Memphis Judge Delays Release of Additional Footage of Gang of Cops Beating Tyre Nichols to Death

From [HERE] Additional footage showing police officers as they brutally beat Tyre Nichols to death is forthcoming. Twenty more hours of video and several internal documents related to the Jan. 7 incident were expected to be released last week; however, Shelby County Criminal Court Judge James Jones Jr. issued a court order temporarily blocking the release.

“The court orders that the release of videos, audio, reports, and personnel files of City of Memphis employees related to this indictment and investigation (to include administrative hearings, records, and related files) shall be delayed until such time as the state and the defendants have reviewed this information. The release of this information shall be subject to further orders of this court and, in the public interest, will be ordered as soon as possible,” stated the order that was obtained by CNN on Wednesday (March 8).

As previously reported, protests against police brutality broke out across the country when the Memphis Police Department shared bodycam and surveillance recordings on Jan. 27. The grisly images of the father as he was repeatedly struck drew comparisons to the infamous cop beating of Rodney King and was likened to a modern-day public lynching. The additional video footage will include revealing audio from after the 29-year-old was battered and transported by EMTs to a hospital. Regarding the documents, they include portions of the city’s investigation and the personnel records of 13 officers and four members of the Memphis Fire Department.

Initially, the five disgraced officers — identified as Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley, Justin Smith, Emmitt Martin III and Desmond Mills Jr.— who attacked Nichols were fired, but terminations have since included two additional members of the force. Bean, Haley, Smith, Martin and Mills have each been charged in connection with the assault that ultimately led to the 29-year-old’s death. Last month, during their first court appearance on Feb. 17, they pleaded not guilty to the criminal charges, which included second-degree murder. The men are due back in court on May 1.

Black LAPD Cop who was Unlawfully Stopped, Searched and Detained for 6 Hours by White Cops, Files Suit to Disband Gang Unit that Targets and “Terrorizes” Blacks. Says LAPD Function Like Slave Patrols

From [HERE] In 2021, Bernard Robins was racially profiled by officers from the Los Angeles Police Department, who detained him after refusing to accept his identification as an LAPD officer.

Now, Robins is determined to get LAPD’s gang unit disbanded, because the department is rooted in racially profiling Black men from the inner city.

As a LAPD officer, Robins received a first hand look into how marginalized communities in L.A are policed differently from the larger Los Angeles landscape. 

The incident involved officers from the 77th police station and happened while Robins stopped by his home briefly with a friend. 

They had been filming a project Robins was working on, and preparing to head to their final set location for the day.

Robins sat talking with his passenger, when he spotted three LAPD officers get out of a patrol car as he turned to exit his vehicle.

“I immediately put my hands up and told them I was a police officer, and that I had my firearm on me, which I am legally allowed to carry. They told us to get up on the fence and the person I was with put his bag in the car,” Robins detailed.

Robins went along with officers as they placed him in handcuffs, reassuring himself that the officers were just following protocol. 

He objected, however, when officers told Robins they were going to search his vehicle.

Initially they said they stopped me for tinted windows. They then told me after seeing my police ID that they couldn't verify that I was an officer for over an hour. There are systems where you can look up officers current status in 5 minutes, said Robins. 

As Robins was being detained in front of his home, officers illegally searched his car, finding an unregistered firearm in his passenger’s backpack.

They were both taken down to the station, where Robins remained in handcuffs for over six hours.

When he was allowed to leave the station, officers apologizing to him profusely during his release.

Although his passenger was not given a reason why, his gun case was eventually thrown out. Robins suspects it was because the initial stop was illegal. 

Those officers violated our pretext stop policy when they detained me. Secondly, they said they detained me for tinted windows but I was parked before they initiated a stop. The third policy they broke was the way the requested consent to search my vehicle. And lastly, they tried to make me allow them to search my vehicle after I said no, which is also a violation of policy.

During his probationary period, Robins worked at a station near the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and says local residents were treated nice and with respect by police.

In South Central, Robins was shunned by fellow officers for waving at Black people in the community.

When he would be requested as backup for traffic stops, Robins began to notice that Black men usually had their rights infringed upon by police.

The officers who initiated these traffic stops were always convinced there were weapons and drugs in the car, or the Black occupants had open warrants for their arrest.

I've lived on the border of 77th division and Inglewood since I was 7 years old. During my time with LAPD, I've never witnessed officers pull a group of white or Asian males out of a vehicle, but I've witnessed it happen to Black groups around 10 times and Latinos twice. 

Robins experiences made him draw parallels between law enforcement today and the origins of policing in America, which were runaway slave patrols during slavery.

He is now suing LAPD, calling attention to the department’s tactics. Robins says illegal traffic stops are leading to larger situations, such as the beating death of Tyre Nichols by Memphis Police.

“They are terrorizing the community. I was a cop and still got my rights violated. The best thing for us to do is have solidarity and start showing up as groups. If I was not a former officer, the lawyers would not have taken my case because this happens so often.”[MORE]

Report says LA Authorities (white liberals) are Purposefully Misclassifying Violent Deaths as Natural Causes or Suicides in the County’s Jails

From [HERE] The Los Angeles County Department of the Medical Examiner and Coroner often overgeneralizes or misrepresents the reasons people are dying inside the county’s jails, according to a new report from Dignity and Power Now and UCLA’s BioCritical Studies Lab (BSL) scrutinizing autopsy results from in-custody deaths. 

The report, which looks at the influence the LA County Sheriff’s Department has on the county’s death investigation system, is part of a larger body of research examining the “history and current practices of the United States medical examiner/coroner system.”

LA County, however, is free of a worse conflict because the LA County Sheriff doesn’t oversee the coroner’s office.** Yet, according to the new report, that the fact that sheriff’s personnel are present during the coroner’s autopsy process, may have influenced a longstanding pattern in which deaths in custody are misclassified as natural, undetermined, or suicide.

The March 1 report points to a string of cases in which medical examiners labeled deaths that show multiple signs of being caused by physical violence as due instead to “undetermined” factors, suicide, or natural causes. 

For example there is the case of Markese Braxton, a 26-year-old Black man who died in Twin Towers in 2018. Braxton’s autopsy described blood between his brain and skull, as well as soft tissue hemorrhage on his hands, back, shoulders, and shins. The toxicology report showed there were non-fatal doses of antihistamine and antipsychotic medications in Braxton’s body. Yet, the coroner’s office reported an undetermined cause of death. 

Seven years earlier, in 2011, an 18-year-old named Jorge Rosales was being held pretrial when he died in Twin Towers Correctional Facility. According to the UCLA/DPN report, Rosales’s body showed “significant physical trauma, including a black eye and scleral hemorrhage, scalp and facial contusions and abrasions, bruising and abrasions of the arms, and pancreatic hemorrhage” that could have been caused by blunt abdominal trauma. Yet, again, the medical examiner labeled the official cause of death as undetermined. 

As mentioned above, in a large number of the state’s counties the conflict of interest is far more severe due to the fact that California is just one of three states that allows non-medically trained elected officials to run the coroner’s office.

While, in Los Angeles the coroner is not elected, but is appointed by the LA County Board of Supervisors, in the majority of the state’s other 57 counties, this elected official is the local sheriff. Efforts to forcibly separate the offices at the state level have failed.

