42 Yrs Later the System of Injustice Releases 76 yr Old Black Man on Death Row and 61 yr Old Black Man Serving Life Sentence; No Physical Evidence Linked Them to Murder and Another Person Confessed

Clifford Williams.jpg

injustice - the by product of authority and its enforcement through legal fictions: the Corporate Police State and their tribunals. FUNKTIONARY.

From [HERE] and [HERE] Forty-two years after he and his nephew were wrongfully convicted of murder in Florida and he was sentenced to death, Clifford Williams, Jr. (pictured) and and Hubert "Nathan" Myers have been exonerated. Submitting a report from its Conviction Integrity Unit that found “no credible evidence of guilt and … credible evidence of innocence,” Duval County prosecutors asked a Jacksonville trial court to dismiss all charges against Williams, now 76 years old, and his nephew, Nathan Myers, now 61.

Williams is the 165th former death-row prisoner to be exonerated in the United States since 1973.

Williams and Myers were tried and convicted in 1976 for the murder of Jeanette Williams and the wounding of her girlfriend, Nina Marshall. Marshall told police that two men had entered their bedroom at night and fired shots from the foot of the bed. She identified Williams and Myers as the shooters. However, the physical evidence — never presented by defense counsel — revealed that the bullets had been fired from outside, through the bedroom window, and had come from a single gun. Defense counsel also ignored forty alibi witnesses whom Williams and Myers had indicated would be able to testify that they had been next door at a birthday party at the time the shooting occurred. The defense presented no witnesses. The first trial resulted in a mistrial. In the second trial, which lasted two days, prosecutors argued, without presenting any supporting evidence, that the men committed the murder because Jeannette Williams supposedly owed them a $50 drug debt. The jury convicted Williams and Myers but recommended that they be sentenced to life. Judge Cliff Shepard — a notoriously harsh trial judge — overrode the jury’s sentencing recommendation for Williams and sentenced him to death. Shepard accepted the life recommendation for 18-year-old Myers.

Prosecutors began reinvestigating the case after newly elected State Attorney Melissa Nelson created the first Conviction Integrity Unit in the state in 2018. The unit issued its report, authored by Conviction Integrity Review Director Shelley Thibodeau, in February. The report noted that no physical evidence linked Williams or Myers to the shooting and that “the physical and scientific evidence actually contradicts [Marshall’s] testimony about what happened.” The report also found that another man, Nathaniel Lawson, had confessed to several people that he had committed the killings and that a 1976 police report noted his presence near the crime scene around the time of the murder. Thibodeau concluded that "[t]he culmination of all the evidence, most of which the jury never heard or saw, leaves no abiding confidence in the convictions or the guilt of the defendants.”  

Williams had been trying unsuccessfully for years to get anyone interested in the case, and responded emotionally after the hearing. “My mother died while I was on death row,” he told Florida Times-Union reporter Andrew Pantazi. Through tears, he said, “I just wanted to get out and see my kids. There wasn’t nobody but them.”

Twenty-nine wrongfully convicted death-row prisoners have been exonerated in Florida, the most in the nation. In 21 of the 23 Florida exonerations for which the jury’s sentencing vote is known, judges imposed the death penalty by overriding a jury recommendation for life or following a non-unanimous jury recommendation for death. Florida now requires a unanimous jury recommendation before a judge can impose a death sentence.

Without Public Input or Regard to Native American Treaties, Water Systems, Resources or Properties, Yurugu Trump Ignores Injunction and Grants Permit to Construct Keystone XL Pipeline

keystone+xl (1).jpg

‘Weitko Disease is the caucasian’s patapathetic fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man.’ FUNKTIONARY

From [HERE] President Donald Trump handed a victory to a major North American energy company on Friday afternoon with a new presidential permit allowing the controversial Keystone XL pipeline to go forward. Many say the move is an effort to sidestep judiciary and environmental review and is likely to face legal challenges.

Pipeline company TransCanada Corp. is authorized to “construct, connect, operate and maintain” pipeline facilities running between the United States and Canada, per the permit issued on March 29. It additionally allows the maintenance of a pipeline facility in Phillips County, Montana.

The presidential permit revokes and replaces a previous presidential permit granted by Trump in March 2017. In November 2018, a Montana judge invalidated that permit and it is currently being appealed, while a December lawsuit and subsequent injunction largely halted pre-construction activities on the pipeline. The Trump administration was, as a result of the November legal action, ordered to conduct a new environmental review of the pipeline — something the new presidential permit apparently seeks to sidestep.

“This permit supersedes the Presidential permit issued to the permittee, dated March 23, 2017,” the new permit notes. Some think that logic stems from the Justice Department’s previous argument that the permit isn’t subject to environmental review by the State Department if it is signed by the president himself.

According to the suit concerning said March permit;

TransCanada’s permit applications had been denied two previous times, but on January 24, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed a memorandum “invit[ing] TransCanada . . . to promptly re-submit its application to the Department of State for a Presidential permit for the construction and operation of the Keystone XL Pipeline.” Memorandum: Construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline, 82 Fed. Reg. 8,663, § 2 (Jan. 24, 2017) (“the Memorandum”). Unlike in the two previous permit applications, Defendants initiated no public process or environmental review of any kind for the third permit application.

Despite the lack of any public process and review, on March 23, 2017, the Department of State published its Record of Decision and National Interest Determination (“2017 Decision”). Plaintiffs’ Exhibit A; see 82 Fed. Reg. 16,467 (Apr. 4, 2017). Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Thomas A. Shannon, Jr., granted TransCanada’s permit application and issued it a presidential permit (“the Permit”).

In granting this third application, Defendants reached the exact opposite conclusion as the previous administration on the very same record, in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. 5. In granting this third application, there was no analysis of the trust obligation the federal government owes to the Rosebud Sioux Tribe and their unique water system, no analysis of the potential impact of the Pipeline on treaty rights, no analysis of the subpar leak detection system and the potential impact of spills on Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s members, and no analysis of the potential impact on the Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s cultural resources and historic properties in the path of the Pipeline, in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Historic Preservation Act [MORE] and [more]

The new permit notably removes a section from its older version that referenced a 2014 environmental impact statement assessing Keystone XL’s environmental consequences. That document includes references to climate change and environmental justice, along with threatened and endangered species. The word “environment” appears only once in the new presidential permit issued Friday, referencing environmental contamination. The word “climate” does not appear at all.

“What’s especially appalling about Trump’s move is that many parts of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route in Nebraska are literally underwater right now with devastating floods impacting the Midwest, and instead of offering support to the communities who will face more of these kinds of disasters as the climate crisis worsens, Trump is offering a Canadian fossil fuel company another chance to build a gigantic fossil fuel project that would only unlock more climate pollution while putting already suffering communities further at risk,” said Greenpeace USA campaigner Rachel Butler to ThinkProgress in an email.

Keystone XL has been a raging source of controversy for years, due largely to the public health and environmental implications posed by the pipeline. President Barack Obama handed pipeline opponents a victory when he backed away from the project in 2015 amid heated pushback. But Trump has prioritized the project — it was among the first actions Trump made after taking office and he has worked repeatedly to ensure that the pipeline comes to fruition, despite legal setbacks.

Trump with a dick.jpg

Meanwhile, lobbyists have also been hard at work pushing for the pipeline’s construction. TransCanada spent around $200,000 each quarter of 2018 lobbying on issues including Keystone XL, according to disclosures. Documents also show the all-Republican D.C.-based lobbying firm CGCN Group spent $90,000 each quarter representing TransCanada last year.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has also lobbied on the Keystone XL environmental assessment specifically. On Friday, the organization celebrated the presidential permit almost immediately. “Keystone XL is in our economic and energy security interests, and review after review have found that it can be built and operated in an environmentally responsible way,” the statement read.

