MD General Assembly Overrides Wes Moore’s Veto on Reparations Commission. Nations Only Black Governor Promotes the On Going Smiling Face while Opposing Restitution Owed to Blacks for Unjust Enrichment

From [HERE] Studies on reparations and climate change in Maryland now won’t have to clear major state legislative hurdles, thanks to the General Assembly’s override of a slew of bills on Tuesday.

The overrides took place after the Maryland General Assembly convened to elect Del. Joseline Peña-Melnyk, D-Anne Arundel and Prince George’s counties, the new Speaker of the House of Delegates. The lawmakers reconsidered various bills vetoed by Gov. Wes Moore, a Democrat, before ultimately overriding 18, including notable legislation to establish the Maryland Reparations Commission. 

The bill, a priority of the Legislative Black Caucus during the 2025 regular legislative session, would establish the commission to take two years to delve into research to determine if Marylanders whose families were impacted by slavery or unjust government policies should receive reparations.

Moore shocked the legislature when he, the state’s first Black governor, vetoed the legislation, which passed with overwhelming Democratic approval in both chambers. This move was part of a broader break from his norm: In past years, he only vetoed a handful of bills after each session. In 2025, though, he prevented 29 from becoming law.

“I will always protect and defend the full history of African Americans in our state and country,” Moore said in his May letter vetoing the reparations commission bill. “But in light of the many important studies that have taken place on this issue over nearly three decades, now is the time to focus on the work itself: Narrowing the racial wealth gap, expanding homeownership, uplifting entrepreneurs of color, and closing the foundational disparities that lead to inequality — from food insecurity to education.”

Arguing for the override in his chamber, Sen. Charles Sydnor, D-Baltimore County, said reversing Moore’s veto “does not stop the governor from acting on those topics he has expressed support for.”

“The recommendations will ensure that, when Maryland acts specifically in the name of reparations, it does so with clarity, credibility and permanence,” he said. “If the legislature or community leaders want a durable, defensible roadmap for redress, a focused commission remains the appropriate mechanism to convert fragment studies into coordinated recommendations.”

No further debate took place in the chamber after Sydnor sat down. The veto was overridden on a margin of 31-14. [MORE]

More Symbolic Politics from Elite White Liberals: San Francisco Mayor Creates a Fund for Reparations but Government Has No Money to Fund It

From [HERE] The mayor of San Francisco has signed a city measure to create a fund that could grant each of the city’s eligible black residents $5 million in reparations.

The new ordinance, signed by Mayor Daniel Lurie just before Christmas, establishes a reparations fund, as proposed by the city’s African American Reparations Advisory Committee (AARAC) in 2023 – a measure that would cost an estimated $50 billion.

The legislation merely establishes the fund but does not allocate any money to it - setting up the framework for any future contributions, whether they be through the city or privately donated.

The AARAC is tasked with developing 'recommendations for repairing harm in our black communities,' according to its website.  San Francisco journalist Erica Sandberg was among the first to highlight what Mayor Lurie had done

Per the 2023 report, every eligible African-American adult in San Francisco should be handed a $5 million lump sum to 'compensate the affected population for the decades of harm that they have experienced.' Approximately 50,000 black people live in San Francisco, and the qualifying requirements remain unclear.

But Mayor Lurie said the city is bracing for a $1 billion budget deficit next year.

'That means identifying key priorities for funding so we can continue delivering those services well,' he explained. 

'Given these historic fiscal challenges, the city does not have resources to allocate to this fund.'

He noted that his administration has always been open to outside donors, so 'if there is private funding that can be legally dedicated to this fund, we stand ready to ensure that funding gets to those who are eligible for it.' [MORE]

DOJ Sues Virgin Islands Police Over its Purposeful Gun Permit Delays

From [HERE] The Department of Justice has slammed another police agency for dragging its feet on issuing gun permits, this time in the Virgin Islands, declaring in a 12-page federal complaint, “Despite the Supreme Court’s unequivocal and repeated endorsement of an individual right to keep and bear arms…the VI Defendants have continued to obstruct and systematically deny law-abiding American citizens this fundamental right by systematically delaying the processing of applications and imposing unconstitutional conditions on the exercise of this constitutional right.”

Named as defendants in the action are the government of the Virgin Islands, the Virgin Islands Police Department (VIPD) and Police Commissioner Mario Brooks, in his official capacity.

