Over 80 US Aircraft Destroyed or Damaged in Unprovoked War with Iran, according to the Congressional Research Service

A report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service (CRS) has identified at least 81 American military aircraft reportedly lost or damaged during the American-led war effort against Iran since February 28. This includes 12 F-15E Strike Eagle fighters, seven KC-135 Stratotanker aerial refuelling aircraft and at least 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones. The report draws on media accounts, statements from the Department of Defense and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), and findings published by the Pentagon’s Inspector General. It provides an expanded accounting of the damage sustained by American aviation during the conflict, although the CRS cautions that its figures remain subject to revision and that some damaged aircraft may already have returned to service.

The reports stressed that uncertainties surrounding classified incidents, continuing military operations and the attribution of individual losses could affect the final tally. An earlier version of the report, published in May, listed 42 aircraft, with the increase reflecting the incorporation of additional incidents and new information rather than necessarily representing losses sustained entirely since that earlier assessment. The F-15E Strike Eagle accounts for 12 aircraft in the report. Three were destroyed over Kuwait on March 2, with Iraqi militias reported to have shot it down, while U.S. reports first indicated Kuwaiti Patriot air defences, and then a Kuwaiti F-18, were responsible as part of a friendly fire incident. Another was shot down over Iran on April 5. The remaining eight sustained damage during an Iranian strike on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan on September 9–10. [MORE]

Genocide Treated as Afterthought by Massa Media on Third Anniversary of October 7 “Attacks”

From [HERE] October 7 marked three years since the Hamas attacks on Israel that left some 1,200 people dead and 251 taken hostage. It also marks three years since Israel launched its genocide of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip with material and moral support from the United States, with an official death toll surpassing 74,000—including more than 20,000 children.

The official death toll is no doubt an underestimate, given the large number of missing and disappeared persons. (When Western corporate media outlets cite this toll, they often feel compelled to qualify it—e.g., as the BBC [10/7/26] had it, the “war between Israel and Hamas has killed more than 74,200 people in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, whose overall figures are seen as accurate by the UN”—lest, presumably, they be seen as taking Hamas’s word for it that the figure is so high.)

The killing spree continues in spite of an alleged ceasefire implemented last year, although the Jerusalem Post (10/5/26) charitably reckons that “less than 50%” of the casualties have been civilians.

The genocide was not, of course, a sudden violent outburst that came out of nowhere. Rather, it was a climax of genocidal momentum that had been building since the founding of the state of Israel in 1948, which was itself achieved via the destruction of some 530 Palestinian villages, the killing of 15,000 Palestinians, and the expulsion of three-quarters of a million more.

Now, three years later, the corporate media still can’t bring themselves to refer to the genocide of Palestinians as such—notwithstanding it being a pretty textbook case of the phenomenon. Predictably, then, the third anniversary of the commencement of mass slaughter and devastation in Gaza has been cast in corporate media as an afterthought to the anniversary of the Hamas attacks. [MORE]

Contrary to PropaGandhi’s FEAR ("false evidence appearing real"), Murders Committed with Firearms Declined 36% since the Supreme Court Ruling in Bruen (2022)

According to FUNKTIONARY:

PropaGandhi – passive social non-resistance propaganda. 2) obedience-based servitude to the enforcers of granfalloons uncommonly known as Corporate States and any other group-entities. Mahatma Gandhi mostly walked barefoot which produced calluses on his feet. He also had a very weird diet sprinkled with bouts of fasting which made him rather frail and suffer intermittently from halitosis—this made him… “A super callused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis.” (See: Poser, Class, Mass, Racism White Supremacy, Gun Control & Caste)

free State – any state of the Union that has legalized (acknowledged) the Right to Life, i.e., recognized the unalienable right for men and women to openly carry non-concealed firearms (for purposes of protecting their lives). (See: Gun Control)

gun control – using both hands. 2) actually hitting your target. 3) holding an instrument of persuasion with a good grip. You don’t shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive. Those who use guns to “break” (violate) the law will have no problem breaking the law to get guns (to commit violent crimes against you). The issue is not the laws, it’s the lawlessness. The drop in the overt crime rate in any geographic area or so-called “jurisdiction” is proportional to the number of permits of concealed handgun licensing issued in any particular “jurisdiction” across the country. This fact is reported in a study within the book More Guns, Less Crime by Dr. John R. Lott. Those who bend their guns into plowshares will plow for those who don’t. I don’t mean to alarm you, but the statists and fascists are trying to unarm you while the less respectable criminals are waiting to harm you. [MORE]

Gun control groups and anti-gun politicians warned that restoring the right to carry, ending ATF’s bump-stock ban and rolling back NFA restrictions would make America more dangerous. A new Second Amendment Foundation factsheet collects 85 of those statements–and places them beside crime figures showing murders falling sharply.

According to SAF’s compilation, estimated U.S. murders dropped approximately 36% between 2022 and 2025. The 2025 murder rate tied the FBI’s historical low. Texas and Florida recorded substantial murder-rate declines after adopting permitless carry. Even the broad mass-shooting count cited in the report fell after the Supreme Court struck down the bump-stock ban.

