“Media is the Virus:” Government Building in Canada Plastered with Photos of People Killed and Injured by COVID Injections. Induced to Take Deadly Injections by Govt and Media Lies (genthanasia)
/From [HERE] Watch our exclusive report of the activists plastering the CBC building on Front St. with stickers of people suspected of suffering Covid “vaccine” injuries and deaths.
Inspired by the UK’s “Media Is the Virus” protests that targeted the BBC in similar fashion, the activists hoped to share a voice for those affected while holding the CBC and other mainstream media to account for their complicity in promoting an unscientific and dangerous “safe and effective” narrative. (Bright Light News/Rumble)
Court Tosses Israel Lobby’s Lawsuit that Targeted US Scholars with “Law Fare” to Silence Their Political Conduct and Speech Calling for a Boycott of Racist Country Run by Terrocrats
/
From [HERE] A court in Washington, DC has entirely dismissed a lawsuit against the American Studies Association over its support of an academic boycott of Israel.
The lawsuit, which was filed in 2016 by Israel advocates, has now failed three separate times in court – a significant defeat for the Israel lobby’s attempt to punish scholars who back Palestinian rights.
“The court found that the claims primarily arose from advocacy on an issue of public interest and were not likely to succeed,” stated the Center for Constitutional Rights.
In a 2013 referendum, members of the American Studies Association overwhelmingly endorsed an academic boycott of Israel.
The vote followed an endorsement of the boycott by the association’s governing body.
Declaring the boycott an ethical stance, the ASA said that it “represents a principle of solidarity with scholars and students deprived of their academic freedom and an aspiration to enlarge that freedom for all, including Palestinians.”
Israel advocates within the association, however, jumped into action to persecute colleagues who dared to criticize Israel.
Using a tactic known as lawfare, in which Israel lobby groups use legal means to harass and silence supporters of Palestinian rights, the plaintiffs claimed that the boycott resolution was brought by “insurgents” within the association who attempted to “subvert and change the ASA’s purpose” into a political advocacy organization.
The plaintiffs alleged that a “cabal” of leaders from the US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (USACBI) surreptitiously took over the ASA and used their positions on its executive committee and national council to foist the boycott resolution on the association’s unsuspecting membership, misspending ASA money in the process.
A federal court threw out a key claim in the lawsuit in 2017, ruling that the ASA’s endorsement of the boycott was not contrary to the association’s charter.
After the lawsuit was initially dismissed in 2019, the plaintiffs filed an appeal, and opened a second case in the Washington, DC Superior Court.
Later that year, the Superior Court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss in part, but denied their anti-SLAPP motion.
SLAPP suits are intended to suppress free speech and force people or organizations into spending money defending themselves in court.
But defendants appealed the denial of that anti-SLAPP motion.
The DC Court of Appeals ordered the court to reanalyze the case, resulting in the most recent ruling, notes the Center for Constitutional Rights.
The force behind the lawsuit was the Louis D. Brandeis Center, an Israel advocacy organization that has for years worked to smear Palestine solidarity activism as anti-Semitism, and attempts to suppress it with frivolous lawsuits and bogus civil rights complaints.
The organization’s former president, attorney Kenneth Marcus, represented the plaintiffs until February 2018 – when he was appointed as the Trump administration’s top civil rights enforcer at the US Department of Education.
After resigning from his position in 2020, Marcus returned to lead the Louis D. Brandeis Center.
“The purpose of lawsuits like these are really to harass and intimidate activists who support rights anywhere, but freedom and justice in Palestine in particular,” Astha Sharma Pokharel, staff lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights, told The Electronic Intifada.
Along with the anti-SLAPP laws that are designed to deter these kinds of attacks, the court’s dismissal “sends a message to Palestinian rights advocates that they are supported and that the law is on their side,” Sharma Pokharel added.
“A losing strategy”
The Center for Constitutional Rights represented Steven Salaita, one of the defendants targeted by this lawsuit.
In 2014, Salaita was fired by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for social media comments criticizing Israel’s assault on Gaza that year.
He sued the university for breach of contract, alleging administrators acted under pressure from pro-Israel donors, later settling the case.
Salaita then found himself targeted by the lawsuit against the American Studies Association.
He told The Electronic Intifada this week that he was relieved that the DC court dismissed the lawsuit against the American Studies Association.
“It was something hanging over my head and I dislike being obliged to deal with people who deny my humanity,” Salaita said.
“I don’t know what message [Israel lawfare groups] will hear – probably nothing – but it should send them the message that it’s a losing strategy,” he said.
“More importantly, it should send them the message that even if their nonsense were to be effective according to judicial bodies in the United States, it still won’t stop anybody from agitating against the Israeli state.”
