‘Hitler was OK’ to Coin Operative Candace Owens who will say Whatever the White Party Wants Her to Say for Sellout Treasures. Paid $40k for GOP Fundraisers Since May 2018

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Sambo - a self-loathing Negro lacking self-knowledge. "A willing slave gets upset if you refuse to acknowledge his or her master. Usually when people say 'act responsibly,' what they mean is: 'cowtow to the conforming lies we call truths.'" -George Battailles. The old saying still holds true: "The value of a dollar, will never, ever drop as low as the standards of some miseducated self-hating Negroes to obtain it." (See: Sniggers, Mentacide, Self-Hate & Slavery)

Black Conservative - a lost sheep in master's clothing. A black conservative typically has nothing of his own to conserve with the exception of his or her own double-consciousness. So-called "Black Conservatives" dodge the reality of their folly and posit is that what they truly are conserving is traditional "values" as if values ever had anything whatsoever to do with morality or ethics. A black conservative unknowingly preserves the differential power-relations and dynamics between those of African descent he and their bosses, the overruling overclass elite. A black conservative is a turncoat made of wooly hair with no one to turn to tie because when it comes to empowering his own people, his master will turn to him say: "Get your hat, your robe and coat and leave—you're still just a nigger Clarence!" (See: Sambo, Nigger, Somnamnesiac, Values, Status Quo, Strawboss, Double Consciousness, Overclass, Uncle Tom. Status-Quoticians & Assimilationism)

From [MediaMatters] and [MORE] Candace Owens, who recently said that Adolf Hitler would have been “fine” if he focused just on Germany, is heavily involved in the Republican fundraising circuit. The Turning Point USA (TPUSA) communications director and frequent Fox News guest is scheduled to do or has done a dozen GOP events since May 2018, and she has already received over $40,000 in speaking fees.

As BuzzFeed News reported, Owens claimed during a December launch event for Turning Point UK: "If Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine. The problem is that he wanted -- he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German, everybody to look a different way. That's not -- to me, that’s not nationalism. … I have no problems with nationalism." Owens was condemned for the remarks after video from the event was recently publicized.

Despite her comments, the Boulder County Republicans in Colorado hosted Owens as the keynote speaker for its annual fundraising dinner on February 9.

Owens’ commentary about Hitler is the latest problem for TPUSA. As The Daily Beast’s Will Sommer wrote, “Last October, members of a Turning Point chapter in Florida were revealed to be sharing racist memes in a group chat. In 2017, the New Yorker reported that a high-ranking TPUSA member once wrote ‘I hate blacks.’ Owens has frequently clashed with other conservative personalities, including Fox News’ Tomi Lahren. Rapper Kanye West, whose endorsement rocketed Owens to fame, eventually distanced himself from her in October.”

---

This sambo negro fails to understand that the holocaust was an episode of white supremacy. According to Hitler, Jewish people were not white people- they were an inferior race, an alien threat to racial (white) purity and community. In Nazi Germany (1933-1945}, a genocidal imperative was declared when the Semite and gypsy populations were classified as non-white and therefore were deemed worthy of destruction. Indeed, the word Semite is derived from the Latin prefix "semi," which means half. Semites were the products of the genetic mixture produced when white Greek and Roman soldiers invaded Africa and raped African women, who of course were Black. Semite means the same as mulatto [non-white]. Thus Jews were considered to be half Black and half white, or colored people to Hitler. [MORE]

The terms anti-Semite and anti-Semitism most fundamentally refer to a destructive ideological, psychological and behavioral state of "anti-color" waged by people who classify themselves as white against those who are classified as non-white, even when those non-whites have lost much of their skin coloration in some instances.

According to Hitler, because Jews were semi or not pure or half-white, they therefore had to be destroyed.[MORE] and [MORE]

---

Owens has also attacked the #MeToo movement. She’s claimed that the movement has “turned sexual assault into a trend and simultaneously drowned out the voices of real rape victims— who deserve to be heard” and that #MeToo is evidence of “how vicious and cunning women can be when they feel scorned.”

Media Matters previously reported that conservative media personalities such as Jeanine Pirro, Pete Hegseth, and Sebastian Gorka have cashed in by touring the GOP speaking circuit.

The following are Republican events that Owens is scheduled to speak at or has spoken at since May 2018, along with her speaking fees in 2018. (The speaking fees are accessible by searching government campaign finance databases.)

• Owens is scheduled to speak at a May 16 event for the Republican Committee of Lower Merion & Narberth in Pennsylvania.

• Owens is scheduled to speak at a May 10 event for the Snohomish County Republican Party in Washington state.

• Owens is scheduled to speak at a March 2 event for the Lincoln Reagan Gala Committee, which helps Republican organizations, in Virginia.  

• Owens spoke at a February 9 event for the Boulder County Republicans in Colorado.

• The Republican Committee of Chester County in Pennsylvania paid Owens $7,500 for speaking at an October 30, 2018, event.

• The Hernando County Republican Executive Committee in Florida paid Owens $7,500 for speaking at a September 29, 2018, event.  

• The Hawaii Republican Party paid Owens $7,500 for speaking at a September 20, 2018, event.

• The Alabama Republican Executive Committee paid Owens $5,000 for speaking at an August 24, 2018, event.

• The Stark County Republican Party in Ohio paid Owens $5,000 to speak at a July 30, 2018, event.

• The Republican Party of Arkansas paid Owens $5,000 for speaking at a July 21, 2018, event.

• Roger Allison’s unsuccessful congressional campaign in North Carolina paid Owens $7,043.80 for speaking at a July 20, 2018, event.

• The Bridgeport Republican Town Committee in Connecticut paid Owens $1,000 for speaking at a May 24, 2018, event.

[Demockery] Strawboss DC Mayor Continues to Do Things the Black Votary Didn’t Elect Her to Do: Plan to Take Local Gun Cases to Federal Court will Ensure More Blacks are Placed in Greater Confinement

BLACK FACES IN HIGH PLACES SUPPORTING THE CORPORATE POLICE STATE. ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

STRAW-BOSS - A SAMBO WHO IS APPOINTED A CERTAIN OVERSIGHT ROLE FOR THE WHITE POWER OVERSEER. IT IS THE JOB OF THE STRAW BOSS TO ESTABLISH A FORMAL ORGANIZATION TO EFFECTIVELY AND SYSTEMATICALLY CARRY OUT THE WISHES OF THE WHITE SUPREMACIST POWER MATRIX WHILE SERVING HIS OWN PERSONAL NEEDS AND ENDS THROUGH PATRONAGE POWER. 2) A RANKING SNIGGER. 3) TOBY. 4) "SAFE NEGRO." 5) RESPONSIBLE (TO THE WHITE SUPREMACIST IDEOLOGY) NEGRO. 6) THE GATEKEEPER FOR BLACK PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS GAINED THROUGH (ACQUIESCED) TO VARIOUS SEXUAL POSITIONS. 7) PORK CHOP BOY. (SEE SNIGGER & MCNEGRO)

WORKING FOR WHITEY. From [WashPost] D.C. police and federal agents will work closely together this year in a crackdown on convicted felons illegally carrying guns in the city, a law enforcement strategy prompted by a steep increase in homicides in 2018, officials said Wednesday.

The new approach — in which U.S. authorities will play a greater role in investigating local gun-possession offenses in the District — will involve prosecuting many “felon-in-possession” defendants in federal court rather than D.C. Superior Court, officials said. That could result in longer prison terms in some cases.

Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) and U.S. Attorney Jessie K. Liu of the District, appearing at a news briefing Wednesday, praised the plan, which Bowser attributed to Liu.

“Today the U.S. attorney briefed me on a new strategy her office has launched that will take more illegal gun cases [to federal court], specifically cases where a previously convicted felon is . . . arrested and charged with illegally possessing a gun,” Bowser said.

“I support the U.S. attorney’s strategy and believe it will send a clear message that violence will not be tolerated in the District,” the mayor added.

Earlier this week, after officials outlined the strategy to The Washington Post, speaking on the condition of anonymity ahead of Wednesday’s announcement, the head of the American Civil Liberties Union in the District criticized it as “reactionary,” suggesting it would aggravate the problem of mass incarceration.

