Assassin of Haitian President Linked to US Intel. Did US Authorities Murder Moïse b/c He Rejected MRNA COVID Shots? Poor Nation that Didnt Vax, Social Distance or Shut Down was Unaffected by Plandemic

From [FTP] South Florida businessman accused of funding the plot to assassinate former Haitian President Jovenel Moise received legal advice endorsing a mission to capture the head of state from a confidential informant of a US intelligence agency, court documents unveiled in July 2024 allege. According to the accused’s legal team, “the discovery received from The Government redacts the U.S. intelligence agency with which [the informant] is affiliated,” but “it is clear that he is a [confidential informant] for a U.S. Intelligence Agency.”

The businessman, Walter Veintemilla, and his company, Worldwide Capital Lending Group, stand accused of providing a $175,000 line of credit to Florida defense contractor CTU Security LLC, which reportedly carried out the assassination. 

On July 1, Veintemilla’s attorneys filed a pretrial motion to depose the alleged intelligence informant, “J.C.,” who is described as an Ecuadorian lawyer living in Bolivia. Veintemilla’s defense argues that testimony from “J.C.” would support their contention “that several investigative and administrative agencies of the United States Government were aware of the actions and intentions of his alleged co-conspirators in Haiti and supported those actions.”

Veintemilla’s co-defendants also joined in that motion to depose J.C. in Bolivia. Several of them, including Arcangel Pretel Ortiz and Antonio Intriago, were accused by the Bolivian government of plotting an aborted coup attempt in October 2020 against President Luis Arce. German Alejandro Rivera Garcia, a retired Colombian Army officer who helped lead the kill team in Haiti, was also present in Bolivia with this group. He was extradited to the US, pled guilty, and received a life sentence in late 2023. [MORE]

One week after Haiti's president was assassinated, the country's first shipment of COVID-19 vaccines finally arrived.

President Jovenel Moïse was allegedly shot a dozen times in his private residence on July 7. Prior to his murder Haiti, the poorest nation in the Western hemisphere, was the only nation that hadn’t vaccinated a single resident against Covid-19.

Haiti was among the 92 poor and middle-income countries offered doses under the Covax Facility. But the government initially declined AstraZeneca PLC shots, citing side effects and widespread fears in the population.

“Haiti did not reject the offer of vaccines from Covax,” Haiti Ministry of Health General Director Laure Adrien said in a telephone interview. “All we asked was that they change the vaccine they were providing us.” [MORE]

Boris Johnson says COVID Lockdowns were “Medieval.” Is that One of the Reasons Elites Removed Him from Service?

From [HERE] Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has said he doubts lockdowns played a significant role in bringing the COVID-19 pandemic to an end.

In extracts released from his new memoir Unleashed, he describes the lockdowns as “literally medieval in their savagery and consequences,” and likened himself to King Canute attempting to “repel the waves of a highly contagious disease.”

He also says he believes the COVID-19 virus did originate in a laboratory in Wuhan, rather than a wet market.

At the British government’s COVID inquiry last December, Johnson said there were “appalling harms on either side of the decision” to lock down the country, and he apologised for any mistakes he and his government made.

Initially, according to the extracts, Johnson said he believe the lockdowns were reducing the spread of the virus.

“It was only later that I started to look at the curves of the pandemic around the world—the double hump that seemed to rise and fall irrespective of the approaches taken by governments,” he writes.

“There were always two waves, whether you were in China, where lockdowns were ruthlessly enforced, or in Sweden, where they took a more voluntary approach.”

He continues: “I am not saying that lockdowns achieved nothing; I am sure they had some effect. But were they decisive in beating back the ­disease, turning that wave down? All I can say is that I am no longer sure.”

Johnson goes on to say that the lockdowns showed Britain had “barely progressed” from the Elizabethan era, four hundred years ago, when theatres were closed and the number of mourners at funerals were limited to stop the spread of pestilence.

Three national lockdowns took place in Britain, from March 2020 to June 2020, from November 2020 to December 2020 and from January 2021 to May 2021.

Boris Johnson was forced to resign in 2022, after a series of scandals including so-called “Partygate,” when it was revealed the members of the government did not abide by the social-distancing restrictions imposed on the country.

Allies of Mr Johnson, such as Michael Gove, have suggested the lockdowns went totally against the former prime ministers “worldview.”

After Using Unscientific Nonsense to Destroy Jobs and Businesses w/COVID Lockdowns, Elite White Liberals in DC to Allow Evictions of Mostly Black People to Resume w/Rollback of City Tenant Protections

From [HERE] During the pandemic, emergency legislation made it easier for people falling on hard times to obtain rental assistance and stay in their homes or apartments.

Now, D.C. leaders say some are using the changes to delay their eviction, and those delays are impacting landlords that provide affordable housing in the city.

“The long-term continuation of these emergency policies, some of them becoming permanent policies, have put the affordable housing that we have invested so heavily in at risk, ” said D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser at a press conference on Monday.

Bowser joined D.C. Council Chair Phil Mendelson to announce emergency legislation that both said would roll back the Emergency Rental Assistance Program, or ERAP, to where it was before the pandemic.

The D.C. Council will take up the emergency legislation Tuesday, and Mendelson believes there is enough support among council members for the measure to pass.

MO Executes Marcellus Williams Despite Prosecutor Opposition. DA Said No Evidence Connected Black Man to Murder of White Woman. White Jury Conviction Supported by a Discredited Snitch who Got Reward $

From [HERE] Despite St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell’s opposition, Missouri executed Marcellus Williams, 55, Tuesday for a 1998 killing that he consistently maintained he did not commit.

“Marcellus Williams should be alive today,” Mr. Bell said in a statement shortly after the execution. “If there is even the shadow of a doubt of innocence, the death penalty should never be an option. This outcome did not serve the interests of justice.”

Prosecutor Works to Correct “Manifest Injustice”

In January, the St. Louis County prosecutor’s office filed a 63-page motion to vacate Mr. Williams’s 2001 conviction in the killing of a journalist in her home in the St. Louis suburbs.

The prosecuting attorney wrote that new DNA evidence, increasing doubts about the credibility of the State’s key witnesses, and constitutional defects including ineffective counsel and racially discriminatory jury selection at trial compelled him to ask the circuit court “to correct this manifest injustice.” 

A lot of physical evidence was collected at the crime scene—including the murder weapon (a kitchen knife), bloody shoeprints and fingerprints, and hairs on the victim’s t-shirt, her hands, and the floor that did not match her or her husband—and none of it can be tied to Mr. Williams, the prosecutor wrote

Mr. Williams was excluded as the source of the footprints and hairs, the fingerprints, and male DNA that was recently recovered from the knife handle.

With no direct evidence linking Mr. Williams to the crime, the State’s case depended on two unreliable witnesses—a jailhouse informant who claimed that Mr. Williams confessed to him, and Mr. Williams’s girlfriend, who claimed she saw Mr. Williams with the victim’s laptop. Both implicated Mr. Williams because they wanted reward money and shorter sentences in their own cases, Mr. Williams’s counsel told The Washington Post. 

