CDC Study at Federal Prison in TX Finds No Vaccine Benefit: Vaccinated and Unvaxed Persons Infected w/COVID Transmitted It at the Same Rate. No Infected Prisoners Died Even Though Over 70% were Obese

From [GR} CDC Researchers studied a Corona outbreak in a prison in Texas in July 2021. In the following weeks, regular smears and tests were taken from a selected group of inmates. The result: There is no difference whatsoever between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated inmates.

No statistically significant difference was detected in the duration of viral culture positivity between participants who were fully vaccinated (median: 5 days) compared with those who were not fully vaccinated.

It states:

“Conclusions As this field continues to develop, clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons. These findings are critically important, especially in congregate settings where viral transmission can lead to large outbreaks.”

Not a single one of the infected prisoners died of Covid-19, although over 70 percent were overweight or obese, according to the study. One vaccinated and one unvaccinated were hospitalized. The most common symptoms were a runny nose, impaired sense of taste and cough. Since a prison is a confined space, the results are very revealing for hospitals, nursing homes, office complexes and enclosed spaces in general.

As this study shows, every vaccinated nurse or doctor is infectious for as long and just as severely as an unvaccinated doctor or nurse. This gene therapy does not bring about clinical or sterile immunity.

They warned health practitioners to “consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons. These findings are critically important, especially in congregate settings where viral transmission can lead to large outbreaks”. [MORE]

Should Biden Also Build a Better Black Borg VP? Amateur Probot Short Circuits Under Soft Ball Questioning, Sabotaging a Manufactured Happy News Event. Blight House Shenanigger Unable to Stop Interview

BORG BLOOPERS. Was Kamala Harris’ staff just looking for something for the VP to do on a Friday when they chose to do a soft ball interview with Charlamagne Tha God on Comedy Central? The incident began when Black borg Kamala Harris was asked during the happy news event, ‘who is the real superhero in DC?’ ‘who really holds the power in Washington, is it Joe Biden or Joe Manchin?’ Said soft ball questions inexplicably caused Harris to crash or short circuit, which prompted Symone Sanders, a shenanigger who is one of Harris’ aides, to unsuccessfully attempt to shut down the interview. Time to reboot.

Corpse Joe Biden and rolebot Kamala Harris’ poll numbers have set all time low records for several months. Like authoritarians in totalitarian nations, Biden is comfortable with his unpopularity because he apparently has no interest in running for reelection in 2024. Hence, he is free to be “Stuttering-ass Brandon,” the unaccountable leader of a non-representative government who uses his authority to do things the votary obviously does not want him to do, such as impose irrational injection mandates and exempt injection makers and government from all liability for harm and death caused by the injections [but enjoy the Spectacle and its granfalloons]

Harris, on the other hand ambitiously desires to be president. With her poll numbers tanking among moderate white folks, what was the happy news event with Charlamagne Tha God, who has an overwhelming Black audience, intended to accomplish? As explained by the great rebel Amos Wilson, while taking its cues from the dependent media

“the Black press and safe negro TV incumbents make little or no demands on Black politicians while it constantly parades them before the Black community as role models, regardless of their success or lack of it in advancing the interests of the community. The achieve­ments of Black politicians, no matter how dubious, are often pre­sented by the Black press as vicarious achievements of the Black community as a whole. Black incumbents are given ready access to Black media outlets to massage the Black community, to maintain their public persona, and to rationalize their very frequent failures to provide the Black community with responsive and effective political leadership. Thus, they keep their opposition out of the media limelight and the community is cajoled into re-electing a political establishment whose accomplishments are meager when not plainly regressive.”

So, wow, how could Kamala fuck up a softball moment with “black media” on Comedy Central? This episode is more evidence that Kamala Harris is simply a Human Resource to corpse Biden. The only thing Kamala Harris can substantively do for Black people is make them feel better about their servant condition. [MORE]

Shenanigger SYMONE SANDERS ON 12/10/21 IN DC AND PUPPETICIAN VP KAMALA HARRIS

Never trust a probot. Her/his business is process. A probot is a propagandizing programmed robot. According to FUNKTIONARY, a probot is a proxymoron who conveys programmed disinformation in computerized language and bureaucratese jargon. A probot is one who disseminates lies, distortions and convenient mass truths composed by a superior overruling elite. [more] They function with an extremely low level of consciousness as they view obedience to authority as a moral virtue and place form over substance, rules over reason and law over humanity. A black probot is capable of advocating for widespread aggression and destruction of life if the rules say so. Elite whites put them on the front lines, watch your back. According to FUNKTIONARY:

Electoral politics - a polylogue of agreed-upon illusions and false (deflectionary) issues. (See: Politicking & Pathocracy)

shenanigger - a Negro (neo-lawn-jockey) who carries out Step-n-Fetchit type activites/actions (shenanigans) for the dominant immoral majority (the psychopathic white power semi-organism), i.e., the Rhodes, Rothschild, Anglo Saxon Zionist power clique, unknowingly at the expense of him/herself and knowingly at the expense (sell-out/buy-out) of his people and culture. (See: McNegro, Coin-Operated, The Moteasuh Tribe, Sambo & SNigger).

PropaGandhi - passive social non-resistance propaganda. 2) obedience-based servitude to the enforcers of granfalloons uncommonly known as Corporate States and any other group-entities. Mahatma Gandhi mostly walked barefoot which produced calluses on his feet. He also had a very weird diet sprinkled with bouts of fasting which made him rather frail and suffer intermittently from halitosis—this made him... "A super callused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis." (See: Poser, Class, Mass, Racism White Supremacy, Gun Control & Caste).

White Cop-Actress Kim Potter Cries Waterless Tears During Court Performance [because that’s What Psychopaths Must Do to Get an Acquittal from a White Jury After Murdering a Black Person]

IM SO SUPER SORRY I GOT CAUGHT. BOOO FUCKING HOOOO. Testifying in front of the mostly white jurors who will decide her fate, white cop Kimberly Potter pretended to break down on Friday as she watched body camera video that captured her fatal shooting of a 20-year-old Black man during an encounter that began with a traffic stop over an air freshener. Dressed in a yellow cardigan and slumping forward in her witness chair with a frown she looked like a Pac-Man ghost. Fuck the police. [MORE]

LIKE THE COVID INJECTIONS, BLACK SKIN IS A LEADING CAUSE OF COINCIDENCES. Generally, white people treat each other humanely. Most racists, however, function as psychopaths in their relations with black people. In photo white cops suffering from psychopathic racial disorder cry on demand in court but without tears. And usually in front of overwhelmingly white juries: Kanas City cop Eric DeValkenaere last month on trial mudering Cameron Lamb, Miami cop Amber Guyger on trial for murdering Botham Jean, Chicago cop Jason Van Dyke (who used a napkin as an effective prop to wipe his dry face) on trial for murdering Laquan McDonald and Cincinnati cop Ray Tensing on trial for murdering Sam Dubose (partly covered his face and put his head down) in front of his overwhelming white jury during his fake trial in the lex-icon.

