Federal Judge Blocks DHS’ Warrantless Immigration Arrests

From [HERE] A US federal judge on Tuesday granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from enforcing its policy of warrantless civil immigration arrests without probable cause of escape risk.

The order grants both a preliminary injunction and provisional class certification, and denies a separate motion for final class certification without prejudice, meaning plaintiffs can still refile this request in the future. The provisional class certification includes all individuals arrested in the District of Columbia who were not subject to escape risk assessments prior to their arrest.

Tuesday’s ruling stems from the lawsuit Escobar Molina v. DHS, filed in September. Four individual immigrants and CASA, Inc. challenged DHS policy of conducting warrantless civil immigration arrests in Washington, D.C. without individualized probable cause determinations, following an emergency declaration made in August. The plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction and provisional class certification under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(g). The complaint argues that DHS violated federal standards for warrantless arrests under 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2), which requires the arresting officer to have reason to believe the individual is “likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest.” 

Writing for the US District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Beryl Howell concluded that the plaintiffs had demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on their claim that DHS adopted a policy requiring only “reasonable suspicion” rather than probable cause for both unlawful presence and escape risk. The 88-page memorandum opinion, which gives reasons for the order, cited repeated public statements by senior DHS officials, including Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino, explicitly stating that warrantless arrests required only “reasonable suspicion.”

The Court rejected DHS’s jurisdictional defenses, holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5), (b)(9), and (g), which strip district courts of jurisdiction for removal-related matters, do not apply to arrest procedures that are not directly part of the removal process itself. The Court emphasized that being deportable does not automatically establish a likelihood of escape, rejecting arguments that would otherwise conflate the statute’s two distinct probable cause requirements. Tuesday’s injunction requires DHS to transmit the district court’s order to all federal agents with immigration enforcement authority, and it must now document the factual basis for each warrantless arrest. [MORE]

Federal Judge Rules Trump's National Guard Deployment in DC was Unlawful, but Appeals Court says his Race Soldiers Can Stay During Their Review

From [HERE] The Trump administration will be allowed to continue its National Guard deployment in D.C. at least temporarily, pending another appeals court decision, a panel of U.S. Court of Appeals judges said Thursday.

The ruling means the deployment of troops to the nation’s capital could persist beyond Dec. 11, the date a lower-court judge had previously set as a deadline for the administration to halt the mission. Last month, that U.S. District Court judge handed D.C. a preliminary legal win in its lawsuit over the deployment, writing in an opinion that it was illegal and ordering the administration to pause it while litigation proceeds.

The Trump administration then asked the appeals court to intervene and allow the troops to remain longer — and on Thursday, judges with the D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals granted an administrative stay in the case, meaning the drawdown of troops will be delayed at least until the appeals court makes an additional ruling.

The court emphasized that Thursday’s decision had nothing to do with the merits of the Trump administration’s arguments in the case and that it merely buys the judges more time. “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” they wrote. [MORE]

From [HERE] Last week a US federal judge ruled that President Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Washington, DC, is unlawful, in District of Columbia v. Trump.

District Judge Jia M. Cobb of the US District Court for the District of Columbia stated in a memorandum opinion that the defendants “exceeded the bounds of their authority under Title 49 of the D.C. Code” by using the DC National Guard (DCNG) for “non-military, crime-deterrence” reasons, through mechanisms like patrols in public spaces. Although Title 49 designates the president as commander in chief of the DCNG, the president is nonetheless limited to “instances in which the relevant civil authorities request” their aid. She further stated that the Department of Defense “lack[s] statutory authority under 32 U.S.C. § 502” to bring in National Guard members from outside the state. According to the court, the code only permits this where the “operations or missions … are authorized under state law.” While granting preliminary relief, the court issued an administrative stay for 21 days to allow time for an appeal.

The suit was brought by the District of Columbia against the Trump administration on September 4. The complaint alleged that the use of the National Guard affects the District’s “sovereignty and right to self-governance … inflaming tensions.” An executive order declaring a “crime emergency” in DC was issued on August 11, and a second order deploying the National Guard was issued on August 25. Roughly 2,200 members of the National Guard are currently in DC.