New evidence further undermined the witnesses’ credibility, prosecutors wrote. Sworn statements from his own family state the jailhouse informant made up the story about Mr. Williams to get the reward money, and evidence emerged that Mr. Williams had gotten the laptop from his girlfriend, who had her own financial and personal motives to implicate him.

“This never-before-considered evidence, when paired with the relative paucity of other, credible evidence supporting guilt, as well as additional considerations of ineffective assistance of counsel and racial discrimination in jury selection,” the prosecuting attorney’s office wrote, “casts inexorable doubt on Mr. Williams’s conviction and sentence.”

Despite Widespread Opposition, Execution Proceeds

In June, while the motion to vacate was pending, the Missouri Supreme Court set September 24 as Mr. Williams’s third execution date. 

In 2015 and 2017, the state supreme court and then-Gov. Eric Greitens, respectively, issued last-minute reprieves. The governor appointed a board of inquiry to investigate innocence claims based on DNA testing of the weapon, but before it submitted findings, it was disbanded by current Gov. Mike Parson.

Just before a hearing on the prosecutor’s motion, DNA test results revealed that the DNA on the knife that excluded Mr. Williams matched the trial prosecutor and his investigator, who had repeatedly handled the weapon without gloves.

The contamination undermined Mr. Williams’s ability to prove an actual innocence claim based on new evidence, so he entered an agreement with the prosecutor to enter a “no contest” plea in exchange for a life-without-parole sentence. The circuit judge and the victim’s family approved it, but the Missouri Supreme Court intervened and overturned the agreement.

In August, the circuit court held an evidentiary hearing where the trial prosecutor admitted he repeatedly handled the murder weapon without gloves and, according to Mr. William’s court filings, admitted that “part of the reason” he struck a potential juror was because he was Black. 

Mr. Bell conceded constitutional error in the mishandling of evidence, but the state courts nonetheless deniedthe prosecutor’s motion and the U.S. Supreme Court denied a stay without explanation. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson noted they would have granted a stay.

Despite statewide protests, Gov. Mike Parson denied clemency and, reportedly for the first time, Missouri carried out an execution over opposition from both the prosecutor’s office and the victim’s family.

Mr. Williams was the 100th person executed in Missouri since 1989, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

US Reaches 1600 Executions, Demonstrating Disconnect between Elected Officials and Declining Public Support

From [HERE] The United States has reached a milestone in the administration of capital punishment this week. All four scheduled executions in Texas, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Alabama took place, marking the 1600th execution in the modern era of the death penalty in the U.S., despite public opinion polls showing growing concerns about the fairness and accuracy of the death penalty and declining support for its use.

The majority of U.S. states have either abandoned use of the death penalty entirely or paused executions (29 states, the District of Columbia and the federal government). A Gallup poll recently found that the percentage of Americans who believe the death penalty is used unfairly increased to 50%, while overall support for the death penalty has been steadily decreasing since 1994, now at a slim majority of 53%. Unlike past years, the death penalty isn’t among top voter priorities during this election year, and neither national political party even mentions use of the death penalty in their platforms.

While all the data continue to show a decline in use and support, a handful of state elected officials have recently expanded use of the death penalty. Utah, South Carolina, Idaho, and Indiana scheduled executions in 2024 after at least a decade-long pause. Several state legislatures have also authorized new methods of execution, and two states (Florida and Tennessee) have added new death-eligible crimes. DPI research suggests that these officials are largely out of step with increasing public concern about the fairness and accuracy of capital punishment—and that zealous approaches to using the death penalty that were once popular are no longer winning the same levels of voter support.

DPI’s data show that even at the peak of use and public support, the death penalty has never been a majority state practice. Since 2012, the number of states conducting executions has remained below 20% in any given year. [MORE]

3rd Circuit Ct Allows Black Man to Sue Prison for Detaining Him in Solitary Confinement for 26 Years. Inhumane Authorities also Knew He Had Preexisting Serious Mental Illness

Roy Lee Williams, a Pennsylvania death-row prisoner with a history of mental illness, was held in solitary confinement for 26 years. He sues a prison official, who does not dispute whether that violates the Eighth Amendment, arguing only that he is entitled to qualified immunity. Third Circuit There's "no room for doubt that individuals with a known history of serious mental illness have a clearly established right not to be subjected to prolonged solitary confinement without penological justification." No QI. District Court’s grant of summary judgment vacated. [MORE]

ACLU Lawsuit Claims Oregon Authorities Surveil People who Dare to Protest Against Police Departments that Murder or Brutalize Black Citizens

From [HERE] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Oregon filed a lawsuit against the city of Medford, Oregon, on Tuesday, alleging that the city’s law enforcement authorities have been surveilling and illegally gathering information on the complainants for years. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two local organizations and an individual activist.

In the complaint, filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court, plaintiffs say that records reveal that the police have been conducting surveillance on political activists in the city. This surveillance allegedly began after protests in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in 2020. Police continued to monitor protests against the overturning of Roe v. Wade, and the police department allegedly infiltrated a social media group of activists.

As per the complainants, the police department maintained files on activists who had only engaged in peaceful protesting, violating ORS 181A.250, a statute that forbids law enforcement authorities from collecting information about parties unless in the course of a criminal investigation, where there are reasonable grounds to suspect the party of criminal behavior. [MORE]

Across the US Less Black Students are Attending College, according to a Report from the Schott Foundation

From [HERE] Across the nation, more Black students are graduating from high school — but fewer are attending college, according to a report released by the Schott Foundation for Public Education

A study released Tuesday by the organization examined 15 districts throughout the country that collectively educate more than 250,000 Black male students, two of which are in California: the Los Angeles Unified School District, the largest school district in the state, where 7% of students are Black, and the Oakland Unified School District, which has an enrollment of about 45,000, 21% of students being Black. 

With a 71% graduation rate, Black males at Oakland Unified were among the five lowest in the country — hovering above Detroit, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Minneapolis. At 75%, Los Angeles Unified’s wasn’t much higher. 

“It’s clear that there is something that has to happen across California,” said John Jackson, the CEO and president of the Schott Foundation. 

“If you take L.A. Unified and Oakland Unified as two of the largest districts in the state — and two districts that have the largest Black male population — there is something that has to happen.” 

Jackson added that any efforts by LAUSD are especially critical and could “potentially catalyze progress across the country.” [MORE]

"Literary Crisis" Prompts the NAACP to Sue the St. Louis Public Fool System Over Liberal Authorities’ Failure to Educate Black Children

From [HERE] In a major move, the St. Louis NAACP has filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education and the Office of Civil Rights over what they describe as a “literary crisis” facing African American children in St. Louis County and City.  

The complaint targets not just public schools but private and charter schools as well.

“Black kids in all of those schools are reading behind; they’re reading at levels lower than the state,” St. Louis City NAACP President Adolphus M. Pruitt II said. 