As Bowser spoke Wednesday, she seemed aware of the criticism, which had been echoed by others. She began her remarks by pointing out that last week, she and D.C. Attorney General Karl A. Racine announced a $6 million investment in the District’s workforce development and violence prevention efforts.

“We know that guns have a devastating effect on families, neighborhoods and our entire city,” she said. “Reducing this violence requires an approach that’s not just specific to law enforcement, but also focused on human services and the community. And together we know that we will address every aspect of the problem we are experiencing.”

---

Driven to please her masters desires she is oblivious to reality. Violent crime in the District is down overall. [MORE]. The elite white media makes much of the fact that the year 2018 ended with 160 homicides on the books —a 38 percent increase from the previous year. [MORE] However, such statistics are taken out of context: the DC murder rate hit historic lows in 2017 with only 116 homicides. Yet this is nothing compared to what it was; in 1991 there were 482 murders and 443 and 454 murders respectively in 1992 and 1993. These numbers are on a substantial downward decline in general. See Chart below. 

But local racist suspect elites have white supremacy & Black inferiority to sell. As explained by Dr. Amos Wilson,

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image. The Black criminal is used to support the White American community's self-serving, self-justifying judgments of itself. White America's preoccupation with Black criminality betrays its own need for reassurance; betrays its own basic insecurity regarding its projected moral purity. Consequently, the higher the incidence of reported Black criminality, the more exceptionally righteous White America feels itself to be. The more righteous it feels itself to be the more intensely and guiltlessly it promulgates and justifies its domination and exploitation of African peoples at home and abroad. [MORE]

---

Liu said the FBI, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and other federal agencies “will be working closely” with D.C. police from start to finish on felon-in-possession cases.

She has previously described the shift and refocusing of federal law enforcement resources as a “homegrown” option that emerged in talks with D.C. authorities over how to combat escalating violence.

“This strategy will enable us to leverage local and federal law enforcement resources throughout the District from the ground level up,” she said Wednesday, “giving us an opportunity from the very start of a case to try to find out where these firearms are coming from, how they’re being used and what we can do to prevent further violence.”

In Superior Court, a defendant with a felony record who is convicted of illegal gun possession can be sentenced to up to 15 years, depending on the circumstances of the case. But many receive sentences in the one-to-three-year range, according to sentencing reports for D.C. Superior Court cases and attorneys.

Under the federal law dealing with felons in possession, defendants convicted in U.S. District Court are exposed to longer sentences, depending on the circumstances of their cases.

In 2018, there were 350 such gun cases filed in the District, but just 25 percent of them were charged as federal crimes. The city also recorded 160 homicides last year, an increase of about 40 percent over the 2017 total.

Asked whether the shift of cases to the federal court was meant to achieve longer prison terms, Bowser and Liu played down that aspect of the strategy. “Those cases will be prosecuted in federal court because we’re going to be working more closely with our federal partners, and that is typically where they bring their cases,” Liu said.

Bowser noted that case dockets are less crowded in federal court than in Superior Court.

“I think what we should be focused on is how quickly these cases can be brought, “ she said. “That protects the guilty and the not guilty. So the guilty are going to get their justice, and the not guilty are going to get a swift trial.”

Black Self Respect Continues to Drop in VA as 5 Negro Leaders Take a Stand to Forgive Ralph Northam & Pray He Won’t Lie About Posing as a Klansman or in Blackface in Photos Ever Again

html5 video converter by EasyHtml5Video.com v3.9.1

[leadership as performance] Yeah Tell Jesus to Give Him a Call. According to Dr. Blynd;

Negro - a man or woman of Afrikan descent living in pathological mental state of cultural abstinence and historical amnesia— one who wants to impress his or her oppressor while ignoring the effects and plight that his or her accommodationist posture inures. 2) a Hanky-head. 3) an indigenous-to-the-land (American) Afrikan who does everything in his or her power to suppress or pretend that he or she is other than someone of recent Afrikan descent. 4) ethnicity-denying, assimilated and confused Afrikans indigenous to America. 5) one who truly believes he or she is white American—masquerading in black face. Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's a Negro after all? (See: Snigger, Rentellectual, McNegro & Negropolitan)

Meanwhile Rev Al was not having it.

Federal Ct Finds Alabama to be “Deliberately Indifferent" to the Mental Health of Prisoners in Isolation, in Violation of the 8th Amendment Prohibition Against Cruel & Unusual Punishment

From [HERE] and [HERE] A federal court ruled Monday that Alabama’s prison system fails to adequately evaluate the mental health of inmates during isolation in segregation cells. The ruling was the latest development in the lawsuit, Braggs v. Dunn, that the SPLC and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program (ADAP) filed in June 2014. 

The treatment of the inmates is unconstitutional and violates the Eighth Amendment, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson wrote in a ruling that found the Alabama Department of Corrections to be “deliberately indifferent” to the treatment of the prisoners in isolation.

The court’s a 66-page decision released publicly Monday accompanies a 2017 ruling that found mental health care in Alabama’s prisons to be “horrendously inadequate.”

A federal court ruled Monday that Alabama’s prison system fails to adequately evaluate the mental health of inmates during isolation in segregation cells.

The treatment of the inmates is unconstitutional and violates the Eighth Amendment, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson wrote in a ruling that found the Alabama Department of Corrections to be “deliberately indifferent” to the treatment of the prisoners in isolation.

The court’s a 66-page decision released publicly Monday accompanies a 2017 ruling that found mental health care in Alabama’s prisons to be “horrendously inadequate.”

Thompson's scathing ruling — which calls ADOC's mental health evaluations "so cursory as not to be worth the paper they are written on" — comes days after the state acknowledged a spate of suicides in Alabama prisons. Thirteen people have died by suicides in Alabama prisons within the last 14 months, with six occurring since November 2018.

“It has been evident for years that ADOC has failed to identify, monitor, and properly care for people who have serious mental illnesses and who develop them in ADOC custody,” said Maria Morris, senior supervising attorney at the SPLC. “That systematic failure has led to needless suffering, especially for people in segregation. We are sorry ADOC didn’t do anything to remedy the situation during the last year and a half, as hundreds or thousands of men and women suffered in ADOC segregation units, and ultimately as 13 people took their own lives. We look forward to addressing the remedy with ADOC as soon as possible.”

The Alabama Disability Advocacy Program and the Southern Poverty Law Center brought the lawsuit, Braggs v. Dunn, in 2014 that led to the 2017 ruling and the new ruling Monday. The mental health care aspect of the lawsuit is only the first phase of the suit. A second phase of the suit concerning dental care will go to trial in late 2019 or early 2020. A third phase will follow and focus on medical care.

“It has been evident for years that ADOC has failed to identify, monitor, and properly care for people who have serious mental illnesses and who develop them in ADOC custody.  That systematic failure has led to needless suffering, especially for people in segregation,” said Maria Morris, senior supervising attorney at the SPLC. “We are only sorry ADOC didn’t do anything to remedy the situation during the last year and a half, as hundreds or thousands of men and women suffered in ADOC segregation units, and ultimately as 13 people took their own lives. We look forward to addressing the remedy with ADOC as soon as possible.”

The new ruling comes as Gov. Kay Ivey is considering a plan to reform Alabama’s prison system. In her State of the State Address, she called for an “Alabama solution” to an “Alabama problem.”

Former Gov. Robert Bentley tried to alleviate overcrowding and poor conditions in prisons by proposing a plan to build four new regional prisons to replace Alabama’s aging 15 correctional facilities. That plan failed two years in a row.

Last week, the SPLC called on the Legislature and Ivey to address the suicide crisis in Alabama’s prisons.

2 Black Men on Death-Row Set to be Murdered by Authoritarians in Georgia & Oklahoma Ask the Supreme Ct for New Trials b/c Racist Jurors Described Them as NGHRS & Racism "Infected their cases"

From [HERE] Georgia death-row prisoner Keith Tharpe (pictured, left below) and Oklahoma death-row prisoner Julius Jones (pictured, right below) are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to grant them new trials after evidence showed that white jurors who described the defendants with racist slurs participated in deciding their cases. The involvement of the racist jurors, the prisoners say, violated their Sixth Amendment rights to impartial juries. A juror in Tharpe’s trial gave a sworn affidavit years after voting to convict Tharpe, in which he wondered “if black people even have souls,” and said, “there are two types of black people: 1. Black folks and 2. N***rs." Tharpe, he wrote, “wasn’t in the ‘good’ black folks category in my book, should get the electric chair for what he did." In Jones’s case, a juror told Jones’s legal team that another juror had said the trial was “a waste of time” and “they should just take the n***r out and shoot him behind the jail.”