‘Locking Up the Worst of the Worst’? DOJ Figures Show 97.4% of 614 Detained Immigrants in Chicago Had No Criminal Record [and are 100% non-white]

From [HERE] President Donald Trump and his administration have claimed repeatedly that the immigration raids that have terrorized communities nationwide this year are focused on getting the “worst of the worst” off the streets and out of the country, but new detention data filed by the Department of Justice on Friday shows that only a tiny fraction of the more than 600 people who remain in detention in the Chicago area from raids over recent months have any criminal record, bolstering anecdotal evidence that many of those targeted for by ICE and federal border agents are hard-working, law-abiding members of society.

According to the Chicago Tribune:

The Trump administration on Friday released the names of 614 people whose Chicago-area immigration arrests may have violated a 2022 consent decree, and only 16 of them have criminal histories that present a “high public safety risk.”

The list was produced as part of an ongoing lawsuit alleging immigration agents have repeatedly violated the terms of the in-court settlement, mostly during “Operation Midway Blitz,” that puts a high bar on making so-called warrantless arrests without a prior warrant or probable cause.

The newspaper reports that of the 16 people arrested with criminal histories—representing just 2.6% of the total listed in the filing— “five involved domestic battery, two were related to drunken driving, and one allegedly had an unidentified criminal history in another country.” None had criminal backgrounds that included worst-of-the-worst offenses like rape or murder.

Earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings ordered the government to provide more information about the more than 600 people being held in detention and suggested he would order their release if compelling public-safety reasons were not presented. While ordering the immediate release of 13 people he deemed were arrested unlawfully, Cummings gave the government until Friday to release the additional information on those being held. [MORE]

Border Patrol Cops are Monitoring Law Abiding Drivers and Detaining People Deemed to Have ‘Suspicious’ Travel Patterns

The U.S. Border Patrol is monitoring millions of American drivers nationwide in a secretive program to identify and detain people whose travel patterns it deems suspicious, The Associated Press has found.

The predictive intelligence program has resulted in people being stopped, searched and in some cases arrested. A network of cameras scans and records vehicle license plate information, and an algorithm flags vehicles deemed suspicious based on where they came from, where they were going and which route they took. Federal agents in turn may then flag local law enforcement.

Suddenly, drivers find themselves pulled over — often for reasons cited such as speeding, failure to signal, the wrong window tint or even a dangling air freshener blocking the view. They are then aggressively questioned and searched, with no inkling that the roads they drove put them on law enforcement’s radar. [MORE]

New ACLU Study says Most Juries in Death Penalty Cases of Black Defendants are All White, Violating the Constitution

From [HERE] To serve in a capital trial, potential jury members must declare that they are willing to impose the death penalty. This process, known as “death qualification,” erases large swaths of otherwise jury-eligible adults from the jury box and results in death penalty decisions—including the threshold and vital question of guilty or innocent —being made by a skewed pool of jurors who do not represent our communities.

The Constitution requires juries to carefully weigh mitigating circumstances in a separate penalty phase of a trial when deciding between life imprisonment without parole and death. The Constitution also requires the jury’s decision to express the “conscience of the community.” But, because of death qualification (which the Constitution does not require), juries making these decisions do not accurately reflect our communities or their values. Even though a juror who is unwilling to impose a death sentence can still listen to the evidence, weigh the credibility of witnesses, deliberate and even find a defendant guilty and impose the lawful sentence of life imprisonment, death qualification prevents the approximately 40% of Americans who now oppose the death penalty from participating in this important part of our democracy.

Decades of empirical research shows that death qualification results in juries that are more likely to convict, and more likely to reach hasty decisions and ignore mitigating evidence the Constitution says must be considered. Death qualification also results in the disproportionate exclusion of groups that are more likely to oppose the death penalty, including Black people, especially Black women, other people of color, women, and followers of certain religions. The racial divide in support for the death penalty is consistently demonstrated in over thirty years of social science research.1 The resulting capital juries, comprised predominantly of white men, are less likely to deliberate vigorously and more likely to convict and sentence a person to death, especially when the defendant is Black. [MORE]

Elon Musk’s Gigantic Supercomputer is Poisoning the Air of Black Residents in a Poor Neighborhood in Memphis

Elon Musk’s pet AI chatbot, Grok comes at a high price: the health of those unfortunate souls who live next to the data center that makes Grok possible.

