Potentially Dangerous 5G is Being Deployed Without Evaluating the Health Effects

From [HERE] Published peer reviewed science already indicates that the current wireless technologies of 2G, 3G and 4G – in use today with our cell or mobile phones, computers and wearable tech – creates radiofrequency exposures which poses a serious health risk to humans, animals and the environment. Scientists are cautioning that before rolling out 5G, research on human health effects urgently needs to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected.

The text below is copied from an article published by Environmental Health Trust titled  ‘5G And the IoT: Scientific Overview of Human Health Risks’ (section titled 5G Deployment Without Health Effect Evaluation).  It’s not clear when this article was written but the latest reference it contains is dated early 2019 and it makes a prediction regarding 2020 in the second paragraph: “It is assumed that 5G networks will not become commercially available until 2020 but several cities are rolling out 5G as test areas now.”

5G is being developed and implemented without adequate evaluation of the effect of this technology on human health after long term exposure to these frequencies. Peer reviewed research studies have found adverse effects from the electromagnetic frequencies currently in use and that will be in use for this new technology.

“There is an urgent need to evaluate 5G health effects now before millions are exposed. We need to know if 5G increases the risk of skin diseases such as melanoma or other skin cancers,” stated Ron Melnick, the National Institutes of Health scientist, now retired, who led the design of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation.

In Dr. Cindy Russell’s ​’A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a smart nation or contribute to an unhealthy one​’ (​pdf document)​, published in the Santa Clara Medical Association, Russell states that “3G, 4G, 5G or a combination of zapping frequencies giving us immersive connection and entertainment but at a potentially steep price.” Russell details the scientific documentation on 5G’s frequencies which include arrhythmias, heart rate variability, bacterial affects, antibiotic resistance, immune system affects, chromatin affects, teratogenic effects, altered gene expression and cataracts. [MORE]

MRNA Exposed: Dr. Michael Palmer Provides a Detailed Analysis of How MRNA Injections are Poisoning Populations

Just Because You Put Syrup On It Doesn’t Mean it’s Pancakes [Vaccines aren't what you think they are - David Icke]

Lawmakers ask top Michigan court to block new voting maps b/c They Dilute the Power of Black Voters in Detroit by Using Boundaries that Bleed into Suburban Communities

From [HERE] A group of Detroit lawmakers filed a complaint with the Michigan Supreme Court late Monday seeking to block the implementation of newly drawn congressional and legislative districts they contend weaken the voting power of Black residents.

The lawsuit comes just days after the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission finalized U.S. House of Representatives and Michigan Legislature maps to take effect in 2022. Those new boundaries are intended to last a decade, until the next census.

“Unfortunately, the problem lies in the largest African American majority city in the nation has received the very short end of the stick,” filing attorney Nabih Ayad told the Detroit News. “The new redistricting map lines have unfairly discriminated against the Ccty of Detroit, its residents and its elected officials.”

The suit alleges violations of the federal Voting Rights Act and the Michigan Constitution, noting the state's high court already ruled against the commission over an Open Meetings Act violation claim. The state lawmakers say the hope of fair districts has been “shattered” by the revelation of the new maps.

“Should the plans be adopted, it would completely eliminate the two majority-minority (Black) districts that currently run through Detroit. Instead, those districts would be apportioned into eight new districts comprised of eight small sections of Detroit, each paired with a large section of a Detroit suburb,” the lawsuit states. "Each of the new eight districts would be majority-white."

The complaint was filed by state Representatives Tenisha Yancey, D-Harper Woods; Tyrone Carter, D-Detroit; Helena Scott, D-Detroit; Stephanie Young, D-Detroit, and Mary Cavanagh, D-Redford Township. Democratic state Senator Betty Jean Alexander of Detroit is also listed as a plaintiff.

"I felt that it was imperative that we file a lawsuit immediately," Yancey told the Detroit Free Press. She told the newspaper she will not be running for reelection due to term limits but wants to support those running in 2022 to represent Detroiters.

The Detroit lawmakers are concerned that Black candidates from the city would not fare as well in the newly drawn districts and say the commission failed to closely examine state legislative primary elections to better understand racial voting patterns.

The lawsuit alleges that the new congressional and state Senate maps include zero majority-Black wards. Under the old maps, there were two such congressional districts and five for the state Senate. It also alleges that the state House will only have two majority-Black districts, down from 12.

Commissioners have countered that Black voters can still elect their candidates of choice without comprising at least half of a district's electorate.

The 13-member commission and its lawyers have also said federal law does not require majority-minority districts.

"As shared previously, we believe in the advice of our Voting Rights Act legal counsel that we comply with the Voting Rights Act," commission spokesperson Edwards Woods III told the Associated Press.

The voter-created commission was established to “lead Michigan's redistricting process to assure Michigan's congressional, state Senate, and state House district lines are drawn fairly in a citizen-led, transparent process, meeting Constitutional mandates,” according to the mission statement on its website.

The process had previously been handled by the Republican-controlled Legislature.

Lisa Handley, a consultant hired to advise the commission, compiled reports on racial bloc data during the map drawing process.

She submitted a report to the panel that found candidates preferred by Black voters can win general elections even if the population of that district is not 50% African American. But she also noted a lack of data to discern how Black candidates may be affected by white voters in primaries, which could be a deciding factor.

If successful, the lawsuit would force the commission to revise the maps. A request for comment from the commission was not returned by press time.

Lavora Barnes, chair of the Michigan Democratic Party, said she does not want to see the diversity of the Legislature diminished.

"The MDP is committed to fighting to ensure fair representation for all Michiganders including giving Black and Brown voters the ability to elect their candidate of choice in a general election," she said in a statement.

Former state Representative Sherry Gay-Dagnogo, now a Detroit School Board member, said the city "deserves to have Black leaders."

ACLU files lawsuit challenging new Georgia legislative maps claiming that the state’s newly-drawn state House and Senate districts disadvantage Black voters.

From [HERE] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Thursday filed a lawsuit in Georgia, claiming that the state’s newly-drawn state House and Senate districts disadvantage Black voters.

The complaint notes that Georgia is one of the fastest growing states in the nation, with much of that growth driven by an increase in the Black population which has grown 16% over the last ten years. The complaint alleges that, despite this dramatic growth, the new legislative maps passed by the General Assembly disenfranchise the growing Black population. Black Georgians are often either packed together in some areas, while in others large, cohesive Black communities are dissected. Recalling Georgia’s history of racial discrimination, the complaint says “the State’s maps will prevent Black Georgians from exercising political power on an equal playing field with white Georgians.”

Six plaintiffs brought the suit against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. They include Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, the nation’s oldest Black fraternity, the African Methodist Church, one of the oldest Black churches, and four individual plaintiffs. All claim that the new legislative maps will harm their ability or the ability of their members to elect state representatives and senators of their choice. They allege that the state’s manipulation of the redistricting process is a violation of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). That section prohibits redistricting plans which would lead to members of a racial minority to “have less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice.”

This is the first redistricting in Georgia since the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down the VRA’s preclearance regime. Prior to that decision, states with a history of discriminatory voting practices, including Georgia, had to preclear legislative maps with the Department of Justice to ensure fairness to minority voters. With no preclearance requirement, the plaintiffs allege that the redistricting process was marked by a lack of transparency and a rushed legislative session that passed the new maps in under two weeks. The plaintiffs are seeking a permanent injunction preventing elections under these maps, and an order that the state adopt maps that do not violate section 2 of the VRA.

The ACLU released a statement saying, “The people of Georgia deserve far better than these unfair, racially discriminatory electoral maps, and we won’t stop fighting until they are blocked.” Secretary of state Raffensperger asserted that “Georgia’s maps are fair and adhere to traditional principles of redistricting,” and called the lawsuit “politically motivated.”

Judge who Said 'Nigger, Like a Roach' in Video Resigns. Beyond Merely Saying NGHR, What Did She Do to the NGHRs in Cases She Presided Over and Previously Prosecuted? Is There a Remedy for Those NGHRs?

POSSIBLE TO GET A FAIR TRIAL OR PROSECUTION FROM A RACIST? Can you Make a mirror out of a brick? From [HERE] A racist Republican judge who could be heard on a video using a racial slur while watching security footage of a foiled burglary outside her home has resigned, according to her lawyer and a letter from the judge.

“I take full responsibility for the hurtful words I used to describe the individual who burglarized the vehicles at my home,” the judge, Michelle Odinet, of the City Court of Lafayette, La., wrote in a letter dated Friday to the chief justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court.

“I am sorry for the pain that I have caused my community and ask for your forgiveness, as my words did not foster the public’s confidence and integrity for the judiciary,” she wrote.

