To Mandroids [academented conformists, managers] Anything Contrary to the Vested Interests is Disinformation [‘those who are clever at deceiving others become equally adroit at deceiving themselves’]

From [HERE] Summary: The strategic warning report is intended to provide relevant and necessary intelligence to the senior policy-maker for the United States (U.S.) intelligence community (IC). The strategic warning report aims to identify the necessary posture and response to address the matter referenced in the strategic warning. The strategic warning report will convey to the policy-maker the urgency to respond and the potential consequences concerning national security (Gentry and Gordon 2019). Therefore, the intelligence professional must be clear, concise, and deliberate in presenting the strategic warning to a policymaker.

The national security matter addressed in this strategic warning report concerns the potential degradation and limitations of U.S. intelligence collection and analysis platforms due to the deliberate disinformation campaign directed by the foreign adversary (Frank, Dambre, and Clark, 2022). Contained in this strategic warning report are significant factors affecting the policies regarding national security. The pertinent factors include Assumptions, Analysis, Threats, Indicators, Opportunities, and the Strategic Intelligence Posture (SIP). The foreign adversary’s disinformation campaign may take many forms but is most often seen across virtual social media platforms. Social media platforms are a lightly controlled breeding ground for disinformation strategies. The intelligence professional’s strategic warning is thus that disinformation operations targeting U.S. intelligence collection and national interests represent a critical threat to the intelligence community infrastructure and its ability to provide valued strategic intelligence to senior policy-makers in the intelligence community.

Assumptions

There have been several flawed attempts to inhibit the spread of disinformation. The focus has always been on social media platforms. The role of actors other than social platforms is often ignored, particularly the historical part of mass media in spreading state propaganda or suppressing political expression (CITAP, 2022). Most recently, President Biden established the Disinformation Governance Board to study best practices in combating the harmful effects of disinformation. The board was later dissolved in May 2022. Following the false premise that “broken” social media is responsible for the ills it reveals, regulation will suppress speech (Cato, 2022). Social media restrictions will be viewed as an infringement on First Amendment Rights. Social media restriction is not an infringement when the rights being practiced impede national security. Focusing on the perpetrators and penalizing violators will minimize the spread of disinformation to manageable levels (DHS, 2022).

Analysis

Disinformation has a long history of plaguing Americans. According to Marwick and Kuo (2021), it became apparent in the 2016 U.S. General elections that the spread of disinformation is driven by fundamental human tendencies to share shocking information and to prefer information that conforms with their existing beliefs (Haigh, Haigh, and Matychak, 2019). Disinformation happens in moments of crisis when people search for information to help them understand what is happening or how to stay safe (ShareVerified, 2022). There is evidence that certain groups purposely target U.S. intelligence agencies to discredit their reports. They have been named the ‘deep state’ on many platforms. The narrative is constantly repeated. As a result of this disinformation campaign against the U.S. intelligence agencies, the reports are questioned and often not believed.

Disinformation is crippling the credibility of the United States intelligence agencies. The political, economic, and cultural impacts limit the United States’ ability to govern effectively. In the wake of the crisis in Ukraine that erupted in 2013–2014, the Kremlin has been accused of orchestrating disinformation campaigns against the Ukrainian government and western countries by using online trolls, a person or group that intentionally incites discord in online conversations, and state-controlled online outlets such as RT (formerly known as Russia Today), Sputnik and Life News (Bjola and Pammet, 2016). Foreign news has led to a wave of counter-disinformation measures in the West to combat what is seen as a threat to democracy, international security, and stability (Golovchenko, Hartmann, and Adler-Nissen, 2018). Action must be taken immediately to quell the spread of disinformation to ensure the United States can continue supporting Ukraine effectively as Russia reconstitutes and continues its advancements in Eastern Ukraine. More people are beginning to support the narrative that Ukraine is corrupt and perhaps Russia is justified in launching an attack. Failure to counter anti-Ukraine messaging can have an irreversible impact on Western democracy when factual evidentiary data from the intelligence community is rendered propaganda from the ‘deep state.’ More than $40 billion in additional aid to Ukraine was approved by the U.S. Congress on May 19, 2022, bringing the total U.S. commitment during the Russian invasion to roughly $54 billion combined with the aid package passed in March (Pallaro and Parlapiano, 2022). The U.S. cannot sustain this level of support to Ukraine without U.S. support, and the disinformation campaign may prolong the war and the level of aid needed by the Ukrainian government. [MORE]

UN Investigative body calls Israel presence in Palestine ‘unlawful under international law,’ Fascist US Authorities Criticize Inquiry

From [HERE] The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Thursday released its second report, stating there are “reasonable grounds to conclude that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory is now unlawful under international law due to its permanence and the Israeli Government’s de-facto annexation policies.”

The commission called for the UN Security Council to bring to an end the “illegal situation resulting from the permanent occupation imposed by Israel” and require Israel to bring “its permanent occupation to an end immediately.” According to the commission, Israel has “created and is maintaining a complex environment of coercion,” including the demolition of homes and the destruction of property, excessive use of force by security forces, mass incarceration, settler violence, restricted movement through checkpoints and roads and limitations on access to livelihoods, basic necessities, services and humanitarian assistance. Such occupation policies violate the right of Palestinians to an adequate standard of living under Article 11 of the ICESCR, Article 46 of The Hague Regulations and Article 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

The commission reported 398 settler attacks in the West Bank, with 84 attacks resulting in casualties from January to July 2022.  In comparison, there were 496 attacks during 2021 and 358 attacks in 2020. The commission called special attention to gender-based violations and stated that the policies implemented by Israel in Palestine have a pervasive discriminatory effect on Palestinian women and violate the protections of CEDAW.

