New York Appeals Court Reinstates Chokehold Ban

From [HERE] A New York Appellate Division court Thursday ruled to reinstate the state’s chokehold ban. Section 10-181 of New York’s administrative code, known as the “diaphragm law,” was passed in 2020 following the murder of George Floyd. The law states:

No person shall restrain an individual in a manner that restricts the flow of air or blood by compressing the windpipe or the carotid arteries on each side of the neck, or sitting, kneeling, or standing on the chest or back in a manner that compresses the diaphragm, in the course of effecting or attempting to effect an arrest.

The Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York, a police labor union, argued that the ban is too “imprecise” and “open-ended” to enforce. In 2021, a trial court agreed, declared § 10-181 unconstitutionally vague and permanently banned enforcement of the law.

However, an appeals court held Thursday that the lower court “should not have found the diaphragm compression ban to be unconstitutionally vague.” The court reasoned that “[t]he diaphragm compression ban is sufficiently definite to give notice of the prohibited conduct and does not lack objective standards or create the potential for arbitrary or discriminatory enforcement[.]” The court further wrote that a trained police officer must be able to detect when the pressure exerted on a person’s chest or back causes a difficulty breathing in a detainee.

A Gang of NYPD Cops Attack an Unarmed 61 Year Old Woman for Recording Inside Precinct after She Asked for a Police Report

From [HERE] Patricia Rodney, a 61-year-old woman with diabetes, was told by her insurance company she needed to file a police report over a missing glucometer before they could replace the glucose-measuring device.

But she ended up brutally arrested by several New York City police officers while trying to obtain the report, according to body camera footage released this week.

The cops arrested her for recording inside the precinct even though there is no law forbidding citizens from recording in public areas of public buildings. In fact, a New York City law that went into effect in 2020 specifically states that citizens have the “right to record police activities.”

However, the NYPD created a policy stating that citizens are not allowed to record inside precincts and they even posted a sign on a wall to send the message to citizens – even though departmental policies has no legal bearing on citizens.

Rodney was charged with several contempt-of-cop charges, including resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration, disorderly conduct and criminal trespass which were all dismissed, according to Hell Gate, an independent news site in New York City that broke the story.

The incident took place on December 2, 2020 after Rodney walked into the 62nd Precinct in Brooklyn to obtain a police report over the missing glucometer. The diabetic grandmother of three must measure her blood glucose several times throughout the day but was unable to do so after losing the device.

According to the lawsuit filed in February, Rodney had walked into the precinct days earlier and spoken to a cop behind the front desk who agreed to help her with the report. The cop took her information and told her to return later in the week to pick up a copy of the completed report.

But when she returned, there was another cop behind the front desk who told her she needed to pick up the report from police headquarters in Manhattan which is about an hour away on the subway.

Believing she was getting the run-around, Rodney told the cops she was not leaving until they gave her the report which is when several cops surrounded her in an attempt to intimidate her.

She pulled out her phone to start recording after they told her they had turned on their body cameras. They then pointed to a sign behind her that said “members of the public are prohibited from audio/video recording or photography inside this facility.”

The sign did not include any statute or ordinance number so it was just a suggestion enforced by intimidation and violence. Another example of cops creating their own laws when they do not agree with existing laws.

The video shows several cops pouncing on her with one cop yelling, “I’m not playing with you!’. The video also shows a cop pulling her face mask over her eyes and walking away after she was handcuffed.

The lawsuit which you can read here names only two cops, Sergeant Hernandez and Tamara Clement, but lists several other unidentified cops as John or Janes Does.

In a Real Terror Attack a Chicago Cop Shot a Black Child who Had His Hands Up. Gangster Government Confiscates Surveillance Video and Refuses Release of Bodycam While They Create a Public Narrative

From [HERE] and [HERE] A Chicago police officer shot and wounded an unarmed 13-year-old boy who ran from a car being sought in an Oak Park carjacking, a shooting captured on multiple cameras and now under investigation, officials said.

Chicago police officers at about 10:30 p.m. Wednesday stopped the driver of a stolen car they suspected had been involved in the Oak Park carjacking near Chicago and Cicero avenues, police said. The boy, who had been in the car, got out and ran away as officers walked up to it, officials said. The driver of the car drove off.

Officers chased the boy to the 800 block of North Cicero Avenue, where one officer shot him, police said. The boy was hospitalized in serious condition, according to a Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA) spokesperson.

Officers were trying “to stop a stolen vehicle wanted in connection with a vehicular hijacking from a neighboring suburb,” in the 800 block of North Cicero Avenue about 10:15 p.m., according to a statement from Chicago police.

Police would claim that as the boy ran, he “turned toward officers” briefly before one of them opened fire and shot the unarmed child.

“All of a sudden, I see a little guy wearing all black get out of the car and run toward the gas station, and his hands were up,” one witness who asked not to be identified  told ABC7.

“And I seen the cop run up to the boy and started shooting. That boy didn’t have no gun or nothing,” the witness said.

“They said, ‘Put your hands up, put your hands up!’ The boy’s hands were up. There’s other people out there that seen it. I got it all on my phone — his hands were up. He didn’t have a gun,” the witness said. “They shot him for no reason.”

“No shots were fired at officers,” Chicago police Superintendent David Brown said during a brief evening news conference at police headquarters Thursday.

COPA investigators, who probe police shootings, collected body camera footage from the officer who fired the shot, city surveillance video from the scene and “third-party” video of the incident, but the agency said it won’t be released, according to a statement. No weapon was recovered at the scene, officials said.

“Worse fear confirmed!” anti-violence group GoodKids MadCity tweeted after the shooting. “Especially knowing how this child will be handcuffed to the hospital bed, criminalized by the media & silenced from sharing their version of what happened, locked away in the” Juvenile Temporary Detention Center.

Brown would not answer questions about where the boy was shot, or give any details about the officer who fired their weapon.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot issued a statement Thursday, saying she has “full confidence” in the probe of the shooting.

“I am aware of the officer involved shooting that resulted in a thirteen-year-old being shot by a Chicago police officer yesterday evening,” the mayor said. “I have been in contact with Superintendent Brown and the Civilian Office of Police Accountability, led by Chief Administrator Andrea Kersten, is actively investigating this matter. I have full confidence that COPA will investigate this incident expeditiously with the full cooperation of the Chicago Police Department.”  

The shooting comes a little more than a year after a Chicago police officer fatally shot another 13-year-old, Adam Toledo, during a foot chase in Little Village. In that instance, COPA leaders also initially said they could not release video of the shooting — though they eventually released it amid public pressure.

Video of his shooting — which showed Toledo had a gun, though he dropped it less than a second before an officer shot him — garnered national attention and led to protests in the city. Prosecutors eventually announced they will not pursue charges against the officer who shot Toledo.

PropaGandhi – passive social non-resistance propaganda. 2) obedience-based servitude to the enforcers of granfalloons uncommonly known as Corporate States and any other group-entities. - FUNKTIONARY

According to FUNKTIONARY:

PropaGandhi – passive social non-resistance propaganda. 2) obedience-based servitude to the enforcers of granfalloons uncommonly known as Corporate States and any other group-entities. Mahatma Gandhi mostly walked barefoot which produced calluses on his feet. He also had a very weird diet sprinkled with bouts of fasting which made him rather frail and suffer intermittently from halitosis—this made him… “A super callused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis.” (See: Poser, Class, Mass, Racism White Supremacy, Gun Control & Caste)

Of Course Bill Gates Tested Positive for COVID. COVID Injections Don't Immunize or Stop Spread. They're Treatments (Not Vaccines) that feed the Virus and Facilitate its Development into More Variants

Psychopath Bill Gates tests positive for COVID-19, claims he's experiencing mild symptoms. Frequent Announcements by Influencers about their MEANINGLESS positive COVID tests Remind the Public of the Plandemic. the goal here is to create covid SHOT dependency IN ORDER TO COMMIT GENOCIDE AND TO GAIN GREATER CONTROL OF PEOPLE IN THE FREE RANGE PRISON.

The following is the Executive Summary for Litigation of PLANDEMIC Crimes from Prosecute Now, an organization founded by Dr. David Martin to fund law suits for crimes against humanity.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

It is the consensus of the medical community that the currently available Covid-19 vaccine injections (“Covid-19 injections") do not prevent the spread of Covid-19. Relevant federal agencies have repeatedly acknowledged this consensus.

Therefore, there is no scientific or legal justification for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration COSHA") to segregate injected and un-injected people.

Indeed, since the Covid-19 injections do not confer immunity upon the recipients, but are claimed to merely reduce the symptoms of the disease, they do not fall within the long-established definition of a vaccine at all. They are instead treatments and must be analyzed as such under the law.

Even if OSHA possessed the statutory and constitutional authority to issue the Emergency Temporary Standard ("ETS")2 now challenged before the Court, which it does not, the substantive due process clause of the Fifth Amendment would require the federal government to 

establish that the OSHA ETS is narrowly tailored to meet a compelling state interest. This is a standard it cannot meet.

ARGUMENT

A. Covid-19 injections do not create immunity. They are treatments, not vaccines.

The uncontroverted medical consensus is that existing Covid-19 injections do not prevent infection or transmission of the coronavirus; i.e., they do not create immunity in the recipients. This is admitted openly today, including by U.S. Health Agencies, which is why the CDC Director stated on CNN, "What the vaccines can't do anymore is prevent transmission.''3 Examples abound:

a. NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci to NPR: "We know now as a fact that [vaccinated people with Covid-19] are capable of transmitting the infection to someone else.''a

b. Dr. Anthony Fauci on November 12, 2021, referring to the experience of health officials regarding the injections:

They are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn't just the elderly.

