Epstein and the Clintons: As Hillary Launched Presidential Campaign, Epstein Feared Exposure

From [HERE] Since Jeffrey Epstein’s second arrest in 2019, the Clintons have spent considerable effort distancing themselves from the enigmatic financier, and they are currently fending off House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, who threatened contempt proceedings after the political power couple refused to testify this week regarding their relationship to Epstein.

Epstein first came into public view after accompanying former President Bill Clinton on a 2002 tour of Africa, aboard Epstein’s infamous Boeing 727 plane, later dubbed “Lolita Express.” Abundant photos from that Africa trip—with Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker—have just been released by the Justice Department.

Through a spokesperson, Bill Clinton has acknowledged traveling on Epstein’s jet during a humanitarian tour of Africa in 2002, but has said he knew nothing of Epstein’s crimes, never visited Epstein’s properties, and ended contact in 2005. In a Justice Department interview in July 2025, Ghislaine Maxwell downplayed Epstein’s connection to the former president, telling Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, “President Clinton was my friend, not Epstein’s friend.” [MORE]

Promised Aid to Gaza Blocked by Barbaric Israeli's - US Ambassador Lied about Trucks Arriving Daily

From [HERE] The Government Media Office in Gaza has firmly rejected recent claims by US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz regarding the volume of humanitarian aid entering Gaza. In a statement released Thursday, the office described Waltz’s remarks as "misleading and detached from reality."

"The ambassador’s comments represent a transparent attempt to absolve the Israeli occupation of responsibility for the blockade and the deliberate starvation of civilians," the office said.

According to recent data by Gaza authorities, the daily average of incoming aid trucks since the start of the ceasefire stands at just 234. This is far below the 600 trucks claimed by Waltz and represents only 39% of the pledged daily aid delivery.

Two days ago, the Gaza Media Office reported that over a 60-day period, only 13,511 trucks had entered Gaza out of the 36,000 expected, averaging 226 trucks per day.

Earlier figures, gathered before November 5, paint a similar picture. At that time, only 4,453 aid trucks had entered Gaza out of the 15,600 that were required under the ceasefire terms, a compliance rate of just 28%. [MORE]

With Israel controlling all of Gaza’s major landfill areas, 900,000 tons of solid waste have been dumped across the enclave, exacerbating a public health crisis

From [HERE] Amin Sabri’s battered tent was among several sitting at the foot of a hillside of rotting garbage towering some 25 feet in the middle of Gaza City. Barefoot children, their clothes caked in grime, scampered nearby. Flies were everywhere, and the stench of fetid waste blanketed the air.

"This is my tent and this is the garbage dump I’m living across from,” Sabri told Drop Site. “We don’t sleep—not at night, nor during the day—because of the garbage. The smell comes at us constantly, and our children are ill. They suffer from severe headaches. We’re dealing with an infestation of germs and insects.”

Over the past two years, Gaza’s civilian infrastructure has been systematically destroyed by the Israeli military, including waste management services. Massive piles of garbage have accumulated across the enclave. Once busy markets and tree-shaded streets have turned into endless mountains of trash, severely exacerbating Gaza’s environmental and public health crisis.

Before the war, waste collection in Gaza City was coordinated through the Yarmouk waste transfer site, located near the city stadium, and would be transported to the Johr El-Deek landfill. With Johr El Deek inaccessible—lying east of the “yellow line” with occupying Israeli military forces—the Yarmouk facility has now been transformed into a massive dumping site.

The few landfill vehicles still operating in Gaza climb to the top of the Yarmouk site and dump more untreated garbage every day. Some communities resort to burning waste, sending toxic fumes into the air. Children run across the hills of rotting waste looking to scavenge what they can. [MORE]

First it was Israel's Right to Defend Itself (based on a False Flag) Then it was "a War" (against Civilians who have No Military) and Now its a "Ceasefire" (or Ongoing Slaughter of Human Beings)

From [HERE] First, it was Israel’s right to defend itself.

Then it was a war, even though, by Israel’s own military intelligence database, 83 percent of the casualties were civilians.

