Gun Control? Ohio Deputy Charged with Murdering Casey Goodson. White Cop Executed Black Man Walking into His Own Home Holding a Bag of Subway Sandwiches. Shot 5X in the Back, Hadn't Committed a Crime

/

ACCORDING TO THE CIVIL COMPLAINT; “Photograph A” – Bullet holes in metal screen door
“Photograph B” – Casey’s keys in the wooden side door “Photograph C” – Sandwiches on the kitchen floor where they fell when Meade shot Casey .

From [HERE] The white Ohio sheriff’s deputy who shot Casey Goodson Jr. in the back five times was charged with murder Thursday, as Goodson’s family also filed a federal civil rights lawsuit and the now-retired deputy publicly shared details of what happened from his perspective for the first time [read that elsewhere].

Casey had just left an appointment at the dentist’s office and was bringing lunch back to his grandmother’s house when Jason Meade shot him six times from behind, killing him. Meade’s lawyer says the deputy fired when Goodson pointed a gun at him. Goodson’s family has said he was holding a sandwich, not a gun.

The case remains under criminal investigation by the U.S. attorney’s office with help from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.

The December 2020 shooting of Goodson, who was Black, by longtime deputy Jason Meade, who is white, led to protests in Columbus and many lingering questions, in part because the killing wasn’t recorded on body or dash camera footage.

According to the complaint, “Jason Meade was a violent deputy who had a history of violating established departmental policy regarding the use of force.

Prior to starting with the Franklin County Sheriff’s Office, Meade spent almost three years in the US Marine Corps where his primary specialty was as a Machine Gunner. He also received his expert rifle badge. When attempting to become a Franklin County Sheriff’s deputy, his military experience was touted as something that would help him in his career as an officer despite his “very little work-related experience” and the fact that the interviewers believed he would “need considerable training”. One interviewer highlighted that he had taken “very few courses related to this position.” The Franklin County Sheriff’s Office failed to provide necessary and considerable training and supervision to Meade, and failed to investigate any potential issues related to his military service. “

The complaint states in relevant part,

“a group of officers tasked to the U.S. Marshals were in the neighborhood to arrest someone that was not Casey and was in no way affiliated with Casey. Jason Meade was working with the task force as a member of their Southern Ohio Fugitive Apprehension Strike Team (SOFAST) and as a member of their District Fugitive Task Force (DTF). The U.S. Marshals were heavily armed, and Jason Meade was not in uniform and was carrying a rifle.

The SOFAST and DTF did not find their target, however the target’s sister did encounter Meade when he and his colleagues raided her home. As she stated in a Facebook post, “#JasonMeade was already on bullshit before he left my house. Knowing I wasn’t dressed busted in my room knowing I was naked and we had a brief argument as he felt I had ‘plenty of time’ to get dressed. They were aware my brother was AT WORK. Truth be told, they shouldn’t have been on this street PERIOD. It was as simple as communicating with the parties involved.” The sister also later described Meade as a ticking time bomb who was extremely angry and aggressive when inside of her home.

The mission of SOFAST and DTF ended without apprehending their target, and the members of the team began to disperse.

Around this time, Casey had finished his appointment at the dentist. After leaving, Casey went to Subway to buy sandwiches for his family.

As Casey was returning home from Subway, upon information and belief, Jason Meade saw Casey and followed Casey back to his home.

Upon information and belief, Casey arrived home, parked, and exited his vehicle. He grabbed the bag of subway sandwiches, and began walking toward the side of the house to enter through the side door.

Casey was not committing any crime, was not suspected of committing any crime and did not present any threat to Meade or anyone else. He was simply attempting to enter his own home.

Jason Meade—armed with a rifle— targeted and hunted Casey, following him as Casey proceeded towards his house.

Casey proceeded to enter the side door of the house. The side door of the house is comprised of an exterior door with a metal-screen, and a wooden interior door with a lock. Casey opened the exterior door and used his keys to unlock the wooden door. As Casey unlocked the wooden door, Jason Meade opened fire. Casey was entering through the door when Jason Meade shot him to death.

Meade fired six bullets into Casey’s body with his rifle. Two bullets pierced Casey’s back, ripping through his body, bullet’s trajectory exiting through his chest, next to his heart.

Another bullet pierced Casey’s back, about six inches from where the first and second bullet pierced his body, exiting directly left to his chest.

Meade fired another bullet into Casey’s left-lower-back. Unlike Jason Meade’s first, second, and third bullet, the fourth bullet did not rip through Casey’s body. Instead, it blew a chunk of flesh off of Casey’s body.

Meade fired another bullet into Casey’s lower-right-back, ripped through Casey’s body up to Casey’s chest.

A sixth bullet entered Casey’s right buttock and remained lodged directly above his hip bone. At least three of the bullets flew through the metal screen, shattering the glass contained within the door.

Wound mapping provided Bauer Forensics demonstrates that Meade shot Casey all six times while Casey was facing away from him, entering his home.

Nine members of Casey’s family were in the house at that time but did not know that Meade was nearby. They did not hear any alleged orders or commands from Meade.

When Casey’s family heard gunshots and the glass in the metal screen door shattering, they ran toward the door to see what was happening. There, Casey’s family members observed Casey lying on the kitchen floor, bleeding to death.

While still in the house, an officer pointed his rifle at Tamala’s brother, who was holding his three-year old daughter and commanded them to “get out of the house before [he] shoots them too.”

Casey’s grandmother suffered a stroke that night, which caused her to fall and injure her head in her own home—the same place where Jason Meade shot her grandson in the back six times.

This shooting was unjustified, objectively unreasonable, and constituted excessive force, in violation of Casey’s constitutional rights.

In the criminal case a judge scheduled an initial hearing Friday for Meade, who will plead not guilty, Collins said.

Only Cops/Criminals Should Have Guns? Lathered-Up Puppetician Makes PropaGandi Speech About Gun Control the Same Day a Cop Executed a Man in a Wheelchair, Shot 9X in the Back, suspected shoplifter

/

ONLY COPS AND CROOKS SHOULD HAVE GUNS, JUST LIKE THE CONSTITUTION SAYS. Contrary to indoctrination from freedumb advocates, the 2nd Amendment is not for primarily for hunting animals or for self-defense from thugs trying to break into your house. Rather, it exists for when all other rights have failed. An armed population is necessary to check authority and tyranny. [MORE]

From [HERE] Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy (Conn.) condemned his anti-abortion Republican colleagues on Tuesday following several speeches that were given on the Senate floor against abortions, accusing them of hypocrisy in light of the fatal school shooting at Oxford High School in Michigan.

Murphy wrote on Twitter that he had been driving home, but then thought of the speeches on the "sanctity of life" that Republicans had given on Tuesday. Numerous Republican lawmakers gave speeches condemning abortion in anticipation of the Supreme Court hearing oral arguments in a case that could potentially overturn Roe v. Wade.