Dr. Bobby Wright explained, 'the psychopath is an individual who is constantly in conflict with other persons or groups. He is unable to experience guilt, is completely selfish and callous, and has a total disregard for the rights of others. psychopaths simply ignore the concept of right and wrong. By ignoring this trait in the white race (the lack of ethical and moral development) blacks have made and are still making a tragic mistake in basing the worldwide black liberation movement on moral suasion. It is pathological for blacks to keep attempting to use moral suasion on a people who have no morality where race is the variable.' Wright called this condition affecting whites the psychopathic racial personality [MORE]

Jury Reminds Us, the Right to be Left the Fuck Alone Can be Granted or Taken Away Anytime by Authorities in the Free Range Prison: White Liar La Mesa Cop Found Not Guilty of Lying to Detain Black Man

From [HERE] A former La Mesa police officer was acquitted Friday of a felony count of falsifying a police report in connection with his high- profile arrest of a young Black man near the Grossmont Transit Center last year.

Matthew Dages was accused of lying about the basis of his May 27, 2020, arrest of Amaurie Johnson, which sparked protests in the East County city when a video of the arrest went viral. [MORE]

To Obtain Mathematical Justice [revenge] Jury Recommends FLA Authorities to Murder Markeith Loyd b/c He Murdered an Orlando Cop. Plus Cops are Superior to Regular Human Beings in a Copitalist System

From [HERE] Markeith Loyd should be executed for killing Orlando police Lt. Debra Clayton, a jury unanimously recommended Wednesday.

The 12-member jury deliberated for about five hours over two days on whether Loyd should face the death penalty for Clayton’s slaying.

The same jury convicted Loyd of first-degree murder last month for fatally shooting Clayton when she tried to arrest him at the Walmart on Princeton Street Jan. 9, 2017, for killing his pregnant ex-girlfriend, Sade Dixon.

As the verdict was read, Clayton’s family members cried silently.

Loyd, 46, was removed from the courtroom after arguing with his attorneys and Circuit Judge Leticia Marques over when he will be sentenced and whether he will have another hearing to present additional evidence to the judge.

“I want to get sentenced today,” Loyd said.

“Mr. Loyd, I’m not going to do your sentencing today,” Marques told him.

“These people been trying to kill me,” Loyd said during his outburst. “Walmart never had to happen. I ain’t scared of nothing going on in this courtroom.”

Before deputies took him out of the courtroom, Loyd said, “Love y’all,” to his family members sitting in the gallery.

Loyd could only be sent to death row if jurors recommended it unanimously. Marques will decide later whether to follow the jury’s recommendation or sentence Loyd to life in prison. [MORE]

White Jurors See Inherent Differences btw Gun, Taser. Will they See Imaginary Differences btw White and Black People? If You Expect Justice in the Kim Potter Trial then you have Lost Your MF Mind

According to the criminal complaint the white cop-actress’ Black 9mm was in plain view on her body cam for at 4 seconds before she shot an unarmed Black man to death after an air freshener stop.

The complaint explains that a Special Agent McGinnis collected and reviewed the layout of Defendant’s duty belt. SSA McGinnis observed that Defendant’s handgun was holstered on the right side of the belt, set in a straight-draw position, requiring Defendant to use her right hand to draw the handgun. Defendant’s Taser was holstered on the left side of the belt, also set in a straight-draw position, requiring Defendant to use her left hand to draw her Taser. The Taser is yellow with a black grip, while the handgun is entirely black. Additionally, the texture of Defendant’s handgun has a distinct grip from that on her Taser. Defendant’s Taser is also equipped with a manual safety switch which the operator must physically disengage before the Taser can be discharged and with a laser-sighting feature, which causes a laser indicator to appear on target when the Taser is being aimed after the safety is disengaged. Defendant’s Glock handgun is not equipped with such features.

During her 26 years as a police officer, Defendant received a substantial amount of training, including training related to use of force and, specifically, to the use of Tasers and firearms. Defendant completed annual recertification training courses on each of these weapons. These courses included training on how to draw, aim, and use each weapon correctly. The training material for these courses also included notices alerting Defendant to the possibility and risks of drawing a handgun instead of a Taser.

In the six months before this incident, Defendant completed two Taser-specific training courses. For example, on March 2, 2021, Defendant attended a four-hour training course pertaining to the Taser. This course involved a classroom component, which provided detailed and substantive information concerning the function, proper use, and safety concerns associated with using Tasers; a practical component; and a written test. After this training, Defendant was certified for use of the Taser X7. On Defendant’s certificate of completion, Defendant provided her signature, acknowledging that she had read and understood the information and warnings provided by the manufacturer regarding safe use of the Taser. One of those warnings states: “Confusing a handgun with a CEW [Taser] could result in death or serious injury. Learn the differences in the physical feel and holstering characteristics between your CEW and your handgun to help avoid confusion” and instructs officers to “always follow your agency’s guidance and training.” In other prior Taser trainings completed by Defendant, including another on November 5, 2020, Defendant likewise signed paperwork acknowledging that she received, read, and understood identical warnings. [MORE]

OBEDIENT WHITE JURORS BELIEVE WHATEVER WHITE COPS TELL THEM TO BELIEVE ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE. From [HERE] Kim Potter was trained on policies as they evolved during her 26-year career and repeatedly signed documents acknowledging the policies, Brooklyn Center Police Commander Garett Flesland testified.

Potter, 49, is charged with manslaughter in Wright's death on April 11 after he was pulled over for having expired license plate tags and an air freshener dangling from his rear-view mirror. Video captured the moments when Wright pulled away from officers who were trying to arrest him on an outstanding warrant, with Potter shouting “I'll tase you!” and then shooting Wright with her handgun.

Prosecutors introduced several documents Tuesday that Flesland testified showed Potter's repeated certifications on Taser training, and her awareness of the warnings for their use — including a certification the month before Wright was shot.

Sgt. Mike Peterson, a use-of-force instructor with the department and certified Taser instructor, showed the jury how officers are supposed to run a “spark test” at the beginning of every shift to check whether their Tasers are working. He did so with his own device, which generated a loud buzz for five seconds as electricity arced across the electrodes. 

Sam McGinnis, a senior special agent with the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, testified Monday that Potter failed to run the test on her Taser on the day she shot Wright.

Peterson also walked the jury through the Brooklyn Center department’s training procedures for using Tasers as prosecutor Matthew Frank showed them pages from the manufacturer’s and the department's training materials that warn against the dangers of mixing up a Taser and a handgun. Frank also highlighted portions that say a Taser should not be used simply to stop fleeing suspects or on suspects who are operating vehicles.

