White Folks and Black Jokes. (You are the Joke). Volkswagon's Racist Super Bowl Commercial Go Boom!

"blackface with voices" [MOREThe characters in minstrel shows (usually white males in black face) portrayed Blacks as cheerful, simple-minded darkies who loved to sing and dance for the "White folks." The white males who portrayed black characters spoke an exaggerated form of Black English. [MORE] and [MORE]  During the existence of White Supremacy (Racism), most forms of "entertainment" are directly or indirectly designed to be supportive to The System of White Supremacy (Racism). Stop supporting businesses and entertainers who demean non-white people." [the Code]

Making fun of how Black people talk also sells chicken for KFC (gameday bucket go boom!):

and Popeyes

misrepresenting history sells movies made for white folks about Black people

and insurance for Geico

selling non-white people as mascots sells everything on gameday.

Black & Guilty Until Proven Innocent. Central Park Five File $200 Million Lawsuit in their False Convictions for Rape of White Woman Jogger

From [HERE] Four of the five men wrongfully convicted of raping a jogger in Central Park in 1989 appealed Sunday for a settlement in their 10-year-old suit against the city. The four — Raymond Santana, Yusef Salaam, Kharey Wise and Kevin Richardson — appeared at a  screening attended by hundreds of people at Riverside Church of “The Central Park Five,” the movie that tells their story.

Salaam’s children moved through the audience, collecting signatures on a letter to Mayor Bloomberg asking for his support for the men, who all served years in prison before a serial rapist confessed to the crime, and DNA evidence showed he was the attacker. Santana, 38,  said the civil case, next in court on Feb. 19, has been "moving at a snail’s pace."

Roger Wareham, an attorney for three of the five, said the slow progress was "very frustrating, especially since the city has not even made an offer.”

Each of the five is seeking $50 million, but Wareham insists no amount of money can replace the years of their lives spent in prison. "There's no financial amount that can compensate spending their teenage lives in jail," he said.

Read More

Analysis: 201,000 in Florida didn't vote because of (white supremacy) long lines

(In photo white voters in Dixville Notch, New Hampshire wait to cast their votes on November 6, 2012. What is racism? [MORE]) Jim Crow tacticBy and large, white people in white voting precincts, Democrat or Republican did not have to wait in line to vote in the Presidential election. [MORE]  From [HERE] The long Election Day lines around Florida may have turned away more than 200,000 frustrated would-be voters who gave up and went home before they cast ballots — or else saw the lines and elected not to join them.

Analyzing data compiled by the Orlando Sentinel, Ohio State University professor Theodore Allen estimated last week that at least 201,000 voters likely gave up in frustration on Nov. 6, based on research Allen has been doing on voter behavior.

His preliminary conclusion was based on the Sentinel's analysis of voter patterns and precinct-closing times in Florida's 25 largest counties, home to 86 percent of the state's 11.9 million registered voters.

"My gut is telling me that the real number [of voters] deterred is likely higher," Allen said. "You make people wait longer, they are less likely to vote."

(In photo, Non-White Voters stand in a long line at the Supervisor of Elections office in West Palm Beach, Florida for early voting on November 5, 2012.)

Around the state, nearly 2 million registered voters live in precincts that stayed open at least 90 minutes past the scheduled 7 p.m. closing time, according to Sentinel analysis of voting data obtained from county elections supervisors. Of those, 561,000 voters live in precincts that stayed open three extra hours or longer.

And two of the five counties with the worst lines were in Central Florida. In Orange and Osceola counties, as many as 48 percent of those who cast votes on Election Day live in precincts that closed at least 90 minutes late, the analysis showed.

Read More

Facts and Myths About the Supreme Court Challenge to the Voting Rights Act

In video, Whoopi Goldberg & Ann Coulter go toe to toe on ABC's "the View" on 9/28/12 - having a meaningless argument about why they support their political parties. Voters - customers of beggars (politicians). A voter is born every second. (See: Secret Ballot, Voting Hoax & Control) [MORE

 From [HERE] Described as the crown jewel of civil rights law, the Voting Rights Act has been the target of right-wing misinformation for decades, and a parallel legal assault against its constitutionality will be argued before the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder on February 27. The VRA, enacted to stem voter suppression on the basis of race in the South, contains a provision within it - Section 5 - which identifies the worst historical offenders and requires that election changes in those jurisdictions pass federal review. The current legal challenges to the VRA focus on Section 5, and are the continuation of the same discredited claims lodged against this anti-discrimination law since its inception.

FACT: Voter Suppression Was A Serious Problem In The Last Election Cycle, Admitted To By Its Perpetrators, Reported By Journalists, And Proven In Federal Courts.

Myth: Section 5 Of The Voting Rights Act Is Outdated.