"This concern for 'life' apparently doesn't extend to the kids who were shot today in a school in Michigan," wrote Murphy. "So I turned the car around, and went to the Senate floor." Three people, all believed to be students at Oxford High School, were killed in the shooting and at least eight others were injured. The suspect, a 15-year-old sophomore, has been apprehended. [MORE] The guns involved in said alleged tragedy were apparently purchased lawfully by the child’s parents. The child possessed the gun unlawfully at school.

Meanwhile the Tucson Police Department moved swiftly on Tuesday to fire a police officer after he fatally shot a man in a motorized wheelchair who was suspected of stealing a toolbox from a Walmart and flashing a knife when challenged.

Police bodycam video shows an officer pursuing the suspect and yelling, “Do not go into the store, sir,” as the man, identified as Richard Lee Richards, 61, continued to the entrance of a Lowe’s Home Improvement store on Monday night. The officer, Ryan Remington, fired nine shots and hit the man in the back and side, the police said, causing Mr. Richards to hunch over and fall in front of a display of pink and red flowers.

A store surveillance video shows Officer Remington placing handcuffs on a motionless Mr. Richards.

Coincidence Theory? Another White Jury is Chosen for a White Defendant Accused of Murdering a Black Man. Trial Starts for Cop who Acted Like She Killed Daunte Wright by Mistake After Air Freshner Stop

/

BLACKS ARE UNFIT FOR CITIZENSHIP. IT ALWAYS SOUNDS REASONABLE WHEN ATTORNEYS AND DEPENDENT MEDIA ALWAYS EXPLAIN WHY THERE ARE NO BLACKS ON THE JURY. BLACKS ARE RARELY CHOSEN TO SIT ON JURIES. IN FACT, Black people have been excluded from jury service since America’s founding. BUT ITS ALWAYS JUST COINCIDENCE and has nothing to do with the system of racism white supremacy, a system that most white people participate in. According to FUNKTIONARY:

coincidence theories - the naive belief that problems (and solutions to them) happen spontaneously, that nothing is ever foreseen, plotted, planned or conspired through collusion by the wealthy and powerful. (See: Pathocracy, Fronts, Predictive Planning, Conspiracy Theories, Laws, Lawyers, Technetronic Age, WARS & Council on Foreign Relations)

THERE ARE ONLY A FEW WAYS THAT AMERICANS CAN MEANINGFULLY EXERCISE THEIR CITIZENSHIP; ENLISTING IN THE MILITARY, RUNNING FOR NATIONAL OFFICE, VOTING AND SERVING ON A JURY. LIKE VOTING, JURY SERVICE IS A BASIC RIGHT OF CITIZENSHIP THAT IS AN ILLUSORY FOR BLACK CITIZENS. [MORE]

Cop for 26 Yrs Knew Taser was Yellow (not Black), was on Belt's Left Side (not right) and Had a Safety Switch. From [HERE] and [FTP] A mostly white jury was seated Friday for the trial of a white Minneapolis police officer charged in Daunte Wright’s shooting death, and opening statements were scheduled to begin Wednesday.

Kim Potter, 49, is charged with first- and second-degree manslaughter in the April 11 shooting of Wright, a 20-year-old Black motorist, following a traffic stop in the suburb of Brooklyn Center.

The last two jurors, both alternates, were quickly seated Friday morning.

Nine of the first 12 jurors seated — the ones who will deliberate if no alternates are needed — are white, with one juror identifying as Black and two as Asian. It’s evenly split between men and women. Demographic information of the two alternates was not immediately released by the court.

According to the criminal complaint:

It states

On April 11, 2021, around 1:53 p.m., Brooklyn Center Police Officer Anthony Luckey and his Field Training Officer, Defendant KIMBERLY ANN POTTER (DOB: 06/18/1972) conducted a traffic stop on a white Buick bearing Minnesota license plate 841UBY near 63rd Avenue North and Orchard Avenue North in Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Officer Luckey identified the driver as Daunte Demetrius Wright. There was also an adult female passenger in the front passenger seat. Officer Luckey informed Mr. Wright that the officers stopped him because the vehicle had an air freshener hanging from the rearview mirror and the tabs on the Buick were expired. Officer Luckey returned to his squad car to conduct a record check for Mr. Wright, during which he learned that Mr. Wright had an outstanding arrest warrant for a gross misdemeanor weapons violation. As Officer Luckey ran these checks, Sergeant Mychal Johnson arrived to assist the officers. Officer Luckey and Defendant then re-approached the driver’s side of the Buick to arrest Mr. Wright on the warrant. Sergeant Johnson approached the passenger side of the vehicle.

According to time stamped BWC footage, at 2:01:11 p.m., Officer Luckey asked Mr. Wright to step out of the vehicle. Mr. Wright opened the door of the Buick at 2:01:22 p.m. and got out of the Buick at 2:01:30 p.m. At 2:01:31, Officer Luckey asked Mr. Wright to turn around and place his hands behind his back. Mr. Wright did so. Officer Luckey then began attempting to handcuff Mr. Wright. At 2:01:36 p.m., Sergeant Johnson told Mr. Wright that he was under arrest and at 2:01:39 p.m., Defendant added that Mr. Wright had a warrant.

At 2:01:43 p.m., Officer Luckey told Mr. Wright not to tense up. At that time, Officer Luckey and Mr. Wright were standing near the open driver’s side door of the Buick. Defendant was standing behind and to the right of Officer Luckey. Defendant walked up to Mr. Wright at 2:01:45 p.m. and, at 2:01:48 p.m., took a piece of paper from Mr. Wright’s hand using her left hand. Defendant immediately transferred the paper to her right hand. At 2:01:49 p.m., Mr. Wright pulled away from Officer Luckey and got back into the driver’s compartment of the Buick. Officer Luckey maintained a grip on Mr. Wright, to keep physical control of him so as to pull Mr. Wright back out of the Buick. Sergeant Johnson, who was on the other side of the vehicle, leaned inside the Buick through the passenger door.

At 2:01:55 p.m., Defendant stated, “I’ll tase ya,” and simultaneously moved the piece of paper she was holding from her right hand to her left hand. One second later, at 2:01:56 p.m., Defendant’s right hand, holding her department-issued Glock 9mm handgun, came into view of her BWC. Defendant pointed her handgun at Mr. Wright and tracked with Mr. Wright’s movements as he and Officer Luckey continued moving. Defendant again announced, “I’ll tase you,” at 2:01:58 p.m. and continued pointing her handgun at Mr. Wright.