It's waning to the point that you're seeing more and more people getting breakthrough infections, and more and more of those people who are getting breakthrough infections are winding up in the hospital. 5

c. WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan: "At the moment I don't believe we have the evidence of any of the vaccines to be confident that it's going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.''6

d. Chief Medical Officer of Moderna Dr. Tal Zaks: "There's no hard evidence that it stops [the Covid-19 vaccinated] from carrying the virus transiently and potentially infecting others who haven't been vaccinated.''7 e. The Surgeon General of the State of Florida, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, MD, PhD: "... the infections can still happen whether people are vaccinated or not. That's very obvious.''s

f. Professor Sir Andrew Pollard who led the Oxford vaccine team: "We don't have anything that will stop transmission, so I think we are in a situation where herd immunity is not a possibility and I suspect the virus will throw up a new variant that is even better at infecting vaccinated individuals."9

g. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, Professor of Health Policy, Stanford University: "Based on my analysis of the existing medical and scientific literature, any exemption policy that does not recognize natural immunity is irrational, arbitrary, and counterproductive to community health.'’1o 

h. 2008 Nobel Prize winner in Medicine Dr. Luc Montagnier (also winner of the French National Order of Merit and 20 other major international awards):

The vaccines don't stop the virus, they do the opposite - they 'feed the virus,' and facilitate its development into stronger and more transmissible variants...You see it in each country, it's the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths ... the vaccines Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca do not prevent the transmission of the virus person-to-person and the vaccinated are just as transmissive as the unvaccinated.ll

i. A study of a Covid-19 outbreak in July 2021 published in Eurosurveillance observed that 100 percent of severe, critical, and fatal cases of Covid-19 occurred in injected individuals. The authors stated that the study "challenges the assumption that high universal vaccination rates will lead to herd immunity and prevent COVID-19 outbreaks.’'12

j. Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School:

"The bottom line is that these vaccines do not prevent transmission.'’13 

k. Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Infectious Disease Epidemiologist and Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology at the University of Oxford:

[I]t is really not logical to use [these] vaccines to protect other people ... I don't think they should be forced [] on the understanding simply because this vaccine does not prevent transmission. So if you just think of the logic of it, what is the point of requiring a vaccine to protect others if that vaccine does not durably prevent onward transmission of a virus?14 

The Court may already be aware of the countless news reports of outbreaks on fully "vaccinated" sports teams15 and cruise ships,16 not to mention in the fully "vaccinated" White House.17 There is simply no question that the Covid-19 injections do not create immunity. This was summed up quite nicely by Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks, who "warned that the trial results show that the vaccine can prevent someone from getting sick or 'severely sick,' from COVID-19, however, the results don't show that the vaccine prevents transmission of the virus.''is Recognition of this fact may explain why, in August of 2021, the CDC changed the definition of "vaccination" from "the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease" to "the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection to a specific disease.’'19

However, this newly created CDC definition conflicts with the statutory criteria for a vaccine, which focuses solely upon immunity. In 1986, Congress passed 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1, which established "a National Vaccine Program to achieve optimal prevention of human infectious diseases through immunization " (emphasis added). Clearly, from both a public health standpoint as well as from a legal standpoint, immunization is the intended sine qua non of vaccination.

Since they do not create immunity, but are claimed to merely reduce the symptoms of the disease, the so called Covid-19 vaccines are treatments, not vaccines.2o Even the FDA has classified them as "CBER-Regulated Biologics" otherwise known as "therapeutics" which fall under the "Coronavirus Treatment Acceleration Program.’'21

The FDA's "therapeutics" classification of the injections is consistent with representations made by Pfizer partner BioNTech to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in its 2020 Annual Report, where it stated with regard to the mRNA technology forming the basis of its Covid-19 injection: 

Although we expect to submit BLAs [biologics license applications] for our mRNA-based product candidates in the United States, and in the European Union, mRNA therapies have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products, and other jurisdictions may consider our mRNA-based product candidates to be new drugs, not biologics or gene therapy medicinal products, and require different marketing applications.22

Similarly, in its June 30, 2020 Quarterly Report to the SEC, Moderna stated with regard to the mRNA technology underpinning its injection: "Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.’'23

Thus, the medical community, the relevant agencies, and both Pfizer and Moderna -- the manufacturers of the dominant injections -- recognize that the socalled vaccines are therapeutics, or medical treatments. Since they do not achieve immunization, this conclusion is also consistent with Congress' definition of vaccines in establishing the National Vaccine Program in 1986: the "prevention of human infectious diseases through immunization.''24 Accordingly, we herein refer to the Covid- 19 "vaccines" as Covid- 19 injections.

B. The Government's attempt to mandate treatments is subject to strict scrutiny.

The judiciary has too often assumed without analysis that requiring individuals to submit to Covid-19 injections is permissible under the determination made in Jacebsen.25 However, because these injections do not confer immunity, but are instead merely treatments that may reduce the severity of symptoms, the proper analysis stems from Cruzan v. Dir., Me. Dep't of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990).26

In Cruzan, the Court addressed whether the parents of a young woman severely brain damaged in a car wreck could compel the hospital to remove her from life support in the absence of any clear directive memorializing her intent. Missouri required clear and convincing evidence of intent to remove a patient from life support, and the parents argued this violated both their and their daughter’s Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process rights. Significantly for the issue at hand, the Court began by recognizing a fundamental human right of informed consent to medical treatment stemming from the right of self-determination, stating:

At common law, even the touching of one person by another without consent and without legal justification was a battery. Before the turn of the century, this Court observed that "no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law." This notion of bodily integrity has been embodied in the requirement that informed consent is generally required for medical treatment. Justice Cardozo, while on the Court of Appeals of New York, aptly described this doctrine: "Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient's consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages." The informed consent doctrine has become firmly entrenched in American tort law. The logical corollary of the doctrine of informed consent is that the patient generally possesses the right not to consent, that is, to refuse treatment. 497 U.S. at 269-270 (citations omitted).

The Court went on to state that "[t]he principle that a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment may be inferred from our prior decisions" citing three cases pertinent to our analysis here. First, the Cruzan Court cited Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 221-222 (1990), where the Court recognized that prisoners possess "a significant liberty interest in avoiding the unwanted administration of antipsychotic drugs under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment." Significantly, theCourt in Harper stated that "[t]he forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's liberty." 494 U.S. at 229. Second, the Cruzan Court cited Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480, 494 (1980), where the Court recognized that the transfer to a mental hospital coupled with mandatory behavior modification treatment implicated liberty interests. Third, the Court cited Parham v. J. R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979) where the Court recognized that "a child, in common with adults, has a substantial liberty interest in not being confined unnecessarily for medical treatment.”

Cruzan was followed in 1997 by Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997), where the issue before the Court was whether the substantive due process right to refuse medical treatment included the right to assisted suicide. The following language of the Court is particularly significant to the issue presently before the Court:

The Due Process Clause guarantees more than fair process, and the "liberty" it protects includes more than the absence of physical restraint. Collins v. Harker Heights, 503 U.S. 115, 125 (1992)(Due Process Clause "protects individual liberty against 'certain government actions regardless of the fairness of the procedures used to implement them"') (quoting Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 331 (1986)). The Clause also provides heightened protection against government interference with certain fundamental rights and liberty interests ....

We have also assumed, and strongly suggested, that the Due Process Clause protects the traditional right to refuse unwanted lifesaving medical treatment. Cruzan, 497 U.S. at 278-279.

521 U.S. at 719-720. (internal citations omitted)

The fact that the Glucksberg Court identified the right to refuse unwanted lifesaving medical treatment as one in a long list of traditional fundamental human rights and liberty interests is extremely important because once a right is so identified, any governmental action infringing upon it is subjected to the "strict scrutiny" test. As stated by the Court in Glucksberg, "the Fourteenth Amendment forbids the government to infringe fundamental liberty interests at all, no matter what process is provided, unless the infringement is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest." Glucksberg, 521 U.S. at 721 (internal quotations omitted, emphasis in original).

The Court's analysis in both Cruzan and Glucksberg was based upon a sick person asserting a right to deny treatment. The ETS mandate, on the other hand, forces treatment on perfectly healthy people. All of the arguments in favor of selfdetermination reviewed by the Court in Cruzan and Glucksberg are even stronger when applied to a perfectly healthy person's right to refuse a treatment on the basis that it may make symptoms of a disease that healthy person may never contract less severe. And we remember here the uncontroverted medical consensus that Covid-19 injections do not prevent infection or transmission of the coronavirus; i.e., they do not create immunity in the recipients. The bar should be even higher to force a healthy person to accept "treatment" than to force a sick person to accept critical care. As stated by the Court in Harper, where a physically healthy prisoner objected to the administration of antipsychotic drugs, "[t]he forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's liberty." 494 U.S. at 229

Footnotes

2 86 FED. REG. 61402 (November 4, 2021).

3 CNN. The Situation Room, interview with CDC Director Walensky. (August 5, 2021).

https://twitter.com/CNNSitRoom/status/1423422301882748929

4 Stieg, C. “Dr. Fauci on CDC mask guidelines: ‘We are dealing with a different virus now.’” (July 28, 2021). https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/28/dr-fauci-on-why-cdc-changed- guidelines-delta-is-a-different-virus.html

5 Coleman, K (November 12, 2021). Dr. Fauci Just Issued This Urgent Warning to Vaccinated People. Yahoo News. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/dr-fauci-just-issued-urgent-201846228.html

6. Colson, T. “Top WHO scientist says vaccinated travelers should still quarantine, citing lack of evidence that COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission.” Business Insider. (December 29, 2020). https://www.businessinsider.com/who-says-no-evidence-coronavirus-vaccine-prevent-transmissions-2020-12?op=1

7 Manskar, N. “Moderna boss says COVID-19 vaccine not proven to stop spread of virus.” New York Post. (November 24, 2020). https://nypost.com/2020/11/24/moderna-boss-says-covid-shot-not-proven-to-stop-virus-spread/.

8 WFLA News. “Desantis, Moody Speak Out Against Vaccine Mandates in Clearwater.” Twitter Repost. (October 24, 2021). https://twitter.com/4patrick7/status/1452309002021388296?s=21

9 Knapton, S. “Delta variant has wrecked hopes of herd immunity, warn scientists.” The Telegraph. (October 8, 2021). https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/medical/delta-variant- has-wrecked-hopes-of-herd-immunity-warn-scientists/ar-AAN9O4p

10 Bhattacharya, J., et al. “The beauty of vaccines and natural immunity.” Smerconish Newsletter. (June 4, 2021). https://www.smerconish.com/exclusive-content/the-beauty-of-vaccines-and-natural-immunity

11 RAIR Foundation USA video with Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier. https://rairfoundation.com/bombshell-nobel-prize-winner-reveals-covid-vaccine-is-creating-variants/.

(May 18, 2021).

