Mastercard & The Bill Gates-funded GAVI Vaccine Alliance will Beta-test a Biometric Digital Identity System w/Vaccination records & a payment system in poor, remote communities in W Africa

Movement restrictions & identification measures were Imposed on Jews in Nazi Germany. Such measures included personal Jew identification cards, passports marked with a J, assignment of names and the outward marking of persons with a yellow star. Jews age six years or older were allowed to appear in public only when wearing the Jewish star. Without the star (and meticulous record keeping) there was no way to tell who was a semite and who was not. The star enabled the police to pick up any Jew, anywhere, anytime. Seem familiar? [MORE]

From [HERE] Abiometric digital identity platform that “evolves just as you evolve” is set to be introduced in “low-income, remote communities” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance, Mastercard and the AI-powered “identity authentication” company, Trust Stamp.

The program, which was first launched in late 2018, will see Trust Stamp’s digital identity platform integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “Wellness Pass,” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData. Mastercard, in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “centralized record keeping of childhood immunization” also describes itself as a leader toward a “World Beyond Cash,” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system, vaccination records, and a payment system into a single cohesive platform. The effort, since its launch nearly two years ago, has been funded via $3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

In early June, GAVI reported that Mastercard’s Wellness Pass program would be adapted in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Around a month later, Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp’s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp’s system is capable of providing biometric identity in areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual’s legal name or identity to function. The Wellness Program involving GAVI, Mastercard, and Trust Stamp will soon be launched in West Africa and will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program once a vaccine becomes available.

The push to implement biometrics as part of national ID registration systems has been ongoing for many years on the continent and has become a highly politicized issue in several African countries. Opposition to similar projects in Africa often revolves around the costs surrounding them, such as the biometric voter management system that the Electoral Commission of Ghana has been trying to implement ahead of their 2020 general election in December. Bright Simons, honorary VP of the IMANI policy think tank, has questioned the “budgetary allocation” for the new system, claiming that the “unnecessary registration of 17 million people all over again” represents millions of dollars “being blown for reasons that nobody can explain in this country.”

Masking ulterior motives

Trust Stamp’s biometric identity system, largely funded by Mastercard’s massive investment in the company in February, utilizes a technology it calls Evergreen Hash that creates an AI-generated “3D mask” based on a single photo of a person’s face, palm or fingerprint. Once this “mask” is created, much of the original data is discarded and encryption keys are created in place of a person’s name or other more traditional identifiers.

“Only a small percentage of the data that originally existed is in the hash,” Trust Stamp CEO Gareth Genner has stated. “What you have is something safer for storing because it can’t be used to directly identify you. No one would recognize you in this huge jumble of numbers.” The result, according to Genner, is an “irreversible non-personally identifiable information” system that “protects privacy, reduces potential for misuse and allows effective inclusion when there is no other form of legal record.”

Genner also explained in a recent press release that the unique “hash” is capable of “evolving” as a new hash with updated health information is created every time a child or individual gets a vaccine. Trust Stamp’s AI algorithms can accurately determine if different hashes belong to the same individual, meaning that “the hash evolves over time just as you evolve,” said Genner.

It is unclear how much the Wellness Pass initiative is motivated by public health concerns as opposed to free market considerations. Indeed, the GAVI alliance, largely funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations, as well as allied governments and the vaccine industry, is principally concerned with improving “the health of markets for vaccines and other immunization products,” rather than the health of individuals, according to its own website. Similarly, Mastercard’s GAVI partnership is directly linked to its “World Beyond Cash” effort, which mainly bolsters its business model that has long depended on a reduction in the use of physical cash.

Dual use tyranny

Trust Stamp also shares this market-focused vision for its digital identity system as the company has stated that it is looking for new commercialization options for its Evergreen Hash technology, specifically with prison systems. Talks with private and public prison systems have revealed an interest in their utilization of Trust Stamp’s technology to provide identification for individuals on parole “without making them pay for pricey ankle bracelets that monitor their every move,” as Trust Stamp’s platform would ostensibly provide that same function but in a “touchless” and less expensive manner.

Trust Stamp’s interest in providing its technology to both COVID-19 response and to law enforcement is part of a growing trend where numerous companies providing digital solutions to  COVID-19 also offer the same solutions to prison systems and law enforcement for the purposes of surveillance and “predictive policing.”

Akufo-Addo Denies His Voice is on Audio Claiming COVID was Created at FT Detrick to Cause Govt Dependence & Warning ‘A Lack of Interaction Weakens Our Immune System Allowing It to Infect/Spread’

During George Floyd’s Houston funeral there was a reference to the message of condolence sent to Mr Floyd's family by Ghana's President Nana Akufo-Addo. It was also mentioned that at the president's request, Mr Floyd's name had been permanently mounted on the wall of the Diasporan African Forum at the W.E.B. Du Bois Centre in Ghana's capital, Accra.

Also Akufo-Addo declared 2019, the 400th anniversary of the start of the transatlantic slave trade, “the Year of Return,” with a special invitation to all Africans in the diaspora, especially the descendants of slaves, to come to Ghana, either to visit or even to live permanently. [MORE]

 A 14-minute audio purported to be from the President of Ghana, Akufo-Addo, warns Ghanaians to pay attention to an alleged extract from an article titled ‘Rockefeller Lockstep 2010’ on the Rockefeller website. According to AFP Factcheck the Ghana information minister said the claim that the president’s voice is on the recording it is “absolutely false.” [MORE] and [MORE] It clearly does not sound like him - as he has an english sounding accent [listen to his voice on this speech at the Harvard Kennedy School]. The speaker might be an African religious figure because at the end of it he discusses, ‘the role of the church in resisting evil.’

Like all conspiracy theories it relies upon your particular “beliefs,” anecdotal facts and lacks factual detail. As we know beliefs and dogma are dangerous. Nevertheless, the speech is compelling, interesting and provokes thought as it provides an alternative explanation to the official story presented in The Spectacle. Just because someone misidentified the speaker does not necessarily take away or add to its authenticity.

In the audio, the speaker references an alleged Rockefeller Foundation document from 2010 that detailed a simulated global outbreak, the required steps involved, the various phases required, the overall timeline and its expected outcomes.

In 2010 in a document entitled, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” the Rockefeller Foundation and the Global Business Network released a strategy toolkit based on various proposed, hypothetical scenarios that could affect the world. It is not known to BW whether this document is actually a Rockefeller Foundation document.

A scenario called “Lockstep” discussed a global pandemic affecting millions that required “the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.” Lockstep describes “A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” 

The scenario said it would occur in 2012 and the new influenza strain originated from wild geese. It states, “Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.“ Thereafter, a highly government controlled world results in which citizens willingly give up “some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability.” Subsequently, the extreme presence of government authority inhibited entrepreneurial activity and the majority of citizens grow tired and pushback against it. The scenario does not predict any end result other that conflict between people and governments.

However, overlooked by conspiracy buffs posting this audio is the fact that the speech describes a more detailed and distinct scenario than the Rockefeller scenario.

The speaker says a deadly virus was created at a Fort Detrick class 4 lab, which is a US Army Medical Command Installation operated. It is not clear exactly who else created the virus with the US Government but the speaker states that Bill Gates, George Soros and Anthony Faucci and The WHO are among the elites involved in its creation.

The virus was then transported and researched at the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg Canada. While there it was stolen and smuggled out by China and taken to China's only class 4 lab, the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan China. According to the speaker the goal was to create a narrative in which China could be blamed for creating the and releasing it by accident (a planned accident = a plandemic).

The speaker says it was planned that governments would ‘downplay the human-to-human transmission for as long as possible to allow the research strain to spread on a global scale before any country can lockdown/respond to avoid initial infection. Once a country has seed infection in place, lockdown incoming/outgoing travel but keep the transmission within the country spreading for as long as possible. Once enough people in a country/region are infected, enact forced quarantines/isolation for that area and expand the lockdown regions slowly over time. Over-hype the mortality rate by tying the research strain to deaths that have little to nothing to do with the actual virus to keep the fear and compliance at a maximum (if anyone dies for ANY reason and is found they have COVID consider it a COVID death & if anyone is thought to of MAYBE had symptoms of COVID to assume they have COVID and consider it a COVID death).’

He explains that the purpose of government stay in place and quarantine orders is to cause unrest and weaken the populations immune system.

The speaker states people’s immune system will weaken due to lack of interaction with other people. Governments and media will downplay and attack any potential "treatments and continue to echo that only a "cure" is viable to fight this virus (aka a vaccine). They will continue to drag out the quarantine over and over and over again in intervals causing more and more people to eventually stand up and protest or defy them. Eventually end the phase 1 quarantine once they get enough public push-back (June 2020), and publicly state that they still think it's "too early" to end the isolation but are going to do it anyways. Due to the isolation people will be susceptible to the virus and spread when quarantines are lifted or defied. Also, to "pad" the mortality rate and hype the upcoming phase 2 lockdown people will die from standard illnesses at a higher rate than normal due to having highly weakened immune systems - but such deaths will be attributed to the virus.

Eventually enact phase 2 quarantines (~Oct-Nov 2020) on a even more extreme level and blame the protesters (mostly people who don't trust their government already for the cause of the "larger" 2nd wave (He says ‘we told you so, it was too early, this is all your fault cause you needed a hair cut, your freedoms have consequences...).’

-Enforce the phase 2 quarantine at a much more extreme level, increasing the penalty for defiance (replace fines with jail time).deem ALL travel as non-essential, increase checkpoints (including military assistance), increase tracking/tracing of the population (mandatory apps), take over control of food/gas (large scale shortages) so that people can only get access to essential products/services if they are FIRST given permission.anyone who defy's them appear as public enemy #1 to those who are willing to submit.

-Keep the phase 2 lockdown in place for a much longer period of time than the phase 1 lockdown, continuing to destroy the global economy, further degrade the supply chain, and further amplify the food shortages, and alike.

