India Director of Education Says Parents Must be Informed of Fatal Side Effects of COVID Injections. Coercion to Take a Shot is a Crime and Tort, Death from Coerced Vax is Chargeable as Murder

/

From [HERE] Maharashtra State Education Department’s Dy. Director issues circular on February 14, 2022 to the effect that:

  • Vaccine is not mandatory for students

  • The children and their parents must be informed about the fatal and other side effects of vaccines

  • Obtaining a written consent/permission from parents is a must before vaccinating students

  • No requirement of vaccination as a prerequisite to appear for exams

The Deputy Director of Education (Maharashtra State) Shri. Deepak Chavne, after his meeting with Awaken India Movement (AIM) team and after going through all the documents including IBA’s Notice, case laws and RTI Reply,  has issued a new circular on 14th February, 2022 asking all the Divisional Directors of Education and all Education officers of  Zilla Parishad, not to force any student to get vaccinated. It is further intimated that every student and his/her parent must be informed about every aspect regarding the vaccine (which includes death causing and other side effects) and students can be vaccinated only after getting written permission from parents. A copy of said letter is also marked to Dr. Sachin Pethkar, AIM, Pune.

As per Central Government’s Covid-19 Guidelines, Covid vaccination is voluntary and not compulsory. Secondly, it is mandatory to inform about the side effects of vaccines including the fatal side effects, to students and their parents before they are asked to get vaccinated. Only after getting a written consent from parents, the respective students can be vaccinated.

Hon’ble  Supreme  Court in Noida Entrepreneurs Vs. Noida (2011) 6 SCC 527 has made it clear that, if anything is prohibited then it cannot be done indirectly. It means that vaccination cannot be a condition for appearing for an exam or to avail any services or benefits, when it is not mandatory.

If any person or student is vaccinated without being informed of its side effects or if anyone is compelled to take vaccine under pressure by setting it as a condition to appear for exams or for availing any other services or benefits, then such officers will be guilty of violating fundamental rights of the citizen and also be guilty of committing criminal offences.

Such guilty officers, principal, school teacher, employer etc. will be liable to pay compensation to the victim and they will also be liable to be punished under section 420, 409, 115, 323, 336, 120(B), 109, 34 etc. of Indian Penal Code.

If any person taking vaccine dies, then such accused officials, Principal etc. will be liable for action under section 302,304-A, 120(B), 34, 109 etc. of Indian Penal Code. Section 302 is an offence of murder and has punishment up to death penalty or life imprisonment.

Model Grand Jury to Investigate COVID Eugenocide. Video of 2nd Day (Anglo Empire/Rule of Elites) and 3rd Day (Fraudulent PCR Plandemic) of Proceedings for Crimes Against Humanity

/

SCREENSHOT FROM DAY 2, ALEX THOMSON TESTIMONY

Concerned lawyers from nations across the globe, working with esteemed scientists and medical experts, have come together to present the legal, scientific, and medical reasons why the populace must stop the Covid-19 measures and refuse the mRNA based injections that forced upon them. This Grand Jury Investigation serves to present to a jury (consisting of the citizens of the world) all available evidence of Crimes Against Humanity committed to date.

This proceeding ́s main purpose (apart from demonstrating actual evidence to the world and serving as a model proceeding for future legal cases to be filed) is to show a complete picture of what we consider massive Crimes Against Humanity rather than just discussing pieces of the puzzle. The supporting evidence will be presented by real lawyers and real expert witnesses to examine the evidence under the auspices of a real judge accurately and truthfully.

It is important to note, however, that each one of the participating lawyers has filed and will continue to file similar cases in their countries’ existing judicial system, and that these cases will be supported by our joint, worldwide effort. [MORE]

From [HERE] A group of international lawyers and a judge are conducting a criminal investigation modeled after the United States Grand Jury proceedings in order to present to the public all available evidence of COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic. This investigation is of the people, by the people and for the people, so YOU can be part of the jury.

>>>> DAY 2: Historical & Geopolitical Background <<<<

>> Introduction <<

00:00:45 – Alex Thomson (Former GCHQ Officer)

00:46:55 – Matthew Ehret (Journalist, Author, Historian)

01:57:58 – Brian Gerrish (Public Speaker & Investigative Journalist, United Kingdom)

02:21:25 – Debi Evans (Former NHS Registered Nurse)

03:04:00 – Whitney Webb (Author & Investigative Journalist, USA)

>>> Testimony - Whistleblower Statements <<<

03:32:15 – Introduction

03:36:49 – Footage provided by Whistleblower #2

03:40:45 – Footage provided by Roman Mironov

03:43:00 – Roman Mironov (Human Rights Defender)

03:46:20 – James Bush (Former Engineering and Operations Manager for Infectious Disease Research Center at Colorado University)

04:29:06 – Dr. Silvia Berendt (Former Legal Consultant at WHO and Pandemic Management Expert, Austria)

04:51:00 – Dr. Astrid Stuckelbe Bill Gates GAVI

A White Cop Tackled a 62 yr Old Latino Man Riding a Bike who Posed No Threat, Caused Coma. Hobbs Police/Media Claim its a case of Mistaken Identity, as if its Otherwise OK for Cops to Attack Citizens

/

(KRQE) states: A case of mistaken identity? A Hobbs woman claims police attacked and arrested her cognitively-impaired brother, seriously injuring him and violating his civil rights. In a new lawsuit, the family made it clear they don’t believe Albert Barela was the suspect who Hobbs Police were after that night.

A black eye, bloody nose, head wound, and cuts on his wrist are some of the visible injuries Barela’s attorney said two officers caused while arresting him. Dashcam video captured by a patrol car the night of January 20, 2021, showed an unarmed Barela riding his bike down West Grimes Street. The first officer runs after him, tackling Barela to the ground. “There wasn’t any sort of emergency whatsoever that would require this type of excessive force,” Attorney Eric Dixon explained.

The footage then showed the two officers holding Barela up. Dixon said the one officer knocked the 62-year-old unconscious, causing several skull and facial fractures that left Barela in a coma and hospitalized for several months.

“He’s an elderly man,” Dixon said. “He wasn’t anywhere near the — in the vicinity and didn’t fit the description of the individual that they were looking for, in any shape or form.” The family’s lawsuit states police were dispatched to a domestic dispute a street over and told to look for 28-year-old Ramon Barrera who was wearing blue jeans and a blue jacket. Court records show police believed Barela matched that description, tried to stop him and Barela ignored the officers, which led to the takedown and arrest.

In the report, the officer also admits he didn’t turn his lapel camera on — another violation — Barela’s attorney claimed.

“We’re going to ask the court for relief, including proper training in the use of force and proper training in de-escalating situations,” Dixon said. He mentioned he’s familiar with other excessive force cases involving Hobbs Police. And in this instance, Dixon not only believes the officers’ actions were unjustified, he believes they violated Barela’s civil rights. Dixon pointed out Barela is well-known in the community and to the police. He believes they should’ve known they had the wrong guy. “This is a life-altering injury that Mr. Barela sustained,” Dixon explained.

Barela actually faced criminal charges of riding his bike in the road, not having a lamp on that bike, and resisting officers during this arrest. A judge dismissed the case in September.

Online court records show no charges were issued against Ramon Barrera, Hobbs Police’s original target that night. The Deputy Police Chief declined to comment, saying the Department has not been served with the lawsuit.

Racist Suspect Democrat Governor Accused in Cover-Up of Brutal Police Murder of Ronald Greene. Did Nothing After Privately Watching Video, Said Black Man Ran Into a Tree and No Cops Should be Charged

/

From [HERE] Declaring "no cover-up will be tolerated," Louisiana's House speaker announced a bipartisan legislative investigation Thursday into the deadly 2019 arrest of Black motorist Ronald Greene, an inquiry that will examine the state's response at "all levels," from troopers to the governor.