12 Pnina, S. et al. “Nosocomial outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a highly vaccinated population, Israel, July 2021.” EuroSurveill. 26:39. (September 23, 2021). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.39.2100822

13 Adams, P, et al. “Who Are These COVID-19 Vaccine Skeptics and What Do They Believe?” Epoch Times. (October 20, 2021). https://www.theepochtimes.com/who-are-these-covid-19-

vaccine-skeptics-and-what-do-they-believe_4043094.html

14 Allen, R. “Oxford Scientist ‘It’s Illogical & Unethical To Force Jab On NHS Staff.’”

The Richie Allen Radio Show. (September 9, 2021). https://richieallen.co.uk/oxford-scientist-

its-illogical-unethical-to-force-jab-on-nhs-staff/

15 Associated Press. “US sports leagues cope with COVID-19 outbreaks amid variants.”

(December 15, 2021). https://www.foxnews.com/sports/us-sports-leagues-cope-with-covid-19-

outbreaks-amid-variants

16 Lemos, G. et al. “17 Covid-19 cases identified on New Orleans-bound cruise ship.”

CNN. (December 5, 2021). https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/05/us/cruise-ship-norwegian-

breakaway-covid-cases/index.html

17 Chasmar, J. “Psaki doesn’t deny White House COVID-19 outbreak.” Yahoo News.

(December 20, 2021). https://news.yahoo.com/psaki-doesn-apos-t-deny-210029232.html

18 Al-Arshani, S. “Moderna’s chief medical officer says that vaccine trial results only show that they prevent people from getting sick – not necessarily that recipients won’t still be able to transmit the virus.” Business Insider. (November 2020). https://www.businessinsider.com/moderna-chief-medical-officer-vaccines-interview-2020-11

19 Attkisson, S. “CDC changes definition of “vaccines” to fit Covid-19 vaccine limitations.” (September 8, 2021). https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/09/read-cdc-changes-definition-of-vaccines-to-fit-covid-19-vaccine-limitations/

20 See, e.g., Moderna Program Patents. (December 2021). https://www.modernatx.com/patents

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Moderna Form 10Q. (August 6,

2020). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285220000017/mrna-

20200630.htm

Nakagami, H. “Development of COVID-19 vaccines utilizing gene therapy

technology.” Int Immunol. 33(10):521-527. (September 25, 2021). https://pubmed.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/.

FDA. “Comirnaty. Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics.” (December 2021). https://

www.fda.gov/ vaccines-blood-biologics/comirnaty

21 FDA. “Coronavirus (COVID-19) | CBER-Regulated Biologics.” (2021). https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/industry-biologics/coronavirus-covid-19-cber-regulated-biologic

FDA. “Coronavirus Treatment Acceleration Program(CTAP).” (2021). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/coronavirus-covid-19-drugs/coronavirus-treatment-acceleration-program-ctap.

22 United States Securities and Exchange Commission. BioNTech SE Form 20-F.

(2020). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1776985/000156459021016723/bntx-20f_

20201231.htm at page 26.

23 United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Moderna SE Form 10-Q. (June 30, 2020). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285220000017 /mrna- 20200630.htm

24 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1 et seq.

25 Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).

26 Although Cruzan was decided under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, this Court has long held that the same substantive due process analysis applied to the states under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment also applies to the federal government under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. See, e.g., Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 500 (1954) (“In view of our decision that the

Constitution prohibits the states from maintaining racially segregated public schools, it would be unthinkable that the same Constitution would impose a lesser duty on the Federal Government.”) See also, Adarand Constructors v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (same); Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) (holding federal law discriminating on basis of sex unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment due process clause based on Fourteenth Amendment analysis); Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977) (striking down federal racial classification on basis of Fifth Amendment due process clause stating that strict scrutiny is the proper standard for analysis of all racial classifications, whether imposed by a federal, state, or local actor. Id. at 231, superseded by statute); Jimenez v. Weinberger, 417 U.S. 628 (1974) (striking down provision of the Social Security Act based upon illegitimacy applying substantive due process analysis through the due process of clause of the Fifth Amendment).

Louisiana Governor Reverses ‘Insane Mandate’ Requiring COVID Injections for Children

From [CHD] Children and students attending daycare, K-12 programs and college in Louisiana, at least for now, will not be required to get the COVID-19 vaccine, Gov. John Bel Edwards announced Wednesday.

The announcement reversed an earlier decision by the governor’s administration and the Louisiana Health Department (LHD) requiring students to be fully vaccinated beginning in the 2022-23 school year.

Edwards said he based the decision on the fact that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not fully approved the vaccines for people under age 16.

The governor said his administration will continue to recommend all children age 5 and over get the vaccine, a recommendation the LHD endorsed Wednesday in a news release.

In their statements, the governor and the LHD implied COVID-19 vaccines for people over age 16 are fully approved. However, while the FDA did grant full licensing to Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax COVID-19 vaccines — for people 16 and older and 18 and older, respectively — those vaccines are not available in the U.S.

All COVID-19 vaccines being administered in the U.S. are still available only under Emergency Use Authorization.

Commenting on the governor’s announcement, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said:

“The science shows this age group is at zero risk from COVID-19 and at high risk of debilitating and sometimes deadly vaccine injury.

“The only thing driving these mandates is the deceptive campaign of orchestrated fear and deliberately induced confusion carried out by reckless and incompetent health officials, their Big Pharma overlords and the gullible politicians who do what they are told rather than conduct their own independent research.”

Kennedy added, “Hats off to Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, who forced Gov. Edwards to back off this insane mandate.” [MORE]

Dems/GOP Play Dumb About Replacement Theory. Fear of a Brown Planet is the Racist's Most Basic Fear. Racists Know that If a White Person Mixes with a Non-White Person, a Brown Person Will be Created

Since the apparent false flag operation in Buffalo racist suspect democrat politicians and their dependent media have been discussing so-called “replacement theory.” According to dem governmental authorities the “racist terrorist” who allegedly shot up a grocery store wrote about it in his so-called “manifesto” or crimes confession book. Corpse Joe came to life and strongly condemned racist conspiracy theories in a speech Tuesday after visiting Tops Friendly Markets grocery store. Democrats frequently use racism and race to push an item on their agenda which usually provides no tangible benefit Black people. Here, democrat authorities want to push a ‘lets control people’s online speech’ and/or take away people’s right to have guns to defend themselves and their property against criminals and the government. While purporting to debunk racist “replacement theory” as myth, which it clearly is not, democrats are strengthening belief in the granfalloon and group hallucination of “race.” As such, said discussions are actually part of the refinement of racism white supremacy [RWS]; making it harder for non-white people to deal with this societal illness and solve their problems. Belief here means “the greatest fiction,” granfalloon refers to an empty representation and evil means believing in and acting on a false belief. Racism white supremacy is defined below.

Persons who are classified as white are indeed replaceable. Most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

• White plus Black equals Colored.

• White plus Brown equals Colored.

• White plus Yellow equals Colored.

It is scientific fact that white people are genetic recessive. In general, this means they cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained that the so-called “white race" can be replaced or "genetically annihilated" through assimilation or social intermingling with non-whites. The above formula is the meaning of the slogans, "you will not replace us" and "‘Europe Will Be White." It also is what ‘Clean Blood’ is referring to - clean white blood. A recent Reuters poll reflects white people’s fear of replacement as 31% of participants agreed "America must protect and preserve its White European heritage” and 39 percent agreed with the statement that “White people are currently under attack in this country.” [MORE]

As white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. [MORE] In fact, according to the Census Bureau, whites remain the only segment of the U.S. population where deaths outpace births.  Ken Gronbach, a demographer and futurist who writes and lectures on marketing and generational change, said "the whole complexion of the US is going to get darker - we're going to look like Derek Jeter" - or Barak Obama. [MORE]

In reality, persons who classify themselves as Whites make up less than 10% of the world's population. That is, 90% of the world's population of 7 billion people are non-white. If anything, this suggests that the characteristic of having white skin is an anomaly. Read the above again and further understand that in 1950, whites were 28 percent of world population.

Racist, do-gooder liberals and Republicans ignoring this obvious and undisputed factual basis concerning the declining white population want to maintain the system of racism/White supremacy. Dr. Welsing explained, “They don’t want the victims of that system to have clarity as to what’s happening to them.”

It is important to understand that racists are the only white people concerned about the declining “white race.” People who classify themselves as White, who wish to be taken seriously, and who are righteous and responsible don’t care about whether their numbers are diminishing. [MORE] Race is not real, there is no “white race.” Race is "a totally artificial theologically-driven, biologically-based, and scientifically-invalid "European" ideology of human genetic evolution and classification coinciding with the emergence of colonialism and the rise of the transatlantic slave trade." Dr. Blynd explains, "Race is not real but the psycho-socio-economic effects of racism surely is. [MORE] Hamid Dabashi further explains, “There are no white people. There are no black people. There are no red, yellow, brown, blue, purple, crimson or any other colour people. These are all socially constructed delusions. Delusions though with real, frightful, murderous, and genocidal consequences.” FUNKTIONARY states, “Race as a biological construct has been created to be wrongly confused with ethnic identity in order to establish the sense of "otherness" and de-humanization of melanated peoples around the globe.” FUNKTIONARY further states,

Races are not biologically real, nor can humans be divided into scientifically valid, biologically distinct groupings or races based on subjective, arbitrary and superficial observable criteria (genetic traits). If scientists were true to the scientific reality, we would have to map millions of genetic traits that would translate into millions of "races. [MORE]

Dr. Dorothy Roberts explains,

“race is a political system that governs people by sorting them into social groupings based on invented biological demarcations. Race is not only interpreted according to invented rules, but, more important, race itself is an invented political grouping. Race is not a biological category that is politically charged. It is a political category that has been disguised as a biological one”

Racists (upholders, supporters and perpetrators of the institution of the White Supremacy Dynamic) created the concept of race out of thin air. Having little biological validity, the term "race" is better translated to mean organization. Welsing states, the sole purpose of such organization is to maintain white domination and world control of non-whites, who have been frictionalized into made up classifications of people by racists. Thus, the only purpose of race is to practice racism.

In reality, any discussion about the declining number of “white people” is simply talk about the number of persons who have white skin. Only deluded persons attribute value and substance to non-reality. Only a believer in the delusion of “race” would attribute substantive value to a meaningless human characteristic such as skin color or toe nail size or sweaty palms and then be alarmed that persons with white skin or small toe nails etc are disappearing from the planet.

