Feds Indict White Indianapolis Police Sergeant for "Deprivation of Rights" for Stomping a Homeless Black Man's Head While he was Handcuffed and Held Down on Sidewalk. Also faces State Charges

From [HERE] A white Indianapolis police sergeant faces federal charges after shocking bodycam video captured him stomping on a handcuffed homeless Black man’s face as he lay on the ground.

Sgt. Eric Huxley, 44, a 15-year veteran, has been indicted by a federal grand jury for violating the black man’s civil rights by using excessive force during the caught-on-video incident Sept. 24, 2021.

Huxley, who is white, was charged with one count of deprivation of rights under color of law while using a dangerous weapon, resulting in bodily injury.

The sergeant and two other officers — Sgt. Christopher Kibbey and officer Matthew Shores — were trying to arrest Jermaine Vaughn for disorderly conduct and forced him to the ground as he argued, Fox 59 reported.

“[The man] is on his backside on the ground, looking up at Ofc. Shores with his hands cuffed behind his back,” stated the probable cause affidavit, the news outlet reported.

Sgt. Huxley then walks over to [the man], lifts his left leg and drives his left foot down into [the man’s] face. Within seconds, blood is visible in [the man’s] mouth,” it stated.

“Stop! You’re done! You’re done! You’re done!” Huxley yells at Vaughn after kicking him in the face, the video shows.

“There you go. Police brutality!” the bloodied suspect responds.

The federal grand jury indictment alleges Huxley used his foot to hit the man without lawful justification.

Huxley, who has been suspended without pay, also faces termination along with local felony charges of battery and official misconduct, according to Fox 59.

The city, police department and Police Chief Randal Taylor also face a separate federal lawsuit claiming the two other officers who reported Huxley faced retaliation, the station added.

The two cops have alleged the department accused them of not making a timely report and placed them on administrative leave — adding that they were forced to turn in their patrol cars for older models that were “determined to be unsafe,” WTHR reported.

“This incident was unnecessary and should have never occurred,” Taylor said after the indictment was handed down Tuesday.

Bullshit Charges Dropped against Randy Cox, Black man Paralyzed by New Haven Cops

From [HERE] A Black man partially paralyzed after sliding head-first into the back wall of a Connecticut police van has had all charges against him dropped, the deputy chief clerk for the New Haven Superior Court said Thursday.

Randy Cox, 36, was arrested on June 19 on suspicion of illegally possessing a handgun.

Video of his arrest shows Cox getting into a police transport van that had a long bench but no seat belts.

When the driver makes an abrupt stop, Cox – who was handcuffed – slides down the bench head-first into the back wall of the van.

He is now paralyzed from the chest down, attorney Benjamin Crump said.

Mayor said the incident was ‘terrible and completely unacceptable’

Police footage shows Cox repeatedly asking for help, saying he cannot move and thinks his neck is broken.

When he arrives at a detention center, officers tell him to sit up or get up off the van floor.

Cox again says he cannot move.

“You’re not even trying,” one officer says.

The video also shows an officer telling Cox he drank too much and to sit up. [MORE]

Black Woman who escaped abductor’s basement in Kansas City Affirms Problem that Cops Don’t take Reports of Missing Black Women Seriously or Protect Black People and Media Parrots Whatever Police Say

From [HERE] On Oct. 7, a terrified 22-year-old Black woman escaped from a home in Excelsior Springs. She told police she had been locked up there for about a month, after being abducted from Prospect Avenue in Kansas City by a man who lives in the home.

The man, Timothy M. Haslett Jr., 39, is in custody facing charges of rape, kidnapping and assault in Clay County. The woman told neighbors and police that she was restrained in a small room in Haslett’s basement, where he repeatedly raped, beat and tortured her. She managed to escape when he took his elementary-age son to school. 

The woman told a neighbor and police something else: There were other victims, she said. Women who “didn’t make it out.” 

The woman’s escape and Haslett’s arrest occurred a month after The Kansas City Defender, a Black-owned news publication, republished a video of Bishop Tony Caldwell, a community and church leader, alerting the public of assertions that at least several Black girls and women are missing from the Prospect Avenue corridor. 

“We got four young ladies that have been murdered within the last week off of here at 85th and Prospect,” Caldwell said in the video. “We got a serial killer again.”

After the video went viral on social media, the Kansas City Police Department released a statement calling Caldwell’s assertions “completely unfounded.” The department makes the public aware of every homicide it investigates, the statement said. It said police had responded to one homicide of a woman in six weeks, at a location not close to Prospect Avenue.  Several local news outlets, which had not reported on Caldwell’s allegations, did report the police rebuttal. 

Authorities in Kansas City and Excelsior Springs have told news outlets they have not found a link connecting the woman imprisoned in Haslett’s home with any other reported missing or murdered women. A police investigative squad in Clay County is working the case and searching for any other victims. 

But the woman’s emergence, and her story of being abducted in Kansas City, has roiled Black leaders and residents. They contend that the events are proof that police don’t take reports of missing Black women seriously and that mainstream news outlets are too quick to accept the police version of events. 

“I’m tired of hearing these excuses. I’m tired of hearing people thinking what people know, instead of going to the people and seeing who they are,” said Gloria Ellington, the founder of GYRL, a nonprofit she started in 2000 with the mission of empowering women, especially victims and survivors of domestic violence. Ellington is part of the group searching for missing women and girls along the Prospect corridor.