Located in the Memphis neighborhood of Boxtown, Tennessee, xAI’s “Colossus supercomputer” data center has been mired in controversy ever since its inception, pumping noxious gasses into the air and drying out local faucets. For Musk, it’s the key piece of infrastructure behind AI ambitions — the facility keeping him in the AI race with other tech magnates like Sam Altman and Mark Zuckerberg.

For the predominantly black residents of Boxtown, however, Colossus is turning their neighborhood into a putrid nightmare.

Boxtown is a historically and predominantly African American neighborhood in South Memphis, Tennessee, founded by formerly enslaved people shortly after the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863

Speaking to The Times, 81-year-old Boxtown resident Willie Joe Stafford blamed the mucus he regularly hacks up is the result of Colossus’ pollution. “The people who live round here are blacks,” he said. “So they think they can do what they want.”

Another resident, Sarah Gladney, explained that xAI has changed the character of the neighborhood, which wasn’t exactly pretty before.

“Prior to xAI, we were dealing with more of a waste smell. Like poop. This is more like a chemical-type smell,” she explained. At 71, Gladney told the publication she hardly ever opens her windows for fresh air, and no longer goes on her daily walks.

“We have to put our lungs up in exchange for profit,” 66-year-old Boxtown resident Batsell Booker told The Times. His daughter, Booker said, is recovering from cancer — a disease Boxtown has no shortage of. [MORE]

Data Shows Black Students in Public Fool Systems are Less Likely to be Offered Early Algebra, which Limits the Odds they will get Advanced Courses and Higher-Paying Jobs

From [HERE] Schools are less likely to offer Latino and Black students early algebra classes, effectively shutting these students off from advanced courses and higher-paying jobs, according to research released Tuesday.

Algebra has traditionally been offered to teens starting in ninth grade, but a growing body of research shows that students who take the class in eighth grade are more likely to succeed in high school math, pursue STEM majors in college and earn more money as adults.

Nationwide, 3 in 5 schools offer students the option to take early algebra, according to research from NWEA, a national testing group. Schools in rural areas, high-poverty schools and campuses with a large Black or Latino student body were less likely to offer the class.

“Algebra in eighth grade is not just another math class,” said Daniel Long, one of the report’s researchers. “This is closing off access to advanced math pathways for many students.”

Even if a school does offer algebra to eighth-graders, access is often determined by a child’s race or ethnicity, Long added. More than half of Asian eighth-graders took the course when their school offered it, compared with 22 percent of Latino students and 17 percent of Black students, data shows.

Those gaps, Long said, persisted even among top-achieving students. Among high-performing pupils, about 60 percent of Black students are placed into algebra in eighth grade, compared with 84 percent of Asian students and 68 percent of White and Latino students.

“Placement, not ability, seems to be the driver,” Long said. Researchers examined 162,000 children in 22 states.

Most schools use test scores, teacher recommendations and parent requests to determine who gets to take eighth-grade algebra. But those methods can be biased, said Allison Socol, vice president of P-12 policy, practice and research at EdTrust, a national education nonprofit that has also found disparities in who gets to take challenging classes.

“Because of implicit biases, racial biases, and mindsets about who is and who isn’t a math person, Black and Latino students and students from low-income backgrounds — even when they demonstrate that they are ready and they are very clear that they are eager for those courses — are still shut out,” Socol said. “Across the U.S., in every state, students of color and students from low-income backgrounds are often shut out of rigorous courses.”

Teachers tend to underestimate children of color, even when they perform similarly to White students, a New York University researcher found. Wealthier parents tend to advocate more than less affluent families, according to research from Rand. [MORE]

Laboring Black Woman Forced to Give Birth in Parking Lot After Racist Suspects @ Indy Hospital Turned Her Away [Racists Know the Difference btw Right and Wrong but Ignore it when race is a variable]

Two pregnant Black women nearly 1,000 miles apart were ready to do what many do every day: welcome new bundles of joy, and just before the start of the holiday season. Instead, the health of both women and their babies was put at risk after hospital staff did not immediately provide the needed care.

One woman was discharged and delivered her baby on the side of an Indiana highway, while the other nearly gave birth in a Texas hospital’s emergency waiting room. Both women survived, but are still reeling from ordeals that have drawn national attention — in part, because they were captured on video and shared on social media.