The NAACP’s St. Louis president has taken the bold step of also including Missouri’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, holding them accountable for the success and failures of students.

“We hope from there that between the U.S. Department of Education, the NAACP, and those individual school districts, we can have some serious conversations about them setting some goals,” Pruitt said. 

One local parent pulled his three children out of Saint Louis Public Schools due to concerns over their reading skills, and is grateful to the St. Louis NAACP for taking this initiative.

“They started playing with my child’s grades—her reading scores specifically. I know my child can read college books as well as other books, and they’re telling me that she’s reading below her grade level. That’s ridiculous,” Anthony Dorsey, a concerned parent, said. “I think it’s about time they paid attention to our children and our communities.”

Organizations like Ready Readers are stepping up to combat the literacy crisis.

“Other districts who you think have all the resources do a great job trying to educate kids—trying to make sure kids are reading at grade level,” Executive Director Angela Sears-Spittal said. “But if you look again at children of color, they’re reading about half the rate of all the kids in the grade.”

While multiple schools did not respond to our request for comment, KIPP Schools provided the following statement:

Black Man’s Lawsuit says San Diego Cops Assaulted Him and Broke His Car Window after an Unlawful Stop. Claims SDPD Targets Black People in Liberal City

From [HERE] A Black man is suing the city's police department for negligence and brutality after smashing his car window during a routine traffic stop off the 805 freeway in Southcrest.

He served nearly a decade for conspiracy to commit murder. That charge was overturned, but is currently still on his record. He says that, in addition to his skin color, has made him a target.

On May 9, 2024, San Diego Police Officers pulled over 31-year-old Nicholas Hoskins for not making a complete stop at an intersection. 

Within minutes, six police cruisers arrived at the scene. Officers immediately demanded to search Hoskins' vehicle. It was the fourth time police stopped Hoskins in 14 months.

Hoskins immediately pressed record on his cellphone which was mounted on his dashboard.

Hoskins calmly told officers he was on his way to pick his son up from the bus stop. When officers insisted on searching his car, Hoskins requested to speak to the officer's supervisor.

"I was a black man, in the wrong neighborhood, at the wrong time, when they felt like abusing their power," Hoskins said.

He is a San Diego native, father of two, friend to many and a construction worker who likes bowling and golf.

He asked officers, "What is the probable cause for a search?" An officer can be heard saying, "I'm going to break your window if you want to play this game?"

Hoskins tells the officer, "I just came from the park and I'm about to go pick up my son from school."

He's now accusing the San Diego Police Department of excessive force, an illegal search and an unlawful arrest.

"I'm a law abiding, tax paying citizen. I am not on paperwork or parole, I am not doing anything wrong," he added. "I feel racially profiled, demeaned, emasculated, the list goes on."

Hoskins says he stayed calm and complied, just to survive. 

They are accusing SDPD of racial profiling and say the goal of the lawsuit is accountability.

"The black community is being stopped at a higher rate, they're being searched at a higher rate, excessive force is being used at a higher rate," Angeles added.

Analysis says Cleveland Police Target Law Abiding Black People; 65% of All Drivers Stopped are Black in City Controlled by Elite, White Liberals

Review of 17,000 Cleveland police stops shows Black people are searched three times as often, yet White people have contraband at near equal rates.

From [HERE] Cleveland police searched Black people more than three times as often as white people during stops in 2023 — despite finding contraband at similar rates, a Marshall Project - Cleveland and WEWS News 5 analysis found.

The analysis examined the race of people stopped by Cleveland officers and was developed using data the city was required to provide under a consent decree with the U.S. Department of Justice in 2015, following years of excessive force complaints and paying millions of dollars in lawsuit settlements and judgments for police misconduct.

Using records of nearly 17,000 police encounters, the analysis shows officers often used low-level offenses like broken tail lights or tinted windows to search Black people, who were stopped overall at twice the rate of white people.

Black Clevelanders have had a simmering distrust of police that first emerged in the 1960s with the Hough Riots. The city has experienced several high-profile, fatal encounters involving white officers in the past decade, leading to the federal intervention and oversight.

More than a dozen Black people told The Marshall Project - Cleveland and WEWS News 5 that they believed police targeted them for minor violations to look for larger crimes.

“It has something to do with the color of our skin,” said Vanika Burks, who was stopped four times in 2023. “I can't see it any other way. I should get treated just the way everybody else should.”

The consent decree created a blueprint for Cleveland police to repair community relationships and overhaul its use-of-force policies. It also required the police to record detailed information on every stop.

The news outlets analyzed nearly 17,000 encounters, defined by Cleveland Division of Police policy as any interaction between officers and people stopped for traffic violations or suspected criminal activity.

Black people accounted for nearly 63% of the encounters and were searched at least three times more than white individuals. But when it came to finding illegal items during those searches, contraband was recovered 37% of the time from Black people versus 32% from white individuals.

Stops for low-level infractions have long been the common driver of police-citizen encounters. But stops for minor infractions across the country have led to numerous deadly encounters after escalating into violent and sometimes fatal struggles.

Pretextual stops, the practice of enforcing minor infractions with the intent to look for more serious offenses, have been criticized but have withstood constitutional challenges.

Civil rights advocates and legal scholars say the practice gives too much power to police, often leading to racial profiling while fomenting community distrust.

Jeffrey A. Fagan, a Columbia Law School professor, has studied police reforms and consent decrees for decades. He reviewed the 2023 Cleveland police data at the request of The Marshall Project - Cleveland and WEWS News 5.

If officers are searching Black residents more often than white people and not finding a disproportionately greater level of contraband, “that suggests they’re exercising some kind of racial discrimination,” Fagan said.

“They're using race as a pretext for making a stop,” he said. “The practice itself is leading to disparities which present constitutional problems.”

Cleveland came under federal oversight after it made national headlines when officers shot Timothy Russell and Malissa Williams 137 times during a car chase in 2012 and an officer shot 12-year-old Tamir Rice as he played with a toy gun outside a city rec center in 2014.

Mutombo Dead from Tumor. Tricked by Gov Liars Into Taking COVID Shot and Spreading Myth-Information on Deadly Injections. Coincidence Theorists call Silence on Mounting Deaths 'Respect for the Family'

PROLIFIC SHOT BLOCKER CAN’T DODGE THE MRNA DEATH SHOT. Dikembe Mutombo has died at 58, the NBA announced on Monday. The cause of death was brain cancer. [MORE] On Oct 15, 2022 ESPN reported that Mutombo began receiving treatment for a brain tumor.

Ironically, Dikembe helped to propagandize deadly COVID shots by spreading unscientific nonsense and myth information. [MORE] and [MORE] and [MORE] Similar to “Race,” COVID Shots are a Leading Cause of Millions of Coincidences. Racists and synchronized, obedient Defenders of Genocidal, Coerced Shots Dogmatically Disagree.

