and wit­nessed bru­tal­i­ty against his peers. Mr. Jones was beat­en sev­er­al times with thick leather straps, wit­nessed the gang-rape of his peers, and to avoid sex­u­al vio­lence, he had to fight off oth­er boys, which land­ed him in soli­tary con­fine­ment. As a result of the abuse he wit­nessed and expe­ri­enced, Mr. Jones devel­oped Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), sui­ci­dal ideations, and a drug depen­den­cy. Though Mr. Jones told oth­ers, includ­ing author­i­ty fig­ures and adults about Okeechobee, no one believed him — includ­ing his pros­e­cut­ing attor­ney. Throughout his tri­al and appel­late pro­ceed­ings, the state of Florida has con­sis­tent­ly argued that evi­dence of Mr. Jones’ abuse and the men­tal health effects of that abuse was not cred­i­ble or believ­able. Without hear­ing the evi­dence of Okeechobee and his child­hood abuse, his jury returned two ver­dicts for death. Mr. Jones’ cur­rent coun­sel con­tends that had the tri­al jury heard this evi­dence it would not have sen­tenced him to death. 

Gov. DeSantis signed Mr. Jones’ exe­cu­tion war­rant less than eight months after sign­ing a bill that sets aside $20mil­lion to com­pen­sate indi­vid­u­als who were sent to Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys and Okeechobee between 1940 and 1975 who suf­fered from men­tal, phys­i­cal, or sex­u­al abuse at the hands of state-employed offi­cials. By sign­ing this leg­is­la­tion, Gov. DeSantis acknowl­edged the wrong­do­ing of the state and trau­mat­ic effects of both Dozier and Okeechobee. An inves­ti­ga­tion by The Marshall Project found that at least 34 for­mer res­i­dents of Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys were even­tu­al­ly sen­tenced to death in Florida. One of these indi­vid­u­als, Michael Bell, was exe­cut­ed in May 2025, despite fed­er­al courts nev­er hear­ing his claims. 

In January 2025, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody’s office for­mal­ly rec­og­nized in a let­ter to Mr. Jones that he is a mem­ber of the class of boys who were abused at Okeechobee. The let­ter states in part, ​“Please know that we are sor­ry to hear about the cir­cum­stances that prompt­ed you to apply for com­pen­sa­tion,” which was even­tu­al­ly sent to his account in prison. Mr. Jones’ coun­sel argues that the let­ter from AG Moody’s office should pre­clude the state from con­tin­u­ing to pro­mote the the­o­ry that his claims of abuse are not cred­i­ble. Noting the lim­it­ed nature of the aggra­vat­ing fac­tors found at tri­al, attor­neys for Mr. Jones argue his case requires relief because a rea­son­able prob­a­bil­i­ty exists that in con­junc­tion with new evi­dence of his men­tal health issues and low IQ, the let­ter from January 2025, would lead a jury to sen­tence him to life impris­on­ment. Mr. Jones’ final war­rant-relat­ed appeals remain pend­ing in the Florida Supreme Court. 

Autopsy Shows that the Lethal Injection Given to Byron Black by Tennessee Authorities Causes Pul­monary Ede­ma While Awake, Leading to Great Pain and a Feeling of Suf­fo­ca­tion like Water Boarding

From [HERE] Byron Black was exe­cut­ed in Tennessee by lethal injec­tion on August 5, 2025. During his exe­cu­tion, Mr. Black unex­pect­ed­ly and repeat­ed­ly groaned over the course of sev­er­al min­utes and audi­bly told his spir­i­tu­al advi­sor that he was in pain. An autop­sy released September 10, 2025, pro­vides some expla­na­tion. It found evi­dence of ​“pul­monary con­ges­tion and ede­ma”– defined as an abnor­mal buildup of flu­id in the lungs which can pro­duce sen­sa­tions of ​“doom, pan­ic, drown­ing, and asphyx­i­a­tion” accord­ing to Dr. Mark Edgar, a pathol­o­gist and autop­sy direc­tor at the Mayo Clinic in Florida until his death ear­li­er this year. 

“It’s hurt­ing so bad.” 