Republican Rep. Clay Schexnayder said he launched the probe in response to an Associated Press report last month that showed Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards was informed within hours that troopers arresting Greene engaged in a "violent, lengthy struggle," yet he kept quiet for two years as state police told a much different story to the victim's family and in official reports: that Greene died from a crash after a high-speed chase.

"These events have raised serious questions regarding who knew what and when," Schexnayder said in a statement. "The actions taken that night and the cryptic decisions and statements made every step of the way since then have eroded public trust."

Edwards, who was in the midst of a tight reelection campaign at the time of Greene's May 2019 death near Monroe, did not speak out in detail about the case until last May, after the AP obtained and published long-withheld body-camera video showing white troopers jolting Greene with stun guns, punching him in the face and dragging him by his ankle shackles as he wailed, "I'm your brother! I'm scared! I'm scared!"

After decrying the prospect of a legislative probe during a news conference last week as "an absolute witch hunt," Edwards said in a statement Thursday that he now welcomes "any and all legislative oversight."

"I am certain that any fair and impartial investigation will conclude that I made no attempt to impede or interfere with any investigation into Mr. Greene's death," the governor said. "Any allegation to the contrary is simply not true."

Edwards' news conference last week marked the first time he characterized the actions of the troopers involved in Greene's arrest as "racist." He said he was unaware Greene had been mistreated until September 2020 and did not speak out about the troopers' actions — even after privately watching the footage — because of an ongoing federal civil rights investigation.

Schexnayder said a new investigative committee made up of four Democrats and four Republicans will begin public hearings in the coming weeks, with Edwards himself among the witnesses likely to be called. Lawmakers are also expected to request a range of documents, including text messages from Edwards that he has yet to release in response to a public records request by AP.

Edwards has denied Schexnayder's contention in the recent AP report that the governor met with him last June and sought to discourage a legislative inquiry into the case by blaming Greene's death on a car wreck.

Page Cortez, the Republican Senate president, said he was also at the meeting and recalled the governor making the argument that "nothing nefarious" happened in Greene's arrest; that Greene "ran into a tree" after a chase; and that no criminal charges were going to be brought in the case. Cortez also backed Schexnayder's account of the governor saying there was no need for lawmakers to take action.

Cortez said recent events have made clear that lawmakers — and the public — need more information. "The legislature, as a whole, feels like we need to get more answers and be more transparent about what took place," he said.

"I want to know exactly what happened to make sure the family gets justice," said state Rep. C. Denise Marcelle, a Baton Rouge Democrat appointed to the committee. "The governor should answer any questions we have but our focus has to be the entire, holistic view of the investigation."

The legislative action is playing out amid a more than 2-year-old federal civil rights probe into the deadly encounter and whether police brass obstructed justice to protect the troopers who arrested Greene.

An AP investigation found Greene's death was part of a pattern of state police violence shrouded in secrecy, and among at least a dozen cases over the past decade in which troopers or their bosses ignored or concealed evidence of beatings, deflected blame and impeded efforts to root out misconduct.

In a virtual news conference Thursday, the National Bar Association, which represents more than 66,000 mostly African American lawyers, joined Greene's mother and sister in calling on Edwards to step down over the Greene case.

"My family will never rest because my son was murdered by the Louisiana state troopers and it was condoned," said Greene's mother, Mona Hardin, adding later, "I'm disgusted that you are allowed to hold the office of governor."

Studies Find Doctors Are More Likely to Describe Black Patients as Uncooperative [only 5% of all Active Doctors are Black]

/

From [HERE] Medical records contain a plethora of information, from a patient’s diagnoses and treatments to marital status to drinking and exercise habits.

They also note whether a patient has followed medical advice. A health provider may add a line stating that the patient is “noncompliant” or “non-adherent,” signaling that the patient has been uncooperative and may exhibit problematic behaviors.

Two large new studies found that such terms, while not commonly used, are much more likely to appear in the medical records of Black patients than in those of other races.

“In medicine, we tend to label people in derogatory ways when we don’t truly ‘see’ them — when we don’t know them or understand them,” said Dr. Dean Schillinger, who directs the Center for Vulnerable Populations at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, and was not involved in the studies. “The process of labeling provides a convenient shortcut that leads some physicians to blame the patient for their illnesses.”

The first study, published in Health Affairs, found that Black patients were two and a half times as likely as white patients to have at least one negative descriptive term used in their electronic health record. The study was based on an analysis of more than 40,000 notes taken for 18,459 adult patients at a large urban medical center in Chicago between January 2019 and October 2020.

About 8 percent of all patients had one or more derogatory terms in their charts, the study found. The most common negative descriptive terms used in the records were “refused,” “not adherent,” “not compliant” and “agitated.”

“It’s not so much whether you should never use these words, but why are we applying these words with so much more frequency to Black patients?” said Michael Sun, the lead author of the study and a third-year medical school student at the University of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Medicine. “Do we really believe Black patients are truly not compliant, so many more times than white patients?”

Rather than assume the patient is lacking in motivation or disengaged, he said, the medical team should inquire whether the patient is facing financial barriers, transportation difficulties or other obstacles to adhering to treatment, such as illiteracy or trouble with English.

The researchers found that outpatient clinic records were far less likely to contain the negative comments, compared with records from hospitals and emergency rooms, perhaps because outpatient providers have ongoing relationships with their patients and are more familiar with their circumstances. [MORE]

Graphene COVID Kill Shots: Let the Evidence Speak for Itself

/

From [Global Resarch] I compiled all the evidence we have into this article that prove Graphene Oxide, Graphene Hydroxide and other Graphene variants are in fact being injected into people by governments and Big Pharma.

This evidence was discovered and proven numerous times already by independent research teams, scientists, Biotech whistleblowers and the few ethical Journalists remaining.

There’s a concerted effort by the pharmaceutical cartel funded “fact checkers,” Big Tech platforms and mainstream media, to hide the evidence and slander the people bringing this to light.

Once you go over the evidence provided here, you must take action for the safety of you and your families.

Serve all war criminals participating in this COVID death jab program with a Notice of Liability for the murders they are committing.

This is definitive action that any person can take, worldwide.

The notices are already drafted by legal teams so why not use them and let our enemies be on the defensive. The criminals will be reminded of the Nuremberg trials, and informed that they will be brought to justice. They need to cease and desist from acting knowingly and willfully in mandating “vaccine” death jabs and enforcing them. The evidence to the danger is clear and deaths have been proven. Anyone administering or mandating these “vaccine” kill shots are doing so without Informed Consent.

Compilation of Evidence

On November 2nd, a prominent Professor at the University of Almeria, Dr. Pablo Campra, revealed his detection of Graphene in multiple Covid-19 “vaccine” vials, using Micro-Raman Spectroscopy. The Dr. Campra’s University of Almeria report demonstrated the detection of Graphene and Graphene Oxide in 8 samples from various “vaccine” manufacturers.

In response, Dr. Andreas Noack released a scathing video commenting on Dr. Campra’s report. Dr. Noack is a chemist and the world’s leading expert in activated carbon engineering and GRAPHENE. Dr. Noack did his PhD doctoral thesis on how to turn Graphene Oxide into Graphene Hydroxide.

The video is of crucial importance. Dr. Noack said that two of the frequency bands that Dr. Campra detected were of Graphene Hydroxide. Graphene Hydroxide (GHO) is a mono-layer activated carbon, 50nm long and 0.1nm thick (an atom layer thick). Thus, the injections contain nano-razorblades of exceptional stability, which are non-biodegrable (a fact that every chemist knows).

In effect, these nano-razorblades cut up and destroy the heart, brain and cardiovascular system. The epithelial cells become rough so things stick to them. He says that toxicologists cannot find them in a petri dish by normal methods as they do not move and they don’t expect to discover nano-sized razor blades. Moreover, any doctor who injects them with knowledge of this issue, is a murderer.