In a prepared statement announcing the lawsuit, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said, “This Civil Rights Division will protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. The newly-established Second Amendment Section filed this lawsuit to bring the Virgin Islands Police Department back into legal compliance by ensuring that applicants receive timely decisions without unconstitutional obstruction.”

Earlier, the DOJ sued the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for essentially the same thing: deliberately delaying the issuance of carry licenses, sometimes for more than a year. This new action suggests the new 2A Section will be focusing attention on the permit processes, although gun rights organizations, such as the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, have recommended the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division take on some bigger issues, such as state laws which do, or will, require permits-to-purchase before law-abiding citizens can exercise their right to buy and own a firearm.

“Nowhere in this country should a citizen be forced to get permission from a government entity in order to exercise a fundamental right protected by the U.S. Constitution and delineated in nearly all state constitutions,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. “Nobody needs government permission to exercise a right.”

In a statement, U.S. Attorney Adam Sleeper, who filed the federal complaint in U.S. District Court of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas and St. John Division, asserted, “The territory’s firearms licensing laws and practices are inconsistent with the Second Amendment. This lawsuit seeks to uphold the rights of law-abiding citizens to bear arms in the U.S. Virgin Islands.” [MORE]

Rep Pressley pushes AI Civil Rights Act, aimed to ‘especially’ protect Black, Brown and marginalized people

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., helped advocate for the AI Civil Rights Act last week in order to prevent companies from using what Democrats describe as "biased and discriminatory AI-powered algorithms."

Pressley joined Sen. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., and Reps. Yvette Clarke, D-N.Y., Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., and Summer Lee, D-Pa., to reintroduce and advocate for the AI Civil Rights last week.

"As AI innovation grows, it is incumbent on us all to prioritize the safety, rights, and opportunity of all people — especially the Black, Brown, and marginalized communities who disproportionately bear the burden of biased and discriminatory systems," Pressley said in a statement on her website. "We cannot allow AI to be the latest chapter in America’s history of exploiting marginalized people. That is why the AI Civil Rights Act is necessary — to invest in an approach rooted in equity that safeguards all of our civil rights and liberties."

Damon Hewitt, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, was quoted in the same piece declaring his organization’s pride in partnering with the politicians pushing this legislation. [MORE]

Black Lawmakers in MD Seek to Create a Commission to Investigate the Deaths of Black Children Killed at a Juvenile Prison and Buried by Gov Authorities in an Abandoned Graveyard

From [HERE] A group of Black Maryland state lawmakers plan to propose a bill during the upcoming legislative session that would create an independent commission to investigate the deaths of hundreds of Black children who died at a segregated juvenile detention facility during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Members of the General Assembly‘s Legislative Black Caucus are drafting a bill that would create the investigative body and allocate $750,000 so the commission can assemble a full accounting of what happened at the House of Reformation and Instruction for Colored Children – where Black boys as young as 7 were committed, typically for minor offenses.

Boys who died at the facility were buried on state-owned land in Cheltenham, near the former House of Reformation. State Sen. William C. Smith Jr. (D-Montgomery) and lawmakers who represent the area in Prince George’s County where the grave site is located, including Del. Jeffrie E. Long Jr. (D-Calvert) and state Sen. Kevin M. Harris (D-Prince George’s), said they will file the bill at the beginning of the legislative session in January.

The third-party nature of the commission is essential, Smith said, “because no agency and no entity can investigate itself.”

“The independent investigation will do a very thorough analysis and inquiry into some things that will ultimately and undoubtedly be uncomfortable to learn,” Smith said. “And to have that information presented in an unbiased and unvarnished manner is critical to the purpose of this project, which is to provide Marylanders an explanation and understanding of the tragedies that happened here.”

Long, who will sponsor the bill in the House of Delegates, said that since learning about the graveyard earlier this year, he has wanted to make it his “mission” to ensure the House of Reformation boys are properly memorialized.

A Washington Post investigation in September found that for decades, Maryland officials allowed the boys’ unmarked graves to remain dilapidated, even as they approved construction of a well-kept veteran’s cemetery yards away. The reporting also found that at least 230 children died at the facility between 1870 and 1939, far exceeding the 67 previously estimated by the state.