Tharpe and Jones argue that two 2017 Supreme Court decisions, Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado and Buck v. Davis, require the Court to reconsider their cases. In Buck, Chief Justice John Roberts declared for the Court that “the law punishes people for what they do, not who they are,” and overturned a death sentence imposed after a psychologist testified that Buck posed a greater risk of future dangerousness because he is black. The Chief Justice wrote that “discrimination on the basis of race, odious in all aspects, is especially pernicious in the administration of justice,” calling racism a “toxin[ that] can be deadly in small doses.” In Peña-Rodriguez, now-retired Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for a five-justice majority of the Court that courts may consider a juror’s statement showing he had relied on racial stereotypes to convict a defendant as evidence of a Sixth Amendment violation.

In January 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a federal appeals court’s refusal to consider Tharpe’s racial discrimination claim.  Less than three months later, that court again refused to consider the issue, saying Tharpe had not previously presented it to the state courts. Jones has also repeatedly sought review of claims that racial discrimination has infected his case. He previously asked the Court to overturn his death sentence based on the findings of a 2017 study that showed significant racial disparities in Oklahoma’s death sentencing practices. On January 22, 2019, after having rescheduled consideration of Jones’s appel 25 times, the Court declined to review the case. Samuel Spital, who was co-counsel in Buck’s case and is lead counsel on the brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund’s friend-of-the-court brief supporting Tharpe, said of Tharpe and Jones, “We know that these two men are facing execution at least in part because they’re black. Under those circumstances, the state just doesn’t have an interest in enforcing a death sentence, and for that reason, the procedural obstacles that you would have with respect to certain other claims should not be part of the analysis.” The cases are considered a bellwether of the post-Kennedy Court’s commitment to racial justice.

Body Cam Footage Shows White BSO Deputy Public Ruler Yelling at Black Man Calling Him "Boy" & Demanding Subservience Before Grabbing Him by the Throat while he is Holding an Infant

From [HERE] Deputy James Cady confronts Allen Floyd, an African-American father calmly holding his infant, angrily drops f-bombs and calls Floyd “boy” before appearing to grab Floyd by the throat.

Floyd wasn’t under investigation for any crime. Nor was he being belligerent towards Cady in the video from July 25, 2017.

Broward Public Defender Howard Finkelstein made the latter point in a Jan. 30 letter to newly appointed Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony.

“Deputy Cady’s verbal assault coupled with him choking an otherwise cooperative bystander can only be characterized as unlawful touching,” Finkelstein wrote. “In addition, Deputy Cady’s use of the term “boy” is offensive, condescending and demeaning. It carries racial connotations when used while addressing an adult black male.”

In the official report on the incident, Cady’s presence isn’t even noted, although the video shows he played a key role.

Tony’s response letter said, “Thank you for bringing this matter that occurred in July 2017 to my attention. A cursory search of our system shows that no complaint was made prior to receiving your letter.

“Our Division of Internal Affairs will provide you with a response upon conducting a thorough examination.”

“Our Division of Internal Affairs will provide you with a response upon conducting a thorough examination.”

The public defender’s office discovered the video in preparing to defend Johnnymae Dardy. The probable cause affidavit, filled out by BSO Deputy Debbra Bridgman, said Dardy had been watching Floyd’s baby when police encountered her at the Red Carpet Inn in Dania Beach. The Sun Sentinel said BSO had been called to the motel about Dardy, who had a room there.

The bodycam video picks up with Cady asking Floyd, who is holding his child and sitting on a curb, if he has a separate room at the motel. Then, Cady demands, three times, to see Floyd’s identification. Floyd shows Cady pictures on his phone, apparently to show he’s the child’s father, a gesture Cady disdains.

Finally, after Floyd shakes his head at Cady, Cady says, “OK, fine, I’m going to take her to jail because she’s got a warrant and I’m going to call child services on this kid!” When Floyd starts to say something, Cady says, “Quit f----- with me, boy! You hear me? Get your ID! Now!”

Bridgman’s voice chimes in, “ID!”

Dardy, who had been in a car, appears and Cady says, “Get your ass back in the car! I’m tired of you f----- playing games!”

As Cady angrily repeats his demand for Floyd’s identification, Floyd asks, “Why are you being so hostile?”

Cady answers, “Because you’re giving me s--- and I’m tired of it!”

Eventually Cady says, “I want to know who this baby is going with!” and Floyd replies, “He’s going with me, Allen Floyd.”

Floyd rises from the curb, still holding his child in his left arm. Cady steps toward him. Floyd turns to walk away and says, “Stop calling me ‘boy!’ ”

Cady grabs Floyd by the right arm while Bridgman grabs Floyd’s child from his left arm. Then, the video shows Cady’s left hand holding small papers that, along with Floyd’s torso, partially block the bodycam while his right hand is up in Floyd’s throat area.

When a fuller view is available again, Floyd’s saying, “I ain’t doin’ nothin’!” with his arms spread wide. Bridgman is holding the baby.

The probable cause affidavit, available on the Broward County Courts website under Case No. 17008749CF10A, doesn’t mention that Cady was among the deputies there. It doesn’t mention Floyd. It doesn’t mention why the deputies came to the Red Carpet Inn. Nor, when describing Dardy trying to grab the baby from Bridgman’s arms, does it mention how Bridgman came to be holding the child.

It does say, “While attempting to identify a child’s parent that was in Johnnymae Dardy’s custody when making contact with her, Johnnymae Dardy exited the vehicle and attempted to grab the baby from Deputy Bridgman’s arms, risking the safety of the baby.”

Gordon Weekes, executive chief assistant public defender, said that if a person answers a law enforcement officer with his name, as Floyd did several times, he’s identified himself. From that point, officers have many ways to verify identity.

Video Shows White Philly Cop Grabbing a Black Teenager’s Hair from Behind & Throwing Her Down to the Curb to Make False Arrest for Stolen Car - Charges Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence

From [HERE] Na-Sha Lockett was left shaken and traumatized after a male Philadelphia police officer yanked her by her hair, forcefully threw her onto a city street and used racial slurs during an arrest on Wednesday, said her attorney, Emeka Igwe.

Lockett, 18, also accused the officer of leaving her in a patrol car for hours with her hands cuffed behind her back outside a police district building, Igwe said. When police took Lockett out of the car, they put her in jail for the night.

Police charged Lockett with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, but the district attorney’s office declined to prosecute due to lack of evidence, said Ben Waxman, a spokesman for the office.

Lockett, who was released on Thursday, said in an email that she’s grateful to be alive.

“The encounter with the police officers was brutal!” Lockett said. “I felt scared, disrespected, humiliated and physically injured from head-to-toe.”

The confrontation between Lockett and police began between 3 and 4 p.m. Wednesday afternoon, when she was traveling with three other people in a vehicle in North Philadelphia, Igwe said.

The driver parked the car on the 2300 block of North Colorado Street, not far from Lockett’s home, Igwe said. The three other passengers got out of the car while Lockett remained sitting in the front passenger seat waiting for their return, Igwe said.

That was when police approached the parked car because the vehicle was reported as stolen, Igwe said. However, Igwe said, the car was not stolen and the driver had attempted to remove the car from the database in the past.

The police officer, who was in uniform, approached Lockett as she sat inside the car and ordered her to open the door, Igwe said.

When Lockett did not open the door, the officer opened the door, removed her from the vehicle, and put her in handcuffs, Igwe said. The officer never told Lockett why she was being detained, Igwe added.

A minute-long video of the encounter posted on YouTube shows Lockett standing with her hands cuffed behind her back and pressed up against the rear of the police vehicle by the unidentified officer.

In the video, Lockett can be seen yelling and cursing as she stood facing away from the officer, but she did not appear to be physically resisting the officer.

Lockett says, “I’m about to spit on you.”

The officer can be seen in the video grabbing Lockett’s hair, spinning her around and using a leg-sweep to get her onto the ground. Another officer can be seen in the video standing only a few inches away from Lockett and the first officer.