Graphene Hydroxide is a new material and toxicologists aren’t aware of it yet. This is why people are dropping dead from these lethal shots, especially athletes, Dr. Noack explains. This is a “highly intelligent poison”.

What’s even more horrifying is that if you perform an autopsy you will not find anything. This stealth weapon is even untraceable after death. The Graphene Hydroxide nano-razerblades cause people to bleed to death internally.

“Even if people don’t drop dead immediately, it cuts up the blood vessels little by little… I can say as a chemist that we are absolutely certain that the Graphene Hydroxide is in there… as a chemist, if you inject this into the blood, you know you are a murderer.”

Dr. Noack was killed just days after blowing the whistle and releasing this video.

His wife made an announcement that it was a brutal sneak attack.

She pleads with us to have the courage to BELIEVE and to ACT NOW to expose this! She said her husband is a kind soul and he did this for us, he died for all of us.

There are some rumors being spread to distract and confuse you regarding his suspected murder and the mainstream media is ever silent but here is some additional evidence that he was killed. Dr. Noack’s wife just released an update saying she believes he was attacked by a radiation beam.

Send out this video and my article to all doctors, experts and world leaders now.

Governments are already injecting 5-year-olds with Pharma’s kill shots containing Graphene Hydroxide razors. This technology will cut up their insides and delivery a gruesome, painful death to our kids!

Last year the Austrian police busted down Dr. Noack’s door and arrested him in an attempt to stop him from speaking out. The incident was recorded on camera. He was clearly a target.

Dr Pablo Campra was the first to deduce that the Pfizer serum contains Graphene Oxide flakes using Transmission Electron Microscopy in July, 2021. His techniques of detection also included infrared spectroscopy combined with optical microscopy.

Prior to Dr. Campra’s discovery, another Spanish research team named La Quinta Columna, released their discovery in June, that the COVID serums in all their variants, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, etc., contain a considerable dose of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles, reported by Global Research.

Dr. Ricardo Delgado a biostatistician and founder of La Quinta Columna, discovered that 99% of the Pfizer contents are Graphene Oxide. His team was smeared by fact checkers who provided no evidence of their libelous claims.

In my article entitled, “Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide,” I explain the chemical process involved in reducing Graphene Oxide to a clear liquid serum by reducing its oxygen content. By doing so, Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) is more lethal. So yes, it’s scientifically possible that COVID serums can be 99% Graphene Oxide.

Dr. Delgado’s team released a scientific report of their optical and electron microscopy analysis showing Graphene Oxide was found in four “Covid-19 Vaccines”. Orwell City broke the news in English. Then La Quinta Columna requested an Interim Report from the University of Almeria entitled, “DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN AQUEOUS SUSPENSION SAMPLE”.

La Quinta Columna’s report was originally published in Spanish on June 28, 2021.

“The problem is that this is not a vaccine, this is a dose of graphene to a person.”– Dr. Ricardo Delgado

Whitney Webb attempted a smear piece on La Quinta Columna and the University of Almeria’s discovery, where she directly attacked Dr. Ricardo Delgado’s credibility without anything substantial. Investigative Journalist Ramola D. and myself debunked Whitney’s Webb of lies.

On August 19, another research team going by the name “The Scientist Club” found Graphene in 7 prominent Biotech serums using Optical Microscope, Dark-Field Microscope, UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscope, Scanning Electron Microscopes, Transmission Electron Microscope, Energy Dispersive Spectroscope, X-ray Diffractometer, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments to verify the serums morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.

For obvious reasons, The Scientist Club kept their identity secret. They analyzed Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen and AstraZeneca and found a Carbon-based substrate with nanoparticles embedded, Graphene sheets and Graphene Oxide.

Undeclared metal-containing components were found by scientists in Japan, which caused the Japanese Government to halt the use of Moderna’s serums. The Japanese Ministry reported that the particles found reacted to magnets and was therefore suspected to be a metal contaminant. Graphene, Graphene Oxide (GO) and Reduced Graphene Oxide (RDO) all have paramagnetic properties.

A September, a German team revealed damning evidence of “vaccine” contaminants and autopsies linking “vaccines” to deaths.

Dr. T. made a call out to all medical professionals in this urgent announcement asking medical professionals to report magnetic phenomenon because she believes that Graphene Oxide flakes are responsible for the “vaccine”-induced magnetism that we have witnessed internationally. Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy (retired) of Imperial College London has explained the possible mechanism here.

Pfizer Whistleblower Karen Kingston revealed in August, how Graphene Oxide was hidden under a trade secret and that’s why it wasn’t listed in the patents. However Kingston explains, it is in fact the key ingredient in the Covid-19 serums.

Another Chief Scientist for Pfizer blew the whistle in November, leaking internal emails on Stew Peter’s Show from top Pfizer executives and scientists discussing how they were going to hide from the public that Graphene Oxide is in their serums.

In April 2021, Health Canada recalled a million and a half KN95 face masks containing Graphene. Children had been forced to wear these masks in Canadian schools. Health Canada compared wearing them to breathing in asbestos all day long. These poisonous masks came from China’s Shandong Shengquan New Materials Co. Ltd.

Dr. Robert Young used Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy which revealed Graphene Oxide in four Covid-19 trade marked serums, September 11, 2021.

Dr. Franc Zalewski also found Graphene Oxide in the Pfizer serum.

Dr. Antonietta Gatti did a recent video interview on the toxicity of Graphene Oxide Nanometallic particulates to cells. She has found them in the “vaccines”, PCR kits and face masks.

In her groundbreaking 2017 report with Dr. Stefano Montanari, Dr. Antoinetta Gatti explains Nanoparticles inside cells destroy the innate defense mechanism of cells and cause blood clots, deadly inflammation, thrombi, and multi-organ failure posed by nanometallic particulates, which are non-biodegradable and indeed biopersistent. They can both enter cells, harm DNA, and be carried by the blood to bind with organic matter and coagulate in organs.

A Slovakian team analyzed PCR kit nasal swabs using SD Biosensor, Abbott and Nadal in a hospital laboratory from Bratislava. The team found that when DARPA’s Graphene Oxide Hydrogels come in contact with organic fluid (e.g., saliva) within a few minutes they begin to form rectangular crystal structures. These gradually grow in a fractal manner. A German research team also filmed the crystalline growth of the GO Hydrogels.

Science Papers and Patents

Several scientific papers show that Graphene Oxide is being used in gene therapy as a scaffold or platform for the delivery of mRNA into cells by way of its high electrical conductivity and ability to permeate cell membranes. The crystalline networks form in bodily fluid and replicate after injection and in the serum itself, as shown in this video of the Pfizer serum. It sure does look like nano high frequency antennas.

Scientists have developed a novel way of making carbon nanotubes at the NanoScience Center of the University of Jyväskylä, Finland, and at Harvard University, in the US.

Graphene was part of the first human genome project initiated in 2001. mRNA gene therapy Nanotech using Graphene Oxide as a vector, runs on CRISPR technology and it was developed by Pfizer,Moderna, and BioNTech, as a treatment for sick cancer patients. Due to its cytotoxicity (cell death) in healthy cells and the fact that all the animals died in the animal trials, Graphene Oxide Nanotechnology was never approved for use on Humans! Why is this technology now being used on healthy people and on children, who are at no risk of COVID?

It should be quite clear to everyone by now that the pharmaceutical cartel is using this technology worldwide, in illegal Human trials and trying to mandate their poisonous “vaccines” on everyone, with impunity.

Nanografi is manufacturing Graphene Oxide Nanotubes and intranasal vaccines for Covid-19 drug delivery.

Scientists have already studied the Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation by intra-nasal spray, using thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets. Make no mistake about it, nasal spray “vaccines” contain Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles.

If you’re still not convinced, here’s a main stream media article trying to pitch Graphene Oxide “flu vaccine” nasal spray as some kind of protective intervention.