Heritage Foundation's Hans Von Spakovsky: There Is "A Complete Lack Of Evidence" Of Relevant Discrimination. Von Spakovsky, the repeatedly discredited voter ID proponent, described by former Bush-era Department of Justice colleagues as the "point person for undermining the Civil Rights Division's mandate to protect voting rights," still opposes the Voting Rights Act. In conjunction with his belief in in-person voter fraud - despite evidence that it is practically non-existent - he also believes there is no longer widespread voter suppression to justify Section 5:

[The 2006 reauthorization of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act] seems designed to make it easier for Justice attorneys to label covered jurisdictions as racist. That is a dangerous thing. During my service as a career attorney in the Civil Rights Division, I found that nearly all the lawyers and staff involved in Section 5 determinations see nefarious racial agendas -- i.e., discriminatory purpose -- lurking at every corner.

[Section 5] also provides a heckler's veto to any minority state legislator unsatisfied with a new redistricting map; such a legislator can now simply cry "racism," thereby causing the map to suffer from a fatal Section 5 "discriminatory purpose" defect. Today, lone cries of racism are often (although not always, of course) totally baseless. But one can count on the ideologues in the Voting Section to accept every cry as legitimate.

States must understand that they cannot expect to get an impartial hearing from this Justice Department. They may still get a panel of liberal judges in federal court, but at least normal evidentiary standards will apply. In court, DOJ will have to provide actual evidence of discrimination -- not the rank hearsay and imaginary evidence often considered in its own administrative review. [National Review, 2/23/11]

Read More

SNigger Kenneth Blackwell Chosen by the White Party (Republicans) to Lead New Jim Crow Electoral College Push

In photo, election criminal, Kenneth Blackwell, President Bush's Pet Negro from back in the day [MORE] and [MORE]. He is a SNigger - a sold-out smiling Sambo-Negro. 2) a South-Bender offender. Sniggers are traitors and pawns of the oppressors. Watch the company you keep! Don't cross-over unless you are ready to bend over! [MORE]. Do the votes of the Non-White votary really count in a white supremacy system? [MORE]  

From [HERE] Former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell (R), who was the chief elections officer when the state experienced massive voting problems in 2004, is planning to lead a national effort to rig the electoral college in favor of the 2016 Republican presidential candidate.

Republicans who hold power in states that have voted Democratic in the last few presidential contests, including Virginia and Pennsylvania, are considering a change to their apportionment of electoral votes. Instead of a winner-take-all system for the state, electoral votes would be doled out by congressional district, using highly-gerrymandered maps. The result is that a state like Pennsylvania, which voted for President Obama by more than 5 percent in 2012, would have given most of its electoral votes to Mitt Romney.

That plan is now receiving national backing, thanks to Blackwell and GOP operative Jordan Gehrke. The two men detailed their effort in an interview with the Atlantic and conceded that the effort could make it easier for Republicans to win the White House:

ATLANTIC: You are a Republican operative, though. And it’s Republican legislators who are pushing this in all the states where it’s come up so far. You can claim this is about policy, but doesn’t it really make it easier for Republicans to win presidential elections?

BLACKWELL & GEHRKE: That could be a byproduct, depending on who drew the lines last and who’s running – a lot of different things. What it’s really about is making sure that more people in more congressional districts get attention.

Though Blackwell and Gehrke argued that allocating electoral votes by congressional district is more representative, that doesn’t mean they support the much simpler, fairer system of a national popular vote. “Abolishing the electoral college is very difficult to do,” they claimed.

What’s both true and sad, though, is that rigging the system to ensure the Republican candidate wins, no matter how Americans actually vote, is far easier to accomplish in Republican-controlled states.

Are Public Defenders ‘True Believers in Justice’ or Oven Holders for the System of White Supremacy?

'Justice cannot exist in a white supremacy system. Each person is either trying to produce justice or he is trying to maintain the status quo.' [MORE]  The system of white supremacy is based on deception and/or violence.The so-called "criminal justice system' is part of the illusion of democracy. The white supremacist goal of the criminal justice system is the Greater Confinement of as many Non-whites as possible.

The refinement of white supremacy requires the appearance of justice. How would the courtroom look if all the defendants were non-white and all the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys and police were white? The criminal justice system looks and feels better to the Victims of White Supremacy with the participation of Non-white judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers.  The operating system of white supremacy runs more effectively like that - manufacturing consent, participation in their own destruction. 