Louisiana Prisons Routinely Deny Inmates Access to their Attorneys, “Resulting in Grievous Harm.” ACLU asks DOJ to Investigate

From [HERE] Louisiana's ACLU is asking federal officials to investigate allegations that incarcerated people in Louisiana aren't given access to their attorneys.

The ACLU of Louisiana and the law firm Wilson Sonsini sent a letter today to the Department of Justice (DOJ) calling for an investigation into the lack of access to counsel within Louisiana’s prison system.

According to a release from the ACLU, through a series of interviews with local public defenders, the interviewers learned that jails throughout Louisiana are engaged in a widespread practice of denying incarcerated people access to counsel, in alleged violation of the United States Constitution and Louisiana law.

The letter specifically mentions Beauregard, Calcasieu, East Baton Rouge, Evangeline, Orleans, and Lafayette parishes. We've reached out to all of Acadiana's sheriffs to get a copy of their counsel access policy, and we'll update this story as we receive them.

“No person should be required to navigate the criminal legal system without the ability to communicate confidentially with a criminal defense attorney — thwarting this constitutional right is an atrocious and egregious violation that demands action,” said Nora Ahmed, ACLU of Louisiana Legal Director. “That this practice appears routine at multiple jails is astounding. In our letter to the DOJ, we provide a non-exhaustive list of how incarcerated people’s right to counsel is being denied at multiple facilities. We urge the Department, as part of its ongoing investigation into the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, to investigate these harmful practices immediately, and, if warranted, pursue civil action against all facilities actively thwarting incarcerated people’s right to counsel.”

Both the United States Constitution and Louisiana law require prison personnel to allow incarcerated people reasonable access to private consultation with attorneys.

However, the release states, Louisiana prisons appear to have extensive practices that deny or gravely interfere with incarcerated persons’ constitutional right to counsel, resulting in grievous harm. [MORE]

Justice Dept Claims the Orange County DA and Sheriff Conspired to Violate People's Right to Attorney by Using Jailhouse Snitches to Elicit Incriminating Statements and Hiding Information from Defense

From [HERE] A jailhouse informant program in Orange County, California, violated the constitutional rights of criminal defendants because of jailers’ involvement, according to a long-awaited report by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ press release available here(link is external)).

The federal agency, which began investigating(link is external) in 2016, issued a lengthy report(link is external) detailing Orange County authorities' use of the informants from 2007 to 2016 and their failure to release information, as required by law, about incriminating statements gathered by the snitches to lawyers for the accused.

The report said there is “reasonable cause to believe” the sheriff’s department and district attorney’s office in Orange County, California, systematically violated defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to counsel and their 14th Amendment right to due process.

The Orange County program, which focused on defendants charged with homicide and gang crimes, operated from 2007 through 2016. Jailers placed informants next to targeted defendants after those defendants were charged with a crime and while they were represented by counsel, according to the report.

Informants were rewarded with leniency in the form of reduced charges or sentencing requests and were provided benefits that made their jail time easier. Those benefits could include special food, visits, phone calls and preferred housing assignments. Providing rewards to informants “further illuminates” the close relationship with law enforcement.

Prosecutors failed to seek out and disclose to the defense evidence that the defendants were questioned by informants in violation of their Sixth Amendment rights. Prosecutors also failed to disclose that the informants had a motive to lie or were unreliable people.

According to ACLU Lawsuit Racist Suspect Orange County DA is Ignoring the Racial Justice Act to Hide Racist Charging Decisions

From [HERE] The American Civil Liberties teamed up with a local activist organization to sue Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer Wednesday for allegedly failing to comply with public records act requests for data regarding its handling of the new Racial Justice Act law.

The lawsuit was filed in Orange County Superior Court by the ACLU and Chicanxs Unidxs de Orange County.

The organizations filed five public records act requests to Spitzer’s office in 2021 and 2022 “seeking prosecutorial data and other information relevant to the implementation of the Racial Justice Act,” according to the lawsuit. “Four of these requests sought data reflecting prosecutorial actions and case outcomes, and one request sought prosecutorial policies, practices and training materials.”

The District’s Attorney’s Office “has refused to produce any data, asserted overbroad and unsupported exemptions, withheld key policy documents, and rebuffed efforts to provide statutorily required information,” the suit alleges.

District Attorney’s Office spokeswoman Kimberly Edds said the office has “absolutely complied with the law in connection with the ACLU’s numerous PRA requests, including resending previous responses when the ACLU claimed technical difficulties on its end which prevented it from receiving our responses.”

Edds said the office has “sent 19 responses to the ACLU since their initial request in July 2021, including 14 monthly updates by email since August 2021. California law does not require government agencies to create new records for public records requests if the records do not already exist. We cannot produce records we do not have.

“The law safeguards taxpayers from being forced to respond to overly burdensome fishing expeditions. The ACLU’s requests  that were denied were denied as a result of being either overly burdensome or records not in possession of the Orange County District Attorney’s Office as allowed under the law.”

The new law aims to eliminate systemic racism in criminal justice.

The lawsuit claims that the failure to respond to the public records request “is apparently standard practice.”

