DHS to Blow $700,000 of Taxpayers’ Money on Studying “Extremism” in Video Gaming

From [HERE] The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has awarded researchers a $699,768 grant to investigate extremism in gaming.

As reported by VICE, the money will go to Logically, a company committed to the issue of “bad” online behavior, Middlebury Institute’s Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism (CTEC), and Take This, a nonprofit that specializes in mental health in video gaming.

“Over the past decade, video games have increasingly become focal points of social activity and identity creation for adolescents and young adults. Relationships made and fostered within game ecosystems routinely cross over into the real world and are impactful parts of local communities,” the grant announcement on the DHS website said. “Correspondingly, extremists have used video games and targeted video game communities for activities ranging from propaganda creation to terrorist mobilization and training.”

The DHS announcement adds that the project will develop, “a set of best practices and centralized resources for monitoring and evaluation of extremist activities as well as a series of training workshops for the monitoring, detection, and prevention of extremist exploitation in gaming spaces for community managers, multiplayer designers, lore developers, mechanics designers, and trust and safety professionals.”

“Game developers in general—from small, independent studios to billion-dollar multinational corporations—have lagged in awareness of how extremists may attempt to exploit their games, and how their communities can be targeted for radicalization,” states the DHS announcement.

The funding follows news that DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas suggested radicalized Americans who believe “false narratives” online are the new terror threat and following the DHS having to shut down the controversial Disinformation Governance Board over First Amendment concerns.

LAPD says White Cops Attempted to Murder 2 Latino Men b/c They “Mistook a Lighter for a Gun.” Cops Shot w/o Warning from a moving car but Faced No Imminent Danger b/c the Lighter was Not Aimed @ Them

WHEN A MERE MORTAL SHOOTS A GUN AT ANOTHER PERSON ITS CALLED ATTEMPT MURDER. From [HERE] Los Angeles Police Department officers were caught on body camera shooting at an unarmed suspect wanted for arrest from a moving patrol vehicle. It was the second such shooting by LAPD members in a particularly violent week over the summer.

Officers shot at three people, one a suspected gang member, as they were exiting a truck at Radford Avenue and Stagg Street in the LA neighborhood of Sun Valley on the evening of July 21, 2022, according to the Los Angeles Times. Video of the incident was posted two weeks ago on the YouTube account PoliceActivity:

The Times reported that the only shots fired at the scene came from LAPD. After the gunfire, a man came out of the house, telling police his family was inside and begging them to stop shooting. Another voice cried out that he was holding a lighter, not a weapon.

The LAPD’s official statement claims that officers mistook the lighter for a gun. Never mind the fact that officers gave no instruction and no chance for the suspect to drop the item in his hands, nor did the officers apparently consider that it is legal to openly carry a gun on your own private property in Los Angeles.

In July, the Times reported that the suspect “...barred himself in a nearby house,” which sounds a little bit like taking cover from some shoot-first-ask-questions-eventually cops. The family inside the house was thankfullyunscathed, as was the suspect. But by the time police set up a perimeter, brought out crisis negotiators and finally sent in SWAT officers, the person facing arrest was gone.

Rolling up on unsuspecting people and catching them by surprise by firing on them is conduct normally associated with gang members, not police officers. But this isn’t even the only such LAPD-involved shooting to happen that week. 

Footage of a similar police shooting was captured on July 18 in the Leimert Park neighborhood. Police in a moving vehicle shot at an allegedly mentally ill man, Jermaine Petit, despite officers on the scene saying out loud that Petit was not holding a firearm. From the Times:

“It’s not a gun, bro,” the officer told his partner about the metallic object in Petit’s hand, according to video of the incident from officers’ body-worn cameras that the Los Angeles Police Department made public Thursday.

But that realization wouldn’t matter. Less than half a minute later, Petit would be shot multiple times by an LAPD sergeant firing from inside his vehicle and the officer’s partner, who failed to hear the warning that Petit was unarmed, according to the videos and information released by the department.

Police shot Petit multiple times, and at least one shot came from inside a moving patrol vehicle. It turned out Petit was holding a black metal lock actuator from a car door.

Petit was initially charged with resisting arrest and assaulting police with a deadly weapon, but since the cops were never in any danger, the LAPD eventually petitioned the court to drop the charge down to misdemeanor possession of an imitation weapon. The city has not yet filed any charges against Petit.

Violent, "Progressive" Do-Gooder Puppeticians in Madison Refuse to Ban Police from Using Tear Gas, Mace and Other Weapons to Silence Speech [in Defense of Authority not Liberty]

ACCORDING TO FUNKTIONARY:

The Do-Gooders – that most dangerous tribe of pseudo-moralists armed with ignorance and golden rulers. The do-gooders absence of the true nature of Self (the ‘I Am,’) strengthen all the forces of illusion and collusion and ensure the continuity to the realm of unreality for the sleep-walking masses. “The world suffers most from the disinterested tyranny of its well-wisher.” ~Rabinath Tagore. (See: Status-Quoticians & The Golden Rule)

From [HERE] The Madison City Council on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved a compromise to allow continued police use of tear gas, mace and devices that fire less-lethal projectiles under certain circumstances to control unruly crowds, but require the city’s independent police monitor to do an after-action review when tear gas is deployed.

Ald. Juliana Bennett, who represents the campus-area 8th District, initially proposed to ban police and law enforcement responding under mutual aid from using tear gas, mace and devices that fire less-lethal projectiles such as bean bags or sponge-tipped rounds to control unruly crowds, a move strongly opposed by Police Chief Shon Barnes and other police agencies.

But on Tuesday, Bennett and Ald. Yannette Figueroa Cole offered an alternative that allows continued use of those munitions, but requires the city’s yet-to-be-hired first independent police monitor to do an after-action review of any use of tear gas by the Madison police for crowd control. The monitor would have to start the review within 30 days and share its findings with the council and the city’s Police Civilian Oversight Board. [MORE]

UK Government Documents Prove Bill Gates is Primary Funder of UK Medicine Regulator Despite Owning Major Shares in Pfizer & BioNTech

From [HERE] An investigation has revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the primary funder of the UK’s Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and the Foundation also owns major shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech.

The Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) extended the emergency authorisation of the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab in the UK to allow it to be given to children between the ages of 12 – 15 on the 4th June 2021.

At the time, the Chief Executive of the MHRA, Dr June Raine said the MHRA had “carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits outweigh any risk”.

