Nevada Reaches 'Largest Wrongful Death Settlement in State history' after Police Brutally Beat a White Man and Blocked Nurses from Providing Aid

From [HERE] The state of Nevada has agreed to settle Walker v. State of Nevada. According to the family’s attorney, the settlement amount is $4.6 million, which he described as the largest wrongful death settlement in the state’s history.

The agreement resolves the state’s role in the case involving Christian Walker, who died at High Desert State Prison in 2023. The family’s lawsuit alleges correctional officers beat Walker and blocked nurses from providing emergency care. The Clark County coroner, however, ruled his death natural due to hypertensive cardiovascular disease, despite documented injuries.

Attorney James D. Urrutia of the LJU Law Firm, who represents Walker’s family, said the case has always been about more than financial compensation:

“All my client has sought is justice for her son. We are grateful that this part of the case is behind us and that we can now focus our efforts on Clark County. Our work in this case has already led to changes in the system, and we hope further change occurs through our continued pursuit of justice.”

The family has said it plans to continue advocating for reforms to improve protections for people in custody.

Walker’s case comes amid growing concerns about conditions within the Nevada Department of Corrections. Dozens of families we've heard from have raised concerns and called for accountability over conditions within the Nevada Department of Corrections, including a recent rise in inmate deaths.

At High Desert State Prison, 17 deaths have been reported so far in 2025, compared to nine in 2024. At Southern Desert Correctional Center, four deaths have been reported this year, compared to one last year. [MORE]

Malcolm James Died in a Wisconsin Jail b/c Police Bent Him Over While He Was Restrained to a Chair, He Told Cops He Couldn’t Breathe. A $20M Suit Demands Justice After White DA Failed to Charge Cops

From [HERE] “I can’t breathe.” Those were Malcolm James’s final words on June 1, 2021, as Racine County Jail officers pinned him into a restraint chair. Minutes later, the 27-year-old was dead.

Four years later, his case centers on a $20 million federal wrongful death lawsuit filed by his mother, Sherry James. The complaint accuses Racine County deputies, Sheriff Christopher Schmaling, and jail medical staff of using excessive force and ignoring urgent medical needs. At stake is whether a jail reliant on non-sworn officers and private medical contractors can keep people in psychiatric crisis safe — and how a homicide ruling produced no charges, no discipline, and no reforms.

“I lost my eldest son, and he was a good kid. Nobody deserves that,” James said.

Attorney Kevin O’Connor, representing the family, added: “No one was disciplined. No one was retrained. The question is: how does that happen?”

Malcolm James’ final minutes

On June 1, 2021, correction officers strapped James into a restraint chair. According to federal court exhibits, officers pepper-sprayed and tased him before restraining him.

As he cried out, “I can’t breathe” for just over three minutes, several members of the jail’s Correctional Emergency Response Team (CERT) in full gear pressed down on his back and shoulders, folding him forward in the chair and layering their weight on top of him while others struggled to remove the Taser probes.

Officers fumbled for several minutes before retrieving the proper removal tool. At least one officer suggested calling paramedics to handle the probes; a supervisor directed them to keep trying, according to the civil complaint. James remained bent forward under their weight until he went limp.

When Nurse Crystal Kristiansen arrived, she reached for smelling salts and a pulse oximeter. Still, she did not attempt CPR and admitted she didn’t know where the automated external defibrillator (AED) was stored. Paramedics were called, but James had no pulse when they arrived. He was pronounced dead soon after.

Four days earlier, James had called 911 in crisis, saying he was suicidal. Police discovered he had set fire to his clothes and apartment. He was first taken to Ascension Hospital–Racine for evaluation, but was released within hours and booked into jail on arson charges. Correction officers later returned him to Ascension two more times. Still, he was discharged each time with only instructions not to harm himself, according to Lt. Michael Luell’s deposition and court filings.

The lawsuit

In August 2021, Sherry James filed a claim against Racine County seeking $20 million in damages. That claim became the basis for the federal wrongful death lawsuit filed in March 2022.

The lawsuit alleges systemic failures, including:

  • Excessive force during restraint.

  • Failure to provide urgent medical care, despite signs of distress.

  • Inadequate training on positional asphyxia and crisis response.

  • Negligent medical care by MEnD Correctional Care, which at the time served as the jail’s for-profit provider.

“The problem isn’t just those final minutes,” O’Connor said. “It’s culture, training, outsourcing — all of it added up to Malcolm’s death.”

Official explanations

  • The Milwaukee County Medical Examiner ruled James’s death a homicide by asphyxia, according to the autopsy.

  • Sheriff Christopher Schmaling [white person], in a June 2021 recorded statement, urged patience and released a video showing James striking his head against a wall. He said the video demonstrated James “intentionally harmed himself.” Lt. Michael Luell later clarified that Schmaling never said James “killed himself” and that the release was meant to counter misinformation. But to the family, the release shifted attention away from officers’ actions in the restraint chair — the focus of the lawsuit.