Ms. Odinet said she was stepping down “after much reflection and prayer, and in order to facilitate healing within the community.” yup, fuck you too and your apology, your majesty. "People who classify themselves as White, who wish to be taken seriously, and who are righteous and responsible, will only talk about ending White Supremacy (Racism) and replacing it with Justice." [MORE]

In the video, people off camera inside the judge’s home can be heard using a racial slur repeatedly and laughing as they narrate security-camera footage of a person trying to break into a car on Dec. 11.

The word “mom” is used a few times in the clip, and at least two people in the room identify themselves as being in the security footage, helping stop the burglary. Ms. Odinet’s lawyer, Dane S. Ciolino, later confirmed that she had used a racial slur in the video, which did not show the faces of those speaking.

After an unknown person released the video to the local news media, civic groups, including the Lafayette branch of the N.A.A.C.P., called on the judge to resign, and criminal defense lawyers asked the judge to recuse herself from their cases.

Mr. Ciolino acknowledged on Friday that the video footage had raised understandable concerns about Ms. Odinet’s impartiality as a judge.

The local N.A.A.C.P. chapter president, Michael Toussaint, said that Ms. Odinet was not fit for her job.

“We do not believe a person having her revealed disposition should fulfill any office bearing the powers over judiciary,” he said.

Ms. Odinet, a Republican, was elected in November 2020 to be the judge for Division A of Lafayette City Court. City judges serve six-year terms. She was previously a prosecutor for the district attorney’s offices in New Orleans and Lafayette.

Mr. Ciolino said there were efforts in New Orleans to scour Ms. Odinet’s files for evidence of racism in how she had handled cases involving Black people.

Contrary to the vested interests who purposefully confuse bigotry with racism white supremacy, WITHOUT MORE, BEING CALLED NIGGER IN A DEROGATORY MANNER BY RACISTS IS JUST NAME CALLING. THE REAL QUESTION IS WHAT DOES THE RACIST PLAN TO DO WITH A NIGGER OR PLAN TO DO TO A NGGER.

A Nigger is a non-white person who is subject to White Supremacy. Nigger is what is being done to you. In the absence of white supremacy there would be no niggers.

Anon further breaks down the term nigger as follows: [HERE] 

The Definition Of "Nigger" In a White Supremacy System:

1. "Nigger" is NOT a racial identity.

2. ALL non-white people are niggers  -  by default - in a system of white supremacy.

3."Nigger" is NOT a personality defect.

4."Nigger" is a political term that defines a social, economic, and political REALITY.

5. A nigger cannot decide who is a nigger and who is not.

6. All black people are niggers but all niggers are not black people.

7. All non-white people are niggers (in a system of white supremacy). 

8. There is no place on earth called "Nigger Land," therefore niggers are NOT born (niggers), they are CREATED.

9. White people cannot be niggers in a system of white supremacy.

10. There is NO racial slur for whites that is the social, economic, or political equivalent of "nigger" in a white supremacist system.

11. There is no such thing as "acting like a nigger."

12. Being a nigger has nothing to do with being ignorant, backward, country, poor, or uneducated. Those qualities are found in every ethnic group.

13. No amount of education, professional achievements, or fancy table manners will transform a nigger into a white person in a system of white supremacy.

14. Nigger is not a lifestyle or behavior, it's a condition. Accusing someone of acting like a "nigger" is like saying, "Stop acting poor!" If you're poor, you act poor. In other words, your behavior reflects your conditions NOT your race.

15. If we eliminated poverty and white supremacy, there would be no poor folks or niggers.

16. "Nigger" should never be a term of endearment. This is like greeting a friend who just lost his job by saying, "How you doing, you 'out of work person'?"

17. In the absence of white supremacy, niggers would not exist.

18.  In the absence of white supremacy, there would be no need for niggers.

19.  A moral and just society is "nigger-proof." (because there would be no need to invent niggers).

Once we understand what a "nigger" is, we will understand that a made-up word DOES NOT DEFINE WHO WE ARE; it defines WHAT IS BEING DONE TO US.

Once we understand what the word "nigger" means, we will stop being afraid of a word we did not create. Once we understand that "nigger" does not define (or limit) our humanity, we will stop being ashamed of a word that says more about the creator than it does about us. Then, we will have the time and energy to turn our collective focus to eliminating the conditions that have created "niggers" all over the world. [MORE]

Another White Supremacy Mystery? Few Details Known after a Black Man who Went on a Hunting Trip w/Several White Men [racist suspects] Found Dead. Shot 9 Times; 6X in chest, 2X in buttocks, 1X in Face

From [HERE] and [HERE] Black residents and organizations in Pittsburgh are calling for an arrest after Jamaican immigrant Peter Spencer was shot and killed in Western Pennsylvania this month. The case has drawn suspicion after he went hunting with several white men and never returned.

The Black Political Empowerment Project (BPEP) is demanding answers after Spencer was shot several times and killed last week. WTAE reported that a 25-year-old man was taken into custody, and multiple guns were found at his residence, but he was not charged with Spencer’s murder.

According to police, Spencer was found shot in Rockland Township in the early morning hours of Dec. 12.

“I found this story beyond tragic … we decided that we needed to send a letter to some of the key members that be in Pennsylvania,” BPEP CEO Tim Stevens told WTAE.

“WE ARE TALKING SIX BULLETS INTO THE CHEST, TWO INTO THE BUTTOCKS, AND ONE WE HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION – EITHER THROUGH THE MOUTH OR FROM THE NECK OUT OF THE MOUTH.”

So far, police have only released an initial report but have not released any information on the suspect or motive.

Stevens said the morning of Spencer’s death, his fiancé dropped him off to go hunting with a man he’d visited in the past and several other white men. Stevens added Spencer’s girlfriend didn’t feel comfortable with him going.

Less than a day later, the fiancé went to pick him up, and he was dead. Stevens said the man taken into custody claimed self-defense.

The BPEP called the self-defense excuse unacceptable and offensive and is now calling for justice, and Spencer’s family has set up a GoFundMe for funeral expenses.

The situation is similar to Tamla Horsford, who mysteriously died on a camping trip with seven white females and three white men she considered friends in 2019. Horsford, a 40-year old Black mother of five, was the only Black person to go on the trip.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation initially closed the case, and Forsyth County District Attorney Penny Penn declined to press charges, but a Rolling Stone investigation detailed police mistakes, offensive social media posts, questionable friendships, and an uproar about the case during the Black Lives Matter movement led to the case being reopened.

Control of Speech: The NYPD, an Agency Uncontrollable by People, Sends a Message to Blacks as Only 3 Cops Have Been Disciplined for Criminal Conduct, Unlawful Detentions During George Floyd Protests

“NEVER PROTEST AUTHORITY” (especially not in LIBERAL NYC). A white NYPD cop attacked a retreating young Black woman, shouting that she was a “fucking bitch” as he forcefully threw her to the ground. She ended up in the hospital with her injuries. [MORE] and [MORE]

From [HERE] More than a year after the George Floyd protests, the New York City Police Department (NYPD) has disciplined just three officers, despite substantiated misconduct findings from the city's Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) against 80 officers.

The CCRB, a police watchdgog, released a data snapshot last week showing that so far it has investigated three-quarters of the 318 complaints lodged against NYPD officers for alleged misconduct during Black Lives Matter protests last summer. Of those, the CCRB has recommended the highest level of discipline, which includes suspension or termination, against 47 officers and less severe discipline for 33 others.

However, the NYPD has only finalized 12 of the substantiated cases. It imposed discipline on three officers and declined to punish nine others.

In a statement to Reason, Sgt. Edward Riley, an NYPD spokesperson, says that "each matter must be looked at individually." Four of the nine sustained allegations, the spokesperson says, involved an incident "where officers under a scaffolding were being pelted with bottles and other objects by a crowd that was screaming epithets and threats while closing in."

"After reviewing the video and the totality of the circumstances, it was the Commissioner's judgement that imposing discipline on officers who were trying to protect themselves did not make sense, nor amount to justice," Riley says.

New York Attorney General Letitia James sued the NYPD in January over its handling of the protests. James' office alleges that NYPD officers beat and pepper-sprayed protesters without justification, performed mass arrests without probable cause, and improperly arrested legal observers and medics.

"There is no question that the NYPD engaged in a pattern of excessive, brutal, and unlawful force against peaceful protesters," James said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.

Several other lawsuits have been filed against NYPD officers for their actions during the protests. Earlier this month, Francisco Casablanca-Torres, who was filmed in a viral video being clubbed by several NYPD officers while trying to cross a crosswalk with his bike, filed a civil rights lawsuit alleging excessive force.