During the Holocaust, Nazi's used Jewish professional persons to assist in the destruction of Jews - such as by having them hold open ovens to assist in the burning of their own people. Prior to the Holocaust, Jews were highly assimilated & integrated into German society - they considered themselves Germans. To be effective counter-racist advocates, public defenders must understand the environment they are working in. If they do not understand white supremacy, everything else they think they understand will only confuse them. [MORE]

Non-white prosecutors are the biggest "true beleivers" in the illusion of democracy. Themselves, victims of white supremacy most direclty assist white supremacists/racists 

From [HERE] I’d always wanted to be a lawyer, but unlike Travis Williams — the subject of this Op-Doc video — I never wanted to be a public defender. I didn’t understand how anyone could represent people who did terrible things. “Criminals” were not people I wanted to help.

Then, in 2009, while working in the legal department at A&E Television, I met Jonathan Rapping, the founder of what’s now Gideon’s Promise. He invited me to his client-centered legal training program in Alabama. At the start of training, Mr. Rapping asked each lawyer to articulate why he or she chose to become a public defender.

Read More

Still Dreaming of a White President: The White Party (GOP) Rubs its Hands Together to Rig Electoral College

Whiter than This? From [HERE] Republican politicians have a big problem. Their massively unpopular policies and offensive rhetoric about minorities, women, and LGBT people have alienated vast swaths of the electorate, making it increasingly difficult for them to win national elections. And these problems are only getting worse as the country’s attitudes evolves and its demographics change. In fact, the Republican candidate has lost the popular vote in 5 of the last 6 presidential elections.

The Republicans’ Solution: Re-Write the Rules to Game the System and Rig Elections

Instead of addressing their fundamental problems, Republican politicians have instead devoted themselves to re-writing the rules and rigging the game:

  • Make it Harder to Vote: Republican politicians are engaged in a systematic campaign to change voting laws and election procedures in order make it harder for young people, minorities, and others likely to vote Democratic to vote.
  • Gerrymander: Because of partisan gerrymandering after the 2010 Census, Republicans have a structural advantage when it comes to the House of Representatives. Even though more than a million more people voted for Democrats for the House in 2012, Republicans still managed to hold on to the House with a 15-seat majority.
  • Rig the Game: Now Republican-controlled swing states are trying to rig the Electoral College in order to steal the White House.

How It Works

  • Red States Stay the Same: Truly red states keep the current winner-take-all system, thus delivering all of their electoral votes to the Republican candidate.
  • Swing States Get Divided Up: Swing states currently controlled by Republicans (VA, OH, WI, MI, PA, NC, and FL) will award their electoral votes by Congressional District. Through gerrymandering, Republicans have managed to pack Democrats into a small number of districts, giving the GOP a large advantage in the aggregate number of House seats they hold in these states.
  • Bonus Votes for Republicans: In some versions of this plan, the two remaining electoral votes in each state that are not associated with a House district would still be awarded to the winner of the state’s popular vote. Virginia, however, has an even more pernicious plan; its plan would award the other two votes to the winner of a majority of the state’s congressional districts. If other swing states adopted this plan, it could shift an extra dozen or more electoral votes to the Republican candidate — a number equivalent to the electoral votes of Virginia or the votes of Iowa and Nevada combined.

The Result — President Romney

 The GOP plan to rig the Electoral College means that even if a Democrat wins the popular vote in a state by a comfortable margin, the Republican candidate could still walk away with as many two-thirds or even three-quarters of the state’s Electoral College votes.


If Republican-controlled swing states had put this plan into effect before the 2012 election, Mitt Romney would likely be the president today thanks to the shift in electoral votes in key states.

Read More

('I Live in the Ghetto, You Just Come to Visit me at Election Time') Obama Police Protection 20,000 Deep for Inaugural

A worker cleans plates of bulletproof glass on the stage where President Obama spoke to a crowd gathered in Grant Park in Chicago. 

 From [HERE] According to ThinkProgress an estimated 20,000 law enforcement officials prepared to patrol the District of Columbia for the Inaguration. According to Jacqueline McGwyer, an agent at the Washington Field Office of the FBI, there is currently “no credible or corroborated threat” towards the President ahead of the Inaugural. In addition, according to McGwyer, there’s less chatter that would suggest a potential attack compared to the same period in 2009.

The decrease in overall noise tracks with what independent observers are seeing as well. What worries J.M. Berger more is the severity of what he’s seeing from the far right. Berger tracks terrorism in the form of both jihadi extremists and white supremacists through their Internet presence on his website Intelwire. According to Berger, “There are certain phrases that you see, that are always in the mix, but are more prominent now.” He described these phrases as calls to action, such as “The time is now,” that ebb and flow in their usage, but have peaked in the last few days.

President Obama speaks behind bullet-proof glass at College Green in Dublin May 23, 2011.