According to FUNKTIONARY,

coincidence theories – the naïve belief that problems (and solutions to them) happen spontaneously, that nothing is ever foreseen, plotted, planned or conspired through collusion by the wealthy and powerful. (See: Pathocracy, Fronts, Predictive Programming, Conspiracy Theories, Laws, Technetronic Age, WARS & Council on Foreign Relations).

According to Dr. Michael Palmer and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi:

Are mRNA vaccines dangerous in principle, or is the observed harm accidental?

The facts presented in this book will make it clear that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have done very significant harm. We might wonder whether this damage was caused by these vaccines working as intended, or rather by undeclared ingredients or contaminants. This question cannot be dismissed out of hand. Several kinds of contaminations have been clearly documented; and furthermore, there is an unusually large spread in the rate of adverse events between batches of the same COVID-19 vaccines, which indicates at the very least that these were not manufactured to consistent standards (see Section 5.4). Each of these factors may potentially influence toxicity. However, we will make the case that most of the observed severe harm is best understood in terms of these vaccines doing what they are designed to do; the harm is not accidental but rather built into the mRNA technology.

1.2 COVID-19 vaccines were never about your health

The official story of the COVID-19 “pandemic” is a staggering concoction of unscientific nonsense and outright lies [2]. This started already with the tales about the allegedly natural origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which became untenable as soon as Chinese virologist Li-Meng Yan and her colleagues published their detailed analysis of the viral genome, revealing unambiguous traces of laboratory manipulation [3, 4]. While we still don’t know for certain who was or was not involved in the creation of this chimeric virus, this question is not really crucial: the absurd and predictably harmful “response measures”, which were imposed swiftly and in lock-step by the WHO and by most national governments of the world, revealed clearly and early on that the virus and these measures were part of the same agenda. Already in early 2020, Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret, in their book COVID-19: The Great Reset [5], spelled it out for us:

The worldwide crisis triggered by the coronavirus pandemic . . . is bringing economic disruption of monumental proportions. . . . At the time of writing (June 2020), the pandemic continues to worsen globally. Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The short response is: never.

The authors’ patently false claim that the “pandemic continues to worsen” as of June 2020—see for example Figure 1.1—gives the game away: Klaus Schwab and his cronies at the World Economic Forum are using COVID-19 as a cudgel to inflict upon the world their premeditated “economic disruption of monumental proportions” and to usher in their dystopian “new normal.” Early measures such as the closure of small businesses, schools, and places of worship caused grave damage to our livelihoods and our quality of life.

However, even worse was to come with the introduction of the gene- based COVID-19 vaccines. While there is now overwhelming evidence of grave injury and death due to these products (see Chapters 4 and 7), this evidence is still only slowly making its way into general awareness. A case can be made that these risks were not merely accepted but intended; the entire process of development and approval appears to have been designed to conceal the dangers and rush these harmful vaccines to market. [MORE]

ACLU Finds Freedom of Movement Limited for Blacks in DC [in EVERY City Controlled by Elite White Liberals w/a Large Black Population, Cops Stop and Degrade Blacks in Grossly Disproportionate Numbers]

LEGAL TRUTHS MUST GIVE WAY TO REALITY. BRAZEN COPS SO FREQUENTLY ABUSE THEIR POWER THAT NO BLACK SHOPPER, PEDESTRIAN, MOTORIST, JUVENILE, ADULT OR BLACK PROFESSIONAL OF ANY KIND—COULD MAKE A RATIONAL ARGUMENT THAT SO-CALLED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROVIDE BLACK PEOPLE ANY MEANINGFUL PROTECTION FROM COPS OR THE GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL.

"RIGHTS" EXIST IN LAW BOOKS and courtrooms BUT NOT ON THE STREET OR IN REALITY. YOU ONLY HAVE RIGHTS IF AN AUTHORITY SAYS THAT YOU DO. THE ONLY THING UPHOLDING THE 4TH AMENDMENT IS YOUR BELIEF IN IT. YOUR POSSESSION OF "RIGHTS” GIVEN TO YOU BY A MAGICAL GOVERNMENT, WHICH FUNCTIONS AS YOUR MASTER, IS CULT BELIEF SOLD TO YOU SINCE BIRTH BY THE VESTED INTERESTS. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE MYTHS. AS STATED BY DR. BLYND, “THERE IS NO FREEDOM IN THE PRESENCE OF SO-CALLED AUTHORITY.” THE BELIEF IN “AUTHORITY,” WHICH INCLUDES ALL BELIEF IN “GOVERNMENT,” IS IRRATIONAL AND CONTRARY TO CIVILIZATION AND MORALITY, AND CONSTITUTES THE MOST DANGEROUS, DESTRUCTIVE SUPERSTITION THAT HAS EVER EXISTED. RATHER THAN BEING A FORCE FOR ORDER AND JUSTICE, THE BELIEF IN “AUTHORITY” IS THE ARCH-ENEMY OF HUMANITY.” [MORE] AND [MORE]

From [HERE] New data on encounters with police in D.C. revealed serious racial disparities, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. The data collected between January 2022 and December 2023 found that Black people accounted for more than 70% of the people stopped by police in the city.

Addtionally, a City Paper analysis of the department’s stop data found that while the number of police stops resulting in frisks (or pat downs) are relatively small compared to the number of overall stops, officers are much more likely to search Black people. More than 90 percent of frisks involve Black suspects.

“The main thing that we have found is that the number of stops conducted by the police of Black people in the District is grossly disproportionate to their representation in the population,” said ACLU of D.C. policy advocacy director Scarlett Aldebot.

According to the Census Bureau, Black people make up 43.5% of D.C.’s population. White residents make up just over 36% of the population, but, the ACLU said, that population accounted for just under 13% of people stopped by police.

“When we see this level of disproportionality that can impact trust in the police, and we’re not really seeing the benefit of these stops, we need to really ask ourselves if this practice is making us safer,” Aldebot said.

The report looked at the almost 137,000 stops reported by the police department during the two-year period.

Not all stops result in so-called stop-and-frisk searches, but those that did, according to the ACLU, did not result in many guns being taken off the streets. The report found in 2022, 0.9% of stops resulted in guns being recovered, and the result rose to 1.2% in 2023.

Aldebot said the perception of biased policing in the city also can result in situations where residents won’t report crimes or criminal activity.