At 2:02:00 p.m., Defendant said, “Taser, Taser, Taser.” Sergeant Johnson and Officer Luckey both immediately began disengaging from Mr. Wright. One second later, at 02:02:01 p.m., Defendant pulled the trigger and discharged her handgun one time, firing a single round of ammunition. The bullet entered the left side of Mr. Wright’s chest and sequentially perforated the left 6th rib and 5th intercostal muscles, left lung, pericardium, heart, pericardium once again, right lung, and right 4th intercostal muscles before partially exiting the right chest wall, perforating the skin, and becoming lodged in the right side of Mr. Wright’s chest. When she fired the handgun, Defendant was standing outside the driver’s side door and in close proximity to Officer Luckey. Defendant’s handgun was just inches below Officer Luckey’s arm pointing into the driver’s compartment of the Buick, in the direction of Mr. Wright, the passenger, and Sergeant Johnson. Defendant fired her handgun close to Officer Luckey’s face, and the discharged cartridge casing from Defendant’s handgun appeared to strike Officer Luckey in the face as it was ejected. At 2:02:02 p.m., Mr. Wright said, “Ah, he shot me.” The Buick then traveled short distance down the street, where it crashed into another vehicle. Defendant stated at 2:02:03 p.m., “Shit!” and at 2:02:05 p.m., “I just shot him.” Another officer asked, “you did?” and Defendant responded, “yes.” At 2:02:09 p.m., Defendant stated, “I grabbed the wrong fucking gun,” and repeated again, “I shot him.” At 2:03:09 p.m., Defendant stated, “I’m going to go to prison.” At 2:07:27, Defendant stated, “I killed a boy.” Other officers and paramedics responded. Medical personnel were unable to revive Mr. Wright and Mr. Wright was pronounced dead on scene at 2:18 p.m. Assistant Hennepin County Medical Examiner Dr. Lorren Jackson later conducted an autopsy and determined Mr. Wright’s cause of death to be a gunshot wound and deemed the manner of death a homicide.

SSA McGinnis later collected and reviewed the layout of Defendant’s duty belt. SSA McGinnis observed that Defendant’s handgun was holstered on the right side of the belt, set in a straight-draw position, requiring Defendant to use her right hand to draw the handgun. Defendant’s Taser was holstered on the left side of the belt, also set in a straight-draw position, requiring Defendant to use her left hand to draw her Taser. The Taser is yellow with a black grip, while the handgun is entirely black. Additionally, the texture of Defendant’s handgun has a distinct grip from that on her Taser. Defendant’s Taser is also equipped with a manual safety switch which the operator must physically disengage before the Taser can be discharged and with a laser-sighting feature, which causes a laser indicator to appear on target when the Taser is being aimed after the safety is disengaged. Defendant’s Glock handgun is not equipped with such features.

During her 26 years as a police officer, Defendant received a substantial amount of training, including training related to use of force and, specifically, to the use of Tasers and firearms. Defendant completed annual recertification training courses on each of these weapons. These courses included training on how to draw, aim, and use each weapon correctly. The training material for these courses also included notices alerting Defendant to the possibility and risks of drawing a handgun instead of a Taser.

In the six months before this incident, Defendant completed two Taser-specific training courses. For example, on March 2, 2021, Defendant attended a four-hour training course pertaining to the Taser. This course involved a classroom component, which provided detailed and substantive information concerning the function, proper use, and safety concerns associated with using Tasers; a practical component; and a written test. After this training, Defendant was certified for use of the Taser X7. On Defendant’s certificate of completion, Defendant provided her signature, acknowledging that she had read and understood the information and warnings provided by the manufacturer regarding safe use of the Taser. One of those warnings states: “Confusing a handgun with a CEW [Taser] could result in death or serious injury. Learn the differences in the physical feel and holstering characteristics between your CEW and your handgun to help avoid confusion” and instructs officers to “always follow your agency’s guidance and training.” In other prior Taser trainings completed by Defendant, including another on November 5, 2020, Defendant likewise signed paperwork acknowledging that she received, read, and understood identical warnings. [MORE]

Another Black Person's Case Closed w/o a Trial as Judge Dismisses the Danquirs Franklin Suit. White NC Cops Put on a Show for the Bodycamera and Acted Like They Were in Danger to Justify Murdering Him

/

From [HERE] A federal judge has dismissed the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of Danquirs Franklin, who was shot and killed in a Burger King parking lot by a CMPD officer in 2019.

Franklin’s mother filed the lawsuit against the City of Charlotte and the officer who shot him.

CMPD Officer Wende Kerl shot and killed Franklin on March 25, 2019, in the parking lot of the Burger King on Beatties Ford Road after responding to a 911 call.

Franklin’s mother, the representative of Franklin’s estate, subsequently filed a lawsuit against Officer Kerl and the City of Charlotte, raising federal constitutional and state tort claims.

United States District Judge Graham C. Mullen (also white) issued the ruling Friday, giving reasons why the case was being dismissed. The following statement was a part of Friday’s ruling:

“Given the gift of hindsight, it seems likely that Officer Kerl made a mistake in shooting Danquirs Franklin. Franklin appeared to be complying with the CMPD officers’ orders to “drop the gun” when he took the pistol out of his jacket pocket. Video shows that he was holding the slide of the pistol, not the grip. And Franklin’s incredulous last words—”You told me to”—seem to confirm his intentions nearly beyond doubt. But because a court must not judge with the “20/20 vision of hindsight,” Graham, 490 U.S. at 396, the question is whether Officer Kerl’s mistake in shooting Franklin was reasonable. The answer is yes.”

In other words the white judge believed the white cop artist’s body cam performance. To persons not so afflicted with the mind virus [here, racism] it looked like bad theater; white cops murdered him because they could.

Franklin is seen in the footage squatting in front of an open car door while Kerl and another white officer shout: “Drop the gun. Drop it. Drop it now.” The cops appear to be super hyped up and overly dramatic bringing chaos to the scene.

Franklin’s firearm is not visible at first. Then, he slowly moves his right hand to his pocket and appears to take out a gun in order to put it down. It was never pointed at the police and he was following their commands. Nevertheless, Kerl fires multiple times.

“You told me to,” Franklin said, looking up, before collapsing on the floor.

The video cuts off seconds later, after he slumps over.

The district attorney, Spencer B. Merriweather, the first black DA in Mecklenburg County decided not to file charges last August, saying he didn't think he could prove to a jury that "Officer Kerl's belief that she faced an imminent threat of death of great bodily harm was unreasonable" and he didn’t want to disturb his white masters.

Fed Judge Halts the Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers. The Court Cited the Govt's "Puzzling” Rejection of Natural Immunity as a Reasonable Alternative to the Vax as a Basis to Issue Injunction

/

From [HERE] Judge Terry Douglas of the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Tuesday blocked a federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for US health care workers. This nationwide injunction halts the mandate, pending a full judicial review of the mandate’s legality.