Compounding the chatter surrounding the inauguration are the President’s recent proposals to reduce gun violence. Volume among the fringe right is as high today as it was immediately after the tragedy in Newtown, CT, Berger said. The real concern, he said, is that protesters will flow into the city in the hopes of setting off a confrontation with law enforcement. Berger described the feeling among the far right-wing internet communities as akin to a “powder-keg poised to go off.” Should the weekend pass without seeing that influx though, Berger predicted that the communities he monitors will calm down until the passage of any firearms legislation in Congress.

At least one event scheduled for this weekend shows the potential for getting the far right further riled. Media Matters for America reported on Friday that the “Gun Appreciation Day” event due to take place on Saturday in protest of Obama’s gun proposals is being sponsored in part by a white nationalist group called American Third Position. Groups like American Third Position were the subject of a recent study by the Combating Terrorism Center highlighting the threat that fringe right-wing groups pose to the United States.

Norwegian and US security officials install bullet proof glass on the terrace of the hotel where Nobel Peace laureate Barack Obama stayed on Wednesday Dec. 9, 2009 in Oslo, Norway. Obama received the award for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples" and cited his push for nuclear disarmament. Reuters

Laura Bush, former president George W. Bush, Michelle Obama and President Barack Obama bow their heads during a moment of silence during ceremonies marking the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, in New York, September 11, 2011. 

Thousands of Armed White Protestors Gather at State Capitols (Dear Lard. Pleaze Dont Let 'Prezodent Darkness' Ruin 'Merikka' 2)

From [HERE] Thousands of gun advocates gathered peacefully Saturday at state capitals around the U.S. to rally against stricter limits on firearms, with demonstrators carrying rifles and pistols in some places while those elsewhere settled for waving hand-scrawled signs or screaming themselves hoarse. The size of crowds at each location varied - from dozens of people in South Dakota to 2,000 in New York. Large crowds also turned out in Connecticut, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Washington state. 

Some demonstrators in Olympia, Wash., Phoenix, Salem, Ore., and Salt Lake City came with holstered handguns or rifles on their backs. At the Kentucky Capitol in Frankfort, attendees gave a special round of applause for 'the ladies that are packin'. Activists promoted the 'Guns Across America' rallies primarily through social media. They were being held just days after President Barack Obama unveiled a sweeping package of federal gun-control proposals.


[MORE]

The Vanishing Majority (White People) Must Rig Elections (practice racism) to Survive: GOP (The White Party) eyes new election laws in states Obama won

The GOP is the party of the vanishing majority in the U.S - white people. That is, the U.S. Census Bureau has reported that by 2047 non-white persons will be the majority of the US population. (Worldwide the white population is less than 10%.)

"The Republican party is a racial identity party. It is designed to appeal to white people as white people... not as union-members or as unemployed people or as home-owners... as white people.  It is a crude racial-identity party and the numbers bear that out. It is an almost exclusively white party. Many white people vote Democratic, but the Republican party is pretty close to all white. (A fact that is soft-pedaled in out national dialog because it makes the modern Republican party sound like a racist institution, which it is.") [MORE

Republicans now depend on this vanishing majority of whites for fully 90 percent of their votes in presidential elections, while the Democratic Party wins 60 to 70 percent of the Asian and Hispanic vote and 90 to 95 percent of the black vote. The Democratic base is growing inexorably, while the Republican base is shriveling. [MORE]

Already, California, Illinois and New York are lost. The GOP has not carried any of the three in six presidential elections. When Texas – where whites are a minority and a declining share of the population – tips, how does the GOP put together an electoral majority? [MORE] In order for the white party (gop) to survive it will have to suppress or otherwise prevent non-whites from voting - or just rig it -- again.

A Non-White Thing. Racism is the observable phenomemon that is ignored. (In photo, Non-White Voters stand in a long line at the Supervisor of Elections office in West Palm Beach, Florida for early voting on November 5, 2012. A Jim Crow tacticBy and large, white people in white voting precincts, Democrat or Republican did not have to wait in line to vote in the Presidential election. In a system of white supremacy what will they get for their vote? [MORE] and [MORE]) 

From [AP] After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change the rules to make it easier for them to win.

From Wisconsin to Pennsylvania, GOP officials who control legislatures in states that supported President Barack Obama are considering changing state laws that give the winner of a state’s popular vote all of its Electoral College votes, too. Instead, these officials want Electoral College votes to be divided proportionally, a move that could transform the way the country elects its president.

(In photo white voters in Dixville Notch, New Hampshire wait to cast their votes on November 6, 2012. What is racism? [MORE])

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus endorsed the idea this week, and other Republican leaders support it, too, suggesting that the effort may be gaining momentum. There are other signs that Republican state legislators, governors and veteran political strategists are seriously considering making the shift as the GOP looks to rebound from presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s Electoral College shellacking and the demographic changes that threaten the party’s long-term political prospects.

(above Cleveland, Ohio on election day MORE]. 

