Prosecutor Used Flawed AI to Keep a Man in Jail

From [HERE] When Kyle Kjoller, a 57-year-old welder, was ordered held without bail in Nevada County, Calif., in April, he protested. The charges against him — multiple counts of illegal gun possession — were not grave enough under California law to warrant keeping him in jail for months awaiting his trial (article available here).

Prosecutors disagreed, and offered 11 pages’ worth of reasons. But the brief they filed, Mr. Kjoller’s lawyers contend, was rife with errors that bear the hallmarks of generative artificial intelligence.

The lawyers soon turned up briefs in four separate cases, including Mr. Kjoller’s, that were filled with mistakes, all of them from the office of the same prosecutor, District Attorney Jesse Wilson. The mistakes included wholesale misinterpretations of the law, as well as quotations that do not actually appear in the cited texts. 

Wilson has acknowledged that the briefs contain numerous errors, but he has said that A.I. was used to draft only one of them, and not the one filed in Kjoller’s case.

That answer has not satisfied Mr. Kjoller’s lawyers, who have asked the California Supreme Court to investigate whether the briefs indicate a “wider pattern” of prosecutors asking courts to rule against defendants “on the basis of nonexistent case citations and holdings.”

“Prosecutors’ reliance on inaccurate legal authority can violate ethical rules, and represents an existential threat to the due process rights of criminal defendants and the legitimacy of the courts,” they wrote. [MORE]

ACLU Sues San Francisco Landlords Over Alleged AI Surveillance In Tenants’ Homes

From [HERE] The ACLU Foundation of Northern California and two partner law firms filed a lawsuit Thursday against major landlord Equity Residential and surveillance technology vendor SmartRent, alleging the companies violated tenants’ constitutional privacy rights by forcing the use of in-home “smart” surveillance systems.

The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco Superior Court, challenges the installation of SmartRent technology in residential units owned or operated by Equity Residential, one of the largest corporate landlords in the United States. The complaint names SmartRent Technologies Inc. as a co-defendant and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to halt what plaintiffs describe as unlawful monitoring inside people’s homes.

According to the ACLU, tenants in multiple San Francisco-area buildings were required to accept so-called “smart home” systems as a condition of their tenancy. The systems include digital door locks, thermostats and environmental sensors that collect data about tenants’ movements, habits and home conditions, and transmit that information to landlords and third-party technology providers.

The technology does not appear on its face to be surveillance equipment. The systems consist of digital door locks, thermostats and small environmental sensors that resemble ordinary apartment fixtures, leading tenant advocates to argue that residents may not immediately understand the extent to which activity inside their homes can be recorded or analyzed.

“It’s against the law for landlords to force tenants to have surveillance devices in their homes,” said Jake Snow, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Northern California. “This is a flagrant abuse of people’s privacy.” [MORE]

The FCC and US Puppeticians Push Law that would strip Local Control and Force Residents to Accept More Cell Towers in their Neighborhoods.

From [HERE] The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and federal lawmakers are pushing to make it easy for telecom companies to erect cell towers in communities without residents’ consent — even if the tower isn’t really needed to close a coverage gap in cell service.

If either the agency or Congress succeeds, communities will lose the right to keep unwanted towers and other wireless infrastructure away from their homes and schools, according to Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) & Wireless Program.

“This is the most aggressive push we’ve ever seen to override local zoning, erase public participation, and force dense wireless infrastructure into residential areas under the guise of streamlining wireless infrastructure deployment,” Eckenfels said.

On Wednesday, the U.S House Committee on Energy and Commerce advanced H.R. 2289, the American Broadband Deployment Act of 2025, in a 26-24 vote along party lines, with Democrats opposing it. A floor vote has yet to be scheduled as of press time.

If passed, the bill would allow wireless companies to install towers and antennas wherever they decide, regardless of whether local residents want the equipment, Eckenfels said.

The FCC, the federal agency that oversees telecommunications, is working on its own similar strategy. On Dec. 1, the agency published a notice in the Federal Register about a proposed rule to “free towers and other wireless infrastructure from unlawful regulatory burdens.”

Eckenfels called H.R. 2289 a “legislative shortcut” for what the FCC wants to accomplish.

The FCC and lawmakers don’t want any roadblocks to installing more wireless infrastructure, said tech attorney Odette Wilkens, president and general counsel for the nonprofit Wired Broadband, Inc. “They see community input as an obstacle, and they see it as a regulatory barrier because the zoning ordinances on the local level protect the people.”

Across the country, residents have been successfully keeping new cell towers and antennas from going up next to their homes and schools.

Eckenfels said she thinks these successes prompted the FCC — which is captured by the wireless industry — and lawmakers who favor the wireless industry to push the measures. [MORE]

Regardless of Whether a FLA Officer Shot the Right or Wrong Black Teen in the Back, a White DA says the Cop Acted "in Good Faith" During Their 'Which NGHR Hunt.' 14 Yr Old Hadn't Committed a Crime

NO CRIMINAL CONSEQUENCES AFTER COP SHOT INNOCENT BLACK BOY IN THE BACK. A so-called communication breakdown within the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office dispatch system led multiple officers on a frenzied, hour-long search for the wrong car in the wake of a fatal drive-by shooting last month in Northwest Jacksonville. Operating under incorrect information, a JSO officer shot a fleeing, unarmed 14-year-old boy in the back four times, leaving him in critical condition. The boy had nothing to do with the shooting.

