Biden, Unaccountable for Countless COVID Injection Deaths, Falsely Claims Gun Makers are the Only Industry That Can’t Be Sued. Yet Feds Gave Vax Makers Total Immunity for Any Injection Injury or Death

/

AUTHORITY BY ITS NATURE IS UNACCOUNTABLE AND IMMUNE FOR HARMS CAUSED. IS BIDEN AN INCOMPETENT, FUDDY-DUDDY, OLDY BUT GOODY PUPPETICIAN OR JUST A ROTTEN MOTHERFUCKER? ALTHOUGH HIS LIARABILITY RATINGS ARE HIGH, HE REMAINS VASTLY UNPOPULAR. HE PROBABLY WON’T BE ALIVE FOR HIS NUREMBERG TRIAL. According to FUNKTIONARY:

liarbility – the ability and commensurate propensity to prevaricate. “The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the greatest liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.” ~H. L. Mencken. A liar bears false witness against others, but a hypocrite bears false witness against himself. (See: Politicians, Internal Revenue Service, White Lie, Black Lie, Legislators, Hypocrite, True Believers, Legistraitors, Grey Lie & Affair)

From [CHD] President Biden during Tuesday’s State of the Union address falsely claimed the billion-dollar gun manufacturing industry is the only industry in the U.S. that can’t be sued — when in fact, vaccine makers in the U.S. have total liability protection for injuries or deaths caused by COVID vaccines.

“Repeal the liability shield that makes gun manufacturers the only industry in America that can’t be sued,” Biden said. “These laws don’t infringe on the Second Amendment. They save lives.”

CNN fact-checked Biden’s claim and said it was “false.”

“Gun manufacturers are not entirely exempt from being sued, nor are they the only industry with some liability protections,” CNN said. “Under the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, gun manufacturers cannot be held liable for the use of their products in a crime.”

But gun makers can be held liable for “negligence, breach of contract regarding the purchase of a gun or certain damages from defects in the design of a gun.”

According to CNN:

“Other industries also have some exemptions in liability. For example, vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable in a civil suit for damages from a vaccine-related injury or death. And for the next four years, pharmaceutical companies developing the Covid-19 vaccines will have immunity from liability under the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act.

“Those who claim to have been harmed by vaccines may receive money from the government, not the pharmaceutical company, via the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.”

Although CNN was correct that vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable for harm caused by vaccines, those injured by COVID vaccines cannot seek compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).

Instead, claims must be submitted through an obscure government program called the “Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).” The CICP, which almost never awards money, is the only program that accepts claims related to COVID vaccines and other COVID countermeasures. The program provides compensation only for medical expenses, lost employment income and survivor death benefits as “the payer of last resort,” covering only what remains unpaid or unpayable by other third parties such as health insurance. [MORE]

Attorney Aaron Siri makes it plain,

The federal government has given complete immunity to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J for any injury caused by their Covid-19 vaccines.  That’s right: you cannot sue them if you are injured by their Covid-19 vaccine.  (See Note 1 to read the law yourself.)  So, while their product may not give you immunity, Pfizer and Moderna are guaranteed immunity.   

And it gets even worse.  These companies are even immune for – hold your breath – willful misconduct.  That may sound crazy, but it is shockingly true.  You can only sue them for willful misconduct if the federal government first sues them for such conduct.  (See Note 2 to read the law yourself.)  And what are the odds the federal government will do so after wildly promoting the vaccine?  About as likely as the FDA ever admitting they promoted a vaccine that caused widespread harm. 

So, despite Pfizer’s history of willful misconduct, and that this is Moderna’s first product, and that they are going to rake in over $100 billion selling a product millions of Americans are mandated to take, you cannot sue them for injuries.  That seems fair.  After all, we should take pity on these companies since this revenue may not be sufficient to pay for the injuries. 

What is most incredible is that we are talking about a product that even the Director of the CDC said does not prevent transmission.  So, you cannot say “no” to the product without losing your job, cannot sue if you are injured, cannot see the data underlying its licensure, in order to potentially protect … you!  What?!  

It is dystopian to fire someone from their job for refusing to receive an injection of a product that does not prevent transmission but is rather for that person’s “benefit.”  Let me repeat.  The government cares about you so much that in order to get you to take your medicine it is going to make sure you cannot earn a living until you roll up your sleeve like an obedient child and take the jab.  But don’t worry, it is so safe that the government did you the favor of making sure you cannot sue the companies that sell this medicine, even for willful misconduct.

If this form of authoritarianism is permitted to stand, there is no limit to what the government can mandate you to do in the name of public health.  If a Covid-19 vaccine can be mandated, then there is no reason the government cannot mandate every drug a doctor believes you should receive for your own good.  Why not? 

The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure.  Never.  It is the last and final backstop to the dangerous authoritarianism that results when we permit the government to decide what must be injected or placed into or onto our bodies.   Whatever your views are on the Covid-19 vaccine itself, every American should reject letting the government decide what medical procedures they must engage in to have a job. [MORE]

Note 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d the federal government “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19” provides that “manufacturers” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].”

Note 2.  Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(c)(5) “If an act or omission by a manufacturer or distributor with respect to a covered countermeasure, which act or omission is alleged under subsection (e)(3)(A) to constitute willful misconduct, … such act or omission shall not constitute ‘willful misconduct’ … if—(i)neither the Secretary nor the Attorney General has initiated an enforcement action with respect to such act or omission; or (ii)such an enforcement action has been initiated and the action has been terminated or finally resolved without a covered remedy.”

The Unelected Rulers at the CDC Ease Mask Guidelines, but Have Uncontrollable Authority to Re-Impose them Based on Made-Up Science-Free Metrics (Vax %, hospitalization/infection rates) as They See Fit

/

mask GUIDELINES AND MANDATES ARE BASED ON SCIENCE FREE, completely arbitrary metrics, like vaccination percentage, hospitalization rates, and infection rates. These are all red herrings as everyone knows from the only two randomized trials (Denmark and Bangladesh) that cloth and surgical masks do not work, and from real-world data that N95 masks don’t work either. See the mask section of Incriminating Evidence for details. GOVERNMENTS AND THEIR DEPENDENT MEDIA CLAIM TO BE followING the science to keep THE community safe as possible But the randomized trials are the highest scientific proof and they clearly show that masks don’t work. What science ARE THEY following? Surely not the latest flawed non-randomized CDC study that UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad ripped to shreds in his Substack and his YouTube channel? [MORE]

From [HERE] On Friday, February 25, 2022, the CDC significantly eased COVID-19 mask guidelines. The new guidelines are based on COVID-19 community levels.

As the COVID-19 surge fueled by the Omicron variant began to retreat, many states eased or planned to ease COVID-19 masking mandates. On Friday, February 25, 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) followed suit when it released much-anticipated updated mask guidelines based upon Community Level metrics. Under the new guidelines, most healthy people across the U.S. are no longer advised to mask in indoors environments. Masking is recommended only in areas of high community transmission, determined by hospitalization rates, hospital ICU usage, and new cases.

The new CDC guidelines make no distinction between vaccinated or unvaccinated individuals.  The CDC continues to recommend “layered prevention strategies,” which include staying up to date on vaccines and wearing masks, to prevent severe illness and a potential strain on the healthcare system.

Low COVID-19 Community Level

For those who live in counties with a “low” COVID-19 Community Level, the CDC guidelines do not recommend masking in any setting, leaving mask use up to the individual. However, the CDC continues to recommend staying up to date on COVID-19 vaccines, and testing when experiencing symptoms.

Medium Community Level

For those who live in counties with a “medium” COVID-19 Community Level and are either (1) immunocompromised or at high risk for severe illness; or (2) live with someone who is at high risk for severe illness, the CDC recommends they continue to wear a mask while indoors in public setting. In addition, the CDC continues to recommend that everyone in a “medium” Community Level stay up to date on COVID-19 vaccines and test when experiencing symptoms.

High Community Level

For individuals who live in counties with a “high” COVID-19 Community Level, the CDC guidelines recommend that they continue to wear well-fitting masks while indoors in public, regardless of vaccination status or individual risk. For those who are immunocompromised or at high risk of severe illness, the CDC recommends a well-fitting masks or respirator.

While many counties remain at a high level, approximately 70% of Americans live in counties where guidelines have now eased. Employers may check individual Community Levels by county here.

Notwithstanding, employees who are experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, test positive for COVID-19, or have been exposed to COVID-19 should continue to wear a mask according to the CDC. Employers who wish to continue requiring that employees wear a mask, may continue to do so (subject to state or local laws banning masking requirements).

"How Can You Defend Freedom and Democracy If it Never Existed in the First Place?" The Same Liars Who Spent the Past 2 Years Destroying Life, Enslaving Humanity with a COVID Hoax are Now its Defenders

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

demockery – a spectacle of the true nature of democracy. What each political party (the jackass and the elephant) wants is not justice but its own idea of what is just (for themselves and their special interests). “We the people have no say, our duty is to obey and pay for lavish lifestyle of our betters, politicos, bankers and men of letters who talk down to us as though to fools, the working stiff, taxable mules. With intent to confuse the dumbed-down herd, economics, science presented by some nerd, with confident arrogance, talk not plain, why attempt with animals to explain the higher thoughts of lofty mind to junk-gene people left behind. For government you’ll fight, be taxed, labour, next election you’re supplied (again) with another savior.” ~ Alan Watt. (See: Government, Justice, Predictive Programming, Equality, Elections, Voting, Politics, Holodeck Court, Ideology, Collective Delusions, Taxtortion, Slavery, Political Money, Freedom, Control & Violence)

