Mounting Data Shows that a Major Side Effect from the Experimental COVID Injections is Dementia, and this previously nontransmissible Disease Might be “Contagious”

/

From [HERE] Story at a glance:

  • Mounting research suggests a serious side effect of the COVID-19 mRNA jabs could be dementia, and the prions that cause it may be contagious.

  • Frameshifting, as we now know occurs in the COVID-19 shots, can induce prion production and lead to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).

  • Sid Belzberg’s prions.rip website, which collected data on neurological side effects post-jab, found a notably high incidence of diagnosed CJD cases, suggesting an alarming trend.

  • A series of articles highlights biases in clinical trials and observational studies, suggesting COVID-19 vaccines’ safety and effectiveness have been massively overstated.

  • The Global COVID Vaccine Safety Project study — funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — reveals significant side effects, including myocarditis, pericarditis and blood clots, underscoring the need for reevaluation of COVID-19 vaccine risks and benefits.

According to mounting data, one of the more serious side effects of the COVID-19 mRNA jabs appears to be dementia, and worse yet, this previously nontransmissible disease may now be “contagious,” transmissible by way of prions.

In my 2021 interview with Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., she explained why she suspected the COVID-19 shots may eventually result in an avalanche of neurological prion-based diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

She also published a paper detailing those mechanisms in the May 10, 2021, issue of the International Journal of Vaccine Theory.

As she explained in that paper:

“A paper published by J. Bart Classen (2021) proposed that the spike protein in the mRNA vaccines could cause prion-like diseases, in part through its ability to bind to many known proteins and induce their misfolding into potential prions.

“Idrees and Kumar (2021) have proposed that the spike protein’s S1 component is prone to act as a functional amyloid and form toxic aggregates … and can ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.”

In summary, the take-home from Seneff’s paper is that the COVID-19 shots, offered to hundreds of millions of people, are instruction sets for your body to make a toxic protein that will eventually wind up concentrated in your spleen, from where prion-like protein instructions will be sent out, leading to neurodegenerative diseases.

What are prions?

The term “prion” derives from “proteinaceous infectious particle.” Prions are known to cause a variety of neurodegenerative diseases in animals and humans, such as CJD in humans, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or “mad cow disease”) in cattle and chronic wasting disease in deer and elk.

These diseases are collectively referred to as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. They’re characterized by long incubation periods, brain damage, the formation of holes in the brain giving it a sponge-like appearance and failure to induce an inflammatory response.

In short, prions are infectious agents composed entirely of a protein material that can fold in multiple, structurally distinct ways, at least one of which is transmissible to other prion proteins, leading to a disease that is similar to viral infections but without nucleic acids.

Unlike bacteria, viruses and fungi, which contain nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) that instruct their replication, prions propagate by transmitting their misfolded protein state to normal variants of the same protein.

According to the prion disease model, the infectious properties of prions are due to the ability of the abnormal protein to convert the normal version of the protein into the misfolded form, thereby setting off a chain reaction that progressively damages the nervous system.

Prions are remarkably resistant to conventional methods of sterilization and can survive extreme conditions that would normally destroy nucleic acids or other pathogens, which is part of why prion diseases are so difficult to treat.

RFK Jr. and Brian Hooker’s New Book: “Vax-Unvax”

ORDER NOW

More evidence mRNA shots can trigger dementia

Today, there’s even more evidence to support Seneff’s theory. In August 2022, tech entrepreneur Sid Belzberg wrote about prions.rip, a website he’d set up to collect data on the neurological side effects of the jabs. (This site is no longer live.)

Within a few months, the site had received about 15,000 hits and gathered 60 reports from people who got the jab and suffered neurological deficits shortly thereafter, including six cases of diagnosed CJD.

“Normally this disease affects 1 in a 1,000,000 people,” Belzberg wrote.

He continued:

“To get 6 cases you would need 6,000,000 hits to the site assuming everyone reports.

“The chances of getting 1 case in 15,000 hits is 1 in 66. To see 6 cases in 1 group of 15,000 is 1/66^6 or 1 in 82,000,000,000, or 20 times more likely to win a Powerball lottery!

“To reiterate, CJD is an exceptionally rare disease that is now a known and established severe adverse reaction (SAE) from the DEATHVAX™. Injecting this slow kill bioweapon can cause ailments that are about as likely to develop in the real word as getting struck by lightning twice.

“The proof is now irrefutable.”

Frameshifting can result in prion production

In mid-December 2023, researchers reported that the replacing of uracil with synthetic methylpseudouridine in the COVID-19 shots — a process known as codon optimization — can cause frameshifting, a glitch in the decoding, thereby triggering the production of off-target aberrant proteins.

The antibodies that develop as a result may, in turn, trigger off-target immune reactions. According to the authors, off-target cellular immune responses occur in 25% to 30% of people who have received the COVID-19 shot. But that’s not all.

According to British neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCairn, this frameshifting phenomenon has also been linked to harmful prion production — and that frame-shifted prions, specifically, are infectious and can be transmitted from one person to another.

As reported in the Journal of Theoretical Biology in 2013:

“A quantitatively consistent explanation for the titres of infectivity found in a variety of prion-containing preparations is provided on the basis that the etiological agents of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy comprise a very small population fraction of prion protein (PrP) variants, which contain frameshifted elements in their N-terminal octapeptide-repeat regions.

“Frameshifting accounts quantitatively for the etiology of prion disease. One per million frameshifted prions may be enough to cause disease. The HIV TAR-like element in the PRNP mRNA is likely an effector of frameshifting.”

McCairn explained this mechanism in a Feb. 19, 2023, interview with Health Alliance Australia (see video below). In it, he noted:

“Mis-folded proteins caused by prions can impact every level organ and tissue system in the body … [They] bioaccumulate and are resistant to degradation, thereby building up.”

Prions may in fact be the primary molecule that is being “shed” by COVID-19 jab recipients, and if those prions are due to frameshifting, that could be very bad news indeed, considering their implication in dementia.

Another doctor who believes we’ll be facing an “epidemic of prion disease” is Dr. David Cartland. In late February, he posted 13 scientific papers linking the COVID-19 jabs, prion diseases and CJD, noting that was just a “small selection” of what’s available in the medical literature.

Racist Suspect GA Cop Turns Himself In After Murdering Emmanuel Millard: Indictment says, 20 Yr Old Black Man Had Surrendered and Complied with Orders When White Cop Shot Him in the Head

/

From [HERE] A white Georgia cop has turned himself into police to face charges for the fatal shooting of a 20-year-old man.

A grand jury indicted Woodstock Police Officer Grant Matthew Shaw for the killing of Emmanuel Millard after a police chase on Oct. 12, 2023, in Cherokee County.