-Quell any public outrage using extreme actions/force and make anyone who defy's them appear as public enemy #1 to those who are willing to submit

After a rather long phase 2 lockdown (6+ months), roll-out the vaccination program + vaccine certification and make it mandatory for everyone (giving priority access to those that submitted from the start), and have those that are for it attack those that are against it saying they are a threat and the cause of all the problems (we can't go back to normal until EVERYONE takes the vaccine... people defying them are hurting our way of life and therefore are the enemy).

-If the majority of people go along with the agenda then let those people enter the new system (new normal) while limiting the minority that defy the agenda's ability to work/travel/live.

-If the majority of people go against the agenda then release the weaponized SARS/HIV/MERS tribrid strain as phase 3, a virus with a 30%+ mortality rate as a final scare to push the minority to quickly become the majority and give a final "we told you so" to those that didn't listen.

Enact the new economy model which is based on human behavior and willingness to submit to government authority using food/water/shelter and other essentials as a weapon of enforcement of the new economic system. Basically do what the government wants and get rewarded (gain credits/score and gain more access to things you need to survive) or go against what the government wants and get penalized (lose credits/score and lose access to things you need to survive).

FedEx Threatens to Remove Its Signage from the Redskins Stadium if Their Name Isn’t Changed. Letter says the Name Harms FedEx’s Reputation & is inconsistent w/its commitment to inclusive society

From [HERE] FedEx, the shipping giant that signed a $205 million stadium naming rights deal with the Washington Redskins in 1999, notified the team in a July 2 letter that unless the team changes its name it will remove its signage from the stadium after the NFL’s 2020 season, six years before the deal’s expiration.

The two-page letter, from the general counsel of FedEx to the general counsel at Washington Football Inc., the corporate name of the Redskins, was emailed the same day FedEx publicly acknowledged in a one-sentence statement that it had communicated its “request” that the team change its name.

The private letter is more detailed and pointed. It noted that the team’s name, which it never cited, poses the risk of harming FedEx’s brand reputation and is inconsistent with its commitment to a more inclusive society.

The removal of FedEx’s name and signage from the stadium would cost Snyder dearly. Because FedEx is paying its $205 million naming-rights deal over time, roughly $45 million is due after the 2020 season, if payments are spread out evenly over the 27-year contract. By citing the risk to the FedEx brand, the letter appears to lay the foundation for terminating the agreement “for cause.” That interpretation, confirmed by a person with knowledge of the letter, means that FedEx wouldn’t pay the balance due after 2020 if the name isn’t changed. [MORE]

Movement for Black Lives Proposes the BREATHE Act for Police Reform [but terminating their "Authority" to forcibly control us & interfere w/our freedom whenever they desire not among the goals]

According to FUNKTIONARY: reform - superficial change in form and formalities (fictitious change) which only further lubricates the status quo by renovating and painting old society in new colors. 2) appearance of change sans the change. Reform is always in the service of the status quo and the politician: it serves the privilege of the past not the promise of the future. Reform creates hypocrisy as a matter of course. Reform is the first stage in the three "P,'s" in hue-man evolution; the other two being revolution and rebellion. There are two basic types of reformists: those who are preparing the ground for Third Eye revolution and those who are trying to prevent the conscious revolution. (See: Revolution, Status Quo, Barbarian, Meme & Change).

Dr. Blynd explains “Authority” is rule through physical coercion. It is a farce not a force.

Larken Rose explains, ‘the belief in “authority,” or the right to rule over other people which includes all belief in “government,” is irrational and self-contradictory; it is contrary to civilization and morality, and constitutes the most dangerous, destructive superstition that has ever existed. Rather than being a force for order and justice, the belief in “authority” is the arch-enemy of humanity.’ [MORE]

SEEKING MORE PERFECT MASTERS & BETTER MASTER/SERVANT RELATIONS IN THE FREE RANGE PRISON. From [HERE] The Movement for Black Lives coalition unveiled proposed federal legislation Tuesday seeking to radically transform the US criminal justice system.

The proposals, collectively referred to as the BREATHE Act, follow protests against the police killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Rayshard Brooks, and Elijah McClain, as well as countless other individuals who perished at the hands of police years ago. This legislation seeks to “divest our taxpayer dollars from brutal and discriminatory policing and invests in a new vision of public safety—a vision that answers the call to defund the police and allows all communities to finally BREATHE free.”

The BREATHE Act has four main goals—divert federal resources from jails and police, invest in other methods of community safety, allot funds to rebuilding communities, and hold law enforcement officials accountable for civil rights violations. The act seeks to accomplish its first goal by eliminating federal programs used to support the criminal justice system. The policing, prosecution, sentencing, and jailing practices used in the criminal justice system adversely impact black and brown communities. Through this first goal, the BREATHE Act seeks to reverse the deleterious effects these communities experience on a daily basis. The second goal aims to provide community-led approaches to public safety by defunding local police forces. The act seeks to implement its third goal by promoting educational judgment, which would provide equal funding among all public institutions, close youth detention centers and replace them with community-based, rehabilitation focused centers and remove both armed police and security guards and surveillance equipment from schools. The last goal seeks to prevent voter suppression and disenfranchisement, which currently affects black and brown communities at a greater rate than white communities.

The four goals articulated in the BREATHE act seek to fulfill the Movement for Black Lives’ mission, which is:

“We are rising up against all the ways that the criminal-legal system has harmed and failed to protect Black communities. The current moment requires a solution that fundamentally shifts how we envision community-care and invest in our society. History is clear that we cannot achieve genuine safety and liberation until we abandon police, prisons, and all punishment paradigms.”

Members of Congress have yet to comment on whether they will introduce the BREATHE Act.

ICE Helped Spread COVID by Infecting Non-White Migrants in Its Prisons & then Moving Them from State to State Before Deporting Them & Exporting the Virus

Although Cops Kill a Black Person Every 40 hrs the DOJ Formed a Task Force to Investigate Anti-Govt Protesters to Please its Shrinking, Racist Votary who Believe they Must Murder Blacks to Survive

ACCORDING TO THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTE, “Officer-involved killings have increased about 25% over the past 20 years. Every 20 hours a person is killed by the police. Black people are killed every 40 hours representing about 40% of people killed by police who are not attacking or have a gun. Rarely are officers charged, convicted, or face civil liability for police killings.“

From [HERE] Attorney General William P. Barr on Friday directed the formation of a task force that will be dedicated to countering “anti-government extremists,” escalating federal law enforcement’s response to the violence that has sometimes marked nationwide protests against police brutality and racism, according to a memo obtained by The Washington Post.

In the memo, Barr wrote that amid peaceful demonstrations, anti-government extremists had “engaged in indefensible acts of violence designed to undermine public order.”

“Among other lawless conduct, these extremists have violently attacked police officers and other government officials, destroyed public and private property, and threatened innocent people,” Barr wrote in a directive to all the Justice Department’s law enforcement components and U.S. attorneys. “Although these extremists profess a variety of ideologies, they are united in their opposition to the core constitutional values of a democratic society governed by law. . . . Some pretend to profess a message of freedom and progress, but they are in fact forces of anarchy, destruction, and coercion.”

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Liar Barr should wear a clown suit. Although, a few weeks ago he vowed that the federal investigation into George Floyd’s death would proceed quickly - he has does nothing except talk about increasing the funding of police. As explained by the WashPost, “the Trump administration’s years of inaction on police violence and President Trump’s embrace of law enforcement have made civil rights advocates wary of the Justice Department’s involvement in the Floyd case. The administration has largely dismantled police oversight efforts, curbing the use of federal consent decrees to overhaul local police departments. Mr. Barr has said that communities that criticize law enforcement may not deserve police protection, and Mr. Trump has encouraged officers not to be “too nice” in handling suspects.“

Mr. Trump’s first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, moved to rein Justice Department efforts to investigate patterns of allegations of misconduct by the local police.

Shortly after taking office, he ordered a broad review of consent decrees. On the day he was fired in 2018, Mr. Sessions sharply limited their use altogether. Mr. Sessions repeatedly argued that criticism of the police or excessive oversight could damage the morale of officers, harming their ability to control crime. Mr. Barr, in his own public comments, has stressed that abuses reflect “bad apples” more than systemic breakdowns.

Non-white communities have long criticized Mr. Barr’s full-throated support of law enforcement, beginning with his first stint as attorney general under President George Bush, when he advocated on behalf of maximum sentencing laws that laid the groundwork for high rates of incarceration among black people. [MORE]

Like racist prank callers who call 911 to sic police onto Blacks to physically harm them or put them in greater confinement, racist voters use their anonymous ballots to elect racist government “representatives,” such as Trump, and direct them to act genocidally towards Blacks. Presently, the racist votary lives vicariously through Trump and love being dominated by him and feeling necessary to his domination. FUNKTIONARY explains ‘there are no Tyrants; only tyranny exists. And tyranny requires an accomplice.’ Here, Trump’s tyranny is supported by a mobocracy of simple-minded neanderthals who probably let their tails out and walk on all fours when they get home.

Many commentators correctly observe that Republicans [a crude racial identity party designed to appeal to white people as white people, not as union-members or as unemployed people or as home-owners but as white people] provide almost nothing of tangible benefit to poor, working class neuropeons and actively destroy social programs helpful to said constituents while governing in plain sight on their real agenda of defending the upper-class interest of wealth and corporate power of elite whites. However, commentators misunderstand the nature and benefits of the system of racism white supremacy. Neuropeons view the “alien presence” of non-whites, particularly Blacks and Latinos as “the primary impediment to governing. This presence is racist America’s number one domestic issue.’ It centers around projecting the idea that the White populace is threatened by over­whelming alien forces, particularly Black criminals, non-white immigrants taking their jobs & culture, non-whites demanding welfare and special entitlements and non-whites threatening them abroad.’