Boycotts, he added, are “designed to bypass and subvert state institutions.”
[Elite Racists Continue to Trick Black People by Confusing Bigotry w/Racism] A Tenn Lawmaker Didn't Say Mean Words About Lynching (bigotry), He Proposed Lynching Mostly Blacks (racism) to Execute Them
/
WAKE UP. NAME CALLING IS NOT RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY. From [HERE] During a debate on Tuesday about a bill that would expand the State’s options for putting people to death, a Tennessee state representative expressed support for the bill and suggested adding hanging from a tree as an execution method.
Lawmakers were discussing HB1245, which would allow electrocution as an alternative to lethal injection, and an amendment that would add execution by firing squad, when Rep. Paul Sherrell (R-Sparta) said, “I was just wondering, could I put an amendment on that that would include hanging by a tree, also.”
Racial Terror Lynching in Tennessee
EJI has documented 236 racial terror lynchings of Black people in Tennessee between 1877 and 1950, including hangings of Black journalists, business leaders, and teachers.
EJI’s report on terror lynchings in the 12 most active lynching states in America found that Tennessee’s Lake and Moore counties had the sixth and seventh highest lynching rates, respectively, and Shelby County had the 18th highest number of lynching victims.
Black people were lynched in Tennessee for minor social transgressions or for demanding basic rights and fair treatment. Richard Wilkerson, for example, was lynched in Manchester, Tennessee, in 1934 for allegedly slapping a white man who had assaulted a Black woman at an African American dance.
Businessmen Thomas Moss, Calvin McDowell, and Henry Stewart were brutally lynched in Memphis in 1892 for defending their grocery business against white attackers. The men were friends of anti-lynching crusader Ida B. Wells, who wrote an editorial in response to their murders urging Black residents in Memphis to “leave a town which will neither protect our lives and property, nor give us a fair trial in the courts, but takes us out and murders us in cold blood when accused by white persons.” A white mob then attacked and destroyed her newspaper office and threatened her not to return to Memphis.
Tennessee lynch mobs regularly displayed complete disregard for the legal system. In 1906, Edward Johnson, a Black man, was convicted of raping a white woman and sentenced to death by an all-white jury in Chattanooga. His attorneys appealed the case and won a rare stay of execution from the U.S. Supreme Court.
In response, a white mob seized Mr. Johnson from the jail, dragged him through the streets, hanged him from the second span of the Walnut Street Bridge, and shot him hundreds of times. The mob left a note pinned on the corpse that read: “To Justice Harlan. Come get your n—r now.” Mr. Johnson, who used his last words to declare his innocence, was cleared of the rape nearly a century later.
The Legacy of Racial Terror
Communities across Tennessee have partnered with EJI to truthfully confront this history of racial terror lynching. Ed Johnson was among four lynching victims memorialized in Chattanooga, and community members have installed two historical markers in downtown Nashville to remember four men who were lynched there during the era of racial terror.
In 2020, a historical marker was installed in front of the Madison County courthouse to memorialize John Brown, who was lynched on the courthouse lawn by a mob of 500 men, and Eliza Woods, who was dragged to the courthouse by a mob after she was accused of poisoning her white employer. Ms. Woods declared her innocence, but the mob ripped off her clothes, hanged her from a tree, and shot at her body.
On Tuesday, however, other lawmakers failed to even respond to Mr. Sherrell’s comment. He apologized only after the remark drew widespread attention and criticism, and in doing so he restated his support for the death penalty bill.
“A bill calling to expand the death penalty by firing squad, and even lynching, is deplorable, immoral and takes us back to the dark days of Jim Crow,” the Rev. Kevin Riggs, pastor of Franklin Community Church, told The Tennessean. “I’m appalled by the words of Representative Sherrell. Suggesting firing squads and lynchings is unconscionable. Tennessee should be moving in the direction of outlawing state sanctioned killings, instead of toward more killings and in more inhumane ways than already exist. There is no moral way to murder another person.”
The decline of lynching in the early 20th century relied heavily on the increased use of the death penalty, and public hangings were often racialized displays intended to appease would-be lynch mobs.
Northern states had abolished public executions by 1850, but some Southern states authorized public hangings until 1938. And even after they were legally banned, mobs often succeeded in forcing public hangings in Southern states.
Lawmakers on Tuesday advanced HB1245 to the next committee.
'blows my mind that we're still hanging brothers by a tree:' Elite Racist Suspects @ Marriott/NFL/ESPN Gas Light Michael Irvin w/BS Claim He Touched a White Woman, Witnesses say Video Shows Otherwise
/[MeToo movement Used as a Tool of Racism White Supremacy] From [HERE] and [HERE] Former Cowboys receiver Michael Irvin held a news conference on Wednesday to address an incident involving a female hotel staffer in Arizona, which led to Irvin being sent home from Super Bowl coverage.