Staff members of Maryland’s Department of Juvenile Services rediscovered about 100 of the graves last year, finding them in an overgrown, wooded patch of state property – many marked only by cinder blocks. Without further forensic and anthropological work at the site, it’s impossible to determine exactly how many children are buried in the House of Reformation graveyard. [MORE]

Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Ordered to Testify in Dutch COVID Shot Injury Lawsuit

From [HERE] Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla will have to appear in person in the Netherlands to testify at a hearing in a COVID-19 vaccine injury lawsuit, a Dutch court ruled late last month.

The court order relates to a lawsuit filed in 2023 by seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines. One of the victims has since died.

The lawsuit centers around the question “of whether the COVID-19 injections are a bioweapon,” Dutch newspaper De Andere Krant reported. In addition to Gates and Bourla, the suit names 15 other defendants, including former Dutch prime minister and current NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the Dutch state, and several Dutch public health officials and journalists.

De Andere Krant said last month’s ruling “is a significant setback for the defendants, who are accused of misleading victims about the ‘safety and effectiveness’ of the vaccines.” However, it “remains to be seen” whether the defendants will comply with the court’s order and appear at next year’s hearing.

The defendants may face additional legal challenges in Dutch courts in the new year. A second lawsuit, filed in March by three COVID-19 vaccine injury victims in the Netherlands, presents a similar set of allegations and names the same defendants.

At a press conference last week, Dutch attorney Peter Stassen, who represents the vaccine-injured plaintiffs in both cases, earlier this month petitioned the courts in both cases to hear in-person testimony by five expert witnesses regarding the safety and efficacy of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

According to Stassen, oral hearings will be held in both cases next year, but hearing dates have not yet been scheduled. Stassen seeks to consolidate the cases.

The expert witnesses include:

  • Catherine Austin Fitts, founder and publisher of the Solari Report and former assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

  • Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical research and development executive.

  • Joseph Sansone, Ph.D., a psychotherapist who is litigating to prohibit mRNA vaccines in Florida.

  • Katherine Watt, a researcher and paralegal.

  • Mike Yeadon, Ph.D., a pharmacologist and former vice president of Pfizer’s allergy and respiratory research unit. [MORE]

"A National Injustice." Large Study Finds that Vaccinated Black Infants Die at Double the Rate of White Infants and All Vaccinated Infants Have a Higher Mortality Rate than Unvaccinated Infants

SEE FULL GRAPH BELOW AND HERE

From [HERE] Infants vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to die in their third month than unvaccinated infants, according to an analysis of data obtained from the Louisiana Department of Health. Female and Black infants died at higher rates than male or white babies.

Children’s Health Defense scientists Brian Hooker, Ph.D., and Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., conducted the analysis, which was published Monday on Preprints.org.

Depending on which vaccines they received, vaccinated children were between 29%-74% more likely to die than unvaccinated children. Vaccinated Black infants were 28%-74% more likely to die, and vaccinated female infants had a 52%-98% greater risk of death.

Overall, children who received all six vaccines recommended for 2-month-olds were 68% more likely to die in their third month of life, the data showed.

Hooker and Jablonowski determined the death rates by analyzing immunization and mortality records from the Louisiana Department of Health for children who died before age 3 months between 2013 and 2024.

“This very important paper represents one of the first studies on the cumulative effect of vaccinesgiven at 2 months of age following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommended schedule,” Hooker told The Defender.

He added:

“The highest infant mortality rates were seen when children received all six of the recommended vaccines in one visit. In addition to elevated mortality, the vaccination schedule also increased the likelihood that children were more likely to die of non-leading causes of death.

“This type of study is needed to guide the efforts of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and especially the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) as they revisit the recommended schedule.”

Hooker and Jablonowski compared infants vaccinated between 60 and 90 days of life — the window corresponding to the CDC’s recommended 2-month immunization visit — with children who were unvaccinated during that same period. Mortality was defined as death occurring between 90 and 120 days of life.

At the 2-month visit, during the period studied, a CDC-compliant infant would likely have received shots for respiratory syncytial virus or RSV; hepatitis B (Hep B); rotavirusdiphtheria, tetanus, pertussisHaemophilus influenzae type B; pneumococcal; and poliovirus.

“It is the largest single-day antigenic assault a person is ever likely to encounter in their lifetimes, and may be accompanied with 1.225 mg [milligrams] of aluminum adjuvant … even though the … maximum per-dose limit allowable by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is 0.85mg,” according to the authors.