Neuropeans and Neuropeons appear to gain great satisfaction and respite from anxiety when; Black men are choked to death in the street by white police officers or when Trump blocks earthquake supplies that were promised to Puerto Rico, leading to 4,000 deaths or when the government poisons the water in Flint harming its poor non-white residents, or when brown children are treated like trash and criminals at the political border. Toward this end the Blight House now has its do-boy, William Barr to act in service of racism white supremacy.

Similarly, by believing that the system of racism white supremacy is a system of bigotry, mean acts and minor inconveniences, Black advocates have gullibly based “the Black struggle” on efforts to change the conduct of racists through moral suasion. As a result Black people are in a continuous state of checkmate (a losing streak that is centuries long). Osho Rajineesh explained you can’t make a mirror out of a brick. It is stupid to try.

Racism is a behavioral system of survival whereby racists believe they must dominate Blacks and other non-whites through genocidal and genthanasiastic conduct in all areas of people activity. Racism is based on their perceived “survival” because racists fear their replacement by non-white people and fear losing control of them. When white and non-white persons intermix or have sexual relations that produce children their offspring necessarily will be non-white. In other words, whites can be “replaced” or "white can be genetically annihilated by non-white persons. As articulated Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, most white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;

• White plus Black equals Colored.

• White plus Brown equals Colored.

• White plus Yellow equals Colored. [MORE] and [MORE]

In other words white people are genetic recessive and can literally be replaced by non-white people. While white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. In fact, according to the Census Bureau, whites remain the only segment of the U.S. population where deaths outpace births. Throughout the world, Caucasians are vastly outnumbered, 90% of the world is non-white. The declining white population is not a new or reversible trend - the decline has only quickened in recent years.

The racist’s worst and most basic fear is the “fear of replacement” or fear of genetic annihilation in the form of the impending "Non-White Planet." [MORE] According to Welsing, ‘genetic annihilation is the fundamental motivation of racists, whether it is conscious and/or subconsciously determined. Said "fear of replacement" and/or fear of losing control over non-whites fuels the system of white supremacy/racism and causes racists to act genocidally towards non-whites in a perceived "survival game" they are engaged in with non-whites. Welsing’s color confrontation theory explained that the more the white population shrinks the worse its conduct toward non-whites will get. [MORE]

She explained, that the global Racist Collective is simultaneously engaging in behaviors—in economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and more—in order for them to survive on the planet, by any means necessary.  In addition, within each of these areas of activity racists have evolved myriad institutions, all of which further the goal of white supremacy. Another part of this unreal but deadly “game” is the fantastic myth of white genetic superiority. Welsing explains, “Acutely aware of their inferior genetic ability to produce skin color, whites built the elaborate myth of white genetic superiority. Elite racists set about the huge task of evolving a social, political and economic structure that would support the myth of the inferiority of Blacks and other non-whites. Welsing said, “if white people had not created such a global system in which they established power over the world's non-white majority, the white collective would have been genetically extinct a long time ago." [MORE] and [MORE] 

In a system of white supremacy/racism it is logical to assume that most white people are racist and or the most powerful people are racist and participate in said system. If this were not so many of the problems (poverty, economic inequality, unemployment, drug addiction, infant mortality, health disparities, chronic welfare dependency, affordable housing, gentrification, homelessness, servant education, the unequal administration of justice, police brutality, jim crow incarceration and much more) caused by white supremacy would not exist. Welsing explained, ‘persons who classify themselves as White, who are righteous and responsible, will work to end White Supremacy (Racism) and replace it with Justice.’

Nelly Fuller explains, "most white people hate Black people. The reason that most white people hate Black people is because whites are not Black people. If you know this about white people, you need know little else. If you do not know this about white people, virtually all else that you know about them will only confuse you." [MORE]  He states "There is no known code of White Supremacy that can be formally recognized as such in a single set of words or pictures. The basic code of white supremacy is the total pattern of everyday thought, speech and action of the individual white persons who practice it. All things that help to promote it are apart of the white code." [MORE]

Welsing plainly states:

“Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (the civilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation), all white peoples have the spoken or unspoken mandate to participate actively in their collective struggle for global white genetic survival. This specifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black and other non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to be necessary and, therefore, justified.” [MORE]

As such there is no need or reason to transform racists through moral suasion. Welsing explains, ’Because Blacks and other non-white people have failed to understand racism as white genetic survival, they erroneously have believed that they could be integrated into the white supremacy system and that they could depend upon whites to maximally develop Black infants, children and youth in the same manner that white people promote the maximal development of white infants, children and youth. Blacks and other non-whites have failed to understand that if white people were to do this, it would mean active white participation in white genocide. Black people must master this perception of racism (local and global) as a war for white genetic survival, a system into which non-white people never can be integrated.” [MORE]

Dr. Bobby Wright stated that racists function as psychopaths in their relations with Black people. He explains that “psychopaths simply ignore the concept of right and wrong. By ignoring this trait in the White race (the lack of ethical and moral development) Blacks have made and are still making a tragic mistake in basing the worldwide Black liberation movement on moral suasion. It is pathological for Blacks to keep attempting to use moral suasion on a people who have no morality where race is the variable.”

Furthermore, gullible Black reformers hoping that the changing demographics will translate into power gained through elections in a so-called representative democracy have misunderstood the fraudulence of democracy. It is worth restating that 90% of the world’s 7 billion people are non-white. Clearly, white skin is an anomaly. Whites have been the world’s minority for some time – nevertheless, 'everywhere one finds Whites and Blacks in close proximity to each other, whether it is Ferguson, Mo. or Zimbabwe, the whites are in control. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every known statistical law of probability.' [MORE]

Elite racists will remain in control after white people officially attain minority status. As explained by Dr. Blynd, ‘Racism White Supremacy is a power group dynamic involving a master-servant relationship between whites and Blacks in a system of vast unequal power. It is economic discrimination by one group over and against another for the purposes of subjugation and/or maintaining the imbalance of power through cooperative control, misinformation, indoctrination, genocide and oppression. Racists also practice racism because they have the power to do so. As explained by Dr. Amos Wilson, 'to end racism/white supremacy we must end or neutralize white power.' [MORE] Such empowerment of Blacks and disempowerment of racists will not come through the ballot.

US democracy is not based on the consent of the governed but the consent of the strongest party -like all despotic governments. The strongest party has little to do with numbers and more to do with the strongest parties superior wealth, resources and their organized ability to act in concert. For instance white people hold 90% of the national wealth compared to Black people with less than 3%. The stronger party acts together to dominate the weaker party with force and coercion. The stronger party creates laws and imposes them on the weaker party. There is nothing consensual about the US system of governance – most laws are commands backed by the threat of violence; you either obey or got to jail. As explained by Lysander Spooner, “It would be absurd for the most numerous party to talk of establishing a government over the less numerous party, unless the former were also the strongest, as well as the most numerous; for it is not to be supposed that the strongest party would ever submit to the rule of the weaker party, merely because the latter were the most numerous. And as a matter of fact, it is perhaps never that governments are established by the most numerous party.” Under this tyrannical arrangement non-whites essentially only have rights that the strongest party allows them to have. Larken Rose explains, 'To expect the master to serve the slave and to expect power to be used solely for the benefit of the one being controlled, not the one in control - is ridiculous.'

BROWN PLUS WHITE = WHITE ONLY IN THE SPECTACLE [MORE]

Somnambulistic advocates forget that Blacks have been voting for a long time. Black and other liberal elected officials at the highest levels and appointments to various government positions along with individual accomplishments in corporations have not translated into power for Black people. Non-whites should witness that Minnesota, Atlanta, St. Louis, Cleveland, Baltimore or NYC or many other places where white cops murder Blacks in broad daylight are all already dominated by liberal Democrats duly elected by the black votary. Said “black voting power” did not produce justice and does not prevent injustice from occurring to Black people. Additionally, as explained Dr. Amos Wilson, “There are so many of us who believe that fear housing laws, anti-discrimination laws, civil rights laws, voting laws and so forth, guarantee our freedom. That is an illusion. What a flight into fantasy!” Most laws are created and funded by white legislators, administered by white Government workers, enforced by white prosecutors and remedied by white jurors and judges [& their Black & Brown clones] - the same racist suspects who participate, perpetuate and/or benefit from this system of white domination and control. "Laws in and of themselves will not protect us."

Neely Fuller correctly states in the system of racism white supremacy Black people are subject to the direct and indirect power of elite racists in all areas of activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, religion, Sex and War. Therefore, elite racists are the direct or indirect masters of Black people. The elite racists are responsible for everything that happens or does not happen in regards to Black people.’ Fuller describes Black people as “the powerless class” because it accurately describes their power relationship between Blacks and elite racists. In their relationship with whites, Blacks cannot be be "upper" or "middle" - but only under whites in this operating system of vast unequal power. He explains, "in a socio-material system dominated by White Supremacists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by White Supremacists. The White Supremacists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers. Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by White Supremacists. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many people — particularly non-white people — prefer not to acknowledge. [MORE]

Amos Wilson asks Blacks, ‘Who has control of your food? Who has control of your electricity? Who has control of your water? Of your jobs? Who tells you what to wear when you go to work? Who tells you when to come to work...when to leave...when to go to lunch...how to speak...how to write...how to do this...how to do that...and how are these things taught, and how they are conditioned?"-- It is by reward and punishment. " You do this you get paid; you don't do this you don't get paid; you get a raise, you get docked. What do we have here?’

To live under the power of another people is to be created by that people. To be rewarded or punished by that people is to be created by that people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of another people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation (i.e., the conditions under which we live), then we must change the power relationships. If we are to prevent ourselves from being created by another people and are to engage in the act of self creation, then we must change the power relations.’