  • District Attorney Patricia Hanson [white person] declined charges after consulting outside experts. Dr. Tom S. Neuman concluded sudden cardiac death was likely, citing James’s enlarged heart and fibrosis in his expert report. Hanson wrote that the evidence and outside experts did not support charges. The lawsuit, however, argues that Hanson relied on hired experts to sidestep the medical examiner’s homicide ruling, leaving a death with no accountability. [MORE]

Chicago Agreed to a $90 Million Settlement Resolving 176 Wrongful Conviction Lawsuits tied to Police Sgt Ronald Watts; Nearly 200 people (nearly all Black) spent more than 200 years in Prison

ALTHOUGH DO-GOODER REFORMERS OFTEN CLAIM DIVERSE POLICE FORCES ARE A CURE FOR POLICE BRUTALITY, BLACK COPS BRUTALIZE AND HARM BLACK PEOPLE AT A RATE NEARLY EQUAL TO WHITE COPS. SCHOLAR ALEX VITALE STATES, “REFORMERS OFTEN CALL FOR RECRUITING MORE OFFICERS OF COLOR IN THE HOPES THAT THEY WILL TREAT COMMUNITIES WITH GREATER DIGNITY, RESPECT, AND FAIRNESS. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS LITTLE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THIS HOPE. EVEN THE MOST DIVERSE FORCES HAVE MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH RACIAL PROFILING AND BIAS, AND INDIVIDUAL BLACK AND LATINO OFFICERS APPEAR TO PERFORM VERY MUCH LIKE THEIR WHITE COUNTERPARTS.” HE STATES, “THERE IS NOW A LARGE BODY OF EVIDENCE MEASURING WHETHER THE RACE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OFFICERS AFFECTS THEIR USE OF FORCE. MOST STUDIES SHOW NO EFFECT. MORE DISTRESSINGLY, A FEW INDICATE THAT BLACK OFFICERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO USE FORCE OR MAKE ARRESTS, ESPECIALLY OF BLACK CIVILIANS.” [MORE]

CONVERSELY, IT IS RARE FOR A BLACK POLICE OFFICER TO USE EXCESSIVE FORCE AGAINST A WHITE PERSON. IN FACT, ACCORDING TO ANON, IN THE HISTORY OF MODERN LAW ENFORCEMENT THERE HAVE BEEN ONLY A HANDFUL OF INSTANCES OF A BLACK POLICE OFFICER SHOOTING OR KILLING AN UNARMED WHITE PERSON. THIS IS NOT SURPRISING BUT IT IS ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT THE BLACK INDIVIDUAL OPERATING WITHIN A SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY CANNOT MISTREAT WHITES EVEN IF HE OR SHE IS WEARING A UNIFORM, A BADGE, AND CARRYING A GUN." [MORE] IT ALSO PROOF THAT A BLACK INDIVIDUAL WHOSE POWER COMES SOLELY FROM INDIVIDUAL WHITES OR FROM WHITE ORGANIZATIONS OR BUSINESSES OR FROM GOVERNMENTS CONTROLLED BY WHITE INTERESTS/ELITES CANNOT GENERALLY GET AWAY WITH HARMING A WHITE PERSON. [MORE]

NOT ALL, BUT MANY BLACK COPS ARE OBEDIENT BLACK ROLEBOTS PLUGGED INTO DOGGY'S OPERATING SYSTEM. THEY WORSHIP RULES, GOVERNMENT AND LOGIC WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE LEX-ICON. [MORE] AND [MORE]. THE PRESENCE OF BLACK COPS IS INTENDED TO CREATE ‘THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE’ IN A SYSTEM OF INJUSTICE. BLACK COPS EXIST PRIMARILY TO ARREST, SURVEIL AND CONTROL BLACK PEOPLE AND PROVIDE A VENEER OF CIVILITY AND A PRETENSE OF INCLUSION, PROTECTION AND “PUBLIC SERVICE” IN A FREE RANGE PRISON DISGUISED AS A DEMOCRACY [DEMOCKERY].

From [HERE] The City of Chicago has agreed to pay $90 million to settle dozens of wrongful conviction lawsuits tied to former Chicago police Sgt. Ronald Watts and his tactical team.

What we know:

The settlement, which still requires approval from the City Council, would resolve 176 lawsuits involving nearly 200 people who collectively spent more than 200 years in prison. 

Each case stems from false arrests, fabricated evidence and other misconduct by Watts and his unit, city lawyers said.

The lawsuits represent one of the largest police misconduct scandals in Chicago’s history.

Watts and Officer Kallatt Mohammed were indicted in 2012 and later served federal prison sentences. But the fallout has continued for more than a decade as convictions were overturned and many plaintiffs received certificates of innocence.

According to the city’s law department, the agreement would settle about 64% of Chicago’s active wrongful conviction lawsuits.

"The lowest payout is $150,000 and the highest, I believe, is $3.4 million, just over that figure. It might be $3.9… And that's for an individual who spent nearly 10 years in custody. So as I'm sure many of you who cover these types of cases understand, a lot of these settlements are driven by time and custody per year, recent incarceration, et cetera, and that's largely a formula. But a lot in terms of identifying which plaintiff is getting which amount of money is based heavily on discussions and information from the plaintiff's counsel," said Victoria Benson, part of the deputy corporation counsel.

Judge Ends Federal Oversight of the Seattle Police in Liberal City. Nothing Will Change So Long as Police have the Unjust and Evil Power to Use Force Offensively on People

A federal judge ended oversight of the Seattle Police Department on Wednesday, more than a decade after the U.S. Department of Justice found that officers had a history of excessive force and practices that could have a disparate effect on minority communities.

In the 13 years since a federal consent decree was put into place, Seattle’s department has adopted new use-of-force policies, begun using body cameras, changed its protocols for holding officers accountable and reviewed its crowd management tactics. The city and the federal government had first moved to begin ending the federal oversight in 2023, under the Biden administration, but the process was delayed with some lingering issues left to resolve.