The infant mortality rate in the U.S. is about 1 in 200. However, “in what amounts to one of the greatest health hazards in the entire country, and a national injustice,” according to the authors, the mortality rate for infants born to Black mothers is approximately 1 in 100 — almost double the national rate.

Major departure from the standard narrative

Public health authorities have long maintained that childhood vaccines are safe and effective and that vaccination prevents far more deaths than it could plausibly cause.

However, some doctors and scientists, including some who spoke at recent ACIP meetings, are beginning to acknowledge that these claims are based on limited evidence, that many vaccines were recommended without sufficient safety data and that the expansion of the childhood schedule coincided with a rise in chronic illness among U.S. children.

The authors said their study — although limited to a few thousand children — is, to date, one of the largest studies of its kind. [MORE]

Federal Monitor Finds Cleveland Police Nearly Four Times More Likely to Stop Black Drivers, in city controlled by elite white liberals

From [HERE] Cleveland Police disproportionately stop, search and arrest Black Clevelanders compared to other races, according to a new assessment from the monitor overseeing the police consent decree.

“Citywide, Black drivers are stopped by police at nearly twice (1.97 or 197%) the rate you would expect based on their share of the driving population—making up 62.7% of traffic stops but only 31.8% of drivers,” the monitor, Christine Cole, wrote, adding that white drivers make up 31% of stops and 59% of drivers. “Black drivers are more than 3.7 times as likely as White drivers to be stopped by Cleveland police.”

The assessment additionally found Black people were more likely to be searched and more likely to be arrested after a stop.

The monitoring team analyzed documentation from all stops in 2024 and closely scrutinized the reasoning for stops. Subsequent searches or arrests in 376 traffic stops and 255 investigatory stops were also reviewed. [MORE]

San Bernardino DA Declines to Charge Cop who Struck a White Man 16 Times with his Baton, Claims Unprovoked Attack was Valid Violence

From [HERE] The San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office has cleared a San Bernardino police officer of criminal wrongdoing after he struck a man 16 times with his baton during the videotaped arrest of a Crestline man in 2024.

Officer Javier Chavez’s “use of force was objectively reasonable and not excessive. It was therefore lawful,” said the DA’s 19-page report, which was released Tuesday, Dec. 2.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that “Reasonableness is an objective analysis and must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight. It is also highly deferential to the police officer’s need to protect himself and others.”

Investigators reached their conclusion by reviewing audio and video recordings and written police reports. Investigators did not interview the officers, the suspect or witnesses, the DA’s report said.

That investigation was separate from the internal probe by the Police Department, which determined that Chavez violated department policy. Chavez was suspended and returned to patrol duty after additional training, Chief Darren Goodman said. Chavez was not disciplined for using excessive force, but for something else related to the investigation that Goodman said he could not disclose because it is a personnel matter, Goodman said.

The suspect, Billy Lee Hill, 39, has filed a lawsuit against the city and the three officers he encountered the night of June 6, 2024. Hill alleged excessive force and other civil rights violations. The city, in its response filed with the court, denied the allegations. A mediation session has been scheduled for Dec. 8. [MORE]

Honduras Plunges Into Turmoil as Electoral Official Alleges “Monumental Fraud:” Trump’s Threats to Cut Aid and Pardon of a Convicted Drug Trafficker Manipulated Honduras' presidential election

From [HERE] and [HERE] Days removed from Sunday’s presidential vote, and still without a clear winner, Honduras’s post-election crisis became more contentious after a member of the country’s electoral authority denounced “monumental electoral fraud” on Thursday evening.

Marlon Ochoa, a representative for the Libre Party on the three-member National Electoral Council (CNE), alleged coordinated and deliberate electoral fraud carried out by the other council members, Cossette Alejandra López-Osorio of the National Party and Ana Paola Hall of the Liberal Party.

The CNE had claimed in a social media post on Tuesday that the delays in election results were due to technical issues. Two members of the council criticized Grupo ASD S.A.S, the company behind the Transmission and Dissemination of Election Results reporting system (known as TREP), for carrying out software modifications without the unanimous authorization of the council plenary.

But on Thursday, after repeated downtime of the TREP system continued to prevent the public from accessing real-time updates, the Honduran Center for Democracy Studies (CESPAD) issued an alert calling on CNE to take action.

