Alabama Correctional Officer Sentenced to 9 years in Prison for Failing to Stop Another Cop from Assaulting a Handcuffed, Unresisting Inmate with a Baton

From [EJI] The U.S. Department of Justice announced last Friday that former Alabama Department of Corrections lieutenant Willie M. Burks III was sentenced in federal court to nine years in prison, followed by two years of supervised release, for failing to stop an officer under his command from assaulting an incarcerated man at Elmore Correctional Facility.

Mr. Burks was convicted on July 21, 2021, after a three-day trial in federal court.

The Justice Department said the evidence at trial showed that, on February 16, 2019, former Correctional Sergeant Ulysses Oliver Jr., who was under Mr. Burks’s command, took a handcuffed and unresisting man out of an observation room and beat him with his fists, feet, and collapsible baton.

After Mr. Oliver finished beating this man, Mr. Burks came into the hallway, and then stood by and watched as Mr. Oliver took a second handcuffed and compliant man from the observation room, threw him to the ground, and then kicked and beat him with a baton.

“Despite having the duty, ability and opportunity to intervene to stop Oliver from beating the second inmate,” federal prosecutors said in a statement, “Burks only stood by and said, ‘it’s fair.’”

Mr. Burks then allowed Mr. Oliver to go back into the observation room, where he again stood by and did nothing while Mr. Oliver shoved the tip of his baton into a man’s face, lacerating the victim’s face.

Mr. Burks is the fourth Alabama correctional officer to be convicted in federal court in connection with these assaults. Mr. Oliver pleaded guilty on April 2, 2019, to assaulting the two men, and former correctional officers Bryanna Mosley and Leon Williams pleaded guilty in May and July 2019, respectively, to failing to intervene to stop the assaults.

“Those working inside our jails and prisons have a duty to intervene in the face of unlawful and violent conduct being carried out by their colleagues,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said in a statement. “Under the Constitution, correctional officers may not physically assault inmates for violations of prison rules, and any officials who see this happening must do what they can to stop it. The Department of Justice will vigorously prosecute officers who stand by and do nothing while other officers brutalize inmates in their charge.”

The Elmore/Staton correctional complex has been the focus of numerous investigations into violence and mismanagement. Two incarcerated men have been killed there in the past six weeks alone.

Over the past five years, six officers, including a lieutenant and two sergeants, have been criminally indicted for abusing incarcerated people at the complex, including Billy Smith, who died of blunt force trauma to the head after being assaulted by both inmates and officers at Elmore/Staton in 2017. Officers hogtied Mr. Smith and left him on the ground for several hours as he cried for help and vomited on himself.

The Justice Department is suing Alabama and ADOC for the state’s failure to protect incarcerated people from physical and sexual violence.

In an amended complaint filed last May, DOJ said that despite being warned about unconstitutional conditions in 2019, the state has failed to address “pervasive and systemic” violence in its prisons.

Alabama correctional officers continue to attack men under their care, the complaint said, detailing assaults by officers in 2020 and 2021.

France, Italy, Germany and Spain Suspend Use of AstraZeneca COVID Injection Amid Blood Clot Fears

From [HERE] France, Italy, Germany and Spain suspended the rollout of the AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID-19 vaccine on Monday, March 15, amid reports of blood clots in people who received the shot.

French President Emmanuel Macron said during a press conference that the country decided to halt the use of the AstraZeneca-Oxford jab as a precaution. He added that the rollout will resume immediately once the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the European Union‘s regulatory authority for drug safety, deems the vaccine safe.

The German Ministry of Health also suspended vaccinations with the shot due to reports of blood clot cases emerging in connection with the vaccine. “The European Medicines Agency will decide whether and how the new findings will affect the approval of the vaccine,” the ministry said.

In Italy, thousands of doses in the northern province of Piedmont were seized on Sunday, March 14, after a man passed away hours after vaccination. Reuters reported that the 57-year-old man fell ill and died hours after receiving the jab, for unclear reasons.

“It is therefore important to ensure that continued administration of the drug throughout the country does not lead to further consequences (harmful or fatal) … until we are completely sure that (the man’s) death cannot be attributed to the above-mentioned inoculation,” prosecutor Teresa Angela Camelio said in a statement on Monday.

The Italian Medicines Agency confirmed that it temporarily stopped administering the vaccine as a precaution.

Also on Monday, Spain’s Health Minister Carolina Dias announced that the country will pause the use of the shot for two weeks as a precautionary measure. Prior to the announcement, only people under the age of 55 had been receiving the jab in Spain. (Related: Top vaccine scientist warns the world: HALT all covid-19 vaccinations immediately, or “uncontrollable monster” will be unleashed.)

AstraZeneca stated that there were 37 reports of blood clots out of more than 17 million people vaccinated in 28 European countries, including France, Germany, Italy and Spain. The pharmaceutical company added that there is no evidence that its COVID-19 vaccine carries an increased risk of blood clots.

The EMA also reassured people about the vaccine. “Many thousands of people develop blood clots annually in the European Union for different reasons,” the agency said, adding that the incidence in vaccinated people does not seem to be higher than what’s seen in the general population.

More countries suspend AstraZeneca vaccine rollout

Many other countries also decided to pause the rollout of the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine over safety concerns. The Netherlands announced on Sunday that the jab will not be used until at least March 29 as a precaution.

The move is expected to cause delays in rolling out shots in the country, which pre-ordered 12 million doses of the AstraZeneca-Oxford jab and scheduled around 290,000 injections in the next two weeks. But Dutch Health Minister Hugo de Jonge said that the government could not “allow any doubts about the vaccine.”

“We have to make sure everything is right, so it is wise to pause for now,” de Jonge added.

The decision is based on reports from Denmark and Norway of people who developed blood clots after receiving the shot. Danish officials announced on Sunday that a 60-year-old woman who recently got vaccinated with the jab had blood clots, a low blood platelet count and bleeding before dying.