Spitzer “is now refusing to produce the exact same data that the OCDA previously produced in 2019,” the suit alleges. “Further, OCDA has also refused requests from public defenders who have sought data necessary to pursue Racial Justice Act claims in criminal court on behalf of people facing criminal charges, whether that information requested pursuant to the PRA or the Racial Justice Act.”

The lawsuit notes that now-retired Orange County Superior Court Judge Gregg Prickett found that Spitzer had violated the Racial Justice Act when mulling whether to pursue the death penalty against a double-murder defendant in Newport Beach.

In the case of Jamon Buggs, Spitzer said, during a discussion on the death penalty with prosecutors, that he knew Black men in college who dated white women to increase their social status. Buggs, who is Black, was convicted of killing a man who had just made friends with the defendant’s ex-girlfriend, who is white, as well as a woman, who was sleeping overnight with the man.

Edds disputed the ACLU’s characterization of Prickett’s ruling.

When one of Buggs’ attorneys asked Prickett at the sentencing hearing if he had found that Spitzer violated the Racial Justice Act Prickett replied that he had made that finding.

The ACLU had used data provided by Spitzer’s office from 2017 and 2018 — when his predecessor Tony Rackauckas was the county’s top prosecutor — to issue a report claiming “racial disparities in charging decisions,” according to the lawsuit.

“For example, 2.1% of people in Orange County are Black, but Black people represented 5.8% of those criminally charged in the county,” according to the lawsuit’s citation of the report issued in February.

The Orange County District Attorney’s Office “is also more likely to charge Black and Latinx people with felonies and sentencing enhancements than white people, and less likely to offer Black and Latinx people diversion as an alternative to incarceration,” the lawsuit alleged.

Liberal Minneapolis to Pay more than $700k to Settle Claims that Cops Attacked Demonstrators who Protested the Police Murders of Black People

From [HERE] The Minneapolis City Council approved four separate settlements Thursday totaling more than $700,000 to resolve claims of unreasonable and excessive force by police in response to demonstrations following the deaths of George Floyd and Winston Smith.

The largest award was issued to a group of 11 Minnesotans and one former Iowa resident who filed a class-action lawsuit in federal court accusing the Minneapolis Police Department of targeting them with tear gas, rubber bullets and pepper spray as they peacefully protested in the immediate aftermath of Floyd's murder.

Most of the plaintiffs were marching along the Interstate 35W bridge on May 31, 2020, when an oil tanker barreled toward the large crowd at high speed, forcing protesters to scatter in every direction. When MPD and other law enforcement arrived, they did not seek to discover whether anyone was injured, the suit alleges, instead focusing on the safety of the truck driver.

"In other blatant displays of excessive force, captured on video, MPD officers can be seen spraying tear gas and pepper spray indiscriminately out of their squad car windows while driving through peaceful protests," according to a 60-page civil suit.

After a closed-door session Thursday, 12 City Council members unanimously voted to award $50,000 to each named plaintiff in the case, which included civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong, her husband, Marques Armstrong, and Hennepin Healthcare's Dr. Max Fraden. (Council Member Andrew Johnson was absent for the vote.)

The city also agreed to an injunction that, subject to court approval, would bar MPD from unlawfully using rubber bullets, Mace and tear gas as a crowd control measure against those exercising their First Amendment rights, said Minneapolis-based attorney Joshua J. Rissman, a partner with Gustafson Gluek PLLC. [MORE]

“Detroit Will Breathe” Wins $1M from Detroit Police’s Handling of Demonstrations and the Government’s Violent Efforts to Silence Speech Critical of Cops in 2020

From [HERE] A racial justice group said it has settled a lawsuit with Detroit for the city police’s handling of demonstrations in 2020.

said 14 people who were injured by the police during the three months of protests will receive $1 million from the city.

The lawsuit, filed in 2020, charged that excessive force by the police resulted in concussions, broken bones, broken ribs and a fractured skull.

“This judgment is a victory for the movement,” Detroit Will Breathe said in a prepared statement.

City officials could not be reached for comment.

The racial justice group organized demonstrations in the city as part of the national furor over the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.

In July, the Detroit City Council responded to the lawsuit by approving an offer of $1,035,000.

The 14 plaintiffs will receive anywhere from $15,000 to $250,000, depending on the severity of their injuries. Detroit Will Breathe will receive $5,000.

In its statement, the group said the quest for justice isn’t finished and will continue in different forms. It said it will continue to fight against police brutality and other forms of harm to people.

It lauded the increase in strikes against businesses for better wages, and walkouts by students protesting school rules.

“The militancy of these new actions is a spark that can light a fire,” said the group. “We encourage everyone to join the fight in any way they can. See y’all in the streets.”

Deeply Rooted: DPIC Report Connects Oklahoma’s History of Racists Lynching Black People to Present Day Racists Using Government Authority to Murder Black People [the death penalty]

From [HERE] New Report Places Oklahoma’s Death Penalty in its Historical Context of Lynchings and Mass Violence Against Black Oklahomans and the Forced Migration of Native Americans

“Systemic issues in the state’s use of the death penalty affect all capital defendants. However, the impact is skewed based on the race of defendant and victim, and the effects are particularly harsh on defendants of color.”