Commission member Chris Sidoti said:

The actions of Israeli Governments reviewed in our report constitute an illegal occupation and annexation regime that must be addressed. The international system and individual States must act and uphold their obligations under international law. That must begin at this session of the General Assembly with a referral to the International Court of Justice.

The commission recommended three actions: (1) the Israeli government should comply completely with international law and end without any delay its 55 years of occupation of the Palestinian and Syrian territories; (2) the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court should prioritize its investigation into the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; and (3) the UN General Assembly should urgently request an advisory opinion from the ICJ on the legal consequences of Israel’s continued refusal to end its occupation of the Palestine and East Jerusalem.

In a press briefing, US Department of State Spokesperson Ned Price said Israel is “consistently unfairly targeted” by the UN. According to Price, “[n]o country, the record of no country, should be immune from scrutiny, but no country should also be targeted unfairly. And that’s the principle that we seek to uphold.”

In 2021, the UN Human Rights Council held a special session on the “grave human rights situation” in Palestine and East Jerusalem and adopted a resolution to establish the a special commission of inquiry. The commission released its first report in May.

In the 1960s when the Flu Vax was found to be ineffective Whistleblowers were Censored, Fired or Filtered Out by the Vested Interests

“The Only Reason I Voted No was that Hell No Wasn’t a Choice.' Top Pediatrician on FDA’s Vaccine Committee Rejects COVID Boosters Approved for 5-Year-Olds

From [HERE] On Wednesday, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the new COVID-19 boosters for children as young as 5 years old. The decision was followed by a recommendation from CDC Director Rochelle Walensky.

“Updated COVID-19 vaccines add Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 spike protein components to the current vaccine composition, helping to restore protection that has waned since previous vaccination and targeting recent Omicron variants that are more transmissible and immune-evading,” the CDC wrote in a statement.  

The agency added: “FDA’s authorization of updated (bivalent) COVID-19 vaccines for this younger age group, and CDC’s recommendation for use, are critical next steps forward in our country’s vaccination program—a program that has helped provide increased protection against severe COVID-19 disease and death.”

PROMINENT PEDIATRICIAN DISAGREES 

But a member of the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory Committee did not agree with the decision to approve the bivalent boosters.

Dr. Paul Offit is one of the country’s most prominent pediatricians. He serves as director of the Vaccine Education Center and professor of pediatrics in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. In addition, he is the Maurice R. Hilleman Professor of Vaccinology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

“We really need much better data, I think, before we move forward on this, and I can only hope that it’s coming,” Dr. Offit said in a video that has gone viral on Twitter. “I feel very strongly about my ‘no’ vote there, in fact, the only reason I voted ‘no’ was that ‘hell no’ wasn’t a choice […] The fix was in here a little bit, maybe that’s not the right phrase, but it was something that they wanted…” he added.

“I DIDN’T SEE THE BENEFITS”

As previously reported by The Florida Standard, the bivalent boosters only rely on data from testing on eight mice. 

“I don’t think you should ever ask tens of millions of people to get a vaccine based on mouse data,” Dr. Offit stated in an interview with NBC 10 Philadelphia on August 22.

“Do the benefits of this vaccine outweigh the risks? I didn’t see the benefits,” Dr. Offit said.

The World’s 2nd-Largest PR Firms Representing Pfizer and Moderna Have Staff Embedded in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Division

From [HERE] The world’s second-largest global relations firms representing Pfizer and Moderna has staff embedded in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine division. 

During the 2020 pandemic, the CDC, with U.S. tax dollars, paid Weber Shandwick to “boost its health communication” during the pandemic, which involved campaigns that encouraged Americans to get vaccinated. 

The New York-based firm has been responsible for elevating Pfizer’s profile since 2003 and partnered with Moderna in June 2022 to market its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine despite being a rival to Pfizer’s. 

Weber Shandwick’s conflict of interest was brought to light in a LinkedIn post by an employee of the PR firm last year who said they were excited about starting a job at the PR firm and working with the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD). 

The NCIRD implements vaccine programs and heads the agency’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), according to an exposé newsletter by investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker.

Weber Shandwick in 2020 secured a $ 50 million contract from the U.S. Government to promote flu vaccines to the public. Responsibilities included circulating social media posts and articles promoting vaccines and sending press releases to the media. It was also involved in paid media advertising. 

A “$50 million contract allows PR firm to be ‘embedded at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta as part of the Division of Viral Diseases team,’” said Thacker in a tweet Tuesday.

According to Daily Mail, a spokesperson for Weber Shandwick told the media outlet the firm had a “thorough vetting and mitigation process to avoid conflicts.”

Craig Holman, a lobbyist on Capitol Hill for Public Citizen, criticized the CDC for its obvious conflict of interest.

“This is irresponsible of CDC to issue a PR contract to Weber Shandwick,” he told the DisInformation Chronicle on Substack. “Knowing that the firm also works for Moderna and Pfizer.”