Three health workers in Norway were also hospitalized for similar symptoms shortly after getting the vaccine, Norwegian health authorities said on Saturday.

Both Denmark and Norway have suspended the use of the shot.

Other countries that put off the rollout of the jab included Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg and Romania. Outside of Europe, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Indonesia and Thailand have also halted the rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Dr. José Luis Gettor says COVID Swab Tests Aren’t Plastic Sticks with a Cotton Tip; It's a Bundle of Hollow Nylon Fibers Containing a Military Developed Substance Called "DARPA Hydrogel"- A Poison

From [HERE] Dr. José Luis Gettor an emergency physician in Spain has warned the population about the damage caused by PCR test swabs.

“Swabs are a weapon. They contain a substance developed by military intelligence called ‘DARPA hydrogel’. And the little tip of the swab isn’t plain cotton. Those swabs come from China. It’s not a plastic stick with a cotton tip. It’s a bundle of hollow nylon fibres that contain, among other things, ethylene oxide.

“Ethylene oxide is a poison that’s retained by the hydrogel. But when the swab penetrates the mucosa at 30ºC, the hydrogel melts. And keep in mind that ethylene oxide boils at 10.4ºC. That’s why it’s so painful. That’s why it’s so stinging. Because once the hydrogel melts, ethylene oxide is released and generates an ulcer at the bottom of the rhino pharynx.

“Far from making a diagnosis, what they’re doing is much, much harm. So, please, people, stop getting swabbed,” Dr. Gettor warned.

Warnings from the United States

In late April 2021, Natural News published a series of nearly 40 microscope photos showing strange fibres, structures and even “hooks” that are embedded in the fibres of Covid nasal swabs and masks.  Mike Adams explained all the photos and how they were taken, using iodine stains and ultraviolet light in certain cases in his Situation Update video HERE.

Below is an example of one of the 40 microscope photos.  Natural News took a time-lapse photo series and aggregated the photos to reveal strange sparkles coming off the synthetic swab strands when exposed to UV light:

Health Ranger posts new microscopy photos of covid swabs, covid masks and mysterious red and blue fibres, 25 April 2021

Warnings from Slovakia

In May 2021 a Slovakian report revealed that “covid tests” are contaminated with nanotech hydrogels and lithium. Lithium is used in the lipid compound coating nanobots which are inserted into the hydrogels for ballistic delivery of biological agents.

Mark Sexton, a retired UK police officer, went public with the Slovakian report knowing full-well that mainstream media would not touch the story. At the time, Sexton also pleaded with the public to take the PCR “test kits” to a local police station and remove the so-called “tests” from circulation at once.

Click on the image below to watch the video on Brand New Tube.

Report from Slovakia: PCR Tests are contaminated and therefore an act of bioterrorism, 18 May 2021 (13 mins)

Warnings from Cyprus

In October 2021, a union in Cyprus, Isotita, representing the rights of public-sector workers called for the suspension of rapid tests for the coronavirus, after media reports showed a swab contained multiple times the permissible trace level of ethylene oxide.

Citing the European Chemicals Agency, the union said ethylene oxide – a substance used to coat and sterilise PCR and rapid test nasal swabs – is toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic even when inhaled.

The use of EO is banned in food production in the EU. Under EU Regulation No. 2015/868, the maximum residue level for the sum (of ethylene oxide and the conversion product 2-chloroethanol), referred to as ethylene oxide, has been specified at 0.05 mg/kg.

Isotita’s concerns come after a report aired two days before on media channel, Pronews TV, about a rapid test swab found to contain 0.36 mg/kg of ethylene oxide.

Warnings from the United Kingdom

More recently, concerns have been expressed by Mike Watson. The Telegram channel for Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar shared a post from Watson on 15 January 2022 which reads:

ETHYLENE OXIDE

Check the swab packet and you will find letters EO in a black square box.

I work on refineries with “Ethylene Oxide” catalyst reactors and wear full breathing apparatus because it’s a major carcinogen.

One swab in the nose and back of the throat forces EO ppm into your mucus membrane where unknown ppm remains in the body.

However multiple swabs, every few days over time, increases one’s critical ppm exposure levels that exponentially increases cancer risk, from now until one’s immune system naturally deteriorates with age (this goes with any carcinogen we put into our bodies e.g., smoking) BUT EO massively increases cancer risk to all in medical and other industries (jabbed or not) who are forced to test by employers, every 3 days (ca.120 x per year!!) Their PPM exposure level is through the roof.

http://www.msds-al.co.uk/assets/file_assets/Ethylene_oxide.pdf

There is no discernible, empirically measured benefit between a swab up the nose/throat -V- Saliva test to measure results of an already flawed PCR method.

Current MSDS (material safety data sheet) / COSHH (care of substances hazardous to health) uses an average mean PPM value, typically based on double blind exposure trials of a few hundred people who naturally would all have varying health conditions, done over 5 years before FDA approval.

By exposing billions of people to ever increasing EO exposure levels by forced swabbing will only show increased cancer levels (hopefully not) between now and 5/10 years. Providing a non-suppressed, global process can be implemented which can accurately follow up, measure, monitor and record data that is then shared with a decentralised, non-corrupt, “trust less” database management entity. Thinking specifically blockchain!

That said ALARA (as low as reasonably acceptable) shouldn’t really come into it. Should swabs be deemed absolutely necessary (many countries are now abandoning this entire protocol and living with it all) I’d recommend to Senate, should you get another opportunity, that all such tests revert to saliva based and not nasal/throat swabs, which to most is extremely uncomfortable, extremely stressful and wilfully and unethically inserts a known carcinogen more times than has ever been tested into the bodies of all ages! Why, when saliva works just as well!