On October 20, 2022, Oklahoma is scheduled to conduct the second in a series of 25 executions over a two-year period, or one execution nearly every month through 2024. As this protracted spree begins, the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) today released a report that documents the historical role that race has played in Oklahoma’s death penalty and details the pervasive impact that racial discrimination continues to have in the administration of capital punishment.

The report, “Deeply Rooted: How Racial History Informs Oklahoma’s Death Penalty,” and related graphics are available at https://tinyurl.com/bdddu6ex.

“Ten Facts You Should Know About Oklahoma’s Death Penalty” is available at

https://tinyurl.com/2p8reph3

The report ties Oklahoma’s use of the death penalty to its troubled history of racial violence and segregation. “To move towards true justice, Oklahoma must reckon with the harm that has already been inflicted by a criminal legal system in which race can determine who lives or dies,” Dr. Tiffany Crutcher, Founder and Executive Director of the Terence Crutcher Foundation, said. “To understand this history, we must recognize the generational trauma inflicted on so many in Black communities, those who have been victims of racialized violence, those who have lost family members to murder with no redress, and those who have had to stand by as the legal system takes the lives of their loved ones.”

The report observes that Oklahoma is at an inflection point in its administration of the death penalty and argues that if the state is to establish a fair and humane system of justice, it is crucial to acknowledge and redress the effects of Jim Crow and racial violence that persist into the present day.

“A bipartisan commission concluded that Oklahoma’s death penalty was broken, discriminatory, and inhumane. After extensive study, the commission recommended a moratorium until reforms were made. Five years later, nothing has changed. A frenzy of 25 executions is not conservative, not limited government, and not pro-life,” said Brett Farley, state coordinator for Oklahoma Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty.

The report notes that death sentences and executions are in decline nationally, making Oklahoma an outlier state. In 2021, 18 people were sentenced to death nationwide and 11 people were executed, the fewest since 1988. Oklahoma has executed more people per capita than any other state in the country. Oklahoma County and Tulsa County rank fourth and sixth, respectively, for the most executions by any county in the past fifty years. No county outside of Texas is responsible for more executions than either Oklahoma County or Tulsa County.

Racial discrimination, especially the race of the victim, continues to infect all aspects of the death penalty in Oklahoma. A study of homicides in the state between 1990 and 2012 found that the odds a person charged with killing a white female victim would be sentenced to death were 10 times greater than if the victim was a minority male. Of the 25 executions scheduled between August 2022 and December 2024, 68% involve white victims. Data throughout the report suggest that valuing white victims more than others has resulted in disproportionate punishment for Black defendants who murder white people.

An examination of the age and race of the men scheduled for execution reflects the bias that Black youth are perceived as older and less innocent than white youth. Seven of the 10 Black men set for execution were 25 years old or younger at the time of the crime. By contrast, only one of the 13 white men set for execution was 25 or younger at the time of his crime. Three of the Black men were 20 or younger and one of them, Alfred Mitchell, was only two weeks past his 18th birthday.

Of the 142 people in the U.S. who have been removed from death row because of intellectual disability (because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that their executions are barred), the majority (83%) have been people of color. This suggests that people of color, especially Black people, with intellectual disability are at a greater risk of being subjected to capital punishment. Oklahoma has limited the ability for people on death row to seek relief based on intellectual disability. As the report notes, Michael Smith, a Black man scheduled for execution on July 6, 2023 has a documented, lifelong intellectual disability. Despite his medical diagnosis, Oklahoma has denied Mr. Smith a hearing on his intellectual disability.

At least five cases of those scheduled for execution in Oklahoma may have involved official misconduct, including Clarence Goode, a Black and Muscogee man set to be executed on August 8, 2024, who was convicted after the testimony of a detective who later served time in federal prison for misconduct in other cases. Nationwide, nearly 80% of wrongful capital convictions of Black people involve official misconduct by police, prosecutors, or other government officials.

The report states that Oklahoma has a history of defying U.S. Supreme Court decisions that would provide some measure of racial justice. For example, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals refused to apply McGirt v. Oklahoma (holding that the state lacked jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by or against Native American people on tribal lands)

retroactively to four death-row prisoners even after the Supreme Court had retroactively applied it in the case of Patrick Murphy, a Muscogee man, who challenged Oklahoma’s jurisdiction because his crime was committed on tribal land. Thirty-seven Native American men and women have been sentenced to death in Oklahoma, more than in any other state. Two people currently scheduled for execution, Clarence Goode, Jr. and Alfred Mitchell, are Native American.

Today’s report builds upon DPIC’s 2020 report, “Enduring Injustice: the Persistence of Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Death Penalty.” It is the first in a series of reports detailing how individual state histories of racial injustice inform the current use of capital punishment in those states. The next in the series will be Tennessee.

###

The Death Penalty Information Center (www.deathpenaltyinfo.org) is a non-profit organization serving the media and the public with analysis and information on issues concerning capital punishment. DPIC was founded in 1990 and prepares in-depth reports, issues press releases, conducts briefings for the media, and serves as a resource to those working on this issue. DPIC does not take a position on the death penalty but has been critical of how it is administered.

Philadelphia Authorities Apologize for Experimenting on Black Inmates at Holmesburg Prison [apology here means ‘to lay the foundation for future offenses or affronts’ and ‘to reform its own image’]

From [HERE] The city of Philadelphia issued an apology Thursday for the unethical medical experiments performed on mostly Black inmates at its Holmesburg Prison from the 1950s through the 1970s (article available here(link is external)).