Pfizer currently controls about 70% of the U.S, and European markets and brought in roughly $81 billion in 2021 — mostly from its COVID-19 vaccine. This year the pharmaceutical giant expects to bring in $50 billion from just its vaccine and antiviral medication Paxlovid — infamous for causing “rebound COVID.”

According to The Epoch Times, Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna last year brought in a combined estimated pre-tax profit of $1,000 a second, $65,000 a minute or $93.5 million a day. 

The companies plan to continue to rake in the profits with their endless experimental booster shots, currently recommended for everyone 12 and over. 

Plandemic: Irrational US lockdowns and Fear Driven Panic Miraculously Healed the US/China Trade Rift that had been Developing for the 2 Years Prior

From [HERE] The story of the shocking lockdowns, in the US and around the world, of Spring of 2020 is impossible to tell without the central role of China, where lockdowns began and where the virus is believed to have originated. The World Health Organization, with the UK and the US as signatories, proclaimed that China managed the virus properly in an influential reportdated February 26, 2020. 

This series of events did not occur in a vacuum. The US and China were in the thick of a fiery trade war, with nearly two years of rounds of claims and counterclaims, fines and retaliations, as well as on and off rounds of negotiations that proved fruitless. There was plenty of carnage on both sides along the way. 

Is there a way in which the two fields of battle – the trade row and the virus response – are somehow linked? Was the selling of lockdowns as a virus response its own form of trade retaliation? Many have speculated along those lines. 

And there’s another intriguing prospect raised by this stark reality: even while the US was in the thick of a cruel lockdown that crushed small business and so much of American civic life, trade with China actually began to recover, due mostly to the persuasive gifts of Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Perhaps this was not an accident.

Let’s review the series of events.

Starting in 2018, President Trump imposed tariffs on trade with China. It was an unusual approach by any postwar standard. Normally presidents past would impose tariffs on goods from any country in the name of protecting domestic industry, or perhaps target a single country on grounds of national security. 

This was different – targeting a single country on economic grounds – and it happened because Trump had a list of countries with whom the US ran a trade deficit, which he saw as proof of how “they” owed “us” money. 

So he started at the top of the list (China) and went down (Mexico, Germany, and even Canada). There is no evidence that he fully understood either what it means to have a “trade deficit” or that these policies could not force any other country to pay anything; American consumers and businesses pay the tariffs as another form of taxation to the US government. 

In any case, contrary to what Trump promised and expected, Xi Jinping retaliated and made it ever more difficult for the US to export to or import from China. Consumers and producers on both sides suffered. For a while, the consequences for China were devastating. By October 2018, imports from China to the US fell off a cliff. 

Matters became far worse with pandemic lockdowns in the US, a period during which China had opened up completely. Trump shut down travel to China on January 31, 2020, thinking that this would keep the virus out that had been in the US already six months, and continually referred to the “China virus.” A pathogen from China was something that Trump believed he needed to stop. The result was another blow to US-China trade. 

Anthony Fauci’s deputy assistant H. Clifford Lane went to China in mid-February 2020 to observe how China had supposed crushed the virus through brutal lockdowns, and, through a WHO report, urged the US to follow the same course. Trump went along at the urging of Fauci, Deborah Birx, and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, as well as vice president Mike Pence. [MORE]

Corpse Biden Extends the Manufactured COVID “Emergency,” thereby Extending the Govt's Grant of Immunity for Any Injury Caused by COVID Shots to Any “Vaccine” Maker” or Person who Administer Shots

The U.S. has extended the COVID public health emergency through Jan. 11, despite corpse Joe Biden’s recent claim that the pandemic is over. Yep “over” because it never existed in the first place.

The public health emergency, first declared in January 2020 by the Trump administration, has been renewed every 90 days since the plandemic began. [MORE]

The extension of the manufactured COVID emergency (plandemic) means that emergency use authorization immunity for fake COVID vaccines also continues.

From [HERE] The Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Alex M. Azar III, has granted the companies selling and those involved in virtually any other activity related to any COVID-19 vaccine immunity from liability for any injuries caused by these products. Prior to his current position, Secretary Azar was a senior executive for a major pharmaceutical company, Eli Lilly and Company, from 2007 to 2017.

Secretary Azar has issued a “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.” (85 FR 15198.) It provides that those that “prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute or dispense” and the “manufacturers [and] distributors” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].” (Id.; 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d.)

The above stated regulations are the implementing regs for the actual statutory immunity provide for COVID injections. As explained by attorney Aaron Siri,

The federal government has given complete immunity to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J for any injury caused by their Covid-19 vaccines.  That’s right: you cannot sue them if you are injured by their Covid-19 vaccine.  (See Note 1 to read the law yourself.)  So, while their product may not give you immunity, Pfizer and Moderna are guaranteed immunity.  Said immunity also shields doctors, hospitals and any other persons who administer or coerce people to take deadly COVID injections.

And it gets even worse.  These companies are even immune for – hold your breath – willful misconduct.  That may sound crazy, but it is shockingly true.  You can only sue them for willful misconduct if the federal government first sues them for such conduct.  (See Note 2 below to read the law yourself.)  And what are the odds the federal government will do so after wildly promoting the vaccine?  About as likely as the FDA ever admitting they promoted a vaccine that caused widespread harm. [MORE]

Note 1. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d the federal government “Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19” provides that “manufacturers” of “any vaccine, used to treat, … prevent or mitigate COVID-19” shall enjoy “[l]iablity immunity ,” including, “from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a [COVID-19 vaccine].”