democracy - a commercial form of "government" (exploitation and theft via force, deception and involuntary participation) of the mob, by the mob, and/or the mob, i.e., Mob-Rule. 2) a guise rubber stamping of an alternative royalty into overruling power. 3) the worst possible form of government because the majority rules whether they be good, evil, or misled by a minority. 4) slavery of the people, by the people, for the people. 5) equality achieved through force. 6) a system where only the majority need to befooled. 7) advertised equality. 8) a parody of a free society that only ethical anarchism or voluntaryism can usher into existence. "Democracy has always been seen (and is still seen today) as equality of rights (granted privileges), not conditions. To the hypothetical equality of rights there has always corresponded a substantial inequality of conditions. And instead of being related to the nature of their individuality, differences between people have always been those marked by the different basic conditions they live in as they struggle against the suffocating artificial divisions imposed on them by power." —Alfred M. Bonanno. Democracy is a euphonious term created mainly to serve as sheepskin for Leviathan, Doggy and the Crimethlnc. All-Stars. 9) Dictatorship camouflaged as freedom 10) a whitewashed plutocracy with a pastel eggshell finish. Democracy, next to "monetized debt," and direct taxation (on labor) is the biggest con-game perpetrated on a population. Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain and sustain power over people is to assure the people that they are ruling themselves. Once they believe that lie, they make wonderfully submissive and self-maintained slaves. "There are those who maintain that at bottom what is called democracy, (whenever and wherever it is supposed to have existed), is merely the mask for the rule of capitalist and/or bureaucratic minorities over an ignorant and deceived majority whose franchise signifies only the right to choose or tc change its masters." -Max Nomad. As long as mob rule is allowed through secret ballots, operational and organizational transparency will evade us and vice (vested interests controlling economies) will continue to forsake us and break us. Democracy is a powerful synthetic ideology of recuperation. Democracy goes against the emancipation of desire. Democracy allows for A to band together with B (majority rule) to rip off C. Democracy and citizenship are the chains that filter your pursuit of happiness and the happiness in your pursuit. Democracy in America has been checked and balanced, or gone unchecked and unbalanced—depending on one's indoctrination—to the point (extent) of collapse. Only the improper is left to prop it up aright as if it were still standing on its own ideological efficacy and edifice. "Democracy (the political ideal) is just a dream, it has not happened anywhere, it cannot happen. And wherever it happens (in practice), it creates trouble, the medicine proves more dangerous than the disease itself." -OSHO. "If the people of a democracy are allowed to do so, they will vote away freedoms that are essential to that democracy." -Snell Putney. As H.L. Mencken so aptly observed, "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard." In a democracy, scum rises to the top; otherwise it starts there. Democracy is a specific instance of stationary rogue State power. Under the rubric of democracy, justice can be attained only by begging, buying, milking and taking.  A gang is an embryonic democracy in the making. Keep in mind that Hitler was elected in a full, free and fair democratic election. Democracy is a sweet-sounding word that offers freedom but delivers illusions. It has no other choice—it isn't what it appears and never could be what it advertises. There has never been a democracy where the public was consulted for input or consent before statutes and policies detrimental to their interests were already completed and or implemented by the shadow, invisible or parallel government (the Pathocracy). The ruse of democracy and fake elections stalls rebellion.   It's a placebo fed to the public so the ruling dominant elite can execute their plans for a global society—a New World Order.  

"Already American democracy and freedom are in their to throes, hemorrhaging from years of corporatist mutilation. Elections have become a sham, a farce. Freedoms are disappearing becoming extinct. The enemy within wishes for nothing more than an authoritarian, fascist nation, the easier to make decisions the easier to implement their vision, the easier to control the population. The enemy within detests democracy, and this we must understand. Democracy and freedom are enemies.

Ask yourself who has been the organization destroying our democracy and freedoms, our civil rights and liberties?  Who has enacted Patriot Acts I and II, who has destroyed due process, right to an attorney, habeas corpus? Who has tried to silence truth, dissent, protest and free speech? Who has made torture legal, faise imprisonment necessary, confessions by torture legal and evidence concocted through hearsay or torture legal? Who has made it legal to spy on American citizens, opening our email accounts, overhearing our phone conversations, and looking into our lives It has not been the dreaded Arab evildoers. It has been the Bush administration. It has been your own government." —Manuel Valenzuela. 

The noted author, Alex Carey, an Australian, states with prophetic clarity that: "The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy." I am 50 years old and have never known any government but fascism and take it as a matter of course that they are out to get me for exposing the truth (See: Mobocracy, Federal Constitution for the United States, Pathocracy, Fascism, Promises, Servitude, Enforcement, Disaster Capitalism, VICE, COP, Nine-Eleven, Patriot Act, CRIME, Statism, Doggy, Demarchy, Crimethlnc, Corporate State, Majority Rule, Voting, Formal Democracy, Colonialism, Communism, Conformity, Economatrix, SOS, Popular Sovereignty, Executive Orders, Bush Family Crime Syndicate, Cooperative Federalism, Self-Maintained Slavery, New World Order, Understanding Herd Management, War, LOFTY, Anarchy, Communism, MOS DEF, Capitalism, Parallel Government, Rebellion, Media, Motion of Alimni, "Government" & Authoritarianism). 

Why Take Sides, When it’s All The Same Web? The Stage Hands [Media] for Territorial Gangsters [governments] Have Re-Directed Sheeple’s Attention [webbed from the start] to Ukraine [weiteko vs weiteko]

/

How Can You Defend Freedom and the Concept of Democracy If You Never Had It in the First Place?

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Leviathan – great seemingly real and immovable giants—hard to control, impossible to grasp, but the monster guardian of fear and the foe of change. (See: Corporate State, Reification, Doggy, Hidalgo & CrimethInc.)

“Hidalgo” – a system of institutions which control the drama-game called society—the system that continues the traditions of the kings (the divine rights) and the evolution from the first man to seek the power to control or use force over men and women for whatever reason. 2) the universal feudal slave system of land, energy and people control (via oppression) on all countries, through all nations and throughout all ages. 3) any place or condition where usury and trade in flesh is legalized and/or lawful. (See: Convictim, BOP, PIC, D.O.C., The Wallflower Order, “The Greater System” & The Neocrat)

“Government” – a shamanic sham (as all prime corporate fictions are)—something “created,” propped up for everyone to beseech and blame simultaneously; a cartoonic escapegoat for Hidalgo, Doggy and the CrimethInc. All-Stars.

Governments – transitory mental contrivances (repressive fictions) established (“conjured”) by the dominant minority elitists (conniving few) as a covenant (belief system) for the sole and tacit purpose of creating the systematized mechanisms and smokescreens to ensure living off the labor-energy of (and therefore amass wealth and out-live) the many (masses) without their overstanding of the theft and violence taking place, or with sufficient patriotic brainwashing and fascist propaganda, that any theft or enslavement has taken place at all. (See: Corporate State, Territorial Gangsters, Taxtortion, Statism, Property, Stationary Bandits, Free-Range Slavery, Labor, “Credit” & CrimethInc.)

Government - (as commonly misunderstood)—a communal exchange of autonomy for appearance of order (peace via coercion), expanded over time, with the option of exercising violence being reserved to those who define and provide an illusion of order through force and fear. 2) a coercive institution—dysfunctional force and veiled violence. 3) the compelled enforcement of involuntary society. The Corporate State)—a fictitious entity (mental aberration or abstraction) and thus a non-producer of wealth, but masquerading as the prime merchant. 4) human failure programs that stay (hold off) maximumissness and depend on the support, (stealing then redistributing wealth) of its subject-victims. 5) 'organized' coerced support of selected monopolized services. 6) licensed, sanctioned and legalized criminal activity. 7) a sticky residue on your shoe. The whole idea of government is this: If enough people get together and act in concert, they can take some and not pay for it.

Any government represents a crucial compromise with freedom and distortion of reality, and no reified abstraction (however crafted by crafty corporate cartoonists) can protect anyone from any and all danger. The feudal subject-King relationship is exactly the same as the federal citizen-Government relationship. "That government is best which governs not at all; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient. The objections that have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army in the U.S. is only an arm of the standing government put into action only after the economic hit men and "jackals" (wet-ops) return home unsuccessful in their missions to earn their booty off dirty intrigue commissions.

The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before people can act through it." -Henry David Thoreau (slightly adapted). Government was formed with one major and one minor purpose—the major purpose, being to protect the wealth of the wealthy; and the minor purpose being to prevent the non-wealthy from becoming wealthy and subjecting them to the dictates of statutes (written laws—not common law).

Government is itself an evil—an abstraction given artificial life for the ostensible purpose of preventing certain conditions from arising, these conditions being the product of injurious behavior (actual injury) on the part of other persons as well as autonomous freedom (ownership of one's body, mind and labor) of those subjugated to force, exploitation, jurisdiction and control.

Government is that group of people who hold the generally tolerated monopoly on acceptable violence.

"It is a function of government to invent philosophies [and sophistries] to explain the demands of its own convenience." -Murray Kempson.

Until people wake-the-spell up to a higher level of individual and collective consciousness, government so-called will remain an unnecessary, yet banefully suffered evil to battle the evil that itself breeds as a matter of course.

The creation and imposition of government is the compelled pressure to conform to what is common, established, unoriginal, unacceptable, and ultimately inimical to all, whether reinforced by law, lethal force or acculturation.

Throughout history many intelligent thinkers all around the world have tried to contemplate or design some way to have "government" and freedom too. Failing miserably and repeatedly to find one either in practice or in theory, it is time for intelligent human beings to give way to beings of higher consciousness using sagacity and sapience to finally realize that:. 1) "government" itself is a deadly mental contrivance and immanent threat to their freedom; 2) there is no way to prevent "government" from constantly increasing its power and eroding freedom; 3) "government" itself being a reification (deadly cartoon) will vanish when the illusion on which it rests dissipates.

This goes for all brands and flavors of "government" across the ideological spectrum. [MORE]

Clearing the Atmos-Fear Created by Weiteko about COVID Shots that Has Destroyed Voluntary Consent, Bodily Autonomy, Respect for Human Dignity and Prioritized Society Over Individuals to Commit Biocide

/

THE ABOVE FLYER IS FROM AIM, THE AWAKEN INDIA MOVEMENT . The complete flyer with annotated citations is [HERE] OR CLICK ON THE ABOVE

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Weiteko Disease – the Caucasian’s patapathetic and pathological fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man . 2) Death-force. (See: Caucasian, Western Civilization & Yurugu)

biocide – the attempted annihilation of all life, which is the intent of Doggy and CrimethInc. (See: Doggy & CrimethInc.)