According to the lawsuit, Casablanca-Torres was arrested and issued a summons for violating New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio's curfew order. The criminal case against him was allegedly dismissed. His bicycle was confiscated and never returned to him, the lawsuit says.

The CCRB is currently advocating to be allowed to make decisions on what type of discipline officers should face when it substantiates claims against them. The NYPD commissioner holds final power over disciplinary decisions.

CCRB Chair Fred Davie said in a press statement that the NYPD's failure to discipline officers for misconduct during the George Floyd protests was yet another reason the CCRB should have the power to impose punishment.

"If this continues, the CCRB's work to increase accountability for the people of New York will be nullified," Davie said. "It is critical that members of service who are found guilty of misconduct face consequences. This is another example of why the CCRB should have final authority over CCRB cases."

New York City has been slowly increasing the powers of the CCRB, although not as quickly or expansively as civil liberties advocates would like. This month the New York City Council voted to allow the CCRB to launch its own investigations into police misconduct, and earlier this year the CCRB began investigating instances of sexual misconduct as well. In the wake of the George Floyd protests, the New York State Legislature also repealed a notorious police secrecy law that had kept misconduct records hidden for four decades.

New York City Police Commissioner Dermot Shea defended the actions of officers in June, praising their "incredible amount of restraint" and saying he was "proud of their performance in policing these protests, ending the riots and upholding the rule of law."

Overall, the CCRB has substantiated roughly a third of the complaints it has investigated against NYPD officers for misconduct during the George Floyd protests.

However, it was unable to identify the officers, leading to another third of cases being closed for lack of evidence. The CCRB noted in its press release that it faced "unprecedented challenges in investigating these complaints" due to officers covering their names and badge numbers, officers wearing protective equipment that did not belong to them, failing to properly use their body worn cameras, as well as "incomplete and severely delayed paperwork."

Complaint in Intl Criminal Court Says COVID Injections are Killing People. Suit Filed Against Vax Makers, UK Govt, WHO, Fauci, Gates Foundation, Others, for Genocide, War Crimes, Nuremberg Violations

In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6, an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53. The complaint is the first of its kind against COVID injection makers and governments.

On behalf of the “peoples of the “United Kingdom” Attorney Hannah Rose and seven applicants brought the Nuremberg action on behalf of the victims. The plaintiffs or applicants are a scientific researcher, an astrophysicist, police officer, funeral director, activist and a nurse. Rose filed the legal proceeding with the International Criminal Court located at The Hague.

The defendants or perpetrators are set forth as:

“Perpetrators: Prime Minister for the United Kingdom BORIS JOHNSON, Chief Medical Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government CHRISTOPHER WHITTY, (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care MATTHEW HANCOCK, (current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care SAJID JAVID, Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) JUNE RAINE, Director- General of the World Health Organisation TEDROS ADANHOM GHEBREYESUS, Co- chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation WILLIAM GATES III and Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation MELINDA GATES, Chairman and Chief executive officer of Pfizer ALBERT BOURLA, Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca STEPHANE BANCEL, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna PASCAL SORIOT, Chief Executive of Johnson and Johnson ALEX GORSKY, President of the Rockefeller Foundation DR RAJIV SHAH, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) DR ANTHONY FAUCI, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum KLAUS SCWAB, President of EcoHealth Alliance DR PETER DASZACK.”

The complaint states:

Subject of complaint:
- Violations of the Nuremberg Code
- Violation of Article 6 of the Rome Statute
- Violation of Article 7 of the Rome Statute
- Violation of Article 8 of the Rome
- Violation of Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute

With regard to allegations under the Nuremberg Code the complaint states:

a) Informed consent to participate in a medical experiment
The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is a willingness and informed consent by the person to receive treatment and participate in an experiment. The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention, either through force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any other type of binding or coercion.

When the heads of the Ministry of Health as well as the Prime Minister presented the vaccine in the United Kingdom and began the vaccination of United Kingdom residents, the vaccinated were not advised, that in practice, they would be taking part in a medical experiment and that their consent is required under the Nuremberg Code. This as a matter of fact is a genetic medical experiment on human beings performed without informed consent under a severe and blatant offense of the Nuremberg Code.

b) Alternative treatments
– On the subject of informed consent for medical treatment, and based on the Nuremberg Code principles, an obligation exists to detail and suggest to a patient several treatment alternatives, detailing the medical process (and all that is included in it) as well as the advantages and disadvantages/ benefits and risks, existing in every treatment, to enable him to make an intelligent personal decision regarding the treatment he prefers. As stated, this choice must be made freely by the individual.

Despite all of the above-stated, the Government of the United Kingdom and the Ministry of Health continue to fail to present the citizens of the United Kingdom with the currently existing alternatives for treating Covid 19. Alternative treatments that have now been proven to be both extremely safe and extremely efficacious in the treatment of Covid 19 with up to a 100% success rate with alternative treatments mentioned above. The government of the United Kingdom continue to solicit their citizens, pressuring and manipulating them in blatant violation of the informed consent process, intentionally concealing information regarding the vaccinations and creating an atmosphere of fear and coercion.

The experiment will be conducted to prevent suffering or physical injury.

It is known that the m-RNA ‘vaccination’ treatments have caused the death of many as well as injury and severe damage (including disablement and paralysis) after the ‘vaccine’ was administered. Despite this fact, the government did not instruct the initiation of an investigation into the matter. It is also questionable that given the experimental nature of these vaccinations, that there are not any full reports available of the numbers of dead or injured, as may be expected in such a medical process for the benefit of the public participating in the experiment.

d) The experiment must not be conducted when there is reason to assume that death or

real injury will occur.

Regarding the violation of this principle, as stated above, the data on cases of death from the treatment is suppressed and we the citizens hear only by word of mouth and on social networks (friends, neighbours or relatives) not from the state media.

e) The individual in charge of the experiment must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe it will cause injury, disability or death of the experiment participant.

It has already been proven that many have died from the m-RNA treatments, were injured or became disabled; however the Government of the United Kingdom continues to compel this dangerous experiment on its citizens.

With regard to the allegations of genocide the criminal complaint states:

Pursuant to the Rome Statute’s Article 6, - “genocide” means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of these groups:

- the group in this case is in principle “the entire population of the United Kingdom” (and the world) starting with the elderly, chronically ill and disabled.

(b) Causing serious bodily harm or mental harm to members of the group:

- Proven long-term effects 8 months after first being infected by the virus (appendix 20

- Massive short-term damage and death from the ‘vaccines’. As of 24th November 2021, for the UK 136,582 yellow cards have been reported for the Pfizer ‘vaccine’, 238,086 have been reported for the AstraZeneca, 19,101 for the Moderna and 1,280 have been reported where the brand was not specified. That is a total of 395,049 reported adverse reactions in the UK alone that were serious enough to warrant being reported to the Yellow Card reporting system (Appendix 20)

- Expected long term effects as above in the vaccinated

- Statistical evidence suggests massive increase in deaths after ‘vaccination’ (Appendix 21)

- Immeasurable mental harm caused by 24/7 psychological warfare propaganda, false positive PCR tests, lack of medical care and mass vaccinations.

- Increase in alcoholics relapsing, eating disorders relapsing and not being managed in the community due to lockdowns.

- The number of vulnerable children calling ChildLine was up 37% over lockdowns (Appendix 22)

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part:

- Destruction of wealth and businesses by the imposed lockdowns (Appendix 23)

- Inflicting damage on the immune systems of all those who either got ill from the virus and/or received the m-RNA ‘vaccine’, the mask mandates and mandatory test regimes

Statistics prove that those who received a covid-‘vaccine’ are at greater risk of getting seriously ill, and even family members of the vaccinated are become ill and in some cases dying. This is an extremely alarming signal of what the future holds. (Appendix 24)

d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group:

- Proven increase in spontaneous abortion after a Covid m-RNA ‘vaccination. A recent study in the New England Medical Journal showed 8 in 10 women had a miscarriage after taking a Covid ‘vaccine’ before the third trimester (Appendix 25)

 - Expected reduction in fertility after a Covid-‘vaccination’ due to the deliberate change in DNA sequencing from the m-RNA (Appendix 26)

The section of the complaint alleging Crimes Against Humanity states:

Pursuant to the Rome Statute’s Article 7 – Crimes against humanity, means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(a) Murder:

-Statistics from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shown below (also Appendix 27) have recorded between January 2nd 2021 and July 2nd 202l, 18,653 deaths within 21 days of the first dose of a Covid Vaccine – 4,388 (30%) of those involving the Covid-19 virus. 73,822 deaths 21 days or more after the first dose – 7,289 (11%) of those involved the Covid- 19 Virus. 11,652 deaths within 21 days of a second dose – 182 (1.5%) involved the Covid-19 virus and 57,721 deaths 21 days or more after second dose – 458 (0.8%).