MR. BYRON BLACK, FIVE MIN­UTES INTO HIS EXE­CU­TION WITH PEN­TO­BAR­BI­TAL ON AUGUST 5, 2025

Mr. Black’s suf­fer­ing was not unprece­dent­ed. In 2016, Dr. Edgar and Dr. Joel Zivot, then both at the Mayo Clinic, began exam­in­ing autop­sy reports of exe­cut­ed pris­on­ers and noticed that many of the pris­on­ers’ lungs were twice as heavy as they should have been. After gath­er­ing more records, they found pul­monary ede­ma in approx­i­mate­ly three-quar­ters of the peo­ple who had been exe­cut­ed. Their work led to a 2020 National Public Radio analy­sis of more than 200 autop­sies of death-row pris­on­ers exe­cut­ed using lethal injec­tion. That study found that 84% showed evi­dence of pul­monary ede­ma, a con­di­tion in which a person’s lungs fill with flu­id, cre­at­ing the feel­ing of suf­fo­ca­tion or drown­ing that some experts have likened to water­board­ing. Their find­ings were con­sis­tent irre­spec­tive of the state that car­ried out the exe­cu­tion or the drug pro­to­col employed. Autopsy results showed the pres­ence of pul­monary ede­ma in lethal injec­tions involv­ing sodi­um thiopen­tal, pen­to­bar­bi­tal, mida­zo­lam, and etomidate. 

Prior to Mr. Black’s exe­cu­tion, his attor­neys flagged that a sin­gle-drug pen­to­bar­bi­tal exe­cu­tion raised the risk that he would suf­fer from pul­monary ede­ma in vio­la­tion of the Eighth Amendment pro­hi­bi­tion on cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment. But the state’s expert tes­ti­fied in hear­ings pri­or to his exe­cu­tion that Mr. Black would lose con­scious­ness under the pen­to­bar­bi­tal quick­ly — with­in 20 sec­onds. Witnesses to Mr. Black’s exe­cu­tion not­ed that he was still awake and a groan­ing in appar­ent pain five min­utes after the start of the exe­cu­tion, say­ing ​“It’s hurt­ing so bad.” 

Even with the release of Mr. Black’s autop­sy, his attor­neys are still seek­ing addi­tion­al infor­ma­tion. Speaking to the Nashville Banner about ques­tions still unan­swered by the autop­sy, attor­neys for Mr. Black not­ed that the report ​“fails to doc­u­ment the con­di­tion of the veins … [and] to doc­u­ment the EKG results.” His attor­neys are also con­cerned about the admin­is­tra­tion of the pen­to­bar­bi­tal, includ­ing whether prison staff were able to locate a vein, or if they inject­ed the drug into his mus­cle, some­thing that would have cre­at­ed a wound at the injec­tion site. Mr. Black’s team has filed free­dom of infor­ma­tion act requests of the Tennessee Department of Corrections which they expect to be answered by December. 

Crump Demands Authorities to Release the Public's Surveillance Video of the Delta State Hanging Incident to Trey Reed's Family

From [HERE] Attorney Ben Crump is demanding that all video footage pertaining to the Delta State incident be shown to family.

On Monday, the body of Demartravion “Trey” Reed, 21, a Black student at Delta State, was found hanging from a tree on the university’s campus.

At a Wednesday press conference, authorities said there is footage of the incident.

“There are videos,” said Pike Peeler, Delta State’s Director of Public Safety, at a press conference on Wednesday. “They are in the hands of the investigative team.”

In a press release, Ben Crump, who has been retained by Reed’s family, said that all video footage in the investigation of Reed’s death should be shown to his family.

In an official statement from the Bolivar County Coroner’s Office, which was released late Monday evening, Coroner Randolph Seals said that based on their preliminary examination, Reed was not suffering from any lacerations, contusions, compound fractures, broken bones, or injuries consistent with assault.

Seals also stated that, at this time, there is no evidence to suggest Reed had been physically attacked before his death.

However, Crump says that Reed’s family has raised concerns after receiving what he says are conflicting accounts and incomplete information about the circumstances of his death.

Crump says he, the family, and their civil rights partners will also commission a separate, independent autopsy. This, he says, “to verify the findings of the state medical examiner and ensure no question goes unanswered.”