State Attorney Melissa Nelson said this week the officer, Jacob Cahill, did not violate any laws by shooting the boy, who survived, because he was working in good faith on outdated information. Nelson is white. She also recently declined to file charges against the Florida cops who stopped a Black man for driving without headlights on during the daytime and beat him causing brain injury.

A black Kia Optima that the boy and his friends stole that evening from a DoorDash driver for a joy ride was initially suspected of being involved in a nearby shooting, but officers working the shooting scene quickly realized those crimes were not related.

If dispatchers had relayed to the task force that the black Kia was not linked to the drive-by, Nelson said there would not have been a full-fledged pursuit of the four teens, which damaged the Kia and one JSO cruiser, which crashed into a nearby building.

Cahill, however, who was a member of that task force, didn’t know the Kia was no longer the suspect vehicle in the drive-by shooting, so when the 14-year-old boy fled from the scene, he believed he was chasing a potential shooter, Nelson said.

Nelson characterized the circumstances as a “perfect storm” and an “unusual and unfortunate alignment of circumstances,” but the foul-up also revealed a systemic and critical failure in the way JSO dispatchers communicate with officers on the street. 

Officer Jacob T. Cahill, 27, who has been with JSO for three years, said he chased one of the teens who ran, thinking he was the driver of the crashed Kia and that he was armed. Nelson said Cahill believed that because of the prior reports, the car chase and crash, the teen’s arm position, and poor visibility, which kept him from seeing what was in the teen’s left hand.

Cahill shouted a command and almost immediately fired four shots, hitting the teen in the back.

It turned out the teen was unarmed, and his movement toward his waistband was likely just grabbing his pants.

The teen was rushed into surgery in critical condition. Nelson declined to release his name at the request of his family. She said he has been released from the hospital.

Nelson said that because of the anticipated public interest, her office sped up the review that normally takes anywhere from six to 12 months and finished it in about 30 days.

She said her team examined bodycams, surveillance, radio logs and witness statements, and consulted use of force experts before concluding that Cahill’s use of potentially deadly force was lawful and not criminal under the legal standard that looks at what a reasonable officer could have believed at the time.

“We, in reviewing his actions, must assess his actions from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, not with the benefit of hindsight, and must consider all facts known to and reasonably believed by him at the moment force is deployed,” Nelson explained. “The question is not what we know now to be true today, but what a reasonable officer could have believed in that moment based on the information available to him.” [MORE]

Apparently, the racist suspect prosecutor claims that the officer would have been justified in using deadly force against any person who fled from the police at that time, regardless of whether the individual had committed a crime or not.

Even if the teen was involved in a crime, he could not have reasonably posed a threat to the white cop as he fled - running away from the cop as fast as he could, who then shot him in the back.

Jacksonville attorney Matt Kachergus, who is representing the family of the 14-year-old boy, who The Tributary is not naming, said in a written statement that the family is disappointed that their child was shot multiple times while Cahill is likely to not be held accountable for the use of deadly force. 

 “Although the State Attorney has determined there will be no accountability for this officer, the family will seek to hold him accountable in our system of justice,” Kachergus said.

White LA County DA Asks Court to Dismiss Charges Against the 2 White Torrance Cops who Murdered Christopher Mitchell. Shot Black Man Sitting in His Car, he was Not Under Arrest. Cops Sent Racist Texts

From [HERE] Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Nathan Hochman moved to drop manslaughter charges Friday against two Torrance police officers who shot and killed a Black man in 2018, attempting to end a seven-year saga that saw the case rejected and then reexamined by three different elected prosecutors. Hochman is white and both officers are white.

Matthew Concannon and Anthony Chavez were indicted in 2023 for the shooting death of Christopher Deandre Mitchell, a 23-year-old car theft suspect who was in possession of an air rifle at the time he was killed. While Mitchell never pointed the weapon at either officer, Concannon told authorities he saw Mitchell reaching for what he believed was a real firearm when he opened fire.

Michael Gennaco, a special prosecutor hired earlier this year by Hochman to review the case, filed a motion to dismiss charges late Thursday, saying he did not believe prosecutors could prove voluntary manslaughter at trial.

But Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Sam Ohta declined to rule on the motion Friday, citing a pending review of the case by the California Supreme Court. Concannon's attorneys had previously filed a writ of habeas corpus after Ohta rejected a motion to dismiss the charges.

“I am not going to rule on this because it would be inappropriate for me to do that at this point. The Supreme Court has to tell us its decision," Ohta said.

Ohta signaled he wouldn't decide the motion until the case was withdrawn from the Supreme Court, and even then, he would need time to review the filings.

Chavez and Concannon were among those investigated in 2021 when the district attorney's office uncovered a thread of racist text messages sent by members of the Torrance Police Department. At least 15 officers with the Torrance Police Department sent approximately 390 racist, sexist and homophobic messages from 2018 to 2020. This is something that appears to be somewhat common among cops in California and elsewhere. The text messages talked about hurting and killing Black people. The messages included jokes about setting up Black men to be killed, with one officer suggesting he wanted to shoot and hang several Black suspects, and a picture of a teddy bear being lynched inside the police department’s headquarters, according to documents previously reviewed by The Times.

While The Times never found evidence that Concannon or Chavez sent any of the messages, they were both under investigation as part of the scandal, according to documents previously reviewed by the newspaper and sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Messages sent by unidentified officers used the N-word to describe Mitchell’s loved ones and celebrated other officers’ decision to use force against protesters who supported Mitchell’s family during a demonstration in front of the Torrance City Council. Several of the officers who used racist language in the messages were also later accused of using excessive force against protesters in civil lawsuits.