Dr. Chunhong Dong is lead author of a study from the Institute for Biomedical Sciences in China where he boasts,

“This study gives new insights into developing high performance intranasal vaccine systems with two-dimensional sheet-like nanoparticles.”

Graphene Oxide has been carefully engineered as a “vaccine adjuvant for immunotherapy” and Polyethylene glycol (PEG), another highly toxic poison, is used as coating polymers. PEGs are widely used as additives in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food. But PEGs come with potential life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis.

This is not a big name brand but they do mention “Carbon graphene loaded nano particles and micro-particles” in their Sars-Cov2 patent invention.

Here’s a list of peer reviewed medical studies on Graphene Oxide Toxicity and how it coagulates the blood. How much more evidence do you need to BELIEVE?

Dr. Armin Koroknay, Research director of Private Consultants and Research Institute of Zürich, analyzed the effects of COVID “Vaccination” on Blood.

Dr. Bärbel Ghitalla and her team put different brands under a microscope and found things they could not explain, but are explained in the “Covid-19 vaccine” patents.

Spanish Researchers who Examined Vials of Pfizer COVID Shot Say It is an Injection of Mostly Graphene Oxide, a Toxin that Can Cause Blood Clots, Strokes, Cancers and Destroy the Immune System

/

From [HERE] La Quinta Columna has made an urgent announcement that they hope will reach the largest number of people, especially those related to health and legal services, since the biostatistician Ricardo Delgado, Dr. José Luis Sevillano and the team of researchers and professors with whom they have been conducting their research have confirmed the presence of graphene oxide nanoparticles in vaccination vials.


Orwell City, as always, has translated the message from La Quinta Columna and subtitled the video that they shared a few hours ago on their official Telegram channel (link on Rumble).

Next, La Quinta Columna provides you with vital information for your health, physical integrity and that of your environment.

The masks they are using and are currently on the market contain graphene oxide. Not only those that were withdrawn at the time, as indicated by the media, the swabs used both in the PCR tests and in the antigen tests, also contain graphene oxide nanoparticles.

Covid vaccines in all their variants, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, etc., also contain a considerable dose of graphene oxide nanoparticles. This has been the result of its analysis to electron microscopy and spectroscopy, among other techniques used by various public universities in our country.

The influenza vaccine contained graphene oxide nanoparticles, and the new influenza vaccines and the supposedly new intranasal covid vaccines that they prepare also contain huge doses of graphene oxide nanoparticles.

The graphene oxide is a toxic generated in the thrombi body, the graphene oxide is a toxic generates blood clotting. Graphene oxide causes alteration of the immune system. By decompensating the oxidative balance in relation to the gulation reserves. If the dose of graphene oxide is increased by any route of administration, it causes the collapse of the immune system and the subsequent cytokine storm. Graphene oxide accumulated in the lungs causes’ bilateral pneumonia by uniform spread in the pulmonary alveolar tract. Graphene oxide causes a metallic taste.

Maybe this will start to work for you now.

Inhaled graphene oxide causes inflammation of the mucosa and with it loss of taste and partial or total loss of smell. Graphene oxide acquires powerful magnetic properties within the body. This is the explanation for the magnetic phenomenon that billions of people around the world already present after different routes of administration of graphene oxide. Among them the vaccine.

In short, graphene oxide is the supposed SARS-CoV-2, the supposed new coronavirus causes before the disease called covid-19. For this reason, we never had real isolation or purification of a new coronavirus, as recognized by most health institutions at the highest level and from different countries when they were questioned about it.

The covid-19 disease is the result of introducing graphene oxide through different routes of administration. Graphene oxide is extremely powerful and strong in aerosols, just like the so-called SARS-CoV-2.

Like all materials, graphene oxide has what we call an “electronic absorption band.” This means a certain frequency from which the material is excited and oxidized very quickly, thus breaking the balance with the proliferation in the body of the toxin against our natural antioxidant glutathione reserves. Precisely this frequency band is broadcast in the new broadcast bandwidths of the new 5G wireless technology. That is why the implantation of these antennas never stopped during the pandemic.

In fact, they were one of the few services that were maintained, apart from a special surveillance by the State Security Forces and Bodies of these antennas. We suspect that in the 2019 flu campaign, graphene oxide was introduced into these vials, since it was already used as an adjuvant.

With subsequent 5G technological trials in different parts of the world, the COVID-19 disease was developed in interaction of external electromagnetic fields and graphene oxide now in their bodies. Remember that it all started in Wuhan, and this was the first pilot sample city in the world to do the 5G technology trial at the end of November 2019. Coincidence in space and time.

Both the pangolin version and the bat soup version were simply distractions. The purpose of the introduction of graphene oxide is even darker than you might imagine. For this reason, it is more than enough to assimilate this information and “reset” the knowledge that until now had of the disease from the highest governmental institutions, the population is told to protect itself and is even obliged to do what is potentially to get sick from the disease itself. Logically, now that you know that the cause or etiological agent of the disease is precisely a chemical toxicant and not a biological agent, we know how to attenuate it: increasing glutathione levels.

Glutathione is a natural antioxidant that we present in reserves in the body. They serve as some details so that you fully understand everything that was spilled in the media.

Glutathione is extremely high children. Therefore, the disease has little impact on the child population. Glutathione drops very considerably after 65 years of age. Therefore, COVID-19 is especially prevalent in the senile population. Glutathione is at very high levels in the population that practices sports intensively. For this reason, only 0.22% of the athletes presented the disease.

You will now understand why countless studies in practice showed that treatment with N-acetylcysteine ​​(which is a precursor of glutathione in the body), or glutathione administered directly, very quickly cured COVID-19 disease in patients. Simply and simply because glutathione levels were raised with which to deal with the administered toxic called graphene oxide.

The discovery made here by La Quinta Columna supposes a full-blown attack of state bioterrorism , or at least with the complicity of governments against the entire world population, now constituting crimes against humanity. Therefore, it is absolutely essential and vital that you put this information at the service of your medical community. General practitioners, nursing and health services in general, but also local, regional and press media, as well as those around them.

The Fifth Column estimates that tens of thousands of people will die every day. Only in our country when they make the new and next 5G technological ignition.

Taking into account that now it is not only the elderly of the residences who are vaccinated in that known graphene anti-flu vaccine, but that, as you know, a large part of the population has been vaccinated, or graphene, with gradual doses of graphene oxide.

The body has a natural ability to eliminate this toxin, which is why you are given up to a third dose a year every year to keep graphene in your body.

We have each and every one of the proofs of what has been manifested here. And as long as justice acts, if it can ever be, people will continue to be pushed off a bottomless cliff.

If you are watching this audiovisual material, you will understand that for more than a year you have been totally and naively deceived from the highest institutions. Only now will you understand all the inconsistencies you saw on your television news. To complement this valuable information, you can access https://laquintacolumna.net or our Telegram channel: La Quinta Columna TV, where more than 100,000 people are already aware of the truth and are not part of the massive deception to which they were subjected.

Video below: Doctor Dead After Vaxx Discovery: Dr. Noack Dead After Locating Graphene Hydroxide [MORE]

JUSTICE SYSTEM or SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY? White Cop Actress who Murdered Daunte Wright Sentenced to Only 2 Years. Judge Says Cop's Misuse of Her Absolute, Uncontrollable Authority was "A Mistake”

/

ABSOLUTE, UNCONTROLLABLE AUTHORITY IS ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE, ESPECIALLY BLACK PEOPLE. THE COSTUMED AUTHORITARIAN who sentenced Kim Potter for Daunte Wright's death cried as she asked people to empathize with the WHITE cop. FUCK AUTHORITY IT IS SLAVERY, enjoy your illusions and symptoms. FUCK THE POLICE AND ALL OTHER ORDERLIES, WHO ARE REPRESENTATIVES OF AUTHORITY.

From [HERE] Kimberly Potter, the former Brooklyn Center, Minn., police officer convicted of first-degree manslaughter in the shooting death of Daunte Wright last April, was sentenced Friday to two years in prison.