We are left wondering if Dr June Raine and the MHRA have even read the results of the extremely short and small study. If they have then they would have seen that 86% of children in the study suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious.

Just 1,127 children took part in the trial, however, only 1,097 children completed the trial, with 30 of them not participating after being given the first dose of the Pfizer jab. The results do not state why the 30 children did not go on to complete the trial.

The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).

There was never any doubt that the MHRA would give emergency authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine to be used in children when you consider that a certain Mr Bill Gates owns shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech and is the primary funder of the MHRA. [MORE]

[in The Spectacle (a constructed reality) elites pretend that over 1 Million People Injured by COVID Shots Don't Exist] Fakebook and BBC Shut Down "Vaccine" Injured Groups by Labelling Them "Anti-Vax"

From [HERE] A major media member of the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) has warned a primary tech member about vaccine injury groups gaming the system to avoid algorithm detection and thus scrutiny. In what could be described as a dangerous move, the BBC collaborates with Facebook to shut down vaccine injury support groups by universally referring to them as “anti-vaccine” or “anti-vaxxers” and calling out the ways that they use carrot emojis to hide from Facebook their true identity. Members of the TNI are collaborating to purge social media participants that are part of vaccine-injured groups. Even if some of them, or even many of them, are in fact vaccine injured, the policies of the BBC and Facebook, as well as other media and social tech companies assume that there are absolutely no vaccine-injured persons and that such persons have no rights whatsoever to share their stories. 

The BBC reports that a number of purported vaccine injury groups involving hundreds if not thousands of members used the emoji in place of the word “vaccine” in a bid to avoid Facebook algorithms.

The BBC reports that “several groups, one with hundreds of thousands of members, in which the emoji appears in place of the word ‘vaccine.’” The BBC’s Zoe Kleinman wrote that Facebook parent company Meta was alerted, and the groups were removed.

According to a statement from Facebook:

“We have removed this group for violating our harmful misinformation policies and will review any other similar content in line with this policy. We continue to work closely with public health experts and the UK government to further tackle Covid vaccine misinformation.”

Yet the BBC’s Kleinman reports that the groups are back even though they were taken down from Facebook.  According to Kleinman, the groups the BBC and Facebook label as anti-vax groups sought to rebrand themselves as places where people can share vaccine stories, for example sharing “banter, bets and funny video.”

But behind the scenes, the groups were using code words for communication purposes. For example, “Do not use the c word, v word or b word ever” (covid, vaccine booster). The particular group has 250,000 members.

Marc Owen-Jones, a misinformation specialist at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in Qatar,shared that instead of using words such as “Covid-19” or “Vaccine,” the group was instructed to use emojis of carrots as an example apparently to evade the fake news detection algorithms reports Ms. Kleinman.

In the BBC piece, it’s identified that an Online Safety Bill could come into law which would lead to “steep penalties for failing to identify removing harmful material on their platforms.”

What if there are actually vaccine-injured persons? Currently, the BBC doesn’t recognize that there are actually adverse events and some deaths, albeit rare, that occur with the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, even at a rare rate of one-tenth of one percent hundreds, this would translate into hundreds of thousands of vaccines injured in the United States alone.

TrialSite has been chronicling dozens of deaths from COVID-19 vaccines involving governments making compensatory payouts. Is it not allowed by the Trusted News Initiative to speak the truth about this situation? In the United States, over 224 million people have received at least a primary series vaccine in the USA. Estimates of vaccine injury in the USA vary from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands and possibly even over one million. [MORE]

Study by Top Scientists says COVID Shots are Unethical and up to 98X Worse than COVID: Mandated Injections Cause Injury w/No Legal Remedy and Infringe on Freedom of Association and Occupational Choice

From [HERE] Reported by The Epoch Times, a 50-page study, co-authored by: 

1. Dr. Stefan Baral, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University; 

2. surgeon Martin Adel Makary, M.D., a professor at Johns Hopkins University; 

3. Dr. Vinayak Prasad, a haematologist-oncologist professor at UCSF; 

4. Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D., current Director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, and professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School; 

concludes that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause up to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.

The authors provide five reasons why the “vaccines” are unethical and should not be mandated:

1) Lack of policymaking transparency. The scientists pointed out that no formal and scientifically rigorous risk-benefit analysis of whether boosters are helpful in preventing severe infections and hospitalizations exists for young adults.

2) Expected harm. A look at the currently available data shows that mandates will result in what the authors call a “net expected harm” to young people. This expected harm will exceed the potential benefit from the boosters.

3) Lack of efficacy. The vaccines have not effectively prevented transmission of COVID-19. Given how poorly they work—the authors call this “modest and transient effectiveness” — the expected harms caused by the boosters likely outweigh any benefits to public health.

4) No recourse for vaccine-injured young adults. Forcing vaccination as a prerequisite to attend college is especially problematic because young people injured by these vaccines will likely not be able to receive compensation for these injuries.

5) Harm to society. Mandates, the authors insisted, ostracize unvaccinated young adults, excluding them from education and university employment opportunities. Coerced vaccination entails “major infringements to free choice of occupation and freedom of association,” the scientists wrote, especially when “mandates are not supported by compelling public health justification.”

Woman’s Brain Inflammation Caused by Moderna COVID Vaccine, Authors of Case Study Conclude

From [HERE] A healthy 35-year-old woman who experienced a seizure two days after her second dose of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine was diagnosed with limbic encephalitis, a rare form of brain inflammation.

The authors of a recent case study on the patient stated:

“We believe that this episode of limbic encephalitis, which occurred quickly after COVID-19 vaccination, is an uncommon side effect of the [Moderna] vaccine.”

Limbic encephalitis is an acute condition of noninfectious inflammation of the brain that affects the limbic system.

The limbic system is a group of structures involved in processing emotion and memory. It includes the hippocampus, medial temporal lobe, cingulate cortex and frontonasal cortex.

The symptoms of limbic encephalitis include amnesia (memory loss), behavioral changes, psychiatric symptoms, seizures and a disturbed level of consciousness.

The pathophysiology (functional changes that accompany a particular syndrome or disease) of limbic encephalitis is known to be mediated (indirectly caused) by an antigen that stimulates an antibody-mediated host immune response that inadvertently targets cells in the limbic area.

There are two causes of limbic encephalitis: paraneoplastic and autoimmune.

“Paraneoplastic” means “caused by or resulting from the presence of cancer in the body but not the physical presence of cancerous tissue in the part or organ affected.”