The shooting incident occurred when officers approached Mitchell while he was seated in a purported stolen car in a Ralphs parking lot. They claimed they spotted what was later revealed to be a "break barrel air rifle" between his legs.

Gennaco said the stock of the air rifle, which was all Concannon could see, looked "strikingly similar" to a shotgun. He fired one round, and Chavez fired twice immediately after. The two officers then retreated and waited for backup.

Nearly 30 minutes elapsed before anyone checked on Mitchell, who was then pronounced dead of a single gunshot wound, according to court records.

Christopher Deandre Mitchell’s family have maintained that Mitchell did follow commands and was never a threat to the officers, who they say never gave him a chance to surrender. They claim he was asleep in the car when the cops approached him. Black Lives Matter Los Angeles organizer Sheila Bates said Monday that the officers unnecessarily escalated the situation despite Mitchell not threatening them in any way, and they opened fire within seconds of approaching him.

The video speaks for itself - the white cops pretend to be threatened as the Black man appears calm and is trying to comply with their confusing, excited commands. Mitchell speaks in a calm, non-threatening voice and appears to be apologizing to them for not understanding their disfluent commands or not complying fast enough. Police are not facing any imminent threat of deadly harm when they fatally shoot him - at least from a reasonable, non-racist point of view.

Court Might Allow Black Man Family’s Lawsuit to Proceed: East Bay (CA) Cops Tased Deontae Faison While He Was in the Water, Watched Him Drown, Denied CPR, Still in Coma. Cops were Investigating Tags

From [HERE] A federal judge indicated she was going to deny full summary judgment during a Thursday hearing on a case involving an unarmed man who was shocked with a Taser while in the San Leandro Bay in 2024, resulting in his lapse into a coma, saying at least some of the claims will likely go to trial.

According to his family, Deontae Charles Faison was shocked with a Taser five times by East Bay Regional Park District police officer Jonathan Knea, with two shots happening while Faison was in the water, after he fled from Knea’s questioning about possible expired tags on Faison’s car parked nearby.

U.S. District Judge Jaqueline Scott Corley called the case “tragic and troubling” and heard arguments from both sides’ attorneys, particularly regarding which, if any, of the Taser shots could be included in a qualified immunity claim for Knea, the use of excessive force and lethal force, and whether Knea was trained inadequately. Corley allowed the suit to advance in July.

The East Bay Regional Park District’s attorney Patrick Moriarty argued Faison entered the water of his own volition and questioned the claim of whether his cardiac arrest in the water was due to being shocked with the Taser or because of his supposed drowning in frigid water. During the incident and after the last fired Taser shots, Faison was captured on footage from officers’ body cameras.

“Even though we have body cameras, there is always going to be disputes,” said Moriarty.

Attorney Patrick Buelna, representing Faison’s family, said the defense was trying to “strip away and sanitize the reason why he got into the water in the first place,” and suggested he fled into the water out of fear, confusion and disorientation because he was shocked multiple times.

Police video shows white cops aggressively approach the car with a gun pointed at him threatening his life while yelling at him to get out the car. The car appeared to be lawfully parked in a picnic area. It does look like he was with a white woman, so that may have triggered racist suspect cops.

Buelna cited the “not heavily litigated but clearly established” state-created danger doctrine as a possible way to show Knea put Faison in mortal danger by shocking and leaving him in the water without aid. The doctrine is a legal theory designed to allow a lawsuit for constitutional violations against state actors who put others in a dangerous situation that leads to injuries.

During the hearing, Corley had a spirited back-and-forth with Moriarty, saying several times she couldn’t infer certain ideas in the defendant’s favor during summary judgment and that there were still some facts in dispute.

Further complicating the case, she noted, was the lack of case law about people being shocked with a Taser in water and that Faison cannot testify for himself about what he was thinking or what happened before and after he was shocked.

“I have a lot here to go through,” Corley said, remarking the arguments Moriarty and Buelna made at the hearing were “super helpful today.” [bullshit. let a jury decide]

According to his family, on April 5, 2024, Faison set out for a day at Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline Park with a friend when he was approached by Knea, who activated his vehicle’s lights and instructed them to sit on the car’s bumper.

The family says Knea said the car next to Faison had expired tags and that it belonged to him, despite never seeing Faison drive it.

When asked his name, Faison provided Knea with an alias. After running his name through the district system without any matches, Knea called for backup.

After 20 minutes, Faison attempted to leave the area, and Knea drew a gun on him. Faison ran toward the Bay, and Knea deployed his Taser, first hitting Faison in the back a few feet from the water.

Faison collapsed but got back up and walked into the water. There, his family claims, officers reapplied the Taser to him multiple times, against the district and Taser manufacturer’s orders, at one point stating, “He is not going to make it.”

The officers watched him yell for help for nearly 40 minutes until he lost consciousness and then dragged him out of the water. At no point did the officers render CPR to Faison, the family claims.

Faison has been in a coma and on life support since that day.

Faison’s family is seeking punitive and statutory damages against the officers and the district for assault, violations of his constitutional rights, negligence, false imprisonment and misrepresenting the harm he endured to medical staff.

“We are hopeful that the plaintiff has enough claims to go to trial,” Buelna said after the hearing.

Faison’s family filed the lawsuit in August 2024. The park district moved to dismiss earlier this year.