The permit announcement appears to have caught stakeholders and environmental advocates largely off-guard. The State Department, which is conducting the new environmental review of the pipeline, appeared surprised by the news. Environmental groups similarly expressed shock to ThinkProgress, but underscored that the move is likely to face immediate legal challenges.

“The courts have repeatedly rejected Trump’s attempts to get this pipeline built, so now he’s shamefully attempting to bypass our bedrock environmental laws for the benefit of a foreign pipeline company,” Sierra Club Executive Director Michal Brune told ThinkProgress. “We will continue to pursue every available avenue to ensure that this pipeline is never built.”

Judge Orders Authorities at Santa Rita Jail to Stop Constantly Waking up Female Inmates (80% Non-White). 'Non-sleep schedule is an unconstitutional deprivation of basic needs'

Judge Orders Authorities at Santa Rita Jail to Stop Constantly Waking up Female Inmates (80% Non-White). 'Non-sleep schedule is an unconstitutional deprivation of basic needs'

If they try to avert their eyes from the light by covering their head with a blanket or by covering the light, the jailers either bang on their cells so they remove the blanket or will write them up for a disciplinary violation, the inmates said. Then, there’s the constant nighttime background noise: vacuuming, maintenance, announcements on the intercom, doors slamming. They accused the jailers of shining flashlights directly in their faces during the half-hour checks — which the jailers disputed — and of regularly banging on the cells to wake them.

Read More

17 Chicago Cops Subject Black Family to Random Violence and Search During “Mistaken" Raid in which Cops Broke in, Tore Up the Apt and NHGRized 4 Yr Old Kids at Birthday Party

chicago cops niggerize.jpg

Niggerized - "unsafe, unprotected, subjected and subjugated to random violence, hated for who you are to the point you become so scared that you defer to the powers that be while willing to consent to your own domination." Dr. Cornel West quoted in FUNKTIONARY

From [HERE] It was supposed to be a little boy’s birthday party, but the frightening mayhem exploded before he could blow out the candles.

Feb. 10, 2019, was a Sunday evening, the cold Chicago night sinking into the low 20s. Friends and family had gathered in the basement apartment where 4-year-old TJ Jackson Jr. lived with his parents and 7-year-old sister Samari in the city’s Auburn Gresham neighborhood on the South Side.

Around 10 adults chatted and played cards. TJ, Samari, and two other kids were playing Duck, Duck, Goose. The children’s mother, Stephanie Bures, had run to the store for ice cream. When she returned, it would be time for cake and presents.

But according to a recently filed federal lawsuit, at 7:15 p.m., the house’s unlocked back door smacked open. The crash of footsteps coming down the basement stairs filled the apartment. Plainclothes men with guns filled the room, some hefting crowbars, sledgehammers and a battering ram.

“Get your f------ hands up!” the men screamed, according to the complaint. “We are doing a f------ raid!”

While the four children, including the birthday boy, wailed in panic, 17 officers allegedly went about tearing the apartment to pieces, including knocking over TJ’s birthday cake.

When the adults in the apartment realized these were policemen, they say they asked to see a warrant. Instead, they were allegedly screamed at or handcuffed. Forty-five minutes into the raid, the officers realized the man they were looking for — a suspected ecstasy dealer — was not in the apartment. They made no arrests and found no drugs, according to the complaint.

The suspect had not lived in the apartment for five years before the family moved in. The family filed a lawsuit this week in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging the Chicago police officers used excessive force and violated their civil rights during the winter evening’s raid.

“Can you imagine sitting, playing games with other kids and guns pointed at them?” Bures said Tuesday at a news conference announcing the lawsuit, WGN reported.

For the Chicago Police Department the lawsuit comes as yet another black eye on a department with a reputation of recklessness. According to CBS Chicago, local police have raided the wrong house at least a dozen times in the last 18 months.

“Our children in Auburn Gresham face enough trauma every day just trying to grow up in Chicago,” Father Michael Pfleger, a Catholic priest and Chicago activist, told reporters Tuesday.

The department has yet to publicly comment on the lawsuit.

The whole event, and the traumatic fallout, could have been avoided with better police work, the lawsuit alleges.

According to the lawsuit, records reveal the officers were part of a gang enforcement unit. The police were allegedly trying to track down a drug dealer named Philip C. Baylis. A John Doe confidential informant — “an admitted narcotics user with pending criminal charges,” according to the complaint — told investigators Baylis was living in a basement apartment in an address on S. Paulina Street.

The officers got a search warrant for the apartment. But Baylis no longer lived at the address and had not since March 2014.

The complaint states Baylis has had “no connection” to the address since he left. “He does not receive mail or store belongings there. He does not have a key. As a distant relative, he occasionally visits. He was not present at TJ’s birthday party on February 10, 2019 and had not been invited.”

According to the complaint, officers could have found a more updated address for the suspect, or further investigated to substantiate the informant’s claims. Instead, they barged into TJ’s party.

The officers had all the adults present put their coats and phones along a wall, then forced them to sit against the walls while they ran their IDs through the system.

“In these bedrooms, officers pulled clothes and other items out of drawers and plastic storage containers and threw them around, and broke drawers and other furniture,” the complaint stated. “They flipped mattresses over and threw . . . [a] flat-screen TV into the floor, breaking it.”

The officers also “spitefully” poured a bottle of vodka all over a flipped mattress and clothes in the one of the bedrooms, the lawsuit claims.

The officers are also accused of damaging the boy’s birthday gifts in another room.

“In the children’s bedroom, officers poured hydrogen peroxide over the flipped mattress and clothes that they had strewn around the room, dousing new clothes that were birthday gifts [for] TJ that day.”

At one point, when one of the members of the family, a teacher who works with disabled children, told the officers all the adults present had steady paying jobs, the officers allegedly ignored the comment.

“I feel sorry for the kids if you’re teaching them,” one officer said, according to the lawsuit.

Bures said her two children, including the birthday boy, were traumatized by the raid. The officers left — with TJ’s cake still in the box but tipped over on the ground — without apologizing, the complaint states.

“I thought they were going to shoot me and my brother and everybody else,” Samari told CBS.

Lawless Chicago Cops Take a Break From Murdering, Assaulting & Surveilling Black People to Protest the Jussie Smollett Decision, 1 Less Black Man Prosecuted

From [HERE] There are few images more vomitous than Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel giving a high-minded speech about justice, while surrounded by the top brass of the Chicago Police Department. Emanuel is the same Machiavellian mayor whose administration concealed a video tape of Jason Van Dyke, then a Chicago police officer, murdering Laquan McDonald, a 17-year-old African American, in cold blood. A jury of his peers convicted Van Dyke of second degree murder only to have a judge hand down the absurd sentence of six years and nine months. The judge said that the courts must take into account Van Dyke’s “years of public service” when punishing him for the crime. After all, who can begrudge a distinguished officer an occasional homicide? It turns out, however, that Van Dyke was not so distinguished. Twenty citizen complaints were filed against him, including for the use of racial slurs and excessive force, but none resulted in any disciplinary action.

A Chicago judge also acquitted three police officers who faced credible charges of falsifying reports and committing other procedural irregularities to make Van Dyke’s shooting appear justified.