The report called for an end to stop-and-frisk practices and for public safety approaches that the ACLU claims are “not biased or disproportionate, do not cause harm, adhere to constitutional requirements, and increase trust in government among the most vulnerable communities.” [REPORT]


Most black people live in metro areas. The U.S. metropolitan areas with the 30 largest African-American populations are the following:

  1. New York, New York

  2. Atlanta, Georgia

  3. Chicago, Illinois

  4. Washington, District of Columbia

  5. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  6. Houston, Texas

  7. Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas

  8. Miami, Florida

  9. Detroit, Michigan

  10. Los Angeles, California

  11. Baltimore, Maryland

  12. Memphis, Tennessee

  13. Charlotte, North Carolina

  14. Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News, Virginia

  15. St. Louis, Missouri (MO-IL)

  16. New Orleans, Louisiana

  17. Orlando, Florida

  18. Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, Ohio

  19. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Florida

  20. Richmond-Petersburg, Virginia

  21. Boston, Massachusetts

  22. San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, Puerto Rico

  23. Jacksonville, Florida

  24. Riverside-San Bernardino, California

  25. Minneapolis-Saint Paul

  26. San Francisco-Oakland, California

  27. Columbus, Ohio

  28. Birmingham, Alabama

  29. Indianapolis, Indiana

  30. Baton Rouge, Louisiana

With the exception of Tampa-St Petersburg and Jacksonville FLA, all the above metro areas can be described as cities controlled by elite white liberals. In nearly every metro area Black people are routinely stopped, searched, detained and degraded by police in grossly substantial numbers. In the above stated cities, liberal Democrats control nearly all levels and branches of government and control all local government agencies, such as police departments. Consequently, if democrats really wanted to protect the so-called rights of its loyal Black constituents- that is, controlling their own cops’ behavior in their relations with its Black and Latino residents, then the elite white liberal leadership could and would have done so at some point over the past 40-50 years. To trick the gullible black votary at election time, elite white liberals often pay lip service about police brutality and decarceration - in fact a few days ago the Washington Post, a newspaper owned by elite white liberals, implied that police unaccountability was part of their agenda, despite all evidence to the contrary;

DC

NYC

CHICAGO

BALTIMORE

BOSTON

NEWARK

RICHMOND

MEMPHIS

COLUMBUS

CLEVELAND

CINCINNATI

CHARLOTTE

RALEIGH

ATLANTA

INDIANAPOLIS

NEW ORLEANS

ST. LOUIS

MINNESOTA

LOS ANGELES

OAKLAND

BERKELEY CA

SAN FRANCISCO

RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNADINO

HOUSTON

DALLAS

MIAMI

BIRMINGHAM

MILWAUKEE

PHOENIX

HUH? DID YOU REALLY THINK NYC WAS RUN BY ELECTED AND SELECTED BLACK ROLEBOTS? HOW CAN REMOTE CONTROLLED PUPPETICIANS ACTUALLY RUN ANYTHING WHILE THEY SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THEIR WEALTHY, POWERFUL WHITE LIBERAL MASTERS? ABOVE Dem kingmaker George Soros’ son Alex hosts Tim Walz in his fancy NYC home

NOT RUN BY ELITE WHITE LIBERALS? Here, white liberals and their sleeping Tom believers may delude themselves that cities like Memphis, Baltimore, Atlanta and DC are not actually run by white liberals and may claim they are in fact run by Blacks themselves. However, whether a city is controlled by ‘elite white liberals’ has nothing to do with the number of elected black officials or appointed black straw boss authorities in a given jurisdiction. In reality, Black people in general function as “a powerless class” having no power independent of elite whites. In nearly all liberal jurisdictions where blacks reside, elite whites control and own all major resources (such as banks, local mainstream media, major real estate, ports, utilities, large corporations and businesses, all major industry, major non-profits, unions, hospitals, etc) and own most major real estate and anything else of substantial material value. Neely Fuller explains, ‘in a socio-material system dominated by wealthy, powerful racists, all major decisions involving non-white people are made by elite racists. In such places elite white liberals function as the major decision makers in regards to what happens or does not happen to non-white people, particularly Blacks and Latinos.’ Elite racists are their employers, landlords, creditors, land owners, supervisors, bosses and major decision-makers. Fuller states, ‘Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by elite racists. This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism) that many Black people prefer not to acknowledge.’ [MORE] Thus, in their direct or indirect relations with elite white liberals, most black people function as their employees, workers, consumers, helpers, servants, tenants, patients, clients and customers. Contrary to liberal whitenology, racists use the granfalloon of race to dominate and control Black people - hate and mean words have little to do with it; master-servant relations are the gravamen of the system of racism white supremacy - not mere bigotry, overt hate or affiliation with clown groups, such as the KKK or Nazis.

Dr. Amos Wilson statesTo live under the power of another people is to be created by that people. To be rewarded or punished by that people is to be created by that people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of another people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation then we must change the power relationships.’ With such an understanding, “endependent” Black minds should stop attempting to transform or reform racists and once and for all, bury moral suasion as a tool of liberation alongside John Lewis’ corpse.

A FREE RANGE PRISON. Authorities and their media often mischaracterize police stops of Black drivers and Black citizens as ‘minor intrusions’ or temporary interferences with their freedom. For example, NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg attacked a NYC court decision which ruled stop and frisk unconstitutional, by claiming, “stop and frisk is not racial profiling.” In reality, the pervasive use of authority to arbitrarily stop law abiding Black people against their volition terrorizes and degrades their humanity and “citizenship” and chills their inherent human right to freedom of movement.

Black scholars Naa Kwate and Shatema Threadcraft explain that unlawful stops of Black people lead to “Embodied stress, fear and trauma” because “the subject knows that any encounter may well end in death—and moreover, that the death may go unpunished.” The frequency of such “routine” stops ‘produces bodies that are harassed, stressed and resource deprived, if not altogether dead.’ Kwate and Threadcraft state, “Even those who are not stopped fear being stopped, fear death, and thus also find themselves in the grip of this form of necropower.” The omnipresent threat of being stopped for no reason by police is a form of “torture-lite” according to scholar Paul Butler. Here, the difference between adherent rights and inherent rights should be understood. FUNKTIONARY explains,

adherent rights – privileges disguised as so-called “rights” created by men via deceptive word-manipulation in written form called “symbolaeography,” and legal documents. 2) privileges granted by an apparent or putative authority at the expense of one's inherent or unalienable ‘rights.’ Also, “rights deriving from the corporate government (against itself) that can be liened against or taken away at any time by the creator or grantor of the bestowed right or benefit.”

inherent rights – unalienable and unassailable rights. Also, “All individual’s have unalienable rights. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. [MORE]

rights” – useful fictions declared in order to make agents of another type of fiction (“government”) have to play along in their deadly theatrical (tragicomedy) game. 2) mere fictions, the contemplation of which leads only to a progressive social, personal, racial and jurisprudential separation from reality. Discussion and debates about “rights” merely evades the FAQ, i.e., the frequently avoided question of who is to enforce any “right” and who will benefit from the pretense. [MORE]

unalienable rights –You can't surrender, sell or transfer unalienable rights, they are a gift from the creator to the individual and can't under any circumstances be surrendered or taken. [MORE]

Hans Buchheim explains, ‘The humanity of each person is the interior reference point of every natural or inherent right. We are all naturally endowed with rights - rights that we possess because we are human beings (regardless of whether we have earned them or are deemed worthy of them by a government authority) – these rights are not given or taken away. Said rights are necessary to human dignity and autonomy - among other things, these natural rights include the right of freedom of movement, the right to be free from detentions, seizures, searches and the right to be left the fuck alone.’