“Get off of me!” Lockett can be heard screaming while on the ground in the video.

Lockett did not spit at the officer, Igwe said, and her face was turned away from the officer when he yanked her hair.

Igwe said the officer used racial slurs during the arrest, including calling Lockett a “Black bastard” and a “Black b----.”

In the video, a female bystander can be seen walking up to Lockett and the officer on the ground, yelling, “Why are you on her like that?”

Lockett was receiving medical attention for a sprained neck, headaches and more, Igwe said.

“I don’t think there’s any way to sugarcoat it other than it was an assault on her by this Philadelphia police officer,” Igwe said.

Igwe called for a timely investigation into the incident and, if warranted, for charges to be filed against the officer. He added that Lockett was considering filing a lawsuit over the incident.

“An apology is not sufficient,” he said. “There needs to be consequences.”

Mark Kelly Tyler, senior pastor at Mother Bethel A.M.E. Church, said the brief video of the encounter was “extremely troubling” and appeared to be “a classic example of excessive force.” He believed race was a factor in the officer’s decision to use force, saying Blacks have a long history of abuse at the hands of police in Philadelphia.

“I couldn’t see him doing that to a white woman,” he said.

Random White Man Pounces On Black Man's Back While He is Held Down by 2 White Cops Making a Shoplifting Arrest [assault] in the Parking Lot of Walmart in Yorktown County

A Brown Watch. During Nazi Germany, German citizens functioned as an auxiliary police force; monitoring, arresting and watching Jews to assist Nazi police & soldiers with genocide. This "watch" of the Jews enabled Nazi control because Jews outnumbered the German police/soldier forces combined. Similar to Nazi Germany, with regard to non-whites, especially Black males, racist citizens [slaves] function as an auxiliary police & snitch force. [MORE]

Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained, “Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (the civilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation), all white peoples have the spoken or unspoken mandate to participate actively in their collective struggle for global white genetic survival. This specifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black and other non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to be necessary and, therefore, justified [MORE]

From [HERE] The York-Poquoson Sheriff's Office is responding to an arrest video gone viral.

In the video, a white citizen steps in to help deputies arresting a man at the Yorktown Walmart.

It's sparked controversy because in the process of the arrest, the suspect may have been put in harm's way as the citizen's knee is pressed down on the man.

The video that’s now been shared more than a thousand times was recorded by a woman named Dana Grey on February 1.

“Can he breathe? Can he breathe?" shouts Grey in the video.

Grey says she started recording when she noticed two police officers and a civilian pinning down a man in the Walmart parking lot. 
She says she saw they were all punching the man on the ground and she was concerned for his safety. 

"For crying out loud the guy was already on his stomach, why are you punching him? Why are you tasing him? Why do you need the assistance of a ... non law enforcement officer to help you apprehend this man?" asked Grey. 

Grey says she continued to record as the officers put the man in handcuffs, the civilian walked away, and medics arrived. 

"He has no affiliation with law enforcement, and that to me right there off bat is unwanted assault. The fact police officers would allow that to happen under their supervision. I really don't trust it,” she explained.

The York County Sheriff, Danny Diggs says the man who was arrested is 41-year-old Raymond Tyrone Ralph. 

Police say right before Grey started recording the incident, Ralph was wanted for a shoplift in progress. They say Ralph got just outside of Walmart with a tote full of stolen items when he ditched the cart and took off running. 

"He runs, jumps over a curb into a car, and falls down on the ground himself, so when we get to him he's already down on the ground and it's in between some cars, it's kind of a tight space."

Another gentleman comes up and says 'hey do you need some assistance because the suspect is actively resisting'" Diggs stated. Diggs says he's grateful to the white man who helped his deputies.

Police say Ralph is now facing obstruction of justice and 3rd offense shoplifting charges.

10 On Your Side viewed Walmart’s surveillance video, and one of the officer’s body camera footage. 

The sheriff’s office edited the surveillance footage inside the Walmart for time’s sake but showed us the complete body camera footage. 

Only one officer’s body camera was activated because the other didn’t turn it on properly. 

We confirmed the sheriff’s narrative, but did not hear the verbal exchange of the man asking permission to intervene. The full video is at this link.

White Alabama AG says White Cop who Fatally Shot Armed Black Man in the Back in Mall Reasonably but Mistakenly Believed he Posed “an Immediate Deadly Threat to Innocent Civilians" - No Charges Filed

RACIST SUSPECT Alabama Attorney General Steve MarshALL.

From [HERE] and [HERE] An unidentified white police officer who shot and killed a black man during a shootout inside an Alabama mall will not face criminal charges.

A report released by the state’s attorney general’s office says that the officer “reasonably exercised” his power when he shot Emantic “EJ” Fitzgerald Bradford Jr. three times. In the seconds-long chaos of that Thanksgiving night, the officer saw Bradford holding a gun, just feet away from a man who had just been shot. He saw the 21-year-old as “an immediate deadly threat to innocent civilians,” the report says, even though Bradford never fired his gun.

The 26-page report pieced together the rapid sequence of events that began with two gunshots just before 10 p.m. on Nov. 22, during early Black Friday shopping at the Galleria.

The announcement comes after months of investigation into the shooting, during which police repeatedly changed their story about what happened. Shortly after the shooting on November 22, police claimed that Bradford had shot at least one person at the Riverchase Galleria mall prior to the police shooting. But police later acknowledged that Bradford didn’t shoot anyone, and arrested another man for the initial shooting. [MORE]

Erron Brown, the man who police later said was the actual shooter, allegedly shot 18-year-old Brian Wilson on the mall’s second-floor walkway and left him lying outside a JC Penney store. Brown ran toward the store as mall shoppers scurried away. Bradford, who was nearby, ran in the opposite direction. But he then turned around and headed toward the JC Penney and Wilson, with his gun drawn, the report says. It states:

“The facts of this case demonstrate that Officer 1 reasonably exercised his official powers, duties, or functions when he shot E.J. Bradford. Officer 1 and his partner (“Officer 2”) were on duty in the Galleria when they heard two gunshots approximately 75 feet away.

Officers 1 and 2 immediately moved toward the gunshots. Within three seconds, they encountered E.J. Bradford, who held a firearm in a ready position, then charged forward:

Several persons were in Bradford’s path. Immediately before him, Brian Wilson lay on the ground, bleeding from his gunshot wounds, and 18-year-old (“AC”) stood over Wilson. Beyond them, Erron Brown (the initial shooter) and his companions were running into JC Penney, while several innocent bystanders were scrambling for cover:

Officer 1 identified E.J. Bradford as an immediate deadly threat to innocent civilians and thus shot Bradford to eliminate the threat.”

Witnesses told investigators that they heard the officer tell Bradford to drop his weapon. But the officer told investigators that he was unable to give verbal commands because of the “quickness of the event” and the “immediate threat” he believed Bradford posed, according to the report.

The report says that the officer mistakenly believed Bradford shot the victim “does not render his actions unreasonable,” the report says.

“First, a reasonable person could have assumed that the only person with a gun who was running toward the victim of a shooting that occurred just three seconds earlier fired the shots,” the report says, adding that the other officer and two other witnesses all said that, at that moment, they also believed Bradford was the shooter. The report states:

“Officer 1’s actions were reasonable under the circumstances and were consistent with his training and nationally-accepted standards for “active shooter” scenarios. Accordingly, Officer 1’s actions do not constitute a crime under Alabama law, see Ala. Code § 13A-3-22, and therefore should not be presented to a grand jury for potential criminal prosecution. See Rule 3.8(a), Alabama Rules for Professional Conduct.”

Bradford was licensed to carry a firearm, and it’s not illegal in Alabama to carry a gun in public.

Brown, 20, has been charged with attempted murder. His attorneys said he shot Wilson in self-defense, according to the report, which did not say how the two men knew each other. There has been no evidence that Bradford was involved in the shooting, and it remains unclear why he drew his gun.

The report also did not say whether he knew that the officers were behind him. Although the officer was wearing a body camera, he did not activate it before he shot Bradford. There was “no time” to do so, he told investigators.

Bradford’s parents and a family attorney said earlier that he had a concealed-handgun license. The officer, who was not named, was placed on administrative leave after the shooting, though it was not immediately clear if he has been reinstated. The Hoover Police Department have not responded to a request for comment Wednesday.