The 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza, living under an Israeli air, land and sea blockade, have no army, air force, no mechanized units, no tanks, no navy, no missiles, no heavy artillery, no fleets of killer drones, no sophisticated tracking systems to map all movements, or an ally like the United States, which has given Israel at least $21.7 billion in military aid since Oct. 7, 2023.

Now, it is a “ceasefire.”

Except of course, as usual, Israel only abided by the first of the 20 stipulations. It freed around 2,000 Palestinian captives held in Israeli prisons — 1,700 of whom were detained after Oct. 7 — as well as around 300 bodies of Palestinians, in exchange for the return of the 20 remaining Israeli captives.

Israel has violated every other condition. It has tossed the agreement — brokered by the Trump administration without Palestinian participation — into the bonfire with all the other agreements and peace accords concerning Palestinians.

Israel’s extensive and blatant flouting of international agreements and international law — Israel and its allies refuse to abide by three sets of legally binding orders by the International Cout of Justice (ICJ) and two ICJ advisory opinions, as well as the Genocide Convention and international humanitarian law — presage a world where the law is whatever the most militarily advanced countries say it is.

The sham peace plan — “President Donald J. Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict” — in an act of stunning betrayal of the Palestinian people, was endorsed by most of the U.N. Security Council in November, with China and Russia abstaining. Member states washed their hands of Gaza and turned their backs on the genocide.

The adoption of resolution 2803 (2025), as the Middle East scholar Norman Finkelstein writes,

“… was simultaneously a revelation of moral insolvency and a declaration of war against Gaza. By proclaiming international law null and void, the Security Council proclaimed itself null and void. Vis-à-vis Gaza, the Council transmuted into a criminal conspiracy.”

The next phase is supposed to see Hamas surrender its weapons and Israel withdraw from Gaza. But these two steps will never happen.

Hamas — along with other Palestinian factions — reject the Security Council resolution. They say they will disarm only when the occupation ends and a Palestinian state is created. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed that if Hamas does not disarm, it will be done “the hard way.”

The “Board of Peace,” headed by Trump, will ostensibly govern Gaza along with armed mercenaries from the Israel-allied International Stabilization Force, although no country seems anxious to commit their troops.

Trump promises a Gaza Riviera that will function as a “special economic zone” — a territory operating outside of state law governed entirely by private investors, such as the Peter Thiel-backed charter city in Honduras. [MORE]

Vast majority of illnesses in Gaza may be unreported, WHO cautions amid limited access

The World Health Organization warned on Thursday that disease outbreaks in Gaza may be spreading largely undetected due to the near-total collapse of surveillance and laboratory systems.

Teresa Zakaria, WHO's unit head for humanitarian and disaster action, said the living conditions in the enclave are so severe that "we can't even describe it anymore," adding that "all the basis for diseases to develop in a constricted environment with very limited access to prevention, to detection and response are all indicating that outbreaks can really spread out of control and very rapidly."

Her remarks came during an Association of Accredited Correspondents at the United Nations (ACANU) media briefing in Geneva.

Zakaria said humanitarian access and diagnostic capacities remain "very limited," making early detection and response nearly impossible.

"What is very important here to highlight is that we are probably missing the vast majority of diseases that are spreading in the territory at the moment just because we have not been able to detect them," she said. [MORE]

Israeli Soldiers Murder Unarmed 16 Year Old Palestinian by Shooting Him at Close Range in Unprovoked Attack

From [HERE] A 16-year-old Palestinian boy was shot dead at point-blank range by an Israeli soldier in the occupied West Bank on Saturday, the latest in a string of lethal shootings that bookend a particularly violent year for the enclave.

Ryan Muhammad Abdul Qader Abu Mualla was killed in the northern town of Qabatiya, during a raid by the Israeli military, Palestinian officials said in several statements on Saturday.

The Israeli military said in a statement on the same day that a “terrorist” had thrown a “block” at several soldiers, and they then shot and “eliminated" the block thrower.

But CCTV video appeared to show Mualla was not throwing a block or holding one.