Govt/Media Continue to Lie About "Safe" "Vaccines" While CDC's Own Underreported Data Shows COVID Injections Have Caused: 3,573 Fetal Deaths in Pregnant Woman and 1,103,893 Injuries and 23,615 Deaths

From [HERE] The U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was updated this past Friday, February 11, 2022, and it is now reporting that there have been 1,103,893 cases of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines since December of 2020, when the FDA issued emergency use authorizations for the COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

The data included a total of 23,615 reports of deaths — an increase of 466 over the previous week — and 188,135 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,824 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 753,482 adverse events, including 10,747 deaths and 70,746 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 4, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS. [MORE]

By way of contrast, there were 918,856 cases of injuries and deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years, from 1990 through November of 2020. (Source.)

So there have been more injuries and deaths recorded in VAERS during the past 14 months following COVID-19 vaccines, than there were for the previous 30+ years combined following all vaccines recorded in VAERS.

Fetal Deaths Increase by 1,867% Following COVID-19 VaccinesThis most recent update of VAERS shows that there have now been 3,573 fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

To arrive at the number of fetal deaths recorded in VAERS I had to test several different searches on listed “symptoms” and then see if the search results documented fetal deaths, since there is no demographic for “fetal deaths.”

The following is the current list of “symptoms” in VAERS that reveals fetal deaths:

  • Aborted pregnancy

  • Abortion

  • Abortion complete

  • Abortion complicated

  • Abortion early

  • Abortion incomplete

  • Abortion induced

  • Abortion induced incomplete

  • Abortion late

  • Abortion missed

  • Abortion of ectopic pregnancy

  • Abortion spontaneous

  • Abortion spontaneous complete

  • Abortion spontaneous incomplete

  • Ectopic pregnancy

  • Ectopic pregnancy termination

  • Ectopic pregnancy with contraceptive device

  • Foetal cardiac arrest

  • Foetal death

  • Premature baby death

  • Premature delivery

  • Ruptured ectopic pregnancy

  • Stillbirth

This list may not be exhaustive. But if we use the exact same search using these symptoms, we can compare “apples to apples” in examining fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines as compared to fetal deaths following all non-COVID vaccines.

Using this search for all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years before the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorization in December of 2020, we find 2,519 fetal deaths, the vast majority of which followed vaccines produced by Merck, which would include the Gardasil vaccines. (Source.)

Here are the yearly averages:

  • 82 fetal deaths per year following non-COVID vaccines

  • 3063 fetal deaths per year following COVID-19 vaccines

I arrived at these averages by taking the total number of fetal deaths following non-COVID vaccines and divided by 31, and for the fetal deaths following COVID-19 vaccines I divided by 14 to get the monthly average, and then multiplied by 12.

To get a more accurate percentage of how many more fetal deaths are following the COVID-19 vaccines than all other FDA approved vaccines, we have to also factor in the number of doses administered.

The U.S. Government’s Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) complies data on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and a report that they published on 12/01/2021 shows that there were over 4 billion (4,092,757,049) doses of vaccines administered in the United States between 1/01/2006 through 12/31/2019, a year before the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorizations. (Source.)

Using that date range I repeated the exact same search for fetal deaths recorded in VAERS during that time, and VAERS reports 1,369 deaths from among those 4 billion+ doses administered between 1/01/2006 through 12/31/2019. (Source.)

The CDC reported this past week that there have been 543 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered as of February 3, 2022. (Source.)

So from 2006 through 2019, there was 1 fetal death recorded in VAERS for every 2,989,596 doses of vaccines administered.

From December, 2020 through February 4, 2022, there has been 1 fetal death recorded in VAERS for ever 151,973 doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered.

That’s a 1,867% increase of fetal deaths recorded in VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines.

I’ve run out of superlatives to use in the English language to describe this. And this is just using the U.S. Government’s own reported statistics, without even trying to figure out what the unreported factor is.

Here are two recent stories from young mothers who lost their unborn babies just after receiving a second COVID-19 vaccine. Perhaps their words and their experiences, which obviously represent, at least, many thousands of others, can better communicate just how truly horrible this is.

To Silence Speech Puppetician Orders Disobedient Truckers to Obey Authority or Go to Jail [Revealing the True Basis of All Government Regardless of Ostensible Form; the Initiation of Force/Coercion]

The Fake Vaccines are Bioweapons that are Designed for Depopulation and Greater Control Over Populations in a Free Range Prison. ALL Individuals in Government, Big Tech, Big-Pharma, Medicine, Education Institutions and Dependent Media promoting COVID injections are the permanent enemies of humanity, complicit with genocide and the destruction of freedom. Said representatives of authority have drawn a line in the sand; they don’t care if you know that they are trying to kill you. Hopefully, they will soon lose their right to to sleep well at night.

According to FUNKTIONARY:

authority - (from the root word author)—which means to originate. Only you have authority over your Self...anything else. i.e.. to accept any authority external to one's Self once of discriminating age, is the very definition of irresponsibility. There is no freedom in the presence of so-called authority, i.e. outside of one's Self and Self-Nature.) 2) the handmaiden of autonomy. 3) internal power. 4) Nommo. All authority, like the kingdom of heaven, is within. Be an authority unto yourself as all authority should come from your own authentic experience—that is the only source or wellspring of authority. Authority is the means by which society uses to control its population. Ignoring or belittling authority does not mean people are either good or bad, whether or not they are punished for their insubordination. Healthy people do not need authority figures to tell them what to do, but only the knowledge of themselves. You can teach a parrot to quote from either scripture or statute, but a parrot is not an authority. Only by you becoming truth do you have authority to speak—and then only on your behalf (i.e., your inner truth), your innerstanding. An authority is an eyewitness or an I-witness. and to picture the dynamic truth no proofs or negatives are needed nor possible—as reality isn't certain or static. When you are dead to sin and Alive to the God-Self-Divine, you become the Buddha, the Christ, the true authority within. (See: Obedience, Predictive Programming. Autonomy, Anarchy, Nommo, Sin, Alive. Authentic, Responsitivity, Dharma, Follower, Spontaneity, Conditioning, Conditions, Freedom & Responsibility) [MORE]

Freedomination - the liberty to choose the commitments, ideologies, covenants, contracts, judgments, and relationships that bind or restrain you within the Matrix. (See: The Matrix, Phfreedom, Freedom & Liberty)

"Government" - Latinized Greek ("Gubematlo" = control; and from the Latin "menre" = mind; "The control of the mind." 2) an abstraction (hoax) created for the sole purpose of making theft respectable and mind-control acceptable. 3) the societal manifestation of mass individual psychological reversal, i.e., the statutes, regulations, agencies, and agents (so-called bureaucrats) needed to threaten and shrink one's comfort zone. 4) a granfalloon. 5) a fiction supported by those who kill on command and steal on demand under the guise of "protecting" their victims.