The patient was screened for tumors, and cancer was ruled out as the cause in this patient’s case.

Case report

According to the case report, when the woman arrived at the hospital she had a fever, followed by generalized tonic-clonic seizures (formerly known as grand mal seizures) that lasted for approximately five minutes and a postictal (post-seizure) phase of confusion that lasted approximately 30 minutes.

During her stay in the emergency department, she had two more generalized seizures, which were controlled with medication, each one lasting less than two minutes after intervention.

The patient, who did not have any other neurological symptoms and was stable, was admitted to the hospital.

The authors wrote, “Apart from looking tired, she was oriented to time, place and person. Her neck was supported, and she had full power and sensation with normal higher functions. Cranial nerves were intact.”

The patient had a full basic blood workup, which was normal. Her COVID-19 PCR test was negative. There was nothing unusual about her contrast MRI, performed upon her admission.

A lumbar puncture was performed, and her cerebrospinal fluid did have significant lymphocytosis— an abnormal increase in the number of lymphocytes (white blood cells), usually resulting from infection or inflammation. [MORE]

47 Members of Congress Claim the Military’s COVID Injection Mandate Affects the Ability to Sustain Combat Formations and Recruit Talent; Urge the Pentagon to Revoke It

From [CHD] Nearly 50 Republican lawmakers, led by Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.), have called on the U.S. Department of Defense to withdraw its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for military members, citing concerns over the mandate’s impact on the readiness of the U.S. armed forces.

In a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin dated Sept. 15, the lawmakers, including Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), expressed their “grave concerns” over the impact of the mandate, particularly with regard to the U.S. Army.

“As a result of your mandate, 8% of the Army’s approximately 1 million soldiers face expulsion, Army recruiters cannot meet their FY22 target and the Army has cut its projected FY23 end strength by 12,000 soldiers,” they wrote.

Referring to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, the lawmakers noted that the U.S. military currently faces “a self-imposed readiness crisis.”

Citing “sparse” data from the Department of the Army, they noted that “at least 40,000 National Guardsmen, 20,000 Army Reservists and at least 15,000 Active Army Soldiers” haven’t yet received a COVID-19 vaccine and subsequently face being discharged from service.

“The Department of Defense’s own COVID response page indicates that approximately 900,000 soldiers are fully vaccinated out of the 1 million soldiers in the Army, Army Reserve and Army National Guard,” the letter reads.

The lawmakers pointed to testimony delivered in July by Vice Chief of Staff of the Army Gen. Joseph Martin before the House Armed Services Committee.

During that testimony, Martin said that “less than 20,000” people were facing discharge for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine, much less than the initial figures that officials had provided.

"What the White House Expects from Us:" Fakebook Executive Admits Working with US Government to Censor Users, Silence Speech about the Danger of COVID Injections

Massa’ Media Complicit in COVID Vax Genocide: Dr Robert Malone Files $50M Defamation Lawsuit Against Washington Post, Other Liars who Concealed the Dangers of COVID Shots by Calling it Misinformation

From [HERE] and [PDF] Dr. Robert Malone has unintentionally become a public figure for speaking out about the risks and ineffectiveness of COVID-19 shots; he’s subsequently become the target of media attacks

• Malone’s attorneys sent cease-and-desist letters to the corporate media outlets that were most egregious in their attacks against him; this included The Washington Post, The New York Times, Atlantic Monthly, Rolling Stone and The Scientist

• Even after the cease-and-desist letter, The Washington Post put out another attack article repeating the same defamatory statements against Malone

• Now Malone is fighting back, as he’s filed a $50 million lawsuit against The Washington Post

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,1 has unintentionally become a public figure for speaking out about the risks and ineffectiveness of COVID-19 shots. He's been deplatformed by LinkedIn and Twitter in the process, but that's only the beginning.

Malone is now earning most of his income from continuing to speak out via Substack, functioning not only as a scientist but as a citizen reporter. "To shut me down is basically anticompetitive," Malone said, speaking with WND in the video above.2

Malone Files Defamation Lawsuit Against WaPo

Yet, corporate media outlets are attempting to do just that, as they continue to publish defamatory hit pieces against Malone, as they have done to yours truly and many others who have shared information that's not in line with the official narrative. Now Malone is fighting back, as he's filed a $50 million lawsuit3 against The Washington Post (WaPo).4

If you've heard of Malone, it may be because his mention of the term "mass formation psychosis" on an episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience" December 31, 2021, which was viewed by more than 50 million people,5 went viral.

Those under the spell of mass formation psychosis obsessively focus on a failure of the normal world or a particular event or person who becomes the focus of the attention and can effectively control the masses.

Mass formation can occur in a society with feelings of social isolation and free-floating anxiety among a large number of people, and provides a coherent explanation of why so many people have fallen victim to the unbelievable lies and propaganda of the mainstream COVID-19 narrative.

Malone is also dedicated to speaking out because he wants to protect future generations. He's concerned about the pandemic response's effects on children, stating that public policies have had a particularly strong adverse effect on the young, and calling COVID-19 injection mandates "completely unjustified" for children.6 He also told WND:7

"I am of the opinion that a product that does not prevent infection, replication or spread of a pathogen to any substantial degree is not a vaccine.

And the fallback, of course, has been by the government that the genetic inoculations prevent severe disease and death, but unfortunately for all of us, the data are now showing internationally, and increasingly within the U.S., that the risk of severe disease or death is at a minimum equivalent between the unvaccinated and those who have received at least two inoculations.

And the data from most countries that are reporting this, like in Northern Europe, suggest the multiple inoculations — four or more injections, and even three injections to some extent — are associated with a higher risk of hospitalization and death."

It doesn't matter if what he's saying is true; if it creates "vaccine hesitancy," it will be censored. Toward that end, Malone has been targeted by the media and labeled an "anti-vaxxer," which is ironic since he's received COVID-19 shots.