ELECTRIC CHAIR OR LIFE IMPRISONMENT FOR PURPOSEFUL VIOLATIONS OF UNESCO AND THE NUREMBERG CODE TO COMMIT BIOCIDE?

fear – an obstacle illusion. 2) amputated thinking in the presence of the apparent unsolvable; in volitional forms—the attempt to escape a perceived threat to structural integrity; the flight half of flight/fright survival behavior. 3) the recognition and acknowledgment of powers and forces superior to those of your own. 4) a withholding of love from ourselves, and often from another. 5) obsession without embracing. 6) the denial that you are one with each other and with your universe (Interbeing). 7) that which governs (rules) the majority in communist Corporate States, in the U.S.S.A, and in the former USSR (KGB IRS CIAIO). 8) the memory of pain. 9) a state of disquiet, of powerlessness and apprehension. 10) the tax which conscience pays to guilt. 11) the urge to protect and project. 12) reaction to ignorance. 13) inverted faith. 14) the tax that conscience pays to guilt. 15) negative future expectations of one’s positive expectation (outcome) going unmet. 16) a signal of the strain arising when our desires conflict with our actions. 17) an emotional separation from Source. Fear is simply the lack of awareness of God-Self Presence, which in its highest vibration is Love. Since fear (both functional and abstract) is both proximate and distal common denominator of most dysfunctional and destructive human behavior, it is paramount that we make the fear conscious and address it in deep and skillful ways towards opening the Heart-Center. Fear is pure energy, it is nothing more than being in a new situation, and however, our response to fear translates into the lack of overstanding coupled with feelings of inadequacy, disconnection and unpreparedness. Fear is the mother of hatred and is typically encountered when you think or feel you have no control. Fear also coalesces in minds as a perpetual cloud of gloom—it is the sign that you are attached (identified with) matter. Whoever identifies with matter consequently identifies with fear. To the degree (extent) that you realize the existence of the True Self, you are an initiate in the Greater Work toward realizing the Unique Self. The only potentially constructive aspect of fear is the fear of fear itself—which can be transformative. It has the potential to force us to abandon all illusions of security and begin retroactively revising and proactively editing our truths to renew the fruits of our experience while reformatting our operational frames and filters. Fear claims the same cognitive ability to see and hear, to experience as palpable what is not actually present. Fear is nourished, if not amplified, by the exquisitely unique human imagination. Too much of human learning has been relegated towards the attempt to manage the abstracted fears of human vulnerability and bodily death (mortality). Abstracted fear (ego-manufactured fear rooted in our imaginative capacities), not the species-appropriate fear of actual (specific) threats in the immediate environment, is the fundamental issue which generates much social, economic and political behavior in society. Nothing beneficial or real can grow out of fear—you have to grow-up and outgrow fear itself. Only those who fear the truth lie. Only those who fear reality quote the truth. Ponder this quote. “Let us not correct ourselves out of fear, but let us never fear to correct ourselves.” ~William Safire. Remember always, fear is an idea you are holding, not an experience you are having—due to your conditioning. If you follow the sensation that triggers the thought pattern of fear, you will begin to realize there is no correlation between what you thought and the reality of it otherwise. Instead of an outlook, fear generates a paranoid kind of “look-out” on life. Fear is not only generative; it is regenerative and accumulative in nature (carrying countless generations accrued in the semantic payload of the word). The perspective is that of an isolated, dejected, rejected and separated sense of an isolated personal self. “If you have fear, you have no need to think of punishment. Fear itself is punishment enough. Similarly with hope. Intense hope leads easily to fear that the hope may not be realized. To feel that one possesses something may at any moment lead to fear of deprivation.” ~Idries Shah. Beloved, there is no such thing as fear—only those who succumb to and suffer in his or her own projection of it. Fear is not encoded into our genes, but exists on the surface of our genes in the protein sheaths that cover the DNA. Fear is mimetically encoded in the epigenetic layer of our chromosomes. All who refrain from dealing with their fears will live in their fantasies. Fear is like a stalker, and with an unseen cloak it can overtake you into fretful psycho-emotional disrepair. So let’s elude, and never feed into (include), or submit to its despair. If you live in fear, you have never really lived. Hark! “The End is Rear!” Fear lives in our heart, mind and experiences, but it does not exist of its own accord—fear itself has no life. Fear is a parasitic thought barricading our hearts. As we feed it and feed into it, fear seems to take on a life of its own. So much that appears to be real isn’t. Only love is real, it is eternal, making itself felt and known in time as the very pulse of the Divine. The only reality is love—all else is a simulation or aberration of it. Fear is of your own making; love is the building block and cornerstone of this manifestation also called God’s creation. Fear is unreal, impermanent, and thus can be accurately considered an illusion. It is an egoistic reaction; it is based on the ingrained but fundamentally false notion that you are separate from others. Fear operates through our stories. Our stories how we perceive ourselves. Our stories around how we perceive others. Our stories are full of want (lack). And because of the lack we naturally fear because we feel that we are missing something. There’s something that’s not there. But you can’t always close your eyes from the things you don’t want to see, sometimes you have to face the lack in the pitch black. So instead of registering the goodness of what is not there which causes an opening, we register what’s not there from the perspective of lack which makes us defensive, constrictive and fearful. We fear that what we know is there deep within. But we fear what we cannot behold. So we move away from response to what we are directly knowing and we engage the fear in not being able to see which separates us more from that deep inner knowledge.” ~John de Ruiter. Shedding fear is creating no separation based on resistance by the Light towards the dark. Fear is nothing more than the Mind reacting to one of its imagings. Fear is a negative frequency that undermines acceptance because it is an emotion that creates responses that attempt to alter the divine perfection of the experience. It is a primitive emotion that Nature has propagated to protect this body, which you mistakenly take yourself to be. Remain aware, alert and vigilant, lest the mind’s positive intent hijacks the Heart’s content. Only what is divine is real and everlasting—all else is impermanent and changing according to its nature. “Flaming eyes of people’s fear—burnin’ into you. Many men are missing much, hatin’ what they do. Youth and truth are making love—dig it for a starter. Dying young is hard to take—selling-out is harder.” ~Sly Stone. Emerson once said “Do the thing you fear, and the death of fear is certain.” Fear is a false prophet; it pretends to know the future, but it only echoes the superstitions of the past. It is the self-erected barrier between God and True Self. The ladder of truth brings fear in two ways: at the bottom, we worry if the ladder will hold us. At the top, we’re afraid to let go. You reach the God-Self-Divine when your last fear has vanished—and your last truth. With fear, guilt and belief we build a hole (hollow) life on it. Banish fear and guilt and see the shining edifice that can be built. Your energy field clears after fears that produce judgment, limited thinking, envy, and restricted feelings have been identified, resolved, and then dissolved. (See: Stories, Judgment, Perceptions, Fright, Attitude, Acceptance, Control, Scarcity, Consciousness, SOIL, Responsibility, Possessions, Self-Image, Hope, Lack, Group Seven Centers, Entity, Fantasy, Weiteko Disease, Positive Intention, Impersonality, Anger, The Past, Dreams, Love, Christ Consciousness, Attachment, Suffering, Nightmare, Hatred, Expectation, Solar Plexus, Initiation, Subconscious Mind, Separation, Unknown, Beliefs, Unknowable, O.D., Judgment, Guilt, Belief Exams, Suicide, The Future, Resistance, Intellectual, Addictive Demand, Doership, Discernment, Colonized Mind, Pain, Anxiety, Scarcity & Unsucking)

F.E.A.R. – False Evidence Appearing Real. 2) Forfeiture Endangers American Rights. 3) Familiar Escape Avoidance Reoccuring. 4) Fake Experienced As Real. Fear invokes our reptilian brain—fight or flight—response that leads to two possible actions: (Flight mode) – Forget Everything And Run, or (Fight mode) – Face Everything And Rise. How we respond is a choice we all have. Fear is not of the unknown, but of losing the known and one’s investment therein. Fear is often disguised as procrastination. Fear often hides behind foolishness and fear often represents the status quo. Fear plays a much larger role in our decision making than most would like to admit. There’s fear of failure, fear of being left out, fear of acceptance, fear of success, fear of being exposed, fear of being alone, fear of ego-death, fear of dying, fear of being wrong, fear of being unpopular, or just a fear of change. Fear is rampant, wears many faces and is at the bottom of many decisions that the fearful routinely make. Fear-based thoughtforms, behaviors, and thought patterns drain your energy and inhibit you from freeing, clearing, and rechanneling the requisite energy necessary to face the unknown. Fear is a formulated lie, a lopsided perception distorting, clouding or veiling the hidden implicate order and balance. We’re living in a four-lettered world—FEAR! Self-Realization neutralizes fear at its root before its permutation and permeation at the cellular level. “Conutatis Maledictis flammis acribus addictus.” “We fear things in proportion to our ignorance of them.” There’s no place to hide but there is a place we can run—follow me out of the ashes and into the Sun. (See: Acceptance, Human Beam, Wholeness, Judgment, Unknown, Light, Enlightenment, Fright, Ignorance, Pathocracy, Self-Awareness, The Past, Self- Observation, Opinion, The Crowd’s Clothes, Self-Image, Self-Importance, Deep Awake, Self-Cultivation, Shine, Resentment, Fearlessness, “Assemblage Point,” Kensei, Clarity, Death Concept, Money, Substitute Life, Unconditional Love, Self-Realization, Primordial Fear, Kenosis, The Future, Memory, Representation, Understranded & Courage)

David Icke: Perpetual War and the COVID Biocide are Proof the World Suffers from Weiteko Disease; the Neuropean's Fascination with Control and Destruction of Humanity, a Yurugistic Mind Virus

/

According to "FUNKTIONARY, THE KEY HOLDERS ENPSYCHLOPEDIA:" 

Weitko Disease - the caucasian’s patapathetic fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man.