The outworking of history consistently demonstrates that government will, in spite of the Bill of Rights, arrogate all power to itself eventually, if the people don't act to prevent it. You have rights alright, just don't get caught exercising them, O.K.? "Government" is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else.

Official "government" is disorganized, politicized; centralized; canonized and revered initiation of force, but it is no less initiation of force and coercion than any unofficial singular action of the same offensive or violent content.

"Government" is an abstract infinite entity acting as a possessive noun. There is not a single line in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any governmental document that states that a natural person will be left alone as long as she or he does not impose upon another or others.

By commission and omission, all official decrees make clear that a human is regarded as owned property or resource of the god called "Corporate State." It is controlling the lives, energy and property of others that requires coercive force and this is its sole function. Endorsing the lie of an imagined abstract collective interest supports the very concept that gives rise to all covert and overt oppression. [MORE]

Force - the source or sources of all possible actions of the particles or materials of the universe(s). 2) the manipulation of a man or woman in disregard of its own volition or nature. 3) the use of an outside physical coercion of any kind by one or more humanoids against another or others in order to make him/her or them obedient and compliant to higher or their will. 4) the basis of all social evils and can only be used in the sense of attack not defense. 5) You must! In the way I say! 6) the social disease. "Force (coercion) and fraud are the foundation of all social systems and the source of the aroma which they exhale." --Max Nomad. "Force" operates to remove personal volition from opportunity to act or not act. Someone '`makes" you behave in a certain way by threatening to injure or enslave you, someone you love, or something you prize, if you do not behave in that way. Force operates to obtain an intended behavior when the forced party would otherwise have exhibited a different behavior. Punishment, pain, suffering, and discomfort characterize force. Unfortunately, governments only function by force. Once established, they put laws into effect by threatening persecution, imprisonment, fine, or death against all who don't comply with those laws--including the use of the force continuum. (See: Autonomy, Fiction, Fraud, Corporate State, Freedom, Forgery, Authority, Violence, Coercion, Deception, Language, Punishment, Capital Punishment, Gerp & Government)

In Case You Missed It, Photos of Racist Suspect Liberal Puppetician Justin Trudeau in BlackFace

Yet another image of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in blackface at the 2001 Arabian Nights party - this time in color - has emerged.

The photo, released in September by Canadian Proud, shows the liberal icon in a turban and robe, with his tongue sticking out. The world leader has also covered his face with dark makeup. The racist suspect apparently has a checkered history of blackface. [MORE]

Yes authority is a farce and we are being clowned by costumed and uncostumed orderlies.

Tyrants Own the Minds of Its Victims thru Their Assent to Certain Concepts [vaccine, COVID case, COVID death, variant, positive test] which Gives Rise to Coercive Control [The COVID Tyrant Paradigm]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyrant-paradigm - the assertion or assent to certain concepts, idea, memes, words, patterns of thinking, attitudes, beliefs, and convictions that give rise to coercive political systems. It includes the notion that the tyrants (territorial gangsters) are so omniscient and omnipotent that they can prevent natural persons from living free. The words that constitute the tyrant paradigm are enemy outposts in your mind. Tyrants "own" the minds of their oppressed victims to the extent that victims hold contents of the tyrant-paradigm in the minds. The tyrant-paradigm consists of the "construction of systematic thought" and "the systematic pattems of thought" that give rise to coercive political systems. (See: The OCTOCON, Territorial Gangsters & Reactions)

Tyrants - there are none; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind-control and word-conditioning control? "Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive." -Freddy D. "The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." -John Jay, Castilian Days II, 1872. (See: Tyranny, Terms, "The Law," Dictatorship, Corporate State & Fascism)

democracy - a commercial form of "government" (exploitation and theft via force, deception and involuntary participation) of the mob, by the mob, and/or the mob, i.e., Mob-Rule. 2) a guise rubber stamping of an alternative royalty into overruling power. 3) the worst possible form of government because the majority rules whether they be good, evil, or misled by a minority. 4) slavery of the people, by the people, for the people. 5) equality achieved through force. 6) a system where only the majority need to befooled. 7) advertised equality. 8) a parody of a free society that only ethical anarchism or voluntaryism can usher into existence.

"Democracy has always been seen (and is still seen today) as equality of rights (granted privileges), not conditions. To the hypothetical equality of rights there has always corresponded a substantial inequality of conditions. And instead of being related to the nature of their individuality, differences between people have always been those marked by the different basic conditions they live in as they struggle against the suffocating artificial divisions imposed on them by power." —Alfred M. Bonanno. Democracy is a euphonious term created mainly to serve as sheepskin for Leviathan, Doggy and the Crimethlnc. All-Stars. 9) Dictatorship camouflaged as freedom 10) a whitewashed plutocracy with a pastel eggshell finish. Democracy, next to "monetized debt," and direct taxation (on labor) is the biggest con-game perpetrated on a population. Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain and sustain power over people is to assure the people that they are ruling themselves. Once they believe that lie, they make wonderfully submissive and self-maintained slaves.