That night, police tried to pull Millard over for multiple traffic offenses in Woodstock, but Millard fled, which started a pursuit.

A grand jury indicted former Woodstock, Georgia, police officer Grant Matthew Shaw on an involuntary manslaughter charge for the fatal shooting of Emmanuel Millard (pictured on the left). (Photos: GoFundMe, Georgia Peace Officer Standards and Training Council)

Officers had to use a Pursuit Intervention Technique (PIT) to stop him, which caused his car to crash five miles away in Cobb County.

According to the indictment, as officers attempted to remove Millard from the car to arrest him, Shaw shot him in the head. Millard was taken to a local hospital in critical condition, where he died two days later.

The indictment states that “while in the commission of reckless conduct, an unlawful act,” Shaw caused the man’s death “without any intention to do so, by pointing a Glock model 34, 9 mm firearm at Emmanuel Malik Millard while his finger was on the trigger, thereby endangering” his “bodily safety.”

The family’s attorney, Andrew Lampros, viewed the unreleased bodycam footage of the incident.

“[Millard] showed him his hands, he was fully compliant and told him to get out of the car, and as he went to get out of the car, he shot and killed him,” Lampros said. “Traffic stops are not supposed to end in the death of the person who was stopped, especially when they present no danger to themselves or anyone else.”

A week after the shooting, Shaw resigned from the Woodstock Police Department, where he had worked since 2021.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation conducted an independent investigation into the shooting and released its findings to the Cobb County District Attorney, who presented it to a grand jury.

That grand jury indicted Shaw earlier this month on an involuntary manslaughter charge. He surrendered to the police on April 22. The officer is being held at the Cobb County jail without bond. [MORE]

Black Philadelphia Cop who shot White 12-yr-old to Death Pleads Guilty to 3rd Degree Murder. Evidence Shows Thomas Siderio Surrendered before Cop shot Him in the Back while Laying Down

/

From [HERE] Former Philadelphia Police Officer Edsaul Mendoza, accused of shooting an unarmed, white 12-year-old, pleaded guilty to 3rd-degree murder on Friday, according to the Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner’s Office.

In March 2022, Mendoza shot Thomas “TJ” Siderio during a “tactically unsound” foot pursuit. The former officer had been charged with first-degree murder, third-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, and possession of an instrument of crime.

Prior to the pursuit, Siderio had “most likely shot a gun at an unmarked police vehicle, which caused three plainclothes officers to duck for cover.” Mendoza then pursued Siderio, during which he shot at Siderio three times. According to Krasner, “[a]t the time of the last two shots, Thomas Siderio was unarmed, having discarded the gun…approximately 40 feet away.”

Siderio was facedown on the ground when the fatal shot was fired–it is not clear if he dove or fell to the ground, and Krasner said there is evidence that Siderio may have been surrendering to Mendoza before being shot. While on the ground, Siderio was shot through the back and was pronounced dead at the hospital. Krasner described the situation as “very, very disturbing.”

Philadelphia Police Commissioner Danielle Outlaw said in a press conference in 2022:

It’s clear that the use of force policy was violated…All use of force has to be proportionate to the resistance [officers] are trying to overcome…This incident does not reflect who we are as the Philadelphia Police Department. It is not aligned with our values of honor, integrity and service.

Following the guilty plea, Krasner said in a statement, “Justice must be even-handed. Everyone must be accountable under the law.” Mendoza’s attorney did not comment on the plea.

Mendoza’s guilty plea is a rarity as the Police Violence Report, an organization dedicated to mapping and tracking incidents of violent encounters with police, estimates that only 1 percent of fatal police incidents resulted in officers being charged in 2023. However, the last few years have seen an increase in police brutality prosecutions. In March, a fourth sheriff’s deputy was sentenced for the January 2023 beating and torture of two Black men in Mississippi as part of the self-titled “Goon Squad.” In November 2023, the US Supreme Court declined to take up the appeal of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who was found guilty of murdering George Floyd after kneeling on Floyd’s neck for nine minutes. In October 2023, New Mexico Police Officer Brad Lunsford was charged with voluntary manslaughter for shooting and killing a Black nurse, Presley Eze. In September of 2023, a US federal grand jury indicted five Memphis Police Department officers involved in the fatal beating of Tyre Nichols.

It is unclear what Mendoza’s sentence will be, and Kramer said they expect to receive information from the defense team and a pre-sentencing investigation.

Williamson County Judge Sentences White Cop to Probation, No Jail Time for Slamming Black Woman Face-First into the Ground, Handcuffing Her to a hospital bed and Denying Access to Bathroom

/

In a case that has echoed through the corridors of Williamson County justice, a former sheriff's deputy has taken responsibility for his misconduct during a 2019 traffic stop, KXAN reports. Christopher Pisa, 29, entered a guilty plea on charges of official oppression and assault, following an incident where he was accused of using excessive force against Imani Nembhard, a mother of two.

As part of his plea agreement, Pisa has been sentenced to 18 months probation and a 12-month jail sentence that will be probated; he will serve only six days behind bars, with three to be served immediately and the remaining three on the anniversary of the offense, District Attorney Shawn Dick's office stated, Pisa will also permanently relinquish his peace officer's license and must complete 200 hours of community service.

On the night of April 21, 2019, the encounter turned forceful when Pisa initiated a stop for a missing front license plate; he became involved in a heated exchange with Nembhard about the well-being of her children, afterward physically removing her from the vehicle, according to CBS Austin. The lawsuit highlights states that Pisa, without provocation, manhandled Nembhard, slamming her face-first into the ground. The subsequent actions were equally disturbing: Nembhard, who neither resisted Pisa nor carried a weapon, was later handcuffed to a hospital bed, denied access to a restroom, and had to resort to degrading means to relieve herself.

