Shenanigger AOC Votes Against Amendment that Would Have Slashed $500M in Weapons Aid to Israel. Offers Frivolous Justification for Her Step-n-Fetchit Activity for Elites [murdering Palestinians]
/
shenanigger – a Negro (neo-lawn-jockey) who carries out Step-n-Fetchit type activities/actions (shenanigans) for the dominant immoral minority (the psychopathic white power semi-organism), i.e., the Rhodes, Rothschild Anglo-Saxon Zionist power clique, unknowingly at the expense of him/herself and knowingly at the expense (sell-out/buy-out) of his/her people and culture. (See: McNegro, Coin-Operated, The Moteasuh Tribe, Sambo & $nigger)
zig-zagetry – the occurrence and practice of saying one thing and doing the exact opposite. (See: Politician & Politics)
Zionism – “Jewish” Kazzarian brand of fascism arising from a racist and fanatical religious based political ideology.
From [HERE] and [HERE] US puppetician Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) is under fire after voting against a congressional amendment that would have slashed $500 million in weapons aid to Israel. Her justification? The amendment would have allegedly “cut off defensive Iron Dome capacities,” while doing nothing to stop offensive US-made weapons being used in Gaza.
But critics say her logic doesn’t hold up. In fact, many argue that so-called “defensive aid” is inseparable from Israel’s offensive war strategy, particularly in Gaza, where over 58,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children, have been killed since October 2023.
This report breaks down why AOC’s explanation is not only misleading but deeply flawed.
The False Divide Between “Defensive” and “Offensive” Aid
In her public response, AOC claimed:
“Marjorie Taylor Greene’s amendment does nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza… What it does do is cut off defensive Iron Dome capacities while allowing the actual bombs killing Palestinians to continue.”
But human rights experts and legal scholars say that the distinction between “defensive” and “offensive” military aid is not meaningful in the case of Israel. The Iron Dome doesn’t operate in isolation. It’s part of a larger, integrated system that allows Israel to launch wars without fear of retaliation. In other words, Iron Dome provides impunity, a shield that enables continued aggression.
Craig Mokhiber, former UN human rights official, responded directly to AOC:
“You have just voted to send weapons to a regime that the ICJ and all human rights organizations have affirmed is an apartheid regime, that is on trial for genocide… This is not discernment. It’s complicity.”
Israel’s Iron Dome guards military airbases, arms depots, intelligence sites, and weapons factories, many of which are embedded within ‘civilian’ population centers across Israel. This entanglement of military infrastructure and civilian areas doesn’t make Iron Dome more ethical. It makes its funding more dangerous.
Israel often places its military assets within or beside civilian housing blocks, schools, and places of worship. From Tel Aviv to Ashkelon, Iron Dome batteries are located near shopping malls and apartment buildings. While Israel claims this is for efficiency and defense, it blurs the lines between combatant and civilian, exposing nearby civilians to risk, while simultaneously portraying itself as a victim if retaliatory attacks occur.
This tactic also prevents effective deterrence. Palestinian resistance groups have limited capacity to strike back, and when they do, Iron Dome intercepts nearly everything. That creates a military imbalance where Israel can kill with impunity while remaining largely shielded. [MORE]