Irvin sued the Arizona Marriott hotel for $100 million in damages over the allegations. He has denied the allegations that he had any inappropriate physical conduct between him and the woman.
Irvin said in the press conference that this situation "sickens" him. He said it takes him "back to a time where a white woman would accuse a Black man of something and they would take a bunch of guys who were above the law, run in the ban and put a rope around his foot and drag him through the mud and hang him by the tree."
Irvin said he's been asked if he remembers the woman from the lobby, to which he replied that he meets so many people year-long staying in hotels.
"I couldn't even tell you what she looks like," Irvin said. "I don't even know who I'm talking about it. This just blows my mind that, in 2023, we're still dragging and hanging brothers by a tree."
Irvin said he still has not seen the tape of the alleged incident and does not know what he is being accused of. He said if he did something wrong, he'll suffer the consequences.
"But if you did something wrong, you meaning them, then they should suffer the consequences," Irvin said.
Two witnesses of the incident also spoke with reporters.
One was an Australian man who said he did not know who Irvin was because he's not an NFL fan and the Super Bowl was his first introduction to the sport. He said he met Irvin while doing business with his colleagues in the hotel lobby.
The other man said he did know who Irvin was, as an Eagles fan, but offered to buy Irvin a drink, which he refused.
Both men said they did not see any behavior from Irvin that was a cause for concern.
Irvin got emotional after listening to the two men give their accounts of the incident because he was thankful they were there and weren’t alone with his word versus his accuser.
ESPN said it had no comment on the legal developments in the case and the NFL Network did not respond to a request for comment.
In his lawsuit, which is filed in Collin County where he lives, Irvin's attorneys accused Marriott's employees and management of "inaccurately and inflammatorily" accusing Irvin of misconduct.
The lawsuit said Irvin had a "brief, friendly interaction with a Marriott employee lasting no longer than one minute" as he arrived back at the hotel Sunday night.
"Witnesses have verified that Mr. Irvin, casually exchanged pleasantries with one of the hotel employees, Mr. Irvin shook her hand, and went to his room alone," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit said Irving "appreciates spending time with his fans," including taking pictures and talking with them, and that his interaction with the Marriott employee "was no different and witness testimony will prove this to be the case."
"Nonetheless, Marriott recklessly reported to the NFL that Mr. Irvin had somehow acted inappropriately even though in this brief interaction with multiple witnesses, nothing took place other than a friendly interaction that ended with a polite handshake," the lawsuit said.
In a legal response filed Wednesday, Marriott said it didn’t provide the video due to concerns it would reveal the identity of the woman and other guests if Irvin’s attorneys released it publicly.
The company’s attorneys said the order they were given didn’t require the video to be copied, but if the judge now orders a copy, they would ask that it not be shared publicly. They say they offered to allow Irvin to watch the video, but he declined.
The lawsuit also said Irvin then went upstairs to his room. After he fell asleep, he was "shockingly woken up" by security and removed from the hotel. WFAA reached out to Marriott for a comment on the lawsuit when it was filed and they did not respond.
Irvin's lawyer, Levi G. McCathern, previously told WFAA that his office had reached out to the hotel to talk about the situation but "they refused to speak to us." In the press conference, McCathern said Irvin's agent was eventually able to get a meeting with Marriott's GM and head of marketing. The head of security was not included in that meeting, McCathern said.
"They absolutely refused to give [Irvin's agent] any information about what the allegations were against Mr. Irvin," McCathern said.
Irvin and two other men, who were witnesses to the incident and part of Wednesday's press conference, were made available to Marriott for interviews and the hotel declined to speak with any of them, according to McCathern.
The press conference came one day after a judge ordered Marriott to provide Irvin “any and all video recordings, written reports, and/or witness statements gathered” that pertain to Irvin’s February visit at the Arizona hotel by March 7 at 5 p.m.
McCathern said he has seen the surveillance video, but was not allowed to have a copy of it. In a new court filing, Irvin's team filed for an emergency court order to obtain a copy of the video with a proposed deadline of the end of the day – 5 p.m. on March 8.
Since there was no copy of the video to show, McCathern gave his personal description of what the video entailed.
McCathern said the video shows Irvin being approached by the woman after taking pictures outside with some fans – the witnesses in the press conference – and the interaction between Irvin and the woman happens behind a pole in the center of the room. According to McCathern and the two witnesses, Irvin touches the woman four times: the introductory handshake, the handshake at the end of the interaction, once on the elbow and "brushes" her once on the other elbow after bowing over laughing.