The Chicago Police Department paid $45 million in settlement fees for violations of civil rights in 2018, ringing up a staggering $662 million total since 2004. The most egregious and vicious exhibition of cruelty and despondency from the CPD involved former commander Jon Burge, who routinely ordered his officers to torture black men in the elicitation of false confessions.

In 2015, the Guardian reported that the CPD, in an eerie combination of the Middle Ages and Dick Cheney’s dreams, administers a “black site,” where suspects have received “off the books” interrogation. With a policy that struck a match to the U.S. Constitution, along with any notion of basic decency, police officers shackled suspects for nearly 24 hours, subjected them to physical abuse and neglect, and denied attorneys access to the facility. One man, whom journalists and legal advocates believe died in custody, entered the black site to never again see the outside world.

Racial profiling, police brutality, and an omerta to protect abusive and violent officers is as characteristic of Chicago as cold winters. Under the mayoral tenure of Emanuel, the draconian assaults on black residents of the city worsened, rather than mitigated, and for that reason, among many others, it challenges the heart and the stomach to watch Emanuel do his best impersonation of Thomas Aquinas, as he presents a treatise on justice for the cameras, all because disorderly conduct charges against the television actor Jussie Smollett, accused of staging a hate crime to advance his career, were dismissed. Emanuel thunderously denounced the city prosecutor, calling the decision to release Smollett a “whitewash of justice.”

For the sake of argument, even if one concedes that Smollett was as guilty as Van Dyke, a comparison of the crimes in question, and the reaction they each provoked, offers a colorful illustration of whose lives have value in the United States.

Filing a false police report, claiming victimhood when none exists, and exploiting the racial divisions of American culture would amount to an immoral and insidious waste of taxpayer money and police resources. Even still, it causes no one’s death, dismemberment, or, given that the police while investigating the hate crime arrested no suspects, imprisonment. Young, mostly black men are dead, suffer from debilitating injuries, or look over their shoulders at a life languishing in a prison cell for crimes that they did not commit because of the racism and criminality of the Chicago Police Department. Mayor Rahm Emanuel offers barely a word about those injustices. The unforgivable sentence for Van Dyke elicited only a mealy mouthed suggestion for the city to “repair its broken relationships” from the mayor — the same mayor who consistently shut down mental health clinics, and in one of his first governmental moves, closed 49 schools in black neighborhoods.

Emanuel, not exactly Donald Trump, but a Democrat with experience in the Clinton and Obama administrations, transcends his own persona to become the personification of white indifference to black oppression in America.

Emanuel has plenty of voices of support on the right. John Kass, a Chicago Tribune columnist and Trump supporter who dedicates himself to verifying Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” characterization of Trump’s base, wrote that Smollett’s release displays a “crooked system” of criminal justice. Kass’ previous journalistic triumph was referring to black youth as “feral” in a column that was typical of his Chicago tough guy, Jim Belushi meets Bull Connor routine. With the quality of erudition one would expect from a right wing radio host, Steven Crowder said that Smollett is “still a piece of shit,” and Donald Trump Jr., a living argument against America’s notion of meritocracy, accused CNN’s Brian Stelter of acting as “propaganda czar” for claiming that it is unlikely “we will ever know what happened” the night that Smollett alleges he was attacked.

Many deliberately obtuse white Americans object to the slogan and organizing title “Black Lives Matter,” because they feel it is exclusionary. If you are outraged over Smollett not facing trial for unprovable and nonviolent crimes, but demonstrated malevolent silence after Jason Van Dyke murdered Laquan McDonald on video — or, to move beyond Chicago’s borders, when Sandra Bland was found dead in her Texas jail cell while in custody for no crime; or when George Zimmerman was acquitted after profiling, stalking, and killing Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black youth walking to his father’s house; or when a New York police officer strangled Eric Garner to death, ignoring his repeated plea, “I can’t breathe,” because he was “illegally selling cigarettes,” you need only look in the mirror to find validation of the need for the protest cry, “Black lives matter.”

A favorite Republican bromide is that cities facing conditions of escalating poverty, urban decay, and racial inequality are “all run by Democrats.” While their identification of the political party of most major municipal governments is largely accurate, their assumption that the governance of America’s cities is leftist or progressive is superficial, shallow, and simply wrong.

If they broke with their own commitment to ignorance, and actually attempted to learn about what they pontificate, they would discover that Chicago, to use one salient example, has done little to correct its long history of redlining, hiring discrimination against blacks, police corruption and brutality, and educational apartheid. The “city of big shoulders” enjoys a liberal reputation because it is the home of Barack Obama, and it is one of the country’s most diverse, but it is also one of its most segregated. Throughout the black South Side, the terrain is full of food desserts, lack of commercial development, high poverty and crime, and a deficit of public investment. The white North Side is brimming with prosperity, presenting a small scale version of the stratification and inequality that now defines much of American life.

Paul Street, a historian who spent five years as research director for the Chicago Urban League in Chicago, opens his excellent book, "Racial Oppression in the Global Metropolis: A Living Black Chicago History," by explaining that his study of Chicago on the behalf of a civil rights organization, “provided invaluable lessons on the powerfully persistent grip of white supremacist race apartheid and anti-black discrimination in American life in the post-civil rights era.” Street correctly describes black neighborhoods full of dilapidated housing and disgraceful schools as “quasi-Third World.”

Chicago is preparing for a historic change of guard in its imminent mayoral election. Two black women — Tori Preckwrinkle, the current Cook County Board President, and Lori Lightfoot, a veteran attorney and activist, and former leader of the Chicago Police Accountability Task Force, will face off on Tuesday in a runoff vote to determine the city’s next mayor. They both have advocated for positions and proposed policies vastly superior to those of the Emanuel administration, and there is genuine hope that the next mayor — whether it is Lightfoot or Preckwrinkle — will begin to excavate the roots of Chicago’s economic and racial troubles, rather than repeat the technique of most moderate Democrats by merely manicuring the foliage.

The next mayor will have to contend, however, with a destructive culture of white callousness throughout Chicago, and America. Indignation over Smollett’s charges being dismissed, but refusal to address black suffering, even when it happens under sponsorship of the state, is the latest iteration of a refrain that dates back to the Civil War.

Jesse Jackson, when speaking at the Chicago headquarters of his civil rights organization, Rainbow/PUSH, once remarked that “it takes discipline to be as ignorant as Rahm Emanuel.” The same condemnation applies to the white majority.

Authorities Turn Detroit Into a 'Chinese-style’ Surveillance City; Thousands of Cameras Installed to Watch & Control Black Residents (83%) at Gas Stations, Stores and Public Housing 24/7

detroit cops surveil Blacks.jpg

“When our rights and minds are washed-up by the same "government" we are being "watched-up" by, then we find ourselves in the spin cycle of the Spectacle.” FUNKTIONARY. In photo white cop watches young Black men pump gas in Detroit, a city that is 83% Black and 90% non-white.

From [MassPrivatel The push to turn America's cities into Chinese-style surveillance networks has found a new partner in Detroit, Michigan.

The only difference between what is happening in San Diego and what is happening in Detroit is, they are not using the same smart street lights to spy on everyone. Detroit uses Intellistreets a company known to have strong ties to Homeland Security.

What started out as a 'voluntary' police-cam share program in Saginaw, Michigan has morphed into a massive 1000 surveillance camera network which includes 500 businesses in Detroit.

Detroit's Project Green Light, spies on people in real-time at gas stations, retail stores and public housing.

A map of Project Green Light's surveillance cameras, shows the true extent of police spying in Detroit and it looks an awful lot like the map of San Diego's IQ street lights.