Malone Attorneys File Cease-and-Desist Letters

Malone's attorneys sent cease-and-desist letters to the corporate media outlets that were most egregious in their attacks against him. This included The Washington Post, The New York Times, Atlantic Monthly, Rolling Stone and The Scientist, which published an inflammatory article against Malone and his response when a physician from Maui alerted the Maryland state medical board that Malone was promoting "COVID-19 misinformation."8

The reason he's suing The Washington Post, in particular, is because after his attorneys sent the media outlet a cease-and-desist letter, it put out another attack article repeating the same defamatory statements. "So that appears to show malice," Malone said, "and there's a number of other aspects in the words that they've used that appear to meet the criteria for malice."9

The Washington Post has continued to publish hit pieces against Malone, "accusing him of spreading 'dangerous lies' and 'leading his followers on a journey to illness, suffering and possible death,'" WND noted, adding, "Significantly, Post staff writer Timothy Bella labeled as "misinformation" Malone's statement that the vaccines 'are not working,' citing studies published by the CDC's sponsored journal as a counterpoint."10

Writing on Substack, Malone further explained that he had a gut feeling The Washington Post was up to no good when Bella first contacted him, asking to shadow him at the Defeat the Mandates rally in Washington, D.C., held in January 2022, where Malone was speaking:11

"Having been defamed and slandered by state-sponsored media before, I had learned enough about how these reporters approach their targets to politely turn down the offer to 'profile' me by a WaPo reported who has 'respect for you and your body of work' ...

In retrospect, my gut instinct was right. I felt like I was being set up (I can't get into the head or Mr. Bella and speak to his motives — maybe others can). Can you only imagine what would have been written and published IF I had agreed to have Mr. Bella shadow me — as he requested? Let my experience be a lesson to all concerned."

Malone is seeking more than $50 million in damages for injury to his reputation (past and future), insult, pain and mental suffering, lost income, career damage and impairment of future earnings.12The lawsuit alleges:13

"WaPo falsely accused Dr. Malone of fraud, disinformation, dishonesty, deception, lying to the American public, lack of integrity, immorality and ethical improprieties. The gist of the Article is that Dr. Malone is unfit to be a medical doctor and scientist. WaPo exposed Dr. Malone to public ridicule, scorn, and contempt, and severely prejudiced Dr. Malone in his employment."

The New York Times Also Attacked Malone

Malone told WND that he was also "ground into sausage" by The New York Times, after one of their reporters, who he welcomed to his farm for what he thought would be a good faith interview, published another attack piece. He now says he's gotten to the point where he tells others who are speaking words that are not endorsed by the government or the current narrative to "just say no" if they're approached by the media.14

Indeed, The New York Times has also published repeated hit pieces against me, making multiple blatantly false claims and labeling me a "superspreader" of misinformation. Twitter has banned anyone from sharing any link to my website, YouTube banned my account with over 15 years of content, while Facebook and Google have done everything possible to make me disappear.

It certainly would be much easier to cave under the pressure, but if we don't stand up for our rights and freedom now — when will it be too late? I will continue 'superspreading' truth and health until my last days, and I suspect Malone will as well.

"The lesson learned by so many is that the likes of Business Insider, Atlantic Monthly, Rolling Stone, The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN," Malone said, "these are media outlets which are paid by pharma and paid by the government ... more and more is coming out ... that the government has been actively promoting these forms of attack, cancelling and defamation."15

New York Times Paradox Explained?

Malone also spoke about the seeming paradox of the corporate-sponsored, narrative-aligned New York Times publishing an exposé in February 2022 that revealed the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had been collecting data on COVID-19 hospitalizations according to age, race and injection status throughout the pandemic but didn't release most of it to the public.16

Such data certainly would have been of interest to a large portion of the U.S. population, but according to CDC spokeswoman Kristen Nordlund, the CDC hadn't released all of the data "because basically, at the end of the day, it's not yet ready for prime time."17 The Times reported, "Another reason is fear that the information might be misinterpreted, Ms. Nordlund said."18

Malone said he believes that the CDC withholding evidence about COVID-19 shot safety is scientific fraud19 and, beyond that, the outcome of the Times exposé and other public criticism of the CDC may have been revealed by CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky's recent calls for sweeping changes at the CDC.20 Among them, Malone says, is the establishment of a committee:21

"The outcome of all of this is that a committee has been established — you know what that means in D.C., it means that nobody has to take a hit for any bad decisions ... responsibility is all diffused — to advise and provide oversite for operations at the CDC."

Another outcome is to make the CDC less academic and give them more money and more power. "They need the power to extract data from the states," Malone said, explaining:22

"Since the practice of medicine is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution as a federal mandate," — the regulation of the practice of medicine is done at the state level — "she wants to basically circumvent the Constitution and be able to demand data from the states, because apparently they don't have enough data at the CDC, even though there are multiple stories out that they haven't analyzed and reported the data that they do have, and they need more money to hire more people in order to do this. 

They need to refocus their workforce on rapid response rather than putting out academic papers. The whole thing, to me, reeks to high heaven."

Turning an Attack Into a Badge of Honor

While being targeted by the media has ruined many reputations, it's possible to turn the attack into a badge of honor. One way to do this is to not back down under these signs of oppression and continue to fight for the truth, no matter the cost. Malone's lawsuit will not be the last that seeks to expose the true intentions behind the COVID spin.

And remember, in your own search for the truth — and in your journey to protect and maintain your health and that of your family — understand that the media intentionally uses Orwellian doublespeak, a weapon of tyranny in which words are twisted, reversing their meaning.

Analysis of Documents Reveal Pfizer Knew COVID Injections Cause Injuries to the Penis; through Blood Clots, Lesions and General Penile Infection

MOTHERFUCKING LIARS LYING ABOUT COVID INJECTIONS ON TV.

Media Continues to Mischaracterize the Parkland Shooter's Sentencing Hearing as "a Trial;" Misleading the Public to Believe a Trial On the Merits is Going On. Guilty Pleas Don't Make False Flags Real

CNN reported “The defense team in the trial of Parkland, Florida, school shooter Nikolas Cruz abruptly rested its case Wednesday, leading the judge to admonish his attorneys for what she described as a “level of unprofessionalism” she had never before experienced.

The defense team planned to call 80 witnesses, lead defense attorney Melisa McNeill said in opening the case, but by Wednesday it had called just 26. So, its move appeared to come as a shock to the judge and prosecutors, who’d arrived in court expecting Cruz’s defense team to call its first witness of the day.

Prosecutors in the case then told the judge they were not ready to proceed with their rebuttal.  “We were waiting for 40 more witnesses,” lead prosecutor Mike Satz said Wednesday, throwing up his hands.

Without jurors present, state Judge Elizabeth Scherer went on to criticize the defense for “another day wasted” in a trial that has seen numerous delays and postponements.” [MORE]

You would think that an actual criminal defense trial on the merits was taking place. BUT HE ALREADY PLED GUILTY. Cruz pled guilty last October to 17 counts of murder and 17 counts of attempted murder in the Parkland shooting. That triggered the current phase of his trial, which is meant only to determine his sentence; specifically whether he will be sentenced to die.