The issue found itself in a spotlight in December 2017, when two medical examiners, including renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Bennet Omalu,resigned from their posts. Omalu accused then-San Joaquin County Sheriff Steve Moore — who also served as the county’s coroner — of “intentionally” withholding information “in order to mislead me” from determining cases to be homicides.

In response to the allegations, during the next legislative session, lawmakers passedSB 1303, a bill that would have required autopsies to be conducted by licensed physicians and surgeons.

Former Governor Jerry Brown vetoed the bill

The decision of how to structure local coroners’ offices, Brown said in hisveto message, “is best left to the discretion of local elected officials who are in the best position to determine how their county offices are organized.”

In 2022, a  similar bill, AB 1608, failed to pass out of the Senate.

Deadly jails

The same week that DPN and UCLA released their report, the LASD’s Civilian Oversight Commission (COC) approved findings from an investigation led by Special Counsel Bert Deixler into deputy gangs operating within the LA County Sheriff’s Department, as well as a list of 27 recommendations for Sheriff Robert Luna to eradicate those gangs. 

“The Department currently contains several active groups that have been, and still are, engaged in harmful, dangerous, and often illegal, behavior,” the members of Special Counsel wrote in their report to the Civilian Oversight Commission (COC). “Some of these groups have engaged in acts of violence, threatened acts of violence, placed fellow Deputies at risk of physical harm, engaged in acts celebrating officer involved shootings, and created a climate of physical fear and professional retribution to those who would speak publicly about the misconduct of such groups.”

At a rally outside the coroner’s office on March 1, Dignity and Power Now and the larger JusticeLA Coalition urged the COC to look more deeply at the connection between deputy gangs and the coroner’s office, suggesting that members of the toxic culture of LASD deputy gangs may be influencing the investigations of in-custody deaths and other deadly encounters with law enforcement.

“There are real lives at stake and the [COC] needs to investigate the impact that LASD gangs have on these coroner’s reports,” JusticeLA wrote on Twitter. The presence of LASD personnel during the coroner’s autopsy process alongside the unchecked violence and influence of Deputy gangs have resulted in a longstanding pattern where deaths in custody are misclassified as natural, undetermined, or suicide.”

The coroner’s office labeled the 2009 death of a 22-year-old Black man, John Horton III, a suicide, despite evidence of “fresh intra-abdominal and back muscle blunt force injury,” according to the report. Horton was being held pre-trial.

Horton’s mother, Helen Jones, said her son “was murdered in Men’s Central Jail on March 30th, 2009 by the 3000 Boys deputy sheriff gang members,” who operated on the 3000 floor of the Men’s Central Jail — a “dangerous, deadly, toxic, outdated jail where Black and Brown men have been killed over a decade before and after John was killed and they will continue to die.”

In 2009, one of the jail system’s most deadly pre-pandemic years, thirty-eight people died in custody. 

“Most of these deaths involved Black and Latino men and the majority happened before standing trial. This is unacceptable. No one should die while in jail,” said UCLA Professor Terence Keel, who founded the BioCritical Studies Lab and co-authored Monday’s report. “Our report shows that Los Angeles County Jails are some of the most lethal in the nation…Each day that Men’s Central Jail remains open is a day that someone is likely to die.”

While it is the most dangerously dilapidated facility, Men’s Central Jail is not the only county-run lockup where people are dying. 

Shackled to benches for days

At the LASD’s Inmate Reception Center, the backlogged way station where people are processed into the jail system after arrest, people die after being chained to benches for days, or after going without necessary medication.  

On June 19, 2015, a man died after being restrained for 32 hours after he ripped up his shirt, threatened to hurt himself, then head-butted a deputy, injuring her.

Deputies left the man for 32 hours with his hands both cuffed behind his back and attached to waist chains attached to a bench. During those 32 hours, he received no meals, only one cup of water, and no access to a toilet. In response to the man’s death, then-Sheriff Jim McDonnell fired ten department members.

LASD leaders did not resolve the longstanding problems at IRC with the 2015 firing spree, however. 

Eight years later, conditions at the facility remain inhumane and dangerous, according to the ACLU of Southern California and the LA County Office of the Inspector General (OIG)

Staff from both offices have reported seeing garbage, feces, and urine on the floors of the facility.

The OIG reported to the LA County Board of Supervisors that some people with mental illness had been chained to IRC benches for “over sixty hours each.” One man diagnosed with schizophrenia was reportedly cuffed to the jail’s front bench for more than 99 hours.

In April 2022, a man died after waiting two days at the facility for an evaluation, according to the OIG.

A month later, a 72-year-old man collapsed and died after also being held for two days without an evaluation, the ACLU said in a court filing.

A federal court order issued last September dictated that the LASD could not hold people at the IRC for more than 24 hours, and could not chain people to benches or other objects for more than four hours. The department was also ordered to keep conditions at IRC sanitary, with clean water provided, working toilets, mattresses for people held overnight, and timely access to mental health care and medications.

On February 27, 2023, the ACLU filed a motion asking Judge Dean Pregerson to hold the LA County Supervisors and the new sheriff, Robert Luna, whose department still remains “massively out of compliance,” in contempt of court. 

A hearing on the matter will be held in Judge Pregerson’s court on March 20, at 10 a.m.

“Contempt of court is the strongest sanction available to a judge, and rare because it is used only after all other efforts to enforce compliance have failed,” said Corene Kendrick, deputy director of the ACLU National Prison Project.

Kendrick brought the motion together with Peter Eliasberg, chief counsel at the ACLU SoCal, and David Fathi, director of the ACLU’s National Prison Project.) 

“Make no mistake,” Kendrick said, “L.A. County has failed to comply with past orders about the jails, and the ACLU’s request for contempt is how the federal court can bring the county into line and protect the people locked in its jails.”

The ACLU’s filing notes describe how the sheriff’s department has been using Men’s Central Jail as overflow for IRC, chaining people to gurneys in hallways for hours instead of their former habit of chaining those waiting to be placed to the IRC benches. 

The sheriff’s department has not included these people and conditions in “IRC overflow” in their reports required by a preliminary injunction.

The LA County Board of Supervisors have been in the process of closing the dungeon-like Men’s Central Jail for more than a decade, with a troubling lack of measurable progress. After vowing to close the jail by employing a robust system of community-based alternatives to incarceration, the supes are reconsidering the once-scrapped idea of building locked medical facilities for people in the county’s jail system who have the most severe forms of mental illness.

“For years, the county and board of supervisors have known about these inhumane conditions and that the only solution was to expand effective programs to move people with mental illness out of the jails into community treatment,” said Eliasberg.

“But they have failed to do what was necessary to solve the problem, and scores of vulnerable people are suffering every day because of their inaction.”

Lawsuit Claims Cayuga County (white liberal) Authorities "Over Detained" 300 People After They Should Have Been Released. Made $99 per day for each inmate from Cleveland [disproportionately Black]

From [HERE] Cuyahoga County, Ohio, jail has a practice of keeping people behind bars long after they are meant to be released in order to boost its profits, a new class action lawsuit alleges.

Plaintiff Alanna Dunn filed the class action lawsuit against Cuyahoga County on Feb. 23 in an Ohio federal court, alleging nearly 300 people were kept in jail long after they were supposed to be released, Cleveland.com reports.