Further data from the ONS shown in the tables below (also Appendix 28) demonstrates, that there was a 23% increase in the deaths registered in January 2021 compared with January 2020. Similarly with February 2021 compared with February 2020 there was increase in overall deaths of 26%. We know that the Covid 19 ‘vaccines’ were rolled out in the UK in December of 2020 and anyone who was genuinely willing to take the ‘vaccines’ freely and without political pressure or coercion was going to do so within the first few weeks of the rollout, this staggering increase in death within the first 8 weeks of the introduction of the experimental vaccines is alarming to say the least and warrants a full investigation by the court.

The protocol in the UK for an individual who tests positive for Covid-19 has been to self- isolate and stay home until you absolutely can’t breathe at which point you go to the hospital to be put on a ventilator and in most cases die. A study (Appendix 29) of 1023 covid-19 patients on ventilators found that 42% of them died and 57% survived. We submit that the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.

Data taken from the ONS below shows that during April 2020 there were 26,541 deaths that occurred in care homes, an increase of 17,850 on the five-year average. (Appendix 52 )

The Liverpool Care Pathway was abandoned in 2014 after being deemed inhumane, but evidence suggests it was brought back at the start of the pandemic in early 2020 and is being implemented in care homes across the UK. In a House of commons document, Matt Hancock and Conservative MP Dr Luke Evans discuss the use of medications to give Covid patients a ‘good death’ (euthanasia).

In March 202 Hancock ordered two years’ worth of a sedative called Midazolam from a French supplier (Appendix 31). At the time the order was made it was claimed that Midazolam was for the treatment of covid 19 patients – Midazolam suppresses the respiratory system – Covid-19 is a respiratory disease. We request the court carry out a full investigation into why the UK government would purchase two years’ worth of Midazolam, a drug associated with respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest, to treat a disease that causes respiratory suppression and respiratory arrest.

The document (Appendix 32) also provides a table confirming dosage of Midazolam for the elderly or unwell should be no more than 0.5mg-1mg, side effects include cardiorespiratory depression and the drug should be used with caution in those suffering respiratory disease.

A document produced by the NHS (Appendix 33) states that Midalozam should be used for comfort at the end of life care due to Covid-19 to ease fear, anxiety and agitation. The document states that Midazolam should be used for sedation prior to the patient requiring mechanical ventilation. The same document also provides confirmation that Midazolam has the potential to impair the respiration system, particularly in the presence of disease or old age and clearly states that dosage should be kept to a minimum and should be within the manufacturers guidelines.

We submit that creating policy for treating patient allegedly suffering anxiety due to Covid- 19 with a starting dose of 2.5mg of Midazolam when the recommended dose for elderly and/or frail patients is 0.25mg amounts to unlawful euthanasia and murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.

Additionally, a large number of vaccinated people are getting seriously ill and are at risk of dying from an immune system failure, antibody dependent enhancement, in the near future (Appendix 34)

(b) Extermination:

There is good reason to assume that a large percentage of the UK population (and world population) is now at risk of either serious illness or death due to the recent mRNA ‘vaccines’. Animal studies conducted in 2012-2013 (Appendix 35 and 36) to test mRNA vaccines found most animals died within 2 weeks of receiving the treatment, this is equivalent to 1.5 years for humans. The vaccinated have been exposed to the very same ‘man-made spike protein’ as the virus. Both the virus and the vaccines have been proven to be able to change human DNA (Appendix 37). The immune system is unlikely to ever return to what it was after receiving a covid ‘vaccination’. Several high-level immunologists and vaccine designers including joint applicant on this request Dr Mike Yeadon, have warned, in the worst possible scenario, most of the human race who have received these m-RNA treatments will perish.

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law:

- Ban on freedom of travel both national and international

 - Forced lockdown and economic warfare – especially on small business owners – forcing people to be dependent on the State for survival

- Forced quarantine in hotels for both healthy and false positive PCR tests and rapid flow tests returning from international travel.

- Forced ‘self -isolation’ at the demand of NHS Track and Trace app

- Severe deprivation of physical liberties on travel, visiting friends, arranging parties, taking part in cultural and sports activities, religious congregations

(f) Torture:

- Psychological terror and warfare (mental torture) is being administered by the Government, State Media and main-stream media along with Social Media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google.

(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancies, enforced sterilisations, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity:

- One effect of the ‘vaccines’ suggested by a number of medical doctors and scientists is ‘enforced sterilisations’ with a number of spontaneous abortions/ miscarriages reported by pregnant women who received a covid ‘vaccine’ (Appendix 38, 39)

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectively on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognised as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court:

- Persecution against the unvaccinated, loss of jobs, refusal to public events

- Persecution against all religious groups being hindered to attend places of worship

(j) Apartheid:

- The real effect of the new ‘vaccine passport’ will introduce a new form of medical apartheid, for the benefit of pressuring people to get vaccinated and to deprive those who are not vaccinated of the right to travel, work and participate in society as normal.

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering or serious injury to the body or to mental or physical health:

- Social distancing measures, mask mandates, fear mongering, vaccination pressure as well as the ‘vaccines’ themselves are all reasons for serious injury to the body, mind and soul.

With regard to war crimes the complaint alleges the following:

Contextual element of a war crime - We submit to you that a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines’. We submit that the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) are under systemic attack from those who released the beforementioned biological weapons and by those individuals within the UK Government and international leaders against which we have brought this request, who seek to serve the same agenda. We therefore submit that the contextual element of a war crime has been met and the alleged crimes took place in the context of an international and non-international armed conflict.

Mens Rea element: We further submit that the members of the UK government and world international leaders against which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA ‘vaccines’. We submit therefore that the members of the UK government and world leaders against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.

The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.

Pursuant to the Rome Statute Article 8 ‘war crimes’ means:
(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:

(i) Wilful killing:

- We have provided statistical data of the death rate of the ‘vaccines’ killing a relatively large proportion of recipients, with numbers increasing as a result of more ‘vaccinations’ being administered, it is a logical conclusion that the continuing use of these ‘vaccines’ constitutes a wilful killing. Even if the victims are predominantly elderly, we also have a relatively high proportion of deaths and harm for younger and healthier people.

- We have provided evidence that the use of 5 times the recommended amount of Midazolam for patients in care homes amounts to wilful killing

- Graphene hydroxide in the vaccines

(ii) Torture

- The Cov-SARS-2 Virus is a man-made “gain of function virus”. It was created as a “biological experiment” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology during a period of at least 10-15 years, according to massive documentation enclosed hereby. The Virus was released, either by an accident or deliberately.

- The development of such a biological weapon is a crime on its own merit.

- The use of the masks by a mandate also constitutes a biological experiment. Which has caused massive harms as documented in the Danish Mask study (Appendix 40)

- The use of the test-pins and the use of cancer rated chemicals in the noses of millions of humans are also clearly a biological experiment or warfare.

- The so-called vaccines are only approved for emergency use only, and the massive use of these gene therapy drugs constitute the largest biological experiment in human history and causing an irreversible change to the DNA, through the Vaccination.

- Such an experiment on our DNA is the worst crime ever committed against the human race, totally without informed consent.

(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health:

- The forced use of face masks has caused great harm, both physically and mentally.

- The closing down of doctor’s offices has clearly caused serious injury to body and health with a number of serious illnesses going undiagnosed and/or untreated for months due to closures

- The vaccines are proven to kill and cause major damage to health, based on the short-term effects only.

- The psychological warfare, and economic warfare by the lock downs, combined with the medical and biological warfare causes immense injury to the health.

- The denial of use of effective medicine (HCQ, Ivermectin), against Cov-Sars2 is a cause of serious injury to body or health and the cause of many preventable deaths in the UK

- Suppression of alternative treatments

- Use of ventilators with such low success rate

- Midazolam used to euthanise elderly in care homes

(iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and want only:

- The extensive economical destruction of business activity, as well as private wealth and personal and business income due to UK lockdowns has led to a massive appropriation of private property by the banks, from people, who are not able to achieve a normal income due to all the effects of the lockdowns

- A massive transfer of property from the middle class to the ultrarich Globalists will be the consequence of these policies worldwide. This can be interpreted as the biggest land and power grab in modern history.

(v) Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities:

- The people of the United Kingdom (and the entire human race) are currently under attack by way of these draconian measures and biological warfare, which is an integrated part of a psychological and economic warfare.

(iv) Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated:

- The creation of the Cov-SARS-2 virus was the pre-condition for launching this attack.

- There is a timeline going back to the 1990s and the first SARS1 virus, as to the MERS Virus. And to both US Military biological research (DARPA), linked to French, British, Australian and to a large extent the Chinese efforts done during more than 15 years.