The court found that the government would not be able defend the order, considering the amount of time that it took to initiate the order and the lack of consultation with members of affected communities. The court noted concerns about the loss of healthcare workers who could potentially quit over the vaccine mandate. The court further noted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service’s “puzzling” rejection of “natural immunity” as a reasonable alternative to the vaccine among the reasons for issuing the injunction.

The injunction follows a Missouri district court decision to block the mandate in 10 states that was granted Monday. District Judge Matthew Schelp likewise noted legal barriers needed to be addressed before the order could be upheld. Judge Schelp similarly included the lack of jurisdictional authority and the lack of notice, and emphasized the lack of “reasonable” explanations for the mandate to the list of concerns.

The order affects over 10 million healthcare workers across the country. The reason for the mandate, as quoted in Judge Douglas’ decision, was to “protect the health and safety of individuals providing and receiving care and services . . . and [under] CMS’s broad authority to establish health and safety regulations, we are compelled to require staff vaccinations for COVIS-19 in these settings.”

The standard for preliminary injunctions includes the demonstration of the substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the case, that there is a likelihood to suffer irreparable harm, that the balance of equities tips in the plaintiff’s favor, and that an injunction is in the public’s interest.

SA Doctor: The Goal of the Vax is Depopulation/Control. It Produces Spike Protein which Poisons the Body, Exacerbates Illness and will Cause Diverse Kinds of Deaths in Billions of People Over Time

/

(Natural News) Dr. Shankara Chetty, a South African family doctor who is credited with improving early treatment for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), says that the goal of the mass “vaccination” program is to “control and kill off a large proportion of our population without anyone suspecting that we were poisoned.”

In a recent statement, Dr. Chetty explained that the dying process provoked by the injections was designed in such a way as to be untraceable. People will start to get sick from this or that, and the symptoms will be so wide ranging that it will be difficult to definitively peg them on the shots.

“The deaths that are meant to follow the vaccinations will never be able to be pinned on the poison,” he said. “They will be too diverse, there will be too many, and they will be in too broad a timeframe for us to understand that we have been poisoned.”

Dr. Chetty claims to have successfully treated more than 7,000 Chinese Virus patients “without a single hospitalization or death.” He is also keenly aware of the government’s censorship campaign against the early treatment protocols he provides to his patients.

“I think the perspective around what is happening is vitally important,” Dr. Chetty explained during a Zoom conference call. “We need to understand what the aim is. Everyone knows that there are inconsistencies, that there’s coercion, but we need to understand why. Why is it there?”

Jab spike protein is the “pathogen … causing all the death in covid illness”

In Dr. Chetty’s view, there is one thing that appears to be causing all of the deaths attributed to covid, and that thing is the spike protein.

This “pathogen,” as he describes it, is either found in (Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca) or produced by (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna) the so-called “vaccines.” And it is this pathogen that will eventually kill off millions, if not billions, of people.

“What looks like transpired here [is] they’ve engineered a virus and put this weapons-grade package onto it called ‘spike protein,'” Dr. Chetty further explained.

Only a small number of people experience an immediate “allergic reaction” to the “most elaborately engineered toxin,” he says, usually within the first eight days after the onset of symptoms. The injections, however, extend that allergic reaction “for a longer period.”

“We begin to see the endothelial [blood vessel lining] injuries that this vaccine causes with its spike protein, with its influence on its ACE2 receptors,” Dr. Chetty warns. “Those are the deaths that are meant to follow. And they will never be pinned onto the spike protein, a very well-engineered toxin.”

“Now spike protein is also a membrane protein. So, the mRNA will distribute this throughout our body. It will be made in various tissues around our body. It will be incorporated into those membranes around our body, and those specific tissues.”

Because these spike proteins are recognized by the body as foreign invaders, the immune system overreacts in an autoimmune way – meaning it attacks itself. This is where the slow-death process begins.

“Now this toxin in the long term is going to get people with pre-existing illness to have those illnesses exasperated,” he warns.

What is worse, these toxins include “bits of HIV protein,” which clearly shows that they were genetically engineered, Dr. Chetty says. People with cancer “are going to have their cancers flare up, and they will say they died of the cancer.”

“People with vessel injuries or predisposition like our diabetics and [those with] hypertension are going to have strokes and heart attacks and the rest at varying times, and we’ll attribute those to their preexisting conditions,” he added.

“People are going to develop, over time, autoimmune conditions, the diversity of which will never be addressed by any pharmaceutical intervention because they’re far too targeted.”

'The mRNA Vax is Designed to Poison People, there’s really no two-ways about it. The Spike Protein Increases Heart Attacks and Destroys Immune ​System' - Dr. Michael Palmer

/

From [UNZ] Question– Does the Covid-19 vaccine cause heart attacks?

Answer– It does, and researchers are closer to understanding the mechanism that triggers those events.

Question– How can I be sure you’re telling the truth?

Answer– Well, for starters, there’s a research paper that appeared recently in the prestigious Circulation magazine that draws the same conclusion. Here’s an excerpt from the paper:

“We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium (layer of cells lining the blood vessels) and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis (clotting), cardiomyopathy, (a group of diseases that affect the heart muscle) and other vascular events following vaccination.” (“Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning”, Circulation)

It’s actually quite rare for researchers to be so blunt in their analysis, but there it is in black and white. As you can see, they didn’t pull their punches. Here’s how Alex Berenson summed it up on his blogsite at Substack:

“A new study of 566 patients who received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines shows that signs of cardiovascular damage soared following the shots. The risk of heart attacks or other severe coronary problems more than doubled months after the vaccines were administered, based on changes in markers of inflammation and other cell damage. Patients had a 1 in 4 risk for severe problems after the vaccines, compared to 1 in 9 before. (“If you like heart problems, you’ll love the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines”, Alex Berenson, Substack)

“Doubled”? “The risk of heart attacks.. more than doubled” after vaccination?

Apparently, so. No wonder cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra is so flabbergasted. Here’s what he said in a recent interview:

“Extraordinary, disturbing and upsetting. We now have evidence of a plausible biological mechanism of how mRNA vaccine may be contributing to increased cardiac events. The abstract is published in the highest impact cardiology journal so we must take these findings very seriously.”

Indeed, we must, but our public health experts continue to pretend that nothing has changed, even though more and more professionals continue to speak out. Here’s Malhotra again:

“I have alot of interaction with the cardiology community across the UK, and anecdotally, I have been told by colleagues that they are seeing younger and younger people coming in with heart attacks…. Now since July, there’s been at least 10,000 non-covid deaths, and most of those have been driven by circulatory disease, in other words, heart attack and stroke. And there’s been a 30% increase in deaths at home, often because of cardiac arrest…. (So) The signal is quite strong… This needs to be investigated… And I think it is high-time that policymakers around the world put an end to the mandates, because –if this signal is correct– then history will not be on their side and the public will not forgive them for it.” (Dr Aseem Malhotra reveals increase in risk of heart attack following the mRNA COVID vaccine, Bitchute, Minute-1:35)

Shocking, right? And what’s more shocking is the media’s response which is aimed at concealing the fact that these toxic injections pose a clear threat to the lives of millions. Is that overstating the case?