The lawsuit reportedly states the county had a practice of keeping people behind bars after judges ordered them released, or after prosecutors declined to pursue charges. 

Dunn, a Cleveland woman, alleges she spent two days in jail after Cleveland police and prosecutors decided not to press charges against her.

According to her lawsuit, she is one of at least 289 people “over detained” in 2021 and 2022. 

Attorneys for the plaintiff said they believed many more could have been over detained in the jail during that time, because their estimates were only based on Cleveland police officers’ arrests, Cleveland.com reports.

County jail asked for Cleveland inmates in order to generate revenue, lawsuit alleges

Cleveland police started taking fresh arrestees to the county jail instead of the city jail beginning in 2018, as part of a deal with the county, the lawsuit states.

County officials reportedly pushed to house Cleveland’s inmates because they believed it would generate revenue. The county earned $99 per day for each inmate, and cut costs for basic inmate care so it would make a profit.

The lawsuit says people were over detained for up to 56 days in some cases. It adds that, most months, about a dozen people spent time in jail longer than they were supposed to.

According to the complaint, 159 people were kept in the facility longer than they should have been in 2021, and 130 were kept too long in 2022.

“The county’s widespread and systematic over detention of people in its custody results in serious harm,” the lawsuit states. 

“Even a single additional night in jail can severely disrupt a person’s life and have lasting destabilizing and traumatic effects.”

Colorado State House passes bill to reduce prison sentences for inmates pursuing higher education

From [HERE] An effort to incentivize Colorado prisoners to pursue higher education took a major step forward on Tuesday, receiving near-unanimous approval from the state House of Representatives. 

House Bill 1037 would deduct six months from an inmate’s prison sentence for earning a certificate while incarcerated, one year for an associate or bachelor’s degree, 18 months for a master's degree and two years for a doctorate degree. The program would only apply to non-violent offenders. Prisoners released prior to completing their degree could finish to earn time off of parole. 

The bill will next need approval from the Senate and governor before taking effect. 

"Getting them connected to education lowers recidivism and helps them get their lives back on track," said bill sponsor Rep. Matthew Martinez, D-Monte Vista, who worked at the Adams State University Prison Education Program before being elected. "They become productive members of society and that's better for all of Colorado."

Proponents of the bill said providing prisoners with education gives them hope for their future and makes them more qualified for jobs when they get released, preventing them from reoffending. 

Colorado currently has among the worst recidivism rates in the country, with over 50% of people released from prison ending up back behind bars within three years. 

Prisoners who pursue higher education while incarcerated have been found to be less likely to return to crime after they’re released. Recidivism rates drop to 13.7% for prisoners who earned associates degrees, 5.6% for those who earned bachelor’s degrees and 0% for those who earned master’s degrees, according to a 2006 national analysis by Emory University.

“This is a program that will help decrease recidivism in non-violent offenders, which will make our communities safer," said bill sponsor Rep. Rose Pugliese, R-Colorado Springs. "There is no additional cost to the people of Colorado. It is good public policy.” [MORE]

[no Rational person could argue that Constitutional Rights Protect black people from cops or Are anything but Myths] Report Finds Black Drivers in Chicago are 6X More Likely to be Stopped than Whites

legal truths must give way to reality. Brazen cops so frequently abuse their power that no Black shopper, pedestrian, motorist, juvenile, adult or Black professional of any kind—could make a compelling argument that so-called constitutional rights provide Black people any real protection from cops or the government in general.

The only thing upholding the 4th Amendment is your belief in it. You only have rights if an authority says that you do. Your possession of "rights” given to you by a magical government, which functions as your master, is cult belief. Rights are myths. As stated by Dr. Blynd, “There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority.” The belief in “authority,” which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.” [MORE] AND [MORE]

FUNKTIONARY explains,

adherent rights – privileges disguised as so-called “rights” created by men via deceptive word-manipulation in written form called “symbolaeography,” and legal documents. 2) privileges granted by an apparent or putative authority at the expense of one's inherent or unalienable ‘rights.’ (See: Inherent Rights & Rights)

inherent rights – unalienable and unassailable rights. Inherent rights have never been codified into law, so if you’re from a phfree family, you’ll know how to assert and defend them), and if not, you won’t. (See: Adherent Rights)

'“4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TURNED ON AND OFF LIGHT A LIKE SWITCH.” From [HERE] As the Chicago mayoral election puts a spotlight on public safety and police-community relations, a new report on police traffic stops in the city offers insight into racial inequities that persist.

A report by BPI and the Free2Move Coalition found that from 2015 to 2021, the average Black Chicago driver was six times more likely to be stopped than the average White driver. Latino drivers were twice as likely to be stopped than White drivers.

José Manuel Almanza Jr., director of advocacy and movement building at Equiticity and coordinator for the Free2Move Coalition, said he was pulled over several times as a teenager and through his adult life.

“I get nervous, I get sweaty, my heart starts racing, I start stuttering and I ask myself, ‘Am I looking suspicious?,’” Almanza said. “This is conversations that I hear from folks all over the West Side and South Side of Chicago.”

The report also found that the Chicago Police Department has increasingly been doing more traffic stops over the past few years.

Traffic stops have increased almost seven times from 2015 to 2019, jumping from nearly 85,965 traffic stops in 2015 to 598,515 traffic stops in 2019, according to the report. The number dipped in 2020, which the report said is likely due to COVID-19 stay-at-home orders at the start of the pandemic. Traffic stops ticked back up in 2021.

Loren Jones, staff attorney at Business and Professional People for the Public Interest and member of the Free2Move Coalition, said the impact from stops such as arrest and citation disproportionately harm Black and Latino people.

“The stops that we looked at for this report are based entirely on the stops that they’re (police are) making because they saw a traffic violation and then decided to continue to investigate for signs of criminal activity,” Jones said. “This needle-in-a-haystack approach is leading to immense harm in communities around Chicago.”

Although the Supreme Ct Made it Plain that People Have the Right ‘to Wear, Bear, or Carry Arms for Self Defense’ White Liberals Make It Impossible to Do So in Crime Ridden Places Like San Francisco

The sheriff’s office and the police department in San Francisco have collectively approved just one gun permit since the Supreme Court ruling last June. WSJ reports, “The San Franciscans who want to carry guns include software engineers, accountants, middle managers and firearms instructors. They fall along the entire political spectrum, but many have at least one thing in common: They don’t want to be identified because they are worried about judgment from their neighbors or employers.

Their names are discoverable under public records law with some exceptions, according to legal experts. 

Cities such as San Francisco that routinely denied such permits have received a flood of applications since the Supreme Court ruled for the first time last summer that the Second Amendment protects Americans’ right to carry guns outside the home for self-defense. In the past, authorities here said they received fewer than 20 applications a year. 

Democratic leaders in states such as New York and California have sought to pass measures to blunt the effects of the ruling by imposing more thorough background investigations or training requirements for those seeking to carry concealed weapons in public. But a judge put most of the New York law on hold in October, and California’s failed to pass the state legislature. [MORE]

Another App Court Tosses a Claim that Cops Failed to Protect People During a Mass Shooting. Cops have No Legal Duty to Protect Anyone from Violence by Private Parties per the Public Duty Doctrine

According to the Supreme Court police have no legal duty to protect any victim from violence by other private parties unless the victim was in police custody. [MORE] and [MORE] This means that police cannot be sued for any federal constitutional claim for a failure to protect citizens. Unless a state negligence law exists allowing such a lawsuit, victims cannot hold police liable for a failure to protect from harm from private parties. [MORE]

From [HERE] The Ninth Circuit upheld the dismissal of mass shooting survivors’ lawsuit against police officers who allegedly withheld law enforcement services from the scene, where five people were killed and 18 were injured. The survivors failed to state a claim for violation of their due process, equal protection and municipal liability claims.