FUNKTIONARY explains, '“A racist is a psychopath at war with his own being." [MORE] Suffering from the disease of constant comparison racists and their make believe beliefs, in which they believe they are part of an imaginary hierarchy wherein persons unable to produce color & lacking melanin are supreme; and they imagine themselves to be higher than what they imagine non-whites to be, are in a state of non-reality, a play world going on in their minds. "A divided mind, with the an unconscious and a conscious one, can never apperceive things as they are. Truth is adulterated with falsehood in the same proportion to which one is unconscious." (In fact, ALL persons who believe in the granfalloon of “race” consciously or subconsciously imagine themselves to fit within this human hierarchy based on their skin color. How could they not? Once any person, white or non-white, believes in and accepts the premise of race, then logically it follows that they must also believe there are inherent differences (not cultural) among the “races” - such inherent differences are the imaginary basis of "the race” and the criteria for the imaginary hierarchy of “racial groups.” Non-whites who believe in this delusion also suffer greatly from it {MORE]; to be discussed supra.

The shrinking of the “white race” or “numerical inadequacy” fuels the practice of racism. Dr. Welsing explained, white people's behavior in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war) is motivated by their fear of genetic annihilation. FUNKTIONARY explains a Caucasian is one whose worst and most basic fear still remains genetic annihilation in the form of the fear of the impending “Black Planet.” According to Dr. Welsing, ‘genetic annihilation is the fundamental motivation of racists, whether it is conscious and/or subconsciously determined. Said "fear of physical replacement" and/or fear of losing control over non-whites fuels the system of white supremacy/racism and causes racists to act genocidally towards non-whites in a perceived "survival game" they are engaged in with non-whites. She explained that [among other things] “numerical inadequacy” drives racists to practice racism - to survive and to maintain control of non-whites. [MORE]. Said color confrontation theory explained that the more the white population shrinks the worse its conduct toward non-whites will get. Events and episodes over the past century clearly bear the color confrontation theory out.

For instance, the racist’s great fear of replacement logically justifies racial segregation. After all, people who live together also go to school, church, work, play and shop together. Such integrated persons are thus also likely to date each other and may have children together. The fear of replacement also provides a rationalization for the murder of Blacks, particularly Black males. Welsing explains, "Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (the civilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation), all white peoples have the spoken or unspoken mandate to participate actively in their collective struggle for global white genetic survival. This specifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black and other non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to be necessary and, therefore, justified.” [MORE]

It is important to understand that racists aren’t simply white persons who are proud of their white skin and history. Rather, racists believe non-whites threaten their actual existence. As such, racists conclude that they must dominate and control non-whites in order to survive and/or racists believe they are the rightful masters of non-white persons, who are lower forms of human life to them. Welsing explained,

“They [elite whites] realized that they could be genetically annihilated and White people could, as a collective of people, disappear. They worked out a system for White survival, which entails dominating all of the Black, Brown, Red and Yellow people on the planet. So racism is a behavioral system for the survival of White people. . . Black people [must] finally understand that White people are playing a White survival game [which] has to inferiorize the functioning of Black and other people of color.” [MORE] In other words: what the White Collective is doing on the planet is engaging in behaviors—in economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and more—in order for them to survive on the planet, by any means necessary. [MORE] 

She states,

“This fundamen­tal fear of albino isolation, abandonment and genetic annihilation, is at the core of Western civilization - a civilization structured to ensure white genetic survival. This survival plan necessitates the subjugation and control of all non-white peoples. I define this subjugation and control as the white supremacy system."

"It is this same anxiety that causes Western civilization's preoccupation with weapons, spending more money on armaments than on any other single budgetary item. These weapons surround all of the world's non-white peoples. The whites hope that the weapons will prevent white genetic annihilation and thereby ensure white genetic survival, but then whites hold the pervasive attendant fear that they will be destroyed in the conflagration also." [MORE]

The difference that race makes is the difference that race is made to make by delusional racists and their delusional cooperative, mentacidal non-white victims. The point here is for Black people to master their understanding of racism - to understand the dynamics of racism/white supremacy so that they can actually respond (not react) to it to either destroy or neutralize the system of racism white supremacy. Black people have misunderstood reality by believing that racists practice racism out of hatred or a lack of information or unfamiliarity. Also the failure of Blacks to recognize that they are in a system of racism white supremacy has led to extreme disillusionment and their current powerless class.

Rather than run from reality, Dr. Welsing theorized that if Black people could understand what motivates racists to practice racism, then perhaps they could neutralize or destroy the system of white supremacy. Such a lens also promotes compassionate understanding; if racists want to be separate and apart from Blacks and enjoy their white heritage alone then so be it, so long as doing so does not call for dominating non-whites or engaging in master-servant relations with them, forced or otherwise. Black people must understand and master the definition of racism white supremacy as a global system designed for “the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation.” With such an informed understanding Black people would, for instance, immediately drop the failed and pathological strategies of moral suasion and integration. Once aware of the system of racism white supremacy a black individual would immediately see the valuelessness of tactics such as forcing persons who believe Blacks threaten their survival to integrate with them. At this point in history attempting to transform or reform racists – white individuals who either function as psychopaths in their interactions with Black people or believe they must dominate them to in order to survive is entirely pathological.

To be very clear here, there are certainly other possible explanations as to why racists practice racism and why a white over Black system exists. As Dr. Amos Wilson explained, what matters most is that Black people understand that such a system exists and that they are immersed in the system. The system of RWS is the context that governs all that Black people do and it rewards and punishes them because they function as servants in said system.

Dr. Welsing accurately observed ‘Black people are in a continuous state of checkmate” and are ‘currently in a losing streak that is centuries long.’ [MORE] Black people must look in the mirror. It may be painful to realize but thus far, all persons such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, the BPP, Nelson Mandela and many other courageous others, who have attempted to establish justice and/or to eliminate racism white supremacy have totally failed.’ [MORE] Accepting the reality of the color confrontation or replacement theory, which is far from what racist liberals and Republicans are promoting, could have profound consequences for the future of Black people and the termination of master servant relations once and for all.

Notice that liberal and conservative whites rarely attempt to define the highly observable phenomenon of racism. Nevertheless, said racist suspects constantly chatter about racism in terms of mean words and conduct and affiliation with clown groups, such as KKK, nazis, proud boys, etc. Racism is not primarily about bigotry - minor inconveniences such as trouble catching a cab, standing in a long line to vote, or name calling, disrespect, stereotypes or other mean conduct & words by white people. Also, being a white supremacist has nothing to do with membership in some clownish organization and there are differing ways to practice white supremacy. Rather, racism/white supremacy is about the superior, dominate position of whites and vast unequal power and opportunities and maintaining the imbalance of power through Black people’s cooperative control. A white supremacist can be a soccer mom, a businessman, or a US Senator if they are practicing racism against non-whites. [MORE] Racism concerns a power relationship between whites and Blacks. Belief that racism is only bigotry is a vital part of false programming sold by elite whites - white publishers, professionals, professors and government representatives and also promoted by their showcase Blacks who parrot such programming in various styles. 

Amos Wilson explained that defining racism in terms of attitude or bigotry will absolutely lead to solving the wrong problems. FUNKTIONARY defines:

Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." -Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, MD.

Also, believing that white people who are friendly and nice to Blacks cannot be racist is maya - racism is not necessarily hate based; most dog owners do not hate their dogs, but all dog owners believe that they are superior to the dog - therefore they don’t have arms length or equal relations with dogs. Pretending that racism is based on mean words by bad people wearing costumes has led gullible blacks to catastrophically misidentify racists and ally themselves with their enemies or persons who have different political interests. White liberals have mislead Black people into believing that voting for Democrats is somehow the beginning to solving their problems which are caused and maintained by Republicans. Yet in places where democrats dominate politics, Black people are targeted and surveilled by police, struck from juries, stuffed into reprehensible jails, given a servant education, denied housing, underemployed, evicted, prosecuted, etc on a daily basis and when Blacks are murdered by cops nothing is done. The domination of Black people is made to seem natural. Don’t take BW’s word for it; if you live in a liberal city like NYC, D.C. or San Francisco go to your local court and sit, watch and count how many Blacks are arrested and charged in the arraignment courts. Is it republicans in Michigan who have doing nothing since Patrick Lyoya was murdered by a white cop 2 months ago? Said Black man (and many many others) was murdered in public on video in a city with a democrat; mayor, city commissioners, state attorney general, governor, lt governor, 2 US Senators etc. Voting heavily for said puppeticians in Grand Rapids or NYC has had zero effect on the myriad of problems caused by racism white supremacy. The quality of citizenship for Black people in the free range prison is base. Misunderstandings about what racism is must be unlearned by Black people so that they can stop participating in and essentially doing nothing to stop their oppression. White liberals in particular, who are masquerading as our friends are enabling such false consciousness conditioning, are the permanent enemies of Black people, “its high time time to cut the leash.”

As explained, not all racists are concerned with being replaced or with their genetic annihilation. The bottom line for all racists is maintaining the master servant relationship. Neely Fuller correctly states ‘in the system of racism white supremacy Black people are subject to the direct and indirect power of elite racists in all areas of activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, religion, Sex and War. Therefore, elite racists are the direct or indirect masters of Black people. The elite racists are responsible for everything that happens or does not happen in regards to Black people.’ Fuller describes Black people as “the powerless class” because it accurately describes their power relationship between Blacks and elite racists. In their relationship with whites, Blacks cannot be be "upper" or "middle" - but only under whites in this operating system of vast unequal power. He explains, "in a socio-material system dominated by White Supremacists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by White Supremacists. The White Supremacists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers. Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by White Supremacists. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many people — particularly non-white people — prefer not to acknowledge. [MORE] Similarly, Dr. Wilson rhetorically asks Black adults;

‘Who has control of your food? Who has control of your electricity? Who has control of your water? Of your jobs? Who tells you what to wear when you go to work? Who tells you when to come to work...when to leave...when to go to lunch...how to speak...how to write...how to do this...how to do that...and how are these things taught, and how they are conditioned?"-- It is by reward and punishment. " You do this you get paid; you don't do this you don't get paid; you get a raise, you get docked. What do we have here?’