U.S. District Judge James Robart said on Wednesday the city complied with its obligations on Wednesday and lifted the consent decree, a court-approved agreement. [MORE]

Nothing can ever change with regard to “excessive force” or police brutality so long as police have the power to use force offensively on “citizens.” In fact, despite the falling violent crime rates since 1993, police killings have increased. According to Mapping Police Violence, “Police killed more people in 2023 than any year in more than a decade. Police have continued to kill at a similar rate in 2024.Police killed at least 1,247 people in 2023. Black people were 27% of those killed by police in 2023 despite being only 13% of the population. Thus far, there have been only 9 days in 2024 where police did not kill someone. Black people are most likely to be killed by police and are three times more likely than whites to be killed by police. 33% of Black people killed by police were running away, driving away or otherwise trying to flee. Regardless of race, there is no accountability: 98.1% of killings by police from 2013-2023 did not result with officers even being charged with a crime. [MORE]

Petitioning puppeticians for reforms, or begging them to enforce the status quo by punishing police for conduct that is already illegal or begging them to defund or lower police department budgets can have no effect on the extraordinary police power to use force offensively on citizens. Said non-reformable and uncontrollable power to initiate the use of unprovoked violence on people is called “authority.”

As you will see, if you indulge BW here, due to the fact that "authority" is immoral and unjust and there is no legitimate or rational way to account for belief in its existence, the legal system is entirely based on physical coercion or violence. In other words, we are not free.

Political “authority” can be summed up as the implied right to rule over people. It is the idea that some people have the moral right to forcibly control others, and that, consequently, those others have the moral and legal obligation to obey.’ [MORE] Authority is the basis and operating system for all governments throughout the world, regardless of type, function or characterization. As so-called representatives of authority, police officers (among other authorities) are empowered to use force offensively against citizens who are legally and morally obliged to obey authority. [MORE]

Charlie Who? The Media Misremembers Charlie Kirk as a Well Known Celebrity, Despite Being Unknown to Most People, and Forgets 9/11 During a Synchronized Psyop to Create Reality after Alleged Shooting

According to FUNKTIONARY:

mass media – “Massa’ Media. Massa’s media plus (+) Mass Hypnosis = Mindless Masses. 2) The “Mess” Media. 3) wholesale retale— retelling the whole tale (propaganda) exactly as you’re told, consistently and relentlessly. How can you possibly relate when you are framed by the very debate wherein you are an unwilling spectator? Let’s be perfectly clear on this. There’s no counteroption or outlet to vent when you’re under the controlled thoughtform of mass-think manufactured consent. “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.” ~A.J. Liebling. (See: Media, T.V., Mass, Alienation, Spectacle Society, NEWS, ABCTV, Propaganda, Legislation & The New God Economy)

prodcasting – propaganda cast as a spell to prod mind-slaves into behavior, thoughts and actions that benefit the spell-caster ($pinfidel) and his master. Prodcasting targets the unthinking herd into conformity, apathy, complacency and uniformity to the dictates of the overtakers otherwise known as the Pathocracy—the intergenerational psychopathic overruling class and adept practitioners of Richcraft. (See: Propaganda, $pinfidel, Coin-Operated, MEDIA & Richcraft)

Propagenda – propaganda developed and directed to a particular audience as a means of predictive programming for accepting someone’s agenda as their very own. (See: $pinfidels, Predictive Programming & Coin-Operated)

psyopsy – performing an analysis of what caused one who is mentally dead and culturally comatose to reach such a state or fate. Psyopsies can be performed only on the living dead. Those who are living another’s script (“reality”) are candidates.

public opinion – a contrived notion ostensibly of what “people” think other “people” are thinking without really thinking. 2) manufactured consent by the agents and dupes of Corporate State media. Public opinion is manufactured in this society to defend the spin—i.e. the political position of those in power. Are you contemptuous of the contrived, hyped, manipulated, orchestrated and outright fallacious centralized media memetics as portrayed to the credulous consumer through façade, illusion and collusion? Survey says: “You can live without public opinion.” (See: MEDIA, Psyopsy, Metaprogram, Propaganda, Public Relations, Culture, Primary Program, Reversibility Thinking, Paradigm, Brand, Reality-Boxes, FRAMES, Predictive Programming, Conditioning, Indoctrination, Beliefs & Semantic Reality)

misremembering – a by-product of the fallible wetware (biochemical, electrical and ephemeral) of the brain-mind complex. How did our culture end up forgetting how to remember? Memory, once so essential, has become so marginalized. We even go to great lengths to avoid relying on human memory altogether. (See: Memory, Culture, Brain, Mind, Hippocampus, Forgetting, Brain- Mind Complex, Consciousness, Fornix, Memory Palace & Momentariness)

Spacism + Racism = No Right to Be Left the Fuck Alone. NJ Cops Destroy the Play Freedoms of Black Men Standing in Front of Their Yard Bothering No One and Only Disturbing the Peace of Their Masters

From [HERE]

Pervasive, arbitrary stops function to “niggerize,” degrade humanity and humiliate Blacks in public, rendering them “unsafe, unprotected, subjected and subjugated to random violence” by government authority. Jeremy Locke points out that “slavery is not a concept of totality . . . The ultimate slavery is murder . . . Slavery is found both in the partial and complete destruction of freedom.” Prolific stops by cops everywhere a large number of Black people reside, inhibit their freedom of movement and function as a tool to keep Blacks confined to a physical, social and symbolic space. Thus, elites use arbitrary stops to help dominate Black people and control their movements by force. Such stops are a form of slavery. The result is a 2nd class citizenship for Blacks. Legal scholar Charles Epps observes, “police stops convey powerful messages about citizenship and equality. Across millions of stops, these experiences are translated into common stories about who is an equal member of a rule-governed society and who is subjected to arbitrary surveillance and inquiry.” FUNKTIONARY makes it plain, “People who are awake see cops as mercenary security guards that remind us daily, through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate State”