Pervasive, arbitrary stops function to “niggerize,” degrade humanity and humiliate Blacks in public, rendering them “unsafe, unprotected, subjected and subjugated to random violence” by government authority. The undeceiver Jeremy Locke points out that “slavery is not a concept of totality . . . The ultimate slavery is murder . . . Slavery is found both in the partial and complete destruction of freedom.” Prolific stops by cops everywhere a large number of Black people reside, inhibit their freedom of movement and function as a tool to keep Blacks confined to a physical, social and symbolic space. Thus, elites use arbitrary stops to help dominate Black people and control their movements by force. Such stops are a form of slavery. The result is a 2nd class citizenship for Blacks. Legal scholar Charles Epps observes, “police stops convey powerful messages about citizenship and equality. Across millions of stops, these experiences are translated into common stories about who is an equal member of a rule-governed society and who is subjected to arbitrary surveillance and inquiry.” FUNKTIONARY makes it plain, “People who are awake see cops as mercenary security guards that remind us daily, through acts of force, that we are simultaneously both enemies and slaves of the Corporate State

IN PHOTO BLACK PROBOT JOY REID WITH FALSE flaggot, DAVID HOGG.  BOTH MAKE A GOOD LIVING OFF THE WHITE LIBERAL ESTABLISHMENT.

The above is part of mounting evidence that voting for liberals and supporting their causes has been a complete disaster for Blacks. In metro areas controlled by elite white liberals Black people’s so-called “rights” are turned on and off like light switches as cops routinely surveil, stop, detain and search their clothing, possessions, cars and generally interfere with their freedom of movement as they attempt to go about their daily lives. Additionally, in the same places, police have mauled, injured and put thousands of Black people into greater confinement and murdered hundreds with impunity.[MORE]

Elite liberals and their Black probots loudly and dogmatically claim that voting will solve most of their problems. However, the quality of Black citizenship stays low where the majority of Blacks live and it does so despite high turnout by the black votary. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained Black people are currently in a “losing streak that is centuries long.” According to the Urban League’s report, “State of Black America,” “Black people haven’t progressed since 1965” and “the Black-White disparity persists across virtually every line or indicator of life and quality of life in the US. That is, Black people occupy the bottom of nearly every statistical category of life. [MORE]. To racist suspect elite white liberals, Black people and their welfare are not the end of the electoral process but merely the means for winning. “It’s high time to cut the leash.”

[Mandatory Service Provided by Racists] Justice Dept says Lexington Cops (MS) Routinely Assault, Wrongfully Arrest and Incarcerate Poor Residents in 80% Black City Controlled by Elite White Liberals

From [HERE] The city of Lexington, Miss., has fewer than 1,500 residents and only 10 police officers. But it prompted a 47-page report by the Justice Department’s civil rights division, which found that residents were routinely jailed on illegal “investigative holds” or for unpaid fines, and that they faced excessive force, sexual harassment, retaliation when they criticized the police and racial discrimination.

So intent were officers on collecting fines, said the report released on Thursday, that body camera videos showed them brainstorming additional charges such as “disturbing a business” for a man who ran into the police station to escape a beating. (He was charged with disturbing the peace.)

The report was released after a 10-month investigation, and comes nine years after the Justice Department placed the Police Department in Ferguson, Mo., under federal oversight, in part because of a similar focus on raising revenue at the expense of respecting constitutional rights.

In Lexington, the Justice Department said, more than half of the residents had a warrant for unpaid fines and fees, making them subject to arrest. “Going into town for any reason can mean going to jail,” the report said.

Over the past two years, the Lexington police have made one arrest for every four residents, many of them for noncriminal conduct like using profanity, the Justice Department said. After one woman came in to give a witness statement in a murder investigation, the police arrested her for unpaid fines.

Lexington has been called one of the the poorest cities in America’s poorest state. About 80 percent of Lexington’s residents are Black, as are the current police chief and a majority of the town’s aldermen and officers. The mayor, Robin McCrory is white. All of its leaders are liberals. The previous police chief, who was white, was fired two years ago after being recorded uttering a racial slur, the report said. Although massa’ media has implied that Lexington is a Black city - it is actually a jurisdiction controlled by elite white liberals - as Black people probably do not own any banks, industry, utilities, major businesses, hospitals or non-profit organizations in the area. Although BW is not certain, white liberals most likely control the above and own any major real estate and most land in the area, which they control. Racist liberals often deceive by mischaracterizing an area, such as Baltimore, as “black” - yet in reality Blacks own nothing of material value in such places and function as the employees, servants, tenants, customers, etc of elite, white liberals.

“After an extensive review, we found that police officers in Lexington routinely make illegal arrests, use brutal and unnecessary force and punish people for their poverty — including by jailing people who cannot afford to pay fines or money bail,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke, who leads the civil rights division. “For too long, the Lexington Police Department has been playing by its own rules and operating with impunity. It’s time for this to end.”

A receptionist who answered the phone at Lexington’s City Hall said no one was available to comment on the investigation’s findings. The police chief, Charles Henderson, did not return a call for comment, nor did the city’s lawyer.

The report also comes eight years after the Justice Department warned Ville Platte, La., that it could not imprison people on “investigative holds” without probable cause. In Lexington, the report said, one woman was held on an investigative hold for five days while the police lied to obtain a search warrant for her home.

The Justice Department has rarely, if ever, focused on such a small department. But Ms. Clarke has said that rural Americans have the same constitutional rights as city dwellers, and the report notes that nearly half of the nation’s 18,000 police departments have fewer than 10 officers.

The report said that the Lexington police responded to low-level offenses with force and aggression that are usually reserved for serious crimes.

Growing Homeless Population in US on Pace to Set Record. Although Black People are Only 13% of the US, They Account for 50% of Homeless Families

IN top left PHOTO IS NW DC, THE NATIONS CAPITAL. PHOTO BY UNDECEIVER VINCENT BROWN. ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

“Opportomist” – a straight-up opportunist who revels in his tokenhood. 2) a token hood handpicked and taken out of the ‘hood. 3) a lawn jockey. 4) a “Yes-man” for the “Other Man” in derogation of the “Brotherman.” An opportomist is an African-American nameslug who has been acculturated and culturally conditioned into self-hatred and seeks personal gain through obsequious behavior to Caucasian overlings. (See: Sambo, Criss-Crossover, DAMS & Mainstream)

From [HERE] The number of homeless people in the U.S. continues to grow, putting the country on pace to hit yet another record high this year.

Counts from encampments, streets, and shelters are largely higher than they were in 2023, according to preliminary data collected and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. 

The numbers come from more than 250 homeless-service organizations covering cities, metro areas and vast rural areas. They are meant to reflect homelessness as it existed on a single night early this year. The Journal’s count includes about 550,000 homeless people so far, up about 10% from what these places reported last year. 

The trend thus far means the U.S. is likely to top the roughly 653,000 homeless people estimated in 2023—the highest number since the government started reporting comparable data in 2007.

Most non-whites, especially African Americans and Indigenous people, experience homelessness at higher rates than Whites, largely due to long-standing historical and structural racism.