To live under the power of another people is to be created by that people. To be rewarded or punished by that people is to be created by that people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of another people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation (i.e., the conditions under which we live), then we must change the power relationships. If we are to prevent ourselves from being created by another people and are to engage in the act of self creation, then we must change the power relations.’ [MORE]

Whites have been the world’s minority for some time – nevertheless, 'everywhere one finds Whites and Blacks in close proximity to each other, whether it is Ferguson, Missouri or Zimbabwe, the whites are in control. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every known statistical law of probability.' [MORE]  Dr. Wilson explains, “[Blacks] must question how is it that a minority people [whites], a very small percentage of mankind, a people who are essentially resourceless in terms of their natural resources, maintain the power they have. Why is it that the peoples whose lands contain the wealth of the earth are the poorest people? Why is it that Afrika with some twenty (20) or thirty (30) strategic metals that make the space age possible — why is it that the image of Afrika is projected at us time and time again as that of starving children, as societies in disorder, as societies on the verge of disaster? This implies that there must exist a political, social situation wherein the mental orientation of our people must be so structured that the power and the ability of the Europeans to rule this earth are continually maintained.' [MORE]

In response to Wright and Wilson most Black people, like the racists discussed above, believe in the granfalloon of race and therefore rationalize white dominance over things as being a natural state of affairs. To believe you are an inferior form of human life relative to the others is mentacidal and is the basis of master servant relations in a white over black system, a system based on consent not force. Whites are in charge everywhere that whites and Blacks live together and in control of all the material resources because Whites and Blacks believe that whites are superior to Blacks. Wilson states, "It is not so much that the European says we are inferior and that the European maligns our character, et cetera. It is the belief on our part that what he says is true that drives us to be crazy. It is a crazy reaction to what the European says, an insane and unthinking kind of approach to dealing with what he says about us, that maintains the craziness." [MORE] and [MORE] In order to for the system of racism/white supremacy to thrive, Black people must be maintained in a particular state of mind - literally kept out of our minds. [MORE] ” As stated this mentacidal logic rationalizes why the jails are filled with Blacks because they are inferior beings prone to criminality or why more Blacks are unemployed, homeless, etc. Many Blacks look at their low position in all areas of people activity in the same way a midget might perceive the lack of midgets playing professional basketball; midgets are inherently short and basketball is game created primarily for tall people.

Until Black people change their consciousness and respond to reality elite racists will remain in control no matter how outnumbered white people are. Lysander Spooner stated, “It would be absurd for the most numerous party to talk of establishing a government over the less numerous party, unless the former were also the strongest, as well as the most numerous; for it is not to be supposed that the strongest party would ever submit to the rule of the weaker party, merely because the latter were the most numerous. And as a matter of fact, it is perhaps never that governments are established by the most numerous party.” Under this tyrannical arrangement non-whites essentially only have “rights” that the strongest party allows them to have. Larken Rose explains, 'To expect the master to serve the slave and to expect power to be used solely for the benefit of the one being controlled, not the one in control - is ridiculous.'

According to FUNKTIONARY, ‘Racism White Supremacy is a power group dynamic involving a master-servant relationship between whites and Blacks in a system of vast unequal power. The imbalance of power is maintained to an extent through cooperative control and voluntary relations. No one can play master without willing servants. ‘Black people's uncritical acceptance of the rules, moral beliefs, perspectives, and their customary traditional participation in the American (White) political-economic process and system is tantamount to the legitimization of their own oppression and to the consensual ensurance of their own powerlessness.’ [MORE]

To end racism/white supremacy we must destroy or neutralize white power.' [MORE] The destruction of the master/servant relationship does not mean killing white people or not having relations with them. It means that Black people will no longer have voluntary master/servant relations with white people. In other words it means changing the relationships between white and Black people. 

The first step to neutralizing racism white supremacy is for Black individuals to recognize what it is. The second step is for Black individuals to recognize they are living in a context of racism white supremacy. Said system is the cause of many of their problems. With such an awareness Black individuals must start the process of promptly unlearning the false programming put in their minds from birth by their racist masters, towards a goal of attaining individual endependence and responsibility for solving their own problems. Only then could such aware individuals work together in ways that are unforeseeable now to create new Black political philosophies, education, music, arts and economic systems and actions. To be clear, well intentioned or do-gooder Blacks who do not understand racism white supremacy are useless to the liberation of Black people. The false programming must go. Unfortunately, some of the most educated Black people are the most indoctrinated and thereby useless persons to liberate Black people. Lawyers, doctors, social science or the helping professionals are trained to solve white people’s problems and to help maintain the status quo. Such persons most likely have the most unlearning to do. Dr. Bynd describes such tamed persons as mandriods:  a programmed, indoctrinated, academented, miseducated, trained, stupefied and stymied conformist. When a critical mass of individual, endependent, self-respecting Black people understand and become aware of what racism white supremacy is, the voluntary nature of RSW will cease to exist, forcing change.

Dr. Wilson, stated:

We talk about the Civil Rights Movement, and the Apartheid system of the South, when Blacks decided to just get out of the buses and just walk, the system changed. Yes, when they stopped sitting behind the white driver, just changing that relationship, changed the nature of power, in that system. When they decided then to walk side by side, when they decided to walk abreast and line themselves up, because they had not walked that way before … for the ends to be fought, the relationship changed. When they kept their monies in their pockets, when they sat on the stools and blocked the other people from them, and change the nature of the interactions between themselves and Europeans, the nature of the system changed.  

So therefore we have tremendous Power. It depends upon how we align ourselves as a people, and how we decide to relate to other people in the world, because they cannot have what they have, unless we are who we are. And that is why we don’t have to waste a great deal of time always appealing to them, and analyzing them, because we can better appeal to our own sense of self, and our own consciousness, and we waste a lot of time trying to transform them, when through transforming ourselves, they will be transformed automatically.’

FUNKTIONARY states “a slave is one who waits for someone else to free him.” It defines the following as follows:

Neuropeans - (Neurotic Europeans) - neurotic, ignorant, narcissistic and self-deluded white supremacist Caucasians operating at the mythic and rational levels of consciousness only. 2) Fascists. (See Weitko Disease, White Supremacy and Yurungu.)

Neuropeons - neurotic, stupid and self deluded poor white trash. 2) skin heads 3) Nazis, neo-Nazis and Theo-nazis (See KKK, WOTAN, Weitko Disease, Fasxism, Racism White Supremacy, Stupidity, Ku Klux Klan & Yurungu).

European - a political euphemism for northwest Asian, i.e., the last branch of the hue-man family to emerge into the arena called civilization; holding the distinction of destroying more cultures and ravishing more civilizations than they have built.

European psychology - the pathological notion that: "If you can't understand it, fabricate it, identify with it, compete with it. discredit it, or assimilate it, then destroy it." (See: Yurugu & Weiteko Disease) [MORE]

Corpse Joe is Correct, Racism is Poison. But Whats that Got to Do w/the False Flag in Buffalo? The Real Question is, Can a Person Get Shot and Not Bleed? [blind Believers create their Own Deceivers]

NOT REAL. ABOVE IS CORPSE BRANDON, A GOTDAMMED LIAR. BELOW HE ACTS NEAR THE SCENE OF THE STAGED CRIME

Don’t human beings bleed when they get shot by a high powered rifle at close range? ‘Follow the government approved science’ and ‘do the research they allow you to see.’

According to FUNKTIONARY:

ostrichism – a belief that knowledge ignored does not exist and cannot affect anyone. (See: Bra, Ignorance & Stupidity)

false flag – staged psychological operations by government operatives and shadow elite orchestrated and perpetrated against the civilian population. False flag operations does not necessarily mean that oftentimes real people don’t die.

believer – one who accepts that which has no basis in reality and unwilling to question or test it. 2) a person who revels in or enjoys being self-deceived. A believer does not seek—just accepts theologies and/or ideologies. 3) one who is addicted to vanity and/or chained to convention with conviction. 4) one who lives in a cloud of illusions, confounded by language and its deceptions. Believers are people who make their lives subjective slaves to a mere belief—engineered my limited and fragmented understanding and fostered by erroneous conclusions based solely on effects and appearances. A true believer would rather believe in something and be wrong than not believe in it and be right. A believer is never a spiritual person, and a spiritual person is never a believer. A spiritual person knows not; a religious person think she knows; a believer only (merely) believes. Unbelievably, a believer elevates the very notion of belief to a higher value than fact or knowing. Belief and believer are one. The condition is thought or belief in form; the two are actually one. Regardless of the particular belief held, it is belief itself which gives the sustaining power to thought. “It is done to you as you believe.” ~Jesus (of Biblical Lore). Keep believing and it will continue being done to you. All belief is still an act of consciousness, hence it can be reduced to a state of thought. The Law of Belief creates its own law which is changed only by reversing or dispersing the belief. “Believe not every spirit”: refers to the psychic confusion of beliefs. You see, subjective forms are not always what they seem or claim to be. (See: Convictions, Ultimate Truth, Absolute Truth, True Believer, Self-Realization, Prayer, Proof, Higher Truth, Axioms, Seven Centers, SLAP-House, Awakening, Stillness, Meditation, Naptivity, Seeking First, Buddha-Christ, Willful Ignorance, Body of Christ, Knowingness & Blind Faith)

blind belief – an oxymoron. All belief is blind leading the mind. Read Luke 6:39 & 11:52 and Mathew 15:14 & 23:13-28. For the overwhelming majority, it seems better not to think (for ourselves), so we adopt and accept a belief or belief system and stagnate in belief, which we euphemistically refer to as religion. (See: Natural Faith, Limbo & Belief Systems)

believer – one who accepts that which has no basis in reality and unwilling to question or test it. 2) a person who revels in or enjoys being self-deceived. A believer does not seek—just accepts theologies and/or ideologies. 3) one who is addicted to vanity and/or chained to convention with conviction. 4) one who lives in a cloud of illusions, confounded by language and its deceptions. Believers are people who make their lives subjective slaves to a mere belief—engineered my limited and fragmented understanding and fostered by erroneous conclusions based solely on effects and appearances. A true believer would rather believe in something and be wrong than not believe in it and be right. A believer is never a spiritual person, and a spiritual person is never a believer. A spiritual person knows not; a religious person think she knows; a believer only (merely) believes. Unbelievably, a believer elevates the very notion of belief to a higher value than fact or knowing. Belief and believer are one. The condition is thought or belief in form; the two are actually one. Regardless of the particular belief held, it is belief itself which gives the sustaining power to thought. “It is done to you as you believe.” ~Jesus (of Biblical Lore). Keep believing and it will continue being done to you. All belief is still an act of consciousness, hence it can be reduced to a state of thought. The Law of Belief creates its own law which is changed only by reversing or dispersing the belief. “Believe not every spirit”: refers to the psychic confusion of beliefs. You see, subjective forms are not always what they seem or claim to be. (See: Convictions, Ultimate Truth, Absolute Truth, True Believer, Self-Realization, Prayer, Proof, Higher Truth, Axioms, Seven Centers, SLAP-House, Awakening, Stillness, Meditation, Naptivity, Seeking First, Buddha-Christ, Willful Ignorance, Body of Christ, Knowingness & Blind Faith)