"There are those who maintain that at bottom what is called democracy, (whenever and wherever it is supposed to have existed), is merely the mask for the rule of capitalist and/or bureaucratic minorities over an ignorant and deceived majority whose franchise signifies only the right to choose or tc change its masters." -Max Nomad. As long as mob rule is allowed through secret ballots, operational and organizational transparency will evade us and vice (vested interests controlling economies) will continue to forsake us and break us. Democracy is a powerful synthetic ideology of recuperation. Democracy goes against the emancipation of desire. Democracy allows for A to band together with B (majority rule) to rip off C. Democracy and citizenship are the chains that filter your pursuit of happiness and the happiness in your pursuit. Democracy in America has been checked and balanced, or gone unchecked and unbalanced—depending on one's indoctrination—to the point (extent) of collapse. Only the improper is left to prop it up aright as if it were still standing on its own ideological efficacy and edifice. "Democracy (the political ideal) is just a dream, it has not happened anywhere, it cannot happen. And wherever it happens (in practice), it creates trouble, the medicine proves more dangerous than the disease itself." -OSHO. "If the people of a democracy are allowed to do so, they will vote away freedoms that are essential to that democracy." -Snell Putney. As H.L. Mencken so aptly observed, "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard." In a democracy, scum rises to the top; otherwise it starts there. Democracy is a specific instance of stationary rogue State power. Under the rubric of democracy, justice can be attained only by begging, buying, milking and taking. [MORE]

Public Input/Review Excluded as DoGooder Boston Mayor Used Uncontrollable Emergency Authority to Mandate Deadly COVID Injections, Destroying Rights to Bodily Autonomy. Citizens Blow Up Fake Town Hall

From [InfoWars} Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s social media town hall got highjacked this week by fed-up city residents and labor unions fuming over the new mayor’s strident vaccine and mask mandates – even as other cities and states around the US are loosening pandemic restrictions.

Wu, who took office just three months ago, upset many of her constituents with her vaccine passports and mandates for indoor dining, bars, businesses, schools, and city workers. 

She announced she does not plan to lift mask mandates for public schools at the end of February.

The mandate, which Wu announced in December and came into effect late last month, has been highly controversial sparking teachers union strikes, complaints from restaurants and local businesses, and unrest among Bostonians.  

Some of those angry Beantowners expressed their frustrations this week when Wu held an social media town hall on InstagramLive – and welcomed comments from her constituents, telling them ‘I will answer any questions that you have.’

‘Why do you hate kids? Teachers? Cops? Firemen?’ one commenter immediately demanded to know. 

‘Please stop the indoor vaccine requirement mandate,’ wrote another. ‘It does nothing but discriminate and rob people of freedom.’

Despite her promise to answer questions, negative queries were ignored. 

Wu instead cooed about a tiger emoji that someone posted in honor of the Chinese Lunar New Year.

[The Opposite of Black Power] To Make Master Happy RecogNegro NYC Mayor Wants to Detain Anyone Arrested Until Trial if They are Deemed "Dangerous" Using Criteria Designed to Lock Up More Blacks

From [HERE] When Mayor Eric Adams released a wide-ranging plan to tackle crime in New York City, one formidable obstacle became clear: He would need cooperation from all levels of government to attack the root causes of gun violence.

While the mayor oversees the Police Department and city agencies that will implement many of his proposals, some of the most significant portions of his plan hinge on his ability to win over forces outside his control — and signs of resistance are already emerging.

In Albany, Mr. Adams dived into one of the most searing debates in the State Capitol: He asked lawmakers to revise the state’s recently reformed bail law, which has divided Democrats and has been used by Republicans to stoke fears of rising crime.

The mayor called on judges to tackle a growing backlog of gun cases and urged Congress to implement universal background checks and ban assault weapons, legislation that remains in limbo because of Republican opposition.

He also asked district attorneys to prioritize gun-related cases — a vague directive that left some officials unsure if the mayor was aware of what their offices were already doing.

The response so far has been lukewarm, especially from Democratic legislative leaders in the Capitol. They passionately defended the 2019 legislation that seriously restricted the crimes for which judges could set bail. Though judges can still set bail for certain felonies, they are compelled to set it at the lowest level necessary to ensure defendants return to court.

But the Democratic leaders still appeared open to a dialogue.

“Can we stop blaming bail reform when the sun comes up?” Carl E. Heastie, the Assembly speaker, said last month. “Please stop just trying to make political fodder because we think it’ll make for good campaigns.” But he later allowed that “there’s a lot of discussions that have to happen.”

Andrea Stewart-Cousins, the majority leader in the State Senate, said on Tuesday that she was open to broad conversations about criminal justice. “We are concerned, as everyone is, about a spike in crime,” she said. “But there is no connection between our bail reform and the national spike in crime.”

The mayor quickly signaled he would be unafraid to use his bully pulpit to pressure lawmakers. Days after releasing his crime plan, he issued a forceful statement calling on lawmakers to give judges more discretion in sentencing after the release of a teenager whose bullet grazed a policeman’s leg in a scuffle. Although the teenager posted bail, Mr. Adams raised a different issue: whether judges should be free to deny bail to defendants they thought were dangerous and keep them in jail.

Mr. Adams’s stance has placed state Democratic leaders in a conundrum, especially in an election year.

On the one hand, the legislative leaders want to be courteous to the recently elected mayor, whose profile continues to rise. But they are also wary of lending credence to Republican attacks that the bail law Democrats passed is flawed or helped fuel crime, an assertion that is not supported by any reliable data

In late December, two years after the law took effect, the state began to publish data that documented the rates at which defendants were rearrested. In the year after reforms were fully implemented, the available data appears to show that roughly 20 percent of those released after being charged with crimes ineligible for bail were rearrested before trial. About 2 percent were rearrested for violent crimes.

The data is incomplete and limited, making it impossible to draw a complete picture, however, and some researchers say that it could be years before the full impact of the bail law can be properly assessed.

Even so, some Democrats say the preliminary results vindicate bail reform, pointing to the low rate of recidivism in violent crimes and citing the positive effects of allowing those facing trial to remain in their jobs and homes while they wait for their day in court.

Studies from other localities where similar reforms have been introduced have found that such laws do not “lead to a meaningful increase in crime,” according to an analysis released by the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Republicans, for their part, have largely argued that any preventable crime is a public policy failure. 