The Greater System – Doggy. In the Greater System, no one is allowed to live, only to lie. (See: Greater System)

Greater System – accumulated negative energy (thought-forms) responsible for creating self-limiting competitive analytic belief systems (CABS) programmed to keep us out of the reality of the present moment by our illusions from the past. 2) the Syndrome. Being misaligned with affinity in the Present guarantees retention in and detention by your PBS (programmed belief system) channeling your oppression. The Greater System exists but cannot be seen—composed entirely of stratified, mortified, and constricted human energy—the product of life-force that lives from a paradigm of scarcity, focused on survival, security and greed sought by or achieved through constraint, conformity and fear. The Greater System creates sacred cows (casualties of war slaughtered). However, it is Doggy that creates the conditions from which you declared war upon yourself. (See: Doggy, Indoctrination, Conditioning, Placebo Syndrome, Predictive Programming, MOB, Collective Unconsciousness, Scarcity, Fishbowl, Holodeck Court, Law, Humanity, The Truth, Religion, Thought Forms & CABS)

Doggy – Uncle Brother—the condition and conditioning which serves you your problem doubling as your very own ambition. 2) a situation such that the fulfillment of the conditions necessary to achieve a desired result produces its failure. 3) the entity that goes by many names, including bank-monopolized capitalism, the Spectacle, the Hall of Mirrors and the Looking Glass society, the Mega-machine, Statism, Global Imperialism, Scientific Socialism, cooperative federalism, corporate religion, and the phallacy of “progress”—the manifestation and embodiment of the tool of the Wallflower Order. 4) any shrewd trickster. 5) Leviathan’s Big Brother. 6) the creators of the source code for the global dis-information “system.” 7) Dr. Sam and Mr. Brother. 8) the collective name ascribed to inert abstractions that we have given artificial life support to and unwittingly sanctioned or accorded superiority over life. Doggy is the cultural conditioning system that maintains its hold over all things and all people, even our minds and opinions, by getting us to be informers and informants on each other, by getting us to be the trustees in and of their mind prism prison. Doggy is any and all conditioning, often self-imposed and when necessary involuntarily inflicted, that promotes your belief in illusion (both grand and petit) as a way of life. Doggy creates the conditions wherein an undetected and undeclared war is waged on us directly through us. The result of this on-going psychological war is that you, like many others, willingly destroy your freedom without the possibility of recognizing or overcoming the oppressions of control. The belief in illusion is the agreement to oppression. Doggy is the violent programming we have sustained all of our lives. Doggy wants you to just barely survive—but not to be fully alive—wants you to remain barely alive, but not to fully live. Say Uncle! Bad Doggy. (See: “THEY,” Hidalgo, Vampires, Society, Thoughtforms, CrimethInc., Beasthood, Corporate State, Governments, Uncle Sam, Wallflower Order, Cell, The Collective, Fishbowlers, Big Brother & “Greater System”)

fear – an obstacle illusion. 2) amputated processing thinking in the presence of the unknown, the incomprehensible, or the unsolvable; in volitional forms—the attempt to escape a perceived threat to structural integrity; the flight half of flight/fright survival behavior. 3) the recognition and acknowledgment of powers and forces superior to those of your own. 4) a withholding of love from ourselves, and often from another. 5) obsession without embracing. 6) the denial that you are one with each other and with your universe (Interbeing). 7) that which governs (rules) the majority in socialist Corporate State, in the U.S.S.A, and in the former USSR. 8) the memory of pain. 9) a state of disquiet, of powerlessness and apprehension. 10) the tax which conscience pays to guilt. 11) the urge to protect and project. 12) reaction to ignorance. 13) inverted faith. 14) negative future expectations of one’s positive expectation (outcome) going unmet. Fear is the lack of overstanding and desire of control coupled with feelings of inadequacy, uncertainty and ill preparedness. While fear is the mother of hatred, control is the mother of fear. Fear also coalesces in minds as a perpetual cloud of gloom. The only potentially constructive aspect of fear is the fear of fear itself— which can be transformative. It has the potential to force us to abandon all illusions of security and begin revising our truths to renew the fruits of our experience. Nothing beneficial or real can grow out of fear— you have to grow-up and outgrow fear itself. (See: Control, Anxiety, Scarcity, Other, Fright, Responsibility, Processing Thinking, Self-Image, Group Entity, Overstanding, Subconscious, Weiteko Disease, Dreams, Nightmare, Hatred, Fear Clouds, Solar Plexus, Subconscious Mind, Attitude, Unknown, Unknowable, Suicide, Faith, Trust, Existence, Letting Go, Bubble, Substitute Life, One Love & Thought)

The Cure is Worse than the Disease: An Israeli Analysis of the Side Effects from the 3rd Dose of COVID Injections Shows the Injections are worse than COVID Itself

/

Expert statistician Joel Smalley states;

My friend, Galileo has very kindly shared a Translated Israeli MOH survey of reported adverse events after the third Pfizer vaccine shot for Covid-19 and asked us to judge if the results demonstrate that the vaccine is safe and effective.

Here is my “judgement”.

I’ll start with a preface from Prof. Chris Whitty (back in May 2020 when he used to tell the truth).

  1. A significant portion of people will not get this virus at all.

  2. Of those that do, some of them will get it without even knowing.

  3. Of those that do get it, 80% will have mild to moderate to disease, possibly have to stay in bed for a couple of days but won’t even have to see the doctor.

  4. A minority will go to hospital but will just need some oxygen and then leave.

  5. A minority of that minority will go to critical care and some will die. 

  6. Even the vast majority of people in the very highest risk groups will not die if they catch this virus.

So, there’s the context. Actually, not quite because obviously back then dear Chris was talking about the original Wuhan strain which to an esteemed epidemiologist like him would obviously have been more severe than any subsequent variants. 

Unnatural variant selection is just one of the appalling outcomes of mass vaccination with this suboptimal product which has slowed the attenuation process of COVID but finally a new common cold didemerge as Omicron. 

Adverse events from the vaccine (including this analysis of dose 3) should be measured against Omicron.

  1. Within 21 to 30 days, 58% of men and 75% of women reported at least one side effect. This was 71% of those aged 18 to 39, 70% of those aged 40 to 59 and 57% of those aged over 60. [Already, it’s looking like the vaccine has a greater adverse effect rate than the virus, especially for the young.]

  2. Of those who reported a side effect, 35% of men and 51% of women had difficulty performing daily activities as a result. [A really bad cold has never seriously affected my ability to perform daily activities].

  3. Specifically, 32% of men and 53% of women reported weakness/tiredness, 18% of men and 35% of women reported headache, and a similar ratio for muscle/joint pain, 11% and 24% respectively for shaking and similar for high temperature. Other common complaints included dizziness, feeling faint, nausea and vomiting. [My colds bung my nose up and make my throat sore for a couple of days].

  4. Almost 5% of respondents reported neurological complaints including tingling/itching sensation, Bell’s Palsy, vision problems, memory damage, hearing issues, convulsions and fainting. [Even my worst ever man flu doesn’t come close].

  5. 10% of the women under the age of 54 reported menstrual changes (abnormal bleeding), of which 31% sought medical treatment. [Can’t comment!]

  6. In all types of adverse reaction, there were more reports of increased severity than less with around 1/4 seeking medical attention. However, overall, there was little difference in severity. [N/A].

In summary, the majority of side effects were local or general and only lasted a few days (but re-occurred with subsequent vaccination). However, the more serious neurological adverse events persisted.

My judgement? 

One dose of the virus for me, thanks. 

Fewer/shorter adverse effects, greater protective immunity, and no contribution to the destruction of humanity.

It’s a no-brainer really, so not sure how to describe those who are still lining up for repeat doses?

Put it On, Take it Off, Wear it Here but Not There for Science-Free Reasons: The Purpose of Masks is Obedience to Authority and to Remind Sheeple of the Plandemic. Another Study Finds Masks Useless

/

Dr Stephen Hammer explains, Mask mandates in high-school age children were continued in Scotland in the Autumn 2021 school term. At the same time in England, masks were made optional. We can compare the difference in case counts in both countries and see the effect of this difference in policy. He concluded “The enhanced restrictions and secondary school mask mandate seems to have had a negative effect overall on weekly cases in primary and secondary school age groups in Scotland. Test positivity is higher there and increases in cases and testing at the start of the autumn term were higher than in England. If masks and more restrictions reduce transmission, why did Scottish young people have greater increases in weekly cases and higher test positivity than English young people in autumn 2021?”

From [NN] Asking people to wear masks was a visual sign that the world is in a pandemic, and many are supposed to be afraid and panicked at all times. Mask-wearing showed that the government can tell everyone what to do and force them to do something without really explaining the reasons why.

During the February 16 episode of “The American Journal,” Ian Miller talked about how masking narratives are affecting the way people think. Miller is the author of the book “Unmasked: The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates.”

“The American Journal” host Harrison Smith pointed out that the masks from the very beginning “have been totally not based on science, totally baseless” and that “all of the published works before showed the masks were ineffective.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci himself sent an email to one of the employees at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), saying that he reviewed all the randomized controlled trials on masking, and there had been no benefit to it. Then three or four days later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Fauci himself came to say that everyone should wear a mask. It is not possible for science to change in three or four days in that way.

Still, masks remain mandatory. People can wear whatever kind of mask, even a handkerchief or a bandana, or even a used mask, and it counts because the masks are merely symbolic, and it’s not actually being used as protection. [MORE]

From [HART] In the summer of 2020, mandates were introduced to compel healthy people to wear masks in the community, purportedly to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Prior to this time, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UK politicians alike did not support face coverings for the healthy but U-turned, apparently in response to political lobbying.1

In the early stages of the novel coronavirus in the United Kingdom, public health advice remained that masks for the general public were of little benefit, and could even be harmful.2 There is emerging evidence that cloth masks can amplify the spread of COVID-19 particles by acting as a ‘microniser’, transforming large droplets, which would ordinarily fall swiftly to the ground close to the person, into smaller, truly airborne & respirable droplets.3

As has been established in the preceding article on asymptomatic spread, for a person to be ‘clinically relevant’ in public health terms, they must have symptoms. The mandating of mask-wearing for the majority of the population who are perfectly healthy is not an effective public health measure to contain the spread of COVID-19. Prior to 2020 this was not a controversial position. Whilst masks have undoubtedly been a successful psychological tool to remind the public to remain alert, they have not achieved their primary objective, that is, to act as a safe and effective measure to curb the spread of disease.

Masks don’t reduce community transmission
Contrary to the Government message that it ‘follows the science’, the sudden change in advice by the WHO was not based on any new, high-quality scientific studies. By summer 2020, there was substantial evidence that non-medical masks for the general public did not reduce the transmission of respiratory viruses. A review of 14 controlled studies had concluded that masks did not significantly lessen the spread of seasonal ‘flu in the community.4 A Norwegian Institute for Public Health review found that non-medical masks achieve no benefit for healthy individuals, particularly when viral prevalence is low.5 From a common sense angle, scientists had argued that cloth masks contain perforations that are far too big to act as a viral barrier and therefore ‘offer zero protection against COVID-19’.6

Inevitably, the public often wear masks incorrectly, or improperly handle them when putting them on, or removing them, constituting an additional infection hazard. There has been recognition of this contamination risk in the scientific literature7 and other researchers have cautioned against the use of cloth face coverings.8 Potential harms to the wearer include exhaustion, headaches, fatigue and dehydration.9 Some doctors have suggested an increased risk of pneumonia.10 Furthermore, the widely varying physical characteristics of the face coverings used by people in the community, that are not standardised for material, fit, length of wearing, changes after washing and drying, and disposal, means that laboratory research on mask efficacy cannot be generalised to real-world situations.