- There is a clear link to the so-called Globalist Elite, the Club of Rome, the WEF (Davos Group), Globalist politicians, the biggest Capitalists on earth, and their plan of Agenda 2030 (UN), WHO, and “the Great Reset”.

- These people have clearly spoken of a need for a great global depopulation, and Bill Gates among others, have stated that the Vaccinations is one way to do it.

- Gain of Function manipulation of the Virus has given the virus properties that makes it able to spread 10-20 times compared to the SARS 1 and MERS and all other Corona viruses. The scientists behind this gain of function research have created a dangerous synthetic Virus, as documented enclosed. With a dangerous “Hiv GP120” component to make it dormant, like HIV. (Appendix 49)

- The project seems to be a Global conspiracy to radically change both the demographical as well as the political landscape, by a transformation from a democratic system into a totalitarian world, to be ruled by a centralised unelected elite.

- The massive destruction of life, the effects of economic warfare, connected to an alleged medical emergency, and a massive psychological warfare operation, with the initial aim of brainwashing the population into accepting mass vaccination, as the only remedy for returning to a less than normal situation, and the only available the first step.

- The massive economic melt-down is leading to a financial collapse of epic proportions, causing states and currencies, at least in Europe, to collapse totally.

- Based on the economic ruin and catastrophe, it is likely that martial law will be introduced, a result of the economic collapse and the coming social unrest. Under the Defence Act 2020 new powers were given to the police to ‘strengthen enforcement powers to reduce the spread of Corona virus, protect the NHS and save lives’

- The financial crisis will most likely lead to the collapse of both banks and central banks, and loss of private property on a massive scale, to the benefit of the ultrarich elite only.

- New bail out rules, and delays on financial reporting, has only delayed this crash.

- On top of all of this, and other measures, the medium and long-term effects of both the Cov- SARS2, as well as the “Vaccines” will soon be apparent, causing massive illness and death of biblical proportions, never seen before.

The complaint also sets forth crimes of aggression as follows:

ARTICLE 8 bis3 - Crimes of aggression

For the purpose of this Statute, “crime of aggression” means the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades.

It is now obvious that “the plan” involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation states, with a few exceptions. It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF in Davos as well as the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI among others, are at the centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; “BUILD BACK BETTER”, used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other World leaders.

The goal of this activity is to create a new world order, through the UN ̈s Agenda 2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the peoples of the Earth. In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfilment of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind.

This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.

It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of covid vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.

The full complaint is [HERE]

The Hague is notable for its long history in helping victims seek redress for war crimes and defining appropriate ethical guidelines for conduct during war. Following the Nazi atrocities committed during World War II, the war crime trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany. Following these, a set of principles was developed, which ultimately led to the development of the Nuremberg Code.

These principles essentially meant that anyone, no matter how wealthy or powerful, even a head of state, was not above the law. The fact that the law of their home nation would permit their action would not relieve the person from justice under international law. [MORE]

Contrary to Dependent Media’s Narrative, Recent Surveys say PhD-holders and Black People are among the Most "Vaccine Hesitant" Groups, as are women looking to become pregnant and the religious

Recent findings from surveys found PhD-holders and Black people are among the most vaccine hesitant groups as are women looking to become pregnant, religious people, and people who practice yoga/“wellness” culture. The largest study of 10 million people found that persons with a PhD are the most hesitant when it comes to getting the Covid-19 vaccine, according to a paper by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh.

The information comes from Med-RX-IV, MSN, Guardian and [MORE]

Puppetician Trump Shows his Support for Deadly COVID Injections to Redemonstrate Loyalty to the Vested Interests, Thereby Maintaining Eligibility to be a Viable [S]election On Their 2024 Ballot

From [HERE] Former President Donald Trump continued to hammer the message that the COVID-19 vaccine and boosters are effective, though he remained resistant to vaccine mandates. 

Trump appeared on YouTube outlet Right Side Broadcasting Network Thursday night, where he continued to support the inoculations.   

He noted that the vaccine has ‘saved millions of lives. We’re very proud of the vaccines.’

However, he continued to say he was against President Joe Biden‘s vaccine mandate. 

‘But the mandates, they should not be—and they are trying to enforce these mandates, and it’s so bad for people and for our country,’ Trump said. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY

Voting Hoax - "Help Slave America." "We would do well to remember that voting is often a way not of consenting to something, but only of expressing a preference. If the state gives a group of condemned prisoners the choice of being executed by firing squad or by lethal injection, and all of them vote for firing squad, we cannot conclude from this that the prisoners thereby consent to being executed by firing squad. They do, of course, choose this option; they approve of it, but only in the sense that they prefer it to the other option. They consent to neither option, despising both. Voting for a candidate in a democratic election sometimes has a depressingly similar structure. The state offers you a choice among candidates (or perhaps it is "the people" who make the offer), and you choose one, hoping to make the best of a bad situation. You thereby express a preference, approve of that candidate (over the others), but consent to the authority of no one." -A. John Simmons. (See: Taxtortion, Freedom Technology, Ph.F. Degree, NOW, The Matrix, MEDIA, Elections & University of Chocolate City)

Federal Vaccine Mandate Scorecard at a Glance Summary (12/30/21)

New Columbia University Study Estimates that COVID Injections Have Killed at Least 187,000 People in the US. ‘The Risks of the Vax Outweigh Any Benefits for Most Age Groups’

Columbia University researchers have found that the true number of people in the USA and other territories who have died as a result of getting one of the experimental Covid-19 injections is significantly higher than the official figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The abstract for the paper “COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk” by Spiro P. Pantazatos and Hervé Seligmann states:

Abstract

Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters against SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in different age groups. However, existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced fatality rates (VFR). Here, regional variation in vaccination rates was used to predict all-cause mortality and non-COVID deaths in subsequent time periods using two independent, publicly available datasets from the US and Europe (month- and week-level resolutions, respectively). Vaccination correlated negatively with mortality 6-20 weeks post-injection, while vaccination predicted all-cause mortality 0-5 weeks post-injection in almost all age groups and with an age-related temporal pattern consistent with the US vaccine rollout. Results from fitted regression slopes (p<0.05 FDR corrected) suggest a US national average VFR of 0.04% and higher VFR with age (VFR=0.004% in ages 0-17 increasing to 0.06% in ages >75 years), and 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August, 2021. Notably, adult vaccination increased ulterior mortality of unvaccinated young (<18, US; <15, Europe). Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under- ascertainment bias. Comparing our age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults, and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure. Our findings raise important questions about current COVID mass vaccination strategies and warrant further investigation and review.

Introduction

Accurate estimates of severe vaccine adverse event rates are critical for cost-benefit ratio analyses of COVID vaccination in various age groups. The vaccine clinical trials (~15-20K participants in each arm) and safety surveillance studies (1) are either underpowered or not designed for adequate safety assessments with respect to vaccine-induced death (see Discussion for brief review). In the US, real-world vaccine safety signals have relied on the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database (2). The CDC has used VAERS data to report a vaccine fatality rate (VFR) of 0.002%1, estimated by dividing the number of reported VAERS deaths by the total number of vaccine doses administered in the US. However, the VAERS has several limitations, including 1) reported incidents are not independently verified or confirmed to results from vaccination, and 2) it only receives, not collects, reports from individuals and/or health professionals and organizations and likely suffers from under-ascertainment/underreporting bias (3).

Here, two independent, publicly available data sources from the US and Europe were used to test whether region-to-region variation in vaccination rates predicts or correlates with region-to-region variation in future (following weeks or month) mortality rates. Using the European data, we asked whether COVID vaccination correlates with deaths at short and long intervals post-injection stratified by 6 age groups (0-14, 15-44, 45-64, 65-74, 75-84, and 85+). With the US data, multiple linear regression was used to test whether we could observe similar short term effects seen in the European data. The US data was stratified by 8 age groups (0-17, 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-64, 64-74, 75-84, and 85+). These models adjusted for COVID deaths as well as seasonality effects and interregional variation in mortality due to other factors by adjusting for same-month 2020 deaths. Using same month deaths from 2020 (as opposed to 2019 or earlier) also helped control for interregional differences in pandemic public health measures before the vaccination campaigns began.

Our second aim was to estimate a US national average VFR and age-stratified rates using significant regression slopes for the vaccination term in the regression model. The European data reports age-stratified mortality rates on a weekly basis and allows for higher temporal resolution analyses, but mortality rates are z-scored normalized and hence effect size estimates in real units are not possible. The units of the US data allow for such estimates since it records raw numbers of administered vaccine doses and death counts in each jurisdiction, but at a lower (monthly) temporal resolution. Finally, we compared our estimates with previously published US national average and age-stratified SARS- CoV- 2 infection fatality rates for risk-benefit ratio analysis of vaccination against COVID-19 stratified by age.