What makes Detroit's spying so disturbing, is that the city wants the public to help fund their program.

The Detroit Free Press said, Mayor Mike Duggan, a racist suspect Democrat, sent out a 'citizen petition drive' soliciting money from home owners and businesses to help pay for a new multi-million dollar surveillance program.

"In order to continue making Detroit a safe place to live, work, and play, we are asking you to gather signatures from your neighbors pledging support for the Neighborhood Real-Time Intelligence Program."

Motorola Solution's hand in helping turn our cities into Chines-style surveillance centers is deplorable.

Motorola and the Detroit Police Department have worked together to create their own "Neighborhood Real-Time Intelligence Program" (NRTIP) which spies on residents 24 hours a day. (To learn more about Motorola and Project Green Light click here.)

An article in the Neighborhoods.org revealed that police departments are creating their own 'real-time intelligence centers'.

Detroit Police Department Lieutenant Sonia Russell said, "the difference between us and a fusion center is that we’re not on the state level. All the products that we have here are on the same level as being a fusion center with counter-terrorism, with the statistical data, with the crime patterns and trends, with the camera footage,” she said. “That’s what’s unique about us, we got everything right here, and a lot of real time crime centers don’t have that. We’re able to do all the things that a fusion center can do.”

I am torn between calling Detroit, America's second Chinese-style surveillance city or New Orleans which has the dishonor of being "America's largest spying network."

DETROIT STRAWBOSS POLICE CHIEF IS A SMOOTH OPERATOR BLACK PROBOT, MOST EFFICIENT AT WATCHING BLACKS ON BEHALF OF HIS MASTERS.

DETROIT STRAWBOSS POLICE CHIEF IS A SMOOTH OPERATOR BLACK PROBOT, MOST EFFICIENT AT WATCHING BLACKS ON BEHALF OF HIS MASTERS.

The true extent of police spying is much worse that what is being reported, especially if you include Ring doorbells and Nest cameras which turn entire neighborhoods into mini-surveillance networks.

I think what puts Detroit in second place, is law enforcement's social media spying.

Local police mimic China by spying on everyone's social media

The 'Neighborhoods' article also revealed that Detroit's NRTIP spies on everyone's social media and receives secret hot lists from Project Green Light.

"Project Green Light is a considerable portion of how they track crime in the city, using their hot list – the area around a recent crime – as a way to prioritize where they should be monitoring and focusing their efforts."

"The screens on the front wall are feeds from Project Green Light locations and dumping cameras. One analyst scrolled through Twitter and other social media to check for any threats or mentions of crime."

Big Brother's justification for turning our cities into mirror images of China is summed up by Crime Analyst Breanna Lingo who said, " If you were a victim of crime one day, there could be an extra eye watching to really help.”

Does it make you feel safer knowing that law enforcement is using the same tactics that China uses? Do we really need police spying on everyone in real-time to make us feel safer?

Report Shows Nearly All (87%) Arrests & Prosecutions in NYC are of Blacks & Latinos: ‘Everyday DA’s Aggressively Bring Cases Against Non-whites for Engaging in Mainly Innocuous Activities’

NYC’s crime murder rate in 2018 was “the lowest in several decades.” See Brennan Report. Compared to other countries’ military manpower the NYPD ranks No. 65 in sheer manpower. There are 133 “recognized countries” in the world, for perspective. The …

NYC’s crime murder rate in 2018 was “the lowest in several decades.” See Brennan Report. Compared to other countries’ military manpower the NYPD ranks No. 65 in sheer manpower. There are 133 “recognized countries” in the world, for perspective. The NYPD staffs roughly 55,000 employees. Roughly 72% of that is uniformed officers. [MORE] In spite of the fact that crime and murder have significantly declined in NYC and nationwide, continuing the historic downward trend, police are everywhere in NYC hunting non-white people. Corporate Police State

From [HERE] The NYPD disproportionately targets minorities for arrest, according to a new report from a police reform group that tracks arraignments in the city’s criminal courts.

The Police Reform Organizing Project, or PROP, found that in the 485 criminal arraignments its volunteers observed from June to December 2018, roughly 87% involved non-white defendants. People of color make up 56 % of the city’s population. The report is [HERE PDF]

PROP director Robert Gangi said Wednesday that racial breakdown has remained consistent over the past four-and-a-half years, even as the number of arrests and types of crimes charged by police have changed. Since it started monitoring the courts, the group found that 5,067 of the 5,647 cases it observed, or 90 %, involve people of color.

“These numbers reflect the entrenched and long-standing problem of stark racial bias in NYPD tactics,” Gangi said.

NYPD report.jpg

The report states:

Everyday the New York Police Department’s quota-driven “broken windows” arrest practices inflict hardship and harm on the most vulnerable New Yorkers, especially low- income people of color, the homeless, and persons with mental illnesses. Everyday New York’s district attorneys aggressively prosecute cases against black and brown people for engaging in mainly innocent or innocuous activities. Everyday our city’s courts devote considerable resources to the administration of injustice, applying sanctions in hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where the charges involve, at worst, petty infractions and where the defendants are almost always people of color, some of whom live on the margins of society.

From October 26th, 2015 through March 18th, 2015, PROP recorded information on 529 cases presented in Manhattan and Brooklyn arraignments parts. Of those, PROP recorded the outcome of 498 cases.

  • Of the 529 cases seen, 463, or 87.5%, of defendants were people of color.

  • Of the 498 outcomes recorded, 479, or 96.2%, of defendants walked out of the

    courtroom.

  • Of the 2 court visits that PROP was able to time, the average amount of time that the court spent on each case was approximately 2 minutes, 7.5 seconds. The longest case lasted 6 minutes, 16 seconds. The shortest case lasted 26 seconds.

Dr. Blynd states, “People who are awake see cops are mercenary security guards that remind us daily, through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate state - colonized, surveilled and patrolled by the desensitized and lobotomized drones of the colonizers.”

In one example cited, the report states”Officers arrested a middle-aged African-American man for theft of services or farebeating. Because he had a history of misdemeanor convictions for low-level, non- predatory offenses, the judge, over the strenuous objections of the man’s lawyer, sentenced him to 12 days on Rikers Island. As a result, the man would lose his place in line for affordable housing. Before the arrest, he was about to gain access to an apartment. He would now leave jail as a homeless person.“ It further states,

Police officers in Manhattan arrested a homeless man late at night on the subway on the charge of, as the court officer read out loud, "occupying multiple seats on the subway.” The judged issued an ACD & let the man walk out of the court room. A PROP representative followed him out & tried to talk with him. Unsteady on his feet, the man said apologetically that he could barely stand up & that he was withdrawing from his alcohol habit. When asked where he was going & where would he stay, the man said that he was going to "ride the trains.”

Police officers in Manhattan arrested a 91 year-old wheelchair bound woman on an assault charge after she struck her 93 year-old husband on the head. She appeared in arraignment court still handcuffed to her wheelchair.

Police officers arrested a young man for dancing on the subway, the official charge being "unlawful solicitation.” The youth explained that the NYPD also arrested a friend that danced with him on the train -- the officers released the friend on a ACD, but held the young man that we spoke with because he had an outstanding warrant for drinking a beer in front of his building. He also related that the police have arrested him several times for subway dancing & that the judge always releases him with an ACD.