Note 2. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(c)(5) “If an act or omission by a manufacturer or distributor with respect to a covered countermeasure, which act or omission is alleged under subsection (e)(3)(A) to constitute willful misconduct, … such act or omission shall not constitute ‘willful misconduct’ … if—(i)neither the Secretary nor the Attorney General has initiated an enforcement action with respect to such act or omission; or (ii)such an enforcement action has been initiated and the action has been terminated or finally resolved without a covered remedy.”

Authorities in US and China Continue to Ignore Natural Immunity to COVID to Promote Depopulation, Genocide

From [HERE] Global giants U.S. and China still require proof of vaccination and ignore natural immunity to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) despite multiple studies proving it is better in all respects than vaccine immunity.

In China, travelers need to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and have obtained proof of vaccination to apply for visas. The communist nation even provides easier visa application procedures with looser requirements for people who were vaccinated using Chinese-made COVID-19 vaccines.

In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) requires non-citizens and non-immigrant passengers alike arriving from a foreign country by air to present proof of vaccination. Worse yet, the CDC’s guidelines for incoming air travelers does not recognize those with natural immunity. (Related: After destroying American society, the CDC admits natural immunity works better than COVID jabs.)

“At this time all non-citizen, non-immigrant air passengers traveling to the United States, regardless of antibody status, are required to provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination,” reads the CDC’s page on COVID-19 vaccination requirements for air travelers entering the country.

Natural immunity is far superior than so-called vaccine immunity – and many countries are responding accordingly

Multiple studies since nearly the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts in late 2020 have proven that natural immunity to COVID-19, acquired through previous infection, is far superior to any so-called immunity provided by the experimental and ineffective COVID-19 vaccines.

One such study was released in late September by the peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet, one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world.

The study, conducted by researchers from Quebec and British Columbia in Canada, found: “Previous omicron BA.1 primary infection alone was the single most protective factor against BA.2 reinfection (risk reduction of 72 percent), and was associated with higher protection than pre-omicron primary infection alone (38 percent), or even than three doses of mRNA vaccine in people with no previous infection (46 percent).”

“Receiving natural immunity is better than three mRNA doses – that’s two primary doses and a booster,” commented investigative journalist Jefferey Jaxen on “The Highwire with Del Bigtree.”

In response to this study, the government of Canada has lifted COVID-19 mask, testing and ArriveCan – a digital vaccine passport – requirements for people entering the country. Air Canada, the country’s flag carrier and largest airline, welcomed the decision, saying the reduction in travel requirements is desperately needed for the benefit of travelers and the economy.

Canada is not the only country with data supporting both the strength of natural immunity and the weakness of so-called vaccine immunity.

In the United Kingdom, one study also published by The Lancet found that people with higher body mass indexes who got vaccinated with one or two doses of the COVID-19 vaccines had “a higher risk of test positivity after vaccination,” proving that the vaccines actually lowered their immunity.

In Sweden, a preprint study published in SSRN found that its results were similar to the previously mentioned U.K. study, “albeit with even more rapidly waning effectiveness.” The study found that “vaccinated individuals experienced a higher risk of infection [to the omicron variant] than those unvaccinated.”

Both Sweden and the United Kingdom have relaxed many of their requirements for travelers entering their respective countries.

“We have talked about this so much. The vaccine is helping you get infected,” commented Bigtree. “What negative efficacy means, you’re doing worse than had you not had anything at all. Which means somehow it’s better for your immune system to be more vulnerable, the exact opposite of what a product like this is supposed to be doing to you.”

New Study and Pfizer Docs Show COVID Injections Reduce Sperm Count, Harm the Fetus, Increase the risk of Miscarriage and Can Cause Infertility in both Men and Women [depopulation]

From [HERE] Respected doctors and scientists have discovered that Covid-19 vaccination decimates sperm count and have published their findings on the fertility of Covid-19 vaccinated men in a recently published scientific study. 

The new findings are however just the tip of the iceberg. 

Because a mountain of evidence found in the confidential Pfizer documents proves Covid-19 vaccination also has an adverse effect on fertility in women, increases the risk of pregnancy loss, and causes significant harm to the developing foetus resulting in premature deaths of newborns. 

Due to the extremely high vaccination rate, these findings suggest that Covid-19 vaccination may very well lead to depopulation, if not around the world, then most definitely across Europe and America. 

et’s start with the evidence contained in the new study.

A recent Israeli study in the journal Andrology found that there was a reduction in sperm count equating to an average of 22% among samples from donors three months after participants had received a second dose of the experimental Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 injection. 

The following table taken from the study displays the results – 

Source

The above chart shows that “total motile count” – the number of sperm in the ejaculated semen – plunged 22%, three to five months after the second shot (T2) and barely recovered during the final count (T3) when it was still 19 per cent below the pre-shot level.

Unfortunately, no observations were carried out after this period so we have no idea if things improve or worsen. 

Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, director of male reproductive medicine and surgery at the University of Miami’s health system, said the study adds extremely “interesting” information to the field of ongoing research into the effects of this experimental injection. 