In the discussion section it states:

The US CDC data allowed for estimation of VFR and vaccine-induced deaths. Importantly, our calculations do not rely on VAERS and its associated limitations. Our estimated US national average VFR of 0.04% is 20-fold greater than the CDC reported VFR of 0.002%2, suggesting vaccine-associated deaths are underreported by at least a factor of 20 in VAERS. The estimate is based only on significant effects detected in our analysis, and hence likely represents a lower bound on the actual underreporting factor.

Interestingly, our estimates of 133K to 187K vaccine-related deaths are very similar to recent, independent estimates based off of US VAERS data through August 28th, 2021 by Rose and Crawford (11). The authors report a range of estimates depending on different credible assumptions about the VAERS underreporting factor and percentages of VAERS deaths definitely caused by vaccination based on pathologists’ autopsy findings. The authors compared a previously reported incidence rate of anaphylaxis in reaction to mRNA COVID vaccine (~2.5 per 10,000 vaccinated) (12) to the number of events reported to VAERS to estimate an underreporting factor for anaphylaxis (41x). This factor, multiplied by the number of reported VAERS deaths and the percentage of VAERS deaths believed to be caused by vaccination based on pathologists’ estimates, yields various estimates with an average around 180K deaths. Our estimate does not rely on VAERS data and uses independent and publicly available data, and thus contributes additional convergent evidence for the above estimate of vaccine-induced deaths. See Supplementary Discussion for additional reasons why our results evidence a causal link (not just an association) between vaccination and death.

Death and severe adverse events to the COVID vaccines appear to be mediated in part by cytotoxicity of the spike protein and its (unintended) cleaving from transfected cells and biodistribution in organs outside the injection site (13–18). Vaccination may also contribute to higher COVID IFR before vaccination protection kicks in (and after full protection wears off) due to antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) (8,10,19). The effect may be related to enhanced respiratory disease observed in preclinical studies of SARS and MERS vaccines (20,21). An additional or alternative mechanism may stem from quality control issues related to production, handling and distribution of the vaccines. A recent analysis of VAERS data suggests only ~5% of the vaccine batches account for the majority (>90%) of adverse reactions, those batches were the most widely distributed (more than 13 states), and reported adverse event rates appear to vary across jurisdictions an order of magnitude (22).

The paper further states

Implications for public health policy

There is little to no evidence that vaccines reduce community spread and transmission. The vaccine clinical trials used symptomatic, not asymptomatic COVID, as a clinical endpoint. Since they did not require weekly coronavirus testing in their participants, they were not designed to estimate vaccine efficacy in reducing infection and hence transmission of the virus in pre- and/or asymptomatic persons. Indeed a recent July CDC study in Barnstable, MA reported a majority (75%) of COVID infections were among fully vaccinated people in an area with 69% vaccination coverage, with similar viral loads between vaccinated and unvaccinated (35). Given that vaccines do not appear to reduce community spread and that the risks outweigh the benefits for most age groups, vaccine mandates in workplaces, colleges, schools and elsewhere are ill- advised. We do not see much benefit in vaccine mandates other than increasing serviceable obtainable market (SOM) share for the vaccine companies. See (36) and (18) for a more in- depth discussion and literature review on why the mandates are not based on sound science given the relatively low COVID risk in healthy middle-aged and young adults and growing evidence base for alternative prevention and early treatment options for COVID. See Supplemental Discussion for more resources where readers can learn about the nature and volume of life-altering COVID vaccine injuries. [MORE]

Engineering Study Estimates COVID Injections Have Killed 150,00 People in the US. The Injections Kill More People Than They Save. Thus, 2 Separate Conditions to Stop the injections Have Been Satisfied

“Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America” From [HERE] By Steve Kirsch, Jessica Rose, Mathew Crawford

Last update: December 24, 2021: Added excess death study so there are 9 ways to get to >150K Americans killed by the COVID vaccines

Abstract: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines. A simple analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by the current COVID vaccines as of Aug 28, 2021.

At this point, two separate stopping conditions have been satisfied:

1. The vaccines kill more people than they save

2. The vaccines have killed over 150,000 Americans so far.

This is an engineering estimate This is an engineering analysis, not a strict scientific analysis.

What I mean by this is that our objective is to use all the available data and our own expert judgement in interpreting that data in a reasonable way in an attempt to get an accurate estimate.

For example, one analysis we reference said that up to 86% of VAERS deaths could be caused by the vaccine and 14% could not be. However, we know more about the causes of death after vaccination than someone who doesn’t understand the mechanisms of action of the vaccine and common side effects reported by victims. So we took the high end of the estimate as being closer to the truth.

Similarly, critics delight in saying that the English translation of the Schirmacher article says he estimated that between 30% to 40% of the bodies he examined died from the vaccine. However, we know from personal contacts that the 30% to 40% is a floor.

Similarly, using anaphylaxis as a proxy for the URF was chosen because in our judgement, anaphylaxis should always be reported at a higher rate than deaths. It’s the best-case adverse event. So calculating a URF from anaphylaxis yields a value that should always underestimate the number of actual events when applied to any event (such as death). Nobody who has disputed this choice has produced any data at all that supports their hypothesis that our assumption wasn’t correct; they just use hand-waving arguments.

So all this extra knowledge is included in interpreting the data.

Because we validated our death estimates against the analysis of different datasets done by different people, we have high confidence our estimates are reasonable.

It is easy to criticize every single method and to tell us “you can’t do that” or “you have to use DB-RCT data” or other objections.

More constructive would be for our critics to come up with their estimate and provide the 7 independent ways they validated that their estimates were valid. And then show that all 8 of our methods are flawed. Then we can simply compare which analysis better fits the observed data.

Nobody seems to want to do that for some odd reason. We can’t fathom why...

Our research is supported by the peer reviewed

literature
Our estimate is supported by multiple papers in the peer-reviewed scientific literature including:

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? by Ron Kostoff
“Compared with the 28,000 deaths the CDC stated were due to COVID-19 and not associated morbidities for the 65+ age range, the inoculation-based deaths are an order-of-magnitude greater than the COVID-19 deaths!”

The Walach paper found the same thing: that the vaccines harm more people than they save. It has now been re-published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law which is a peer-reviewed medical journal. The Walach paper appears in this issue along with a scathing editorial by the journal editor talking about how the paper authors were mistreated by the scientific community.

Critical Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System? By Jessica Rose. “Using this URF for all VAERS-classified SAEs, estimates to date are as follows: 205,809 dead, 818,462 hospitalizations, 1,830,891 ER visits, 230,113 life-threatening events, 212,691 disabled and 7,998 birth defects to date [39]."

Note that in this paper, the 205,809 deaths were not categorized into background deaths and excess deaths. We do that calculation in this paper. The point of this paper is she determined a URF of 31 using a very conservative method which determines a lower bound on the URF. Even with a URF of 31, the death toll is horrendous, and as we show in Risk benefit by age of the COVID vaccines, virtually all these deaths are “excess” deaths.

And other independent studies such as:

Vaccine death report

The VAERS database is the only pharmacovigilance database used by FDA and CDC that is accessible to the public. It is the only database to which the public can voluntarily report injuries or deaths following vaccinations. Medical professionals and pharmaceutical manufacturers are mandated to report serious injuries or deaths to VAERS following vaccinations when they are made aware of them. It is a “passive” system with uncertain reporting rates. VAERS is called the “early warning system” because it is intended to reveal early signals of problems, which can then be evaluated carefully by using an “active” surveillance system.

Those who believe the FDA mantra that you cannot use VAERS to determine causality, should start by reading this editorial: If Vaccine Adverse Events Tracking Systems Do Not Support Causal Inference, then “Pharmacovigilance” Does Not Exist.

There are effectively two separate determinations:

1. What is the number of “excess deaths” which is the total # of deaths from this vax - # of

   deaths normally expected from the typical vaccine. Causality plays no role whatsoever in

   determining this number.

2. Ascribing a cause to the excess deaths. Were these excess deaths caused by the

   vaccine or by something else?

The detailed steps are:

1. Determine the under-reporting factor (URF) by using a known significant adverse event

   rate

2. Determine the number of US deaths reported into VAERS

3. Determine the propensity to report (PTR) significant adverse events this year

4. Estimate the number of excess deaths using these numbers

5. Validate the result using independent methods

Determining the VAERS under-reporting factor

(URF)

One method to discover the VAERS under-reporting analysis can be done using a specific serious adverse event that should always be reported, data from the CDC, and a study published in JAMA.

Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and occurs in approximately 2 to 5 people per million vaccinated in the United States based on events reported to VAERS according to the CDC report on Selected Adverse Events Reported after COVID-19 Vaccination.

Anaphylaxis is a well known side effect and doctors are required to report it (see FDA Fact Sheet at the top of page 10) because it is considered a “severe adverse reaction.” It occurs right after the shot. You can’t miss it. It should always be reported.

A study at Mass General Brigham (MGM) that assessed anaphylaxis in a clinical setting after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines published in JAMA on March 8, 2021, found “severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000 vaccinations.” This rate is based on reactions occurring within 2 hours of vaccination, the mean time was 17 minutes after vaccination. This study used “active” surveillance and tried not to miss any cases.

When asked about this, both the CDC and FDA sidestepped answering the question. Here’s the proof at the CDC (see page 1 which incorporates the CDC response to the original letter on pages 2 and 3).

As noted in the letter, this implies that VAERS is under-reporting anaphylaxis by 50X to 123X. The CDC chose not to respond to the letter.

Is the anaphylaxis under reporting rate a good proxy for reporting fatalities? Since anaphylaxis is such an obvious association, one could argue that the rate would be a lower bound. Others would argue that deaths are more important and would be more reported than anaphylaxis.

We don’t know, but it doesn’t matter because this is just an estimate to get to a ballpark figure. Since there are 5 other estimates, if we are wrong, we’ll know pretty quickly. Lacking a more definitive method, we go with this as our “best guess” in the meantime. We are working on a clever way to determine the fatality URF directly which will be a good “double check” on our estimate.

In general, most of us think It is therefore entirely reasonable to assert that deaths are reported even less frequently than anaphylaxis since deaths are not as temporally proximal to the injection event.

The MGH study used practically identical criteria as CDC used in its study to define a case of anaphylaxis.

We ran the numbers ourselves and confirmed this.Therefore, a conservative estimate (giving the government the greatest benefit of the doubt) would use 50X as the under-reporting rate.

However, after the MGH study was published, one doctor pointed out that doctors were more careful to avoid anaphylaxis; there was more careful screening of people likely to have anaphylaxis, and they were advised to see their allergist and take more precautions prior to vaccination. This sort of thing would overstate the numbers above. [MORE]

The US Military Spent $14 Trillion on Afghanistan War. One-third to half of that Sum went to 5 Defense Companies: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, Raytheon Technologies and Northrop Grumman

From [HERE] Many contractors won big in the US 20 year war in Afghanistan.

Those who benefited from the outpouring of government money range from major weapons manufacturers to entrepreneurs. A California businessman running a bar in Kyrgyzstan started a fuel business that brought in billions in revenue. A young Afghan translator transformed a deal to provide forces with bed sheets into a business empire including a TV station and a domestic airline.

Two Army National Guardsmen from Ohio started a small business providing the military with Afghan interpreters that grew to become one of the Army’s top contractors. It collected nearly $4 billion in federal contracts, according to publicly available records.

Four months after the last American troops left Afghanistan, the U.S. is assessing the lessons to be learned. Among those, some officials and watchdog groups say, is the reliance on battlefield contractors and how that adds to the costs of waging war. 

Since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, military outsourcing helped push up Pentagon spending to $14 trillion, creating opportunities for profit as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq stretched on.

One-third to half of that sum went to contractors, with five defense companies— Lockheed Martin Corp. , Boeing Co. , General Dynamics Corp. , Raytheon Technologies Corp. and Northrop Grumman Corp. —taking the lion’s share, $2.1 trillion, for weapons, supplies and other services, according to Brown University’s Costs of War Project, a group of scholars, legal experts and others that aims to draw attention to what it calls the hidden impact of America’s military. [MORE]

A Wealth Transfer from You to CrimethInc: U.S. Companies are Thriving from the Plandemic

From [HERE] Nearly two years after the coronavirus pandemic brought much of the U.S. economy to a halt, public companies are recording some of their best ever financial results.

Profit growth is strong. Most companies’ sales are higher than where they were before Covid-19—often well above. The liquidity crunch many feared in 2020 never materialized, leaving companies with sizable cash cushions. The stock market ended 2021 near record highs and far fewer public companies filed for bankruptcy in 2021 than in the years before the pandemic.

“At the start of the pandemic, if you asked us to look forward, I don’t think we would have expected this outcome,” said Brian Kloss, a portfolio manager for Brandywine Global, a unit of Franklin Resources Inc. that manages about $67 billion in assets. “This has been very different than any other cycle we’ve seen.” [MORE]

Unconstitutional Conditions Persist in Alabama Prisons. Fed Court Says Authorities at the Alabama DOC Failed to Make Court-Ordered Changes to Improve Mental Health Care in the State’s Prisons

From [EJI] A federal court in Montgomery ruled Monday that the Alabama Department of Corrections has failed to make court-ordered changes to improve mental health care in the state’s prisons. “ADOC does not have enough correctional staff to provide constitutionally adequate mental-health care to prisoners who need it,” the court wrote.

The court ruled in 2017 that Alabama was failing to provide constitutionally adequate mental health care to people in state prisons, finding that mental health services are “horrendously inadequate” and have led to a “skyrocketing suicide rate” among incarcerated people.

The court ordered multiple reforms to improve mental health care. Hiring more correctional officers was a critically needed change, the court wrote, because “staffing shortages, combined with persistent and significant overcrowding, contribute to serious systemic deficiencies in the delivery of mental-health care.”

But in its 600-page opinion, the court found this week that staffing has barely increased in the last three years. ADOC has filled less than half of the required 3,826 full-time-equivalent officer positions. As a result, the court found that its February 20, 2022, target is now “out of reach.”

The continued dearth of correctional staff is the fault at the heart of ADOC's system of mental-health care.

Federal court order

“What was true four years ago is no less true today,” the court wrote. “The absence of security staff prevents people who need treatment from accessing it, stops those whose mental health is deteriorating from being caught before they lapse into psychosis or suicidality, and fosters an environment of danger, anxiety, and violence that constantly assaults the psychological stability of people with mental illness in ADOC custody.”

The deadline for the state to fill all mandatory and essential posts was extended to July 1, 2025, and the court added yearly benchmarks to measure ADOC’s progress, underscoring that “[t]hese steps cannot wait.” The court wrote:

So long as ADOC’s current staffing levels persist, people with serious mental-health needs are not safe in Alabama’s prisons, but are at daily serious risk of deprivation, decompensation, and death.

At least 27 more people have died by suicide in Alabama’s prisons in the four years since the court’s ruling, while ADOC has “persistently failed” to implement reforms.

For example, the court found, “ADOC has done nothing” to ensure that people in restrictive housing units “receive the out-of-cell time they need.” One man rarely received the required five hours per week out of his restrictive housing cell in the seven months before he died by suicide.

Audits found less than 20% compliance with the required 30-minute security checks in restrictive housing. It took staff 12 minutes to start resuscitation attempts after a man was found hanging in his cell, and another man, Casey Murphree, was not found until hours after his death, when rigor mortis had set in.

The “absence of correctional staff and resulting violence and stress among ADOC inmates resulted in decompensation and suicidality,” the court explained. Before he died by suicide, one man reported that he was the victim of “frequent, pervasive sexual and physical violence” and told his mental health provider he was being “trafficked by a gang and forced to perform sex acts to pay off the gang’s debt.”

In response to ADOC’s failures, the court ordered that mental health patients must get some time out of their cells, security checks must be regularly conducted, assessments must be properly done, and people who require hospital-level care must receive it within a reasonable period of time.

Staff must conduct regular drills on how to respond to suicide attempts, the court wrote, and a mental health professional must provide a confidential, out-of-cell evaluation prior to discharging a person from suicide watch and then conduct follow-up examinations for three days.

The court also ordered ADOC to explain how “Tommy Lee Rutledge’s cell reached 104 degrees, causing him to die of hyperthermia, in a unit that was supposedly air conditioned, and how the ADOC will prevent that from ever occurring again.”

The court left open the possibility of additional action against the state if staffing levels do not improve, AP reports.

Nurses in Ventura (CA) Hospitals blow whistle on “overwhelming” number of heart attacks, strokes, blood clotting occurring in the Fully Vaccinated. Docs Refuse to Consider Reactions to Covid Injection

After the Conejo Guardian’s report on alarming trends in Ventura County hospitals, more nurses have come forward to affirm the rise in unexplained heart problems, strokes and blood clotting in local vaccinated patient populations. They also say doctors refuse to consider that these could be adverse reactions to Covid shots.

Sam, a critical care nurse at an ICU in a Ventura County hospital, came forward because, “I’m tired of all the B.S. that’s going on,” he told the Guardian. “It’s crazy how nobody questions anything anymore.”