Each instance highlights the long-standing and rising disparities in health outcomes for Black women, who die at a rate nearly 3.5 times higher than white women around the time of childbirth, according to a 2023 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report.

While maternal mortality rates for white, Hispanic and Asian women fell in 2023, according to the CDC report, the rate for Black women barely budged.

Now, the women’s families, health organizations and civil rights advocates are urging the medical profession to address systemic racism that they say perpetuates Black women’s experiences.

‘I felt dismissed’

Mercedes Wells’ water had already broken when a nurse at Indiana’s Franciscan Health Crown Point hospital checked on her in triage, a room typically designated for women in earlier trimesters of pregnancy.

Wells, already a mother of three, knew the baby could come at any minute. The nurse did not believe she was going into labor, Wells recalled.

“She still suggested that I be discharged and I begged, ‘No, I can’t be discharged. Please don’t discharge me because I am about to have this baby,’” Wells, 38, told The Associated Press from her Chicago area home in Dolton, Illinois.

“I began to wail because I was in so much pain, and my feelings were hurt because that was happening to me. So I let out a cry, you know? The nurses showed no compassion, none of them,” said Wells, whose experience was captured in a now-viral video of her crying in pain as nurses pushed her toward the exit.

But she was out of time. Wells felt the baby coming.

Her husband, Leon, loaded her into their car and sped away hoping to reach another hospital. Thereafter, in the early morning hours of Nov. 16, he pulled over on a Lake County highway and delivered their daughter.

Wells said the nurses she saw were all white, and all assured her that concerns were relayed to the attending physician.

“I felt dismissed. I felt ignored, disregarded as a whole,” she said. “I’m dealing with this pain, and they’re all watching me from the nurse’s station as if it’s normal to send someone out in that much pain.”

Franciscan Health Crown Point said in a statement that both the nurse and physician involved in Wells’ ordeal were fired and that the hospital has mandated cultural competency training for all labor and delivery staff. [MORE]

Viral Video Shows Pregnant Black Woman who Gave Birth Screaming in Pain as White Hospital Staff Delay Care in Dallas [Racists Ignore Morality, Right and Wrong in the Presence of Color]

What is The Psychopathic Racial Personality? A shocking TikTok video has captured the harrowing moment a heavily pregnant woman in Texas went into active labour, only to be left waiting as hospital staff continued asking intake questions instead of rushing her to care.

The distressing clip, filmed at the Dallas Regional Medical Center in Mesquite, shows the woman doubled over and screaming in agony while seated in a wheelchair. Her companion pleads for help, shouting in frustration as staff appear to ignore the urgency of the situation. [MORE]

Massa Media Facilitates Trump’s Criminal Aggression against Venezuela

From [HERE] Eighty years after the Nuremberg Trials prosecuted Nazi leaders for criminal aggression against nations, the Trump administration is blatantly doing the same against Venezuela. Yet there is not a word of condemnation in the U.S. media or among European allies.

In the past two months, more than 80 people have been killed by U.S. air strikes on over 20 civilian boats in the waters off the Latin American country. The Trump administration has provided no evidence to back up claims that these killings were carried out against alleged drug traffickers. They are extrajudicial executions, or murder.

This week, Trump has designated the Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro as the head of a foreign terrorist organization, an alleged narcotics cartel that is supposedly flooding the U.S. with drugs. Again, no evidence is provided. Venezuela dismissed the allegations as a ridiculous lie whose ulterior motive is the illegal use of U.S. military force for regime change in Caracas.

The pretext of combating the illicit drug trade should be seen as transparent. The largest deployment of U.S. military force in the Caribbean since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis is in itself a demonstration that the real agenda is not about interdicting drugs.

Venezuela’s role in narcotics trafficking to the United States is not significant compared with other Latin American countries, according to the UN’s Office on Drugs and Crime. Colombia and Peru are more important as cocaine sources. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration has denoted Mexico as the biggest source of illicit fentanyl, which is responsible for most American overdose deaths.