PropaGandhi – passive social non-resistance propaganda. 2) obedience-based servitude to the enforcers of granfalloons uncommonly known as Corporate States and any other group-entities. Mahatma Gandhi mostly walked barefoot which produced calluses on his feet. He also had a very weird diet sprinkled with bouts of fasting which made him rather frail and suffer intermittently from halitosis—this made him… “A super callused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis.” (See: Poser, Class, Mass, Racism White Supremacy, Gun Control & Caste)

Propagenda – propaganda developed and directed to a particular audience as a means of predictive programming for accepting someone’s agenda as their very own. (See: $pinfidels, Predictive Programming & Coin-Operated)

propaganda – a psychological technique and means by which the lawless confound the lawful (dwellers upon the land). 2) any message intended to influence whether true or false. 3) disinformation used as programming that in its absence wouldn’t stand up itself nor stand up for itself by itself. 4) the over-preponderance of a certain message that is designed to impose certain forms and frames of reference and patterns of thought the objective of which being to subjugate a people. The Jesuits were the ones who invented the word and the first to systematize its practice. Propaganda is memes distributed with an external anchor and an embedded carrier; it is linguistic obfuscation, misdirection, and purposeful deception in public rhetoric to accomplish plutocratic ends of wealth centralization and power through mind-control of the masses. Propaganda is to be used as subversion, which is the undermining or detachment of the loyalties of significant social groups and their transference to the symbols and institutions of the aggressor-oppressor. “It is a political necessity to destroy the African consciousness of colonialized Africans or African people.” ~ Dr. Amos N. Wilson. As for the minds of the general public, the most sinister part of The Matrix in which we now live is that you have been cajoled and convinced to suppress your own free will and surrender to the manipulators who control not just your mind, but your entire reality. Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda, explained: “If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of... In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.” “Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government (all forms are) entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.” ~Michael Rivero. (See: Public Relations, Memes, Mind Viruses, Dance of Truth, Absolute Truth, Human Language, Memetics, Good & Evil, Confusion, False Flag Operation, Nine-Eleven, MEDIA, Propagenda, The Truth, Subvertilizers, Evolution, Religion, State, ESP, Predictive Programming, Symbolaeography, Voting, Elections, Orderlies, Critical Thinking, Colonized Mind, Corporate State, “Government,” “Rolebot” & Reification)

MI Police Release Video of a White Cop Shooting a Black Man in the Back in a Store Parking Lot, a Real Terrorism [the implementation of the principle of limited liability] Incident. Cop Not Charged

From [HERE] Video footage recorded inside a Meijer store on April 25 appears to show that 20-year-old DeAnthony VanAtten went through the self-checkout lane before being chased from the store and shot by police in the parking lot.

East Lansing police on Monday released 12 video clips taken from interior store surveillance cameras, including a brief clip that appears to show VanAtten buying something before running from the store with officers in pursuit.

Some of the clips show only normal shopping activity, while others show VanAtten running in the store or officers moving toward him. In some videos, an officer can be seen carrying a stun gun while chasing VanAtten.

One video appears to show VanAtten buying something, using a card and putting a receipt in the grocery bag. Although previously released video showed he was holding a white grocery bag as he ran from the store, police have not said he had gone through checkout.

They have declined to say what crime was being investigated when the shooting happened, citing the ongoing investigation.

The city released video captured by police body cameras and a dash camera on May 5. Recordings of the initial 911 calls about a man with a gun were released on Friday.

In a Monday afternoon news release, East Lansing Police Chief Kim Johnson said the interior footage was released "as part of ELPD's ongoing commitment to transparency in this case and to accommodate a request made by the East Lansing Independent Police Oversight Commission."

In the videos, the faces of some store customers or employees were obscured to protect their privacy, he said. The videos can be viewed on the city's website.

After Raising $90 Million in 2020, Black Lives Matter Has $42 Million in Assets

From [HERE] In the tragic, whirlwind year of 2020, with racial-justice protests prompted by the killing of Black men and women by police officers, the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation raised $90 million, much of it small donations from rank-and-file supporters. A recent tax filing from the group shows that by the middle of last year, more than half of that money had been granted to smaller organizations or spent on consultants and real estate, leaving the foundation with $42 million in assets.

The foundation’s finances have been subjected to criticism both from participants in the Black Lives Matter movement and from their opponents. Many local groups that are part of the movement have called for more transparency and a greater role in making decisions, as well as more money for the organizations led by activists on the ground. At the same time, opponents of Black Lives Matter have tried to portray spending by one of the group’s founders as evidence of widespread mismanagement in a manner that appears intended to impugn the cause of racial justice as well as the group.

“No one expected the foundation to grow at this pace and to this scale,” Cicley Gay, chair of the board of directors, said in a statement on Tuesday. “Now, we are taking time to build efficient infrastructure to run the largest Black, abolitionist, philanthropic organization to ever exist in the United States.”

Ms. Gay was one of three new board members that the group announced last month. In an interview on Tuesday, Shalomyah Bowers, another new member of the board, said the picture painted by the documents shows an organization retooling for the long haul. [MORE]

Did Pfizer Commit Fraud in Its COVID Injection Research? Contrary to Its Claims, The Clinical Trials Failed to Demonstrate the Vaccine "Safes Lives" or that It is "Highly Effective"

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• In November 2021, Brook Jackson, a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID jab trial in the fall of 2020, warned she’d seen evidence of fraud in the trial

• With the release of Pfizer trial data — which they tried to withhold for 75 years — additional problems suggestive of fraud and data manipulation are coming to light

• Trial site 1231, located in Argentina, somehow managed to recruit 10% of the total trial participants, 4,501 in all, and they did so in just three weeks, and without a contract research organization — a feat that has many questioning whether fraud was committed

• The lead investigator for trial site 1231 is Dr. Fernando Polack, who also happens to be a consultant for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (RBPAC), a current adjunct professor at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee, an investigator for Fundación Infant, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation, and the first author of Pfizer’s paper, “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine,” published at the end of December 2021

• Site 1231 held a second enrollment session, given the designation of “site 4444.” The 4444 trial site data raise another red flag. It supposedly enrolled 1,275 patients in a single week, from September 22 through 27, 2020 — the last week that recruitment could take place to meet the data cutoff for the FDA meeting in December 2020. Was “site 4444” fabricating data to create the appearance that the jab was having an effect?

From [MERCOLA] In November 2021, Brook Jackson, a whistleblower who worked on Pfizer's Phase 3 COVID jab trial in the fall of 2020, warned she'd seen evidence of fraud in the trial.

Data were falsified, patients were unblinded, the company hired poorly trained people to administer the injections, and follow-up on reported side effects lagged way behind. The revelation was published in The British Medical Journal. In his November 2, 2021, report, investigative journalist Paul Thacker wrote:1

"Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer's pivotal COVID-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight ...

[F]or researchers who were testing Pfizer's vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety ... Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding."

Jackson, a former regional director of Ventavia Research Group, a research organization charged with testing Pfizer's COVID jab at several sites in Texas, repeatedly "informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient safety concerns and data integrity issues," Thacker wrote.

When her concerns were ignored, she finally called the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and filed a complaint via email. Jackson was fired later that day after just two weeks on the job. According to her separation letter, management decided she was "not a good fit" for the company after all.

She provided The BMJ with "dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings and emails" proving her concerns were valid, and according to Jackson, this was the first time she'd ever been fired in her 20-year career as a clinical research coordinator.

BMJ Report Censored

Disturbingly, social media actually censored this BMJ article and published pure falsehoods in an effort to "debunk" it. Mind you, the BMJ is one of the oldest and most respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world! The Facebook "fact check" was done by Lead Stories, a Facebook contractor, which claimed the BMJ "did NOT reveal disqualifying and ignored reports of flaws in Pfizer's" trials.2

In response, The BMJ slammed the fact check, calling it "inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible."3,4,5 In an open letter6 addressed to Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, The BMJ urged Zuckerberg to "act swiftly" to correct the erroneous fact check, review the processes that allowed it to occur in the first place, and "generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall." As noted by The BMJ in its letter, the Lead Stories' fact check:7

• Inaccurately referred to The BMJ as a "news blog"

• Failed to specify any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong

• Published the fact check on the Lead Stories' website under a URL that contains the phrase "hoax-alert"

Pfizer Trial Data Raises Suspicions of Fraud

Now, with the release of Pfizer trial data8 — which they tried to withhold for 75 years — internet sleuths are finding additional problems suggestive of fraud and data manipulation. May 9, 2022, a Twitter user named Jikkyleaks posted a series of tweets questioning data from Pfizer trial sites 1231 and 4444.9

Trial site 1231, located in Argentina, somehow managed to recruit 10% of the total trial participants, 4,501 in all, and they did so in just three weeks, and without a contract research organization (CRO). CROs like the Ventavia Research Group, which Jackson worked for, provide clinical trial management services. The lead investigator for trial site 1231 is Dr. Fernando Polack,10 who also happens to be:11

• A consultant for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (RBPAC) since 2017

• A current adjunct professor at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee

• An investigator for Fundación Infant,12 which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation13

• The first author of Pfizer's paper,14 "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine," published at the end of December 2021

As noted by Jikkyleaks, Polack "is literally the busiest doctor on the planet," because in addition to all those roles, he also managed to single-handedly enroll 4,500 patients in three weeks, which entails filling out some 250 pages of case report forms (CRFs) for each patient. That's about 1,125,000 pages total. (CRFs are documents used in clinical research to record standardized data from each patient, including adverse events.)

This recruitment also took place seven days a week, which is another red flag. "Weekend recruitment for a clinical trial would be odd. Staff are needed to fill out that many record forms (CRFs) and there are potential risks to the trial, so you need medical staff. It would be highly unusual," Jikkyleaks notes.