A guilty plea is just a guilty plea - it is not proof that anything happened in any case. A guilty plea is a way to avoid an actual trial or avoid having to prove that a crime took place. The guilty plea here doesn’t prove that Mr. Cruz committed a massacre or that Parkland happened - its just a plea, nothing more. If an actual, contested criminal defense trial had taken place the Government would have had the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a massacre took place and Mr. Cruz committed it. That is, the Government would have had to show that Parkland was real - with actual authenticated, admissible evidence and testimony subject to cross-examination, credibility determinations, investigation and inspection in an adversarial process before a jury who would decide on the merits. But that never happened. Nevertheless, in The Spectacle The Dependent Media goes on implying that “a trial” is presently being conducted. Similarly, “Sandy Hoax” was not proven to be real simply because a court entered default judgments against Alex Jones when he failed to respond to court orders in lawsuits.

The hearing is a sentencing - not an actual criminal trial on the merits. [MORE] The Dependent Media is promoting confusion because the Parkland episode looks staged.

FAKE AS FUCK [MORE]

Due to the contrived nature of the Parkland narrative, voluntary confession, many fake looking/sounding media interviews with in-credible witnesses providing inconsistent facts, a lack of corroborating forensic evidence, a lack of cell-phone video from high school students, miraculously quick medical recoveries by kids shot in the chest, books that deflected bullets and more, many consider Parkland a false flag operation or cover story. Belief isn’t needed to come to such a conclusion- go watch the many videos online about it. On the other hand however, belief is needed to conclude that an actual massacre occurred because the evidence has never been seen. We must believe cops and whatever emotional words the media put before our eyes. It takes absolutely no intelligence to believe.

The fact that there was no trial only strengthens the doubt of persons who don’t blindly believe whatever the media says. In all microwave terror episodes the media simply parrot whatever police say from a crime scene closed to the public in an instantly open and shut case. To be clear here, no criminal trial means no contested, adversarial proceeding in which the government would have to establish facts beyond a reasonable doubt with actual, admissible, authenticated evidence and credible witness testimony that is subjected to rigorous cross -examination, rules of evidence, discovery, Brady disclosures and the defendant’s right to face to face confrontation with his accusers. What better way could there be to drop any doubt as to whether this fake looking bullshit ever took place?

[MORE]

36% of "Mass Shooters" in False Flag Episodes were Trained by the US Military, But Few Americans Know This Because the Media Never Report It

From [HERE] In the wake of a barrage of contrived mass shootings, the media have offered a variety of explanations centering predominantly on the social isolation and mental illness of shooters and their easy access to military-style weaponry due to lax gun regulations.

These factors are significant but almost all media pundits avoid the gorilla sitting in the psyche of the American mind—that of the huge military budget and culture of military veneration, which is reminiscent of fascist cultures.

In a July 8 column entitled “Why Shooters Do the Evil They Do,” New York Times columnist David Brooks characteristically cites mental illness, loneliness and the need for recognition and power as lying at the root of recent mass shootings.

What is missing is any discussion of American-style militarism, something Brooks has whitewashed throughout his writing career.

According to David Swanson, Director of World Beyond War, 36% of mass shooters have been trained by the U.S. military—when only one percent of Americans serve in the military. [MORE]

MORE ON SANDY HOAX [HERE]

Video Shows a Bloodless "Massacre" in Buffalo by “The White Supremacist”]

Caught in Lies: Released Uvalde Video Looks Like a Staged Drill; Heavy Breathing, Cops Looking at Phones, "Border Patrol Hero" Absent, Dry Tears and No Blood. 6 Yr Olds with Cell Phones Not Present

Gun Sales w/Credit Cards are Now Tracked w/a New Code [in The Spectacle freedumb advocates believe criminals lawfully buy guns, leave guns at crime scenes and gun registration is used to solve crimes]

RESEARCHER JOHN LOTT EXPLAINS, “The idea behind a registry is that guns left at a crime scene can be used to trace back to the criminals. Unfortunately, guns are very rarely left at the scene of the crime. Those that are left behind are virtually never registered—criminals are not stupid enough to leave behind guns registered to them. In the few cases where registered guns were left at the scene, the criminal had usually been killed or seriously injured.” LOtt further explains that crimes are rarely if ever solved by registration [MORE] and Very few criminals legally purchase guns themselves. [MORE]

According to FUNKTIONARY:

gun ban – the precursor to servitude. Enslavement is like old age; it creeps up on you. Banning guns to reduce crime is like banning sex to reduce rape. If guns supposedly cause (or encourage) crime, why are we arming police officers? The same people who fear firearms in the hands of the people also fear information in the minds of people. Information bans (censorship) only affect people who desire to think for themselves. The methodology of the gun-grabbers is simple; pick any group, and with the help of the press, abolish their rights. Then pick another group and abolish their rights, etc. Those who meet publicly to defend their right to life should not take threats idly. While threats to anyone’s safety should not be tolerated in public meetings, being public about your arms (within non-slave states—right to open carry) and your intention to defend your rights is your best protection against lawlessness, even or especially lawlessness by government agents. [MORE]

The Spectacle – a constructed reality; the concrete inversion of life; via the autonomous movement of the apparently non-living. 2) the mirrorization of the noumenon into the phenomenal universe without understanding or overstanding it as such an objectivization in duality. The Spectacle is not a collection of images but a social relation among people mediated by images. The Spectacle is a theoretical construct—a tool for explaining many things about society; how people live vicariously through the dominant images of production, consumption and power relations. It is the thoughtforms in which people create, contemplate and consume mediated by images of what-life-is, so that they will forget how to live radically for themselves. It is the totality of images and illusions that alienate people from living, its the primary production of modern societies. It is ideology materialized. It is the social relations that are mediated by the mass media; it is what makes people apathetic and reduces them to inactivity. It is what prevents people from realizing what their collective problems are and dissolving them. It is what perpetually absorbs people into activities that prolong their misery. It is the mediated stream of unreality that channels desire-energy against itself, producing a separate world, a pseudo-world apart form one’s self-history—from all those powerful institutions of Self-actualization. It is what motivates people to live a pseudo-life in submission to products and machines, basking passively in the acceptance of oppression, to blindly do what is manifestly against their own self-interest, to pollute the land they love and the air they breathe—it is a fundamental sickness of modern societies superimposed over and aided by the “Rolebots” (clones and drones) of Corporate State. It is the mass media and the propaganda from the pure war machine and the military prison industrial police state complex. It is Doggy, the double-bind of not knowing real from unreal, (hypereal) or what you say from what you want. It is the mass objectivization and unholy marriage (union) of the Beasthood with the Syndrome, leaving people fragmented, separated, isolated, alienated, fascinated, pixelated, dilated, intimidated, exasperated, mediated, concatenated, weak, docile, dependent, submissive and uncritical. “The Spectacle is the ultimate commodity in that it makes all others possible.” ~Scott Bukatman. “Without the slightest hint of suppression or intolerance, the spectacle ensures that the appearance of real dissent precludes its real appearance.” ~Sadie Plant. (See: PIC, Commodity, Screen, Maya, Pseudolife, The Passing Show, Rolling Mirror, MEDIA, Materialism, Funktionalize, F-Prime, Meta-Frame, Naïve Realism, “Dream,” Trance, Emergency, Consumers & Doggy)