Preliminary results of Reed’s autopsy should be available within the next 24 hours, Director Peeler said during the Wednesday press conference at Delta State.

NAACP alleges state withheld millions that could have helped Jackson’s water system

The NAACP sued Mississippi last week, alleging that state officials withheld millions of federal dollars while knowing the City of Jackson’s water system was on the edge of failure.  

A 38-page lawsuit contends that Mississippi “knowingly and intentionally” created policies that stopped Jackson from receiving millions of dollars from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds in May 2021.

The lawsuit, which names the State Treasurer, the head of the Department of Environmental Quality, and the Executive Director of the Department of Finance and Administration, claims state leaders denied the citizens of Jackson equal protection under the law in violation of the 14th Amendment.

With 122,000 black residents, the lawsuit claims the unequal access to funding amounted to race-based discrimination.

“With discriminatory purpose, the state of Mississippi enacted facially discriminated against the City of Jackson by requiring that funds awarded to Jackson and only Jackson were to be held by the Mississippi Treasury in a Capital City Water/ Sewer Projects Fund. S.B. 2822 provided no clear guidance as to what Jackson would have to do to receive those monies. No other municipality was singled out in this way or had its ARPA award withheld,” the lawsuit reads. [MORE]

[Most People Never Heard of Charlie Kirk, Knew Little About Him] The Blight White House Releases AI-Generated Video Of Trump Eulogizing Charlie Kirk

Lebron: The King that Never Was

Mississippi police await autopsy results for Black student found hanged at Delta State University

Mississippi police on Wednesday awaited autopsy results for a Black student found hanging from a tree at Delta State University, in a case that has ignited strong emotions in a state with a history of racist violence.

The 21-year-old student was found near the campus pickleball courts early Monday. While police have said they saw no evidence of foul play, his family is demanding answers and has hired prominent civil rights attorney Ben Crump.

Campus police Chief Michael Peeler released little new information about the investigation at a news conference, calling the death an "isolated incident" and insisting there were no active threats to students and faculty.

The chief state medical examiner was conducting an autopsy Wednesday, and Peeler said preliminary findings should be released in a day or two.

Peeler said the evidence includes video footage, but he would not say what it shows and where it came from, citing the ongoing investigation. [MORE]

The Covid Shot Catastrophe: Death And Injury On The Scale Of Hundreds Of Nuclear Strikes!

Attorney Aaron Siri Told Senate Puppeticians that a Large Study Found Vaccinated Kids were Far More Likely to Develop Chronic Disease than Unvaccinated Kids, But Researchers Fear Releasing It

In a U.S. Senate hearing today, attorney Aaron Siri revealed the results of a large study that found vaccinated children were far more likely to develop chronic disease than unvaccinated kids.

The study never underwent peer review and was never published, because the authors — staunch vaccine supporters — told Siri they were concerned about losing their jobs or reputations because their findings contradicted the official public health narrative and vaccine policy.

Siri’s testimony, delivered during Tuesday’s Senate hearing, “How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines,” addressed the study’s origins, findings and suppression.

The study involved over 18,000 children enrolled in Henry Ford Health system’s insurance plan in Michigan.

“The results are astonishing,” Siri told The Defender. “For example, vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease (a group of allergic conditions), 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorder.”

These findings were statistically significant — even when accounting for gender, race, birthweight, premature birth, and respiratory distress or trauma at birth.

But rather than publishing the results, the study authors and their bosses at Henry Ford Health refused to make them public — even though the lead author previously assured Siri and Del Bigtree he would publish the results, whatever the findings. [MORE]

Trump-Bush Stopped Celebrating the Life of Charlie Kirk Long Enough to Murder 3 More People in Venezuela; Claimed w/o Proof They Were Running Drugs Out of Boat Drifting at Sea, Posed No Threat to US

From [HERE] The US military on Monday bombed a boat near Venezuela and killed three people, according to a statement released by President Trump on Truth Social.

President Trump claimed without providing evidence that the boat was carrying drugs and that the three people who were killed were “narcoterrorists.” He made similar claims about the first US military strike on a boat near Venezuela that occurred on September 2, which he said killed 11 “narcoterrorists.”