State Senator Zellnor Myrie, a left-leaning Democrat, said that it was “important that we acknowledge that whether or not the statistics bear it out, people feel afraid.” [MORE]

Newly Elected Black Reformer Manhattan DA Already 'Getting Reformed Into the System' as He's Forced to Walk Back Prosecution Policies Criticized as Too Lenient [on the Blacks and Latinos]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

reform - superficial change in form and formalities (fictitious change) which only further lubricates the status quo by renovating and painting old society in new colors. 2) appearance of change sans the change. Reform is always in the service of the status quo and the politician: it serves the privilege of the past not the promise of the future. [MORE]

From [HERE] Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in New York City on Friday reversed parts of a Jan. 3 memo that directed prosecutors to avoid seeking jail time for some robberies, assaults and gun crimes.

The initial memo, issued a few days after Bragg took office, had told prosecutors that they should seek jail time only for the most serious offenses, the New York Times reports. The document, which implemented his campaign promises, “prompted weeks of pushback from police officers, small business owners and public officials, making Mr. Bragg a political target,” the article reports.

Since then, Bragg has clarified and modified his new policy, completing “the pivot that he started to make shortly after the backlash began,” according to the New York Times.

ABC News, the New York Post and NBC New York also have coverage of the Feb. 4 memo, posted by the New York Post.

The articles outline these revisions:

• Bragg originally said robberies would be charged as felonies only if they created a genuine risk of physical harm. His new policy says commercial robberies involving the use of guns, realistic fake guns and other weapons carrying the risk of physical harm would be charged as felonies. “A commercial robbery with a gun will be charged as a felony, whether or not the gun is operable, loaded or a realistic imitation,” Bragg now says.

• The first memo did not say prosecutors should seek jail time for gun possession. Bragg’s new policy says “the default in gun cases is a felony prosecution.”

• Bragg originally said the crime of resisting arrest, standing alone, would not be prosecuted. His new policy says anyone who harms or tries to harm a police officer will be prosecuted. “Violence against police officers will not be tolerated,” Bragg now says.

Bragg also told prosecutors that they were hired for their experience and judgment, and it would be up to them to determine how to charge individual cases.

White Privileged Neuropeon Couple Allowed to Retain Their Law Licenses Despite Making Threats to Murder Black Protestors. White Prosecutors Gave Them Misdemeanor Treatment for Said Felony Conduct

From [HERE] White lawyers Mark and Patricia McCloskey have received a stayed suspension of their law licenses for brandishing guns as protesters marched through their neighborhood in June 2020.

The Missouri Supreme Court ordered the stayed suspensions (here and here) Tuesday, report the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Associated Press and St. Louis Public Radio.

Further discipline could be imposed on Mark or Patricia McCloskey if they fail to stay out of disciplinary trouble during a probationary period of one year, according to terms and conditions (here and here). They will each have to submit quarterly reports and provide 100 hours of pro bono service.

The McCloskeys pleaded guilty to misdemeanors in June 2021 for waving their guns during the racial justice protest in June 2020. Mark McCloskey pleaded guilty to fourth-degree assault, while Patricia McCloskey pleaded guilty to harassment. Missouri Gov. Mike Parson pardoned both lawyers in August 2021.

Missouri Chief Disciplinary Counsel Alan Pratzel had sought an indefinite suspension, with the ability to seek reinstatement after six months. Pratzel argued that the crimes showed indifference to public safety and involved moral turpitude.

Mark McCloskey told the Associated Press that he and his wife respect the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision, although they disagree.

“We will comply 100% with the orders,” he said.

But he plans to consult with his attorney about the possibility of asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.

Mark McCloskey is a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate. Last week, he testified in a support of a Missouri bill that would shift the burden of proof in self-defense cases, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch previously reported.

The bill would create pretrial immunity hearings in which a defendant can make a self-defense claim. The state would have to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant isn’t immune from prosecution. Currently, the defendant has the burden of raising and proving self-defense during trial.

One opponent has called the bill the “Make Murder Legal Act.”

Racist Suspect Republican Judge Sentences BLM Activist to 6 Yrs in Jail for Voting when She was Ineligible to Vote, But Still On the Rolls [contrast w/3 yrs for White Cop who Murdered Laquan McDonald]

From [HERE] Critics are denouncing a six-years-and-a-day sentence for a Black Lives Matter activist who said she didn’t know that her voter registration was illegal because she received inadequate and faulty information from the state of Tennessee.

Judge W. Mark Ward of Shelby County, Tennessee, sentenced 44-year-old Pamela Moses on Jan. 31 for her illegal attempt to register to vote in 2019, report the Associated Press, the New York Times, the Guardian and the Washington Post. Ward added that he would consider probation for Moses, a Black woman, after nine months of incarceration.

“Voting rights activists say Ms. Moses’ lengthy sentence underscores racial disparities in the criminal justice system when it comes to voting fraud cases,” the New York Times reports, “especially since white men who have been charged in more straightforward instances of voting fraud have received probation or just days of imprisonment.”

The Associated Press said some legal experts view Moses’ sentence “as excessive and baffling.”

Moses was barred from voting because of her criminal record. She pleaded guilty in 2015 to tampering with evidence and forgery, both felonies, and to misdemeanor counts of perjury, stalking, theft under $500 and escape, according to a press release announcing the latest sentence.

Most of the 2015 charges stemmed from allegations that Moses impersonated an attorney in an attempt to file a judicial misconduct complaint against a judge, according to prior coverage by the Memphis Commercial Appeal. She was placed on probation for seven years as a result of the 2015 sentence. She was also told to comply with any treatment recommended by court-ordered mental health evaluations.

The evidence-tampering conviction meant that Moses was permanently ineligible to register and vote in Tennessee. But no one informed Moses, she told the Guardian. She should have been removed from the voting rolls at that time, but it didn’t happen. She voted in at least six elections between 2015 and 2018, according to a sentencing order cited by the New York Times.