The move comes after community activists and families of some of those inmates raised the need for a formal apology. It also follows a string of apologies from various U.S. cities over historically racist policies or wrongdoing in the wake of the nationwide racial reckoning after the killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.

The city allowed University of Pennsylvania researcher Dr. Albert Kligman to conduct the dermatological, biochemical and pharmaceutical experiments that intentionally exposed about 300 inmates to viruses, fungus, asbestos and chemical agents including dioxin — a component of Agent Orange.

The vast majority of Kligman's experiments were performed on Black men, many of whom were awaiting trial and trying to save money for bail, and many of whom were illiterate, the city said.

Many of the former inmates would have lifelong scars and health issues from the experiments. A group of the inmates filed a lawsuit against the university and Kligman in 2000 that was ultimately thrown out because of a statute of limitations.

"Without excuse, we formally and officially extend a sincere apology to those who were subjected to this inhumane and horrific abuse. We are also sorry it took far too long to hear these words," Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney wrote.

Last year, the University of Pennsylvania issued a formal apology and took Kligman's name off some honorifics like an annual lecture series and professorship. The university also directed research funds to fellows focused on dermatological issues in people of color.

MD Authorities Order the reinvestigation of 100 Deaths in Police Custody. Examinations by Racist Suspect Examiner who Testified for Cop in George Floyd Trial Lacked Integrity

From [HERE] After George Floyd was killed by former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin in 2020, Maryland's former Chief Medical Examiner Dr. David Fowler was called in as a defense witness for the 2021 trial.

On the stand, Fowler testified that, based on his study of the forensic evidence, Floyd's death should be classified as "undetermined" and not a homicide, due to a medley of factors including heart disease, drug use and carbon monoxide exposure.

Chauvin was later convicted of murder and manslaughter for kneeling on Floyd's neck for more than nine minutes. But Fowler's testimony — which contradicted the Hennepin medical examiner's determination that Floyd's death was a homicidesparked immediate concern among hundreds of his peers around the country, who suggested he might be motivated by racial or pro-law enforcement bias.

As a result, officials in Maryland launched a review last year of similar "in-custody" death reports that were performed during Fowler's tenure at the helm of the state medical examiner's office.

Now, that probe has spurred further scrutiny.

After reviewing the work by Fowler and his team on over 1,300 cases in which people died in police custody, an independent audit design team is recommending that the state reinvestigate about 100 of those. The cases share key similarities, including the absence of an "obvious medical cause of death," and they each involved physical restraint.

"We embarked on this process with the goal of overseeing a professional and independent audit that adheres to the highest standards of impartiality and integrity," Attorney General Brian Frosh said in a statement on Wednesday.

What will the new audit be looking for?

The new investigations will be led by an independent group of experts in forensic pathology, Frosh announced. As they reopen reports and comb through the records, they'll be tasked with deciding whether they agree or disagree with the original medical examiner's conclusions on the cause and manner of death. They'll also judge if those involved followed existing protocols.

Among their many questions, the new panel will explore the role of physical restraint in each death, and whether the person would have lived but for the application of restraint. They will also recommend the need for changes in training, policy or procedure regarding the application of physical restraint that might reduce the risk of death in such cases.

Fowler, who has been considered one of the foremost medical examiners in the country and served on the National Board of Medical Examiners, has defended his record, noting that he did not work alone when preparing autopsy conclusions.

Fowler did not respond to NPR's requests for comment.

"There's a large team of forensic pathologists, with layers of supervision, and those medical examiners always did tremendous work," Fowler told the Baltimore Sun.

Closer scrutiny could reopen cases for families who have long-doubted the medical examiner's findings

The findings of the audit could have a significant impact on several cases involving the deaths of other men in police custody, including the 2018 death of Anton Black. [MORE]

DC Taxpayers are Spending Millions to Rehire Bad Cops to Surveil, Arrest and Place Blacks in Greater Confinement

From [HERE] Late last year, a trove of records was obtained by transparency activists Distributed Denial of Secret (DDoS). Those records showed what the Washington DC Metro PD hoped to hide: that the internal disciplinary process was apparently irreparably broken.

The joint report by DCist and The Reveal made sense of the DDoS-liberated data. What it showed was that officers with sustained complaints were often given nothing more than tiny hand slaps (suspensions, write-ups) for severe misconduct, including drunk driving, indecent exposure, sexual solicitation, and theft.

Welcome to Impunityville, USA. Not only were Metro PD officers assured they wouldn’t face criminal charges for criminal acts, they were assured they wouldn’t even need to worry where their next paycheck would come from.

Now there’s more bad news. Every so often, the DC Metro PD actually finds officers worth firing. A report from the DC auditor shows taxpayers are shelling out millions to keep the worst of the PD’s officers on the job, as Mitch Ryals reports for the Washington City Paper

The full scope of this problem and what it has cost D.C. taxpayers, is detailed in an explosive report released this week from D.C. Auditor Kathy Patterson.

From October 2015 to March 2021, the Office of the D.C. Auditor found that MPD fired 49 officers and was forced to rehire 37 officers. The department paid out $14.3 million in back wages to 36 of those officers after their appeals crawled toward a resolution.