Bradford’s death last November reignited racial tensions in Alabama, where protesters marched through the Riverchase Galleria in the city of Hoover, demanding why police killed a black man who may not have had anything to do with the shooting.

Now, more than two months later, the decision to not charge the officer has renewed that outrage. On Tuesday evening, protesters outside Hoover City Hall burned American flags spray-painted with “BLACK LIVES DON’T MATTER,” as police officers watched from a short distance. Frank Matthews, one of the organizers, told the Associated Press that demonstrators, including Bradford’s relatives, will travel to Montgomery, Ala., on Wednesday to protest outside the office of Attorney General Steve Marshall.

On Tuesday evening, demonstrators burned two American flags outside Hoover City Hall as police nearby looked on. On the flags were spray painted the words "BLACK LIVES DON'T MATTER."

Demonstrator Carlos Chaverst Jr. told onlookers at the gathering, "His life burned. And now this American flag is going to burn to represent what it’s like to be black in America."An independent autopsy showed Bradford was struck three times from behind — in the head, neck and the back.

Crump said that race played a role in Bradford's death and that a civil lawsuit claiming wrongful death will be filed.

"All across America, you see this symbiotic relationship between prosecutors and law enforcement that when they kill unarmed people of color or they kill people of color who are posing no threats, and they shot first and ask questions later," Crump said.

President Yurugu Continues to Display His Patapathetic Fascination w/the Exploitation & Control of Nature and Genocide of Non-White People in Tweet Mocking the Trail of Tears [Weitko Disease]

The Trail of Tears was a series of forced relocations of Native Americans in the United States from their ancestral homelands in the Southeastern United States, to areas to the west (usually west of the Mississippi River) that had been designated as Indian Territory. The forced relocations were carried out by government authorities following the passage of the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The relocated peoples suffered from exposure, disease, and starvation while en route to their new designated reserve, and many died before reaching their destinations. The forced removals included members of the Cherokee, Muscogee (Creek), Seminole, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Ponca nations. The phrase "Trail of Tears" originates from a description of the removal of many Native American tribes, including the infamous Cherokee Nation relocation in 1838. [MORE]

According to "FUNKTIONARY, THE KEY HOLDERS ENPSYCHLOPEDIA:" 

Weitko Disease - the caucasian’s patapathetic fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man.

Yurugu - a mythological figure within the Dogon tribe (Africa) who is "the incomplete being" (fiend without a face) referring to Neuropeans (neurotic Europeans) within the European asili. 2) a regressive (degenerative) state of consciousness where the soul is cut off from itself. 3) the inability to recognize or abate unacknowledged destructive capabilities. Yurugu also expresses itself and manifests as the pathological condition that utterly fails to convince those in geographical proximity of its harmlessness, therefore has to kill them. Yurugu is in a vicious spiral increasingly at odds with his own humanity—as fragmented, pathological, and distorted as it is. (See: Asili, Caucasian, Racism White Supremacy, Elite, Western Civilization, Neuropean, WASP, Privilege, Oppression, Scarcity, Violence, Genocide, Manifest Density & Ma'afa)

Virginia Police Sergeant Suspended After Antifa Group Reveals His 'Explicit, Overt Ties to a White Nationalist Organization'

From [NYT] and [AntifaSH] A white police sergeant in Virginia who was assigned to monitor the protests related to Gov. Ralph Northam was suspended Wednesday after being identified by an anti-fascist group as having an “affinity with white nationalist groups.”

The sergeant, Robert A. Stamm, 36, “has been placed on paid administrative leave pending the results of a review,” the Virginia Division of Capitol Police said in a statement. Sergeant Stamm joined the division in 2014 and was promoted to his current rank last year, officials said.

“There is a review policy in place, and we will follow that policy,” Col. Anthony S. Pike, the division’s chief, said in the statement.

Reached by telephone on Wednesday night, Sergeant Stamm declined to comment.

The authorities said in the statement that they were “made aware” early Wednesday morning of a “possible violation of division policy” by Sergeant Stamm. A police official specified that the possible violation that prompted the suspension was outlined in a blog post published on Tuesday by Antifascist of the Seven Hills. The group describes itself as an organization that seeks “to fight fascists” in Richmond, Va., “as communists and anarchists united in militant opposition.”

In the blog post, the group published several pictures — apparently pulled from Sergeant Stamm’s social media accounts — of what it said was him with tattoos, flags and banners that it said were symbols and images associated with Nazis and white supremacists.

Prof. Brian Levin of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino, said some of the symbols could have “dual messages.” For instance, the Wolfsangel symbol — which resembles one of the tattoos — is a centuries-old insignia that was later used in Nazi Germany, according to the Anti-Defamation League.

“These symbols, whether Wolfsangel or others, embrace Nordic history and culture,” Professor Levin said. “A lot of this has been appropriated by modern-day white supremacists and neo-Nazis.”

The anti-fascist group said Sergeant Stamm came to its attention during the recent protests on the Capitol grounds during which people have demanded that Governor Northam resign over a racist photo in his medical school yearbook. Sergeant Stamm came to the attention of anti-fascists because he had a large Band-Aid covering his neck during one of the protests, the group said in its blog post. The police official confirmed that Sergeant Stamm had been assigned to patrol Virginia’s Executive Mansion at least twice in recent days.

The group also alleges that on Sergeant Stamm’s Facebook page — which, along with other social media accounts appears to have been deleted — he was “friends with a number of people who claim to be associated with the group Asatru Folk Assembly” and at one point earlier this year added a profile photo of himself with what the group said was the Asatru Folk Assembly logo overlaid on it.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has called the Asatru Folk Assembly “perhaps this country’s largest neo-Völkisch hate group.” Neo-Völkisch adherents, the Law Center says, are “spirituality premised on the survival of white Europeans and the preservation of dead or dying cultures they presume to embody” and “organized around ethnocentricity and archaic notions of gender.”

As recently as 2015, the F.B.I. foiled a plot by two men in the Richmond area who ascribed “to a white supremacy extremist version of the Asatru faith,” an F.B.I. agent wrote in a federal affidavit. The plot, the agent alleged, involved shooting or bombing black churches and Jewish synagogues and doing harm to a gun store owner.

In Venezuela, White Supremacy is Key to a Coup by Territorial Gangsters Pulling Puppetician Trump's Strings

Protesters outside the Bank of England on 2/8/19 asking the bank to release $ 2 billion in gold that belongs to Venezuala’s government.

Note: Palast covered Venezuela during the Chavez presidency for BBC Television Newsnight and The Guardian. Download, for free, the film of Palast’s BBC reports, “The Assassination of Hugo Chavez.” This article incorporates additional reporting by William Camacaro in Caracas.

 From [GREG PALAST] On January 23, right after a phone call from Donald Trump, Juan Guaido, former Speaker of Venezuela’s National Assembly, declared himself President. No voting. When you have official recognition from The Donald, who needs elections?

Say what?

I can explain what’s going on in Venezuela in three photos.

First, we have Juan Guaido, self-proclaimed (and Trump-proclaimed) president of the nation, with his wife and child, a photo prominently placed in The New York Times. 

Next to it, the class photo of Gauido’s party members in the National Assembly.  They appear, overwhelmingly, white as snow—

especially when compared to their political opposites in the third photo, the congress members who support the elected President Nicolas Maduro. The Maduro supporters are nearly all of a darker hue.

This is the story of Venezuela in black and white, the story not told in the New York Times nor the rest of our establishment media.  This year’s so-called popular uprising is, at its heart, a furious backlash of the whiter (and wealthier) Venezuelans against their replacement by the larger mestizo (mixed-race) poor.

Four centuries of white supremacy in Venezuela by those who identify their ancestors as European not tainted with Black or Indian blood came to an end with the 1998 election of Hugo Chavez.  The new racial color of power continues under Maduro, Chavez’ chosen successor.

Chavez:  "I am Negro e Indio"

In my interviews with Chavez for BBC beginning in 2002, he talked with humor about the fury of a white ruling class finding itself displaced by a man who was so visibly “Negro e Indio,” as he called himself.