McCathern said the woman is never seen in the video acting upset and doesn't back away from Irvin. The conversation between Irvin and the woman lasted about a minute and a half, McCathern said.
"This is what I'm struggling with," Irvin said. "You try to be an ambassador of the league and also understand that God has blessed me and given me a platform to try to touch people, try to raise people, try to lift people up. I've met a lot of fans. I've always tried to be good with people."
Elite Racist Media Sensationalizes Episode w/Shawn Kemp as a “Drive by Shooting.” NO CHARGES Filed Against Him, Immediately Released by Cops. No Facts About Driving by and Shooting at Anyone Confirmed
/From [HERE] No charges are immediately being filed against former NBA star Shawn Kemp following his arrest in a drive-by shooting in Washington, prosecutors said Thursday.
Kemp, 53, was arrested for investigation of felony drive-by shooting shortly before 6 p.m. Wednesday in Tacoma, online jail records show. No one was injured in the shooting Wednesday afternoon.
Adam Faber, a spokesman for the Pierce County Prosecutor's Office, said in an emailed statement Thursday afternoon that that no charges were immediately being filed against Kemp and that he was being released from jail pending further investigation.
Tacoma police said they arrested a 53-year-old man after a shooting in a parking lot near the Tacoma Mall on Wednesday, but a spokeswoman Thursday did not confirm whether that was Kemp. The shooting followed an altercation between people in two vehicles; one car fled and a gun was recovered, police said.
Court Rules a Policy Allowing Only “Respectful and Courteous” Comments at Town Meetings Violates Mass Constitution; Laws Allowing Lavish Praise but Disallowing Harsh Criticism of Government Unlawful
/
From [HERE] A policy allowing only “respectful and courteous” public comments at town meetings violates the state constitution, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled.
The Massachusetts town of Southborough’s comment policy violated protections for freedom of assembly and freedom of speech in the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, the top state court ruled March 7.
The policy at issue partly reads: “All remarks and dialogue in public meetings must be respectful and courteous, free of rude, personal or slanderous remarks. Inappropriate language and/or shouting will not be tolerated.”
Justice Scott L. Kafker wrote the opinion striking down the policy.
“Although civility, of course, is to be encouraged, it cannot be required regarding the content of what may be said in a public comment session of a governmental meeting,” wrote Kafker for the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
“What can be required is that the public comment session be conducted in an ‘orderly and peaceable’ manner, including designating when public comment shall be allowed in the governmental meeting, the time limits for each person speaking, and rules preventing speakers from disrupting others and removing those speakers if they do.”
The plaintiff in the case, Louise Barron, was accused of violating the civility policy during a town meeting and threatened with physical removal. In her remarks, she said the town was “spending like drunken sailors” and said the town board had violated the state’s open meetings law.
Even though board members are volunteers, “breaking the law is breaking the law,” Barron said.
A town official interjected, telling Barron that if she wanted to slander town officials, the public comment session would be stopped.
“Look, you need to stop being a Hitler.” Barron said. “You’re a Hitler. I can say what I want.”
The board member called a recess. After turning off his microphone, the board member pointed in Barron’s direction. He allegedly yelled, “You’re disgusting,” and said Barron would be escorted from the meeting if she didn’t leave. Barron left.
The state constitutional provision regarding the right to assembly was drafted by John Adams, with some help from his cousin Samuel Adams, Kafker said. It provides for the right to assemble, the right to give instructions to representatives and the right to seek redress of wrongs.
The provision, Kafker said, “expressly envisions a politically active and engaged, even aggrieved and angry, populace.” It also “reflects the lessons and the spirit of the American Revolution.”
Turning to the free speech issue, Kafker said the town’s civility code is directed at government speech, and it is content based, requiring strict scrutiny of restrictions. The policy also appears to be viewpoint based, Kafker said, because it allows “lavish praise” while “disallowing harsh criticism of government officials.”
“In this country, we have never concluded that there is a compelling need to mandate that political discourse with those with whom we strongly disagree be courteous and respectful,” Kafker said.