Opinion is [HERE]

Civilian Oversight Report Says Deputy Gangs Continue to Operate in the LA Sheriff's Dept. Uncontrollable Cops "Valorize Violence" Against Blacks and Latinos in a City Run by White Liberals

From [HERE] A scathing report issued Friday by the Civilian Oversight Commission revealed there are deputy gangs and cliques still operating within the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, including at several stations such as East Los Angeles and Compton.

According to the special counsel's 70-page report, members of such deputy gangs as the Executioners, the Banditos, the Regulators, the Spartans, the Gladiators, the Cowboys and the Reapers "run'' many of the county's patrol stations, as opposed to the sergeants, lieutenants and captains ostensibly in charge.

The report also determined that new deputy cliques form as members of existing groups retire or otherwise leave the sheriff's department. There is evidence to suggest that gangs are now re-emerging in Men's Central Jail after efforts over the years to eradicate the problem of excessive force behind bars, the special counsel found.

"Contrary to the statements of the prior sheriff, deputy gangs exist and operate in the department, as they have for the last 50 years. They are a cancer," said Bert Deixler, the special counsel who led the investigation.

"Many of the people with whom we spoke expressed fears of personal or professional harm, not just for themselves, but often for spouses and children who serve in a department," he added.

Most troubling, the report said, the gangs "create rituals that valorize violence, such as recording all deputy involved shootings in an official book, celebrating with 'shooting parties,' and authorizing deputies who have shot a community member to add embellishments to their common gang tattoos.''

Hans Johnson, who is on the Civilian Oversight Commission, called the report "50 years of denial, obfuscation, foot dragging and stonewalling about the reality that is documented in this report."

The commission came up with a number of recommendations, including rotating deputies to different stations and outlawing gang-related tattoos.

Deputies sued in civil lawsuits arising from the alleged use of excessive force cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars in judgments and settlements, the report said, estimating that the additional cost to the county in such cases is upwards of $55 million.

Meanwhile, past administrations such as that of disgraced former Sheriff Lee Baca have promoted tattooed deputy gang members to the highest levels of leadership in the LASD, the report contends.

"Promoting deputy gang members into leadership positions reinforces the power of deputy gangs and deputy cliques and undermines the ability of officials to implement reforms aimed at eliminating them within the department,'' the special counsel team wrote this week.

While not addressing the report directly, Sheriff Robert Luna said Friday that he was elected to "bring new leadership and accountability'' to the department, and has created an office for "constitutional policing,'' led by former U.S. Attorney Eileen Decker.

That office, Luna said in a statement, "will be staffed with attorneys, investigators, and auditors, and it will be tasked with helping to eradicate deputy gangs from this department. The vast majority of the department personnel are hardworking and dedicated professionals who are committed to humbly serving the community.''

"We look forward to working with the Civilian Oversight Commission and Inspector General on this in the future.''

Inspector General Max Huntsman said, "We're going to start moving the culture right now. It's already begun since the election. The new sheriff has a totally different approach and I've seen change within the sheriffs department in response to that."

In the hearing Friday at which Diexler presented the report, the Civilian Oversight Commission approved the document and adopted its guidance. The report's recommendations will be sent to Luna, with the commission's urging that he adopt, implement and start enforcing them immediately. The document will also be sent to the Board of Supervisors to fulfill their September 2021 directive to develop a plan to address the problem.

"We have faith that Sheriff Luna's administration understands the damage that deputy gangs cause,'' Danielle Butler Vappie, interim executive director for the commission, said in a statement. The gangs "put a stain on all the positive work that is being done by honorable deputies each day,'' she added.

Meanwhile, some people told ABC7 they're skeptical that there will be any actual changes.

"What there isn't is the testimony from family members that are faced with retaliation by these deputy gang members on a daily basis," said one speaker.

The investigation involved eight hearings that included witness testimony and public comments. The special counsel's team also interviewed nearly 80 anonymous witnesses.

Supervisors voted to implement the commission in January 2016 with the mission to oversee and improve public transparency and accountability with respect to the Sheriff's Department. The long history of documentation on deputy gangs includes the 2012 Citizens' Commission on Jail Violence Report, the Inspector General's analysis of the Banditos, Loyola Law School's study of the deputy gang issue, Knock LA's investigative series, and most recently a 2021 Rand study.

Most Murders of Black People in Oakland Go Unsolved. Authorities Have No Plan to "Fix It" [if Cops Have No Legal Duty to Protect Citizens, What's the Basis of Their Authority and Our Duty to Obey It?]

the SO-CALLED social contract IS SAID TO BE AN agreement whereby citizens voluntarily agree to obey government authority in exchange for police protection and other services from the government.

If there is no social contract then there is no rational basis for the belief in political authority - the basis for all governments, everywhere. Here, BW is not talking about the purpose of government or how government can be improved. Rather, the problem is whether the government has a right to rule over people IN THE FIRST PLACE and whether people have an obligation to obey THEIR IMPLIED authority. What is the basis of the government’s implied right to rule over people in the first place? Is there a rational basis to account for authority or a logical way to account for its existence? [MORE]

From [HERE] This is the common experience for families of homicide victims in Oakland, where most homicides go unsolved — a devastating phenomenon that regularly plagues the city, according to a San Francisco Chronicle analysis.

Black men are grossly overrepresented in both homicide totals and in cases that go unsolved.

Watkins was one of 120 people killed in Oakland last year. By the end of 2022, the Oakland Police Department reported “clearing” — meaning resolving a case, either through an arrest or other means — just 32 out of those cases, or 27%. The FBI defines a clearance rate as the percentage of homicides from a given year that were resolved — as well as cases that were resolved from prior years. That gave Oakland police an official 2022 clearance rate of 36%.

Oakland’s rate is far below other large California cities, including San Francisco, and a national average that suffered during the pandemic, declining to about 50% in 2020, the most recent year for which the FBI had figures.

The Chronicle analysis found homicides in 2022 were more likely to go unsolved in East Oakland, where the majority of the city’s lower-income Black and Latino residents live, and more likely to be solved in rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods closer to the city’s affluent population, like downtown and, increasingly, West Oakland.

In a city whose Police Department has churned through a dozen chiefs while under federal oversight for 20 years, the reasons for Oakland’s consistently low solve rate may be myriad.