He has witnessed a surge in numbers of young people experiencing severe health problems after receiving Covid shots.

“We’ve been having a lot of younger people come in,” Sam says. “We’re seeing a lot of strokes, a lot of heart attacks.”

One 38-year-old-woman came in with occlusions (blockages of blood flow) in her brain.

“They [doctors] were searching for everything under the sun and documenting this in the chart, but nowhere do you see if she was vaccinated or not,” Sam says. “One thing the vaccine causes is thrombosis, clotting. Here you have a 38-year-old woman who was double-vaccinated and she’s having strokes they can’t explain. None of the doctors relates it to the vaccine. It’s garbage. It’s absolute garbage.”

Another woman, age 63, came in the day she took the Moderna Covid shot. With no previous cardiac history, she suffered a heart attack. Tests revealed her coronary arteries were clean.

“One doctor actually questioned the vaccine, but they didn’t mention it in the chart because you can’t prove it,” Sam says.

While hospitals are seeing more myocarditis, an associated side effect of the Covid shots, “Everyone wants to downplay it — ’It’s rare, it’s rare,’” Sam says. “Doctors don’t want to question it. We have these mass vaccinations happening and we’re seeing myocarditis more frequently and nobody wants to raise the red flag. When we discuss the case, they don’t even discuss it. They don’t mention it. They act like they don’t have a reason, that it’s spontaneous.”

Dana, another ICU nurse, says the number of sick, critically ill people in her Ventura County hospital has become “overwhelming,” pushing her facility’s patient census to the highest levels she has ever seen.

“It has never been this busy, and none of it is Covid-19,” Dana says. “We don’t normally see this amount of strokes, aneurysms and heart attacks all happening at once. … Normally we’ll see six to ten aortic dissections a year. We’ve seen six in the last month. It’s crazy. Those have very high rates of mortality.”

But doctors almost never bring up the possibility of adverse reactions due to Covid vaccinations.

“Doctors are like, ‘It’s probably the holidays,’” Dana says. “I don’t understand how you can look at what’s going on and come up with just, ‘Yeah, it’s the holidays.’ There’s been a big change in everybody’s life, and it’s the vaccine.”

Covid infection numbers remain small, and most patients who come in with Covid have already been vaccinated, she says. Rather, an unprecedented number of patients are “on pressers to keep their blood pressure up, people on ventilators, clotting issues, so we have a lot of Heparin drips to make sure they don’t stroke out,” Dana says.

Meanwhile, “Everybody’s in survival mode because of staffing.”

Nurse shortages, caused by people fleeing California and the health care profession, have local hospitals scrambling to provide care. Dana has been “out of ratio” for the last three shifts, based on the State of California’s maximum allowable nurse-to-patient ratio for safely delivering care.

That is leading to serious lapses.

“Because we’re short-staffed, they are hiring new nurses and I’m seeing mistakes in the hospital that are not even funny — medical errors,” Dana says. “[Hospitals] are trying to fill these spots and are getting any warm body to do the bare minimum. I think it’s terrible what’s happening.”

Recently, Dana took care of a patient who was mistakenly given massive amounts of a certain hormone by a different nurse.

“Now their brain is fried,” she says. “The patient is screwed.”

Unfortunately, most newly-hired nurses “are not capable of safely managing patients,” and yet are being thrust early into this environment, she says.

“The hospital is like, ‘We need to fill these spots. We’re getting killed.’ So they release all these people who’ve been training for two to three months. Normally you train four to six months,” Dana says. “To be honest, I feel like our hospital is on the brink of — we’re barely able to function right now. That’s how bad it is.”

Even the physical space is taxed by the influx of patients with life-threatening health conditions. Dana’s hospital is so packed that they are putting patients in staging areas of operating rooms.

As a result of crowding, equipment is not always where it should be and “when someone takes a dump on you and goes into cardiovascular collapse, you don’t know where your stuff is — and time is tissue,” she says. “Their blood pressure starts dropping, their respiratory rate goes up, and because we’re having to shuffle patients and staff around, equipment is in different spots. Sometimes you need to respond in minutes, and if a nurse doesn’t know where stuff is and is not used to dealing with the numbers of people and the types of critical problems — every second of delay in therapeutic treatment causes more tissue to get damaged and die, whether it’s heart tissue, brain tissue, muscle tissue. Every second counts.”

Green nurses managing more patients, with more serious problems, is forcing unpleasant choices.

“It’s setting up the patients for failure,” Dana says. “How can you manage four to five critically ill patients effectively? You have to pick winners and losers.”

Pressuring the ‘unvaccinated’

Meanwhile, doctors seem obsessed with getting people to take Covid shots.

Sam took the first two Covid shots while working in Los Angeles during the pandemic, but is shocked at how medical professionals and political leaders are demanding universal acceptance of what he says is “not really a vaccine. It’s experimental.”

“They shouldn’t be forcing it on everyone,” he continues. “There isn’t a lot of data. There are risks associated with it and you should be able to turn it down. Now if you don’t take the vaccine, people shun you.”

Hostility toward those who don’t go along runs high among medical co-workers.

“You’re not allowed to say you don’t want it,” Sam says. “Coworkers will talk [trash] about you, they’re so adamant about it. It’s frustrating. … You always hear the conversations behind their backs. ‘She’s not vaccinated, blah blah blah.’ I’m like, who gives a [care]? It’s none of your business. It’s their choice. Before, medical information was really private. Now it’s like, ‘What’s you’re Covid status?’”

Even patients coming into his hospital who have not taken the Covid shots are flagged and treated with disdain, he says.

“The first thing [nurses] say in the history and physical is, ‘He’s not vaccinated. He’s got Covid,’” he says. Meanwhile, “The Covid numbers in ICU are zero.”

As for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), it may as well not exist. In his hospital, “There’s no protocol [for reporting to VAERS]. Nobody ever talks about that,” he says.

Even those who have strong natural immunity after overcoming the virus naturally are being pressured to take Covid shots.

“If this is about science, why on earth are we pushing people to get the vaccine?” Sam says. “We have rights, but they’ve taken that away. If you don’t get the shot, you lose your job.”

Informed consent also seems to have gone by the wayside.

“When you give someone informed consent, you are supposed to give them all the risks and benefits, and all options,” he says. “I feel like with the vaccine, they don’t give you the risks. They say, ‘Take this vaccine. It’s for the good of the community.’ They won’t be honest about it because it will drive down vaccination numbers. Every other medical product we give, we inform them fully. I don’t understand what it is about the Covid vaccine. They are so adamant about giving it.”

‘No boosters’

“I DON’T WANT TO KEEP INJECTING MYSELF WITH SOMETHING EVERY SIX MONTHS WHEN I DON’T HAVE DATA.”

Sam is most disappointed with doctors and nurses.

“The doctors don’t question anymore,” he says. “None question whether the vaccine causes myocarditis, pericarditis and the strokes that are coming in. If they don’t toe the line, they could lose their medical license. They do what they do because they have bills to pay. I’m disappointed because you have a handful of doctors who will question the narrative, but the rest go along.”

The level of propaganda, in his view, is “out of control.”

“Propaganda creates doubt,” he says. “Half the country buys it and the other half distrusts the system. They [doctors] are smart people but they don’t think for themselves anymore. It’s the propaganda, the repetition of the lie. It’s very effective.”

For his part, Sam has decided not to take any boosters.

“I don’t want to keep getting this thing. What if I clot off and get a heart attack?” he says. “Health care professionals are evidence-based people — or we used to be — and there’s just no evidence what this thing’s going to do in 10 years. We have no evidence what it does to the immune system and clotting system. I don’t want to keep injecting myself with something every six months when I don’t have data.”

He and his wife have decided they will leave the state if they can’t afford to homeschool their child, when the child reaches school age.

“My [child] will never get the vaccine. We will leave,” Sam says. “They are out of their minds to vaccinate these children. Their immune systems are immature. They are growing. I’m not willing to take the risk. No way. Me and my wife feel the same way.”

Florida, which is maintaining medical freedom and privacy, is also their preferred destination if and when he loses his job once governments change the definition of “vaccinated” — leaving him in the same category as those who never took Covid shots in the first place.

“I may end up getting a lawyer if they change the definition of ‘vaccinated’ and you need a third shot,” he says. “California law allows for religious exemptions and hospitals are denying them. That’s discrimination.”

Like all the nurses interviewed by the Guardian, he says he is “sick and tired of the coercion.”

“If you’re vaccinated and I’m not, what the heck are you worried about? It’s my choice, right?” he says. “If I get sick and die, that’s the price of freedom. That’s what we’re built on. In America, we don’t force people to take injections and medical products against their will.”