The bigger picture is, of course, the objective to get rid of a socialist government in Venezuela and for the U.S. to gain control of the country’s vast oil reserves, the largest known reserves on the planet. Allied to that major reason is the desire in Washington to stymie China’s legitimate growing strategic partnerships across Latin America. As Donald Ramotar, the former president of Guyana, and other observers pointed out in a recent roundtable discussion sponsored by the Schiller Institute, the United States is flexing its muscles in its presumed “backyard” to try to restore its failing global power.

This should be obvious, as it is criminal. The United Nations Charter explicitly outlaws every aspect of Trump’s conduct towards Venezuela. Article 2:3 mandates that all disputes must be settled through peaceful means. Article 2:4 prohibits the use or threat of military force.

In other words, the Trump administration is clearly engaging in criminal aggression, the very conduct that the UN Charter was established in 1945 to banish after the horrific experience of Nazi crimes against peace that resulted in World War II. [MORE]

Glenn Greenwald Dismantles the Lies Justifying War with Venezuela

Google Gemini Concluded that Videos of the US Boat Strikes were AI Generated. With No Dead Bodies, Destroyed Boats, Funerals or Witnesses, the Only Proof that Strikes Occurred is that Trump Said So

In the video above a media hoaxed French probot attempts to fact check Google Gemini’s claim that Trump’s boat strikes were AI generated. Naturally, she attacks Google Gemini and not the substance of its claim. Ironically, the boat strikes are based on the unverified and uncorroborated hearsay claims of Mr. Trump and his authorities. Without any independent investigation, massa media merely parrots Trump’s claims - thereafter, various pundits discuss said unchallenged premise as if it were true. In other words, authority and the media would have us believe that the strikes have occurred simply because Trump said so. However, there is no reason to presume anything Globocop says is true because he is known to tell unsophisticated lies. At any rate, for what reasons is the proxymoron above seeking proof of a non-occurrence instead of showing us facts which demonstrate that the strike occurred? What is belief and do you suffer from it?

Besides the video, which looks like a 80’s video game, massa media and authority have not presented any tangible evidence of boats being destroyed, such as damaged boats, dead bodies, funerals, witnesses, drugs or other contraband, etc. Also, if the 2 lone survivors of the several attacks were terrorist/drug dealers who the US intended to kill, then why did US authorities promptly release them without any charges? If they were so imminently dangerous to the nation then for what reason were they not also summarily “executed” upon capture or detained without charges as enemies of the state? [MORE]

Venezuelans, who should be reasonably angered about the ongoing random murder spree, appear to have had no reaction to the boat strikes in the many public gatherings since the strikes began. You would also assume that Venezuela authorities would use the boat murders against Tump/Bush to its moral advantage on the international stage. However, Freddy Ñáñez, the Venezuelan communications minister, stated that the footage of the attack was fake. [MORE] and Diosdado Cabello, Venezuela's Minister of Interior, Justice and Peace, characterized the strike as "fake news" "invented" by the US as a cover for regime change and President Maduro has ignored the strikes altogether making no mention of them in his various speeches.

Due to the contrived nature of the videos, the high liarability of the “dependent media” and Mr. Trump and the lack of corroboratable and verifiable physical and circumstantial evidence, the boat strikes should be presumed to be a false flag, IQ test or a psy-op until proven otherwise or rebutted.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Probot – a propagandizing programmed robot. A representative from an organization, agency or institution, especially the Internal Revenue Service, Pentagon, State Department, or Blight House, whose assignment is to make prepared statements and answer “cooked” (prepared) questions at news conferences, briefings and the like. A probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite. (See: Proxymoron)

believer – one who accepts that which has no basis in reality and unwilling to question or test it. 2) a person who revels in or enjoys being self-deceived. A believer does not seek—just accepts theologies and/or ideologies. 3) one who is addicted to vanity and/or chained to convention with conviction. 4) one who lives in a cloud of illusions, confounded by language and its deceptions. Believers are people who make their lives subjective slaves to a mere belief—engineered my limited and fragmented understanding and fostered by erroneous conclusions based solely on effects and appearances. A true believer would rather believe in something and be wrong than not believe in it and be right. A believer is never a spiritual person, and a spiritual person is never a believer. A spiritual person knows not; a religious person think she knows; a believer only (merely) believes. Unbelievably, a believer elevates the very notion of belief to a higher value than fact or knowing. Belief and believer are one. The condition is thought or belief in form; the two are actually one. Regardless of the particular belief held, it is belief itself which gives the sustaining power to thought. “It is done to you as you believe.” ~Jesus (of Biblical Lore). Keep believing and it will continue being done to you. All belief is still an act of consciousness, hence it can be reduced to a state of thought. The Law of Belief creates its own law which is changed only by reversing or dispersing the belief. “Believe not every spirit”: refers to the psychic confusion of beliefs. You see, subjective forms are not always what they seem or claim to be. (See: Convictions, Ultimate Truth, Absolute Truth, True Believer, Self-Realization, Prayer, Proof, Higher Truth, Axioms, Seven Centers, SLAP-House, Awakening, Stillness, Meditation, Naptivity, Seeking First, Buddha-Christ, Willful Ignorance, Body of Christ, Knowingness & Blind Faith)