Even more unsettling was the initial charge against Nembhard: assault on a public servant and resisting arrest. After a video recording of the incident was scrutinized, prosecutors discerned the unjust use of force by Pisa, leading to the dismissal of the charges against Nembhard. Notably, Pisa left the Williamson County sheriff’s office two days post the Nembhard arrest and has since been charged with official oppression and assault. Adding to the controversial atmosphere, Pisa revealed a disturbing practice, stating that Williamson County deputies were incentivized with steakhouse gift cards for displaying force. [MORE]

After the Texas Rangers conducted a thorough investigation into the incident, Pisa was formally indicted by a grand jury, the culmination of a legal saga that included his rehiring by the Williamson County Sheriff's Office on administrative duty in January 2021 before he had his day in court, to which the charges of official oppression and assault in October 2020 eventually led to the probe, the guilty plea and Pisa's resignation and stripped privilege to enforce the law. [MORE]

Public Service from Racists in a White Liberal City: Aurora Judge Sentences Paramedic who Helped Murder Elijah Mclain to Work Release. Cops Smothered 140 lbs Black Man as Medic Injected Him w/Ketamine

/

Can You Decline Govt "Services" from Yurugu? Unable to Suppress the Joy of Destroying Black Life, White Cops Selfie Themselves Laughing & Smiling While Reenacting Their Murder of Elijah Mclain

Aurora is the 3rd largest city in Denver. It is controlled by so-called “progressive democrats.” It is 43% white; 30% Hispanic; 17% Black and 6% Asian. Stay away from this racist place run by barbarians within the free range prison,. [MORE]

From [HERE] and [HERE] Colorado’s Attorney General Philip J. Weiser announced that former paramedic Jeremy Cooper was sentenced state court on Friday to four years probation, 14 months of work release and 100 hours of community service. A jury convicted him of negligent homicide of Elijah McClain last December. Paramedic Cooper is white. AG Weiser is also white.

McClain, a 23-year-old Black man, was unlawfully stopped, smothered/piled on and placed in a neck hold by a group of white police officers in Aurora, Colorado in August 2019. Cooper and his colleague [also white] then injected McClain with ketamine to sedate him. According to the federal indictment McClain begged for his life to the police and 1st responders, who murdered him. He went into cardiac arrest and later died in the hospital.

Aurora, Colorado is a city run and controlled by white liberals.

Local prosecutors initially refused to charge the officers, which prompted Colorado Governor Jared Polis to order the state’s attorney general to investigate McClain’s death. A separate investigation found that the officers had no legal basis to stop and hold McClain. The officers and paramedics were indicted in September 2021. One officer was convicted of negligent homicide; two others were acquitted. Both paramedics were convicted of negligent homicide; Cooper’s colleague was also convicted of assault.

Although criminal defendants have a right to a jury at trial, a judge typically decides the sentence after conviction. The white judge in this case chose not to give Cooper prison time because he believed the evidence did not show Cooper intentionally overdosed McClain.

McLain suffered a cardiac arrest in the ambulance in the moments after his illegal and forceful arrest.

Work-release programs typically require convicts to spent nights and weekends in jail, though they are free to leave for work during weekdays.

Fellow paramedic Peter Cichuniec was convicted of criminally negligent homicide and assault by drugging. He was sentence last month to five years in prison, the mandatory minimum for the assault conviction.

AG Weiser pretended that the sentence was “fair.” [MORE]

SIMILAR TO a criminal conspiracy, the system of white supremacy/racism is a CONSCIOUS OR SUBCONSCIOUS agreement among racists to DOMINATE OR act genocidally towards non-whites. Here, a group of racist suspects acted together in a chain of events to harm a Black MAN. It was not personal - but to the extent that each actor may have been a racist -  it was racial. 

WHAT IS white collective power.? when a white policeman shoots an unarmed black man, his fellow officers, the police chief, internal affairs, the union, the media, the prosecutor, the judge, and the jury will support, defend, and finance that white police officer’s “right” to shoot (murder) an unarmed black person.

IN THIS EPISODE, WHITE COPS AND PARAMEDICS MURDERED ELIJAH MCLAIN AFTER DISREGARDING HIS SO-CALLED 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. THEREAFTER, WHITE PROSECUTORS SUPPORTED SAID GOVERNMENT ACTORS BY UNDERCHARGING THEM WITH CRIMES AND THEN REQUESTING LIGHT SENTENCES. WHITE JUDGES IN TURN PROVIDED LENIENT SENTENCES. IN GENERAL, THE DEPENDENT MEDIA , WHICH IS CONTROLLED BY ELITE WHITES, HAS BEEN SYMPATHETIC TO THE COPS AND PARAMEDICS AND DOWNPLAYED ELIJAH’S CASE and CONCEALed THE BRUTAL DETAILS FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC. AS SUCH, THE WHITE COPS AND PARAMEDICS RIGHT TO MURDER BLACKS HAS BEEN UPHELD BY WHITE MEDIA, WHITE PROSECUTORS, WHITE UNION LEADERSHIP AND A WHITE JUDGE . [MORE]

According to the federal indictment:

WOODYARD arrived first and ordered Mr. McClain to stop. WOODYARD did not see Mr. McClain with any weapons, but he noted a grocery bag and that, in his opinion, Mr. McClain was “suspicious.” Immediately after WOODYARD contacted Mr. McClain, ROSENBLATT joined WOODYARD, and the stop quickly turned physical. The officers grabbed Mr. McClain's arms then forcibly moved Mr. McClain over to a grassy area near where the officers first contacted Mr. McClain and pushed him up against the exterior wall of a nearby apartment building. ROEDEMA grabbed the grocery bag out of Mr. McClain’s hands and threw it to the ground. He did not examine the bag’s contents. The bag contained cans of iced tea. Mr. McClain was struggling as the officers attempted to restrain him. While Mr. McClain was pushed up against the wall and struggling, ROEDEMA told the other officers that Mr. McClain had reached for ‘your gun” Neither ROSENBLATT nor WOODYARD knew whether “your gun” meant ROSENBLATTs or WOODYARD's gun. ROEDEMA later said that Mr. McClain reached for ROSENBLATT's gun. ROSENBLATT stated that he did not feel any contact with his service weapon.

Officers are instructed that to perform a carotid control hold an officer uses his or her bicep and forearm to apply pressure to the carotid arteries on the sides of a 1 subject's neck, thereby cutting off blood flow to the subject's brain and causing temporary unconsciousness for the purpose gaining compliance or control ROSENBLATT stated that he applied an unsuccessful carotid control hold to Mr. McClain, and WOODYARD then applied a carotid control hold that resulted in Mr. McClain going unconscious and snoring. Mr. McClain suffered bodily injury. He was was rendered unconscious, suffered hypoxia, and his physical and mental condition were impaired. The risk of hypoxia and cerebral hypoxia was exacerbated by applying two carotid control holds. ROEDEMA also placed Mr. McClain in a bar hammer lock. Abar hammer lock is a physical defensive tactic whereby a subject's arm is held back behind their back to gain controlof the subject. ROEDEMA stated that he “cranked pretty hard” on Mr. McClain's shoulder and heard it pop three times. ROEDEMA, WOODYARD, and ROSENBLATT had all been trained that the carotid hold posed dangers and should never be administered more than once.

l hold, and ROSENBLATT radioed for Aurora Fire Rescue to respond to the scene. At the same time, Mr. McClain regained consciousness, the struggle resumed, and WOODYARD reported that Mr. McClain started to twist and pull away while on the ground. ROEDEMA, ROSENBLATT, and WOODYARD wrestled Mr. McClain to the ground. ROEDEMA tried to maintain control of Mr. McClain by putting his entire body on top of Mr. McClain in an attempt to sprawl him out.