From [HERE] Visa Inc., V -1.06%▼ Mastercard Inc. MA -0.58%▼ and American Express Co. AXP -1.95%▼will add a new merchant category for firearms retailers, a victory for freeDumb advocates who have pressed the financial industry to do more to disarm the public.

The new merchant-category code was recently approved by an international entity that sets standards for the payments industry.

Merchant-category codes, or MCCs, are four-digit numbers that networks use to identify types of merchants by the goods and services they sell. Card networks assign specific codes to many kinds of specialty merchants, such as fast-food restaurants, bars and bicycle shops. 

Until now, gun shops were often categorized as specialty retailers or durable-goods sellers—categories that include a much broader collection of companies. [MORE]

Natural News states “The Democrat left has found another way to infringe on the constitutional rights of Americans, this time attacking two amendments with the same initiative, and they are using their woke international and corporate allies to do it.

Specifically, leftists associated with the International Organization for Standardization’s Registration and Maintenance Management Group met last week to discuss a proposal already adopted by the country’s largest payment processor, Visa, to attach a special code to the sale of firearms so they can be tracked under the lie of “public safety.”

So, with one proposal, these international leftists have convinced American payment processors to infringe on Americans’ Second Amendment rights and their Fourth Amendment right to privacy.

The company claims that the new classification will allow for easier tracking of firearms sales as a means of helping to prevent mass shootings, according to The Associated Press. But of course, gun rights advocates see the move as a huge encroachment on the legal sale of firearms by left-wing activists who, 10 minutes ago, were complaining about a ‘woman’s right to privacy’ having been taken away by the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

“The (industry’s) decision to create a firearm-specific code is nothing more than a capitulation to anti-gun politicians and activists bent on eroding the rights of law-abiding Americans one transaction at a time,” said National Rifle Association spokesman Lars Dalseide.” [MORE]

Are Chicago Police More Likely to Prevent Crime or Shoot Blacks? Cops in an Unmarked Car Shot a Black Man w/His Hands Up, Another in the Back as He Fled and a Woman Walking by. Both Charged w/Felonies

From [HERE] Two white police officers have been charged with three felonies each after they shot an unarmed man in Pilsen and then lied to authorities about it, the county’s top prosecutor said Friday.

Sgt. Christopher Liakopoulos, 43, and officer Ruben Reynoso, 42, are charged with aggravated battery with a firearm, aggravated discharge of a firearm and official misconduct, State’s Attorney Kim Foxx said.

The officers shot and wounded a 23-year-old man in an unprovoked act of violence, and another person was grazed by a bullet, Foxx said. The officers told authorities they’d been shot at first and Supt. David Brown told the public the same shortly after the shooting. But videotape of the incident directly contradicts that, and neither of the wounded people fired shots at the officers, Foxx said.

“It is our position based on the facts, the evidence and the law that the officers involved in this incident did not have provocation or justification to shoot the unarmed victim during this incident,” Foxx said. “The evidence does not support the use of deadly force … and was not lawful.”

The two officers were relieved of their duties by the Police Department, as well.

The shooting happened around 7 a.m. July 22 in the 1000 block of West 18th Street, police previously said.

The officers, members of the Major Accidents Investigations Unit, were traveling on 18th Street near Morgan Street in an unmarked police car on their way to the Police Training Academy for training. Liakopoulos was driving and Reynoso was in the front passenger seat, Assistant State’s Attorney Alyssa Janicki said during a bond hearing Friday. 

They saw several men or boys standing near a business that was closed at the time, stopped their car and backed up near the group, the prosecutor said. 

The officers asked the group what they were doing in front of the business. As they were talking to the group, a 23-year-old man and a youth approached the officers’ car, Janicki said. The 23-year-old was carrying a cellphone and a bottle of wine in one hand and the minor was holding onto a cross-body satchel that contained a firearm, she said. 

Before reaching the officers’ car, the youth turned around and began running east down the street, the prosecutor said. The 23-year-old continued walking toward the car and waved his open hands at the officers to show he had a phone and bottle of wine in one hand and the other hand was empty, Janicki said.

Reynoso then reached his arm out of the car window and fired a shot in the direction of the victim, Janicki said. Liakopoulos, in the driver’s seat, then reached across the car to also fire his gun out of the passenger side in the direction of the minor, Janicki said.

As the minor was running from the car, he fired shots back at the officers, Janicki said. The officers shot again, hitting a pedestrian walking by and causing a graze wound to his leg, she said. 

Both officers fired multiple shots in the direction of the 23-year-old victim, Janicki said. He was shot in his back and his leg and fell to the ground, the prosecutor said. 

The officers were not wearing body-worn cameras at the time because they were headed to the police academy in the West Loop, Janicki said. 

The officers initially told investigators they fired their guns only after they were fired upon by the minor, Janicki said. The next day, the officers said they didn’t know who shot first, but said the minor pointed the gun at them before any shots were fired, the prosecutor said. After investigators reviewed surveillance footage of the area, they determined the shooting as described by the officers did not reflect what the footage showed, she said. [MORE]

Keshawn Thomas' Family is Forced to Sue Albuquerque to Obtain Video and Reports after Cops Shot Him to Death. Materials Sought are Allegedly Owned by the Public but Kept Secret by Alleged "Servants"

From [HERE] The 27-year-old Black man who was shot and killed by three Albuquerque Police Department officers at a West Side gas station late last month had given the officers a magazine and told them he had a gun in the trunk of his car before he was shot, according to a search warrant affidavit filed in 2nd Judicial District Court.