Black People Not Wanted in Their Courtrooms. Blacks are Routinely Excluded from Juries and the 80% White Legal Profession: Alabama Suspends Black Judge Who Declared Death Penalty Unconstitutional

UNCIVILIZED ALABAMA HAS THE HIGHEST DEATH SENTENCING RATE IN THE US. ACCORDING TO THE EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE, EACH YEAR IN ALABAMA, NEARLY 65% OF ALL MURDERS INVOLVE BLACK VICTIMS, YET 80% OF THE PEOPLE CURRENTLY AWAITING EXECUTION IN ALABAMA WERE CONVICTED OF CRIMES IN WHICH THE VICTIMS WERE WHITE. ONLY 6% OF ALL MURDERS IN ALABAMA INVOLVE BLACK DEFENDANTS AND WHITE VICTIMS, BUT OVER 60% OF BLACK DEATH ROW PRISONERS HAVE BEEN SENTENCED FOR KILLING SOMEONE WHITE. ACCORDING TO DPIC, ALTHOUGH BLACKS MAKE UP 26% OF ALABAMA’S POPULATION, THEY ARE 51% OF ITS DEATH ROW.

From [HERE] The Alabama Court of the Judiciary has suspended for 90 days without pay a Black trial judge who declared the state’s death penalty statute unconstitutional and criticized appellate review of some death penalty cases as “ceremonial at best.” 

After a four-day trial, the disciplinary panel ruled on December 3, 2021 that Jefferson County Judge Tracie Todd had violated four canons of judicial ethics in connection with her conduct in death penalty cases. In an opinion that provided little explanation for how it reached its decision, the judiciary court admonished Todd for “repeatedly disregarding the law as set forth in decisions of the Alabama appellate courts”; “defying and disregarding orders and decisions of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals”; “making inappropriate statements regarding the Alabama judiciary, including … suggesting that the judiciary in Alabama is politically corrupt”; and “abandoning her role as a neutral arbiter and becoming an advocate for defendants, her own judicial rulings, and her personal opinions.” 

The panel also ruled that Todd had violated judicial ethics by placing a prosecutor who had attempted to recuse her under oath and questioning hm “regarding his contributions to her political opponent’s campaign in a matter in which such contributions were not at issue and were not raised by any party, thereby creating at least the appearance of impropriety.”

Todd’s lawyer did not indicate whether she will appeal the ruling.

In March 2016, Todd issued a ruling that barred Jefferson County prosecutors from seeking the death penalty in four cases and that declared the state’s death-penalty statute unconstitutional because it permitted judges to impose death sentences based on non-unanimous jury recommendations for death and to override jury votes for life. Her decision came in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s January 2016 ruling in Hurst v. Florida striking down Florida’s death penalty scheme on the grounds that it reserved the final authority to determine facts necessary to impose the death penalty to judges, rather than juries. 

Based on Hurst, courts in the only other states that had permitted judicial override — the Florida and Delaware Supreme Courts — declared the practice unconstitutional. The Alabama appeal courts reversed Todd’s ruling.

Todd noted in her decision that “Alabama has become a clear outlier” by permitting judges to impose death sentences by overriding jury votes for life. “Alabama is solitary in its unbridled system of allowing judges to deviate from jury advisory verdicts in order to effect life-to-death sentence overrides,” she wrote. Relying on Hurst, she said capital sentences in the state were “being imposed in a wholly unconstitutional manner.” 

THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS FOUND THAT THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS 80% WHITE. AMONG THE HIGHEST STATE COURTS THE JUDICIARY IS 83% WHITE. IN FACT THERE ARE NO BLACK JUSTICES IN 28 STATES, THERE ARE NO LATINO JUSTICES IN 40 STATES, THERE ARE NO ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICES IN 44 STATES AND THERE ARE NO NATIVE AMERICAN JUSTICES IN 47 STATES. [MORE] ANOTHER STUDY FOUND THAT THE STATE JUDICIARY AT ALL OTHER LOWER LEVELS IS ALSO 80% WHITE. [MORE]

FURTHERMORE, ACCORDING TO THE A RECENT STUDY AND THE ABA ONLY 5% OF ALL ATTORNEYS ARE BLACK. SAID NUMBER HAS REMAINED STEADY FROM 2009 - 2019. THE LEGAL PROFESSION IS NEARLY ALL WHITE: SPECIFICALLY, IT IS 85% WHITE, 5% BLACK, 5% LATINO, 2% ASIAN AMERICAN AND 1% NATIVE AMERICAN. [MORE] AND [MORE]

Todd echoed the dissenting opinions of U.S. Supreme Court justices John Paul Stevens and Sonia Sotomayor that the partisan nature of judicial elections inevitably influenced judicial actions and Alabama judges were more likely to override jury votes for life and impose death sentences in years they were up for election. Quoting Justice Sotomayor, she wrote, “Alabama judges have become ‘too responsive to a higher power’ and have ‘succumbed to electoral pressures.’” As a result, she said, “An appeal to the higher courts in Alabama on behalf of a capital defendant sentenced to death by judicial override is ceremonial at best.”

Todd also wrote that it was “an open secret” that judicial decisions to appoint counsel in death penalty cases were used to reward campaign contributions. “Alabama’s judiciary has unequivocally been hijacked by partisan interests and unlawful legislative neglect,” she said. 

Though Todd never used the term, the disciplinary court equated her comments with “suggesting that the judiciary in Alabama is politically corrupt.” It also sanctioned her for engaging in judicial analysis beyond the four corners of the arguments raised in the defendants’ challenge to Alabama’s statute, saying she had “engag[ed] in extrajudicial factual investigations, by making findings of fact regarding matters as to which no evidence was presented, and by inappropriately inserting legal issues not raised by the parties.”

Alabama’s Judicial Inquiry Commission suspended Todd with pay in April 2021, filing a 109-page complaintagainst her. The complaint alleged that her order barring prosecutors from seeking the death penalty constituted judicial overreach because her ruling applied only to death sentences imposed by judicial override, not cases in which juries recommended the death penalty. It further charged that she had abused judicial power by banning a Birmingham prosecutor from her courtroom, holding him in contempt of court, and accusing him of “unpredictable mood swings” and possible “mental instability.”

Todd also refused to recuse herself from other cases involving that prosecutor, asserting that the recusal motions had been filed in retaliation for her decision striking down the death penalty. “Historically, judges in Alabama who made unfavorable rulings against the interests of the power structure were threatened, ostracized and made subject of personal and political retaliation,” she wrote. She then attempted to remain on the cases after state appeals courts ordered her recused. 

The Court of the Judiciary ruled that the time she had been suspended as a result of the Judicial Inquiry Commission complaint would count toward her punishment for the ethics violation. The court reinstated her to the bench, effective December 6, 2021, without pay for 90 days. The court also assessed Todd the costs of the disciplinary proceedings.

ALA Removes a Black Judge who called another Judge "Uncle Tom" [she probably meant Sambo (a traitor to Black people, Yurugu's pawn) b/c Tom was Killed for withholding information]

From [the ABA] A Birmingham, Alabama, domestic relations judge has been removed from the bench based on findings that she used Facebook aliases to communicate with litigants and “engaged in a pattern of abuse of staff, attorneys and litigants.”

The Alabama Court of the Judiciary removed Judge Nakita Blocton of Jefferson County, Alabama, in a Dec. 10 order. She had been temporarily removed in May.