The October 2026 factsheet, The Bloodbath That Never Came, was prepared by Kostas Moros, SAF’s director of legal research and education. Its central question deserves an answer: Why should Americans keep surrendering constitutional rights to people whose sweeping predictions of disaster run against the crime trends that followed?

The estimated number of murders declined 9.1% in 2023, 13.7% in 2024 and 18.1% in 2025. From 2022 to 2025, the total fell from 21,923 to 14,085.

SAF describes the 2025 reduction as the fastest recorded decline in murders. It also reports a 9.3% reduction in violent crime that year, identifying it as the largest drop since FBI national estimates began in 1936. [MORE]]

The Only Thing TrumpStein Proved With his Staged ‘Ilhan Omar Raid Election-Event’ was that She Has a Much Smaller House than His and its Not Far from the Hood

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents on Monday searched the Washington DC-area home of US Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) as part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

While officials speaking on the condition of anonymity provided initial details to reporters, the Department of Justice (DOJ) subsequently confirmed in a statement to outlets that agents executed a “judicially authorized search warrant.” The action was swiftly denounced by House Democratic leadership in a joint press release as a targeted abuse of executive power, occurring just weeks before the November midterm elections.

While the supporting affidavit remains sealed, the execution of the warrant confirms that a federal magistrate judge determined there was probable cause to believe evidence of a federal crime was located at the premises. Federal authorities declined to provide additional details on the active probe beyond confirming its ongoing status.

The search follows prior public comments earlier this year by Vice President JD Vance regarding the congresswoman’s background and immigration history, in which he stated that the administration intended to investigate allegations to determine whether a formal review or prosecution was warranted. [MORE]

Is it False Flag Season? New Analysis Shows the Murder of “The Ukrainian Refugee Model” by "The Black Career Criminal" on the NC Train was Probably Done Using AI by Authorities and Massa Media

Analysis Shows the False Flag involving the “Ukrainian Refugee” and the "Black Career Criminal" on the Train in NC was Created by Gov/Media Using AI, Bad Special Effects and False Flaggots (Actors)

Police are Using Flock Cameras to Manufacture Probable Cause in Real Time: Video of the First Flock Search Ruled Unconstitutional by Federal Court

WATCH WHAT YOU SAY TO COPS ABOUT WHERE YOU’VE BEEN b/c THEY MAY ALREADY KNOW. From [HERE] Body camera footage obtained by 404 Media reveals the first Flock camera searches ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge, and highlights how the system has turned otherwise mundane traffic stops into interrogations for drivers.

On Friday, 404 Media reported that a federal judge ruled the use of license plate reader systems in the arrest of a woman named Melissa Kyle to be an “unconstitutional warrantless search,” “indiscriminate mass surveillance,” and a violation of the driver’s Fourth Amendment rights. The judge in that case ruled that, even though Kyle had more than 91 pounds of meth in her vehicle, the police had no justifiable reason to search Flock for her license plate and no reason to suspect that her travel as shown on Flock’s system was suspicious. Therefore, all of the evidence from Flock and the search of her vehicle must be thrown out. [MORE and full videos]

Mamdani Wants to Reform NYPD Use of Force but All Force Used Offensively is Evil, whether its done by Citizens or People Wearing Blue Uniforms. No One Has a Right to Rule Over Another Person

‘Reformers Get Reformed into the Shitstem.’ Mayor Zohran Mamdani said on Monday that the New York Police Department had reformed how it would handle parts of its oversight after an officer was allowed to retire before facing a disciplinary trial over the death of a teenager.

Mr. Mamdani also ordered the police to conduct a review of their use-of-force policies, which were central to an oversight board’s decision to recommend excessive force charges against the officer, Salvatore Alongi, in the death of the 19-year-old Win Rozario in 2024.

He announced a package of reforms aimed at strengthening civilian oversight, including new procedures to prevent officers from retiring before facing disciplinary proceedings.

In a press release issued by the Mayor’s office, Mamdani framed the move in direct terms. “When the government uses force against a New Yorker, the standard for accountability must be at its highest. Every New Yorker deserves to know that force will be used lawfully, carefully and only when necessary,” he said.

The review will take place over the coming months and include a community engagement process. The announcement came weeks after Officer Salvatore Alongi retired before a disciplinary trial by the Civilian Complaint Review Board could take place. Alongi was one of two officers involved in the 2024 fatal shooting of 19-year-old Win Rozario during a mental health crisis in Queens. The NYPD had failed to notify the board that Alongi was headed toward retirement.

Win’s family later filed a complaint against the City of New York, Alongi, and other NYPD police officers, stating that their “quick resort to force, repeated and loud shouting, and aggressive actions escalated and exacerbated the situation, making him fear for his life.” They also gave oral testimony ahead of the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB)’s vote to substantiate four misconduct allegations against each officer involved in his death.