The president also posted a video that purported to show the Monday strike. It showed what appeared to be a boat that was drifting at sea, followed by an explosion.

“This morning, on my Orders, US Military Forces conducted a SECOND Kinetic Strike against positively identified, extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels and narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility,” Trump said. “The Strike occurred while these confirmed narcoterrorists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics (A DEADLY WEAPON POISONING AMERICANS!) headed to the US.”

The president also signaled that more US strikes on boats in the region were coming. “BE WARNED — IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!” he wrote.

The second US bombing in the region came after the Venezuelan government said that personnel from a US warship boarded a Venezuelan tuna boat that was in Venezuelan waters. Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil said 18 armed US troops were on the vessel for 18 hours, a claim that hasn’t been confirmed by the US military.

“Those who give the order to carry out such provocations are seeking an incident that would justify a military escalation in the Caribbean,” Gil said.

While Trump and other US officials claim the military action and pressure on Venezuela’s government is about drug trafficking and a response to overdose deaths in the US, fentanyl doesn’t come from or through Venezuela, and the majority of the cocaine that is transported to the US comes through the Pacific, not the Caribbean. Gil said that the real purpose of the US operations was for the US to “persist in their failed policy” of regime change in Venezuela.

The Venezuela policy is being largely driven by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has long pushed for regime change in Venezuela. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Monday called out Rubio in response to the US boarding the tuna boat, calling him a “lord of death and war.”

Florida Court Strikes Down Law that Prohibited Law Abiding People from Carrying Guns in Public for Self-Defense, "the right to bear arms in public necessarily includes the right to do so openly"

Florida is one of just four states that generally prohibit people from openly carrying firearms in public. That law, a Florida appeals court ruled on Wednesday, is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.

"The Constitution protects the right to carry arms openly for self-defense," Judge Stephanie Ray writes in a unanimous opinion from the First District Court of Appeal. "Florida's Open Carry Ban cannot be reconciled with that guarantee."

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier welcomed the decision. "Florida's 1st District Court of Appeals just ruled that Florida's open carry ban is no longer constitutionally enforceable statewide," he wrote on X. "Our office fully supports the Court's decision. This is a big win for the Second Amendment rights of Floridians."

The case, McDaniels v. Florida, involves an activist who sought to test Florida's ban by inviting his own arrest. In July 2022, Ray notes, Stanley Victor McDaniels "stood at a major intersection in downtown Pensacola," holding a copy of the U.S. Constitution and waving at passing cars. He "had a loaded handgun tucked inside his pants using an inside-the-waistband holster. The holstered firearm was visible to anyone who passed by, but McDaniels was not threatening anyone. He had also set up a camera on a tripod to record his activity."

When police questioned him, McDaniels explained that he planned a constitutional challenge to Section 790.053 of the Florida Statutes. That provision, enacted in 1987, says "it is unlawful for any person to openly carry on or about his or her person any firearm." Violating the prohibition is a second-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 60 days in jail and a $500 fine.

Trump Claims to Support Gun Rights but Most of the Arrests in DC by His Fed Cops Were of Black Men for Mere Gun Possession [not gun violence]; No Different than the White Liberals He Whines About

On President Donald Trump’s orders, thousands of local police, federal agents and camouflage-clad troops have fanned out across the nation’s capital every night for the past month. The surge sprawled across D.C., from its poorest pockets to its busiest commercial corridors and marbled monuments.

The White House has touted the success of the operation, saying it drove down crime and took illegal guns off the streets. But they’ve offered little insight into who was being arrested, how, where and for what.

To answer those questions, The Washington Post gathered more than a thousand charging documents from local and federal courts, mapped the incidents and examined how they played out. The documents portray an expanded law enforcement presence that considered no crime too small while hunting for guns and employing tactics that have sparked community opposition in the past.

More than a third of the 1,273 arrests examined by The Post from the first four weeks of Trump’s crackdown in D.C. involved federal law enforcement, a figure that doesn’t include arrests made by immigration officers.

Those arrests occurred in all eight city wards, but were concentrated in the city’s poorest, least White and most crime-ridden neighborhoods.