“It’s something that a lot of states that have been consistently blue that are fully controlled red ought to be looking at,” Priebus told the Wisconsin Journal Sentinel, emphasizing that each state must decide for itself.

Remembering that MLK was a Target of the US Government: FBI Goal was "to Destroy" or "Neutralize" him

The following is an excerpt from the Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations submitted to the US Senate in 1976. [HERE] From December 1963 until his death in 1968, Martin Luther King, Jr. was the target of an intensive campaign by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to "neutralize" him as an effective civil rights leader. In the words of the man in charge of the FBI's "war" against Dr. King:

No holds were barred. We have used [similar] techniques against Soviet agents. [The same methods were] brought home against any organization against which we were targeted. We did not differentiate. This is a rough, tough business. 

The FBI collected information about Dr. King's plans and activities through an extensive surveillance program, employing nearly every intelligence-gathering technique at the Bureau's disposal. Wiretaps, which were initially approved by Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, were maintained on Dr. King's home telephone from October 1963 until mid-1965; the SCLC headquarter's telephones were covered by wiretaps for an even longer period. Phones in the homes and offices of some of Dr. King's close advisers were also wiretapped. The FBI has acknowledged 16 occasions on which microphones were hidden in Dr. King's hotel and motel rooms in an "attempt" to obtain information about the "private activities of King and his advisers" for use to "completely discredit" them. 

On March 4, 1968, the COINTELPRO program was expanded from twenty-three to forty-one field offices. The letter expanding the program lists five long-range goals for the program:

(1) to prevent the "coalition of militant black nationalist groups," which might be the first step toward a real "Mau Mau" in America; (2) to prevent the rise of a "messiah" who could "unify, and electrify," the movement, naming specifically Martin Luther King, Stokely Carmichael, and Elijah Muhammed; (3) to prevent violence on the part of black nationalist groups, by pinpointing "potential troublemakers" and neutralizing them "before they exercise their potential for violence;" (4) to prevent groups and leaders from gaining "respectability" by discrediting them to the "responsible" Negro community, to the white community (both the responsible community and the "liberals" -- the distinction is the Bureau's), and to Negro radicals; and (5) to prevent the long range growth of these organizations, especially among youth, by developing specific tactics to "prevent these groups from recruiting young people."

Read More

Militarizing Latin America - U.S. Military Buildup to Protect Oil Pipelines?

On the surface, Mr. Monroe’s Doctrine would appear to be a dead letter.

Which is why the policies of the Obama administration vis-à-vis Latin America are so disturbing. After decades of peace and economic development, why is the U.S. engaged in a major military buildup in the region? Why has Washington turned a blind eye to two successful, and one attempted, coups in the last three years? And why isn’t Washington distancing itself from the predatory practices of so-called “vulture funds,” whose greed is threatening to destabilize the Argentinean economy?

As it has in Africa and Asia, the Obama administration has militarized its foreign policy vis-à-vis Latin America. Washington has spread a network of bases from Central America to Argentina. Colombia now has seven major bases, and there are U.S. military installations in Honduras, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panama, and Belize. The newly reactivated Fifth Fleet prowls the South Atlantic. Marines are in Guatemala chasing drug dealers. Special Forces are in Honduras and Colombia. What are their missions? How many are there? We don’t know because much of this deployment is obscured by the cloak of “national security.”

Read More

Fast Food/Soda Companies Target Black Youth with Sugar Drinks & Heart Attack Food (racism still exists)

In photo, a billboard from RacismStillExists.Tumblr.com posted in NYC this month. [HERE]  From [HERE] and Black youth are nearly twice as likely as their white counterparts to take in large quantities of their daily calories from sugary drinks, according to a new study examining American beverage consumption. Low-income children of all racial backgrounds also tend to drink almost twice as many sugary beverages as wealthier Americans do.

Considering the fact that sugar-filled drinks have been conclusively linked to an increased risk for obesity, the study’s results reveal some of the racial and economic disparities within the nation’s obesity epidemic. “Some groups may be more at risk for soda, others may be more at risk for fruit drinks, all of which … have the same sugar base that contributes to obesity and disease,” one of the study’s co-authors, health policy researcher Lisa Powell, explained.

It’s not clear whether the soda industry is also disproportionately targeting low-income or minority groups, but it wouldn’t be the first beverage sector to try. Alcohol advertising has been proven to particularly target black youth, even despite the fact that African-American teens tend to drink less alcohol than youths from other racial groups.

Density of fast food restaurants in Black neighborhoods 

From [RacismStillExists] “Every time you turn around and want to get something to eat the only thing you see is one of these greasy joints and fast food restaurants.”

“The community right here is all fast food restaurants, you don’t have the vegetables and what you’re supposed to be eating.  You got to go out the neighborhood to get it.”