“My understanding is that he lawfully owned the weapon …,” said attorney Taylor Smith, who is representing Keshawn Thomas’ family. “It’s also my understanding that he always kept the gun and magazine separate from one another – like a responsible gun owner would.”

Thomas’ family has filed a lawsuit against the city alleging it has not produced records requested under the Inspection of Public Records Act. Smith said he has also been retained to investigate for a wrongful death lawsuit.

The shooting was the 12th by APD officers this year. Out of those cases, seven people were killed and one was injured. In the remaining shootings the officers missed but in one case it turned out a man had killed himself before they fired.

All shootings by law enforcement in Bernalillo County are investigated by a Multi-Agency Task Force. APD typically does a media briefing in the weeks following shootings by its officers.

August shooting

The entire encounter – from when officers arrived on the scene to when they fired shots – lasted about five minutes, according to a warrant to search Thomas’ car that was filed after the shooting.

Around 11:15 p.m. Aug. 28, officers were called to a Valero gas station on Coors, near Quail NW, because the clerk reported a car had been parked in one of the gasoline bays for about four hours, according to the affidavit.

When the officers arrived they found Thomas in his 2022 green Dodge Challenger.

In a briefing at the scene hours after the shooting, Chief Harold Medina said the officers thought Thomas “may be intoxicated and passed out.” He said the officers had Thomas step out of the car and he started to smoke a cigarette so they asked him to move away from the gasoline.

Medina said that at some point Thomas re-entered the vehicle and “some kind of confrontation occurred between the officer and the individual and multiple officers fired shots.”

According to the search warrant affidavit, the clerk told investigators she saw the officers talking with a man, later identified as Thomas, on the sidewalk for several minutes.

“The officers walked the individual back to his vehicle where she observed the individual start the vehicle (this was indicated to her by the headlights coming on),” a detective wrote in the affidavit. “A few minutes later (the clerk) heard gunshots.” Thomas was taken to the hospital, where he died.

The detective reviewed the lapel camera footage of the shooting and said that during the encounter the officers told Thomas “he appears intoxicated and needs to call for a ride.”

He said Thomas handed the officer a magazine and told them he had a gun in the trunk.

“The suspect enters his vehicle and is observed reaching around the seat and console area,” the detective wrote in the affidavit. “Officers tell the suspect to get his cellphone and exit the vehicle. One officer standing near the driver’s side door, walks up to the driver side of the vehicle and yells ‘gun’ approximately three times before all three officers fire their weapons at the suspect.”

The officers told APD dispatch that after the shooting they removed a firearm from Thomas’ person and placed it in the trunk of his car.

The return and inventory on the search warrant states that the detective found a projectile, magazine, and firearm accessories in the car.

Records request

The day after Thomas was shot, his mother filed a records request asking for audio, video, photographs, Computer Aided Dispatch records, reports, and all written communication within APD about the incident or about press releases.

She received a reply saying it was “excessively burdensome and broad” and the City Clerk’s Office requested an “additional reasonable period of time.”

Smith said he has received audio CADs from dispatch but they were incredibly hard to hear. He filed the lawsuit on Tuesday asking the city to produce the rest of the records and for damages, costs and attorney fees.

Black Federal Judge Discounts Homeless Black Man's Jury Verdict from $100M to $40M. Atlanta Cop Chased and Tased a 65 Yr Old who Fell and Hit His Head Causing Permanent Paralysis - Wasn't Under Arrest

From [HERE] A Black federal judge who oversaw a $100 million police misconduct case against the City of Atlanta and one of its officers granted a motion on Wednesday that clears the city of its direct liability and shaves off more than half the verdict awarded to a 69-year-old man paralyzed after the officer tased him.

Judge Steve C. Jones said that although the jury found Officer Jon Grubbs used excessive force when he tased Jerry Blasingame in 2018, there was not enough evidence that the city’s policies or training standards were the problem.

The judge on Wednesday granted a motion for judgment filed by the City of Atlanta, which overturned the $60 million in compensatory damages that the verdict last month brought down against it. Still, the judge upheld the $40 million verdict against the officer.

Jones said he did not make the decision lightly as “trial by jury is a hallmark of our justice system, a bedrock principle of this country.” However, he said, the court must “correct a clear error in those rare cases where juries reach a legally unsupportable result.”

In respect to the claims made in this case, Jones wrote: “The jury did so here.”

The judge’s decision formally closed the case brought to the federal court on behalf of Blasingame, who was left paralyzed from the neck down by the incident.

The incident happened the afternoon of July 10, 2018 near Windsor Street, south of downtown, according to the lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court in 2019. The filing said Blasingame, who was unarmed, was on the street and asking people for money, when Grubbs and another officer arrived and saw him talking with a driver.

When Grubbs got out of an APD patrol car and told Blasingame to stop, Blasingame moved out of the street and ran, the lawsuit alleged. At some point, Grubbs ran at Blasingame and deployed his Taser on Blasingame, causing him to “fall and seriously injure himself.”

At the trial, which lasted just over a week, the eight-person federal jury awarded Blasingame both compensatory and punitive damages on August 26. The city was liable for $60 million and Grubbs for $40 million.

Jones initially did not grant the city’s motion for judgment but took it under advisement when they renewed it ahead of jury deliberations. He sided with the city after determining that Blasingame’s attorneys had not presented enough evidence that the city’s policies had created a widespread and persistent problem with excessive force that ultimately led to the 69-year-old’s injuries.

“Because Plaintiff failed to show that the City of Atlanta was the moving force behind Officer Grubbs’ use of taser against Mr. Blasingame, the Court finds that there was not sufficient evidence at trial for the jury to find against the City of Atlanta with respect to use-of-force or use-of-taser policies,” Jones wrote.

The attorneys representing Blasingame and his conservator at trial called on multiple witnesses, including two experts, who spoke about body camera usage. During the trial, the experts testified that the city created an environment in which officers felt there were no consequences for failing to comply with policies. The attorneys contended that indifference and shortcomings when supervising officers led to the excessive force used by Grubbs.

Evidence of this, the attorneys said, was that Grubbs’ bodyworn camera was in the incorrect recording mode during his encounter with Blasingame and did not capture the full incident. The attorneys contended that knowing that there would be no video footage of the encounter allowed Grubbs to feel comfortable using excessive force without repercussions.