The East Bay Regional Park District is a special district that operates within Alameda and Contra Costa counties in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area. It maintains its own police and fire departments, separate from the county.

1 New Haven Cop Pleads Guilty in the Randy Cox Case. 5 Officers Intentionally Paralyzed Black Man by Slamming On the Brakes while he was Not Belted in an Empty Police Van, then Denied Medical Care

From [HERE] A New Haven police officer has pleaded guilty in the 2022 case of Randy Cox, who was left paralyzed after hitting his head and neck inside of a police van. 

Sgt. Betsy Segui took a plea deal, while the other officers charged rejected the plea deal and are headed to trial. If convicted, all three could face up to a year and a half in jail. 

Segui pleaded guilty to second-degree reckless endangerment.

She also received a 60-day suspended sentence and a six-month conditional discharge. 

The fifth officer charged, Ronald Pressley, accepted the same plea deal.

However, Officer Oscar Diaz, and former officers Jocelyn Lavandier and Luis Rivera, rejected the same plea deal from the state. 

Ray Hassett, the attorney representing Rivera, said not all of the officers played the same role in the incident. 

“Everybody feels really bad for Mr. Cox and what happened to him. It’s a tragedy, but these officers, as Will established in court, had nothing to do with his injuries. They didn’t exacerbate them; they didn’t create them,” said Hassett. 

Four of the officers were fired by the city, but Diaz was reinstated earlier this year after the state labor board overturned his firing. 

Segui’s bid to return to the department was rejected, while arbitration cases for Lavandier and Rivera are still open.

Attorney Daniel Ford, who represents Lavendier, said he’s looking forward to their day in court.

“I don’t think she did anything wrong here and I think a jury is going to agree with all of it,” said Ford. 

In June of 2022, Randy Cox was arrested by New Haven police and charged with weapons offenses. 

He was then put in the back of a police transport van driven by Diaz. 

On the way to the police department, the van stopped short. 

Cox, who was in the back of the van with no seatbelt, flew into a wall inside the van, hitting his head and neck. 

New Haven State's Attorney John P. Doyle Jr. said Cox tried to tell the officers he was hurt. 

“He was met with comments by officers that he was not injured and that they were going to remove him from vehicle,” said Doyle Jr. 

Body cam footage shows Cox being taken out of the vehicle, being placed on the ground and then being placed in a wheelchair. 

He was later dragged into a holding cell. 

As a result of this incident, Cox is now paralyzed from the mid-chest down. 

The offenses Cox was charged with were eventually dropped by the state. 

“The conduct and the behavior of the officers the scene and in that detention center was reckless to Mr. Cox indifference to his person and in different to his claims,” added Doyle Jr.  

Doyle Jr. made it clear that Cox is prepared to testify if necessary, at trial. 

The judge will hear arguments next month on whether the officers will be tried together or separately.

 The first trial is expected to begin on Feb. 9, 2026. 

White Antioch Police Officer Sentenced To 7.5 Years in Prison for Conspiring to Injure, Oppress, Threaten or Intimidate Residents Through the Use of Force

From [HERE] Former Antioch police officer Devon Christopher Wenger was sentenced today to seven-and-a-half years in federal prison for conspiring to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate residents of Antioch through the use of unreasonable force, conspiring to distribute anabolic steroids, and obstructing justice. Senior U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White handed down the sentence.

Wenger, 33, formerly of Oakley, California, was indicted in two separate cases. In April 2025, following a three-day trial, a federal jury convictedWenger on one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute anabolic steroids and one count of obstruction of justice. In September 2025, following a seven-day trial, a jury convictedWenger of conspiracy against rights. Wenger was remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshals in September 2025 and has remained in federal custody since then.

“Devon Wenger and his co-conspirators believed the badges they wore gave them a license to break the law. They were wrong. Today, the court held Mr. Wenger accountable for his betrayal of the public trust placed in him,” said United States Attorney Craig H. Missakian.

“Devon Wenger’s sentencing marks another significant step in a multi-year effort to uncover and confront corruption within the Antioch and Pittsburg police departments. His conviction, along with the earlier convictions in this case, underscores that no one is above the law. The FBI and our partners are committed to holding those who violate the civil rights of others and betray the public’s trust accountable,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Agustin Lopez.

According to court documents and the evidence presented at the September 2025 trial, Wenger and two other Antioch Police Department officers, Morteza Amiri and Eric Rombough, conspired with each other and others about using excessive force against individuals in and around Antioch. The uses and intended uses of excessive force included deployment of a police K9, deployment of a 40mm “less lethal” launcher, and other unnecessary violence. The evidence showed that Wenger and others deployed uses of force as punishment to subjects beyond any punishment appropriately imposed by the criminal justice system. Wenger also withheld details about uses of excessive force from police reports and other official documents.

Wenger, Amiri, and or Rombough engaged in numerous communications in furtherance of the conspiracy, including an April 2019 communication in which Wenger sent a photo and booking information for a suspect to Amiri and Rombough and requested that they “[p]lease find this guy[] and f— him in the a–.” Rombough responded “Deal,” and Amiri responded “ill bite em.”

Later in 2019, Wenger broke the arm of a young female shoplifting suspect, then pushed her sister to the ground, handcuffed the sister, picked the sister up and grabbed her neck, and smashed the sister’s face into the side of the patrol car, as captured on video. However, Wenger wrote in his police report that as he was escorting the sister to a patrol car, she attempted to pull away from him and that as a result of her actions she “subsequently fell onto the side of the patrol vehicle.”