Although Alongi avoided facing trial, the CCRB confirmed that the trial against the other officer, Matthew Cianfrocco, will proceed as planned. In 2025, New York Attorney General Letitia James’ Office of Special Investigation (OSI) released a report after examining the evidence in the case including body-worn cameras and recordings of 911 calls.

The office ultimately determined that no criminal charges would be brought against the police officers, as it found that a prosecutor could not disprove beyond a reasonable doubt that the officers’ actions fell within the scope of their duties.

Mayor Mamdani made it clear that this decision was in direct response to the incident, saying, “We have an obligation to Win’s family and to every New Yorker who calls for help in a moment of crisis.” [MORE] and [MORE]

To be clear, all persons have the natural, inalienable right to defend themselves and come to the defense of others if they believe another person is in imminent danger from an aggressor. Private security guards work under this natural law of self-defense. In contrast though, police officers and other representatives of authority have the additional “power” to act offensively as aggressors - to initiate unprovoked acts of violence against people whenever they deem it necessary to enforce law. As such, police are permitted to engage in conduct that “citizens” can never lawfully do, such as; stop individuals, touch them against their will, attack (make arrests) people, kill people, interfere with their freedoms in many ways (search interrogate, order etc), kidnap people (that is, ‘detain and transport’) or imprison them because higher authorities have empowered them to do so.

It is non-controversial to say that the legal system is entirely based on physical coercion or the use of physical force. “Laws” are threats backed by the ability and willingness of the government to use violence/force against those who disobey. Nearly all laws carry some punishment such as jail or a fine and all government orders carry some enforcement mechanism. Huemer explains ‘the legal system is anchored by a non-voluntary intervention, a harm that the state can impose regardless of the individual’s choices.’ An individual is perhaps “free” to; disobey a law, decline to pay a fine or ignore a command by police. But if the government chooses to enforce the law or its command, compliance is made mandatory by force – even if it means physically taking the money from the offender’s account or physically carrying him to the jail and dragging him to a cell. With regard to all governments worldwide who are believed to legitimately possess authority, regardless of type, function or characterization, said authority makes government the supreme authority over human affairs.

The problem, however, is that “authority” has no legitimate basis and rational basis to account for its existence; it is a granfalloon, mere belief.

Hypocritical Cops in Their Feelings after Citizen-Subjects Use Force Offensively by Hitting Them with Snowballs and Express Dissatisfaction with NYPD's Un-Declinable "Public Service" that is Provided thru Unprovoked Violence

Disturbing the Peace of the Masters in Public: Latino Man Discovers "His Rights" were Actually Just “Master’s Favors" - NYPD Public Relations Failure After Bullshit Stop

We are taught from birth that all governmental power purportedly comes from the people. That is, citizens delegate their individual power to the government for it to act on our behalf. The government is said to represent our collective will. However, individuals cannot delegate powers or rights that they do not individually possess to the government. Government is said to work much in the same way that an agent represents a principal in all kinds of business or other contractual relationships. For instance, a manager at McDonalds represents the franchise owner when she carries out his everyday business requests, like ordering inventory and hiring workers, etc. She is the agent and the owner is the principal who empowers and directs her work. Naturally, an agent only can possess whatever powers the principal gave to her. For instance, the McDonalds manager would not have the authority to sell the owner’s store unless the owner granted her such power. Similarly, the McDonalds manager could not have the power to do things that the franchise owner himself does not have the power to do - such as change the McDonalds logo to a black panther or use another business’ parking lot for its storage without the other businesses’ permission. An agent cannot have more power than the principal because all his/her power necessarily originated from the principal.

While individuals have the inalienable right to act in self-defense or to come to the defense of others, individuals do not have a right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence (use force offensively) on people and do not have a right to forcibly control other people. As explained, citizens cannot delegate rights they don’t have. As such, it is impossible for citizens to delegate to the government the power to use force offensively and the power to forcibly control other people. The government could not and did not derive its power to rule over people from individuals. Even if an individual voluntarily agreed to allow the government to use force offensively on him and be subject to its rulership, such an agreement would not empower the government to do the same to other people and similarly forcibly control them. Nevertheless, the government has somehow granted itself the power to do things that no individual citizen could ever do – rule or govern over people and forcibly control them to enforce laws that people are legally obligated to obey. [MORE]

Black Rolebot says, “No Charges” Against Detroit Cop Who Shot a Sprinting Black Teen in the Back. On Video Alonzo Lee-Perkins Never Turned Around as Cop Repeatedly Yells “I'm Bout to Shoot You Bitch"

“PUBLIC SERVICE" from SERVANTS or UNDECLINABLE GOVERNANCE BY PUBLIC MASTERS? From [HERE] Alonzo Lee-Perkins never turns around while a police officer chases him, gun out, yelling “I’m ‘bout to shoot you, b–ch,” repeatedly, Detroit police body camera video shows.

“B--ch, come here b--ch, I’m ‘bout to shoot you, I’m ‘bout to shoot you, I’m ‘bout to shoot you b–-ch, I’m ‘bout to shoot you, b–-ch, “I’m ‘bout to –” (Masss media censors the recording on behalf of its masters)

Then the officer does.