In Venezuela, as in the USA, poverty and race are locked together.  Why did the mestizo poor love Chavez (and love is not too strong a word)?  As the US CIA’s surprisingly honest Fact Book states:

“Social investment in Venezuela during the Chavez administration reduced poverty from nearly 50% in 1999 to about 27% in 2011, increased school enrollment, substantially decreased infant and child mortality, and improved access to potable water and sanitation through social investment.”

But, just as Maduro took office, the price of oil began its collapse, and the vast social programs that oil had paid for were now supported by borrowing money and printing it, causing wild inflation.  The economic slide is now made impossibly worse because the Trump Administration cut off Venezuela from the oil sale proceeds from its biggest customer, the USA.  The UN rapporteur for Venezuela compared this to “medieval sieges, a crime against humanity.”

Everyone has been hurt economically, but the privileged class’ bank accounts have become nearly worthless.  So, knowing that the mestizo majority would not elect their Great White Hope Guaido, the ruling whites simply took to the streets – often armed. (And yes, both sides are armed.)

“Chavez, monkey!”

I’ve seen this movie before. When I look at today’s news reports of massive demonstrations against the so-called “dictatorship” of Venezuela’s left government, it looks awfully like 2002, when I was first in Caracas reporting for BBC Television.

Then, as now, The New York Times, NPR and other mainstream outlets in the US, reported on marches against the Chavez government, describing the tens of thousands of Venezuelans calling for Chavez’s removal. The light-skinned protesters were overwhelmingly wealthy—and they wanted you to know it. Many of the women marched in high heels, the men peacocking in business suits, proudly displayed in the uniforms of their privileged class. By contrast, the un-heeled Chavistas wore patriotic yellow, blue and red T-shirts, sneaks, jeans.

For the anti-Chavista protesters, race was an issue as much class economics.  When I marched alongside these opposition demonstrators, they shouted “Chavez, Monkey!” and worse.

You may not know this story of race war in Venezuela (and war is what it is), as the US press does not recognize its own racial bias.  In 2002, as today, the massive demonstrations of the whiter Venezuelans were reported as evidence that Chavez was wildly unpopular. Yet, the day after each anti-Chavez march, I would witness and film the pro-Chavez demonstrations that flooded Caracas with an ocean of nearly half a million marchers, dark and poor—that received little or no coverage in the US press.

The bias continues.  The New York Times did not run a photo of this past week’s pro-Maduro demonstrations.  But in hard-to-find photos and reports from my colleagues on the ground, the Chavista demonstrations are bigger, involving mass turnouts in several cities, not just wealthy neighborhoods in Caracas.

Why do the poor march for Maduro?  Even though the mestizo majority suffers today, they will not turn back to the pre-Chavez days of de facto apartheid.

Coup #2

And we must remember this is not the first time the US government has tried to overthrow the elected government in Venezuela.

In 2002, George W. Bush’s State Department cheer-led the coup. The plotters kidnapped Chavez and held him hostage. The coup was led by an oil industry leader and head of the Chamber of Commerce, Pedro Carmona, who had seized the nation’s White House, and, like Guaido today, declared himself president. Into my hidden microphone, Carmona told me proudly about the fancy inaugural ball held by the nation’s elite and attended by Bush’s ambassador.

But the Bush/Carmona coup collapsed when a million darker-skinned Venezuelans flooded the capital and forced the plotters to return their hero, the supposedly unpopular Chavez, to Miraflores, the Presidential Palace. “Presidente” Carmona fled.

Today, Guaido’s supporters, like Carmona’s, know they can’t win an election given the overwhelming fact of the newly empowered mestizo majority.  So Guaido has skipped the idea of an election altogether, simply replacing running for office with the “recognition” from Trump and allies which Guaido can’t get from Venezuelans.

Just like a Trump rally

When I see the images and hear the chants of the anti-Chavista demonstrators now, I’m also reminded of what I saw at a Trump rally in Macon, Georgia, this past November. The president slid out of Air Force One to tell the crowd—heavily weighted with white supremacists—that they needed to take back their country from those “invading” the border. Trump told them to fear gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, who is Black, saying she would “turn Georgia into Venezuela.”

I don’t think Trump was talking about Abrams’ program to bring universal health care to Georgia, as Chavez did for Venezuela.

The US press is quick to condemn the racial hatred on display at Trump rallies.  But I have yet to hear or read in the US press what our eyes can see in the three photos from Venezuela: an uprising of white people wanting to “take back their country.”  

A coup designed by the NSA

The putsch in Venezuela is carried out by the wealthy, internationally connected minority; but they are operating according to a regime-change plan designed in Washington John Bolton, Trump’s National Security Adviser, a neo-con re-tread.  The plan: to control Venezuela and its oil, as Bolton openly proclaims.

Ah, yes, the oil. It’s always the oil. And Venezuela has plenty to seize: the world’s largest reserves.

We’ll get to that in Part II.

Uncivilized Supreme Court Justices Denied a Black Man's Last Request to have a Muslim Imam Present Instead of a Christian Chaplain During His Murder by Alabama Authoritarians

From [DPIC] and [HERE] In a 5-4 vote that Justice Elena Kagan characterized as “profoundly wrong,” the U.S. Supreme Court on February 7, 2019 permitted Alabama to murder a Muslim death-row prisoner, Domineque Ray (pictured), who had claimed that the state’s execution process discriminated against him because of his religion. Without explanation, the Court asserted that Ray had waited too long to challenge a provision in Alabama’s execution protocol that made a Christian chaplain part of the state’s execution team and prohibited other religious advisors from being present in the execution chamber. Ray argued that Alabama’s practice constituted an establishment of religion that discriminated against non-Christians. During federal court hearings on the constitutionality of the policy, Alabama withdrew its requirement that the chaplain be present in the execution chamber. However, it continued to reject Ray’s request that his imam—a prison-approved spiritual advisor—be permitted in the execution chamber. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that Ray was likely to succeed on his religious discrimination claim, scheduled briefing in his case, and stayed his execution. The Supreme Court reversed, without addressing the constitutional issue.

Justice Kagan, joined by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor dissented. Quoting prior Supreme Court decisions, Kagan wrote, “‘The clearest command of the Establishment Clause is that one religious denomination cannot be officially preferred over another.’ But the State’s policy does just that. Under that policy, a Christian prisoner may have a minister of his own faith accompany him into the execution chamber to say his last rites. But if an inmate practices a different religion—whether Islam, Judaism, or any other—he may not die with a minister of his own faith by his side. That treatment goes against the Establishment Clause’s core principle of denominational neutrality.” In asserting that its execution process complied with constitutional guarantees of religious freedom, the Alabama Attorney General’s office told the federal courts: “Like any other inmate, Ray has been and will be given opportunities to speak with his spiritual adviser, including up to the moment that he is taken into the chamber.” However, Spencer Hahn, one of Ray’s lawyers, said the prison had failed to honor that promise and that Ray lost access to his imam three hours before the execution.

Ray was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a 15-year-old girl. No physical evidence linked him to the crimes and a sole prosecution witness, Marcus Owden, implicated Ray. In 2017, Ray’s appeal lawyers discovered for the first time that Owden—who avoided the death penalty by testifying against Ray—had schizophrenia and was suffering from delusions and auditory hallucinations when he accused Ray of the rape and murder and testified against him. Ray’s lawyers argued that the prosecution’s deliberate suppression of this evidence, despite being aware of Owden’s mental illness, violated Ray’s due process rights and entitled him to a new trial. Without comment, the Supreme Court declined to review the claim and denied a stay. Ray was the second person executed in the U.S. in 2019 and the first in Alabama.

Black Self Respect Hits Low in Virginia as 58% of Blacks say Northam Should Remain in Office After Lying About the Klansman Photo on His Profile Page in Elite Medical School’s Yearbook

constant complaining about SYMPTOMS OF RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY BY BLACKS while ignoring the reality of white supremacy is 'consistent with submission to and/or cooperation with' their own racist oppression. Dr. frances cress welsing stated,

"This behavior of submission to and cooperation with white supremacy is consistent with the illusion that there can be a complete integration of non-whites into the white supremacy system. In contrast to these modes of thought and action are actual resistance to and destruction of white supremacy as an absolute form of injustice. These latter forms of behavior require high levels of self- and group-respect and can be sustained only when there is the willingness to give one's life for the achievement of justice..." [MORE]

From [WashingtonPost] Virginians are deadlocked over whether Gov. Ralph Northam (D) should step down after the emergence of a photo on his 1984 medical school yearbook page depicting people in blackface and Ku Klux Klan garb, with African Americans saying by a wide margin that he should remain in office despite the offensive image, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll.