Dr Ramasamy said it “would be among the first to demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccines could lead to a decrease in sperm parameters”. 

With official figures estimating over 500 million men may have been given an mRNA Covid-19 injection, it’s quite easy to see how this study alone proves Covid-19 vaccination is going to lead to mass depopulation through infertility.

But this isn’t going to be the only contributing factor in regard to Covid-19 vaccination. 

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website. The latest drop happened on 1stJune 2022.

One of the studies, found in the long list of confidential Pfizer documents reveals that the contents of the Pfizer vaccine accumulate in the ovaries. 

The study was carried out on Wistar Han rats, 21 of which were female and 21 of which were male.

Each rat received a single intramuscular dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection and then the content and concentration of total radioactivity in blood, plasma and tissues were determined at pre-defined points following administration.

In other words, the scientists conducting the study measured how much of the Covid-19 injection has spread to other parts of the body such as the skin, liver, spleen, heart etc.

But one of the most concerning findings from the study is the fact that the Pfizer injection accumulates in the ovaries over time.

An ‘ovary’ is one of a pair of female glands in which the eggs form and the female hormones oestrogen and progesterone are made.

Source

In the first 15 minutes following injection of the Pfizer jab, researchers found that the total lipid concentration in the ovaries measured 0.104ml. This then increased to 1.34ml after 1 hour, 2.34ml after 4 hours, and then 12.3ml after 48 hours.

The scientists, however, did not conduct any further research on the accumulation after a period of 48 hours, so we simply don’t know whether that concerning accumulation continued.

We are however witnessing the consequences of this action. Official UK figures published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here, show that the number of women suffering ovarian cancer in 2021 was significantly higher than in 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.

The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland’s dashboard now show figures all the way up to December 2021 and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering Ovarian cancer increasing significantly. [MORE]

Is Genocide in the ‘best interest of the child?’ CDC Mandates for Children Attempt to Create Human Dependency on Dangerous COVID Injections

The next battle front is the body of every child in this country whose parents do not want them to receive a Covid-19 vaccine. A product for which you cannot sue the manufacturers for harm. A product whose clinical trial for children was underpowered, not properly controlled, and that did not review safety for a sufficient duration. But even in the absence of these issues, corrosive rights-crushing mandates should never exist.

Note that the CDC’s action of adding the Covid-19 vaccine to its routine childhood vaccine schedule does not automatically make it mandatory in all states for attending school. In most states, the state itself needs to take action to make it mandatory. The expectation is that some states will seek to do just that.

Renowned Cardiologist says mRNA COVID Shots are ‘Not Safe, Cause Unprecedented Harms and Must Be Suspended’

Corpse Biden Set to Resume Deadly COVID Mandate for Contractors. Although a Fed Appeals Ct Ruled the Mandate is Unlawful, It also Reduced the Scope of the Injunction to Only Those who Challenged It

From [HERE] As we previously reported, on August 26, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision narrowing the nationwide injunction against the COVID-19 vaccination mandate for federal contractor employees set forth in President Biden’s Executive Order 14042. 

Although the Eleventh Circuit found the vaccination mandate to be unlawful, it found the nationwide injunction (applicable to all federal contractors across the country) to be overbroad and reduced the scope of the injunction to apply only to the States and parties that challenged the mandate in the case. This allows the vaccination mandate to go into effect for federal contractors in the majority of the country. On October 14, 2022, the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force issued guidance about its intentions and course of action following the Eleventh Circuit’s decision.

The new Task Force guidance strongly applies that the federal government will resume enforcing Executive Order 14042’s vaccine mandate. 

Before the government does so, however, the Task Force outlines a three-step process that will occur:

• First, the Office of Management and Budget will notify federal agencies regarding their obligations to comply with the remaining injunctions against Executive Order 14042, which continue in effect.

• Second, the Task Force will update its guidance regarding COVID-19 safety protocols for federal contractor and sub-contractor workplaces. Due to the injunctions, the Task Force has not updated its contractor guidance since November 2021, despite great changes in the state of the COVID-19 pandemic since that time. The October 14, 2022, notice does not provide any hints as to what types of updates the Task Force may make.

• Third, and finally, OMB will provide additional guidance to federal agencies regarding the resumption of enforcement of contract clauses implementing Executive Order 14042’s requirements. Prior to this notice, the federal government will continue not to enforce any of Executive Order 14042’s requirements.

The timeframes under which these steps will occur are not defined by the Task Force’s notice.

As noted above, the Eleventh Circuit’s decision did not affect other pending injunctions prohibiting enforcement of the vaccination mandate against contractors and subcontractors in the States of Missouri, Nebraska, Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio, and Florida. In addition, members of the Associated Builders and Contractors also retain the protection of the former nationwide injunction.

All other contractors not covered by pending injunctions will need to resume their efforts to comply with Executive Order 14042. That said, it is unknown at this time how the Task Force will modify its guidance. For example, will the Task Force now require that covered contractor employees obtain booster shots in addition to the initial vaccination. Although the exact contours of the modified guidance are important, there are steps federal contractors can take to begin preparing now, to avoid being caught under potentially short deadlines as the three-step process unfolds over an unknown timeline.