[media distracts] Trump's Alleged Extrajudicial Murders of Humans Aboard Boats in the Caribbean are as Unlawful and Barbaric as Blowing Up Humans Sitting on Park Benches b/c Drugs are Sold in the Park

THERE IS NO ARMED CONFLICT, SO “THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT” WOULD NOT APPLY. IF THEse KILLINGS actually occuRred they are simply MURDERS. Based on the fact that the US military killed persons from another country and the incidents happened outside of the US, international law applies.

The analysis is straightforward: WHEN THE INCIDENT OCCURRED WAS there an armed conflict between the United States and VENEZUELA? The answer is no. So it means that the international human rights law standard is applicable. According to said standard the use of lethal force against an individual must be “absolutely necessary.”

An international court would determine whether EACH individual(s) in the boat(s) posed a “concrete, specific, and imminent threat to life and physical safety,” and whether the United States MILITARY could have reasonably used nonlethal force to address that threat. 

From [HERE] 'When it comes to President Trump’s and the Pentagon’s extra-judicial drug-war killings in the Caribbean, there is little or no doubt that the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice falls into the second category. Asked to provide a legal opinion as to the legality of President Trump’s and the Pentagon’s extra-judicial drug-war killings in the Caribbean the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice has come up with a memorandum containing inane legal justifications, in an obvious effort to provide legal cover for the people involved in the extrajudicial killings. In fact, the still-secret memo expressly assures U.S. military personnel that they will not face future criminal prosecution for their involvement in the killings.

The memo states that the high number of deaths from drug use among American drug consumers constitutes an “armed attack” against the United States. Really? Where are the armaments? Are Latin American drug dealers entering the United States, kidnapping regular American citizens, physically holding them down, and then injecting drugs into their noses, mouths, or other parts of their bodies?

I don’t think so. There is certainly no evidence of that. All of the evidence is that American consumers of drugs are voluntarily buying and ingesting mind-altering substances knowing full well that this isn’t a risk-free endeavor.

Another part of the memo claims that the boats that are suspected of carrying drugs are generating revenue for groups that are supposedly in armed conflict with the United States.

Really? Where are the conflicts? I don’t see any Latin American cartels landing on American shores and killing American citizens. Indeed, I haven’t seen those boats firing at American Naval vessels or at American B-52s. All I’ve seen is massacres of defenseless private individuals in the face of overwhelming U.S. military power.

According to the Intercept: “One senior defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, blasted the opinion. ‘I don’t know what’s more insane – that the ‘President of Peace’ is starting an illegal war or that he’s giving a get out of jail free card to the U.S. military,’ said the official, referencing President Donald Trump’s self-proclaimed moniker. ‘Hopefully they realize there’s no immunity for war crimes. Nor is there a statute of limitations.’”

One of the other justifications on which Trump and the Pentagon are relying is their claim that these boat people are “terrorists.” Apparently that governmental accusation means that they are subject to being exterminated without arrest, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and sentence — that is, without any due process of law for what amounts to an accusation of a criminal-law violation, whether it is drug-war-related or terrorist-related.

For some time, Trump has been claiming that Venezuela immigrants have been “invading” the United States. I guess we should be thankful that the Office of Legal Counsel hasn’t yet opined that the U.S. is repelling an immigrant “invasion” of the United States by killing people in those boats.

One of the most fascinating and revealing aspects of these extra-judicial killings is when U.S. forces took custody of two targeted people who survived the attack on their vessel. What happened afterward reveals what a sham these drug-war killings are. U.S. officials released both men back to their home countries.