In August 2020, after Amiri deployed his K9 to apprehend a suspect in Pittsburg, California, with Wenger, he wrote to Wenger “if pitt didn’t have all those body cams and that was us… we would have f—ed him up more. he didn’t get what he deserved.” Wenger responded, “I agree. That’s why I don’t like body cams.” The next night, Wenger wrote to Amiri, “We need to get into something tonight bro!! Lets go 3 nights in a row dog bite!!!” Amiri and Wenger exchanged additional messages and bloodied photographs after engaging with another suspect that night, and following Amiri’s deployment of his K9 to bite a suspect in a homeless encampment the subsequent evening. At the end of the week, Amiri wrote to Wenger, “let’s f— some people up next work week,” to which Wenger agreed.

According to court documents and evidence presented at the April 2025 trial, in February 2022, Wenger set up the sale of anabolic steroids, a Schedule III controlled substance, between Daniel Harris, who was at the time also an Antioch Police Department officer, and a third individual. Law enforcement officials seized the package of anabolic steroids destined for Harris before they arrived, although Wenger continued to communicate with Harris about supplying the third individual with anabolic steroids, including offering to give this individual some of Wenger’s own while they waited for the delayed package.

On March 23, 2022, at 8:03 a.m., the FBI began calling and sending text messages to Wenger telling him that they were outside of his residence with a warrant. It was not until 9:00 a.m. that Wenger appeared for the FBI to seize Wenger’s cellular phone. Later forensic examination of that device showed that specific entries related to the anabolic steroid distribution conspiracy had been deleted.

In addition to the prison term, Judge White also sentenced the defendant to a three-year period of supervised release. A hearing to determine the amounts of restitution owed to victims is scheduled for January 27, 2026.

The case is being prosecuted by the National Security & Special Prosecutions Section and the Oakland Branch of the United States Attorney’s Office. This prosecution is the result of an investigation by the FBI and the Office of the Contra Costa County District Attorney.

"The Immense Immorality of Finding a Way to Legitimately Hang People:" Charles Gaines’s New Sculpture, Hanging Tree, Now at Freedom Monument Sculpture Park

From [HERE] Acclaimed conceptual artist Charles Gaines came to Montgomery, Alabama, on October 17 to speak about Hanging Tree, his new work commissioned by EJI for Freedom Monument Sculpture Park. Mr. Gaines’s talk was part of an exciting program of events celebrating the opening of Elevation Convening Center and Hotel.

Mr. Gaines reflected on his upbringing in the Jim Crow South—remembering when his mother dragged him to the back of a bus after he tried to sit in the front and what it was like using the entrance for Black people at the Charleston Zoo—and how it inspires his work to this day.

“In Charleston [there was] this general tenor that you’re living in a place where people don’t like you. And I couldn’t understand that…I think [that] eventually helped shape what I was interested in terms of being an artist.”

Mr. Gaines’s desire to find a way out of living in a highly racialized society motivated him to use his art to “unpack ideological constructs that rule our lives.” His work has evolved as he continues to explore how best to make art that is personally meaningful.

The piece Mr. Gaines created for Freedom Monument Sculpture Park is site specific, he explained—designed to be “in correspondence with the other works in the park, and also with the general idea of the Museum.”

The “hauntingness of the space, of the environment, of this place,” Mr. Gaines said, “created this compelling idea of the importance of place.” His art draws from the power of place, he explained, because it “compels the reality of the narrative aspect of the work.”

Mr. Gaines described Hanging Tree as “a simple structure where I take a tree, turn it upside down, and hang it from a stanchion.” The tree is engineered to gently swing on a motor. [MORE]

Louisiana Death Row Prisoner Jimmie Duncan Released on Bail After Evidence Shows He is ​“Factually Innocent”

On November 26, 2025, Jimmie Duncan was released on bail from Louisiana’s Angola prison after spend­ing 27 years on death row for a crime that a court now says nev­er occurred. Ouachita Parish District Attorney Robert Tew opposed Mr. Duncan’s release on bail and main­tains that he is guilty of rape and mur­der. Mr. Duncan’s attor­neys dis­pute this and say Judge Alvin Sharp’s bail rul­ing ​“acknowl­edged the clear and con­vinc­ing evi­dence show­ing Mr. Duncan is factually innocent.” 

“[T]his court finds that a prop­er assess­ment [under rel­e­vant law] reveals there are not legal­ly suf­fi­cient grounds upon which to pros­e­cute [Mr. Duncan] and, thus, [Mr. Duncan] is enti­tled to bail as though he had not been con­vict­ed of the offense in question.” 

BAIL ORDER SIGNED BY LOUISIANA DISTRICT JUDGE ALVIN SHARP, NOVEMBER 21, 2025 

Last April, Judge Sharp set aside Mr. Duncan’s first-degree mur­der con­vic­tion and death sen­tence. Mr. Duncan was sen­tenced to death in 1998 for the 1993 death of his girlfriend’s tod­dler based large­ly on ques­tion­able ​“bite-mark” evi­dence. His con­vic­tion relied on foren­sic evi­dence and tes­ti­mo­ny pro­vid­ed by den­tist Dr. Michael West and pathol­o­gist Dr. Steven Hayne, whose work has been dis­cred­it­ed. Judge Sharp held that expert tes­ti­mo­ny demon­strat­ed the bite mark analy­sis used against Mr. Duncan is ​“no longer valid” and ​“not sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly defen­si­ble.” According to an inves­ti­ga­tion by ProPublica, Mr. Duncan stands to be the tenth indi­vid­ual freed from prison after it was proven that their con­vic­tions were based at least in part on inac­cu­rate evi­dence stem­ming from the work of these two doc­tors using ques­tion­able foren­sic tech­niques now char­ac­ter­ized by many experts as ​“junk science.” [MORE]

The International Criminal Court Shuns US Demands to Drop Israel War Crimes Probe and Amend Treaty

The oversight body of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has shunned US demands for the court to drop its investigation into Israeli war crimes and to amend its founding treaty to prevent the prosecution of nationals from countries that do not recognise the court’s jurisdiction, Middle East Eye can reveal.