The officers reported that Mr. McClain exhibited extraordinary strength. (a frail, 140-pound man, the three officers assumed that he was on drugs or a stimulant, performing for the camera, a white cop stated “Whatever he is on, he has crazy strength,” )The autopsy found only ketamine and marijuana in his system. )The officers placed Mr. McClain in handcuffs, and the officers continued to restrain Mr. McClain. ROEDEMA, ROSENBLATT, and WOODYARD remained on top of him and continued to hold him on the ground despite pleas that he could not breathe. 'WOODYARD rolled Mr. McClain onto his side into the “recovery position.” Officers were trained that if they administered a carotid control hold they had to place the individual in the “recovery position,” meaning placement on one’s side rather than in the prone position. Mr. McClain vomited multiple times while being restrained. Mr. McClain vomited into his mask during the struggle, and it ultimately came off after the handcuffs were secured. There was evidenceof vomit found inside the mask. Mr. McClain's handcuffs behind his back restricted his movement and prevented him from removing the mask.

Around this time, additional officers arrived on scene. ROEDEMA and ROSENBLATT continued to hold Mr. McClain on the ground, while WOODYARD walked away and was replaced by another officer. None of the officers checked Mr. MeClain’s pulse or monitored his airway, breathing, or circulation. ROSENBLATT straddled Mr. MeClain's legs, while ROEDEMA was positioned at McClain's back; Mr. McClain's hands were handcuffed behind his back. During this time, Mr. MeClain said his name, stated that he could not breathe and that what the officers were doing “really hurt,” Mr. McClain reported that he did not have a gun, did not do that sort of thing, he asked for help, and asked to find his phone. ROEDEMA applied, and directed other officers who responded to apply, pain compliance techniques to the handcuffed Mr. McClain. While restraining Mr. McClain, ROEDEMA increased pressure causing Mr. McClain tocry out, “Ah, ow, okay, okay.” KOEDEMA responded, “Well, chill out! You've already been told several times to stop.” Mr. McClain spoke again and ROEDEMA picked up Mr. McClain's torso and forcibly pushed it to the ground, causing Mr. McClain to cry out, “Ow!”

ROEDEMA was the senior patrol officer on scene and directed other officers. Mr. McClain repeatedly stated that he could not breathe. ROEDEMA ignored Mr. McClain's repeated statements that he could not breathe. Initially during the restraint, ROEDEMA, ROSENBLATT, and WOODYARD were all on top of Mr. McClain, and they were lying on his back. Throughout the restraint, two or three officers were physically restraining Mr. McClain, with ROEDEMA on his back and controlling him there, and with ROSENBLATT on Mr. McClain's legs. Other officers on the scene told ROEDEMA to make sure Mr. McClain could breathe, and ROEDEMA dismissed those reminders, asserting that Mr. McClain could breathe.

Additionally, prior to the restraint period, Mr. McClain vomited into his mask, which he was unable to remove during the struggle and once restrained. In addition to the vomit inside Mr. McClain'’s mask, Mr. McClain vomited repeatedly while being restrained on his side. Gurgling sounds by Mr. McClain were audible in body-worn camera video footage. Medical evidence indicated that this was evidence of potential aspiration while he was restrained. Mr. McClain's breathing further indicated he had hypoxia? following the police restraint and use of the carotid control hold. Medical evidence also conveyed that Mr. McClain was in a hypoxemic state with decreased cerebral oxygenation. Finally, Mr. McClain suffered from metabolic acidosis from the physical struggle with police. Hypoxia, hypoxemia? and metabolic acidosis, all constitute serious bodily injury. Individually and collectively, they pose a substantial risk of death or a substantial risk of protracted loss or impairment of the function of any part or organ of the body. [MORE] and [MORE]

A Barbaric, White Brentwood Cop Used His Uncontrollable Authority to Allow His K-9 to Rip Open a Black Woman’s Skull and Scalp After She Surrendered. Court Denies the Government's Request for Immunity

/

From [HERE] Ordering a police dog to bite a person doesn't necessarily constitute excessive force, but siccing a K-9 on a person for a long time does, a federal judge in San Francisco has ruled. 

That was Monday's decision by U.S. District Court Judge Rita Lin in the case of Tamilka Bates vs. Brentwood police officer Ryan Rezentes, whose dog Marco clamped down on the young woman's scalp for roughly a minute as she hid in the bushes after allegedly shoplifting cosmetics from a nearby Ulta store. The store had insurance against theft.

Lin said it was OK that Rezentes had his dog bite Bates in February 2020. But she ruled that the officer cannot claim qualified immunity in this case, specifically citing the duration and the location of the dog bite that left Bates with traumatic brain injury.

The head is a "uniquely vulnerable part of the body," the judge wrote. 

The judge's order also noted that Rezentes did not give any warning that he had a K-9, allowing Bates to surrender, and he had not officially given Marco any command before the dog began biting Bates, who was hiding in the bushes. 

According to the complaint:

On February 10, 2020, at approximately 12:40 p.m., off-duty Brentwood Police Officer Ryan Rezentes and his Czech Republic trained German Sheppard “Marco” responded to a call for service to help locate three suspected shoplifters. Officer Rezentes deployed his police canine, “Marco,” and searched a field near Empire Way in Brentwood, CA.

Officer Rezentes’ was directed to take Marco and search a clump of bushes in the field. Without providing any warning or a reasonable opportunity to come out the bushes, Officer Rezentes commanded Marco to go into the bushes where the German Sheppard located Ms. Bates and immediately sunk its teeth into the unarmed woman’s head. Officer Rezentes ignored Ms. Bates’ chilling screams as he stood by and watched his canine viciously maul the young victim. Finally, the Officer began commanding the canine to “heel” in German. The dog ignored the commands while Ms. Bates continued to scream and beg for her life as the dog continued its attack. Nearly one minute later, Officer Rezentes once again command his dog to heel —yet again, the dog ignored his handler’s commands. Ms. Bates continued to cry out for her mother while pleading with the Officers to make the dog stop.

Officer Rezentes eventually came to the obvious conclusion that he had lost control of his attack animal and inexplicably yelled at Ms. Bates to “do something!” The Officer finally went into the bushes and physically removed the dog’s bite from Ms. Bates’ scalp. After over a minute of being attacked by the rogue animal, Ms. Bates was left laying on the ground mangled and paralyzed with fear.