Belief that racism is only bigotry is a vital part of false programming sold to you by the vested interests for your cooperation and submission to your own oppression. [MORE] Defining racism in terms of bad attitude or bigotry leads to solving the wrong problems. [MORE]

Operating within the proper framework or construct we can begin to neutralize the system of racism white supremacy. Wilson stated and asked, 'our salvation requires that we perceive White supremacy as the major social, political, economic, and spiritual problem to be resolved by Afrikan peoples, and that we ask and answer definitively the questions: What kind of culture must we construct in order to overthrow White Supremacy? What kinds of social identities, relations, arrangements, alignments, institutions, values, etc., when actualized, will allow us to attain and protect our liberty?; enhance our quality of life? What kinds of socialization practices must we institute in order to empower ourselves to become the kinds of people we must become if we are to secure our rights to be free?" [MORE]

Wilson probed, "[Blacks] must question how is it that a minority people [whites], a very small percentage of mankind, a people who are essentially resourceless in terms of their natural resources, maintain the power they have.” He asked,

Why is it that the peoples whose lands contain the wealth of the earth are the poorest people? Why is it that Afrika with some twenty (20) or thirty (30) strategic metals that make the space age possible — why is it that the image of Afrika is projected at us time and time again as that of starving children, as societies in disorder, as societies on the verge of disaster? This implies that there must exist a political, social situation wherein the mental orientation of our people must be so structured that the power and the ability of the Europeans to rule this earth are continually maintained.' [MORE]

To what extent is our oppression voluntary, cooperative and consensual? In what ways do we support the master/servant relationship that maintains RSW and what else must be unlearned to unplug ourselves from this system of injustice? Wilson explained

‘We have wasted time appealing to racists, and analyzing them, because we can better appeal to our own sense of self, and our own consciousness, and we have wasted time trying to transform them, when through transforming ourselves, they will be transformed automatically.’ [MORE]

Is Trump More Likely to Get Crushed by Biden, Have a Heart Attack or Steal the Election? Voter Purge Expert Greg Palast says He’s Already Rigged It [Again] by Erasing Non-White Voters Off Voter Rolls

Yesterday the Cook Report predicted “This election is looking more like a Democratic tsunami than simply a Blue wave. President Trump, mired in some of the lowest job approval ratings of his presidency, is trailing Biden by significant margins in key battleground states like Pennsylvania (8 points), Michigan (9 points), and Wisconsin (9 points). He’s even running behind Biden in his firewall states of Florida and North Carolina. 

We’ve made changes to our Electoral College ratings to reflect this reality. 

• Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Nebraska’s 2nd district move from Toss Up to Lean Democrat.

• Maine, once in Lean Democrat, moves to the safer Likely Democratic category. 

• Georgia has joined Arizona, North Carolina and Florida in the Toss Up column, although, at this point, Biden would be slightly favored to win at least Arizona and Florida. 

• Maine’s 2nd district has moved from Likely Republican to a more competitive Lean Republican. 

These moves alone push Biden over the 270 electoral vote threshold (to 279).” [MORE] 

Said predictions are based on the assumption that all votes are actually counted. Voter suppression expert Greg Palast says, “Trump didn’t win in 2016. And I’m not talking about Trump losing the popular vote. Trump lost the Electoral College. That is, he lost if you count all the votes burgled, jacked, swiped, shoplifted, purloined, filched, fiddled and snatched from citizens not of a whitish orange hue.

And unless we wise up, 2020 will be déjà vu all over again.“ [MORE]

His research in a new book is set to drop on July 14th. Gullible Dems and their dependent media will probably pay no attention to it until its all over and then do nothing to protect the so-called voting rights of Black and Latino people. [MORE]

Greg Palast says, “Trump didn’t win in 2016. And I’m not talking about Trump losing the popular vote. Trump lost the Electoral College. That is, he lost if you count all the votes burgled, jacked, swiped, shoplifted, purloined, filched, fiddled and snatched from citizens not of a whitish orange hue.

And unless we wise up, 2020 will be déjà vu all over again.“ [MORE]

Palast’s previous research demonstrated that Trump stole the 2016 using the Interstate Crosscheck program. The program is a voter erasing system in which millions of Black, Latino & Asian voters were removed from voter rolls in swing states by a so-called "voter fraud" program created by the GOP. Thirty (30) states participated in Interstate Crosscheck. Palast calls Crosscheck the "Great White Hope Machine."  

Interstate Crosscheck removed voters from the voter list if a voter's name appeared to be registered in more than one state. Around 7 million names were put on the list of “potential double voters” before the 2014 election. Crosscheck then compares each state’s list with lists from other states in the program. Specifically, according to Palast, the Crosscheck list contains 7,264,422 voters.

Although the Crosscheck program aims to prevent individuals from voting in more than one state in the same election, Crosscheck has been doing the exact opposite and is used to remove legitmate voters from voting rolls. Greg Palast has claimed that before a single vote was even cast, the election was already fixed by Trump operatives who eliminated millions of legitimate African American, Latino and Asian voters from the voter rolls in North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. [MORE]

Palast’s previous work on the 2016 election theft was corroborated by a study by professors from Yale, Harvard, Stanford and U Penn. Dependent media looked the other way. [MORE]

Blight House Proxymoron Tells Media-Hoaxed Reporters that Trump Re-Tweeted the Video of the Racist in the Golf Cart b/c he Thought He was Yelling "Dwight Howard" not "White Power"

WHITE PRESUMACY. From [HERE] On Sunday, June 28th, President Donald Trump retweeted a video of a couple in a golf cart decorated with Trump signs with the driver yelling “white power” twice to protesters while he raised his fist. That phrase and raised fist are attributed to white supremacists as a form of hate speech. Trump added to the retweeted video, “Thank you to the great people of The Villages. The Radical Left Do Nothing Democrats will Fall in the Fall. Corrupt Joe is shot. See you soon!!” 

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany saidthat Trump listened to the video before retweeting it, but claimed that he did not hear the man in the video exclaim, “white power.” When McEnany was asked directly whether Trump condemns the racist term, she didn’t respond. A deputy to the press secretary claimed that Trump did not hear the white supremacist saying, but “what he did see was tremendous enthusiasm from his many supporters.” However, that “enthusiasm” included white supremacist hate speech. There has still been no apology or condemnation of the video from Trump, McEnany, or the White House. [MORE] Fuck trump.

According to Body Cam Transcripts George Floyd Told Police He Couldn’t Breathe 20X & Previously had COVID & Derek Chauvin Mocked Him. Yet Safe-Negro AG Charged White Cop w/Unintentional Murder

From [HERE] George Floyd repeatedly begged police officers not to shoot him and complained of being claustrophobic as they tried to place him in a squad car in the minutes before he was killed on a South Minneapolis street corner in May, according to transcripts of police body camera footage from the scene released Wednesday.

The transcripts make clear that Floyd was trying to cooperate with police but was deathly afraid of them, at times telling them that he had had covid-19 and was worried that he was going to die because he couldn’t breathe while in their custody. As one of the officers — Derek Chauvin — pressed a knee into his neck and held Floyd on the ground, he told Floyd that he must be okay because he was able to speak, saying that he was using up a lot of oxygen pleading for help.

“They going to kill me,” Floyd said as officers sat atop him in the street, according to the transcripts. “They’re going to kill me man.”

Floyd went lifeless minutes later and was pronounced dead.

The newly disclosed transcripts of body cameras worn by J. Alexander Kueng and Thomas K. Lane, two of the four former Minneapolis police officers charged in Floyd’s death, were disclosed in court Wednesday as Lane’s attorney sought to dismiss charges against his client, arguing there is not enough evidence that he committed a crime. [lol]

Lane, according to the transcripts, appeared to ask Chauvin — the most senior officer at the scene — if they should reposition Floyd. Chauvin, according to the transcripts, declined and instead opted to wait for emergency medical help to arrive, keeping his knee on his throat well after Floyd lost consciousness.

The transcripts offer an expanded view of the events that led up to the Memorial Day slaying of Floyd, 46, who died after being pressed into the pavement for eight minutes. It was eight minutes that would transform into one of the largest and most-sustained series of protests in U.S. history, eight minutes that would change the course of the American conversation on police brutality, social justice and racism.

Autopsy showed Floyd had COVID 6 weeks before cops murdered him in the street.

The transcripts also offer more details about Floyd’s encounter with police and perhaps lay out the arguments that will dominate the proceedings as the officers are tried for his death.

They show that Floyd appeared to be afraid of any dealings with police, saying he had been previously shot by an officer and did not want it to happen again. He said he did not want to be placed in a squad car, said he wouldn’t hurt anyone, and numerous times explained that he couldn’t breathe and worried that he was going to die.

They also show that officers at least briefly questioned the tactics of their superior, only to be rebuffed as Floyd took his last gasps of air.

Chauvin, the white officer who was shown with his knee on Floyd’s throat, has been charged with second-degree murder, while the other three officers at the scene — Kueng, Lane and Tou Thao — have been charged with aiding and abetting murder.

[Dependent media’s sleight of hand is that Chauvin is charged with 2nd degree unintentional murder. That is, Safe Negro Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison charged that the white cop did not intend to kill Floyd; rather he intended to commit a felony assault and his death occurred in the process.

The AG and media have done nothing to correct the public’s misunderstanding that when Ellison upgraded the charge from 3rd degree to 2nd degree said change had nothing to do with whether Chauvin’s conduct was purposeful. In Minnesota a third-degree murder is an unintentional killing which results from an act eminently dangerous to others that is done with a wanton and willful disregard of an unreasonable risk to human life. There are two kinds of 2nd degree murder charges in Minnesota; one requires proof the at the defendant intended to kill and the other covers unintended murders where the defendant caused the unintended death during the commission of a felony. Ellison chose the latter which only requires the government to prove that officer Chauvin intended to commit a felony assault on George Floyd and when he did so, his death occurred. The public’s misunderstanding acted as a placebo, calming down protesters - mission accomplished. [MORE] ]

[UNLAWFUL STOP IN VIOLATION OF THE IMAGINARY 4TH AMENDMENT. Another media sleight of hand that typically occurs in coverage of police brutality involving non-whites is the complete omission of the legality of the initial government intrusion into the victim’s freedom of movement.