The poll, conducted Wednesday through Friday, finds residents split over Northam’s fate, with 47 percent wanting him to step down and 47 percent saying he should stay on. Northam counts higher support among black residents — who say he should remain in office by a margin of 58 percent to 37 percent — than among whites, who are more evenly divided.

Most remain undecided about a woman’s tabloid complaint that Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax (D) sexually assaulted her in 2004, with 65 percent saying they didn’t know enough to judge Fairfax’s denial of the accusation. [MORE] Although the statute of limitations has not expired, no criminal or civil case has been filed against Fairfax.

On February 1, 2019, images from Northam's medical school yearbook were published on the far-right conspiracy theorist website Big League Politics. The photos showed an image of an unidentified person in blackface and an unidentified person in a Ku Klux Klan hood on Northam's page in the yearbook. A spokesman for Eastern Virginia Medical School confirmed that the image appeared in its 1984 yearbook. Shortly after the news broke, Northam apologized for appearing in the photo and issued a statement saying,

“Earlier today, a website published a photograph of me from my 1984 medical school yearbook in a costume that is clearly racist and offensive. I am deeply sorry for the decision I made to appear as I did in this photo and for the hurt that decision caused then and now. This behavior is not in keeping with who I am today and the values I have fought for throughout my career in the military, in medicine, and in public service. But I want to be clear, I understand how this decision shakes Virginians’ faith in that commitment. I recognize that it will take time and serious effort to heal the damage this conduct has caused. I am ready to do that important work. The first step is to offer my sincerest apology and to state my absolute commitment to living up to the expectations Virginians set for me when they elected me to be their Governor.”

WHY LIE ABOUT IT? Prior to issuing his apology, Northam claimed that he had privately reacted in confusion to the photo and told several people that he did not believe that he was either of the men depicted in the photo. Early that evening, he claimed that he had also told Lieutenant Governor Justin Fairfax that although he had no recollection of the photo, he considered it a possibility that he was one of the two men depicted. According to The Washington Post, "two people familiar with the events of that evening" said that Northam "decided to take the blame" for the photo due to the pressure on him to issue a statement, even though at the time, Northam was still confused about the photo's origins. [MORE] After extreme backlash the racist suspect then said he does not believe he is either person in the racist photo that appeared in his 1984 yearbook but that he did once darken his face to resemble Michael Jackson during a dance contest in 1984. [MORE]

During the 30 years that followed Northam never took action to correct the publication that published a photo of a klansman and a white man in Blackface posing on his medical school profile page. As such, through subsequent inaction he ratified the photo and its symbolic validation of the system of racism white supremacy and his participation and/or support for it.

Too Scared to Confront Liar VA Governor, “Piece-Activist" Spike Lee Calls his Individual Consumer Choice to Not Purchase Gucci Products Over its Blackface Ad - “a Boycott"

From [HERE] Always trying to get his masters to do the right thing [as opposed to having no master at all], Spike Lee said he will no longer wear Prada or Gucci until the fashion houses "hire some black designers."

On the eve of his official initiation into the The Moteasuh Tribe [mo tea sir?] at the upcoming Oscars, the nominated director made the announcement via Instagram on Friday in light of the labels' blackface controversies. Prada received backlash less than two months ago for an accessories collection that featured a dark-colored monkey with bright red, oversized lips as a figurine, a racist caricature popularized during the Jim Crow era. Prada issued an apology and eventually pulled the design.

Gucci clearly didn't learn from Prada's ignorant mistake. On Wednesday, the Italian fashion label announced it would stop selling a black balaclava sweater that evoked blackface imagery. The piece featured an oversized collar that could be pulled over the wearer's mouth; the collar included a mouth slit that was framed with giant red lips.

"I, Spike Lee Of Sound Mind And Body Will No Longer Wear Prada Or Gucci Until They Hire Some Black Designers To Be In Da Room When It Happens," the filmmaker director wrote on Instagram. "It's Obvious To Da Peoples That They Don't Have A Clue When It Comes To Racist, Blackface Hateful Imagery. WAKE UP. Ya-Dig? [MORE]

Spike Lee's politics always involve an appeal to the moral suasion of racists. As discussed previously, other-directed SNigger Spike Lee is often showcased to confuse bigotry with racism. Recently he also worked as a paid consultant for the NYPD to create a propaganda campaign to sell Black people the lie - 'cops are not here to harm you but to protect you.' [As explained by FUNKTIONARY if you put money in a coin operated negro, he will spouse the view, ideas, thought forms, vision or ideology of the customer.’] Now, Spike is further expanding his usefulness to the system of racism white supremacy by using “boycott” interchangeably with what is nothing but his own individual consumer choice to not purchase certain products. In similar episodes we have seen the NAACP [Negro Anglo American Corporate Preserve] announce symbolic “boycotts” of “American Airlines” and the NFL - unorganized, token “efforts” that had no tangible impact on either business. His SNiggering comments about Gucci and racism during the ongoing controversy surrounding the racist suspect VA governor demonstrate his black cowardice and fear of confronting white supremacy and authority. As governor of Virginia, Ralph Northam is poised to do more actual harm [that is practice racism] against Black people than a maker of luxury fashion and leather goods. Black consumers probably account for less than 5% of the $1 Billion it annually generates in revenue. [MORE]

Paper chasing niggers fail to realize Black dollars matter. Rather than begging or trying to persuade racists to change a particular course of conduct, a successful boycott can force a change in the relationship between Blacks and elite racists.  In theory, a successful boycott can empower Blacks and simultaneously disempower strategically targeted elite whites and change the relations and structure of social power."

However, boycotts cannot be random or individual. Personal boycotts or symbolic boycotts are not boycotts. They are simply an individual consumer choice and have only a minimal, symbolic effect. This is more "protest" actually in cooperation with and submission to white supremacy/racism.  

Rather, a boycott is a collective, group effort to inflict some economic loss to compel the target to change its conduct. A boycott must be an actual organized campaign that directly communicates to Black consumers to mobilize their participation via social media & grassroots organizing in Black & Brown communities/organizations and then targets specific businesses.[MORE]. 

Lawsuit Seeking to Enjoin Georgia’s Electronic Voting [s]Election System b/c it ‘Creates an Unacceptable Risk that Ballots will Not be Counted’ is Allowed to Proceed by Appeals Court

IN PHOTO NEUROPEON BRIAN KEMP WHO STOLE THE GA GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION THROUGH VARIOUS METHODS OF UNDERCOUNTING BLACK VOTES.

From [HERE] A ruling by a federal appeals court in Atlanta clears the way for two lawsuits challenging Georgia's use of paperless electronic voting machines to move forward.

The lawsuits, filed by Georgia voters and an election integrity group, seek to bar Georgia from using the machines in future elections. In an opinion Thursday, a three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Court of Appeals did not rule on the merits of the case but rejected arguments that state officials have immunity from the suits.

The lawsuits argue that the touchscreen voting machines Georgia has used since 2002 are vulnerable to hacking and provide no way to confirm that votes have been recorded correctly because there's no paper trail. They sought in motions filed in August to force the state to use paper ballots in the November midterm election.

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg in September denied those requests, saying she worried it would be too chaotic or problematic to make the switch so close to the election. But she found that the Georgia voters and election integrity advocates who filed the suits had demonstrated "the threat of real harms to their constitutional interests."

Most importantly and beyond said midterm elections the plaintiffs are seeking declaratory relief and an injunction against enforcing this election system in future elections.

Plaintiffs are Georgia voters and a coalition group focused on secure elections. Essentially, Plaintiffs complained that Georgia’s election system creates an unacceptable risk that voters’ ballots will not be counted because hackers will intercept or modify them. More specifically, the State Election Board administers its Election Rule 183–1–12–.01, which requires voters to use electronic voting machines when casting ballots in person. In accordance with that rule, Georgia employs approximately 27,000 Direct Record Electronic (“DRE”) machines every Election Day. By contrast, the Georgia Election Code permits those who vote by mail to do so by paper ballot. Plaintiffs alleged that some experts have warned that DRE machines have “critical” vulnerabilities that make them more susceptible to hacking than other voting systems. One of those alleged vulnerabilities is that DRE machines do not produce a paper trail, which makes detecting hacking difficult. Additionally, Plaintiffs asserted that officials exacerbated security risks by leaving unsecured aspects of the state’s election infrastructure, such as a server that housed voter data.