AL.com and the Associated Press have coverage of the decision, issued after a December trial.

The commission said Blocton made employees work unreasonable hours, repeatedly threatened to fire employees, and verbally abused and belittled one employee. She also called one employee a “heifer.”

The commission also found that Blocton had a pattern and practice of inappropriate comments. Examples included calling one judge an “Uncle Tom” and another judge a “fat b- - - -.”

The commission also said Blocton:

• Used several Facebook aliases to communicate with litigants in a pending domestic relations case in an effort to affect the outcome.

• Demanded employees’ work computer login information and ordered employees to show her their private cellphones, so any information related to the ethics investigation could be deleted.

• Failed to promptly dispose of many cases assigned to her, even though she spent a substantial amount of time at the office.

The court said the Judicial Inquiry Commission failed to prove that Blocton used or appeared to use drugs in an inappropriate manner, failed to prove that she is mentally unstable, and failed to prove that she made an inappropriate contribution to a mayoral candidate. The ethics complaint had alleged that Blocton used prescription pills, including the diet drug phentermine, which produced behavioral changes.

The commission said Blocton failed to upheld the integrity of the judiciary; failed to conduct herself in a way that promotes confidence in the integrity of the judiciary; failed to maintain the decorum befitting her office; failed to be patient, dignified and courteous; failed to promptly dispose of court business; and failed to diligently discharge her responsibilities.

Blocton is represented by Emory Anthony. He told AL.com and the AP that he hasn’t discussed the next step with Blocton, but she could choose to appeal.

“We were trying to keep her on the bench, and we were disappointed they removed her from the bench,” Anthony said.

Supreme Court Considers Whether People on Death Row Can Present New Evidence

From [HERE] The Supreme Court heard oral argument last Wednesday in a case that has important implications for people with death sentences across the country.

The case concerns the application of the Court’s 2012 decision in Martinez v. Ryan, which held that a person whose postconviction lawyer fails to adequately challenge their trial lawyer’s ineffective performance may raise the ineffectiveness claim for the first time in federal court.

Martinez provided a critical safeguard for people sentenced to death who did not receive adequate review of their claims in state postconviction proceedings.

In the cases of Barry Jones and David Ramirez—whose federal habeas lawyers discovered evidence of innocence, and of intellectual disability and childhood abuse, respectively, that their postconviction counsel failed to discover—a federal appellate court applied Martinez to allow the newly developed evidence to be considered by the federal court in deciding the claims that trial counsel was ineffective.

As a result, Mr. Jones was granted a new trial and Mr. Ramirez was granted an evidentiary hearing in federal court.

Arizona prosecutors appealed, arguing in the combined case of Shinn v. Ramirez that Martinez conflicts with the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), a federal law passed in 1996 that severely restricts incarcerated and death-sentenced people’s access to federal habeas corpus review.

Counsel for the State argued last week that the AEDPA bars a federal court from considering any evidence that was not presented in state court, even if Martinez allows the ineffectiveness claim to be raised in federal court.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts questioned the inherent conflict in Arizona’s position, with Justice Thomas noting that it would be “rather odd” to “excuse a default under Martinez, but not allow the prisoner to make his underlying claim or develop his evidence.”

Chief Justice Roberts likewise pressed the State, observing that in Martinez, the Court “obviously carefully crafted an opinion to give you the right to raise an ineffective assistance claim, to make sure it’s considered at least once.”

He continued: “[I]f you do get the right to raise the claim for the first time, because your counsel was incompetent before, surely you have the right to get the evidence that’s necessary to support your claim.”

Vermont AG requests information on Border Patrol use of Clearview AI facial recognition technology. Claims Children’s Facial Recognition Data is Collected and Sold

From [HERE] Vermont Attorney General T.J. Donovan Monday requested information about Border Patrol’s use of Clearview AI facial recognition technology in Vermont.

Clearview AI aims to support law enforcement and government agencies solve crimes “by revealing leads, insights, and relationships.” According to Clearview AI, its web-based intelligence platform “includes the largest known database of 10+ billion facial images sourced from public-only web sources, including news media, mugshot websites, public social media, and other open sources.”

Donovan requested the information in a letter sent to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Attorney General’s Office seeks to understand how the facial network will affect citizens’ rights to privacy and liberty. As such, the letter requests information regarding Clearview AI use at the Vermont-Canada border and in the state.

In March of 2020, Donovan filed suit against Clearview AI, alleging that the technology company violated Vermont’s Consumer Protection Act and Data Broker law. Donovan stated, “I am disturbed by this practice, particularly the practice of collecting and selling children’s facial recognition data.” He added: “This practice is unscrupulous, unethical, and contrary to public policy. I will continue to fight for the privacy of Vermonters, particularly our most vulnerable.”

Clearview AI’s data collection methods come under scrutiny before. Last month, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) imposed a penalty exceeding £17 million on Clearview AI for breaching data protection laws. The ICO conducted an investigation and reported that Clearview AI failed to comply with UK data protection laws by not processing or collecting data in a fair and lawful manner.

Similarly, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) and Privacy Commissioner
found that Clearview AI breached Australian privacy laws by failing to take reasonable steps to verify that it disclosed accurate personal information. Consequently, an Australian regulator ordered the technology company to stop collecting images and destroy previously collected data.

After Prolonged Fight with Local Prosecutors, Tennessee Attorney General Will Not Appeal Plea Deal Taking Abu-Ali Abdur’Rahman Off Death Row

From [HERE] More than 34 years after having been sentenced to death in Nashville, Abu-Ali Abdur’Rahman is coming off Tennessee’s death row. 

After a prolonged dispute between Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery III, and Davidson County reform District Attorney Glenn Funk, Slatery announced on December 10, 2021 that he would not appeal a November 11 plea deal that would resentence Abdur’Rahman to three consecutive life terms. Nashville Criminal Court Judge Monte Watkins approved the resentencing after accepting Funk’s stipulation that former Davidson County Assistant District Attorney John Zimmerman had unconstitutionally exercised his discretionary jury strikes to exclude Black prospective jurors from serving in Abdur’Rahman’s 1987 capital trial. Funk told the court that prosecution notes from Abdur’Rahman’s jury selection and comments Zimmerman made during a state-wide prosecutors’ training program in which he advocated race-based use of jury strikes amounted to a “smoking gun of racial bias” in the case. 

The plea deal, which had the support of the victims’ family members, was the second time that the county court had approved an agreement between local prosecutors and defense lawyers to remove Abdur’Rahman from the state’s death row. Under the deal, Abdur’Rahman admitted guilt on three charges — murder, attempted murder, and armed robbery — and waived his right to future appeals. 

Slatery had scuttled a prior 2019 plea agreement, arguing that Funk lacked the authority to modify Abdur’Rahman’s sentence without first obtaining a judicial determination that his conviction or death sentence had been unconstitutionally obtained. The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals agreed with Slatery’s argument, struck down the plea deal, and returned the case to Judge Watkins with directions on how to proceed.