In Minnesota and nearly all states an officer can’t arrest an adult for a misdemeanor without a warrant, unless he witnesses the person committing it. In other words, the misdemeanor must occur “in the presence” of the officer. The May 25th murder episode of George Floyd began when someone called 911 to report that a man had used a counterfeit $20 bill for a purchase at Cup Foods, a restaurant on Chicago Avenue. The alleged fake bill was used to purchase a pack of cigarettes, a misdemeanor in Minnesota.

Shortly after 8 p.m., Officers Thomas Lane and J.A. Kueng arrived at the restaurant, where employees reported that the customer who had made the purchase was sitting in a car parked nearby on 38th Street. Lane and Kueng found Floyd sitting in the driver's seat and ordered him, then pulled him, out of the car. Floyd was not free to go and detained within the meaning of the 4th Amendment. And when they put their hands on him, he was under arrest within the meaning of the 4th Amendment. Prior to his arrest, the cops did not witness any misdemeanor counterfeiting. As explained, they arrived after the alleged crime occurred and they had no warrant. Thus, the arrest for counterfeiting was probably unlawful.]

Transcripts show that Lane approached the car and called on Floyd at least five times to show his hands, drawing his gun when he didn’t. “I’m sorry, I’m sorry,” Floyd responded, according to a transcript of Lane’s body camera. “I didn’t do nothing. … What did I do though? What did we do, Mr. Officer?”

As Lane asked him to step out of the car, Floyd apologized several times and repeatedly asked the officer not to shoot him.

“I’m sorry, I’m so sorry. God dang man. Man, I got shot. I got shot the same way, Mr. Officer, before,” Floyd told Lane, the transcripts show. “Mr. Officer, please don’t shoot me. Please man.”

“I’m not going to shoot you,” Lane replied.

The transcripts show Floyd continued to ask officers not to shoot him as he stepped from his vehicle and suggest he struggled with officers as they tried to handcuff him. “Stop resisting Floyd!” Shawanda Renee Hill, a witness inside the car, called out, according to the transcript of Lane’s camera.

As Kueng walked Floyd across the street, Lane asked Hill about Floyd’s behavior. “Why’s he getting all squirrelly and not showing us his hands and just being all weird like that?” he asked, according to the transcript.

“I have no clue, because he’s been shot before,” Hill said.

Lane asked if Floyd was “drunk” or “on something.”

“No, he got a thing going on, I’m telling you, about the police,” Hill replied. “He have problems all the time when they come, especially when that man put that gun like that.”

Along with the body camera footage transcripts, Lane’s attorney filed several photos from inside Floyd’s car, including one that he said depicts two counterfeit $20 bills. The image does not show the bill that prompted the 911 call from Cup Foods, which was turned over to police.

A) It is very unlikely that cops could determine whether said bill was counterfeit on the street and B) it is not likely cops or prosecutors could ever prove that when Floyd obtained possession of the alleged fake that he knew the bill was fake- which is required by the Minnesota statute: “ Whoever  . . .having reason to know that the money order, currency, note, or obligation or security is forged, counterfeited, falsely made, altered, or printed, is guilty of offering counterfeited currency.” [MORE] At any rate, the cops never saw the misdemeanor take place.

“And do you know why we pulled you out of the car? Because you was not listening to anything we told you,” Kueng told him, according to the transcript.

“Right, but I didn’t know what was going on,” Floyd replied.

“You listen to us, and we will tell you what’s going on, all right?” Kueng said.

“Yes sir,” Floyd told him.

Lane asked Floyd whether he was on drugs while Kueng pointed out the “foam” around his mouth. But Floyd insisted he was on “nothing” and had been playing basketball earlier.

“You acting real erratic,” Kueng said.

“I’m scared man,” Floyd replied.

According to the transcripts, the officers tried placing Floyd in the squad car, but he resisted, repeatedly telling them he was “claustrophobic” and had “anxiety.” He begged to be released from his handcuffs, promising he wouldn’t hurt anyone. “Y’all, I’m going to die in here,” he told them. “I just had COVID man, don’t want to go back to that.”

By then, Chauvin and Thao had arrived as Kueng and Lane were struggling to get Floyd in the car. It’s unclear whether they were attempting to assist, but at one point, an unknown officer sought to intervene, according to the transcripts. “Man, you’re going to die of a heart attack,” one of the officers told Floyd. “Just get in the car.”

Floyd began to bleed from the mouth, after bumping his head inside the vehicle, and Lane called emergency medical help to the scene. Floyd began to complain that he couldn’t breathe. “I just had COVID, man,” Floyd said. “I can’t breathe. I can’t breathe. Please one of you listen to me.”

Chauvin asked whether Floyd was going to jail, and the officers pulled him from the car. “Get him down on the ground,” Chauvin said.

The transcripts show Floyd continued to complain that he couldn’t breathe and called out for his mother. The officers restrained him on the ground — Lane at his feet, Kueng at his back and Chauvin at his head.

“You’re under arrest guy,” Chauvin told him.

“All right, all right. Oh my god. I can’t believe this. I can’t believe this,” Floyd said. “Mama, I love you … Tell my kids I love them. I’m dead.”

“You’re doing a lot of talking, man,” Chauvin replied.

As the officers held Floyd to the ground, Chauvin asked the other officers if Floyd was “high.” Kueng told him they’d found “a pipe on him.” Floyd again told the officers he couldn’t breathe. “You’re doing fine. You’re talking fine,” Kueng said, as Lane told him to take a “deep breath” and Chauvin told him to “relax.”

“My neck hurts,” Floyd said.

“Uh huh,” Chauvin replied. “You’re doing a lot of talking, a lot of yelling.”

“They going to kill me,” Floyd said. “They’re going to kill me man.”

“Takes a heck of a lot of oxygen to say that,” Chauvin said.

Attorneys for Lane and Keung, rookie officers who had been on the force for less than a week before Floyd’s death, have argued their clients were merely following orders from Chauvin, the senior officer at the scene, as they kept Floyd pinned to the ground even as he complained of struggling to breathe. Floyd ultimately lost consciousness.

The transcripts show Lane asked Chauvin several times if Floyd should be moved.

“No, leave him,” Chauvin told him. “Staying put where we got him.”

Lane told Chauvin he was worried about “excited delirium,” citing a forensic term that has been used by medical examiners to describe the sudden in-custody death of individuals who may be under the influence of drugs or in an agitated state.

“That’s why we got the ambulance coming,” Chauvin said.

“Okay, I suppose,” Lane replied. A few seconds later, he told Chauvin that he believed Floyd had passed out. When an off-duty firefighter on the scene pressed the officers to check Floyd’s pulse, Kueng couldn’t find one.

“Huh?” Chauvin replied, according to the transcript. In the filing, Earl Gray, an attorney for Lane, pressed for charges against his client to be dropped, citing the body camera footage as proof that his client had not played “an intentional role in aiding the commission of a crime” or that he was aware that Chauvin was committing a crime

The transcript suggests the ambulance arrived about two minutes later. Video shows that Chauvin removed his knee from Floyd’s neck only when prodded by a paramedic. Lane jumped into the ambulance with medics and began performing chest compressions in an attempt to revive Floyd, who was by then in full cardiac arrest, according to the transcript of Lane’s body camera.

A medic quizzed Lane on whether Floyd had been fighting with the officers. Later, another medic informed Lane that Floyd had “crashed” in the ambulance.

“I wonder what he was on,” the unidentified person said.

“Not sure, but yeah, he seemed very agitated and paranoid,” Lane replied.

“That’s a shame,” the person said.

“Yeah,” Lane responded.

The Hennepin County Medical Examiner found that Floyd had fentanyl and methamphetamine in his system at the time of his death. But its report cited “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression” as the cause of his death, not drugs.

A Hennepin County judge last month set a tentative trial date of March 8 for the four former officers. Prosecutors have signaled they are pushing for all four men to be tried together, but Judge Peter A. Cahill said he is still weighing the question of joint prosecutions.

The officers are set to be in court for a pretrial hearing on Sept. 11.

"Who Is It?" Cops Ignored Breonna Taylor before Maliciously Shooting Her Based on an Unlawful Warrant. Complaint Says “Lingering" Residents were Targeted for Removal by City in a Gentrification Push

From [HERE] and [HERE] Breonna Taylor's shooting was the result of a Louisville police department operation to clear out a block in western Louisville that was part of a major gentrification makeover, according to attorneys representing the slain 26-year-old's family.

Lawyers for Taylor's family allege in court documents filed in Jefferson Circuit Court Sunday that a police squad — named Place-Based Investigations — had "deliberately misled" narcotics detectives to target a home on Elliott Avenue, leading them to believe they were after some of the city's largest violent crime and drug rings.