Ms. Potter, a 26-year veteran, testified that she thought she had drawn her stun gun when she shot the 20-year-old in the chest with her 9mm handgun after a traffic stop in the Minneapolis suburb turned up an outstanding warrant.

Prosecutors had sought a sentence of seven years and two months, the presumptive sentence under Minnesota guidelines for someone with no prior record. Her lawyers sought probation, citing her years of public service and remorse.

The judge said Ms. Potter, 49 years old, would serve 16 months in prison and eight months of probation if she shows good behavior, which is in line with state guidelines.

“This is one of the saddest cases I’ve had in my 20 years on the bench,” said Judge Regina Chu before handing down the sentence.

Judge Chu said she understood that some people would think her sentence was too lenient. But she drew a distinction between this case and that of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who was convicted last year of second-degree murder in the killing of George Floyd and is serving a sentence of 22.5 years.

“This is a cop who made a tragic mistake,” the judge said.

After the sentencing, Katie Wright, Mr. Wright’s mother, told local media, “Kim Potter murdered my son and he died April 11. Today, the justice system murdered him all over again.” [MORE]

MURDER IS THE ULTIMATE SLAVERY

According to the criminal complaint:

STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE

Your Complainant, Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) Charles Phill is employed by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. In that capacity, ASAC Phill and SSA Sam McGinnis have reviewed reports and body worn camera footage (BWC) and gathered additional evidence related to this case and to Defendant. Based on that information, your Complainant states the following to establish probable cause:

On April 11, 2021, around 1:53 p.m., Brooklyn Center Police Officer Anthony Luckey and his Field Training Officer, Defendant KIMBERLY ANN POTTER (DOB: 06/18/1972) conducted a traffic stop on a white Buick

bearing Minnesota license plate 841UBY near 63rd Avenue North and Orchard Avenue North in Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Officer Luckey identified the driver as Daunte Demetrius Wright. There was also an adult female passenger in the front passenger seat. Officer Luckey informed Mr. Wright that the officers stopped him because the vehicle had an air freshener hanging from the rearview mirror and the tabs on the Buick were expired. Officer Luckey returned to his squad car to conduct a record check for Mr. Wright, during which he learned that Mr. Wright had an outstanding arrest warrant for a gross misdemeanor weapons violation. As Officer Luckey ran these checks, Sergeant Mychal Johnson arrived to assist the officers. Officer Luckey and Defendant then re-approached the driver’s side of the Buick to arrest Mr. Wright on the warrant. Sergeant Johnson approached the passenger side of the vehicle.

According to time stamped BWC footage, at 2:01:11 p.m., Officer Luckey asked Mr. Wright to step out of the vehicle. Mr. Wright opened the door of the Buick at 2:01:22 p.m. and got out of the Buick at 2:01:30 p.m. At 2:01:31, Officer Luckey asked Mr. Wright to turn around and place his hands behind his back. Mr. Wright did so. Officer Luckey then began attempting to handcuff Mr. Wright. At 2:01:36 p.m., Sergeant Johnson told Mr. Wright that he was under arrest and at 2:01:39 p.m., Defendant added that Mr. Wright had a warrant. At 2:01:43 p.m., Officer Luckey told Mr. Wright not to tense up. At that time, Officer Luckey and Mr. Wright were standing near the open driver’s side door of the Buick. Defendant was standing behind and to the right of Officer Luckey. Defendant walked up to Mr. Wright at 2:01:45 p.m. and, at 2:01:48 p.m., took a piece of paper from Mr. Wright’s hand using her left hand. Defendant immediately transferred the paper to her right hand.

At 2:01:49 p.m., Mr. Wright pulled away from Officer Luckey and got back into the driver’s compartment of the Buick. Officer Luckey maintained a grip on Mr. Wright, to keep physical control of him so as to pull Mr. Wright back out of the Buick. Sergeant Johnson, who was on the other side of the vehicle, leaned inside the Buick through the passenger door.

At 2:01:55 p.m., Defendant stated, “I’ll tase ya,” and simultaneously moved the piece of paper she was holding from her right hand to her left hand. One second later, at 2:01:56 p.m., Defendant’s right hand, holding her department-issued Glock 9mm handgun, came into view of her BWC. Defendant pointed her handgun at Mr. Wright and tracked with Mr. Wright’s movements as he and Officer Luckey continued moving. Defendant again announced, “I’ll tase you,” at 2:01:58 p.m. and continued pointing her handgun at Mr. Wright. At 2:02:00 p.m., Defendant said, “Taser, Taser, Taser.” Sergeant Johnson and Officer Luckey both immediately began disengaging from Mr. Wright. One second later, at 02:02:01 p.m., Defendant pulled the trigger and discharged her handgun one time, firing a single round of ammunition. The bullet

entered the left side of Mr. Wright’s chest and sequentially perforated the left 6th rib and 5th intercostal

muscles, left lung, pericardium, heart, pericardium once again, right lung, and right 4th intercostal muscles before partially exiting the right chest wall, perforating the skin, and becoming lodged in the right side of Mr. Wright’s chest. When she fired the handgun, Defendant was standing outside the driver’s side door and in close proximity to Officer Luckey. Defendant’s handgun was just inches below Officer Luckey’s arm pointing into the driver’s compartment of the Buick, in the direction of Mr. Wright, the passenger, and

2

Sergeant Johnson. Defendant fired her handgun close to Officer Luckey’s face, and the discharged cartridge casing from Defendant’s handgun appeared to strike Officer Luckey in the face as it was ejected.

At 2:02:02 p.m., Mr. Wright said, “Ah, he shot me.” The Buick then traveled short distance down the street, where it crashed into another vehicle. Defendant stated at 2:02:03 p.m., “Shit!” and at 2:02:05 p.m., “I just shot him.” Another officer asked, “you did?” and Defendant responded, “yes.” At 2:02:09 p.m., Defendant stated, “I grabbed the wrong fucking gun,” and repeated again, “I shot him.” At 2:03:09 p.m., Defendant stated, “I’m going to go to prison.” At 2:07:27, Defendant stated, “I killed a boy.” Other officers and paramedics responded. Medical personnel were unable to revive Mr. Wright and Mr. Wright was pronounced dead on scene at 2:18 p.m. Assistant Hennepin County Medical Examiner Dr. Lorren Jackson later conducted an autopsy and determined Mr. Wright’s cause of death to be a gunshot wound and deemed the manner of death a homicide.

SSA McGinnis later collected and reviewed the layout of Defendant’s duty belt. SSA McGinnis observed that Defendant’s handgun was holstered on the right side of the belt, set in a straight-draw position, requiring Defendant to use her right hand to draw the handgun. Defendant’s Taser was holstered on the left side of the belt, also set in a straight-draw position, requiring Defendant to use her left hand to draw her Taser. The Taser is yellow with a black grip, while the handgun is entirely black. Additionally, the texture of Defendant’s handgun has a distinct grip from that on her Taser. Defendant’s Taser is also equipped with a manual safety switch which the operator must physically disengage before the Taser can be discharged and with a laser-sighting feature, which causes a laser indicator to appear on target when the Taser is being aimed after the safety is disengaged. Defendant’s Glock handgun is not equipped with such features.

During her 26 years as a police officer, Defendant received a substantial amount of training, including training related to use of force and, specifically, to the use of Tasers and firearms. Defendant completed annual recertification training courses on each of these weapons. These courses included training on how to draw, aim, and use each weapon correctly. The training material for these courses also included notices alerting Defendant to the possibility and risks of drawing a handgun instead of a Taser.