Three of the reinstated officers have been determined by the Auditor’s office to be a “threat to safety.” One of those is Jay Hong, who collided with another vehicle while drunk. In his vehicle, investigators found one (1) loaded handgun and one (1) unconscious, partially-nude woman. Hong pleaded guilty to DUI charges and was fired. The woman later accused Hong of sexual assault, but PD investigators cleared Hong of these accusations. Hong re-secured his job through a third-party arbitrator who suggested a 35-day suspension was a more appropriate punishment for driving drunk with a loaded gun and a loaded woman in his car. He received nearly $300,000 in back pay.

He’s not the only fully employed “threat to safety.” There are more:

The other two officers tagged as safety threats, who are still employed with MPD, are Wilberto Flores and Richard Mazloom, according to ODCA.

Flores was convicted in a criminal court of exposing his genitals to women in the parking lot of a grocery store in 2010, according to the report, which cites information from MPD and the Office of Employee Appeals. 

[…]

Mazloom was the subject of three complaints submitted to the Office of Police Complaints before he went out drinking with friends while off duty and with his service weapon on him in August of 2011…

That night, Mazloom got into a fight on H Street NE, the auditor’s report says. He was later fired, but an arbitrator overturned his termination, in part because they “thought the evidence showed Mazloom was not the aggressor and the other party instigated the fight.”

Both officers were reinstated, taking home more than a half-million in back pay between the two of them. Officer Mazloom has since racked up two more complaints and one sustained instance of misconduct.

According to the City Paper report, nearly 40% of these reinstatements are due to the Metro PD missing administrative deadlines in the disciplinary process. This either means the Metro PD has so many bad cops it can’t keep up with the paperwork or it’s more than willing to slow walk investigations to ensure officers it actually decides to fire can get their jobs back. Neither alternative should be considered acceptable.

This happens frequently enough that even other MPD officers are getting sick of it. Statements made to the Auditor’s office during the preparation of this report show many officers are “demoralized” by the rehiring of bad cops and fully cognizant of the fact that overturned firings emboldens the worst officers in their ranks.

The Auditor’s report closes by recommending the Metro PD (duh) start meeting administrative deadlines to help assure bad cops can’t get their jobs back on a technicality. But the city seems powerless to actually enforce this, which means the PD can pick and choose which officers it will efficiently discipline. And that means taxpayers will still keep paying good money for cops even the Metro PD feels are too terrible to stay employed.

FDA Refuses to Release Autopsy Reports of those who Died After COVID Shots

From [HERE] Citing personal medical privacy laws, the U.S. FDA is refusing to honor a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from The Epoch Times to release details on autopsies of people who died after receiving a COVID shot.

They won’t even do it with names and identifying information redacted, The Epoch Times said, adding that the agency may have a more nefarious reason for not wanting the information made public. “To release autopsy reports of people who died after receiving COVID shots might lead to uncomfortable questions about the conclusions reached by FDA and CDC officials and raise the specter of a national re-evaluation and lots of second opinions regarding the safety of the shots,” The Epoch Times said.

“Those responsible for operating these federal agencies, not to mention countless doctors, scientists and politicians around the country, have staked their reputations on assuring the American public that the COVID shots do not cause harm, much less death. Why indeed would they want to investigate and give space to a conversation asking legitimate questions and offering dissenting views?”

Richcraft: As COVID Hit, Washington Authorities and Puppeticians Profited from Their Plandemic by Trading Stocks w/Exquisite Timing. Fauci, Elaine Chao, Many Others Got Paid according to WSJ Analysis

From [HERE] Federal officials working on the government response to Covid-19 made well-timed financial trades when the pandemic began—both as the markets plunged and as they rallied—a Wall Street Journal investigation found.

In January 2020, the U.S. public was largely unaware of the threat posed by the virus spreading in China, but health officials were on high alert and girding for a crisis.

A deputy to top health official Anthony Fauci reported 10 sales of mutual funds and stocks totaling between $157,000 and $480,000 that month. Collectively, officials at another health agency, Health and Human Services, reported 60% more sales of stocks and funds in January than the average over the previous 12 months, driven by a handful of particularly active traders.

By March, agencies across the government were working on wide-reaching measures to prop the economy and markets. Then-Transportation Secretary Elaine Chaopurchased more than $600,000 in two stock funds while her agency was involved in the pandemic response and her husband, Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell, was leading negotiations over a giant, market-boosting stimulus bill.

And as the government was devising a loan package aimed specifically at helping companies including Boeing Co. and General Electric Co., a Treasury Department official involved in administering the aid acquired shares of both companies.

Federal officials owned millions of dollars of stock in industries most affected by the pandemic and the government’s response. About 240 officials at health agencies and at the Pentagon, a key player in the vaccine rollout, reported owning a total of between $9 million and $28 million in stocks of drug, manufacturing and biotechnology companies that won federal contracts related to Covid-19 in 2020 and 2021, the Journal’s analysis found.