A 2020 UC Berkeley study uncovered “stark racial disparities in arrest rates for homicides” and many complaints about the way Oakland police respond to homicides. Victims’ families, particularly Black ones, reported “disrespectful and discriminatory” treatment and that police didn’t take their safety concerns seriously enough as cases dragged on unsolved. The study found that this contributes to the difficulty police have in getting witness cooperation, and raises grave fears of retaliatory violence. [MORE]

[police only Incidentally or randomly protect Black people and aren’t really involved in ‘police work’ in Black communities] Gallup Poll Finds the Majority of Black Women Don't Feel Safe Walking Alone

any protection from police is incidental and random - keeping BLACKS safe is not their goal. Cops exist primarily to manage the behavior of Blacks & Latinos within a free-range prison. Their goal is to place you in greater confinement. As Dr. Blynd observes, "people who are awake see cops as mercenary guards that remind us daily through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate State - colonized, surveilled and patrolled by the desensitized and lobotomized drones of the colonizers." Black people need to once again protect themselves, family members and their communities with “vigor and audacity,“ grow up and stop looking for authority to solve the many problems It actually creates and maintains. FUNKTIONARY explains, “only a slave waits for someone else to free him. [more] and [MORE]

According to GALLUP Less than half of Black women in the U.S. (46%) report feeling safe walking alone at night in the area where they live, compared with about three in four Black men (75%) and U.S. adults overall (73%).

Among all race and gender subgroups, Black women are the only group in which less than half say they feel safe walking alone.

These measures, as well as others, are updated on a quarterly basis as part of the ongoing research from the Gallup Center on Black Voices. [MORE]

Racist Man Sentenced for Federal Hate Crime for Cross Burning with the Intent to Intimidate a Black Family in Mississippi

From [HERE] A white man was sentenced today before U.S. District Judge Halil S. Ozerden to 42 months* in prison followed by three years supervised release and restitution in the amount of $7,810 for burning a cross in his front yard with the intent to intimidate a Black family.

According to court documents, in Gulfport, Mississippi, on Dec. 3, 2020, Axel Cox, 24, violated the Fair Housing Act when he used threatening and racially derogatory language toward his Black neighbors and burned a cross to intimidate them. After a dispute with the Black family victims, Cox wedged two pieces of wood together to form a cross, placed it in clear view of the victims’ residence, doused it in oil and set it alight. During this incident, Cox yelled threats and racial slurs toward the occupants of the house. Cox admitted that he lit the cross on fire because the victims were Black and that he intended to scare them into moving out of the neighborhood.

“This cross burning was an abhorrent act that used a traditional symbol of hatred and violence to stoke fear and drive a Black family out of their home,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “While one might think cross-burnings and white supremacist threats and violence are things of the past, the unfortunate reality is that these incidents continue today. This sentence demonstrates the importance of holding people accountable for threatening the safety and security of Black people in their homes because of the color of their skin or where they are from.”

“No one should endure such hatred and intimidation because of the color of his skin,” said U.S. Attorney Darren LaMarca for the Southern District of Mississippi. “This defendant has been held accountable. His sentence should permeate among his kind and declare that Mississippi and the Department of Justice will not tolerate this hateful behavior.”

“Mr. Axel Cox sought to intimidate members of the community through his intimidating threats," said FBI Special Agent in Charge Jermicha Fomby of the FBI Jackson Field Office. “The FBI prioritizes the protection of civil rights to ensure citizens remain safe without fear of any harm. We remain committed to tirelessly thwarting the nefarious actions of those, like Mr. Cox, who intended to impact fear upon citizens based on biases.”

A federal grand jury indicted Cox on Sept. 20, 2022. Cox faced a maximum penalty of up to 10 years in prison for interfering with the victims’ housing rights and a mandatory minimum of 10 years in prison, consecutive to any other sentence, for using fire to commit a federal felony. Cox also faced a fine of up to $250,000 with respect to each charge.

Assistant Attorney General Clarke, U.S. Attorney LaMarca and Special Agent in Charge Fomby made the announcement.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrea Cabell Jones for the Southern District of Mississippi and former Trial Attorney Noah Coakley II of the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section prosecuted the case.

For more information and resources on the department’s efforts to combat hate crimes, visit www.justice.gov/hatecrimes.

* This has been corrected to reflect the correct sentencing time of 42 months

Park National Bank Agrees to Pay $9 Million to Resolve DOJ Suit. (white liberal) Bank Officials Engaged in Redlining Practices by Not Providing Mortgage Services to Black and Latino Areas in Columbus

What is a “White Supremacist?” A white person (a racist) who practices racism against non-whites. A RACIST IS ANY WHITE PERSON ENGAGED IN MASTER-SERVANT RELATIONS WITH NON-WHITE PEOPLE. [MORE]

Being a white supremacist has nothing to do with income, title, status or POLITICAL PARTY. Notice that liberal and conservative whites rarely attempt to define the highly observable phenomenon of racism. Nevertheless, said racist suspects constantly chatter about racism in terms of mean words, DISRESPECT and affiliation with clown groups, such as KKK, nazis, proud boys, MAGA etc. Racism is not primarily about bigotry - minor inconveniences such as name calling, stereotypes or other mean words OR PERSONALIZED CONDUCT. Also, there are differENT ways to practice white supremacy. Rather, racism/white supremacy is about the superior, dominate position of whites and vast unequal power and opportunities and maintaining the imbalance of power through Black people’s cooperative control. A white supremacist can be a soccer mom, a businessman, or a US Senator if they are practicing racism against non-whites. [MORE] Belief that racism is bigotry is a vital part of false programming sold by elite whites - white publishers, professionals, professors and government representatives, ETC and promoted by showcase Blacks who parrot such programming in various styles. [MORE]

Amos Wilson explained that defining racism in terms of attitude or bigotry will absolutely lead to solving the wrong problems. ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." -Dr. Francis Cress Welsing, MD.

From [HERE] Park National Bank (“Park National”), based in Ohio, has agreed to pay $9 million to settle allegations brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that it engaged in unlawful redlining practices in the Columbus metropolitan area by not providing mortgage lending services to majority-Black and Hispanic communities from 2015 to 2021.  

According to the DOJ’s complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Park National concentrated all of its branches and mortgage lenders in majority-White neighborhoods and did not take any significant steps to make up for its absence in majority-Black and Hispanic communities.  Further, the DOJ alleges that peer lenders generated mortgage applications at a rate between five and ten times higher than that of Park National in the majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, and that peer lenders extended mortgage loans in such neighborhoods at a rate between 4.5 and 12.5 times higher than that of Park National.

Park National and the DOJ memorialized their agreement to settle all of the DOJ’s claims through a consent order filed with the federal court on February 28, 2023.  Under the consent order, Park National agreed to invest at least $7.75 million in a loan subsidy fund to provide subsidies for home mortgage loans, home improvement loans, home refinance loans, and home equity loans for applicants in majority-Black and Hispanic communities in the Columbus area.  Park National also pledged to allocate at least $750,000 towards advertising, outreach, consumer financial education, and credit counseling in the Columbus area.  Further, Park National agreed to invest a minimum of $500,000 developing partnerships with community-based or governmental organizations to provide services related to credit, financial education, homeownership, and foreclosure prevention to residents of majority-Black and Hispanic census tracts in the Columbus Area.  Additionally, Park National will open a new full service branch and a mortgage loan production office in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Columbus area, and assign at least four mortgage lenders, including a Spanish-speaking lender, to serve such neighborhoods.

The allegations made by the DOJ in the complaint, and the remedies provided for in the consent order, reflect the types of allegations and remedies in recent redlining settlements resulting from the DOJ’s Combating Redlining Initiative that was launched by Attorney General Merrick B. Garland in October 2021.  The initiative is a nationwide effort to address lending discrimination against communities of color and, the settlement with Park National is part of the initiative.  Since the initiative’s launch, the DOJ has announced six redlining cases and settlements, including settlements with Trustmark National Bank and Lakeland Bank, securing $84 million in relief for communities of color affected by lending discrimination across the United States.