López-Osorio and Hall represent the country’s traditional political parties, both of which were relegated to opposition status when Xiomara Castro won the general election for Libre in 2021. Salvador Nasralla of the Liberal Party has likewise alleged that irregularities may be affecting the results. [MORE]

Pro-Israel Forces Intensify Effort To Control American Sheeple's Discourse and Minds

From [HERE] Across the American political spectrum, support for the State of Israel is steadily eroding. With the long-running, staggeringly expensive redistribution of American wealth and weapons to one of the world’s most prosperous countries under unprecedented threat, Israel’s advocates inside the United States are growing increasingly desperate to suppress the facts, opinions, questions and imagery that are causing this sea change.

Pro-Israel forces have long worked to limit and shape US discourse to Israel’s advantage. However, the intensity and novelty of what’s taking place in 2025 — from the government-coerced transfer of a social media platform to pro-Israel billionaires, to the jailing and attempted deportation of a student for writing an opinion piece, and more — deserves the attention of every American who values free expression, an enlightened electorate, and independence from foreign influence.

Many Americans know that Congress and President Biden teamed up in 2024 to force the Chinese company ByteDance to divest its US operation of the popular video-sharing app TikTok, yet few realize this unusual intervention was motivated in large part by a desire to serve the interests of Israel.

Though politicians pointed to the supposed Chinese menace lurking inside the app — while revealing their lack of sincerity by continuing to use it themselves — the catalyst for the extraordinary legislation’s passage was a sea of viral content illuminating Israel’s rampage in Gaza, casting Palestinians in empathetic light, and questioning the legitimacy of the political philosophy that is Zionism.

The idea that passage of the ban was largely about Israel is no conspiracy theory. American politicians who supported the compelled divestiture of TikTok have candidly said so themselves. Sharing a stage with Biden Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2024, then-Senator Mitt Romney said:

Some wonder why there was such overwhelming support for us to shut down, potentially, TikTok or other entities of that nature. You look at the postings on TikTok and the number of mentions of Palestinians relative to other social media sites — it’s overwhelmingly so among TikTok broadcasts, so I’d note that’s of real interest to the president, who will get the chance to take action in that regard.

Similarly, Rep. Mike Lawler of New York told a webinar that pro-Palestinian student protests were “exactly why we included the TikTok bill…because you’re seeing how these kids are being manipulated by certain groups or entities or countries to foment hate on their behalf and really create a hostile environment here in the US.” [MORE]

Israeli Army Murders a Palestinian Child by Shooting Him and Then Crushes His Body with a Tank

From [HERE] Israeli forces in northern Gaza shot and killed a 16-year-old boy on Wednesday before crushing his body with a tank, the Palestinian news agency WAFA has reported, as the IDF continues to violate the US-backed ceasefire deal.

“A WAFA correspondent reported that the army shot 16-year-old Zaher Nasser Shamiya from Jabalia refugee camp and then ran over him with a tank, splitting his body in half,” the news agency said.

The Quds News Network said in a post on X that Shamiya had “returned with his family to live in Block 2 of Jabalia refugee camp, along the so-called ‘yellow line,'” referring to the vague boundary that separates the Israeli-occupied side of Gaza from the rest of the Strip.

Turkey’s Anadolu Agency reported that an “Israeli force made up of several military vehicles and bulldozers, backed by infantry units, advanced several hundred meters beyond the ‘yellow line'” into the al-Ternes area of the Jabalia refugee camp, which has been completely destroyed by the IDF.

The IDF claimed that two “terrorists” crossed the yellow line and said that its forces “eliminated” one of them.

The Anadolu report said that two other Palestinians were killed by Israeli gunfire in Jabalia on Wednesday.

Gaza’s Health Ministry said earlier in the day that since the ceasefire was supposed to go into effect on October 10, Israeli forces have killed at least 379 Palestinians and wounded 992. “A number of victims are still under the rubble and in the streets, as ambulance and civil defense crews have been unable to reach them so far,” the ministry said. [MORE]

In a New "Low IQ" Ad, Frivolous SNigger Jasmine Crocket is Silent on Trump's Criticisms b/c She Has No Legislative Accomplishments and Done More to Support Israel's Genocide than to Help Black People

BARK AND CLAP POLITRICKS. Sleeping Tom’s feel compelled to bark and clap for Jasmine Crockett but they don’t know why. SNigger Crockett has delivered little to nothing of tangible valuable to Black communities. She has advanced the interests of Black people or provided effective political leadership about as much as comedian Kevin Hart, James Comey or Rachel Maddow - persons the black votary also barks and claps for. Crockett is a rhetoritician whose only agenda appears to be about herself - making herself a symbolic leader, providing leadership only as a performance without solutions and accountability to Black folks.