No, not at all.

So, what conclusions can we draw from this new research? What is the science telling us?

It’s telling us that the vaccine can reduce the flow of blood to the heart, damage heart tissue, and greatly increase the risk of a heart attack. The authors are telling readers point-blank that the vaccine can either kill or severely injure them. Can you see that?

Question– I can’t say. I haven’t read the report.

Answer– No, you haven’t, and you probably won’t either since the big news organizations and social media giants are going to make sure it never sees the light of day. But just read that one paragraph over again and try to grasp what the authors are saying. They’re saying that many people who choose to get vaccinated will either die or have years shaved off their lives. And–remember–this isn’t an opinion piece. It’s science. It’s also a straightforward repudiation of a mass vaccination campaign that is demonstrably killing people.

Question– You always exaggerate. This is just one report from one group of researchers. I could easily provide you with research that refutes your theory.

Answer– I’m sure you could, in fact there’s a small army of industry-employed propagandists (aka– “fact checkers”) who spend all their waking hours cobbling together fake news stories that do just that; discredit the science that veers even slightly from the official narrative. The truth is, the pro-vaxx disinformation campaign has been vastly more effective than the vaccine itself. I don’t think even you’d disagree with that.

Question– I do disagree with that, and I resent your characterization of the widespread support for these essential procedures as “pro-vaxx disinformation”. That is an extremely biased and ignorant statement.

Answer– Is it? In the last few weeks, we’ve produced hard evidence that a great many people who died after vaccination, died from the vaccination. We showed, for example, that two German pathology professors, Arne Burkhardt and Walter Lang, found that in five of the ten autopsies, “the two physicians rate the connection between death and vaccination as very probable, in two cases as probable.” These same doctors found that “lymphocytic myocarditis, the most common diagnosis.…(along with) autoimmune phenomena, reduction in immune capacity, acceleration of cancer growth, vascular damage “endothelitis”, vasculitis, perivasculitis and erythrocyte “clumping”.. In other words, the whole ‘dog’s breakfast’ of maladies that have been linked to the “poison-death shot”. (See full report here; “Lymphocyte riot’: Pathologists investigate deaths after Corona vaccination”, Free West Media)

These same pathologists found evidence of a “lymphocyte riot”, potentially in all tissues and organs. (Note– Lymphocytes are white blood cells in the immune system that swing into action to fight invaders or pathogen-infected cells. A “lymphocyte riot” suggests the immune system has gone crazy trying to counter the effects of billions of spike proteins located in cells in the bloodstream. As the lymphocytes are depleted, the body grows more susceptible to other infections which may explain why a large number of people are now contracting respiratory viruses in late summer.)

The autopsies provide hard evidence that the vaccines do, in fact, cause significant tissue damage. So, my question to you is this: How do you brush aside the rock-solid proof that the vaccines inflict significant injury on people who get injected? Do you need to examine the maligned corpses yourself before you change your mind and admit you’re wrong?

Question– Nothing can be deduced from just 10 autopsies. More than a billion people have been vaccinated so far, and the deaths are still within an acceptable range given the severity of the disease.

Answer– “The severity of the disease”? You mean a virus that is survived by over 99.98% of the people who catch it? You mean an infection that –according to the latest figures from Johns Hopkins– killed 351,000 in the US in 2020 which is roughly half the number of people who die from heart disease every year? And when you say: “Nothing can be deduced from just 10 autopsies”, you are very much mistaken. You can detect a pattern of vaccine-generated disease that is produced by the injection of a toxic substance (spike protein) that causes bleeding, clotting and autoimmunity even in the people who survive. “Survival” does not mean undamaged. Oh, no. And anyone who has seen the many videos of healthy athletes dropping dead on the field of play months after being jabbed, should understand that “There go I but for the grace of God.” Bottom line: If you get injected, you’re never going to know whether you’ll be struck-down without warning by a similar cardio-type event. (See: “At least 69 athletes collapse in one month, many dead”, freewestmedia.com)

Do you think that if these athletes knew they could die from the vaccine, they would have made the choice they did?

Question– You’re being overly dramatic. Naturally, not everyone is going to react the same to an emergency-use drug, but– on balance– the vaccines have mitigated the impact of a deadly pandemic the likes of which we haven’t seen for more than a century.

Answer– You really believe that, don’t you? Just like you really believe that Covid-19 is a totally unique and “novel” virus. If you just researched it a bit, you’d know that that theory has been thoroughly debunked. The Coronavirus isn’t new; it is an iteration of numerous other infections that have spread through the population for a least 2 decades. Take a look at this except from a research paper by the Doctors for Covid Ethics and you’ll see what I’m talking about:

“Several studies have demonstrated that circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA antibodies became detectable within 1-2 weeks after application of mRNA vaccines...  Rapid production of IgG and IgA always indicates a secondary, memory-type response that is elicited through re-stimulation of pre-existing immune cells…. Importantly, however, IgG rose faster than IgM, which confirms that the early IgG response was indeed of the memory type. This memory response indicates pre-existing, cross-reactive immunity due to previous infectionwith ordinary respiratory human coronavirus strains….

Memory-type responses have also been documented with respect to T-cell-mediated immunity. Overall, these findings indicate that our immune system efficiently recognizes SARS-CoV-2 as “known” even on first contact. Severe cases of the disease thus cannot be ascribed to lacking immunity. Instead, severe cases might very well be caused or aggravated by pre-existing immunity through antibody-dependent enhancement.

This study confirms the above assertion that the immune response to initial contact with SARS-CoV-2 is of the memory type. In addition, it shows that this reaction occurs with almost all individuals, and particularly also with those who experience no manifest clinical symptoms.

Conclusion– The collective findings discussed above clearly show that the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful. In contrast, the harm the vaccines do is very well substantiated, with more than 15.000 vaccination-associated deaths now documented in the EU drug adverse events database (EudraVigilance), and over 7.000 more deaths within the UK and the US.” (“Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding COVID-19 Immunity and Vaccines – Implications for Safety and Efficacy”, Doctors for Covid Ethics)

Repeat: If the vast majority of people already have robust, pre-existing immunity, “then the benefits of vaccination are highly doubtful.”

​Is that a reasonable “evidence-based” conclusion? And, if it is, then shouldn’t there have been a debate on this matter before over a billion people were inoculated with an experimental substance that causes, bleeding, clotting, autoimmunity, strokes, and heart attacks? And how could it not be true, after all, if there was no pre-existing immunity in a US population of 330 million people, then the number of fatalities would be exponentially higher. Instead, after a full two years of exposure– the percentage of deaths in the US is still less than one-third of one percent, a veritable drop in the bucket. Would that be possible with a truly super-contagious “novel” virus?