Hat tip to Law360 and MySouthborough.com, which had coverage, and the Volokh Conspiracy, which had opinion highlights. [MORE]
Media Attacks Tucker Carlson Over Honkey Kong Jan 6th Revelations. Claim 39,000 Hours of Footage Showing Neuropeon Cops and Protesters Calmly Interacting w/Each Other Inside Capitol is Disinformation
/
THE DEPENDENT MEDIA CONCEALS REALITY. How many neuropeons were armed?? Nearly all DEFENDANTS were charged with misdemeanors, such as trespass or disorderly. [MORE] One person died inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 — Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt. Despite being unarmed and presenting no physical threat to anyone, she was shot dead by Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd. Fake news reports claimed that Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by rioters wielding a fire extinguisher. However, as George Parry reported at TheAmerican Spectator, Sicknick died on Jan. 7 of a stroke. The medical examiner found no evidence of physical trauma. Kevin Greeson, Benjamin Phillips, and Roseanne Boyland were all protesters who died outside of the Capitol building pursuant to ongoing health issues. [MORE]
Videos Show Polite, White Cops Accompany and Open Doors for QAnon Shaman. Other Cops Tour w/Their Neuropeon Brothers and Sisters During J6 Unarmed "Insurrection" Where Vast Majority were Non-Violent
/
“Virtually every moment of Jacob Chansley’s time inside the Capitol was caught on tape,” says Carlson, who was granted exclusive access by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy to 40,000 hours of surveillance footage from that day inside and around the Capitol, which has never been seen before by the public.
“The tapes show the Capitol Police never stopped Jacob Chansley. They helped him. They acted as his tour guides.” [MORE]
Bronsexualitis- A virus of the mind suffered by a small hoard of self-deluded mouth-breathing sports fans (and fanboys) who fantasize about LeBron James and over-inflate his accomplishments- Dr Blynd
/
According to DR. BLYND:
Bronsexualitis - a seemingly incurable pathology, mental malady or psychological infection--a virus of the mind suffered by a small hoard of self-deluded mouth-breathing sports fans (and fanboys) who fantasize about LeBron James and over-inflate his accomplishments (and overlook or minimize his failures) on the basketball court as compared to the widley accepted and universally acknowledged GOAT (Michael Jordan), while sidestepping (or skipping over) comparisons with Kobe Bryant. Bronsexaulitis has afflicted a fringe cult of thumb-sucking, witless blind-witnessing believers (busters). Fortunately, those in touch with reality armed with critical thinking skills along with basic logic and reasoning skills are immune to catching this embarrassing and insufferable mentally-debilitating dis-ease. Thankfully, like stupidity or willful ignorance, it's not a communicable or transmissible disease, but it is however utterly miserable for those who silently suffer from it as they give voice to delusion and expose their condition and fringe cultish status to the world.
‘He has Muscles and is Bigger than Me So I Couldn’t Defend Myself.’ SUKR SNigger Chris Rock Plays Vaginal Role After Getting the Shit Smacked Out of His Created Persona, Degrades Blacks in the Process
/
OH DON’T CRY CWISS. SELECTIVE NONSENSE FROM A COIN-OPERATED SUKR NGHR. AS IF HE WERE STILL A LITTLE BOY, MR. ROCK SAID ‘HE WON’T FIGHT ANOTHER BLACK MAN IN FRONT OF WHITE PEOPLE BECAUSE HIS PARENTS TAUGHT HIM NOT TO DO THAT’- THEN HE THROW THE MIC DOWN to emphasis HIS POINT. PARENTS? AT AGE 60 is he still controlled by the approval of fatHer figures OR external authorities? (at any rate, it SOUNDS LIKE A FAMILY OF SLEEPING TOMS, ‘we don’t defend ourselves. B/C that’s bad.’). HOWEVER, THE LAST 10 MINUTES OF HIS “COMEDY” SPECIAL DIDN’T CONTAIN ONE JOKE- it was solely intended to degrade WILL AND JADA SMITH. IN SO DOING HE DEGRADED BLACK PEOPLE WITH AN EMOTIONAL rant ABOUT JADA “SUCKING DICK,” ‘JADA GETTING FUCKED’ AND ‘BITCH, NIGGER, BITCH, BITCH, BITCH ETC.’ IN OTHER WORDS, HE WONT FIGHT BLACK PEOPLE IN FRONT OF WHITE PEOPLE BUT HE WILL DEGRADE THEM IN FRONT OF WHITE PEOPLE. FUCKING CLOWN CLOGIC. IT APPEARS THAT THE SLAP-DOWN [REALITY] REVEALED MR. ROCK’S PERSONA was SIMPLY CREATED FOR THE STAGE; HE SOUNDS LIKE AND ACTS LIKE A BLACK MAN BUT ITS really AN ACT. MR ROCK’S STAGE CREATED PERSONA FROM ‘BROOKLAWN’ would have known that YOU DON’T ALWAYS FIGHT TO WIN - but the real chris rock, who is a SNIGGER, DOESN’T KNOW THAT.
According to FUNKTIONARY:
sniggering – the modus vivendi of opportunist (sell-out) compromises. 2) the actions of SNiggers. (See: Coin-Operated)
enterstainment – dubious, dreadful, inappropriate or grossly offensive entertainment which leaves one feeling stained.