With particular reference to COVID-19, the only large randomised controlled trial exploring the benefits of adopting face coverings in the community found that masks (even the surgical variety) did not result in a significant reduction in infection risk for the wearer.11A detailed analysis12 of all research investigations, including those purported to suggest that masks might achieve some benefits, led to the view that there is ‘little to no evidence’ that cloth masks in the general population are effective.

Masks cause psychological harm
Masks impair verbal communication, render lip-reading impossible for the deaf, and stymie emotional expression, the latter effect potentially constituting a gross impediment to children’s social development. Acting as a crude, highly visible reminder that danger is all around, face coverings are fuelling widespread, irrational fear. 

Wearing a mask will heighten the distress of many people with existing mental health problems and may trigger ‘flashbacks’ for those historically traumatised by physical and/or sexual abuse. Sadly, going without a mask (even as a means of avoiding psychological distress) can often attract harassment and further victimisation. In response to this, ‘exemption lanyards’ have been developed, which further stigmatise those who cannot wear face coverings due to health conditions or previous trauma. 

Mandates in schools
Beginning March 8, 2021, secondary-school pupils are now required to wear masks in indoor areas for the entire day. In addition to the lack of demonstrable benefits as described above, it is most concerning that no comprehensive risk assessment of potential harms has been carried out before making these demands. Prior to imposing this requirement for masks, a full assessment should have been conducted, incorporating the following areas:

● Assessment of oxygen levels in mask wearer at the beginning and end of the day13
● Assessment of impairments to concentration and ability to learn14
● Assessment of impairment to children with hearing difficulties and special educational needs15,16,17,18
● Assessment of impairment to psychological wellbeing19
● Assessment of possible damages from inhalation of micro-fibres20
● Assessment of potential harms of repeated use of dirty cloth masks21,22
● Assessment of impairment to non-verbal communication23

Many of the potential harms may only become apparent in the long-term, thereby casting yet more doubt on the assumption that, for children, the benefits outweigh the risks. What is even more puzzling is that the masking requirement has been introduced at the time of year when there is almost no circulating COVID-19 in the community due to its seasonality. There is no justification for this move from the Department for Education. It should be rapidly retracted for the safety and well-being of all children. 

Conclusion
Wearing a mask is not a benign intervention. Making masks mandatory would only be justified if science had shown they achieved a marked reduction in viral transmission. The evidence is simply not there. On the contrary, it is clear that face coverings for healthy people do more harm than good. Additionally, evidence demonstrating that asymptomatic, healthy members of society are unlikely to spread the virus strengthens the conclusion that mask mandates are unnecessary.

Endnotes

1. Daily Mail, Tuesday 14 July, 2020: Fines for not wearing masks
2. Face masks could increase risk of getting coronavirus, medical chief warns
3. Low-cost measurement of face mask efficacy for filtering expelled droplets during speech
4. Non pharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Non healthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures
5. Should individuals in the community without respiratory symptoms wear face masks to reduce the spread of COVID-19?
6. Cloth face masks offer zero shield against virus, a study shows
7. Advice on the use of masks1 in the community setting in Influenza A (H1N1) outbreaks
8. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers
9. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Part 1 – Face masks, eye protection and person distancing: systematic review and meta-analysis
10. Medical Doctor Warns that “Bacterial Pneumonias Are on the Rise” from Mask Wearing
11. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
12. Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence
13. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery
14. Corona children studies “Co-Ki”: First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children
15. The challenges of facemasks for people with hearing loss
16. Lip Reading, Facial Expressions: How Masks Make Life Harder for People with Hearing Difficulties
17. Face masks and communication – coronavirus info for families of deaf children
18. The Challenges of Face Masks: Organisation of Autism Research
19. Corona children studies “Co-Ki”: First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children
20. Need for Assessing the Inhalation of Micro(nano)plastic Debris Shed from Masks, Respirators, and Home-Made Face Coverings During the COVID-19 Pandemic
21. Can You Get a Sore Throat From Wearing a Dirty Mask?
22. Face mask hygiene: how dirty is yours?
23. Masked education? The benefits and burdens of wearing face masks in schools during the current Corona pandemic

21 yr Old Med Student Severely Injured by COVID Shot. No One Can Be Held Liable. Gov Injury Program Doesn't Compensate for Injury or Future Harms but may Cover Out of Pocket Costs, Many Years from now

/

GOVT AND MEDIA LIE-ABILITY IS HIGH. IF INJURY IS SO “RARE”, THEN WHY NOT PAY FOR THE HARM CAUSED? From [CHD] A family whose 21-year-old son developed a life-threatening reaction to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has been waiting six months to learn if the U.S. government’s Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) will help cover their son’s medical bills, but nothing else.

The federal government has given complete immunity to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J for any injury caused by their Covid-19 vaccines.  That’s right: you cannot sue them if you are injured by their Covid-19 vaccine.  (See Note 1 to read the law yourself.)  So, while their product may not give you immunity, Pfizer and Moderna are guaranteed immunity.  Said immunity also shields doctors, hospitals and any other persons who administer or coerce people to take deadly COVID injections.

And it gets even worse.  These companies are even immune for – hold your breath – willful misconduct.  That may sound crazy, but it is shockingly true.  You can only sue them for willful misconduct if the federal government first sues them for such conduct.  (See Note 2 below to read the law yourself.)  And what are the odds the federal government will do so after wildly promoting the vaccine?  About as likely as the FDA ever admitting they promoted a vaccine that caused widespread harm. [MORE]

The CICP program, which operates under the federal Health Resources and Services Administration, provides payment for serious injuries or death caused by certain medications, medical devices and vaccines, including COVID vaccines.

The family of Kartik Bhakta in August 2021 submitted a claim on behalf of their son. So far, the claim has been ignored.

Bhakta, a second-year pre-med student described as a “genius” by his father, was severely injured after his first Pfizer shot. According to hospital records, Bhakta suffered from an extremely rare life-threatening adverse reaction to the vaccine.

Within two hours of his first dose, Bhakta experienced nausea and vomiting. He then developed back pain, a severe rash, tinnitus, eye problems, kidney failure, deafness and neuropathy. He spent three months in the hospital.

The day before getting vaccinated, Bhakta was healthy and had no medical conditions, his father said. The doctors said the neuropathy could be caused by steroids given to him for treatment, but they attribute the other conditions to the vaccine.

“We need some kind of help and direction from somewhere so that way he can get medical assistance or whatever he needs,” Bhakta’s father said.

In addition to a lengthy hospitalization, Bhakta underwent numerous surgeries, can’t walk without a walker and had to put his schooling on hold.

His family relocated to Texas in 2021 to be closer to the medical services their son needed, as the school’s insurance program stopped covering Bhakta’s medical bills in August.

His family does not have coverage for the additional eye surgeries their son needs and cannot work due to his medical appointments and need for care.

Instead, they’re relying on the government’s CICP to compensate him for his injuries.

The failures of the CICP to compensate the vaccine injured 

The Bhakta family submitted a claim to the CICP in August and received an email that a staffer would follow up, but never received a response.

Over the next several months, family members contacted the CICP by phone and email multiple times. They unsuccessfully tried to obtain assistance from U.S. Rep. Filemon Vela’s (D-Texas) office.

Asked what the family would do if denied assistance, Bhakta’s father replied, “I don’t know. Then why is the government forcing us to take a vaccine if they’re not taking responsibility?”

Since the CICP launched in 2010, 7,033 claims have been filed, but only 29 claims have been compensated.

There are about 300 claims pending with the CICP for injuries or deaths due to COVID vaccines. As of Feb. 1, the CICP had approved only one claim, but that claim has not been paid out.

To be compensated by the CICP for a COVID vaccine injury, it must be established,  based on “compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence,” that the injury or death was directly caused by the vaccine.

The CICP provides compensation only for out-of-pocket medical costs, lost wages or a death benefit. It does not provide any compensatory damages, which make an individual harmed “whole”; paying for all damages and necessary future harms and loss from the injury. The claim must be filed within one year of the injury.

According to Sean Greenwood, a vaccine injury attorney in Texas, even if the family does get an approved claim, they could wait “many many years” to receive compensation.

Once the government approves the vaccine for children under 5 years old and pregnant women, compensation requests will move over to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), Greenwood said. The NVICP allows up to $250,000 for pain and suffering.

The best option for people seeking recourse from COVID vaccine injuries is to file a CICP claim within one year of receiving the vaccine — and hope COVID vaccines will be added to the NVICP, Greenwood added.

“The best thing to do just to preserve your rights is to file in the CICP,” Greenwood said. “I just don’t have a lot of confidence that these people are going to get a good result.”

It is unknown whether CICP claimants will also be able to file in the NVICP if the COVID vaccine is added to the program.

Countries like Japan and France have already added COVID vaccines to their equivalent courts, and those injured receive compensation “pretty quickly,” according to Greenwood.

Italy plans to set aside 150 million euros ($169.91 million) to compensate those injured by COVID vaccines, according to a draft decree shown to Reuters. About 50 million euros in 2022 and an additional 100 million in 2023 will be reserved for those permanently disabled by the COVID vaccines recommended by Italy’s health authority.

Note 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d the federal government “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19” provides that “manufacturers” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].”

Note 2.  Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(c)(5) “If an act or omission by a manufacturer or distributor with respect to a covered countermeasure, which act or omission is alleged under subsection (e)(3)(A) to constitute willful misconduct, … such act or omission shall not constitute ‘willful misconduct’ … if—(i)neither the Secretary nor the Attorney General has initiated an enforcement action with respect to such act or omission; or (ii)such an enforcement action has been initiated an

COVID Injections Have Caused Nearly 24,000 Deaths According to VAERS, the CDC's Underreported, Govt Manipulated Reporting System

/

From [CHD] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,119,063 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 11, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 23,990 reports of deaths — an increase of 375 over the previous week — and 192,517 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,382 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 760,102 adverse events, including 10,909 deaths and 79,111 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 11, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 10,909 U.S. deaths reported as of Feb. 11, 18% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 23% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 60% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 546 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Feb. 11, including 321 million doses of Pfizer, 206 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

The most recent death involves a 7-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1975356) from Minnesota who died 11 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when she was found unresponsive by her mother. An autopsy is pending.

  • 16 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).