Black scholars Naa Kwate and Shatema Threadcraft explain that unlawful stops of Black people lead to “Embodied stress, fear and trauma” because “the subject knows that any encounter may well end in death—and moreover, that the death may go unpunished.” The frequency of such “routine” stops ‘produces bodies that are harassed, stressed and resource deprived, if not altogether dead.’ Kwate and Threadcraft state, “Even those who are not stopped fear being stopped, fear death, and thus also find themselves in the grip of this form of necropower.” The omnipresent threat of being stopped for no reason by police is a form of “torture-lite” according to scholar Paul Butler. Here, the difference between adherent rights and inherent rights should be understood.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Spacism – racism white supremacy applied to geographical, cultural and geopolitical space; especially the consolidation and concentration of property ownership by Caucasians and Corporations in (or with) economic and political power. 2) urban removal. 3) gentrification. (See: Racism White Supremacy, Property, Capital Punishment & Monopoly Capitalism)

Crump Files Suit After White Prosecutor Fails to Charge White Cops who Beat Black College Student Causing Brain Injury. Slave Catchers Stopped Him for Driving While Black w/o Lights On During the Day

From [HERE] A Jacksonville man has filed a federal lawsuit accusing officers with the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office of using excessive force during a February traffic stop, which he says caused a traumatic brain injury and other harm, according to the suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division.

William McNeil Jr. claims he was assaulted by Officer D. Bowers for driving without headlights and for not wearing a seat belt. According to the complaint, McNeil opened his car door to explain that his window was damaged and asked why he was being stopped. Bowers claimed it was due to inclement weather, though the lawsuit states there was no rain.

McNeil, questioning the legitimacy of the stop, requested a supervisor. Bowers then placed his hand on his weapon and ordered McNeil out of the vehicle, prompting McNeil to close and lock his door while continuing to request a supervisor.

Additional officers arrived, including Officer D. Miller, who reportedly agreed with McNeil Jr. that it wasn’t raining. The lawsuit says while another officer pointed a gun at McNeil Jr., Bowers apparently shattered the driver’s side window, struck McNeil Jr. in the face, forcibly removed him from the car and slammed his head into the pavement.

According to the lawsuit, the incident caused a gash to McNeil Jr.’s chin and lip, a fractured tooth and a traumatic brain injury. Miller also reportedly delivered four closed-hand strikes to McNeil Jr.’s back.

The lawsuit names Bowers, Miller, Sheriff Thomas Kevin Waters and the Consolidated City of Jacksonville and Duval County as defendants. It accuses the city and sheriff’s office of maintaining policies that permit officers to use “distractionary blows” and avoid reporting force unless injuries are evident.

McNeil’s attorneys, including notable civil rights lawyer Benjamin Crump, say the incident reflects a broader pattern of unchecked violence within the department. Between 2022 and 2024, the sheriff’s office investigated 424 excessive force complaints but upheld only three, according to internal data cited in the lawsuit.

The complaint seeks more than $100,000 in damages for physical injuries, emotional trauma and accused violations of McNeil’s constitutional rights.

Jacksonville officials have not yet responded publicly to the lawsuit

‘It’s Not Science’: JAMA Study Claiming COVID Vaccines Saved Millions is Fundamentally Flawed

A report in JAMA Health Forum that estimates COVID-19 vaccines saved between 1.4 million and 4 million lives is false and based on flawed assumptions, according to a preprint paper published this week by Correlation, a Canadian nonprofit research organization.

All-cause mortality expert Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., argued in the preprint that the inputs used by Dr. John Ioannidis and his colleagues for their COVID-19 vaccine calculations were based on incorrect assumptions about infection fatality rates and vaccine efficacy.

The authors of the JAMA paper also didn’t account for harms from vaccines or compare their results to real-world data, Rancourt said.

Rancourt said his critique exposes the “mental game” used by the scientists to build a case for the COVID-19 vaccines’ lifesaving abilities. He said:

“The formula they’re applying is elegant and straightforward — anybody can understand it.

“But look at the components inside the formula. They’re based on nothing. They’re based on something that is nothing, that is based on something else that is nothing, and so on. This is nonsense. It’s not science. It’s just manipulation of concocted data.

“Here’s a smart man applying a formula, but the outcome is garbage. There is no reason to believe that any lives were saved.” [MORE]

Another Black Person's Lawsuit Against Police for Murder Dismissed w/o a Trial: Video Showed a Plainclothes Newark Cop Jump Out an Unmarked Van and Shoot Carl Dorsey. White Fed Judge Tosses Case

From [HERE] A federal judge has dismissed a civil rights lawsuit filed by the estate of Carl Dorsey III, a 39-year-old man fatally shot by a Newark police detective just after midnight on New Year’s Day in 2021.

U.S. District Judge Susan D. Wigenton ruled Thursday that the City of Newark cannot be held liable for Dorsey’s death under federal law, rejecting claims that the city had a longstanding custom of tolerating excessive force and failed to properly train its officers.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for New Jersey by Tamara Fong, the administrator of Dorsey’s estate and guardian to his three minor children.