[MORE]

“Leave Our Children Alone.” Massachusetts Rabbi Under Attack for Speaking Out About Dangerous COVID Injections

From [HERE] Rabbi Michoel Green is the Rabbi of Congregation Ahavat Achim in Westborough, Massachusetts. Rabbi Green is an independent thinker, and he made a name for himself early on in the Covid era as a Rabbi who constantly questioned the authorities, beginning with an immediate aversion to any forced closures of schools and synagogues. In his words from March 2020 “What Antiochus, Hadrian, Stalin, et al, couldn’t accomplish in thousands of years, the Rabbinate of Crown Heights accomplished in 15 seconds….” referring to their acquiesence to go along with the public mandates to close sacred institutions.

Rabbi Green continued speaking up for freedom and sanity throughout the pandemic, up to and including coming out strongly and publicly against the Covid vaccine. He wrote religious exemptions for thousands of people and helped tens of thousands of people obtain religious exemptions, including hundreds in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

In January 2021, his outspoken views could no longer be tolerated by the Chabad organization that he held membership with at the time, and they officially cut off his chapter from their organization. He continued to lead his congregation and instituted a “no segregation” policy when it came to vaccines. He also opened up online services for those who were not comfortable attending synagogue in person and attracted people from all over the world who appreciated his services and views. A quick look at his website shows the kind of integrity and strength possessed by Rabbi Green.

Deputies Ambush Black Security Guard in Liberal LA. 2 Cops Repeatedly Struck Man in the Head w/Gun, Fists, Slammed Face into Sidewalk, Used Chokehold and Threatened his Life. Eye Sight Gone in 1 Eye

From [HERE] and [HERE] Video shows Los Angeles deputies allegedly beating a Black security guard and putting a gun to the back of his head in front of a horrified crowd of people.

The 90-second clip was posted on Twitter by Cerise Castle, an investigative journalist based in Los Angeles, on Tuesday. She also obtained video from a nearby business that shows the thug cops pulling into the parking lot, jumped out and attacked Blake Anderson as he walked with a friend. Blake has since lost his eyesight a result of this brutal beating.

According to Castle, two deputies with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department arrived at the Good Batch Lounge in Inglewood on Sunday morning and began beating a man she identified as Blake Anderson.

"This is Blake Anderson. He's a security guard at the Good Batch Lounge. Early Sunday morning, deputy Rodriguez and his partner pulled up and began beating Blake," Castle wrote in a tweet alongside the clip.

"He's since lost vision in his eye. He's [currently] being charged with assault on a police office for this."

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, the Los Angeles Police Department and the Inglewood Police Department have all been contacted for comment.

As the video begins, one deputy has Anderson in a headlock while the other repeatedly hits him.

Among the crowd of people witnessing the incident, a woman can be seen yelling at the deputies: "He's security here."

As one woman repeatedly yells that Anderson "works here," one of the deputies is seen pulling the gun out of his holster and holding it to Anderson's back. The other restrains him.

"Don't resist, they're a gang!" another person at the scene is heard saying. Earlier this year, the Los Angeles County Civilian Oversight Commission announced an investigation into "the deputy gangs that have plagued the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department for decades."

Seconds later, the deputy points the gun to the back of Anderson's head and uses his other hand to hold the civilian's head down.

According to Castle, at this point deputy said to Anderson: "I'm going to blow your f**king brains out."

In the video, the woman filming can be heard pleading with Anderson not to do anything that could risk his life.

"Blake, no. Blake, no. Blake. Don't resist, Blake. No no no. Do what you gotta do, Blake. Come on," the person is heard saying, as one deputy punches Anderson in the head and slams his head into the ground.

"Please Blake, no. Don't fight back," the person adds, as the deputies force Anderson's arms behind his back.

One deputy pins him down with a knee on his shoulder area while the other deputy places him in handcuffs.

"He did nothing. He was walking with me. He did nothing," the person filming says. "Blake, do not let them do anything, Blake. Blake, let them take you bro."

According to a GoFundMe page set up by Anderson's sister Bailey Anderson to raise funds for medical and legal costs, multiple witnesses said Anderson was speaking with a customer when the deputies "got out of their vehicle and proceeded to ambush him with no probable cause."

"No name, source of identification, or justification for arrest was asked for before immediately slamming his head into a glass window," his sister wrote on the page.

Anderson had been recovering from a ruptured right eye and "finally showing signs of his sight returning" prior to Sunday's incident, she wrote.

"After being slammed into the window, Blake attempted to let the officers know about the current condition of his eye to no avail.

"While on the ground, Officer Rodriguez repeatedly struck him in the head with his firearm, punched him in the face, pressed his gun into the back of his head, continuously slammed his head into the concrete, and stomped on his head. All while his partner held Blake down."

Anderson sustained multiple injuries, including a dislocated shoulder, his sister said. "Worst of all, the sight improvement in his right eye has now deteriorated. Doctors say the eye must be cosmetically removed, and a prosthetic eye should be inserted."

She described her brother "one of the most incredible people to be around" and said he is expecting a baby with his long-time girlfriend.

"He was at work trying to provide for his family, and this tragic incident happened," she added.

Bailey Anderson has been contacted for comment.

White Opelousas Police Sgt Convicted for Brutally Attacking Black Teen Restrained to a Hospital Bed. Jury Found Cop Repeatedly Punched and Used Chokehold on Teen, who was Not Under Arrest or a Suspect

On count one, he was accused of hitting the teen in the face. He was found guilty on that count.
On count two, he was accused of using his hand to "choke" the teen. He was found guilty on that count.
On count three, he was accused of using his arm and elbow to "choke" the teen. He was found guilty on that count.
On count four, he was accused of pushing the teen's leg; he was found not guilty on that count.
On count five, he was accused of pulling the teen's arm while his wrist was handcuffed; the jury was unable to agree on a verdict on that count.