Officer David Gonzalez fires four times, hitting the 18-year-old in the back as he runs through a downtown parking lot before the June 22 Ford Fireworks event, Gonzalez’s body camera footage obtained by the Free Press shows. Lee-Perkins survived. While he was shot multiple times in the back, shoulder, and buttocks by a Detroit Police officer on June 22, 2026, he survived his injuries. 

Police have said Lee-Perkins’ hands made him look armed’ (??) and that Gonzalez fired because he feared for his safety and the safety of others. The footage, which hasn’t been released publicly until now, shows a teen running away, never turning toward the officer, with nothing appearing to be visible in his hands.

It’s the clearest look yet at a shooting that fueled protests in Detroit and prompted demands to make the video public. And it adds to a pattern the Free Press documented in a 2025 investigaton: stops over a suspected gun that turn into foot chases, then gunfire. In this case, the teen running away is now facing charges of carrying a concealed weapon, felony firearm, and resisting police. 

The officer who shot him has not been charged. He’s been back on full-duty since July 20, Detroit police said Monday in response to questions from the Free Press. Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy declined to press charges on Oct. 6 after reviewing a Michigan State Police investigation, her office said Monday.

“There was insufficient evidence to overcome the officer’s rights under the laws of self defense, defense of others, and apprehending fleeing felons,” she said in a statement to the Free Press.

However, Lee-Perkins has no criminal record.

Attorney Julie Hurwitz, who intends to represent Lee-Perkins in civil court once his criminal case concludes – and whom the Free Press obtained the video from – said it’s “outrageous that they are doing nothing to hold this officer accountable.”

And for Allison Kriger, Lee Perkins’ defense attorney on his criminal charges: “This is the most egregious police shooting of a civilian in recent memory.”

Kriger said Gonzalez’s actions were “entirely unnecessary, completely avoidable, and show a callous disregard for human life. He should be stripped of his badge and prosecuted.”

In response to a Free Press request for comment, Jasmin Barmore, the police department’s media director, said:

“Our officers are trained to assess the totality of the circumstances in every situation and make split-second decisions based on the facts and circumstances confronting them at that moment. Public safety remains paramount and our officers have a responsibility to protect the lives and safety of others.”

Ron Thomas, the vice president of the Detroit Police Officers Association, declined to comment on behalf of Gonzalez and the union.

“No one will be commenting on it," he said.

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

dummy – a wooden puppet or programmed dupe that only speaks when spoken through. 2) one seeming to act independently but in reality controlled by another. ~Webster’s Dictionary. I know it’s hard for most people to imagine themselves as dummies, but the reality of our circumstances painfully underscore this sad fact. How else could it be that for eons, centuries, and even up to this day, that the elite few rule, fool, divide and terrorize the many? If we imagine that we are free, we won’t ever suspect or imagine we are dummies. Seeming to be free and actually experiencing, i.e., load testing, your alleged freedom are two different things altogether. As long as we seem to be free (despite all the facts to the contrary), it is most trivial to be manipulated and conned into doing the will of another against your own vital interests. If and whenever one is willing to overcome denial and accept his or her apparently free condition as false or an abject delusion, then the strings of control that have been (mis)guiding you will begin to become noticeable or perhaps even felt. What part of you has been complicit in “pulling the strings” of the puppet master as the fat lady sings another stanza from the starspangled banter? (See: Politician, Borg, Zombie, Proxymoron, Jehovah’s Witness Protection Program, Dummy Return, True Believer, Perceptions & Disciple)

What led to Detroit police shooting before fireworks show

Gonzalez and his partner, Joseph Wafer, weren’t looking for Lee-Perkins that day. They had pulled into Cadillac Square to help another unit with an arrest of someone else. Then the 18-year-old walked away from that group and past their squad car, appearing to be holding something near his waistband, according to Detroit police.

Gonzalez told him to stop. Lee-Perkins ran. Thus, at the time he was shot the police did not have reasonable suspicion or probable cause that he had committed a crime.

A gun was recovered near where Lee-Perkins lay wounded, and he later told investigators he had one in his waistband. But the body camera footage doesn’t appear to show him holding a weapon, and it’s unclear in the video how the gun ended up on the ground.

Kriger, the defense attorney, says he never pulled it out or pointed it at officers. She argued during a July 31 hearing in 36th District Court that the stop was unlawful from the start – a hunch that someone has a weapon isn’t reasonable suspicion, she said.

Wafer, who testified in court about the chase, said under oath that he never saw a gun and said what Lee-Perkins was holding could have been a phone or a wallet.

Gonzalez invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, while prosecutors continued to maintain that Lee-Perkins’ hands suggested he was armed.

The video obtained by the Free Press begins mid-chase – Kriger questioned whether the police have more video. Lee-Perkins appears to have been shot after jumping over construction barrels. In the video, it appears he’s about to get away from Gonzalez when the officer shoots.

When Gonzalez approaches Lee-Perkins on the ground, an officer tells him to pick up the weapon – he does with bare hands – and then another officer reminds him not to pick it up. He drops it.