Moses’ lawyer, Bede Anyanwu, told the New York Times that officials had told Moses only that she had to check her probation status to vote.

Moses learned of a possible problem when she decided to run for Memphis mayor in 2019, according to the Guardian. Election officials told Moses that she couldn’t be on the ballot because of her felony conviction. Moses was confused because she thought that her probation was over. She asked a judge for clarification, and the judge said Moses was still on probation.

Moses thought that the judge calculated her sentence incorrectly, so she asked the probation office for help. An officer signed a form that said Moses’ probation was over. Moses filed the form with election officials.

The probation officer made a mistake, however, and the Tennessee Department of Correction told election officials the next day that Moses could not vote. Moses said she wasn’t informed of the reversal, according to the Washington Post.

That resulted in charges, including the charge on which Moses was convicted: false entry on official election documents.

Prosecutors had argued at trial that Moses knew that she was ineligible to vote after the judge told her that she was ineligible. Ward apparently accepted that argument, saying she “tricked the probation department” into giving her a document saying she was off probation.

David Becker, a former attorney in the voting section of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, told the Associated Press that Tennessee “is an outlier” because of restrictive voting laws that are “so difficult to navigate that I don’t think voters understand them.”

Racist Indicted by Federal Grand Jury on Hate Crime Charges for Arson of Black Church (MLK Community Presbyterian Church)

From [HERE] A white man was indicted by a federal grand jury Thursday on hate crimes charges relating to the arson of a Black church in Massachusetts.

Dushko Vulchev was indicted on four counts of damage to religious property involving fire and one count of use of fire to commit a federal felony relating to a fire at the Martin Luther King Jr. Community Presbyterian Church in Springfield in the morning hours of December 28, 2020. There had been other fires and damage to church property in the days leading up to the fire. Review of video surveillance evidence identified Vulchev as the perpetrator.

A subsequent search uncovered electronic storage devices belonging to Vulchev which contained multiple images and messages of racial animus toward Black people, including a “White Lives Matter” mural and an image of Adolf Hitler. In interviews persons familiar with Vulchev told law enforcement officials that he frequently displayed hatred of non-white people and routinely referred to Black people with racial epithets.

The charge of damage to religious property carries a sentence of up to twenty years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of up to $250,000. Use of fire to commit a federal felony provides up to ten years in prison. Vulchev was previously charged by criminal complaint in April 2021.

Do You Live Near a Cell Tower? Small Town Threatens Verizon to Cease-and-Desist. Residents ill After 5G Activation. Radiation Causes Brain Problems, DNA Damage, Cancer, Alzheimers, infertility,

From [CHD] In what may be the first such move by a city health department, members of the Pittsfield, Massachusetts Board of Health on Feb. 2 voted unanimously to issue a cease-and-desist order to Verizon if the company refuses to discuss removing or relocating a cell tower residents said is the source of multiple illnesses.

The order would require Verizon to turn off the tower unless it commits to resolving issues raised by residents of the Berkshire Mountains community.

Following the vote, Verizon told WAMC Northeast Public Radio:

“Verizon telecommunications equipment and networks comply with all health and safety standards established by the FCC [Federal Communications Commission]. We have met on multiple occasions with the Pittsfield Health Department and members of the community to address their concerns with this site. All of Verizon’s equipment at the Pittsfield tower operates well under the FCC’s conservative limits, as confirmed by the city’s own RF study from last summer.”

Susan Foster, a medical writer who organized a SPECT brain scan pilot study of California firefighters in 2004, said Verizon and other telecom giants, championed by the FCC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, hide behind the illusion that their cell towers produce only a small fraction of what the FCC allows.

“The truth is the FCC set those limits extraordinarily high for several purposes, and one is to offer the illusion of safety,” Foster said.

She added:

“Every time one of the carriers wants to come in and place a cell tower near your child’s school or in the midst of a residential neighborhood, telecom representatives come before a local planning board and present carefully orchestrated routines in which they say, ‘The cell tower we are proposing for this site measures at 1/1000 of what the FCC allows.’

“Of course, that sounds reassuring. What they don’t tell you is that thousands of studies by some of the world’s leading physicians and scientists have found radio-frequency radiation is linked to acoustic neuromas and glioblastomas, oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, male infertility and electrosensitivity (EHS) at a small fraction of what the FCC allows.”

In fact, in December 2019, Verizon warned investors, in documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, that it could be the target of litigation that could require the company to pay significant damages or settlements:

“[O]ur wireless business also faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio-frequency transmitters. We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.”

Foster has studied the health impact of wireless technology for nearly two decades. She organized a firefighters pilot study at a small station in central California where she chronicled previously healthy firefighters suffering cognitive impairment to the point they got lost responding to 911 calls in the same town they grew up in.

The study, published in 2004, was conducted by Gunnar Heuser, M.D., Ph.D., then of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. It found brain abnormalities inconsistent with the profile of previously strong, healthy men in the prime of life.

The study served as the basis for state and national lobbying on the part of the firefighters which resulted most recently in an exemption to 5G towers on fire stations throughout the state of California — the first such exemption in the world.

“If the firefighters, the strongest of the strong among us, sustained brain damage at 1/1000 of what the FCC allows, and this was 2G when we did the study in 2004, what are we doing to pregnant women, developing children, the immunocompromised, the elderly and to society as a whole?” Foster asked.

Foster said the symptoms she found in firefighters correlate with the symptoms reported by Pittsfield residents.

Pittsfield residents have been reporting symptoms to city leaders and the Board of Health for at least 18 months.

For some, the symptoms appeared immediately after the August 2020 activation of the cell tower.

For others, the headaches, nausea, vomiting, rashes, vertigo and foggy thinking — and in some cases, more severe medical conditions — came on in the days, weeks and months later.

Residents invited medical and scientific experts to speak to city officials. Some residents sold their homes and left Pittsfield because they were no longer able to live with the radiation raining down on them. Others lived in their cars or moved in with relatives.