  • 29 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

The most recent deaths involve a 13-year-old male (VAERS I.D. 2042005) from an unidentified state who died from a sudden heart attack seven months after receiving his second dose of Moderna, and a 17-year-old female from an unidentified state (VAERS I.D. 2039111) who died after receiving her first dose of Moderna. Medical information was limited and it is unknown if an autopsy was performed in either case.

  • 68 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

  • 639 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 627 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

  • 158 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

Insurance Company: Govts are Undercounting COVID Shot Injuries/Deaths. Estimates 3 Million Germans Got Medical Treatment for COVID Injuries. Claims Show 31,254 Vax Deaths but Govt Data Show only 2,255

/

From [CHD] and [MORE] A German health insurance company this week said an analysis of data collected from more than 10 million people suggests COVID vaccine side effects are “significantly” underreported.

The company, BKK ProVita (BKK), said its analysis revealed a “significant alarm signal” and that “a risk to human life cannot be ruled out.”

Based on the data collected, BKK said the number of vaccine side effects is many times higher than the number officially announced by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), Germany’s federal health agency that monitors the safety of vaccines and biomedicines.

The PEI announced in a press release there were 244,576 suspected cases of vaccine side effectsreported in 2021 following COVID vaccination, but BKK said its analysis revealed more than 400,000 cases.

BKK board member Andreas Schöfbeck told WELT, a German news publication, “The numbers determined are significant and urgently need to be checked for plausibility.”

In a letter, Schöfbeck said BKK analyzed doctors’ billing data from 10.9 million insured people and found 217,000 people received medical treatment due to vaccine side effects.

“In our opinion, there is a significant underreporting of the side effects of the vaccination,” said Schöfbeck. “According to our calculations, we consider 400,000 visits to the doctor by our insured persons due to vaccination complications to be realistic to date.”

Schöfbeck said if figures are extrapolated over a year for the entire German population of 83 million people, it is likely 2.5 – 3 million people in Germany received medical treatment for COVID vaccine adverse events.

“The data available to our company gives us reason to believe that there is a very considerable under-recording of suspected cases of vaccination side-effects after they received the [COVID-19] vaccine,” Schöfbeck wrote.

Schöfbeck sent the letter to PEI President Dr. Klaus Cichutek, the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, the German Medical Association, National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, the Standing Vaccination Commission and BKK’s umbrella organization.

In another letter, the company suggested vaccine side effects across Germany are at least 10 times more common than what was reported by the PEI, the German newspaper Nordkurier reported Wednesday.

The letters did not disclose symptoms, the severity of adverse events or which vaccines caused the side effects.

Germany’s drug regulator approved COVID vaccines from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax and Moderna.

Federal health officials in the U.S. and Germany have emphasized the benefits of COVID vaccines outweigh the potential risks, and side effects are rare.

In the U.S. last month, an executive at an Indiana life insurance company reported a “stunning” 40% increase in the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old adults compared to pre-pandemic levels, The Defender reported.

During the same call, OneAmerica’s CEO J. Scott Davison also described a major uptick in both short- and long-term disability claims.

The insurance executive rated the extraordinarily high death rate as “the highest … we have seen in the history of this business,” adding the trend is “consistent across every player in that business.”

To further underscore the import of his statements, Davison said, “Just to give you an idea of how bad [40%] is, a … one-in-200 catastrophe would be a 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So 40% is just unheard of.”

Contrary to what the public might assume — given the media’s unremitting coverage of COVID-19— Davison reported most of the death claims listed causes of death other than COVID.

Commenting on the news, Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, wrote, “It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big.”

Moreover, Kirsch said, the culprit would have to be something first introduced in 2021 — “something new … that a huge number of people would be exposed to” — such as COVID shots.

Vaccine scientist Dr. Robert Malone and statistician Jessica Rose, Ph.D., agreed that experimentalCOVID injections should be considered prime suspects.

Govt Manipulating Data: Hospitals are Instructed to Count All Persons as Unvaxed if there is No Immediate Confirmation of Vax Status, thereby Inflating the No of Unvaxed Hospitalizations and Deaths

/

From [HIRSHORN] There has been recent attention to CDC hiding considerable data on COVID health impacts.  What has not been focused on, however, is an even greater fraud.  In its goal of coercing the whole population to get COVID shots, CDC has manipulated data to make it look like it is the unvaccinated who have suffered the worst impacts, like hospitalization and death.  They wanted the public to believe there has been a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

For months there have been frightening statements along the lines that unvaccinated Americans are XXX times more likely to be hospitalized or die.  All such statements, including one made by President Biden, are lies, intentionally created by over-counting the number of unvaccinated people.

On February 5 President Biden said: “Here’s the deal: Unvaccinated individuals are 97 times more likely to die compared to those who are boosted.  Protect yourself and those around you by getting vaccinated and boosted today.”

This is what the data fraud is all about.

How has CDC and the public health system created this fiction?

Simply put, it comes down to hospitals categorizing many people as unvaccinated when, in fact, they likely had received the jab.

The fraud by hospitals and CDC is really so simple.  When a COVID patient enters the hospital system there is an immediate check within that system to see if the person had gotten the jab.  Just one very big problem.

A large number of people who enter any hospital very likely got the jab at any one of countless places giving free vaccinations.  That group includes chain pharmacies and ones in supermarkets, community places run by various public health agencies, and physician offices.

What happens when a COVID patient enters a hospital and there is no immediate confirmation that the person got the jab?  That person is classified as UNVACCINATED.

This procedure guarantees an inflated number of unvaccinated COVID hospitalizations and deaths!

The goal is to instill fear among the population that COVID shots are critically needed for public health and safety.

So, data are created for the nation by CDC that there is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.  In truth, the continuing explosion of COVID infections, hospitalizations and deaths in recent months has been a pandemic of the vaccinated.  So many people who have been fully vaccinated, including many who got booster jabs, got infected, got hospitalized, and all too often died.

Another aspect of this fraud is that many vaccine related adverse events are not getting into the CDC VAERS data system because people who are not officially recognized as vaccinated but are suffering a multitude of health problems or death are not counted by CDC.  They are being counted as unvaccinated and, therefore, their conditions do not always fit into the CDC data system counting impacts of vaccines.

Another aspect of this fraud is the use of incorrect population data.

CDC easily uses outdated population numbers that leads to artificially inflated estimates of COVID-19 case, hospitalization and death rates among the ever-shrinking unvaccinated population.  They use population numbers that are lower than the most recent numbers from census studies.  Simply put, they use a denominator that is too low to make their calculation of pandemic impacts seem higher than they really are.

All of this fraud not only casts blame on the unvaccinated, it also is designed to make use of COVID vaccines more effective than they really are.  A pandemic of the vaccinated does not motivate people to get the jab or booster shots.

Withholding data, as recently reported, is terrible.  But how CDC has manipulated data is even worse; it is a big lie compared to a lie of omission.

As the COVID Tyrant Paradigm Unravels [assent to false memes such as ‘covid case,' ‘covid death,’ ‘positive test’ or ‘vax Stops the Spread’] CrimethInc Redirects Sheeples’ Minds to a War Paradigm

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

tyrant-paradigm - the assertion or assent to certain concepts, idea, memes, words, patterns of thinking, attitudes, beliefs, and convictions that give rise to coercive political systems. It includes the notion that the tyrants (territorial gangsters) are so omniscient and omnipotent that they can prevent natural persons from living free. The words that constitute the tyrant paradigm are enemy outposts in your mind. Tyrants "own" the minds of their oppressed victims to the extent that victims hold contents of the tyrant-paradigm in the minds. The tyrant-paradigm consists of the "construction of systematic thought" and "the systematic pattems of thought" that give rise to coercive political systems. (See: The OCTOCON, Territorial Gangsters & Reactions)

Tyrants - there are none; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind-control and word-conditioning control? "Find out the exact amount of injustice any people accept, and you will find out the exact amount of injustice they receive." -Freddy D. "The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it." -John Jay, Castilian Days II, 1872. (See: Tyranny, Terms, "The Law," Dictatorship, Corporate State & Fascism)

From [HERE] “Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes… known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.… No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” — James Madison

War is the enemy of freedom.

As long as America’s politicians continue to involve us in wars that bankrupt the nation, jeopardize our servicemen and women, increase the chances of terrorism and blowback domestically, and push the nation that much closer to eventual collapse, “we the people” will find ourselves in a perpetual state of tyranny.

It’s time for the U.S. government to stop policing the globe.

This latest crisis—America’s part in the showdown between Russia and the Ukraine—has conveniently followed on the heels of a long line of other crises, manufactured or otherwise, which have occurred like clockwork in order to keep Americans distracted, deluded, amused, and insulated from the government’s steady encroachments on our freedoms.

And so it continues in its Orwellian fashion.

Two years after COVID-19 shifted the world into a state of global authoritarianism, just as the people’s tolerance for heavy-handed mandates seems to have finally worn thin, we are being prepped for the next distraction and the next drain on our economy.

Yet policing the globe and waging endless wars abroad isn’t making America—or the rest of the world—any safer, it’s certainly not making America great again, and it’s undeniably digging the U.S. deeper into debt.

Indeed, even if we were to put an end to all of the government’s military meddling and bring all of the troops home today, it would take decades to pay down the price of these wars and get the government’s creditors off our backs.

War has become a huge money-making venture, and the U.S. government, with its vast military empire, is one of its best buyers and sellers.

What most Americans—brainwashed into believing that patriotism means supporting the war machine—fail to recognize is that these ongoing wars have little to do with keeping the country safe and everything to do with propping up a military industrial complex that continues to dominate, dictate and shape almost every aspect of our lives.

Consider: We are a military culture engaged in continuous warfare. We have been a nation at war for most of our existence. We are a nation that makes a living from killing through defense contracts, weapons manufacturing and endless wars.

We are also being fed a steady diet of violence through our entertainment, news and politics.

All of the military equipment featured in blockbuster movies is provided—at taxpayer expense—in exchange for carefully placed promotional spots.

Back when I was a boy growing up in the 1950s, almost every classic sci fi movie ended with the heroic American military saving the day, whether it was battle tanks in Invaders from Mars (1953) or military roadblocks in Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956).

What I didn’t know then as a schoolboy was the extent to which the Pentagon was paying to be cast as America’s savior. By the time my own kids were growing up, it was Jerry Bruckheimer’s blockbuster film Top Gun—created with Pentagon assistance and equipment—that boosted civic pride in the military.