Then Gonzalez is briefly interviewed by an officer, and other cops come and leave the scene, the video shows.  Detroit Police Commander Matthew Fulgenzi of the downtown precinct gave Gonzalez a thumbs up when he arrived.

Kriger said she finds it surprising that the video she received from Gonzalez’s body camera footage begins mid-chase. 

Did Detroit police violate policy?

The footage and testimony from Gonzalez’s partner raise questions about whether the shooting followed Detroit police’s own rules, both in chasing Lee-Perkins and in firing.

Running on its own isn't enough reason to give chase under department policy. Officers are supposed to weigh the risks first, consider alternatives and promote de-escalation. 

The rules on shooting are stricter. Officers can’t fire to catch someone merely suspected of a crime, and according to their own training, just because they have a gun. 

Deadly force against someone who is fleeing is reserved for a short list of violent felonies, such as murder and armed robbery, and only if the officer believes the person would be a deadly threat. Officers can’t shoot if bystanders are in danger.

Carrying a concealed weapon isn’t on the list. And Gonzalez fired in downtown Detroit as crowds gathered for one of the biggest nights of the year.

Detroit police’s use-of-force policy warns against that instinct, citing research that finds an officer’s urge to keep pushing forward instead of backing off is among the most common factors in excessive force. Often, the policy says, the better move is to disengage, contain the area or call for backup.

“Research indicates that one of the most common factors found in both police excessive or unjustified use of force, and officer injuries and fatalities during force encounters, is an officer’s perceived compulsion to press forward rather than to disengage (e.g., “back off”) and explore other options,” the policy reads.

“The most appropriate response choice to a situation often involves de-escalation, disengagement, area containment, surveillance, waiting out a subject, summoning reinforcements, or calling in specialized commands.”

A 2025 Free Press investigation found that 20% of Detroit police shootings over the past decade began as nonviolent stops, often for suspected gun possession, that turned into foot chases.

Click here to watch a longer version of the police body camera video on the YouTube channel of the Detroit Free Press.

Full statement from Massa via DUMMY Kym Worthy

Here is the full statement from Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy about why she declined to prosecute the officer:

"A warrant request was submitted related to an officer involved shooting that occurred on June 22, 2026, at 6:30 p.m., the same day of the annual Detroit fireworks. Detroit Police Officers approached a group of individuals who were walking around Bates and Farmer St. in Downtown Detroit. The shooting occurred after Mr. Alonzo Lee-Perkins fled an investigatory stop initiated by other officers while he was armed with a gun. On October 6, 2026, after WCPO reviewed the Michigan State Police-led investigation into matter, it was determined there was insufficient evidence to overcome the officer’s rights under the laws of self defense, defense of others, and apprehending fleeing felons."

The Only Person Convicted after Baltimore Cops Murdered Freddie Gray was the DA: Elite Whites 'Kaepernicked' Marilyn Mosby's Career and Supreme Ct won’t Hear Her Perjury Appeal in Latest Setback

Prosecution is about Locking Up Blacks Not Prosecuting Cops Who Murder Black People: Gullible Black DA who Tried to Get Justice for Freddy Gray is Now Jobless and On House Arrest for Victimless Crime

Only 5% Black: Legal System Excludes Black Attorneys & Filters Out Those who Refuse to Fulfill Complimentary Roles in the Lex-icon & System of White Supremacy

LAW ONLY AS AN ENEMY TO BLACKS. From [HERE] The U.S. Supreme Court refused to take up former Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby‘s appeal of her perjury convictions as the high court began its new nine-month term.

Mosby, 46, had filed a petition with the court after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the former prosecutor’s perjury convictions, vacated her mortgage fraud conviction and declined to hear the matter again.

Maryland Federal Public Defender James Wyda, who represented Mosby, declined to comment Monday, as did a spokesperson for the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office.

In a statement, Mosby said that she was “deeply disappointed” by the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case but “not surprised.”

“The political implications surrounding my case have been evident from the beginning,” she said, adding that she was “unjustly and politically targeted” for prosecution.

At the end of her second term as state’s attorney, Mosby was charged with federal perjury and mortgage fraud offenses stemming from two withdrawals from her retirement account and purchase of two Florida homes. The Democratic prosecutor was found to have obtained favorable tax terms on retirement withdrawals by falsely certifying that the coronavirus pandemic caused her to suffer “adverse financial consequences” and made a false statement on a mortgage application.

She was ultimately convicted of two counts of perjury and one of mortgage fraud after two trials. The Fourth Circuit overturned the mortgage fraud verdict on the grounds that prosecutors had not properly established Maryland as the proper venue.

The Rewards and Punishments of White Supremacy: Black Cop Once Charged in Freddie Gray Case Gets Promoted

In her petition to the nation’s highest court for a writ of certiorari, Mosby’s attorneys argued that the language on the withdrawal forms that led to her perjury convictions was “fundamentally ambiguous” and that reasonable people confronted with the phrase “adverse financial consequences” could have understood the term differently. The Fourth Circuit found that the term was “adequately clear”; Mosby’s petition argued that it was only defined at her trial, years after she made the retirement withdrawals.