The Pulaski Cty Sheriff Presented 43 Minutes of Video from Terence Caffey's Arrest but Omitted the Part Where 1 Cop Held his Neck while Another Put a Knee in His Back Moments Before He Died

From [HERE] A controversial video was released last month by the Pulaski County Sheriff's Office about the arrest of Terence Caffey at the Movie Tavern theater last December.

Family members of Caffey said when the video was released, authorities didn't show all of the video. They believe more than 10 months ago, Caffey took his last breath at the movie theater while in police custody.

During a press conference on Wednesday, you can hear chants of "Justice for Terence Caffey" throughout the room. National civil rights attorney Ben Crump and his legal team showed unreleased video to the public for the first time.

According to Crump's legal team, the nearly 43 minute video released by PCSO never showed an officer holding their hand on Caffey's neck while another placed their knee on his back. Nearly four minutes later from that vantage point, officers back Caffey up and place him into a squad car. Crump believes at this point Caffey was no longer alive.

"Our medical examiner believes he's dead at that point, and they did put him in the car," Crump said. "They put him in the car and its like no problem they him stay there and they all just kickin it, talking like no problem at all. Finally, one of the officers goes to check in the back of the police car with their light and they say oh we got a problem. Maybe he wasn't just saying he can't breathe."

Crump's legal team said they believe the video they showed should've been included in last month's released and presented to a grand jury. Attorney Elizabeth White said the people of the community deserve to make the decision from themselves, not the Pulaski County prosecuting attorney.

"They made the decision not to even present the case to the grand jury, not to let the people of this city decide what happened to Terence Caffey and who is responsible," White said.

KATV reached out to Pulaski Count prosecuting attorney Larry Jegley for answers. He told KATV the case was not sent to a grand jury because the state's constitution allows the prosecuting attorney to decide criminal charges without presenting evidence to a grand jury. When asked why not one officer was criminally charged in Caffey's death he said, "The laws the law, the evidence is the evidence, and the investigation is the investigation and our ruling is our ruling,"

In a letter sent to Pulaski County Sheriff Eric Higgins, Jegley states at no time did any officer use more physical force than is authorized by law to restrain Caffey. Here is the full letter below that was sent to Higgins by Jegley.

Caffey family member Nigel Caffey told KATV, this entire process has been deeply hurtful to their family. He said everyone involved needs to held responsible.

"He had a colostomy bag on face down, face down on with a colostomy bag, it's murder man, no other way you can put it," Nigel said.

According to Jegley's report, the medical examiner states Caffey died from a sickle cell crisis due to being restrained and struggling with officers. It also states Caffey suffered no other trauma that would've resulted in his death.

Another attorney on Crump's legal team, Kenneth Abbarno told KATV they were let down on the criminal side of the case that no officers would be charged. He said they are looking to hold everyone accountable through the civil justice system.

"It was ultimately ruled a homicide, we do not disagree with the ruling that this was a homicide in any way shape or form," Abbarno said.

Abbarno said Captain Mark Swagerty, Deputy Ryan Crancer, Deputy Antonio Swygart, and Deputy Ricky Wheeler were placed on administrative leave following the death of Caffey. According to PCSO the deputies have since returned to work.

Crump said the family is now asking the Department of Justice to open a federal civil rights investigation into Caffey's death.

Erik Cantu's Family Retains Ben Crump. In Attempted Murder a White SAPD Cop Opened Fire on a Latino Teen Wrongly Believing his Car was Stolen, Continued Shooting Him as he Fled and Posed No Threat

From [HERE] High-profile civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who represented the family of Trayvon Martin and George Floyd, is now representing the family of Erik Cantu, the 17-year-old shot by former San Antonio Police Department officer James Brennand.

The announcement was made in a press release from Crump's law firm, Ben Crump Law PLLC. Crump said the shooting was wholly unjustified.

"It should go without saying that our children should be able to eat a meal in peace without being gunned down by police, but here we are — yet again," Crump's statement said.

Brennand shot Cantu multiple times on Oct. 2 after he approached Cantu's vehicle in a McDonald's parking lot and demanded that he get out because he wrongly believed the vehicle was stolen.

After Cantu reversed to flee, and Brennand then shot multiple times into the vehicle. As Cantu put the car in drive and attempted to drive away, Brennand shot at the moving car several more times.

Brennand was fired two days later by the SAPD. He was charged on Oct. 11 with two counts of first-degree felony aggravated assault by a public servant, which carries a minimum sentence of five years and a maximum sentence of 99 years.

In Crump’s announcement, he called the aggravated assault charges "woefully inadequate," but did not say what charges he thought should be brought against Brennand.

Activists and supporters of Cantu have previously called for the former officer to be charged with attempted murder.

In the press conference when he first announced the charges, San Antonio Police Chief William McManus said his department did not come to the conclusion that attempted murder charges fit, but that the district attorney's office had the last word on the decision.

"That's not the conclusion that we came with right now," McManus said. "That would be up to the DA [Joe Gonzales] if he decides to change that, but our case led us down the path of aggravated assault by a public official."

In a previous statement from Cantu's parents, they said he was still struggling nearly every day and had undergone multiple surgeries to repair bullet damage to his stomach, lungs, liver and diaphragm.

Cantu's parents also said there had been fake GoFundMe pages created that were not associated with the family. They said the only legitimate GoFundMe for Cantu was called "Support for Erik Cantu," organized by Ruben Carranco and Natalia Farias-Carranco.