In the six months before this incident, Defendant completed two Taser-specific training courses. For example, on March 2, 2021, Defendant attended a four-hour training course pertaining to the Taser. This course involved a classroom component, which provided detailed and substantive information concerning the function, proper use, and safety concerns associated with using Tasers; a practical component; and a written test. After this training, Defendant was certified for use of the Taser X7. On Defendant’s certificate of completion, Defendant provided her signature, acknowledging that she had read and understood the information and warnings provided by the manufacturer regarding safe use of the Taser. One of those warnings states: “Confusing a handgun with a CEW [Taser] could result in death or serious injury. Learn the differences in the physical feel and holstering characteristics between your CEW and your handgun to help avoid confusion” and instructs officers to “always follow your agency’s guidance and training.” In other prior Taser trainings completed by Defendant, including another on November 5, 2020, Defendant likewise signed paperwork acknowledging that she received, read, and understood identical warnings.

Making Healthy People Sick: "Nanotech" found in Pfizer COVID Injection by New Zealand Lab

/

From [HERE] A couple of weeks ago we wrote an article on the nanotechnology found in five vaccine types by researchers in Argentina.  Since then, nanotechnology has been found in Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccines” by New Zealand scientists.  And, a laboratory in the United Kingdom has found undisclosed ingredients, for example graphene, in Covid injections.

Undisclosed Ingredients Found in New Zealand

At the end of January, Sue Grey, co-leader of the Outdoors and Freedom Party, and Dr. Matt Shelton from New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science (“NZDSOS”) put the Health Select Committee on notice that serious contamination of the Pfizer vaccine has been uncovered and they needed to act immediately to stop the injection campaign.

Dr Shelton came forward to disclose the discovery of formations of nano-particles found by New Zealand scientists using specialised microscopic techniques. None of the experts consulted have ever seen anything like this before. None of these contaminants are listed or approved ingredients, wrote Outdoors and Freedom Party.

After being ignored and dismissed by the Health Select Committee, Sue Grey interviewed Dr. Shelton outside parliament.

South African Doctor who Discovered the “Omicron Variant" was Forced to Lie About Severity: 'I was Told Not to Publicly State that it was a Mild Illness and to Say that it is a Serious illness'

/

From [HERE] Dr. Angelique Coetzee, head of the South African Medical Association and one of the doctors who discovered omicron, admitted that she was pressured not to reveal the mildness of the variant. “I was told not to publicly state that it was a mild illness. I have been asked to refrain from making such statements and to say that it is a serious illness. I declined,” Dr. Coetzee told Germany’s Welt newspaper.

Coetzee did not reveal which government officials pressured her to lie. However, she revealed that it spanned far beyond the South African government. In an effort to discredit her, Coetzee says that officials from the Netherlands and UK also began to criticize her.

“What I said at one point—because I was just tired of it—was: In South Africa, this is a mild illness, but in Europe, it is a very serious one. That’s what your politicians wanted to hear,” she said.

“The definition of mild COVID-19 disease is clear, and it is a [World Health Organization] definition: patients can be treated at home and oxygen or hospitalization is not required,” Coetzee said, adding, “A serious illness is one in which we see acute pulmonary respiratory infections: people need oxygen, maybe even artificial respiration. We saw that with delta—but not with omicron. So I said to people, ‘I can’t say it like that because it’s not what we’re seeing.’”

Hospitals and Big Pharma would have lost out on profits from omicron had her voice not been stifled. Lockdowns, mandates, and the governments’ grab for power would have potentially lessened had the mainstream media reported the doctor’s findings. Governments worldwide clearly have an agenda (Agenda 2030) and collaborated to LIE to the people in order to retain the powers provided to them by COVID fearmongering. The Great Unwashed eventually discovered the truth after countless people contracted the virus and lived to tell the tale. In fact, omicron proved that the vaccines were a moot point since “the vaccinated” still contracted and transmitted the virus. The truth always reveals itself in the end.

Expert for the World Council for Health says 'It's Indisputable that COVID Injections are Dangerous and Ineffective but Big Pharma has Inexhaustible Resources and Control our Governments and Media'

/

From {HERE] Defending the cause of justice was centre of attention at the World Council for Health’s (WCH’s) virtual conference on understanding vaccine causation, on Saturday.

Experts from around the world in the field of medicine, law and science explored the advocacy routes in cases where there are adverse effects on the human body due to the administration of vaccines.

They attempted to draw causal conclusions on the link between vaccines given to the general public and a variety of negative health effects.

In introducing the conference, the WCH’s Dr. Mark Trozzi said it was important in terms of de-monopolising the information bubble around Covid-19 vaccines.

“For those of us who have done extensive research over the last two years, it is difficult to imagine that there is still a dispute regarding forced vaccine injections. It is my submission that they are both dangerous and ineffective,” said Trozzi.

“Big pharma and its allies, on the other hand, appear to have inexhaustible resources, especially given the record profits they have garnered from their Covid-19 vaccines. They have gained control over governments and institutions. The aim of the conference is to ensure there is not a monopoly on information, and that the law is equal to all, protect human rights and ensure institutional integrity.”

Advocate Sabelo Sibanda said there was an “unholy alliance” between governments and private corporations shutting down justice voices in the vaccine debate. 

He cited the example of the South African vaccine injury fund, where manufacturers required that the government protect them, at least in part, from liability and future lawsuits if the shots caused serious adverse effects.

“The unholy alliance between the government and the private sector is shutting the people down through the law of which in itself is designed to perpetuate unlawfulness,” Sibanda said.

“In the South African context, in April 2021, the government gave the nation approximately five days to comment on a vaccine compensation scheme proposal that was going to be made law. On proper analysis, the government was at a point of doing a mass roll-out of vaccines. In doing so, anyone who suffered injury or harm upon taking the vaccine is perceived to have recourse and therefore can be compensated, which sounds good on the surface. But, the scheme was to exonerate all the people who were in the thick of the decision-making in the administering of jabs against any public claims that have been occasioned by the jab.

“Also, the causation element, in the scheme, becomes problematic in law and science when the person who is injured must prove how the vaccine is to be blamed for injury, ultimately, closing them out while pretending to open the door for them to receive compensation. It makes the causation aspect impossible for them,” Sibanda added

He said schemes such as the Workman’s Compensation Fund were being used to advance the making of vaccines mandatory. 

“You find that even the Workman’s Compensation Fund has now been structured in such a manner that people who take the jab as a result of pressure from the employer may be compensated through that fund, which was never designed for that, it is now being tailored in that way because governments know that there is no law that gives them the authority to mandate the vaccination of anyone. They are subsequently using internal processes to lure employers to vaccinate people. This needs to be challenged as fraud and corruption,” said Sibanda.

The one-day marathon conference featured 18 global speakers.

Lawyer and convenor at CHO, Shabnam Mohamed, said research done by various organisations had shown the adverse effects of the vaccine, adding that the conference would help understand and prove vaccine causation.

“From research, victim and expert interviews, and our work at the World Council for Health, I realised that people are experiencing adverse effects from Covid-19 injections. Vaccine adverse effects reporting systems like VAERS, MHRA, Eudravigilance, and South Africa's SA VAERS show a range of adverse effects most people don't know about,” said Mohamed.

“Only 1-10% of adverse effects are reported. Many people do not connect the dots, don't bother reporting to governments, or are convinced that the adverse effect post-vaccine is unrelated. This means they do not seek the medical and psychological care they need, nor do they apply for compensation for negative effects, injury, or death.”

COVID Advisory Group Calls for Immediate Stop to COVID Injections for Kids Pending Urgent Review. Docs Claim the Shots Cause Death and are the Reason for Significantly Higher Amount of Excess Deaths

/

From [HERE]

To: Professor Wei, JCVI

Professor Sir Chris Whitty, CMO

Rt Hon Sajid Javid, Secretary of State, DHSC

cc Rt Hon Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Dear Professor Wei, Professor Whitty and Mr Javid,

We wrote to you and also the MHRA last month regarding urgent investigation of the acknowledged increase in all-cause mortality in males aged 15-19, since the Pfizer covid vaccine rollout commenced in this age group in May 2021. ONS have acknowledged in the High Court in London, that the figure of 402 excess deaths is significantly higher than the previous 5 year average of 337 deaths. It has proved impossible to get the actual data.  Indeed, they stated it is probably an underestimate because of delays for coroners’ cases.  This equates to at least two additional teenage boys dying each week of the roll-out, possibly more.   It is thus very disappointing not to have received any response.