In announcing his decision not to appeal the latest plea deal, Slatery took the opportunity to lob one last broadside at the district attorney. In a letter to Funk, Slatery wrote that “[m]y office has reviewed the court’s order, and we have significant concerns about its legality. Despite these concerns, we have decided not to appeal, in part, because we think it would be unfair to expose Mr. Abdur'Rahman to continued uncertainty about his sentence.” Slatery cautioned Funk that the “decision not to appeal should not be taken by you or anyone else as tacit approval of the order obtained or the positions you have taken.”

Prison Phone Companies, such as Securus, are Recording Attorney-Client Calls Across the US

From [HERE] Lawyers say their conversations with incarcerated people are being recorded and analyzed by private companies in at least nine US states (article available here(link is external)).

While such communications are ostensibly protected from surveillance under the Sixth Amendment (link is external) of the US Constitution and the Federal Wiretap Act(link is external), there had been little trust that prison telecommunications vendor Securus Technologies was properly distinguishing between personal calls—which incarcerated people are told are monitored—and private calls with attorneys. 

In a statement to the (link is external)Daily News(link is external), Securus claimed the issue was not widespread and that wrongfully recorded calls were prefaced with an automated message warning that the call was being recorded. Several defense attorneys said they weren’t aware the calls were recorded, however.

In at least seven other states, according to lawsuits that have been filed in California(link is external), Kansas(link is external), Louisiana(link is external), Maine(link is external), Missouri(link is external), Texas(link is external), and Wisconsin(link is external). Global Tel Link (GTL), another major prison telecommunications vendor, allegedly recorded phone calls with attorneys in Florida(link is external), California(link is external), and Maine(link is external). In some cases, it was discovered(link is external) that prosecutors had listened(link is external) to privileged communications.

Originally justified as a way of maintaining security within prisons and jails, personal call recordings are now frequently used by prosecutors(link is external) to build cases. Law enforcement also hasn’t shown much proof that recording calls has improved safety behind bars.

Another Death of a Black or Latino Person Held Pre-Trial at Rikers in Liberal NYC. A Federal Monitor found Rikers “trapped in a state of disrepair" and NY Jails “rife with violence and disorder"

From [HERE] A Brooklyn man being held at the Rikers Island jail complex died on Friday after a medical emergency — becoming the 15th person to die this year at a time when New York City’s correction system has been embroiled in a continuing crisis.

The man, Malcolm Boatwright, 28, had been at the Bellevue Hospital Center since Thursday after having seizures, correction and union officials said. He died early on Friday morning after cardiac arrest, though an official cause of death was still pending.

Mr. Boatwright, who had autism, had been detained for nearly a month on sexual abuse charges and related offenses, court records show. He had been ordered held on Rikers Island pending the results of a psychiatric exam that had been requested by his defense lawyer on the case, in which he had been accused of touching a 6-year-old boy’s genitals.

Officials have struggled to respond to converging crises — a pandemic and a staffing problem that has crippled the correction system. This has been the deadliest year in New York City jails since 2016.

His death comes just days after a federal monitor appointed to oversee reforms at the troubled jail complex wrote in his latest report that the Department of Correction was “trapped in a state of disrepair” with no sign of major improvement, calling it a system that is “rife with violence and disorder.”

Mr. Boatwright’s mother, Lashawn Boatwright, said that her son had the mind of an 11-year-old, but that he had been in good physical health when he entered Rikers.

During a phone conversation this week, Ms. Boatwright recounted, her son spoke cryptically about his experience at the jail. He said that he thought one correction officer disliked him and that a detainee had given him a “warning.” The next day, Mr. Boatwright told his mother he had hit his head.

“I said, ‘Malcolm, did somebody hit you?’ He brushed it off,” she said, adding that he said that he had had a seizure, though he had no history of them. He declined to give his mother additional details, noting that he did not trust the people around him.

While at Bellevue, Mr. Boatwright told his mother that he had been checked out and was being returned to the jail.

“He never made it,” she said.

An officer touring the hospital ward found Mr. Boatwright on the floor, and he appeared ill and unresponsive, said Joseph Russo, president of the union representing deputy wardens and assistant deputy wardens. The officer called for medical assistance, but Mr. Boatwright went into cardiac arrest, Mr. Russo said.

Mr. Boatwright had told his mother that the conditions in the jail, where he had been held since Nov. 12, were terrible.

“He was scared to take a shower,” she said, adding that he said other detainees had threatened him and thrown hot water, feces and urine on him.

Ms. Boatwright said that her son had proclaimed his innocence and planned on pleading not guilty to the latest charges.

Doctor Says Covid Injections Damage the immune system, Impairing the body’s ability to fight infection, viruses and disease. The Injections have Killed More People than Any Other Vaccine in History

From [HERE] Question– Does the Covid-19 vaccine damage the immune system?

Answer– It does. It impairs the body’s ability to fight infection, viruses and disease.

Question– If that’s true, then why haven’t more people died after getting vaccinated?

Answer– I’m not sure what you mean? The vaccine has killed more people than any vaccine in history. “So far, in the United States, the death toll is three times higher than the total of all vaccines in the last 35 years.” That’s simply astonishing. We’ve also seen a steady rise in all-cause mortality and excess deaths in the countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. Sometimes the increase is as much as 20 percent over the five-year average. That is a massive spike in fatalities, and it’s largely attributable to the vaccine. So, what do you mean when you say, “Why haven’t more people died”? Did you expect to see people clutching their hearts and dropping dead after getting jabbed? That’s a very naive understanding of how the injection works. (See: “COVID Deaths Before and After Vaccination Programs”, You Tube; 2 minutes)

Question– All I’m saying is that the percentage of people that have died is quite small compared to the tens of millions that have been vaccinated.

Answer– And all I’m saying is that if the vaccine is lab-generated pathogen– and I think it is– then it certainly was not designed to kill people on the spot. It was engineered to produce a delayed reaction that gradually but relentlessly erodes the health of the vaccinee. In other words, the full impact of the blood clots, bleeding, autoimmune issues and other vaccine-generated injuries will only be fully felt at a later date via increasing incidents of heart attacks, strokes, vascular illness and even cancer. (Check out the “latest trend of cardiac attendances by Scottish Ambulance Service – this is *excess* above the 2018/19 norm. Huge spike in summer, 500 ambulance calls per week above normal, mainly age 15-64. Was settling, then spike up again since late October.” Scottish Unity – Edinburgh Group)

Answer– The chart above shows why cardiac issues have garnered alot of attention lately, but the damage to the immune system is even more concerning.

Question– Can you explain what you mean without getting too technical?

Answer– I can do better than that. I can give you a short clip from an article that covers the latest research. Check it out:

“A Swedish lab study (titled “SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro“, NIH) released in mid-October found that the spike protein… enters the nucleus of cells and significantly interferes with DNA damage-repair functions compromising a person’s adaptive immunity and perhaps encouraging the formation of cancer cells….

“Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair,” they wrote. “Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.”(“Spike protein in COVID virus and shots weakens immune system, may be linked with cancer: Swedish study“, Lifesite News)

What the researchers found is that the spike protein blocks production of the enzymes that are needed to repair broken DNA which, in turn, prevents the “proliferation” of B and T cells that are needed to fight infection.

Question– Can you explain that in plain English?

Answer– Sure. It means the vaccine short-circuits your immune system which clears the way for infection, disease and an early death. Maybe, you think you can have a long and happy life with a dysfunctional immune system, but I think you’re wrong. The immune system is the shield that protects you from all-manner of potentially-lethal viruses, bacteria and infections. It is not just the first-line of defense, it’s the only line of defense. Absent the full protection of B and T cells to fight-off foreign intruders, the prospects for survival are miniscule at best.

In order to underscore that point, check out this video of British Funeral Director, John O’ Looney, who has provided regular updates on what he is seeing on the ground 10 months following the vaccination rollout. It’s a disturbing account of the catastrophe that is now unfolding before our eyes:

(30 second mark) “So what we’re seeing is an unnaturally large number of deaths due to heart attack, stroke, aneurism; and these are all the result of thrombosis … Embolisms in the lungs the legs, various places that are causing these deaths that are well documented by the local coroners and well-documented across the country. And no one seems to be concerned about the alarming rise of (blood clots) I’ve seen more in this year than in the last 14 years….

That’s one kind of death we’re seeing, the other kind is the people that are getting sick now as their immune systems finally give up. So, they’ve had the jabs maybe 6 or 8 months ago, and it’s been eating away at their immune system, and now they’re struggling to fight off things like the common cold. So, we’re in winter and there are colds and flus around and these people can’t fight them off. The government are very quick to label it “Omicron”…but they are sick with the common cold. Their immune systems are decimated. It’s much like a cancer patient, who goes through chemotherapy and it decimates their immune system. And they have to be very careful because the common cold or flu can kill them. And this is what we’re seeing now…

We’re nearly 12 months since the first jabs began, so their immune systems are falling apart; that is the reality and that’s what I’m seeing... and they can’t cope with a cold anymore. … When I went to the meeting in Westminster in September, the scientist predicted that this is what would happen and, lo-and-behold, that’s what happening. The people are getting sick and dying….. It’s frightening.” (“Omicron is ‘vaccine injury’; it’s nothing more than that.” John Looney, Rumble)

Is he right? Is the uptick in fatalities NOT another wave of Covid but the knock-on effects of a cytotoxic injection that targets the immune system leaving millions of people defenseless against routine infections and disease?

It sounds feasible and it certainly fits with the depopulation agenda which requires a hybrid biologic that doesn’t kill its target outright but basically dismantles the critical defense systems that make human survival possible. By disguising a “killer protein”
as a harmless antigen, our pandemic managers have been able to access the bloodstreams of millions of people allowing them to insert a ticking time-bomb that ravages crucial T and B-cell populations leaving victims vulnerable to whatever bug happens to be circulating in the population. As Looney notes, scientists warned of this very outcome when mass vaccination was first proposed. Naturally, opposing views were ignored and censored. Here’s more from a pre-print research paper on the medRxiv server. It helps to explain the vaccine’s impact on the immune system:

“Researchers in The Netherlands and Germany have warned that Pfizer-BioNTech’s … (COVID-19) vaccine induces complex reprogramming of innate immune responses that should be considered in the development and use of mRNA-based vaccines…. Following vaccination, innate immune cells had a reduced response to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), TLR7 and TLR8 – all ligands that play an important role in the immune response to viral infection….

“Multiple studies have shown that long-term innate immune responses can be either increased (trained immunity) or down-regulated (innate immune tolerance) after certain vaccines or infections.”…

These results collectively demonstrate that the effects of the BNT162b2 vaccine go beyond the adaptive immune system.. The BNT162b2 vaccine induces reprogramming of innate immune responses as well, and this needs to be taken into account.”…(“Research suggests Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reprograms innate immune responses”, New-Medical net)

How many people would have gotten vaccinated if they’d known it would reprogram their immune system?

Probably, no one, which is why our public health officials never broach the topic. Anything that veers even slightly from the “vaccines are good for you” narrative is omitted from mainstream coverage and erased on social media. But aren’t people entitled to know what’s going on, what is being injected into their bodies, and what impact it will have on their lives and health? Isn’t that what is meant by “informed consent” or is that another casualty of the rush to inoculate all 7 people on planet earth? Here’s a clip from a short interview with pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole:

“When we give these shots, we can see the types of white blood cells in the body… and you have a broad array of immune cells that work together to fight off viruses and keep cancers in check. We’re already seeing the signals in the laboratory of decreases in critically important T-cells you need… in your innate immune system. These are the Marines in your body; fighting off viruses fighting cancer…. But what we’re seeing in the laboratory after people get these shots, we’re seeing a very concerning locked-in, low profile of these important killer T-cells that you want in your body. (CD8 cells) And what they do, is keep all other viruses in check.

What am I seeing in the laboratory? I’m seeing an uptick of Herpes family viruses, I’m seeing Shingles, I’m seeing Mono, I’m seeing a huge uptick in human papilloma virus… We are literally weakening the immune systems of these individuals.

Most concerning of all, is there’s a pattern of these types of immune cells in the body that keep cancer in check. Since, January 1, (in the laboratory) I’ve seen a 20X increase of endometrial cancer over what I see on an annual basis.” (“Pathologist Ryan N Cole of the Mayo Clinic on What We Are Seeing In Lab Results”, Rumble; 2 minutes)

“Herpes, Shingles, Mono, and even cancer!” What the heck is going on? This can’t be true, can it?

Yes, it is true; immuno-suppression leads to all kinds of terrible health outcomes. Some readers might recall how Canadian vaccinologist Dr Byram Bridle made similar claims in an interview just a few weeks ago. Here’s what he said:

“What I’ve seen way too much of is people who had cancers that were in remission, or that were being well controlled; their cancers have gone completely out of control after getting this vaccine. And we know the vaccine causes a drop in T-cell numbers, and those T-cells are part of our immune system and they are part of the critical weapons our immune system has to fight off cancer cells; so there’s a potential mechanism there. All I can say, is I’ve had way too many people contact me with these reports for me to feel comfortable. I would say that is my newest major safety concern, and it’s also the one that’s going to be the most under-reported in the adverse data base, because if someone has had cancer before the vaccine, there’s no way public health officials will ever link it to the vaccine.” (“Dr Byram Bridle speaks”, Bitchute, :55 second-mark)

Once again, how many people would have decided to get vaccinated if they knew that it could trigger a flare-up of dormant viruses or cancers in remission? Who would take that risk?