In a statement issued on Wednesday after its annual meeting in The Hague earlier this week, the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) vowed to uphold the integrity of the Rome Statute and said it was “gravely concerned” by threats and coercive measures targeting the court.

The meeting took place in the shadow of US sanctions already imposed against a number of ICC senior officials, including judges and the chief prosecutor, Karim Khan.

Diplomats speaking on the sidelines of the event told MEE that the Trump administration had tried to exert further pressure on the ICC in the leadup to the ASP meeting by calling on the court to drop its investigations into war crimes in Palestine and Afghanistan as a condition for lifting sanctions.

The US also called on member states to amend the Rome Statute to prohibit prosecutions of citizens of non-signatory states, a move that would have effectively granted immunity to American and Israeli nationals. An amendment of that nature would also end the Ukraine investigation into alleged war crimes by Russia, a non-member of the ICC. [MORE]

The Clogic of Piece Maker Trump’s Drug War: Pardons for the Convicted, Drone Strikes for the Suspected

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

clogic – clogged logic—closed-circuit logic—clueless logic—locked in an endless loop of flawed axioms and paradoxical premises that prevent describing or relating to reality in alignment with its attributes. Using “clogic” is like being trapped in a hall of mirrors in which the two (self and world) endlessly reflect and determine one another in a dualistic duel that shape and dominate each other and with erring inaccuracy keeping us overruled and fooled (through dim and gross reflections that distort the world and ourselves) that is, until Shatterday arrives. (See: Shatterday, Psycholesterol, Wholesight, BLYND, Axioms, Logic, Truth, Belief Systems, Conclusion, Proof, Experience, Objectivism, Third Sight & Suffering)

From [HERE] This week, President Donald Trump pardoned a man federal prosecutors described as the architect of a “narco-state” who moved 400 tons of cocaine to United States shores. In September, the US military began killing people on Caribbean vessels based on unproven suspicions they were doing the same thing on a far smaller scale. The strikes have drawn allegations of war crimes; the contradiction has drawn bipartisan scrutiny.

Former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández walked out of a federal penitentiary in West Virginia on December 2, after Trump issued him a “full and unconditional” pardon. Hernández had been serving a 45-year prison sentence after being convicted in 2024 of facilitating the importation of more than 400 tons of cocaine into the United States over nearly two decades. Then-Attorney General Merrick Garland said at the time that Hernández had “abused his position as President of Honduras to operate the country as a narco-state where violent drug traffickers were allowed to operate with virtual impunity, and the people of Honduras and the United States were forced to suffer the consequences.”

Meanwhile, since early September 2025, the US military has conducted a series of more than 20 strikes on vessels in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific Ocean, killing at least 82 people. The administration alleges these individuals were all trafficking drugs, but without public evidence or judicial process. The legal framework constructed to justify these killings rests on the claim that the US is engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels, rendering suspected smugglers “unlawful combatants” subject to lethal force.

This explainer examines that framework, with particular attention to a September 2 incident that has prompted congressional investigations and accusations that the US military committed war crimes.

Background

In August, the US began amassing troops and warships in the Caribbean, posing the build-up as a counter-narcotics effort. On September 2, the US military launched the first strike in what would come to be known as Operation Southern Spear, killing 11 people in a fishing boat. “There are 11 narco-terrorists at the bottom of the Caribbean right now who found out, at the hands of American power, that you will not be poisoning the American people anymore,” Secretary of Defense (or “Secretary of War,” as now designated by the Trump administration) Pete Hegseth said.

The strikes have escalated steadily. As of the start of December, US forces had conducted 21 kinetic strikes, killing 82, according to the Pentagon. According to analysts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), recent deployments to the Caribbean have included “larger ships, bringing with them immense firepower and other combat capabilities.” These include the USS Gerald R. Ford, the Navy’s most advanced aircraft carrier.

The Administration’s Legal Theory

On September 4, Trump informed Congress of the strike, as required by the War Powers Resolution. The letter addressed domestic law by citing his constitutional authority under Article II, and international law by claiming “self defense.”

The legal justification for Operation Southern Spear is said to rest on a secret memo reportedly authorizing strikes against cartels beyond those that have been publicly designated as terrorist organizations, and against individuals merely “affiliated” with such groups. The memo was reportedly produced by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) within the US Department of Justice (DOJ).

House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin described the memo as having given Trump “unchecked power to order military strikes on civilian targets who have unverified ties to ‘a secret list of groups.'”

In an October letter demanding the release of the memo, Raskin wrote that media reporting on the memo “raises the alarming prospect that DOJ has authorized the President to order targeted assassinations against anyone he deems an enemy combatant, including individuals located in the United States, without having to provide any evidence or justification to Congress or any federal judge.”