In the complaint, Fong alleged that Detective Rod Simpkins shot Dorseywithout justification while patrolling a high-crime area in plain clothes.

According to court documents, Simpkins exited an unmarked police SUV with his gun drawn and bumped into Dorsey, then turned and shot him in the chest.

Fong claimed Dorsey was unarmed and attempting to cross the street when he was shot and killed.

Surveillance video capturing the killing shows a group of 12 plainclothes officers pull up in unmarked cars to South 11th Street and Dorsey crossing the street toward them.

Simpkins and Dorsey collide, and then Simpkins shoots him. Dorsey, a 39-year-old father of three, died an hour later after being transported to University Hospital in Newark.

Robert Tarver, attorney for the family, noted the video shows Simpkins turning his body and firing toward Dorsey after they collide. The Attorney General’s Office describes the shooting like this: “As Det. Simpkins was falling to the ground, his service weapon discharged once, striking Mr. Dorsey.” 

“As if it had done that by itself,” Tarver said.

Dorsey lay bleeding on the sidewalk while officers searched him and the surrounding area but did not provide medical aid, the complaint said.

He was later pronounced dead at University Hospital.

Fong’s lawsuit claimed the city had a pattern of excessive force and inadequate oversight, citing past incidents, statistics, and findings from a federal monitor overseeing police reforms in Newark.

However, Wigenton said those claims weren’t strong enough to hold the city legally responsible under the rules set by the U.S. Supreme Court in Monell v. Department of Social Services.

Naturally, the white liberal Attorney General Matt Platkin — whose office must investigate all police-involved fatalities - failed to file any charges against the white cop.

Lawsuit says Cleveland Heights Cops Fired 25 Shots at Christian Thomas while He was Unarmed, Killing Black man During Standoff. No Charges by White Liberal Prosecutors

An 18-year-old man was unarmed when he was shot to death by Cleveland Heights police officers outside his home, according to a lawsuit. 

Attorneys said Christian Thomas, 18, never pointed a gun at officers or his family and had dropped the weapon before officers fired 25 shots, hitting him nine times. 

The wrongful death lawsuit was filed Friday in federal court in Cleveland on behalf of Christian Thomas’ father, Ferrel Thomas. It accuses officers of using excessive force. 

Officers “shot and killed Christian Thomas while he was unarmed and running and posed no imminent or significant threat of death or serious injury to [officers] or any others,” attorney Stanley Jackson wrote.

The lawsuit names three police officers, but attorneys wrote that they were unsure of the identities of the officers who shot Thomas because their names were redacted on records from the Ohio Attorney General’s Office. 

A Cuyahoga County grand jury in July declined to indict the officers after the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation investigated the shooting. 

The shooting happened on Aug. 29, 2024, at Thomas’ father’s house on Yellowstone Road. The father and son had been arguing, and investigators believed that Christian Thomas had taken psilocybin mushrooms before grabbing his father’s handgun.

A standoff began with Christian and Ferrel Thomas inside the house, where the father tried to convince his son to put the gun down. Family members went outside while police officers surrounded the home.

Thomas fired two gunshots while inside the home, including one before he exited, according to the lawsuit. When he finally emerged, he dropped his gun and ran, the lawsuit said. 

Three officers fired multiple shots, including two from rifles. 

Some officers told investigators they couldn’t see clearly because it was dark and fired after hearing a gunshot, the lawsuit said. [MORE]

UConn Study says Police in [white liberal] Connecticut Use Force on Black People More Often than Whites. Although Blacks Account for Only 34% of All Arrests, 41% of all Force Incidents Involved Blacks

From [HERE] A new report shows that police appear to use force more often on Black people during arrests than on white arrestees, according to one of its authors.

The report by the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at the University of Connecticut also shows it is unusual for police to use force in Connecticut, and that a small group of departments may be responsible for most of it, said Ken Barone, the institute’s associate director.

The 74-page report is the result of the second statewide use-of-force study produced under a state law. It is based on an analysis of 1,516 use-of-force incidents reported by 83 police agencies across the state. The study period was from July 1, 2022 through Dec. 31, 2023.

The study looked at race and saw a disparities when comparing the number of times force was used on Black people when compared to how many Black people were arrested during the 18-month time period: Black individuals represented 41% of all subjects in use-of-force incidents, but only 34% of arrests, the study found. 

With white people, it was just the opposite, with Caucasians making up 56% of people on whom force was used, compared to 63% of those arrested.

“What that says is force is used more frequently on a Black person who is arrested than on a white person who is arrested,” Barone said. But he said more study is needed on the race issue.

More than half of the cases in which force was used involved the same 10 police departments, the report stated.

The 10 cities and towns that used force the most during the study period were New Haven, with 124 incidents; Hartford, 109; Waterbury, 108; East Hartford, 100; Norwalk, 63;  Meriden, 55; Manchester, 45; Stamford, 40; and New London and West Hartford, which both said they had 36 incidents of force during the study period. [MORE]

Another Contrived Gov Tale Sold to Racists: A 'Black Career Criminal' Cut a “Ukrainian Refugee,” Yet There's No Blood on Her Body and White Women Always Avoid Black Men like DeCarlos Brown in Public

AUTHORITIES ARE FUCKING WITH OUR SENSES AND DOGMATIC BELIEFS. As a general rule in all public places in an urban environment, particularly trains, buses, elevators and public streets white women generally go out of their away to avoid Black men who look like DeCarlos Brown. If you have not noticed this then you have missed reality. In general, where there are open seats on uncrowded public buses and trains, entering passengers evaluate each open seat and choose the one that appears most comfortable, safe or convenient to them.