Police officers arrested a homeless woman for the second time in a week for sleeping in the machine room of an apartment building where the janitorial staff had befriended her & let her use the unoccupied room. She was an addict who was afraid to stay at a shelter & who had been trying unsuccessfully to find a rehab program that would help her. The NYPD provided her with no assistance to meet either need.

Officers arrested a middle-aged man on a petty larceny charge to which he pled guilty & after which the judge levied a $200 surcharge and a $50 fine. Upon speaking to the man, a PROP volunteer learned that he was homeless & had no ability to come up with the money to pay the penalty. He also explained that his "offense" involved a case of entrapment. Officers had placed money on a Harlem street & when he bent to pick it up, they arrested him on the petty larceny charge. When asked why he then pled guilty, he replied that he "just wanted to leave.” [MORE]

PROP said that in In 88 % of the cases it tracked, the charges were minor enough for the defendant to walk out of the courtroom after the proceeding. That was typically because they were released on their own recognizance, the district attorney’s office declined prosecution, the judge dismissed the case or they received a adjournment contemplating dismissal, the group found.

“Despite the innocuous nature of most of the charges, and the non-existent safety threat represented by most defendants, police had arrested all these individuals — cuffed and confined them, leaving most of them to sit in jail overnight,” the report released Wednesday contends.

[PROP’s volunteers visited arraignment courts in all five boroughs a total of 35 times, and noticed the most common charges people faced were misdemeanor assault, driving with a suspended license and petty larceny.

That’s a shift from previous years, when the majority of cases observed by the group involved marijuana possession, fare beating and misdemeanor assault, Gangi said.

NYPD camera.jpg

After FLA Voters Approved an initiative to Automatically Restore Voting Rights to 1.4 million w/felony convictions, Racist Suspect Authorities Want Said “Rights" Contingent on Paying Court Fines

After FLA Voters Approved an initiative to Automatically Restore Voting Rights to 1.4 million w/felony convictions, Racist Suspect Authorities Propose Making “Rights” Contingent on Paying Court Fines

After FLA Voters Approved an initiative to Automatically Restore Voting Rights to 1.4 million w/felony convictions, Racist Suspect Authorities Want Said “Rights” Contingent on Paying Court Fines

From [EJI] After Florida Voters Approved an initiative to Automatically Restore Voting “Rights” to 1.4 million w/felony convictions, Racist Suspect Authorities Want to Make Restoration Contingent on Payment of Court Fines

In November, Florida voters approved Amendment 4, a ballot initiative to automatically restore voting rights to 1.4 million people with felony convictions. Now state lawmakers are considering legislation that would make restoration of voting rights contingent on a person's ability to pay all court fines and fees.

History of Racial Injustice in Florida Voting

State laws disenfranchising people convicted of a felony proliferated during the 1860s and 1870s, especially in Southern states with the largest populations of African Americans, where lawmakers were explicit about the need to suppress the black vote.

Florida created an especially harsh felony disenfranchisement scheme, barring people from voting even after they completed their sentences. A process for getting voting rights restored was recently adopted in the state, but it required people to wait up to seven years to apply and the process itself could take years. According to the Florida Commission on Offender Review, only 3005 of more than 30,000 applicants had their voting rights restored through this system.

As a result, Florida disenfranchised more potential voters than any other state, barring more than 10 percent of all potential voters and more than 21 percent of potential black voters from the polls due to felony records. 

Because African Americans are disproportionately arrested and incarcerated, Florida voters' abolition of felony disenfranchisement (except for murder and felony sex offense convictions) was a significant step towards confronting and healing the state's history of racial injustice.

A Step Backwards

State legislators are now working to limit that historic move, arguing that additional legislation is required to clarify Amendment 4. 

Mother Jones reports that a House subcommittee on Tuesday approved a bill that would bar people with felony records from voting until they have paid all court fines and fees, including "any cost of supervision" like parole, even if the fines and fees were not part of the original sentence.

Millions of American families — disproportionately poor and minority families — are already struggling to pay fees imposed by the criminal justice system, often forgoing basic necessities because failing to pay supervision fees and other costs can lead to their loved ones being returned to jail or prison. A recent study found that about 113 million American adults have an immediate family member who is formerly or currently incarcerated. As of 2011, the total amount of criminal justice debt owed by Americans amounted to around $50 billion.

The Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, which helped pass Amendment 4, described bill 19-03 as an "unconstitutional overreach" that "would restrict the number of people who would otherwise be eligible to vote." 

Others argue the bill would unfairly burden low-income people who cannot afford to repay all their fines and fees. Rep. Adam Hattersley (D-Riverview) told the Tampa Bay Times, "It's blatantly unconstitutional as a poll tax." 

As the bill moves on to broader consideration in the legislature, voting rights advocates have vowed to "fight any measure that denies people their constitutional rights."

No Reward for Puerto Rico Governor’s Costly Coin-Operated Activities: Says Trump Won’t Meet about Hurricane Recovery and Subsequent Disaster and Deaths Caused by Stupid, Clown President

trump and PR Puppetician.jpg

Never Help Racists Practice Racism/White Supremacy. From [WashPost] In the brutal months after Hurricane Maria, which killed [a conservatively] estimated 2,975 people in Puerto Rico, the island’s Democratic governor abstained from joining the local chorus lashing President Trump over what they see as a botched federal response. But that fragile alliance has disintegrated, as Trump increasingly insists that aid to the island be cut off, a demand he reiterated to Senate Republicans on Tuesday.

In his strongest rebuke yet of the president, Gov. Ricardo Rosselló late on Tuesday called Trump’s comments “below the dignity of a sitting President” and “irresponsible, regrettable and, above all, unjustified,” while suggesting Trump has dodged meeting him.

“I invite the President to stop listening to ignorant and completely wrong advice,” Rosselló said in a statement. “Instead he should come to Puerto Rico to hear firsthand from the people on the ground. I invite him to put all of the resources at his disposal to help Americans in Puerto Rico, like he did for Texas and Alabama. No more, no less.”

Rosselló’s stinging commentary is likely to exacerbate deep-seated arguments about who deserves federal aid in an administration that has turned disaster relief into red-meat political fodder.

While FEMA admitted to widespread failures after Maria ravaged Puerto Rico in September 2017, Trump has insisted his administration “did a fantastic job” and criticized the island’s requests for billions to rebuild. In January, he said he would reject $600 million in food stamps for Puerto Ricans and asked the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to look into diverting some of its $13.9 billion in emergency funds for the island to pay for his border wall. One senior administration official recently told The Post that Trump’s stance is that “he doesn’t want another single dollar going to the island.”

In a closed-door lunch with Senate Republicans on Tuesday, Trump complained that Puerto Rico was getting $91 billion in aid, which dwarfed the disaster relief budgeted for red states like Texas and South Carolina. But that figure is far more than Puerto Rico has actually received, The Washington Post’s Philip Bump reported, and it’s not clear where Trump got the number.

Rosselló suggested that Trump was getting bad data and urged him to meet in person to talk.

“I can only assume that Trump is receiving misleading information from his own staff,” the governor said. “I have now made several requests to meet with the President to discuss Puerto Rico’s recovery and reconstruction, but up to this day we haven’t received a confirmation or a date, even though Trump told me we would meet after his visit to Vietnam earlier this year.”

Judd Deere, a White House spokesman, said the administration expected a visit from Rosselló next month.

“The White House recently helped set up important meetings between Governor Rossello and HUD and FEMA leadership. We understand that the Governor is not visiting until later in April and we look forward to once again helping set up productive conversations with Administration leaders to discuss the island’s recovery,” Deere said in a statement.