What? Yes, they took two supposed “narco-terrorists” into custody and then released them, which means that they are now free to engage in more “narco activity” and more “terrorism.” Does that make any sense whatsoever?

The real interesting question is: When they saw that those men had survived the military attack on their vessel, why didn’t U.S. military personnel simply fire missiles at them or just shoot them while they were bobbing in the water? After all, they had just tried to kill them inside their boat. What’s the difference with killing them outside their boat? [MORE]

US Designates a Non-Existent Cartel as a ‘Foreign Terrorist Organization’ to Justify its Pending Venezuela Oil Grab [group has no meaningful existence, like "Antifa"]

The US State Department on Monday formally designated the Cartel de los Soles, or Cartel of the Suns, a group that doesn’t actually exist, as a “Foreign Terrorist Organization,” providing a pretext for a potential attack on Venezuela.

The term “Cartel of the Suns” was first used in the 1990s to describe two Venezuelan military generals with sun insignias on their uniforms who were involved in cocaine trafficking. According to a 60 Minutes report that aired in 1993, one of the generals was working with the CIA at the time.

Today, the term is used to describe a loose network of Venezuelan military and government officials allegedly involved in drug trafficking, but the Cartel of the Suns doesn’t actually exist as a structured organization.

According to InSight Crime, a think tank that receives grants from the State Department’s Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, recent US sanctions mischaracterized the Cartel of the Suns, which InSight described as “a system of corruption wherein military and political officials profit by working with drug traffickers.”

Despite the reality, the US is now calling the Cartel of the Suns a terrorist organization and claims that Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro is its leader, a push being led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has long sought regime change in Caracas. [MORE]

Despite [WAR] White Authoritarian Rhetoric from Trump, Air Connections between Russia and Venezuela Remain Operational

The ambassador of the Russian Federation to Venezuela, Sergei Melik-Bagdasarov, announced via his social media that flights between the Eurasian nation and Venezuela continue to operate.

“I am pleased to inform you of my return to Venezuela. Taking advantage of the recently inaugurated regular flight from St. Petersburg (the heroic city of Leningrad), I have returned to the homeland of Bolívar, Chávez, and Maduro,” the diplomat stated.

The ambassador highlighted that together with the Venezuelan delegation, the 19th meeting of the High-Level Intergovernmental Commission was held in Russia, in which important documents were signed aimed at strengthening and further developing the strategic partnership between both countries, in the name of peace and progress.

Mélik-Bagdasárov further emphasizes the significance of the date: “Today is December 1st. Here in blessed Venezuela, which recently welcomed its Catholic patron saints for the first time in its history, December is the path to Christmas: a celebration that unites loved ones, a celebration of love and peace.” [MORE]

The Exact Numbers of Palestinians Murdered by IsrAlien Soldiers Regularly Parroted by Master's Media are "Mythematics-" unfounded, empirically invalid conclusions for political motives or mind control

From [HERE] and [MORE] In his latest podcast with journalist and political activist Owen Jones, University of Bradford Emeritus Professor Paul Rogers says the bombing in Gaza is worse than the Allied carpet bombing of Dresden, Germany during the Second World War. 

 Professor Rogers, author of the best-selling Losing Control (Pluto Press) and most recently Monstrous Anger of the Guns (Pluto Press) and The Insecurity Trap (Hawthorn Press), cites a Scientists for Global Security report that uses official statistics to estimate the tonnage of bombs dropped on Gaza. 

In the interview – which has already gained 38,000 views on YouTube – Professor Rogers describes the level of destruction in Gaza as “unparalleled in the post Second World War World era.” 

 He goes on: “If you look at the total tonnage of weapons dropped, mainly bombs but missiles and tens of thousands of artillery shells, you get a total of something like 70,000 tonnes of explosives. 

 “Back in the Cold War days, we used to say a kilotonne is equivalent to a thousand tonnes of TNT. We are now using explosives that are much more powerful than TNT. But if we do use that figure – 70 kilotonnes of weapons dropped across Gaza – Hiroshima was about 12 kilotonnes, so we are talking about the equivalent of six Hiroshimas... but because these bombs drop individually, they are spread much more, so you get an extraordinary level of devastation. It’s certainly more than Dresden, certainly more than the other 2,000 bomber raids in the Second World War. 