But they don’t know they’re taking a risk, do they, because they haven’t been told the truth. And the reason they haven’t been told the truth is because they are a target in a war of extermination that is being waged on them. Sometimes it’s very hard for people to admit to what they know to be the truth, but the truth is plain to see. Our pandemic managers and their foot-soldiers in the media, public health and government want to do us harm, want to inject us with a mysterious substance that will wreak havoc on our immune systems and shorten our lives. This isn’t just a struggle for personal freedom or bodily autonomy, it’s a battle for survival. We are defending our right to live. Here’s more from Viral Immunologist Dr. Jessica Rose:

“There are studies coming out now, and there are ample signs in the adverse events data, that these products (Covid vaccines) are not only immuno-modulating the immune system and causing hyper inflammation; there are signs now that they are very negatively effecting CD8 T-cell populations. For those who don’t know, this is extremely bad news. It’s only on a few people so far, but the data does not look good so far. These T-cells are the so-called “killer cells”. Their job…is to kill virally infected cells that are showing foreign markers on their surface. So, if these populations are depleted, then that is very bad news, because we don’t have a population of cells in the acquired immune system to remove virally-infected cells.

There are clear signs that are starting to emerge, that there is an “immunity deficiency syndrome” coming about as a result of these products (vaccines) As a result of hyper-stimulation…T-cells being (diminished), and the ever-presence of repeated injections of a cytotoxic protein… I would never, ever recommend that someone who is immuno-compromised to ever go near these things, because I can almost guarantee you, that your condition is going to get worse. Another thing we’re seeing in VAERS is cancers coming out of remission and alot of doctors are reporting this on the ground. And–by the way– this has never happened before, not on this scale; not even close… So, there’s something going on here that warrants further investigation, and it doesn’t look good.” (“Viral Immunologist Dr. Jessica Rose explains the concerning information emerging about the compromised immunity of the vaccinated“, Odysee)

Can you see the pattern yet? Can you see how they’re all saying the same thing? Why is that, do you think?

It’s because it’s the truth, the pure, unvarnished truth.

The point we’re trying to make cannot be overstated: The vaccine is a man-made, lab-generated bioweapon that disables the body’s critical defense system which increases one’s susceptibility to disease by many orders of magnitude. With each additional injection, one is less capable of mounting a sufficient response to routine infections, flus or viruses. That’s going to lead to a tsunami of sickness that will likely overwhelm our public health system and plunge the country deeper into crisis. Is that the plan? Is that what our globalist overlords have in store for us?

We’ll see. Now check out this last clip from video by vaccinologist, Geert Vanden Bossche:

“The first thing I would like to highlight is that Covid-19 is not a disease of healthy people. People who are in good health have a healthy innate immune system that can deal with a number of respiratory viruses without any problem. These people are not only protected against the disease but can even–in many cases– prevent infection. These are people who can contribute to sterilizing immunity and to herd immunity which is very, very important. So, listen: Never, ever allow anyone or anything to interfere or suppress your innate immune system. You can do a bad job yourself by leading an unhealthy life, that is going to suppress your innate immunity, but even worse, is vaccine-induced antibodies that do suppress your innate immunity. And these vaccinal antibodies cannot substitute for it because they lose their efficacy against the virus, and become less and less effective. In contrast to the innate antibodies, they cannot prevent infection, they cannot sterilize the virus. Therefore, they do contribute to herd immunity….

If we suppress these innate antibodies in children, it could lead to autoimmune diseases. This is an absolute “No go” We cannot vaccinate our children with these vaccines. The suppression of innate immunity is already a problem among vaccinees, and they are, indeed, going to have a difficult time controlling a number of diseases, not just Covid-19, but other diseases too …and it will require a very dramatic change in the strategies to help the vaccinees–and my heart goes out to them–because they will need extensive treatment in many cases...

… Boosting them–which means giving them a third dose– is absolutely insane, because what it will do, is increase the immune pressure of the vaccinal antibodies, on their innate immunity. So boosting is absolute nonsense; it is dangerous and should not be done….

So, what does the science tell us? It tells us that it’s innate immunity that will protect us, not the vaccine.” (“Geert Vanden Bossche on Vaccines and the suppression of innate immunity”, Rumble)

So, we now know that– along with the blood clots, the bleeding, the heart attacks, the strokes, the vascular and neurological diseases– the vaccine is also designed to eviscerate the system that protects us from illness and death, the immune system. How steeped in denial one must be not to see the evil that is now among us.

Report from ICNARC in the UK Shows the Majority of Covid ICU Patients in October and November were Double Vaccinated

From [HERE] Contrary to the claims made by Dr. Rachel Clarke and Professor Stephen Powis last month and used to blame the unvaccinated for the mounting troubles of the NHS, new data out this week shows that the majority of Covid ICU admissions in October and November were among the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated.

The latest report from ICNARC shows that of Covid ICU patients in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 50.5% in October and 50.7% in November were double vaccinated. Add to that the 2.8% in October and 1.8% in November who were single-vaccinated and you get overall vaccinated proportions of 53.3% in October and 52.5% in November. That compares to 46.7% unvaccinated in October and 47.5% in November. Note that the unvaccinated here includes people who received a vaccine less than 14 days prior to the positive Covid test, so includes some (an unknown number) who are actually single vaccinated.

This is not what the public has been led to believe by some prominent medics and newspapers.

Two weeks ago, Professor Stephen Powis, the National Medical Director of NHS England, was quoted in the Sunday Times saying: “Data shows that the overwhelming majority of people admitted to intensive care with Covid are not fully vaccinated.” A source was not provided for this claim but the article implied that it meant right now, with an opening paragraph stating: “Hundreds of intensive care beds that could be used for life-saving surgery are instead occupied by unvaccinated Covid patients, one of NHS England’s top officials has said.”

The same day the Sunday Times also printed an article by Dr. Rachel Clarke with the subheading: “Some 75% of those suffocating in intensive care with the coronavirus are unvaccinated.” In it she states: “Of the Covid patients treated in intensive care in recent months, the majority – nearly 75% according to the latest data – have chosen not to be vaccinated.”

The Guardian published a piece in November headlined “ICU is full of the unvaccinated – my patience with them is wearing thin”, written by an anonymous medic who claimed that the ICU patient population “consists of a few vulnerable people with severe underlying health problems and a majority of fit, healthy, younger people unvaccinated by choice”.

Now that the data has been released it’s clear that the claim that ICUs are “full of” the unvaccinated is highly misleading. While the unvaccinated do currently appear to be over-represented (depending how many of them are misclassified), no one now can claim that ICUs are “full of” the unvaccinated or that the unvaccinated constitute the “overwhelming majority” of Covid ICU admissions. If you spot any newspapers still peddling this misinformation, particularly it if is being used to stigmatise and pressure the unvaccinated, you can complain to IPSO here.

Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS): Covid Injections are causing elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that may result in Death or Chronic Illness

From [HERE] If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested “booster” will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent?’

A Lancet study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people in Sweden was conducted among 1.6 million individuals over nine months. It showed that protection against symptomatic COVID-19 declined with time, such that by six months, some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.

Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated “immune erosion” or “acquired immune deficiency”, accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness.