Earlier on Tuesday, Deere insisted Trump was committed to helping Puerto Rico, but also noted that “the Trump Administration will not put taxpayers on the hook to correct a decades-old spending crisis that has left the island with deep-rooted economic problems.”

Rosselló also took issue with allegations that disaster relief has been diverted to help pay off the island’s crippling debt.

“I want to be very clear: Not a single federal dollar has been used to make debt payments,” he said. “This has been the most transparent recovery in the history of the United States, providing unprecedented access and collaboration with federal agencies.”

The governor has used FEMA’s shaky response to Maria to make a renewed push for Puerto Rican statehood, a theme he struck again in his response to Trump. Without a full say in American politics, Puerto Ricans will always get short shrift in disaster response, he argued.

“The world knows the unpleasant truth that Puerto Rico is a colonial territory of the United States and are well aware of the democratic deficiencies we endure: We are not allowed to vote for our President nor have voting representation in Congress,” he said. “The federal response and its treatment during these past months in the aftermath of Hurricane María is clear evidence of our second-class citizenship.”

trump clown guy.jpg

Trump’s public reluctance to send more money to the island has now launched an official probe. On Tuesday, the Department of Housing and Urban Development told Congress that its inspector general is investigating whether the Trump administration has actively interfered with disaster aid to Puerto Rico.

Rosselló closed his statement by insisting that his only request to Trump was equal treatment.

“We are not your political adversaries; we are your citizens,” he said. “We are not asking for anything more than any other U.S. state has received. We are merely asking for equality.”

Lawsuit Claims SD Cops Put a Cuffed Black Man in “The WRAP," Using a stiff blanket to Tie his legs, a strap btw his chest and ankles and Socks Over His Face, Killing Him After He Turned Himself in

police body wraps.jpg

“At its root Government is based on violence and coercion.” -FUNKTIONARY.

From [HERE] A lawsuit filed by relatives of Earl McNeil, a Black man who died in June following a struggle with National City police, accuses officers of excessive force and failing to provide “critically needed” medical care, it was reported Wednesday.

The suit says these violations, among others, were fueled in part by “unconstitutional policies and practices,” including those that govern force and emergency medical care, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported. It also accuses National City police leaders of failing to effectively discipline officers who violate the constitutional rights of others, creating a culture that excuses that behavior.

The lawsuit, filed March 20 on behalf of Taneka Ellis McNeil, Earl McNeil’s widow, and two other family members, names National City, former National City police chief Manuel Rodriguez and a number of National City police officers and deputies as defendants, according to the Union-Tribune.

McNeil died on June 11, 16 days after he showed up outside National City police headquarters around 5:30 a.m. saying he wanted to turn himself in on a warrant, the newspaper reported.

The first officers to approach McNeil placed him in handcuffs and detained him on suspicion of being under the influence of a controlled substance after he began to struggle, according to the Union-Tribune. A small bag of methamphetamine was later found in his front pocket.

Officers then wrestled him to the ground and placed him in a device called The WRAP, which uses a stiff blanket to immobilize a person’s legs and a strap between the chest and ankles to keep a person upright and breathing, the newspaper reported.

McNeil was in the device for nearly two hours and also had two socks placed over his head to keep him from spitting on officers, according to the Union-Tribune.

He was eventually taken to county jail, but a nurse declined to book him and an ambulance was called to take him for a medical and psychological evaluation.

A short time after the ambulance arrived, McNeil stopped breathing. Paramedics were able to resuscitate him and get him to a hospital, but he never regained consciousness, according to the Union-Tribune. His family terminated life-support two weeks later.

An autopsy showed that McNeil died of brain damage caused by respiratory arrest.

earl-mcneil.jpg

The San Diego County Medical Examiner’s Office stated that several conditions could have contributed to his death, which was declared a homicide, including the methamphetamine in his system and the use of The WRAP as well as the two spit socks, the Union-Tribune reported.

The lawsuit claims McNeil should not have been restrained in the first place and says that after he was restrained there were many signs that he required “immediate medical aid,” according to the newspaper.

The lawsuit also contends that McNeil had exhibited several conditions that require immediate medical treatment after The WRAP was applied, including respiratory distress, suspected drug behavior and sweating profusely, the Union-Tribune reported.

In September, District Attorney Summer Stephan announced that no National City police officers or sheriff’s deputies would face criminal charges in connection with McNeil’s death.

Video Proves Police Lied. Mario Woods was Staggering Away, Not Moving Quickly Towards White Cops When They Shot Black Man 19 Times in 3 Seconds: San Francisco Settles Suit Before Trial

mario woods 4.jpg

“Government" is simply, unequivocally, and always initiation of force or coercion and nothing else.“

From {HERE] The city of San Francisco on Tuesday settled a high-profile civil rights suit over the 2015 police shooting death of Mario Woods, a 26-year-old black man, just days before a widely anticipated trial was set to start.

Terms of the settlement, which must be approved by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, will remain confidential for 30 days, according to the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office.

Woods was killed on Dec. 2, 2015, when five officers fired 27 bullets at the knife-wielding suspect – hitting him 21 times – after less lethal beanbag rounds failed to subdue him. An autopsy revealed Woods had methamphetamine and THC in his system when he died, something cops would have no idea of knowing when they encountered him on the street.

A video of the San Francisco police shooting "casts doubt" on officers' accounts that a black man was moving quickly toward them when they shot, a federal judge wrote in a court ruling in October.

The police department initially said Woods had lunged at an officer with a 13-inch kitchen knife before he was shot, but cellphone videos and some eyewitnesses contradict that version of events.

Woods was suspected of stabbing a man when officers found him standing at transit stop. Several officers surrounded Woods in a semicircle and shot him with "non-lethal" rubber bullets after they said he refused to drop a knife, according to depositions.

Videos taken by bystanders show Woods staggering out of the semicircle and sliding his right side against a wall as he tried to walk away and one of the officers scurrying to get in front of him.

At that point, five officers shot Woods a combined 21 times.

The officers testified that they believed Woods was walking quickly toward the officer who was trying to cut him off and that's why they fired.

"Videos cast doubt on the officer accounts that Woods was moving quickly or speeding up when officers shot him," Orrick wrote. "They seem to show him take four slow steps with his right shoulder up against the building, walking with a heavy limp. The knife was in Woods' right hand, on the building side."

Woods’ mother insists her son was in the midst of a mental health crisis and that officers failed to follow their training and use de-escalation tactics before resorting to lethal force.

The shooting sparked series of protests, leading to a federal review of the San Francisco Police Department and changes to its training guidelines and use-of-force policies.

Jury selection for the two-week trial was set to begin Friday, and the trial was scheduled to commence April 1.

Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge William Orrick III denied the city’s request to prevent the jury from hearing a witness exclaim “that was unnecessary” in a video of the police shooting.

The San Francisco City Attorney’s Office would not say whether that ruling played a role in its decision to settle the case, but it did defend the five officers accused of excessive force in an emailed statement Tuesday.

Damages for grief and emotional distress are not recoverable in wrongful death suits under California law, but Woods’ mother sought damages for “the loss of love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection, society, and moral support.”

Her attorney, John Burris, did not immediately respond to an email request for an interview, but the civil rights attorney has previously said that his client was seeking “substantial” damages for the death of her son.

Authorities Ignore Jury Verdict, claim Florida’s “limited resources are better spent elsewhere" after White Cop Shot Black Man Believing Cell Phone was a Gun During a Bike Stop, Paralyzing Him in 2013

Dontrell Stephens.jpg

Lawsuit Against the Government - a potentially endless loop of fiery hoops designed to burn you out, sustain destructive governmental decisions no matter how egregious and absolve government of accountability in a system of law over humanity [lex-icon].