Officers Rezentes and Lou yelled at Ms. Bates to stand up, an impossible task, as leaves and twigs scraped against her open head wounds. Eventually, Officer Lou helped Ms. Bates to her feet and placed her in handcuffs. The Officers berated Ms. Bates for running from police as if getting her head bit and mauled by a vicious canine was a lawful and appropriate punishment for her crimes.

As she emerged from the bushes, the assembled Officers could see large chunks of Ms. Bates’ scalp were ripped from her head, exposing bone and tissue. 15. In an apparent effort to cover-up this shocking display of police brutality, Officer Rezentes failed to include significant facts from his official police report detailing the encounter. In his report, Officer Rezentes claims that he did not have the benefit of a cover officer which prevented him from physically removing the dog from gnawing on Ms. Bates’ head. However, Brentwood Police Officer Lou’s body worn camera (BWC) proves this is patently false. In fact, the BWC clearly showed that he was standing next to Officer Rezentes with his gun drawn while reassuring Officer Rezentes, “Don't worry, I won’t shoot your dog.” Indeed, Officer Rezentes knowingly omitted the multiple failed attempts to get his canine to release its potentially deadly grip. Officer Rezentes failed to mention that Marco was out of control. 16. Following this tragic event, Ms. Bates was transported to John Muir Medical Center Walnut Creek for emergency medical care. Fortunately, surgeons were able to reattach her scalp however, Ms. Bates continues to suffer from headaches, memory loss and depression as a result of the horrific experience.[MORE]

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals precedent holds that excessive duration of a K-9 bite, or officers improperly encouraging a continued attack, could constitute excessive force and a constitutional violation, Lin wrote, "regardless of whether the initial dog bite was justified." 

"Viewing the facts in Bates' favor, a reasonable jury could conclude that Rezentes violated the Fourth Amendment by allowing his dog to hold its bite on Bates' head for 40 seconds after she indicated her surrender," Line wrote. "A reasonable jury could conclude that the government's intrusion was severe." 

The judge's decision was a procedural hurdle that Bates and her legal team, Lawyers for the People, were thrilled to overcome, as now a jury can decide the case on its merits.

Adante Pointer, Bates' attorney, said the ruling is also significant as it puts K-9 use "under a microscope" as police dog bites are finally undergoing more scrutiny from the public and politicians.

"It's a big deal," Pointer said Wednesday.

The city of Brentwood did not immediately respond to the ruling, though Pointer said he expected them to appeal it.

The city also did not say whether Rezentes was still employed with the department, or if any police policies had changed since the brutal attack on Bates, that exposed her bloody scalp and caused her years of physical and emotional pain.

The judge's ruling also outlined a second-by-second play of what had occurred.

After 16 seconds, Bates shouts, "Oh my God, please get your dog. I'm coming out. I'm coming out, please get your dog," according to body camera from the scene.Rezentes tells her to crawl out to him.

"But your dog's biting me," Bates cries out. 

Thirty seconds into the video, Rezentes crouches inside the bush, next to Bates, who is screaming, "My whole brain!"

Pictures from that day show her scalp has literally been ripped off her head. 

For another 30 seconds, Bates calls out for her "mama." 

Fifty-six seconds into the footage, Rezentes says, "Marco pust," which means release. 

He repeats that command five seconds later.

Just after the one-minute mark, Rezentes removes Marco.  

"Furthermore," Lin wrote, "a reasonable jury could conclude that Rezentes could see from his vantage point that the dog was biting Bates' head about 30 seconds after the bite, and thus that he needed to intervene as soon as reasonably possible, rather than waiting another 25-30 seconds to attempt a further release command." 

Too Many Murdered to Count: US Government is Funding Ongoing Genocide by Barbaric, Crazy IsrAliens in the Name of Deluded Sheeple in the US

/

According to FUNKTIONARY:

terrorist organizations – embryonic “governments,” the members of which who can successfully challenge the nation-state or Corporate State’s claim to a monopoly on legitimized violence, mayhem and murder. The label ‘terrorist’ or ‘freedom fighter’ depend on political orientation and the presence or lack of rootedness in the historical consciousness of a protracted struggle against oppression and exploitation. (See: Corporate State, World Bank, IMF, Gangbanking & WAR)

Israeliens – impostor (pale interloper alien) Hebrews—Eastern European stock Caucasians who adopted the philosophy, myths, fables, and traditions of the so-called “Jews” while living in Russia—masquerading as if they had any genetic or historical ancestry and cultural heritage to the Afrikan Hebrews, the Afrim people, who occupied Canaan (Palestine) from ancient times. 2) those who currently are occupying Palestine (the land of Canaan), colonizing and killing its rightful descendants, historic owners and dwellers), and are undeniably alien (foreign—not aboriginal) to that land. 3) impostor Hebrews originating from the Pale of Settlement in Kazzarian Russia currently an occupying force (militarily holed-up and propped-up by US financial support and British skullduggery) in occupied Palestine. 4) alien Jews—Pinchbeck Hebrews. Israeliens are East Europeans with no genetic or actual historic ties whatsoever to the land now called Palestine. Israeliens have brainwashed (and fooled) themselves and many others into believing this historical lie and propaganda that they are the descendents of “Jews” (a misnomer for African Hebrews, itself a misnomer for the Afrim people). Anyone with a modicum of research skills, knowledge of basic geography, philology, and an unbiased-by-religious-myth mind can easily confirm or validate this fact for his or herself. Both so-called Sephardim and Ashkenazim “Jews” are not historically tied to the Afrim. It’s not that Caucasians who have adopted the “Jewish” religion shouldn’t have a place to live—but how about suggesting relocating where they came from—the hills of Russia, and not on another peoples’ land. You don’t invade (break into) someone’s house (property) and expect them to just go away and not fight to get it back (despite how much force, murdering, deception, and propaganda that is brought to bear to justify such wrongful invasion and genocide). Psychological repression is both invisible and reflexive. (See: Zionism, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, Genocide, Immigrant Human, Jew, Twelve Tribes of Israel, Evolution, Caucasian, Pilgarlick, El & Judaism)

Media Looks the Other Away as Lebron James Threatens to Assault White Woman During Game – TNT Edits Footage, Conceals Story to Protect Specially Protected Rolebotic KneeGrow

/

Perhaps the Greatest Showcase Black of All Time? Elite racists allowed their Showcase kneegrow LeBron to threaten a white woman fan during playoff game.