No, it would not be possible, which means that Fauci and Co lied. And the reason they lied was to convince people that they’re more vulnerable than they really are. It’s just one of many fearmongering scams they used to promote the vaccine: “Get vaccinated or die”, that was the message.

Doesn’t that bother you? Doesn’t it bother you to know the government and public health authorities twisted the truth in order to dupe you into an invasive and potentially-lethal medical procedure? [MORE]

New Variant Distracts from the Link btw Rising Mortality Rates and the Vax. More People are Dying b/c More People Have Been Vaccinated. Toxic Jab Causes heart failure/disease, clotting, strokes, more

/

Mass vaccination was supposed to reduce the number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths. Instead, the fatalities continue to rise. From [CHD] Just in time for the end-of-year holidays, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials and their bought media agents trotted out a new round of Gothic horror stories about a purported COVID “variant.”

Their apparent hope is that the synchronized hullabaloo about “variants” will distract the public from the true nightmare that is unfolding: a record-setting uptick in all-cause mortality that jives suspiciously not only with the timing of the COVID vaccination rollout but with the top adverse events — heart failure, heart disease, circulatory conditions and strokes — associated with the experimental COVID shots.

Media reports acknowledge the rising tide of “extra non-COVID deaths” and “seriously ill people” swarming emergency departments, even stating that patients are “showing up much sicker than [Er staff have] ever seen” and are younger than expected.

However, while admitting patients’ unusual symptoms — abdominal pain, blood clots, heart conditions and tingling of extremities — are not COVID-related, health officials assert “no one knows why” they are occurring.

For others, the explanation is obvious. “These are precisely the ailments one would expect to see,” said Mike Whitney of The Unz Review, “if one had just injected millions of people with a clot-generating biologic that triggers a violent immune response that attacks the inner lining of the blood vessels inflicting severe damage to the body’s critical infrastructure.”

UCLA pediatric specialist J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D., gave the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ample warning about this very scenario back in December 2020.

At the time, Whelan was already deeply concerned about the risk of “long-lasting or even permanent damage to [the] brain or heart microvasculature” from clotting and inflammation induced by the spike protein-based vaccines.

By July 2021, Canadian physician Dr. Charles Hoffe was in complete agreement. Hoffe’s experience with COVID-vaccinated patients indicated that not only is “widespread microscopic blood clotting” a virtually “inevitable” outcome of the mRNA vaccines, but “the worst,” in all likelihood, “is yet to come.”

South African physician Dr. Shankara Chetty recently termed the vaccines’ synthetic spike protein “one of the most contrived poisons that man has ever made.”

Stacey Abrams, touting exceptional fundraising ability, declares run for Georgia governor

/

From [HERE] Stacey Abrams, the Georgia Democrat and founder of voting rights organization Fair Fight Action, announced Wednesday she will run for Georgia governor in 2022, setting up a potential rematch against incumbent Republican Gov. Brian Kemp. 

Abrams brings an exceptional ability to fundraise from donors across the country, after building an extensive campaign finance machine since her failed bid for governor in 2018.  

“Leadership that understands the true pain folks are feeling, and has real plans. That’s the job of governor,” Abrams said in her campaign announcement video. “To fight for one Georgia, our Georgia. And now, it’s time to get the job done.”

During her first run for governor, Abrams raised $27.7 million to Kemp’s $22.3 million. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution estimated the race cost more than $100 million, which included spending from outside groups. 

In 2018, she lost to Kemp by 1.4 percentage points, or about 55,000 voters. Afterward, Abrams garnered national attention from Democrats who praised her playbook to elect Democrats in the South by energizing a previously inactive coalition of racially diverse voters. Abrams did not concedein the 2018 election and argued voter suppression played a role in her 2018 loss. 

After her 2018 run, Abrams founded Fair Fight Action, an organization dedicated to protecting voting rights. In the 2020 election, Fair Fight PAC, which operates as a “hybrid” super PAC and traditional PAC, raised nearly $90 million and spent more than $66 million.

The PAC’s largest donation came from former New York City mayor and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg, who gave $5 million in 2019. The PAC received seven other donations of $1 million or more in the 2020 election cycle. 

The PAC’s largest expenditures in the 2020 cycle went to the Senate Majority PAC, with a $6.7 million donation, and the Black PAC, which works to mobilize Black voters, with a $6.6 million donation. [MORE]

Amateur Probot and Step-and-Fetchit Coordinator Symone Sanders to leave the VP’s office

/

From [HERE] Symone Sanders, the senior adviser and chief spokesperson for Vice President Kamala Harris, is expected to leave the White House at the end of the year, according to five administration officials familiar with the matter.

It was not immediately clear where Sanders is heading next or when she will be leaving the vice president’s office. Sanders is the highest profile exit and the second high-profile one from the Harris team in the last month. Ashley Etienne, Harris’ communications director, is also set to depart in the coming weeks.

Nominee for top NY court will be 2nd Black woman in position [the legal profession is Overwhelmingly White; 80% of All Judges are White]

/

THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS FOUND THAT THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS 80% WHITE. AMONG THE HIGHEST STATE COURTS THE JUDICIARY IS 83% WHITE. IN FACT THERE ARE NO BLACK JUSTICES IN 28 STATES, THERE ARE NO LATINO JUSTICES IN 40 STATES, THERE ARE NO ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICES IN 44 STATES AND THERE ARE NO NATIVE AMERICAN JUSTICES IN 47 STATES. [MORE] ANOTHER STUDY FOUND THAT THE STATE JUDICIARY AT ALL OTHER LOWER LEVELS IS ALSO 80% WHITE. [MORE]

FURTHERMORE, ACCORDING TO THE A RECENT STUDY AND THE ABA ONLY 5% OF ALL ATTORNEYS ARE BLACK. SAID NUMBER HAS REMAINED STEADY FROM 2009 - 2019. THE LEGAL PROFESSION IS NEARLY ALL WHITE: SPECIFICALLY, IT IS 85% WHITE, 5% BLACK, 5% LATINO, 2% ASIAN AMERICAN AND 1% NATIVE AMERICAN. [MORE] AND [MORE]

From [HERE] Judge Shirley Troutman, the daughter of parents who grew up in the segregated South but moved their family north for a better life, said she was overwhelmed on learning Wednesday that New York Governor Kathy Hochul had nominated her to sit on the New York Court of Appeals.

“To think that I will soon stand before the New York Senate to be confirmed as a member and associate judge of the New York State Court of Appeals, our highest court, is certainly, simply put, surreal to me,” Troutman said.