The complaint — which amends an earlier lawsuit filed by Taylor's mother against the three Louisville officers who fired their weapons into Taylor's home — claims Taylor was caught up in a case that was less about a drug house on Elliott Avenue and more about speeding up the city's multi-million dollar Vision Russell development plan. [MORE]

After Taylor’s death the City bought the house for $17k

The introduction of the complaint states:

Breonna’s home should never have had police there in the first place. When the layers are peeled back, the origin of Breonna’s home being raided by police starts with a political need to clear out a street for a large real estate development project and finishes with a newly formed, rogue police unit violating all levels of policy, protocol and policing standards. Breonna’s death was the culmination of radical political and police conduct. As the factual allegations set forth further herein will confirm, a police unit went on a crusade to target people and homes in a confined area of Elliott Avenue in west Louisville. People needed to be removed and homes needed to be vacated so that a high dollar, legacy-creating real estate development could move forward. One of the primary roadblocks to this unit and the real estate development project was an ex- boyfriend of Breonna Taylor, who rented a home on Elliott Avenue. The police unit’s efforts to clean house on Elliott became so outrageous, unlawful, corrupt and reckless that a bogus, no-knock search warrant was obtained for the home of Breonna Taylor, a woman with no criminal history, no drugs in her home, no targets in her home and whose home was more than 10 miles away from Elliott Ave. From there, the named Defendants made error after error, violated policy after policy and committed unlawful act after unlawful act, resulting in Breonna being taken from the Louisville community and from her family far too soon.”

The complaint states, afterwards cops falsified police reports to cover up “mistakes” in executing the warrant. It also states that the LMPD and the Mayor are refusing to release body camera footage.

Like the Chokehold Ban, Is Reform Legislation Needed for NYPD To Enforce Criminal Assault Laws? SUV Drives Through BLM Protest but Cops Catch & Release the White Driver w/No Charges or a Ticket

From [HERE] The New York Police Department is investigating why a man drove his SUV through a Black Lives Matter protest in Midtown Manhattan. 

The man drove a black Dodge Durango through a demonstration on Tuesday night after protesters tried to stop the car at 42nd Street and Sixth Avenue while they marched, according to NYPD officials. Police briefly detained the man a few blocks away but then released him, the officials said. They declined to provide the driver’s identity. No one was injured or arrested, according to the officials. 

Video of the incident was shared on social media. 

New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williamssaid on Twitter Wednesday that his office was also investigating the matter. “This video is extremely troubling. Someone could have been killed, but thankfully no serious injuries have been reported,” Mr. Williams, a Democrat, wrote.

The march had begun at Washington Square Park and made its way throughout the city, stopping traffic and, at one point, preventing drivers from entering the Lincoln Tunnel.

The protesters were making their way across 42nd Street when the driver appeared to speed up, targeting cyclists and marchers.

One cyclist, Jeffrey, told NY1’s Ruschell Boone about the terrifying moments when the car pushed its way through the crowd.

“I am on my bicycle. I swear to God, he was coming for me,” said a protester who was nearly struck down by an SUV that plowed through a crowd of #BlackLivesMatterprotesters in #Midtown on Tuesday night. https://t.co/vfNOloQdwppic.twitter.com/QysIEGozMo

— Spectrum News NY1 (@NY1) July 8, 2020

“He didn’t stop,” Jeffrey said, “he literally put pedal to the metal and literally drove through the crowd. It was devastating.”

“I rode beside the car and punched the car,” he said. “Luckily I didn’t injure my hand, but I punched the glass. You can imagine the speed he’s going, the intensity. I just wanted to protect the crowd.”

One of the protest organizers talked about what she witnessed.

BREAKING: Our @RuschellBoone was on the scene in Manhattan when an SUV sped through a crowd of #BlackLivesMatter protesters, dragging a bicycle on the ground for at least a block. Protesters are telling NY1 no one was seriously injured. pic.twitter.com/X3mM82Nfqv

— Spectrum News NY1 (@NY1) July 8, 2020

“I see him drive by and I see four or five bikes being pushed to the point where it’s sparking on the ground,” she said. “I knew there was a family with a toddler. My first thought was, holy crap, I hope they didn’t just run this kid over.” [MORE]

Fed Court says the Govt Didn't Need a Warrant To Put a Pole Camera Outside a Black Woman's Home that took Images of Her House 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week, for 8 months to Bust Her for Drugs

From [HERE] In United States v. Moore-Bush,1 the First Circuit recently held that the government does not need a warrant to place a pole camera outside of a defendant’s home. The court considered whether the placement of that camera violated the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Carpenter v. United States.2

The breadth of the Fourth Amendment has been hotly debated in the justice system, especially with regard to the impact of advances in technology. The Supreme Court took up this question in 2018 in Carpenter, when it determined that the use of cell-site records maintained by third-party cell phone companies to trace individuals’ whereabouts constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment. The Court reached this decision because the records provided the Government with “near perfect surveillance and allow[ed] it to travel back in time to retrace a person’s whereabouts,” implicating serious privacy concerns.

The facts in Carpenter presented a tension in Fourth Amendment caselaw between an individual’s expectation of privacy in his or her physical location or movements on the one hand, which have generally been recognized as protected, and an individual’s expectation of privacy regarding information it has turned over to a third party on the other, which historically has not been protected. Since Carpenter, Courts have had to interpret the case’s holding while also considering the earlier Fourth Amendment caselaw that limit privacy protections for actions taken in public view.

In Moore-Bush, the First Circuit overturned the district court’s decision to suppress evidence obtained from a pole camera. The First Circuit stated in Moore-Bush that the Supreme Court in Carpenter “was concerned with the extent of the third-party exception to the Fourth Amendment law of reasonable expectation of privacy and not with the in-public-view doctrine spelled out in Katz v. United States3 and involved in this case.”

The only thing upholding the 4th Amendment is your belief in it! Your “writes” are just words on paper. Your “rights” exist on the thought standard - you have rights if a police officer or government orderly thinks you have rights. Such rights then dwell in a “consensus reality” - “a movie comprising belief, expectation and the magic of agreeing. 2) an aggrieved upon hallucination.” [con-sense-us]

In Moore-Bush, the government put a pole camera in front of the home of co-defendants Daphne Moore and Nia Moore-Bush. The Black women are mother and daughter and Daphne Moore was the clerk in the Hampden Superior Court. The camera showed a front view of the house, driveway, and the street in front of the home but did not capture the house’s front door. The camera took images 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for eight months. Agents could zoom and tilt the camera. The government ultimately indicted Moore and Moore-Bush for drug trafficking and money laundering offenses.

The information obtained from the pole cameras was intended to be used at trial as evidence and served in part as the basis for warrants for additional surveillance, including tracking locations of individuals using cell phone location data and placing pen registers and trap and trace devices on several cell phones. The district court compared the pole camera surveillance to that of the cell-site records in Carpenter, indicating that the surveillance allowed the authorities to get an intimate view of a suspect’s daily life unlike information that could be obtained by simply being in the public view.

On appeal, the First Circuit indicated that the comparison drawn by the district court to Carpenter was inappropriate. The First Circuit noted that the Supreme Court in Carpenteracknowledged that its holding was “narrow” and did not “call into question conventional surveillance techniques and tools.” The Supreme Court specifically stated that one of these “conventional surveillance techniques and tools” is security cameras, which the First Circuit equated with pole cameras. In addition, the First Circuit drew a “sharp contrast” between the new technology being dealt with in Carpenter, data that is acquired from the use of modern cell phones, and the technology being used in Moore-Bush, which has been used as a form of surveillance since the 1980s. Thus, the First Circuit concluded that under Carpenter, the information obtained from the pole camera would not be considered an unconstitutional search.

Moreover, the First Circuit stated that the district court’s holding was in contravention with Fourth Amendment doctrine not implicated in Carpenter: that an individual does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy to information that one knowingly submits to public view. The Court argued that the pole cameras only captured information that a lay person passing on the street could have observed and therefore, Moore and Moore-Bush had no reasonable expectation of privacy regarding this information as established by foundational Fourth Amendment caselaw in Katz and Smith v. Maryland.4 Indeed, the First Circuit stated “Nowhere in the Carpenter opinion does the Court suggest that any of those cases, or any part of the Court’s existing Fourth Amendment framework . . . has been overruled or modified. Instead, the opinion was framed as ‘how to apply the Fourth amendment to a new phenomenon.’”

Though Carpenter’s impact on the Fourth Amendment landscape is undeniable, the First Circuit’s opinion in Moore-Bush suggests that perhaps it is limited. Couching the Supreme Court’s decision as focusing primarily on the use of new technology and expectations of privacy associated with providing information to a third party, the First Circuit attempted to protect prior precedent and narrow Carpenter’s scope. As more circuits are confronted with interpreting Carpenter, we will monitor whether they take a similar, limited view.

1 United States v. Moore-Bush, Nos. 19-1582, 19-1625, Nos. 19-1583, 19-1626, 2020 WL 3249060 (1st Cir. June 16, 2020).

2 Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018).

3 Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).

4 Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).

Kareem Johnson is the 170th Death-Row Exoneree: White Prosecutors & Cops Told a Jury that the Victim's Blood was On a Red Hat He Wore, Found at the Murder Scene-but there was no blood or red hat

From [HERE] Former Pennsylvania death-row prisoner Kareem Johnson has been exonerated, thirteen years after being wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death by a Philadelphia jury. On July 1, 2020, the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas completed his exoneration, formally entering an order dismissing all charges against him in his capital case. On May 19, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had barred his reprosecution because of prosecutorial misconduct that exhibited a conscious and reckless disregard for his right to a fair trial .

Johnson is the third death-row exoneration in 2020 and the 170th death-row exoneration DPIC has confirmed in the United States since 1973. He is the third former Philadelphia death-row prisoner exonerated in the last six-and-one-half months. Walter Ogrod was exonerated in June 2020 and Christopher Williams was exonerated in December 2019.

Johnson’s wrongful conviction and death sentence were a product of official misconduct, false forensic evidence, and ineffective representation. He was convicted and sentenced to death in 2007 based upon evidence and argument falsely informing the jury that DNA evidence had linked him to the murder. The prosecution, police, and a prosecution forensic analyst told the jury that Johnson had shot the victim, Walter Smith, at such close range that Smith’s blood spattered onto a red baseball cap Johnson was wearing that supposedly had been recovered at the murder scene. Philadelphia homicide prosecutor Michael Barry [racist suspect in photo above] falsely linked Johnson to the murder through the hat, telling jurors in his opening statement that it “was left at th[e] scene in the middle of the street [and] has Kareem Johnson’s sweat on it and has Walter Smith’s blood on it.”