The video, which Reuters obtained from the owner of a security camera, begins six minutes before the shooting and shows relatively empty streets.

Two Israeli soldiers, one crouching and one standing, can be seen on a lit street corner at dark. A third soldier appears to take position in an adjacent street leading to the same corner.

Three seconds before the shooting, a person appears walking down the street, and as he reaches the corner, the crouching soldier opens fire. The person then falls to the ground.

While the incident is partially obscured because of the angle of the camera and the low light, the video does not appear to show the person who was shot throwing a block or holding one. [MORE]

Video Shows Israeli Soldier Run Over a Palestinian Man from Behind and While He was Praying

From [HERE] Israeli police have released a soldier from custody after he was filmed running his vehicle over a Palestinian man who was praying outside the city of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank.

A silent video of the incident, which both Israeli and Palestinian outlets reported on Thursday, shows an Israeli settler with a rifle slung over his back driving his all-terrain vehicle (ATV) toward a 23-year-old Palestinian man as he knelt in prayer on the roadside.

Mokho told Agence France-Presse: “The assailant is a known settler. He set up an outpost near the village, and with other settlers he comes to graze his livestock, blocks the road, and provokes the residents.”

He also said the settler blinded him with pepper spray after hitting his son, though this is not shown in the video.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) identified the driver as an Israeli reserve soldier with one of its regional defense units. These battalions have dramatically expanded in recent years with backing from Israel’s right-wing government, which contains many officials at the center of the settler movement. [MORE]

Massa Media Ignores Video Evidence that Barbaric Israeli Soldiers Raped Detained Palestinian Men with Objects and Dogs (in self-defense of course)

From [HERE] Earlier this year, a United Nations inquiry accused Israel of using sexualised torture and rape as "a method of war... to destabilize, dominate, oppress and destroy the Palestinian people".

The Israeli human rights organisation B’Tselem has described the Israeli prison system as a "network of torture camps" within which prisoners were subjected to "repeated use of sexual violence" including "gang sexual violence and assault committed by a group of prison guards or soldiers".

Last year, Israel's Channel 12 published a leaked video which appeared to show Israeli soldiers sexually assaulting a Palestinian detainee.

In response to questions from MEE, the Israeli Prison Service said it "categorically rejected" the allegations of abuse described by the prisoners.

‘We want to kill you’

Al-Sai, 44, a father from Tulkarm, has worked for years as a journalist in the occupied West Bank, reporting for Al Jazeera Mubasher and the local broadcaster Al-Fajer TV.

On 23 February 2024, Israeli forces raided his home during an intensive arrest campaign in the West Bank following the October 2023 war on Gaza. He was taken from his home and spent the next 16 months in Israeli custody under administrative detention.

Under the controversial practice, detainees are held without charge or trial based on secret evidence they are not permitted to see.

After an initial 19 days in military custody, al-Sai was transferred to Megiddo Prison. Upon arrival, he said he was handcuffed and blindfolded.

His first stop was the prison clinic. On the way, he could hear screams from other rooms.

“'Say long live the Israeli flag,'” he recalls hearing a guard, speaking fluent Arabic, shout at a prisoner. “'We want to kill you. We want to make you die.'

“At that moment, I knew I was entering a stage I had never experienced before,” said al-Sai, who had been arrested by Israeli forces three times before.

Inside the clinic, guards and medical staff accused him of being a member of Hamas, repeatedly threatening him that they “fuck, fuck, fuck” anyone associated with the group. He denied the accusation. 

After an electrocardiogram and a brief examination, the doctor told the guards he was fit.

Al-Sai said he was blindfolded again and escorted by four to six guards, including a woman, through a series of corridors. Doors opened and closed. He was finally thrown to the ground.

At this point, al-Sai said, his trousers and underwear were pulled down, and he was ordered onto his knees. The beating began, with the guards striking him repeatedly on the head, back and legs.

“I felt close to death,” he said. “The pain was overwhelming. But I still didn’t know what they were going to do. Why did they remove my trousers?”