Additionally, many occurred in low-crime areas highly visible to the president and tourists: the National Mall, outside the White House and around Union Station.

Of the 470 arrests where federal officers were present:

• Weapons charges were the most common, primarily illegal gun possession. One in 4 cases involved gun charges. Officers found firearms in cars, waistbands and a child’s backpack.

• About 1 in 7 cases involved people accused of having open containers of alcohol, in cars or parks or curbside. Almost two dozen cases involved public consumption of marijuana — possession of which, in small quantities, is legal in D.C.

• One in 8 cases involved people accused of assaulting a police officer or resisting arrest. Most of those also involved other charges, but on 20 occasions, assaulting or resisting was the sole charge — including people who have screamed at, spat on and, in one viral case, hurled a sandwich at a federal officer.

• One in 12 arrests included solely minor charges, such as using marijuana in public, fare evasion and traffic offenses like driving without a valid license.

• Those arrested were overwhelmingly young, Black men. Black men have made up the majority of D.C. police arrests for years.

• The quarter of the D.C. census tracts with the highest violent crime rates were the site of nearly half of arrests, while the quarter with the lowest rates had 11 percent. [MORE]

Analysis Shows the False Flag involving the “Ukrainian Refugee” and the "Black Career Criminal" on the Train in NC was Created by Gov/Media Using AI, Bad Special Effects and False Flaggots (Actors)

This false flag draws some similarities to the “Brooklyn Subway Terror Attack,” in which blood packets appeared to be set down in places by actors on the subway platform and also all the passengers appeared to respond to directions given to them on their cell phones (See videos below).

As stated previously, this false flag is also similar to other racial false flags such as the ‘White Marine (Daniel Penny) vs. ‘Homeless Black Man’ (Jordan Neely) on the NYC subway and the ‘Waukesha Christmas Parade Attack.’ Said episodes were told in accord with the appetite of the racist believer, not the realities of life. No details or critical analysis is possible with a combined jesusized belief, clogic and emotion in the mind given to racists (check out this supreme neuropeon idiocy for example). Conversely, it is also similar to ‘the Buffalo Supermarket Massacre,’ and the “Dylann Roof” Charleston Shooting hoax at a Black Church. Said racial episodes were told in accord with the beliefs of the woke listener. [MORE]

Besides government authority and massa media, the problem here is “belief” itself. Belief is like sauce, it can make any rotten meat palatable and enable it to slide down your throat with its true nature concealed. Osho explains that, “A mind that is filled with belief is a mind which can project anything according to the belief.” He states,

“Whatsoever you believe, you project. Belief is a projection. It is just like a projector in a movie film-house: you see something on the screen which is not there. The projector is hidden behind, but you never look at the projector, you look at the screen. The projector is at the back, and the whole game is going on there, but you look at the screen. The whole game is going on in your mind, and a mind filled with belief always goes on projecting things in the world, it sees things which are not there. This is the problem. The mind which believes is always vulnerable and always provides an opportunity to be exploited by the cheaters - and the cheaters are all around.”

FUNKTIONARY sets forth the following:

Belief – the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome realityentanglement. 2) a construction of approximate truths, absolute truths, mass truths and primary myths, based on genetic predisposition, and environmental and socio-psychological conditioning. 3) the institutionalization of the unknowable, i.e., a conviction that is not necessarily based upon any empirical, direct-mind or experiential knowledge. 4) a non-physical surviving thought-form. 5) any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought. 6) an intellectual rationalization surrounded by (based on) “proofs,” reasons and arguments. 7) that which springs out of cultural ideology. 8) the greatest fiction. 9) a trick of the mind to repress doubt. 10) a mental doubtsuppression tactic. A suppressed doubt is neither faith nor even trust. 11) repressed doubt. 12) an explicit or implicit assent to dogmatic propositions (with or without overgrown religious foliage) on someone else’s authority. 13) reverential blindness that thwarts fresh perception and intuitive apperception. 14) a prejudice without any experience to support it. 15) a peculiar blend of fatiloquent assertion on one hand and adamant denial on the other. 16) a manic flirtation with the terminally unprovable. 17) certainty based in the unknown. 18) having another “see” it for you while seeing him see it (for you)—in effect being for another. 19) a conclusion without the verification of direct experience—make-believe made real. 20) the inability or unwillingness to master the requisite logic or reason to counterbalance (or overcome) the willingness to be misled. 21) the abnegation of internal authenticity for outside authority. 22) ego-consoling faith. 23) acceptance of a statement, tenet or creed with available verification and substantive evidence to its contrary. The word belief in English comes from the Anglo-Saxon root ‘leif’, which means, “to wish.” Belief is a conviction that can only be held or maintained in absence of empirical or experiential evidence—that is, it cannot be proved or disproved. Once anything can be proven as factual, it no longer occupies the space of belief. Belief is mental belly-fat. It is the inability to formulate the necessary suspicion that there is something seriously missing, inaccurate or incomplete. Sin means missing the mark—and belief is the mark that’s missed in the very act of merely believing. [MORE]