However, the judge said that while the experts offered opinions that proper use of body cameras can reduce the use of excessive force, there wasn’t enough evidence to show if failing to use a body camera increases that force. The judge wrote that the relationship between the use of body cameras and the use of excessive force in the case was “too tenuous” to support the plaintiff’s claim.

“Even considering that evidence in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, however, the Court cannot find that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that any policies and procedures related to (body-worn cameras) caused the constitutional violation at issue,” Jones wrote.

Jones ruling determined there was enough evidence presented at trial that Grubbs had used excessive force, but the evidence didn’t point to the city’s culpability. Jones denied a separate renewed motion for judgment filed by Grubbs, thus the $40 million verdict against him was upheld.

Blasingame’s attorney Ven Johnson told the AJC he is “disappointed” by the judge’s decision to grant the city’s motion and that he and Blasingame’s other attorneys plan to file a motion asking the court to reinstate the jury’s verdict. However, he said he is pleased the judge upheld the verdict against Grubbs.

“Judge Jones denied Officer Grubbs’ directed verdict motion for a second time and thus the court will enter a judgment in favor of our client for $40 million,” he said, adding that he will next file a motion for costs, interest and attorney fees.

The City of Atlanta declined to speak on the judge’s decision, citing its policy not to comment on pending litigation.

On Video Costumed, Masked White Folks (cops) Pop Up at a Black Woman’s (citizen) House and Attempt to ConVince Her to Allow Them to Search It (warrantless). Who Benefits from Rights Role Play Theater?

According to MoorInfo this episode occurred in Arlington

Authority is a farce - it is only a belief in your mind and never rises above the level of a “hypothesized moral property.” FUNKTIONARY explains that authority “has no meaning in reality,” it “is the means by which society uses to control its population.” Michael Huemer explains, “political authority is an illusion: no one has the right to rule, and no one is obliged to obey a command merely because it comes from their government.”

Dr. Blynd states that like ‘All Corporate State fictions,’ authority was “created” by its creators as a psychological retro-virus in people’s minds as if it were a real (existential and volitional) entity, the sole purpose of which is to command, mediate, control and subdue the natural inclinations of a sleeping people who do not understand (know) themselves in order that they may silently rob them of their property and mind—under the Great Brain Robbery.’ Trent Goodbaudy describes authority as a “statist delusion.” He states, “We are stuck in an illusory construct that only exists in a diseased psyche. There really are no rulers and no masters anyway; just claims of authority, and acceptance of these claims by the brainwashed. There really is no government other than what you choose to be governed by: they only have the authority that you grant them.” Dr. Blynd states, ‘there are no tyrants; only tyranny exists. How can one man or woman rule a multitude against their will except through mind control and word-conditioning control?’ Larken Rose explains, ‘millions of people have hallucinated that puppeticians have authority and then do their bidding, paying for their empires and carrying out their orders.’ [MORE] Among other things FUNKTIONARY explains such an arrangement as a consensus reality, “an aggrieved upon hallucination. . . the most malefic trickster of all.” FUNKTIONARY defines consensus as the hypnotic communal cultural trance—the collective psychosis. 2) a common agreement about reality. 3) an artificial overlay or semantic screen (filter) that obfuscates the clarity of our subjective reality. . . Consensus is the art of conning the group—Con-Sense-Us— you con. Consensus has nothing to do with census, but with common sense, albeit mostly manufactured through programming and social conditioning of the masses. [MORE]

Larken Rose explains that within this consensus reality various fictions and devices are used to disguise the reality of the master-servant relationship, such as “consent of the governed,” “we the people,” “democracy,” “representative government,” “social contract” and “constitutional rights.” According to FUNKTIONARY these ‘fictions lead only to a progressive social, personal, racial and jurisprudential separation from reality.’ Discussion and debates about fictions such as “rights” merely evades the FAQ, i.e., the frequently avoided question of who is to enforce any “right” and who will benefit from the pretense.”

According to FUNKTIONARY:

rights – fantasmatic or fictitious objects having no reality in actuality by those imagining as an identity being in possession of them. Rights are cultural gratuities perceived through various fantasy frames, recognized, and sometimes even created, by man’s system of law to provide a modicum or pretense of civility under a system whereby their very undermining and violation is vouchsafed. Rights are merely rites unless you know how to assert and defend them in order to enjoy them. 2) things people are free to do whether they are able to or not. 3) conditions of existence required by hue-man’s nature for their potential survival (primarily against the cartoon that kills, i.e., the wholly unconscionable entity called the “State”). It is a mistaken notion that rights are enjoyed by one at the expense of the many—that is the realm of privilege. Enjoyment of rights in a neo-imperialistic world controlled by Yurugu through the Greater System (Symbolic Order), paradoxically, entails not only a recognition of their inevitability but, equally, their impossibility. How can we be endowed with rights, or even know what rights are when they are based on binary considerations? Rights, as ontological ephemera, cannot be universally observed, recognized, realized or enforced—and paradoxically, act also as its own eternal source for its assertion and vessel for its fulfillment in our imaginary enjoyment of them. While the law reads rights referentially, what is universally needed in the praxis of rights discourse today is a particular re-inscription, demystification or reontologising of rights (revivified and convivial) by the pan-gendered subject-citizendecoder— taken symptomatically rather than seriously. Most people rarely experience the cognizance of being property of corporate fictions because as long as you don’t violate the rules of society your real status as feudal-property-slave is not involved or revealed. If there is no ‘I,’ to what and to whom do rights as objects accrue? Those who are confused by suffering (and the subject of same) require a re-onotoligisation of rights through the trajectory of meaning independent of their existence. Rights and even ‘lefts’ (i.e., what remains after all of our imaginary rights are traced to their inception as figment) for that matter, like good and evil, are human inventions which humans treat as non-human realities. While fantasy frames invent rights, romanticism reinvents them. Enjoy your symptoms and play with your syndrome—the symptom is the solution. Read carefully the holding in the supreme Court case of U.S. v. Babcock. Rights are myths—obedience to servitude or jail is the reality. Always remember: “The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.” ~William Safire. (See: Abilities, Bill of Rights, Monoright, Servitude, Fantasy, Jurisdiction, Human Resources, Citizenship, Frankenstein, Autonomy, Rule of Law, Surrogate Power, Indigenous Power, Yurugu, Jouissance, Privilege, Disobedience, Duty & Willpower)