‘Reception party’

Moments later, he said, a solid object was forced into his rectum.

“I tried to resist. I clenched my body to stop it. That only made the pain worse. Eventually, I surrendered.”

The object was pushed deeper and twisted deliberately, he said. When he began screaming, a guard squeezed his testicles and pulled his penis.

“I screamed so loudly I thought my voice would leave the prison walls,” he said. 

“I wanted to die at that moment. I couldn’t take it. I reached a point where I couldn’t comprehend what was happening.”

Throughout the assault, guards laughed. One addressed him directly.

“You are a journalist,” the guard said, according to al-Sai.

“We will bring all the journalists and do this to them. We will bring your wife, your sisters, your mother, and your son.”

At one point, he heard a guard say: “Bring me a carrot.” Another object was inserted.

Later, he learned from other detainees that vegetables, sticks and other objects were commonly used during such assaults.

A guard stood on his head with full body weight. Al-Sai feared his skull would burst. He also heard one guard tell another to “stop filming”, suggesting the assault may have been recorded.

“They said they were taking revenge for 7 October,” he said. “But I am not from Gaza. I am a journalist.”

The assault lasted about 25 minutes, he estimates. He was held in the room for nearly an hour.

Among prisoners, this assault is called “the reception party” - a violent attack involving sexual violence that many detainees face upon arrival at the prison. [MORE]

Trump Claims the US Conducted a Drone Strike in Venezuela- No Proof that it Occurred, Other than His Statement. Alleged Attack Not Confirmed by Venezuela

From [HERE] President Trump has claimed that the US had “knocked out” a “big facility” as part of the US campaign targeting alleged drug boats in Latin America and against Venezuela.

CNN later reported on Monday that the CIA conducted a drone strike on a port facility in Venezuela, which, if true, would mark a major US escalation against the country. So far, the Venezuelan government hasn’t confirmed the claims.

Trump first made the comments in an interview on WABC radio on Friday when discussing the US operations against alleged drug boats in the region. “And we just knocked out, I don’t know if you read or you saw, they have a big plant or a big facility where they send the, you know, where the ships come from. Two nights ago, we knocked that out, so we hit them very hard,” he said.

The president was asked by a reporter on Monday about the comments and whether the alleged attack was conducted by the US military. “Well, it doesn’t matter, but there was a major explosion in the dock area where they load the boats up with drugs,” he said, describing the target as an “implementation area” that’s no longer around.

Unnamed US officials speaking to The New York Times claimed that in the WABC interview, Trump was referencing a “drug facility in Venezuela” that they said was “eliminated.” Sources speaking to CNN said the facility was allegedly used by the gang Tren de Aragua and that there were no casualties because no one was present at the time of the attack.

Trump claimed the attack occurred on December 24, the same day there was an explosion at a warehouse in Venezuela’s northwestern state of Zulia. The company that owns the warehouse, Primazol, which specializes in chemical supplies for livestock feed and other purposes, said in a statement that it rejected unspecified allegations about the incident that were circulating on social media, though it’s unclear if it was referencing claims that the blast may have been caused by a US attack.

A major part of the US aggression against Venezuela has been a psychological campaign aimed at scaring Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, involving leaks to the media about US plans to bomb the country.

Back in October, Trump said that he authorized covert CIA activity inside Venezuela, and the US spy agency had previously conducted cyberattacks in the country during his first administration.

Any US attack on Venezuela would be illegal under the Constitution, which requires congressional authorization to launch a war. The Trump administration has been clear that its goal in its campaign against Venezuela is the ouster of Maduro, while using false claims that his government is a “cartel” as a pretext.

The US has been enforcing a naval blockade on Venezuela, which so far has involved the seizure of two tankers, a step that’s traditionally considered an act of war and has been strongly denounced by UN experts as illegal aggression.

“There is no right to enforce unilateral sanctions through an armed blockade,” four UN human rights experts said last week. “The illegal use of force, and threats to use further force at sea and on land, gravely endanger the human right to life and other rights in Venezuela and the region.”