 “This is about as bad as it [gets] outside the Second World War. Very few people realise just how intense this has been, and how continual. We’ve not seen much of it on the television here, compared to channels in the Middle East, which means right across the Arab world, the degree of anger – and, I have to say, hatred - of what is happening, is palpable." [MORE]

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

mythematics – the manipulation of statistics to formulate and reflect the validity a preconceived desired result or position in an academic and/or socio-political context. (See: Statistics)

The Trump administration is the Netanyahu administration

From [HERE] However, since US President Donald Trump has taken office, he has not attempted to pursue a strategic policy agenda. Instead, he has followed his Israeli handlers around like a little puppy dog, bowing to their every wish.

Trump’s administration had worked alongside the Israelis to supervise a three-month-long siege on the population of Gaza, where no aid entered the territory and triggering a famine. He then used US taxpayer dollars to fund a privatised aid scheme, which functioned as a death trap that took the lives of around 2,600 Palestinian civilians.

He launched an embarrassing failure of a military campaign against Yemen, directly striking Iran after using diplomacy to lower its guard to an Israeli attack. The Trump administration has stationed more forces inside Syria, taking over two air bases there, while pushing for an Israeli-Syrian normalisation “security deal” and using American power in an attempt to disarm both Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Hashd al-Shaabi in Iraq.

Trump’s regime most recently bullied the UN’s Security Council into quickly accepting the most disgraceful resolution of the Palestine issue, authorising a regime change operation. He has stationed US boots on the ground, oversees daily Israeli war crimes that violate the Gaza ceasefire, and is attempting to follow through on his pledge from February to “own Gaza”.

Domestically, from day one, he pursued the implementation of ‘Project Esther’, a document published by the Heritage Foundation think-tank, that seeks to dismantle free speech about Israeli crimes in the United States. He also accelerated the worst crackdown on American academic freedom in US history.

Now he pivots to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a "terrorist organisation" at the behest of Israeli lobbying efforts, allowing for this designation to grant greater powers for a crackdown on pro-Palestinian non-profit groups, by claiming they are affiliated with a "terrorist organisation". [MORE]

Barbaric Israeli Authorities Accused of Harvesting Body Parts of Murdered Palestinians in Zionist Organ Trafficking Conspiracy

In early October, Israeli-Ukrainian Boris Wolfman was arrested in Russia. He is charged with masterminding a criminal organ trafficking scheme. His capture, wholly ignored by the Western media, raises the prospect that at long last, some justice will be served in a number of major organ trafficking scandals, dating back many years. Wolfman’s apprehension also highlights Tel Aviv’s little-scrutinised role as the world’s centre of illegal organ harvesting and trafficking. Grimly, the Gaza genocide may have greatly facilitated this perverse commerce.

Ever since October 7th, credible allegations have widely circulated that Zionist Occupation Forces are illegally harvesting the organs of slain Palestinians. In November 2023, the Euro-Med Monitor published a report documenting how Israeli soldiers confiscated dozens of corpses from major hospitals in Gaza, to the extent of digging up and raiding mass graves built in their grounds to accommodate the never-ending influx of slaughtered civilians. While some bodies were subsequently handed over to the Red Cross, many were and remain withheld.

Euro-Med Monitor records how many corpses exhibited clear indications of organ harvesting, including missing cochleas and corneas, as well as hearts, kidneys, and livers. Since then, the Zionist entity has released token numbers of murdered Palestinians at intermittent intervals to their surviving relatives. Frequently, the bodies are decomposed beyond recognition, making conducting professional autopsies - and identifying whether organs have been stolen - difficult if not impossible. Sometimes, the corpses are frozen solid, again greatly complicating medical examinations, and potentially obscuring organ theft.

The 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention mandates respect for the dignity of dead civilians, and explicitly prohibits the looting or mutilation of their bodies during wartime. However, the Zionist entity has not only failed to ratify the treaty, but expressly rejects its applicability to Gaza and the illegally-occupied West Bank. Moreover, repulsive local laws and legal precedents unique to Tel Aviv grant authorities the power to refuse to release dead Palestinians to their families. [MORE]