From [HERE] Dontrell Stephens, the Black man shot and paralyzed by a white Palm Beach County deputy in 2013, will fight for $25 million in Tallahassee on Friday.

After a one day trial, attorneys appointed by the state legislature will decide whether or not to recommend the state tell PBSO to pay Stephens the millions of dollars a federal jury once awarded him. They could also recommend he receive nothing.

Dontrell's life today

Dontrell Stephens has been confined to a wheelchair for 6 years.

"I just need prayers right now," says Stephens. He's currently in the hospital being treated for bed sores, something that can be fatal for paraplegics.

In 2013, PBSO Deputy Adams Lin shot Stephens 4 times, after stopping the then 20 year old for riding his bicycle on the wrong side of the road. Lin said he thought Stephens had a gun, but it was a cell phone.

Stephens says he's now in constant pain.

"I've been in the hospital so much to the point of all the nurses know me," says Stephens. "I haven't been getting the proper care that I need so that's the main thing right now."

Stephens, and his lawyer Jack Scarola say, that's because he doesn't have the money. He's 25 and homeless.

"The Sheriff's office owes a debt to this man that needs to be paid," says Scarola.

A federal jury awarded Stephens $23.1 million in 2016 after they found Lin used excessive force, having had no reason to shoot Stephens.

An appeals court recently ordered a new trial for Lin on the excessive force charge, citing erroneous jury instructions in the original trial.

But a battery charge against the Sheriff was affirmed by the higher court, and "the sheriff stipulated to entry of a final judgment in the full amount of the verdict." This ended the battle in court, but without legislative approval, Bradshaw can't be forced to pay more than $200,000.

Attorneys appointed by the Florida House and Senate will conduct a one day mini trial on Friday. These attorneys will decide whether or not to recommend the legislature force PBSO to pay Stephens the millions of dollars the jury once awarded him. It's 25 million dollars now because of interest. The attorneys could also recommend he receive nothing.

PBSO

In papers filed with the special masters, Sheriff Ric Bradshaw's legal team plans to argue Friday that "Dontrell Stephens is a drug dealer and a convicted felon who was injured as a result of his refusal to follow a uniformed officer’s directions during a lawful traffic stop," ending their opening argument saying "Florida’s limited resources are better spent elsewhere." [nonsense. apparently the state has access to nearly unlimited money creation].

Scarola doesn't shy away from Stephens' past.

"That's true. Dontrell Stephens, at age 18 got convicted of a drug charge. That doesn't render his life worthless," says Scarola.

A year after he won his lawsuit, Stephens was also convicted of selling drugs to an undercover officer. His lawyers suggest iit was payback.

As for failing to follow directions, Scarola says that dash cam video and audio from the shooting, does not have any recording of Lin issuing commands.

"They are still arguing the same case that was rejected by the jury, the trial court judge, appellate court," says Scarola.

The future

Asked what he could do with that money, besides buying a new bed and a new wheelchair cushion to prevent bed sores, Stephens lights up.

"I got a lot of things. I want to go back to school, I want to get my G.E.D. then I want start working on real estate. I was good at every sport so I mean I'll even play sports in a wheelchair," says Stephens.

He says he's waited a long time for Friday.

"I just leave it in God's hands, let God deal with it.

In 2018, after the appeals court overturned the excessive force verdict, but kept the battery charge, PBSO entered an agreement to pay Stephens $200,000. Scarola says Stephens' bills are much larger than that.

By law, government agencies can only be forced to pay $200,000 to victims of their wrongdoing. Any more needs to get approved by the State Legislature.

Bradshaw was not available for comment Tuesday, as he was traveling back from testimony in Washington DC on federal gun laws, but Bradshaw has said before that “PBSO will oppose any attempt by (Stephens) to force PBSO to pay any more than the $200,000 statutory cap by legislative action."

White Kansas Cop Shoots Black Man After Seatbelt Stop to En-Force Compliance w/Authority, Demonstrating that “Laws" are Threats Backed by Violence- but He is “Free" to Believe Otherwise

lawrence cops FTP.jpg

"The child who is taught to believe the law will be his protection is the child who will become the victim of its own beliefs."  "Unquestioned beliefs own you." - FUNKTIONARY

The Lawrence Police Department has released dashcam video of a white officer shooting a Black motorist during a traffic stop that turned violent. The officer who fired now faces a felony charge, though she maintains she meant to draw her Taser instead of her gun. [don’t hold your breath waiting for random or incidental justice in a system of injustice]

The police department provided the video to the Journal-World Monday morning, in response to an open records request from the newspaper.

The shooting occurred about 5:15 p.m. on May 29, 2018, in the 100 block of West Sixth Street, at the north end of downtown Lawrence. The video is from the patrol vehicle of an officer who initially pulled over Lawrence resident Akira S. Lewis, 35, for not wearing a seat belt. The footage shows the traffic stop escalating from there. Luckily for Lewis, he was not killed in the shooting. However, he was arrested and charged with battery against a law enforcement officer, interference with law enforcement and driving without proof of insurance, all misdemeanors, and failure to wear a seat belt. [MORE]

  Michael Huemer further explains,  

"The Significance of Coercion and the Reach of Authority

The need for an account of political legitimacy arises from the moral significance of coercion and from the coercive nature of government. It is important to bring these principles clearly into focus, to have a clear view of what needs explaining before we try to explain it.

     First, what is coercion? Hereinafter, I use the term ‘coercion’ to denote a person’s use of or threat to use physical force against another person. When I speak of coercing a person to do something, I shall mean using physical force or the threat of physical force to induce that person to perform the desired action. I use ‘physical force’ and ‘violence’ interchangeably. I shall not define ‘physical force’ here; our intuitive understanding of the notion will suffice for the subsequent arguments, and I shall not rely on any controversial judgments about what qualifies as physical force.

     My definition of ‘coercion’ is not intended as an analysis of the term’s standard use in English. It is a stipulative definition, intended to avoid repetition of the phrase ‘use of or threat to use physical force’. My use of the term differs from the ordinary usage in at least two ways: first, in the ordinary sense of the term, when A ‘coerces’ B, A induces B to behave in some way desired by A; but in my sense, A might coerce B by physically injuring B, whether or not A influences B’s behavior. Second, the ordinary sense counts a broader range of threats as coercive: in the ordinary sense, A might ‘coerce’ B using a threat to spread malicious rumors about B. This would not qualify as coercion in my sense, because the threat is not one of violence. The ordinary concept of coercion is useful in many contexts; nevertheless, I have introduced a stipulative definition because doing so enables us to consider some important and interesting arguments regarding political authority, while avoiding unnecessary semantic debates. 

     Government is a coercive institution. Generally speaking, when the state makes a law, the law carries with it a punishment to be imposed upon violators. It is possible to have a law with no specified punishment for violation, but all actual governments attach punishments to nearly all laws.  Not everyone who breaks the law will in fact be punished, but the state will generally make a reasonable effort at punishing violators and will generally punish a fair number of them, typically with fines or imprisonment. These punishments are intended to harm lawbreakers, and they generally succeed in doing so.Direct physical violence is rarely used as a punishment. Nevertheless, violence plays a crucial role in the system, because without the threat of violence, lawbreakers could simply choose not to suffer punishment. For example, the government commands that drivers stop before all red lights. If you violate this rule, you might be punished with a $200 fine. But this is simply another command. If you didn’t obey the command to stop before all red lights, why would you obey the command to pay $200 to the government? Perhaps the second command will be enforced by a third command: the government may threaten to revoke your driver’s license if you do not pay the fine. In other words, they may command you to stop driving. But if you violated the first two commands, why would you follow the third? Well, the command to stop driving may be enforced by a threat of imprisonment if you continue to drive without a license. As these examples illustrate, commands are often enforced with threats to issue further commands, yet that cannot be all there is to it. At the end of the chain must come a threat that the violator literally cannot defy. The system as a whole must be anchored by a non-voluntary intervention, a harm that the state can impose regardless of the individual’s choices.