Elite racists have created an entire community of “Showcase Blacks” or rolebotic Blacks whom they control through various rewards and punishments. Said role-bots have priceless value to racists in the system of racism white Supremacy. FUNKTIONARY explains, “A role-bot merely plays the role of the mask - the personae - society issued and approved.” Said “coin-operated negros” are high-profile blacks that are constantly paraded before the public. They may be political dignitaries, pro athletes, entertainers, educators, business people, judges or elected officials. Anon explains, Showcase Blacks are not showcasing themselves, they are being showcased by white supremacists to promote some aspect of racism white supremacy (RWS).’

Generally speaking, within the system of racism white supremacy Black individuals have no power to harm white people as a group - unless they are allowed to or directed to do so by elite whites. Anon states, ‘a black person whose power comes from a white institution will not be allowed to mistreat whites - unless he or she is following orders from more powerful whites. . . A white supremacy system by its very NATURE forbids ALL non-white people - regardless of wealth, status, or position - from victimizing white people.’ [MORE] In most instances when a Black person actually harms a white person he/she is summarily dealt with by elite whites who control all areas of people activity in various contexts (SEE the racial disparity statistics for whenever a non-white defendant harms a white victim). For example, in the very, very rare case of a Black police officer unlawfully harming a white citizen - said cops are generally fired and prosecuted “promptly” or Starbucks quick , thereby alleviating any need for protesting, teddy bear posting or ‘white lives matter’ chanting and begging to authorities.

Here, LeMedia immediately concealed LeBron’s conduct during a live game and ignored the incident as a non-story. As AOH’s video indicates, within seconds TNT edited LeBron’s conduct out of the highlight. Clearly he was joking - but what was the punchline? ‘I can punch a woman in the face!’ Hoho hilarious. Surely, no regular Black man could get way with such conduct - threatening a white woman in front of an audience of millions. The dependent media, which Ishmael Reed describes as a “segregated white-owned enterprise with billions of dollars at their disposal,” has apparently looked the other way because he is a tool of racist elites who serves some purpose and usefulness to the system of racism white supremacy. Obviously, Lebron is ineligible for “White privilege,” which FUNKTIONARY defines as “an invisible package of unearned assets bequeathed to all Caucasians or an invisible weightless knapsack of advantages.” [MORE] But as an elite showcase Black and in exchange for dutifully playing his role, Lebron has been given an “invisible knapsack of advantages” which include exaggerating his accomplishments, ignoring his frequent lack of competitiveness, overlooking his clutch time disappearances, equating his obvious mediocrity with excellence and consistently ignoring or concealing his most egregious loser conduct. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

Propagenda – propaganda developed and directed to a particular audience as a means of predictive programming for accepting someone’s agenda as their very own. (See: $pinfidels, Predictive Programming & Coin-Operated)

predictive programming – an ancient technique of downloading (marketing) an idea into the subconscious of the conditioned mass-mind (step-by-step) guiding (bringing) the duped victims into a desired or predetermined conclusion that they actually believe was consciously derived on their own. Predictive programming works down through the centuries like a charm. Everyone is standardized with the same indoctrination—conditioned under the same mis-education and disinformation. Since we all watch the same TV and download the same standardized education, it never occurs that we are getting conned, uploaded, downgraded, brainchipped and ultimately faded from any memory of being an individual self. “Most folk’s beliefs and what they think is induced beliefs, is propagated into them through repetition as Bertrand Russell said. Just repetitive advertising and people start parroting it in their daily lives and it’s actually changing the structure of their mind into acceptance of something they don’t even perceive yet.” ~Alan Watt. With predictive programming you are entrained to accept something that has not yet happened (but will) and respond to it just like the characters in the movie—performing and dream-weaving what you’ve subliminally consumed. (See: THC, Borg, Pathocracy, MEDIA, T.V., Money, Deaf-Effect, Schooling, Education, Indoctrination, Cultural Conditioning, Dollar, “Government,” Authority, DOOR, Zombie, Android, Belief, Cognitive Dissonance, Clocksuckers, Chemtrails & Democracy)

Under the Guise of ‘fighting crime’ Authorities are Filling Prisons w/Blacks: The US has 1.8 Million Incarcerated individuals. Nearly 40% are Black, yet Blacks make up only 13% of the population

/

From [HERE] The US prides itself on being a nation built on freedom, justice, and individual rights. And yet the evolution of its system of mass incarceration — a system that cannot be defined without reference to shocking racial disparities — seems to directly contradict these founding principles.

The US prison population dwarfs those of nearly every other country. As of Dec. 2023, the US had some 1.8 million incarcerated individuals. China trailed with just under 1.7 million — but these figures are incomparable when factoring in the fact that China’s general population size is more than quadruple that of the US.

And among the US prison population, more than 37 percent of those incarcerated are Black. This is particularly unnerving because Black people make up only 13 percent of the country’s total population.

How did we get here?

Beginning in the 1970s, the idea of protecting public safety by implementing policies that were “tough on crime” became increasingly politically valuable. Philosophy Professor Shari Stone-Mediatore describes these policies as “stiff criminal codes, long prison sentences, laws that facilitate police search and seizure, laws that make it more difficult to challenge a wrongful conviction, and stringent parole boards.” Taken together, these policies laid the groundwork for the expansion of the US criminal justice system.

It was against this backdrop that President Richard Nixon launched his so-called “War on Drugs,” aimed at combatting drug addiction through punitive measures, and formed the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), which enforces drug laws and works to limit drug supplies. Years later, the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984created longer sentences for people convicted of drug crimes. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws and harsh penalties that arose from the “tough on crime” policies combined to cause a surge in the number of people incarcerated for drug offenses — a trend that continues to this day.

This heightened criminal enforcement occurred in the aftermath of the deinstitutionalization movement — US policies aimed at reducing the number of individuals confined to psychiatric institutions. During the 1950s and 1960s, the number of patients committed to such facilities was approximately triple that of the country’s prison population, according to a 2013 journal article published by the University of Chicago. As pressure mounted to reduce inpatient populations, pressure also increased to impose harsh sentences against drug users, leading legal scholars Steven Raphael and Michael A. Stoll to conclude at the time that “a sizable portion of the mentally ill behind bars would not have been incarcerated in years past.”

In 1975, the incarcerated population surpassed the committed population and has continued to rise in the ensuing decades. Since the start of the 1970s, the US prison population has expanded by 500%. [MORE]

'like being locked in a casket you Can't escape.' Class Action of Black/Latino Inmates Says NY Authorities Continue to Detain Disabled People in Solitary Confinement Despite Law Banning it

/

From [HERE] A class action complaint filed this week accuses New York prison officials of holding disabled inmates in solitary confinement in violation of state law.