Cantu is still on life support, according to Crump’s announcement. Crump said he considered it his mission to "push for justice in his name."

Brennand is currently out on bond after turning himself in and then posting a $200,000 bail. A pre-hearing is set for Nov. 23.

Is it Reasonable to Shoot Someone to Death if They Threw Rocks at Your Car? Phoenix Cops Think So. Ali Osman's Family Sues For $85 Million after Police Murdered Black Man

From [HERE] The family of Ali Osman, a man who was fatally shot by Phoenix police after he allegedly threw rocks at one of their patrol units, is suing for $85 million. Last month, two police vehicles were driving through the intersection of 19th Avenue and Tuckey Lane. According to a news release from law enforcement “their cars were struck by unknown items causing damage.”

One of the officers say they saw Osman “throwing rocks towards his patrol car,” the release continued. He claimed Osman refused to stop and “that’s when the officer-involved shooting occurred striking the man.” Osman, who was only 34, died later at a hospital from his injuries.

Quacy Smith, who is part of the legal team for Ali Osman’s family, filed a notice of claim on Friday. The claim, which comes before a lawsuit, lists Phoenix, its police department, two officers and Chief Michael Sullivan as defendants.

The claim states: “The Claimants seek an award of damages reasonably calculated to compensate for the injuries they suffered in connection with the wrongful death of Ali Osman on September 24, 2022.” Smith insists that this wasn’t an accident but murder.

“This is not just homicide. This was murder. He should be in jail, not in a graveyard,” Smith said at a news conference. Smith, who is a former police officer, has previously stated that he said couldn’t “fathom a set of circumstances described to us that would warrant this young Black man being shot down by police in the streets of our city for throwing rocks.”

The notice of claim also explains that Osman was “neither a threat of death nor of great bodily harm to the officers.” Furthermore, he was not “engaging in conduct that justified the extent of force used by the officers.”

The shooting is under a criminal and internal investigation.

Chicago Officer Might Lose His Job After Murdering Adam Toldeo. Cop Shot 13 yr Old Latino Boy While His Hands Were Up but faced No Charges b/c Police are Exempt from Normal Human Morality and Laws

From [HERE] The president of the Chicago Police Board ruled on Thursday that Chicago police officer Eric Stillman will face an evidentiary hearing for the fatal March 2021 shooting of 13-year-old Adam Toledo on the city’s Southwest Side. The trial-like process will be used by the other seven members of the Chicago Police board to determine whether or not Stillman will face disciplinary measures — up to, and including, termination — for the shooting.

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability, the agency that investigates use-of-force incidents by CPD officers — concluded its report on the shooting last April and recommended to CPD Supt. David Brown that Stillman be fired from the department.

Brown disagreed, instead saying that Stillman should face lesser discipline, the extent of which was not immediately known. That disagreement triggered a process that mandated a single member of the CPD board — in this case, Board President Ghian Foreman, who was selected at random — decide whether or not Stillman would face administrative charges as part of a trial-like procedure known as an evidentiary hearing.

“Based on a thorough review of the material, the parties and the public will benefit from a full evidentiary hearing on this matter, and so referring this matter for a hearing before the full police will be the appropriate next step,” Foreman said during the board’s monthly meeting, which was held via video conference.

“Let me be clear: with this ruling, I am not saying that the chief administrator’s recommendation is right and that the superintendent is wrong, nor am I saying that Officer Stillman should be suspended while this case is pending before the police board,” Foreman continued. “Rather, I am saying that a police board hearing that provides due process for all parties is necessary to determine whether Officer Stillman violated any of the Chicago Police Department’s rules of conduct and, if so, the proper disciplinary action.”

Earlier this year, Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx announced her office would not bring criminal charges against Stillman. The Toledo family, meanwhile, filed a still-pending wrongful death lawsuit against Stillman in Chicago’s federal court.

Stillman shot and killed the 13-year-old Adam around 2:30 a.m. on March 29, 2021 in the 2300 block of South Spaulding Avenue in the Little Village neighborhood.

Adam was shot after he and another man allegedly ran away from police who were responding to the area for a report of gunfire.

COPA last year released 17 bodyworn camera videos, four third-party videos and several audio transmissions and police reports related to the shooting. 

Stillman’s own bodyworn camera footage showed he and his partner briefly chasing Adam and the other man — identified as Ruben Roman — through an alley near Farragut Career Academy High School. Stillman’s partner quickly tackles Roman, while Stillman goes after Adam.

While chasing the teen, Stillman repeatedly tells him to “stop right f—— now” and to “show me your f—— hands.” The officer also tells Adam to “drop it.”

Adam can be seen briefly ducking behind a break in a fence near Farragut, then quickly reemerging. Stillman was standing about 10 feet away, pointing his gun and a flashlight at the teen. Moments later, Adam turns toward Stillman with both his hands raised, and the officer fires a single shot, striking Adam in the upper left side of his chest, near his heart.

After he’s shot, the teen stumbles backward and collapses to the pavement. Officers immediately run to him, and Stillman is the first to start rendering CPR while calling for more medical aid. More than a dozen additional CPD officers soon arrive at the scene.