“A Supreme Court denial does not transform an unprecedented prosecution into a just one, nor does it answer the serious questions about fairness, consistency, and equal treatment that this case has exposed,” Mosby said.

Since her 2022 indictment, Mosby has argued that she was unfairly targeted for prosecution, calling the investigation a “crusade” to ruin her political career as retribution for disrupting the status quo. Mosby received national attention when her office pursued criminal charges against the Baltimore Police officers involved in Freddie Gray’s in-custody death, shortly after she was elected.

She sought a pardon from then-President Joe Biden after her convictions, an effort backed by the NAACP and other civil rights organizations. In a joint letter to Biden, the groups cited Mosby’s status as a “model for progressive prosecutors” as the reason federal officials pursued charges during Donald Trump‘s first presidency.

“What remains deeply troubling is that I am, to this day, the only person convicted under a provision of a vague statute that has never been legally defined by either the IRS or Congress,” she said Monday. Mosby said she “unequivocally” stands by her innocence.

Despite her convictions, Mosby’s law license is still active. After she was convicted, the Maryland Supreme Court ordered a pause to Attorney Grievance Commission proceedings against her during the course of her appeals. She said Monday that she would “continue every available legal avenue to protect my law license, defend my reputation, and ensure that my case is not the final word on what justice looks like.”

Racism White Supremacy and Authority are the Unofficial Causes of Death for Curtis Flowers (Age 56): White DA Falsely Prosecuted Him 6X for Murder, Removed All Black Jurors in Bullshit Trials

Doug Evans, the racist suspect DA who Falsely Prosecuted Curtis Flowers 6X for Murder and Routinely Removed Black Jurors b/c They were Black, Loses Election for Judgeship

Curtis Flowers, a Black man whose six trials in the same Mississippi murder case became a national symbol of racial bias in jury selection, leading the Supreme Court to reverse his capital conviction in 2019, died at home this week in Winona, Miss. He was 56.

His sister Priscilla Flowers-Ward said he had been suffering from advanced diabetes, and that the family was awaiting an autopsy to identify the cause of death.

Curtis Flowers was transferred off death row in Parchman prison in Mississippi and released in December 2019, after nearly 23 years behind bars. His release followed the Supreme Court’s ruling that Black people had been unconstitutionally excluded from the jury in his sixth trial.

In the 7-2 majority opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that the state of Mississippi had pursued a “relentless, determined effort to rid the jury of Black individuals.”

Mr. Flowers was convicted in that trial of killing four people in 1996 at a furniture store where he had once worked in Winona, a small city in central Mississippi.

The white district attorney, Doug Evans, who tried all of Mr. Flowers’ six cases, spent two decades employing the same tactic: ensuring that few or no Black residents in the majority-Black county were seated on Mr. Flowers’ juries.

Across the half-dozen trials, 61 of the 72 jurors were white. Two of the prosecutions ended in mistrials, and four in convictions that were overturned on appeal.

Mr. Flowers’ ordeal gained broader attention through a 2018 podcast, In the Dark, which identified holes in the prosecution’s case. One witness who had testified at four of Mr. Flowers’ trials, and who had said that Mr. Flowers had confessed to the crime in jail, recanted to the podcast reporters. [MORE]

After a License Plate Traffic Stop, Attorney says Milwaukee Cops Screamed at a Black Man when He Told Them He Lawfully Possessed a Firearm. 3 White Cops Then Beat Him in the Street, Causing Injury

Police In Liberal Cities Continue to Dominate Blacks With Bullshit Traffic Stops & Gun Possession Arrests. A Black man’s family is calling for accountability after they said Milwaukee police used excessive force during an arrest.

According to civil rights attorney B'Ivory LaMarr, 24-year-old Nicholas Beamon was struck multiple times in the head during an arrest on Oct. 8. He said Beamon has severe injuries.

"What we've seen on this video is just appalling. I believe that this was a clear abuse of force. I believe that the force was excessive. I believe it was unconstitutional," LaMarr said. "He has been to the emergency room twice, and that he will be following up with specialists as it relates to what he succumbed to back on Oct. 8."

Milwaukee police said they initially pulled the vehicle over for a "license plate violation" near Palmer Street and Keefe Avenue just before 6:30 p.m. on Oct. 8.

Police claimed, in an email to WISN 12 News, two of the vehicle's passengers (not the driver) who were both female were uncooperative and refused to identify themselves. Police also said Beamon had a firearm in his front sweatshirt pocket and "officers attempted to engage in dialogue with that subject to advise him that he was being detained for the safety of the officers on scene."

LaMarr said Beamon had the gun legally and alerted police he had the firearm.

"It's my understanding that Nicholas declared to the officers that he did have the firearm," LaMarr said. "He's the one that told them, which their response was, they started screaming about a firearm."

In video obtained by WISN 12 News, you can see an officer searching the front pockets of Beamon's sweatshirt as Beamon begins to turn. Seconds later is when Beamon and the officers are on the ground and a third officer appears to strike him repeatedly.