Entertainment Criminals – the Media Mafia. If you give them your attention, you give them your power, unless you can observe the Spectacle without involvement, consumeristic demand or mindless attachment to a virtual world.
Corpse Joe Says He Will Protect the Black Vote, Offers Sleeping Toms Only Boilerplate White Liberalism and No Solutions to the Myriad of Problems Caused by White Supremacy Plaguing Black Communities
/
ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:
Sleeping Tom – a person of Afrikan descent who has not consciously awakened to fully embrace his or her own asili (connective cultural tissue, heritage, imprimatur, and imperative). 2) a socially unconscious person of Afrikan descent who participates in secret balloting (voting). A sleepin’ Tom lives and reacts out of another culture’s asili or out of the mind of another; not their own. 3) a Negro who is unaware that he is all souled-out. 4) a Negro who isn’t aware that he is in fact and in deed a certified Sambo. 5) a broken, token Negro; a coin-operative. (See: Straw Boss, Asili, Doublemindedness, Sambo, Uncle Tom-Tom, Coin-Operated, Black Flask Brigade & Secret Ballots)
POLITICAL SILENCE – THE STUDY OF THE ART OF CONTROL. 2) CENSORED AND MUTED VOICES OF THE DISPOSSESSED ALWAYS STRENGTHENS THOSE PRIVILEGED BY THE STATUS QUO. SCIENTISTS WHO ACTUALLY ENGAGE IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRIES DO NOT TAKE VOTES. (SEE: VOTING)
From [HERE] President Biden told a crowd gathered to commemorate the 58th anniversary of a brutal police attack on Black protesters that the right to vote was “under assault” as Republicans introduce laws to restrict ballot access and redraw voting districts.
Observing the anniversary of Bloody Sunday, an event that electrified the civil rights movement, Mr. Biden said the marchers who crossed the Edmund Pettus Bridge on March 7, 1965, had bucked the “forces of hate” and encouraged activism that led to the signing of the Voting Rights Act five months later.
“They forced the country to confront hard truths,” Mr. Biden said, “and to act to keep the promise of America alive.”
Mr. Biden’s trip to Selma, the first he has made as president, came amid expectations that he would soon announce another bid for the presidency, a candidacy that will require the support of Black voters who were decisive in helping him win a first term. Recent polling has shown that a majority of Black voters believe Mr. Biden should run again in 2024, and in Selma, marchers shouted “We love Joe” and “Bring it home” as the president spoke. [MORE]
POLITICAL SILENCE. About twenty years ago Norman Kelley observed that black people had become political weaklings, “complicit in their own political emasculation.” At one time Black Americans forcefully argued for their own seat at the table but now in their relations with the democrat party they function like trained seals or dogs that “bark and clap” at election time and shut-up afterwards. Black people, once envied and imitated by people seeking freedom throughout the world are now demobilized and have no effective political organizations, no real leaders and “black politics” is void of any substance. [MORE]
Democrats have no messaging or organizing aimed at black people. As explained by Kelley ‘Democrats offer only boilerplate liberalism and no legislative initiative. And why would they need one? Democrats know they will suffer no sanctions from disgruntled blacks.’
Kelley explained Democrats essentially offer no substantial policy initiatives that benefit African-Americans and “No real agenda drives politics beyond having the Democratic candidate show up.”
‘Democrats don’t stand for anything in regard to Blacks; black people are voting against republicans but not for Democrats.
Here, Dems push so-called ‘climate change,’ limitless abortions, a gay-transexual agenda, “infrastructure” and their Trump obsession onto Black people as if this ad-hoc collection of issues will address the myriad of problems in Black communities caused by the system of racism white supremacy. Elite whites and their probots are quick to remind anyone that “Black voters are not a monolith, and their attitudes differ based on upbringing, geography and other factors.” Duh. No group of people is a monolith but it should be obvious that black people are not white people – and white people are not subjected to the system of racism white supremacy. Anon explains, “in the absence of white supremacy, niggers would not exist.” And white liberals’ white menu of political concerns have little to do with the realities of daily life Black people face.