These statements were made by residents on Chicago’s South Side [1], but they could have been uttered by residents from any number of Black neighborhoods across the country.  It has long been voiced at the community level that Black neighborhoods have disproportionate densities of fast food restaurants.  And research studies have consistently supported these claims [2].

A 2004 study conducted in New Orleans looked at the relationship between fast food density (the number of restaurants per square mile in shopping areas) and the percentage of Black residents.  They also looked at the effect of neighborhood income.  Only the percentage of Black residents was related to fast food density, and Black neighborhoods had 6 times as much fast food as White neighborhoods [3].  On the other hand, a study in Atlanta showed that low and high income predominantly Black areas had less access than comparable White areas to restaurants that were not fast food [4].  The fact that this was true for low and high income areas highlights the fact that income is not the driving factor.  It is often assumed that if Black neighborhoods have high densities of fast food restaurants, it is because those neighborhoods are lower in income than White neighborhoods, and perhaps fast food companies target lower income customers.  But research consistently shows that income is not the only factor.  In some studies, race is just as important as income.  In others, race is the only important factor. [MORE]

'How to Catch an Illegal Immigrant' T-Shirts Definitely, Definitely Not Aimed at Non-White People

From [HERE] A Columbia, S.C., so-called "Mexican" restaurant known as Taco Cid is seeing a boom in sales of its "How To Catch An Illegal Immigrant" T-shirt following news reports about the item's controversial slogan and the image it features: an open box with two tacos positioned as bait. The restaurant is owned by racist suspects (White people). 

Columbia's The State reports the restaurant has sold 400 of the shirts to buyers in every state. Purchases for the T-shirts, which cost $37.95, have even come from as far away as Kosovo. The Taco Cid's owner told the news outlet that the shirts have been especially popular with border patrol agents in Texas. As The Huffington Post previously reported, the T-shirts garnered national attention earlier this month after a restaurant patron snapped a photo of an employee wearing the shirt and posted the image to Twitter.

In response to criticism about the racist implications of the shirts, the restaurant released a statement defending the shirts as witty and comical, rather than a racist or hateful.

Read More

Justice or White Supremacy? No Real Punishment for Marine who Urinated on Dead Afgahns

The Psychopathic Racial Personality =  Have a Nice Day Buddy

From [HERE] A US marine who pleaded guilty on Wednesday to urinating on the corpse of a Taliban fighter in Afghanistan is likely to be demoted one rank under a plea agreement, although a military judge called for a much harsher sentence. Staff Sergeant Edward Deptola admitted multiple charges at a court martial, including dereliction of duty for desecrating remains, posing for photographs with corpses and failing to properly supervise junior marines.

The judge, Lieutenant Colonel Nicole Hudspeth, would have sentenced him to six months confinement, a $5,000 (£3,100) fine, demotion to private and a bad-conduct discharge, but she is bound by terms of the plea agreement Deptola reached with military prosecutors. A general will review the sentence and could choose to lower it.

Deptola and another marine based at Camp Lejeune were charged last year after a video surfaced showing four marines in full combat gear urinating on the bodies of three dead Afghans in July 2011. In the video, one of the marines looks down at the bodies and says: "Have a good day, buddy."

Read More

Papers Please? Israel Uses Control of Birth Registry and ID Cards for Nazi Like De-population Control of Palestinians


More at The Real News

Palestinians will outnumber Israeli Jews by 2020 [MORE] Without an Israeli approved ID card, Palestinians cannot cross into Gaza which according to Human Rights Watch has separated families, caused people to lose jobs and educational opportunities, barred people from entering the Palestinian territories, and trapped others inside them. [MORE

In Nazi Germany , the Nazis created an elaborate system of identifying Jewish people that included personal Jew identification cards, passports marked with a J, assignment of names and the outward marking of persons with a yellow star. 

According to Raul Hilberg: "the whole identification system, with its personal documents, specially assigned names, and conspicuous tagging in public, was a powerful weapon in the hands of the police. First, the system was an auxiliary device that facilitated the enforcement of residence and movement restrictions. Second, it was an independent control measure in that it enabled the police to pick up any Jew, anywhere, anytime. Third, and perhaps most important, identification had a paralyzing effect on its victims. The system induced the Jews to be even more docile, more responsive to command than before. The wearer of the star was exposed; he thought that all eyes were fixed upon him. It was as though the whole population had become a police force, watching him and guarding his actions. No Jew, under those conditions, could resist, escape, or hide without first ridding himself of the conspicuous tag, the revealing middle name, the telltale ration card, passport, and identification papers. Yet the riddance of these burdens was dangerous, for the victim could be recognized and denounced. Few Jews took the chance. The vast majority wore the star and, wearing it, were lost." (11) [MORE

If You Attempt to Understand Israeli Apartheid Without Understanding White Supremacy you will only be Confused

According to Dr. Frances Cress Welsing [MORE], from 1933 to 1945, Germany - a leading country in Western civiliza­tion under the leadership of Adolph Hitler - with the assistance of politicians, doctors, lawyers, professors, judges, scientists and the general population, conducted open warfare against and planned the extermina­tion of Semites of the Jewish religion who were citizens of Germany and other countries of German-occupied Europe.