Hochul, New York’s first female governor, told Troutman that she would be her first appointment to the Court of Appeals shortly before the press release announcing the decision was issued this morning, according to the judge.

If confirmed, Troutman would be the second Black woman to sit on the state’s highest court.

Her nomination comes as the state’s top court faced several vacancies this year. In March, Judge Paul Feinman, the first openly gay judge to sit on that bench, abruptly resigned due to illness and then died days later. In June, Judge Leslie Stein stepped down and was replaced by Judge Madeline Singas.

Hochul said in a statement that Troutman’s nomination represented Hochul’s effort to fill leadership positions across the state with a diverse slate of individuals.

Troutman, Hochul said, “has a brilliant legal mind, a fair-minded judicial philosophy, sterling qualifications, and a commitment to equal justice that guides her approach from the bench.”

The nomination of Troutman is to fill the seat of Associate Judge Eugene Fahey, who will leave the bench at the end of the year due to a requirement that judges retire when they turn 70. He had worked on the seven-member bench since 2015. [MORE]

Andre Dickens, Black Democrat Wins Atlanta Mayor Race

/

From [HERE] Voters elected City Councilman Andre Dickens as Atlanta’s next mayor in a runoff election Tuesday, after a campaign dominated by concern over a rise in violent crime in Georgia’s largest city.

The Associated Press declared Mr. Dickens the winner late Tuesday night over City Council President Felicia Moore, with 62% of the votes in the two-person race, with 44% of precincts reporting. Both are Democrats, though the post is officially nonpartisan.

Mr. Dickens, 47 years old, will replace outgoing Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, who chose not to seek re-election after 2020 protests that were followed by vandalism, a police shooting that sparked further unrest and a rise in murders and other violent crimes. Mayor Bottoms had endorsed Mr. Dickens in the runoff. 

In the general election on Nov. 2, Mr. Dickens had come in second place behind Ms. Moore, 60, in a field of 14 candidates. Since Ms. Moore didn’t win more than 50% of the vote, a runoff was required by law. Both candidates said combating crime would be one of their top priorities if elected. [MORE]

[Tyranny Requires Accomplices and White Supremacy Requires Willing Servants] NYC's New Mayor Wants Law Abiding Blacks to Cooperate w/NYPD who Stop and Frisk Them as They Go About their Daily Lives

/

There are more Blacks in NYC than in any other US city. NYC is also the mecca for democrats and liberals, who control all levels and branches of NYC government. What are Democrats doing for you if 1) uncontrollable cops can kill you in broad daylight in front of witnesses or interfere with your rights at will anytime you walk down the street and 2) never be held accountable? [MORE]

GET THE F*** OUTTA HERE! From [HERE] New York City Mayor-elect Eric Adams reiterated support for "stop and frisk" in a new op-ed piece published Sunday reacting to last week’s Thanksgiving Eve shooting that wounded two police officers. 

Adams, who will be the city’s second Black mayor, praised the "professional conduct" of NYPD officers Alejandra Jacobs and Robert Holmes in their handling of suspect Charlie Vasquez in the Bronx last week. Judging by the NYPD’s account, Adams said the officers handled the situation correctly – they approached the suspect matching a 911 caller’s description and asked him to show his hands. 

But Vasquez open fired. Shot in the arm, Jacobs returned fire, and then, "the threat was neutralized. One more gun off the street. One more blow against the bad guys," Adams wrote in an op-ed for the New York Daily News. "Yet there are some in our city who would say these officers should never have confronted Vasquez, that he never should have been stopped and questioned."

Adams rejected his opponents’ calls to "end stop and frisk forever," making the distinction in the op-ed that the tactic "stop, question and frisk" must be reinstated because it can actually help reduce crime "without infringing on personal liberties and human rights." 

But Vasquez open fired. Shot in the arm, Jacobs returned fire, and then, "the threat was neutralized. One more gun off the street. One more blow against the bad guys," Adams wrote in an op-ed for the New York Daily News. "Yet there are some in our city who would say these officers should never have confronted Vasquez, that he never should have been stopped and questioned."

Clearly this Black borg is an ignorant simpleton who has confused lawful and unlawful stops and acted as if they are the same - sort of like acting like stealing an item is the same as paying for it! What a fuck-up. Cops may make lawful stops within the bounds of the 4th Amendment; such stops do not include stopping, frisking, touching, searching and detaining people based on skin color or targeting people by skin color or perceived status or appearance. The cops Adams referred to in his op-ed apparently had reasonable suspicion that a crime had been committed and reasonable suspicion to believe that the suspect had committed the crime because ‘he matched the description provided by police dispatch.’ The cops did not stop the man simply because he was Black - which is what this straw-boss is referring to when he refers to “stop and frisk” as a tactic of policing. Adams appears to be woking on a barbaric level of consciousness in service of white authority.

In order for the police to stop you the Supreme Court has ruled that police must have reasonable articulable suspicion that there is criminal activity afoot and the person detained is involved in the activity. In order to frisk you the Supreme Court has ruled that the police must have independent reasonable articulable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous before they may touch you (a cursory patdown for weapons). Police may not act on on the basis of an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or a hunch - there must be some specific articulable facts along with reasonable inferences from those facts to justify the intrusion. 

Clearly these rules are only intended for white people. Non-whites are stopped and then frisked because they are Non-white - regardless of income, education, political affiliation or skin color. ‘The NYPD has been stopping and questioning Blacks & Latinos first and then developing reasonable suspicion later. 

Brazen cops so frequently abuse their power that no Black pedestrian, motorist, juvenile, adult or Black professional of any kind—could make a compelling argument that the so-called 4th Amendment affords any meaningful protection from police or the government.

South Africa Authorities Asked Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer to Stop Sending their COVID vaccines b/c People Are Not Interested in Injecting Bioweapons into Their Bodies

/

 From [REUTERS] South Africa has asked Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) and Pfizer (PFE.N) to delay delivery of COVID-19 vaccines because it now has too much stock, health ministry officials said, as vaccine hesitancy slows an inoculation campaign.

About 35% of South Africans are fully vaccinated, higher than in most other African nations, but half the government's year-end target. It has averaged 106,000 doses a day in the past 15 days in a nation of 60 million people.

Earlier this year the programme was slowed by insufficient doses. Now deliveries have been delayed due to oversupply, making the country an outlier in the continent where most are still starved of vaccines.

Nicholas Crisp, deputy director-general of the Health Department, told Reuters that South Africa had 16.8 million doses in stock and said deliveries had been deferred.

"We have 158 days' stock in the country at current use," a spokesman for the Health Ministry said. "We have deferred some deliveries."

They did not say when deliveries would now take place.

Stavros Nicolaou, chief executive of Aspen Pharmacare (APNJ.J), which is packaging 25 million doses a month of J&J vaccines in South Africa, said most of the vaccines bound for South Africa would now go to the rest of the continent.