The memo has not been released to the public. [MORE]

Media Offers Only More Hearsay Evidence about the Unreleased, Unedited 1st Boat Strike Video; “Lawmakers call It Shocking.” Gemini Said the Original Video Looked “Cartoon Like” and "AI Generated"

Video footage of a U.S. military strike on alleged drug smugglers in the Caribbean Sea shows two people attempting to flip their capsized vessel as they were attacked again, multiple lawmakers said Thursday after speaking with the Navy admiral who oversaw the controversial mission.

The recording was shown during a day of closed-door meetings on Capitol Hill featuring Adm. Frank M. Bradley, the commander who oversaw the Sept. 2 operation, which entailed four strikes in all. The attack killed 11 people, including the two people who survived the first blast that hit their boat.

Rep. Jim Himes (Connecticut), the House Intelligence Committee’s top Democrat, described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.” The two survivors, he said, were “in clear distress” after their boat was “destroyed.” [MORE]

“I am deeply disturbed by what I saw this morning,” Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI), the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said after the briefing. “The Department of Defense has no choice but to release the complete, unedited footage of the September 2 strike, as the president has agreed to do.”

Reed’s remarks came after Adm. Frank Bradley and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine briefed some members of the Senate and House Armed Services and Intelligence committees on the so-called “double-tap” strike, in which nine people were killed in the initial bombing and two survivors clinging to the burning wreckage of the vessel were slain in second attack. [MORE]

Until Thursday, the only video of the attack that had been seen by lawmakers was an edited clip posted to the Truth Social account of President Donald Trump on September 2 announcing the strike. The edited clip captures the initial strike, showing a four-engine speedboat erupt in an explosion. It does not show the second strike on the wreckage of the vessel and the survivors — which was first reported by The Intercept.

Trump has said he supports the release of the video showing the second boat strike that killed the remaining survivors of the initial September 2 attack. “I don’t know what they have, but whatever they have, we’d certainly release, no problem,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday. [MORE]

Besides the video, which looks like a 80’s video game, massa media and authority have not presented any tangible evidence of boats being destroyed, such as damaged boats, dead bodies, funerals, witnesses, drugs or other contraband, etc. Also, if the 2 lone survivors of the several attacks were terrorist/drug dealers who the US intended to kill, then why did US authorities promptly release them without any charges? If they were so imminently dangerous to the nation then for what reason were they not also summarily “executed” upon capture or detained without charges as enemies of the state? [MORE]

Venezuelans, who should be reasonably angered about the ongoing random murder spree, appear to have had no reaction to the boat strikes in the many public gatherings since the strikes began. You would also assume that Venezuela authorities would use the boat murders against Tump/Bush to its moral advantage on the international stage. However, Freddy Ñáñez, the Venezuelan communications minister, stated that the footage of the attack was fake. [MORE] and Diosdado Cabello, Venezuela's Minister of Interior, Justice and Peace, characterized the strike as "fake news" "invented" by the US as a cover for regime change and President Maduro has ignored the strikes altogether making no mention of them in his various speeches. [MORE]

The Seven Richest Billionaires Are All Zionists Using the CIA to Control the Media

From [HERE] Trump loyalist and CIA contractor Larry Ellison’s purchase of CNN appears imminent, and marks the latest venture into media for the world’s second-richest individual.

But Ellison is not alone.

Indeed, the world’s seven richest individuals are all now powerful media barons, controlling what the world sees, reads, and hears, marking a new chapter in oligarchical control over society and striking another blow at a free, independent press and diversity of opinion.

MEDIA MONOPOLY

Paramount Skydance– an Ellison-owned company– is in pole position to purchase Warner Brothers Discovery, a conglomerate that controls gigantic film and television studios, streaming services like HBO Max and Discovery+, franchises like DC Comics, and TV networks such as HBO, TNT, Discovery Channel, TLC, Food Network, and CNN. This lead is largely due to Ellison’s proximity to President Trump, who will ultimately have to sign off on such a deal.

Ellison has already spoken to senior White House officials about axing CNN hosts and content that Trump is said to dislike, including anchors, Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar. It is this willingness to completely reorientate the network’s political direction that has made him the White House’s preferred purchaser of Warner Brothers Discovery. He is reportedly so wealthy that he can afford to pay in cash.

Ellison, whose net worth stands at a staggering $278 billion, has been on a media spending spree of late. Earlier this year, he provided the funds for Skydance to purchase Paramount Global, another gigantic conglomerate that controls such products as CBS, BET, MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, Paramount Streaming, and Showtime.

Immediately upon being appointed CEO of CBS News, Larry’s son, David, began drastically reorientating the network’s political outlook, firing staff, pushing it to become pro-Trump, and appointing self-described “Zionist fanatic” Bari Weiss as its editor-in-chief.

The Ellison family, however, is far from finished. In September, President Trump signed an executive order approving a proposal to force through the sale of social media platform TikTok to an American consortium led by Ellison-owned tech company, Oracle.

Under the planned arrangement, Oracle will oversee the platform’s security and operations, giving the world’s second-richest man effective control over the platform that more than 60% of Americans under thirty years of age use for news and entertainment. Trump himself stated that he was extremely pleased that Oracle would be controlling the platform.