Another False Flag Sold in Accord w/Racist Dogma? A 'Black Career Criminal' Stabbed a “Ukrainian Refugee” to Death, Yet There's No Blood on Her Body or Clothes and White Women Always Avoid Black Men like DeCarlos Brown in Public Places

cover-stories – headlines that provide cover (hiding and distraction) for the real untold and undiscussed stories behind the one’s they are really (deliberately) not covering, undressing or addressing at all. 2) planted actors and/or provocateurs providing misinformation immediately after a false flag operation—like 9-11, Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon bombing. The methodology: Sell the lie with authority, then change the subject to something emotional. For example, the cover stories about whether or not “well-intentioned” public officials (on oxymoronic characterization itself) made “mistakes” in not paying attention to obvious warnings of so-called Al-Qaida operations inside the territorial United States posed by the mock 9-11 Commission mockery. The whole thrust behind the cover-story was to specifically avoid treating the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon, and the fields in Pennsylvania as actual crime scenes—to avoid the contradictions in the official stories with physical evidence to the contrary, to totally ignore the blatant anomalies regarding the well-planned, orchestrated, and executed sophisticated operations (hoax) that happened and didn’t happen on that fateful day. (See: Underlying, MEDIA, Tyrant-Paradigm, Pixelated People, West-Wingers, Oklahoma City Bombing, Nine- Eleven, MEDIA NSA Position, Bush Family Crime Syndicate, Pentagon Murders, Killer-Jet, CIA, Israelians, NSA, King TUT, RUN—GMC & The OCTOCON)

Black Teen vs MI Cops [the Power the Police Have to Attack People, Offensively is Evil and Has No Natural Source. It Doesn't Come from People, which is Where All Gov Power is Supposed to Come From]

Judge Pauses Civil Suit against MI Trooper who Murdered Samuel Sterling Until Criminal Appeal is Resolved. White Cop Intentionally Struck and Crushed Fleeing Black Man w/Unmarked Mini-Van, Denied Help

From [HERE] A civil lawsuit filed by the family of a man who died after being hit by a Michigan State Police (MSP) cruiser was paused by a federal judge Tuesday, according to court documents.

A civil trial tied to an excessive force lawsuit against former MSP Detective Sergeant Brian Keely was originally set to take place in November, however, Judge Hala Jarbou granted his attorneys a motion to stay.

In the civil lawsuit filed in January, Samuel Sterling’s family alleged Keely violated his Fourth and 14th Amendment protections against excessive force and argued gross negligence and willful and wanton misconduct.

In Kentwood in April 2024, Sterling ran away from a task force seeking to arrest him. Officers chased him to a Burger King while Keely pursued in an unmarked cruiser. Video released by MSP shows the white police officer deliberately drive over a curb - onto a sidewalk - and then violently strike him with a mini-van. The mini-van then pushes Sterling into the side of the building, crushing and pinning him against it. After he was struck, the officer backed up off the curb.

Officers are seen putting handcuffs on Sterling and telling firefighters who responded to the scene to keep the cuffs on, while he was dying. Sterling, 25, was hospitalized and died hours later.