As persons who were referred to in Germany and throughout Europe as Semites, the Jews were not considered to be white people or aryans. As Semites they were considered to have their genetic roots amongst Africans - Black people on the continent of Africa.

Read More

Psychopathic White Man charged with Milwaukee Murder of Unarmed 13-year-old Black Boy Claims Incompetence to Stand Trial

Do Not Expect Justice - Expect White Supremacy Racist Suspect John Spooner is accused of murdering Darius Simmons, an unarmed Black 13 year old in front of his mother in an unprovoked shooting in the front of her home on May 31 in Milwaukee. After the murder, even though Spooner confessed to the murder, the Milwaukee police searched the mother's home, detained her for hours and arrested her other son. While she was detained her son died at the hospital [MORE] and [MOREPreviously at his arraingment, according to Bishop Tavis  Grant, from Rainbow Push, Spooner came to court laughing, giggling and motioning for coffee, showing no remorse." [MORE]  

Trial Delayed. From [HERE] A 76-year-old white man accused of shooting and killing his Black teenage neighbor will get a mental exam to determine whether he's competent to proceed to trial. John Spooner was in court Monday for a motion hearing. He's accused of killing 13-year-old Darius Simmons, who was unarmed and did not provoke or otherwise threaten Spooner.

Defense attorney Steve McGaver requested a change of venue, arguing that pre-trial publicity would make it difficult for Spooner to receive a fair trial. Judge Jeffrey Wagner denied that motion. McGaver also told the judge there was reason to believe Spooner might not be competent to proceed. The judge ordered that Spooner be evaluated by a mental-health professional. Online court records say the doctor's report is due Feb. 4. The trial date was also pushed back two months, to May 6.

According to the criminal complaint, Simmons was retrieving the garbage from the curb when he was confronted by Spooner. Spooner, the victim of multiple burglaries, claimed Simmons was the culprit of at least one of the burglaries.

Spooner asked Simmons for his belongings back, including two shotguns. Simmons denied having anything to do with Spooners’ stolen property. During the confrontation Simmons’ mother Patricia Larry told police that she also told Spooner that her son had nothing to do with his stolen property.

The criminal complaint says that’s when Spooner pulled out his gun and fired two shots at Simmons' chest. The boy ran around the corner and collapsed, and Spooner waited for police to arrive. When police arrived Spooner said, “Yeah I shot him.” [MORE] In other words this allegedly was a pre-medidtated murder of an unarmed Black child. That is, Spooner 1) went and got his gun 2) loaded it, 3) confronted Simmons 4) made decision to kill 5) shot him two times as his mother watched (no concern for consequences), 6) calmly waited for police, 7) confessed to police and 8) made up story about a theft.

Read More

The Return Of Right-Wing Pro-Gun Insurrectionism (This Time Featuring Hitler)

Oh Lard, Pleaze Don't Let Black Prezodent Ruin 'Merikka.' In photo President Obama gives speech behind bullet proof glass in Chicago. 

From [HERE] What is it about President Obama's inaugurations that bring out the craziest of the right-wing crazies? (He is a Black man) 

Four years ago, Obama's historic swearing-in sparked months' worth of teeth-chattering paranoia, trumpeted by the conservative media, about how the new Democratic president posed a mortal threat to America and that drastic action might need to be taken.

In 2009, a far-right Newsmax columnist determined that a "military coup "to resolve the 'Obama problem'" was not "unrealistic." That's about the same time Glenn Beck used his then-new program on Fox News to game out bloody scenarios for the coming civil war against the Obama-led tyranny. Note that the armed rebellion rhetoric was uncorked just weeks after Obama's first cabinet had been confirmed.

(In photo, the new best seller from Brad Meltzer about assassinating the current president [MORE].) Now, four years later as Obama's second swearing-in approaches, the same misguided insurrectionist pageantry is back on display. (The fringe John Birch Society is probing the likelihood of "armed resistance" against the government -- "an unlikely prospect, for now at least.") And this time, Adolf Hitler stars in a leading role.

In fact, there's a disturbing collision now underway featuring two signature, conservative paranoid fantasies. One holds that Obama is like Hitler; that he's a tyrant ready to undo democracy at home. The other is that Americans need access to an unregulated supply of assault weapons in order to fight their looming insurrectionist war with the government.