With No Evidence other than Trump's Claims and Fake Looking Computer Generated Video, Massa Media Reports that the US Bombed 5 More Alleged Drug Boats - according to Trump

From [HERE] US Southern Command said on Wednesday that its forces bombed three more alleged drug boats that were traveling as a convoy and suggested there may have been survivors. Later in the night, the command announced another attack on two other boats.

SOUTHCOM said the first strikes that targeted three boats killed at least three “narco-terrorists,” a term the Trump administration uses to justify extra-judicial executions for an alleged crime that doesn’t receive the death penalty in the US.

“The remaining narco-terrorists abandoned the other two vessels, jumping overboard and distancing themselves before follow-on engagements sank their respective vessels,” the command wrote on X, adding that it notified the US Coast Guard to “activate the Search and Rescue System.”

In its second announcement, SOUTHCOM said that it killed five people. “A total of five narco-terrorists were killed during these actions – three in the first vessel and two in the second,” the command said.

SOUTHCOM, which oversees US military operations in Central and South America, did not specify the location of either attack. The bombing campaign against small boats started in the Caribbean off the coast of Venezuela and has expanded into the Eastern Pacific Ocean.

Previous US attacks on boats in the region have left survivors, including a Colombian national and an Ecuadorian, who were both sent back to their home countries and released due to the lack of evidence that they committed a crime. According to a report from The New York Times, the Pentagon released the survivors to ensure that they did not end up in the US judicial system, where the Trump administration could be forced to show evidence justifying the bombing campaign. [MORE]

Republocrats Signal End to Its Probe of Trump's Alleged Boat Strikes in Venezuala and Fail to Release So-Called Unedited Video of the 2nd Strike [original videos all look AI generated]

From [HERE] Top Republican lawmakers have signaled they are ending their inquiries into a controversial U.S. military strike on an alleged drug smuggling vessel in the waters off Venezuela.

Sen. Roger Wicker (Mississippi), Republican chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a statement Thursday that he had seen “no evidence of war crimes” in the Sept. 2 operation that killed two survivors of an initial U.S. attack on their boat. He expressed confidence that the Trump administration’s military campaign around Latin America, responsible to date for the deaths of nearly 100 people, has been conducted “based on sound legal advice.”

His comments come a day after Rep. Mike D. Rogers (R-Alabama), who leads the House Armed Services Committee, said he will shutter a parallel inquiry. Rogers told reporters that he, too, was “satisfied” that members of his panel had been able to directly question the military officials who oversaw the Sept. 2 strike, which killed 11 people in all, and that he had concluded the operation followed a “lawful process.”

Wicker’s statement does not specify that his probe is ending immediately or whether he would seek any additional materials from the Defense Department related to the operation. [MORE]

Trump Signs Bill That Gives Him Over $1 Trillion Military Budget

From [HERE] President Trump on Thursday signed the massive $901 billion 2026 National Defense Authorization Act into law, which will be combined with a supplemental spending bill he signed earlier this year to give him a more than $1 trillion military budget.

While the true cost of US military and national security spending has exceeded $1 trillion for many years, this marks the first time the official military budget is over $1 trillion, though it was done in an unconventional way by combining the NDAA with a $156 billion supplemental that was part of the so-called “Big Beautiful Bill.”

The NDAA passed through the Senate on Wednesday in a vote of 77-20, with just two Republicans, Senators Rand Paul (KY) and Mike Lee (UT), and 18 Democrats voting against it. Last week, the House approved the bill in a vote of 312-112.

Notable amendments include a provision directing the Selective Service System (SSS) to register all potential draftees in the US automatically. According to Edward Hasbrouk, an expert on the Selective Service, it marks the biggest change to the system since 1980.

The NDAA also includes a new provision to ensure Israel is not impacted by global arms restrictions that have been imposed in response to its genocidal war in Gaza. The amendment requires a review of the arms restrictions and says the US will take steps to “mitigate” any “gaps” it may find.