He faces faces up to 20 years in prison, so how many days in jail do you think he will get hooked up with? Maybe just probation? what is white collective power?

From [HERE] A white Opelousas police officer might face jail time after he was convicted Tuesday on three counts of malfeasance in connection with a 2019 attack on a Black teenager who was restrained in an emergency room hospital bed.

Tyron Andrepont, 50, now awaits a sentencing date following a court-ordered pre-sentence investigation that will probably occur sometime during the next six months.

Andrepont tried to resign, but the City Council rejected his resignation. Then, in July 2020, the council voted to terminate him after Louisiana State Police investigators determined from hospital camera footage that Andrepont allegedly used “excessive force” in handling Jonah Coleman, a patient at Opelousas General Hospital. [MORE]

The teenager was not a suspect in a crime or in police custody.

St. Landry Parish Assistant District Attorney Katie Ryan, who was the lead prosecutor for the two-day jury before retired District Judge Ronnie Cox, said during an interview that each count of malfeasance against Andrepont carries a maximum sentence of five years, with or without hard labor.

Flora Coleman, mother of Jonah Coleman, spoke to reporters after the trial and said she hopes Andrepont will never work again as a police officer.

A hospital surveillance camera filmed as Opelousas Police Sgt. Tyron Andrepont repeatedly struck and applied a choke hold to a restrained black teenager in October 2019, court documents said. He attacked the teenager on 3 separate occasions.

On Oct. 30, Andrepont responded to Opelousas General Hospital’s south campus, where 18-year-old Jonah Coleman was receiving treatment in the hospital’s emergency room. Coleman had been taken to the hospital by his family at the request of his parents and was not in police custody, McLendon and the teen's attorney said. 

Louisiana State Police Investigator Mark Fournet reported footage from Coleman’s treatment room in the hospital’s emergency facility showed the teenager tried to get out of bed several times [which is not illegal]

At time stamp 7:18, Andrepont rushed toward Coleman, struck him in the face with his right hand and Coleman’s head snapped back. Andrepont reached for Coleman again but didn’t make contact, then pushed down on Coleman’s neck and upper chest before putting his hand on Coleman’s neck and pushing him away, the affidavit said.

At time stamp 7:37, Andrepont grabbed Coleman’s right leg and pushed his leg up and toward Coleman’s head. Five minutes later, Andrepont put his right hand on Coleman’s neck, pushing his head down. He maintained his hold on Colemna’s neck, according to court documents. At 8:32, Andrepont grabbed Coleman’s neck with his right hand and pushed his head down while maintaining “his hold on Jonah’s neck.” At 9:51, Fournet reported that Andrepont put his right arm around Coleman’s neck in a choke hold, the documents said.

Finally, at 10:18 p.m., Andrepont “held the handcuff that was still attached to Jonah’s right wrist and pulled it to the rear, extending Jonah’s arm.”

After reviewing Fournet’s report and the video, St. Landry Parish District Attorney’s Investigator J. Rene Speyrer wrote: “It is my opinion that Sgt. Tyron Andrepont, working as an officer with the Opelousas Police Department, committed several acts of battery on Jonah Shyheem Coleman Jr….”

The six-person trial jury deliberated for three and a half hours on Tuesday. In addition to the conviction on three of the malfeasance charges, jurors also concluded that Andrepont was not guilty on another malfeasance charge. The jury additionally indicated that they could reach no decision on another charge of malfeasance against Andrepont.

Court records contained in the bill of information indicate the malfeasance charges contain separate allegations that Andrepont at some point during the incident placed Coleman in a chokehold, struck or slapped Coleman in the face and restrained Coleman by using arms and elbows.

Defense attorney Kevin Stockstill said after the verdict that Andrepont, who did not testify, does not plan to seek further employment in law enforcement. At the time of his arrest, KATC Investigates turned up several cases in which Andrepont was disciplined while a member of Opelousas Police. To read that story, click here.

Stephen Curry Appeals for Brittney Griner’s Release in Front of Packed Audience Before Game

From [HERE] Stephen Curry of the Golden State Warriors offered support to Brittney Griner, the American basketball player serving a prison sentence in Russia, saying he hoped everyone was doing their part to bring her home.

Mr. Curry, a star shooter, denounced Ms. Griner’s incarceration during his team’s championship ring ceremony. His statements were part of a coordinated campaign for sports figures—including Billie Jean King, Abby Wambach and WNBA players—to speak about Ms. Griner’s detention.

Her agent planned the campaign, called #WeAreBG, for around her 32nd birthday Tuesday and her appeal hearing next week. She is appealing her nine-year prison sentence on drug charges following her February arrest at a Moscow airport.

“We want to continue to use our platform and the opportunity to shout out a very special member of the basketball community,” Mr. Curry said Tuesday night, wishing her a happy birthday as he addressed a packed crowd at Chase Center in San Francisco.

Mr. Curry spoke during a ceremony ahead of the Warriors’s closely watched season opener on Tuesday against the Los Angeles Lakers. The Warriors beat the Lakers 123-109. [MORE]