Solitary confinement has been a core feature of the US penal system since the 18th century — dating back to the earliest state prisons, where the inmates seen as most depraved were isolated to prevent the spread of their moral influence. Though these days officials tend to prefer the term “special housing units” (SHU), the punishment remains essentially unaltered and can include up to 24 hours of isolation each day for years, even decades. Activists have long criticized solitary confinement as ineffective and tantamount to torture.

Based in part on these concerns, New York enacted a law in 2021 designed to limit the use of solitary confinement and to encourage forms of confinement that were less punitive and more rehabilitative and therapeutic in nature. The Humane Alternatives to Long-Term Solitary Confinement Act (HALT) was designed to limit the use of solitary confinement and to encourage the use of less punitive, more therapeutic confinement options. In part, the law forbids prison officials from imposing the punishment against members of groups seen as particularly vulnerable to the ill effects of isolation in all but true emergency situations. Among those listed are people with disabilities and people with histories of trauma.

Several named plaintiffs representing a class of “themselves and all others similarly situated” filed a complaint this week with New York’s Supreme Court for Kings County alleging that since HALT was enacted, prison officials have denied its benefits to “hundreds of people with disabilities.” All the plaintiffs are Black or Latino.

In a statement released Tuesday, the advocacy groups and attorneys representing the plaintiffs alleged New York prison officials have created exceptions to HALT by narrowing the definition of “disability” to improperly exclude certain conditions. They highlight the cases of several named plaintiffs with mental and physical conditions whose health they claim has deteriorated as a result of these violations.

The complaint states,

Plaintiffs bring this case on behalf of two overlapping groups of incarcerated people with disabilities whom Defendants subject to solitary confinement in violation of HALT.

First, all Plaintiffs bring this case on behalf of a Practice Class, defined more specifically below, of people with disabilities whom Defendants subject to solitary confinement by holding them in cells for more than 17 hours per day. Plaintiffs, on behalf of the Practice Class, seek an injunction prohibiting Defendants from placing members of the Practice Class in solitary confinement, and a declaration that Defendants’ current practice of doing so violates HALT.

Second, Plaintiffs Adams, Allen, Gneco, Greene, and Peña bring this case on behalf of a Policy Class, defined more specifically below, of people who have certain disabilities but whom Defendants, through their continuing policies, deny the disability-based protections of HALT, and put at constant risk of placement in segregated confinement. These policies—which Defendants promulgated after the codification of HALT and which they maintain today—permit the use of solitary confinement for people with many types of disabilities, including, for example, people with posttraumatic stress disorder, speech disabilities, and some mobility disabilities, as well as people who are hard of hearing or have low vision. Defendants have relied on these policies to impose segregated confinement on hundreds of people with disabilities, including numerous Plaintiffs, who should be excluded from solitary confinement under HALT. Plaintiffs, on behalf of the Policy Class, seek a declaration that these policies violate HALT, and an injunction prohibiting the maintenance of ongoing policies that narrow HALT’s protections. [MORE]

When it released its annual solitary confinement report in 2020, the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) wrote that it was in the process of implementing prohibitions on the placement of people with disabilities in solitary confinement. In June 2023, the organization issued Directive #4933D, essentially codifying the requirements of HALT. The same month, the DOCCS released a report outlining its efforts to comply with HALT, in which it asserted the number of inmates confined to the SHU had dropped by 80% over the past year.

In the latter report, the DOCCS leadership expressed pride in their achievements:

There is no doubt that the Department has undergone significant change over the last few years. Indeed, the extent of structural changes experienced during this time may very well be the greatest experienced by the Department in its history. … Legislative changes have had profound impacts on facility operations. The HALT Solitary Confinement Law required the Department to fundamentally alter the disciplinary system, including the creation of new Residential Rehabilitation Units and instituting strict criteria and time limits for when an incarcerated individual can be placed in a Special Housing Unit.

But in the interim, , the organization appears to have replaced its annual write-ups with spreadsheets providing vague data points related to demographic breakdowns of those subjected to solitary confinement, as well as overviews of provoking incidents. These reports lack detailed information on the nature of confined inmates’  health challenges, categorizing mental health concerns only along a numbered spectrum.

The plaintiffs’ advocates challenge the adequacy of DOCCS’ measures. Josh Rosenthal, supervising attorney with the organization Disability Rights Advocates, said:

It is long past time for the State to end the use of solitary confinement for people with disabilities. … New York’s passage of the HALT Act represented an historic and important step in preventing the harms that solitary causes for incarcerated people with disabilities. But words are not enough, and [New York prison authorities] must comply with state law and stop this vicious practice once and for all.

Retired Black Judge was Just Another NGHR to American Airlines’ Racist Suspect Flight Attendant who Ordered Her to the Back of the Plane

/

From [HERE] A Black retired judge from Chicago said she was flying first class when an American Airlines flight attendant accused her of slamming the first-class restroom door and later directed her to use the facilities in the back of the plane.

The retired judge, Judge Pamela Hill-Veal, told NPR that the incident happened on a Feb. 10 flight from Chicago to Phoenix.

The first time that she used the first-class restroom, Hill-Veal said, the flight attendant told her that she slammed the door and should not do it again because passengers were sleeping. Hill-Veal denied slamming the door.

The second time that she used the first-class restroom, the flight attendant reprimanded her, according to Hill-Veal.

“He began to berate me by pointing his finger at me towards my face,” Hill-Veal told NPR.

She alleges that the flight attendant told her, “I told you not to slam the door … so from now on, you are to use the restroom in the back of the plane,” which was in coach.

When she used the first-class restroom a third time, Hill-Veal said, the flight attendant followed her to her seat, began to touch her and warned that she would be arrested when the plane landed. He accused Hill-Veal of hitting him and said he didn’t like the way that she was speaking to him, she said.

Hill-Veal said she never hit the flight attendant, and she thinks that the incident was racially motivated.

White Kansas Prosecutor Who Framed Lamonte McIntyre Surrenders Her Law License, Faces Disbarment. Innocent Black Man Spent 23 Years in Prison

/

Terra Morehead, a longtime county and federal prosecutor who helped police frame at least one innocent Black man, has agreed to surrender her law license and faces disbarment (article available here). She is white [racist suspect].

Morehead, who retired from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Kansas last August and notorious for skirting legal protections for defendants, agreed to surrender her license as part of an agreement with the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys. She is awaiting disbarment from the Kansas Supreme Court, according to court filings.

Morehead’s conduct came under scrutiny during the exoneration of Lamonte McIntyre (link is external), who was convicted in 1994 of a double homicide when he was 17. McIntyre was freed in 2017 after Wyandotte County District Attorney Mark Dupree said his conviction was a “manifest injustice” and a judge dropped the case. [MORE]

Who Are the Real Criminals When an Innocent Black Man Spends 25 Years on Death Row? Jury Awards $16M to James Dennis, Finds that White Philadelphia Cops and DA Hid Exculpatory Evidence

/

A jury has awarded $16 million to a Black man whose murder conviction was overturned after he spent 25 years on death row — the largest wrongful conviction payout in city history. (here).

