Defense Lawyers Argue Race was Significant Factor in Death Sentence for Non-Whites Accused of Murder in NC: White Prosecutor Struck Black Jurors
/About 149 cases stand to be litigated under N.C.'s Racial Justice Act, a law that allows statistics to be used in order to show bias, and if bias is shown, a sentence would be reduced from death to life without parole. From [HERE] and [HERE] Race was a significant factor in the death sentences given to two black men and one American Indian woman convicted of murder who are trying to have their sentences reduced under the Racial Justice Act, a defense attorney said Monday in Cumberland County court.
They are the first death-row inmates to make their cases before a judge since the General Assembly made it harder this summer to win claims under the controversial N.C. Racial Justice Act. The inmates are Christina "Queen" Walters, who killed two women in a gang initiation ritual; Tilmon Golphin, who killed two law enforcement officers in a traffic stop; and Quintel Augustine, convicted of killing a Fayetteville police officer.
Their hearing started Monday in Cumberland County Superior Court. Defense lawyers on the first day of hearing used notes that prosecutors made 10 years ago to try to prove they made racist decisions while picking a jury for the Quintel Augustine murder trial.
It's unconstitutional to convict someone or set a punishment on the basis of race. It's also unconstitutional to reject potential jurors based on their race. The Racial Justice Act of 2009, passed by a Democratic-controlled legislature, provided a legal framework for condemned inmates to advance claims that racism was an illegal factor in their convictions and sentences. It was promoted as a means to protect the criminal justice system's fairness and integrity, and redress a history of institutional racism.