(In photo, Obama’s 2008 election night speech was made behind bullet proof glass.) In the last week we've heard more and more conservatives try to tie the two wild tales together: Obama's allegedly pending gun grab will prove he's just like Hitler, which will demonstrate the need for citizens to declare war on the government.

Ignoring nearly 250 years of our democratic history, conservative voices across the media landscape have been nodding their heads in agreement suggesting it's only a matter of time before the United States resembles a tyrannical dictatorship that will be either fascistic or Stalinist in nature (or both, if the rhetorician feels no obligation to historical accuracy).  

In photo, an airbrushed shirt worn by a racist suspect featuring a graphic of President Obama as a witch doctor made a splash at a Tea Party (White Party) convention last weekend in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. [MORE]

So much for the notion of American exceptionalism -- "the conviction that our country holds a unique place and role in human history" -- that conservatives love to preach. 

White People Love to hear Quentin Tarantino say Nigger: Drops N-Word Less than a Minute into Press Conference

In the absence of white supremacy, niggers would not exist. According to the Code Word Guide, a Nigger is any non-white person, who is directly or indirectly subject to the System of White Supremacy (Racism) in any area of activity, including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, law, Politics, Religion, Sex and/or War. According to Dr. Blynd, a nigger is a species of caterpillar-known also as a 'black jack.' [MORE

From [HERE] Racist suspect Director Quentin Tarantino's film "Django Unchained", another racist movie about black people for white audiences [MORE], won two awards at last night's Golden Globes awards. Tarantino won a Golden Globe for "Best Screenplay for a Motion Picture" category and actor Christoph Waltz won for "Best Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture." Less than a minute in to the director's press conference backstage he had already dropped the N-word. Tarantino was answering a question about the use of the N-word in his film.

(in photo, racist Django dolls made for white children to play with [MORE]) "If someone is out there actually saying that when it comes to the word nigger that the fact that I was using it in the more that it was used back in the antebellum south, in Mississippi 1858, then feel free to make that case," Tarantino told reporters backstage shortly after his win. "But no one is actually making that case, so in other words what they're actually saying is I should soften it, they're saying i should lie , that I should whitewash, they're saying I should massage and I never do that when it comes to my characters."

"Django Unchained" is on pace to become Tarantino's highest grossing movie ever. The film has made more than $125 million since its release on December 25, 2012.

New Years Resolution: Stop supporting entertainers who demean non-white people. Avoid helping persons you suspect may be Racist (White Supremacist). In top photo Jamie Foxx, a "showcase Black" hired as "movie defender" of Django Unchained.

According to Anon: [MORE]

The Definition Of "Nigger" In A White Supremacy System:

1. "Nigger" is NOT a racial identity.

2. ALL non-white people are niggers  -  by default - in a system of white supremacy.

3."Nigger" is NOT a personality defect.

4."Nigger" is a political term that defines a social, economic, and political REALITY.

5. A nigger cannot decide who is a nigger and who is not.

6. All black people are niggers but all niggers are not black people.

7. All non-white people are niggers (in a system of white supremacy). 

8. There is no place on earth called "Nigger Land," therefore niggers are NOT born (niggers), they are CREATED.

9. White people cannot be niggers in a system of white supremacy.

10. There is NO racial slur for whites that is the social, economic, or political equivalent of "nigger" in a white supremacist system.

11. There is no such thing as "acting like a nigger."

12. Being a nigger has nothing to do with being ignorant, backward, country, poor, or uneducated. Those qualities are found in every ethnic group.

13. No amount of education, professional achievements, or fancy table manners will transform a nigger into a white person in a system of white supremacy.

14. Nigger is not a lifestyle or behavior, it's a condition. Accusing someone of acting like a "nigger" is like saying, "Stop acting poor!" If you're poor, you act poor. In other words, your behavior reflects your conditions NOT your race.

15. If we eliminated poverty and white supremacy, there would be no poor folks or niggers.

16. "Nigger" should never be a term of endearment. This is like greeting a friend who just lost his job by saying, "How you doing, you 'out of work person'?"

17. In the absence of white supremacy, niggers would not exist.

18.  In the absence of white supremacy, there would be no need for niggers.

19.  A moral and just society is "nigger-proof." (because there would be no need to invent niggers).

Once we understand what a "nigger" is, we will understand that a made-up word DOES NOT DEFINE WHO WE ARE; it defines WHAT IS BEING DONE TO US.

Once we understand what the word "nigger" means, we will stop being afraid of a word we did not create. Once we understand that "nigger" does not define (or limit) our humanity, we will stop being ashamed of a word that says more about the creator than it does about us. Then, we will have the time and energy to turn our collective focus to eliminating the conditions that have created "niggers" all over the world. [MORE]