We are writing further to ask you to pause the vaccines for children while you undertake and publish an urgent review of the risk/benefit analysis. In August 2021 you concluded that there was no medical justification for vaccinating healthy 12-15-year-olds, with the authorisation based on an aim to reduce school closures. But this new safety signal and the impact of this uncertainty must affect your assessment of the risk to benefits.

Since that date, much has changed. The latest omicron variant has been shown to have a much lower risk of serious illness, hospitalisations and deaths than the previous alpha and delta variants circulating at the time of the decision.  This is true for childrenas well as adults, so given the extremely low risk for children in previous waves, any potential for benefit must surely have dwindled to virtually zero. Also, in your analysis you failed to take due regard to naturally-acquired immunity, now demonstrated and widely accepted to be superior to vaccine acquired immunity. Children have had high rates of infection throughout recent weeks with at least 80% now estimated to be immune. In addition, the efficacy of Pfizer against omicron compared to previous variants is reduced to the point where infection rates are now higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated removing any potential indirect benefit to immune-compromised family members and perversely creating an increased risk to contacts of the vaccinated.   

On the risks side of the balance sheet, we have further information regarding myocarditis, with an occurrence rate of 1/2680 young men in Hong Kong, where unlike the UK, this was sought systematically from the start of their rollout. Indeed they paused their second dose, just as the UK moved from one to two doses. Data from the US also confirm high rates of 1/9443 in males aged 16-17 after their second dose. We still have no follow-up data on the increasing number of children reported from the US with significant abnormalities on their cardiac MRI scans. We also have worrying information on all-cause mortality by vaccination status, which even from the original adult Pfizer trial showed a higher mortality for the vaccinated group. Side effects are higher when vaccinating those already immune. Other side effects such as increased blood clots will all be playing a part in this balance of risk. Non-fatal adverse events, particularly neurological, have the potential to blight the lives of affected children. 

The latest information from the CDC is very worrying, that of 4149 injured children, 100 (2.41%) had a serious adverse event, 15/4149 (0.36%) had increased troponin (12 confirmed to be myocarditis), 12/4149 (0.29%) had seizures, 2/4149 (0.048%) died (being evaluated). This in itself is a reason to review. To clarify, this is 4149 non-serious adverse events and 100 serious adverse events reported in a total of ~8 million doses to this age group which is 1 in 80,000 but we know that VAERS is a gross underestimate.

Furthermore, there is increasing evidence of impairment of immune function particularly following multiple doses of vaccine. Israelis now seeing serious illness and death after the fourth vaccine dose. There is also new bio-distribution data showing that mRNA and spike protein, far from being eliminated within a few days, are still persisting for 60 days or more. We have no knowledge of the long-term implications of vaccinating children against what is now acknowledged to be a very mild illness for them, indeed with 50% having no symptoms whatsoever. 

With the arrival of omicron, SARS-CoV-2 has moved from pandemic to endemic. If the current situation had existed six months ago, there would have been no case made for commencing routine rollout for healthy children. Now, it is proposed that even those testing positive for omicron do not need to isolate. If omicron is no risk to others, why vaccinate? The prospect now of widening the coverage to 5-11s would be all the more ludicrous. We should, like Norway & Sweden, make clear that vaccination for this age group is simply not necessary.  

The time has now come to pause and acknowledge that there is no emergency for children and that for them the balance of benefit and risk now clearly favours natural immunity. On that basis the routine programme could and should be halted. Failure to act will lay you open to liability for ongoing harms.

We would like to meet with you urgently, in order to support you in taking stock of all of the pertinent new and emerging data. 

Yours sincerely,

  • Dr Rosamond Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician, convener CCVAG (Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Group)

  • Professor Keith Willison, PhD, Professor of Chemical Biology, Imperial, London

  • Professor David Livermore, BSc, PhD, Professor of Medical Microbiology, University of East Anglia

  • Professor Anthony J Brookes, Professor of Genomics and Health Data Science, University of Leicester

  • Professor Richard Ennos, MA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh

  • Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Professor of Oncology, St Georges Hospital, London

  • Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon

  • Professor Norman Fenton, CEng, CMath, PhD, FBCS, MIET, Professor of Risk Information Management, Queen Mary University of London

  • Professor Anthony Fryer, PhD FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry

  • Lord Moonie, MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary under-secretary of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine

  • Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath

  • Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD. Retired Director of Safety Evaluation, Beecham Pharmaceuticals

  • 1980-1989 and Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery 1990-92 SmithKline Beecham

  • Dr Roland Salmon, MB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre Wales

  • Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology

  • Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology

  • Katherine MacGilchrist, BSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd.

  • Mr James Royle, MBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon

  • Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt, PhD, Clinical Scientist

  • Dr Elizabeth Evans MA(Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, Retired Doctor

  • Dr Rohaan Seth, Bsc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Emma Brierly, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

  • Mr Malcolm Loudon, MBChB, MD, FRCSEd, FRCS(Gen Surg), MIHM,VR, Consultant Surgeon

  • Dr Alan Black, MBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, retired pharmaceutical physician

  • Dr David Cartland, MBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner

  • Dr Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine practitioner

  • Dr Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

  • Dr Samuel McBride, MBBCh, BAO, BSc, MSc, MRCP (UK) FRCEM, FRCP (Edinburgh), NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics

  • Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant ophthalmologist

  • Dr Branko Latinkic, BSc, PhD, Reader in Biosciences

  • Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

  • Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

  • Mr Anthony Hinton, MBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London

  • Dr Tanya Klymenko, PhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior lecturer in Biomedical Sciences

  • Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

  • Dr Carmen Wheatley, DPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology

  • Dr Charles Lane OBE, Molecular Biologist

  • Mr Angus Robertson BSc (Med. Sci.) MB ChB FRCS(Ed) FFSEM(UK) Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

  • Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB MRCGP Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Jayne LM Donegan, MBBS, DRCOG, DCH, DFFP, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD in Pharmacology, 32 years’ experience in Pharmaceutical R&D

  • Dr Keith Johnson, BA, D.Phil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing

  • Julie Annakin, RN, Immunisation Specialist Nurse

  • Rev Dr William J U Philip MB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow, formerly physician specialising in cardiology

  • Dr Jonathan Rogers MBChB (Bristol) MRCGP DRCOG Retired NHS General Practitioner

  • Dr Pauline Jones, MB BS, Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Emma Brierly, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • Dr Elizabeth Burton, MB ChB, Retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Franziska Meuschel, MD, ND, PhD, LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine

  • Dr Michael Bazlinton, MBCHB MRCGP DCH

  • Dr Holly Young, BSc, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant Palliative Care Medicine

  • Dr Julian Tomkinson, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner, GP Trainer, PCME

  • Dr David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist

  • Dr Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause Specialist

  • Dr Chris Newton, PhD, Biochemist working in immuno-metabolism

  • Dr Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB, Bioinoganic Chemist

  • Dr Sarah Myhill, MBBS, Retired General Practitioner

  • Jessica Righart, Senior Critical Care Scientist

  • Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

  • Dr Angharad Powell, MBChB, General Practitioner

  • Dr Stephen Ting, MB CHB, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Physician

  • Mr Ahmad K Malik, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon

  • Dr Catherine Hatton, MBChB, General Practitioner

  • Dr Kulvinder S. Manik MBChB, MRCGP, MA(Cantab), LLM, Gray’s Inn

  • Dr Stefanie Williams, MD, Dermatologist

  • Kim Bull, Foundation Degree in Paramedic Science, Paramedic

  • Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire

  • Dr Haleema Sheikh, MRCGP, General Practitioner

  • James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health (MPH)