The most striking disparity can be found among African Americans, who represent 13 percent of the general population but account for 37 percent of people experiencing homelessness and more than 50 percent of homeless families with children. This imbalance has not improved over time.

The final count will depend on outstanding data from places that haven’t yet divulged their 2024 numbers, especially New York City, which reported the highest count last year.

Migrants bused by Texas to Chicago and Denver contributed to the latest increases when they landed in shelters there. Migrants have arrived in significant numbers in New York, which has long had a legal right to shelter, swelling numbers in last year’s count. [MORE]

State Attorney Finally Charges White FLA Cop who Murdered Roger Fortson. The Black Airman's Palm was Up and His Gun was Down @ His Side when Officer Shot Him

From [HERE] The Florida sheriff’s deputy who shot and killed senior U.S. airman Roger Fortson in his home in May has been charged with manslaughter, according to authorities.

The Okaloosa County, Fla., State Attorney’s Office confirmed to NPR on Friday that Eddie Duran, the former Okaloosa County sheriff who fired the shot that killed Fortson, will be charged with one count of manslaughter with a firearm.

Gregory Marcille, the assistant state attorney for Okaloosa County, said the manslaughter charge carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison. The Okaloosa County State Attorney's Office declined further comment as the investigation is ongoing.

Ginger Brown Madden, the Okaloosa County State Attorney, said in a statement that a warrant for Duran’s arrest is still outstanding.

Following news of Duran's charges, the Okaloosa County Sheriff's Department issued a statement saying it stands by its decision to terminate Duran, finding his use of force "not objectively reasonable."

Duran was responding to a call of a domestic dispute May 3 when he arrived at the apartment complex Fortson lived in. The airman was alone in his apartment the night of the shooting.

When Fortson heard someone knocking on his door, he asked who was at the door but didn’t get a response. When Duran knocked again, Crump said, the airman was unable to see anyone when he looked out the peephole, so he retained his legally owned gun and opened the door.

Body camera footage released in May showed Duran shooting Fortson six times, just seconds after he opened the door holding his gun. According to a witness who Crump said was on FaceTime with Fortson during the shooting, the airman fell to the ground after he was shot, saying, “I can’t breathe.”

He was transported to a hospital, where he later died.

Friday’s announcement follows Fortson’s family demanding transparencyfor months and just this week calling for Duran to face charges. 

“Nothing can ever bring Roger back, and our fight is far from over, but we are hopeful that this arrest and these charges will result in real justice for the Fortson family,” Crump said Friday.

“Let this be a reminder to law enforcement officers everywhere that they swore a solemn oath to protect and defend, and their actions have consequences, especially when it results in the loss of life.”

'When Black Man Heard Someone Breaking Into Breonna Taylor's Home He Should've Known It Was Police?' White Judge Uses Authoritarian Clogic to Dismiss Felony Charges of Cops who Lied to Get Warrant

From [HERE] A white federal judge agreed to dismiss part of the most serious charge against two white police officers in Lousiville, Kentucky, accused of falsifying a search warrant that led to colleagues killing Breonna Taylor, an unarmed Black medical worker, in her apartment in 2020.

Joshua Jaynes, a former Louisville Police Department detective, and Kyle Meany, a former Louisville sergeant, are accused of knowingly making false statements in their application to a judge for a "no knock" warrant to search Taylor's home.

Louisville police were investigating a man whom Taylor had previously dated, suspecting him of drug trafficking.

According to the wrongful death complaint filed on behalf of Taylor:

At 12:30 am on March 13, 2020 both Breonna Taylor and Kenneth Walker were asleep in their bedroom. While Breonna and Kenneth were sleeping peacefully, the three Defendants arrived in their neighborhood in plain clothes in unmarked vehicles. These defendants were working within the criminal interdiction unit of the Louisville Metro Police Department.

The Defendants had a knock and announce search warrant for Breonna’s apartment, where the officers were searching for Jamarcus Glover who lived in a different part of Louisville. LMPD was successful in locating Glover at his home, detaining him, executing a search, identifying drugs and firearms, and arresting Glover.

Glover was located and identified by LMPD prior to the warrant being executed at home. Despite this, the Defendants elected to proceed with executing the warrant at home.

As confirmed by multiple neighbors, the Defendant officers did not knock or identify themselves prior to entering Breonna’s home.

Knocking and announcing is critical for a warrant of this nature to be executed safely. Reasons include but are not limited to the following:

  1. The officers were in plain clothes;

  2. It was 12:40 in the morning;

  3. The home was part of a large unit of connected homes containing children;

  4. There was nothing to indicate that Breonna Taylor and Kenneth would flee or

    pose an unreasonable danger if the officers knocked and identified themselves

    as police; and

  5. Individuals, under several circumstances, have a lawful right to use deadly force

    in order to defend against those who enter their home.

The Defendant officers breached the front door and entered the home without knocking and without announcing themselves.

Breonna and Kenneth were awakened by the Defendants’ unannounced entry into their home. They believed that their home had been broken into by criminals and that they were in significant, imminent danger.

Kenneth proceeded to call 911.

The Defendant officers fired their weapons into Breonna’s home repeatedly. The Defendants fired several shots into the home from outside on the patio.

The living room was obscured by curtains; the officers could not see anything inside the home (past the curtains) within their line of fire when shooting into the home through the glass. The Defendants fired several shots into the home from outside of the second bedroom window. The second bedroom window was obscured by a screen and blinds; there was no way that the officers could have had a reasonable line of sight when firing into the home from outside this window.

The Defendants did not have discretion to shoot blindly into Breonna’s home in this manner. The Defendants’ gunshots struck objects in the home’s living room, dining room, kitchen, bathroom, hallway and both bedrooms.

Several of the Defendants’ gunshots traveled into the adjacent home, where a five- year-old child and pregnant mother were located.

Breonna was shot several times by the Defendants. Breonna was unarmed when she was shot repeatedly. Breonna posed no threat to the officers when she was shot repeatedly.

The Defendant officers acted intentionally, knowingly, unreasonably, maliciously, negligently, recklessly, and in bad faith with deliberate indifference to the safety and rights of Breonna Taylor when they attempted to execute a warrant without the SWAT unit, proceeded with executing the warrant without probable cause, entered the home unannounced, entered the home without permission, entered the home without complying with the terms of the warrant, engaged in erratic gunfire and fired at Breonna, who was unarmed and posed no threat, in an intentional, erratic and deadly manner. These actions were objectively unreasonable.

The officers failed to use any sound reasonable judgment whatsoever when firing more than 25 blind shots into multiple homes and causing the wrongful death of Breonna. [MORE]

Jaynes and Keany were not part of the team that went to Taylor's apartment.

They were both charged with depriving Taylor of her civil rights, including a right not to be subject to an unreasonable search, by obtaining the search warrant on false grounds, knowing it would result in armed officers storming her apartment.

Prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division said in its indictment that the rights violation "involved the use of a weapon and resulted in Taylor's death," making the charge a felony crime for which they faced a sentence of life in prison if convicted.