The NDAA formally lifts the Caesar Act sanctions that were imposed on Syria in 2020 and were designed to prevent the country’s reconstruction until the ousting of former President Bashar al-Assad, which happened last year, when Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, an offshoot of al-Qaeda, took power in Damascus. [MORE]

Rent Strikes Being Used as a Strategic Tactic in Mid Sized Cities Against Rising Housing Costs

The rent strike is part of a strategy that housing activists have started to replicate in midsize cities across the country. Tenant organizing is more common in liberal coastal metropolises like Los Angeles and New York — which recently elected Zohran Mamdani, a former tenant organizer, as its mayor.

But rent strikes have been almost unheard of in places like Kansas City, Missouri, where according to Zillow the median rent increased 4.4 percent in the last year, twice the rate of the national average. Now, tenants in at least three buildings around the city have formed unions. Similar groups have popped up in Bozeman, Montana; Louisville; and New Haven, Connecticut.

The country’s renters are at a “total breaking point,” said Tara Raghuveer, founding director of the Kansas City Tenants Union, also known as KC Tenants, an activist group. “When you get displaced from Chicago as a tenant, you might end up in a place like Kansas City. When you get displaced from Kansas City, you might end up in a Raytown, Missouri. When you get displaced in Raytown, Missouri, I do not know where … you’re supposed to go.” [MORE]

DPIC Report says US Juries Increasingly Rejecting Death Penalty

From [HERE] The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) released its annual report Monday, finding that, while the number of executions in the US increased last year, the number of new death sentences decreased. The following is an overview of the report’s key findings.

Death Sentences Decline, Executions Rise

The report drew a contrast between new death sentences and number of executions, with the former totaling 22 and the latter 48. The executive director of the DPIC, Robin Maher, commented that this suggests “new death sentences are becoming vanishingly rare.”

Executions Concentrated in a Few States

Four states—Florida, Alabama, South Carolina and Texas—imposed the majority of death penalty sentences (72 percent). Florida enacted by far the most, increasing from one execution in 2024 to 19 in 2025, which made up over a third of executions overall.

The death penalty is legal in 27 states in total.

Public Opinion Increasingly Against the Death Penalty

Polling demonstrates that support for the death penalty is at an all-time low, with 52 percent being in favor. This figure is lower amongst those under 55. A shift in public opinion is also suggested by the actions of capital juries, with 56 percent proposing a life sentence over a death sentence when given the choice (from a study of over 50 juries.) [MORE]

Trump Takes Positive Step by Changing Marijuana Classification from Schedule I to Schedule III- as Drug is Less Dangerous than Alcohol

From [HERE] President Trump recently signed an executive order changing marijuana’s Controlled Substances Act classification from Schedule I to Schedule III. Schedule I is supposed to include especially dangerous drugs that are likely to be abused and have no medical purpose. Whatever one thinks of the wisdom and morality of using marijuana, the fact is it is less addictive, and quite possibly safer, than alcohol. Many Americans who live in one of the 40 states that have legalized medicinal marijuana use it for a variety of ailments.

Reclassifying marijuana does not repeal federal laws criminalizing its use. The reclassifying does, though, facilitate research into marijuana’s medical benefits. It also enables marijuana businesses that are legal under state laws to take ordinary deductions on their taxes. While President Trump’s executive order is a step forward, those who support advancing liberty must continue to press for repeal of all federal drug laws.

The Constitution does not give the federal government any authority to outlaw marijuana or any other “illicit” substance. At least supporters of alcohol prohibition understood that a constitutional amendment was needed to impose a national ban on alcohol. The war on drugs has been a primary excuse for violations of liberties including unconstitutional searches and seizures, “no-knock raids,” bank reports to the federal government on those making large cash deposits, and draconian mandatory minimum sentences. The drug war has also been used to justify foreign interventions — such as President Trump’s current actions against Venezuela.

Defenders of the drug war say it is necessary because the drug trade is controlled by violent criminals — even though this is the inevitable result of outlawing a product people wish to consume. The most important reason to end the drug war is that government has no moral right to stop adults from engaging in a peaceful (even if unwise) behavior like smoking marijuana. Laws prohibiting drug use have no place in a free society. These laws are rooted in the idea that our rights are merely gifts from the government conditioned on our “good “behavior. A government that can stop people from smoking marijuana is a government that can also mandate what vaccines we receive and how our children are educated.