Officer William Trenwith then testified that he had found the hat laying 8–10 feet from Smith’s body. He further told the jury that, in his years of investigating homicide, he had never seen blood travel that far a distance from a victim’s body. Based on that testimony, Barry told jurors: “We know that he [Kareem Johnson] got in real close, within 2½ feet, close enough so that Walter Smith’s blood could splash up onto the bill of the cap he was wearing.” Barry argued: “Do you know who says the killer wore the hat? Walter Smith says the killer wore the hat. He says it with his blood.”

In fact, there was no blood on the red hat, nor did the police property receipt for the hat contain any indication of blood. Smith’s blood was actually on a second hat — a black hat he was wearing at the time he was shot in the head. The DNA reports for the red hat also raised questions about the sweat stain attributed to Johnson. The initial DNA report on the sweat stain — which was supplemented twice without explanation — did not link the hat to Johnson.

When post-conviction counsel for Johnson discovered the discrepancies in the evidence, police and prosecutors claimed to have mixed up the hats. The Philadelphia DA’s office agreed that Johnson’s conviction should be overturned but stipulated to its reversal in April 2015 based only “on ineffective assistance of counsel at the guilty-innocence phase of trial.” Prosecutors insisted at the time of the stipulation that Johnson “agree[ ] to withdraw all other claims … including claims alleging prosecutorial misconduct of District Attorney Michael Barry.”

After obtaining additional discovery in preparation for retrial, Johnson moved to bar his retrial on double jeopardy grounds. Although the lower courts described the prosecution’s mishandling of the evidence in the case as “extremely negligent, perhaps even reckless” and called Johnson’s trial a “farce,” they allowed the retrial to proceed.

On May 19, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed, finding that the misconduct — even if not deemed intentional — was so severe that retrying Johnson would violate his constitutional rights. “Under Article I, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution,” it wrote, “prosecutorial overreaching sufficient to invoke double jeopardy protections includes misconduct which not only deprives the defendant of his right to a fair trial, but is undertaken recklessly, that is, with a conscious disregard for a substantial risk that such will be the result.” The ruling expanded Pennsylvania’s double jeopardy protections to include cases not only of intentional misconduct, but also reckless disregard for the defendant’s right to a fair trial. Two justices dissented, saying that granting Johnson a retrial was a sufficient remedy for the prosecution’s actions.

The court returned the case to the trial court with directions to enter an order granting Johnson’s motion to bar retrial. The Philadelphia courts formally dismissed the charges on July 1.

Johnson is Pennsylvania’s ninth death-row exoneration and the sixth from Philadelphia. All six Philadelphia exonerations have involved official misconduct. Johnson remains incarcerated on unrelated murder charges. His innocence claim on those charges is pending in the Pennsylvania state courts.

Fed Judge Shuts Down Dakota Access Pipeline: President Yurugu Granted Permits w/o Any Public Process or Regard for Native American Treaty Rights, Water Systems, Resources & Historic Properties

From [HERE] and [HERE] A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled on Monday that the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) must shut down pending a review of its environmental impact. This ruling comes after Judge James Boasberg ruled in March that the US Army Corps of Engineers violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Boasberg ordered a full environmental review and production of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which can take several years. Further, they must seek new permits.

Additionally, Boasberg explained that he “is mindful of the disruption such a shutdown will cause.” However, he stated, “[T]he seriousness of the Corps’ deficiencies outweighs the negative effects of halting the oil flow for the thirteen months that the Corps believes the creation of an EIS will take.” Ultimately, Boasberg concluded:

[G]iven the seriousness of the Corps’ NEPA error, the impossibility of a simple fix, the fact that Dakota Access did assume much of its economic risk knowingly, and the potential harm each day the pipeline operates, the Court is forced to conclude that the flow of oil must cease.

Former president Barack Obama rejected [JURIST report] the pipeline in 2012 and 2015 on climate change grounds, but President Donald Trump gave the project a green light shortly after his inauguration in 2017 via a presidential permit. According to the suit,

TransCanada’s permit applications had been denied two previous times, but on January 24, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed a memorandum “invit[ing] TransCanada . . . to promptly re-submit its application to the Department of State for a Presidential permit for the construction and operation of the Keystone XL Pipeline.” Memorandum: Construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline, 82 Fed. Reg. 8,663, § 2 (Jan. 24, 2017) (“the Memorandum”). Unlike in the two previous permit applications, Defendants initiated no public process or environmental review of any kind for the third permit application.

Despite the lack of any public process and review, on March 23, 2017, the Department of State published its Record of Decision and National Interest Determination (“2017 Decision”). Plaintiffs’ Exhibit A; see 82 Fed. Reg. 16,467 (Apr. 4, 2017). Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas A. Shannon, Jr., granted TransCanada’s permit application and issued it a presidential permit (“the Permit”).

In granting this third application, Defendants reached the exact opposite conclusion as the previous administration on the very same record, in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. 5. In granting this third application, there was no analysis of the trust obligation the federal government owes to the Rosebud Sioux Tribe and their unique water system, no analysis of the potential impact of the Pipeline on treaty rights, no analysis of the subpar leak detection system and the potential impact of spills on Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s members, and no analysis of the potential impact on the Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s cultural resources and historic properties in the path of the Pipeline, in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Historic Preservation Act [MORE]

“You don't have to stay where you're not wanted forever." Ghana is Welcoming African Americans who Want to Live in a Less Confining Environment & Has Earmarked 500 Acres of Land for Newcomers

From [HERE] Kimberly Reese has never visited Ghana, but she is already designing her dream home there. The Ohio mother of five says she doesn’t feel safe in the United States.

“Some of us are tired,” Reese said. “Some of us just want to be in an environment where we don’t have to look over our shoulders. Where we don’t have to worry about our sons getting pulled over.”

She’d rather focus on floor plans some 6,000 miles away.

As the United States again confronts its history of racism, as outrage again erupts over police killings, leaders in Ghana say they’re rolling out the welcome mat for black Americans who want to get away from the turmoil.

The government has negotiated with local chiefs to earmark 500 acres of land near the nation’s center for newcomers, carving out enough space for about 1,500 families. Survey and registration fees are waived for members of the African diaspora.

The effort grew out of a public campaign called the Year of Return, which attracted a record number of tourists to the West African country last year — four centuries after the first slave ship reached Virginia — and aims to convert visitors to residents with special land deals, expatriate guides and easier paths to citizenship.

“We want to remind our kin over there that there is a place you can escape to,” said Akwasi Agyeman, chief executive of the Ghana Tourism Authority. “That is Africa.”

Reese, who owns a public relations agency in Cincinnati, heard about the deal from her close friend and business partner, who is from Ghana.

She can work anywhere with an Internet connection and has tucked away savings from her time in corporate America, where a manager once said her natural hair was inappropriate for the workplace.

Now old pain swirls with renewed fears: What if police stop her teenage son on his walk to the recreation center?

“It isn’t like that in Ghana,” she said. “You don’t have to worry about being black.”

THE TRUE SIZE OF AFRICA. FUNKTIONARY EXPLAINS:

African American - a non-immigrant Afrikan (mentally captured and economically indentured) in America. 2) the hyphenated hybrid---implicated, marginalized, demonized, profiled, targeted, Xeroxed, incarcerated Afrikan misplaced in America. “African-American" is a dash surrounded by a paradox masked as contradiction; an existential aposiopetic pause---a stutter step for the proverbial cause---a tenuous graft that left us faded, jaded, degraded, and unwhole, and in fact, according to his-story, less than a half---one third human to be exact. It is the fool who says "I have lost nothing in Africa or I have not gained anything in America." (See: Doctrine of Exclusion, Racism White Supremacy, Melanin & Genius)

A MAJOR GOAL OF THE GLOBAL SYSTEM OF RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY IS TO PUT NON-WHITE PEOPLE INTO GREATER CONFINEMENT.

The number of visitors in 2019 from January to September leaped by 237,000 — a 45 percent increase, according to the Ghana Tourism Authority. Most came from the United States.

Officials are building on that upswing with a 10-year program, launched in June, to entice people to keep their talents (and money) in Ghana.

Outreach has ramped up since the killing of George Floyd in the custody of Minneapolis police, which set off protests worldwide — including in Ghana’s capital, Accra.

President Nana Akufo-Addo sent the country’s traditional kente cloth to Floyd’s family after his funeral in Houston. Mourners held their own memorial for the slain American in seaside Accra, chanting some of his last words, “I can’t breathe.”

“We continue to open our arms and invite all our brothers and sisters home,” Barbara Oteng Gyasi, Ghana’s tourism minister, said at a televised ceremony. “Build a life in Ghana. You do not have to stay where you are not wanted forever.”

Ghana has extended such invitations for decades.

After the country declared independence from Britain in 1957, the first prime minister, Kwame Nkrumah, received American civil rights leaders.

“He thought the independence of Ghana was meaningless without the total liberation of people of African descent everywhere in the world,” said Kevin Gaines, a professor of civil rights and justice at the University of Virginia.

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., one of his first guests, told his congregation that Nkrumah had urged them to come and help build the new nation.

A handful of Americans accepted that mission. Among them: Pauli Murray, a prominent activist and lawyer who landed at the Ghana School of Law in Accra.

“She lacked professional opportunities and ended up helping Ghana develop its legal and constitutional infrastructure,” said Gaines, who wrote a book about the period.

The movement stalled after a coup ousted Nkrumah in 1966 and autocracy swept much of the continent.

Today, roughly 3,000 American expatriates live in Ghana.

Some view the arrivals as wealthy outsiders in a country where 30 percent of the population lives on less than $3.20 per day.

The government has urged people to stop calling them foreigners. (A previous marketing campaign cast the Americans as “brothers and sisters.”)