Based upon those allegations, Plaintiffs brought state claims and two federal claims: (1) a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of due process by impinging on Plaintiffs’ voting rights and (2) a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Defendants violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection, based on the theory that Defendants treat those who vote in person differently than those who vote by mail because those who vote by mail can vote by paper ballot. Plaintiffs sought a court order declaring that Defendants violated the Fourteenth Amendment and an injunction prohibiting Defendants from using DREs. [MORE]

Totenberg also declined to dismiss claims against the Georgia secretary of state and state election board members, and the state appealed that rejection to the 11th Circuit, which was denied.

The Klansman & Blackface Medical School Photo "Mix-Up" that Ralph Northam Never Bothered to Correct, Ratified His Participation in the System of White Supremacy [All Racists are Liars]

A racist suspect is any white person who is capable of practicing racism against non-whites. In general, if a White person is able to be a Racist (White Supremacist), he or she may be one and should be presumed to be Racist. According to Neely Fuller, as long as white supremacy exists, every person classified as "white" should be suspected of being Racist (White Supremacist). [MORE]

All Racists are Liars b/c Racism is Carried out by Deception. Part of the deception is not knowing who the racists are.  From [HERE] Racist suspect Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam is the star of the saddest clownshow this week outside the Trump administration. Friday, Northam apologized for a blackface photo in his 1984 medical school yearbook, and then, in an utterly bizarre presser Saturday, denied it was a photo of him after all, and said he had no idea how the photo ended up on his yearbook page. To make matters worse, Northam acknowledged he actually DID wear blackface in a 1984 dance contest where he performed as Michael Jackson. [MORE]

With a straight face the racist suspects at Washington Post reported that the photo at the prestigious medical school may have been intended for another racist student: “The racist yearbook photo that could sink Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s career may have been mistakenly placed on his profile page — but even if it were put there intentionally, it’s unlikely that many students would have noticed, according to alumni who put together the publication or submitted pictures to it 35 years ago. [what kind of doctors did they create at this elite university?]

Dr. Giac Chan Nguyen-Tan, a physician practicing in Connecticut, remembers that a page he laid out for the 1984 Eastern Virginia Medical School yearbook was changed without his knowledge before publication.

“Could (the offensive photo) have been slipped in there? Absolutely,” he said, adding that he doesn’t remember laying out Northam’s page, which ended up including a photo of one person in blackface and another dressed in a Ku Klux Klan hood and robes.

Fellow yearbook staffer Dr. William Elwood disagrees. Elwood said he doubts any photos were mixed up — and he says it’s unlikely that someone could have pulled a prank because a limited number of people had keys to the yearbook room. He said he took his job seriously and received no complaints after the yearbook was published. The white supremacy bigotry mystery rolls on.

For years, each graduating student was given half a page in the yearbook to leave behind memories. Some inserted poetry. Others left reminiscences. There were photos submitted by the graduates, some heartwarming and others jarring in their insensitivity.

The half page that Northam was allotted in the yearbook includes three pictures, including one of him in a suit. A fourth photo shows a man in blackface standing next to a person in a full KKK costume. At a news conference Saturday, Northam remarked that a former, unidentified classmate told him she thought “numerous pages” of the yearbook had received the wrong photos. At the same time, however, Northam acknowledged that he wore blackface to imitate Michael Jackson at a dance contest in Texas decades ago.

The image was one of at least three blackface photos in the 1984 publication, which was reviewed by an Associated Press reporter. One of the others shows a man in blackface who is dressed up as a woman wearing a wig. A caption reads: “’Baby Love,’ who ever thought Diana Ross would make it to Medical School!” [MORE]

One photo featured a professor holding a mug that read: “We can’t get fired! Slaves have to be sold.”

And a male student grabbed a female mannequin’s breast in one picture with the caption, “I try never to divulge my true feelings while examining my patients!”

Racist suspect med students claimed that in 1984 they didn’t realize blackface was offensive. The NYT reports, “Some white students said that nothing seemed out of the ordinary when their white classmates wore blackface. It was typical at costume parties or at talent shows, said Dr. William Elwood, a retired family physician who is white and who graduated in 1984, the same year as Mr. Northam.

Dr. Elwood worked on the yearbook that year, laying out pages, he said. For their personal pages, students would submit their own photos to the staff, he said. The designers would lay them out on the page, he said, and mark where each photo was to be placed. The photos were then put into an envelope, which was attached to the page where they belonged and sent to the press to be printed.

Mr. Northam, after initially saying that he was in the offensive photograph on his page, has since said he was not and that he had not seen the photo before.

Mr. Elwood said he did not recall laying out Mr. Northam’s page. But he did recall the yearbook including a picture of three men dressed in wigs, dresses and blackface, pretending to be The Supremes, he said. It did not offend him and he did not think twice about whether the photo should have been in the yearbook, he said.

“It was done as part of a dress up, being somebody you’re not,” Dr. Elwood, 68, said. “It was not done as some kind of racial thing.”“

Dr. Blynd explained that "Racism is a virus in the mind.

According to Anon, there are different types of white people: 

There are whites who:

• are practicing racism against non-whites at a particular moment

• are not practicing racism at that moment but have practiced it at a previous time, or will practice it at a later time

• are not practicing racism at that moment, but say and do nothing to stop those who are

• are not practicing racism at that moment, but have no problem with other whites practicing racism (don’t care)

• are benefiting from the crime of racism even if they are not practicing racism at that moment

• refuse to tell WHO is practicing racism; HOW racism is being practiced; and refuse to help the victims with the information they have

• oppose racism by exposing and opposing whites who practice it [MORE]

"People who classify themselves as White, who wish to be taken seriously, and who are righteous and responsible, will only talk about ending White Supremacy (Racism) and replacing it with Justice." Dr. Frances Cress Welsing.

Proxymoronic Puppetican Trump Parrots Racist Dummy Sean Hannity in State of the Union Address to Believers in Agreed Upon Illusions

Media Matters reports President Dummy Trump’s 2019 State of the Union address sounded remarkably similar to the commentary aired on Sean Hannity's Fox News show. Above is a side-by-side comparison they complied.

As defined in FUNKTIONARY:

dummy - a wooden puppet or programmed dupe that only speaks when spoken through. 2) one seeming to act independently but in reality controlled by another. -Webster's Dictionary. I know it's hard for most people to imagine themselves as dummies, but the reality of our circumstances painfully underscore this sad fact. How else could it be that for eons, centuries, and even up to this day, that the elite few rule, fool, divide and terrorize the many? If we imagine that we are free, we won't ever suspect or imagine we are dummies. Seeming to be free and actually experiencing, i.e., load testing, your alleged freedom are two different things altogether. As long as we seem to be free (despite all the facts to the contrary), it is most trivial to be manipulated and conned into doing the will of another against your own vital interests. If and whenever one is willing to overcome denial and accept his or her apparently free condition as false or an abject delusion, then the strings of control that have been (mis)guiding you will begin to become noticeable or perhaps even felt. What part of you has been complicit in ''pulling the strings" of the puppet master as the fat lady sings another stanza from the star-spangled banter? (See: Politician, Borg, Zombie, Proxymoron, Jehovah's Witness Protection Program, Dummy Return, True Believer, Perceptions & Disciple)

FUNKTIONARY explains: “Throughout history many intelligent thinkers all around the world have tried to contemplate or design some way to have "government" and freedom too. Failing miserably and repeatedly to find one either in practice or in theory, it is time for intelligent human beings to give way to beings of higher consciousness using sagacity and sapience to finally realize that:.

1) "government" itself is a deadly mental contrivance and immanent threat to their freedom;

2) there is no way to prevent "government" from constantly increasing its power and eroding freedom;

3) "government" itself being a reification (deadly cartoon) will vanish when the illusion on which it rests dissipates. [MORE]