Of course, in a free society, an individual who uses drugs would be responsible for the consequences of his choices, and those who oppose drug use could exercise their right to try to persuade others to abstain from drug use. [MORE]

Dr Vernon Coleman: Obedience will Destroy us All

From [HERE] For more years than most people realise, the conspirators have been training the masses to obey and to comply. They have used endless threats (such as global warming and the fake covid pandemic) to terrify populations around the world.

We cannot fight back with force because the enemy controls our armies.

Throwing apple crumble and custard at the crown jewels, delaying traffic, interrupting sporting events and throwing dye onto the stones of Stonehenge either annoy or trigger contempt. (All of these have been tried.) Such pathetic stunts will not change anything.

We cannot fight back through the ballot box because elections are fixed and the political parties are interchangeable.

So what can we do? Things are now moving very quickly – especially in Britain, where the massive rise in local property taxes means that banks have an excuse to close the remainder of the branches – making online banking inevitable.

A programme of non-compliance is our only choice – the only route to victory.

Here’s how the modern defender of freedom does not comply with the system created by the conspirators (please replace “he” with “she” where appropriate):

He doesn’t vote for any political party. He will always prefer to vote for an entirely independent candidate outside the system.

He refuses to bank online. He insists on using cash and paper cheques as often as possible.

He refuses to accept a digital identity.

He has never worn a face mask in private or in public.

He refused the covid vaccine (and other vaccines he is offered).

He writes regularly to politicians explaining why they should oppose “death by doctor” legislation. (I send them my free book `The Kill Bill’, which is available on my website).

He does not participate in the absurdly wasteful recycling programmes run by local councils.

He does not have a smart meter for electricity or water. (If you have a smart meter, you are vulnerable. If you annoy the authorities, they can cut off your electricity in an instant.)

He does not have a doorbell with a camera (most such bells merely provide the authorities with yet more surveillance cameras).

He will never have a dash camera and if he rides a bike, he won’t have a helmet camera (these are part of the surveillance of the people).

He does not have a TV licence, and if anyone comes from the BBC (“if you don’t give us money for something you don’t want, we will harass you to death”), he will refuse to let them through the door (as is his right).

He uses cash whenever he can. [MORE]

US Supreme Court Blocks Trump's Unlawful Deployment of National Guard to Chicago; "no credible evidence that there is danger of rebellion in the state of Illinois”

From [HERE] The US Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to allow the Trump administration to deploy National Guard troops to Chicago.

In an unsigned order, the court rejected the administration’s petition to overturn a Temporary Restraining Order(TRO) issued in October by Judge April Perry of the Northern District of Illinois. Perry wrote that there is “no credible evidence that there is danger of rebellion in the state of Illinois” when issuing the TRO that originally blocked the National Guard deployment.

The Trump administration appealed the TRO to the Supreme Court after an appellate court refused to overturn the order later in October. In its petition, the administration argued that:

Federal immigration-enforcement efforts have encountered significant resistance, as well as some violence, in Chicago… [F]ederal officers have been obstructed, threatened, and assaulted as they attempt to perform their duties [and] an Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing facility in Broadview, Illinois, has been the site of frequent and sometimes violent protests, damaging federal property and threatening the safety of federal officers.

In the unsigned order the Court responded: “At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois. The President has not invoked a statute that provides an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act.” The administration has sought to circumvent the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the president’s ability use the military as a domestic police force.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker called the ruling “an important step in curbing the Trump Administration’s consistent abuse of power and slowing Trump’s march toward authoritarianism.”

The deployment of National Guard troops has been one of the more controversial elements of the administration’s response to illegal immigration.

The administration’s appeal to the Supreme Court was filed after the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the part of Judge Perry’s order that blocked the administration from deploying the National Guard within Illinois. [MORE]