Courtney Gilardi, whose family moved to a small cottage several miles away, has been active in the fight against the 115-ft Verizon tower ever since it was lowered into a clearing of trees in the midst of her neighborhood.

Gilardi and her 13-year-old daughter spoke at the recent Pittsfield Board of Health meeting, along with eight of their neighbors.

The two also testified before a subcommittee of the Massachusetts legislature as lawmakers were considering establishing a 5G commission patterned after that of neighboring New Hampshire.

Foster called Pittsfield a microcosm of the country.

“We are literally trapped in a web of laws and FCC directives that take away our rights when it comes to fighting these towers,” Foster said.

One year after Verizon activated the tower in Pittsfield, a victory in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals found the FCC’s regulatory limits were “arbitrary and capricious.”

In a case brought by Children’s Health Defense and Environmental Health Trust, the court ruled on Aug. 13, 2021, that the FCC failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against the harmful effects of exposure to radio frequency radiation.

Foster said there’s growing outrage at the encroachment of cell towers into every corner of people’s lives including outside their children’s bedroom windows.

With 5G beaming from hundreds of thousands of satellites orbiting Earth, and global petitions by scientists and physicians calling for a halt to the 5G rollout until it can be studied for health effects, the world might be rooting for Pittsfield to win its battle against Verizon, she said.

After Using Government Authority to Help Destroy the Taxicab Industry, Lyft Emerges as Fundraising Heavyweight in Massachusetts ahead of Vote on Gig Work Ballot Initiative to Rip-Off its Workers

From [HERE] Gig work-based companies such as food delivery apps and rideshare services are pouring millions into supporting a Massachusetts ballot initiative that would solidify their workers’ status as independent contractors instead of employees.

Rideshare company Lyft has already given a hefty $14 million in support of the Massachusetts measure, in hopes of being able to classify their drivers as independent contractors, which would allow Lyft to not provide drivers certain employee benefits such as health insurance and paid vacation.

The Massachusetts ballot initiative, which would classify app-based drivers as independent contractors and enact labor policies, could appear on the ballot during the state’s Nov. 8 election pending either legislature approval or further signature collection.

The issue of gig work classification was first raised statewide last year in California. 

A ballot measure that would allow gig workers to be classified as independent contractors in most cases — Prop. 22 — passed in 2020, handing a big win to gig work-based companies that put more than $200 million behind the measure, according to OpenSecrets data. Although the measure passed, a judge later ruled it unconstitutional and an appeal is pending.

Now, as Massachusetts considers a proposition similar to Prop. 22, companies are replicating their strategy from 2020 by throwing millions of dollars into the effort.

In addition to Lyft’s $14 million, UberDoorDash and Instacart have each injected more than $1 million into funding the Massachusetts measure.

According to the Boston Globe, Lyft’s donation is the largest political contribution the state has ever recorded — easily surpassing the previous record of General Motors’ $5.1 million contribution to fight a successful 2020 ballot measure that would allow auto shops to access more information about the cars they repair.

The majority of Lyft’s $14 million came in the form of a $13 million donation given on Dec. 30. Prior to the end-of-year contribution, Instacart had given the largest single sum of about $978,000.

The Massachusetts measure would classify gig workers as independent contractors instead of employees while providing some benefits, including establishing a pre-tips earning floor equivalent to 120% of the state’s minimum wage and health care stipends for those who work more than 15 hours per week. [MORE]

RichCraft: AstraZeneca Sees $4B in COVID Sales [Sheeple Continue to Believe Shots are "Free" and Offered by Do-Gooders as a Public Service. Death $hots are Only Free of All Liability for Harm Caused]

From [HERE] AstraZeneca recorded a big jump in revenue on Thursday as it begins to take a profit from its coronavirus vaccine for the first time.

The company recorded full-year revenues of $37.4 billion, an increase of 38% from the year before at constant exchange rates. Part of the boost came from $4 billion in sales of its COVID-19 vaccine, developed with the University of Oxford.

Despite rising revenue, AstraZeneca reported a pre-tax loss of $265 million due to costs from its purchase of U.S. drug company Alexion Pharmaceuticals and new drug research.

The Anglo-Swedish drugmaker said in November it would begin to take a “modest” profit from the COVID-19 shot, which it had been providing “at cost” — around $2 to $3 —following an agreement with Oxford. Other COVID-19 vaccine producers, such as Pfizer and Moderna, have been booking hefty profits on their shots all along.

In the three months to September, the company said revenue jumped by about 50%, to a record $9.9 billion. The increase was due to sales of more than $1 billion in COVID-19 vaccines and the inclusion for the first time of some $1.3 billion worth of revenue from its rare disease business unit following the recent acquisition of Alexion. [MORE]

Unelected Rulers at FDA Postpone 2/15 Meeting to Decide Whether to Give Genocidal COVID Injections to Infants and Toddlers After Pfizer Says Not Enough Data

From [CHD] Pfizer today said it will delay applying for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of its COVID vaccine for infants and children 6 months to 4 years old stating there’s not enough data on the efficiency of a third dose.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in response postponed a meeting that had been scheduled for Feb. 15 to review Pfizer’s application for the pediatric vaccine.

Two separate clinical trials of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine for the younger age group are in progress: one involving children between the ages of 6 months to 2 years old, the other involving children between ages 2 and 4.

CNBC last month reported two shots did not induce an adequate immune response in children 2 to 4 years old in Pfizer’s clinical trials, leading Dr. Anthony Fauci to predict children in that age group would need a three-dose regimen of the vaccine.

In what the New York Times described as a “highly unusual move,” the FDA urged Pfizer to apply for EUA of the vaccine, even though two doses failed to produce the hoped-for immune responseamong children 2 to 4 years old and the vaccine maker did not yet have data on the efficacy of a third shot.

Pfizer had planned to submit its application to the FDA next week, then provide additional data in the coming weeks on a third dose, NBC reported.

The FDA did not say when the Feb. 15 meeting would be rescheduled, and Pfizer did not indicate when it would submit the application. [MORE]