Is Polack just a super-humanly efficient trial investigator, or could this be evidence of fraud? As noted by Steve Kirsch in the featured video and an accompanying Substack article,15 Polack is the coordinator for a network of 26 hospitals in Argentina, so perhaps it's possible he could have recruited 57 patients per week per hospital, but it seems highly unlikely.

Questions Surround Site 4444 Data

Now, "site 4444" does not exist. It's actually the same as site 1231. It appears site 1231 held a second enrollment session, and these were for some reason given the designation of 4444. The 4444 trial site data raise another red flag.

Site 4444 (the second enrollment session for site 1231) supposedly enrolled 1,275 patients in a single week, from September 22 through 27, 2020, and the suspicious thing about that — aside from the speed — is the fact that this was the last week that recruitment could take place to meet the data cutoff for the FDA meeting in December 2020. Jikkyleads writes:16

"My guess: they needed enough numbers of 'positive PCR tests' in the placebo group to show a difference between groups for that VRBPAC meeting on the 10th Dec, and they didn't have them. So, site 4444 appeared and gave them their 'perfect' result. Bravo."

Kirsch notes:17

"Was there fraud in the Pfizer trial? Without a doubt. The story of Maddie de Garay is a clear case of that. Brook Jackson has evidence of fraud; she has 17 lawyers working for her. If there wasn't fraud, these lawyers wouldn't be wasting their time.

This new data on Site 1231/4444 looks suspicious to me. It looks too good to be true. But we can't make the call without more information. Undoubtedly, the mainstream media will not look into this, Pfizer will remain silent, and Polack will be unreachable for comment. The lack of transparency should be troubling to everyone. That is the one thing we can say for sure."

Pfizer Documents Reveal COVID Jab Dangers

Among the tens of thousands of Pfizer documents released by the FDA so far, we now also have clear evidence of harm. For nurse educator John Campbell, featured in the video above, these documents appear to have served as a "red pill,"18 waking him up to the possibility that the jabs may indeed be far more dangerous than anyone expected, including himself.

In the video, Campbell reviews the documents listed as "5.3.6. Postmarketing Experience," which were originally marked "confidential." They reveal that, cumulatively, through February 28, 2021, Pfizer received 42,086 adverse event reports, including 1,223 deaths.

To have 1,223 fatalities and 42,086 reports of injury in the first three months is a significant safety signal, especially when you consider that the 1976 swine flu vaccine was pulled after only 25 deaths.

As noted by Campbell, "It would have been good to know about this at the time, wouldn't it?" referring to the rollout of the jabs. Campbell has been fairly consistent in his support of the "safe and effective" vaccine narrative, but "This has just destroyed trust in authority," he said.

158,000 Recorded Side Effects — A World Record?

The first really large tranche of more than 10,000 Pfizer documents was released March 1, 2022. (You can find them all on PHMPT.org.19) In this batch were no less than nine single-space pages of "adverse events of special interest," listed in alphabetical order20 — 158,000 in all!

The first side effect on this shockingly exhaustive list is a rare condition known as 1p36 deleti

Black Man who Claimed He Spoke w/the Buffalo Killer for 2 Hrs the Day Before the Shooting about the "Beginning of Civilization” and “Critical Race Theory,” Forgot to Mention All That in this Interview

IMPEACHMENT BY SILENCE? In the above the alleged witness fails to mention that he talked with the “white supremacist” killer for 2 hours the day before “the massacre.” He seems to be covering every detail he can think of while talking to people who are asking him for every detail. Also, he is talking with the media at a time where the media is attempting to establish any important details. The alleged fact that he conversed with the killer for 2 hours (which he claims in the below video) , something that no one else did, should be paramount in his mind and all his conversations about this- ‘I spoke with a guy the day before he went on a murder spree’ - that is, if this were authentic and not the fabricated nonsense it appears to be. Watch the video below in which he describes the conversation with a different network and reporter.

Video of the Alleged Buffalo Supermarket Shooting Looks Like a Low Budget Government Production with Poor Special Effects (No Blood is Visible During "the Massacre")

UPDATED GO [HERE] - MORE VIDEO, NOT BLOCKED

ALSO [HERE]

VIDEOS REMOVED BY THE VESTED INTERESTS. Alleged unauthenticated “Buffalo Shooter Manifesto:” https://files.catbox.moe/jvis0p.pdf

Why would the government do something like this? FUNKTIONARY explains:

"Government" - Latinized Greek ("Gubematlo" = control; and from the Latin "menre" = mind; "The control of the mind." 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one's comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of "protecting" their victims.

The outworking of history consistently demonstrates that government will, in spite of the Bill of Rights, arrogate all power to itself eventually, if the people don't act to prevent it. You have rights alright, just don't get caught exercising them, O.K.? "Government" is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else.

Official "government" is disorganized, politicized; centralized; canonized and revered initiation of force, but it is no less initiation of force and coercion than any unofficial singular action of the same offensive or violent content. [MORE]

Since the Vaccine Rollout Natural Deaths of All Kinds are Higher. Excess Death is 48% higher between 1/21 and 2/22 compared to 2020. COVID Deaths are 74% Higher and non-COVID deaths are 10% higher

Statistician Joel Smalley explains: It turns out that natural deaths of all kinds post-vaccine are higher than pre-vaccine.

As you can see, all natural causes excess death is 48% higher between the start of 2021 and mid-Feb 2022 compared to 2020. COVID deaths are 74% higher and non-COVID deaths are 10% higher.

Sure, it’s a longer time period and yes, COVID didn’t really hit until March 2020. Even so, due to many reasons (already noted below), cumulative excess deaths should have started trending lower ages ago, especially if this “vaccine” is so damned effective, right??

Even if we take average weekly COVID deaths, they are 7% higher in the post-vax era. Effective?!?!

Anyway, it’s also important to highlight the ratio of non-COVID excess deaths to COVID deaths. Before we even get to how many COVID deaths really were due to COVID and not just incidental, we’re already at 40% in 2020 and 30% in 2021/22.

Given that there are near enough a thousand independent studies and reports showing the complete ineffectiveness of any COVID intervention, we can’t do the real cost/benefit analysis of collateral deaths relative to COVID deaths saved. Can’t divide into zero!

Well, I can reject my first two hypotheses based on analysis at the state level. Excess deaths post-vax are positively correlated with excess deaths pre-vax, statistically significantly too.

So, whatever is killing people since 2021 seems to have a somewhat similar demographic propensity IMO. In other words, if you were susceptible to die of COVID, you were equally susceptible to die of the 2021 pathogen.

Not only that, the excess deaths really only ramp up after the summer - half a million in less than the time it took to rack up the first 275k. It’s like they were triggered by some event.

Now, you know, of course, exactly where I’m going with this. Just like a broken record, so many roads keep leading us back to the *not* safe and *not* effective “vaccine”.

If you plot monthly percentage excess death against percentage vaccinated population for each state, you get a remarkably similar picture… [MORE]

Judge Approves $500k in Failure to Intervene Case. White CA Cop Struck a Latino Man 7X w/Metal Flashlight, Put Him in Sleeper Hold, Pointed a Gun @ His Head and Threatened His Life After Traffic Stop

From [HERE] A federal judge has approved a settlement forcing the city of Richmond to pay more than $500,000 to a man beaten by a deputy during a traffic stop.

U.S. Magistrate Alex Hse on Tuesday ruled in favor of plaintiff Ricardo Hernandez and against police officer Brandon Hodges. 

The civil judgment stems from what happened on May 5, 2018: Police believed that Hernandez had been riding in a stolen a car.

Contra Costa County Sheriff's Deputy Brandon Battles struck Hernandez several times with a flashlight and pointed a gun at his head. 

But Hernandez's lawyer, Fulvio Cajina, sued Hodges -- a Richmond police officer who was there that night -- for failing to intervene and stop Battles from using excessive force. 

"No one, including officers from Richmond PD did anything to stop him shows that they’re liable for this conduct," Cajina said in an earlier interview. 

Contra Costa County settled the same case for more than $260,000. 

Police use of force has been highly scrutinized across the county, but recently so have officers who fail to intervene or report excessive force incidents involving fellow officers.

New laws in numerous states now require law enforcement officers to step in when witnessing unnecessary actions or else they too may be held responsible for any harm caused to a person.

Republican Leader of Texas House Justice Reform Caucus says He Supports a Moratorium on Executions. Although TX is Only 12% Black, Its Death Row is 45% Black

From [HERE] Saying that recents events in Texas’ attempt to execute death-row prisoner Melissa Lucio had shaken his faith in the criminal legal system, an influential Republican state legislator has said that he would now support a moratorium on executions in the state. 

There are 199 people on Texas’ death row. 90 are Black, 52 are Latino, 53 are white and 4 are Asian. [MORE]

In an April 29, 2022 interview on WFAA-TV’s Inside Texas Politics with Jason Whitely, Representative Jeff Leach (pictured), co-chair of the Texas House of Representatives’ bi-partisan Criminal Justice Reform Caucus, said “every option [for death-penalty reform] will be on the table, every tool in the toolbox,” including potentially a moratorium on executions. 

Leach, who was one of the founding members of the reform caucus, was the driving force behind a bipartisan legislative effort that resulted in majorities of both the Texas House and Senate signing letters calling for the commutation Lucio’s sentence. On April 25, 2022, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals halted Lucio’s scheduled April 27th execution and directed a Cameron County trial court to hear evidence on claims that she may be innocent of charges that she murdered her two-year-old daughter and that her conviction was the product of prosecutorial misconduct and false testimony. In the Inside Texas Politics interview, Rep. Leach said: “We’ve got to look at every part of our system, and Melissa’s case, where the system failed her at every turn, is a great example of that.” 

A self-described “pro-life conservative,” Leach said that the near execution of Lucio without consideration of her strong claims of innocence “rocked” him and showed him that “it’s important going forward that we get this right for all other cases.”

One of the tools Leach said he intended to use would be legislative hearings at which “law enforcement and prosecutors and defense counsel and other legislators and experts” would be brought in to help the Texas legislature in “pursuing the right reforms.” He told WFAA reporter Jason Whitely that, after “going through what I just went through and seeing what I just saw” in Melissa Lucio’s case, he would support a moratorium on executions in Texas. 

“I am, again, a supporter of the death penalty in the most heinous cases. But that is contingent upon the system working, the system being trustworthy, fair and reliable, us ensuring beyond a shadow of a doubt the guilt of the inmate,” Leach said. “And right now, I am unsure of that. My trust in the system is shaky.” Leach told Whitely that he believes several other conservative, pro-death penalty legislators also would support a moratorium on executions.