Police said any charges for the three individuals taken into custody will be referred to the district attorney.

LaMarr said the use of force in this situation was unjustified.

"Obviously this family seeks accountability. You know, the police department often speaks immediately following many situations that occur in the city. And we would expect the same in this situation," LaMarr said. "We would expect that the body camera footage be released immediately. I don't see that there's any reason to delay the entirety of the body camera footage to be released. I think that will provide a quick assessment as to really what took place as it relates to bringing the occupants out of this vehicle. We think that what happened here was excessive; it was unconstitutional."

For Every Dollar Earned by White Workers, Black Workers Earn 74 Cents

‍From LISEP Using data compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), we calculate the median earnings of everyone who is employed or actively seeking employment. Thus, we take the median earnings of the whole U.S. labor force as defined by the BLS.

By comparison, the BLS headline numbers only include those who are employed at full-time jobs. Thus, if a low-income worker moves from full time to part time, or becomes unemployed, the BLS metric will report that earnings have risen, giving a false sense that earnings are getting better. TWE, on the other hand, gives policymakers access to a more comprehensive indicator of how the job market is performing as a whole.

Note: Both LISEP and BLS exclude the self-employed from their sample for measurement reasons.
For a more in-depth explanation of True Weekly Earnings, please reference LISEP’s TWE white paper.

Investigation Underway after 2 Santa Ana Cops Caught on Camera Beating a Defenseless Latino Man in Unprovoked Attack in Front of His Home

Santa Ana city officials have ordered an external probe of two police officers who are shown in a video circulating on social media throwing a suspect to the ground and beating him.

During a Tuesday night City Council meeting, Mayor Valerie Amezcua said the council voted during a nearly two-hour closed-door session to engage an independent investigator to review the officers’ body camera footage. If the investigation determines the officers caused the suspect, 28-year-old Florentino Junior Lopez, great bodily injury as a result of use of force, the city will release the names of the officers and the related camera audio and video.

The occasionally shaky video posted on social media shows the officers holding Lopez against the hood of a police car.

“All of the sudden, things got out of control,” said Lopez’s attorney, John Kremer.

The footage was captured by Lopez’s younger sister who was outside with her brother smoking on their front lawn Thursday night when the two officers arrived and summoned Lopez out into the street.

After Lopez says something to the officers, he is yanked to the ground and punched repeatedly. The incident ended when two other officers arrived to restore order, at which point Lopez was handcuffed, Kremer said Monday evening.

During the Tuesday night meeting, several council members publicly apologized to Lopez and his family for the incident.

“No member of the Santa Ana community should be brutalized by a police officer,” said Councilmember Johnathan Ryan Hernandez. [MORE]

Amazon Settles Lawsuit Over Slower Deliveries and Delivery Exclusion to Black Neighborhoods in DC

From [HERE] Amazon Prime customers who experienced slower deliveries because they lived in neighborhoods east of the Anacostia River, which are majority-Black, will receive millions of dollars in refunds after the company settled a lawsuit brought by the District, the city attorney general’s office said Thursday.

The lawsuit accused Amazon of secretly excluding Ward 7 and Ward 8 Zip codes — 20019 and 20020 — from the company’s own branded delivery services, using third-party carriers such as UPS and the U.S. Postal Service instead, which significantly slowed delivery times, despite charging the same price for Prime memberships.

D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D) said in a statement that the online retailer will refund $7.25 million in membership fees to about 69,000 D.C. customers, pay the District $1 million in penalties, and “reform its practices.”

“No company is above the law, no matter how big or powerful,” Schwalb said. [MORE]

Marjorie Taylor Greene says TrumpStein Shut Down the Release of the Epstein Files

DOJ Golden Retriever Todd Blanche Plays a 'Contempt Game' with a Federal Judge to Prevent the Public Release of 50 Pages of FBI Notes about Trump's Alleged Rape of a Teenager in Hidden Epstein Files

From [HERE] U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hand over handwritten FBI interview notes detailing a woman's allegations against President Donald Trump. The order stems from an ongoing lawsuit regarding the government's compliance with the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates public release of records connected to the investigation of late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Sullivan ordered Blanche on September 16 to hand over the underlying notes for private review in both redacted and unredacted versions by 11 a.m. on September 24. In a notice of compliance filed Monday at Sullivan's direction, Blanche said the documents were hand-delivered to chambers 17 minutes before that deadline.

However, Blanche failed to turn over the court ordered redacted notes. Said failure makes it impossible for the judge to determine whether the government has grounds to withhold release of the notes to the public. On Friday, the judge ordered Blanche to also turn over the redacted nots.

Judge Sullivan is presiding over Phang v. Blanche, a lawsuit filed by independent journalist Katie Phang seeking the public release of unredacted records related to the deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

The lawsuit accuses the DOJ under Attorney General Blanche of violating the law by heavily redacting or completely withholding critical components of the Epstein files. This includes eight emails, a draft indictment with hidden co-conspirator names, and handwritten FBI interview notes from a woman alleging that Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump when she was a teenager.