Authorities claim that Keely was not wearing a body camera and his vehicle did not have a dash camera "due to his assignment on a federal task force." The Michigan Attorney General’s Office charged Keely with second-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter. The case was later moved into federal court after a motion by the defense, which said it belonged there because Keely was acting as part of a U.S. Marshals task force when the death happened.

In May of this year, U.S. District Court Judge Hala Jarbou dismissed the criminal case. The AG’s Office has filed a notice to appeal that ruling. The case never went to trial because judge Jarbou ruled that the state does not have enough evidence to establish murder (LOL. never happens). While the state still argued he could be found guilty of second-degree murder or involuntary manslaughter if he acted “in disregard of life-endangering consequences.” “The Court is not persuaded by the State’s argument,” the court documents say. (LOL! it was all just an accident, jury doesn’t need to decide). [MORE]

However, per court documents, the state appealed that decision.

Keely's attorneys filed the motion for stay in August, asking the federal court to pause the civil case against him before the criminal case is complete.

In a written ruling, Jarbou agreed and is "in favor of stay because there is a substantial overlap in issues" and that "his actions were appropriate under the Fourth Amendment. Both those issues are key to the outcome of the civil case."

All White Jury Believes Black WI Cop Who Said He Couldn't Remember Killing Alvin Cole: Shot Black Teen 2X when He was on Hands and Knees and 3X While He was Face Down on Ground. 2nd Civil Mistrial

From [HERE] and [HERE] After 10 hours of deliberation, a Milwaukee jury could not reach a unanimous verdict in the civil lawsuit against a former Wisconsin police officer who fatally shot a 17-year-old in a mall parking lot, resulting in a second mistrial.

Wauwatosa officer Joseph Mensah shot 17-year-old Alvin Cole outside Mayfair Mall on February 2 after police responded to a call of a reported disturbance at the shopping center. 

An all-white, eight-member jury was selected out of a pool of 36 potential jurors, with an even split of men and women. None of the jurors are from Milwaukee. Two indicated that they have close relatives who served in law enforcement. 

Mensah is a Black police officer in Wauwatosa, a suburb of Milwaukee. Cole was Mensah’s third shooting over a five-year period at Wauwatosa PD, a fact not allowed to be shared with the white jurors. That is, he fatally shot three non-white men:  Antonio Gonzales, who had mental health issues and refused to drop a sword; Jay Anderson Jr., a Black man who was shot in the head while asleep in his car in a public park; and Cole.

At trial he claimed he couldn’t remember what happened but that he didn’t shoot for no reason.

In February 2020, around 6 p.m., Wauwatosa police officers were dispatched to Mayfair Mall for a dispute involving a group of teenagers, one of whom was 17-year-old Alvin Cole. He was described by mall security as a Black teenage male wearing a gray hoodie and a fanny pack containing a handgun.

When officers arrived on the scene, Cole and his friends ran away. The shooting occurred after Cole refused a command from the police to drop the stolen gun he was holding and Cole fired a bullet as he tried to flee.

It was determined that Mensah fired his weapon five times. Two shots were fired when Cole was on his hands and knees, and the remaining three shots were fired by Mensah while Cole was face down on the ground. Mensah was the only officer among the five other officers at the scene who fired his weapon.

On October 7, 2020 Milwaukee County District Attorney John T. Chisholm announced that Officer Mensah would not be charged because he had reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary. Chisholm is a white liberal.

Cole’s parents sued Mensah for excessive force in 2022. The first trial in March ended with a hung jury.

The civil retrial began last Monday in the Eastern District of Wisconsin before federal Judge Lynn Adelman.

Over three days of testimony, the plaintiffs attempted to show that Mensah did not have the legal right to use deadly force on Cole because he did not point his weapon at any officer. They used the medical examiner’s report to show that Cole was likely on his hands and knees when Mensah fired, and the testimony of other officers to disprove Mensah’s version of events.

Mensah is the only officer to testify that he saw the gun pointed at him. Officer Evan Olson also claimed to have seen the gun pointed, though he testified that he believed it was pointed at himself. The mall security guard, who was gaining on Cole when the first shot went off, said Cole turned and looked him in the eyes before Mensah got there.