Not everyone feels welcome: A colonial-era law still criminalizes homosexuality. The rule is rarely enforced, but LGBT activists in Ghana say it fuels discrimination and harassment.

Leaders play up other cultural and economic selling points, promoting lower costs, glittering shorelines and early investment opportunities in developing industries.

Travel restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic haven’t chilled interest, said Maurice Cheetham, who runs a tour company in Accra.

People are angry about Floyd and others who met violent ends at the hands of law enforcement. About the virus killing disproportionately high numbers of black Americans. About President Trump retweeting a video that featured a supporter yelling, “White power!”

“With the political climate, people are really looking to get here as soon as they can,” Cheetham said.

One is Kindra Parker, 42, who spent this week packing up her house in Detroit.

The music publicist fell in love with Accra when she visited in 2018 and planned to return for two months this spring. Her fiance grew up there. Then the pandemic hit, and Ghana suspended international flights.

Parker had never felt so trapped in the United States.

“I’m scouring my house, purging it, throwing everything away,” she said. “As soon as the borders open, I’m out.” [MORE]

Using Crime to Justify Their Original Crime: Masters & Their Servants Find Hidden Meaning in the Murder of an 8yr Old Black Child [demographic crime has nothing to do w/the value of Black Lives]

ALL BLACKS ARE VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE DEATH OF AN 8 YR OLD? This is low calorie logic. Here, elite racists talk to us through their dummy rolebot strawbosses. A goal here is to criminalize blacks in order to treat them criminally. IN GENERAL, crime is committed locally and most crime is committed by whites against other whites. And does the self -righteous do-gooder mayor really believe that Black PEOPLE need to demonstrate or prove their humanity to whites? Black lives matter is not an argument or a debate. This is unnecessary begging, flattery to racists.

SECOND GUESSING WHETHER BLACK LIVES HAVE VALUE? That’s something only a NGHR or a racist would do. Atlanta’s strawboss Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms stated, “We have talked about this movement that’s happening across America in this moment in time where we have the ears and interests of people across this country and across this globe who are saying they want to see change. But the difference in this moment in time and the Civil Rights movement, the Civil Rights movement -- it was a defined common enemy. So we’re fighting the enemy within when we are shooting each other up on our streets and the city. “You shot and killed a baby. And it wasn’t one shooter. There were at least two shooters. An 8-year-old baby. And you want people to take us seriously. And you don't want us to lose this movement, then we can't lose each other in this.” [MORE]

The mayor is not part of any “movement”, she works for the same government that simultaneously authorizes cops to treat Black people as their enemy and slaves. Sambo rolebot Keisha Lance Bottoms used this episode to stop protesters from occupying a burned down Wendy’s. She said the city had been negotiating with protesters about use of the Wendy’s site. “An 8-year-old baby has been killed, so the discussions have ended,” she said. However, thus far, no facts indicate that any protesters were involved in the murder of this child. Also, the incident apparently occurred in the driveway of a liquor store that was directly across the street from a Texaco - not at the Wendy’s, which is further down the road and across a divided highway. Nevertheless, the dependent media has been parroting government authorities’ false inferences that the child’s murder was somehow either connected to protest at the Wendy’s, or related to “the movement” or it was committed by a protester. Also, with the exception of a recent uptick in crime, crime rates remain at historic lows and are nowhere near where they were during the 1990’s. Over the past 25 years, crime in major cities fell 65 percent. [MORE] and [MORE]. Presently, crime in America’s 30 largest cities remains near historic lows. [MORE]. Atlanta Police Department statistics (which do not include last weekends numbers) indicate that violent crime, petty crime and arrests are down compared to 2019 levels at this time of the last year [see chart above]. According to APD figures there were 4 less murders by 6/27/19. As stated, in The Spectacle information is presented in accord with the appetite of the racist and or obedient listener and not in accord with reality.

In the face of consistently declining crime rates, especially in the past few years, Governments and racists have been struggling to justify the militarization of police, the large numbers of cops and the high cost of police budgets. Racists have been selling 'the fear of Blacks' to whites for decades to justify treating Blacks criminally. High crime was part of this old order [that many racists and mentacidal Blacks still cling to]. High crime was also indirectly used to justify the original crime, that is ongoing. The vested interests are in search of a new basis to justify over policed, heavily surveilled Black & Brown communities. With less crime around, it looks like a free range prison or plantation to those who have eyes to see. 

Dr. Blynd explains, 

Black-on-Black Crime - a psycho-political euphemism, unwittingly used and abused by African-Americans and deliberately by Caucasians, describing demographic criminal activity in general, as people commit violent crimes on people who live in closest proximity to them, and the violence mostly occurs by those and to those who are held hostage under chronic and cyclical economically disadvantaged circumstances and environments. Do you ever hear of the slogan "White-on-White" crime? Most violent crimes (by number and by percentage of population) take place by Caucasians against Caucasians. Where's the associated terminology? (See Gangbanking & Racism." [MORE]  

Dr. Amos Wilson explains

"Alleged Black criminality, while evoking White American fear and loathing, reassures them of their vaunted self-worth, their assumed innately superior moral standing, of their self-congratulatory self-constraint in contrast with presumed Black American unworthiness, innate inferior moral standing, inherent criminality, lack of self-constraint and self-control.

White America's self-appreciation is enhanced as it insatiably feeds on overblown reports about Black criminality while denying its own incomparable criminal record, and its own racist-imperialist incubation and giving birth to the very same criminal forces which now threaten to destroy it.

Black criminals function as a negative reference group vital to maintaining the White American self-image. The Black criminal is used to support the White American community's self-serving, self-justifying judgments of itself. White America's preoccupation with Black criminality betrays its own need for reassurance; betrays its own basic insecurity regarding its projected moral purity. Consequently, the higher the incidence of reported Black criminality, the more exceptionally righteous White America feels itself to be. The more righteous it feels itself to be the more intensely and guiltlessly it promulgates and justifies its domination and exploitation of African peoples at home and abroad. [MORE]

He states, “Through projection the White community seeks to transform its evil, criminal, genocidal characteristics and intentions into good, law-abiding characteristics and intentions. Thus its evil becomes good. Once it projectively criminalizes the Black community it feels free to treat it criminally. Thus, to defend its own positive self-perception against knowledge  of its own criminality, the White community must falsely accuse the Black community of criminality. For the sake of its own positive self-perception, the White community needs to perceive the Black community as criminal, whether or not such is the case.”

MASTERS & THEIR SERVANTS = RACISTS & THEIR NGHRS. Conversely, when Black people believe such racist programming about themselves the product is a falsified consciousness. As stated by Amos Wilson,

"it is not so much that the European says we are inferior, and that we are this and that, and that the European maligns our character, et cetera: It is the belief on our part that what he says is true that makes us crazy. It is a crazy reaction to what he says, an insane and unthinking kind of approach to dealing with what he says about us, that maintains the craziness. [MORE] 

Such a consciousness is a political necessity to maintain RSW. No one can play master without servants. The system of racism white supremacy is based on cooperative control. This “group dynamic” concerns the consensual master/servant relations between white and black people. Whether racists are rich, poor, Democrat or Republican, they all seek master-servant relations with non-white people - said relations are the gravamen of the current operating system of racism white supremacy. Non-whites who indulge in such relations can be described as niggers within the meaning of FUNKTIONARY [see below].

This two way relationship is something Black people can control and is a main source of Black people’s problems, it must be destroyed. Amos Wilson explains,

'the white man’s so-called power, is to a great extent based upon the nature of the relationship he has with the Black man. We empower him by the nature of our own behavior and attitudes as a people. He cannot be what he is, unless we are, what we are. To a good extent, the European is our creation … yes. If we look at our behavior, we will see that to a good extent, it is our behavior, our values, our consciousness, the kind of personalities we’ve established in ourselves, our taste, our desires and needs; that maintains the European in its position.’  

The destruction of the master/servant relationship does not mean destroying white folks or not having relations with them. It means no longer engaging in master/servant relations with white people. Thereafter, relations with white people can be either at arms-length or non-existent. When a critical mass of individual, self-respecting Black people do so the voluntary nature of RSW would cease to exist, forcing change.

NGHR - the consonant-letter-configuration for the ineffable (unmentionable) derogatory name ascribed to Afrikans, first by ignorant and degenerate Caucasians, then by us—especially here in racist Amerikkka. We use the unexpressed letters "NGFfR" to convey the reality that we cannot delete (erase) the name, nor can the name "Nigger" for which it represents, be rehabilitated or commandeered to a word of endearment (without dire consequence)—even between two Afrikans conscious of the damage and semantic baggage the name carries and the atrocities carried out from its dehumanizing effects without—and the psychological effects of self-hatred deep within. When group slurs are used to insult an individual—in person our through the media—unwittingly a whole people are being attacked in the process. Using the "N-word" loosely among ourselves arms those who are our natural enemies the aided ability and added enmity to act out their madness upon us as we act-out (perpetuate) the self-hate buried within and behind the seemingly harmless expression that whenever spoken is exhumed and haunts us like a ghost off the Goree Island coast. The "brother" who playfully embraces you with a hug around the neck as he greets and speaks "My Nigga," is more likely (than not) the same one who will point a gun to your dome and pull the trigger. Supposedly though, you were his "Nigger," so now being a statistic only your survivors are left to go figure. Through the means of languacultural and literary exorcism the historical word "Nigger," whenever summoned by a writer, should now be written as "NGHR" to inform all others that you have consciously taken control over your use of the nefarious name and realizing that using it from now on will never be taken, given or accepted the same nor will it be spoken like its all just a harmless game. "NGHR" is alsc an acrostic for "Now Giving Honor Respectfully." That is, we are no longer giving the "N-word" circulation because its currency has always been spurious, inflammatory, "illegit" and strictly counterfeit.