Santos spent the bulk of his 11 months in office engulfed in scandal, sidelined by other lawmakers and the buAtt of jokes by late-night TV comedians.

U.S. District Judge Charles Simpson in Louisville agreed with Jaynes' and Keany's motion to dismiss that part of the indictment in an order issued on Thursday, writing that "the Court finds that the warrantless entry was not the actual cause of Taylor's death."

"Even if police had a valid warrant, the alleged post-midnight, busting in would have frightened K.W. who would have fired, prompting the lethal return fire from the officers," the judge wrote, using Kenneth Walker's initials. Huh? So when KW heard people breaking into his house he should have waited to see who it was before he fired shots? How about, knocking, announcing and waiting for refusal to be let in?

Simpson denied the defendants' requests to dismiss all the other charges; both still face the charge of depriving Taylor of her rights as government officials as a misdemeanor crime, with a maximum sentence of a year in prison.

Jaynes also continues to face two cover-up charges, including one of conspiring to falsify evidence to FBI agents investigating the warrant, a felony that carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. Meany faces a charge of making false statements to the FBI.

[Traitors: Black Cops are No Different than White Cops] 1 of the 5 Black Memphis Cops who Brutally Beat Tyre Nichols Cuts a Plea Deal w/Feds. Police Murdered Black Man after an Unlawful Traffic Stop

'THE ARTILLERY IN THE BOTTOM MIDDLE IS FROM RASHID JOHNSON, "A PIG IS A PIG."

BLACK POLICE OFFICERS HELP TO DISGUISE AND MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM OF RACISM WHITE SUPREMACY.AS WITH BLACK JUDGES, PROSECUTORS AND DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, THE PRESENCE OF BLACK COPS IS INTENDED ONLY TO CREATE THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE IN A SYSTEM OF INJUSTICE. BLACK COPS EXIST PRIMARILY TO ARREST, SURVEIL AND CONTROL BLACK PEOPLE AND PROVIDE A VENEER OF CIVILITY, INCLUSION, PROTECTION AND SERVICE IN A FREE RANGE PRISON. THEY ARE MENTACIDAL ROLEBOTS, SNAGS (SNITCH ASS NEGROES AIDING GOVERNMENT) AND HUMAN RESOURCES WHO ARE TRAITORS TO BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE PLUGGED INTO UNCLE BROTHER’S OPERATING SYSTEM. ANY BENEFIT OR SERVICE PROVIDED TO BLACK PEOPLE IS INCIDENTAL, RANDOM AND ACCIDENTAL IN A SYSTEM OF INJUSTICE.

ALTHOUGH DO-GOODERS OFTEN CLAIM DIVERSE POLICE FORCES ARE A CURE FOR REFORM AND POLICE BRUTALITY, BLACK COPS BRUTALIZE AND HARM BLACK PEOPLE AT A RATE NEARLY EQUAL TO WHITE COPS. YALE LEGAL HISTORIAN JAMES FOREMAN EXPLAINS THAT BLACK PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CALLING FOR THE HIRING OF BLACK POLICE OFFICERS SINCE THE 1860’S. SCHOLAR ALEX VITALE STATES, “REFORMERS OFTEN CALL FOR RECRUITING MORE OFFICERS OF COLOR IN THE HOPES THAT THEY WILL TREAT COMMUNITIES WITH GREATER DIGNITY, RESPECT, AND FAIRNESS. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS LITTLE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THIS HOPE. EVEN THE MOST DIVERSE FORCES HAVE MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH RACIAL PROFILING AND BIAS, AND INDIVIDUAL BLACK AND LATINO OFFICERS APPEAR TO PERFORM VERY MUCH LIKE THEIR WHITE COUNTERPARTS.” HE STATES, “THERE IS NOW A LARGE BODY OF EVIDENCE MEASURING WHETHER THE RACE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OFFICERS AFFECTS THEIR USE OF FORCE. MOST STUDIES SHOW NO EFFECT. MORE DISTRESSINGLY, A FEW INDICATE THAT BLACK OFFICERS ARE MORE LIKELY TO USE FORCE OR MAKE ARRESTS, ESPECIALLY OF BLACK CIVILIANS.” [MORE]

From [HERE] A second former Memphis police officer charged with federal civil rights violations in the fatal beating of Tyre Nichols last year is changing his not-guilty plea, in a case that sparked outrage and calls for police reform.

Emmitt Martin is scheduled to appear before U.S. District Judge Mark Norris on Friday to change his plea as part of an agreement with prosecutors, according to a court document filed Thursday. 

Jury selection in his trial had been scheduled for Sept. 9. Three other former officers are still scheduled to go on trial then.

In November, another former Memphis officer, Desmond Mills Jr., also changed his plea to guilty to federal charges of excessive force and obstruction of justice. Mills agreed to cooperate with prosecutors, who recommended a 15-year prison sentence, and could be called to testify at trial against the others accused in Nichols' killing.

Martin, Mills and three other former officers were indicted in September on federal charges that they deprived Nichols of his rights through excessive force and failure to intervene, and obstructed justice through witness tampering. They also were charged in state court with second-degree murder.

It was not immediately clear whether Martin also plans to change his not guilty plea to the state charges. Mills’ lawyer has said he will plead guilty in state court. An attorney for Mills declined to comment on the upcoming change of plea hearing for Martin.

The three other fired officers — Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley and Justin Smith — remain charged with federal civil rights violations, in addition to second-degree murder and other offenses in state court. They have pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The state trial has been postponed until after the federal trial.

Erica Williams, a spokesperson for Shelby County District Attorney Steven Mulroy, said their office will continue coordinating with federal authorities and "will share more updates as soon as possible — ensuring that it does not compromise the investigation."

An attorney for Martin, William Massey, didn’t immediately return a phone message seeking comment. Attorneys for Bean and Smith also did not immediately respond to emails or phone messages requesting a comment. Haley's attorney declined to comment.

Nichols died in a hospital on Jan. 10, 2023, three days after he was kicked, punched and hit with a police baton after a traffic stop. Police video released later that month showed five officers beating Nichols as he begged for his life. Video also showed the officers smiling, congratulating each other, milling about and talking with each other as Nichols sat on the ground, dying from his injuries.

An autopsy report showed Nichols died from blows to the head, and that the manner of death was homicide. The report described brain injuries, cuts and bruises to the head and other parts of the body.

Martin was the second officer to have contact with Nichols and he assisted Haley in forcing Nichols from his vehicle at the traffic stop, according to documents filed in the case to permanently ban Martin from working as a law enforcement officer in the state.

Nichols ran from Martin and his two partners but was apprehended within six minutes by other officers. As other officers were attempting to handcuff Nichols, Martin kicked him in the upper torso while he was on the ground, and Martin punched Nichols in the face while two other officers held Nichols’ arms, the documents show.

Memphis’ police chief has said the department couldn’t substantiate any reason for officers to pull Nichols over.