Led by white liberals black people are going in circles. According to the Urban League’s 2022 State of Black America, Black people haven’t progressed since 1965. Blacks are about three-fifths along the way to experiencing equal status with White Americans. The Black-White disparity persists across virtually every line or indicator of life and quality of life in the United States. Black people occupy the bottom of nearly every statistical category of life. [MORE] US Census data reveals that the unemployment gap between whites and blacks is virtually unchanged over the last 50 years. The income and wealth gaps have actually widened. So has the gap in educational attainment. The jobless rate among African-Americans has remained double to whites for over 5 decades. Among other things, according a to a NY Times analysis the race gap in higher education has also widened. The median Black household income was $43,862 versus $63,823 for Whites. Blacks still trail Whites in homeownership, the traditional path to wealth building in the country, and their homes were valued less than Whites. [MORE] Norman Kelley observed that despite Black people’s heavy involvement in the Democratic Party, schools have remained as segregated as before Brown v. Board of Education, which was decided 70 years ago. [MORE] According to NSBA nearly one third of Black students lived in poverty (32%), compared with 10% of white students in families living in poverty. While white liberals whine about Florida AP classes and captivate Blacks with fantasy talk about reparations, 80% of African-American fourth-graders can barely read and understand mathematics and only 19% were scored proficient in math. [MORE] According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) just 18% of Black eighth-graders reach reading “proficiency.” [MORE] And in 2015 NAEP found that only 17% of Black 12th graders were proficient at reading. [MORE] In 2017, Ballou High School in DC came under intense scrutiny for pushing failing students through to graduation in order to achieve a 100% graduation and college acceptance rate. Teachers stated that many of their 12th graders couldn’t read and write. In 2017-18, only 7% of public school teachers and 11% of public school principals were Black. [MORE]
Black sheeple filled with anxiety are running around worrying about voting “rights” - yet voting for white liberals and their black rolebots has done nothing to neutralize the system of racism white supremacy.
The overblown value of the vote itself is the real ‘propAgenda’ here; the more scarce elites make the vote (or the perception of scarcity), the more valuable it appears to be to the Black votary– yet this is maya. Dr. Amos Wilson explains the Dependent Media and other vested interests ‘strive strenuously to convince the Black electorate that every conceivable problem which confronts it can be resolved through voting heavily for Black and friendly White politicians. The media is ever quick to remind the Black electorate of the historical struggles necessary to achieve their right to vote. It indicts the community for its electoral apathy and seeks to evoke guilt feelings in those who do not participate in the electoral process — making such ritualistic participation emblematic of democracy and first-class citizenship.’ Most importantly however, Wilson explains, “This is of special interest when it is realized that very few, if any, of the major political, economic and social goals achieved by Black America, including the Voting Rights Act, were accomplished through Black voting prowess. The ballot box has been a relatively impotent weapon in the achievement of major victories by the Black community. Suddenly vigorous protest and direct-action legal suits and extralegal processes such as boycotts, sit-ins, and the like, which were used so effectively by the community to achieve its sociopolitical ends and to fight injustice and oppression, have fallen far behind the election of Black politicians to achieve the same ends.”
Was Malcolm X Betrayed By an African American CIA Agent Posing as a Mozambican Freedom Fighter?
/From [HERE] Surveillance of Black Americans, especially those viewed as subversives, has been an enduring process for U.S. governmental agencies. Whether defined as the FBI, CIA, NSA, DOJ, the State Department, or other law enforcement agencies, a close watch on the words and deeds of militant or radical Black Americans has been an active endeavor at least since the dawn of the twentieth century. Long before eavesdropping or wiretapping were the usual means of keeping tabs on subversives, agents were busy spying on and compiling dossiers on individuals who would later be added to the government’s “enemies list.”
Malcolm X believed he was on this list and that he was being intensely pursued and shadowed by the government. A few years after his assassination on February 21, 1965, at the Audubon Ballroom in Washington Heights, it was disclosed that his organizations—the Muslim Mosque, Inc. and the Organization of Afro-American Unity—were polluted by undercover cops. Even so, to date there has been no deep-dive into Malcolm and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), though there appears to be extensive coverage and lengthy dossiers available in their files, some of which Don and I obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.
Such a study or book we thought would be a logical extension of Malcolm X: The FBI File,compiled by Clayborne Carson, edited by David Gallen with an introduction by Spike Lee. The CIA is mentioned only once in the book in which it summarizes a four-page memorandum from the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), dated in the summer of 1965. Basically the memo states that Malcolm, since his break with the Nation of Islam and his travels to Africa, had become a growing threat “all of which was reason for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to want MALCOLM X to be assassinated.”1
If there is any credibility to an article by Paul Meskil of the New York World-Telegram published four days after Malcolm’s assassination, the leader was not killed by Muslims “but by persons who thought he knew too much about a Harlem dope racket with supply lines stretching to Cuba and Red China,” Meskil wrote, adding that Malcolm was furious that the Organization of Afro-American Unity (OAAU) had been infiltrated by “pro-Peking fanatics” and peddling dope in Harlem.
The gunmen who killed Malcolm were clearly black but they, according to CORE’s (Congress of Racial Equality) leader James Farmer, were not Muslims. He believed the assassination, as well as the subsequent fire-bombing of the mosque, were distractions to cover up “a much more sinister plot,” Meskil concluded. How much Malcolm knew about drug trafficking at that time and his interest in ending it remains unknown.