As other officers and Chicago Fire Department personnel continue to perform life-saving procedures, the officer who fired the shot soon finds a gun near the break in fence where the boy was shot.

Stillman joined the CPD in 2015 after having served in Afghanistan in the United States Marine Corps.

The process that played out Thursday night is known as a “request for review.”

After a police shooting occurs, COPA investigates the shooting and submits a report of findings to the superintendent of the CPD. The superintendent then must decide whether to agree or disagree with the findings and any disciplinary recommendations.

If the superintendent disagrees with COPA, a single member of the nine-person Chicago police board is selected at random to review the case and decide whether or not the officer will face an evidentiary hearing — the police board’s version of a trial.

Evidentiary hearings — which are overseen by a hearing officer and video-recorded so they may be reviewed by police board members at a later date — typically last one to four days. The hearings feature attorneys for the superintendent — acting as de facto prosecutors — and attorneys for the accused officer arguing the officer’s guilty or innocence, calling witnesses and presenting evidence.

The remaining seven members of the police board — there is currently a vacancy — then review the proceedings and vote on whether or not the superintendent’s attorneys proved the officer’s guilt of the administrative charges brought against them. If the board finds that superintendent’s attorneys met their burden, they will order discipline on the officer, including possible termination.

Cook County prosecutors later charged Ruben Roman — the 21-year-old arrested after the shooting — with three counts of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon and one count of reckless discharge of a firearm, according to court records. The case is still in the pre-trial phase, and, earlier this month, Roman’s attorney filed a motion that seeks to “bar any lay witness, including police officers and detectives from identifying Mr. Roman in any surveillance video, except for the body worn camera that was captured when he was arrested.”

“The videos speak for themselves and it is a matter for the finder of fact to decide whether any unidentified person in the video is or is not Mr. Roman,” his attorneys wrote. “Any opinion testimony about who the video depicts would improperly intrude on the province if the finder of fact.”

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for later this month.

Missouri Ct Upholds Dismissal of St Louis Cop's Suit to Get His Job Back. For Over a Minute Cop Put His Knee on a Black Inmate's Neck while he was Unconscious, Tried to Kill Him. No Charges Filed

From [HERE] Before George Floyd, a St. Louis Justice Center inmate had a similar experience you haven’t heard about. It happened in 2018, but the case has been held up in the courts until just this week.

Former corrections officer Victor Cooper was fired after the incident. He then sued to get his job back. It went all the way to the Missouri Court of Appeals, which ruled Tuesday and upheld Cooper’s dismissal.

Court records describe the incident in detail – an incident which was also captured on video. The court records indicate an inmate said they were transgender and would not go into a cell with men. The handcuffed inmate then reportedly yelled and turned to try to kick then-Lt. Cooper.

What happened next led to Cooper’s termination by the St. Louis Corrections Department.

Court records reflect video in which you can see Cooper putting his knee on the defendant’s neck for a minute and 18 seconds, even while the person appears unconscious. The guard then drags them and drops them on the floor. At one point, it appears the guard is trying to revive the inmate, by slapping them in the face. The court documents say the defendant, only identified by the initials D.B., did eventually wake up.

Cooper was fired for using excessive force in 2018. He sued to get his job back and lost. He then appealed, with his attorney telling the courts his “…(termination) was not supported by competent and substantial evidence to support the commission’s finding that his conduct violated the department of corrections policy and procedure.”

The appeals court disagreed, affirming St. Louis’ termination of Cooper for what happened on the jail video.

Neither Cooper nor Cooper’s attorney would respond to FOX 2’s requests for comment.

Cooper was never prosecuted criminally for what the corrections department called “excessive force,” and there’s no sign the inmate involved ever filed a lawsuit.

Excessive Force Lawsuit Quickly Filed after LA Cops were Caught on Video Ambushing a Black Man for No Valid Reason, Tried to Kill Him

From [HERE] The family of Blake Anderson, whose violent arrest at an Inglewood hookah bar over the weekend was captured on cell phone video, will hold a news conference tomorrow with attorneys to announce an excessive force claim against Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department deputies.

The arrest occurred Sunday while Anderson was working as a security guard at the Good Batch hookah lounge at 5006 W. Century Blvd. near the San Diego (405) Freeway. The LASD did not explain why deputies were initially called to the scene and noted only that ``deputies were involved in a use-of-force incident with an armed suspect'' at the scene.

The family retained attorneys Ben Crump, Jasmine Mines and Jim DeSimone, and planned a news conference Friday at 1:30 p.m.

Anderson's family claimed in a GoFundMe account that the man was approached by the deputies, who did not identify themselves before attempting to apprehend him.

"According to multiple witnesses, Blake was conversing with an establishment customer when the officers got out of their vehicle and proceeded to ambush him with no probable cause,'' according to the GoFundMe. "No name, source of identification or justification for arrest was asked for before immediately slamming his head into a glass window.''

The LASD claimed Anderson "sustained minor injuries during the use of force'' and was taken to a hospital, where he was "medically cleared for booking.'' Anderson's family, however, reported the man suffered "a dislocated shoulder'' and "several hematomas around his head.''

Additionally, the family's GoFundMe account said Anderson had previously suffered from a ruptured right eye that was unrelated to the arrest and was "finally showing signs of his sight returning,'' but the injuries he sustained during the use of force caused the improvement in his right eye to deteriorate.