     That anchor is provided by physical force. Even the threat of imprisonment requires enforcement: how can the state ensure that the criminal goes to the prison? The answer lies in coercion, involving actual or threatened bodily injury, or at a minimum, physical pushing or pulling of the individual’s body to the location of imprisonment. This is the final intervention that the individual cannot choose to defy. One can choose not to pay a fine, one can choose to drive without a license, and one can even choose not to walk to a police car to be taken away. But one cannot choose not to be subjected to physical force if the agents of the state decide to impose it.

     Thus, the legal system is founded on intentional, harmful coercion. To justify a law, one must justify imposition of that law on the population through a threat of harm, including the coercive imposition of actual harm on those who are caught violating the law. In common sense morality, the threat or actual coercive imposition of harm is normally wrong. This is not to say that it cannot be justified; it is only to say that coercion requires a justification. This may be because of the way in which coercion disrespects persons, seeking to bypass their reason and manipulate them through fear, or the way in which it seems to deny the autonomy and equality of other persons.

Lawyers Group Accuses FBI of Omitting Evidence from 9/11 Report, Including Reports of pre-placed explosives at the World Trade Center

bush knew.jpg

From [CourthouseNews] Nearly two decades after the deadly Sept. 11 attacks, a lawyers’ group claims the federal government did not properly assess evidence known to the FBI but left out of the 9/11 Review Commission findings, including reports of pre-placed explosives at the World Trade Center.

The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth filed a complaint Monday against U.S. Attorney General William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray, claiming the FBI failed in its federally mandated duty to assess all the evidence available that previous 9/11 commissions may have missed.

“The FBI’s 9/11 Review Commission, and the FBI itself, failed to assess and report to Congress, as mandated, several other categories of significant 9/11 related evidence known to the FBI via reports in the press, via the web, and via public events and/or reflected in the FBI’s own records,” according to the lawsuit filed in Washington, D.C., federal court by lead attorney Mick Harrison.

Although the 9/11 Review Commission’s 2015 report details several avenues of evidence explored in its investigation, the plaintiffs argue that investigators failed to address a few key points of evidence, including potential explosives placed before the attacks, individuals seen celebrating the attacks nearby, certain surveillance videos and phone calls, and alternative Saudi Arabian funding sources for the attackers.

Regarding the pre-placed explosives, the lawsuit claims that testimony from over 100 first responders describes “sights or sounds of explosions on 9/11 which due to the circumstances and timing and specific details observed and reported could not be explained by plane impacts or resultant office fires.”

These allegedly included “‘bombs,’ ‘explosions’ at the lowest level and the highest level of the buildings before the collapses, flames being blown out, a ‘synchronized deliberate’ kind of collapse, like a ‘professional demolition,’ ‘pop, pop, pop, pop, pop’ sounds before the collapses.”

Following a 2014 mandate from Congress, the FBI appointed former Attorney General Edwin Meese, former congressman and ambassador Tim Roemer, and Georgetown counterterrorism expert Bruce Hoffman to head the 9/11 Review Commission.

The commission’s tasks, under executive director and former CIA Deputy Director John Gannon, involved reviewing the FBI’s preparedness for modern, global threats as well as analyzing the bureau’s “analysis of institutional lessons learned and practical takeaways” from other high-profile counterterrorism cases.

It was also tasked with reviewing any evidence from the Sept. 11 attacks that was may have been known by the FBI but not considered during the first 9/11 Commission in 2002.

The complaint asks a federal judge to compel the government to finish carrying out its mandate by “undertaking a new thorough external independent assessment of any evidence known to the FBI that was not considered by the 9/11 Commission related to any factors that contributed in any manner to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.”

The plaintiffs’ attorney, Harrison, told Courthouse News that he is “cautiously optimistic” they’ll see the injunction they’re looking for. He said the complaint isn’t about any one particular theory regarding the attacks, but simply “to force the FBI to do its job” and present all the available evidence to Congress as required by its original mandate.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond Tuesday morning to a request for comment.

[the people are not “the government" and it requires profound denial to believe otherwise] Racist Suspect Pentagon Chief says $1 Billion of Funding was Shifted to Border Wall, on Our Behalf

Demockery - a spectacle of the true nature of democracy. Dictatorship camouflaged as freedom. Larken Rose explains “in the real world, so-called “representative governments” are constantly doing things their subjects do not want them to do: increasing “taxes,” engaging in warmongering, selling off power and influence to whoever gives them the most money, and so on. [MORE]

trump blithering idiot .jpg

From [HERE] The U.S. Department of Defense shifted $1 billion to plan and build a 57-mile section of “pedestrian fencing”, roads and lighting along the border between the United States and Mexico, the Pentagon chief said on Monday.

Last week, the Pentagon gave Congress a list that included $12.8 billion of construction projects for which it said funds could be redirected for construction along the U.S.-Mexico border.

U.S. President Donald Trump declared a national emergency last month in a bid to fund his promised border wall without congressional approval.

Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan said in a memo to Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen that the Department of Defense had the authority to support counter-narcotics activities near international boundaries.

Shanahan authorized the U.S Army Corps of Engineers to begin planning and executing the project that would involve building 57 miles of 18-foot-high fencing, constructing and improving roads, and installing lighting within the Yuma and El Paso sections of the U.S.-Mexico border.

White MD Cop Believed Black Attorney was the Defendant and Detained Him, b/c to Racists there is no Innocent Black male, just Black Criminals who Have Not Yet Been Detected, Apprehended or Convicted

ALL BELIEFS ARE DANGEROUS. Dr. Amos Wilson states, “The perpetual domination of African Americans by White Ameri­cans psychically requires the White American criminalization of the African male, i.e., the White American perception of the African mal…

ALL BELIEFS ARE DANGEROUS. Dr. Amos Wilson states, “The perpetual domination of African Americans by White Ameri­cans psychically requires the White American criminalization of the African male, i.e., the White American perception of the African male as inherently criminal.”

From [HERE] Lawyers have filed a complaint against the Harford County Sheriff's Office, requesting an investigation after an African-American legal aid attorney was detained after a sheriff insisted he was the client in the case and not the attorney.

Earlier this month, Maryland Legal Aid Attorney Rashad James went to Harford County District Court to file for an expungement hearing on behalf of a client who was not there. Both James and the client are African-American.

Attorney Chelsea Crawford says, this is a case of "lawyering while black."

"This is another example or instance of second guessing that attaches to black men. It should have been enough when Mr. James appeared in court on the record. He was the attorney and his client was absent," said Crawford.

sheriff harford county.jpg

Crawford says they want a full investigation, for the situation to be noted in the officers file and an apology from him and the department.

Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler [racist suspect costumed orderly in photo] released a statement saying, "The complaint was promptly assigned to the Harford County Sheriff's office of professional standard for a complete and thorough investigation. We take all complaints seriously."