In October 2021, in connection with announcing the initiative to combat redlining, the DOJ also announced the settlement with Trustmark National Bank regarding allegations of redlining in Memphis, Tennessee.  Further, in October 2022, the DOJ settled with Lakeland Bank regarding allegations of redlining in Newark, New Jersey.

COVID Fraud and Battery: Suit Says a Racist Suspect Georgetown Doctor Forced 2 Black Kids to Get Vaxxed w/o Mom's Consent, Prevented Kids from Leaving Clinic and Consulting w/Mom who Was Outside Door

From [HERE] The mother of two children who were given COVID-19 vaccines without the mother’s consent is suing the doctor who administered the vaccines.

An attorney representing NaTonya McNeil last week filed a lawsuit in Superior Court for the District of Columbia against Janine A. Rethy, M.D., M.P.H.

According to the complaint, on Sept. 2, 2022, McNeil took her two older children, ages 15 and 17, to the KIDS Mobile Medical Clinic/Ronald McDonald Care Mobile clinic, operated by Georgetown Hospital, to complete their required annual physical exam for the 2022-2023 school year.

The lawsuit alleges Rethy, director of the mobile clinic, held the children in the examination room longer than necessary for a regular check-up and vaccinated them against COVID-19 over their objections and without consulting their mother

In order to attempt to obtain the children’s consent — which they are not legally able to provide without a parent or guardian — the doctor falsely informed the children the COVID-19 vaccine was mandatory for school attendance and told them they could not lawfully decline it if they wanted to attend school.

The suit, filed by D.C. attorney Matthew Hardin, seeks damages for false imprisonment, battery and fraud.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is financing the lawsuit because, according to CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland, “CHD couldn’t just sit still and not allow this wrong to go unpunished and not bring this to the public’s attention.”

In an exclusive conversation with The Defender, McNeil explained why she is suing the the doctor:

“I just feel like people shouldn’t be able to do whatever they want to do to other people and especially not to children. As a mother, I feel like, ‘You all just took all my rights away from me to do what you wanted to do to my kids.’

“I do want justice to be done in this case. I feel like something needs to be done. This can’t just continue to happen.”

‘I feel violated’

According to the complaint, Rethy’s stated goal is to vaccinate all children against COVID-19. The complaint quotes her statement to the press:

“Our goal is to increase vaccination rates in children here in D.C. … For more than 30 years our role has been to be in the community to help address the problem of health disparities, bringing families care where they are.

“For this particular effort, we are glad to be partnering with DC Health to provide both regular childhood vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines to all children.”

In addition to her role as director of the mobile clinic, Rethy is chief of MedStar Georgetown University Hospital’s Division of Community Pediatrics and assistant professor of pediatrics at Georgetown University School of Medicine.

McNeil said that when she took her older children to the clinic, she stayed outside the examination room to care for her infant. As soon as the children entered the doctor’s office, she called her daughter’s cellphone to let Rethy know she was just outside the door if the doctor needed to consult her for anything.

According to McNeil, the doctor did not ask or inform her about any vaccinations, and did not ask her to sign anything. At the end of the physical, Rethy came out to talk to her.

McNeil said the doctor explained her son’s asthma treatment plan, but that’s all they discussed.

As they were heading home, McNeil said she was shocked when her daughter complained that her arm hurt “pretty bad.” When McNeil asked her why it hurt, her daughter said she was given the COVID-19 shot, even though she told the doctor she didn’t want it.

When McNeil asked her why she allowed the doctor to administer the shot, her daughter said:

“When she had the needle in her hand and she was coming towards me, I backed up and I asked her what is that needle, and she said it was the COVID shot and I … told her I didn’t want it and she said, ‘Well it is mandatory, you have to get it in order to go to school.’”

Rethy allegedly administered the shot to her daughter, and then to her son. McNeil said:

“He’s 14 and he said they didn’t even ask him if he wanted it or not, but when they gave it to him, he said he thought he had to get it because his sister got it.”

According to the complaint, both children received the  Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, authorized for emergency use, and the meningococcal vaccine. Her son was also injected with TDaP.

Both children were upset and angry they had been coerced into vaccination, the complaint says.

No school mandate, despite what clinic and doctor alleged

When she got home, McNeil said she called the doctor’s office, and asked them why they vaccinated her children without her consent.

“I would have never consented to you all vaccinating my children,” she said. “I’m not vaccinated and I’m not getting vaccinated and my kids were never supposed to be vaccinated for COVID period, under no circumstances.”

She said the person on the phone said they were supposed to get them for school.

After hanging up, McNeil said she was “so irritated I even started crying” because she couldn’t believe “they put this poison” into her children’s bodies.

In July 2022, D.C. public schools imposed a vaccine mandate for schoolchildren ages 12 and up for the 2022-2023 school year. But on Aug. 26, just weeks after imposing the mandate, officials walked it back, postponing it until 2023.

That means when McNeil’s children saw the doctor, there was no school vaccine mandate in place, despite what the Rethy allegedly told the children.

The age of consent

The District of Columbia in March 2021 enacted the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Minor Consent Act), allowing children 11 and older to consent to the administration of any vaccine — including COVID-19 shots — recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — without parental knowledge or consent if the medical provider believed “the minor is capable of meeting the informed consent standard.”

The law also required healthcare personnel to provide accurate immunization records to the Department of Health and to the student’s school, but not to parents with religious exemptions.

CHD and Parental Rights Foundation filed a lawsuit seeking a court order to declare the D.C. Act unconstitutional.

A judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 18, 2022, granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the D.C. mayor, Department of Health and public schools from enforcing the law.

That means at the time McNeil’s children visited the clinic, they could not legally provide consent to be vaccinated without their mother’s consent.

McNeil said:

“To do that to my little children, my innocent children. They took her rights. When she backed away from you [the doctor] and said she didn’t want it, that should have been the end of it.

“Or you [the doctor] should have called me on the phone to find out what I feel about the situation. But you [the doctor] basically told my child a lie so you [she] could do what you [she] wanted to do to my kid.”

Lawsuit Claims “Remdesivir,” the primary treatment for COVID in hospitals, Has Killed at Least 100,000 People and the USDA Knows It and Still Approves It and Provides Incentives for Its Usage

From [HERE] and [HERE] The antiviral drug remdesivir, brand name Veklury, is approved for use against COVID-19 despite research showing it lacks effectiveness and can cause high rates of organ failure

  • John Beaudoin is calling for a criminal investigation into remdesivir, citing data that it may have killed 100,000 people in the U.S.

  • Beaudoin received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022, finding 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from January 1, 2021, to November 30, 2022, which he believes may be due to remdesivir

  • A study published in The Lancet found “no clinical benefit” from the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients

  • The U.S. government pays hospitals a 20% upcharge on the entire hospital bill when remdesivir is used

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the experimental antiviral drug remdesivir, brand name Veklury, for emergency use against COVID-19 in May 2020.1 By October 2020, it had received full approval.2 It remains a primary treatment for COVID-19 in hospitals, despite research showing it lacks effectiveness3 and can cause high rates of organ failure.4

On Twitter, John Beaudoin is calling for a criminal investigation into the drug, citing data that it may have killed 100,000 people in the U.S. "They know," he says, "or they willfully refuse to know. Either way, it's homicide."5

Using drugs that cause organ failure, like remdesivir, isn't in the best interest of public health. The fact that U.S. health authorities have focused on this and similarly harmful drugs to the exclusion of all others, including older drugs with high rates of effectiveness and superior safety profiles, sends a very disturbing message.