Central to the dispute are handwritten FBI notes taken during four separate interviews in 2019. The notes contain raw information from an interview with a woman who alleged that Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump when she was a teenager, and that Trump subsequently assaulted her. The notes are roughly 50 pages for 4 different interviews. Plaintiff Katie Phang said the files contain leads the government chose to ignore. [MORE]

Judge Sullivan has repeatedly ruled against the DOJ's attempts to shield the files. He previously issued a preliminary injunction stating that Blanche effectively "conceded" to violating the law by failing to properly address the lawsuit's allegations

"On each of those pages there's either available information that this administration, this DOJ, this FBI has intentionally refused to chase down," Phang said. Blanche initially refused to release the notes in any form, arguing they were "substantially similar" to the typed FD-302 reports the FBI produced from those interviews. Then at an August hearing, DOJ attorney Andrew Block told U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan the notes were "duplicative."

"You and I don't have to go to law school, and you don't really need a lot of information to be able to glean that there is a material substantive difference between something that is substantially similar and something that is duplicative," Phang said.

"There is no way that those 302s were literally word by word the same d— thing as the handwritten FBI notes," she noted.

"Do you see it's a game?" Phang said. "It's a game that Todd Blanche is playing, and he's yanking a lot of chains, isn't he?"

She also noted the Epstein Files Transparency Act lists specific grounds for withholding records, and duplication isn't one of them.

"Even if they are duplicative, that doesn't bar the release of the handwritten notes," Phang said.

Rep Al Green to Make a Final Attempt to Impeach Trump after being Pushed Out of Office by SNigger Jasmine Crockett and the Israeli Lobby

Rep. Al Green (D-Texas 9) announced plans to file another set of articles of impeachment against President Trump and called on elected officials to stick to their beliefs, even when unpopular, during a Friday talk hosted by the Brown Initiative for Policy.

Green will leave his position in January after losing his primary election earlier this year. The 79-year-old staunch progressive and civil rights advocate has served in Congress since 2005.

The congressman attracted national attention when he was removed from Trump’s speech to a joint session of Congress in 2025 after interrupting Trump’s speech, waving his walking cane and declaring the president did not have a mandate to cut Medicaid, before he was escorted out of the House Chamber. 

Green was also removed from Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address after he unfurled a handwritten sign reading “BLACK PEOPLE AREN’T APES!” in protest of a social media post by Trump depicting former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama as apes. “Something just came over me,” Green recalled of the 2025 incident to the crowd of about 60 attendees at Friday’s event, jokingly swinging his cane in the air.

“I knew that there would be consequences. But I also know that there are just some things worth standing for. You just have to take a stand,” Green said.

Green is also known for repeatedly filing articles of impeachment against Trump during both of the president’s terms, a maneuver he has undertaken as recently as August. During Friday’s event, Green announced that he plans to file another set of impeachment articles before he leaves Congress. [MORE]

Shenanigger Jasmine Crocket Up to More Shenanigans: Helped Israel First and Crypto Donors Push Al Green Out of Congress to [S]elect Another KneeGrow Puppetician to Support Israeli Genocide and Wars

Congressional Staffers say White Dumbocrat Mary Peltola Referred to Black Veterans as NGHRS and Uses the Term Often in a Derogatory Manner [in the Absence of White Supremacy Niggers would Not Exist]

Two former staffers of former Rep. Mary Peltola (D-AK) allege the Alaska Democrat repeatedly used the n-word in 2024, according to a report from the Alaska Landmine.

The two former aides worked in the Alaska Democrat’s House office and on her campaign. They spoke to the Landmine on the condition of anonymity, citing fear of retaliation. Both described separate episodes in 2024.

One instance allegedly followed an October 25, 2024 dinner honoring the roughly 4,000 African American soldiers who helped build the Alaska-Canada Highway during World War II. The event was promoted by Ed Wesley, an Army veteran, former commander of American Legion Post 34, and former president of the Anchorage NAACP.

Wesley pressured the campaign to buy tables and promised to fill them, according to a former aide. The campaign purchased eight tables at $1,000 each, the staffer said, and an October 18, 2024 FEC filing shows $8,000 paid to Eventbrite for tickets. The tables sat mostly empty. Peltola did not attend. After staff told her about the turnout, the Senate candidate grew angry and called Wesley a “scammer,” the staffer alleged.

“I can’t believe that n****r,” Peltola said, according to the staffer.

The aide told the Landmine they had grown “numb” to such language, alleging they had previously heard Peltola use the slur “faggot” when referring to gay staffers.

A second staffer alleged the Alaska Democrat used the n-word multiple times during a spring 2024 campaign meeting. Staff conducting opposition research had discovered that her son, Job Nelson, ran a YouTube channel featuring self-produced rap music that frequently used the word. The channel was later deleted, the staffers said.

“It shocked everyone in the room,” the second staffer said, adding that no one confronted her out of fear.

The allegations come weeks after the New York Times published a report describing a pattern of angry outbursts, a shove, and slurs across Peltola’s years in office. Peltola is challenging Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) in a race that could decide control of the Senate. [MORE]