James Dennis, 53, always insisted he was innocent and had been sentenced to death for a 1991 murder he did not commit.

A federal judge overturned his conviction in 2013, calling it a “grave miscarriage of justice,” saying detectives and prosecutors covered up evidence that proved Dennis didn't commit the crime. He was later released from prison.

After a nine-day trial, jurors said Dennis was owed $16 million — $10 million in compensatory damages from the city, and $3 million from each of the two detectives who the jury determined “engaged in malicious or wanton misconduct.” [MORE]

Oklahoma Prison Staff Traumatized by Non-Stop “Executions” [of mostly blacks] Request Gaps in the Death Penalty [murder] Schedule [OK’s Death Row is 41% Black yet Blacks are Only 7% of the Population]

/

The relentless pursuit of “non-stop executions” by a rump of death penalty states is exposing prison staff to extreme levels of psychological and physical stress, according to traumatized corrections officers who are appealing for help (article available here (link is external)).

In Oklahoma, officers at the state penitentiary in McAlester, which houses the death chamber, are so stretched by the schedule of 25 executions set in 2022 by the Republican-controlled state that the state’s own attorney general and the head of the prison service have appealed to the courts for a more staggered approach. They have requested that the gap between executions be widened from 60 to 90 days, so far to no avail.

The unprecedented move to try to cool the pace of executions followed a joint letter(link is external) to the state’s attorney general, Gentner Drummond, from nine former senior corrections officials. They warned that staff were being subjected to “lasting trauma” and a “psychological toll” that included post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol abuse and distress due to the “non-stop executions”. [MORE]

Police Killings Set Record in 2023: Blacks Made up 26% of All those Killed [Initiating Unprovoked Acts of Violence on Others is Immoral whether its done by citizens or by people wearing Blue Costumes]

/

US police brutality hit a new record in 2023 breaking last year’s record as police officers killed at least 1,232 people in 2023 according to Mapping Police Violence. In 2022 cops killed 1,183 people. [MORE]

Black people disproportionately made up 26% of all those killed by police despite being only 13% of the US population. Killings of Black people also rose - as least year Blacks accounted for slightly less deaths at 25%. [MORE] In fact in 2023 Black people were the most likely people to be killed by cops. Blacks are 3X more likely to be killed than whites and 1.3X as likely as white people to be unarmed.

Born into this arrangement we have been miseducated to believe that “political authority” is part of the natural order of organizing human relations. Yet this is actually nonsense. The source of the police brutality problem and many many others is so-called “authority”- the implied right to rule over people. It is the belief that some people [authorities] have the moral and legal right to forcibly control others [citizens], and that, consequently, those citizens have the moral obligation to obey.’ [more] Here in this context, we are discussing the authorities known as police officers, who as representatives of authority, have somehow been empowered to use force offensively against citizens.

Contrary to lofty legal pronouncements and pretenses of civility, authority is evil and there is no legitimate or rational way to account for belief in its existence.

All force used offensively (not in self-defense) is excessive and immoral. Acts that would be considered unjust or morally unacceptable when performed by people are just as unjust or morally unacceptable when performed by government agents. Putting your hands on another human being, not in self-defense but offensively, without their consent and ‘manipulating their body in disregard of their volition is evil’, whether its done by citizens or representatives of “authority” wearing blue costumes. Laws cannot alter morality. Larken Rose explains, “authority is permission to commit evil – to do things that would be recognized as immoral and unjustified if anyone else did them.” subconsciously we know that ruling over others by force is barbaric.

There is no rational basis for the belief in authority. All governmental power purportedly is derived solely from the people. However, the government has somehow granted itself the power to do things that no individual citizen could ever do. While citizens have the inalienable right to act in self-defense or come to the defense of others, citizens have no right to initiate unprovoked acts of violence on other people and have no right to forcibly control other people. As such, it is impossible for citizens to delegate the power to forcibly control others to the government - because citizens cannot possibly delegate powers to the government that they don’t have. Other explanations for authority such as the “social contract” theory have been thoroughly debunked. [more] Although we assume there is some valid explanation for why the government should be entitled to engage in behavior that would be deemed to violate individual rights if performed by anyone other than the government, there is none. [more] And [more] Authority, the basis for all governments and rulership, is a farce. [more] As explained by Funktionary, freedom cannot exist in the presence of so-called authority.

Homicide Rates Fell Sharply in 2023 but Racists Don't Believe it [racists Imagine Blacks are Inherently Criminal and whites are Morally Superior. They believe crime stats are Proof of their delusion]

/

BLACK CRIMINALS FUNCTION AS A NEGATIVE REFERENCE GROUP VITAL TO MAINTAINING THE WHITE AMERICAN SELF-IMAGE. THE BLACK CRIMINAL IS USED TO SUPPORT THE WHITE AMERICAN COMMUNITY'S SELF-SERVING, SELF-JUSTIFYING JUDGMENTS OF ITSELF. WHITE AMERICA'S PREOCCUPATION WITH BLACK CRIMINALITY BETRAYS ITS OWN NEED FOR REASSURANCE; BETRAYS ITS OWN BASIC INSECURITY REGARDING ITS PROJECTED MORAL PURITY. CONSEQUENTLY, THE HIGHER THE INCIDENCE OF REPORTED BLACK CRIMINALITY, THE MORE EXCEPTIONALLY RIGHTEOUS WHITE AMERICA FEELS ITSELF TO BE. THE MORE RIGHTEOUS IT FEELS ITSELF TO BE THE MORE INTENSELY AND GUILTLESSLY IT PROMULGATES AND JUSTIFIES ITS DOMINATION AND EXPLOITATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLES AT HOME AND ABROAD.” [MORE]

According to the Wall Street Journal Killings were down about 15% in the 10 largest cities last year when compared with the previous year. 

Homicides in big U.S. cities fell in 2023 after skyrocketing during the first two years of the pandemic.

Killings were down about 15% in the 10 largest cities last year when compared with 2022, according to local government data. That includes a 20% drop in both Philadelphia and Houston and 16% in Los Angeles. 

Murders rose in two of the top 10 cities. Dallas reported a 15% increase, while homicides in Austin edged up by 3%.

In 2022, murders in the U.S. dropped 6% after rising 4% in 2021 and spiking by nearly 30% in 2020, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The agency isn’t expected to release national crime figures for 2023 until later this year. [MORE]