In this matter, a blonde white woman entered a train that appeared to be 1/3 full and without scanning the train for a seat she immediately sat down in front of DeCarlos Brown, a Black man with long dreadlocks wearing a hoody. He looks sketchy, possibly out to murk - he also is the only person not on a phone. As such, her entrance on the train and seating in close proximity, directly in front of him with her back to him with her headphones on was unusual because most white women avoid black men in public places - especially when there appeared to have been several other seats open and other white folks on the uncrowded train.

Additionally, the white woman is not bleeding after her throat is allegedly slashed by the Black man. In the full second video no blood is present on her neck, face, hands or clothing. In the second video, after she falls to the floor, blood is inexplicably seen on the train seat where she had been sitting. But it makes no sense that her lower half or bottom would be bleeding after only her neck was cut. Also, as observed by Mr. Trumptastic before the incident, the black man appears to open and then close the pocket knife before the assault, which would render it incapable to slash her throat. That is, the black man seems to attack her with a closed knife. However, clearer video may explain this.

As with most false flags, although the incident happened less than 48 hours ago the government and media have already supplied the public with bios of the participants, family album photos, a full confession, partial government video, in an open and closed case. In the overwhelming vast majority of assaults and murder cases the government takes months to provide such information. Undoubtedly, the media will move on in less than 36 hours in order to avoid any scrutiny of details. As with most false flags there will probably be no contested trial and independently verifiable autopsy. Also, look for Brown’s alleged family members or neighbors to pop up with more inculpatory hearsay statements he made - since there is probably no “manifesto” or crimes confession diary, as in other government hoaxes.

Similar to other false flaggotry this episode has a narrative tailored to a particular groups of believers. Here, Neuropeons are provided a story that is told in accordance with racist dogma, predispositions and fears. Namely, its “the Black career criminal” vs "‘the blonde Ukraine Refugee who Sought Safety’ in an urban city in the US. No reason is provided for the attack except that ‘he is crazy and Black and out to kill.’ Such a non-explanation fits well in the racist ego. As explained by Dr. Amos Wilson, “In the context of White American domination there is no innocent Black male, just Black male criminals who have not yet been detected, apprehended or convicted. Their mere presence inspires in White Americans, fears of being assaulted, raped, robbed, or some other indefinable dread of being criminally victimized. Fantasies of the sexual molestation of White females by rapacious Black males are common to the White American male and female consciousness, and are frequent themes of their literary, cinematic, and pornographic productions.”

Despite the facts that 1) nearly 99% of crimes committed against whites are committed by whites and 2) white people are unaffected by most street crime involving Black people, the dependent media nevertheless projects white people as the most frequent victims of street crime. A recent study by the Sentencing Project found that White Americans overestimate the proportion of crime committed by people of color, and associate people of color with criminality. Exaggerated crime rates are part of “white propaganda” which Dr. Blynd explains as a game two can play—which consists simply in repeating '"I am better than you" and "you are utterly unlike (opposite to) me" over and over again; despite the historical record to the contrary.” As explained by Wilson, the myth of black violence serves important roles in justifying and rationalizing white supremacy and in supporting the white American ego and personality (fabrications).

Wilson explains, 

"Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their self-congratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control.

White America's self-appreciation is enhanced as it insatiably feeds on overblown reports about Black criminality while denying its own incomparable criminal record, and its own racist-imperialist incubation and giving birth to the very same criminal forces which now threaten to destroy it.

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image.”  [MORE]

Additionally, unless you are a coincidence theorist, it is most unusual that the incident occurred the day after Trump’s fake DC crime emergency expired and his paper boat plans to fight urban crime using military troops in “blue cities” began to fall out of the news cycle. Said clearly unlawful, racist theater played to the same group of lathered-up, hyper-alert Neuropeons always ready to consume anything to confirm their delusions. It also comes at a time when elites seek to boost support for spending billions on their Ukraine war.

Due to the contrived nature of the evidence this insta-terror case feels synthetic and should be suspected as a false flag operation conducted by the government and media until proven otherwise. If Crimethinc would create fake vaccines for the purpose of genthanasia and biocide then surely It would have no problem fake stabbing a woman on a train.

Why would the government do such a thing? Many reasons -but mostly because sheeple will believe it and use their imaginations to fill in the missing details in accord with their beliefs and dogma. As undeceiver Larken Rose explains, authorities terrorize or create great fear in the citizenry in order convince them to voluntarily give authorities more control, more power over them and their lives. Authorities and their Dependent Media must constantly misrepresent reality so citizens always have a bogey-man or a perceived unsolvable problem to fear. Rose states, elites “must pound into [citizens] heads, day in and day out, that the world is full of horrors and injustices , and that only the government authorities can make their lives bearable and that is necessary for them to have enormous power in order to do so.” Specifically, under the ostensible purpose of crime fighting, its actual purpose is mission creep to continue expanding the power of the executive and planting the idea in sheeple’s mind that military occupation of US cities is lawful, normal and emergency rule may be imposed by authority based on arbitrary criteria.

The great rebel, the Buddha said: "All beliefs are dangerous. You should not believe, you should see.”