Olson drove Mensah back to the station against protocol, which requires involved officers to isolate from each other until they can give statements to internal investigators. Neither could remember what they talked about, and the audio and video turn off when they get into Mensah’s unmarked squad car, according to court records.

Attorney Nate Cade, representing Cole’s estate, suggested several times that the two are close friends and synced up their stories after the shooting and before they gave statements to internal investigating officers from the Milwaukee Police Department.

“If they synced up their stories, they didn’t do a good job,” defense attorney Jasmine Baynard said during her closing argument on Wednesday.

Baynard made a convincing argument in closings, telling the jury that the law doesn’t require Mensah to actually be in danger to use deadly force — he only needs to be able to articulate the danger he perceived himself to be in at the time.

When asked why he shot and killed Cole by his own attorneys, he said simply that he didn’t want to die. He also said that when he responded to the call, which was not yet a particularly serious event, he never imagined that Cole would try to shoot his way out.

The trial was marred by frequent and tense objections, sidebars and impeachment from both sides of the case. With each witness testifying to a slightly different version of events, some seeming logistically improbable and others changing over time, the jury had the difficult task of discerning the evidence in the case from the parties’ arguments and theories.

Idaho AG Fails to Charge 4 White Cops who Fatally Shot an Autistic, Nonverbal Latino Teen who was holding a Knife On the Other Side of a Chain-Link Fence. Shot 9 Times, Obviously Posed No Real Threat

From [HERE] Four Idaho police officers who fatally shot an autistic, nonverbal teenage boy who was holding a knife on the other side of a chain-link fence in April were justified in their actions and will not face criminal charges, the state attorney general said Wednesday.

Victor Perez, 17, was in a coma for a week before dying April 12 after doctors removed nine bullets during several surgeries and amputated his leg. The shooting in southeast Idaho city of Pocatello, which was captured on video, drew outrage from members of the community who questioned why the officers opened fire within 12 seconds of exiting their vehicles.

The Bannock County Prosecutor’s Office asked Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador to review the case to determine whether the officers committed a crime and if their use of force was justified. Labrador said the investigation showed that the officers did not know Perez’s age or disabilities, and they were only told an intoxicated man was threatening people with a knife.

“Believing that individuals were in danger of being stabbed, the officers chose to run toward the fence in case the officers needed to take immediate action to protect others from harm,” he said in a letter to the prosecutor. “The officers’ decision to place themselves at the fence to protect others made the officers vulnerable to a knife attack from someone standing immediately on the other side of the fence.

“Under Idaho law, the officers did not have a duty to retreat from the fence before using deadly force,” Labrador said. These factors would make a criminal prosecution untenable, so they will not file charges against the officers, he said.

Ben Nisenbaum, an Oakland, California, lawyer representing the family in a wrongful death claim against the city of Pocatello, said the family was deeply disappointed by the attorney general’s decision, arguing that the officers had a duty to retreat.

“At the end of the day, anyone responding to that situation would know he was developmentally disabled by the way he was acting. It was obvious,” Nisenbaum told The Associated Press in a phone interview. “Stepping away was what a reasonable person would do.”

Email and phone messages seeking comment from Pocatello Police Chief Roger Schei about the attorney general’s decision and whether the officers faced discipline were not immediately returned.

Perez, who is autistic, has an abnormal gait and other medical conditions had managed to get ahold of a kitchen knife on April 5 and was walking around the yard swinging it. Video shows his grandfather, mother and 16-year-old sister trying to take it from him.

A person who saw the struggle called 911, saying it appeared the person was intoxicated and was trying to stab people. Three officers arrived and approached the backyard carrying Glock handguns, and a fourth officer had a beanbag shotgun. The sister waved her arms at the officers and shouted, but they focused their attention on Perez, who was lying on the ground, the attorney general’s letter said.

The Eastern Idaho Critical Incident Task Force investigated the shooting. The autopsy said the cause of death was multiple gunshot wounds. The officers gave interviews to the task force, but they declined to speak with the attorney general’s office, the letter said. Instead, they sent audio recordings and transcripts of interviews they gave to a third party, the letter said.

After reviewing the material collected, the attorney general said they won’t file criminal charges against the officers “because the state would be unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the officers’ use of force was not justified.”