“It’s owned by Americans, and very sophisticated Americans,” he said. [MORE]

A Dependent Media: The Ellison Family is Now Poised to Control CBS, Paramount, CNN and TikTok, and thereby Refine Single Source Propaganda and Messaging for Elites

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

 Dependent Media – Establishment (dependent) media is both unwilling and incapable of reporting events truthfully, accurately, or without extreme bias. News coverage is just that—covering-up-(masking) and distorting the events and those wielding the power behind the events (those reported and deliberately unreported). News coverage has simply become “disinfotainment” with the sole purpose of perception and knowledge containment as well as realitY concealment. You report in the interests of those who paying you to do so. (See: MEDIA, NBC & NEWS)

From [HERE] and [HERE] Trump loyalist and C.I.A. contractor Larry Ellison’s purchase of CNN appears imminent, and marks the latest venture into media for the world’s second-richest individual.

But Ellison is not alone.

Indeed, the world’s seven richest individuals are all now powerful media barons, controlling what the world sees, reads, and hears, marking a new chapter in oligarchical control over society and striking another blow at a free, independent press and diversity of opinion.

Media Monopoly

Paramount Skydance — an Ellison-owned company — is in pole position to purchase Warner Brothers Discovery, a conglomerate that controls gigantic film and television studios, streaming services like HBO Max and Discovery+, franchises like DC Comics, and TV networks such as HBO, TNT, Discovery Channel, TLC, Food Network, and CNN.

This lead is largely due to Ellison’s proximity to President Donald Trump, who will ultimately have to sign off on such a deal.

Ellison has already spoken to senior White House officials about axing CNN hosts and content that Trump is said to dislike, including anchors, Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar.

It is this willingness to completely re-orientate the network’s political direction that has made him the White House’s preferred purchaser of Warner Brothers Discovery. He is reportedly so wealthy that he can afford to pay in cash.

Ellison, whose net worth stands at a staggering $278 billion, has been on a media spending spree of late. Earlier this year, he provided the funds for Skydance to purchase Paramount Global, another gigantic conglomerate that controls such products as CBS, BET, MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, Paramount Streaming and Showtime.

Immediately upon being appointed CEO of CBS News, Larry’s son, David, began drastically re-orientating the network’s political outlook, firing staff, pushing it to become pro-Trump, and appointing self-described “Zionist fanatic” Bari Weiss as its editor-in-chief.

The Ellison family, however, is far from finished. In September, President Trump signed an executive order approving a proposal to force through the sale of social media platform TikTok to an American consortium led by Ellison-owned tech company, Oracle.

Under the planned arrangement, Oracle will oversee the platform’s security and operations, giving the world’s second-richest man effective control over the platform that more than 60 percent of Americans under 30 years of age use for news and entertainment.

Trump himself stated that he was extremely pleased that Oracle would be controlling the platform. “It’s owned by Americans, and very sophisticated Americans,” he said.

The Ellison family’s sudden venture into the realm of media and communications has shocked many, with senior media figures sounding the alarm.

Longtime CBS News anchor, Dan Rather, warned that “we all have to be concerned about the consolidation of huge billionaires getting control of nearly all of the major news outlets.”

“It is a particularly tough time for anybody working at CBS News,” he stated, citing pressure to change coverage to be more pro-Trump. “I think if [the Ellisons] were to buy CNN, it would change CNN forever, and it might be another very serious wound to CBS News,” he concluded. [MORE]

In its Lathered Up Search for Trump Porn in Epstein Files, Massa Media Ignores [Conceals] Epstein's Relationship with Israel and his Prominent Role in Advancing the Israeli Cyberweapons Industry

From [HERE] With an avalanche of new documents released by the House Oversight Committee, and looming legislation mandating further disclosures, the press has renewed its relentless coverage of the life and times of Jeffrey Epstein. Yet, with some notable exceptions, a major part of his life’s work has remained outside the media’s gaze, his relationship with the state of Israel and his prominent role in helping advance the Israeli cyberweapons industry. And so our series continues.

On July 31, 2019, just eleven days before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in a Manhattan jail cell, his connection to the Rothschild banking dynasty became the subject of major public controversy.

Anonymous sources informed Bloomberg of a 2015 visit to Epstein’s New York mansion by baroness Ariane de Rothschild, the CEO of Edmond de Rothschild Group, a storied private bank and one of the largest Swiss financial institutions by assets under management. The bank’s spokesperson denied any relationship to the notorious American sex trafficker. Epstein was found dead on August 10, 2019.

Four years later, after Epstein’s meeting calendars were leaked to the Wall Street Journal, the bank finally admitted that de Rothschild had met with Epstein as part of her “normal duties at the bank between 2013 and 2019.” Epstein provided introductions to U.S. finance leaders and law firms and provided tax and risk consulting, the bank disclosed, while also helping de Rothschild personally on “a couple of occasions” with advice on estate management.

The bank remained vague about the actual nature of its relationship with the convicted sex trafficker. Newly released documents reveal that Epstein and de Rothschild’s personal relationship was much closer than the bank previously acknowledged. According to emails released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee on November 12, Epstein planned to see a Broadway play with de Rothschild in January 2014, and scheduled a private trip with her to Montreal that September.

A second set of documents—the leaked inbox of former Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak, hacked by Handala and uploaded by non-profit whistleblower Distributed Denial of Secrets—sheds light on Epstein’s efforts to leverage his personal friendship with de Rothschild to raise funds for the development of Israeli cyberweapons. After Barak’s retirement from government in 2013, he recruited Pavel Gurvich, a graduate of the Israel Defense Forces’ secretive Unit 81 technology unit, to source cyberweapons startups from the Israeli intelligence community. Gurvich did not respond to a request for comment. [MORE]