Osho Rajineesh stated, "a mind filled with belief always goes on projecting things in the world, it sees things which are not there. This is the problem. The mind which believes is always vulnerable and always provides an opportunity to be exploited by the cheaters - and the cheaters are all around."

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Hoax - a mirage that appears as believable, popular (and marketable) as Jesus, as tempting as sin, and as captivating as a sweet taboo---without its consequences and side-effects too. The illusion of truth seems real--the "reality" of the reel (the Passing Show)--the surreal. The two most pervasive hoaxes we put over on ourselves is ego and money--neither have any existence. (See: Passing Show, Mirage, Rolling Mirror, Objectivity, Ego, Money, Utopia, Kansas & Alice in Wonderland)

Belief- the psychological calm of imagined certitude safely beyond de-stabilizing doubt and troublesome reality-entanglement. 2) a construction of approximate truths, absolute truths, mass truths and primary myths, based on genetic predisposition, and environmental and socio-psychological conditioning. 3) the institutionalization of the unknowable, i.e., a conviction that is not necessarily based upon any empirical, direct-mind or experiential knowledge. 4) a non-physical surviving thought-form. 5) any conclusion based on a fundamental assumption; the evidence of things not seen, no longer actively sought. 6) an intellectual
rationalization surrounded by (based on) "'proofs," reasons and arguments. 7) that which springs out of cultural ideology. 8) the greatest fiction. 9) a trick of the mind to repress doubt. 10) a mental doubt-suppression tactic. A suppressed doubt is neither faith nor even trust. 11) repressed doubt. 12) an explicit or implicit assent to dogmatic propositions (with or without overgrown religious foliage) on someone else's authority. 13) reverential blindness that thwarts fresh perception and intuitive apperception. 14) a prejudice without any experience to support it. 15) a peculiar blend of fatiloquent assertion on one hand and adamant
denial on the other. 16) a manic flirtation with the terminally unprovable. 17) certainty based in the unknown. 18) having another "see" it for you while seeing him see it (for you)—in effect being for another. 19) a conclusion without the verification of direct experience—make-believe made real. 20) the inability or unwillingness to master the requisite logic or reason to counterbalance (or overcome) the willingness to be misled. [MORE]

With "Trump's Blessing" IsrAlien Warplanes Blew Up a Residential Building in Qatar, a sovereign nation, ‘b/c Hamas was Meeting for Peace Talks’

From [HERE] The Israeli military launched airstrikes in Doha, Qatar, on Tuesday in an attempt to target Hamas political leadership, marking a major Israeli escalation in the region that dims any hope of a ceasefire in Gaza.

A source told Al Jazeera that the attack occurred while Hamas officials were gathered to discuss a ceasefire proposal from the US. Suhail al-Hindi, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, said that Hamas’s leadership survived the attack, while the son of acting Hamas political bureau chief Khalil al-Hayya was killed, along with several of his aides. Qatar’s Interior Ministry said that a Qatari security officer was also killed in the attack.

Hamas later issued a statement that said none of its political leaders were killed in the attack. It said a total of six people were killed, including al-Hayya’s son, four office staff, and the Qatari officer.

According to Israeli media, Israeli warplanes dropped more than 10 bombs on a residential building where Israel believed Hamas leaders were gathering, an area of Doha near schools and embassies. Qatar has hosted a Hamas office since 2012, a step it took at the request of the US.

Sources told Middle East Eye President Trump “blessed” the attack on Qatar, which his a major non-NATO ally of the US and hosts about 10,000 US troops, although US officials speaking to other media outlets claim that the US was notified while Israeli warplanes were in the air.

Israeli Channel 12 reported, citing an Israeli official, that US President Donald Trump gave the green light for the Israeli occupation to launch airstrikes on Hamas leadership in Qatar. The channel added that Washington maintains control over Qatari airspace, requiring “Israel” to coordinate with the US before carrying out such operations.

In an official statement, the Qatari Foreign Ministry condemned what it described as a “cowardly Israeli attack” targeting residential compounds in Doha where members of Hamas’ political bureau were residing. The ministry stressed that Qatar would not tolerate any act undermining its security and sovereignty. [MORE]

At Least 19,400 Children Murdered in Gaza by Israel Authorities as Genocidal Holocaust Marks 700th Day

From [HERE] Children in Gaza account for more than 30 percent of deaths since Israel began its genocide nearly two years ago, as the besieged enclave remains the "most dangerous place to be a child".

According to the latest figures from the Palestinian health ministry in Gaza, at least 19,424 children have been killed in Israeli attacks since October 2023 - the equivalent of one child every 52 minutes. Among them are 1,000 infants under the age of one.

An additional 42,011 people have been wounded in ongoing Israeli shelling, accounting for 26 percent of the total wounded population of 161,583.

Meanwhile, women (10,138) and the elderly (4,695) constitute 23 percent of the overall death toll. Men make up 46.7 percent of casualties (29,975).

The United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef) communications manager Tess Ingram said that the "suffering of children in the Gaza Strip is not accidental".

Malnutrition and famine are weakening children’s bodies as displacement strips them of shelter and care, and bombardments threaten their every move," Ingram said. 

She noted that Palestinian life is being "dismantled" under escalating Israeli attacks, lack of necessities and soaring malnutrition among children and their families. Ingram stressed that even so-called "safe zones" have posed a grave danger for civilians, noting that the "unthinkable" is unfolding in Gaza City.

The Israeli military has repeatedly targeted Israeli-designated "humanitarian zones" across the Gaza Strip since the start of the genocide.