  • Dr Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (Hons), DipPharmMed

  • Dr Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Pathologist

  • Dr David Bell, MBBS, PhD, FRCP(UK), Public Health Physician

  • Dr Ruth Wilde, MB BCh, MRCEM, AFMCP, Integrative & Functional Medicine Doctor

  • John Collis, RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner

  • Dr Damien Downing, MBBS, MRSB, private physician

  • Mr Lasantha Wijesinghe, FRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon

  • Dr Claire Mottram, BSc Hons, MBChB, Doctor in General Practice

  • Dr Ali Haggett, Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of medicine

  • Dr Jenny Goodman, MA, MBChB, Ecological Medicine

  • Suzanne Tomkinson BSc MSc CSci FIBMS Senior Biomedical Scientist (Clinical Biochemistry)

  • Dr Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow

  • Dr Marco Chiesa, MD, FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist & Visiting Professor, UCL

  • Anna Phillips, RSCN, BSc Hons, Clinical Lead Trainer Clinical Systems (Paediatric Intensive Care)

  • Dr Jason Lester, MRCP, FRCR, Consultant Clinical Oncologist

  • Dr Sue de Lacy MBBS MRCGP AFMCP UK Integrative Medicine Doctor

  • Dr David Morris, MBChB, MRCP (UK), General Practitioner

  • Dr Andrew Isaac, MB BCh, Physician, retired

  • Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, General Practitioner

  • Dr Noel Thomas, MA, MBChB, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, Retired Doctor

  • Dr Fiona Martindale, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner in out of hours

  • Dr Zac Cox, BDS, LCPH, Dental Practitioner

  • Mr Colin Natali, BSc(hons) MBBS, FRCS (Orth), Consultant Spinal Surgeon

A Fed Ct held that Solitary Confinement Can't Violate the 8th Amendment, no matter how long, its impact on health or rationale for imposing it. Man Held 27 Yrs Hopes Rulers at Sup Ct are Less Barbaric

/

From [NYT] Dennis Hope has spent 27 years in solitary confinement in a Texas prison, in a cell that is 9 feet long and 6 feet wide — smaller than a compact parking space.

“It’s three steps to the door and then turn around and three steps back,” Mr. Hope, 53, wrote in a recent letter to his lawyers.

His only human contact is with the guards who strip-search and handcuff him before taking him to another enclosure to exercise, alone. He has had one personal phone call since 1994, when his mother died in 2013. He suffers from depression and paranoia and fears he is going insane.

Last month, Mr. Hope asked the Supreme Court to consider whether such prolonged isolation can violate the Eighth Amendment, which bars cruel and unusual punishments. His petition states:

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

I. Dennis Wayne Hope has been in solitary confinement since 1994—for 27 years (and counting). The court below in a 2-1 opinion, over a dissent by Judge Haynes, held that solitary confinement cannot violate the Eighth Amendment, no matter how long it is imposed for, its impact on a prisoner’s mental and physical health, or the rationale for imposing it. The first question presented is:

Whether decades of solitary confinement can, under some circumstances, violate the Eighth Amendment, as at least five circuits have held, or whether solitary confinement can never run afoul of the Eighth Amendment, as the court below and three other circuits have held.

II. Mr. Hope alleges that the regular “reviews” of his isolation are sham proceedings, where officials sign off on his continuing isolation without even bothering to review his file. The court below held— again, 2-1—that those proceedings comply with the Due Process Clause. The second question presented is:

Whether the Due Process Clause requires hearings where prison officials are open to the possibility of a different outcome, as at least seven circuits have held, or whether a hearing that rubber-stamps a prisoner’s placement suffices, as the court below held.

Prison officials in Texas do not seem concerned about Mr. Hope’s lawsuit. Last week, they told the Supreme Court that they waived their right to respond to his petition seeking review in his case, Hope v. Harris, No. 21-1065.

In their appeals court brief, the officials wrote that “Hope has no plausible Eighth Amendment claim.”

“While the conditions of Hope’s confinement may be unpleasant and possibly harsh,” the brief said, “he failed to show the conditions are objectively so serious as to deprive him of the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.”

Texas is a leader in the use of prolonged solitary confinement. More than 500 prisoners there have served more than 10 years in almost total isolation, and 138 have served more than 20.

Across the nation, according to a 2020 study from the Correctional Leaders Association and the Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law at Yale Law School, about 7,000 prisoners have spent at least a year in solitary confinement and about 1,500 have been isolated for more than six years. [MORE]

[wtf?] IRS Retreats From Facial Recognition to Verify Taxpayers’ Identities

/

From [HERE] The Internal Revenue Service is scrapping its use of a private facial-recognition system to authenticate taxpayers’ identities for online accounts, the agency said Monday after criticism from lawmakers in both parties over privacy concerns.

“Everyone should feel comfortable with how their personal information is secured, and we are quickly pursuing short-term options that do not involve facial recognition,” IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig said in a statement on Monday.

The IRS has been using the service from a company called ID.me for people to validate and verify their identities before opening online accounts and accessing sensitive personal tax data. The agency was also planning to phase out access to online accounts except through ID.me, starting this summer. ID.me referred questions to the IRS.

The agency didn’t plan to require taxpayers to use the system to pay or file taxes, check their refunds, or check the status of amended returns. But the technology, which includes facial recognition, has been part of an identity-verification system for people to establish online accounts through the IRS website. Those accounts can be used to check on payment plans, look up records and access information about stimulus payments and advanced child tax credits.

Senate Republicans wrote to Mr. Rettig last week to argue that the move threatened personal privacy and created cybersecurity and oversight risks.

“The IRS has unilaterally decided to allow an outside contractor to stand as the gatekeeper between citizens and necessary government services,” the lawmakers, including Sen. Mike Crapo (R., Idaho), wrote.

On Monday, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D., Ore.) joined in, asking Mr. Rettig to halt the use of facial-recognition software.

“The government can treat Americans with respect and dignity while protecting against fraud and identity theft,” wrote Mr. Wyden, who applauded Mr. Rettig’s decision later on Monday.

Mr. Wyden also expressed concerns about racial and gender bias in facial-recognition systems.

“Many facial recognition technologies are biased in ways that negatively impact vulnerable groups, including people of color, women, and seniors,” he wrote.

Entrusted with millions of Americans’ financial information, the IRS emphasizes data security and taxpayer privacy, but it has sometimes struggled to meet those goals. [MORE]

Trial Underway in Suit Against Engineers Involved in the Flint Water Crisis to Kill/Harm Blacks by Contaminating Their Water

/

From [HERE] Jury selection starts Tuesday in a trial to determine if engineering contractors bear responsibility for lead-contaminated water in Flint.

Veolia North America and Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, known as LAN, were not part of the recent $626 million settlement between Flint residents and the state of Michigan, Flint and two other parties.

Attorneys for four Flint children claim Veolia and LAN were negligent in not doing more to get the city to properly treat water that was being pulled from the Flint River in 2014-15. Corrosive water caused lead to leach from service lines serving homes, a disastrous result in the majority Black community.

Veolia and LAN deny liability. Veolia said it had a brief contract with Flint, mostly to address other water issues at the city's treatment plant. LAN, too, said water quality was not part of its assignment at the plant.

“The problems in Flint were not caused by the alleged failures of outside engineers,” attorneys said last week in a court filing. “They were instead entirely caused by the epic failure of the local and state and federal government at every level.”

Nonetheless, U.S. District Judge Judith Levy declined to dismiss the lawsuit. The trial could last weeks in federal court in Ann Arbor.

Michigan is paying $600 million of the settlement with Flint residents who said they were harmed by lead-contaminated water. After legal fees are subtracted, more than $400 million is expected to go to people and property owners who file claims.

There is no safe level of lead. It can harm a child’s brain development and cause attention and behavior problems.