About twenty years ago Norman Kelley observed that black people had become political weaklings, “complicit in their own political emasculation.” At one time Black Americans forcefully argued for their own seat at the table but now in their relations with the democrat party they function like trained seals or dogs that “bark and clap” at election time and shut-up afterwards. Black people, once envied and imitated by people seeking freedom throughout the world are now demobilized and have no effective political organizations, no real leaders and “black politics” is void of any substance; from the tap dance to the lap dance.

On November 20, 2021, incumbent representative Eddie Bernice Johnson announced she would not seek reelection in 2022. Thereafter, Crockett was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, representing a majority-minority district based in Dallas. Since then she has delivered nothing of tangible value to the Black communities in Texas or elsewhere and spent her time making cute, sarcastic statements to the media to develop her persona in the Spectacle. It is no exaggeration to say that Crockett has no known legislative accomplishments. Her voting record on Israel–Palestine issues, including support for several pro-Israel resolutions and aid measures during the Gaza genocide has drawn criticism from progressive and Palestinian-rights advocacy organizations, which give her low marks on issue-based scorecards, describe her as having "a poor legislative record on Israel–Palestine issues", and have urged her to call for a ceasefire in Gaza, which she failed to do.

As such, it is appropriate that her new commercial contains no substance or message. The only words playing are Donald Trump’s statements in which he described her as “low IQ.” To refute such haterade one might expect to see a greatest hits montage of Ms. Crockett showcasing her achievements and most memorable moments in office. However, as stated, she has no highlight reel of successes, so the commercial just shows her face for 45 seconds and has no words of her own and offers no reason to vote for her.

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

“Opportomist” – a straight-up opportunist who revels in his tokenhood. 2) a token hood handpicked and taken out of the ‘hood. 3) a lawn jockey. 4) a “Yes-man” for the “Other Man” in derogation of the “Brotherman.” An opportomist is an African-American nameslug who has been acculturated and culturally conditioned into self-hatred and seeks personal gain through obsequious behavior to Caucasian overlings. (See: Sambo, Criss-Crossover, DAMS & Mainstream)

SNigger Crockett’s current step-and-fetchit activity for elite liberals involves an obviously futile effort to flip a solidly red US Senate seat in Texas. She will necessarily lose the race but elite liberals will achieve their real goals of raising a lot of money, attracting attention and getting captivated Black voters to bark and clap. Such efforts are not mindless but strategic as they help maintain master-servant relations between whites and Blacks, which is the gravamen of the system of white supremacy, a bi-partisan system of unjust treatment and domination. Sleeping toms (means black voters) will vicariously feel like they participated in a process they are excluded from - like fans at an NBA game who are rewarded with a coupon when the opposing team misses free throws.

Black people are only familiar with Crockett because elite white liberals have showcased her in their media and platforms. She is essentially their creation - an “opporTomist” rolebot controlled remotely by her masters. Elite white liberals have instructed quiescent Black voters to bark and clap for Crockett and they appear to be doing so. The black votary dogmatically votes and supports liberal causes by default as it is no longer concerned with whether its politics function to solve Black problems; it just votes against republicans. To much of the Black votary, whether Jasmine Crockett ever delivers any tangible, material benefits or actually economically empowers Black people or provides substantive justice to Black communities is beside the point - their role is to function as political spectators, much like lathered up sports fans. Claud Anderson explains, “Both White and Black candidates for public office, various political parties, and this nation, all get a free ride with Black voters.” Anderson states, “Black voters are led to believe there are two purposes to vote: 1) to elect the White candidate who is best able to lead and control resources or 2) to elect the Black candidate who is most deserving of a public job and personal recognition. The most we get is personal satisfaction that the candidate we supported won. We play politics just to play. Others play for the benefits of winning or being in the winner's circle. We often support campaign issues that do not benefit us. Blackness is excluded, but we hope that through some miraculous twinge of conscience, once in office the former candidate will offer us some spoils as supporters. We demand nothing and that is basically exactly what we get. We have yet to learn to play politics by the basic rules. We should stay out of any political game that promises that we will get nothing even when our candidate wins.“ The undeceiver Steve Cokely described this nonsensical circumstance as “playing for your sandwich.”