Now it’s my grandkids’ turn to be awed and overwhelmed by child-focused military propaganda. Don’t even get me started on the war propaganda churned out by the toymakers. Even reality TV shows have gotten in on the gig, with the Pentagon’s entertainment office helping to sell war to the American public.

It’s estimated that U.S. military intelligence agencies (including the NSA) have influenced over 1,800 movies and TV shows.

And then there are the growing number of video games, a number of which are engineered by or created for the military, which have accustomed players to interactive war play through military simulations and first-person shooter scenarios.

This is how you acclimate a population to war.

This is how you cultivate loyalty to a war machine.

This is how, to borrow from the subtitle to the 1964 film Dr. Strangelove, you teach a nation to “stop worrying and love the bomb.”

As journalist David Sirota writes for Salon, “[C]ollusion between the military and Hollywood – including allowing Pentagon officials to line edit scripts—is once again on the rise, with new television programs and movies slated to celebrate the Navy SEALs….major Hollywood directors remain more than happy to ideologically slant their films in precisely the pro-war, pro-militarist direction that the Pentagon demands in exchange for taxpayer-subsidized access to military hardware.”

Why is the Pentagon (and the CIA and the government at large) so focused on using Hollywood as a propaganda machine?

To those who profit from war, it is—as Sirota recognizes—“a ‘product’ to be sold via pop culture products that sanitize war and, in the process, boost recruitment numbers….At a time when more and more Americans are questioning the fundamental tenets of militarism (i.e., budget-busting defense expenditures, never-ending wars/occupations, etc.), military officials are desperate to turn the public opinion tide back in a pro-militarist direction — and they know pop culture is the most effective tool to achieve that goal.”

The media, eager to score higher ratings, has been equally complicit in making (real) war more palatable to the public by packaging it as TV friendly.

This is what professor Roger Stahl refers to as the representation of a “clean war”: a war “without victims, without bodies, and without suffering”:

“‘Dehumanize destruction’ by extracting all human imagery from target areas … The language used to describe the clean war is as antiseptic as the pictures. Bombings are ‘air strikes.’ A future bombsite is a ‘target of opportunity.’ Unarmed areas are ‘soft targets.’ Civilians are ‘collateral damage.’ Destruction is always ‘surgical.’ By and large, the clean war wiped the humanity of civilians from the screen … Create conditions by which war appears short, abstract, sanitized and even aesthetically beautiful. Minimize any sense of death: of soldiers or civilians.”

This is how you sell war to a populace that may have grown weary of endless wars: sanitize the war coverage of anything graphic or discomfiting (present a clean war), gloss over the actual numbers of soldiers and civilians killed (human cost), cast the business of killing humans in a more abstract, palatable fashion (such as a hunt), demonize one’s opponents, and make the weapons of war a source of wonder and delight.

“This obsession with weapons of war has a name: technofetishism,” explains Stahl. “Weapons appear to take on a magical aura. They become centerpieces in a cult of worship.”

“Apart from gazing at the majesty of these bombs, we were also invited to step inside these high-tech machines and take them for a spin,” said Stahl. “Or if we have the means, we can purchase one of the military vehicles on the consumer market. Not only are we invited to fantasize about being in the driver’s seat, we are routinely invited to peer through the crosshairs too. These repeated modes of imaging war cultivate new modes of perception, new relationships to the tools of state violence. In other words, we become accustomed to ‘seeing’ through the machines of war.”

In order to sell war, you have to feed the public’s appetite for entertainment.

Not satisfied with peddling its war propaganda through Hollywood, reality TV shows and embedded journalists whose reports came across as glorified promotional ads for the military, the Pentagon has also turned to sports to further advance its agenda, “tying the symbols of sports with the symbols of war.”

The military has been firmly entrenched in the nation’s sports spectacles ever since, having co-opted football, basketball, even NASCAR.

This is how you sustain the nation’s appetite for war.

No wonder entertainment violence is the hottest selling ticket at the box office. As professor Henry Giroux points out, “Popular culture not only trades in violence as entertainment, but also it delivers violence to a society addicted to a pleasure principle steeped in graphic and extreme images of human suffering, mayhem and torture.”

No wonder the government continues to whet the nation’s appetite for violence and war through paid propaganda programs (seeded throughout sports entertainment, Hollywood blockbusters and video games)—what Stahl refers to as “militainment“—that glorify the military and serve as recruiting tools for America’s expanding military empire.

No wonder Americans from a very young age are being groomed to enlist as foot soldiers—even virtual ones—in America’s Army (coincidentally, that’s also the name of a first person shooter video game produced by the military). Explorer Scouts, for example, are one of the most popular recruiting tools for the military and its civilian counterparts (law enforcement, Border Patrol, and the FBI).

No wonder the United States is the number one consumer, exporter and perpetrator of violence and violent weapons in the world. Seriously, America spends more money on war than the combined military budgets of China, Russia, the United Kingdom, Japan, France, Saudi Arabia, India, Germany, Italy and Brazil. America polices the globe, with 800 military bases and troops stationed in 160 countries. Moreover, the war hawks have turned the American homeland into a quasi-battlefield with military gear, weapons and tactics. In turn, domestic police forces have become roving extensions of the military—a standing army.

We are dealing with a sophisticated, far-reaching war machine that has woven itself into the very fabric of this nation.

Clearly, our national priorities are in desperate need of an overhaul.

Eventually, all military empires fall and fail by spreading themselves too thin and spending themselves to death.

It happened in Rome: at the height of its power, even the mighty Roman Empire could not stare down a collapsing economy and a burgeoning military. Prolonged periods of war and false economic prosperity largely led to its demise.

It’s happening again.

The American Empire—with its endless wars waged by U.S. military servicepeople who have been reduced to little more than guns for hire: outsourced, stretched too thin, and deployed to far-flung places to police the globe—is approaching a breaking point.

The government is destabilizing the economy, destroying the national infrastructure through neglect and a lack of resources, and turning taxpayer dollars into blood money with its endless wars, drone strikes and mounting death tolls.

This is exactly the scenario President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned against when he cautioned the citizenry not to let the profit-driven war machine endanger our liberties or democratic processes. Eisenhower, who served as Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Europe during World War II, was alarmed by the rise of the profit-driven war machine that, in order to perpetuate itself, would have to keep waging war.

Yet as Eisenhower recognized, the consequences of allowing the military-industrial complex to wage war, exhaust our resources and dictate our national priorities are beyond grave:

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway. We pay for a single fighter with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This, I repeat, is the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.

We failed to heed Eisenhower’s warning.

The illicit merger of the armaments industry and the government that Eisenhower warned against has come to represent perhaps the greatest threat to the nation today.

What we have is a confluence of factors and influences that go beyond mere comparisons to Rome. It is a union of Orwell’s 1984 with its shadowy, totalitarian government—i.e., fascism, the union of government and corporate powers—and a total surveillance state with a military empire extended throughout the world.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, this is how tyranny rises and freedom falls.

The growth of and reliance on militarism as the solution for our problems both domestically and abroad bodes ill for the constitutional principles which form the basis of the American experiment in freedom.

As author Aldous Huxley warned: “Liberty cannot flourish in a country that is permanently on a war footing, or even a near-war footing. Permanent crisis justifies permanent control of everybody and everything by the agencies of the central government.”

Dr David Martin: There was No COVID Emergency. Fauci/Others Weaponized a Man-Made Virus and Hyped the Public into a Science-Free Hysteria, in a Conspiracy to Create Human Dependency on Deadly Vaccines

/

The following is an excerpt from the Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier by Dr. David Martin

While not covered under 35 U.S.C. §101, Dr. Fauci’s abuse of the patent law is detailed below. Of note, however, is his willful and deceptive use of the term “vaccine” in patents and public pronouncements to pervert the meaning of the term for the manipulation of the public.

In the 1905 Jacobson v. Mass case, the court was clear that a PUBLIC BENEFIT was required for a vaccine to be mandated. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna have proved a disruption of transmission. In Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), the court held that the context for their opinion rested on the following principle:

“This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that ‘persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state…”

The Moderna and Pfizer “alleged vaccine” trials have explicitly acknowledged that their gene therapy technology has no impact on viral infection or transmission whatsoever and merely conveys to the recipient the capacity to produce an S1 spike protein endogenously by the introduction of a synthetic mRNA sequence. Therefore, the basis for the Massachusetts statute and the Supreme Court’s determination is moot in this case.

Further, the USPTO, in its REJECTION of Anthony Fauci’s HIV vaccine made the following statement supporting their rejection of his bogus “invention”

By no later than April 11, 2005, Dr. Anthony Fauci was publicly acknowledging the association of SARS with bioterror potential. Leveraging the fear of the anthrax bioterrorism of 2001, he publicly celebrated the economic boon that domestic terror had directed towards his budget. He specifically stated that NIAID was actively funding research on a “SARS Chip” DNA microarray to rapidly detect SARS (something that was not made available during the current “pandemic”) and two candidate vaccines focused on the SARS CoV spike protein.7 Led by three Chinese researchers under his employment – Zhi-yong Yang, Wing-pui Kong, and Yue Huang – Fauci had at least one DNA vaccine in animal trials by 2004.8 This team, part of the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID, was primarily focused on HIV vaccine development but was tasked to identify SARS vaccine candidates as well. Working in collaboration with Sanofi, Scripps Institute, Harvard, MIT and NIH, Dr. Fauci’s decision to unilaterally promote vaccines as a primary intervention for several designated “infectious diseases” precluded proven therapies from being applied to the sick and dying.9

The CDC and NIAID led by Anthony Fauci entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with EcoHealth Alliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights. This research was known to involve surface proteins in coronavirus that had the capacity to directly infect human respiratory systems. In flagrant violation of the NIH moratorium on gain of function research, NIAID and Ralph Baric persisted in working with chimeric coronavirus components specifically to amplify the pathogenicity of the biologic material.

By October 2013, the Wuhan Institute of Virology 1 coronavirus S1 spike protein was described in NIAID’s funded work in China. This work involved NIAID, USAID, and Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance. This work, funded under R01AI079231, was pivotal in isolating and manipulating viral fragments selected from sites across China which contained high risk for severe human response.10

By March 2015, both the virulence of the S1 spike protein and the ACE II receptor was known to present a considerable risk to human health. NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and numerous researchers lamented the fact that the public was not sufficiently concerned about coronavirus to adequately fund their desired research.11

Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance offered the following assessment:

“Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.”12

Economics will follow the hype.

The CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Shi) et al. 2015-2016. These projects took place during a time when the work being performed was prohibited by the United States National Institutes of Health.

The public was clearly advised of the dangers being presented by NIAID-funded research by 2015 and 2016 when the Wuhan Institute of Virology material was being manipulated at UNC in Ralph Baric’s lab.

“The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk,” agrees Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Both Ebright and Wain-Hobson are long-standing critics of gain-of-function research.

In their paper, the study authors also concede that funders may think twice about allowing such experiments in the future. "Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue," they write, adding that discussion is needed as to "whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved”.

But Baric and others say the research did have benefits. The study findings “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger”, says Peter Daszak, who co-authored the 2013 paper. Daszak is president of the EcoHealth Alliance, an international network of scientists, headquartered in New York City, that samples viruses from animals and people in emerging-diseases hotspots across the globe.

Studies testing hybrid viruses in human cell culture and animal models are limited in what they can say about the threat posed by a wild virus, Daszak agrees. But he argues that they can help indicate which pathogens should be prioritized for further research attention.”13

Knowing that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (through CDC, NIH, NIAID, and their funded laboratories and commercial partners) had patents on each proposed element of medical counter measures and their funding, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Gao (China CDC), and Dr. Elias (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) conspired to commit acts of terror on the global population – including the citizens of the United States – when, in September 2019, they published the following mandate:

“Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst. A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements. Donors and multilateral institutions must ensure adequate investment in developing innovative vaccines and therapeutics, surge manufacturing capacity, broad-spectrum antivirals and appropriate non- pharmaceutical interventions. All countries must develop a system for immediately sharing genome sequences of any new pathogen for public health purposes along with the means to share limited medical countermeasures across countries.

Progress indicator(s) by September 2020

• Donors and countries commit and identify timelines for: financing and development of a universal influenza vaccine, broad spectrum antivirals, and targeted therapeutics. WHO and its Member States develop options for standard procedures and timelines for sharing of sequence data, specimens, and medical countermeasures for pathogens other than influenza.

• Donors, countries and multilateral institutions develop a multi-year plan and approach for strengthening R&D research capacity, in advance of and during an epidemic.

• WHO, the United Nations Children’s Fund, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, academic and other partners identify strategies for increasing capacity and integration of social science approaches and researchers across the entire preparedness/response continuum.”14

As if to confirm the utility of the September 2019 demand for “financing and development of” vaccine and the fortuitous SARS CoV-2 alleged outbreak in December of 2019, Dr. Fauci began gloating that his fortunes for additional funding were likely changing for the better. In a February 2020 interview in STAT, he was quoted as follows:

““The emergence of the new virus is going to change that figure, likely considerably, Fauci said. “I don’t know how much it’s going to be. But I think it’s going to generate more sustained interest in coronaviruses because it’s very clear that coronaviruses can do really interesting things.””15

18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens

Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover "domestic," as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act "dangerous to human life" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;

Dr. Anthony Fauci has intimidated and coerced a civilian population and sought to influence the policy of a government by intimidation and coercion.

With no corroboration, Dr. Anthony Fauci promoted16 Professor Neil Ferguson’s computer simulation derived claims that,

“The world is facing the most serious public health crisis in generations. Here we provide concrete estimates of the scale of the threat countries now face.

“We use the latest estimates of severity to show that policy strategies which aim to mitigate the epidemic might halve deaths and reduce peak healthcare demand by two-thirds, but that this will not be enough to prevent health systems being overwhelmed. More intensive, and socially disruptive interventions will therefore be required to suppress transmission to low levels. It is likely such measures – most notably, large scale social distancing – will need to be in place for many months, perhaps until a vaccine becomes available.” 17

Reporting to the President that as many as 2.2 million deaths may result from a pathogen that had not yet been isolated and could not be measured with any accuracy, Dr. Fauci intimidated and coerced the population and the government into reckless, untested, and harmful acts creating irreparable harm to lives and livelihoods.18 Neither the Imperial College nor the “independent” Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (principally funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation)19 had any evidence of success in estimating previous burdens from coronavirus but, without consultation or peer-review, Dr. Fauci adopted their terrifying estimates as the basis for interventions that are explicitly against medical advice.

  •   The imposition of social distancing was based on computer simulation and environmental models with NO disease transmission evidence whatsoever.

  •   The imposition of face mask wearing was directly against controlled clinical trial evidence and against the written policy in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

    “Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”20

  •   In both the Imperial College and the IHME simulations, quarantines were modeled for the sick, not the healthy.

Insisting on vaccines while blockading the emergency use of proven pharmaceutical interventions may have contributed to the death of many patients and otherwise healthy individuals.21

Using the power of NIAID during the alleged pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci actively suppressed proven medical countermeasures used by, and validated in scientific proceedings, that offered alternatives to the products funded by his conspiring entities for which he had provided direct funding and for whom he would receive tangible and intangible benefit. [MORE]

New Study: All Persons Under 50 are at Greater Risk of Death after Getting a COVID Shot than an Unvaccinated Person is at Risk of a COVID Death. COVID Shot Found to Have No Benefit for Anyone Under 80

/

DOWNLOAD PAPER [PDF]

From {HIRSHORN] Below are excerpts from a new analysis by two great people; the title is “COVID-19 and All-Cause Mortality Data by Age Group Reveals Risk of COVID Vaccine-Induced Fatality is Equal to or Greater than the Risk of a COVID death for all Age Groups Under 80 Years Old as of 6 February 2022.”

From the abstract:

As of 6 February 2022, based on publicly available official UK and US data, all age groups under 50 years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than an unvaccinated person is at risk of a COVID-19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a COVID-19 inoculation, and the younger ages incur significant risk.

From the conclusions:

The benefits of vaccination against COVID-19 have not lived up to expectations. There has been a rapid drop in vaccine-induced antibody levels over time and the rapid emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants that are resistant to the vaccinal antibodies to the spike protein. When COVID-19 death data by vaccination status from early 2022 are analyzed to estimate the degree of protection from mortality afforded to the vaccinated population, the protection from COVID-19 death falls far short of the risk of dying from the vaccine, for anyone below 50 years old.

With Omicron now the dominant strain, the vaccinated population are still catching the disease in large numbers and spreading it. The mRNA vaccines were designed to target the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, and the arrival of variants like Delta and Omicron have changed the risk/benefit ratio. With such a large percentage of the population catching omicron and recovering, we now have a much larger base of 11 a naturally resistant population, whose immunity is much longer lasting and robust than that achieved with the vaccine. With Omicron being both less deadly and more resistant to vaccine antibodies, the benefits of vaccination are further weakened, while the risks of dying from the vaccine remain unaltered.

Even if we roll out new versions of the vaccines, the virus will continue to mutate in a futile cat-and-mouse game. According to the data analysis presented in this paper, all age cohorts under 50 years old are at greater risk (from 5 to 51 times higher) of vaccine-induced fatality within the same or subsequent month of receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than they are at risk of a COVID-19 death within 60 days of a positive test if unvaccinated. All age cohorts have less than ¼ of 1% benefit of absolute risk reduction of a COVID-19 death from receiving a COVID-19 inoculation. Children under age 18 years have 51 times higher chance of fatality after a COVID inoculation than risk of dying from COVID if unvaccinated.

Vaccinations in the under 18 age group are more likely to increase the number of COVID deaths in this age group rather than prevent any. Young adults age 18 to 29 have an 8 times higher risk of fatality from the inoculation than from COVID if not inoculated. This analysis is conservative because it ignores the inoculation-induced risk increases of later fatalities and shortened life spans from thrombosis, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, and other known vaccine-induced injuries and ignores the 90% or more decreases in risk of COVID-19 death if early, effective treatments were provided to all symptomatic high-risk persons. Mandates of COVID inoculations are ill-advised because the alleged vaccines result in higher death rates than COVID itself.

Dr. Josef Thoma Discusses the Inflammation of the Heart Caused by COVID Injections. Even if Myocarditis Heals, there is a Lifelong Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death, Diminished Stamina and Quality of Life

/

From [HERE] By now, everyone has heard that the COVID vaccines cause myocarditis, particularly in the young; however, the significance is downplayed in the media and even in officious medical publications. In the 11-minute video posted below, Josef Thoma MD/PhD, a general practitioner from Berlin, explains what a diagnosis of myocarditis really means: even if it has apparently healed, the patient is left with a lifelong risk of sudden cardiac death, and often also with diminished stamina and quality of life. Thoma presents some recent observations on autopsy materials from vaccine victims, made by professors of pathology Burkhardt and Lange, which drive home he serious nature of vaccine-induced myocarditis. He ends with an appeal to us to protect our children. Please take a look at this important video and share it.

CDC Refuses to publish data it has collected on booster effectiveness for 33 Million Americans aged 18-49 over fears it might show the Injections as ineffective

/

From [HERE] Two weeks ago the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published data about the effectiveness of boosters against COVID-19

The CDC failed to publish a tranche of their data, however – omitting the impact on those aged 18-49, who are least likely to benefit from boosters

The CDC are also being criticized for failing to publish their information about child hospitalization rates and comorbidities

A spokeswoman for the CDC said they were concerned that the data would be misinterpreted, pointing out that it was incomplete and not verified

Critics said that it was always better to publish the information rather than withhold, and allow scientists to analyze and explain what they could 

Oklahoma AG declares medical boards cannot punish doctors for prescribing ivermectin

/

From [NN] Even though federal bureaucrats have arbitrarily decided that Americans should not have access to it, Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor says that doctors in his state, at least, are well within their professional rights to prescribe ivermectin to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) patients.

The same goes for hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), another blacklisted drug that the federal overlords have decreed should never go into an American’s body because it might actually help to prevent a serious infection.

“The Attorney General’s office finds no legal basis for a state medical licensure board to discipline a licensed physician for exercising sound judgment and safely prescribing an FDA-approved drug – like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine – for the off-label purpose of treating a patient with COVID-19,” O’Connor’s office said in a February 8 statement.

“Healthcare professionals should have every tool available to combat COVID-19,” the statement goes on to read. “The Attorney General’s office neither condones nor condemns a specific course of treatment for COVID-19. Our office maintains that proper healthcare decisions are to be made between a patient and his or her physician, and the government should not interfere with their relationship.”

Both ivermectin and HCQ have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for many decades, by the way. Only recently have they been maligned by the government as “horse dewormer” and “aquarium cleaner,” respectively.