Nicolaou, who is also chairman of public health at business lobby Business for South Africa (B4SA), said deliveries would likely be deferred until the first quarter of next year.

Vaccines packaged at Aspen's plant are part of the African Union's agreement to buy 220 million doses from J&J.

The AU and J&J did not respond to an email seeking comment.

A Pfizer spokesperson said: "We remain adaptable to individual country's vaccine requirements whilst continuing to meet our quarterly commitments as per the South Africa supply agreement."

South Africa's government has been seeking to boost the rate of daily administered doses.

"There is a fair amount of apathy and hesitancy," said Shabir Madhi, who led the clinical study for the AstraZeneca (AZN.L) COVID-19 vaccine in South Africa.

To ramp up vaccinations, the government has launched pop-up vaccination centres and sought help from community leaders. It has also opened inoculations to children aged 12 to 17.

Blaming Africa for the "Omicron Variant?" The Dependent Media is LYING TO YOU: Although Only 6% of Africa is Fully Vaccinated, It is “One of the Least-Affected Regions in the World” According to WHO

/

From [CHD] Is the panic surrounding the Omicron variant overblown? That’s the question journalist and political commentator Kim Iversen asked on the latest episode of The Hill’s “Rising.”

Iversen noted how after news outlets reported on the new variant, the stock market fell, countries closed down their borders and travel bans were placed on South African countries.

“Doctors treating Omicron patients in South Africa [are] saying the variant presents with such mild symptoms that the hype makes no sense,” said Iversen.

South African Health Minister Joe Phaahla accused countries that enacted travel bans and closed borders of “knee jerk reactions.”

The chairwoman of the African Medical Association, which is currently monitoring patients who have the Omicron variant, said the variant “presents very mild disease … with no prominent symptoms” other than a “slight cough.”

“The fingers are being pointed at the under-vaccinated and the unvaccinated” in Africa, Iversen said. “The idea is that if the virus is able to spread unabated more variants will form.”

But what gives people the idea that Africa has high levels of spread, Iversen asked?

“People assume that because Africa has extremely low vaccination rates the virus must be running rampant on the continent,” she said.

While it’s true the continent has some of the lowest vaccination rates in the world, with only 6% fully vaccinated, the World Health Organization has consistently described Africa as “one of the least-affected regions in the world” in its weekly pandemic reports.

Despite extremely low spread and hospitalizations, Iversen explained, “the narrative that’s currently circulating is the reason we ended up with Omicron is because of poor vaccination rates in Africa.”

Some people blame the low vaccination rates in Africa on the pharmaceutical companies, because they won’t release their patents. They claim Big Pharma greed is what’s kept the world from gaining access to the “valuable vaccines.”

But the access narrative is not entirely true, Iversen argued. “A lot of people in Africa just don’t want the vaccine,” she said.

Two days before Omicron hit the news, Reuters reported that South Africa asked Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer to stop sending their COVID vaccines because people were not interested in taking them.

“[The South African Government] said there was too much hesitancy in the adult population and they had an overabundance of shots,” Iversen reported.

South Africa isn’t the only African country unwilling to take the COVID vaccine.

According to a recent survey that looked at COVID vaccine acceptance across five  West-African countries, researchers found trust is low and hesitancy is high.

Only 9% of Senegal sees themselves “very likely” to try and get vaccinated when the vaccine is widely available. In Liberia, only 16% of citizens see themselves likely to try and get the vaccine.

Respondents also were not particularly worried about new variants or COVID more generally —  77% of respondents from the five African countries surveyed believed over the next 6 months COVID will be “not serious or not at all serious” of a problem for their country.

According to a Reuters report, there were fears in the African Ivory Coast that vaccine doses would go unused. Reuters observed vaccine centers in “densely populated areas” with “health workers sitting idle with no patients.”

The "Omicron Variant" Propaganda Sends Vaccine Profiteers’ Stocks Soaring. Meanwhile 913,000 Injuries and Deaths Have Been Caused by the Vax Bioweapon According to CDC's Own Data

/

From [CHD] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new data late Monday showing a total of 913,268 adverse events following COVID vaccines were reported between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 19, 2021, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 19,249 reports of deaths — an increase of 396 over the previous week — and 143,395 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,269 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 664,745 adverse events, including 8,898 deaths and 56,297 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Nov. 19, 2021.

Foreign reports are reports received by U.S. manufacturers from their foreign subsidiaries. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 8,898 U.S. deaths reported as of Nov. 19, 20% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 26% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 56% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 447.7 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Nov. 19. This includes: 260 million doses of Pfizer, 171 million doses of Moderna and 16 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 19, 2021 for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

  • 1,103 adverse events have been reported in the 5 to 11 age group since Nov. 1.

  • The rest of the reports in VAERS for children in the 5 to 11 age group occurred prior to the authorization of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, and are due to ”product administered to patient of inappropriate age.”

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 19, 2021 for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

The most recent death involves a 16-year-old girl from Georgia (VAERS I.D. 1865389) who died reportedly from a heart condition and multi-organ failure two days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

Other recent deaths include a 16-year-old girl from Missouri (VAERS I.D. 1823671) who died after receiving her second dose of Pfizer, and a 17-year-old female from Washington (VAERS I.D. 1828901) who died Oct. 29 reportedly from a heart condition after receiving her second dose of Pfizer.

  • 59 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases
    attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

  • 560 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 549 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

  • 139 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Nov. 12, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:

Dr Mercola: 'the Vax is Injuring and Killing Children/young adults who have nearly 0 chance of dying from COVID. Why rush to Inject them w/experimental Vax w/No long-term knowns beyond a few months?

/

From [MERCOLA] The facts are clear and undisputed even by the CDC: Children and young adults have a nearly zero chance of dying from COVID-19. So what’s the rush with injecting them with a science research experiment that has no long-term knowns beyond a few months?

Even more so, why mandate it when teen after teen is developing blood clots and having heart attacks and other heart issues? Why give it to children under 12 now, when reports were already coming in as of August 2021, of myocarditis, heart attacks and neurological problems in 12-year-olds?

A slide show asks these questions, with report after report of youth deaths and injuries. In it, one teen obviously struggling with severe neurological issues says she isn’t staying quiet about this any longer. “I’m done hiding,” she says. “There are several stories like mine. The same doctors who told us this was safe are the same doctors brushing us off as if we didn’t matter.”

It’s time for her and the others to be “heard, seen and believed,” she says. The slide show focuses on profile after profile of young people injured and/or dead after taking this shot, including an 18-year-old who’s had three brain surgeries after the Johnson & Johnson shot.

The mRNA shots are just as responsible for other deaths and injuries, the video shows. It ends with a young girl sobbing and begging not to take the shot; and then it asks: “We are destroying our young and our future. How much longer are we going to allow this?”