In reality, Crockett and an army of thousands of other black elected and appointed rolebots at all levels of government in the US are not engaged in any “black politics” and have no; “black political philosophy,” no “Black agenda” or black messaging or organizing aimed at solving the myriad of problems plaguing Black communities, no explanation to account for the system of racism white supremacy or any response to the 2nd class citizenship imposed on law abiding Black people by authority in all Black communities (many of them controlled by elite white liberals). Said black puppeticians have non-white skin and black chromosomes but for all non-cosmetic purposes they are interchangeable with their white liberal counterparts; looking and sounding different from them (like Crockett) but reading from the same script. “Blackness” and “black politics” has come to mean ‘not Republican’ and not much else. Black politics has gone from being aggressively results oriented and highly organized to being tame activity channelled into voting for the Democratic Party and its grimacing white liberal and black borg candidates.

According to the Urban League’s State of Black America, Black people haven’t progressed since 1965. The Black-White disparity persists across virtually every line or indicator of life in the United States. Since ratification of the Constitution in 1788, the League’s Equality Index finds that Blacks are about three-fifths along the way to experiencing equal status with White Americans. If you overstand that the granfalloon of “race” has no scientific validity and is merely a political classification, then addressing the myriad of unjust problems disproportionately plaguing Black people and their communities should be a paramount concern and an on-going state of emergency. Yet, the menu of political concerns and grievances articulated by elite white liberals (environmentalism, Ukraine war, Israel wars, aborticide after the 7 month, unlimited immigration, genderplex confusion, Trump obsession, injecting experimental “vaccines” and defending James Comey or Leticia James, etc) have nothing to do with the daily realities Black people face. Nevertheless, other directed, cowardly Blacks purposefully kept in a state of mental maladaptiveness (and a permanent state of checkmate) would rather in engage in fantasy discussions about reparations, symbolic politics or moral suasion (transforming the thinking and speech of racists) than deal with the nuts and bolts work of economic development, the creation of sustainable independent communities and institutions and acquiring the political power to prevent racists from practicing racism against Black individuals and communities. Chancellor Williams and Dr. Frances Cress Welsing both observed that sleeping toms 'continue to live in a dream world where they believe singing, marching, chanting, having cookouts, releasing balloons into the air, “performing leadership,” making really great speeches and ‘staying prayed up’ will somehow prevent their continual digression and devolution.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

rhetoritician – one whose capacity to express prevents him or her from ever truly experiencing or desiring to do so clearly and directly. 2) one drunk on the wine of one’s own words devoid of experience or insperience. 3) one who has not discovered the reality covered by truth, but capable of expressing (their distortions of it) anyway. 4) one who is hypnotized or mesmerized by his/her own words—suffering from rigor-rhetoric. (See: True Believer, Witchcraft, BK BURGER & Material Realist)

Sleeping Tom – a person of Afrikan descent who has not consciously awakened to fully embrace his or her own asili (connective cultural tissue, heritage, imprimatur, and imperative). 2) a socially unconscious person of Afrikan descent who participates in secret balloting (voting). A sleepin’ Tom lives and reacts out of another culture’s asili or out of the mind of another; not their own. 3) a Negro who is unaware that he is all souled-out. 4) a Negro who isn’t aware that he is in fact and in deed a certified Sambo. 5) a broken, token Negro; a coin-operative. (See: Straw Boss, Asili, Doublemindedness, Sambo, Uncle Tom-Tom, Coin-Operated, Black Flask Brigade & Secret Ballots)

Opportomist” – a straight-up opportunist who revels in his tokenhood. 2) a token hood handpicked and taken out of the ‘hood. 3) a lawn jockey. 4) a “Yes-man” for the “Other Man” in derogation of the “Brotherman.” An opportomist is an African-American nameslug who has been acculturated and culturally conditioned into self-hatred and seeks personal gain through obsequious behavior to Caucasian overlings. (See: Sambo, Criss-Crossover, DAMS & Mainstream)

sniggering – the modus vivendi of opportunist (sell-out) compromises. 2) the actions of SNiggers. (See: Coin-Operated)

Electoral politics - a polylogue of agreed-upon illusions and false (deflectionary) issues. (See: Politicking & Pathocracy)