At least 64,300 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023. Over 83 percent of those killed are civilians, according to the Israeli military's own data. 

Ingram warned that the latest Israeli operation in the city could bring further catastrophe for families residing in the area, adding that the north "is fast becoming a place where childhood cannot survive".

"It is a city of fear, flight and funerals," she added. 

KKKexit: On the Last Day of Trump’s Unlawful and Involuntary Rule Over DC, 80% of Residents Tell Globocop to 'Please Get the Fuck Out!'

About 8 in 10 D.C. residents oppose Trump taking control of D.C. police and federal troops patrolling the streets, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll. Compared with last year, significantly fewer D.C. residents say that they worry about being a victim of carjacking, theft, home burglary or assault.

ON Sept 6 Thousands march in D.C. against law enforcement takeover [MORE]

From [HERE] Parts of President Donald Trump’s so-called “emergency” takeover of Washington, D.C., may be winding down, but the federal presence in the nation’s capital appears far from over.

As D.C. residents brace for the possibility that National Guard soldiers and federal agents could become a permanent fixture in the city, congressional Republicans are gearing up to clamp down even harder on the municipal government with a massive tranche of new legislation.

In August, Trump invoked a rarely used provision of the 1973 D.C. Home Rule Act, letting the White House seize control of the city’s police during “special conditions of an emergency nature.” He also ordered in the National Guard and about 500 federal agents, leading to thousands of arrests.

The administration’s authority over Metro Police, however, is limited by law to 30 days — a window set to close this week.

Trump has suggested that he would need “long term” control over D.C. police and has contended that he would not need congressional approval to extend that power. Congress would almost certainly need to greenlight such action.

But, for now, it appears unlikely that the president will attempt to seize extended control over D.C.’s police force.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser established a joint emergency operations center last week to coordinate local government efforts with federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The move was seen as paving the way for a long term or even indefinite federal presence in the capital city.

House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Tuesday that Congress hadn’t been asked to weigh in on Trump’s D.C. takeover and suggested Bowser’s order made action unnecessary.

“I think if you have an agreement — I understand it as an agreement — between the White House and local leadership, I’m not sure Congress has any necessity to do anything,” he said. “So, we’ll see.”

Trump’s control of D.C.’s police is set to expire, but lawmakers are preparing a broad legislative overhaul of the city’s criminal justice system, including how local judges are selected. On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee is set to take up more than a dozen Republican-led bills expanding congressional oversight of D.C. governance.

Among those measures is one that would give Congress a 60-day window to review any law passed by the D.C. council and would speed existing mechanisms for lawmakers to overrule legislation approved by the municipal government.

The panel will also weigh bills boosting penalties for certain crimes in D.C., capping “youth offender” status at 18 and letting prosecutors seek adult charges for offenders as young as 14 for some offenses.

Another measure would remove D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb and replace him with a presidential appointee. Voters have elected the city’s top local prosecutor since 2010.

House Republicans are also pushing to amend the Home Rule Act to eliminate D.C.’s judicial nominations commission, which for decades has recommended candidates for the city’s superior and appellate courts to the White House. The panel currently includes attorneys representing the president and the D.C. mayor, as well as members of the city council, the D.C. Bar and the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for D.C.

Under the proposed bill, the authority to appoint judges to the capital’s municipal court system would lie solely with the president.

Democrats blasted the Republicans’ push as an attack on D.C.’s tradition of self-governance. Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.’s nonvoting House delegate, called it an “escalation in the current wave of extreme attacks on D.C. home rule.” [MORE]

FreeDumb Loving GOP Puppeticians Eager for Bush-Trump to Expand Military Use on US Soil

From [HERE] National Guard troops patrolling the streets of U.S. cities. Weapons of war deployed against international gangs suspected of drug trafficking. Military bases and resources redirected to mass immigration enforcement operations.

President Donald Trump is swiftly implementing his vision of the military as an all-powerful tool for his policy goals. It’s ground that presidents have hardly ever crossed outside of times of war, and experts say it’s remaking the role of the most powerful military in the world and its relationship with the American public.

Yet as Trump has dramatically stepped up his use of military force, fellow Republicans in Congress — where authorization for such actions is supposed to originate — have done little but cheer him on. That’s giving the president significant leeway as he raises plans to send troops next to Chicago, Baltimore and New Orleans.

“If I were one of those mayors, I’d be glad to have the help,” said Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, speaking from a Capitol building where National Guard troops were patrolling the surrounding city. “I think the big city Democrats are really making a mistake. I think they’re being tone deaf.” [MORE]

Destroying Freedom to Make us Safe: Drones and Robotic Cameras are Flying All Over Maryland, Surveilling Law Abiding People for "public order" [the will of agents operating on behalf of elites]

Since 2019, dozens, if not hundreds, of law enforcement agencies across the country have adopted similar Drone as First Responder (DFR) programs, using the technology to put eyes on a situation sooner and, sometimes, in a clearer way.

But as drones reach more areas, including Baltimore County, concerns over privacy and surveillance often follow.

Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, has urged lawmakers for years to issue guardrails for DFR programs. Daring success stories may justify a program’s beginning, but Stanley said with expansions and new uses, “it’s important not to make policies based on anecdotes.”

“You don’t want a world where, from the minute you walk out of your front door in the morning until you get home at night, you’re constantly aware that there are flying robotic police cameras … that could be focused on you at any time,” Stanley told The Baltimore Sun. “You have no way of knowing. That’s just not a way for free people to live.” [MORE]