Did Remdesivir Kill Thousands in Massachusetts?

Beaudoin has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court and believes a spike in deaths from acute renal failure (ARF) in Massachusetts is due to remdesivir, which is produced by Gilead Sciences. Using a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Beaudoin received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022.

He then graphed the FOIA data, finding 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from January 1, 2021 to November 30, 2022. Beaudoin also revealed an increase in deaths from acute rental failure in every age group over 15 years old, from 2015 to 2022.6 "Thousands dead in Massachusetts ARF likely due to Remdesivir. This requires CRIMINAL investigation," he tweeted.7

Deaths, Kidney Injury Common With Remdesivir

Remdesivir use didn't become widespread until 2020. From that time until October 2021, at least 7,491 adverse drug reactions were reported to the World Health Organization's (WHO) VigiAccess, including 560 deaths, 550 serious cardiac disorders and 475 acute kidney injuries.8

For comparison, only 5,674 adverse drug reactions were reported for ivermectin from 1992 to October 13, 2021.9 Despite its strong safety profile and efficacy, ivermectin was widely vilified during the pandemic. Not to mention, remdesivir costs between $2,340 and $3,120,10 while the average treatment cost for ivermectin is $58.11 Do you think this has anything to do with remdesivir's promotion and ivermectin's vilification?

While WHO updated its guidance in April 2022 to recommend the use of remdesivir in "mild or moderate COVID-19 patients who are at high risk of hospitalization,"12 a study published in The Lancet found "no clinical benefit" from the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients.13 Further, the investigators believed three deaths during the study were related to remdesivir.14

Gilead's Political Ties Questioned as Remdesivir Use Persists

Still, the question remains why remdesivir continues to be used at all. In November 2020, WHO issued a bulletin recommending against the use of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients, stating, "There is currently no evidence that remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients."15

Is it possible that Gilead's strong political connections have influenced the government's approvals and recommendations? It's worth noting that Donald Rumsfeld was the chairman of Gilead from 1997 until he joined the Bush administration in 2001. Rumsfeld had previously served as secretary of defense under President Gerald Ford from 1975 to 1977, and again under President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2006.

FDA Even Approved Remdesivir for Children

In late April 2022, the FDA even approved remdesivir as the first and only COVID-19 treatment for children under 12, including babies as young as 28 days,16 an approval that boggles the mind, considering COVID-19 is rarely serious in children while remdesivir is ineffective and carries a risk of serious, and deadly, side effects.

What's worse, the drug is also approved for outpatient use in children, which is a first. Dr. Meryl Nass expressed her concerns about the FDA's approval of remdesivir for outpatient use in babies, stating:17

"The FDA just licensed Remdesivir for children as young as one month old. Both hospitalized children and outpatients may receive it. The drug might work in outpatients, but the vast majority of children have a very low risk of dying from COVID. If 7 deaths per 1,000 result from the drug, as … European investigators thought18 … it is possible it will harm or kill more children than it saves.

Shouldn't the FDA have waited longer to see what early outpatient treatment did for older ages? Or studied a much larger group of children? Very little has been published on children and remdesivir …

When we look at the press release issued by Gilead,19 we learn the approval was based on an open label, single arm trial in 53 children, 3 of whom died (6% of these children died); 72% had an adverse event, and 21% had a serious adverse event."

More Lawsuits Filed Against Remdesivir

Two women are suing Kaiser Permanente and Redlands Community Hospital in California for giving remdesivir to their husbands without consent. Both men died from kidney and organ failure after being administered remdesivir. "The day he was admitted on August 12 they started the remdesivir and on [August 17] is when they were done," Christina Briones told CBS News. "Five doses. [On] the 17th his kidneys started to fail."20

In California, lawsuits have been filed on behalf of at least 14 families against medical providers for prescribing remdesivir without providing necessary information about it, leading to the patients' deaths.21 Another wrongful death suit was filed in Nevada, after a patient died of kidney failure and respiratory failure a week after being given remdesivir.22

Safety Signal Revealed for Remdesivir and Kidney Failure

Meanwhile, a study published in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics in April 2021 detected a potential safety signal for remdesivir and acute renal failure:23

"The combination of the terms 'acute renal failure' and 'remdesivir' yielded a statistically significant disproportionality signal with 138 observed cases instead of the nine expected. ROR [reporting odds ratio] of ARF with remdesivir was 20-fold that of comparative drugs.

Based on ARF cases reported in VigiBase, and despite the caveats inherent to COVID-19 circumstances, we detected a statistically significant pharmacovigilance signal of nephrotoxicity associated with remdesivir, deserving a thorough qualitative assessment of all available data."

In May 2021, another pharmacovigilance analysis revealed red flags against remdesivir. "Compared with the use of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, sarilumab, or tocilizumab, the use of remdesivir was associated with an increased reporting of kidney disorders," the study found.24 It concluded:25

"Our findings, based on postmarketing real-life data from >5000 COVID-19 patients, support that kidney disorders, almost exclusively AKI [acute kidney injury], represent a serious, early, and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction of remdesivir. These results are consistent with findings from another group. Physicians should be aware of this potential risk and perform close kidney monitoring when prescribing remdesivir."

In March 2022, yet another pharmacovigilance analysis warned of a significant association between remdesivir and acute kidney injury, especially in male patients and those over the age of 65 years. "Although causality was not confirmed," they noted, "the association between remdesivir and AKI should not be ignored, especially in the older, male COVID-19 inpatients."26

US Government Pays Hospitals to Use Remdesivir

Remdesivir was developed as an antiviral drug and tested during the Ebola breakout in 2014. The drug was found to have a very high death rate and was not pursued further. In the early months of 2020, however, the drug was entered into COVID trials.27 Those trials were also beyond disappointing.28,29,30

Not only was the drug ineffective against the infection but it also had significant and life-threatening side effects, including kidney failure and liver damage.31 Dr. Paul Marik, a pulmonary and critical care specialist and founding member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), explained that during the pandemic the only drug he was allowed to prescribe was remdesivir.

When he refused to follow the remdesivir protocol, he was subjected to a "sham review," an unofficial but well-known process in which a "troublesome" doctor is accused of wrongdoing and basically railroaded out of practice. In the end, he was fired and reported to the National Practitioner Databank and the Board of Medicine.

The financial motivations to report doctors going against the grain run deep. According to Marik, the U.S. government pays hospitals a 20% upcharge on the entire hospital bill when remdesivir is used.32 Citizens Journal also reported that the U.S. government pays hospitals a "bonus" on the entire hospital bill if they use remdesivir.33 It described this practice as a bounty placed on your life, with payouts tied to declining health instead of recovery:34

"For remdesivir, studies show that 71% to 75% of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to 10 days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death.

Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects.