COVID vaccines are not traditional vaccines. Rather, they cause cells to reproduce one portion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the spike protein. The vaccines thus induce the body to create spike proteins. A person only creates antibodies against this one limited portion (the spike protein) of the virus. This has several downstream deleterious effects.

First, these vaccines “mis-train” the immune system to recognize only a small part of the virus (the spike protein). Variants that differ, even slightly, in this protein are able to escape the narrow spectrum of antibodies created by the vaccines.

Second, the vaccines create “vaccine addicts,” meaning persons become dependent upon regular booster shots, because they have been “vaccinated” only against a tiny portion of a mutating virus. Australian Health Minister Dr. Kerry Chant has stated that COVID will be with us foreverand people will “have to get used to” taking endless vaccines. “This will be a regular cycle of vaccination and revaccination.”

Third, the vaccines do not prevent infection in the nose and upper airways, and vaccinated individuals have been shown to have much higher viral loads in these regions. This leads to the vaccinated becoming “super-spreaders” as they carry extremely high viral loads.

In addition, the vaccinated become more clinically ill than the unvaccinated. Scotland reported that the infection fatality rate in the vaccinated is 3.3 times the unvaccinated, and the risk of death if hospitalized is 2.15 times the unvaccinated.

A June report on Israel’s Channel 12 News revealed that in the months since the vaccines were rolled out, 6,765 people who received both shots had contracted coronavirus, while epidemiological tracing revealed an additional 3,133 people contracted COVID-19 from those vaccinatedindividuals.

Meanwhile, New England Journal of Medicine researchers have found that autoimmune response to the coronavirus spike protein may last indefinitely: “Ab2 antibodies binding to the original receptor on normal cells therefore have the potential to mediate profound effects on the cell that could result in pathologic changes, particularly in the long term — long after the original antigen itself has disappeared.” These antibodies produced against the coronavirus spike protein could be responsible for the current unprecedented wave of myocarditis and neurological illnesses, and even more problems in the future.

Indefinite uncontrolled autoimmune response to the coronavirus spike protein may produce a wave of antibodies called anti-idiotype antibodies or Ab2s that continue to damage human bodies long after clearing either Sars-Cov-2 itself or those spike proteins that the shots cause the body’s cells to produce, explained former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson.

Spike protein antibodies may themselves produce a second wave of antibodies, called anti-idiotype antibodies or Ab2s. Those Ab2s may modulate the immune system’s initial response by binding with and destroying the first wave of antibodies.

“Our immune systems produce these antibodies in response to both vaccination and natural infection with COVID,” wrote Berenson. “However – though the researchers do not say so explicitly, possibly because doing so would be politically untenable – spike protein antibody levels are MUCH higher following vaccination than infection. Thus the downstream response to vaccination may be more severe.”

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Chief Science Officer former Pfizer Vice President Michael Yeadon responded to the research: “This is unprecedented. What is happening is not understood.

“Commentators on Israeli TV have reported that contacts in the Health Ministry have termed this ‘immune erosion’:

“While some are concerned that blood IgG antibodies fall with time, I am not convinced that this is a relevant measure,” Yeadon continued. “Respiratory virus infection begins in the lungs and nasopharynx. Neither are protected by blood antibodies, which are molecules too large to diffuse into airways tissue. What protects against infection and initial viral replication is secretory IgA antibodies and T-cells in airways, neither of which have been studied in any efficacy trial.

“The empirical data are very worrying. In most countries now, high fractions of the population have been vaccinated. If the Swedish study is a guide, we should anticipate seeing this immune erosion more widely. The most concerning aspect of that study is that those most in need of protection are those in whom immune erosion is most marked: the elderly, males, and those with comorbidities.

“Some have used the results of this study to support the widespread use of so-called ‘booster’ shots. It has to be said: No one has any safety data about such a plan. If immune erosion occurs after two doses and just a few months, how can we exclude the possibility that effects of an untested ‘booster’ will not erode more rapidly and to a greater extent? And what then would be the response? A fourth injection. Madness.

“It’s long past time when known safe and effective drug treatments be used as the leading response to symptomatic infection (antivirals, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatories).

“In this way, we don’t expose entire populations to experimental medical interventions when only a very small fraction of the population are at notable risk from this virus, which, all hype aside, is by no means exceptional in its lethality compared with numerous others such as seasonal influenza.”

Yeadon concluded:

“Europe is all but gone. The lights are going out. Austria and Germany now subject their unvaccinated to house arrest. In Greece, the unvaccinated are subject to escalating fines, non-payment of which is converted into prison time. In Lithuania, the unvaccinated are excluded from society. The booster campaigns are running full-pelt everywhere.

“Someone, somewhere knows what’s going to happen. Will immunity-erosion worsen more speedily and to a greater extent after this untested ‘booster’? The U.K. government has already said that the fourth injection is to take place a mere three months after the third. It’s utter madness. Yet such is the hermetic control of media that nothing much emerges into the public consciousness.”

Massachusetts Covid “breakthrough cases" surge 11,321 last week, smashing record high for the state

From [HERE] More than 11,000 fully vaccinated people in the Bay State tested positive for coronavirus last week as part of the post-Thanksgiving surge, a daily average of about 1,617 people as breakthrough infections hit a record high in the state.

The count of 11,321 breakthrough cases last week was a 71% spike from the tally of 6,610 breakthrough infections in the prior week.

Breakthrough cases in Massachusetts have been making up about 40% of the state’s overall cases in recent months amid the more highly contagious delta variant.

Overall case counts in the state have been spiking in the last few weeks, and breakthrough infections are following that surging trend as the vaccine’s effectiveness wanes after six months. Officials are urging people to get a booster shot as soon as possible.

Overall, 88,968 fully vaxxed people have tested positive for the virus, according to new data from the state Department of Public Health on Tuesday. That’s 1.8% of the more than 4.9 million fully vaxxed people in Massachusetts.

The 88,968 overall cases is a jump of 11,321 breakthrough infections from last week — or a daily average of 1,617 fully vaccinated people testing positive.

Last Tuesday’s report had showed an increase of 6,610 breakthrough cases, a daily rate of 944 fully vaxxed people testing positive.

The week before that was a rise of 6,917 infections — a daily average of 988.

The previous week’s count was 5,313 cases, a daily rate of 759.

Breakthrough hospitalizations have been accounting for about 35% of current COVID-19 hospitalizations. Those who are unvaccinated are at a much higher risk for a severe case and hospitalization.

There have been 2,716 hospitalizations among fully vaccinated people in Massachusetts, which represents 0.05% of those who are fully vaxxed.

The 2,716 total patients is a one-week increase of 273 fully vaxxed patients. That’s way up from the previous weekly increase of 158 fully vaxxed patients. The week before that was 205 fully vaxxed patients.

The state has reported 647 breakthrough deaths, or 0.01% of those who are fully vaxxed. That’s a one-week increase of 61 deaths — up from the previous weekly increase of 34 deaths. The week before that was 43 deaths.

Scientific Study Concludes 5G May Exacerbate COVID by Weakening Immunity