Leach has been vocally advocating reforms in the Texas capital punishment system since the scheduled execution of Jeffrey Wood in 2016. Wood was convicted and sentenced to death under Texas’ “law of parties,” which makes a defendant liable for the acts and intent of all other people involved in a felony. The undisputed evidence showed that Wood neither killed anyone nor intended for anyone to be killed and, his supporters say, was not even aware the robbery in which a codefendant killed a store clerk was going to occur. At the time of Wood’s death warrant, Leach said, “I simply do not believe that Mr. Wood is deserving of the death sentence. I can’t sit quietly by and not say anything.” 

Wood’s case led Leach to sponsor a bill, which passed the House in 2021, that attempts to end death-penalty eligibility for felony accomplices who neither kill nor intended that a killing take place and were minor participants in the conduct that led to the death of the victim. That bill stalled in a Senate committee.

Leach also advocated to halt the scheduled execution of Rodney Reed in 2019. Pointing to Reed’s strong claims of innocence, Leach, along with the Criminal Justice Reform Caucus’ Democratic co-chair, Rep. Joe Moody and 24 other house members from both parties, drafted a legislative letter asking Texas Governor Greg Abbott to commute Reed’s sentence. In November 2019, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals halted Reed’s execution and ordered an innocence hearing. After the Texas state courts denied Reed access to DNA testing of crime-scene evidence and the lower federal courts refused to review the issue on procedural grounds, the U.S. States Supreme Court on April 25, 2022 granted Reed’s petition for writ of certiorari to address the question of when the time clock begins to run on a state prisoner’s federal civil rights lawsuit seeking access to DNA testing.

53 Burial Sites Found @ Native American Schools Run by US Govt that Used Identity-Altering methods. Kids Subjected to Renaming, Haircuts, Prevented from Using their Language or Cultural Practices

From [HERE] The United States Department of the Interior (DOI) Wednesday reported that it uncovered 53 marked or unmarked burial sites at federal Native American boarding schools. The investigation is a part of the ongoing Federal Indian Boarding School initiative, a government effort to address the dark history of federal Native American boarding schools.

From 1819 to 1969, the US operated Native American boarding schools across 37 states. The schools operated under a joint goal of cultural assimilation and territorial dispossession of Indigenous peoples by forced relocation. According to the report, schools were only listed as Native American boarding schools if they provided on-site housing or overnight lodging, provided formal academic or vocational training, received federal funds or support and operated before 1969. In accordance with those qualifications, the report discovered 408 schools, including 21 in Alaska and 7 in Hawaii. Over 1,000 additional federal and non-federal institutions were discovered as well, including Native American day schools, asylums, orphanages and stand-alone dormitories. Wednesday’s report marks the first time the US government has inventoried and mapped the location of these schools and publicized the results.

According to the report, the schools employed systematic militarized and identity-altering methodologies. Native American children were subjected to renaming and haircuts, prevented from using their native language or cultural practices and ordered to perform military drills and manual labor. Native American children who resisted these methodologies suffered punishment, including corporal punishment.

The report also detailed the discovery of Native American boarding school burial sites, which were discovered across approximately 53 different schools. Investigators found a total of 33 marked, 6 unmarked and 14 marked and unmarked burial sites. The DOI chose not to release locations of burial sites, citing concerns of grave-robbing and vandalism. Initial analysis indicates that 19 Native American boarding schools accounted for over 500 child deaths. DOI expects the number of burial sites and child deaths to rise.

The investigation is expected to continue with funding from Congress through at least the next year. Secretary Deb Haaland said she hopes the investigation gives a “voice to the survivors and descendants of federal Indian boarding school policies” and addresses “the lasting legacies of these policies so Indigenous peoples can continue to grow and heal.” Haaland is the first Native American to serve as a cabinet secretary. 

Black Man to Get $10M. 3 White NJ Cops Pounced on His Back as he Laid in the Street and Stepped on his Neck, Cracking it Audibly. Paralyzed for Life. Cops Claim He Injured Himself [like Freddie Gray]

From [HERE] A Black man paralyzed in a 2014 police encounter with 4 white cops will get $10 million in what might be the largest police brutality settlement in state history.

The county agreed to a settlement last week after years of litigation and a mistrial was declared on March 29 in Camden federal court, when a jury became deadlocked on whether the officers were responsible for Ingram's injuries.

After the mistrial, the judge presiding over the case asked the magistrate judge to intercede and mediate to determine whether the parties could agree to a settlement. The county made the settlement offer that was approved by both parties, bringing the case to a resolution, Ingram's attorney Beth Baldinger told CNN.

The lawsuit accused the officer of using unnecessary, unjustified, excessive force, and of violating Ingram's right to be free of unlawful and unreasonable seizure as protected under the Constitution. The lawsuit also accused Merck of failing to provide medical care as required by their training and failing to intervene, which resulted in the violation of Ingram's constitutional and civil rights.

The incident occurred on June 12, 2014, when Ingram encountered three white county police officers who were on foot patrol conducting a 'sweep' of an apartment complex, according to the lawsuit. Ingram was walking to a liquor store where he met up with a friend, the lawsuit says. When he exited the store with his friend, the lawsuit alleges, he was approached by officers Gennetta and Marchiafava.

Ingram ran into the parking lot of a restaurant while the two officers continued to pursue him, according to the lawsuit, and then ran out into the street and he fell on a rain-slicked street. He surrendered while laying down on the ground with his hands in front of him.

[At this point it is not clear what he was under arrest for. Flight alone is not a basis for arrest - at least in regards to white citizens in the free range prison. As such, it appears that the arrest is unlawful. Apparently, the cops later found out that he had an outstanding warrant for a driving violation.]

That's when a Camden County police officer stepped on his neck, cracking it audibly. The officers stomped on the back of Ingram's neck and back and then proceeding to "viciously strike him," according to the lawsuit. One of the officers "placed his boot on the back of Ingram's neck and intentionally stepped down forcefully," causing him excruciating pain as he screamed for the officers to stop, according to the lawsuit's allegations.

Ingram said he fell on his side and that when Officers Gennetta and Marchiafava caught up, one put a knee on his neck while the other kneeled on his back. They punched and kneed him, he said. Officers Ingram said Merck ran up and, moments later, stepped on his neck.

“I never felt this pain before. It was hurting bad. Two, three seconds later, I blacked out,” he said in his deposition. 

The injuries that left him a quadriplegic, and that police worsened his situation by mishandling him in the wake of his injury.

The officers also failed to provide medical care despite hearing him complain of extreme pain in his neck and was unable to feel his arms and legs. The officers observed Ingram's state but forcefully moved him and failed to stabilize his spine in violation of their emergency medical training, the lawsuit claims says.

One witness said police were “whooping his ass” as he lay on the ground. There are also at least four eyewitnesses who have described what they saw of Ingram’s arrest either to police or in court filings, according to a report completed by one of the plaintiff’s experts. Three witnesses said they saw Ingram being assaulted by police, the report said, while one said he didn’t see any blows but saw police push Ingram’s head and neck down “aggressively.”

Ingram, now 25, will live the rest of his life in a hospital bed at a rehabilitation facility, unable to move anything below his neck. He eats and breathes through tubes surgically implanted in his body. According to his criminal attorney, Robert Dunn of Morristown, “He’s a quadriplegic in a nursing home and right now there’s no chance of him ever improving,” Dunn said. “Unless there’s a medical breakthrough.”

Police denied wrongdoing, saying the Black man caused his own injuries when he fell. In other words they lied to the public.

Dr. James J. Yue, an orthopaedic surgeon in Connecticut, Dr. William D. Matuozzi of Maryland, who specializes in radiology, and Paul C. Ivancic, a spinal biomechanics researcher from Connecticut were prepared to testify for Ingram. 

All three said they believe his injuries — a damaged spinal cord, a displaced vertebrae, and other issues — are consistent with force being applied to the back and side of his neck as he lay on his stomach with his head turned to the right.

They said the force it would take to cause such a violent injury is inconsistent with a slip and fall, and the lack of head trauma or swelling means he did not hit his head hard.

Yue said he believes that the first officer’s knee on Ingram’s neck started the dislocation of the vertebrae and that the compression from Merck’s foot on his neck completed or worsened the dislocation and caused the spinal cord injury.

The two doctors also concluded that the officers’ moving and dropping Ingram, after he repeated that he couldn’t feel his legs, made his injuries worse.

They said the force it would take to cause such a violent injury is inconsistent with a slip and fall, and the lack of head trauma or swelling means he did not hit his head hard. [MORE]

Ingram’s lawsuit contends one officer jumped on his back and two officers punched and kicked him “as soon as he hit the ground.” 

The city man alleged he “was screaming that he could not breathe and that he could not feel his legs” when a supervising officer, Jeremy Merck, told him to ‘shut up,’ stepped on his neck, and … Ingram heard it crack,” according to Simandle’s ruling.

Ingram’s lawsuit alleges excessive force by Merck and two other officers, Nicholas Marchiafava and Antonio Genetta. Among other claims, it also contends the officers showed deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of a person in custody.

Dickerson alleges excessive force against a fourth officer, Nigel Shockley.

This was before Camden cops had body cameras, so the only video of the incident is from one of department’s “eye in the sky” cameras, operated by staff at the police station. The quality of the video is poor, other than a 10-second span when the camera operator zooms in to the scene, but then zooms out again. 

It shows the two officers crouching and moving over Ingram’s body, and Merck running up to join them.

Previously, when the court denied the white cop’s motion for immunity a judge disputed the defense claim that the surveillance video supported the officers’ actions against both men. Simandle said the video “is of such low quality that it cannot be used to definitively ascertain the amount of force” that police used in arresting both men.

The judge also said officers involved in the incident could not claim legal immunity for their actions, asserting a jury might find they had knowingly violated the men’s civil rights.

The settlement reached last week still needs approval from a federal judge.

"Based on the settlement, the county maintains, and continues to maintain, that no wrongdoing took place and is not liable for any of the actions and circumstances of the aforementioned incident," Camden County spokesperson Dan Keashen said in an email to abc7. The government never does anything wrong and is accountable to no one, unless It says so. "Based on the settlement the county maintains, and continues to maintain, that no wrong doing took place and is not liable for any of the actions and circumstances of the aforementioned incident,"