… We now see government-dictated medical care at its worst in our history since the federal government mandated these ineffective and dangerous treatments for COVID-19, and then created financial incentives for hospitals and doctors to use only those 'approved' (and paid for) approaches. Our formerly trusted medical community of hospitals and hospital-employed medical staff have effectively become 'bounty hunters' for your life."

Officials Push Expensive, Risky Treatments

In addition to remdesivir, Pfizer's Paxlovid was granted emergency use authorization to treat mild to moderate COVID-19 in December 2021.35 The drug consists of nirmatrelvir tablets — the antiviral component — and ritonavir tablets, which are intended to slow the breakdown of nirmatrelvir.36

But like remdesivir, there are many problems with Paxlovid. In this case, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a warning to health care providers and public health departments about the potential for COVID-19 rebound after Paxlovid treatment.37 Further, Pfizer stopped a large trial of Paxlovid in standard-risk patients because it didn't show significant protection against hospitalization or death in this group.38

Paxlovid costs $529 per five-day treatment39 and has cost U.S. taxpayers $5.29 billion,40 while safe and less expensive options exist. An investigation by Cornell University, posted on the University's preprint server January 20, 2022, found ivermectin outperformed 10 other drugs against COVID-19.41

Since the FDA and CDC cannot be trusted, and even physicians' hands are often tied by regulatory red tape, it's imperative to take responsibility for your own health. In the case of COVID-19, seek early treatment using an effective and safe protocol — not one that puts profits over patients.

 Sources and References

Restrictions in Free Range Prisons Tighten: Report Says Western Governments are Accelerating the Use of Non-Consensual Persuasion to Ensure Citizens Act and Speak in Ways Compatible w/Govt Narratives

From [HERE] Since the advent of the covid era in early 2020, Western liberal democracies have witnessed a marked acceleration in the systematic deployment of methods of non-consensual persuasion aimed at ensuring that people act and speak in ways that correspond to the dominant state-determined narrative. Throughout this period, everyone – politicians, academics, journalists, scientists and ordinary citizens – have been exposed to some combination of psychological manipulation, censorship, smearing and coercion (seehere for an overview). Disturbingly, two recent events suggest that the methods used by our government and other powerful actors to crush dissent are becoming more flagrant.

Last month, the civil liberties group Big Brother Watch published a document titled Ministry of Truth: the secret government unit spying on our speech. The report confirmed what many of us had long suspected: some of our day-to-day talk and behaviour is being covertly monitored by our own Government for any signs of deviation from their version of the ‘truth’. If the confirmation of such Orwellian activities was not alarming enough, what was arguably more striking was the scale of this state-funded enterprise. Dedicated clandestine units are embedded within a range of government departments, including: the Cabinet Office (‘Rapid Response Unit’); Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (‘Counter Disinformation Unit’); Foreign Office (‘Government Information Cell’); Home Office(‘Research, Intelligence & Communications Unit); and the Ministry of Defence (‘77th Brigade). Clearly, law-abiding citizens that say or do something that deviates from the official government line (on covid, climate change, or the war in Ukraine) risk being clocked and silenced.

Within this state-funded infrastructure to crush free speech, the activities of the ‘Counter Disinformation Unit’ (CDU) evoke particular concerns. Despite being based in the government department responsible for the processing of Freedom of Information requests, the CDU was, paradoxically, the least forthcoming with answers to transparency questions posed by Big Brother Watch. The primary aim of the CDU is to ‘monitor covid disinformation’ and to signal potentially problematic material to social media companies. The Government, via the CDU, holds “Trusted Flagger” status with social media companies while — somewhat disingenuously — claiming not to mandate platforms to remove content. This special relationship results in government concerns being more visible to platforms such as YouTube and therefore more likely to be actioned; an arm’s length mechanism for habitual state censorship.

The Big Brother Watch investigation found that the Department of Digital, Culture, Media & Sport had spent over £1 million pounds on outsourcing private companies to conduct this monitoring of social media outlets. Indeed, as described in a previous article, in summer 2021 HART itself was the victim of this dubious practice when – following an illegal hack – a commercial enterprise called ‘Logically AI’ attempted to undermine us by publicising out-of-context quotes from our informal chat logs. It was galling to discover that the UK Government was spending swathes of taxpayers’ money to monitor and smear a group of academics who were giving their time voluntarily to engage in the perfectly lawful activity of challenging some aspects of covid policy and questioning the dominant covid narrative.  

The second recent event that suggests that government methods for silencing dissent are becoming increasingly dictatorial concerns an interview Andrew Bridgen MP did with Dominique Samuels (a political commentator). The backbench Conservative, the only parliamentarian to openly express concerns about the safety of the covid vaccines, had already been suspended from the party andsmeared as being ‘antisemitic’ and part of an ‘anti-vax conspiracy’ for stating that a Jewish consultant cardiologist had told him that the vaccine rollout had been ‘the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust’. In the interview with Samuels, Bridgen reveals a couple of other consequences he has endured for daring to criticise the dominant narrative.

Bridgen – the democratically elected MP for North West Leicestershire – describes how he was contacted by the ‘welfare’ office at the Houses of Parliament and told that ‘a number of people had come to us to say that you were suicidal, Andrew’. He reassures Samuels that there is absolutely no basis to these concerns. Later in the interview Bridgen also discloses that, around January 2022 (in the aftermath of him submitting a letter of ‘no confidence’ in the serving Prime Minister, Boris Johnson), an advisor from number 10 messaged him to say ‘what do you want … back off and you can have anything you want’. Bridgen says he has taken screenshots of the pertinent messages to support his conclusion that ‘they tried to buy me’. [MORE]

10 Blatant Lies Parroted by Media About COVID to Induce Public Consent to Take Deadly, Experimental COVID Injections

  1. Misinformation #1: Natural immunity offers little protection compared to vaccinated immunity

  2. Misinformation #2: Masks prevent Covid transmission

  3. Misinformation #3: School closures reduce Covid transmission

  4. Misinformation #5: Young people benefit from a vaccine booster

  5. Misinformation #6: Vaccine mandates increased vaccination rates

  6. Misinformation #7: Covid originating from the Wuhan Lab is a conspiracy theory

  7. Misinformation #8: It was important to get the 2nd vaccine dose 3 or 4 weeks after the 1st dose

  8. Misinformation #8: It was important to get the 2nd vaccine dose 3 or 4 weeks after the 1st dose

  9. Misinformation #9: Data on the bivalent vaccine is “crystal clear”

  10. Misinformation #10: One in five people get long Covid

https://archive.today/2023.03.03-171938/https://nypost.com/2023/02/27/10-myths-told-by-covid-experts-now-debunked/

New Emails Show Liar Fauci Commissioned Scientific Paper to Disprove that COVID Wasn’t Made in a Lab (and that He Helped Create It)

From [HERE] New emails uncovered by House Republicans probing the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the deceptive nature of Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

They show he “prompted” or commissioned — and had final approval on — a scientific paper written specifically in February 2020 to disprove the theory that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China. 

Eight weeks later, Fauci stood at a White House press conference alongside President Donald Trump and cited that paper as evidence that the lab leak theory was implausible while pretending it had nothing to do with him and he did not know the authors.

“There was a study recently,” he told reporters on April 17, 2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab, “where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences … in bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human. 

“So, the paper will be available. I don’t have the authors right now, but we can make it available to you.” [MORE]