According to Meskil, several of Malcolm’s top lieutenants had been informed of the flow of cocaine and other drugs from China to Cuba to be dispensed in the U.S. and speculated that Malcolm was possibly on the verge of revealing who they were when he was gunned down.2
Meskil cited what he called a reliable report under investigation by the FBI and the CIA that, “the Reds paid at least part of the tab for Malcolm’s tours of Africa, Europe and the Middle East.”3 Was Malcolm concerned that his leadership role was being undermined and sabotaged by the Reds, as Meskil concludes, thus preparing to expose them? That question as well as where Meskil got his information have never been answered. And who was Paul Meskil? We know he was a highly respected journalist with the New York Daily News until 1991 and was an expert on the Cosa Nostra, who he configured into his story about the Reds in Harlem and their threat to overtake their drug operation. Meskil, 82, died in Sarasota, Florida, on Oct. 11, 2006. [MORE]
UK Government Data Shows You’re Far More Likely to Die from COVID Injections than from COVID Itself
/
CHART IS FROM [HERE]
From [HERE] and [HERE] They apparently did not mean to do this but government officials in the United Kingdom have accidentally admittedthat the risk of death from Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” is far higher than the risk of dying from covid itself.
The data shows that eight times as many people died from the lethal injections in the six-month period following the launch of Operation Warp Speed than died from “covid” over the course of 18 months starting in March 2020.
Now that the cat is out of the bag, it is abundantly clear that Fauci Flu shots never should have been allowed to stay on the market. Had government officials been honest from the beginning about all this, thousands, if not millions, of lives could have been saved.
To tell the truth, though, would have cut into Big Pharma’s bottom line – and we simply cannot have that. Money is the only thing that matters to the pharmakeia-peddling globalists that are using these deaths jabs to cull the masses. (Related: The reason they’re not conducting autopsies on post-jab dead bodies is because they know it would expose the “vaccine” scam.)
Just about everything we were told concerning covid was a lie
Another thing the data shows is that government officials were lying about covid deaths. The vast majority of these deaths were actually caused by other things such as dementia, chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, chronic neurological disease, and heart disease – but instead, they blamed “covid.”
This further skewed the numbers, at least early on, to suggest that “covid” is the real threat and that the “vaccines” help to minimize that threat. The reality is that the oppositeis true: “covid” is nothing to worry about, but the jabs certainly are.
“When you consider that testing was compulsory in hospitals, despite it not being written in law, and they used the PCR test notorious for producing false positives, it’s not hard to see how the Government managed to mix tens of thousands of people who actually died of other causes into the Covid-19 death statistics,” reported The Exposé about this fudging of the numbers.
It took a lot of inquiries, including numerous Freedom of Information requests, to get to the bottom of this deception. It also took an independent analysis and assessment of the data to reach an accurate conclusion about the true primary cause of death throughout the scamdemic: the “vaccines.”
The latest dataset published on Feb. 21, 2023, confirms that covid jabs massively increase a person’s risk of death – by 276 percent, in fact. Mortality rates among the unvaccinated, meanwhile, are the lowest out of every demographic.
“As I see it now that we know the consequences for all untried, untested and unproven vaccines, if any medically trained person tries to stick me with a needle, he or she will accidentally get a broken neck,” one incensed commenter wrote in response to the news.
“It is no more than intentional state-sponsored murder to apply anything like these covid vaxxes again, and the vaxxed to me are too stupid to somehow realize the vaxx and boosters are going to save them. That is also why I should not have to pay anything for this! The vaxxed knowingly injected themselves and should pay for their own healthcare going forward.”
Another commenter expressed worry that perhaps “chemtrails,” which are produced during geoengineering spraying operations, are laced with covid or some other toxic chemical designed to sicken whoever breathes them.
“In Yorkshire U.K., we are chemtrailed on a regular basis,” this person wrote. “There should be a culling of all useless MPs.”
Gullible Black Man Who Took 9 Deadly, Experimental COVID Injections is Now Undergoing Chemo, Trying to Stay Alive [yup, good luck mf]
/
Jim Crenshaw reports, “I guess he does not count cancer as a side effect?
He is now having or had a Cytokine Storm. What this is if you do not know is:
A cytokine storm occurs when your immune system releases too many molecules called cytokines. These molecules promote inflammation and can overstimulate the activity of other immune cells.
It is hard at work killing him. It looks like they are carving this poor dude up like a Christmas Turkey. His medical bills have lots of comma's I am sure. They cannot wait until he dies so they can list it as a covid death and really cash in.”
